HomeMy WebLinkAbout119 LaPorte Avenue_COA 2021-0205STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: February 8, 2021
Application Number: 2021-0205
Property Location: 119 La Porte Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne / 1872, moved 1905
Property Owner: Alexis Torrance
Landmark or District Designation: South Bend Local Landmark #8108-1990
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE:
The 2 ½ story house has a hip roof with end gables, simple cornice and plain returns with plain frieze board.
There is a 25-pane decorative gable window. The façade walls are narrow clapboard with end trim and there
are fish scale and diagonal shingles at the gable. There is a gable front roof covered front porch with decorated
pediment over entablature supported by decorated wood columns. Windows are mostly original wood, 1/1,
Cottage Style, with storm windows.
ALTERATIONS OF STRUCTURE/SITE:
A major restoration occurred in 1986 removing vinyl siding and restoring the original wood siding. The storm
windows are not original and are wood frame with metal inserts. AA 2018-0924 approved replacement of existing
wood fence. COA 2007-0516 approved complete roof tear off and re roof with new asphalt shingle. COA 2003-
0806 approved removal of wooden portion of exterior side stairway and rebuild new exterior stair treads and
supports of treated lumber; repair and retain existing stone and brick structure along south side of house, enclosing
cellar stairs and partly supporting the existing stair to the second floor. COA 2001-0809 approved repair under
frame of porch to realign with house; repair or rebuild front porch to rectify damage caused by decay or settling; all
work shall replicate the original in style, shape, size, material, or location. COA 2001-0420 approved replacement
of 3’ tall wood picket fence with 6’ tall wood privacy fence from the rear corner of house across drive to existing 6’
tall wood privacy fencing from northwest corner of house across side lot to end of existing 6’ tall wood privacy
fence to enclose rear yard of both lots. Existing 3’ tall picket and cement block fencing located across front of side
lot and alley is to remain.
APPLICATION ITEMS:
“Remove storm windows, remove wood sash and tracks, clean opening, install Marvin Ultimate/Elevate Cottage
Style INSERTS (x22), foam insulate, use frame expanders outside, caulk, use 1/2” x 3/4” White Shoe on the White
windows, use Hazelnut on the stained windows. Replace front porch storm doors.”
See written description by applicant for further information.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
1. Remove all “wood with metal insert” storm windows. The existing storm windows are not original and
have been custom fit to the opening size with wood, but the metal inserts do not follow the meeting rail
pattern of the main window beyond, resulting in an offset appearance.
2. Replace eighteen (18) original wood 1/1 Cottage-style window sashes with new Marvin Ultimate
wood/aluminum clad Cottage-style window sashes (INSERTS), replicating pattern.
3. Replace four (4) later wood 1/1 window sashes in second floor back of the house with new Marvin Elevate
wood/fiberglass composite 1/1 window sashes (INSERTS), replicating pattern.
4. Replace front wood storm doors with new Larson full-glass storm doors.
GROUP B STANDARDS FOR LOCAL LANDMARKS:
Preservation Standards for local historic landmarks are used by the Historic Preservation Commission whenever
exterior changes are proposed for officially designated structures. Review is required when proposed plans for
building and development indicate the architectural character of the landmark will be changed, i.e., review is
required for any project that affects the exterior of the building, site, outbuildings, grounds and landscaping. These
standards are an extension of the present Ordinance #5567-73 and #54A-973 already adopted to implement a
comprehensive program of historic preservation.
The present historic preservation ordinances empower the Commission to issue or deny a Certificate of
Appropriateness prior to the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any landmark. The
ordinance also gives the Commission the power to establish reasonable and just standards for the preservation of
historic landmarks, including architectural treatment, site development and maintenance provisions, providing that
the standards are in keeping with the intent of the ordinance and that the standards apply only to the exterior
features of the historic landmark. These standards guide the commission in their review of Certificates of
Appropriateness.
The two major conditions under which change will occur are maintenance or improvement and the demolition of an
existing landmark.
The Historic Preservation Commission has established two levels of preservation standards—Group A and Group
B. Group A standards are the more comprehensive of the two and require that the original character of the building
be maintained or restored. Group B (your Standards) require that the building be maintained as is and, if possible,
returned to the original. One of these levels will be selected at the time of designation. Bot h require a Certificate
of Appropriateness before the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any landmark
structure or site.
The property owner is responsible for furnishing the Commission with a complete description of the pro posed
changes. This information may be plans, elevations, specifications, photographs, or other means to accurately
describe the project. When an application is being reviewed, it will be the responsibility of the applicant to
demonstrate that the new work is compatible.
Definitions
Shall—Defined as an expression of something that is mandatory or must be done.
Should—Defined as an expression of obligation, something that ought to be done but that is open to compromise.
Required—Defined as work which shall be done in a restoration or rehabilitation project in order to restore or
maintain the original or existing character of the structure or site.
Recommended—Defined as work which should be done to help restore or maintain the original or existing
character of the structure or site.
Prohibited—Defined as work which shall not be permitted in a restoration or rehabilitation project because it may
have a negative impact on the original or existing character of the structure or site.
Group B Standards
The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment,
renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and /or
samples where appropriate.
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the
general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all
structure or sites (appendix A: Minimum Maintenance Standards).
B. Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such
improvements include re-roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially
enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark
or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the
landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness
may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency wi th
the original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a
change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered
under demolition (see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover
singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt
the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures
should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. Structure—–Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such
a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of
the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be
allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with
additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the
original when renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is
the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods
should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition
of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,
the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics
will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
(These standards apply to both A and B)
1. Required
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which
reflect the property’s history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained.
Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new
walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic
character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing
deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be
removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases
where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the
buildings style, materials, and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing,
walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property’s history and
development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The
installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas
where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares.
SITE VISIT FINDINGS:
One window on the first floor in the dining room was operable and we discovered that the weight gets hung up in
the pocket when trying to close the sash. Many other windows are missing ropes and are painted shut and not
operable. Wood condition overall is good to very good.
Sashes are original for 90% of the windows. Construction is profile rail and stile with square pegs at the corners
with glazed glass single light panes. Storm windows are possibly newer construction, wood framed, built to fit with
aluminum edged glass inserts.
Several windows have been replaced with wood inserts. 2 windows in the upstairs south facing bedroom are older
sashes constructed to fit the original wood tracks.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO COMMISSION:
These windows are in relatively good condition and are repairable but are overdue for routine maintenance
(painting, re-roping, glazing). While Staff recommends to applicant the restoration of original windows and
installation of new custom storm windows that replicate the meeting rail pattern of Cottage-style windows, based
on Group B Standards, Staff recommends approval of the application items.
Written by
Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator
Reviewed by
Adam Toering, Historic Preservation Specialist
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
LOCATION MAP - Map showing location of the property and surrounding area (Google Maps)
LOCATION MAP - Map showing location of the property (maps.MACOG.com)
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
LOCATION MAP - Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps 1917, 1945, 1960 (Brownfield Coalition Maps)
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
FRONT PICTURE (NORTHEAST) - Picture of the front of the building.
FRONT AND SIDE PICTURE (NORTH) - Picture of the front and side of the building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
REAR PICTURE (SOUTH) - Picture of the rear of the building.
DETAIL PICTURE (NORTHEAST) - Picture of the front door of the building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
DETAIL PICTURES (INTERIOR) - Pictures of the window conditions from the inside of the building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
DETAIL PICTURES (INTERIOR) - Pictures of the window conditions from the inside of the building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
DETAIL PICTURES (INTERIOR) - Pictures of the window conditions from the inside of the building.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
DETAIL PICTURES (INTERIOR) - Pictures of the window conditions from the inside of the building.
END sOUTH A
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
County-City Building. South Bend, IN 46601
http://www.southbendin. gov/government/department/community-investment
E ACE
Phone: 574/235.7478 Fax: 574/235.9021
I803 Email:hpesbsjc@southbendin.gov
Michele Gelfman, President A Certified Local Govemment of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATON FOR A=CERIIEICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLY>>>>>>DO NOT COMPLETANY ENTRUES CONTAINED IN THIs BOX<<eee<oFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: Application Number:
Past Reviews: | YES (Date of Last Review) NO
Staff Approval authorized by: Title:
Historie Preservation Commission Review Date:
Local Landmark Local Historic Distriet (Name)
National Landmark National Register District (Name)
Certificate Of Appropriateness:
LDenied Tabled Sent To Committee Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work: 119 Laporte Ave, South Bend, IN 46616
(Street Number Street Name City-Zip)
Name of Property Owner(s): AleXis Torrance Phone #: 5743293070
Address of Property Owner(s): 119 Laporte Ave, South Bend, IN 46616
(Street Number Street Name Cin Zip)
Ed Risser Name of Contractor(s): Phone #:574-862-1613
e: Quality Window & Door, Inc. Contractor Company Name:
pany:
27888 County Rd 32, Elkhart,IN 46517
(Street Number-Streer Name -Ciy-Zip)
Address of Contractor Company:
Current Use of Building: Single Family
(Single Family-Multi-Fanily-Commercial-Government Inchustrial -Vacant-etc.)
Type of Building Construction: VVood Frame
(Wood Frame-Brick -Stone Steel Concrete-Other)
Proposed Work: (more than one
box may be checked)Landsecape Demolition New Replacement (not in-kind)
Description of Proposed Work:
Rermove Storm widows,remove wood sash and tracks, cloan opening, install Marvin URimate/Elevale Cottage Style INSERTS (k22), foam insulate,
use frame expanders outside,caulk,use 1/2" x 3/4" White shoe on the White windows,use Hazelnut on the stained windows.
Replace front porch storm doors.
alexis.torrance@gmail.com and/or Contractor e-mail: ed@qwdbarn.com Owner e-mail:
and/or X
Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Buldng Departnent Pemit, if applicable
-APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE
2/1/2021 2021
X
February 2, 2021 MA
Rec. No. 175792 $20.00
0205
2/15/21
1
Description of Project
Window & Storm Door replacement at 119 Laporte Avenue
We moved into our home at 119 Laporte Avenue in Fall 2018 knowing that at some point we
would need to restore or replace many of the existing windows. Previous owners had attempted
to remedy some of the problems associated with the original large, single-pane wood windows,
with mixed success. Several window sashes were replaced, but unfortunately not
professionally, it seems. Both the original and replacements have poor sound abatement, leak
far too much air, show signs of excess damage (including rot) and in some cases are not
functional at all. At some point outer storm windows were installed over virtually all the
windows. Unfortunately, these were not installed terribly well or according to the “cottage
style” of the original windows (~60:40), but 50:50, resulting in the bars between the lower and
upper sashes being mismatched throughout the house (this can be observed in the attached
photographs). They also make cleaning the windows all but impossible. Just as
problematically, the storm windows ruin the original aesthetic and character of the house. One
can see from the 19th century image of the house that there were originally no storm windows,
and the windows are set back inside the frames. In terms of the front porch, a previous owner
installed a set of storm doors that obscure the beauty of the original door, with bars running
across the glass. They are also in bad shape. We would replace these storm doors with full-view
glass to help showcase the original front door.
In an effort to remedy the problems with the windows, as well as help restore the original
aesthetic and historical character of the house, we looked into various options. Our first desire
was simply to restore the windows (ideally, removing the storm windows in the process, or if
not, building new storm windows that fit with the original windows). The first major hurdle to
this is the fact that at least five of the windows are not original, and four of these are in
prominent street view on the front (east) and south sides of the house. If only these windows
were replaced, the aesthetic disconnect would continue due to the ongoing presence of the
mismatched storm windows installed by a previous owner over virtually all the windows. As for
the windows that appear to be original, many suffer from extensive damage, rot, glass
scratching, glass cracks, and other problems. The restoration company H. G. Christman told us
they could not give an exact figure on restoring these windows, as the extent of damage and
restoration work needed will not be known until the sashes are physically removed, the side
wells inspected, etc. The expense skyrockets for the windows that are stained rather than
painted, as restoration in these cases essentially involves getting an artist to mimic the
original as closely as possible on restored parts of the frame. Crucially, restoration of these
windows would not significantly enhance energy efficiency or sound abatement in the home. In
fact, if we were to try to shoulder the significant cost of restoring the windows that might be
capable of restoration, and removed the storm windows to best approximate the original
aesthetic of the home, we would be in a far worse position in terms of energy efficiency and
sound abatement.
A major impetus for this project is better sound abatement. Laporte Ave serves as a
thoroughfare for emergency vehicles day and night, as well as being a high-traffic road
generally; it is known for significant and consistent street noise (sound levels, in other words,
rarely if ever encountered when the home was originally built). The old single pane glass, even
with the current storm windows, is simply insufficient to the task of abating the sound: this
affects not only our sleep, but also our work (we both often need to work from home) and day to
day life. This is our home, not a museum. When it became clear consulting, for instance, with
H. G. Christman, that the old single pane glass would remain even after the significant
expense and time put into restoration (thus not greatly improving sound abatement), we
hesitated. Not only that, but energy efficiency is another significant concern. According to the
2
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), the U-
value for an old single glazed wood window in excellent condition is 0.8–0.99. If that is the top
end of where we can hope to get (dropping to maybe 0.55 with new storm windows), we are still
nowhere near the energy-efficiency levels afforded by low-E double paned glass windows
(which tend to have a U-value around 0.3 or lower). We gradually came to realize that in the
best case scenario, if we restored the windows and replaced the storm windows, we would a)
have a similar or larger expense than good replacement insert options; b) not restore the home
to its original aesthetic and character, since the original did not include storm windows; c) have
a dramatically longer lead time (since each window would have to be individually removed,
repaired at the shop, and returned); and d) have a finished product that would not really
improve our quality of life (via sound abatement), nor have a positive environmental impact
with better energy efficiency.
After much deliberation and consultation with a number of window experts, then, we feel that
the house would best be served by wood-clad replacement window inserts, using the reputable
Marvin brand’s highest window line (Marvin Ultimate:
https://www.marvin.com/products/collections/signature/ultimate/double-hung-g2). Vinyl was
out of the question for us, as was vinyl composite material. We thought about fiberglass, but we
really want to maintain the material integrity of the house as far as we can, so we would opt
for full wood replacement windows in almost all cases. We would replicate the cottage-style
double hung windows throughout (some of the existing replacements have not done this), using
inserts that preserve the beauty and integrity of the original exterior and interior trim. Four of
the 22 windows, which are smaller and located on the second floor at the back of the house,
would be replaced with the Marvin Elevate window, their second-highest line which is wood on
the inside and durable fiberglass composite on the outside. We would replace one large picture
window on the main level (which is itself not an original window), but preserve the interior and
exterior trim. Importantly, we would not replace the two original stained glass windows. These
will be left in place. We would also leave in place the attic windows, which include several
windows with original wood grids. Our approach is to replace only windows for which a
comparable replacement exists.
Attached you will find the detailed estimate from Quality Window & Door, Inc., a local and
reputable company that has replaced windows and doors on historic South Bend homes in the
past. This estimate gives all the details of the materials to be used, scale, dimensions, finishes,
etc. We will not be changing the existing color, keeping with the current white trim exterior.
On the main level we will be staining the wood interior to match the surrounding trim. On the
main level also we are including antique brass hardware that approximates the original
window aesthetic, and we will reclaim original handle hardware and install it on the new wood
windows. We would gladly donate the old sashes to the City, which we understand holds a
stock of old windows for restoration projects.
As should be clear from the sample photographs below, the windows on our home need
significant attention. Rather than try to replace them at the cheapest cost possible, we are
trying to take our duty of care for this historic home seriously, and we think that this solution
will not only remedy our current significant problems with sound and energy efficiency—and
the other issues that come with windows that are only semi-functional and impossible to
clean!—but will go a long way to restoring the original aesthetic, character, and beauty of this
house. Our house’s windows have suffered from a hodge-podge approach to repair and
restoration under previous owners; we hope to return the windows to a unified design that is in
historic character. Thank you for taking the time to consider this proposal.
3
Picture of the house
from the nineteenth
century. Notice the
absence of storm
windows. The two
original stained
glass windows on the
house, indicated by
the arrows, will be
left in place, as will
the attic windows.
119 Laporte Ave:
front view from
Laporte Ave. Attic
window with grids
would remain intact.
Notice mismatched
storm windows with
interior windows.
4
A view of the south-facing
side of the house (visible
from Oliver Mansion).
Notice the mismatched
storm windows (50:50) with
the original cottage-style
double hung windows. The
two windows indicated on
the second floor to the left
are not original. Notice the
extensive damage on the
indicated second-floor
window. Outer trim will be
preserved (e.g the large
picture window on the main
level). Again, the stained
glass window on the main
floor will remain untouched.
A view of the east-facing
and north-facing sides of the
house. The attic windows
will remain. Not again the
consistent mismatching of
the cottage-style double
hung windows with the
50:50 storm windows.
5
Left: example of a
second-floor window
in a state of extensive
disrepair. This
window does not open
and is uncleanable.
The screen needs
attention, but cannot
be accessed.
Example of a main floor
window with evidence of
rot and disrepair.
Hardware not
functional.
More signs of
degradation on the
exterior of a main floor
window.
Right: Large window
on front stair landing
in need of serious
attention!
6
The front porch storm
doors. Notice the bars
and excess white at the
bottom of the doors,
which obscures the
beauty and aesthetic of
the original front doors.
Notice also the damage
on these storm doors,
which will be replaced
with full-view white
aluminum storm doors.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote #: 5NVF4ZD
A Proposal for Window and Door Products prepared for:
End Customer:
Customer Number: ER
Torrance, Alex and Eugenia
119 LaPorte Ave.
South Bend, IN 46616
Contact Name: Eugenia
Mobile: (574) 601-1132
Email: alexis.torrance@gmail.com
Job Site:
46616
Shipping Address:
QUALITY WINDOW & DOOR
27888 COUNTY ROAD 32
ELKHART, IN 46517-9510
ED RISSER
QUALITY WINDOW & DOOR
27888 COUNTY ROAD 32
ELKHART, IN 46517-9510
Phone: (574) 862-1613
Email: ed@qwdbarn.com
This report was generated on 1/29/2021 2:13:15
PM using the Marvin Order Management System,
version 0003.06.00 (Current). Price in USD. Unit
availability and price are subject to change. Dealer
terms and conditions may apply.
Project Description:
Remove Storm windows, remove wood sash and tracks, CLEAN OPENING, INSTALL INSERTS, foam insulate, use frame
expanders outside, caulk, use 1/2" x 3/4" White shoe on the White windows, use Hazelnut on the stained windows.
Featuring products from:
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 2 of 10
LINE ITEM QUOTES
The following is a schedule of the windows and doors for this project. For additional unit details, please see Line Item
Quotes. Additional charges, tax or Terms and Conditions may apply. Detail pricing is per unit.
Line #1
Qty: 4
Mark Unit: Upper office ,Bedrooms Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 31 1/2" X 77 1/4"
IO 31 7/8" X 76 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Stone White Clad Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Interior
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 31 1/2" X 77 1/4"
Inside Opening 31 7/8" X 76 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.0:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior
G.S. 26 5/32" X 28 1/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior
G.S. 26 5/32" X 42 3/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
White Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
White Sash Lock
White Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #2
Qty: 4
Mark Unit: Upper Study, M Bedroom Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Stone White Clad Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Interior
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 27 1/2" X 77 1/4"
Inside Opening 27 7/8" X 76 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.0:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior
G.S. 22 5/32" X 28 1/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 3 of 10
Entered As: FS
FS 27 1/2" X 77 1/4"
IO 27 7/8" X 76 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior
G.S. 22 5/32" X 42 3/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
White Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
White Sash Lock
White Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #3
Qty: 2
Mark Unit: Upper Bath Laundry Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 27 1/2" X 41 1/4"
IO 27 7/8" X 40 7/8"
Egress Information
Width: 23 27/32" Height: 15 9/64"
Net Clear Opening: 2.51 SqFt
Performance Grade
Licensee #1123
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/ I.S.2/A440-08
LC-PG40 1067X2146 mm (42X84.5 in)
LC-PG40 DP +40/-40
FL6525
Stone White Exterior
White Interior
Elevate Double Hung Insert
Frame Size 27 1/2" X 41 1/4"
Inside Opening 27 7/8" X 40 7/8"
8 Degree Frame Bevel
Glass Add For All Sash
Top Sash
Stone White Exterior
White Interior
IG - 1 Lite
Tempered Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
Bottom Sash
Stone White Exterior
White Interior
IG - 1 Lite
Tempered Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
White Weather Strip Package
1 White Sash Lock
Exterior Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
Thru Jamb Installation
Existing Sill Angle 8
***Note: Frame Size shown is measured from the exterior of the unit.
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 4 of 10
Line #4
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Stairway in Back Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 27 1/2" X 53 1/4"
IO 27 7/8" X 52 7/8"
Egress Information
Width: 23 27/32" Height: 21 9/64"
Net Clear Opening: 3.50 SqFt
Performance Grade
Licensee #1123
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/ I.S.2/A440-08
LC-PG40 1067X2146 mm (42X84.5 in)
LC-PG40 DP +40/-40
FL6525
Stone White Exterior
White Interior
Elevate Double Hung Insert
Frame Size 27 1/2" X 53 1/4"
Inside Opening 27 7/8" X 52 7/8"
8 Degree Frame Bevel
Top Sash
Stone White Exterior
White Interior
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
Bottom Sash
Stone White Exterior
White Interior
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Stainless Perimeter Bar
White Weather Strip Package
1 White Sash Lock
Exterior Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
Thru Jamb Installation
Existing Sill Angle 8
***Note: Frame Size shown is measured from the exterior of the unit.
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #5
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Stairway Front Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 32" X 77 1/4"
IO 32 3/8" X 76 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Single Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 32" X 77 1/4"
Inside Opening 32 3/8" X 76 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.0:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 26 21/32" X 28 1/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 26 21/32" X 42 3/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 5 of 10
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
Antique Brass Sash Lock
Antique Brass Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Half Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #6
Qty: 2
Mark Unit: Main Level Breakfast Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 23 1/2" X 83 1/4"
IO 23 7/8" X 82 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 23 1/2" X 83 1/4"
Inside Opening 23 7/8" X 82 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.2:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 18 5/32" X 33 15/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 18 5/32" X 42 39/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
Antique Brass Sash Lock
Antique Brass Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #7
Qty: 2
Mark Unit: Main Level Dining Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 31 1/2" X 83 1/4"
Inside Opening 31 7/8" X 82 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.2:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 6 of 10
Entered As: FS
FS 31 1/2" X 83 1/4"
IO 31 7/8" X 82 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 26 5/32" X 33 15/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 26 5/32" X 42 39/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
Antique Brass Sash Lock
Antique Brass Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #8
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Main Level Bath Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 23 1/2" X 73 1/4"
IO 23 7/8" X 72 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Stone White Clad Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Interior
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 23 1/2" X 73 1/4"
Inside Opening 23 7/8" X 72 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.0:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior
G.S. 18 5/32" X 26 7/16"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior
G.S. 18 5/32" X 39 21/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Tempered Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
White Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
White Sash Lock
White Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 7 of 10
Line #9
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Foyer Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 51 1/2" X 55 1/4"
IO 51 7/8" X 54 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1812X2163 mm (71.38X85.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Double Hung Insert Picture G2
Frame Size 51 1/2" X 55 1/4"
Inside Opening 51 7/8" X 54 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #10
Qty: 2
Mark Unit: Stair Landing Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 21 1/2" X 47 1/4"
IO 21 7/8" X 46 63/64"
Egress Information
Width: 17 13/16" Height: 18 9/16"
Net Clear Opening: 2.30 SqFt
Performance Grade
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 21 1/2" X 47 1/4"
Inside Opening 21 7/8" X 46 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Hazelnut Stained Interior Finish
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
Antique Brass Sash Lock
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 8 of 10
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Antique Brass Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #11
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Front Sitting Room Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Entered As: FS
FS 39" X 65 1/4"
IO 39 3/8" X 64 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Leather Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 39" X 65 1/4"
Inside Opening 39 3/8" X 64 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.0:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Leather Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 33 21/32" X 23 15/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Leather Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 33 21/32" X 34 27/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
Antique Brass Sash Lock
Antique Brass Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #12
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Front Sitting Room Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Stone White Clad Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Interior
Leather Stained Interior Finish
Ultimate Double Hung Insert G2
Frame Size 31 1/2" X 83 1/4"
Inside Opening 31 7/8" X 82 63/64"
8° Degree Frame Bevel
Cottage 2.2:5.0
Top Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Leather Stained Interior Finish
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 9 of 10
Entered As: FS
FS 31 1/2" X 83 1/4"
IO 31 7/8" X 82 63/64"
Egress Information
No Egress Information available.
Performance Grade
Licensee #1149
AAMA/WDMA/CSA/101/I.S.2/A440-11
LC-PG50 1149X2223 mm (45.38X87.19 in)
LC-PG50 DP 50
FL28134
G.S. 26 5/32" X 33 15/32"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Bottom Sash
Stone White Clad Sash Exterior
Stained Interior Finish Pine Sash Interior
Leather Stained Interior Finish
G.S. 26 5/32" X 42 39/64"
IG - 1 Lite
Low E2 w/Argon
Black Perimeter Bar
Ogee Interior Glazing Profile
Black Interior Weather Strip Package
White Exterior Weather Strip Package
Antique Brass Sash Lock
Antique Brass Top Sash Strike Plate Assembly Color
Aluminum Screen
Stone White Surround
Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh
***Screen/Combo Ship Loose
3 1/4" Jambs
***Note: Unit Availability and Price is Subject to Change
Line #17
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: All Replacement windows Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Labor Installation of all Replacement windows
Line #18
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Front Storm Doors Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Other LARSON DOUBLE STORM DOOR WHITE 149-FV CLASSIC ELEGANCE FULL VIEW, WITIH 2 -ANTIQUE BRASS
HANDLES, 1- FRENCH DOOR KIT, FS opening 53"x 95" DOORS 2- FS- 26 1/2" X 95" LABOR INCLUDED
Line #19
Qty: 1
Mark Unit: Net Price:
Ext. Net Price: USD
Marvin Parts
17007111 V2034 1" FRAME EXPANDER BOX/50,STONE WHITE
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current)
Product availability and pricing subject to change.
Torrance Residence
Marvin DH
Quote Number: 5NVF4ZD
OMS Ver. 0003.06.00 (Current) Processed on: 1/29/2021 2:13:15 PM Page 10 of 10
PURCHASE APPROVAL/SIGN OFF
Project Subtotal Net Price: USD
Labor: USD
Other: USD
Project Total Net Price: USD
I have reviewed all line item quotes in detail and agree that the product specifications and pricing are accurate, and I
approve the project for order. I acknowledge that additional charges, tax or Terms and Conditions may apply.
Seller: ______________________________________________________________________________
Buyer: ______________________________________________________________________________
A contemporary classic, the Marvin Signature™ Ultimate Double Hung G2 window
blends traditional beauty with state-of-the-art window performance. Reliable and
energy efficient, the Ultimate Double Hung G2 window offers an auto-lock feature
for convenient security, durable hardware for smooth operation and Marvin’s
unique wash mode for easy cleaning. Customize your design with round top styles
or single hung operation with optional Lift Lock – Marvin’s exclusive bottom rail
locking mechanism for easier operation in hard-to-reach areas.
FOR THE PROS
Find technical documents for this product, including installation instructions, sizes
and elevations, 3D drawings, architectural detail manuals and more.
Available in heights up to 10.5 feet or widths up to 5.5 feet
Marvin’s exclusive auto-lock activates when sashes are closed for
convenient security
Unique wash mode allows cleaning of both sides of glass from indoors
Narrow checkrail maximizes view, while maintaining historical accuracy
Retractable screen option is nearly invisible when the screen is not in use
Available with the same features in a single hung style, with optional Lift Lock
Additional configurations include round top, stationary transom or picture
window
Hidden Lock Status Sensor option connects with your smart home to indicate
when windows are closed and locked
Available with IZ3 coastal/hurricane certification
Available with Commercial Windows Performance certification
CE certified
Double Hung Windows: Wood and Clad | Ultimate Double Hung G2 | M... https://www.marvin.com/products/collections/signature/ultimate/double-...
1 of 2 2/3/2021, 2:12 PM
Ebony
A high-quality window deserves a dependable finish. Our low maintenance
clad-wood products feature an extruded aluminum exterior finished in
commercial-grade paint for superior resistance to fading and chalking. Our
palette of nineteen color options spans from muted, earthy tones to bold, rich
colors and three pearlescent finishes. Custom color matching is also available
to meet any design vision.
Selected: Ebony
*Custom Colors: Any color. Any window or door. You name it. No matter
what your inspiration for a custom window or door color, Marvin will
match it. You get any color your heart desires, with your own personal
custom color name and a 20-year warranty. See your Marvin dealer for
details and ask about special pricing.
Double Hung Windows: Wood and Clad | Ultimate Double Hung G2 | M... https://www.marvin.com/products/collections/signature/ultimate/double-...
2 of 2 2/3/2021, 2:12 PM
home
[we make front doors better]
STORM DOORS
www.LARSONdoors.com
full glass STORM DOORS
Ventilation
Window and
screen
interchange
for seasonal
venting
Innovation
Built-in closer
with
Click&Hold™
keeps the
door open
BetterVue®
screen with
up to 20%
improved
clarity, light,
and increased
airflow
Protection
Overlapping
frame and
two closers
provide a
tight seal
Finish
Installation
screw covers
conceal
exterior screws
Convenience
Hold-open closer
keeps the door
open with a
touch of a button
149 models
Durability
Premium
frame
construction
with 1-5/8"
thick aluminum
FEATURE
UPGRADES
159 Models
STANDARD
FEATURES
LowEGLASS
Curved Handle Finishes
Straight Handle Finishes
HIDDENCLOSER
159FVE Low-E
159FV Clear
149FVE Low-E
149FV Clear
Double Bevel
149BV
Pet Door
149PV
Screen not available
Elegant Bevel
149EBV
Elegant Selection MODEL STANDARD SIZE CUSTOM
159 Series
with Hidden Closer
159FVE Low-E*32" x 81"
36" x 81"
3
159FV Clear 3
149 Series
with 2-closer system
149FVE Low-E*
32" x 81"
36" x 81"
3
149FV Clear**3
149PV Pet Door
149BV Double Bevel
149EBV Elegant Bevel 36" x 81"
Seasonal Venting
Maximize your view with our beautiful fullview storm doors.
Interchangeable screen included for seasonal venting.
White Almond Sandstone Brown Black Cranberry Green
* 159FVE, 149FVE feature Low-E glass for improved insulation and less fading.
** 149FV also available in 30" & 34" widths, white only.
White
Matte
Black
Brown SandstoneBrushed
Nickel
Brushed
Nickel
Aged
Bronze
Aged
Bronze
Antique
Brass
Brass
Choose Your Handle
Matching handles inside
and out with built-in
deadbolt. SOLD SEPARATELY
HANDLE SET
customsizes customsizes
6 7
1
Elicia Feasel
From:Alexis Torrance <alexis.torrance@gmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:39 AM
To:Elicia Feasel
Subject:Re: 119 La Porte Avenue - COA
Dear Elicia,
Thank you for all this helpful information. I wish the distinction between "treatment" and "renovation" were clearer: it
still seems like window inserts (rather than full frame window replacements, which we're not proposing) fits more
comfortably into "treatment" than "renovation", analogous I would have thought to re‐roofing.
Re: your question. Sorry for the delay: I just got off the phone with the window company to clarify what the frame
expander component is. It is a thin fiberglass component, trimmed to size during install, that locks into the edge of the
insert windows and serves as additional weatherstripping/insulation between the insert and the original frame. It is
white in this case (in keeping with the existing exterior frame/window color). It does not affect the size of the opening or
interfere with the existing frame. It functions as durable and effective weatherstripping.
Let me know if you have any other questions!
Many thanks,
Alexis
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:42 PM Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov> wrote:
Alexis –
In working on your staff report, I wasn’t sure what a “frame expander” is – would you please clarify.
Group B Standards for Local Landmarks are the criteria that the Commission will consider your proposal under, mainly
Renovation (see bolded text below). Treatment refers to glazing, as in if you were only replacing glass. Deteriorated
beyond repair isn’t specifically mentioned in this Standard but I wanted you to be aware that it commonly does come
up during Commission discussion. I agree that it is hard to define but we also haven’t seen too many instances that the
original wood windows were beyond repair. In the example that Adam provided where a hand could be pushed
through the wood, it was determined that they were.
B. Treatment
2
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such
improvements include re‐roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance
or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its
environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the
landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be
necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original
surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change
in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under
demolition (see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover
singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt
the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures
should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. Structure—–Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a
way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same
material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it
duplicates the original.
Your house is rated as Outstanding with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, for having a substantial amount
of original integrity. The Commissioners hold Outstanding rated properties to the highest preservation standard and
advocate for preservation of original materials. It is entirely possible that your project will be approved; it is a nine
member Board and each member offers a different perspective. Our job is to help prepare documentation for the
commissioners and to help you with the process. Please let me know if there are any other questions.
3
From: Alexis Torrance <alexis.torrance@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 1:32 PM
To: Adam Toering <atoering@southbendin.gov>
Cc: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov>; Ross Van Overberghe <rvoverber@southbendin.gov>
Subject: Re: 119 La Porte Avenue ‐ COA
Thanks, Adam, for clarifying a few things. I look forward to getting my hands on the Hanson volume which looks great.
It will help for other elements of the house: the windows, though, even in a restored state (which is impossible in the
case of those already replaced) would be too costly and time‐consuming a project, and would not produce a livable
outcome given the house's location. I do understand, though, and appreciate, your prioritization of repair and
rehabilitation of original material where feasible. To your points:
1) I don't specifically remember the phrase "beyond repair" which is kind of hard to define. My worry is that the way
you use and describe it incentivizes the total neglect of the windows so that even the salvageable elements (like the
interior and exterior trim) should be put at risk of rot and degradation before a recommendation for the replacement
of what is in fact already an amalgam of some original and some replacement windows in poor condition.
2) You mention "original storms." I haven't seen evidence that any of our storm windows are original. I'd like to note
regarding the windows (which might be in your report), that during the site visit an attempt was made to open only one
window, a window which appeared to be in functional condition (e.g. newer ropes installed): it opened for Adam but
would not close. This is not simply a functionality issue for us but a safety issue. Ross eventually had to intervene to
close it. And of all the older windows this is the window that appears to be in the best shape! To wave all this off as
"maintenance issues" strikes my wife and me as an understatement.
3) Regarding sound insulation, we realize there's no full "fix" out there. Sound gets through walls too, after all, not just
windows (including incidentally, uninsulated weight wells/pockets). The issue is improvement. The data and evidence
all indicate that the replacement window inserts we've proposed will absolutely bring about an improvement to sound
abatement over the potentially costlier and certainly more time‐consuming alternative of repairing the existing
windows (some of which, of course, are already replacements that are poorly installed and/or insulated). The same
goes, of course, for energy efficiency.
Having looked through some of the past meeting minutes, I do have a quick query. It looks as though our proposed
project falls under category B of the Commission's remit, i.e. "Treatment," rather than category C ("Renovation and
Additions") since "renovation" is described as the "modification of a structure," whereas "treatment" is defined as "any
change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re ‐roofing, glazing,
or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the
landmark." I just want to confirm that since our proposed change of surface materials will not alter the style or original
form (and will, we claim, enhance the character of the landmark), it will be considered under this category B rubric. It's
helpful for me to know this, as I've been having trouble working out exactly what explicit criteria govern these decision‐
making processes. We want to be as prepared as we can be for the meeting!
4
Thank you again for all your input. We really appreciate the work you do, and we share your enthusiasm for the historic
properties of South Bend. Look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Best wishes,
Alexis
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:10 AM Adam Toering <atoering@southbendin.gov> wrote:
Alexis,
Wanted to chime in with a few points:
1. “Deterioration Beyond Repair”
Deterioration beyond repair did come up during our site visit. I mentioned a project where our previous site
inspector put his hand through a window sill during his site visit to a property, and how that project was
approved. Both Ross and I stated that it is still possible that the Commission will approve your project as you
have applied for, but they will ask questions as to how bad the windows are, and what you have done to make
them ‘work’. Staff is (almost always) going to advocate for the repair and rehabilitation of original material, as
we understand that to be what we are tasked with doing.
2. Window Condition
Much of what I saw with your windows struck me as maintenance related (ropes, reglazing) – this is normal
for old homes that Ross and I visit. The storm windows are a strange amalgamation of the original storms and
new storm inserts. Were I in your shoes (and tasked with preserving the original windows but making them
more sound and weather resistant), I’d be investigating restoration of the original windows (reglazing, re‐
hanging with new sash cord, perhaps adding some weather stripping on certain windows as we discussed),
and then investigating replacing the existing storms with new custom made storms, be they aluminum or
wood. In some ways you can view the storm windows as being sacrificial – they are there to take the brunt of
the weather for the ‘real’ windows, and can be replaced as needed when they begin to fail or lose
functionality.
3. Sound Insulation
One thing that came to mind after our site visit: your concern regarding street noise (which seems to be one
of the core reasons for your project) may not be ‘fixed’ by replacing the windows. For the sake of your
5
happiness and wellbeing in the house, I hope it is. As someone who lived directly across the street from a
firehouse for three years in a downtown setting, I understand the desire.
I was reminded yesterday (when a city colleague on another team texted me about a strange draft she felt ‘blowing’ in
through her wall on her historic house) of an excellent book to recommend: “Restoring Your Historic House: The
Comprehensive Guide for Homeowners” by Scott T. Hanson. It’s excellent, definitive, and easy to digest.
Best,
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Department of Community Investment
(574) 235‐7478
atoering@southbendin.gov
City of South Bend
227 W. Jefferson Blvd., Ste. 1400
South Bend, IN 46601
From: Alexis Torrance <alexis.torrance@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2021 9:44 PM
To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov>
Cc: Adam Toering <atoering@southbendin.gov>; Ross Van Overberghe <rvoverber@southbendin.gov>
Subject: Re: 119 La Porte Avenue ‐ COA
Thank you, Elicia. Ok: sounds like you wanted a little more from the restoration perspective and the problems we see
it presenting. I've had a final go at the description to clarify this (attached), based on conversation with H. G.
Christman, and the fact that at least five of the windows are not original to the home (I'm not sure how many of the
windows are actually original). I'm puzzled by the sudden "beyond repair" emphasis which didn't come up during the
site visit or in other correspondence. How is that defined? It feels like the goalposts are constantly shifting. We're just
trying to keep the historic character of our home while making it livable. We also both have full‐time jobs, so
unfortunately this is a lot of extra stress, especially as it includes the prospect of not being able to get a good night's
sleep for the foreseeable future because of the sound abatement problems associated with our windows (even in a
hypothetically restored state).
Best wishes,
6
Alexis
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 8:45 PM Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov> wrote:
Alexis –
Thank you for providing the revised supplement and we appreciate your time for the site visit today. Based on past
experience with the Commission, we can anticipate their emphasis on the windows being deteriorated beyond repair
as a qualifier for replacement; any additional material to that point would be helpful to have for the meeting. You will
receive a staff report and agenda toward the middle to end of next week with the meeting taking place virtually on
February 15 beginning at 5:30 pm.
Have a great weekend!
Elicia
From: Alexis Torrance <alexis.torrance@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 12:40 PM
To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov>
Subject: Re: 119 La Porte Avenue ‐ COA
Dear Elicia,
Thank you for your patience. I have updated the narrative accordingly and included a full view picture of the front of
the house (attached). I'm also attaching a pdf brochure from the storm window manufacturer, highlighting which
option we'd be using. The quote from Quality Window includes the specifications/dimensions of the two storm
doors.
Let me know if you need anything more from me. I can also have other material prepared for the meeting itself.
Best,
7
Alexis
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 2:26 PM Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov> wrote:
Hi Alexis –
I do think this additional information would be helpful to have as part of your application narrative because you
touch on the hardship in terms of complexity and expense and it does demonstrate the due diligence that led to the
application to replace the windows. I can either include this email correspondence or would be glad to replace the
original application narrative with an updated – just let me know your preference. Also for the application, could
you please provide a specification of the proposed storm doors and also a photograph of the full front of the house
as seen from the street.
A window repair resources listing is attached for your use and reference; we offer no endorsement to any of the
companies on this list but I can say that North Coast, Werntz, and H.G. Christman are actively engaged in window
restoration in the area presently and each have had positive feedback from property owners.
In terms of the replacement window that you’ve proposed, the aluminum clad and fiberglass are a well‐received
selection (as opposed to vinyl), the profile with the smaller meeting rail is a plus, and the cottage style shows great
attention to detail to match the original window style and pattern.
Thank you for scheduling with Ross and Adam and I’ll look out for their site visit report to include in the
Commissioner packet.
Elicia
From: Alexis Torrance <alexis.torrance@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:17 PM
To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov>
Subject: Re: 119 La Porte Avenue ‐ COA
Hi Elicia,
8
Thank you for getting back to me. I'd be happy to answer any questions you might have. I just got in touch with
Michelle and paid the application fee.
Regarding repair, we have considered it. We've run into a few hurdles with the idea though. First is whether we
could find anyone locally who might not only be able to repair/restore the sashes, weatherize them, etc. (something
that's unfortunately not possible on the windows that previous owners have already replaced), but also replace the
single pane glass throughout with low‐e double glazing. I haven't found anyone yet locally who does this. The
current windows are not only incredibly inefficient (many air gaps around the frame, etc.), but they also let a lot of
sound through the pane. This is a big problem on Laporte Ave partly because we get a good number of
emergency vehicles coming right by the house. If we were to remove the storm windows (which we would have to
do anyway to try to restore the original integrity), and then only have a single pane, we'd be in worse shape than
when we started! The second issue is finding a dependable restoration company in the area in general. We haven't
had much luck on that front. If you have any leads, I would gladly get their opinion. For instance, I haven't been able
to get hold of Schoberg Restorations (Plymouth), and others like Front Gate Indy aren't taking any new customers.
Maybe I should have put all this in the original description. I can modify it if you think I need to. All in all, we've
come to the conclusion that as an option, repair is just too complicated and expensive for us, especially if we end up
with something worse at the other end in terms of energy‐efficiency and sound abatement. I'd also be happy for
Adam and Ross to give their opinion on this when they visit.
Thanks again for taking the time to go over the application.
With best wishes,
Alexis
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:33 PM Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov> wrote:
Greetings –
Thank you for emailing a COA application for your project. The $20 application fee can be made over the phone to
business license administrator, Michelle Adams by calling her line at 574/235.5912. If she is unavailable, please
leave a return phone number and she will return your call.
I’ve quickly glanced at your project to determine that the project would need to be reviewed by the Historic
Preservation Commission and can be included on the February 15, 2021 meeting agenda. As I work to build that
staff report and recommendation, I may contact you with questions. For window replacement projects, an
evaluation by a window repair professional is helpful to demonstrate to the Commission that window repair has
9
been considered. You mention working with window experts so I wonder if any that looked into the project could
put their findings into a statement to include.
I would like to request that you schedule an appointment for a site visit with site inspector, Ross Van Overberghe
and preservation specialist, Adam Toering to evaluate the condition of the windows. Both are copied on this
message so that an appointment can be made directly.
I look forward to working with you on this and communicating throughout the next week to get all the details in
place for the staff report. Talk with you soon.
Elicia
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Department of Community Investment
(574)235‐7672
efeasel@southbendin.gov
City of South Bend
227 W. Jefferson Blvd., Ste. 1400
South Bend, IN 46601
From: Alexis Torrance <alexis.torrance@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 1:51 PM
To: DL‐Historic Preservation <dl‐historicpreservation@southbendin.gov>
Subject: Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness
Dear HPC,
Please find attached my application for a certificate of appropriateness for replacement window work on my home
at 119 Laporte Ave, South Bend, IN 46616. I am also attaching a detailed written description of the project as well
as a detailed estimate by the contractor which indicates materials to be used, scale, dimensions, construction
methods, finishes, etc. Also included in the description of the project is a link to manufacturers’ brochures and
specifications as well as photographs of the areas which the project will affect.
10
I am trying to figure out how to pay the fee during Covid. I am happy to do this by phone. Any help appreciated.
With thanks and best wishes,
Alexis Torrance
IMPORTANT NOTICE! This E‐Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution,
copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E‐Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is
strictly prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E‐Mail
in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E‐Mail address. Please note that incoming e‐mails
are not routinely screened for response deadlines, and as such, please notify the sender separately by fax of any
message containing deadlines. In addition, E‐Mail information cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error‐free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain virus. Therefore,
the sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which