HomeMy WebLinkAbout04.03.23 BZA Agenda Packet
1 | P a g e
City of South Bend
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
AGENDA
Monday, April 3, 2023 - 4:00 p.m.
County-City Building
Fourth-Floor Council Chambers
www.tinyurl.com/sbbza
PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Location: 1021 and 1025 THOMAS ST BZA#0180-23
Owner: YAKIRA MCLEOD
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the maximum one detached accessory structure to two
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
2. Location: 2618 DUNHAM ST BZA#0182-23
Owner: KANKAKEE WETLANDS ORGANIC GARDENS INC
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) To allow an accessory structure on a lot without a primary structure;
2) From the maximum one detached accessory structure to two
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
3. Location: 2046 SOUTH BEND AVE BZA#0184-23
Owner: DEV H12 LLC
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 15' maximum sign height to 18'-4"
Zoning: C Commercial
4. Location: 3202 PLEASANT ST BZA#0187-23
Owner: CARL EVERETT
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 3' maximum fence height in an established corner yard to 6'
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
5. Location: 502 SAMPLE BZA#0188-23
Owner: BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) To allow parking in the established front yard
Zoning: U3 Urban Neighborhood 3
City of South Bend BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
2 | P a g e
6. Location: 1330 HIGH ST, 1306 HIGH ST & 909 E BROADWAY ST BZA#0183-23
Owner: RED TAIL PROPERTIES LLC
Requested Action:
Special Exception: Heavy Industrial
Zoning: I Industrial
7. Location: 439 DUNDEE ST BZA#0185-23
Owner: REDDLINE PROPERTY LLC
Requested Action:
Special Exception: a 2 Unit Dwelling
Zoning: U1 Urban Neighborhood 1
8. Location: 1602 MICHIGAN ST BZA#0186-23
Owner: JMJ GROUP LLC
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) to allow parking in the established corner yard
Special Exception: a Group Residence
Zoning: NC Neighborhood Center
9. Location: 1910 LINCOLNWAY BZA#0148-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 300 sq.ft. maximum sign surface area for an off-premise sign to 494.5 sq.ft.
Zoning: C Commercial
10. Location: 1072 LINCOLNWAY BZA#0149-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 300 sq.ft. maximum sign surface area for an off-premise sign to 494.5 sq.ft.;
2) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premise signs to 15';
3) From the 300' minimum radial spacing between off-premise signs to 102';
4) From the 100’ minimum radial spacing to a residential use or U3 District to 75’
Zoning: C Commercial
11. Location: 1704 LINCOLNWAY BZA#0150-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premise signs to 450';
2) From the 200' minimum linear spacing to a school to 0';
3) From the 100' minimum radial spacing to a residential use or U2 District to 30'
Zoning: C Commercial
City of South Bend BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
3 | P a g e
12. Location: 208 SAMPLE ST BZA#0152-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premise signs to 465'
Zoning: C Commercial
13. Location: 2713 BENDIX DR BZA#0153-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 300 sq.ft. maximum sign surface area for an off-premise sign to 494.5 sq.ft.;
2) From the 200' minimum linear spacing to residential use or U1 District to 0'
Zoning: I Industrial
14. Location: 259 N LOGAN ST BZA#0178-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 200' minimum linear spacing to residential use or 21 District to 13';
2) From the 100' minimum radial spacing to a residential use or S1 District to 13';
3) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premises signs to 0';
4) From the 300’ minimum radial spacing between off-premise signs to 65’
Zoning: C Commercial
15. Location: 323 SHERIDAN ST BZA#0179-23
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Requested Action:
Variance(s):
1) From the 10' minimum front setback to 0'
Zoning: C Commercial
ITEMS NOT REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Findings of Fact – March 6, 2023
2. Minutes – March 6, 2023
3. Other Business
4. Adjournment
NOTICE FOR HEARING AND SIGN IMPAIRED PERSONS
Auxiliary Aid or other services may be available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable
advance request when possible.
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0180-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 1021 and 1025 THOMAS ST
Owner: YAKIRA MCLEOD
Project Summary
Allow an accessory structure in the front yard.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the maximum one detached accessory structure to two
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variance as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0180-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0180-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The proposed variance is out of character with the area, which may impact the general
welfare of the community.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The proposed variance is out of character for this area, which could have an impact on the
value of surrounding properties. Houses in this neighborhood only have one accessory
structure that is located at the rear of their properties. The property owner already has a
large accessory structure in the rear of the property.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would not result in practical difficulties in
the use of the property. The residential use is not impacted by the number of accessory
structures.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
Since there is no practical difficulty to overcome, the variance requested is not the minimum
necessary. The new structure could be moved and attached to the existing accessory
structure.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
There is no hardship on the property. Had the applicant applied for a building permit, they
would have been made aware of the applicable regulations.
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties for the petitioner that would necessitate the
additional accessory structure. The proposed variance is out of character for the area and not
consistent with the intent of the Ordinance.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variance as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0182-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 2618 DUNHAM ST
Owner: KANKAKEE WETLANDS ORGANIC GARDENS INC
Project Summary
Build a larger shed next to the existing shed.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) To allow an accessory structure on a lot without a primary structure
2) From the maximum one detached accessory structure to two
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
approve variance 1) to allow an accessory structure on a lot without a primary structure, and;
deny variance 2) for the second accessory structure.
Staff Report – BZA#0182-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0182-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The proposed variance is out of character with the area, which may impact the general
welfare of the community.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The construction of an additional accessory structure could adversely affect the use and
value of the adjacent properties. Allowing an additional structure without a practical difficulty
could set a precedence for more in the area, thus affecting the value of properties in the
area.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties in the use of
the property. There is nothing unique about the property that creates difficulty in the
agricultural use of the property, and allowing two (2) accessory structures will not help in the
administration of the property as an agricultural endeavor.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
Since there is no practical difficulty to overcome, the variance requested is not the minimum
necessary. The desired outcome could be achieved with a single, larger structure or they
could add on to the existing shed in compliance with the Ordinance.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
There is no hardship on the property to correct.
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties for the petitioner which would necessitate a second
accessory structure at this location. The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would not
result in practical difficulties in the use of the property and the proposed accessory structure
would not be consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The petitioner's property can still be
secured by removing the existing structure and building new or adding on to the existing
structure.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board approve variance 1) to allow an accessory structure on a lot
without a primary structure, and; deny variance 2) for the second accessory structure.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0184-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 2046 SOUTH BEND AVE
Owner: DEV H12 LLC
Project Summary
Relocate the existing sign with the proper setback.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 15' maximum sign height to 18'-4"
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hear, the Staff recommends the Board
approve the variance as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0184-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0184-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
With the appropriate 5' setback, the sign should not be injurious to the general welfare of the
community. While the proposed sign is slightly taller than what is allowed by the Ordinance,
it is not out of character for the area.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The property is located along a commercial corridor. The proposed sign should not
adversely impact the use or value of adjacent properties.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Prior to construction, the property was graded to respond to both the change in elevation of
the property and street. The result is a change in elevation at the same corner of the
property where the sign is located. Moving the sign to another location, away from the drive,
would create a traffic safety issue. The property is located on a curve in the road. The slight
increase helps align the sign within the line of site of motorist traveling northeast on SR-23.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance requested is the minimum necessary to address the hardship created by the
elevation change and curve of the road. The sign structure itself is 13'-6". Installing the sign
at the 5' setback places it on an incline, which is what results in the required variance.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
The curvature of the road and change in road elevation are not self-created.
Analysis: The site is located on a busy commercial corridor, just past a significant curve. The
proposed variance is not out of character for the area and meets the general intent of the
Ordinance.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hear, the Staff
recommends the Board approve the variance as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0187-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 3202 PLEASANT ST
Owner: CARL EVERETT
Project Summary
Installation of a privacy fence in the corner yard.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 3' maximum fence height in an established corner yard to 6'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variance as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0187-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0187-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Allowing a fence in an established corner yard at this height could be injurious to the general
welfare of community because it will be out of character and will not meet the intent of the
ordinance.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property could be affected in an adverse
manner if the variance was granted. Approving a fence that is 6' tall on top of a hill that is
already above grade would create a large enclosed space that would be out of character for
the area and contrary to the intent of the ordinance, having an impact on surrounding
properties.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties in the use of
the property. A shorter, code compliant fence can provide security and privacy of the
property, especially because the site is already elevated from the public sidewalk.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
Since there is no practical difficulty to overcome, the variance requested is not the minimum
necessary. The petitioner could install the fence in compliance with the ordinance and still
retain about the same amount of usable yard space with the desired privacy.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
There is no hardship on the property. The fence was installed without the appropriate
permit. If a permit was requested before the fence was installed, the property owner would
have been aware of the development standards.
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties for the petitioner that would necessitate a 6' fence in
this location. The proposed fence is not consistent with the intent of the ordinance. The site is
already elevated above the street. A code compliant fence could provide the security and
privacy desired by the applicant.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variance as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0188-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 502 SAMPLE
Owner: BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY
Project Summary
Interior remodel of existing facility, with expansion of existing parking lot to the North to allow for
improved bus drop off and student safety.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) To allow parking in the established front yard
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
approve the variance, as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0188-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0188-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The approval of the variance should not be injurious to the public health, safety or general
welfare of the community. The expansion will allow for better circulation of the buses on site,
which will create a safer drop off for the school and the traffic along Fellows St.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
With proper screening, the use and value of the area adjacent should not be affected in an
adverse manner. The parking currently exists in the established front yard, the variance will
allow for a reconfiguration and the addition of approximately 20 more parking spaces. The
variance would allow improved circulation.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the Ordinance could result in practical difficulties in the use of the
property. The parking is already located in the front yard with no drive access to the
side/rear of the building. The majority of the parking impacted are ADA spaces that are
required to be near the door.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance is the minimum necessary to provide accessible parking on the site, and
improve safety during drop-off.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
The variance does not correct a hardship caused by the current owner. When the site was
developed, the parking lot was established legally under the active Zoning Ordinance at the
time.
Analysis: The parking currently exists in the established front yard. The variance will allow for a
reconfiguration and the addition of a bus drop off area. The variance should reduce the impact
to the surrounding properties by improving site circulation. When the site was developed, the
parking lot was established legally under the active Zoning Ordinance at the time.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board approve the variance, as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0183-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 1306, 1330 HIGH ST, & 909 E BROADWAY ST
Owner: RED TAIL PROPERTIES LLC
Project Summary
Vehicle towing, dismantling and auto repair. 2 fenced in lots on property for storage of vehicles.
Requested Action
Special Exception: Heavy Industrial
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
send the petition to the Common Council with an unfavorable recommendation.
Staff Report – BZA#0183-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0183-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
A Special Use may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon the
evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
The proposed use could be injurious to the public healthy, safety and general welfare of the
community. The area is largely residential with small scale commercial surrounding the
immediate property. Auto services and repair would be allowed by right, however, those
services would be performed inside the buildings with restrictions on how long vehicles can
remain on the lot.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
The proposed use could adversely affect the use and values of the adjacent properties and
area. Heavy Industrial uses are not appropriate when adjacent to or located within a
residential neighborhood. Heavy Industrial uses can have a negative impact on future
residential development.
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
The proposed use of Heavy Industrial is not consistent with the character of the surrounding
neighborhood. The site is zoned I Industrial but Heavy Industrial is not appropriate located in
the middle of a neighborhood.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The proposed use is not compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Southeast Neighborhood Master Plan (2015) specifically states this location should be
a mixed use community center to expand upon LangLab and the amenities offered to the
neighborhood.
Analysis: Heavy Industrial uses are not appropriate when adjacent to, or located within, a
residential neighborhood. The area is largely residential with small scale commercial
surrounding the immediate property
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board send the petition to the Common Council with an unfavorable
recommendation.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Special Exception
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 3
Staff Report – BZA#0185-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 439 DUNDEE ST
Owner: REDDLINE PROPERTY LLC
Project Summary
Request a special exception to allow for the use of a duplex.
Requested Action
Special Exception: a 2 Unit Dwelling
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff recommends the Board
send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation, as presented.
Staff Report – BZA#0185-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 3
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0185-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 3
A Special Use may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon the
evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
Approval of the Special Exception will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals,
and general welfare of the community. The loss of population - a decline of approximately
26% - that the neighborhood has experienced over the past 60 years has led to a decrease
in the stability and general welfare of the community. The neighborhood has seen a decline
of over 120 households over this same period. Stabilizing both the population and the
number of households is vital to the future of the neighborhood. Renovating the building will
add more residents to the neighborhood, which will increase safety and general welfare.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
Adding an additional unit to an existing building should not injure or adversely affect the use
or value of the adjacent area or property values, provided the current residential character is
maintained. Renovation of the building should strengthen nearby property values and
prevent the building from deteriorating.
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
The two unit dwelling will be consistent with the character of the district and neighborhood in
both use and style of construction. Given that the house has two entry doors suggests it
might have been used as a two unit dwelling at some time in the past. There is a two unit
dwelling in the neighborhood two parcels north of this location.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The petition is consistent with the City Plan, South Bend Comprehensive Plan (2006)
Objective H1.1: Encourage residential developments to contain a mix of housing types,
densities, price ranges, and amenities.
Analysis: The conversion and rehab of a current one unit dwelling to a two unit dwelling will
further complement the existing housing stock in the surrounding area and be visually
indistinguishable from nearby one unit dwellings. The proposed use will provide more housing
options for residents.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the staff
recommends the Board send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable
recommendation, as presented.
Analysis & Recommendation
Criteria for Decision Making: Special Exception
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0186-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 1602 MICHIGAN ST
Owner: JMJ GROUP LLC
Project Summary
Request a special exception to allow for the use of a Group Residence.
Requested Action
Special Exception: a Group Residence
Variance(s): 1) to allow parking in the established corner yard
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable recommendation. The Staff
recommends the Board deny the variance as presented.
Staff Report – BZA#0186-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0186-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
A Special Use may only be granted upon making a written determination, based upon the
evidence presented at a public hearing, that:
(1) The proposed use will not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort,
community moral standards, convenience or general welfare;
The proposed use should not be injurious to the public health, safety, comfort or general
welfare of the community. A group residence aligns with the residential character of the
immediate surrounding properties. The property is located on a mixed use corridor with
several commercial uses nearby.
(2) The proposed use will not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values therein;
The proposed use should not injure or adversely affect the use of the adjacent area or
property values. The property will still function as a residential dwelling unit, which will
prevent a vacant building from existing in the area.
(3) The proposed use will be consistent with the character of the district in which it is
located and the land uses authorized therein;
This group residence will be consistent with the character of the district and neighborhood in
both use and style of construction. South Michigan is a mixed use corridor. The current
structure is large residential building suitable for multiple individuals.
(4) The proposed use is compatible with the recommendations of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The petition is consistent with the City Plan, South Bend Comprehensive Plan (2006)
Objective H1.1: Encourage residential developments to contain a mix of housing types,
densities, price ranges, and amenities.
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
The proposed variance is out of character with the area, which may impact the general
welfare of the community. The approval of this variance may not be injurious to the public
health or safety of the community as long as site visibility at the curb cut is preserved.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property could be affected in an adverse
manner if the variance was granted. Approving parking in the corner yard, would be out of
character for the area and contrary to the intent of the ordinance, having a significant impact
on surrounding properties.
Criteria for Decision Making: Special Exception
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0186-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would not result in practical difficulties in
the use of the property. There is parking provided at the rear of the property as well as on
street parking along Indiana Ave and Michigan St.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
Since there is no practical difficulty to overcome, the variance requested is not the minimum
necessary. When a Special Exception is requested it is understood that the whole site will
be brought into conformance. The petitioner could utilize the parking provided at the rear of
the site or the on street parking without needing to park in the corner/front yard.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
The variance would not correct a hardship caused by the current owner, however, with the
request of the Special Exception the parking can be established in a code compliant location
on site.
Analysis: Granting the Special Exception will allow for a residential use, which will prevent a
vacant building from existing in the area. South Michigan St. is a commercial corridor with a mix
of commercial intensities along the surrounding stretch. The property is currently zoned for
multifamily use which would allow for an apartment complex. The dwelling is consistent with the
character of the district in the housing style. When a Special Exception is requested it is
understood that the whole site will be brought into conformance. The petitioner could utilize the
parking provided at the rear of the site or the on street parking without needing to park in the
corner/front yard.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information provided prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board send the petition to the Common Council with a favorable
recommendation. The Staff recommends the Board deny the variance as presented.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0148-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 1910 LINCOLNWAY
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Project Summary
Alteration of an off-premise sign.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 300 sq.ft. maximum sign surface area for an off-premise sign to 494.5 sq.ft.
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variance as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0148-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0148-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variance could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting a variance will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
a variance for a legal nonconforming sign that exceeds the maximum area allowed would be
contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the welfare of the
community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The surrounding area is primarily commercial and industrial, so the value of surrounding
properties at this location may not be impacted.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of a variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an
accessory use not related to the use of the property. The petitioner could display an off-
premise sign in this location at the maximum 300 sq.ft., which would still allow for one
portion of the structure to remain.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance granted is not the minimum necessary. There are no practical difficulties on
the property that would result in the petitioners inability to abide by the Ordinance.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the property owner. There are not other hardships or
practical difficulties associated with the property.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0148-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for the variance. Allowing a
variance for a sign that exceeds the maximum area allowed would be contrary to the intent of
the Ordinance and could be injurious to the welfare of the community.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variance as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0149-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 1072 LINCOLNWAY
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY, SLM MANAGEMENT LLC
Project Summary
Alteration of an off-premise sign
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 300 sq.ft. maximum sign surface area for an off-premise sign to 494.5
sq.ft.; 2) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premise signs to 15'; 3) From the 300'
minimum radial spacing between off-premise signs to 102'; 4) From the 100' minimum radial
spacing to a residential use or U3 District to 75'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variances as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0149-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0149-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variances could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting variances will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
variances for a legal nonconforming sign that exceeds the maximum area allowed and does
not meet the spacing requirements would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and
could be injurious to the welfare of the community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
Separation requirements between off-premise signs, and from other districts or uses, are
specifically designed to eliminate excess signs and improve the appearance of the City.
Granting the variance could adversely impact the use and value of the property by impairing
future development or limiting its ability to bring the site into conformance with current
development standards, such as landscaping or building placement.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of a variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The spacing requirements are a
critical element for off-premise signs, because they function as a second use on the property
(i.e. they are not accessory to the primary use). In setting spacing requirements between
other off-premise signs, specific districts, and specific uses, the City is stating they are not
appropriate in locations that do not meet these criteria.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variances requested are not the minimum necessary. There is no justification for a sign
that exceeds the maximum 300 sq.ft., which would still allow for one portion of the structure
to remain. Likewise, the petitioner could remove other off-premise signs in the area to
eliminate variances number 2 and 3. The spacing requirements are a critical element for off-
premise signs. By the adoption of the Ordinance, the City has determined signs that do not
meet these requirements should not be permitted.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0149-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the petitioner. There are not other hardships or practical
difficulties associated with the property.
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for the variances. Allowing
variances for a sign that exceeds the maximum area allowed and does not meet the minimum
separation requirements established would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could
be injurious to the welfare of the community.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variances as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0150-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 1704 LINCOLNWAY
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Project Summary
Alteration of an off-premise sign.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premise signs to 450'
2) From the 200' minimum linear spacing to a school to 0'
3) From the 100' minimum radial spacing to a residential use or U2 District to 30'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variances as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0150-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0150-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variances could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting variances will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
variances for a legal nonconforming sign that does not meet the minimum spacing
requirements would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the
welfare of the community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
Separation requirements between off-premise signs, and from other districts or uses, are
specifically designed to eliminate excess signs and improve the appearance of the City.
Granting the variance could adversely impact the use and value of the property by impairing
future development or limiting its ability to bring the site into conformance with current
development standards, such as landscaping or building placement. The spacing
requirements are a critical element for off-premise signs. By the adoption of the Ordinance,
the City has determined off-premise signs that do not meet these requirements should not
be permitted. The sign being located without meeting the minimum spacing requirements
could affect the use and value of the residential property to the south.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of a variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an
accessory use not related to the use of the property.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of a variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an
accessory use not related to the use of the property. There are other properties zoned C
Commercial where the sign could be placed without violating the spacing requirements.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0150-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the petitioner. There are not other hardships or practical
difficulties associated with the property.
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for a variances. Allowing
variances for a sign that does not meet the minimum separation requirements established would
be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the welfare of the
community.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variances as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0152-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 208 SAMPLE ST
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Project Summary
Alteration of off-premise sign.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 750' minimum linear spacing between off-premise signs to 465'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variance as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0152-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0152-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variance could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting a variance will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
a variance for a legal nonconforming sign that does not meet the minimum separation
requirements would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the
welfare of the community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The surrounding area is primarily commercial and industrial, so the value of surrounding
properties at this location may not be impacted. However, the sign may adversely impact
any future development and use of the site.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of a variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an
accessory use not related to the use of the property.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance requested is not the minimum necessary. The petitioner could remove a
nearby off-premise signs in the area in order to meet the minimum spacing requirements.
The spacing requirements are a critical element for off-premise signs. By the adoption of the
Ordinance, the City has determined off-premise signs that do not meet these requirements
should not be permitted.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the petitioner. There are not other hardships or practical
difficulties associated with the property.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0152-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for the variance. Allowing a
variance for a sign that exceeds the minimum spacing requirements would be contrary to the
intent of the Ordinance and Could be injurious to the welfare of the community.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variance as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0153-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 2713 BENDIX DR
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Project Summary
Alteration of an off-premise sign
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 300 sq.ft. maximum sign surface area for an off-premise sign to 494.5 sq.ft.
2) From the 200' minimum linear spacing to residential use or U1 District to 0'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variances as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0153-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0153-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variances could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting variances will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
variances for a legal nonconforming sign that exceeds the maximum area allowed and does
not meet the separation requirements would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and
could be injurious to the welfare of the community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
While the west side of Bendix is primarily commercial and industrial, the east side of Bendix
in this area is single family residential. The City has recently made an effort to minimize the
impact of Bendix on the use and value of the adjacent properties by reducing the number of
travel lanes and adding sidewalk. Legalizing a sign in a location without meeting the spacing
requirement adopted in the South Bend Zoning Ordinance would be detrimental to the
efforts being made by the City to improve the use and value of the adjacent properties.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an accessory
use not related to the use of the property.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variances requested are not the minimum necessary. There is no justification for a sign
that exceeds the maximum 300 sq.ft Also, the spacing requirements are a critical element
for off-premise signs. By the adoption of the Ordinance, the City has determined off-premise
signs that do not meet these requirements should not be permitted. There are other
industrial or commercial zoned properties where the sign could be placed without violating
the spacing requirements.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0153-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the petitioner. There are not other hardships or practical
difficulties associated with the property.
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for the variances.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variances as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0178-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 259 N LOGAN ST
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Project Summary
Alteration of an off-premise sign.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 200' minimum linear spacing to residential use or 21 District to 13'; 2)
From the 100' minimum radial spacing to a residential use or S1 District to 13'; 3) From the 750'
minimum linear spacing between off-premises signs to 0'; 4) From the 300' minimum radial spacing
between off-premise signs to 65'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variances as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0178-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0178-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variances could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting variances will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
variances for a legal nonconforming sign that does not meet the minimum spacing
requirements would be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the
welfare of the community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
This property is located at a commercial node with residential just to the north. The
proposed variances could negatively impact the value of the property to the north. In
addition, the sign may adversely impact any future development and use of the site.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application would not result in any practical difficulties in the use of the property for
commercial purposes. The primary commercial use of the property can remain without the
approval of a variances to allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an
accessory use not related to the use of the property. With the other off-premise sign at the
same quadrant of the intersection, the petitioner would still have the ability to advertise at
this location even if the sign in question was removed.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance requested is not the minimum necessary. The spacing requirements are a
critical element for off-premise signs. By the adoption of the Ordinance, the City has
determined off-premise signs that do not meet these requirements should not be permitted.
There is no practical difficulty that warrants the requested variances.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the property owner. There are not other hardships or
practical difficulties associated with the property.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0178-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for the variances. Allowing
variances for a sign that does not meet the minimum spacing requirements would be contrary to
the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the welfare of the community.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variances as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 1 of 4
Staff Report – BZA#0179-23 April 3, 2023
Property Information
Location: 323 SHERIDAN ST
Owner: LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
Project Summary
Alteration of an off-premise sign.
Requested Action
Variance(s): 1) From the 10' minimum front setback to 0'
Site Location
Staff Recommendation
Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the Staff recommends the Board
deny the variance as requested.
Staff Report – BZA#0179-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 2 of 4
Proposed Site Plan
Staff Report – BZA#0179-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 3 of 4
State statutes and the Zoning Ordinance require that certain standards must be met before a
variance can be approved. The standards and their justifications are as follows:
(1) The approval will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community
Approval of the variance could be injurious to the community because it would legalize a
sign not otherwise permitted, and violate the intent of the Ordinance. The intent of the sign
regulations include eliminating excessive and confusing sign displays, improving the
appearance of the city, enhancing property values by minimizing the possible adverse
effects of signs, protecting the public and private investment in building and open space,
and eliminating potential hazards to motorist and pedestrians resulting from signs. The legal
nonconforming provision of the Ordinance state that the intent it to allow legally established
to remain, but not encourage their survival. Granting a variance will legalize the sign and
allow it remain indefinitely, even allowing it to be completely replaced in the future. Granting
a variance for a legal nonconforming sign that does not meet the minimum setbacks would
be contrary to the intent of the Ordinance and could be injurious to the welfare of the
community, and potentially the safety as well.
(2) The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will
not be affected in a substantially adverse manner
The surrounding area is primarily commercial and industrial, so the value of surrounding
properties at this location may not be impacted.
(3) The strict application of the terms of this Chapter would result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property
Strict application of the terms of the Ordinance would not result in practical difficulties. The
primary commercial use of the property can remain without the approval of a variances to
allow for an off-premise sign. The off-premise sign is an accessory use not related to the use
of the property. There appears to be adequate room on the property to install the sign at a
code compliant location.
(4) The variance granted is the minimum necessary
The variance requested is not the minimum necessary. There is no justification for a sign
that does not meet the setback requirements of the Ordinance. If a survey is conducted that
shows the leading edge of the sign meets the 10' setback, no variance is needed. The sign
may be able to be modified to meet the setback, or installed at a code compliant location.
(5) The variance does not correct a hardship cause by a former or current owner of
the property
Because the sign was changed as part of a rebranding and not as normal maintenance or
repair, the hardship is created by the petitioner. There are not other hardships or practical
difficulties associated with the property.
Criteria for Decision Making: Variance(s)
Staff Report – BZA#0179-23 April 3, 2023
SOUTH BEND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Page 4 of 4
Analysis: There are no practical difficulties that warrant the request for the variance. Allowing a
variance for a sign that does not meet the minimum setback would be contrary to the intent of
the Ordinance and could be injurious to the welfare of the community.
Staff Recommendation: Based on the information available prior to the public hearing, the
Staff recommends the Board deny the variance as requested.
Analysis & Recommendation