HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-09-22 Budget Hearing #5-7 Follow-up Questions1200N COUNTY-CITY BUILDING PHONE 574.235.9216
227 W. JEFFERSON BLVD. FAX 574.235.9928
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46601-1830
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, IN JAMES MUELLER, MAYOR
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE
Personnel & Finance Committee: 2022 Budget – Strategic Initiatives
September 10, September 17, and September 22, 2021
Responses to Council Questions
9/10/2021 Meeting Follow-up
Note: Information requested on the City of South Bend Housing Repair Program (location of repaired homes,
reasons for denial, etc.) will be presented to Council at an upcoming planned Residential Neighborhoods Committee
meeting.
Question #1 (President White): How much revenue does the City receive from the Federal Government for the
Human Rights Commission?
Here is the revenue from the last few years:
Subdivision 2018 ACTUAL 2019 ACTUAL 2020 ACTUAL
2021
ORIGINAL
BUDGET
2022
BUDGET
Human Rights-EEOC 64,580 63,960 47,200 68,200 68,200
Human Rights-HUD 10,000 183,100 119,900 75,000 85,000
74,580 247,060 167,100 143,200 153,200
9/17/2021 Meeting Follow-up
Question #2 (Vice President McBride): Can the Council members be provided a map showing which
neighborhoods and neighborhood associations are in TIF districts?
The map of TIF districts is copied below (and can also be found online here:
https://southbend.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=b71acfe377144a1e844f42a4bf0b04bd)
Page 2 of 5
Page 3 of 5
Question #3 (Councilmember Wax): What commitment has the County made toward homelessness and mental
health facilities?
The County has not formally or publicly committed to funding either of these projects (intake center or
mental health crisis response center), but both these projects are in discussions at the County level. To date,
the County Council has appropriated approximately $13 million of the $52 million that the County was
allocated from the ARP funds.
Question #4 (Councilmember Tomas Morgan): How much has been spent and how much is remaining of the
original grant from the Bloomberg Mayor’s Challenge for the Commuter’s Trust?
Of the original $1 million grant, the City has spent $652,178 between 1/1/2019 and 8/31/2021. The 2022
budget is expected to be the final year in which there will be funding available from this original grant.
Question #5 (Councilmember Hamann): How much of the proposed utility rate increases are due to an expected
increase in PILOT?
The PILOT payment has held steady or decreased over the past 4-5 years (see table 1 below), and, although it
is expected to increase slightly over the next five years, the overall PILOT payment makes up only a small
percentage of the rates (see table 2 below).
Table 1
Subdivision
2018
ACTUAL
2019
ACTUAL
2020
ACTUAL
2021
ACTUAL
2022
BUDGET
Wastewater 4,601,656 4,678,366 4,592,349 4,543,120 4,465,686
Water Works 1,730,831 1,662,624 1,629,442 1,611,201 1,613,639
6,332,487 6,340,990 6,221,791 6,154,321 6,079,325
Table 2
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Sewage Works
Revenues 38,199,800 39,746,700 41,311,300 43,092,900 44,335,600
Expenses
Operating expenses (24,231,200) (24,715,824) (25,210,140) (25,714,343) (26,228,630)
Capital (non-bond funded) (4,505,000) (10,337,500) (4,755,000) (4,721,000) (5,255,000)
PILOT (4,543,100) (4,465,686) (5,450,800) (6,285,800) (6,250,900)
Debt service (7,689,800) (8,321,600) (9,294,800) (9,316,300) (8,800,500)
Total expenses (40,969,100) (47,840,610) (44,710,740) (46,037,443) (46,535,030)
PILOT as a % of total expenses 11.1% 9.3% 12.2% 13.7% 13.4%
Total approximate monthly sewer bill $47.85 $49.65 $51.66 $53.74 $55.91
Total monthly bill increase YOY $1.80 $2.01 $2.08 $2.17
Monthly bill increase attributable to non-PILOT $1.63 $1.76 $1.80 $1.88
Monthly bill increase attributable to PILOT $0.17 $0.25 $0.28 $0.29
Page 4 of 5
Water Works
Revenues 21,004,800 21,696,800 22,480,300 22,502,600 22,523,300 Expenses
Operating expenses (16,319,200) (16,645,584) (16,978,496) (17,318,066) (17,664,427)
Capital (non-bond funded) (1,421,000) (8,500,000) (1,550,000) (1,600,000) (1,300,000) PILOT (1,611,200) (1,613,639) (1,835,900) (2,096,500) (2,207,400)
Debt service (1,487,200) (1,671,500) (2,041,800) (2,093,600) (2,981,400)
Total expenses (20,838,600) (28,430,723) (22,406,196) (23,108,166) (24,153,227) PILOT as a % of total expenses 7.7% 5.7% 8.2% 9.1% 9.1% Total approximate monthly water bill $20.33 $20.96 $21.71 $21.71 $21.71
Total monthly bill increase YOY $0.63 $0.75 $0.00 $0.00 Monthly bill increase attributable to non-PILOT $0.59 $0.69 $0.00 $0.00
Monthly bill increase attributable to PILOT $0.04 $0.06 $0.00 $0.00
Total monthly bill increase attributable to PILOT $0.20 $0.31 $0.28 $0.29
9/22/2021 Meeting Follow-up
Question #6 (Council President White): What is the breakdown of youth employment demographics and the
mentored mowing program?
Youth Jobs SB
Funded by the Common Council, this program began in the 2020 with the expressed goals of recruiting a
more diverse youth workforce and adding an educational component to the job. Youth employees are
presented with approximately 1 hour of personal development opportunities for every 20 hours of work,
including a dynamic leadership retreat at the beginning of the program. Kintae Lark was hired as the full-
time Youth Employment Manager to oversee the recruitment and training. In its second year, the program
employed 77 young people between the ages of 15 and 18. The demographic information of these employees
in 2021 is included below:
Female Male Total
Asian 1 1
Black or African American 14 6 20
Hispanic or Latino 6 10 16
Two or more races 3 3 6
White 12 22 34
Grand Total 35 42 77
Youth Mentored Mowing Program
Through a competitive, open, and public Request for Proposals, VPA awarded a program contract to Greater
Impact Lawn Care. Greater Impact mentors their employees both on-the-job and in the classroom through a
highly relational approach. They care for approximately 113 city properties, including the City Cemetery.
Currently there are 12 youth hired through Greater Impact Lawn Care that worked directly on City
properties. All of the youth are male, 11 African American and 1 Caucasian.
Question #7 (Councilmember Hamann): Can you revise the provided organizational charts to include the names of
the individuals in each position?
Page 5 of 5
Happy to work to provide this, and will send updated slides to the Clerk’s Office when complete. Because of
the number of employees involved (over 1,000), only upper-level and mid-level management will be
identified by name.
Question #8 (Councilmember Hamann): Which of the proposed new positions are expected to be funded from ARP
funds?
Of the 16 proposed new positions in 2022’s budget, four positions are expected to be funded using ARP
funds. These positions are highlighted in the chart below:
Dept Division / Subdivision Requested Title 2022 Salary Cap
Mayor's Office Community Initiatives Administrative Assistant II 44,410
Mayor's Office Community Initiatives Violence Prevention Coordinator II 42,915
Administration & Finance Controller's Office Director of City Finance 85,152
Public Works Engineering Engineer II 78,725
Public Works Solid Waste Solid Waste Driver 39,478
Innovation & Technology 311 Call Center 311 Customer Service Liaison 47,595
Innovation & Technology Information Technology Specialist of Services 59,372
Community Investment Community Investment Assistant Director of Opportunity 76,834
Community Investment Community Investment Deputy Director - Community Investment 103,691
Community Investment Community Investment Project Manager-EEE 57,845
Community Investment Community Investment Manager - Neighborhood Housing Programs 69,967
Community Investment Community Investment Workforce Development Manager 69,967
Community Investment Community Investment Neighborhood Grant Specialist 53,341
Community Investment Community Investment Neighborhood Program Specialist 53,341
Community Investment Community Investment Property Inspector 59,681
Venues, Parks & Arts Park Maintenance Group Leader - Parks 40,394
Question #9 (Councilmember Hamann): How does the cost of the proposed increases for the 34 positions proposed
to receive an increase above 2% compare with the cost of raising the City minimum wage for part-time / seasonal
employees to $14/hr and full-time to $17/hr?
As provided in a previous answer, as compared to the currently proposed budget (which already makes a
commitment to raise minimum wage for City employees to $12/hour for part-time/seasonal and $15/hour for
full time), the City estimates that it would cost at least $400,000 - $500,000 additional in annual expense to
move to $14/hr and $17/hr.
The total salary cost for the 34 positions proposed to receive a raise greater than 2% is $220,046 higher than
2021’s budgeted salary cost. If you compare the proposed 2022 salaries to what those salaries would have
been in 2022 had the positions received only a standard 2% raise, the increased cost to the City of these 34
proposed raises is $178,012.