HomeMy WebLinkAboutAmending Municipal Code New Section 13-57.1 Use of Police Officers at Large Parties or Gatherings . -lc
. .
ORDINANCE No. 8079-90
Passed by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana
March 26, 90
zgi___
Attest: '.. aL.- 117zi--,—,,..,,_■, City Clerk
IRENE i K. GAMMON
„...--------"
Attest: . A-,./...t.......A.,,1 _. 4t.i4gt. President of Common Council
/ Ole
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of South Bend, Indiana
March 27, 90
z9
City Clerk
IRENE K. GAMMON
March 29 90
Approved and signed by me ig
Mayor
•
BILL NO.
ORDINANCE NO. Q7Q-90
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA,
AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
BY THE INCLUSION OF NEW SECTION 13-57.1 OF ARTICLE 4,
CHAPTER 13 , TO BE ENTITLED: USE OF POLICE OFFICERS AT
LARGE PARTIES OR GATHERINGS REQUIRING A SECOND RESPONSE.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT
The City of South Bend recognizes that a loud, disturbing, large
party or gathering may in some cases threaten the public peace,
health, safety or general welfare of the community and in particular
the neighborhood where the party premises is located. The City of
South Bend Police Department may in some instances receive numerous
complaints regarding such a disturbance. This may require police
officers to control the threat on more than one occasion by their
presence at the premises.
The Common Council believes that repeated calls to the same
disturbance leaves officers unavailable to perform more important
duties which have greater community priority. The Common Council
further finds that these calls are a serious drain on manpower and
leave other areas of the City of South Bend exposed, with no
available officer or assistance, should the need arise.
Therefore, the Common Council believes that to discourage and
minimize the frequency of return disturbance calls to parties, a
service fee will be charged to the responsible participant(s) if
police officers must return to the premises more than once.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City
of South Bend, Indiana, as follows:
SECTION I . Section 13-57. 1, Article 4, Chapter 13 of the
Municipal Code of the City of South Bend, Indiana, shall read in its
entirety as follows:
SECTION 13-57. 1 USE OF POLICE OFFICERS AT LARGE PARTIES OR
GATHERINGS REQUIRING A SECOND RESPONSE.
(a) Complaint and First Response.
After a complaint is received about a disturbing or
disorderly party or gathering, police officers
responding to the complaint must determine if there is,
in fact, a threat to the public peace, health, safety
or general welfare upon arriving at the location. If
the party or gathering appears to be a disturbance, the
resident or person in charge of the party, or other
responsible person shall be informed of the
disturbance, the complaint, and the fact that the
disturbance must cease. Information shall be further
conveyed that the party or gathering shall be allowed
to continue so long as the disturbance which generated
the complaint ceases. They should further be informed
that any continuing disturbance which precipitates
another call and a second response by the police will
result in a charge to the responsible person for the
cost of the police service. A "First Response Notice"
should then be handed to the responsible party,
4 •
(b) Second Response.
If the police receive further complaints about the
disturbance which requires a. second response, the
• officers responding should again determine if there is
a disturbance of the peace resulting from the party or
gathering or if the complaint is unfounded. If a
disturbance is occurring, the responsible party shall
then be given a "Disturbance Violation Fee Notice, "
indicating that the City will bill the responsible
party for the personnel and equipment costs, or other
damage and expense, incurred as a result of the
disturbance.
(c) Responsible Party.
A responsible party is defined as the person in charge
of the premises and the person responsible for the
event, or if either of those persons is a minor, then
the parents or guardians of that minor. If no
responsible party is located on the premises, the
responsible party is deemed to be the property
owner(s) , as determined by reference to the records of
the St. Joseph County Assessor. In such an instance,
the responding officer(s) shall leave a copy of the
First Response Notice, as well as a copy of the
Disturbance Violation Fee Notice if a second response
is required, at the premises. Copies of these
Notice(s) must also be mailed to the property owner as
determined from the Assessor' s records.
(d) Special Security Assignment.
The police personnel utilized during a second response
after the first warning, to control the threat to the
public peace, health, safety or general welfare, shall
be deemed to be on special security assignment over and
above the services normally provided.
(e) Costs.
( 1 ) The costs of such special security assignment may
include minor damages to City property and/or injuries
to City personnel. A citation for a single incident
violation of this Ordinance shall be issued to each
violator imposing a $50. 00 fine payable through the
Ordinance Violation Bureau as addressed in Section
2-213 of this code. The City reserves its legal
options to elect any other legal remedies when the
costs or damage exceed $50.
( 2) All costs assessed hereunder shall be payable
through the Ordinance Violation Bureau of the City of
South Bend, and shall be deposited into the Law
Enforcement Continuing Education Fund.
(f) A "Disturbance Violation Fee Notice, " issued hereunder,
may be issued to a responsible party within twelve (12)
hours of the issuance hereunder to that party of a
"First Response Notice. "
(g) The enforcement of this ordinance shall not abrogate
the responding officer' s enforcement of any other local
ordinances or state laws which may also be violated as
a result of a loud party or gathering.
autumn-tn. Tat ort •
On the Tantrum Qtouucil of tip fl tit of WWII drub.
Your Committee of the Whole
to whom was referred
BILL NO.
18-90 A BILL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, AMENDING THE
MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, BY THE INCLUSION
OF NEW SECTION 13-57.1 OF ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 13, TO BE
ENTITLED: USE OF POLICE OFFICERS AT LARGE PARTIES OR
GATHERINGS REQUIRED A SECOND RESPONSE.
Respectfully-report that they have examined the matter and that in their opinion
This bill should be recommended to the Council favorable.
Chairman
Sean Coleman
FREE PRESS 046aiip PUBLISHING CO.
=SpUTH 8 �11I1
City of South Bend
%'04 �'\''�' !'- ` Common Council
/ County-City Building • South Bend, Indiana 46601
// 9>
IIII �� y\ }jj
:1 865
(219) 284-9321
March 7 , 1990
Thomas Zakrzewski Members of the Common Council
President 441 County-City Building
South Bend, Indiana 46601
Loretta Duda
Vice-President Re: Use of Police Officers at Large Parties or Gather-
Sean Coleman ings Requiring a Second Response.
Chairman. Committee
of the Whole Dear Council Members :
The attached Bill would amend Article 4, Chapter 13 of
the South Bend Municipal Code by the inclusion of new
Stephen Luecke Section 13-57. 1, to be entitled "Use of Police Officers
First District at Large Parties or Gatherings Requiring a Second Re-
sponse" Its intent is to minimize the number of times
Donald Niezgodski that officers must return the site of noisy parties or
Second District gatherings, by providing for a $50.00 fine for additional
William Soderberg calls to a disturbance after a warning has been given.
Third District
Repeated calls to the same disturbance are not only
Ann Puzzello frustrating for the officers and neighbors, but also
Fourth District a distraction from more important duties which have a
greater community priority. So, officers on second
Linas n skas response will be considered to be on "special security
Fifth District assignment" and a fine will be levied. A similar ordi-
Thomas Zakrzewski nance is in place in Fullerton, CA and seems to be ef-
Sixth District fective in minimizing the number of returns calls .
Sean Coleman This Bill has been drafted with the support and assis-
At Large tance of the Police Dept. and the City Attorney' s Office.
Loretta Duda I recommend that the Bill be sent to the appropriate
At Large committee for review and recommendation, and hope for
your favorable support. I look forward to discussing
John Voorde it further with you.
At Large
Sincerely,
Stephen J. Luecke
Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand 1st District Council Member
Council Attorney