Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5. 715 Forest Avenue_COA 2021-0602STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 15, 2021 Application Number: 2021-0602 Property Location: 715 Forest Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gable-T / 1890 / “Francis R Otstat House” Property Owner: Dr. Drew Schmucker Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, #9574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE : Two story t-plan on a brick foundation. Unveiled siding includes scalloping/scaling on the upper gabled dormers with hood through the cornice. Small rear porches, southern porch has turned spindles and bracketed entab lature, enclosed front porch entry. Windows are predominantly 1/1 double hung with molded crown and trim, with aluminum storm windows. ALTERATIONS: RME 2018-0404 allowed for the exploratory removal of the Asbestos siding by the previous homeowner (this was not completed). AA 2019-0703C allowed for the replacement of the porch roof shingles to match the main house shingles, as well as to replace the wood fascia with new wood. AA 2021-0318 allowed for the removal of the Asbestos siding/unveiling of the original siding to assess for condition/rehabilitation. APPLICATION ITEMS: “Replace one picture window with in-kind double-hung. Remove one casement window and replace with in kind double hung. Remove one casement window and side opening. Note: no window is original to structure.” DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant has requested approval to, per a voicemail from the contractor and submitted photographs from the homeowner: 1. Remove an existing casement window (north façade), a. replace it a 24” x 37” window with a double-hung, i. “wood construction on the interior/exterior,” ii. with opaque glass , because it is by the toilet, “but don’t need to use tempered glass.” 2. Large picture window (south façade), unknown dimensions, with a double-hung, Marvin Signature Collection Series, Ultimate Wood double-hung insert. 3. A casement window on the primary (east) façade will be removed and sided over. Marvin Signature Ultimate windows are available in an all-wood option. This t-plan house originally had a wraparound porch. The removal of the asbestos siding unveiled second story shingling as well as the previous porch roofline. The homeowner is not pursing installing the porch at this time. At some point in the past, a previous homeowner enclosed portions of the wrap around porch into livable space. Two of the requested window changes are in this enclosed space, which is now a bathroom. None of the windows are ‘original’ to the structure and appear to be later reconfigurations. The enclosed area of the front porch appears to have been constructed prior to the 1932 Assessment. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and pa inting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration – materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power-washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double-hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Prepared by Adam Toering, Historic Preservation Administrator HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov MAP OF THE AREA - Google Maps view of the subject area. SATELLITE/SANBORN IMAGERY - Sandborn Maps: 1899, 1917, 1945, imagery from 2016 of property. 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov ASSESSOR CARD (FRONT) - 1932 Assessor Card, indicating ownership and property history. ASSESSOR CARD (BACK) - 1932 Assessor Card, indicating enclosed front porch area present in April 1932. 5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov SUBJECT AREAS: (EAST) - Casement to be removed on front facade (behind ladder), March 2021. SIDE PICTURE (SOUTH) - Picture of the side of the building including large picture window, March, 2021 5 From: To:Adam Toering Subject:Re: 715 Forest Avenue Window Replacement Project Date:Tuesday, June 1, 2021 9:01:08 PM Hi Adam, Yes Jeff told me he went in today. He sent photos to me. I’m not sure why he doesn’t email. But I’m attaching them here. Do we have the other documentation we need? Kelly This is the picture window that will be a double hung. This is the casement window we are requesting to take out and side over. This is the casement window we’d like to replace with a window that matches the rest of the windows better. Thanks for your help! I know you’re busy. Kelly Schmucker On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 3:40 PM Adam Toering <atoering@southbendin.gov> wrote: Ms. Schmucker, Today I received a Certificate of Appropriateness application for window replacement for three windows on your property at 715 Forest Avenue, submitted by Jeffrey Dierbeck of Dierbeck and Associates. Unfortunately I wasn’t able to meet with him at the time of his office visit as I was out doing site visits (like when I first met you at your house). Received projects are divided into two categories: those that can be administratively approved by staff, and those that require review by the Commission at one of their monthly meetings. I believe this project to be in the second category, although I envision it will be favorably received by the Commission. Completed applications require certain information to be submitted to our office including, but not limited to: the application itself (with the description of the proposed work), the application fee, site photographs, and proposed product specifications (for replacement windows, for example). As this project calls for replacing windows, specific product manufacture, material, and model would be required (Marvin, Pella, etc). Mr. Dierbeck has submitted the application and paid the fee. Mr. Dierbeck indicated that he had photos, but was unable to provide those to our staff, as he ‘does not e-mail.’ I do not know if he has access to a printer. I’m reaching out to so that you know I would like your project to be on the June meeting agenda, and that I need more information from Mr. Dierbeck to ensure that your project is on that agenda. If you want this project to be on the agenda, I’d ask that you please work with Mr. Dierbeck to ensure that all needed materials are submitted to our office. The deadline for inclusion on the June meeting agenda is next Monday. The needed materials can be e-mailed to me, printed and dropped off, or printed and mailed to our office. I understand you may have questions about the Certificate of Appropriateness review process. Please do not hesitate to call me with those questions. I have attached the received application (and a generic application, which includes a checklist to ensure that applications are complete) to this e-mail. I have also cc’d the e-mail address I have on file for Mr. Dierbeck, as well as Inspector Ross Van Overberghe. Adam Toering Historic Preservation Administrator Department of Community Investment (574) 235-7478 atoering@southbendin.gov City of South Bend 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., Ste. 1400 South Bend, IN 46601 IMPORTANT NOTICE! This E-Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E-Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E- Mail in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E-Mail address. Please note that incoming e-mails are not routinely screened for response deadlines, and as such, please notify the sender separately by fax of any message containing deadlines. In addition, E-Mail information cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain virus. Therefore, the sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a consequence of E-Mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version.