HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-23 Special Exception at 3001, 3011 and 3015 West Western AvenueFiled in Clerk's Office
City of South Bend DEC 05 2023
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS °ER.AWN S�T�B�"°�"
CITY GI�RK,
December 6, 2023
Honorable Lori Hamann
4th Floor, County -City Building
South Bend, IN 46601
RE: Special Exception at 3001, 3011 and 3015 West Western Avenue
Dear Committee Chair Hamann:
Enclosed is an Ordinance for the proposed Special Exception at the above referenced location.
Please include the attached Ordinance on the Council agenda for first reading at your December 11,
2023, Council meeting and set it for public hearing at your January 8, 2024, Council meeting. The
petition is tentatively scheduled for public hearing at the January 2, 2024, South Bend Board of
Zoning Appeals meeting. The staff report and recommendation of the South Bend Board of Zoning
Appeals will be forwarded to the Office of the City Clerk by noon on the Wednesday following the
public hearing.
The petitioner provided the following to describe the proposed project:
Vehicle Service, Minor
The full petition is attached for your reference. Changes may occur between the filing and the public
hearing. Any substantial changes will be identified at the Council meeting.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office.
Sincerely,
Kari Myers 3
Zoning Specialist
CC: Bob Palmer
County -City Building 1 227 W. Jefferson I South Bend, IN 46601 1 574-235-7627 1 www.southbendin.gov/zoning
City of South Bend
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
January 3, 2024
Common Council of South Bend
227 W. Jefferson Blvd, 4' Floor
South Bend, IN 46601
County -City Building
227 W. Jefferson Blvd. 1400S
South Bend, IN 46601
(574) 235-7627
Filed in Clerk's office
. U
CITY CLERK, SOUTH BEND. IN
Re: 86-23: The petition of WESTERN AVE LLC seeking a Special Exception for Minor Vehicle Service
in the NC Neighborhood Center for property located at 3001, 3011, and 3015 WESTERN AVE
Dear Council Members:
I hereby Certify that the above referenced petition of WESTERN AVE LLC was legally advertised on
December 23, 2023, and that the South Bend Board of Zoning Appeals at its public hearing on January 2,
2024, took the following action:
Upon a motion by Kathy Schuth, being seconded by Frank Fotia and unanimously carried, a petition
by WESTERN AVE LLC seeking a Special Exception for Minor Vehicle Service for property located
at 3001, 3011, and 3015 WESTERN AVE, City of South Bend, is sent to the Common Council with a
favorable recommendation, and will issue written Findings of Fact.
The staff comments related to this petition are attached. The Findings of Fact will be adopted at the next
South Bend Board of Zoning Appeals meeting. Minutes of the public hearing are available in our office
and will be posted on our website once approved.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office.
Sincerely.
Kari Myers
Zoning Specialist
Attachment
CC: WESTERN AVE LLC
Manuel Villegas
Theodore Thymianos
Building Department
Bob Palmer
Property Information
Location: 3001, 3011, and 3015 WESTERN AVE
Owner: WESTERN AVE LLC
Project Summary
Requesting a special exception for Vehicle Service, Minor, and proposing a parking lot on vacant
eastern lot.
Requested Action
Special Exception: Minor Vehichle Service
Variance(s):
1) from the minimum 60% transparency of a front facade to 7% and from the minimum 20%
transparency of a corner facade to 0%
2) to allow parking in the front/corner yard
Site Location
i�
,.4 W.WESTFERN AVE 1W Ali
.-n > { 1
r i
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, Staff recommends the Board send the
Special Exception to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation. The staff recommends
the Board deny Variance #1 to allow reduced transparency requirements. Staff recommends the
Board approve Variance #2 to allow parking in a front/corner yard.
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page I of 5
Staff Report - BZA#0245-24
Proposed Site Plan
January 2, 2024
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 5
Staff Report - BZA#0245-24
January 2, 2024
A Special Exception may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon
the evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
Provided the building is brought up to NC building standards, the proposed use should not
be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the community. The
site development standards in the Ordinance are established to limit potentially negative
impacts on the surrounding properties.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
Western Avenue is a long established mixed use corridor. The building was utilized to
accommodate commercial vehicle repair from 1985 until 2017. The approval of the Special
Exception should not injure or adversely affect the use of adjacent area, provided the
building is brought up to NC building standards.
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
The building was originally constructed for window manufacturing, and was then used as a
commercial vehicle service station from the mid 1980s until 2017. The NC Neighborhood
Center District allows this as a Special Exception in order to evaluate the appropriateness in
specific areas. At this location, the reactivation of the vacant building to its original use is
consistent with the character of the district and surrounding area.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The plan is consistent with City Plan (2006) Objective LU 2: Stimulate the rehabilitation and
adaptive reuse of the property in the city
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The approval of variance #1 may be injurious to the general welfare of the community. The
low transparency does not meet the intent of the Ordinance to create pedestrian oriented
buildings in the NC district that appropriately address the street. The approval of variance #2
should not be injurious to the general welfare of the community. The parking lot will be built
to all development standards and serve as an accessory use to the minor vehicle repair.
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 5
Staff Report - BZA#0245-24
January 2, 2024
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The approval of variance #1 may adversely impact the use and value of adjacent properties.
Design standards in the NC district encourage buildings with active facades that address the
street. The existing 7% transparency does not meet the intent of the Ordinance. Variance #2
should not adversely impact the use and value of adjacent properties. The parking lot will be
built to all development standards and mirrors the layout of several proximal buildings.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties in the use of
the property for variance #1. The building could meet transparency standards utilizing
existing window openings. Due to the narrow width of the corner lot, strict application of the
Ordinance on variance #2 would substantially reduce the parking capacity of the parcel.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
Granting variance #1 would not be the minimum necessary. Reducing minimum
transparency requirements from 60% to 7% would not meet the intent of building standards
in the NC district. Granting variance #2 would be the minimum necessary. The Ordinance
mandates a 12' setback for corner yard parking when no building is present on the parcel.
Reducing this setback to a type 1 buffer would allow for more parking while still preserving
the intent of the Ordinance to buffer the lot from the sidewalk and adjacent parcels.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Variance #1 corrects a hardship caused by a former owner of the property. The existing
window openings would meet the 60% transparency requirements but were boarded up by a
previous owner. If the current owner were granted the Special Exception, the owner would
have to meet all development standards, including transparency standards. Variance #2
responds to the narrow width of the lot, which was not a hardship created by a former or
current owner of the property.
Analysis: The building was originally constructed for window manufacturing, and was then used
as a commercial vehicle service station from the mid 1980s until 2017. While the Neighborhood
Center Zoning District outlines pedestrian orientated development, the use of Vehicle Service,
Minor is an allowed Special Exception in the district, particularly for such instances. Because the
proposed use is consistent with a previous use, it is within the character of the district and
surrounding area.
The site contains no practical difficulties and it would not affect the usability of the site to install
appropriate transparency that meets the standards of the Ordinance. However the use of the
corner parcel as a parking area, if held to setback requirements, could hinder the usability and
reactivation of the parcel.
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 5
Staff Report - BZA#0245-24
January 2, 2024
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, Staff
recommends the Board send the Special Exception to the Common Council with a favorable
recommendation. The staff recommends the Board deny variance #1 to allow reduced
transparency requirements. Staff recommends the Board approve variance #2 to allow parking
in a front/corner yard.
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 5 of 5
BILL NO.86-23
ORDINANCE NO. 11000-23
Filer in Clerk's office
DEC 0 5 1023
DAWN! M. jONES
„CLERY gOUTH BEND.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA, APPROVING A PETITION OF THE ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3001, 3011 AND 3015 WEST
WESTERN, COUNCILMANIC DISTRICT NO.2 IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT
Request a Special Exception to allow for the use of Minor Vehicle Service
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,
Indiana, as follows:
SECTION I. The Common Council has provided notice of the hearing on the Petition
from the Advisory Board of Zoning Appeals pursuant to Indiana Code Section 5-14-1.5-5,
requesting that a Special Exception be granted for property located at:
3001 'West Western 018-4055-2040
3011 West Western018-4055-2038
3015 West Western 018-4056-2079
In order to permit Vehicle Service, Minor
SECTION II. Following a presentation by the Petitioner, and after proper public hearing,
the Common Council hereby approves the petition of the Advisory Board of Zoning Appeals, a
copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
that:
SECTION III. The Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, hereby finds
1. The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort, community
moral standards, convenience, or general welfare;
2. The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of adjacent area of property
values therein;
The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located, and the land uses authorized therein;
4. The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the City of South Bend
Comprehensive Plan;
SECTION IV. Approval is subject to the Petitioner complying with the reasonable
conditions, if any, established by the Advisory Board of Zoning Appeals which are on file in the
Office of the City Clerk.
SECTION V. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor, and legal publication, and full execution of
any conditions or Commitments placed upon the approval.
Sharon McBride, Council President
South Bend Common Council
Attest:
Dawn M. Jones, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
Presented by me, the undersigned Clerk of the City of South Bend, to the Mayor of the
City of South Bend, Indiana on the day of , 2023, at
o'clock . M.
.m.
Dawn M. Jones, City Clerk
Office of the City Clerk
Approved and signed by me on the day of
James Mueller, Mayor
City of South Bend, Indiana
2023, at _ o'clock.
-2-
City of South Bend
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
227 W. Jefferson - Suite 1400S
South Bend, IN 46601
zoning@southbendin.gov
Property Information
Tax Key Number: 71-08-10-154-023.000-026,71-08-10-154-024.000-026,71-08-10-154-025.000-026
Address: 3001, 3011 and 3015 W Western Ave
Owner: Western Ave LLC
Zoning: NC Neighborhood Center
Project Summary:
Special Exception for the use of Vehicle Service, Minor in an NC district
Special Exception for the use of a Parking Lot in an NC district
variance from the 60% front fasade transparency requirement in an NC district
variance from the building material requirements in NC
Requested Action
[]✓ Special Exception/ Use Variance — complete and attach Criteria for Decision Making
Use requested: Vehicle service minor
0 Variance(s) - List variances below, complete and attach Criteria for Decision Making
Variance(s) requested:
Window size at 3011 W Western Ave. 3011 W Western Ave was never retail
space it is a six thousand feet of empty warehouse space. It has never had
windows. We added windows to add light to the interior. The height of the
windows is needed to reduce the incidence of broken windows.
Stone Facade 3015 W Western Ave
The stone fasade on the first floor of 3015 W Western ave was falling off.
50% of it was gone. It was not an original feature of the building pror to
2014. We repaired the wall by returning it to it original stucco exterior.
Parking on side yard. The properties around the lot are commercial. It is a
half a city lot that has always had a pea gravel surface .
Required Documents
0 Completed Application (including Criteria for Decision Making and Contact Information)
0 Site Plan drawn to scale
0 Filing Fee rFediled +n eT 5-DECn 2023
D.AWNcLEF ".__
J
S - if applicable
A Special Exception may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon the
evidence presented at a public hearing. Please address how the project meets the following criteria.
(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare, because:
The proposed use does not cause injury to public health or safety or comfort.
The proposed change does not affect Moral standards. The propsed change
creates a more competitive environment for automative work. More repair
shops leads to more competion and more capacity is more conveniance and
faster service for the public I would categorise an addition repair shop on
Western as a positive for the general welfare. Having an operating car is how
you get to work, the doctors office and to the grocery store. Western is the
place to go for reasonable cost repairs because of the many shops.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area
or property values therein, because:
Automotive repair is existing on Western Ave. The street already supports
many repair shops and car dealers. Another shop would not be out of line
with the activity that is existing.
Western Ave LLC takes up the majority of the block between Camden and
Dundee. Prior to the repair/detail shop oppening the building was boarded
up and used as warehouse space. Now there is activity and the building is
alive !
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein, because:
Automotive repair is existing on Western Ave. The street already supports
many repair shops and car dealers. Another shop would not be out of line
with the activity that is existing. It provides another needed service to
community. Being able to keep your car running is how you get work to the
doctors office and to the grocery store. Western Avenue is the place to go
for reasonable cae repairs.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan, because:
The majority of the block on Western between Camden and Dundee had
been empty and boarded up since Power Brake and Spring moved out over
a decade ago. The building now is supporting unsubsidised businesses
creating jobs paying taxes and adding services to the community. We would
be happy to talk to the city about improvements to the facade and look of the
building. Without paying viable tenants it would have continued to be a
vacant eye sore.
Special Exception - if applicable
A Special Exception may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon the
evidence presented at a public hearing. Please address how the project meets the following criteria.
(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare, because:
Adding parking does not take away anyhing from the community. It will be
an improvement visually and functionally. It a net addition.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area
or property values therein, because:
Parking on the lot at 3001 W Western Ave will increase the amount of
availble parking in the area by decreasing the need for street parking.
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein, because:
This a city lot with its own tax id. Leaving it unused would end up making
it a dumping ground for mattreses and refuse. There is a need for more
parking in the immediate area.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan, because:
Additional parking encourages more activity in the area.
Variances) - if applicable
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. Please address how the project meets the following criteria:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community, because:
The transparancy percentage of the area between 2 and 8 ft at the front 3011
W Western Ave was zero. The addition of windows brought it to 40%. 3011 W
Western Ave is not retail shopping space it is six thousand feet of warehouse
space. It has never had windows. We added windows to add light to the interior.
The height of the windows helps reduce the incidents of theft and vandalism.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner, because:
Adding windows to warehouse space is an improvement and does not in
anyway detract the value of the surronding property.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property, because:
Larger windows attract break ins and vandalism because windows are lower
and more accesable to breakage and to entry. We have experienced vandalim
in the past.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary, because:
There is a tradeoff between security and esthetics with windows at this particular
time. The currant size of the windows is a compromise that taks into account
security.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship caused by a former or current owner of
the property, because:
Variances) - if applicable
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. Please address how the project meets the following criteria:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community, because:
variance from the building material requirements in NC.
The stone fasade was not an original feature of the building and appeared after
2014. The stone facade was falling down whens we bought the building. We
repaired the wall by returning it to it original stucco exterior.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner, because:
The stone facade on the first floor of 3015 W Western ave was falling off. We
repaired the wall by returning it to it original stucco exterior an improvenent.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property, because:
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary, because:
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship caused by a former or current owner of
the property, because:
Property owner(s) of the petition site:
Name:
Manuel Villegas
Address:
4102 W Western
South Bend Indiana 46619
Name:
Theodoros Arhontas
Address:
2565 Portage Ave
Las Vegas NV 89120
Name:
TheodoreThymianos
Address:
9866 Raven Wing Canyon Ct
Las Vegas NV 89183
Contact Person:
Name: Theodoros Arhontas
Address:
2565 Portage Ave
Las Vegas NV 89120
Phone Number: 702-945-8307
E-mail. Ted.Arhontas@gmail.com
By signing this petition, the Petitioner/Property Owners of the above described Real
Estate acknowledge they are responsible for understanding and complying with the
South Bend Zoning Ordinance and any other ordinance governing the property.
Failure of staff to notify the petitioner of a requirement does not imply approval or
waiver from anything contained within the ordinance.
The undersigned authorizes the contact person listed above to represent this petition
before the South Bend Plan Commission and Common Council and to answer any and
all questions related to this petition.
Property Owner (s) Signatures:
r