HomeMy WebLinkAboutHistoric Preservation Commission Meeting Signed Minutes - December 21, 2020
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
December 21st, 2020
Microsoft Teams
I. CALL TO ORDER
Commission Secretary Sarah Andrews called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
Members of the Public Present:
Larry Schohl, 527 Riverside Drive, South Bend, IN 46601
David St Clair, 402 West Washington, South Bend, IN 46601
II. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Sarah Andrews, Secretary; Mary Brazinsky, Treasurer; Eric Stalheim;
Patrick Deegan; Joan Downs-Krostenko, Architectural Historian; John Tiffany; David
Wyncott.
Members Not in Attendance: Michele Gelfman, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice
President.
Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator; Adam Toering, Historic
Preservation Specialist; Ross Van Overberghe, Site Inspector; Sandra Kennedy, Legal
Counsel.
Staff Not in Attendance: N/A
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
1. 2020-1113A 527 Riverside Drive River Bend Ordinance No. 8308-92
Representation: Larry Schohl, 527 Riverside Drive, South Bend, IN 46601
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: December 8, 2020
Application Number: 2020-1113A
Property Location: 527 Riverside Drive
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1904
Property Owner: Larry C. Schohl
Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Local Historic District, #8308-92
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two-story house has a square plan with a
later L addition. The foundation is rusticated concrete block. The walls are vinyl siding. The
hipped roof and dormers are covered with asphalt shingles. There is a full -length front
screened in porch with a concrete foundation, wood support posts and railings. The windows
are 6/6 vinyl replacements with some 1/1 double hung. There are 6 /6 and 8/8 double hung
windows on the addition.
ALTERATIONS: RME 2018-0323 approved removal often concrete ste ps leftover from
house tom down 25 years ago (523 Riverside Dr), filled and covered with landscaping. COA
2015-0401 approved complete tear off Sheriff Goslin roof down to the decking, repair decking
as needed and completely install new roofing system using architectural shingles, soffit vents
and gutters will be replaced in kind as needed. COA 2007 -0423 approved complete tear off to
decking and re-roof with asphalt 30 yr Prestige High Definition Shingles, install 7/16 OSB
sheeting, install Ice Dam Membrane, replace 2 vent stack boots, install 27 linear feet shingle
vent II for ventilation and replace mission fascia on West side gable. COA 2002 -0523
approved removal of two layers existing asphalt 3 - tab shingles from roof of back porch, install
new 3-tab white Certainteed 25-year shingles to match house, install decking, felt, and drip
edge as existing.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Build a garage same as the one built next door. 26 ' long,
14' wide, 5'plus from property line. I will get a contractor if this is approved"
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant has requested approval to:
a. Construct a 14' wide x 26' deep garage.
b. Roof will be a 4/12 pitch with asphalt architectural shingles.
c. Foundation will be a 4" slab over entire area with a 12" x 12" perimeter footing.
d. Siding will be vinyl, same as house.
e. Doors will include a steel service (man) door and an overhead door.
The lot for 527 Riverside Drive has been combined with the lot for 523 Riverside Drive where
the house and garage have been de molished. There are two accessory structures currently on
the combined lot, a two-story ADU and a small one-story garage, both on the original 527
Riverside Drive lot.
The South Bend Zoning Ordinance limits each property to 1 detached accessory structure. The
existing ADU is exempt from this requirement. The options for building a new garage are I.
Build a new stand-alone garage in similar location as the former 523 Riverside garage (adjusted
to meet setback requirements of either 5' or 18' , not a distance in between). This option
requires either a zoning variance, or that the small garage be removed from the property, 2.
Connect the new garage to the existing small garage.
The initial application submitted was for a new stand -alone garage in a similar location to the
now demolished garage for 523 Riverside Drive. An alternate site plan was submitted
requesting to build the new garage next to and attached to the existing small garage; staff
recommend against this option and suggested that the app licant move forward with the original
application. Applicant has agreed and will apply for a variance if the COA is approved.
A site plan, to scale, and elevations of the garage are needed to answer questions of 1. the
garage elevation/roof design, 2. exact placement/scale on site, 3. design details of how the
new construction would connect to existing accessory structure (if the alternate location were
being considered).
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVER BEND
I. THE ENVIRONMENT
B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES
Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located
near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in front and a larger lawn to the
rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive
generally have sloping front lawns and flat back yards. The majority of
structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties
include a garage located at the rear of the property accessed from
unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees,
shrubbery and/or hedges. All houses conform to the uniform set-back
within each block.
The district has a compact layout. Large homes are constructed on
small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Pla ce, are
constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of the backyard areas or rear
first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In
recognition of this, greater latitude will be allowed in the application of
the adopted
standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the
individual preferences of the property owners in the treatment of those
backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn, shrubs,
walkways, or semi-permanent surface changes in the rear of houses.
Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent surface changes in the
rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent
structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets,
sandboxes, etc.
Required
Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers)
and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be
retained.
Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past
appearance of the property found in photographs, drawing, and
newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing
surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory
structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings
should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale type and
appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the building's historic
fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved
by the Historic Preservation Commission.
Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees,
fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating
their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas
shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front
yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond
the setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high
intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen
from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as
television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas where they can be
views from the public thoroughfare.
III. NEW CONSTRUCTION
New construction includes any new building or structure constructed
within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an
existing building. New construction should be designed considering the
appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be
contemporary of may suggest motifs from the historic buildings. New
construction design should be clearly differentiated from the design of the
historic buildings.
a. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION
The majority of structures in the district are two stories in height and
are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few story -and-a-half
residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a
1:2 height-to-width ratio.
Required
The height of a new structure and its height -to-width proportions shall be
consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall
be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure in the same block.
Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a
facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Facade
proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade
wider or narrower tha n those existing in the same block. Additions to
existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing
structure.
Recommended
Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and
mood to the building or neighborhood.
Prohibited
Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade
of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height.
Not Recommended
New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be added, nor should
existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details,
features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is
incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions.
b. BUILDING MATERIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION
Wall materials in the district are predominantly wood clapboard and its
imitation in aluminum and vinyl. Some walls are brick. Patterned shingles
are common in gable ends and dormers.
Required
Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale,
texture, and color with adjacent structures . Materials used on an addition
to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of
that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be
retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the
basic structure and appearance of the building.
Recommended
Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible
alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and
style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.
Prohibited
Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they
conform with all other standards.
SITE VISIT REPORT: NI A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for a new stand-alone garage in a
similar location to where the former 523 Riverside garage was once built, with design details
remanded to Staff. HPC approval is contin gent upon receiving a variance from Board of Zoning
Appeals.
Prepared by Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Deegan made a motion to approve COA #2020-1113A as staff
recommended. Seconded by Commissioner Brazinsky.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 – 0. Motion to approve construction of a new stand-alone garage in a similar
location to where the former 523 Riverside garage was once built, with design details
remanded to Staff, approval contingent upon receiving a variance from Board of
Zoning Appeals. COA #2020-1113A passes.
2. 2020-1209 821 Ashland Ave Chapin Park Ordinance No. 9574-05
Representation: David St. Clair, 402 W Washington, South Bend, IN 46601
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: December 14, 2020
Application Number: 2020-1209
Property Location: 821 Ashland Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare / 1901
Property Owner: Stackhouse & St. Clair Holdings
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National
Historic District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two story wood frame house with a square plan
sitting upon a brick foundation. The hip roof has asphalt shingles and a brick chimney offset from
the peak with three simple corbel courses. The house front features a full height bay with
windows. Windows throughout were wood 1/1 double hung with diamond pattern muntins on the
front facade.
ALTERATIONS: Administrative approval #2020-0720 allowed for the replacement of the fire
damage d roof with new rafters and asphalt architectural shingles (not completed). Certificate of
Appropriateness #2019-0404 allowed for the retroactive replacement of a number of the original
windows with new vinyl windows. AA #20 1 9-0404A allowed for the tear off and replacement of the
asphalt shingle roof. COA #2017-0605 allowed for the demolition of the garage structures at the rear
of the property. Aluminum siding was added to the exterior of the structure sometime prior to 1987 . In
1949 the full-width front porch was removed, and a front stoop was added, with a small plastic porch
roof over the entrance.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Remove current home from property with an excavator. Remove all
debris and prepare to redevelop the property for a residential home. "
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant has requested approval to:
1. Demolish the existing structure,
11. Clean the site to prepare for redevelopment.
In November of 2019 a fire caused extensive damage to the property at 821 Ashland Avenue. HPC
Staff, members of the Department of Code Enforcement, local preservation entities (Indiana
Landmarks), and the property owner ha ve been in conversation to determine various options available
to the property owner. The previous property owner had been discussing options with their insurance
provider regarding the fire claim and he testified to this fact at a Code Hearing in early 20 20. The
property owner expressed interest in selling the property and had been actively seeking a potential
buyer.
Code Enforcement applied for the Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the structure in June of
2020. Phone conversations between Deput y Director Marlaina Johns and Specialist Adam Toering on
July 10, 2020 indicated that a purchase agreement had been obtained for this property with a new
party; a repair agreement between the current owner and the Department of Code Enforcement was
entered into and the application was withdrawn. HPC Staff administratively approved repairs for the
burnt roof at that time (AA 2020 -0720), this work was not completed.
On August 7, 2020, Code Enforcement Inspector Steve Szaday informed Specialist Toering that t he
condition of the chimney may be worse than anticipated and that the property owner may seek
approval to remove the chimney to ensure the structure could be saved. In November of 2020,
additional roof members collapsed into the structure, leading to the property owner being interested in
changing the roof line and overall concern for the remaining exterior walls. Staff has received
multiple inquiries about this property from concerned neighbors and community advocates.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
V.GENERAL
A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a
threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and
exterior features of the original buildi ngs, especially horn es rated as historically significant, is
encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic
Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference.
B. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required before m oving any building or structure. The
moving of a building within, out of or into the district is discouraged ; however, moving is preferred
to demolition. Buildings incompatible with existing structures in th e historic district shall be
prohibited.
[ ... l
VI. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
Enforcement of the preservation guidelines and standards for the historic district is made possible
in the Zoning Ordinance of the City of South Bend , ordinance No. 5565-73, as amended and the
Historic Preservation Commission's Preservation Plan.
The Historic Preservation Commission may petition the Building Commissioner to use the l egal
means available to him/her to force the maintenance and / or repair of any building or structure
within the historic district in accordance with the intent of this ordinance.
This ordinance, however, does not prevent the ordinary maintenance and repair of any
building or structure which does not involve a change in any exterior feature, nor does it
prevent the reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any building or structure which
the Building Commissioner or other official has determined to be a hazard to public safety.
Property owners wishing to do, or have done, any work affecting the exterior of their building or land
must apply directly to the History Preservat ion Commission on the form prescribed by the
Commission (see Appendix A). The Historic Preservation Commission shall issue a Certificate of
Appropriateness before commencement of any construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or
moving of any house or structure within the historic district boundaries (see Appendix A). The
Historic Preservation Commission will accept applications for Certificate of Appropriateness only
from the property owner.
In making its determination, the Historic Preservati on Commission shall consider three
factors: first, the appropriateness of the proposed work to the preservation of the building
and district; second, the detriment to the public welfare if the proposed work is permitted
even though it is not deemed appropr iate; third, the potential hardship that the denial of the
Certificate of Appropriateness would cause the applicant.
[ ... l
SITE VISIT REPORT: NI A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledging that over a year has passed since the fire of
November 2019, Historic Preservation Staff would like to see this property find resolution, be it
through demolition or rehabilitation .
Staff concedes that the structure has been open to the elements for over a year and that extensive
interior damage is to be expected from that continued exposure. Were the structure to be approved for
demolition, staff would ask that the property owner deconstruct /save unique character defining
characteristics of the structure for reuse or donation to local preservation organiz ations.
Staff recommends approval for the deconstruction of the structure (with a preference for saving as
much usable material as possible).
Recommendation by Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Downs Krostenko made a motion to accept COA #2020-1209 for the
demolition of the now derelict property and that we request that the owner salvage all
architectural features of the home, particularly the egg and dart molding at the eaves
and any other things that are uncovered when the siding is removed in order to
consider repurposing/reusing them in the next generation building on the site.
Seconded by Commissioner Tiffany.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 – 0. Motion to deconstruction of the structure with a preference for saving as
much usable material as possible. COA #2020-1209 passes.
3. 2020-1209A 319 W Navarre St Chapin Park Ordinance No. 9574-05
Representation: None
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: December 14, 2020
Application Number: 2020-1209A
Property Location: 319 West Navarre Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Stocker House / Gabled El / 1880-1882 (1905?)
Property Owner: Thomas Casteel
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National
Historic District
Rating: Non-Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two story irregular plan house on a brick foundation
covered with stucco. Brick chimney at rear. Aluminum sided, bay on east side of first story. Roof is
cross gabled with asphalt shingles. Small entry steps with pent roof (an extension of the main roof)
with wood console. Vinyl replacement vinyl windows throughout.
ALTERATIONS: Administrative approval #2020-0904 allowed for the reconstruction and replacement
of the existing deck, the addition of a new deck portion, reconstruction of the cellar door,
reconstruction/pointing of the cellar entrance masonry, relocation of existing back door to location of
replacement window, seal up previous opening. Vinyl windows were installed sometime after the
property was surveyed in 1979.
APPLICATION ITEMS: " Window replacement - See attached."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant has requested approval to:
1. Replace five (5) existing vinyl clad double hung replacement windows with
new vinyl clad double hung replacement windows of smaller (shorter)
configuration,
1. Two on the front fa9ade,
2. Three on the east side bay window,
11. Construct new exterior knee walls and cover in new aluminum siding
111. Remove existing wrought iron window grates.
The existing aluminum siding predates the establishment of the district and is visible in th e
1979 survey photographs. It is unknown when the vinyl windows were installed: sometime
after 1979, but before the establishment of the district. This was prior to the properties
purchase by the current owner .
The current windowsills are at floor h eight. The proposed new windowsills will be raised to 27" above
floor height. New walls will be con structed.
Aluminum siding does not 'feather -in ' visually as well a s wood siding. The new material will more
than likely stand out by comparison to the existing siding. Staff does not believe this will detract
from the character of the house any more than the existing aluminum siding already does.
Were the applicant to only change two or three of the five windows of this size, staff would not support
the project. By changing all the windows of this size, the house maintains some semblance of uniformity
and symmetry. The Commission has reviewed and approved projects where windows were made smaller
to allow for improved use and functionality of t he interior space (in kitchens, for example).
Wrought iron window grates are visible in the 1979 Survey Card photo. It is not known how old the
existing fixtures are, if they are original to the house, or if these are the same wrought iron gates from the
1979 Survey Card. The current gates are only present on the street facing windows and have scroll -work
detailing in the centers.
Were the applicant not changing the size of the windows (necessitating new siding material), staff would
administratively approve the replacement of the vinyl windows with new vinyl windows.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
II. EXISTING STRUCTURES
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Original exterior building materials in the district include brick , stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and
brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied
over the original material.
Required
Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials
shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around
windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when
deteriorated be yond repair.
Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when
necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the
preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry
mortar joints should be repainted only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient
mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in
composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile.
When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco,
to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not
compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the
original work.
Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased
deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects.
Recommended
Whenever possible, the o riginal building materials should be restored. When maintaining or
repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When
used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every
effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves
and other architectural features.
Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph
County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is
listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all
facets of rehabilitation and restoration - materials, methods, contractors and the like.
Prohibited
Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the
building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shing les.
Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco,
limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates
deterioration.
Repainting shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a
bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a
result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar.
This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick.
Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall
not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface.
Not Recommended
Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry
surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are
frequently unnecessary and expensive and can accelerate deterioration of the mason ry. Mortar joints,
which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power washed.
[...]
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home.
Many are double-hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and
brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim
has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the
other half have wood storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters,
decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they
shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not
damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design
and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or
coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material.
[...]
SITE VISIT REPORT: NI A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.
Recommendation by Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Stalheim made a motion on COA #2020-1209A to deny application as
proposed but request that in future applications for the window replacement that the
window consideration be for full size replacements with an allowance to reapply
without another fee. Seconded by Commissioner Brazinsky.
Commissioner Stalheim voted to deny because I feel it is prudent to retain the original
window dimensions for this property.
Commissioner Brazinsky voted to deny because I think the windows should be the
same size as they were originally.
Commissioner Andrews voted to deny because the windows are a defining element of
this home from a historic nature and they need to be preserved.
Commissioner Wyncott voted to deny with the reason that the size of the windows is a
character defining feature of the home.
Commissioner Tiffany voted to deny because the windows are great and pay a lot of
character to the house and there is not a safety issue, kids falling out on a second and
third floor, I think they should stay the same size.
Commissioner Downs Krostenko voted to deny because of the reasons that have been
stated by other Commissioners but also the dangerous precedent that would be set.
Commissioner Deegan voted to deny because the windows are out of historic character.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 – 0. Motion to deny COA #2020-1209A passes.
IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
N/A
V. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
i. November 16, 2020
Commissioner Andrews made a motion to approve the November 16th
meeting minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Deegan.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 – 0. Motion to accept the November 16th meeting minutes passes.
B. STAFF REPORTS
i. Administrative Approvals
1. Twelve projects were approved last month with a steady pace of
reviews this month including masonry, fences, roofs.
C. COMMITTEE REPORTS
i. Disposition of Historic Preservation Assets
1. Administrator Feasel gave an update on the progress of the project. Still
seeking 150 square foot of holdings. Continue to send boxes to BOLT
to be digitized. Ross has taken charge of the overscale blueprint project
to be digitized by Arc. Mention of potential partnership. On the digital
data, Adam and Ross have been working on uploading and
consolidating files. Introduction of current Intern, Mia Schwartz,
working in demolished files. Ross introduced Mia. Mia introduced
herself.
ii. Standards Update
1. Administrator Feasel gave an update on the progress of the project.
Standards Update document itself is as comprehensive as it has been.
Commissioner input has been included in the edits. Work is being done
on creating an introductory PowerPoint and consideration of a short
video. Public engagement platform is under construction. Mention of
Jennifer Settle graphic designer. Developing a list of discussion points
that will need to be worked through as a group.
iii. Historic Districts
1. Riverside Drive Lighting – working through legal description of the plat
to determine the boundary.
iv. Local Landmarks
1. Ridgedale/Twyckenham Hills Gates – plan to meet in January to talk
about history and next steps.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
N/A
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. 2021 HPC officer elections – slate of officers
Commissioner Downs Krostenko nominated Commissioner Gelfman to continue in her
position as President with a second by Commissioner Wyncott.
Commissioner Brazinsky nominated Commissioner Andrews for Vice President with a
second by Commissioner Downs Krostenko.
Commissioner Brazinsky nominated Commissioner Downs Krostenko as Secretary with a
second by Commissioner Andrews.
Commissioner Andrews nominated Commissioner Brazinsky as Treasurer with a second by
Commissioner Deegan.
The following slate of officers will be presented at the January meeting for a vote:
President – Commissioner Gelfman
Vice President – Commissioner Andrews
Secretary – Commissioner Down Krostenko
Treasurer – Commissioner Brazinsky
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
A. 2021 HPC meeting dates
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Wyncott made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Deegan.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 – 0. Meeting adjourned at 6:43 pm.
Attest:
____________________________ ___________
Sarah Andrews, Secretary Date
1-22-21