HomeMy WebLinkAboutMentorship Protege 20222022 Mentorship Protégé Program Reporting
During the January 3rd meeting, the IPC board members asked the Office of Diversity and
Inclusion to provide some measurable outcomes from the 2022 Mentorship Protégé initiative.
Because there was no system in place to track success or the lack there of, results were not
delivered in the meeting. This document serves as an attempt to report on those metrics.
The Mentorship Protégé Program aimed to facilitate the following Prime-Sub matches (Table 1):
2022 Mentorship-Protégé Prime-Subcontractor Pairing
Prime Subcontractor 1 Subcontractor 2 Subcontractor 3
Midland Engineering
Company
MET Construction 1st Class Logistics Acorn
Landscaping
Larson & Danielson
Construction
Jackson Demolition Slusser Green
Thumb Inc
Selge Construction Co.
Inc
Kennedy Expressline 1st Class Logistics
HRP Construction Inc. BUC Construction Modern Edge LLC
Milestone North CNB Construction LLC STAAR Corporation
Indiana Toll Road
Concessions
Commission
Core Bore Indiana LLC MET Construction Vision Branding
Green Demolition 1st Class Logistics Kennedy Expressline
G.E Marshall Slusser Green Thumb
Inc
BUC Construction Acorn
Landscaping
Rieth and Riley
Construction
GTO Masonry Acorn Landscaping
Table 1.
Mentorship-Protégé Participant Subcontractors Involvement with City Contracts
in 2022
Business As Subcontractor As Prime Other
Core Bore Indiana LLC 1 - -
C.N.B . Construction LLC - - -
MET Construction LLC - - -
Vision GPS Branding LLC - - Multiple- city supplies
STAAR Corporation - - -
Jackson Demolition Services - 2 -
1st. Class Logistics LLC 12 - -
GTO Masonry - - -
Kennedy Expressline 5 1 -
BUC Construction 6 - 4- city supplies
Modern Edge LLC - - -
Acorn Landscaping - 3 -
Table 2.
*Numbers represent rate of occurrences
Data shows that out of 12 subcontractor participants in the 2022 mentorship-protégé program,
4 (33.33%) were able to secure contracts as subcontractors and 3 (25%) as primes on city projects (Table
2). 1 acted as both a subcontractor and a prime for such projects. It should be noted that causality
cannot be deducted from this data. Because the mentorship protégé program had no method of
tracking outcome, one cannot say if these contracts were due or facilitated in any way by said program.
It is more realistic to examine the matches made and see how many came to fruition with city
procurement (Table 3).
2022 Mentorship Protégé Program Pairing Reporting
Prime Subcontractor Total Project Award Subcontractor Awarded
GE Marshall Inc BUC Construction $237456,10 $47637,17 (20,1%)
Green Demolition Kennedy Expressline $377220 $11316 (3%)
$179800 $3596 (2%)
Selge Construction Co 1st Class Logistics $246810,33 $6994 (2,83%)
Table 3.
As can be seen from the tables above, more subcontractors participated, but not all of them
worked with the primes the Mentorship-Protégé Program matched them with (Table 2 and 3). It is
possible that more of the prime-subcontractor pairings participated in non-city projects but attempts to
verify such occurrences were unsuccessful.