HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-28-91 Zoning & Vacation 1
ftnmmtttn Report
ZONING AND VACATION COMMITTEE
0!u the (Camman Ulounril of tie Mtn of Ovid!! lamb:
The January 28, 1991 meeting of the Zoning and Vacation
Committee was called to order by its Chairperson, Council
Member Lee Slavinskas, at 4 :45 p.m. in the Council Informal
Meeting Room.
Persons in attendance included Council Members Zakrzewski,
Duda, Coleman, Luecke, Niezgodski, Soderberg, Puzzello,
Slavinskas, and Ladewski; John Byorni, James Cook, William
Panzica, Michael Dansch, Willy Lott, Michael Dobson, Sheldon
Maxi, Tim Hartzer, James Hall, Jerry Speedy, Don Porter, and
Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand.
The first item on the agenda was to review Substitute Bill
No. 72-90 which would vacate a portion of an East/West alley
South of Mishawaka Avenue.
Council Member Slavinskas noted that Mr. Butch Morgan of
Indiana Michigan Power Company, contacted the Council
Attorney with regard to the Substitute Bill . That Company's
position was to accept the substitute version if they had
the opportunity to have a proper easement agreement
recorded, and if the effective date of the Bill would be
March 1, 1991.
Mr. Sheldon Maxi, one of the Petitioners, then spoke in
favor of the Bill.
Council Member Sean Coleman noted that the Committee should
review the twenty (20) year plan of IUSB in light of how the
plan may effect other alleys in the area.
Council Member Slavinskas noted that the Board of Public
Works recommended favorably the Substitute Bill as set forth
in their letter of January 28, 1991 (attached) .
Following further discussion, Council Member Coleman made a
motion seconded by Council Member Zakrzewski that the
Substitute Bill, which will be amended by the Council
Attorney, be recommended favorably to Council . The motion
passed.
The next item on the agenda was amended Bill 113-90 which is
an alley vacation located near St. Peter Street and Howard
Street.
Mr. Timothy Hartzer, the attorney for the Petitioner, then
briefly updated the Committee. He noted that the Bill was
continued at the last meeting. He noted that Council Members
Puzzello and Coleman met with the residents of the
t r
Page 2
Zoning and Vacation Committee
January 28, 1991
neighborhood last week, to voice their concerns. He state
that in his opinion he did not believe there were proper
grounds for remonstrance to defeat the recommendation of the
Board of Public Works, however he recognizes that the
Council may consider other considerations. He noted that the
Board of Public Works gave favorable approval at its meeting
of December 17, 1990 and no remonstrators were present at
that hearing. He stated that he would be willing to propose
a continuance rather than have the Bill defeated at this
time.
Council Member Ann Puzzello stated that she would like to
see a site plan for the vacant property in question.
Council Member Coleman that he was concerned about the use
of the vacation, and believes that there should be uniform
rules for vacant property. He further stated that his
personal preference was to see single family residential
development and orderly growth in the area.
Council President Niezgodski stated that the Board of Public
Works is a recommending body and that the final authority
rests with the City Council.
Council Member Puzzello stated that she believes that the
proposed vacation would cause a hardship to the neighborhood
and would take on the task of making sure that they were
properly updated and that proper notice of future hearings
be given to them.
The Council Attorney noted that if the Council would
continue the hearing, that it must be made at the request of
the Petitioner in light of State law. Mr. Hartzer agreed to
that request.
Following further discussion, Council Member Luecke made a
motion seconded by Council President Niezgodski, that the
Committee recommend that amended Bill 113-90 be continued
indefinitely. The motion passed.
The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 1-91 which would vacate
an alley south of Lincolnway West by Blaine Avenue.
Mr. Willy E. Lott of 537 Blaine Avenue was present, and
briefly stated his reasons for the vacation. He noted that
he would like to have the alley vacated in order to add an
extension to the garage on the property.
r r
Page 3
Zoning and Vacation Committee
January 28, 1991
Council President Niezgodski stated that the proposed
vacation is within the Second District. He noted that
several persons have contacted him who are opposed to the
vacation. Blaine Avenue is narrow and he does not believe
that the vacation would be in the best interest of the
neighborhood, and especially those who use Cleveland Avenue
and Blaine. Council President Niezgodski then read from the
December 31, 1990 minutes, a paragraph indicating that the
Engineering Department was giving an unfavorable
recommendation (entire report attached) .
In response to questions raised by Council Member Luecke,
Mr. Lott noted that there are two (2) houses which have
usaeble garages and they are both in favor of the proposed
vacation.
Council Member Ladewski questioned whether the alley was
paved or gravel, and whether the Petitioner had sought BZA
approval. Mr. Lott noted that it was not a paved alley, and
that he could not seek BZA approval in light of the fact
that there was not a primary building on the property.
Following further discussion, Council President Niezgodski
made a motion seconded by Council Member Zakrzewski that
Bill No. 1-91 be recommended unfavorably. The motion passed
with Council Member Luecke abstaining. Council Member Luecke
noted that he needed to have further information and was
concerned that a T-alley would be created and that no
turning radius was being requested by the Engineering
Department.
The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 2-91 which would vacate
the first East/West alley north of South Street. Mr. William
A. Panzica, a partner of River Glen South Associates, gave
the presentation. He noted that BZA would not allow a
variance to allow vehicles to back into the alley. He stated
that the alley is paved and that the Petitioner has been
maintaining it for the past two (2) years.
In response to questions raised by Council Member Luecke, it
was noted that the vacation would allow additional
landscaping, and improved ingress and egress to the parking
area.
Following further discussion, Council Member Zakrzewski made
a motion seconded by Council Member Coleman that Bill No. 2-
91 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed.
The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 99-90 which would amend
the zoning for the property located at 18106 Ireland Road.
Page 4
Zoning and Vacation Committee
January 28, 1991
Mr. Michael Dansch of Peirce and Associates represented the
Petitioner, Mr. Norman Melick. He provided a preliminary
site plan (copy attached) . He noted that at the Area Plan
Meeting of December 18, 1990, a favorable recommendation was
given.
Mr. Byorni of the Area Plan Staff also noted that the Staff
gave a favorable recommendation to the proposed rezoning.
In response to a question raised by Council Member
Slavinskas, it was noted that no alcoholic beverages would
be served at this restaurant. Mr. Dansch noted that it would
be a fast-food type of restaurant on Ireland Road. It would
be directly west of the Noble Romans facility. He further
noted that agreements are close to being signed with the
fast-food restaurant, however he could not disclose the name
of the restaurant at this time.
Following further discussion, Council Member Coleman made a
motion seconded by Council Member Luecke that Bill No. 99-90
be recommended favorably to Council. The motion passed.
The Committee then reviewed Bill No. 100-90 which would
amend the Zoning Ordinance for property located at 3900
Lincolnway West.
Mr. Mike W. Dobson gave the presentation. He noted that at
the December 18, 1990 meeting, the Area Plan gave a
favorable recommendation to the proposed rezoning.
Mr. Byorni of the Area Plan Staff, noted that the Staff also
gave a favorable recommendation. He also noted that the
property had been zoned "C" in the past, however that zoning
had lapsed back to "C-1" .
Council President Niezgodski stated that he had shown
pictures of the proposed development at a prior Zoning and
Vacation Committee. He voiced concern in light of people who
have contacted him in opposition to the proposed rezoning.
He noted that they voiced concern with regard to school
children attending Dickenson, St. John the Baptist, and
Coquillard. He also voiced concern over curb cuts with two
(2) being proposed on Lincolnway and the one (1) on
Maplewood. He stated that he would be in support of a
convenience and carwash operation but would be opposed to
another gas station at this location.
The preliminary site plan was then explained to the
Committee upon the request of Council Member Coleman.
Page 5
Zoning and Vacation Committee
January 28, 1991
Council Member Duda stated that she would prefer ingress and
egress off of Lincolnway and not on Maplewood. She also
voiced concern over the fact that the Petitioner had not
received approval yet with regard to the proposed curb-cut
request.
Mr. Dobson stated that the proposed development must have a
gasoline station and that they are locally owned and
operated. He noted that there is currently a delay from the
LaPorte office on the curb-cuts.
Council Member Luecke voiced concern over the fact that
another gasoline station was being proposed at a new
location as opposed to using former sites.
Mr. Dobson stated that underground contamination concerns,
legal concerns, cleanup costs, and the fact that most older
sites are too small, all are factored into their decision to
locate at the proposed site.
Following further discussion, Council President Niezgodski
made a motion seconded by Council Member Zakrzewksi that
Bill No. 100-90 be recommended unfavorably. The motion
failed with the Committee voting 2-2 with Council Member
Luecke abstaining.
Council Member Coleman then made a motion seconded by
Council Member Luecke that Bill No. 100-90 be sent to full
Council without recommendation. The motion passed with a 3-2
vote.
The next item on the agenda was to review Bill No. 101-90
which would amend the zoning for the property located on the
eastside of Portage Road, 385 feet north of Maple Road and
Portage Road intersectin.
Mr. James Cook and three (3) representatives of the Edward
Rose Properties, Inc. of Kalamazoo, Michigan, were present
for the presentation.
Mr. John Byroni noted that the Area Plan gave a favorable
recommendation at it's meeting of December 18, 1990.
Mr. Jim Hall provided a booklet to each of the Committee
Members (copy attached) . Mr. Jerry Speedy, of the Eward Rose
Properties, Inc. , noted that there would be a total of 396
units located on 28 1/2 acres. The units would be 2 1/2 or 3
stories and approximately 2/3 's of the development would be
1-bedroom units, and 1/3 would be 2-bedroom units.
Y
Page 6
Zoning and Vacation Committee
January 28, 1991
Council Member Luecke noted that the Bill would have to be
amended to show a "B" heightened area, since that is what
was acted upon at the Area Plan Commission.
Council Member Zakrzewski questioned what the proposed
rental would be. It was noted that 1-bedrooms would rent for
$425. 00 per month, and 2-bedrooms would rent for $500. 00 per
month. The project would be similar the the Indian Lakes
Development. Council Member Zakrzewski stated that this is
an exciting development, and hoped that there would be
additional development from this Company.
Mr. James Cook stated that the Edward Rose Properties, Inc. ,
builds out of their own accounts and that the City was very
fortunate to have such a quality developer coming to the
City.
Council Member Ladewski questioned whether the development
would be within the Flight Plan of the airport. The
developers were uncertain and advised the Council that they
would have a specific response at this evening's meeting.
Council Member Soderberg inquired as to the type of
construction materials that would be used.
Following further discussion, Council Member Coleman made a
motion seconded by Council Member Zakrzewski that Bill No.
101-90 be recommended favorably to Council. The motion
passed.
Council Member Slavinskas noted that the Petitioner of Bill
No. 102-90 has requested that the Bill be continued until
the February 11th meeting of the Common Council.
There being no further business to come before the
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 6: 07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Council Member Lee Slavinskas, Chairperson
Zoning and Vacation Committee