HomeMy WebLinkAbout3. Leeper Park - Navarre Cabin_COA 2023-1106ASTAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: November 7, 2023
Application Number: 2023-1106A
Property Location: Leeper Park
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Planned landscape/1897/City
superintendent Herman Beyer; Landscape Architect George Kessler
Property Owner: City of South Bend, Venues Parks & Arts
Landmark or District Designation: Local Landscape Landmark, Ordinance
#8734-96 and National Register of Historic Places, 6/15/2000
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is the first planned public park in South Bend
located north of downtown and the medical district. Leeper Park is oriented east/west at the St. Joseph River,
divided into three sections, East, Central, and West, by Michigan Street and Lafayette Boulevard. The Eastern
section was originally established for the Water Works with the first construction on site being a network of
thirty, six-inch artesian wells.1 “The first land condemned for the future Leeper Park, in June of 1895, was
meant to provide a second artesian well field and pumping facility for the lively industries and town
population which was growing along the south bend of the St. Joseph River.”2 City superintendent Herman
Beyer first influenced the design including curvilinear paths, plantings, and water features. The 1911-1915
Parks and Boulevard system and the Leeper Park Plan, designed by celebrated planner and landscape architect
George Kessler, embodied early twentieth century ideals grounded in the City Beautiful movement,
connecting parks and boulevards as planned elements of a coordinated city plan. Kessler’s Plan for Leeper
Park included both formal and informal design elements, adopting existing park features of the Beyer era
through a skillful remodel. The association of the park sections with different uses was a result of Kessler’s
planning; the West section was deemed for active recreation, the Central section as passive recreation, and the
Eastern Section was adopted for its function as a Water Works but also boasts a number of recreation-related
features. While the Kessler Plan guided Leeper Park development for the next decade, documentary evidence
appears that only some elements of the Kessler design were actually installed.3 Sensitive extensions of
Kessler’s Plan continued into the 1920s and 1930s and included Works Progress Administration funded labor
for several projects.4
Leeper Park East features include: the North Pumping Station, the water reservoir, multiple water well pumps,
Ziegler Performing Center with fixed bench seating, signage for the former Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre
Cabin, the foundation of the former Powell House, a non-functioning Comfort Station, a swing set/slide, the
Sunken (Rose) Garden, the island, and the Works Progress Administration retaining wall and a bridge to the
island.
Leeper Park Central features include: West Lagoon (Duck Pond), concrete stairs on embankment, a well
house, the Edward B. Reynolds fountain, Lavender Labyrinth, memorials including trees, stones, plaques, and
a scenic river overlook.
Leeper Park West features include: backdrop of the former baseball diamond, a playground, tennis courts, a
recreation building, a parking lot, an odor garden, and raised vegetable gardens with adjoining paths.
1 Leeper Park Cultural Landscape Report, prepared by Westerly Group for the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County,
May 1998.
2 Ibid.
3 Ibid.
4 Malcolm Cairns, ASLA. “Leeper Park Historic District.” National Register of Historic Places Inventory/Nomination Form, NR-1411. South Bend,
St. Joseph County, Indiana, June 15, 2000.
ALTERATIONS:
Throughout
COA 2019-0402 approved conditionally 1. Lighting, with condition of staff approval 2. Sign locations, not
sign design 3. Furnishings and Garden Ornaments with exception of the backed, non-custom metal
benches around the fountain to be the backless benches, only 4. Planting Design.
COA 2019-0109 approved conditionally 1. Pedestrian circulation improvements and pathways, with condition
of staff approval over memorials and landscaping 2. New playground 3. Studebaker Fountain and
associated gathering place 4. Removal of Duck Pond, with condition that “reseed the lawn” is not
approved but instead requires a plan be submitted to the Commission to interpret the Duck Pond in
another way 5. Concept of a formal river overlook with final design to be approved by Commission.
RMEs and COAs for tree trimming, removal, and installation have been approved under the guidance of the
City Forester.
RMEs and COAs for sidewalks have been approved.
Leeper Park East
AA 2022-0810 allowed for the installation of a staircase and landscaping leading to the Rose Garden.
AA 2020-0422 allowed for the installation of two wooden trellis in the Rose Garden.
COA 2020-0302 (DENIED) requested the removal of the Navarre Cabin, to be moved to The History Museum
campus.
COA 2019-0108 allowed for the installation of a new water pump structure.
RME 2017-0410 approved “This permit covers only Phase I of the project - drilling a pilot well. Phase II
(drilling the actual well and trenching in the piping) will require a separate COA.”
COA 2017-0306 approved installation of new stage and new audience seating, landscape beautification and
lighting for stage, new benches with concrete pad closer to stage.
RME 2016-1013 approved removal of brush and planting of willow tree near Rose Garden.
The Sunken (Rose) Garden with reflecting pool and statuaries were removed in the 1960s. RME 2017-1012
approved installation of two small concrete pads with two benches adjacent to Rose Garden. Benches
to match those approved through COA 2015-0302A. COA 2017-0228 approved installation of 8’ wide
crushed limestone walkway connecting the Michigan Street sidewalk with the Sunken Garden,
bounded by two, 42” wide flower beds, and irrigation system for entire garden. COA 2015-1002
approved “Within an existing concrete curb (that will remain), the landscaping bed will be enhanced to
mimic the reflecting pool formerly within its boundary. New flower beds will be defined using new
soil, compost and plantings. A walkway of crushed limestone will pass through the beds. Additional
half circle beds will be added to the north and south of the concrete curb. The "three-fates" statues will
be repaired pro-bono by a local artist, and then placed into the center of the "pool" bed, where they
were originally, in the same back-to-back-to back style; and the one remaining "cherub" will be
nearby, on a footing. That "cherub" will be duplicated from the original, and the new statue also placed
nearby in the "pool" bed.” COA 2015-0504A approved restoration of Rose Garden and gravel path
system by volunteers.
COA 2015-0908 approved “Bartlett Street Roundabout Project Description (114-032b). Project to construct a
roundabout at Bartlett and Michigan Street approved per all diagrams and documents submitted.
Encroachment to Leeper Park East will be limited to 0.57 acres and all trees removed will be replaced
within the park.”
The Garden of Fragrance no longer exists, but the signage remains. RME 2015-0422 approved
“Rebuild/restack low retaining wall currently located in Leeper Park next to Garden for the Blind.
Matching flagstone has been donated by Knepp Sand and Stone and Old Fort Building Supply; and
follows material estimate made by a representative of the SB Parks Department. The restacking of the
flagstone wall will also require digging away the dirt around loose blocks and backfilling afterwards.”
COA 2011-1103A approved “Replace the existing lift station on the south side of the North Pumping Station
driveway and relocate it to the north side of the driveway. Screen the new location with landscaping
and plantings. Rehabilitate the Garden of Fragrance Braille marker and boulder monument and install
new sidewalks and decorative paving. All per diagrams, plans and plant palette submitted and
approved.”
Wading Pool was filled in and the pergola removed, 1970s.
Circa 1862 vernacular Powell House
Navarre Cabin moved to Leeper Park, 1904; relocated, 1916; relocated again to present site, 1954. Restored
2005-2006.
Zoo closed and structures used for animals demolished, 1913.
Leeper Park Central
COA 2019-0806 approved the “Construction of a new river overlook in Leeper Park”, with the conditions
regarding the installation of the railings at the overlook, the bench designs, lighting at the overlook,
and railings along the stairs.
COA 2017-0213B approved “Addition to Leeper Park of a garden labyrinth, 40'-0" diameter center, 80'-0"
diameter outer circle per submitted plans. Includes removal and replacement of existing trees
specified in plans; removal of DAR memorial tree NOT PERMITTED.”
COA 2013-0519 approved “Install a climber and merry-go-round at Leeper Park playground. (Replaces old
pieces which were removed.)”
The Mall/Formal Garden, an elongated adaptation of the Kessler design survived well into the 1960s. The
Garden and pedestrian walks became grown over, 1980s.
Tennis courts moved from Central to Eastern section, 1916.
1905 Bugbee Fountain removed, unknown date.
1907-08 East Lagoon (Lily Pond) became stagnant and was removed along with the rustic wooden bridge,
unknown date.
1907-08 West Lagoon (Duck Pond) was extensively remodeled including a change in configuration from a
naturalized shape to a near oval, 1980s and 1990s. The covered shelter and chain link fence are not
original.
Only remnants of a path system were recorded by WPA, 1938.
1910 Reynold’s horse watering trough, relocated from downtown South Bend, 1937.
Fill added and installation of double flight of concrete steps along west bank of West Lagoon, 1916.
Carriage drives redesigned, unknown date.
Leeper Park West
COA 2015-0302A approved “Create a Garden in four sections totaling about 3000 sf including all plants;
include an 8’ wide ADA standard concrete sidewalk-initially 500 feet long; one monument circle and 2
flanking garden observation/education pads to be added per diagram submitted. Install 8 +/- historic
lights of the style of Leeper Park East to be installed along the 8 foot wide walk: 1 on each side of the
3 bump outs along the walk, 1 close to Lafayette and 1 close to the northwest corner end of the current
phase of the walkway. 8 +/- durable quality public benches; 4+/- umbrella tables near tennis court;
opportunities for public art along the garden walk. Subject to approval by the Parks Board. All the
garden plant and vegetable plant options to be agreed upon by Parks Department/Board, Madison
School and HPC Staff to conform to the Standards and Guidelines adopted for Leeper Park. Abstain
from planting fruit trees at this time.”
COA 2008-0306 approved installation of an “Odor Garden” with blower piping and underground odor control
bed to treat sewer gas. Surface odor control bed planted as flower garden. Area will be restored to
grass if and when the system is taken out of service.
COA 2007-0605B approved “Renovation of Tennis Courts, Pavement and Fence replacement, expansion of
Court pavement approximately 20' to South; removal of 17 trees in the South per Brent Thompson and
replace with 12 Cypress per Brent Thompson. Plant to the north of the fence 5 deciduous trees.”
A parking lot south of the Tennis Center was added during the Madison School renovation along with lighting
without COA, 1998.
The 1936 WPA shelter house was replaced with the present recreation building, 1970.
Fill added for installation of Riverside Drive, 1910 and 1938.
APPLICATION ITEMS: “Cabin to be relocated to the museum’s west campus as part of a larger
interpretive site. To be used for educational purposes. See attached plan for details.”
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The Northern Indiana Historical Society (NIHS, also known
as The History Museum) has applied to remove the Navarre Cabin from Leeper Park East and move it to a
purpose-built interpretive area on the west side of the museum’s campus (along Laurel Street).
a. The Cabin will be removed from the current location by Lykowski Construction:
i. The Cabin will be lifted up and transported off-site,
ii. The piers will be disassembled for reuse at the new location.
b. The site will be graded and reseeded, including:
i. The removal / filling in of the pier foundations,
ii. The removal / filling in of the interpretive burn pits,
iii. The removal / grading of the small sections of stone wall,
iv. The removal / filling in of the disused pioneer herb garden,
The cabin colloquially known as the “Pierre Navarre Cabin” originally stood on the north side of the river
somewhere west of what is now Michigan Street Bridge; it was moved to Leeper Park in 1904, only to be
moved/repositioned within the park in 1916. The cabin was again moved in 1954 to its present location. The
structure was renovated using South Bend Parks funds in 1960. The Common Council of South Bend passed a
resolution in 1988 establishing the cabin as an honorary landmark as part of the Hoosier Celebration ’88
activities; a few years later in 1996 the Common Council passed an ordinance formally adopting the entirety
of Leeper Park as a Local Landmark.
Leeper Park was added to the Indiana State Register of Historic Places in April of 1999 and the National
Register of Historic Places in June of 2000, where the Navarre Cabin is indicated as Building ‘B4’ in the
nomination form. The structure was rated Outstanding in the most recent City of South Bend Historic Sites
and Structures Inventory.
In 2005, The History Museum partnered with the Historic Preservation Commission and Historic Landmarks
Foundation of Indiana (now Indiana Landmarks) to pursue funding assistance from the Indiana Department of
Natural Resources to facilitate the structure’s rehabilitation. The National Parks Service furnished $41,000
through the ‘Historic Preservation Fund’, with the remainder of monies being raised by The History Museum
through fundraising. The cabin was eligible for this Federal funding because of its status as an included asset
within the National Register-listed Leeper Park. As a condition of the funding, the State of Indiana’s
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology maintained an internal
and external easement on the structure from 2005 until its expiration in 2015.
National Register listing is often the key to unlocking the few funding opportunities that are available related
to Historic Preservation efforts. Moving the structure from Leeper Park will nullify the Cabin’s existing status
(see Title 36: Parks, Forest, and Public Property, Part 60—National Register of Historic Places, §60.14
‘Changes and revisions to properties listed in the National Register’), as well as potentially preclude the
structure’s future eligibility for re-inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The structure’s new
location is within the West Washington National Register District. Were the structure to be moved to this new
location, the structure would not be a contributing resource in the West Washington National Register District.
The loss of this status will negate future opportunities for rehabilitation grants to preserve the structure long
term. Without those grant opportunities, long term maintenance of the structure will fall exclusively to the
owner.
The History Museum has stated that moving the cabin will lead to greater utilization and more engagement
with the structure. The History Museum previously used the structure for “Cabin Days”, a three-day long
event that occurred annually. The History Museum has stated that amenities (bathrooms / comfort stations,
storage facilities) are not available at the site in its current configuration, and that moving the structure to The
History Museum campus would provide those amenities. The proposed new location would be secure, but
open to the public as part of the museum’s campus.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: See Standards and Guidelines:
• Residential Standards: Moving a Structure — page 39
• Commercial Standards: Moving a Building — page 69
• General Information — page 120
• District Addenda: Leeper Park Historic District — page 160
SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Historic Preservation Commission adopted revised Standards and Guidelines for the Local Historic
Districts on June 20, 2023, and for Local Landmarks on August 21, 2023, after a multi-year review and
engagement process. The revised Standards and Guidelines include allowances for “Moving a Structure” in
the ‘Residential’ Standards, and “Moving a Building” in the ‘Commercial’ Standards. Both state that, “On
rare occasions when a building is not beyond repair and no alternative exists to incorporate it into a new
development, then relocation should be considered.” Both sections further state that, “if no suitable locations
exist within the district, then a site should be selected in another historic area that is of similar era and allows
the positioning of the relocated building on the new site in a way that is similar to its original location.”
Throughout the entirety of the Standards and Guidelines, maintenance of historic structures is encouraged as
necessary for long-term preservation of designated properties. “Demolition by neglect” is discussed under the
Demolition and Deconstruction sections of both the ‘Residential’ (page 38) and ‘Commercial’ (page 68)
sections and is described as “the absence of ordinary and routine maintenance jeopardizing the structural
integrity of the building.” The General Information (page 120) section of the Standards and Guidelines states
that a “Certificate of Appropriateness is required before moving any building or structure. The moving of a
building within, out of or into the district is discouraged; however, moving is preferred to demolition.”
No projects involving moving designated structures have been reviewed since the adoption of the revised
Standards and Guidelines. The Commission has approved moving “threatened” designated structures when no
alternative existed to preserve a structure in its current location under the previous eleven different Standards
and Guidelines. The most recent example of this kind of project is the “May House” (formerly 130 Park Lane,
moved to the corner of Riverside and Park Avenue), reviewed by the Commission in 2021, taking into
consideration both the former “Group B” Standards for Local Landmarks and Riverside Drive Local Historic
District Standards and Guidelines.
The Commission included Addenda related to the nine Local Historic Districts and Leeper Park at the end of
the revised Standards and Guidelines. The Leeper Park Addenda is the Standards and Criteria for Leeper
Park, the document used to review projects within Leeper Park since its adoption as a Local Landmark. When
the Commission reviewed the previous request to move the Navarre Cabin in 2020, HPC Staff recommended
the proposed project unfavorably based upon this document, specifically items 9.2.12 (“Moving or
demolishing historic structures that would alter spatial and visual relationships in the landscape shall not be
allowed.”) and 9.7.1.l (“All items listed herein shall be preserved: […] The Log Cabin known as the Navarre
House, and the footings of the cabin/house which was burned down.”).
When making a determination whether to approve or deny a Certificate of Appropriateness,
the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider the following:
i) Appropriateness of the proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition,
or moving to the preservation of the historic landmark, specifically, and/or the Historic
Preservation District, generally;
ii) The detriment to the public welfare if the proposed construction, reconstruction,
alteration, demolition, or moving is permitted even though it is not deemed
appropriate; and
iii) The potential hardship that the denial of a certificate of appropriateness would cause
the applicant.
City of South Bend Zoning Ordinance, Section 21-12.04(b)(6)(H)
The History Museum’s application indicates (in Appendix A: The Navarre Cabin as a Local Landmark) that
“the Museum commits to submission of an application for [Local Landmark] status within 30 days of COA
approval.” This voluntary submission of interest in re-Landmarking the Cabin in the new location indicates
The History Museum's renewed interest in preserving this structure. Were the Commission to consider
approving the move of the Navarre Cabin, Staff would further recommend the Commission ask The History
Museum to amend this condition of the current application to read “within 30 days of the successful
completion of the move of the Navarre Cabin to the described location.” An appropriate legal description for
this ‘new’ proposed landmark would be needed at that time of that submission.
The History Museum’s request is to move the Navarre Cabin to the West Washington museum campus in an
interpretive site to increase use/activation and educational opportunities. The applicable Standards and
Guidelines – both the revised Standards and Guidelines adopted in 2023, and the existing Standards and
Criteria for Leeper Park – are in place to guide the Commission when reviewing projects to ensure continued
preservation of designated structures.
Staff makes no recommendation.
Prepared by
Adam Toering, Historic Preservation Administrator
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
LOCATION MAP - Map showing location of the property and surrounding area (Google Maps)
AERIEL MAP - highlighted property on map (MACOG)
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
LOCATION MAP - Map showing location of the property and surrounding area (Google Maps)
11
Navarre Cabin
HOMESTEAD PROJECT
Application Attachment for Certificate of Appropriateness
Prepared for the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County
November 6, 2023
2
Table of Contents
Introduction 2
Pierre Navarre 3
The Navarre Cabin 4
Locations Summary 7
Current Photographs 8
The Homestead Project 9
Current Site Photographs 10
Goals 11
Funding 14
Marker at Leeper Park 16
The Cabin’s Place in Leeper Park 17
Sensible Change 20
Appendix A: The Navarre Cabin as a Local Landmark 24
Appendix B: Details on Moving 25
Appendix C: Ownership Notes 27
Introduction
The purpose of this attachment is to provide context on The History Muesum’s intent and
reasoning relating to the desire to relocate the Navarre Cabin. The cabin was given to the
museum (then called the Northern Indiana Historical Society) in 1895, preserved with the
intent to educate the public about pioneer life. The Society did not have a physical presence
at the time and relocated it to an available piece of land in what would become Leeper Park.
The cabin was moved twice more to make way for development. Today, the museum has the
resources and land to make the cabin part of an immersive site, realizing the purpose of the
building’s rescue over 130 years ago.
It is our hope that the following materials will adequately address any concerns and present
a compelling case that this move should be allowed. We look forward to working together to
promote the educational goals of both of The History Museum and the Historic Preservation
Commission.
3
Pierre Navarre
Pierre Freischutz (or Freschette) Navarre was
the first person of European descent to settle
in St. Joseph County. He was an educated man
of French ancestry, born in 1787 in Michigan
Territory near Detroit. Navarre came to this
area as an agent for John Jacob Astor’s American
Fur Company. In 1820, he built a cabin and
established a trading post on the north bank of
the St. Joseph River, with the intent to trade for
furs with the area’s native population.
Navarre married a woman named Keshewaquay,
the daughter of a well-respected local leader
and warrior named Wabaunsee. Keshewaquay
adopted the name Angelique, and she and Pierre
lived with their large family in this cabin on the
north side of the St. Joseph River, gaining title
in 1831 to the 62.6 acres surrounding the site.
When the local Potawatomi, including many
of Navarre’s family, were forcibly removed to
Kansas in 1835, Pierre Navarre joined them.
After Angelique passed away, he returned to the
area, working as a farmer and trader and selling
goods along the Kankakee River. Pierre Navarre
passed away in 1864 and is buried in Cedar Grove
Cemetery at the University of Notre Dame.
Pierre Navarre
Wabaunsee, by Charles Bird King, 1835
Pierre Navarre’s headstone
4
The Navarre Cabin
The original location of
Navarre’s cabin is recognized
today as 123 West North
Shore Drive, on the north
bank of the St. Joseph River.
Navarre sited his cabin for
easy access to the St. Joseph
and Kankakee rivers and the
portage between, a primary
route of travel for trappers
and traders before established
roads. His associated
homestead extended from
the river’s edge north to what
today is Marquette Avenue. Navarre was recorded as living in the cabin by Father Sorin during
an 1850 parish census. Following his death in 1864, Navarre’s land became the property of
Samuel Leeper. The builders of Navarre Place (today’s magnificent homes along North Shore
Drive) purchased the Navarre property from Leeper’s heirs for residential development.
In recognition of its historical
significance, the developers donated
the Navarre Cabin to the Northern
Indiana Historical Society (now
d.b.a. The History Museum) in
May of 1895. The Society’s original
unrealized intent was to relocate the
building to Howard Park; in 1901, the
South Bend Board of Public Works
agreed to allow the cabin to be
moved to a location on the west side
of the river. The cabin was moved
in 1904 by Alexander Staples and
his firm, White & Staples, to a site
noted as Bartlett/Marion Streets.
The Navarre Cabin in its original location, north of the river, ca. 1895.
The Navarre Cabin in second location, ca. 1910.
5
The Navarre Cabin (cont’d)
As the city expanded, the
North Pumping Station
required expansion as well.
It was enlarged in 1912, and
Wellhouse #2 added in 1915. In
1916, the Navarre Cabin was
once again relocated to a site
next to the north/northwest
end of the reservoir to make
way for further development.
In 1918, a (historically
inaccurate) brick chimney and fireplace were added as
part of its remodeling. The cabin was used by the local Boy Scouts as their meeting place from
1925 until World War II. The cabin was maintained by the Parks Department, as the NIHS was
an organization of only two staff and limited resources.
The Navarre Cabin in its 3rd location, 1920-1950.
Aerial photo facing west shows the cabin’s location in the 1920s, abutting the reservoir.
6
It was once again moved in 1954 to its
current location to create distance
from the reservoir, against which it
previously abutted. When the South
Bend Garden Club added the nearby
Garden of Fragrance, they worked with
the Parks Department to restore the
cabin, adding another chimney and
fireplace, this time of stone, along with
landscaped paths.
In 2000, the cabin had deteriorated to the extent that its
survival was in doubt, and it was again described as an
eyesore in the park. The NIHS had experienced exponential
growth, and now had much more robust resources and
the ability to take action. The Society partnered with the
Historic Preservation Commission, and with the assistance
of the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Memorial
Hospital (now Memorial Hospital of South Bend/Beacon
Health), and other local foundations, $150,000 was raised to hire the Leatherwood Company,
the nation’s leading log cabin restoration company, to evaluate and restore the cabin. The
company meticulously documented, disassembled, and reconstructed the cabin on stone piers
as it would have been in the 1820s. Since then, the cabin has been regularly maintained and
until recent years used as an interpretive site on a limited basis.
The cabin’s 4th location, with the Garden of Fragrance, ca. 1960.
The cabin during restoration, 2005.
The Navarre Cabin (cont’d)
The cabin post restoration.
7
1Original site,
built ca. 1820. Fell into
disrepair as a cow barn
and demolition was planned to
make room for the Navarre Place
housing development.
2Second location,
1904. Moved by The History
Museum to Leeper Park East to use
to teach the history
of the area’s pioneer
settlers. Location
listed as “Bartlett/
Marion” which is
believed to be
somewhere near this point. The
park was not yet formally
designed.4 Fourth (cur-
rent) location, 1954.
Moved once
again to make
room for fur-
ther expansion
of the pumping
station and to
add the comfort stations. The
cabin was completely re-
stored in 2005.3Third location,
1916. Moved to make
room for the pumping station
expansion. The cabin was placed
adjacent to the reservoir. Several
additions were
made, such as
a chimney,
lean-to, and
awnings.
The Navarre Cabin
Locations Summary
8
The Navarre Cabin
Current Photographs
Facing southwest
Facing northeast
9
The Homestead Project
Discussion regarding moving the Navarre Cabin to the museum campus began in earnest in
2010 as a reaction to years of vandalism and other security concerns. It was soon apparent that
having the cabin at the museum campus would bring many other benefits to the mission of the
museum and of the Navarre Cabin.
Today, The History Museum seeks to develop an experiential pioneer homestead on the
museum campus, where visitors can be immersed in hands-on pioneer life, learning about
early settlers and the native peoples of this region. The site reserved is approximately 0.7 acres
adjacent to the main campus. Every effort will be made to incorporate the existing mature
trees into the site plan and to provide a visual barriers to enhance the experience.
Proposed homestead site in blue
10
The Homestead Project
Current Site
Proposed Homestead site, facing southeast (Laurel Street to the right)
Proposed Homestead site, facing northwest (museum to the right)
11
Improved interpretation
The new site for the cabin will provide a much more historically
accurate context with mature vegetation, outbuildings, and
other features, improving the breadth of a visitor’s educational
experience. Utilizing first-person interpreters and informational
signage about the complex, the homestead area will provide
flexibility for programming that will not only teach guests about
Pierre Navarre and his home, but lifeways of early pioneer settlers.
Open spaces will provide opportunities to build seasonal native
structures and learn about the area’s first peoples as well as a
place for demonstrations such as pioneer games, crafts, and
food production. A visual barrier will block views of surrounding
structures, completing the illusion of traveling back in time to
Navarre’s homestead.
The Homestead Project
Goals
The site as imagined (trees removed for clarity) includes outbuildings such as a blacksmith shop,
trading post, smoke house, wigwam, garden, and stable. Green space will allow for education of
large groups and hands-on activities, where costumed interpreters can demonstrate activities
such as smithing and candlemaking, with a pen for visiting livestock, and storage for supplies.
An interpreter teaches about pioneer
medicine
12
Maximized visitor exposure
The Navarre Cabin’s remote location in Leeper Park means that it can be used only
infrequently for historical programming. Once located on the museum campus, the
homestead will be included as an integral part of The History Museum’s existing daily
operations, dramatically broadening the audience served by the cabin and its surroundings.
In 2019, the last time the museum held its “Cabin Days” program, the cabin saw 670 visitors.
On its new site the cabin will be included with each of The History Museum’s 50,000 annual
visitor experiences. The site will be open during operating hours free of charge for self-guided
tours, with planned regular public programming. The site will be designed to be inclusive and
accessible to people of all ages, backgrounds, and abilities. The associated green space allows
for broad event planning, from tours of a few guests to large festivals.
Conceptual plan, facing north. The site will be open free of admission during business hours and securely
monitored at night.
The Homestead Project - Goals (cont’d)
13
The Homestead Project - Goals (cont’d)
Maximized benefit for educators
Though many of our local schools receive free admission to the museum, the costs of busing
and difficulty of arranging field trips today make it highly unlikely for students to visit both
the museum campus and the cabin during the school year. An on-campus Homestead means
thousands of students each year can receive hands-on education about pioneer life, instead of
just a limited number of annual “Cabin
Days” programs. At the same time,
they will benefit from the outstanding
curriculum-focused existing offerings
of The History Museum and Studebaker
National Museum. The Museum
Campus’s amenities also include a
secured site, restrooms, ample bus
parking, and alternative space in the
event of inclement weather - none of
which are available in Leeper Park.
Increased Security
In the last two decades, the Society’s Board of
Directors has expressed increasing concern for
the safety of the Navarre Cabin. The structure
has been vandalized and forcibly entered
several times, necessitating the installation
of heavy shutters along with fire and security
alarms. There are concerns that neither the
city nor park police are equipped to provide
adequate surveillance to protect the cabin, with
many alarms not responded to given its remote
location. The planned Navarre Homestead will
be physically secured at night, with security
camera and floodlight coverage. The location
adjacent to the museum will have the added benefit of the maintenance resources present at
the museum.
Evidence of graffiti on the cabin
Students enjoy a presentation inside the cabin
14
The Homestead Project
Funding
In 2010, the museum began, through purchase and donation, acquiring derelict and
abandoned properties on the west side of its campus (South Laurel Street). By 2019, all
properties needed for the proposed Homestead Site had been secured, and over $250,000
had been raised for the project. Lykowski Construction, Inc., was engaged to confirm the
feasibility and cost of moving the cabin from Leeper Park to the museum campus, and
property surveys were completed. The landscape architecture firm of Lehman & Lehman
was engaged to develop and advise on a site plan, and the museum was awarded a grant in
the amount of $25,000 from Visit South Bend/Mishawaka (VSBM) to support moving the
structure.
Though most of the grant was returned after the COA denial
in 2020, VSBM encouraged the museum to reapply, noting the
funding was very likely to be awarded again should approval of a
future COA be granted.
The museum has also secured pledges from several project
supporters to supply the funding necessary to cover the
relocation expenses beyond the anticipated VSBM grant.
These supporters and the larger museum family are also
fully committed to secure the additional funding to ensure
the homestead site project completion within two years of
relocation. However, cabin related programming will begin
immediately following the move, with additional programming
added as the Homestead Site is completed.
It is understood that moving the cabin will result in a loss of National Register status, and it is
uncertain if this status will be regained. It is unfortunate that loss of status will make the cabin
no longer eligable for federal preservation funding. However, given that this funding has only
been utilized once in its nearly 30 years of eligibility and the robust fundraising to date for the
project, staff and board feel the museum can continue to budget for care of the cabin along
with its three other historic buildings, as it has for many years.
Students attend Cabin Days
15
The Homestead Project - Funding (cont’d)
Navarre Cabin Interpretive Site Budget
Funds Already Invested
Item Vendor Actual
Purchase of three lots Museum 139,526
Demolition of three structures Michiana Bobcat/LaPaz Iron 42,000
Other Site Prep Work Misc. 13,181
asbestos removal, retire water lines,
tree stumps & electric pole removal
Initial Landscape plans Lehman & Lehman 9,083
Site Survey Lang, Feeney & Associates 4,010
Total Invested to Date $207,800
Funds Planned
Item Vendor Est. Low Est. High
Relocation Expense Lykowski Construction 60,225 65,225
Foundation Const. Drawings Lehman & Lehman 2,500 4,000
Entry Steps incl. Lykowski Construction 3,500 4,500handicap accessibility
Homestead Site fencing TBD 5,000 7,500 and landscaping
Security Alarm Vermillon 1,500 2,500
Roof & general repairs TBD 12,000 18,000
Outbuildings TBD 50,000 100,000
Interpretive Signage TBD 7,500 10,000
Total $142,225 $211,725
16
The cabin has been in its current location for over 65 years, and some may regret seeing it
go. However, the museum plans to work with South Bend Venues, Parks & Arts and other
strategic partners to develop a new site of reflection to take its place. One of the criteria cited
establishing Leeper Park as a Historic Landmark is its educational value as an example of
early 20th century landscape architecture, and a site such as this could help share that with the
public. One could imagine it as an opportunity for learning and fellowship, featuring a series
of educational markers. The markers would share the story of the Navarre Cabin and its many
locations, alongside that of historic Leeper Park and its famous architect, George Kessler. The
nearby Powell House foundation and the story of the community’s early African American
settlers could also be featured, and the tragedy that left only the foundation to mark the
home’s former location. A visitor could even learn the history of Keshewaquay and the other
native people who once lived in the region, called one of the most beautiful in the country by
early explorers. Visitors can rest, enjoy the park, and reflect on the pioneering spirit of those
who came before.
The Homestead Project
Marker at Leeper Park
Options for a marker might include a design
that reflects the paths, benches, lights and
masory of the nearby amphitheater, as well
as features in Leeper Park West (above). Or,
a more unobtrusive design could more closely
follow the paths of the nearby Garden of
Fragrance (right).
17
The Cabin’s Place
in Leeper Park
In 1901, the Board of Public Works first designated a space adjoining the river as “Leeper Park.”
Improvements and expansion began under the direction of park superintendent Herman H.
Beyer. In 1911, the city hired noted landscape architect George Edward Kessler to develop a
master plan for the park. Kessler was a pioneer of city planning and had designed dozens of
landscapes, neighborhoods, and other projects in Chicago, Indianapolis, Nashville, St. Louis,
Denver, Cincinnati, and many other locations.
In his plan for Leeper Park, adopted in 1915, the park is divided into three sections. The west
and central section are considered the “active” areas, with recreation components like tennis
courts and playgrounds, and the center area with water features, formal plantings, and river
views. The eastern portion featured some waking paths near the river but is largely a “passive”
recreational area. The bulk is distinguished mostly by the presence of the Beaux-Arts pumping
station and the space set aside for structures necessary for its function. All are connected with
sweeping curves reminiscent of the river.
George Kessler’s original plan
18
The Cabin’s Place in Leeper Park (cont’d)
Kessler was a leading landscape architect during the City Beautiful movement, generally
defined as being sparked by the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago in 1893. The
movement holds a philosophy of an orderly “Garden City” linked by paths and water features,
featuring neoclassical and Beaux-Arts architecture. The National Mall in Washington, D.C. is
a well-known example of this aesthetic. What is notably not present on the Kessler plan is the
Pierre Navarre Cabin, which would have been located in the park for several years at the time
of his design. A rustic pioneer cabin would have no place in the neoclassical formal lines of a
City Beautiful park, and it seems clear that Kessler was not considering it for and did not wish
it to be in his plan.
Other examples of George Kessler’s designs include
the 1904 Louisiana Purchase Exposition (top left),
for which he was the master designer. One of his
most celebrated works, this would have been what
he was best known for at the time the City of South
Bend engaged his services. Other examples are the
elaborate gardens and pagoda of Siloam Gardens in
Excelsior Springs, Missouri, dated 1915 (top right);
and Gage Park in Topeka, Kansas, ca. 1900 (right).
19
The Cabin’s Place in Leeper Park (cont’d)
Over 80 years later, in 1996, the Historic Preservation Commission prepared a report, compiled
by Edward Talley, with the intention to outline the case for making Leeper Park a local historic
landmark. Meticulously researched, it described the history of the park, its original architects
and their philosophies, changes through the years, and the HPC’s reasons for the proposal.
This is reflected in the Common Council ordinance later in the year (8734-96) approving this
request, officially establishing the park as a Local Historic Landmark.
That same year saw the application for Leeper Park to the National Register of Historic
Places. The criteria listed for nomination is “Criteria C: The property embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master,
or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components lack individual distinction.” The Statement of Significance and other explanatory
text relies extremely heavily on Kessler’s design for the park in the context of his influence on
landscape design and the City Beautiful movement – “The Park is an outstanding example of
the landscape planning and design for a small city park of the City Beautiful era of American
landscape architectural design.” This argument, as explained previously, does not have
much application to the cabin. The listed “historically significant” dates of the park do not
encompass the Fur Trade era and begin in 1895; nor does it list an interpretive or educational
aspect of the park as a significant part of that movement. The statement’s texts lists structures
and other features that illustrate this style, but the cabin is never mentioned as one of them.
Though all documents above note the Navarre Cabin’s presence in the park as part of their
thorough inventory, its significance is minimized, and its provenance is questioned. None
cite the cabin as contributing specifically to the criteria for the park. This is not surprising,
as all arguments are heavily based on the area as an example of park planning in the late 19th
and early 20th centuries, when the national trend turned to the City Beautiful movement – in
which a rustic pioneer cabin would not be appropriate. In fact, the site to which the cabin had
been most recently moved might be considered an even less appropriate addition, as vistas
following City Beautiful ideals typically feature buildings and monuments on the edges, not
placed on a high point in the center of an unadorned expanse.
20
It is only sensible that, in compiling any of these documents, one would include the oldest
home in the county as a significant building. However, it is clear that when establishing the
historic designations of the park, the cabin was never considered a significant contributor to
any criteria cited. The principles of design are the necessary criteria, and the removal of an
anachronistic pioneer cabin would serve to strengthen its historic ties to Kessler’s
original plan.
The moving of the cabin can be allowed under general preservation principles. Referencing
page 17 of Talley’s report, it discusses the reasons the park meets the Historic Designated
Landscape definition. Two paragraphs address the designs by Herman H. Beyer and George
Kessler and their ties to the City Beautiful movement, ending with “The Historic Preservation
Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County recommends the preservation treatment
for Leeper Park to be rehabilitation, which retains the landscape as it has evolved historically
by maintaining and repairing historic features, while allowing additions and alterations for
contemporary and future uses.” This references National Park Service Preservation Brief #36,
which states that rehabilitation projects allow for successful minor or major change.
SBVPA’s plans for the park include paths reminiscent of Kessler’s design.
Sensible Change
21
This is also reflected by the stated goals of South Bend Venues, Parks & Arts. As part of their
park improvements, SBVPA calls for the “restoration of many historic features that were
included in the original George Kessler design.” In fact, there
has been a notable major change in the park in recent years,
in the form of the addition of the Studebaker Fountain. The
original fountain was located in Howard Park and was in the
possession of The History Museum for many decades. Its
addition is a deviation from the Standards and Guidelines for
the park, as well as from Kessler’s design, yet still follows his
design principles and those of the City Beautiful movement,
where it is common to see sweeping paths terminating in
fountains. The public can not only enjoy this water feature,
but also learn about its history from the placards nearby.
Changes are permitted under South Bend Zoning Ordinance 21-12.04(H), governing the
administration of the Historic Preservation Commission, which states that “In making such
determination, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider the following:
i) Appropriateness of the proposed construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition,
or moving to the preservation of the historic landmark, specifically, and/or the Historic
Preservation District, generally:
ii) The detriment to the public welfare if the proposed construction, reconstruction,
alteration, demolition, or moving is permitted even though it is not deemed
appropriate; and
iii) The potential hardship that the denial of a certificate of appropriate would cause the
applicant.”
Regarding i, though the standards and guidelines advise against moving any structure within
the park, it has been shown in previous pages that the criteria and significance on which
Leeper Park was designated a historic district is not dependent on the presence of the cabin,
Sensible Change (cont’d)
Studebaker Fountain
22
and that removing it would not be deleterious to those stated criteria, especially as it has only
been present in that location since the 1950s.
In terms of ii, the vista present without the cabin would still provide for a pleasing view for
neighbors and visitors, one that is more in line with Kessler’s plan and the original aesthetics
of the park. The proposed marker in its place (or nearby) can provide an educational and
enjoyable experience for any park visitors, as outlined on page 17. Additionally, the benefit to
the public welfare and education at the new Homestead Site at the museum far outweighs
that available at Leeper Park. Anyone can visit the site during museum hours free of charge,
where interpretive signage and increased public programming will dramatically increase the
number of people who will learn about pioneer and native life in the area, as outlined on
pages 10-14.
The hardship indicated in point iii would be borne by both the museum and the public for
whom it holds the cabin in trust. It simply cannot be used to its fullest potential at its current
site. Programming is much more difficult and expensive while also less effective at an offsite
location. Maintenance and upkeep costs are higher, as are risks to the building. At the same
time, significantly fewer people, most notably school groups, will see it, learn from it, and
engage with it.
Relocated cabins have been used successfully for education in many parts of the United States.
One example is the Log Cabin Village, owned by the City of Fort Worth, Texas. Here, a number
of 19th century cabins and other structures were moved to a site donated to the city. The cabins
were restored and used to recreate a contemporary village. Interpreters speak with visitors
and demonstrate skills used in that time period. The Log Cabin Village was recognized for its
role in preserving history in 2019, when it received the Texas Star Award. A similar site is the
Pioneer Schoolhouse Museum, maintained by the Ephraim Historical Foundation in Ephraim,
Wisconsin. Buildings such as the Olga Dana Green and Goodleston Cabin were moved to the
site of the Pioneer Schoolhouse, and the site has been awarded the State Historical Society
of Wisconsin Achievement Award. Other examples include the Francis Stupey Log Cabin
in Highland Park, Illinois, owned by the Highland Park Historical Society. The cabin was
constructed in 1847 and is the oldest building in the city. It was moved to the grounds of
Sensible Change (cont’d)
23
Sensible Change (cont’d)
Exmoor in 1968 to be used as an interpretive site. The Torian Cabin Museum was originally
built in 1845 along a creek near Dove, Texas. It was saved in the 1970s by the Grapevine
Historical Society and City of Grapevine, and moved to a lot near Grapevine City Hall, where
it is maintained as a pioneer museum. It is now recorded as a Texas Historic Landmark. In
fact, another Navarre Cabin, built by Pierre’s relative Peter Navarre, was moved to the Toledo
Botanical Garden as the centerpiece of an interpretive pioneer garden.
At the HPC meeting of February 17, 2020, legal counsel led ethics training for the
commissioners. During this training, it was explained that the commission’s primary
prerogative is not to enforce previously defined rules. It is to know when there are exceptions
and to use good judgment to make decisions that are in the best interest of the community
as a whole. Aside from the increased exposure to the community, education impact with
schools, and increased economic impact from tourism, we also find that the project has broad
public support. The museum held three well-publicised forums in September, 2023, as well as
one larger one in 2020, where the plan was presented and staff solicited input and answered
many questions from attendees. Many were enthusiastic, and a handful who were unsure
left reassured after learning more about the project. In the end, feedback was unanimously
positive from the 100+ attendees, and some have even taken it upon themselves to start
petitions in support among their colleagues and
neighbors. This has also been true in phone calls,
e-mails, and personal conversations outside the
forums. Though we understand that with any
change in the community there are certain to
be individuals who are not in favor, we welcome
the chance for dialogue and to be able to address
and incorporate their concerns as well. In the
end, we believe this project is in the best interest
of the community as a whole, and it is our hope
that these materials have shown that this is a
case where an exception is appropriate, so that
we might best use the Navarre Cabin to its
full potential. Travis Childs, then Director of School Programming,
educates children at Cabin Days
24
Appendix A
The Navarre Cabin as a Local Landmark
It is notable that in the materials included in the 1996 ordinance establishing Leeper Park as a
Local Historic Landmark (8734-96), the Historic Preservation Commission’s recommendation
lists the cabin as an already established designated Local Landmark. This attribution comes
from a 1988 Common Council Resolution (1602-88), for which there remains a plaque on the
structure itself. As the cabin had been moved several times at that point, it seems that the
status was conferred on the merits of the structure and not the location. As official Local
Historic Landmark Status requires an ordinance, the museum commits to submission
of an application for such status within 30 days of COA approval. It is our hope that as the
Commission previously felt the cabin worthy of this status outside of its original location that
this would be again carried forward.
Plaque on the Navarre Cabin indicating its status
25
Appendix B
Details on Moving - Lykowski Construction
26
Appendix B: Details on Moving (cont’d)
Lykowski Construction has a long history of moving historic homes in the city of South
Bend. Due to the nature of the cabin, its removal from the site is expected to be relatively
straightforward, as the building can be moved intact. Though they are not original to the
home, every effort will be made to re-use the current stone piers and steps, and if not possible
they will be recreated as closely as possible. Tim Lykowski of Lykowski Construction is
available for any other questions regarding the move.
The voids left underneath the site will be graded and seeded, with oversight from SBVPA. In
the event that grass or other features are inadvertently damaged, The History Museum will
include their repair in the remediation of the site. The design of the intended marker is hoped
to be complete by the time of the move, and the site will be prepared accordingly, or otherwise
left as a seamless part of the landscape until the marker can be installed.
Lykowski Construction moving the Remedy Building
27
Appendix C
Notes on Ownership
Though the Pierre Navarre Cabin is said to have been donated to the Northern Indiana
Historical Society in 1895, unfortunately the Society did not begin keeping records on
donations until the 1920s, when a large backlog of records were entered into the Society’s
accession books. We were able to locate several references to the NIHS’s ownership in local
publications between 1895 and 1910. These include:
Timothy Howard’s A History of St. Joseph County, Volume 1, dated 1907
“The log house built by Navarre in 1820, which was the first fur trading station in St. Joseph
county, and where this pioneer and his household, half white and half Indiana, so long
resided, has been preserved to this day. It was presented by the proprietors of Navarre Place to
the Northern Indiana Historical Society, and by the society removed to Leeper park, where it is
cared for by the city of South Bend as its most venerable historic relic.” (p. 131)
Charles H. Bartlett’s Navarre Place booklet, dated ca. 1895 (may be slightly later)
“Navarre Place derives its name from the fact that in this locality was the home of Pierre
Frieschutz Navarre, the white man whose presence here as long ago as 1820 marks the very
beginning of the annals of our city. His residence, a substantial and well preserved log house,
has survived to this day and has been given to the Northern Indiana Historical Society.” (p. 3)
“Pierre Navarre’s Log Cabin.” South Bend Tribune, June 28, 1902
“The laying out of the grounds on North Michigan Street where the water works pumping
station is situated into a public park has revived the project of preserving that interesting
relic, the log cabin home of South Bend’s first white settler, which is now doing menial duty
as a stable in the Leeper brick yard. The christening of the new park with the name of Leeper
makes it all the more an appropriate place for this historic structure, and there is little doubt
but the board of public works would give it a conspicuous location and that its removal could
be accomplished with very little expense. The Historical society agitated the subject several
years ago and the late Hon. D. R. Leeper, then a prominent member, promised to help along
the movement by furnishing the building as a gift to the society.”
SARAH ANDREWS
PRESIDENT
A CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
ADAM TOERING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATOR
EXCELLENCE | ACCOUNTABILITY | INNOVATION | INCLUSION | EMPOWERMENT
1400S County-City Building | 227 W. Jefferson Blvd. | South Bend, Indiana 46601 | p 574.235.9371 | f 574.235.9201 | southbendin.gov
LETTERS OF SUPPORT
(WILL NOT BE READ INTO RECORD)
From:G Margaret Porter
To:DL-Historic Preservation
Subject:Pierre Navarre Cabin
Date:Thursday, November 2, 2023 12:31:37 PM
Dear Members of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St.
Joseph County,
I"m writing to you in support of the proposed move of the Pierre Navarre Cabin
from its current location in Leeper Park to the campus of the History Museum.
While I understand that the current location is closer to the original location of
the cabin and that Leeper Park is on the National Register of Historic Places I
believe that a move to the Museum campus would be for the greater good.
The preservation of the Navarre Cabin for current and future citizens of South Bend
and Saint Joseph county is important. The proposed location would be a more
secure area for the cabin than the rather isolated spot in the east side of Leeper Park.
Many of us remember the vandalism and arson that befell the Powell house located
just feet from the Navarre cabin. Certainly the Museum campus would be a
more secure location where a structure of this age and historical significance can be
preserved and protected. Field trips for school children are not taking place since
the location is so close to the river which makes it difficult for teachers and parents
to keep large groups safe. Bus parking is limited and the location does not have
restrooms, which is also a deterrent to bringing large groups of young children. The
city parks department has no plans for improvements in this area of the park.
The Museum campus offers several opportunities for historical education in a safe
environment. The educational value of the cabin's history and the history of the
early Pokagons in this area will be enhanced by the Native American artifacts
housed in the History Museum. The proximity to the African American
Worker's house will offer another view of how people lived as would the Oliver
Mansion and its historical gardens.
While I truly believe we should be vigilant in the preservation of historical
buildings and their environments, I am mindful of the need to make history
accessible and safe for all current and future citizens of a community. The
proposed Museum campus location would accomplish that and I encourage you to
be supportive of the History Museum's goals to make historical education and
preservation priorities.
Sincerely,
G.Margaret Porter
4325 Garden Oak Drive
South Bend, IN 46628
SARAH ANDREWS
PRESIDENT
A CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT
OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
ADAM TOERING
HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATOR
EXCELLENCE | ACCOUNTABILITY | INNOVATION | INCLUSION | EMPOWERMENT
1400S County-City Building | 227 W. Jefferson Blvd. | South Bend, Indiana 46601 | p 574.235.9371 | f 574.235.9201 | southbendin.gov
LETTERS IN OPPOSITION
(WILL NOT BE READ INTO RECORD)
1
Adam Toering
From:Gabriel Radle <gabrielradle@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, October 17, 2023 10:07 AM
To:DL-Historic Preservation
Subject:Objection to moving Navarre Cabin
To whom it may concern,
I am writing as a neighbor of Leeper Park with the request that you deny the Museum's attempts to move the cabin
away from our neighborhood.
Notwithstanding that the cabin's current location is not original, the cabin was originally close to the travel/trade route
of St Joseph River, and taking it away from proximity to the river destroys that historical connection. Furthermore, the
cabin is currently an anchor of both beauty and history on the east section of Leeper Park. If you take away the cabin,
you take away one of the most charming aspects of the park.
Finally, by removing a piece of history from the natural green environment that Pierre Navarre himself would have
known, and moving into the sterile environment of a museum's grounds, the cabin will no longer be a part of daily visual
access for the thousands of people who drive along Michigan Ave. daily and admire the cabin within the beautiful
natural setting of Leeper Park.
PLEASE SAY NO to the Museum's attempts to destroy our heritage under the pretence of trying to preserve it. This is a
false preservation project that only serves the museum's well-intended goals but without full consideration of the many
ramifications.
Thank you for your consideration,
Gabriel Radle
1
Adam Toering
From:Nina Glibetic <ninaglibetic@gmail.com>
Sent:Tuesday, October 17, 2023 2:19 PM
To:DL-Historic Preservation
Subject:Pierre Navarre cabin
Dear Historic Preservation board,
Recent news reports show that the History Museum wants to move the cabin of Pierre Navarre away from the river and
Leeper Park and put it on its own property. They claim they can use it more for education purposes on their property.
Pierre Navarre was a fur trader and also married a Native American woman. He lived in close proximity to the river, both
for commercial reasons and also because of the long establishment of Native American settlements along the river
basin. By moving the county's oldest house away from Leeper Park, we would erase all those connections to our history,
including our Native American past and its intimate connection to the river. We've already lost so much of that past.
Please conserve this home in the natural surrounding in which it belongs.
If the Museum wants to do displays about 19th century living, that is great. But they can do that in their current
museum, or build a replica if they so desire. The initiatives of the museum should not come at the cost of removing the
Navarre cabin away from Leeper Park.
Thank you for your consideration.
Nina Glibetic