Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
October 2018
CITY OF SOUTHBEND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MEETINGAGENDA—MONDAY, OCTOBER 15,2018-5:30 PM COUNTY—CITY BUILDING, 13TH FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I. CALL TO ORDER IL ROLL CALL III. PUBLIC HEARING a. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS i. 2018-0621C 815 Arch #6846-80/6848-80 Edgewater/Local Landmark ii. 2018-0926C 630 W Washington #8078-1990 Local Landmark SB/Fagade Local Landmark SB East Wayne Chapin Park Local Landmark SJC Chapin Park Telephone interpreter service is available upon request free of charge for individuals with limited English proficiency. Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request free of charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. PRESIDENT A CEMHE Loc.Ai. GovFwNNn.N r ELICIA Fr t SE1. OF THr NATIONAL, PARK Sl--,R\-'ICF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATOR EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY; INNOVATION 1 INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT 1400S County -City Building', 227W Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601; p 574.235.9371; f 574.235.9201 www.southbendin.gov Easement iii. 2018-0928 1329 E Washington #7118-1982 iv. 2018-0928A 301 S Sunnyside #7796-87 v. 2018-1001A 760 Portage #9574-05 vi. 2018-1001C 50106 Bittersweet #117-1976 amended 11-1987 vii. 2018-1001D 720 Park #9574-05 IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR V. REGULAR BUSINESS a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES b. STAFF REPORTS c. COMMITTEE REPORTS VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS a. Resolution 18-03 VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS a. Leeper Park Presentation by Venues, Parks, and Arts IX. ADJOURNMENT Local Landmark SB East Wayne Chapin Park Local Landmark SJC Chapin Park Telephone interpreter service is available upon request free of charge for individuals with limited English proficiency. Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request free of charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. PRESIDENT A CEMHE Loc.Ai. GovFwNNn.N r ELICIA Fr t SE1. OF THr NATIONAL, PARK Sl--,R\-'ICF HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATOR EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY; INNOVATION 1 INCLUSION EMPOWERMENT 1400S County -City Building', 227W Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601; p 574.235.9371; f 574.235.9201 www.southbendin.gov HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET October 15, 2018 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME ADDRESS W, B, F, D H, O 3 h0 �or+o-v 5.13 vi 107; a%o1wA1ZI7 I AQ SA /L— I - STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0621 C Property Location: 815 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1921 / Ernest W. Young Property Owner: Jason Pfledderer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80; Local Landmark, Ordinance #6848-1980 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house sits on the corner of Arch and Edgewater. It is a two-story with rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The main level is red brick laid in running bond. The upper level surmounts a continuous band of stucco with half timer expressions on the west end. The broad sweeping asphalt shingled roof lines extend down from the central hip with a variety of intersecting dormers, narrow overhang lines with moulded wood frieze board. A rectangular boathouse is across from the house along the river. ALTERATIONS: All of the windows were replaced between 1985 and 1989. The roof is not original to the house. The doors are replacements. The surfaces of the front walk way, porch steps and porch stoop do not appear to be original to the house. COA #1985-0926 allowed for the replacement of four windows on the shed dormer at the northeast side of the house. COA #1986-0819 allowed for re -roofing. COA #1989-0417 allowed for the replacement of six windows with Polarseal aluminum double hung windows. COA# 1989-0801 allowed for reconstruction of the main entry. COA #1990-0418 allowed for "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized • lumber. The new construction will duplicate the existing fenestration, elevation, screening, etc. exactly." COA #2000-0717 allowed for in-kind repairs of a whole in the roof of the boathouse following a tree fall. COA #2003- 0808 allowed for site work and the replacement of the back door. COA #2011-0812 allowed for the removal of the removal of brush along the river bank per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2012-0515 allowed for the repair of the fence and the replacement of concrete chunks on the site with formed pavers. COA #2014-0804A allowed for the removal of a rotten sugar maple tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2015-0803A allowed for concrete sitework. RME #2016-100313 allowed for the stucco repair on the main house. RME #2016-0628 allowed for the removal of a tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2017-041713 allowed for the removal of windows on the east side of the main house to be replaced with sliding doors, as well as concrete site work. RME #2018-0501A allowed for the re -roofing of the boathouse and the reconstruction of the handrail. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacing railing with vinyl railing." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following components: 1. Remove and replace existing railing. The primary motivations for replacement can be characterized as: 1. The existing (30") railing is not compliant with code and would warrant modification or reconstruction so as to become compliant with the 36" requirement. The applicant would like to replace the existing railing as opposed to modify it by adding additional height. 2. Wood as a material on a boat house (or other structure in close proximity to water) constitutes a consistent and regular maintenance issue. The applicant would prefer to replace wood with a material with a significantly lower maintenance requirement and has expressed a willingness to utilize metal or vinyl options. • Five replacement options for the railing were put forth by the applicant for the September HPC meeting and all of the proposed options would constitute a significant departure from the existing railing's construction and visual appearance. The proposed designs did not have accompanying manufacture specifications and instead appear to be representations as to desired styles and/or constructions. It is unknown if the examples are manufactured out of wood, metal, or vinyl. Were one of these options selected, the existing railing system (including masonry support `columns') would be removed down to the decking. The replacement railing system would need to be bolted onto the decking and secured to the superstructure. 0 SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EDGEWATER PLACE: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the District range from brick, clapboard, shingles, and masonry block to aluminum siding. In the majority of the cases the aluminum siding has been applied over the original clapboard. There are some masonry commercial buildings on Lincolnway. Required Existing exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry structures shall be maintained, tuckpointed and properly cleaned when necessary. Masonry shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with the gentlest method possible, such as low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Stucco surfaces shall be maintained by cleaning and repainted when necessary. When repairing stucco a stucco mixture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative to maintaining the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. However it must be noted that such material can contribute to the deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS The majority of the houses in the district have either an open or a enclosed porch across the front or on the side. Most porches have either gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. A brick base with wood columns is common. Required • Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Porches and steps that are important to the building's style and development may not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS Required Building code requirements shall be compiled with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved. Recommended Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. Prohibited Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and space is prohibited. Not Recommended Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Structures like the boathouse are not specifically defined within the Standards and Guidelines, and as such, the general text covering building materials, as well as those covering entrances, porches, and steps, are considered for this recommendation. The Standards and Guidelines are explicit that "original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replaced with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair" and that "original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. " Historic precedence exists for this, in the form of a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in April of 1990 that allowed for the "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber." The applicant received approval to reconstruct the handrail earlier this year with RME #2018-0501A. Vinyl is only explicitly mentioned four times in the Standards and Guidelines, in relation to siding and window awnings, hoods, and fake shutters. Staff agrees that the railing should be taller to be compliant with State / International Building Code requirements. The applicant's preference for replacement of the railing is not unfounded, and Staff would support replacement to comply with Code requirements specifically because of the river -front setting of this structure. However, Staff is not convinced that enough investigati( recommendation. Staff recommends 1 and Guidelines. • Photos• • Figure 1-815 Arch Avenue, looking west towards the main hoose from near the intersection of Arch Avenue and Riverside Drive. 0 Figure 2 -- 815 Arch, Boat House. Looking north along Riverside Drive. 74 Al � R r► �Q 8 Mi Y v � y. {j{ t _ a h �7 k M, # Y t 1 '..` 'o iII / II I • . 'z a .i ID WAPM Row la,wK, q> 44 g F b � z I ..5�3� Figure 5 -- Boat house lower level, looking north. • C • WAIVER OF STATUTORY TIME PERIOD FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS WHEREAS, county and city ordinances require the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County (the "Commission") to consider my application for a certificate of appropriateness within forty-five (45) days after its filing; and WHEREAS, the county and city ordinances require the Commission to issue a,denial, if they choose to do so, within sixty (60) days of receipt of my application; and WHEREAS, the undersigned, as applicant, has requested that the Commission delay its decision on my application. THEREFORE, the app�cant ereb consents to art extension of the time to act on my application to and including and accordingly.waives any rights affected by the Commission's postponed consideration oNny application. I affirm under the penalties for perjury that the foregoing representations are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. • Applicant r' Za�B — OfoZl �- COA Number 1� 1 V'. Address of Property . Received: Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County this t 1 Day of IQLT-, 20 $• Historic Preservation mmission lie F:IDATAISH'AMILegallWpdatalsgpWPCIWaiver of Time Period COA.doc Re: 815 Ach Ave South Bend, IN 46601 Dear Historic Preservation Committee, Due to the location of the boathouse on the river (moisture), there's a deterioration issue when using the existing wood for a handrail, therefore I don't believe that this material is ideal for this handrail project, thus I am open to any other design that is more stable, safe, and weather resistant Such as: Photo 1 is my 1 It choice Photo 2 is my 2"d choice Photo 3 is my 3rd choice Photo 4 is next choice Photo 5 is my last choice 0 I have clean intent of what exactly I am wanting to do (photo 1) the others are back up options. Code height is 36" per Indiana regulation, the handrail in place now is only 30" — not to code. Sending Ciara Fleming or Ranay Vela to agree to do whatever commission agrees to do to make property more weather resistant and stable. Thank You, Jason Pfledderer C �71 .......... .. ... . .. .. . ... . ............ 0 le Section R323, and are otherwise constructed in accor- dance with this code. 8309.6 Automatic garage door openers. Automatic garage door openers, if provided, shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. SECTION R310 EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS R310.1 Emergency escape and rescue required. Basements with habitable space and every sleeping room shall have at least one openable emergency escape and rescue opening. Where basements contain one or more sleeping rooms, emergency egress and rescue openings shall be required in each sleeping room, but shall not be required in adjoining areas of the base- ment. Where emergency escape and rescue openings are pro- vided they shall have a sill height of not more than 44 inches (1118 mm) above the floor. Where a door opening having a threshold below the adjacent ground elevation serves as an emergency escape and rescue opening and is provided with a bulkhead enclosure, the bulkhead enclosure shall comply with Section 310.3. The net clear opening dimensions required by this section shall be obtained by the normal operation of the emergency escape and rescue opening from the inside. Emer- gency escape and rescue openings with a finished sill height be- low the adjacent ground elevation shall be provided with a window well in accordance with'Section R310.2. R310.1.1 Minimum opening area. All emergency escape and rescue openings shall have a minimum net clear open- ing of 5.7 square feet (0.530 m2). Exception: Grade floor openings shall have a minimum net clear opening of 5 square feet (0.465 m2). R310.1.2 Minimum opening height. The minimum net clear opening height shall be 24 inches (610 mm). R310.1.3 Minimum opening width. The minimum net clear opening width shall be 20 inches (508 mm). R310.1A Operational constraints. Emergency escape and rescue openings shall be operational from the inside of the room without the use of keys or tools. R310.2 Window wells. The minimum horizontal area of the window well shall be 9 square feet (0.84 m2), with a minimum horizontal projection and width of 36 inches (914 mm). The area of the window well shall allow the emergency escape and rescue opening to be fully opened. Exception: The ladder or steps required by Section R310.2.1 shall be permitted to encroach a maximum of 6 inches (152 mm) into the required dimensions of the win- dow well. R310.2.1 Ladder and steps. Window wells with a vertical I depth greater than 44 inches (1118 mm) shall be equipped with a permanently affixed ladder or steps usable with the window in the fully open position. Ladders or steps required by this section shall not be required to comply with Sections R311.5 and R311.6. Ladders or rungs shall have an inside width of at least 12 inches (305 mm), shall project at least 3 inches (76 mm) from the wall and shall be spaced not more BUILDING PLANNING than 18 inches (457 mm) on center vertically for the full height of the window well. R310.3 Bulkhead enclosures. Bulkhead enclosures shall pro- vide direct access to the basement. The bulkhead enclosure with the door panels in the fully open position shall provide the minimum net clear opening required by Section R310.1.1. Bulkhead enclosures shall also comply with Section R311.5.8.2. R310.4 Bars, grills, covers and screens. Bars, grills, covers, screens or similar devices are permitted to be placed over emer- gency escape and rescue openings, bulkhead enclosures, or window wells that serve such openings, provided the minimum net clear opening size complies with Sections R310.1.1 to R310.1.3, and such devices shall be releasable or removable from the inside without the use of a key, tool or force greater than that which is required for normal operation of the escape and rescue opening. SECTION R311 MEANS OF EGRESS R311.1 General. Stairways, ramps, exterior exit balconies, hallways and doors shall comply with this section. R311.2 Construction. R311.2.1 Attachment. Required exterior exit balconies, stairs and similar exit facilities shall be positively anchored to the primary structure to resist both vertical and lateral forces. Such attachment shall not be accomplished by use of toenails or nails subject to withdrawal. R311.2.2 Under stair protection. Enclosed accessible space under stairs shall have walls, under stair surface and any soffits protected on the enclosed side with 1/2 -inch (12.7 mm) gypsum board. R311.3 Hallways. The minimum width of a hallway shall be not less than 3 feet (914 mm). R311A Doors. R311.4.1 Exit door required. Not less than one exit door conforming to this section shall be provided for each dwell- ing unit. The required exit door shall provide for direct ac- cess from the habitable portions of the dwelling to the exterior without requiring travel through a garage. Access to habitable levels not having an exit in accordance with this section shall be by a ramp in accordance with Section R311.6 or a stairway in accordance with Section R311.5. R311.4.2 Door type and size. The required exit door shall be a side -hinged door not less than 3 feet (914 mm) in width and 6 feet 8 inches (2032 mm) in height. Other doors shall not be required to comply with these minimum dimensions. 8311.4.3 Landings at doors. There shall be a floor or land- ing on each side of each exterior door. Exception: Where a stairway of two or fewer risers is lo- cated on the exterior side of a door, other than the re- quired exit door, a landing is not required for the exterior side of the door. The floor or landing at the exit door required by Section R311.4.1 shall not be more than 1.5 inches (38 mm) lower 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE® 49 • BUILDING PLANNING than the top of the threshold. The floor or landing at exterior doors other than the exit door required by Section R311.4.1 shall not be required to comply with this requirement but shall have a rise no greater than that permitted in Section R311.5.3. Exception: The landing at an exterior doorway shall not be more than T/a inches (196 mm) below the top of the threshold, provided the door, other than an exte- rior storm or screen door does not swincover the land- ing. The width of each landing shall not be less than the door served. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of 36 inches (914 mm) measured in the direction of travel. R311.4.4 Type of lock or latch. All egress doors shall be readily openable from the side from which egress is to be made without the use of key or special knowledge or effort. R311.5 Stairways. R311.5.1 Width. Stairways shall not be less than 36 inches (9I4 mm) in clear width at all points above the permitted handrail height and below the required headroom height. Handrails shall not project more than 4.5 inches (114 min) on either side of the stairway and the minimum clear width of the stairway at and below the handrail height, including treads and landings, shall not be less than 31.5 inches (787 mm) where a handrail is installed on one side and 27 inches (698 mm) where handrails are provided on both sides. Exception: The width of spiral stairways shall be in ac- cordance with Section R311.5.8. R311.5.2 Headroom. The minimum headroom in all parts of the stairway shall not be less than 6 feet 8 inches (2036 mm) measured vertically from the sloped plane adjoining the tread nosing or from the floor surface of the landing or R311.5.3 Stair treads R311.5.3.1 Riser height. The maximum riser height shall be 73/,, inches (196 min). The riser shall be mea- sured vertically between leading edges of the adjacent treads. The greatest riser height within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/n inch (9.5 mm). R311.5.3.2 Tread depth. The minima n>n tread depth measured horizontally between the vertical planes of the foremost projection of adjacent treads and at a right angle to the tread's leading edge. The greatest tread depth within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/, inch (9.5 mm). Winder treads shall have a minimum tread depth of 10 inches (254 mm) measured as above at a point 12 inches (305) mm from the side where the treads are narrower. Winder treads shall have a minimum tread depth of 6 inches (152 mm) at any point. Within any flight of stairs, the greatest winder tread depth at the 12 inch (305 nim) walk line shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch (95 mm). R311.5.3.3 Profile. The radius of curvature at the lead- ing edge of the tread shall be no greater than'/,6 inch (14.3 nun). A nosing not less than 31, inch (19 mm) but not more than V/, inch (32 mm) shall be provided on stairways with solid risers. The greatest nosing projec- tion shall not exceed the smallest nosing projection by more than 3/5 inch (9.5 mm) between two stories, includ- ing the nosing at the level of floors and landings. Beveling of nosing shall not exceed 1/2 inch (1.2.7 nim). Risers shall be vertical or sloped from the underside of the leading edge of the tread above at an angle not more than 30 (0.51 rad) degrees from the vertical. Open risers are permitted, provided that the opening between treads does not permit the passage of a 4 -inch diameter (102 mm) sphere. Exceptions: 1. A nosing is not required where the tread depth is a minimum of I 1 inches (279 mm). 2. The opening between adjacent treads is not lim- ited on stairs with a total rise of 30 inches (762 mm) or less. R311.5.4 Landings for stairways. There shall be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each stairway. Exception: A floor or landing is not required at the top of an interior flight of stairs, provided a door does not swing over the stairs. A flight of stairs shall not have a vertical rise greater than 12 feet (3658 mm) between floor levels or landings. The width of each landing shall not be less than the stair- way served. Every landing shall have a minimum dimension of 36 inches (914 mm) measured in the direction of travel. R311.5.5 Stairway walking surface. The walking surface of treads and landings of stairways shall be sloped no steeper than one unit vertical in 48 inches horizontal (2 -per- cent slo e). R311.5.6 Handrails. Handrails shall be provided on at least one side of each continuous run of treads or flight with four r more risers. k It3T>M'.V.THeight. Handrail height, measured vertically from the sloped plane adjoining the tread nosing, or fin- ish surface of ramp slope, shall be not less than 34 inches (864 mm) and not more than 38 inches (965 mm). R311.5.6.2 Continuity. Handrails for stairways shall be continuous for the full length of the flight, from a point directly above the top riser of the flight to a point directly above lowest riser of the flight. Handrail ends shall be re- turned or shall terminate in newel posts or safety termi- nals. Handrails adjacent to a wall shall have a space of not less than 1r/, inch (38 mm) between the wall and the handrails. Exceptions: 1. Handrails shall be permitted to be interrupted by a newel post at the turn. 2. The use of a volute, turnout, starting easing or starting newel shall be allowed over the lowest tread. 50 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE® BUILDING PLANNING R311.5.6.3 Handrail grip size. All required handrails R311.6.3 Handrails required. Handrails shall be provided shall be of one of the following types or provide equiva- on at least one side of all ramps exceeding a slope of one unit lent graspability. vertical in 12 units horizontal (8.33 -percent slope). 1. Type 1. Handrails with a circular cross section shall R311.6.3.1 Height. Handrail height, measured above the have an outside diameter of at least 1'/4 inches (32 finished surface of the ramp slope, shall be not less than mm) and not greater than 2 inches (51 mm). If the 34 inches (864 mm) and not more than 38 inches (965 handrail is not circular it shall have a perimeter di- mm). mension of at least 4 inches (102 mm) and not R311.6.3.2 Handrail grip size. Handrails on ramps greater than 61/4 inches (160 mm) with a maximum shall comply with Section R311.5.6.3. cross section of dimension of 21/4 inches(57 mm). 2. 'I�pe II. Handrails with a perimeter greater than 61/4 R311.6.3.3 Continuity. Handrails where required on ramps shall be continuous for the full length of the ramp. inches (160 mm) shall provide a graspable finger re - cess area on both sides of the profile. The finger re- Handrail ends shall be returned or shall terminate in cess shall begin within a distance of 314 inch (19 mm) newel posts or safety terminals. Handrails adjacent to a measured vertically from the tallest portion of the wall shall have a space of not less than 1.5 inches (38 profile and achieve a depth of at least 546 inch (8 mm) between the wall and the handrails. mm) within V. inch (22 mm) below the widest por- tion of the profile. This required depth shall con- SECTION R312 tinue for at least 3/. inch (10 mm) to a level that is not less than 13/4 inches (45 mm) below the tallest por- tion of the profile. The minimum width of the hand- R312.1 Guards required. Porches, balconies or raised floor rail above the recess shall be 1'/4 inches (32 mm) to a surfaces located more than 30 inches (762 mm) above the floor maximum of 23/4 inches (70 mm). Edges shall have or grade below shall have guards not less than 36 inches (914 a minimum radius of 0.01 inches (0.25 mm). mm) in height. Open sides of stairs with a total rise of more than R311.5.7 Illumination. All stairs shall be provided with il- 30 inches (762 mm) above the floor or grade below shall have lumination in accordance with Section R303.6. guards not less than 34 inches (864 mm) in height measured vertically from the nosing of the treads. R311.5.8 Special stairways. Circular stairways, spiral stairways, winders and bulkhead enclosure stairways shall Porches and decks which are enclosed with insect screening . comply with all requirements of Section R311.5 except as shall be provided with guards where the walking surface is lo - specified below. cated more than 30 inches (762 mm) above the floor or grade below. R311.5.8.1 Spiral stairways. Spiral stairways are per- mitted, provided the minimum width shall be 26 inches R312.2 Guard opening limitations. Required guards on open (660 mm) with each tread having a 7'/2 -inches (190 mm) sides of stairways, raised floor areas, balconies and porches minimum tread depth at 12 inches from the narrower shall have intermediate rails or ornamental closures which do edge. All treads shall be identical, and the rise shall be no not allow passage of a sphere 4 inches (102mm) or more in di- di- more.than 9'/2 inches (241 mm). A minimum headroom ameter. of 6 feet 6 inches (1982 mm) shall be provided. Exceptions: R311.5.8.2 Bulkhead enclosure stairways. Stairways 1. The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and serving bulkhead enclosures, not part of the required bottom rail of a guard at the open side of a stairway are building egress, providing access from the outside grade permitted to be of such a size that a sphere 6 inches level to the basement shall be exempt from the require- (152 mm) cannot pass through. ments of Sections 831 1.4.3 and R311.5 where the maxi- 2. Openings for required guards on the sides of stair mum height from the basement finished floor level to treads shall not allow a spher qlnches (107 mm) to grade adjacent to the stairway does not exceed 8 feet pass through. (2438 mm), and the grade level opening to the stairway is covered by a bulkhead enclosure with hinged doors or other approved means. SECTION R313 R311.6 Ramps. SMOKE ALARMS R311.6.1 Maximum slope. Ramps shall have a maximum [F] R313.1 Smoke alarms. Smoke alarms shall be installed in I slope of one unit vertical in eight units horizontal (12.5 -per- the following locations: cent slope). 1. In each sleeping room. R311.6.2 Landings required. A minimum 3 -foot -by -3 -foot 2. Outside each separate sleeping area in the immediate vi - (914 mm by 914 mm) landing shall be provided: cinity of the bedrooms. 1. At the top and bottom of ramps, 3. On each additional story of the dwelling, including base -• 2. Where doors open onto ramps, ments but not including crawl spaces and uninhabitable I attics. In dwellings or dwelling units with split levels and 3. Where ramps change direction. without an intervening door between the adjacent levels, 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE S1 • • • BUILDING PLANNING a smoke alarm installed on the upper level shall suffice for the adjacent lower level provided that the lower level is less than one full story below the upper level. When more than one smoke alarm is required to be installed within an individual dwelling unit the alarm devices shall be in- terconnected in such a manner that the actuation of one alarm will activate all of the alarms in the individual unit. The alarm shall be clearly audible in all bedrooms over background noise levels with all intervening doors closed. All smoke alarms shall be listed and installed in accordance with the provisions of this code and the household fire warning equipment provisions of NFPA 72. [EB] R313.1.1 Alterations, repairs and additions. When interior alterations, repairs or additions requiring a permit occur, or when one or more sleeping rooms are added or cre- ated in existing dwellings, the individual dwelling unit shall be provided with smoke alarms located as required for new dwellings; the smoke alarms shall be interconnected and hard wired. Exceptions: 1. Smoke alarms in existing areas shall not be fe- quired to be interconnected and hard wired where the alterations or repairs do not result in the re- moval of interior wall or ceiling finishes exposing the structure, unless there is an attic, crawl space, or basement available which could provide access for hard wiring and interconnection without the re- moval of interior finishes. 2. Repairs to the exterior surfaces of dwellings are exempt from the requirements of this section. [F] R313.2 Power source. In new construction, the required smoke alarms shall receive their primary power from the build- ing wiring when such wiring is served from a commercial source, and when primary power is interrupted, shall receive power from a battery. Wiring shall be permanent and without a disconnecting switch other than those required for overcurrent protection. Smoke alarms shall be permitted to be battery oper- ated when installed in buildings without commercial power or in buildings that undergo alterations, repairs or additions regu- lated by Section R313.1.1. SECTION R314 FOAM PLASTIC R314.1 General. The provisions of this section shall govern the requirements and uses of foam plastic insulation. R314.1.1 Surface burning characteristics. Except where otherwise noted in Section R314.2, all foam plastic or foam plastic cores in manufactured assemblies used in building construction shall have a flame -spread rating of not more than 75 and shall have a smoke -developed rating of not more than 450 when tested in the maximum thickness intended for use in accordance with ASTM E 84. R314.1.2 Thermal barrier. Foam plastic, except where otherwise noted, shall be separated from the interior of a building by minimum'/2-inch (12.7 mm) gypsum board or an approved finish material equivalent to a thermal barrier to 52 limit the average temperature rise of the unexposed surface to no more than 250°F (121°C) after 15 minutes of fire exposure to the ASTM E 119 standard time temperature curve. The gypsum board shall be installed using a mechani- cal fastening system in accordance with Section R702.3.5. Reliance on adhesives to ensure that the gypsum board will remain in place when exposed to fire shall be prohibited. 8314.2 Specific requirements. The following requirements shall apply to all uses of foam plastic unless specifically ap- proved in accordance with Section. R314.3 or by other sections of the code. R314.2.1 Masonry or concrete construction. Foam plas- tics may be used without the thermal barrier described in Section R314.1 when the foam plastic is protected by a minimum 1 -inch (25.4 mm) thickness of masonry or con- crete. j R314.2.2 Roofing. Foam plastic may be used in a roof -covering assembly without the thermal barrier when the foam is separated from the interior of the building by wood structural panel sheathing in accordance with Section R803, not less than 15/32 inch (11.9 mm) in thickness bonded with exterior glue and identified as Exposure 1, with edge supported by blocking or tongue -and -groove joints. The smoke -developed rating shall not be limited. R314.2.3 Attics and crawlspaces. Within attics and crawlspaces where entry is made only for service of utilities, foam plastics shall be protected against ignition by 11/2 -inch -thick (38 mm) mineral fiber insulation, '/4 -inch - thick (6.4 mm) wood structural panels, 3/8 -inch (9.5 mm) particleboard, 1/4 -inch (6.4 mm) hardboard, 3/8 -inch (9.5 mm) gypsum board, or corrosion -resistant steel having a base metal thick-ness of 0.016 inch (0.406 mm). R314.2A Foam -filled doors. Foam -filled doors are exempt from the requirements of Section R314.1. R314.25 Siding backer board. Foam plastic board of not more than'/2-inch (12.7 mm) thickness may be used as sid- ing backer board when separated from interior spaces by not less than 2 inches (51 mm) of mineral fiber insulation or 1/2 -inch (12.7 mm) gypsum wallboard or installed over ex- isting exterior wall finish in conjunction with re -siding, pro- viding the plastic board does not have a potential heat of more than 2,000 Btu per square foot (22 720 kJ/m2) when tested in accordance with NFPA 259. R314.2.6 Interior trim. Foam plastic trim defined as pic- ture molds, chair rails, baseboards, handrails, ceiling beams, door trim and window trim may be installed, provided: 1. The minimum density is 20 pounds per cubic foot (3.14 kg/m3). 2. The maximum thickness of the trim is 0.5 inch (12.7 mm) and the maximum width is 4 inches (102 mm). 3. The trim constitutes no more than 10 percent of the area of any wall or ceiling. 4. The flame -spread rating does not exceed 75 when tested per ASTM E 84. The smoke -developed rating is not limited. 2003 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE® JUN 21 2018 lniq_ IZ,ee. t+ 1113['11--n� Z cx HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY • County --City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.southbendin.gov/govemment/department/community-investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Path Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE ONLiS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 1 7-c I Application Number: G'-�' ( 00 — o(, 7 j C Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Title: Local Historic District (Name) 1=�cXwavt-* ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate Of Appropriateness: Denied ❑ Tabled Dent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: Address of Property for proposed work:`` j (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) Name of Property Owner(s): C.1aa'n P 06(Au'("( Phone #: 6-14 - M3 b 13 Address of Property Owner(s): (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) �• 2 Name of Contractor(s): � � jai ii(� ' �W,Kk S Phone #: Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: Current Use of Building: (Street Type of Building Construction: _ L -)Al VV (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel--Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: (more than one ❑ Landscape ElNewReplacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work:. Eci k,,o-0 m-Ae a U `S Vj ata Q_b\ `(1(A Owner e-mail: and/or Contractor a -mail: „ 4W QU w LV &, ft X and/or X Signature of Ownerr' Signature of Contractor By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department permit, if applicable. • e i i a� } i r 4 iil iC IC tt ��is 9� i i iei V Y)e (461 unread) - vwvjm46601@yahoo,com - Yahoo Mail Compose wit enterprise... 798 wwjm46601 461 ajprealestate 548 r!ng616 13 wwimtransacti... 2ss IInbox Unread Starred Drafts Sent Archive Spam Trash Less Views Photos Documents Travel Coupons Purchases Tutorials 461 haps;//mail,yahoo.com/d/folders/54/messages/AAPvd7N89PrRWw6 Rd messages, documet, photos or people v a Jason Back * <4s%. t* e„5„ Archive Move j, Delete Spam " FLASH SALE: Take Your Deck to the Next Level! wwjm46601/inbox 'i 41 6 Menards Flesh <email@menard.messagesl.com> Irq May 30 at 9:S9 AM To: wwjm46601 @yahoo.com r`� r 'alaraCptMMStIYk!$Qas MY ACCOUNT I MOBILE APP I REBATECENiEF BUILDING MATERIALS I HARDWARE I ELECTRICAL I MILLWORK I PAINT I PLUMBING I FLOORCOVERINGS 34 FIASP SALE Pricing Good Through Wednesday, May 30, 2018! Hurry! While Supplies Last! Online Only! FREE SHIPPING To STORE' Folders Hlde New Folder Court Paper Scans E Filed Court Submi... Landlord Registration Ministry Website Notes Sec 6 Unwanted Work Information World Remit �f 7 FREE SHIPPING m STOREt Sale $4999each Premium Colonial 6' Rall Kit • 72" x 36" White Vinyl 112-1668 Rall size Is installed height and on center post spacing. Posts sold separately. SHOP NOW FREE SHIPPING - STOREt Sale $129aach Nome • ring Video Doorbell 2 Answer the door from anywhere with your smartphone. 0 STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0621C Property Location: 815 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1921 / Ernest W. Young Property Owner: Jason Pfledderer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80; Local Landmark, Ordinance #6848-1980 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house sits on the corner of Arch and Edgewater. It is a two-story with rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The main level is red brick laid in running bond. The upper level surmounts a continuous band of stucco with half timer expressions on the west end. The broad sweeping asphalt shingled roof lines extend down from the central hip with a variety of intersecting dormers, narrow overhang lines with moulded wood frieze board. A rectangular boathouse is across from the house along the river. ALTERATIONS: All of the windows were replaced between 1985 and 1989. The roof is not original to the house. The doors are replacements. The surfaces of the front walk way, porch steps and porch stoop do not appear to be original to the house. COA #1985-0926 allowed for the replacement of four windows on the shed dormer at the northeast side of the house. COA #1986-0819 allowed for re -roofing. COA #1989-0417 allowed for the replacement of six windows with Polarseal aluminum double hung windows. COA#1989-0801 allowed for reconstruction of the main entry. COA #1990-0418 allowed for "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized is lumber. The new construction will duplicate the existing fenestration, elevation, screening, etc. exactly." COA #2000-0717 allowed for in-kind repairs of a whole in the roof of the boathouse following a tree fall. COA #2003- 0808 allowed for site work and the replacement of the back door. COA #2011-0812 allowed for the removal of the removal of brush along the river bank per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2012-0515 allowed for the repair of the fence and the replacement of concrete chunks on the site with formed pavers. COA #2014-0804A allowed for the removal of a rotten sugar maple tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2015-0803A allowed for concrete sitework. RME #2016-100313 allowed for the stucco repair on the main house. RME #2016-0628 allowed for the removal of a tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2017-041713 allowed for the removal of windows on the east side of the main house to be replaced with sliding doors, as well as concrete site work. RME #2018-0501A allowed for the re -roofing of the boathouse and the reconstruction of the handrail. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacing railing with vinyl railing." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following components: 1. Remove and replace existing railing. The primary motivations for replacement can be characterized as: 1. The existing (30") railing is not compliant with code and would warrant modification or reconstruction so as to become compliant with the 36" requirement. The applicant would like to replace the existing railing as opposed to modify it by adding additional height. 2. Wood as a material on a boat house (or other structure in close proximity to water) constitutes a consistent and regular maintenance issue. The applicant would prefer to replace wood with a material with a significantly lower maintenance requirement and has expressed a willingness to utilize metal or vinyl options. • Five replacement options for the railing have been put forth by the applicant and all of the proposed options would constitute a significant departure from the existing railing's construction and visual appearance. The proposed designs do not have accompanying manufacture specifications and instead appear to be representations as to desired styles and/or constructions. It is unknown if the examples are manufactured out of wood, metal, or vinyl. Were one of these options selected, the existing railing system (including masonry support `columns') would be removed down to the decking. The replacement railing system would need to be bolted onto the decking and • secured to the superstructure. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EDGEWATER PLACE: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the District range from brick, clapboard, shingles, and masonry block to aluminum siding. In the majority of the cases the aluminum siding has been applied over the original clapboard. There are some masonry commercial buildings on Lincolnway. Required Existing exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry structures shall be maintained, tuckpointed and properly cleaned when necessary. Masonry shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with the gentlest method possible, such as low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Stucco surfaces shall be maintained by cleaning and repainted when necessary. When repairing stucco a stucco mixture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative to maintaining the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. However it must be noted that such material can contribute to the deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS The majority of the houses in the district have either an open or a enclosed porch across the front or on the side. Most porches have either gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. A brick base with wood columns is common. Required Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Porches and steps that are important to the building's style and development may not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS Required Building code requirements shall be compiled with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved. Recommended Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. Prohibited Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and space is prohibited. Not Recommended Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building. 0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Structures like the boathouse are not specifically defined within the Standards and Guidelines, and as such, the general text covering building materials, as well as those covering entrances, porches, and steps, are considered for this recommendation. The Standards and Guidelines are explicit that "original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replaced with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair" and that "original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. " Historic precedence exists for this, in the form of a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in April of 1990 that allowed for the "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber." The applicant received approval to reconstruct the handrail earlier this year with RME #2018-0501A. Vinyl is only explicitly mentioned four times in the Standards and Guidelines, in relation to siding and window awnings, hoods, and fake shutters. Staff agrees that the railing should be taller to be compliant with State / International Building Code requirements. The applicant's preference for replacement of the railing is not unfounded, and Staff would support replacement to comply with Code requirements specifically because of the river -front setting of this structure. However, Staff is not convinced that enough investigation on the part of the applicant has occurred to warrant a favorable recommendation. Staff recommends that the application be denied based upon the requirements of the Standards and Guidelines. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator E is STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0621C Property Location: 815 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1921 / Ernest W. Young Property Owner: Jason Pfledderer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80; Local Landmark, Ordinance #6848-1980 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house sits on the corner of Arch and Edgewater. It is a two-story with rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The main level is red brick laid in running bond. The upper level surmounts a continuous band of stucco with half timer expressions on the west end. The broad sweeping asphalt shingled roof lines extend down from the central hip with a variety of intersecting dormers, narrow overhang lines with moulded wood frieze board. A rectangular boathouse is across from the house along the river. ALTERATIONS: All of the windows were replaced between 1985 and 1989. The roof is not original to the house. The doors are replacements. The surfaces of the front walk way, porch steps and porch stoop do not appear to be original to the house. COA #1985-0926 allowed for the replacement of four windows on the shed dormer at the northeast side of the house. COA #1986-0819 allowed for re -roofing. COA #1989-0417 allowed for the replacement of six windows with Polarseal aluminum double hung windows. COA#1989-0801 allowed for reconstruction of the main entry. COA #1990-0418 allowed for "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber. The new construction will duplicate the existing fenestration, elevation, screening, etc. exactly." COA #2000-0717 allowed for in-kind repairs of a whole in the roof of the boathouse following a tree fall. COA #2003- 0808 allowed for site work and the replacement of the back door. COA #2011-0812 allowed for the removal of the removal of brush along the river bank per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2012-0515 allowed for the repair of the fence and the replacement of concrete chunks on the site with formed pavers. COA #2014-0804A allowed for the removal of a rotten sugar maple tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2015-0803A allowed for concrete sitework. RME #2016-100313 allowed for the stucco repair on the main house. RME #2016-0628 allowed for the removal of a tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2017-0417B allowed for the removal of windows on the east side of the main house to be replaced with sliding doors, as well as concrete site work. RME #2018-0501A allowed for the re -roofing of the boathouse and the reconstruction of the handrail. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacing railing with vinyl railing." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following components: 1. Replace existing wooden railing with multiple spans of 72" x 36" White Vinyl "Premium Colonial 6' Rail Kit" SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EDGEWATER PLACE: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the District range from brick, clapboard, shingles, and masonry block to aluminum siding. In the majority of the cases the aluminum siding has been applied over the original clapboard. There are some masonry commercial buildings on Lincolnway. Required Existing exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry structures shall be maintained, tuckpointed and properly cleaned when necessary. Masonry shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with the gentlest method possible, such as low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Stucco surfaces shall be maintained by cleaning and repainted when necessary. When repairing stucco a stucco mixture shall be used. Recommended A& Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative to maintaining the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the sante size and style as the original wood. However it must be noted that such material can contribute to the deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS The majority of the houses in the district have either an open or a enclosed porch across the front or on the side. Most porches have either gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. A brick base with wood columns is common. Required Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Porches and steps that are important to the building's style and development may not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Structures like the boathouse are not specifically defined within the Standards and Guidelines, and as such, the general text covering building materials, as well as those covering entrances, porches, and steps, are considered for this recommendation. Both sections of the Standards and Guidelines require that existing or original elements be retained or replaced with replicas of the same design and materials. Historic precedence exists for this, in the form of a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in April of 1990 that allowed for the "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber." The applicant received approval to reconstruct the handrail earlier this year with RME #2018-0501A. Vinyl is only explicitly mentioned four times in the Standards and Guidelines, in relation to siding and window awnings, hoods, and fake shutters. Staff recommends that the application be denied based upon the requirements of the Standards and Guidelines. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator 40 STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 4, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0926C Property Location: 630 West Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Pagin-Ford-Cunningham House / Queen Anne / 1886 Property Owner: Thomas and Alice Erlandson Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #8078-1990; West Washington Street National Register District; Historic Preservation Commission Fagade Easement. Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two and a half story irregular plan house sits on a stone foundation. The chimneys are irregularly placed brick with fluted brick work and an embellished cap. The exterior is clapboard with molded cornice board. A flower and vine motif is in the bracketing front gable. The roof was is a 12/12 hip with cross gables, a decorative metal ridge, moulded wood rake and eave details, and gabled dormers. Multiple porches with turned spindles and balustrades are at the corners of the structure, with a porte cochere on the west side and a conical tower at the north west corner. Windows are 1/1 double hung with wide wood moulded casings and window head. A front entry bay window with rounded sashes. The doors are tall with double -leaf glazed wood paneling. A two story Tudor Revival carriage house stands to the south. ALTERATIONS: COA #1990-0321 allowed for the replacement of rotting wood with in-kind materials. COA #1992-0315 allowed for comprehensive site work to the property, including the construction of the current parking area. COA#1992-0808 allowed for the removal and installation of concrete walkway along the west side of the house. COA #1995-1103-2 allowed for the removal of trees and planting of replacement tree. COA #1999-1021 •allowed for the removal and replacement of the slate roof with asphalt shingles. COA #2001-0328 allowed for the removal and replacement of business signage facing West Washington. RME #2018-0926A allowed for the replacement of the driveway aprons with in-kind concrete. APPLICATION ITEMS• "Replace existing ' ivew'y aprens with in kind c.,ne ete. Replace existing concrete and asphalt circular drive with historic paver blocks. '/a to be completed this fall —'h to be completed by next fall." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for improvements on the property, including: 1. Removal of portions of the existing asphalt driveway, 2. Installation of red -brick pavers It is the intention of the applicant to progress with half of the work this fall, and the remainder in the spring of 2019. SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B Standards and Guidelines GROUP B STANDARDS The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. 40A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) • 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project, as it is in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines for Local Landmarks. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator • 0 • • SATELLITE COMPOSITE: kr• a� A GO tj ! o 4 49 4i if_A Eel Diagram 1 -Composite of map and satellite imagery from top to bottom: 1960, 1945, 1917, 1899, 1891, and Satellite Jrom 2Ul b. PHOTOS: Figure I - 630 W Washington, from the sidewalk of West Washington. Figure 2 — 630 W Washington the sidewalk on Scott Street, looking east.. • • • • Figure 3 — 630 W Washington from Scott Street. The drive to be replaced. Figure 4 - The drive, looking northwest, away from the porte cochere. r •'�Re 2. .R '4 / c 'y- . £- r. s. R , tp .. z � _ O � '.. AIL t� • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. southbendin.gov/government/department/community-investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov Timothy S. Klusezinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE ONLY>»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: q1Z to Zd f Application Number: 261S __0 cl Z (A C Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of LastRevierv) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate Of Appropriateness: El Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (Name) Address of Property for proposed work: (,36 Title: ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: 1) ` (Street Number—Str et Name—City—Zip) s Name of Property Owner(s): tAAAAELS Ji- � 1 N Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): Name of Contractor(s): '-71-12 1 Phone #: Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: jj (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) Current Use of Building: a }'tG �6'�' aa�� L1 K1 (Single �Family Fr_ ulti-Family—Commercial—Government I .) ndustrial—Yacant—etc W Type of Building Construction: LR d T ` q .,vi q (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ISIn=Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) •Ow er a -mail• i �� 1 ►"'arid%or Contractor e-mail: X and/or X SI ure of Owner Signature of Contractor By signing this application 1 agree to abide by all local regulations related to project turd to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable. STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 3, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0928 Property Location: 1329 East Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1923 / Austin and Shambleau Property Owner: Molly and Paul Buser Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance #7118-82 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two story irregular Tudor Revival structure on a brick foundation on a large corner lot at the intersection of Washington and Jacob. Rough stucco surfaced walls with visible half timbering throughout. The roof has intersecting gables and several pitches. A long slope roof overhang includes the entrance. Roof detailing includes close verges, little -to -no trim, and some returns. A centrally -located brick corbelled chimney dominates the roof line, with articulated flues above the stone weathering. A carved and detailed tablet is above the entry's wooden surrounds, including wood rope molding at the reveal. Casement windows — many having been replaced within the last decade — are of various sizes, located in groups. To the east of the entry is a two-level grouping of windows in a square bay with smooth stucco spandrels. The southeast corner grouping includes heavy timber and half -round arches. Full -arched windows are on the east and rear facades. The one -and -a -half story stucco and half-timbering garage at rear with bell cast gable, three garage bays, and an upper room with second -level hyphen is separated from the main structure by a lower breezeway access. What was an earlier concrete wall extension with pier -end articulated in brick is now an enclosed low -roofed area on the western fagade that functions as a three -season porch. • ALTERATIONS: RME #2010-0812 in-kind replacement of aluminum clad wood casement circle head windows; RME #2009-0409 in-kind replacement with Marvin aluminum clad wood casement windows; COA #2008-0523A replace wood casement windows with new Marvin aluminum clad wood casement windows; COA #2008-0304 replace garden shed with new custom shed; RME #2007-0607A in-kind replacement of windows over garage with new Pella casements; COA #2007-0607A in-kind replacement of windows over the garage; COA #2007-0307A replace stockade fence with black ornamental aluminum fence; RME #2007-0307 in-kind replacement of yard light, remove arborvitae and gingko trees, plant six trees in tree lawn; COA #1995-0626 in-kind replacement of windows with new. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Infill with Marvin Ultimate or equal wood windows and doors at covered open-air pass-through between house and garage; replace jalousie units at 3 -season porch with Marvin Ultimate or equal wood casements and French doors to make space 4 -season. Add traditional painted cedar railing at roofporch to screen future condensers. " DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following improvements to the site: 1. Re -construction of existing three -season porch (on western fagade) a. Replacing existing plastic -louvered jalousie windows with Marvin Wood Ultimate Casement windows, b. Removing courses of existing brick on the north elevation of this extension to allow the installation of Marvin Wood Ultimate French Doors (with transom above), c. Installation of decorative railing atop this enclosed space to conceal existing condenser units, to be constructed out of cedar posts, balusters, and railings. d. Installation of powder -coated aluminum gutters, downspouts, and flashing to match the rest of • house 2. Enclosing the current pass-thru between the main structure and the garage, a. Wood frame construction between existing timber posts and beams, b. Marvin Wood Ultimate casement windows and doors with simulated divided lights and flush board panels beneath the window openings. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A GROUP B STANDARDS: LOCAL LANDMARKS: • The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with • additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. • 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV • reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of all components of this project, based upon the application's conformity to the `renovations and new additions' sub -section of the Standards and Guidelines. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator is 0 Satellite Imagery: Diagram 1— Top to bottom: 1329 E Washington in 2016 Satellite Imagery, 1960 Sanborn, 1945 Sanborn. • C F 4- e � ri i F 4- b m vr3 a : . �• Al1iope tt�^' _y ,'J ! ✓r ,�.�. � £ ice'*+L F1r3 Y.j:v. w + t - _ fes' • � f i, �I + s.� N, T q 'e u- ry r ' Michele Gelfman, President SEP 2 8 2018 fn HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY • County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.southbendin.gov/government/department/community-Investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE ONLIS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAWED W THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: q _.; 17.e 18 Application Number: / 1 — G9 2 $ Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) a V, {.- ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: o k 06 Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark Certificate Of Appropriateness: 11 Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: Address of Property for proposed work: 3 2- 1 �Pc� 1�'I r� �� �I-( 1 ; S a C 1361 4 D (Street Number—Street Name—City— i!p) • Name of Property Owner(s): H0 U-1 TNtL- Phone #: mg (? �- O Address of Property Owner(s): W�Si�lr-�y[�o-IJ S (Street Number—Street �)CGPA D Name of Contractor(s): Ti>y, Phone #: Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: Current Use of Building: (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) Slig�TLG _eAMiL .- (Single Family--Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: aro brl vk-> (Wood Frame—Brick-Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: (more than one box may be checked) 11Landscape New M Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition Description of Proposed Work: VA, tAAAV n LU-i•1� WtyAws -• �loV,3�11. L Nc1.c�,n U -I - Owner e-mail: and/or Contractor e-mail: • X and/or X Sig re f Ow Signature of Contractor (t-4 Ir y signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable. ♦ 1M"T lr� ♦ TT/ AT 1TT/1TTTT , TRT ATT[' A "W T TVA WTI AAT T1TTTT'1nVT.T C+T7 W 0 0 ALTERATIONS AT 1329 EAST WASHINGTON STREET SOUTH BEND, IN CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DOCUMENTATION FOR REVIEW BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY SEPTEMBER 28, 2018 9 I ATC) TC ll&lN;). i'-4 !C'qd PROJECT DESCRIPTION The owners of this historic Tudor home are proposing to undertake two modifications to the exterior of the house: 1. Their current Three -Season Porch is only usable in the mild months of the year and is neither weather- nor water -tight. They propose to replace the jalousie windows of the Porch (which is itself an addition to the original house) with traditional wood casement windows and French doors, making it truly a Four -Season Room. They intend as well to add a railing at the roof -line of this room only, to screen future condenser units from view as they update the HVAC system throughout the house. 2. They propose to in -fill the open air, covered "pass-through" between their back door and garage with traditional wood casement windows and doors to create a usable, conditioned interior space (there is already a conditioned second story above this location). • 0 ATE: 9/28/18 1329 E. WASHINGTON STREET BUCCELLATO DESIGN, LLC Sce ARCHITECTURE&INTERIORS SHEET TRtF: 1/32" = 1 �-O" 526EASILASALLEAVENUE DRAWN Efr. - -- SOUTH BENa IN 46617 SITE PLAN MMH 574-288 -7723 SHEEP NUMBER: GOA 1 Proposed North Elevation Existing North Elevation at Three -Season Porch Existing West Elevation • 11 m. w__ �� b �_ E .. �,• z�' €t �:; CONSTRUCTION METHODS At the Four -Season Porch, the existing masonry openings will be maintained and new Marvin Wood Ultimate casement windows and French doors with simulated divided lites of traditional proportions will be used to replace the plastic -louvered jalousie units. The proposed screening railing system will be built of painted cedar posts, balusters, and railing profiles. At the Pass-Thru, the construction method will be wood framed walls infilling between the existing timber posts and beams, which will remain, and adding a new slab and footers beneath. The window and door units will be traditional Marvin Wood Ultimate casements and French doors with simulated divided lites and flush board panels beneath the window openings. In both cases, new painted materials (cedar, window sashes, etc.) is to match those of the existing house. MATERIALS TO BE USED All materials as follows: 1. All trim: Western Red Cedar (dimensions and profiles to match rest of house), painted 2. Windows and Doors: Marvin Wood Ultimate Casements and French Doors, simulated divided lites 3. Gutters, downspouts, and flashing: powder -coated aluminum, to match rest of house 4. Railing and components: Painted Western Red Cedar • • • PRICES, PATTERNS, PICTURES i Shiplap, Dutch Lap, Channel Rustic Cedar Siding Prices Pricing based on 1500 SQFToIder • S25000RDER MINIMUM CEDAR LAP SIDING PRICES Pricing by SQUARE FOOT - Understanding our Prices We price codar siding by the square foot. Our Pnco Is meant to include an idea of final cost if you order at least 1500 square feet. If you know your square footage you can multiply it by the price below and have an idea what this product will costyou. 5H IPLAP SI DI NG ST/ 10 A'FLUSH JOINT- SQUARE EDGE PROFILE GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS - BERGER (COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING) HALF ROUND GUTTER MATERIAL: TYPE: STYLE: SIZE: nncxNLss LENGTH: COLOR: SKU: PACKAGING: 13 LIO 8 Wpo,9"'t. AW, 4 Wp� H Nc� S is E, L - -MFS 10 L_ -CPS 1 ZI L -2C5 L --CPS L—M L10CF7 MGM L . -CPSFI C,�4 Fi,d !c ic L—BCS 0 L, DC6 R--CP6 E = 'd al Jo L-1`65 L -FGF, r in QPLAIN ROUND DOWNSPOUT MATERIALS: LENGTHS: THICKNESSES: ki"mm - Prmed, Alimrum - Mei Fim.m, Cxx-.!. 10' Alum --.015_024 Cappr - FWam Grp'. Siad - Gahaiced. Copp.'r -1632, 21k.z Sluel - Pr,,o Grp Stal - &*alums SW - Swi., Steel- 24g. Zgga. 29p, 30g. 0 0 STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 4, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0928A Property Location: 301 Sunnyside Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1930 / H. Russell Stapp Property Owner: Sean and Karen Kennedy Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, Ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two story frame Tudor Revival on an irregular plan. The gabled roof is steep with flared eaves. The front gable roof dormer has half-timber detailing. The first -floor overhangs at the, front. A shed roof dormer supported by curved brackets is on the north face. Windows are 6 -light casements with fixed transoms, some half half-timber lintels. A central steep cross -gabled entry with arched brick door surround faces east. A lower gable roof section sits on the north end. The brick chimney has two chimney pots. The west face includes a small rear one-story shed roof wall dormer. A complimentary two -bay garage stands to the south. ALTERATIONS: COA #1996-0703 allowed for the removal of the slate roof and re -roofing with new fiberglass shingle. COA #2014-0703 allowed for the modifications to the landscaping, including the extension of the fence to the west property line and the construction of a new 36"-48" fence to connect the west property line to the screened -in porch. COA #2015-0504B allowed for the enclosure of the flat roof with a painted fence to match the trim of the home and to conceal air conditioning condensers installed on flat roof area. APPLICATION ITEMS: "The residents of this historic Tudor home are hoping to add an attached garden shed to 40 the south of the garage. The shed will look and feel like an extension of the home including rough-hewn timbers, flush plank wood clapboards, & historically appropriate windows." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following improvements to the site: 1. Construction of 18'-6" x 10' shed extending from the garage to the south. a. Construction details: i. Concrete slab foundation, ii. Wood framed, iii. Have both half-timbering and horizontal flush clapboards, iv. Natural Pine Barn Sash Windows (by American Window Products, LLC), v. Gabled roof to match the existing shingling, vi. Flashing, gutters, trim, trim, to match existing. The proposed structure will include a 6'-6" covered breezeway between the existing garage and the new storage shed. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EAST WAYNE STREET: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Fagade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited • Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing fagade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half-timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of all components of this project, based upon the application's conformity to the `new construction' sub -section of the Standards and Guidelines. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator • • • SATELLITE IMAGERY Diagram 1 - 301 Sunnyside shown in the 1960 Sanborn map at left, and 2016 satellite imagery from MACOG at the right. PHOTOS Figure I - 301 Sunnyside from the street, looking west. Figure 2 - 301 Sunnyside, showing the garage and the area for the new construction. • • • Michele Gelfinan, President SEP 2 8 2018 7(,1 7-5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.southbendin.gov/govemment/department/community-investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov A Certified Local Government of the National Pads Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY G7 Date Received: t ze so ( b Application Number: 2 1 — ®a 2-9 tk Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate Of Appro riateness: 11 Denied ❑ Tabled Title: Local Historic District (Name) `l C-1 At -1 N V ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: Address of Property for proposed work: 301 S StINNYSI m /wrr. Sou-rN FNSPP IN Y6C i5 • (Street Number—Street Name—City—Ztp) Name of Property Owner(s): � ' d' K A K " ke1u ED Y Phone #: 571{" Z 3Y' 3/31{ tea. 7 Address of PropertyOwner(s): 'Sol S St,NNY StDF I'V6 5ovr�( �EN17 (4V I I-5 (Street Number—Street Name--City—Zip) Name of Contractor(s): T a D% Phone #: Contractor Company Name: T R D Address of Contractor Company: ly (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) Current Use of Building: DN GLE F Df'Y (Single Famil),,—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Indalstrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: 4) 0 0 D V V -"VM a- I Tort E_ I t� (Wood Frame B ick—Stone—,S eel— Proposed Work: (more than one ❑ Landscape LJ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition box may be checked) • Owner e-mail: 5IC6NHPd 5 W i CoMand/or Contractor e-mail: (SIA X and/or X Signature of ner Signature of Contractor By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable. —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— A NEW GARDEN SHED AT 301 S. SUNNYSIDE AVE. SOUTH BEND, IN CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS DOCUMENTATION FOR REVIEW BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY SEPTEMBER 27, 2018 FE -1 BUCCLLLA'l-o DESIGN, LLG ARCHITEC URE&1NITRIORS 526 EAS) LASALIA AVLNUI SOUGH BEND. IN 16617 574-289 7723 f`J • • • • 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The residents of this historic Tudor home are hoping to add an attached garden shed to the south of the garage. The shed will look and feel like an extension of the home including rough hewn timbers, flush plank wood clapboards, and historically appropriate windows that match the muntin style and proportion of the existing windows. The new shed will include a breezeway between the ga- rage and the shed so that the new shed gable is perpendicular to the garage and the roof dies into the garage roof. All the materials will be painted to match the existing colors of the home. Nearby Properties with Storage Sheds: 1232 N Wayne St. (Apx 12'x 10') 1321 E Wayne St. S (Apx 12'x 10') 1315 E Wayne St. S (Apx 10'x 10') 1220 Sunnymede Ave (Apx 12'x 10') EXISTING PROPERTY Existing Garage, East Elevation Existing Garage, South Elevation • • • U EXISTING PROPERTY Existing Timber Detail, Main House Location of Proposed Shed, South of Garage CONSTRUCTION METHODS The proposed construction will be wood framing on a new slab with horizontal flush boards and rough hewn timbers similar to the half-timbered portion of the house. The breezeway will host four new 6x6 rough hewn post and brackets as drawn. The existing bed mold will continue through- out the new soffit. All the windows will be wood barn sash windows painted to match the color of the existing windows. The new asphalt shingles will match the color and style of the existing shingles at the garage. The new flashing and gutters will also match that of the existing home and will appear as the same color of the rustic timbers. MATERIALS TO BE USED All materials as follows: 1. Clapboards and trim: Western Red Cedar (dimensions and profiles to match restored elevations) painted 2. Timbers: Rough Hewn Cedar Timbers painted to match existing details 3. Gutters, downspouts, and flashing: powder -coated aluminum, dark bronze in color 4. Roofing: Asphault Shingles to match existing house and garage. The flush clapboards will have a similar appearance as the siding above except painted. • L' C] • 1. BUFFALO LUMBER ROUGH HEWN CEDAR TIMBERS OR EQUAL • • PRICES, PATTERNS, PICTURES Shiplap, Dutch Lap, Channel Rustic Cedar Siding Prices Pricing based on 1500 SQFT order • $2500 ORDER MINIMUM CEDAR LAP SIDING PRICES Pricing by SQUARE FOOT - Understanding our Prices We price codar siding by the square foot. Our Price is meant to include an idea of final cost if you order at least 15oo square feet. if you know your square footage you can multiply it by the price below and have an idea what this product will cost you. 5 f ye ��iy ry -.5HIPLAP SIDING STANDARD PATTERN SAMPLE c • 3. WOOD BARN SASH WINDOW AMEMCA Window Products LLC L r 31-5/16 X 29 NATURAL PINE BARN SASH WINDOW (BSW3129) $33.25 SKU BSW3129 Brand American Window Products LLC Weight 12.50 LBS Rating Shipping Calculated at checkout Quantity 1 11 ............ L w, \ 0 (LAWN \\\\\\\\� / �� \\\\\\` \ 0 111\001 .-A M \\\ \\ 0 0 \\\�R \\� \� \\\\\\\,. � � \\mmo\ M M (EXISTINGHOME kl, ("DRIVEWAYs\ 1 \ % I \\ \\ ) EXISTING GARAGE XN 11 \0 L NEW GARDEN SIZEDX mll :\ `LAWN ' "101\ G3�-O" /01-011 411 SITE PLAN OA 1/16"= V- 0" D- - SHEEP NUMBER: GARDEN SHED ADDITION AT 9/27/18 Fr -sl 301 S. SUNNYSIDE AVENUE SC— BUCCELLATo DESIGN, LLC 1/ 16" = l'- 0" ARCHITECTURE & INTERIORS s -w;- COA1 526 EAST LASALLE AVENUEDRAWN BY. SOUSOUTH BEND, IN 46617 SITE PLAN SLG 574288-7723 0 COE RIGHT BY BUCCELLATO DESIGN. LLC EXISTING WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN NEW ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING @ GARAGE Illip 1111111111 NEW WOOD FLUSH BOARDS PTD. TO __MATCH STUCCO-@ GAkAGE NEW WOOD BARN SASH WINDOWS NEW ROUGH HEWN TIMBERS PTD. TO MATCH EXISTING @ GARAGE 3 EAST ELEVATION OA t i8" = t o^ PLAN V -f %A'J , ,on - , I- n" NEW FLASHING @ GARDEN SHED GABLE, COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING FLASHING * TIMBERS f I r - ILE ILI BED MOULDING * SOFFIT CONDITION TO MATCH EXISTING @ GARAGE (2) SOUTH ELEVATION OA 1 i8" = 1 '- o° - V DATE: SHEET NUMBER: I r - ILE ILI BED MOULDING * SOFFIT CONDITION TO MATCH EXISTING @ GARAGE (2) SOUTH ELEVATION OA 1 i8" = 1 '- o° - V DATE: SHEET NUMBER: GARDEN SHED ADDITION AT 9/27/18 IBM] BUGGELLATO DESIGN, LLC ARCH[TECTURE&INTERIORS 301 S. SUNNYSIDE AVENUE GOA S`.,E /8" = 1-p1. SHEETTR. _ _ DRAWN DY. SLG 526 EAST LA.SALLE AVENUE SOUTH BEND.IN 46617 /� O, PLA & N ELEVATION BY BUCCELLATO DESIGN. STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 8, 2018 Application Number: 2018-1001A Property Location: 760 Portage Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare / 1907 Property Owner: Spencer and Max Watson Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: 2 %2 story square plan house with hipped roof with hipped dormers. Full width front porch with hipped roof, two brick supports, and solid brick rail. Walls are covered with aluminum siding. Windows are original wood 1/1 double hung. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum siding is not original. Soffits are covered in aluminum. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replace aluminum siding with vinyl siding duplicating original clapboard style siding; install pocket window inserts into dilapidated windows; remove 3 windows (one in dining, kitchen, crib room); update window casings with aluminum -wrap; replace entry door with 3 panel mission and side entry with 6 panel steel ." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure: • 1. Siding — a. An exploratory removal of aluminum siding to determine condition of wood siding underneath has revealed penetrations throughout for blown in insulation, wood rot, and previously covered window openings. b. Proposal is to replicate the wood clapboard style of the original siding using vinyl 3.5" on the second story and 4" on the first story. Composite board will be installed over existing decorative trim details to reproduce the detail that existed prior to the aluminum installation, and giving it dimension so it does not sit proud of the siding. "Wood grain" or smooth non textured options are available. c. Enclose windows in three locations, one on each side, one in rear. Cover with new vinyl siding. d. Applicant has investigated alternate materials, on Staff s recommendation. 2. Windows — a. Replace original wood double hung windows with new JELD-WEN Best Series Vinyl Double Hung "pocket" windows. Years of deferred maintenance and inappropriate repairs have rendered the original wood windows in poor condition. Proposed pocket windows will allow for installation without disturbing the trim on either the inside or outside. Light will be reduced by an inch on width and a half inch on height. b. Applicant has investigated alternate materials, on Staff's recommendation, as well as the possibility of adding storms to existing windows. 3. Window Trim — a. Install aluminum casing over all existing window trim, including horizontal and vertical components. 4. Doors — a. Install new "Mission style" steel door into front opening. b. Install new 6 panel solid steel door into side opening. SITE VISIT REPORT: gftctober 1, 2018 760 Portage On September 24, 2018 I visited the property located at 760 Portage with the owners. I had the opportunity to photograph the exterior of the house and inspect the windows inside as well. Following is the breakdown of that inspection. West side (front) no storm windows on this side First floor 1 -large double hung window to the north of the front door -window is in fair shape structurally but has been screwed in place which has damaged the sashes and the pulleys have been filled with clear caulk. • 1 -fixed window to the south of the front door -window is non-operable and has been caulked in place. Structurally sound but removal of caulk and sash may be difficult Second floor 4 -double hung windows -all four windows have rotted meeting rails on both upper and lower sashes. Three out of the four sills are split with deep crevices. Those will also need repair or replacement. Only one of these windows were operable North side First floor 1 -double hung window towards rear -lower sash is missing meeting rail. Sill is rotted and upper sash is screwed shut 3 -double hung windows in single bank -these windows have a rotted common sill. The windows have been screwed shut, caulked pulleys and severely damaged lower sashes 1 -double hung window toward front -lower sash framework is broken and rotted at corner. Second floor 1 -double hung window -lower sash is rotted through and has its joints have separated. Sleeping porch 1 -double hung window -rotted sill and side jamb, caulked pulleys 1 -stationary window -located in closet, cracked sill sash is soft, but not rotted 1 -double hung window toward front of house -window has rotten and broken lower sash, sill is buckled. East side (rear) First floor 3 -double hung windows in a single bank -2 of the windows are 6 over 1 patterned. These differ from the 1 over 1 pattern though most of the house, may not be original. The bank has a rotted common sill. The lower left has dropped over an inch due to water infiltration. The framework as a whole is rotted 3 to 4 inches from the sill up. 1 -covered window opening unveiled 10/1/18. No window jamb or pieces remaining • 1 -stationary window boarded up. No sash remains, was used to hold air conditioner. Sill is water rotted. Second floor 4 -double hung windows -2 double banks, these are wood but newer than the rest of the house. This area appears to be a sleeping porch as it has an exterior door as an entrance. All the windows in this area are painted or screwed in place. Structurally most sound of any in house. South side First floor 2 -double hung windows -2 in a single bank, 6 over 1 pattern. Structural sound but need scraping and new ropes. Single stationary window towards rear -Structurally sound, one of few with wood storm window Second floor 2 double hung windows -2 in a single bank meeting rails are damaged. Damaged jambs at sill 1 double hung window -window operates but needs scraping, ropes and glazing 1 double hung window, towards rear of house -bottom of lower sash is cracked at lift handle, sleeping porch area Overall, all the windows need scraping and reglazing. Most of the upper sashes are painted or screwed in place and the meeting rails are not lining up or closing properly. The windows if kept, will need removal, scraped, repainted, glazed, re -roped, and realigned. The windows out of the direct weather on the south and east are better off in condition than the other two sides. I also was able to view the structure on Monday, October 1, 2018 to view areas of the house where the owners had removed sections of the aluminum siding in order to determine the condition of the original clap board siding underneath. First thing I noticed was the amount of holes that were made to inject insulation. There are hundreds on each side without rhyme or reason and most without plugs. They are not lined up to floor levels as this technique is usually done. There is an infestation of yellow jackets in these holes. They have bedded in the cavities behind the siding via these holes especially in the northeast corner of the structure. The siding outside of the holes has a different reveal on the lower half versus the upper half. Many of the corner boards should be replaced. The siding would need the paint scraped and repaired where needed, and there are several courses that I could see that would need replacement. I was told by the owner that the paint was lead based, but I did not test it myself to verify that statement. I do not have a percentage of siding that needs to be replaced, the owner will continue to remove more aluminum siding as that will have to happen no matter what the future plan. I would like to revisit the site after more aluminum is removed to get a more accurate reading of the state of the original siding. • The soffits are also an issue as there are aluminum, wood, and exposed rafters present. In any case, additional venting is suggested. Steve Szaday Preservation Inspector STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK 0 1.rI. EXISTING STRUCTURES BUILDING MATERIALS iginal exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the 0atortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. painted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Approval of 3.5" and 4" vinyl siding and "smooth' side of the decorative composite trim and for enclosure of three specified windows. 2. Staff acknowledges that original wood windows are in poor condition but does not recommend replacement with proposed JELD-WEN vinyl. Advised applicant to investigate further into repairing windows or continue search for a material that is more appropriate. 3. Repair existing wood window trim. 4. Approval of two doors. Written by . Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator 1960 Sanborn Map Current Site Figure 1— 760 Portage, from sidewalk, looking northeast Window proposed for removal is visible at left. • 0 • 0 • Figure 2 — 760 Portage, looking south west. Figure 3 — 760 Portage, looking north. Window proposed for removal is visible at center. Window proposed for removal is visible at left. Figure 4 — 760 Portage, front. Aluminum siding removal. Figure 5 — 760 Portage, front detail. Proposed vinyl siding and composite trim specifications. • • • • • Figure 6 — 760 Portage, side. Aluminum siding removal. Proposed 3.5" Vinyl Siding Proposed 4" Vinyl Siding Proposed Composite Trim Figure 7— 760 Portage. Existing window. Figure 8 — 760 Portage. Existing window. • • • • • Figure 9 — 760 Portage. Existing window. Figure 10 — 760 Portage. Existing window. m.. ..... Proposed Vinyl Pocket Windows Proposed Side Door • • L_J • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.southbendin.gov/government/department/community-investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov A Certified Local Govemment of the National Patio Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE y�ONL Yt>C»� DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY y Date Received: I t / , ` t ` U Application Number: �qt — o o k Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate OfAppropriateness: Denied ❑ Tabled Title: ❑ Local Historic District (Name) National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: Address of Property for proposed work: :J(an fa r 4: o, e. A tl 5,)4A ,tom) I N U (a G / (� (Street umber—Street Name—City—Zip) Name of Property Owner(s):5C r AQL X �� S c, A , Phone #: (S�) ZZ6 � 0o S r Address of Property Owner(s): 1(13Co Lav -rt-- I + . E/tcytcLr f- 1 N '4 6. -/ Lf (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) Name of Contractor(s): {,n ( �–' Phone #: Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip) Current Use of Building: -4 (Single Family—Mtrlti-Famib}--Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: V/ 0014 -t—,`0., v'� (Wood Frame—Brick--S�tojne—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: (inor•e than one ❑ Landscape ❑ New LJ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: a (e'_ ��0..C.Z %t/1'� (`� G><Ol�� W �h • � Pc Kzi n� i 5S i t)r✓t a-vrc� v 5 ie Ownere-mail: � ��� t J 1 aLl C�Q ' • /or Contractor e -snail: X * and/or X t i ✓(1ij �+9 (A l t.A.4Vt - W Y P -l2 SWMAC eo+ry tVi-Fh (o pa»e.1 stee-l. Signat re of Owner Signature of Contractor By signing flus application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable. —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 8, 2018 Application Number: 2018-1001C Property Location: 50106 Bittersweet Trail Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: L-Plan/Italianate/1877/William C. Kownover Farm Property Owner: David A. Visser Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance No. 117-76, amended 11-1987, Indiana State Register of Historic Places Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kownover farmhouse is a 2 % story brick house with asphalt shingle roof and stone foundation. 2/2 wood windows with segmental arches, with keystones, brick heads, and stone sills, and two bay windows on the front. A portico with flat roof supported by square wood columns covers the front entrance. The property has a summer kitchen of brick to match the house, a silo, as well as corn crib and one and a half story barn structure. ALTERATIONS: Original bay windows roofs have been replaced with higher pitch and wood shakes. Aluminum storm windows have been added. There is a small addition to the rear of the house. Between May 2012 and December 2014, the front portico was removed without a COA. The barn was taken down in 2014 without a COA. Green space at site of former barn has been developed with a stone wall built of original barn foundation stones. COA 2017-0403A approved installation of egress window on north side of house and landscaping to screen window and adjacent A/C unit, creation of dumpster pad along south side of drive adjacent to road, to be enclosed with fence, gates, and evergreens, and extension of gravel driveway. COA 2017-0501 approved installation of 6'H dog-ear wood stockade panels along north property line. Appropriate shade tolerant plants and/or junipers to be installed as necessary. COA 2017-1204A was tabled indefinitely by the Historic Preservation Commission — the absence of a decision on the application resulted in the issuance of an approved COA on January 18, 2018. COA 2018-0306A allowed for the installation of a 40' windmill. APPLICATION ITEMS: "(See Attached)." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following: 1. De -construction of existing corn crib building, a. Salvage material from structure, b. Shore-up/secure remaining structure. The corn crib structure is currently used as storage. The roof is compromised and is currently covered with a tarp. The internal frame of the corn crib is severely damaged by termite infestation and rot while the existing roof framing and joists are bolstered by temporary beams. The adjoining/conjoining barn structure was added sometime prior to 1998 and served to join the original two-story barn to the corn crib structure. The two-story barn was removed in 2014. The remaining structures, when conjoined, create an irregular `M' -shaped roof line, with a pronounced valley between the two. Being taller, the roof line of the later barn structure plunges into the corn crib roof. A gable between the two was an attempt at directing the flow of the water down the valleys, but time and sag have limited the effectiveness of this attempted improvement. This gable and the roof appear to be resting atop the roof of the corn crib, continuing to add additional weight and stress upon its already weakened frame. Applicant plans to return before the Commission in the spring with plans to rebuild the `corn crib' structure in a new location, separate from the pre -1998 barn structure. The to -be -built corn crib will replicate the current corn • crib on a new foundation. Material from the barn torn down in 2014 and the corn crib will be utilized in this reconstruction. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: October 9, 2018 RE: 50106 Bittersweet Trail -St. Joseph County Local Landmark On September 27, 2018, Adam Toering and I visited the site located at 50106 Bittersweet Trail to meet with the property owner and contractor. They are preparing a COA application and wanted a site visit/consultation to discuss the project. In order to simplify this report, I will give a description of each section moving from south to north. Many alterations have not helped the structural integrity of the original corn crib structure. The original barn has been removed leaving a corner support and footer which is part of the newest structure that was constructed between the original barn and corn crib. Southern half of corn crib structure -Alternating open siding exterior wall originally designed to allow air to pass through crop allowing crop to dry. Later this section was adapted to a chicken coop. This stage added chicken wire, feeding doors, ramps, and roosts. I feel that is reasonable to believe that presence of the chicken wire is the only reason this outside wall has not completely collapsed. Reference Figure 7. -The roof trusses are failing as vertical supports have been recently added to hold up the roof structure. Reference Figure 9. -The plywood over joist floor has failed. I stepped right through to the dirt floor underneath when I walked through this section. Reference Figure 8. -The wall in between this and the next section is an addition wall that is framed and on a combination of brick and toward the rear a cement curb. There is dry rot and termite damage along the entire bottom of this wall. Reference Figure 10. Northern half of corn crib structure -This section was enclosed with a front door, windows, and rear overhead garage door. -A concrete floor was added later as well as a curb along the bottom of both east -west walls. -The roof on the northern part has holes with bad deck and rotten trusses. Reference Figure 11. -This small section of roof is receiving the brunt of all the elements that run off the southern roof of the large shop area. A pitch/storage area was added to perhaps divert this load, but it has weakened the roof and the wall supports. -There is a wall for the middle section that is inches away from the wall that is the southern wall of the large shop section. Termites and water have damaged the wall to the point where additional supports had to be added to help hold up the roof in this section. Reference Figure 8, left frame. This building will continue to deteriorate if it is not separated from the rest of the structure. It is not structurally strong enough to hold its own weight let alone strong enough to support the weight of the elements from the shop roof. The roofs and walls need to be rebuilt separately with truss supports, floors, and proper gutters. The structure is not safe and will not likely survive a serious winter as it sits. Steve Szaday Preservation Inspector GROUP B STANDARDS: LOCAL LANDMARKS: A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to • landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. • 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super-graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited • No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the site visit by Historic Preservation Inspector Szaday and Specialist Toering, staff is of the opinion that the corn crib structure is not structurally sound. The irregular roof line created by the attachment of the barn structure to the corn crib has led to continued degradation within the structure of the corn crib. Staff recommends approval of this proposed deconstruction, predicated on the applicant's expressed desire to reconstruct the corn crib in a new location in 2019. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Diagram 1- 50106 Bittersweet Trail as seen in 2016 (top) and 2013 (bottom). • • • • �J Diagram 2 - Staff rendering of roof slopes, based on 2016 satellite imagery. Photos• Figure 1 - File photo of the main farmhouse from December 29, 2U16. Figure 2 - Corn crib, west facade. • r� LJ n • 0 Figure 3 - Corn crib, south facade. Figure 4 - Corn crib, north facade. Figure 5 - Corn crib, east facade. Note roof eave. • • Figure 8 - Interior condition. Note termite damage in the image at left. Figure 9 - Roof beams. • • • • Figure 10 - Foundation rot at shared wall with newer barn structure. Figure 11 - Evidence of sustained water damage in corn crib garage bay. 0 • 0 U OCT - 12018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County --City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.southbendin.gov/govemment/department/community-investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov J0yj 1� C C.� Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Goverment of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE ONLPS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN TILS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Z j Application Number: 22 U f — i e O( C Past Reviews: 19 YES (Date ofLast Review) ElNO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: '( )1 -� Ti& 10 Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Naive) ❑ National Landmark Certificate Of App ro riateness: M Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: Address of Property for proposed work: Saio(r/ji„L�x��sTt%i �%L �21�t;2 /A%0 �GS 30 J(Street Number --Street Name—City—Zip) // Name of Property Owner(s): �n Y' b U, 5 SC -,'7L Phone #: JF /l/% Address of Property Owner(s): ash /y /-/ OBD CT �l� ry/f�y5/3(��G W1 7 f//Z- (Street Number—Street Name—Cit),,—Zip) Name of Contractor(s): d cFF toam '�& ��� Phone #: f Contractor Company Name: A4C _end yltlyCa Awe af- tJJ 114V �2°Sl7�fa 1dN Address of Contractor Company: (Street Number—Street Name—aty—Zip) Current Use of Building: (Single Family—Mul Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: 4kao �'� � /H� .� 4!�C� ��2✓C�d2t (Wood Frame Brzck—Stone—Steel—Cwicrete—Other) Proposed Work: RIn-Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ,Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: /l�Cl%i )11ij6 © �jl 1 AUET and/or Contractor e-mail: /T�l � i/ lei . r=PA Ownere-mail: � ---,— X /¢ �--� and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, ifapplicable. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— R a Wwa; � �4 - - Z-- M� �V-M--W-h �-:,% - L, The Kownover Farmstead 50106 Bittersweet Trail Granger, Indiana 46530 Corn Crib Project Background From the beginning of our ownership in 2015, we have known that the corn crib building was in need of restoration if possible. The roof was already tarped on the southwest end, and there was soft wood flooring in the weathered crib. The east end of the crib had been used as a chicken coop and the wet hay and bedding had taken its toll nn the floorine and side members at the east end of the crib portion. Hatches and other hinged access ports were loose and no longer latched closed. End doors were satisfactory in function, and were padlocked for safety. Interior structural components were suspect, so we added support beams until a definitive plan could be made for the structural issues. There were several major projects in the last 3 years, so there has been no intentional delay in addressing this issue. This year, construction teams have been overwhelmed with work, and we have been forced to delay any prospect of contractor work. I engaged Jeff Weldy, our intended contractor, and we met at the property within the last month. We arranged to meet with Steve Szaday and Adam Toering last week. Understanding both the urgency of the upcoming winter threat, and the deadline for submission for CoA on October 1, we hastened to illustrate our initial plan, and we hope to convey (albeit incomplete) our certain assurance of reconstructing in like fashion, with like materials in like appearance, and with only interior differences that allow for building function, that wasn't possible in its current state. Part of that plan is to include a perennial maintenance plan to protect the woodwork. • • • • • Current structure Building is peak roofed, with peak running east west. The building abutts the adjacent later -added garage (aka larger barn). The peak of the larger barn is also east west, so the abutting sloped roof line meet at an awkwardly constructed peak that runs low and north south, intending to create an east -west water run-off at the edges of {--north where the buildings abutt. This valley currently leaks and threatens both building structures, a model which is suspect in reconstructing like this. Although the chase created by this water -diverting abuttment currently houses HVAC for a garage heater, I no longer intend to use it. Ir - 9� o - 9� o r�L �lir t�}�� f p'f���I!'� 1�� 1,•� Elie lµ Yt 'f - 9� o r�L �lir t�}�� f p'f���I!'� 1�� 1,•� Elie lµ Proposal The proposal is two demolish the unsafe, non -salvageable barn and rebuild in like fashion, using not only wood elements for similar exterior, but reusing existing vintage timbers on the property from the old barn. As well, we have been discussing with Mr. Toering, the repurposing of windows previously donated to HPC if originals are not salvageable. The proposal also includes the professional recommendation of separating the buildings by 2-3' so they don't threaten each other with water run- off and snow accumulation. This would be accomplished by reducing the footprint of the rebuilt corn crib building, and keeping the south end of the building in the samline as currently. ed exteri' ore the crib wall shall erkeeping with ither be a faux the open appearance to the crib portion through exterior over a true interior wall which is black lined, or a concrete -floored patio -like structure, open exposure on the inside as an enhanced similarity to the current structure. The garage portion of the corn crib shall be built to function as a storage area as it is currently. c__ North r: Walls, roof and entire exterior, with the exception of the gap between the buildings, shall be re-created in a manner that restores and maintains the current appearance of the building. 0 Mitigation and Construction Plan The temporary supports that we have previously placed are on weak surfaces. Collapse is a great risk as is, but very likely to occur with the weight of snow. The time of year and expected time frame of the project precludes this being completed before winter, so work shall be done in 2 phases: 1. demolition and safety securing of the site — as soon as approved and permitted 2. rebuild — in Spring 2019 The detail of the demolition is outlined in Jeff Weldy's proposal included separately here. • ADVANCED RENOVATION & CONSTRUCTION To whom it may concern, After a thorough investigation of Mr. Dave Visser's barn/corn crib on his property located on 50106 Bittersweet Trail, Granger, IN 46530, it is in my professional opinion that the existing structure is beyond repair and un -able to be salvaged. Due to the lack of preventive maintenance and the ill -repair of the roof, the structural members of the building are in no way sound or safe to be in or near. it is obvious in many of the pictures that have been taken that the walls of the building have a significant bow and/or lean to them which is evidence of rot and decay and possibly the lack of a solid foundation. On the South/West side of the building the roof is non-existent and has caused major damage to the rafters, floor, and structural members of the corn crib. A large majority of the existing cribbing shows major signs of decay and has lost all structural significance. Overall, I would deem this building as unsalvageable and more importantly unsafe for Mr. Dave Visser, his family, guests, and neighbors. With winter fast approaching it is Mr. Visser and I's concern that even a minor amount of snow load on the roof of this barn could be the end all for this structure, which could potential cause significant damage to the larger barn that is attached to the North or, more importantly, cause harm to someone in or near either barn. We would like to ask for approval from the council to disassemble the barn in question with intent to re -build the structure once approval has been granted. Our goal would be to disassemble the smaller barn while protecting and ensuring the structural integrity of the large barn. We would like to have the building down before winter arrives to avoid any structural damage to the large barn or personal injury. A controlled demolition will obviously produce a much better and safer result for Mr. Visser and his property then a total uncontrolled collapse. Once demolition has occurred we would propose to rebuild the barn using a proper • foundation and proper structural members. It would be our number one goal to produce a 1 • building that mimics the look and character of the existing barn but with a solid structure behind it. All exterior members would be wood and would resemble the existing look and feel including the two windows and the corn crib look and character which is on the south side of the building. We also propose moving the barn 2'-3' away from the large barn. The two barns currently are joined with both roof pitches coming together which creates a vulnerable valley which is susceptible to leaks, ice dames, and snow build-up. In Mr. Visser and I's opinion the two barns were never originally attached and were never meant to be built in that way. We would like to move the smaller barn's north wall 2'-3' away from the larger barn which would give room for both barns to have their own roof lines and guttering systems. To properly tie both roofs together would require major structural changes to the look of the barns. Please reference concept drawings for visuals. Mr. Visser and 1 both appreciate your consideration and assure you that ever step will be taken to maintain the historical look and feel of this property while ensuring the longevity for future generations. We both take this task seriously and have full intentions to work hand in hand with the council and the Historic Preservation Commission of St. Joe County. Thank you for your consideration and for the opportunity to present our case, Jeff Weldy- Owner Advanced Renovation and Construction • 0 Conclusion/Summary • We have great need to address this issue with the unsafe building o Consultation with Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday and Contractor Jeff Weldy support the need • We have great desire to restore this beloved vintage corn crib o Consultation with Adam Toering about preservation goals is in line with our desire to restore the structure • We have resources available to accomplish the entire project o We commit liquid financial resources to accomplish the scope of the needed work (it shall not fall victim to circumstances) • We have developed a valued track record of trust with the HPC in previous projects o Our previous work with the HPC, and projects that we have chosen to do illustrate our desire to improve and restore this grand property, and can be trusted to be in line with mutual goals held by homeowner and HPC> • We seek the approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition and reconstruction of the building referred to as the "corn crib" at 50106 Bittersweet nail in Granger, Indiana • 0 STAFF REPORT • CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 9, 2018 Application Number: 2018-1001D Property Location: 720 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne / 1878 / DeShane House Property Owner: John and Monica Sikorski Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Register Historic District Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story irregular plan Queen Anne style house sits on a brick foundation. Walls are shiplap clapboard with corner boards and frieze boards. An interior brick chimney punctuates the cross gabled roof line with low pitch and asphalt shingles. To the rear is a first story gable rear wing with a shed roof side wing; decorative spindle work punctuates the gable apex. A full width front and side porch wraps the west and south sides, with a second story balcony facing the street. Spindle supports with balustrades and decorative spindles at the eaves with brackets are also present. Windows are 1/1 double hung with molded entablatures. The ground floor has shutters. The front door is wood paneled with beveled glass light and transom and a wood storm. A large two story gabled barn with board and batten siding stands to the rear. ALTERATIONS: COA #2005-1114 allowed for the complete tear -off and re -roof of the entire house, as well as allowed for the installation of flashing and roof vents as needed. COA #2012-0716A allowed for the removal of three storm -damaged trees in the back yard per City Forester Brent Thompson. COA #2015-1215 allowed for the replacement of the existing brick chimney with new in-kind material, to match existing. RME #2017-1023 allowed for the repair woodwork at the northwest corner of the property because of water damage. RME #2018-1005 re- issued COA #2017-1023 for the repair of woodwork on the northwest corner. RME #2018-1005B allowed for the removal and replacement of multiple trees on the property. RME #2018-1005C allowed for the replacement and repair of brick foundation and chimney with like material. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Move or replace eight total windows to accommodate layout of renovated interior. Windows will remain in the same vicinity as before but require re -alignment for purposes of interior layout." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Kitchen — a. Three north kitchen windows to be moved to center over sink and requires lowering the height as to not butt against ceiling. b. New windows will measure 27" x 58" each. 2. Mudroom — a. Re -size and center window on north wall of mudroom to match symmetrically with new window addition on south wall of mudroom. Both windows will be centered on the wall and match sunroom windows in size and style. 3. Basement door — a. Raise current basement door to provide access to elevated kitchen floor. b. Remove current back door to kitchen with two new large windows on east wall to match windows on north and south wall. 4. French door — a. Install new in (or out) swing French doors 5. Bathroom — • a. Replace upstairs southeast window in location of new bathroom. Window is falling out of damaged frame and does not close or open properly. Replacement window will be same size. Proposed windows: Marvin Ultimate casement or double -hung, wood interior/aluminum-clad wood exterior. Or Anderson Architectural Collection E -Series Casement window, wood interior/aluminum-clad wood • exterior. Proposed doors: Final brand and style to be determined. Materials will be wood or wood/aluminum (no steel or vinyl), similar to: Ashworth Professional Series wood/aluminum French doors Or Marvin Ultrex Outswinging French Door SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK: Chapin Park Local Historic District II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. • Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. • Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are is covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of placement and material of window and door adjustments/additions. Remand authority to staff for specific window and door selection. Of the provided examples, 1/1 double hung window style is preferred over casement. Written by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator • 0 pmovt MkfkF �LTw+�ear�rr re srp�utr�ae) bftNI(n (t eM1ve 17ttas—p W. or 8kc+t� (Titikew Tb JAOILT14 FIx CAST MttsoN¢Y I to FOt<a101AMOV4 ��-' otatyF I.etvtsi TIXG W�Ipoas 5.a+►n vlM.� W(wtJ tAks�nAv t4cYRtl�+ Til ktsct�N T alF�otrp uirrttit� WtN�oWS { .t. roew(e vas.L 1 EM�J� r�(bW MhPlK i4sethweiv, Cawa 0- M "IMP- /11phus. %o%p I ?GRt1k Itrt ,-. - ! - _. —12o PftkK (NrCr ToestAu) tTF FL.PrO Site Plan • • W;14 yow ADD FREA�N Deed r Csev skeT4t' l i roew(e vas.L 1 EM�J� r�(bW MhPlK i4sethweiv, Cawa 0- M "IMP- /11phus. %o%p I ?GRt1k Itrt ,-. - ! - _. —12o PftkK (NrCr ToestAu) tTF FL.PrO Site Plan • • • • IzouGla Y,rlv�Pp-� �s i ` p(p��{{ ►tr{LliEN WrNOpv? " RE'rj°�LIL�NrA�T RN-$tLF 1, yt1i00w f s � r j APP f0v sus) su,y4 Ff.r,14 - Pwc, Blueprint �„ RErv#pvE DopR � N tNUOW AN O Aop Trq A rNJOa$ Q, -sr VOw 1REloce- -M tBJGL- v�Tu tarps Fwmn- Figure 1-720 Park, looking north east Ra Figure 2-720 Park, looking north 'TQ "ATtt4•Naw 4-00OvV PQppoS&O ktTGN�►J ariNVOVJ RE-�l\G�1MbNC %toom#H oN ?Owif wA-tL- ComecrL`( acpotoly Figure 3-720 Park, kitchen windows • • • • • 0 eBM.vG )�Rrrl�hsE" 3 w,rp,vs; arro.s,s�.v� ��"'k� ~ Rq 27" X t�'" ktM1SHieN orC0. 'tth $,.+*....aver& Figure 4-720 Park, kitchen windows RO'lLAT.q w STE+ Ftrw tt ow sw,e+t% FO-OVLW- qc, t 5 Figure 5-720 Park, kitchen windows to French doors r"roit tf vota- q 0QrMv-'jT Figure 6-720 Park, kitchen windows to French doors R Lob 9A,**G" wxoVaw A..p fi-EW f QovN rl.*CV G;Pj r jm�044 mq tato Smartt Elsm"Orl Figure 7-720 Park, windows to French doors • • • • 0 gMte v0eit Ao? ANp DOWO-v-M Z M,PDQ*lj t,VVOF W%rA FtuacH/?"O 0"4L- Figure "4 - Figure 8-720 Park, windows and door adjustments MO W aNpaw Figure 9-720 Park, windows and door adjustments Ashworth Professional Door Marvin Ultrex Out Swing French Door Marvin Ultimate Casement Windows on kitchen project approved by HPC on Lamonte Terrace Proposed window and door options 0 • Is OCT -1 2019 ` A' fjl e -t* 7Io§V� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend; IN 46601 http://www.southbend in.gov/government/department/coin m unity -investment Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021 Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov Michele Gelfman, President A Certified Local Government of the National Pmk Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator APPLICATION FOR A - CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS OFFICE USE ONL >> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOY«««OFFICE USE ONLY �1 Date Received: d t�f Z Application Number: — 160 I0 Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: 0 GV E 1 3-() 8— IffLocal Landmark 19 Local Historic District (Name) , (1 t- 1:1 -- ❑ National Landmark Certificate OfApp ro riateness: f Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: Address of Property for proposed work: PANt Divi%- Via-, A '1ENti , 1N kbb I h (Street Number --Street Name—City—Zip) Name of Property Owner(s): JOHN 40 ' fVLONlfq 5\IfwrL'A l Pbone #: 5"1Lj -7,33-731 1 Address of PropertyOwner(s): 72-0 pmi_ ,. 50ttTH 1WE14i) it/ Ab It (Street Ntanber—.Street Name—City—Zip) Name of Contractor(s): ti !A'7-,4z-V1F_t7 (` CVC -ML f"jC—Ow') Phone #: Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: (Street Number—Streel Name—City—Zip) Current Use of Building: $IyVi4G _FMW1'( (Single Familn—;l-lulti-Fcnniln—Commercial—Government—Industrial—locant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: V'Vt q ei WC- (6Vood Fi•ante—Brick—Stone—Steel—Cancrele—Othei) Proposed Work: (more than one LJ Landscape ❑ box may be checked) New L-16Replacement (not in-kind) ❑Demolition Description of Proposed Work: Owner a -mail: Aj jC.falS%yxa( qy._\ Q &MAt(,_ Cc n1 and/or Contractor e-mail: X and/or a Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor By siAiinL isapplication I agree to abide by alt local regulations relaled to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit. if applicable. —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Contractor: Singer Construction Mark Unwin (574)-258-4740 1) Windows and doors: Move or replace eight total windows to accommodate layout of renovated interior. Windows will remain in the same vicinity as before but require re -alignment for purposes of interior layout and symmetry. a) Move three north kitchen windows to center over sink. Each one will measure 27" x 58". Current windows are single -pane with cracked glass. Kitchen re -design requires lowering the windows (current center window butts against ceiling of kitchen). b) Re -size and center window on north wall of mudroom to match symmetrically with new window addition on south wall of mudroom. Both windows will be centered on the wall and match sunroom windows in size and style. C) Raise current basement door to provide access to kitchen elevated kitchen floor and remove current back door to kitchen. d) In place of door, add two large window on east wall to match windows on south and north walls. e) Replace upstairs southeast window in location of new bathroom. Window is falling out of damaged frame and does not close or open properly. New window will be same size. Proposed windows for all replacements/additions: Marvin Ultimate Casement or double -hung windows (wood interior; wood -clad aluminum outside). These are the same windows used on a home on LaMonte Street, and have been approved by the Historic Preservation Commission on other projects. (See attached photos). Or: Andersen Architectural Collection E -Series Casement window (wood interior, wood -clad aluminum exterior) Proposed doors: Final brand and style to be determined. Materials will be Wood or Wood/Aluminum (no steel or vinyl), similar to: Ashworth Professional Series Wood/Aluminum French Doors Or Marvin Ultrex Outswinging French Door • Elicia Feasel Brom: John Christopher Sikorski <jkgsikorski@gmail.com> ent: Friday, October 12, 2018 2:28 PM To: Elicia Feasel; Adam Toering Subject: Re: 720 Park Great, thank you to both of you! Have a great weekend On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:08 PM Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov> wrote: 'Thank you for providing these more specific details. Despite the Staff Report already published, this will allow us to prepare supplements in advance of the meeting. See you on Monday. Elicia From: John Christopher Sikorski <ikgsikorski@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 11:59 AM To: Adam Toering Cc: Elicia Feasel Subject: Re: 720 Park Fbear Adam - I am sorry to hear that you were sick. I am glad to hear that you are better. Thank you for all of your assistance. Am I to understand that, if I were to send you more details of specifications and dimensions at this point, it wouldn't make a difference anyway, since the report is written? Either way, since Elicia (cc'd to this email) requested them, here is what we are currently thinking: All windows will be Marvin Ultimate (see specs here: https•//www marvin com/marvin/windows/casement?view=pro- resources&option=architectural-detail-manuals) Kitchen north wall: -3 in kitchen, casement on two sides of fixed: 27" x 57" North mudroom wall: Replace current window with Marvin Ultimate; keep current dimensions East wall: Marvin Ultimate double hung windows; 24" x 6o" (similar to current size) Door: Therma-tru classic craft Rustic; fiberglass stainable door: South wall of mudroom: 24" x 60" Marvin Ultimate fixed three -over -one window Upstairs bathroom: Marvin Ultimate Double hung window; keep current dimensions (current window is falling out) French door on south wall downstairs: OPTION 1(prefered): Marvin Ultimate French sliding door (See specs here: https://www.marvin.com/marvin/doors/sliding-french OPTION 2: Marvin Ultimate Outswing patio door; see specs here: https://www.marvin.com/marvin/doors/hinged-french Ok, that should be it. Please let me know if you need anything else, and thank you for all of your help! -John Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Department of Community Investment (574) 235-7478 atoering@southbendin.gov City of South Bend • 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., Ste. 1400 South Bend, IN 46601 IMPORTANT NOTICE! This E -Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E -Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E -Mail in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E -Mail address. Please note that incoming e-mails are not routinely screened for response deadlines, and as such, please notify the sender separately by fax of any message containing deadlines. In addition, E -Mail information cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error -free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain virus. Therefore, the sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a consequence of E -Mail transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard -copy version. John Sikorski Director for Adult Faith Formation & Catechesis Associate Secretary for Evangelization & Discipleship Diocese of Fort Wayne -South Bend • IMPORTANT NOTICE! This E -Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY July 16t1t, 2018 13t1' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER Secretary Gelfman called the meeting to order at 5:30 pm. Members of the Public Present: Tom Anderson, 535 Riverside Drive Kevin Buccellato, 304 S Twyckenham Alicia Czarnecki, City of South Bend, Engineering Roger Nawrot, City of South Bend, Engineering Sean Dennison, 3601 W Lathrop Jeff Dierbeck, 61396 Miami Avenue George Garner, 1040 W Washington Chris Hanney, 801 Park Avenue Don Howard, 952 Riverside Drive Deb Parcell, 801 W Washington Tim Scott, 711 Forest Avenue Ed Talley, 1075 Riverside Drive • II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Becky Bonham; Velvet Canada (arriving at 5:51 pm); Greta Fisher, Architectural Historian Members Not in Attendance: Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator; Adam Toering, Historic Preservation Specialist; Aladean DeRose, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: Steve Szaday, Historic Preservation Inspector III. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 535 Riverside COA# 2018-0607 #8308-92 River Bend Local Historic District Representation: Tom Anderson, 535 Riverside Drive STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 9, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0607 Property Location: 535 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/ 1910 Property Owner: Tom Anderson Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Local Historic District (#8308-92) Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: This is a two-story house with a rusticated concrete block foundation. The walls have clapboard vinyl siding. The hipped roof with gabled dormers on the north and east sides is covered with asphalt shingles. The porch has a concrete foundation and steps with iron railing and supports with a hipped roof. The windows are 1/1 double • hung with aluminum storms and an oval window on the front fagade and fixed single pane windows on the first story north and south side of the house. There is a one story hipped -roof enclose rear porch. ALTERATIONS: The porch railing and supports are replacements; the shutters, vinyl siding and aluminum storms are not original to the house. There are vinyl replacement windows. COA 2003-0912 allowed for re -roofing and the installation of gutters and downspouts. COA 2013-0603 allowed for 1) the removal and replacement of the enclosed back porch with a new addition, 2) removal of the current fencing to be replaced with 6' lattice -topped vinyl fencing along the rear north side of the property. RME 2018-0326A allowed for the replacement of the gutters and metal wrap on the front porch, fascia, and eaves. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replace fence gate and fence sections damaged and remove old chain link fence." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure including: 1. Installation of fence sections on the north side of the property, as well as a gate at the northwest side of the property by the existing garage. 2. Removal of existing chain link fence portions. COA #2013-0603 allowed for the removal and replacement of the existing fence with 6' lattice top vinyl fencing along the rear north side of property. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: River Bend Local Historic District Standards and Guidelines I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. IN THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and its location adjacent to Leeper Park and along the St. Joseph River. The district encompasses: two blocks of Riverside Drive beginning at Marion Street (from 503 Riverside Drive north) and ending at Bartlett Street; two lots on the north side of Navarre street just west of the alley behind Riverside Drive; the north side of Hammond Place; the east side of St. Joseph Street between Hammond Place and Bartlett Street; and the south side is of Bartlett Street between St. Joseph and Riverside Drive. The District contains 45 residences and their adjacent outbuildings. Required Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets, alleys and building setbacks shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix). Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Removal of shade trees over twelve inches (12") diameter, conifer trees over six inches (6") in diameter or other major plant elements shall be subject to approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. Any subsequent replacement trees of any size required by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be retained. The Riverfront character of the district shall be retained. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in front and a larger lawn to the rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive generally have sloping front lawns and flat back yards. The majority of structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties include a garage located at the rear of the property accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. All houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. The district has a compact layout. Large homes are constructed on small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Place, are constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of the backyard areas or rear first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In recognition of this, greater latitude will be allowed in the application of the adopted standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the individual preferences of the property owners in the treatment of these backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn, shrubs, walkways or semi- permanent surface changes in the rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets, sand -boxes, etc. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements 2 in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation • Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed fence. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Bonham made a motion to approve. Seconded by Commissioner Fisher. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0607 is passed. • 2. Angela Bridge COA# 2018-0627B #9104-2000 Local Landmark Representation: Alicia Czarnecki, 227 W Jefferson, 13' Floor STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0627B Property Location: 900 W Angela Boulevard Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Filled Spandrel Arch Bridge / 1940 / W. S. Moore & F.J. Miller, Engineers / H. L. Maddocks, Builder Property Owner: St. Joseph County (Bridge #211) Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark #9104-2000 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The Angela Bridge is a three Arch Melan style bridge constructed of reinforced concrete, having two central pillars with corbelled string coursecones at pillar bases and plain spandrels. The bridge construction method relied on bands of several metal arch rings aligned evenly with the protection of a concrete shell. Rough faced cut stone comprises the facing of the structure. ALTERATIONS: COA #2001-0815 allowed for repointing of masonry, replacing pavement, sidewall, and spandrel walls, outside rails, vertical posts above floor beams, the replacement of cross beams as needed, the removal of non -historic aluminum rail, recoating of masonry, COA #2003-0616 allowed for the replacement of the original, deteriorated approach railings with railings of identical shape size, dimensions and design as the existing except that for NHTSA standards rails, piers, and the oval openings were modified. Openings in both the approach and the guard rail were elongated. Conduit for the future installation of light poles was installed, as well. COA #2003-0916-1 allowed for the construction of the trailhead for the Coal Line trail. COA #2010-1206C allowed for the installation of eight Leesburg light poles with Main Street -A luminaires, as well as improvements • to the western bridge approach (including the roundabout). 3 APPLICATION ITEMS: "This project includes the installation of lights on the Angela Bridge of the same type currently existing on Angela Blvd. to the west of the bridge. This project will add six (6) lights, to the locations where existing conduit is located, and will require no modifications to the bridge or railing." • DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure including: Installation of six (6) SternbergLighting model #4510FP4 poles (measuring 10' tall with a 10 ''/z" diameter base) along the bridge. a. The lights will be distributed as follows: i. One set at the western edge of the bridge, over pier 1, ii. One set near the midpoint of the bridge, between pier 2 and 3, iii. One set at the eastern edge of the bridge, over pier 4. b. "Lights shall be attached using 18" straight bolts with 14" of the thread embedded into the top of the bridge rail and 4" of the thread exposed. Bolts locations shall be drilled and epoxy, then hammered in. The Contractor shall field verify, and drill locations shall be approved by the city's representative." c. Two extra light poles will be supplied to the city to be used as spares. COA #2010-1206C allowed for the installation of eight (8) Leesburg 12' straight fluted shafts with Main Street -A luminaires (models #MS805-B or #MS805-B-0) atop. The existing bridge superstructure/railing is not sufficiently wide enough to support the Leesburg 12' base, which is approximately 20" in diameter. Narrower bases are therefore required, necessitating the change in light pole. The Luminaire is of the same style, but is now the LED light model. The existing conduit (installed in 2003) was configured for the installation of six lights. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GROUP B STANDARDS The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the • general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same' material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, • patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, 0 trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. • 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed light installation, as it is a project that has had Historic Preservation support in the past. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator PUBLIC DISCSSION: Tim Scott, 711 Forest Avenue, 1 st District Common Council Rep, President of the South Bend Common Council — "This has been a request by many citizens both on the 4" district side, which is the east side of the bridge, as well as the Pt district side, on the west side of the bridge. We've noticed that the conduit is there, many people have walked through there, they would love this • addition to it, I hope it is architecturally correct, which I have firm faith in the administration for doing that. But this is something that we would definitely want to tie in. It will be a great asset for the city to reflect what is going on on the Michigan Street Bridge — not that it is as ornate or nice as the Michigan Bridge — but it is definitely lights that were asked for by residents in that district. So I ask for you guys to support this." Commissioner Fisher made a motion to approve. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to approve COA #2018-0627B is passed. 3. Riverside Drive Lighting COA# 2018-0627C #7469-85 Riverside Drive Local Historic District; #8734-1996, Leeper Park Local Landmark; #9574-05, Chapin Park Local Historic District Representation: Alicia Czarnecki, 227 W Jefferson, 13' Floor Roger Nawrot, 227 W Jefferson, 13th Floor STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 8, 2018 • Application Number: 2018-0627C Property Location: Multiple Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: N/A 5 Property Owner: Various / City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District (Ordinance #7469-85) and Leeper Park Local Landmark (Ordinances #8734-1996 and #6730-1980), as well as portions of the Chapin Park National Historic District Rating: N/A 0 DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Riverside Drive from Leeper Park to Hudson Avenue — an area including the Riverside Drive Local Historic District, portions of Leeper Park, as well as falling under the umbrella of the Chapin Park National Historic District — is punctuated by a number of historic lights. Originally these streetlights were of the "Park View" model manufactured by the George Cutter Company of South Bend (George Cutter lived within the Riverside Drive Local Historic District at 916 Riverside Drive). Seventeen (17) of the lights are on the north side of Riverside, while four (4) are on the south side. One light post is missing, having previously stood at the intersection of Lafayette Boulevard and Riverside Drive in Leeper Park. ALTERATIONS: COA # 1995-0404 allowed for the removal of existing lamp posts and their replacement with "Hollowspun Post" poles topped with rebuilt Octagonal Junior Luminaire fixtures. The existing light pole in front of 916 Riverside replaced a previous pole that had been struck by a motorist sometime in 2000 (corresponding to COA application #2001-1205). APPLICATION ITEMS: "The project includes maintenance of the historical lighting along Riverside Drive including rewiring the electric and adding a new service point to be located at the alley between Park Avenue and Forest Avenue. The project will require no removals or changes to existing lights." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on multiple lots throughout the Riverside Drive Local Historic District. Specifically: 3. The rewiring of twenty-one (21) historic lights along Riverside Drive, stretching from the intersection of Lafayette Street in Leeper Park to the intersection of Hudson Avenue at the northwest end of the Riverside Drive Local Historic District. a. The street lights will not be altered in any external way. b. The poles will be rewired. c. New electrical boxes (typically flush with the ground, if not underground) will be installed beneath the soil. 4. The replacement of one (1) historic light at the intersection of Riverside Drive and Lafayette Boulevard in Leeper Park utilizing an existing light pole from the Public Works inventory of replacements (the original pole having been previously removed by car accident). 0 5. Installing new wiring between the existing street lights via two methods: open trench and directional drilling. a. Open trench will be utilized primarily along Riverside Drive from the intersection of Hudson east to approximately 1012 Riverside Drive, as well as between Dushane Court and Lafayette Boulevard in Leeper Park. b. Directional drilling will be utilized from Dushane Court along Riverside Drive to approximately 1012 Riverside Drive. Directional drilling will also connect the existing service box on Golden Avenue to the new wiring on Riverside Drive. 6. Capping off and pulling non-essential wiring (primarily in Leeper Park). 7. The installation of a 34" x 22" x 58" high TESCO Cabinet in the alley between Park and Forest Avenues, making use of an existing utility easement. A second service box that will be tied into this project already exists outside of the Riverside Drive Local Historic District on Golden Avenue. SITE VISIT REPORT: July 11, 2018 Historic Preservation Specialist Adam Toering and Project Engineer Alicia Czarnecki from the Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering, conducted a joint site visit to the neighborhood at night on Wednesday, July l lth at approximately 9:30pm to determine which of the light poles were inoperable. Per application document Appendix B, "118-011 Light Up South Bend — Riverside Lighting", light pole numbers 12, 13, and 18 are inoperable. Light poles 14 and 15 have already been converted to LED by the Division of Traffic and Lighting. The amount of light given off by the LED lights is significantly greater. Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Riverside Drive Riverside Drive Local Historic District Guidelines I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and by its intimate relationship with the St. • Joseph River. The district encompasses the seven blocks of Riverside Drive which follow the river front from Lafayette Street to the east of Angela Boulevard to the west. For a portion of that route, there is a row of houses facing the river from across Riverside Drive, while in another portion, residences are situated on both sides of the street, with some properties abutting the river and others located across the drive. The district also includes homes located on Hudson and Golden Streets, between the drive and the alley defining the southern boundary of the district, as well as three separate park areas which lie adjacent to the river's edge: a portion of Leeper Park to the East; all of Shetterly Park in the middle and a portion of Brownfield Part to the West. Required Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, benches, walkways streets alleys and building setbacks shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs, and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society. Light sources must have spectral distribution in all color ranges. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the district. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix) or a suitable replacement which closely duplicates the standard in size, shape, style, and appearance, i.e., Hedwig Lighting Company Standard or similar. Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Tree and landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason to another shall be immediately replaced by suitable flora. The river front neighborhood character of the district shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings, sidewalks, or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. If erosion control efforts become necessary to preserve the riverbank, they should involve processes and materials consistent with the natural beauty of the banks. Large, deep-rooted trees and shrubs as well as fast spreading ground cover should be used when planting for erosion control. As much natural vegetation as possible should be preserved. If large shrubs become unsightly, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and diseased material should be selectively removed. Do not dump leaved and grass clippings on planted slopes as this practice will kill much of the low ground cover and leave soil more susceptible to erosion. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening existing streets, application of asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, major landscaping items, fencing; walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or • inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The introduction of heavy trucks or similar vehicles in the district shall be prohibited. B. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS The majority of the structures within the district have oil or gas heat, and have brick chimneys through the roof. Some houses have one or two window air conditioners. Required Mechanical systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possible alteration to the structural integrity and physical appearance of the building. Solar collectors and TV dishes shall be placed at the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. Recommended Window air conditioners and exhaust fans should be installed at the rear or at an inconspicuous side window. Original lighting fixtures should be retained whenever possible. Prohibited Holes shall not be cut through walls or roofs to accommodate air conditioners or other mechanical equipment in areas that can be seen from the street. Not Recommended Exterior electrical and telephone cables should not be attached to the street elevation of buildings. • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, as this project addresses long-standing desires from the neighborhood to address the faulty or irregular lighting circuit. The new electrical wiring will ensure that the existing street poles are lit and functional. The luminaires will be converted to LED bulbs, which produce more light (as is visible on the examples that have already been converted). Staff would recommend that the TESCO box be shielded from the street and is of the understanding that staff from City Engineering would be explicit conveying these concerns to the contractor for its location and treatment, including paint color. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist 7 Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Canada arrived at 5:51pm. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: Don Howard, 952 Riverside Drive — "Been there since 1997, we live between two of the lights that are out — its been very, very dark in my part of Riverside for a long time. In addition to that we have dealt with a long series of disruptions in service on these lines on individual lights that would go out, stay out, for a long time. It serves as a disruption, as this is not the first service disruption we have had in that neighborhood. Quite frankly, I'm delighted to see a long-term, permanent solution is in plan here. I think it is very much needed and will enhance the quality of life in the neighborhood and also increase the safety within the neighborhood. We have had too many incidents in my immediate stretch of Riverside Drive where the lack of adequate lighting may well have contributed to some of those incidents that required the police to be called out. If I might, I would like to register an opinion about the LED lights: I do think the existing LED lights further east are too bright and would support the idea of dialing back the intensity in those lights. I think it would be more conformable with the character and historical nature of the neighborhood. But otherwise, I am really in support of this project. Ed Talley, 1057 Riverside Drive — "This is the whole history of the Riverside Drive Historic District, partially of East Wayne Street Local Historic District. All of this came about because of • me, and that formed a street light committee by then Mayor Kernan, and the decision to rewire a portion of Riverside Drive Local Historic District with new wiring was decided and executed. There are two circuits on Riverside Drive that feed into the box on the alley, one goes into Hudson, the other goes into Leland. There's nothing wrong with that wiring. There's never been a problem with that wiring since it was installed some 23 years ago. The city made a determination based upon the cost involved at that time in taking over the ownership and metering of these two historic districts, that they would forgo the rewiring of the area feeding out of the central section of Leeper Park which goes from Lafayette near here, to Leland. Part of those two circuits — one on Riverside Drive ones on Leland — part of those circuits go interrupted. And once that project went through its stage, it created a problem further down the line, and its never been able to be rectified. I'm in total favor of this project, but only half of it. And I have a couple of requests. One is, you are wasting city money by rewiring two circuits coming out of Boland Avenue. There's no reason to touch it — there's nothing wrong, no reason at all. There other part that comes out of Leeper Park does need to be re done. Going to an additional expense to establish a new control box which we have been discussing on the alley way, instead of leaving it where it is at in Leeper Park's central section — why waste that money? Just rewire the circuit, and leave it as it is. Unless, because of the location of where the control point is on Riverside Drive near Leland to Lafayette is the same contractors who bring on the park lights circuits on Lafayette Boulevard, that's where one of the real light poles is located. In front of 916 Riverside Drive in 1916, the original "Park View" post with a 16" glove • was installed a week before he died in San Francisco. The Historic Preservation Commission over the years made it a point to keep that Park View post. There was another incident at that location, and that went away and was replaced by a hollow spun • post. There are a couple of Park View posts in existence in the city that could be reestablished in that location. I think it is kind of a nice tribute. Back in 1986, I&M Power Company(`s) Bill Cartwright gave me permission to play with the streetlights on Riverside Drive, and I put ballast in and I check -tested high-pressure sodium and metal [unintelligible] and I put 103 watt bulbs in and 150 watt bulbs in. We went through the entire process of historic lighting because I was on the Commission I introduced the thought to the Commission that streetlighting within the historic district were part of the historic district. And because the entities were located on the acreage of the description they were therefore covered. And what we wanted to do, what we wanted to accomplish was increase the efficiency of the streetlights. Because, before when I&M was involved they were not the way they are today, they used to be a hodge-podge, that we wanted to go to something that was energy efficient, and we wanted to keep the look of the incandescent bulbs. In 1915 the street lights were installed on Riverside Drive all the way to Golden Avenue, that's where it stopped, that was Leland up until that point. The lamps and the streetlamps were 40 watt. A few years later they become 60 watt. When the city took them over they were 103 watt, incandescent. The Mayor's streetlight committee decided that Riverside Drive was going to get high-pressure sodium because as one woman, in Harter Heights said, `It looks just like gas light.' Of course, it was never gaslight. So, we've got the high-pressure sodium. East Wayne Street ended up getting what that district (Riverside Drive) wanted — they wanted 100 watt metal halide bulb. Because 100 watt metal halide bulb looks identical to a 500 watt incandescent bulb. There's a coloring rendition and the Commission spent weeks discussing this topic — the color rendition of lights in historic districts — against paint colors and architectural features. I went through it when I was director with the Court House, they have now corrected that to a smaller fixtures and now it is metal halide. LED lamps that have been installed — I had a conversation with you today, thank you for your time, you are a sweetheart. And you I spoke to. Commissioner Gelfman reminded the speaker that there is a time limit. So, we need go back to warm side. I've been hearing from people in the district. 2900 degrees kelvin, my 21 LED bulb on my streetlight in my yard, it belongs to me at 1075 Riverside Drive. Totally historically correct. Color, everything. So, LED we need to keep in the district. I think that's everything. Thank you for being so patient. Tim Scott, 711 Forest Avenue, 1St District Common Council Rep, President of the South Bend Common Council — I definitely want to concur with Don Howard and Ed Talley on the lights, I want this to be — not make best the enemy of better. I think what we need right now is streetlights. Up, get it lit, for safety and production, and even myself on the Council, and Karen White started up Light Up South Bend with the City, I think that is something that • Kara Boyles and I have been discussing is the Kelvin temperature of the streetlights, and I agree the two east almost down to Lafayette are way brighter than everything else. I think what we can do is get the lights up, get them operating for the safety and everything 0 else, and we have absolutely have asked for this, it is a big issue as Kara can tell that has come before me over and over again because we've had disruptions. But then I think we look at the Standard for the districts and if Ed's got the light at the right color — I've seen his light, it looks pretty darn good — but the one thing I do see is that there are some in the neighborhood that are really blue and some that are really orange. But the ones that are up now — the incandescents are very dim. Different lights, they lose their lumens over time. I like the fact that we are doing LED right now, whatever works with the wiring, because then we have the versatility. Then everyone knows you can play with LEDs, get the right color that we need. And is lower, cheaper, safer for the city, meaning lower voltage. I ask that you support this and pass it. Commission Fisher made a motion that we approve this application with the stipulation that it does not include an approval or specify a lamp type so that it is understood that we would like to see that examined and would like to see further discussion. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Three in favor, two opposed. Vote: 3 — 2 Motion to approve COA#2018-0627C is passed. COA #2018-0627C is approved. 4. 108 N Main COA# 2018-0628 #8915-1998 Local Landmark Representation: Sean Dennison, 3601 West Lathrop STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 9, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0628 Property Location: 108 N Main Street Arcbitectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neo-Classical/1910/Solon Beman and H.G. Christman, builder Property Owner: JMS Development, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Historic Landmark, ordinance # 8915-1998 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: John Mohler Studebaker built this eight story Neo -Classical style office structure in 1910. The fagade is comprised of six bays to the west and three to the south and is covered with white terra cotta classical detailing. It is also clearly divided into three registers that are separated by strong projecting and intervening cornices. The bottom of each cornice is punctuated by volutes and honeysuckle designs placed between each bay. The middle of the structure is articulated with a three bay system, which continues to the second intervening cornice, once again embellished with classical detailing. The top floor is further distinguished by the use of arched bays, which are topped by elaborate egg and dart molding. The overall decorative detail of the structure tends to reflect the impact of the Colombian Exposition of which the architect, Solon S. Beman, was a major participant. However, the frank expression of the steel frame links the building to the Chicago School of skyscraper construction. The building has a flat roof with robust projecting cornices that have egg and dart molding and decorated voluted brackets. The windows are 1/1 double hung with simple decorated spandrels, except for the eighth floor, which has round even spans and cartouche keystones. • ALTERATIONS: COA 2016-0705A approved replacement of the non -original storefronts at ground floor with new aluminum windows and sill flashing and 7 door openings with standard hardware. Vinyl/aluminum windows have been replaced with an historically appropriate Quaker style aluminum that restored all full original window openings, including arched heads. Further • approvals with COA 2016-0705A include: awnings, in-kind; close up windows behind elevator core; masonry restoration, in- kind; remove skylights; install stair tower and trash chute near center of north fagade, all finished in EIFS. COA 2016-0801A approved removal of "JMS Building" sign on the north facade (although sign will remain installed to reflect the historic name 10 and nature of building), and installation of Centier blade sign, Centier sign on north elevation, and Studebaker Lofts sign on west elevation. • APPLICATION ITEMS: "Install on the North Elevation (1) set of LED lit channel letters. Letters to be 4'x4' logo box with 21" letters reading "WEIGAND" underscored with a 13" x 15'-10" light box. All mounted onto a raceway." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: North American Signs, contractor, proposes to install an illuminated sign representing tenant, Weigand Construction, on the north facade of the JMS Building, approximately at the 5" floor level. Great Lakes Capital, owner, approves of the sign as presented. The overall dimensions of the sign will be 24' wide by 5' tall, featuring Weigand Construction's logo and lettering mounted on a raceway. The profile of the sign will protrude 10" from the mounting. Chuck Bulot, Building Commissioner, has approved the sign per the Design Review guidelines for signs in the South Bend Central Development Area. In the denial letter for COA 2017-0803 (an application for a third Centier sign), it was conveyed that the Commission should have a comprehensive plan for signage from the building owner/developer. Staff recommends that building owner/developer provide Commission with a comprehensive plan for signage for the building, or specify what parameters/specifications exist for signage of tenants and future tenants to the building. SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Group B: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment changes of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a • Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure - Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material - Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood - all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials - the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will . also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required 11 Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this is the only sign for this business, is installed on the modern surface of the building, will not alter the original building, and conforms to the Standards and Guidelines, Staff recommends approval. Written by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Molnar made a motion to approve. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0628 is passed. :7 5.801 W Washington COA# 2018-0702A #10443-16 Local Landmark Representation: Deb Parcell, 801 W Washington STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 July 2018 Application Number: 2018-0702A Property Location: 801 West Washington, South Bend, IN 46601 Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Romanesque Revival / 1890 Property Owner: Indiana Landmarks Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Ordinance # 10443-16, West Washington National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kizer House is a contributing structure of the West Washington National Register Historic District. The house is a Romanesque Revival style with a full three stories plus basement. The house is built of coursed gray granite, which contributes to its style including heavy massing and round arches. The mortar is a red color with a raised beaded or grapevine joint. There is a central hip roof with numerous intersecting gables and towers, a massive parapet at the west gable, two round towers on the fagade which terminate into conical roofs. The original dormers feature a conical roof with terra cotta clad sidewalls and terra cotta ridge cap. There are three dormers added c. 1940 with a low slope roof and copper sidewalls. The original roof was covered in square edge red clay the — similar to that on Tippecanoe Place. The current asphalt roof replaced the original tile (first in the 1980's, most recently renovated in 2017) retaining the decorative terra cotta ridge cap. The original roof was completed with a decorative copper cornice and gutters. Elements of the copper flashing remain, although the original copper downspouts have been replaced with galvanized metal and the valleys are asphalt. All entry steps are of cut granite with rough stone balustrades. The front porches and porte-cochere have slender stone column supports. The front porch has a shallow hip roof while the Porte-cochere has a gable roof with a decorative terra cotta shingled pediment. Windows around the house are 1/1 double hung wood windows throughout with stone sills, plain jambs, and massive lintel stones. The Port • Cochere was added at some point following the original construction. A rear porch and kitchen wing has a matching addition 12 assumed to be added at the time the porte-cochere was also added. Three tall chimneys — two in the front and one in the rear — punctuate the roofline. The Carriage House in the rear of the property replaced an earlier wood frame barn c. 1915 to house automobiles with an apartment above and a full basement in poured concrete. Original basement windows have been replaced with new glass block. New wood carriage style doors were installed in 2015 along with a new wood entry door. A new asphalt shingle roof was installed in 2015. The Carriage House is constructed of hollow core clay tile block with a smooth faced red brick. The roof is a steep gabled roof with asphalt shingles and a wide bracketed boxed eave, multi -lite 6/1 double hung wood windows. The Site has been highly altered with a majority of the land being paved with concrete —the exception being an area east of the driveway extending to the sidewalk on Charles Martin Sr. Drive which is grass with scrub trees and decorative red -buds. A small area of grass is also located to the west of the carriage house. A brick wall extends from the west elevation of the carriage house along the north alley to the neighbor's property line. A modern eight -foot -tall wood fence is constructed along the west property line on the Kizer House. A six-inch concrete curb runs the length of the Kizer House property line. There are two driveways to the site entering off West Washington. The original driveway entrance is near the corner of West Washington and Charles Martin Sr. Drive. A shared drive entrance is located at the west property line with the neighbor. ALTERATIONS: COA 2012-0213 approved removal of non-contributing windows installed in carriage house door openings and associated rough sawn siding; installation of finish grade exterior plywood in openings as temporary cover and paint; removal of later enclosure of rear porch and associated doors and windows; removal of scrub brush and associated stumps along west property line; removal of chain-link fence along east property line and install dirt and grass. Extensive site and structure modification occurred prior to the above listed improvements, including (but not limited to): construction of carriage house, addition to the rear of the house and of the porte-cochere, addition of the concrete drive and parking area, and re -roofing of the house in the 1980's. RME 2012-1219 approved removal of two chimneys due to deterioration; chimneys to be reconstructed at a later date as part of a roofing project (materials stored on site). COA 2014-0401 approved a re -roof of the carriage house; repair of gutters and downspouts; removal of scrub trees on property and one maple in tree lawn to restore original landscaping; removal of non-contributing/non-original picture windows and replace with wood replicating garage door pattern until permanent solution found. RME 2014-0917 approved a complete tear -off and re -roof of the Carriage House with Highland Slate Designer Shingles. RME 2016-0318A approved re-tuckpointing of exterior; rebuilding of east and west chimneys (re -added 10 courses); removed and replaced asphalt shingles to match carriage house; replace/replicate downspouts, gutters, and copper flashing; remove, repair, and paint all windows. COA 2017-0905D approved the general scope of work including: major landscaping/site work, masonry and floor repair, accessibility, and carriage house under the condition that all final material and specifications will need to come before the HPC. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Repair and repaint trim and stucco of garage, rehabilitate garage double hung sash, new copper gutters and downspouts on garage. Rebuild site by removing all existing concrete and landscaping, regrading and completing new entrance, parking area and landscaping. See attached plans." "Garage Work on exterior as described on Sheet A2.0 attached. Alternate to install copper gutters and downspouts is proposed in lieu of painted galvanized. Work to include repair of damaged trim and stucco in kind, repainting and stripping and staining of wood trim, rehabilitation of existing double hung sash, removal of aluminum and wood storms and associated metal screens, installation of new wood storms. Install new single lite, paneled wood service entrance door to match original that was removed. See photo. Site Remove all existing concrete, landscaping and lawns. Regrade site and install new entrance drive and parking lot area in concrete excepting drive from W. Washington sidewalk through Port Cochere to parking area which will be constructed in compacted crushed fine limestone. Install new landscaping. Specifically: 1. Undertake all work as outlined in C1.0 2. Undertake work as outlined in C1.1 except handicapped ramp and any associated work on porches and house related to handicapped access. Such work will be brought forward at a later time for review and approval. No railings on front, rear or side porch will be undertaken at this time. 3. Grading and draining as outlined on C1.2 4. Site plan completed as outlined on C1.3, "driveway" from W. Washington Street through Port Cochere proposed to be completed in compacted crushed limestone. Approval is also sought to complete edging along drive in heavy gauge metal steel instead of concrete curbing. This drive will not be used for vehicles. Additional detail sheets (C1.3 and CIA) provided for information on proposed draining and drive installation. 0 All necessary variances and zoning have been secured. Details to bring back for consideration at August meeting or assign to staff for review and approval: 13 Plant list for all new trees Detail for trash enclosure Sign" DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See "Minutes of a Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, September 18, 2017, Public Hearing A, 5 COA 2017-0905D". The general scope of work has already been approved and issued an active COA. The purpose of this public hearing is to review final material and specifications. Additionally, many of the application items are Routine Maintenance Exclusions. SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Group B: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movina The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended • New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be 14 immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The proposed work is in keeping with the historic characteristics of the house, carriage house, and grounds while continuing to rehabilitate same. Written by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Fisher made a motion to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0702A is passed. 6. 801 Park COA# 2018-0703A #9574-05 Chapin Park Local Historic District Representation: Jeff Dierbeck, 61396 Miami Avenue Chris Hanney, 801 Park Avenue • STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 8, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0703A Property Location: 801 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled -ell / 1885, remodeled 1919 Property Owner: Kirsten Cornelson Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Two storey irregular plan, documented as a Gabled -ell in the 2005 survey, a Stick Style on 1977 survey card and as a Late Gothic Revival on the 1987 survey card. There are many intersecting gables of the roofline and although each survey card, including the 1932/49 Assessor's card notes asphalt shingles, the gabled roof material is actually asbestos tile. The roofline employs a rake decorated fanciful non-structural barge board with pendills, the wide plain frieze, and brackets. A low hip roof entry porch on the east side has a dentilled frieze board and square fluted supports. Two chimneys punctuate the roofline: a small ancillary chimney at the northeast corner, and a large, centrally -mounted chimney to the rear. There are 1/1 wood double hung windows with wood sill. A gable garage with vertical plank siding is accessible from Manitou. ALTERATIONS: Although existing roof is asbestos tile, previous documentation (both the 1977 and 1987 sites and structures survey cards, as well as the 1932/49 Assessor's card) indicate that the roof is asphalt. The 1932 Assessor's Card indicates that the house was extensively remodeled in 1919. RME 2014-0520 allowed for the re -roof and re -shingle as well as the repair of the front porch. RME 2018-0703 (a companion to this application) allowed for the removal of the existing roof and its replacement with Landmark Pro Architectural shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Remove abandoned external chimney." • 15 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure: The removal of a degraded external chimney at the north-east corner of the structure. The chimney is visible from the street when looking at the front (Park Avenue) side of the home. Stucco and paint that had encapsulated the chimney has fallen off and exposed the brick beneath. The chimney is non-functional, and was not venting water heater exhaust properly, leading to a build-up of gases in the basement. The water heater is now vented out of the house from a different location. a. The chimney will be removed in its entirety (to the foundation). b. The wood siding, molding, and other external details will be replicated, in-kind to `cover' the exposed area where the chimney once stood. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK General Definitions (B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES (W) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED) Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation would not require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are incompatible with the defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would not require the duplication of the original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and the district's defined elements of preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be encouraged, but contemporary methods and materials would be acceptable when compatible. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt • deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low- pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. • Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. • B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and state shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum - sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. In making its determination, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider three factors: first, the appropriateness of the proposed work to the preservation of the building and district; second, the detriment to the public welfare if the proposed work is permitted even though it is not deemed appropriate; third, the potential hardship that the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness would cause the applicant. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While it is unknown if the chimney in question is original to the 1885 construction of the structure, existing documentation indicates that the chimney is, at its youngest, nearly is 100 years old, and is therefore arguably one of the character defining features of the roofline. Staff recommends denial of the project, as the Standards & Guidelines of the Chapin Park Local and National Historic District are explicit that "all architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including [... ] chimneys [... ]." In lieu of deconstruction and demolition of this feature, staff would recommend that it be rehabilitated. Staff is, however, aware that the Commission must weigh the ` potential hardship that the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness would cause the applicant, " and is understanding that approval may be appropriate under certain circumstances. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Bonham made a motion to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Four in favor, one opposed. Vote: 4 — 1 Motion application #2018-0703A is approved. r� 17 7. 304 S Twyckenham COA# 2018-0706 #7796-87 East Wayne Street Local Historic District Representation: Kevin Buccellato, 304 S Twyckenham Drive STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0706 Property Location: 304 Twyckenham Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival / 1929 / H. R. Stapp / Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Aimee and Kevin Buccellato Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, Ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey frame Colonial Revival home with a rectangular plan, flared gable asphalt shingle roof with three gable inset dormers at the front. The porch roof extended from the main roof supported by square box columns with mold trim as capital. There is a central entry with sidelights. There is a two car garage wing with molded trim cornice, wood balustrade on the flat roof. ALTERATIONS: Home remodeled in 1977. Enclosed arched area at rear garage was noted on survey card. Raised deck added in rear of house off of rear arched porch. Removal of 4 non -conforming pine trees in front of house and 1 deciduous tree in tree lawn approved by Commission September, 15, 2008. Addition of rear bay area on second storey approved by Commission in November 17, 2008. The rear entry porch was removed during kitchen renovation and replaced with a dining area and mud room approved with COA 2009-0505. Three new fences were installed along the rear and side yards of the property along with around window in the north addition with COA 2011-0606. COA #2011-070113 allowed for the installation of a second -floor home office addition above existing 2 -car garage, as well as in-kind replacement of the concrete driveway and in-kind roof replacement with Timberline Prestique 30 shingles. RME #2017-0417 allowed for the replacement of four existing deteriorated steel basement windows with Pella aluminum -clad wood windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Convert existing den on north side of the house (was originally an outdoor or screened porch) into a glass porch (see drawings and specifications). All new material to match existing exactly. Smooth cedar trim, cedar shingles all painted. Marvin windows and doors, see specs." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following improvements to the structure: 1. Conversion of an enclosed first floor room into a sun -room with exterior access by removing existing windows and installing the following: a. West Elevation: i. First story - 1. Four Marvin Ultimate Casement windows with 12 simulated divided lights (with space bar); b. East elevation: i. First story — 1. Four Marvin Ultimate Casement windows with 12 simulated divided lights (with space bar); this wall mirrors the west wall. North elevation: • i. First story — 18 1. Four Marvin Ultimate Casement windows with 8 simulated divided lights (with space bar); 2. Marvin Inswing Ultimate series doors, SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EAST WAYNE STREET: Note: The Guidelines selected by the East Wayne Street Local Historic District are (b2) — Rehabilitation. (b2) Rehabilitation Maintaining the existing character of the District, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation would not require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are incompatible with the defined elements of preservation for the District. The design of new construction or alteration would not require the duplication of the original design and construction, but should be compatible with the existing structures and the District's defined elements of preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be encouraged, but contemporary methods and materials would be acceptable when compatible. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended • Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, as the project is attempting to rehabilitate the structure to be more in keeping with the original design, which was either a screened -in porch or an outdoor porch. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Canada made a motion to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Fisher. 19 Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 – 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0706 is passed. B. PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK – SECOND READING –1040 W WASHINGTON, SOUTH BEND, IN – THE ENGMANNATATORIUM– COMMITTEE REPORT – RESOLUTION Public Discussion: George Garner, IUSB Civil Rights Heritage Center: "It's hard to understate the importance of the former Engman Public Natatorium in the historic record of the city of South Bend. Between 1922 and 1936, those who were allowed to come into the building did so by passing under the word `public" carved into the concrete at the front of the building. Yet, and in spite of the fact that African Americans had always been in the city and, at this time, were moving into the city in record numbers, between 1922 and 1936 the Natatorium's caretakers—all of whom were white—denied entry to African Americans. As a city owned and operated, supposedly 'public "pool, this became one of several places of activity where we, as a city, began choosing what kind of a city we want to be: Are we one that wishes to believe that word "public " is one that includes every human being? Or are we one that believes it is okay for some to selectively determine who that word 'public " gets ascribed to. Leaders in the city, both white and of color, chose to work together and risk their life and livelihood to make South Bend a place where that word `public" is ascribed to all humans. 0 Today, reborn as the home of the Indiana University South Bend Civil Rights Heritage Center, an educational institution dedicated to the study and preservation of the history of civil rights and the experiences of marginalized and oppressed peoples in the city, we have no immediate threats of the building being lost. Still, we believe that the former Natatorium's role in the history of the city is one that must be protected. Before IUSouth Bend came into the picture, in 1999, the city of South Bend set aside funds to study the feasibility of the Natatorium's demolition. Fortunately, we had neighbors and protectors—including some in the Historic Preservation Commission—who avoided its destruction. While I have zero expectation that that could or would ever happen again, I want to add layers of protection to help ensure that it won't. The history of the Natatorium is too pivotal, and need for its story today is too great for it to again be threatened. That is why I come here today to wholeheartedly endorse local landmark status for Engman Natatorium—a building that today we can truly say is `public. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 – 0. 20 • Commissioner Molnar made a motion to approve and send forth this recommendation to the South Bend Common Council. Bonham seconded. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0. Motion is passed favorably. IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR V. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 18th, 2018 Commissioner Bonham made a motion to approve. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0. May minutes are approved. B. STAFF REPORTS 1. RME Report — Distributed. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. DISPOSITION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ASSETS Former Commissioner Anderson had supplied minutes from this Committee's last meeting. Commissioner Fisher conveyed the minutes to the Commission as a whole and explained the Committee's recommendation. A. Commissioner Fisher made a motion to allow the Committee to proceed with the disposal of the HPC assets. Approved by general consent. B. Commissioner Fisher made a motion to distribute the blueprints to the University of Notre Dame, the balance to be conveyed to The History Museum. Approved by general consent. C. Commissioner Fisher made a motion to distribute the three-dimensional objects to The History Museum to become a part of their collection. Approved by general consent. D. Commissioner Fisher will remain as an interim chair for this committee until she is either reaffirmed, or a replacement is appointed. 2. LOCAL LANDMARKS — HISTORIC BRIDGES Committee Chair Molnar discussed and updated the Commission on the progress of the Landmarking of bridges. Owner consent is being sought by HPC Staff. All three bridges (Lasalle, Jefferson, and Twyckenham) have been favorably recommended to the Commission as a whole. VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Discussion of the progress on the Lauber Building was held. VII. NEW BUSINESS A. ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN NEW TERM — ELECTION BY MEMBERS a. Commissioner Molnar made a motion to confirm Greta Fisher as the Architectural Historian. Commissioner Canada seconded. 0 Four in favor, none opposed, one abstention. 21 Vote: 4-0-1 (abstention). Motion to appoint Greta Fisher as the Architectural Historian passes. B. NOMINATING BALLOT a. Commissioner Canada referenced the By -Laws that a nomination by acclamation was an option for establishing a new President. Legal Counsel DeRose clarified the various was through which a new President could be established. Commissioner Gelfman voiced concern that two Commission members were not present, and there remains vacancies on the Commission. Commissioner Canada made a motion to initiate a vote for President by acclamation. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham. Three in favor, two opposed. Vote: 3-2. Motion to initiate a vote for President by acclamation passes. b. Commissioner Canada made a motion to nominate Commissioner Molnar for President. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham. Two in favor, three opposed. Vote: 2-3 Motion to nominate Commissioner Molnar to the position of President fails. c. Commissioner Molnar made a motion to nominate Michele Gelfman for the position of President until the end of 2018. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham. Four in favor, none opposed. • Vote: 4-0-1 (one abstention). Motion to nominate Commissioner Gelfman for the position of President passes. d. Commissioner Molnar made a motion to nominate Commissioner Fisher for the position of Secretary. Seconded by Commissioner Canada. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4-0-0 (one abstention). Motion to nominate Commissioner Fisher for the position of Secretary. C. NEW BUSINESS — COMMITTEE CHAIR a. President Gelfman appointed Commissioner Fisher the chair of the Assets Disposition Committee. D. NEW BUSINESS — WINDOW APPROVAL DISCUSSION a. Commissioner Canada initiated a discussion regarding the creation of some sort of resolution or document to work towards drafting some sort of comprehensive structure for governing window applications. i. Focus on specifications, not branding. ii. Necessity for `deterioration beyond repair.' b. President Gelfman encourages staff to create a rubric by the September meeting. E. NEW BUSINESS — REFOREST SOUTH BEND a. Commissioner Molnar discussed the initiative to plant trees in the tree lawns. The goal is to plant 50 trees in Sunnymede and Near Northwest neighborhood, to be 22 planted in September. Two different types of Oaks and a disease resistant Elm. F. NEW BUSINESS — APPLICATION PROCESS a. Commissioner Canada was curious about standardizing the application process by requesting that more concrete drawings be submitted with the application. b. Commission members requested examples of successful application packets for their review. VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. WINDOWS STORAGE AGREEMENT a. Legal Counsel presented a Resolution for the storage of the windows by Indiana Landmarks. B. PROPOSED MESSAGE TO HISTORIC PROPERTY OWNERS a. Administrator Feasel explained the proposed Letter to Historic Property Owners. IX. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Canada made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote 5 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 8:15 pm. Attest: 0 Greta Fisher, Secretary • Dat/0 14-' ig 23 C • MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY August 20th, 2018 13th Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER Vice President Hertel called the meeting to order at 5:32 pm. Members of the Public Present: Shad Annis, 1247 Mishawaka Avenue Chad Campbell, 607 Leland Avenue Krissy Campbell, 607 Leland Avenue Dale Donat, 55800 Elder Road, Mishawaka Avenue Morgan Donat-Hancock, 15697 Patterson Road, Bremen, IN Angie Dvorak, 215 W North Shore Melissa Frankiewicz, 1247 Mishawaka Avenue Jose Nunez, 1628 Portage Avenue Jason Pfledderer, 815 Arch Avenue Barbara Wascisin Hernly, 1708 Wayne St II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Velvet Canada Members Not in Attendance: Michele Gelfinan, President; Greta Fisher, Architectural Historian / Secretary, Becky Bonham Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator; Adam Toering, Historic Preservation Specialist; Aladean DeRose, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: Steve Szaday, Historic Preservation Inspector IH. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 815 Arch COA# 2018-0621C #6846-80/6848-80 Edgewater Local Historic District Representation: Jason Pfledderer, 815 Arch Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0621C Property Location: 815 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1921 / Ernest W. Young Property Owner: Jason Pfledderer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80; Local Landmark, Ordinance 46848-1980 • Rating: Outstanding 1 DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house sits on the corner of Arch and Edgewater. It is a two-story with rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The main level is red brick laid in running bond. The upper level surmounts a continuous band of stucco with half timer expressions on the west end. The broad sweeping asphalt shingled roof lines extend • down from the central hip with a variety of intersecting dormers, narrow overhang lines with moulded wood frieze board. A rectangular boathouse is across from the house along the river. ALTERATIONS: All of the windows were replaced between 1985 and 1989. The roof is not original to the house. The doors are replacements. The surfaces of the front walk way, porch steps and porch stoop do not appear to be original to the house. COA # 1985-0926 allowed for the replacement of four windows on the shed dormer at the northeast side of the house. COA #1986-0819 allowed for re -roofing. COA #1989-0417 allowed for the replacement of six windows with Polarseal aluminum double hung windows. COA# 1989-0801 allowed for reconstruction of the main entry. COA #1990-0418 allowed for "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber. The new construction will duplicate the existing fenestration, elevation, screening, etc. exactly." COA #2000-0717 allowed for in-kind repairs of a whole in the roof of the boathouse following a tree fall. COA #2003-0808 allowed for site work and the replacement of the back door. COA #2011-0812 allowed for the removal of the removal of brush along the river bank per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2012-0515 allowed for the repair of the fence and the replacement of concrete chunks on the site with formed pavers. COA #2014-0804A allowed for the removal of a rotten sugar maple tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2015-0803A allowed for concrete sitework. RME #2016- 1003B allowed for the stucco repair on the main house. RME #2016-0628 allowed for the removal of a tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2017-0417B allowed for the removal of windows on the east side of the main house to be replaced with sliding doors, as well as concrete site work. RME #2018-0501A allowed for the re -roofing of the boathouse and the reconstruction of the handrail. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacing railing with vinyl railing." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following components: 1. Replace existing wooden railing with multiple spans of 72" x 36" White Vinyl "Premium Colonial 6' Rail Kit" SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EDGEWATER PLACE: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the District range from brick, clapboard, shingles, and masonry block to aluminum siding. In • the majority of the cases the aluminum siding has been applied over the original clapboard. There are some masonry commercial buildings on Lincolnway. Required Existing exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry structures shall be maintained, tuckpointed and properly cleaned when necessary. Masonry shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with the gentlest method possible, such as low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Stucco surfaces shall be maintained by cleaning and repainted when necessary. When repairing stucco a stucco mixture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative to maintaining the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. However it must be noted that such material can contribute to the deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS The majority of the houses in the district have either an open or a enclosed porch across the front or on the side. Most porches have either gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. A brick base with wood columns is common. Required Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the • architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited RA Porches and steps that are important to the building's style and development may not be altered or removed. Not Recommended is Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Structures like the boathouse are not specifically defined within the Standards and Guidelines, and as such, the general text covering building materials, as well as those covering entrances, porches, and steps, are considered for this recommendation. Both sections of the Standards and Guidelines require that existing or original elements be retained or replaced with replicas of the same design and materials.. Historic precedence exists for this, in the form of a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in April of 1990 that allowed for the "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber." The applicant received approval to reconstruct the handrail earlier this year with RME #2018-0501A. Vinyl is only explicitly mentioned four times in the Standards and Guidelines, in relation to siding and window awnings, hoods, and fake shutters. Staff recommends that the application be denied based upon the requirements of the Standards and Guidelines. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Applicant provided a photograph from 1921 indicate that the area of the railing originally had brick supports that supported the wood railings. Applicant also provided images of other properties within the neighborhood that have vinyl railing, including across the street from his property at 815 Arch. The applicant also provided images of the Notre Dame Row house across the river, which has multiple versions of railings, primarily of metal construction. Applicant also provided examples of other railings in the neighborhood that are of wood or metal construction. Applicant would prefer to remove the existing concrete superstructure and replace all of it with vinyl railing. The superstructure that comes up from the deck is made of concrete block. Applicant believes • the railing is not sufficiently tall enough to meet existing building code. Staff and Commissioners noted the property's uniqueness as the only boathouse that is within a Historic District and is an individually designated Local Landmark. Commissioner Hertel asked the applicant if they would be open to research other materials, and they responded in the affirmative. Administrator Feasel specified that the Commission would require elevation views of the structure indicating where the material changes would be. Commissioner Hertel clarified that the applicant would provide those materials, and the applicant responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Molnar made a motion to continue COA #2018-0621C to the September meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Canada. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to continue COA#2018-0621C is approved. 2. 627 Portage COA# 2018-0725 #9574-05 Chapin Park Representation: Jose Nunez, 1628 Portage Avenue • STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 8, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0725 Property Location: 627 Portage Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free -Classic / 1900 Property Owner: DSN IRA, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Two and a half story irregular plan on a stone foundation. The 2005 survey card indicates that the structure may have originally been a Gabled -El that was then added -to. The roof is gabled and has returns. A full -width porch is partially enclosed with metal supports and railing at the entrance. There are a variety of 1/1 double -hung windows, as well as fixed attic lights. Assessor information indicates that a frame garage was built in 1943, that girders and posts in the base were added in 1946, and that an addition to the house was added in 1951 (including re -opening a portion of the porch). ALTERATIONS: In addition to the modifications listed in the description, RME 2008-0514 allowed for the in-kind replacement of the roof shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Building fence on a side of building. " DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a retroactive Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure: The installation of a fence along the northwest edge of the property, providing privacy and security for the tenant. The fence is broken -up / interrupted by a hedge growing in the same area. a. The fence does not run the length of the entire lot, but instead only provides the following barrier: i. 6' H fence for a total of 26' in two sections separated by a hedge (13' 3 ''/z" and 8' 1 %" ) ii. A section of fence that transitions in height from 6' to 4' for a distance of 5' 2" iii. A 4' H section of fence that runs for 8' 9" towards the street, following the contours of the front yard. • The fence is made from treated lumber, The fence does not have any transparency, as it is constructed of boards affixed on both sides of the supporting posts and cross -beams, and is approximately 8" thick. The posts are set in concrete. This project was `red -tagged' by the Building Department on July 25, 2018. The Building Department is waiting for our review before levying any fines, fees, or penalties upon the project. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK 1. THE ENVIRONMENT A. The District Environment The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St. Joseph River, Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the common areas of the district (i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes). Required Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car thoroughfares. The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as possible to their architectural, historic and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district is required. Repair work to fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever applicable. When utility work dictates the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete, asphalt, fillers and similar materials shall not be used. All original streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View" streetlights designed by Cutter Company for this neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood Association and the Historic Preservation Commission to restore "Park View" streetlights to the district shall continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of the Historic Preservation Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the individual property and the • surrounding environment and properties. Recommended The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns and tree lawns should remain open. New or replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept landscaped appropriately while vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of building and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or other bituminous coverings or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Park will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damage or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. is Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial / commercial style fences. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: First, the Chapin Park Standards and Guidelines are explicit that `fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed" (emphasis added). While this particular application is for a stretch of fence along the border or edge of the property, the project fence is visible from the street. Further, the Standards and Guidelines state that "the erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited" (emphasis added). Second, both the Historic Preservation Commission (through its administration of the ordinance that created the Chapin Park Local Historic District) and the Building Department require that appropriate paperwork and permitting be received before projects like fence work should be started. Were the Historic Preservation Commission — or the Building Department — to have been consulted before the initiation of this project, the design and format of the fence could have been in compliance with both Historic and local Building Department requirements. Staff would recommend that the fence — certainly the portion closer to the street from the set -back line — be removed and replaced with an `open' format (for example, metal or wood picket fence). Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel 0 Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Canada made a motion to remand to staff (with spacing between the pickets, in accordance with the Standards and Guidelines, and with a reduction of height back to the front corner of the house to 4'). Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. • Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to approve COA 42018-0725 with conditions is passed. 3. 417 W Navarre COA# 2018-0727 #9574-05 Chapin Park Local Historic District Representation: N/A STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 9, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0727 Property Location: 417 W Navarre Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne / 1919 Property Owner: BAC Home Loans Servicing LP Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Three story Queen Anne (irregular plan) on a brick foundation. Two chimneys punctuate the roof line and have decorative vertical brick string course, polygonal appearance due to central pinching. The wood shingles decorate the exterior as well as the peaks on the second story, with clapboard elsewhere. Considerable decoration is on the west face of the second story. The roof is hipped with gables, barge board on the gables, and has a molded cornice. The south face has an enclosed brick porch with wall and pillars, stone sills, and double -hung sashes. The front entrance was formerly composed of wood double -leaf multi -paned doors with glass in upper quarter. Original screened French doors exist. ALTERATIONS: Certificate of Appropriateness #2013-1202A allowed for the in-kind replacement of a 32" x 85" wood frame is window. COA #2016-0218 allowed for the in-kind repair of rear exterior window stairs and repair wood siding, as well as the trimming of vegetation 18" from the structure. RME #2018-0517A allowed for the replacement of the roof. RME #2018-0725A allowed for the trimming of vegetation away from the fence, deck, and structure. The front door was discarded without COA and replaced with new steel French double doors with 15-lites each. APPLICATION ITEMS: "All ready performed, installed front door." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a retroactive Certificate of Appropriateness for changes on the structure: 1. The replacement of the wood double -leaf multi -paned front doors with a Jeld-Wen Steel Door, "DG Full -Lite w/ Ext Grid WF", model number JEL-M-2-03 808-0000 1. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are • used, they should be of canvas material. on STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of new steel door and recommends replacement with new wood door to resemble original. If retroactive approval is given, Staff recommends painting door to coincide with existing color scheme of • house. Prepared by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Recommendation by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commission Gordon made a motion to deny COA #2018-0727 as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Legal Counsel DeRose clarified that with motions for denial, Commissioners must express their justifications for voting in the affirmative. in cases of motion for denial, votes in favor of the motion in fact support the motion to deny the application.. Roll was called: Commissioner Canada: I agree to deny due to the failure of the applicant to show up to the hearing, and that it did not meet the Standards and Guidelines for the area for replacing the door. Commissioner Hertel: I vote to deny COA #2018-0727 due to the inability to question the owner regarding the condition of the door that had been replaced, and the possibility of restoration versus replacement. Commissioner Molnar: I vote in the affirmative to deny the application due to no one being here for questioning, and also that it does not fit the Standards and Guidelines of the district. Commissioner Gordon: I vote to deny. The new door does not meet the Standards and Guidelines for the area, and we cannot ask the applicant for any alternative closure. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to deny COA#2018-0727 is passed. Application COA #2018-0727 is denied. 4. 528 Eddy COA# 2018-0803A #9089-00 Local Landmark Representation: Shad Ennis, 1247 Mishawaka Avenue Angie Dvorak, 216 W North Shore STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0803A • Property Location: 528 S Eddy St Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Unknown, 1925-26 Property Owner: South Bend Community School Corporation 7 Landmark or District Designation: Included within the legal boundary of the Jefferson School Local Landmark, ordinance #9089-2000 Rating: School is rated Outstanding • DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Thomas Jefferson School was built in 1931 and designed by architect Ernest Young in the Neo -Classical style. The Landmark ordinance for the Thomas Jefferson School passed in January of 2000 established the legal description for the property as "898 feet on Eddy Street by 1129.03 feet deep", which includes all buildings and improvements surrounding the main school structure. Staff was unaware that School Field was included in this Landmark designation until scrutinizing this application; no survey card or research material has been found on file for the stadium itself. ALTERATIONS: Six (6) Certificates of Appropriateness are on file for Thomas Jefferson School, documenting the changes to the structure since the adoption of the landmark designation. The stadium was originally constructed as South Bend School Athletic Field in 1926 with seating for 2,500. In 1929 3,000 additional seats were added. Field lights were added in 1934. The stadium was extensively remodeled in 1985 and 1997 prior to the landmark designation. New field turf and lights were installed in 2018 without going through the Certificate of Appropriateness process. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Signage for TCU naming rights. To be temporary. " STAFF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following improvements to the structure: 1. Installation of three signs containing the TCU logo and the text "SCHOOL FIELD" in red lettering on a white background on the School Field grandstands and in the parking lot in the following locations, a. One (1) 7' x 20'-3" wall sign on the rear (southern) face of the press box, constructed out of Alupanel and Vinyl, i. 68" diameter TCU logo in the left third of the sign, ii. 22'/2" "SCHOOL FIELD" lettering, b. One (1) 4' — 8" x 14' wall sign at the western corner on the southern elevation of the stadium, constructed out of Alupanel and vinyl, i. 46 5/8" diameter TCU logo in the left third of the sign, ii. 151/4" "SCHOOL FIELD" lettering, • C. Once (1) free-standing two-sided sign at the east end of the stadium creating a gate to the stadium field, with TCU SCHOOL FIELD and `EXIT and `ENTRANCE' on either respective side, constructed out of Alupanel and vinyl. i. 30" diameter TCU logo in the top half of the sign, ii. 11" "SCHOOL FIELD" lettering, iii. 7" "ENTRANCE" or "EXIT" lettering in black, iv. This sign will be mounted on approximately 120" tall metal or aluminum poles secured into the asphalt. Alupanel is an aluminum composite material Applicant has been working with the Area Plan Commission regarding the size and composition limitations of this application, and Staff is of the understanding that these projects will comply with APC requirements. Additional elements of this application were approved as a Routine Maintenance Exclusion, specifically: 1) allowing for the installation of TCU signage within the stadium (attached to the sides of the scoreboard), 2) replacing an existing sign beneath the press box, and 3) within the parking lot (temporary/removable banner signs on light poles). PRESERVATION INSPECTOR REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not • require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A • modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. 11 D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movin The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. &m No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the application. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator is Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0803A as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0803A is passed. • 5.1708 E Wayne COA# 2018-0804 #7796-87 East Wayne Street LHD Representation: Barbara Wascisin Hernly, 1708 Wayne Street STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0804 Property Location: 1708 E Wayne Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: "Payton House" / Colonial Revival / 1929 / H. R. Stapp / Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Barbara Wascisin Hernly Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, Ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey frame Colonial Revival home with a rectangular plan, gable asphalt shingle roof with raking trim and returns. A side brick chimney with concrete cap is on the west end. There are 6/1 double -hung windows with wood casings, louvered shutters, and a brick header course. Brick is used throughout. A 1 -story shed roof wing with 1/2 pediment gabled open-end is on the west side of the structure. A 2 -car, 2 -door garage with gabled roof stands to the south east of the main structure. ALTERATIONS: COA # 1994-0606 allowed for the complete tear off and re -roofing with 25 -year synthetic shingles. COA #2003-0630 allowed for multiple projects, including the removal/replacement of a rear window with a door, the construction of an 18' x 16'6" addition, and site work. COA #2011-0421 allowed for the complete tear -off and re -roofing with 30 -year Certainteed Landmark Series shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacement of existing fence, and extending fence approx 12 foot to front of Sunroom. Project was • completed in April of 2018. Homeowner was informed by Contractor that no permits were needed as we were replacing an existing fence." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks retroactive approval for the following improvements to the site: 1. Reconstruction of existing fence using new wood, 2. Extension of existing fence 16' north, parallel to property line towards the street, 3. Connecting fence extension 10' from northern terminus to the exterior of the sunroom. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EAST WAYNE STREET: I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT — The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend. It encompasses several blocks of East Wayne Street, North and South, from Eddy Street east to Greenlawn and the south side of Jefferson Boulevard from Eddy Street east to Sunnyside Avenue. The district is bounded on the north by Jefferson Boulevard from Eddy Street to Sunnyside Avenue and then by the north property lines by the Wayne Street properties to Greenlawn. The south boundary is the southern right of way of the alley or the southern property lines of East Wayne Street, South. Unique features of the neighborhood include the island of homes between East Wayne Street North and East Wayne Street South, the parks at each end of the island, and the brick pillars at the entrance way (Eddy Street) to the subdivision with signage reading "Whitecomb and Keller's Sunnymede." Required Distinctive existing features such as brick entry pillars, parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets and building setbacks shall be retained. Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material, and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illuminating Engineering Society. Light sources must have spectral distribution in all color ranges. Older light fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale, size, shape, style, and appearance to the existing . historic lamps. Streetlights shall be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of public sidewalks. Recommended 10 Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings, sidewalks or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. If large shrubs become unsightly to the point of . detracting from the historic character of the house or site, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and deceased material should be selectively removed. Trees and major landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. The curb height should be sufficient to maintain adequate drainage of the street. If the older light fixtures are taken down by the city, they should be reserved for use in the historic district. Light fixtures on top of the brick pillars at the Eddy Street entryway should be replaced according to these standards Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening existing streets, application of asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The introduction of heavy trucks or smaller vehicles in the district shall be prohibited. Not Recommended High-intensity overhead streetlights should not be used. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes has been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport layout located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surroundings site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval, as the fence is in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines of the district. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Canada. . Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0804 is passed. 11 6. 607 Leland COA# 2018-0813 #8021-1989 Local Landmark Representation: Chad Campbell, 607 Leland Krissy Campbell, 607 Leland STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 13 August 2018 Application Number: 2018-0813 Property Location: 607 Leland Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/1891/Mills House Property Owner: Chad and Krisandra Campbell Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #8021-1989 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Mills House is a 1 % story T -Plan or Stick Vernacular built in 1891. Foundation is brick. Walls are 4" wood clapboard with comer boards. Roof is a gable front with asphalt shingles. Porch employs outstanding decoration giving this house its elegance with elaborate lattice, brackets and stick style turned wood columns. Windows are 1/1 wood double hung. The property was formerly on an Indiana "Blight Elimination Program" list designed to allocate the Federal "Hardest Hit Funds" and had a demolition order by South Bend Code Enforcement. Through Indiana Landmarks and local interest to rehabilitate from Near Northwest Neighborhood, Inc., a complete restoration has been accomplished. ALTERATIONS: RME#2018-0517 approved demolition of a one story rear addition wing and complete exterior using salvaged siding and other materials; construct new 12'x12' rear deck of Trex material with open pergola design featuring scroll cut ends, classic fiberglass tapered 10" columns, and no railing. 0 APPLICATION ITEMS: "See attached. New fence construction — wood picket 4' (high)" DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Install new wood 4' high dog-ear style picket fence with 5" spacing between the pickets at the setback and rear of house. The new fence will tie into the existing fence on north side at the east and west corners. Three gates of the same design will be installed. SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the • original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. 12 b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is • considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscapin¢ 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Molnar made a motion to approve COA #2018-0813 as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Four in favor, one opposed. Vote: 4 — 0. Motion application #2018-0813 is approved. 7. 1341 E Wayne S Historic District Representation: Date: August 15, 2018 COA# 2018-0809A #7796-87 East Wayne Street Local Morgan Donat-Hancock, 15697 Patterson Road, Bremen, IN Dale Donat, 55800 Elder Road, Mishawaka, IN STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2018-0809A Property Location: 1341 E Wayne 13 Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1928 / H. R. Stapp / Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Katherine M. Cinninger Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, Ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Contributing 0 DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two-story frame irregular plan Tudor Revival with a flared gable asphalt shingle roof with gable return and molded raking trim. A large shed -dormer is on the northwest face. There are casement windows with cut stone sills, half-timber lintels, a brick soldier lintels, and irregularly offset stucco and half-timbering. The two car garage to the rear was originally detached, but is now connected with a later one -and -a -half story addition. The chimney is situated at the entry. ALTERATIONS: COA # 1991-0709 allowed for the re -roof of the house and garage with asphalt shingles. COA # 1991-0806 allowed for the construction of a porch and connection to the garage. COA #2007-1030 allowed for the construction of a roof off of the non -original addition to create a shaded patio area, trimmed in cedar to match the main structure. COA #2012-0614 allowed for the re -roof of the main house with Owing -Corning architectural asphalt shingles. COA #2012-0829 and COA #2015-0512 allowed for the removal of a dying willow tree in the front yard. RME #2018-0809 (a companion project to the current application) allowed for the replacement of gutters, repair/replacement of wood trim, and to fix the (ventilation) of the soffits. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacement / repair of cedar lap siding." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following improvements to the site: 4. Replacement of existing cedar shake siding with one of three options: a. Replacement with new Cedar Shake Siding (like for like), b. Replacement with "Double 7" Perfection Shingle" manufactured from Polypropylene by Mastic, c. Replacement with LP Smartside, a wood fiber composite. The cedar aspects of this home are at the rear and are found on later additions to the structure. The position / area of the existing cedar wood siding will require continual maintenance were the cedar shake siding to be replaced like for like. Moss and other examples of water infiltration will continue to occur. Alternative materials are an option, each with benefits and negatives. Mastic "Double 7" Perfection Shingles" is a polypropylene product, and the example provided to our office is a shingle option that makes an attempt to replicate the `even butt' of the shake siding that is currently found on the house. LP Smartside is a wood composite that will have some of the same life -span issues that the existing Cedar Shake siding will have. • SITE VISIT REPORT: August 10, 2018 At approximately 10:45 AM I met with Dale Donat of Donat's Construction at the property located at 1341 E Wayne North. The property is located in East Wayne local historic district. He had applied to do repairs to the siding and soffits to the structure. The original structure has a Tudor style fagade mostly brick and a second story with stucco between cedar trim. There are continuous wood soffits without vents and crown molding against the house holding the soffits in place. The rear of the structure has 15"wood grooved shakes with a 13" reveal. An addition added in the 1980s by Donat's has the same siding and the same soffits as the original structure. I counted at least 12 areas where the siding has either been deteriorated by water or pests and have the underneath material showing. Several areas of the soffit have peeling paint and some warping, due to no ventilation. Many areas of the cedar trim need repair, paint, or in some cases, replacement. Mr. Donat told me he intends to: • repair the soffits, maintain the crown molding and add badly needed ventilation on both the original structure and rear addition • replace the existing wood siding with LP Smart wood composite siding that is textured and sized to match the existing. The siding offers greater resiliency to pests and has a cost that is less than the siding that would match that put on in the 1980s. • repair, paint, or replace the damaged cedar trim where needed. • painting replacement material the same to match. Steve Szaday Preservation Inspector STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES EAST WAYNE STREET: II. EXISTING STRUTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the District include limestone, flagstone, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, sandstone and masonry block. In some instances, vinyl or aluminum siding have been applied over the original surface Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, • cleaning and painting. The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond despair. Masonry including 14 brick, limestone, flagstone, sandstone and stucco shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle bushes. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture compatible in composition, color and texture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornicles, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when metal or vinyl siding has been installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and/or insects. Mortal joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. It is emphasized that, prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort, the property owner should contact the Historical Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County which is located in the County/City Building of South Bend. The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material which is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Brick surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the material and the mortar, which can result in serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces indiscriminately. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointed should not be repointed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The applicant is prepared to replace the existing cedar trim as allowed for with RME #2018- 0809 but has voiced concern that replacing the Cedar shingles is considered cost prohibitive by the homeowner. Because of the location of these Cedar shingle portions of the house, the degradation of the material has been accelerated leading to regular and continued maintenance by the contractor. As an alternative, Staff was willing to consider the replacement of the shingles with LP Smartside. Staff is of the understanding that this material — when cut to fit the roofline of the structure — will have a higher probability of being compromised by the elements (specifically water at the seams) as well as the temperature extremes of Indiana seasons (with expansion and contraction). The final option presented with this application is preferred by the contractor/applicant: replacing the cedar shingles with a polypropylene siding replicating the style of cedar siding. The majority of this siding is at the rear of the structure and has limited visibility from the street. The Standards and Guidelines for the district do allow for the installation of metal or vinyl siding in the event that it is the "only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original material." However, Staff believes that replacement Cedar shake shingles are readily available. In a best case scenario, Staff recommends replacing the shingles with new Cedar Siding. In lieu of that option, staff is conflicted and offers no recommendation. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0809A with the replacement • double -seven perfection shingle. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. 15 Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0809A is passed with conditions. • IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR A. Thomas Gordon, 629 West Lasalle Avenue — Birdsell House — The Birdsell house has broken windows, missing windows. I think we've tried to contact the owner, I know that we've contacted Code Enforcement a number of times. I think that we better document with our overseeing body that we are doing our due diligence that we are trying to uphold this because it is a Landmark. So that we don't have another Mr. Bognar, coming to us with accusations that we are not doing our due diligence with maintaining a Landmarked property. So, as opposed to just saying "we have documentation that we contacted Code, and we have documentation that we tried to contact the owner, " but I think we better have documentation to those ends to Mr. Mueller and the Redevelopment Commission or whoever is overseeing us now so there aren't any repurcussions down the road. So I think staff should get that letter sent out to them, to that Department. Historic Preservation Administrator Feasel: Tom and I talked on Friday when he came to pick up his packet. I followed up with Code Enforcement and, actually, it had just slipped my mind at the time we had talked. Historic Preservation issued a ticket, with a $500 fine to the owner of the Birdsell (Mansion). It was our first ticket ever. Mr. Gordon: Nice! 0 Administrator Feasel: So we have that authority. I guess I would say we are taking that step now by ticketing. Steve (Szaday), who is our Staff of Code Enforcement, an Inspector for Code Enforcement, is going to continue to follow through with whatever violation fee structure he can with the ticket system. Mr. Gordon: I would recommend that we construct a letter to Mr. Mueller outlining the times we have contacted Code or tried to contact the owner. And that we have no ticketed them, but — I mean — the windows are still open, they are broken out, something else needs to be done. Maybe we need to have the Building Department board them up and send the owners the bill. But I don't think that it should continue to remain open. I know on the west side of the house you can continue to go up and get into the house. And I think there's firstfloor windows out, for that matter. V. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 16t'', 2018 Commissioner Molnar made a motion to continue. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0. July minutes are continued. • 16 • • C B. STAFF REPORTS 1. RME Report — Distributed. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. DISPOSITION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ASSETS VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS A. AGREEMENT FOR STORAGE OF WINDOWS a. Commissioner Molnar made a motion to approve the Agreement for Storage of Windows. Commissioner Gordon seconded. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote: 4 — 0. Motion to approve the Agreement for Storage of Windows passes. VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. 2018 STANDING COMMITTEES, AUGUST UPDATE B. 1040 W Washington "Engman Natatorium" a. The Common Council had 2nd and 3rd reading of the Landmark Ordinance on August 13th 2018, where it was passed unanimously. b. Mayor Peter Buttigieg signed the ordinance on August 151h, 2018. c. An event commemorating the establishment of the Local Landmark is forthcoming. C. County Bridges Local Landmark Update IX. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Canada made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Four in favor, none opposed. Vote 4 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 7:16 pm. Attest: Greta Fisher, Secretary S $ Date 17 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY September 17t1', 2018 13t1i Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Gelfman called the meeting to order at 5:33 pm. Members of the Public Present: Wakim Aboukhaled, 601 N Lafayette Shad Annis, 1247 Mishawaka Avenue Jason Dobosiewicz, 326 W Marion Kevin Jakel, 620 W Washington Tyler Kelsey, 2222 Blue Smoke Trail Al Lusk, 909 N St Peter Rosario Mittiga, 26142 Twin Lake Trail Jason Pfledderer, 815 Arch II. ROLL CALL Members Present: Michele Gelfman, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Greta Fisher, is Architectural Historian / Secretary; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Velvet Canada; Becky Bonham Members Not in Attendance: Joseph Molnar, Treasurer Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator; Adam Toering, Historic Preservation Specialist; Sandra Kennedy, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: Steve Szaday, Historic Preservation Inspector M. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 815 Arch COA# 2018-0621C #6846-80/6848-80 Edgewater Local Historic District Representation: Jason Pfledderer, 815 Arch Ave STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0621C Property Location: 815 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival / 1921 / Ernest W. Young Property Owner: Jason Pfledderer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80; Local Landmark, Ordinance #6848-1980 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house sits on the corner of Arch and Edgewater. It is a two-story with • rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The main level is red brick laid in running bond. The upper level surmounts a continuous band of stucco with half timer expressions on the west end. The broad sweeping asphalt shingled roof lines extend down from the central hip with a variety of intersecting dormers, narrow overhang lines with moulded wood frieze board. A rectangular boathouse is across from the house along the river. ALTERATIONS: All of the windows were replaced between 1985 and 1989. The roof is not original to the house. The doors • are replacements. The surfaces of the front walk way, porch steps and porch stoop do not appear to be original to the house. COA # 1985-0926 allowed for the replacement of four windows on the shed dormer at the northeast side of the house. COA # 1986-0819 allowed for re -roofing. COA # 1989-0417 allowed for the replacement of six windows with Polarseal aluminum double hung windows. COA# 1989-0801 allowed for reconstruction of the main entry. COA # 1990-0418 allowed for "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber. The new construction will duplicate the existing fenestration, elevation, screening, etc. exactly." COA #2000-0717 allowed for in-kind repairs of a whole in the roof of the boathouse following a tree fall. COA #2003-0808 allowed for site work and the replacement of the back door. COA #2011-0812 allowed for the removal of the removal of brush along the river bank per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2012-0515 allowed for the repair of the fence and the replacement of concrete chunks on the site with formed pavers. COA #2014-0804A allowed for the removal of a rotten sugar maple tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2015-0803A allowed for concrete sitework. RME #2016- 1003B allowed for the stucco repair on the main house. RME #2016-0628 allowed for the removal of a tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester. COA #2017-0417B allowed for the removal of windows on the east side of the main house to be replaced with sliding doors, as well as concrete site work. RME #2018-0501A allowed for the re -roofing of the boathouse and the reconstruction of the handrail. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replacing railing with vinyl railing." DESCRIPTION PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following components: 1. Remove and replace existing railing. The primary motivations for replacement can be characterized as: 1. The existing (30") railing is not compliant with code and would warrant modification or reconstruction so as to become compliant with the 36" requirement. The applicant would like to replace the existing railing as opposed to modify it by adding additional height. 2. Wood as a material on a boat house (or other structure in close proximity to water) constitutes a consistent and regular maintenance issue. The applicant would prefer to replace wood with a material with a significantly lower maintenance requirement and has expressed a willingness to utilize metal or vinyl options. Five replacement options for the railing have been put forth by the applicant and all of the proposed options would constitute a • significant departure from the existing railing's construction and visual appearance. The proposed designs do not have accompanying manufacture specifications and instead appear to be representations as to desired styles and/or constructions. It is unknown if the examples are manufactured out of wood, metal, or vinyl. Were one of these options selected, the existing railing system (including masonry support `columns') would be removed down to the decking. The replacement railing system would need to be bolted onto the decking and secured to the superstructure. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. EDGEWATER PLACE: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the District range from brick, clapboard, shingles, and masonry block to aluminum siding. In the majority of the cases the aluminum siding has been applied over the original clapboard. There are some masonry commercial buildings on Lincolnway. Required Existing exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry structures shall be maintained, tuckpointed and properly cleaned when necessary. Masonry shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with the gentlest method possible, such as low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Stucco surfaces shall be maintained by cleaning and repainted when necessary. When repairing stucco a stucco mixture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative to maintaining the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. However it must be noted that such material can contribute to the deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. 2 D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS The majority of the houses in the district have either an open or a enclosed porch across the front or on the side. Most porches have either gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. A brick base with wood columns is common. Required Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Porches and steps that are important to the building's style and development may not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS Required Building code requirements shall be compiled with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved. Recommended Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. Prohibited Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and space is prohibited. Not Recommended Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Structures like the boathouse are not specifically defined within the Standards and Guidelines, and as such, the general text covering building materials, as well as those covering entrances, porches, and steps, are considered for this recommendation. • The Standards and Guidelines are explicit that "original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replaced with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair" and that "original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. " Historic precedence exists for this, in the form of a Certificate of Appropriateness issued in April of 1990 that allowed for the "replacing all wood on boathouse with wolmanized lumber." The applicant received approval to reconstruct the handrail earlier this year with RME #2018-0501A. Vinyl is only explicitly mentioned four times in the Standards and Guidelines, in relation to siding and window awnings, hoods, and fake shutters. Staff agrees that the railing should be taller to be compliant with State / International Building Code requirements. The applicant's preference for replacement of the railing is not unfounded, and Staff would support replacement to comply with Code requirements specifically because of the river -front setting of this structure. However, Staff is not convinced that enough investigation on the part of the applicant has occurred to warrant a favorable recommendation. Staff recommends that the application be denied based upon the requirements of the Standards and Guidelines. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Hertel made a motion to extend the COA #2018-0621C for 180 days from the date of the initial application. Seconded by Commissioner Fisher. Five in favor, one opposed. Vote: 5 — 1 Motion to extend COA#2018-0621C is approved. • Applicant signed an extension waiver for COA #2018-0621C for 180 days from the application date. The extension term will end October 19t'', 2018. 2. 1242 E Jefferson COA# 2018-0815 #7796-87 East Wayne Street Local Historic District 0 Representation: Tyler Kelsey, 2222 Blue Smoke Trail, Mishawaka Al Lusk, 909 N St Peter STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 5, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0815 Property Location: 1242 E Jefferson Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: French Eclectic / 1927 / Austin & Schambleau Property Owner: Leo J. McKernan Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, Ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Dr. Stanley Clark home is situated on a double lot. The main house is a two and a half story with a rectangular plan set on a concrete foundation with a round tower in the front next to an off set gabled entry wing with a coat of arms above the doorway. The walls are smooth stucco with Indiana limestone corner quoins and have end piers projecting from the corners. The roof is steeply pitched with small hipped dormers and wall dormers; it is covered in slate with copper ridges and finials and downspouts. The home has multi -paned attenuated casement windows in pairs with transom in segmented arches at the first level all with stone sills. The side and back entry have copper awnings. The site is formally landscaped in the front and terraced in the rear. The house is connected to a three car garage by a one story enclosed breeze way with a steep hip roof in the style of the house. ALTERATIONS: The breezeway was enclosed after 1943 and the door -window combination on the west side was added. The swimming pool was installed at a later date. COA #1990-0319 allowed for the replacement of windows with Marvin windows • and casements, including increasing the kitchen window opening approximately 1'. COA #2008-1105 was issued (but not implemented) for the addition of a 15' x 19 W addition in the southeast corner of the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Leo McKernan would like to have a 14'-2" x 19' addition added to the south east corner of his home to accommodate his need to have the living room be in close proximity to the kitchen to reduce his overall steps taken throughout the day while he resides at his home." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following improvements to the site: 1. Construction of 14'-2" x 19'-0" (266 square foot) addition at the southeast corner of the main structure, adjacent to the kitchen. a. Construction details: i. Concrete slab foundation, ii. Walls to be Stucco to match existing, iii. Flat roof (TPO or PVC over tapered insulation to a roof drain) with Mansard Slate Roof to mimic the existing slope of the main home and garage, iv. Custom wood -framed windows by Marvin (inoperable), b. Existing external windows will be impacted as the structure is constructed, including: i. Two windows on the east side of the breezeway to the garage will be removed, ii. One window on the south wall of the existing kitchen will remain but will be inside of the building. COA #2008-1105 allowed for the construction of a similar addition to the structure, but it was not completed. The flat roof and mansard slate roof `wall' ensure that the narrow second story window will not be altered. SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EAST WAYNE STREET: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new • addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION 11 The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Fagade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing fagade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half-timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended • Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations • STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project, based upon he application's conformity to the ,new construction' sub -section of the Standards and Guidelines, and the precedent created through the approval of a similar project in 2008. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0815 as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Fisher. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0815 is passed. 3. 549 River COA# 2018-0828A #6846-80 Edgewater Place Representation: Rosario Mittiga, 26142 Twin Lake Trail STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 5 Date: September 12, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0828A i Property Location: 549 River Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Craftsman/1921/Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Rosario Mittiga Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80 Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two story plus attic, rectangular plan, cross gable house. Full width open front porch. Windows are wood double hung 2/1 with transom. Walls are clapboard. Foundation is concrete. There is a detached one car garage in rear. ALTERATIONS: RME 2015-0806 approved complete tear off and re -roof with asphalt shingles; repair decking as needed. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Demolition of garage" DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks to demolish the detached one story garage in rear with the support of Code Enforcement. The poor condition of the garage has been documented beginning in 2012. The garage is now deteriorated beyond repair and should be removed on account of safety. A concrete parking pad will remain in place. There is no plan to rebuild at this time. SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, EDGEWATER PLACE: II. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat law, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Many properties have a straight driveway along one edge of the lot leading to a garage at the rear of the house. This driveway often has a sidewalk along one side leading to the front entrance either in the center or at the side of the house. Driveway and sidewalk materials include asphalt or concrete. All of the properties have trees; many have trimmed shrubbery and hedges. All of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Existing plants, trees, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs, and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the buildings that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing old plans, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings and other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, with the exception of properties along Lincolnway, which may be fenced, but not enclosed stockade -type fencing. Not Recommended Telephone poles with high intensity overhead lights should not be used, with the exception of along Lincolnway. V. GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval Commissioner Hertel made a motion to approve COA 92018-0828A as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham. 0 Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 Motion to approve COA #2018-0828A is passed. • 4. 237 N Michigan COA# 2018-0904A #8652-1996 Local Landmark Representation: Shad Annis, 1247 Mishawaka Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0904A Property Location: 237 N. Michigan Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival/Chicago School blend/1921/ Nicol, Schuler and Hoffman Property Owner: LaSalle Apartments, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark (Ordinance #8652-1996) and Multiple Resource National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The LaSalle Hotel is located on the southwest corner of LaSalle and Michigan Streets; it is a nine storey hotel constructed of stretcher bond laid brick with decorative and plain -cut stone string course. The first and second floors on the east and north facades are treated as one floor. The windows and doorways are flanked by spiral columns and surmounted by round -arched windows with tracery, voussoirs and keystones. A projecting string course separates the second floor from the third floor which has limestone window surrounds, as do the single end bay windows and the ninth floor windows. A projecting string course separates the eighth and ninth floors and the building is surmounted by a wide overhanging cornice. The windows on the first floor are large, fixed sash plates with multi -light side lights. Other windows are double hung sash in pairs. ALTERATIONS: All of the single light double hung windows on all of the facades were vinyl replacement windows from the 1980s -1990s when the Charismatic Renewal Services owned the building. COA 2015-0326B approved repair and repointing of brick and masonry, replacement of existing vinyl replacement windows with new aluminum clad wood replacement windows, • replacement of doors and awnings, and restoration of existing wood storefront windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Per enclosed drawings requesting approval of window graphics on each window and one (1) corner mounted illuminated sign." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure, including: The application of vinyl window signs for Ancon Construction, the tenant of the corner unit. a. Vinyl appliques four windows of the office at the northeast corner of the building, two on the east face and two on the north face. b. Overall dimensions: approximately 32" x 48" c. Description of sign design: arched "ANCON CONSTRUCTION" text over the company logo and the text, "SINCE 1975", with smaller text stating "100% Employee Owned". All text in gold with black border. The applicant had originally intended to request a corner mounted illuminated sign, but conversations with the staff at the Area Plan Commission resulted in dropping that element from the application. The proposed four window design complies with Area Plan Commission requirements. The Group B Standards and Guidelines state that "only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business." Staff believes this stipulation came about as a reaction to an over -abundance of signage on commercial buildings, specifically hanging or projecting signs. Signage on historic buildings remains contentious — ensuring the businesses that occupy and bring people to the structure are properly identified in a tasteful and complimentary way is paramount to the long-term preservation of the structure itself. Michael J. Auer wrote the following for the National Park Service in Preservation Brief #25, The Preservation of Historic Signs: The following points should be considered when designing and constructing new signs for historic buildings: • signs should be viewed as part of an overall graphics system for the building. They do not have to do all the "work" by themselves. The building's form, name and outstanding features, both decorative and functional, also support the • advertising function of a sign. Signs should work with the building, rather than against it. • new signs should respect the size, scale and design of the historic building. Often features or details of the building will suggest a motif for new signs. 7 • sign placement is important: new signs should not obscure significant features of the historic building. (Signs above a storefront should fit within the historic signboard, for example) • new signs should also respect neighboring buildings. They should not shadow or overpower adjacent structures. • • sign materials should be compatible with those of the historic building. Materials characteristic of the building's period and style, used in contemporary designs, can form effective new signs. • new signs should be attached to the building carefully, both to prevent damage to historic fabric, and to ensure the safety ofpedestrians. Fittings should penetrate mortar joints rather than brick, for example, and signloads should be properly calculated and distributed. The proposed design compliments the. architectural elements of the building (mimicking the curvature of the windows), is a facsimile of the gold -leaf signage that was so prevalent in the late 19t' and early 20' century, and is respectful to the size and scale of the windows themselves. Other communities with large concentrations of historic commercial buildings have exemptions for the number of allowable windows with signs within their Standards and Guidelines. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GROUP B STANDARDS The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A • modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure–Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and supergraphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio • decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff is cognizant of recent precedent regarding the proposed installation of multiple signs on other downtown commercial buildings (see the J.M.S. Building). Bearing that in mind, staff approves the format and appearance of the proposed signs — as they are historic and complimentary to the building's character — but would encourage debate regarding the number to be installed. It is also worth noting, however, that only the "The LaSalle" blade sign above the east entrance was approved by the Commission. All other window signs appear to have been installed un -reviewed. They are not, however, part of this application and need not be scrutinized as a part of it. As to specific recommendations per the number of installations, Historic Preservation Administrator Feasel advocates for the installation of half the number of window signs (one each on the North and East faces). Historic Preservation Specialist Toering believes the wording of the Standards and Guidelines to be unintentionally ambiguous, and that further revision of those standards may be in order to better accommodate the various kinds of signage that can be found on historic commercial buildings. With regards to this particular application, Specialist Toering would advocate for the allowance of all four of the requested window signs. Written by • Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Bonham made a motion to approve COA #2018-0904A with the condition that only two windows be utilized — one on LaSalle and one on Michigan Street, closest to the corner. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 Motion to approve COA #2018-0904A is passed. 5.326 Marion COA# 2018-0904B #9574-05 Chapin Park Local Historic District Representation: Jason Dobosiewicz, 322 W Marion STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0904B • Property Location: 326 Marion Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gable front/1882/Moore House Property Owner: Jason Dobosiewicz 6 Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05 and Chapin Park National Register District Rating: Non-contributing • DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: One story, rectangular, plan, gable front cottage with simple lines and proportions is slightly elevated from street. Windows are double hung 1/1. There is a stained-glass transom window above front door. ALTERATIONS: A %z width symmetrical front porch with flat roof and decorative turned posts was removed without COA sometime between 2004 and 2009. A treated wood deck with rails has been installed without COA. Siding is non -original vinyl. Windows are not original. Front storm door is aluminum. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Storage shed" DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Storage Shed Application to approve a new 16' x 16' x 12' high (approximately two stories) "shed" in rear of property. Construction has commenced without approved COA or permit. Project was red tagged by the Building Department on 7/2/2018. Completed structure will feature a flat sloped roof to be covered in asphalt shingles, T-111 siding, a total of five 1/1 double hung vinyl windows, and a vinyl door with oval window, see photos. Although the shed height is taller than the one story house it is associated with, there is a 6' privacy fence dividing the house from the shed, making the shed appear from the public view to be related to the nearby two story house on William. With the privacy fence dividing the house and shed, the site of the shed is actually incorporated with the pool area in the rear of 322 Marion (also in Chapin Park and HPC fagade easement). The ability to see the "shed" is mainly from William Street as it is situated beyond a 6' privacy fence that surrounds it on two sides. 2. Front Porch Application to approve a 12' x 12' deck centered on front of house. Construction has commenced without approved COA or permit. Project was red tagged by the Building Department on 6/13/2014. Two former porches had flat roofs, turned posts, and no railings although they were already missing or rotted when applicant began project. Completed deck is constructed of treated wood, has standard deck railings, and extends the depth approximately six feet. There is currently no roof. A new front gable roof that will mimic the roofline of the house is proposed. SITE VISIT REPORT: June 2 • RE: 3266 Marion At approximately 8:30 AM, I was driving northbound on William street. Upon crossing Madison St. I noticed a new structure behind 426 William/326 Marion. I immediately stopped and photographed the structure. I then drove to the building department to inquire if permits had been issued for the project. There were none and I was able to talk to Inspector John Smith who said he would be out there tomorrow to red tag the project. I also learned that the unfinished front porch of the house located at this address was red tagged on June 1311 by Inspector Smith. I was on route to the address again to get a photo of the front of the property when I contacted Code Enforcement Inspector Steve Meadows. He and I walked this block of William and Marion last week and I wanted to make him aware. He was nearby and offered to meet me there. We looked around and Jason who is the owner of the property as well as the adjacent property came out, said hello and offered to let us in to look at the structure. He described it as above ground playhouse and he did not need a permit for building it. I referenced the Chapin Park guidebook that included the section on new structures and outbuildings. I informed him that it need HPC approval and because of its size would most likely need a permit. I called the building department and they confirmed that anything over 120 square foot footprint would need a permit. The owner confirmed the size to be approximately 16 x 16 feet. He became upset when I told him that this would need HPC approval. He told me to leave and stay off of his property. I offered him the guidebook and he took it and threw it onto a chair. I immediately walked out of the yard and into the adjacent parking lot owned by Temple Beth -el where I parked. He told me he will deal with HPC, we can tag him all we want and it doesn't mean anything because we cannot do anything. He also told me to get a real job where I actually have some power and do something. He was becoming increasingly more agitated as he spoke to a neighbor. Steve Meadows and I talked for a moment then I thought it best to leave as his anger was directed towards me. I drove around the corner then I waited in the car around the corner with Inspector Meadows in view until he also left. Steve Szaday Preservation Inspector STANDARDS_ AND GUIDELINES. CHAPIN PARK: Under the requirements of City of South Bend Zoning Ordinance No. 5565-73, as amended, a Certificate of Appropriateness (C of A) would be required for any activity in the district which requires a building permit or which alters the appearance of a building or site, including houses, garages, and other outbuildings, as seen from the streets around the property. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES • A. BUILDING MATERIALS 10 Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. • Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum - sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, • columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have L- or T- shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to the existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building and change its scale and architectural • character shall not be considered. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, 11 features and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS • Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard / composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall related to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS Required Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features and open spaces. Proportions and materials shall conform to those required for new construction. Recommended Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood. Prohibited Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used. Not Recommended Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other guidelines and standards STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Amore appropriate design for this site would be to reduce the shed size to about 10'x 12' and reduce the height by a half story. However, with the site in relation to adjacent properties, and that it is not permanent, the • structure could be considered by the Commission with a conditional approval that all other Building Codes are met. If a variance or special exception is required, the applicant would reapply with an amended design. 2. The Standards and Guidelines are explicit regarding replicating the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. A flat roof with no railing is recommended but an increase in the depth of deck and roof could be considered. Written by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator COMMISSIONER HERTEL LEFT THE MEETING AT 7:07 PM. Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0904B as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham. Three in favor, two opposed. Vote: 3 — 2 Motion to approve COA#2018-0904B is passed. 6. 601 N Lafayette COA# 2018-0906 #9574-05 Chapin Park Representation: Wakim Aboukhaled, 1242 Portage STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS • Date: September 5, 2018 12 Application Number: 2018-0906 Property Location: 601 N Lafayette Boulevard • Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled -el / 1897 Property Owner: DSN IRA, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: This structure is a one and a half story frame home that originally had wood siding and wood shingle roof. The foundation is a combination of brick and concrete. The house is currently sided in vinyl and has long 2/2 original windows in some of the lower openings and vinyl replacement windows in the remainder. ALTERATIONS: The house was converted into three apartments in 1945. A 12' x 12' porch was added to the second floor in 1949. Asphalt shingles were installed on the roof in the 1940s. The porch on the first floor south side was removed in the 1940s. Exterior stairs were added to access the second story apartment. The vinyl siding and replacement windows are not original. COA #2005-0607 allowed for re -roofing, fascia and soffit repair, and site maintenance. COA #2009-1005A allowed for the gutters to be replaced. RME #2018-0906A allowed for the replacement of two vinyl windows with like, removal of one vinyl window and replacement with vinyl siding, replacement of three entry doors with like, and reconstruction / rebuilding of wooden second -story stairs. APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replace windows and doors, block on window, install new gutters and aluminum soffits, aluminum trim [w]rapping on all windows." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure: 1. Windows - a. Removal and replacement of two original wood windows on the south face of the house, to be replaced with vinyl windows of the same size. b. Removal and replacement of one original wood window on the west face of the house, to be replaced with vinyl window of the same size. 2. Gutters and Soffits — • a. Remove and replace wood soffits with aluminum. b. Install aluminum gutters (this would qualify for a `Routine Maintenance Exclusion' but its installation is contingent upon the Soffit condition / material, therefore it is included here). 3. Window Trim a. Install aluminum trim to cover all existing (and proposed replacement) windows. SITE VISIT REPORT: September 6, 2018 On August 16, 2018 I visited the property located at 601 N Lafayette. I noticed a window had been replaced and the old window resting against the house. I approached the gentleman that was at the house and introduced myself. He identified himself as the new owner and explained he was unaware of the requirements that came with a property located in a locally designated historic district. I gave him a copy of the Chapin Park LHD guidebook and my and [Specialist Toering's] business cards. He explained to me what his intentions are with the house and what he would like to replace in the near future. I photographed the window that was removed and each window that is currently in place. Windows: 17 windows are currently vinyl replacement windows. Only two of those had been changed out by this new owner. The windows currently are Kinro brand vinyl windows. These are manufactured housing and recreational vehicle windows made in Elkhart County. The photographs of the one that was removed will show the quality of those windows. There are 5 original windows remaining. Two large double hung wood windows on the south face of the structure have multiple repairs including metal angle brackets and screws. The original storms are missing and have allowed the deep window framework to collect the elements and rot out the bottom sash and sill. Water stains are present on the inside wall material as a result of the water infiltration. These two windows will need the jambs rebuilt and the lower sashes remade or replaced. I believe these are beyond repair. The two upper sashes are structurally intact but have started to separate. There is ample caulk applied to these sashes which has caused greater separation and damage. Still repairable but will require considerable attention. There is one more double hung wood window located on the west side of the structure that have been spared from the onslaught of the elements due to the proximity of the neighboring house. This will need considerable attention however including • stripping, re -glazing, re -roping, and some repair where it looks like the lower sash had been forced open. ' The last two original windows are non-operable windows that needs glazing and some trim repair or replacement. The owner also showed me the rotting wood on the exterior staircase that will need to be replaced. He had some concerns on the structural stability of the posts and bracing holding that staircase in place as well. 13 Steve Szaday Preservation Inspector STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK • IL EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was . constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl - and aluminum -sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. • Prohibited 14 Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of • architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Per Inspector Szaday's site visit, only five wood windows remain on the structure. Of those, the most character defining are the two on the south (W. Navarre) facing side. The house has been extensively modified to the detriment of much of the character of the original construction, with many features covered, removed, added -to, or enclosed. The structure is rated non -Contributing per the most recent county -wide survey, and staff is of the opinion that this is an appropriate rating. Staff would divide the application into two components: 1) the replacement of the two original windows with vinyl, 2) the installation of aluminum soffits, gutters, and window trim. As to the replacement of the original windows, Staff makes no recommendation. As to the installation of the aluminum soffits, gutters, and trim, staff makes a favorable recommendation. Written by Adam Toering • Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Bonham made a motion to approve COA #2018-0906, with the stipulation that the crown molding not be disturbed. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Three in favor, two opposed. Vote: 3 — 2. Application #2018-0906 is approved. President Gelfman called for a revote on the motion related to confusion with the vote. Two in favor, three opposed. Vote: 2 — 3. Application #2018-0906 is denied. Commissioner Fisher made a motion to approve COA #2018-0906 with the stipulation that aluminum trim can only be allowed on the sill portion of the window. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. . Vote: 5 — 0. Application #2018-0906 is approved with conditions. 15 7. 620 W Washington COA# 2018-0907 #6569-1979 Local Landmark Representation: Kevin Jekel, 620 W Washington STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 10, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0907 Property Location: 620 West Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Richardsonian Romanesque/1889/Tippecanoe Place/Henry Ives Cobb, Architect Property Owner: Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #6569-1979; West Washington Street National Register District; National Historic Landmark designated by the National Park Service (only NHL in St. Joseph County and of only 42 in Indiana) Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This four-story house with an irregular plan has a 12/12 red tile covered central hip roof with numerous intersecting hips, towers, and gables, and a simple eave line with copper gutters. The exterior walls and foundations are rough stone, with limestone window and door trim. The house has large bay windows on the north faQade, a four-story tower at the northeast corner, projecting turret with conical roof at the southeast corner, a steep gable on the port- cochere at the west end, and six stone chimneys with simple banding and cut stone caps. Most windows are one -over -one wood double -hung; there are also windows with double transoms, as well as a few Gothic windows. Generally, windows are deeply recessed and feature stone lintels and sills. At the west end of the house, colonnettes flank six windows with double transoms on the fourth floor, while first story windows are set in rounded heavy stone arches with colonettes. The front entry porch is enclosed by round stone arches supported by clusters of Romanesque columns. The porte-cochere has intersecting gables and large arched openings. The rear veranda stretches around the south and east, featuring short Romanesque columns with a variety of capitals. Doors are wood. ALTERATIONS: COA 1979-1107 to convert house into a restaurant through exterior changes listed in Appendix I (including . #10: enclosing rear garden veranda) was denied. COA 1979-1217 addressed concerns discussed on previous COA to convert house into a restaurant; it was conditionally approved pending treatment of the porte-cochere. COA 1980-0219, upon review for the third time, approved conversion of the house into a restaurant, enclosure of the porte-cochere doorway openings with nonfunctional paneled wood doors, and enclosure of rear veranda with 6- and 3- light casement and fixed wood windows. COA 1980-0317 approved construction of a stone sign south of the Washington Street entrance. COA 1980-0903 approved construction of a wooden fence to enclose area south of building to install a freezer. COA 1982-0524 approved repair of roof. COA 1988-0721 approved in-kind replacement of front steps and repair of north garden wall. Six- and three -light casement and fixed windows enclosing rear veranda have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval, in violation of Ordinance Section 21-100(10). COA 2017-0214A to replace wood windows in rear veranda with vinyl windows encased with wood molding to cover all exposed vinyl was denied. COA 2017-0601 (to remove and replace vinyl windows) applied, subsequently withdrawn. COA 2017-0818 to remove 21 vinyl windows, replacing with new custom wood windows was approved with a timeline of completing Southeast side in Spring 2018 and South side in Fall 2018. APPLICATION ITEMS: "This COA is to request a postponement of the south covered porch windows in order to prioritize the restoration of original windows to the main house. This has been discussed with Elicia Feasel at HPC and Todd Zeiger with Indiana Landmarks who are in agreement with our request. Requesting to prioritize this fall the restoration of several much- needed windows on the upper East and South side of the house and postpone the replacement of the porch windows on the South side to spring of 2019." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Application is to request an extension until spring 2019 for the fall 2018 deadline to complete the installation of new custom wood windows to the South side of the rear covered porch. Approving the extension will enable the owners to prioritize the restoration of the original wood windows on the main house. SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: n/a STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends extending the deadline for the porch windows until Spring 2019 but that it should not exceed that timeframe. A COA for window restoration should be applied for and will be processed by Staff as a • Routine Maintenance Exclusion. IRA Written by Elicia Feasel 40 Historic Preservation Administrator Commissioner Canada made a motion to approve COA #2018-0907 as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0907 is passed. 8. 510 S St Joseph COA# 2018-0911A #8952-98 District Representation: No representation STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 11, 2018 Application Number: 2018-0911A Property Location: 510 S St Joseph Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare / 1894 Property Owner: The Entrust Group FBO Lisa H McKnight Landmark or District Designation: Taylor's Field, Ordinance #8952-98 Rating: Contributing Taylor's Field Local Historic DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Large irregular two story (plus attic) Free Classic with American Foursquare stylistic cues on a stone block foundation. Wood shingle siding is found throughout. The roof is hipped with asphalt shingles and hip dormers on the north and south sides. A small porch exists on the second story with wood balustrade, wood columns supporting the hip roof with a large overhang, purlins, and a plain freeze. The entry porch is partially enclosed and has similar details to the second story porch. Windows have aluminum storms and wood surrounds. An exposed second story stair well is on the south side, and an enclosed two-story concrete -block entrance is at the north east corner. ALTERATIONS: Extensive modifications have occurred throughout the structure's history, including additions in 1939 (one story addition to the rear), 1943 (11' x 14' rear porch), and in 1949(?) with the addition of the 7' x 12' cinder block construction at the north east corner. COA # 1999-0308 allowed for the "rebuilding south side stairs and repair clapboard and rotted trim with like materials." COA #2003-0806 allowed for the reconstruction of the exterior stair with treated lumber, and explicitly retained the supporting stone and brick structure beneath this stair. COA #2013-0615 allowed for the tear -off and re -roof of the main structure. COA #2013-0625 allowed for the repair of the internal gutter system on the front facade and the installation of K -style gutter system on the rest of the house. COA #2013-0509A allowed for the re -installation of the front stair guide rail and the repair of the railing to upper apartment #4. APPLICATION ITEMS: "1.) Side staircase replacement. 2). Replacement offallen down fence in backyard. 3) Replacement 7 windows — removal of old wooden windows and old storm windows with vinyl windows. 4) Replacement of damaged on 2"d floor right side and back with vinyl siding. See attached sheet for details. " DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for improvements on the structure, including: 2. Retroactive reconstruction of south stairwell with treated lumber, 3. Retroactive removal of stone and brick structure at base of south stairwell. This structure concealed/protected the • exterior basement access stairwell. 4. Retroactive replacement of fallen fence at rear of property using existing posts (eligible for Routine Maintenance Exclusion by staff), 17 5. Replacement of seven (7) windows on the North face of the structure. Three on the upper floor, four on the ground floor. a. Per inspector Szaday's report, existing windows are either: i. "structurally beyond repair" on the lower level ii. "painted and nailed in place" on the upper level. lb b. Proposed replacement: Jeld-Wen Best Series Model JW1438 vinyl windows, 6. Replace existing mastic/asphalt siding on rear top floor dormer with vinyl siding. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: September 5, 2018 On August 10, 2018 I stopped at the property located at 510 S St Joseph. This property is within the Taylor's Field Locally Designated Historic District. I noticed work being performed and piles of both new and removed materials on site. I met Charles who is the owner's representative. He informed me that the crew that was on site was kicked off the job for sub -par work and that they had not pulled the necessary permits. I saw a new wooden staircase on the south side of the house where the previous wooden one was. I noticed the sculpted block knee wall that was at the bottom of the previous staircase was removed. I also saw new wooden fence panels both in place and stacked on the ground. I returned to the property on September 4, 2018 to meet with Charles and discuss the COA application items up for Commission review. Fence: Most of the posts were original with some new ones replacing old. The panels are similar to those that were there according to the 2013 digital file photos. The footprint does not appear to have been altered based upon those 2013 photographs. Exterior Side Staircase: the new staircase is sturdy and composed of wood as the previous staircase was. I requested that the contractor confer with the building department to make sure the baluster spacing meet code requirements. The remaining block and concrete landing and steps are failing. The steps have sunken to the south and there is a washout spot on the southeast base of the structure has left a deep void underneath. The removal of the knee wall has left the underground staircase to the cellar exposed and should be addressed. Windows: The owner has proposed the replacement of 7 original wood double -hung windows. I was unable to inspect the windows in the second floor as the apartment is occupied and the renter was not home. The four on the first level all have lower sashes that are broken and each have metal angle brackets holding the sashes together. These sashes are missing ropes and are not rotted, but rather are structurally damaged beyond repair. The metal storm windows are missing screens but have kept the original sashes and sills safely out of the elements. The upper sashes are painted and nailed in place. Front Steps: The front steps are failing. I believe they are past the point of merely "capping", and should be removed and replaced entirely. The porch may be tall enough that the building department may require a handrail added. I defer to local ordinance. Siding: The siding on the dormers have both mastic/asphalt siding and asphalt shingles. The 2013 file photographs show a better view of what was in place then. There are places where siding has been replaced with plywood and left unfinished. The remainder of the house is covered with wood clap board with a 4" reveal. Steve Szaday Preservation Inspector STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Taylor's Field Local Historic District Guidelines I. THE ENVIRNOMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot with a small to medium lawn in front and little to no lawn at the rear of the property. Often the back yard is used as a parking lot for tenants. About half of the properties include a garage which is either located at the rear of the property and accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property or located directly next to the structure and accessed by small drives. Nearly all of the garage structure and accessed by small drives. Nearly all of the garage structures are out of date, single -stall frame buildings. One larger carriage house still stands in the district. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. Most houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type, and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains and/or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type, and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building and causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation • Commission. Prohibited 18 No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into • parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television satellite dishes, solar panels and skylights shall not be premised in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the district include limestone, flagstone, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, sandstone and masonry block. In some instances, vinyl or aluminum siding has been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing or original architectural detail windows, porches, doors, and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry including brick, limestone, flagstone, sandstone, and stucco shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle bushes. No chemicals, sand blasting or other invasive methods may be used to clean historic buildings. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture compatible in composition, color, and texture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around the windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves, and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when metal or vinyl siding has been installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and/or insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. It is emphasized that, prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort, the property owner contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County at 125 Lafayette, South Bend. The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material which is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone, and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Brick surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortarjoints which do not need repointing should not be repointed. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the material and the mortar which can result in serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces indiscriminately B. ROOFS AND ROOFING C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where additional siding has been applied window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors and windows are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended • Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS 19 Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required • Existing or original porches, stoops, patios, and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios, and steps that are important to the building's style and character shall not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. E. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS III. NEW CONSTRUCTION IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS Required Building code requirements shall be compiled with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved. Recommended Local code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. Prohibited Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features or existing exits and spaces is prohibited. Not Recommended Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building. B. ACCESS FOR HANDICAPPED OR DISABLED PERSONS V. GENERAL Is STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This property has 1) an extensive history of modification and alteration, 2) existed as rental property for the majority of its existence (records indicate the structure was subdivided sometime after 1970). As a subdivided structure, multiple ingress/egress openings have been added over the years, requiring consistent (and documented) reconstruction. Regarding the external stairw2ell: in the period of time from the establishment of the district in 1998 until today, three out of the five Certificates of Appropriateness on file for this property have been received for projects related to the external staircases. As such, precedent has been established and staff recommends approval. Regarding the low stone and brick wall: of the prior projects, COA #2003-0308 explicitly stated that "the existing stone and brick structure along the south side of the house, enclosing cellar stairs and partly supporting the existing stair to the second floor, is to be retained and repaired. " Inspector Szaday confirmed that the structure was being `washed out.' The structure has been removed, and its likelihood of reconstruction is low. Staff makes no recommendation. Regarding the retroactive reconstruction of the fence using the existing fence posts, staff recommends approval. Regarding the removal and replacement of the windows with Jeld-Wen vinyl windows, staff recommends approval based upon Inspector Szaday's opinion of the existing window condition. Regarding the replacement of the exterior mastic siding with vinyl siding on the rear upper story of the structure, staff recommends approval. Written by Adam Toering Historic Preservation Specialist Approved by • Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Administrator 20 Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0911A with the following conditions: 1) to remand to staff approval the (format of the) railing on the outside stairs, 2) to remand to staff the approval of the windows per Staff recommendation (or return to Commission review), 3) NOT approve the replacement of the mastic siding with vinyl on the south side dormer and require it to match remaining. Seconded by Commissioner Canada. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Motion to approve COA#2018-0911A is passed with conditions. IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR V. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 16', 2018 2. August 20t", 2018 Commission Bonham made a motion to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Three in favor, two opposed. Vote: 3 — 2. Minutes approved as submitted. Legal Counsel Kennedy advised the Commission that they should rescind their motion so as to allow sufficient time for the minutes to be reviewed by the Secretary and others. Commissioner Gelfinan called for a vote to rescind the motion. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0. Motion is to rescind the previous vote passes. Legal Counsel Kennedy expressed that the minutes should be submitted to the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary as a corporate rule. B. STAFF REPORTS 1. RME Report — Distributed. Commissioner Gordon asked for clarification on the School Field Routine Maintenance Exclusion. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. DISPOSITION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ASSETS Commissioner Fisher expressed concern as to who the contact at The History Museum would be. Staff expressed that they would investigate and follow up to facilitate the next meeting of the Committee. VI. OLD BUSINESS • 1. Commissioner Gordon inquired as the Inspector Szaday's compensation. Administrator Feasel explained Inspector Szaday's status as a part-time employee of Code Enforcement as HPC's inspector. 21 VII. NEW BUSINESS VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. Resolution 18-03 and window rubric Administrator Feasel gave an update on the window rubric and HPC (DCI)'s progress on this initiative. B. Update on properties with outstanding violations 1. Birdsell Mansion a. The original windows were approved for rehabilitation as an RME that expired 6/20/2017, and the windows have been missing since that time. b. The property has been ticketed: i. $500 — 7/25/2018 ii. $750 — 8/28/2018 c. Code Enforcement issued a `Board and Secure' the second week of September. The building is now secure on the ground floor. d. Commissioner Gordon had requested a memo to Department of Community Investment Department Head James Mueller. 2. 315 Madison a. COA is expired. b. Work is compliant with COA. 3. 417 Madison a. Bank -owned, vacant and abandoned. b. The bank is soliciting contractors for the work that needs to be executed, but we have had no success yet. IX. ADJOURNMENT i Commissioner Bonham made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote 5 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 8:54 pm. Attest: Greta Fisher, Secretary Date 22 • • RESOLUTION NO. 18-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA ESTABLISHING STAFF PROCEDURES FOR APPROVAL OF ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSIONS AND CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS' THAT COMPLY WITH INTENT OF STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana (the "Commission") operates pursuant to Article 13 of Chapter 21 of the South Bend Municipal Code, as may be amended from time to time (the "City Ordinance"), Title XV, Chapter 154, §§ 154.245-154.263 of the St. Joseph County Code of Ordinances, as may be amended from time to time (the "County Ordinance"), and the terms of the Interlocal Agreement between the City of South Bend and St. Joseph County dated December 12, 2017, as the same may be amended from time to time (the "Interlocal Agreement"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the City Ordinance and the County Ordinance, (a) the Commission shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness (a "COA") before the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any exterior feature of any building, structure, or use within historic preservation districts and with respect to historic landmarks, and (b) a COA is not required in the event of ordinary maintenance or repair of such a building, structure, or use that will not involve a change in any exterior features (a "Routine Maintenance Exclusion" or RME), and (c) applications that comply with the intent of the Standards and 0 Guidelines may be eligible for "Administrative Approval" (or AA); and WHEREAS, the Commission desires to establish by this Resolution certain procedures for the handling of Routine Maintenance Exclusions and Administrative Approvals by the City's staff members, including without limitation, the Historic Preservation Administrator and the Historic Preservation Specialist (collectively, for purposes of this Resolution, the "Staff'); and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Staff, on the Commission's behalf and in accordance with the terms of this Resolution, may qualify and approve any work (whether proposed or completed) as a Routine Maintenance Exclusion if it (a) does not constitute the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any exterior feature of any building, structure, or use within historic preservation districts and with respect to historic landmarks, and (b) constitutes the ordinary maintenance or repair of such a building, structure, or use that will not involve a change in any exterior features, in accordance with the terms of the City Ordinance or the County Ordinance, as applicable in a given case. 2. The Commission hereby instructs the Staff to evaluate the work or conditions potentially constituting Routine Maintenance Exclusions and Administrative Approvals with reference to applicable historic preservation standards and guidelines. Staff shall make is determinations as to Routine Maintenance Exclusions or Administrative Approvals as promptly Page 1 of 3 as reasonably possible but shall have at least two business days from receipt of a complete • application, as deemed by Staff (excluding weekends) to perform their necessary due diligence including review and evaluation of the proposed project as it pertains the Standards and Guidelines. 3. Following the Staff's qualification and approval of any Routine Maintenance Exclusion or Administrative Approval, the Staff must notify the relevant property owner(s) and/or applicant(s) of the decision with respect to the work, without prejudice to any other applicable requirements or procedures, and will report each such determination in writing (including details concerning the property and the work) to the Commission at the Commission's next regular meeting following the Staff's determination. 4. The Commission hereby affirms that the following is a non -exhaustive list of work, examples, and conditions that constitute Routine Maintenance Exclusion or Administrative Approval, not requiring the issuance of a COA under the City Ordinance or the County Ordinance: a. MATERIAL i. The use of an appropriate architectural epoxy is permitted for restoring damaged, original material (esp. character -defining features, old-growth wood and metal). ii. Sections of incompatible siding may be temporarily removed to evaluate the condition of the siding underneath. b. WINDOWS i. Inappropriate, fixed storm window units may be removed. ii. Appropriate, wood storm window sashes may be installed at missing locations. iii. Interior storm windows that do not detract from existing window units, may be used. iv. Window replacement guided by the Window Decision Tree. c. ROOFS i. Architectural shingles may be substituted for three -tab asphalt varieties. ii. Rooftop heating elements for snow and ice dam mitigation, may be installed at approved locations. ,iii. New gutter sections may be installed at inconspicuous and specified locations. d. MECHANICALS i. Exhaust vents and plastic piping for Natural Gas, LP or Radon systems may be installed at specified, unobtrusive locations. e. AMENITIES i. Installations of small-scale and appropriate amenities, including: Plaques, Address Signs, Historic Markers, Mailboxes, Flower Boxes, Light Fixtures, Sconces, Flags and similar items are permitted. f. FENCES Changes in mounting post and gate locations, within previously established perimeters are permitted. is Page 2 of 3 • ii. Alternative wooden picket styles that are in keeping with applicable standards and guidelines, are permitted. g. TREES i. A severely damaged, diseased or structurally intrusive tree specimen may be removed if a suitable replacement will be substituted in situ. ii. Different tree varieties may be substituted if original species are no longer available or appropriate for the specified location. iii. New trees (for removed specimens) may be planted in nearby, alternate locations whenever the original location is deemed incompatible. 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the Commission and shall supersede any prior resolution of the Commission concerning staff approval of Routine Maintenance Exclusions, including, without limitation, Resolution No. 17- 01, adopted on January 23, 2017 and Resolution No. 18-01 adopted on March 19, 2018. ADOPTED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on November 19, 2018, at 1308 County -City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Michele Gelfman, President ATTEST: Greta Fisher, Secretary • Page 3 of 3 • • 0 CITY OF SOUTH BEND VENUES PARKS 6 ARTS Eli A NOTE FROM VENUES PARKS & ARTS ON LEEPER PARK DUCK POND As you're likely aware, the City of South Bend's Venues Parks & Arts Department has been leading a several month process to reimagine and upgrade our riverfront parks and trails, alongside an aggressive plan to upgrade many neighborhood parks and community centers. This will set a new standard in excellence and accessibility for some of our city's most valuable resources. It's an exciting time for the park system and the community is showing extremely broad support for these long -overdue upgrades. Despite the overwhelming enthusiasm to invest in our city's natural spaces, the conversation has recently shifted to focus on one very specific topic, the Leeper Park Duck Pond. A recently released concept for Leeper Park involves transforming the duck pond into an area that will house the historic Studebaker Fountain once it's restored. These decisions are not mutually exclusive of one another, but they do seem to complement one another. This latest concept also involves installing three decks along an enhanced Leeper Riverwalk to overlook the river, creating space for observing wildlife in its natural habitat. No ducks This latest concept also involves installing three decks along an enhanced Leeper Riverwalk to overlook the river, creating space for observing wildlife in its natural habitat. No ducks or geese are harmed, but returned to their native areas. or geese are harmed, but returned to their native areas. Additionally, a regional waterfowl rehabilitator will be on hand to ensure successful transitions, which may also include adoption of some the domesticated animals. This park upgrade solves a major issue that cities across the country are struggling with. Numerous studies show that duck ponds aren't healthy for the wildlife nor the environment. This isn't a case of maintenance neglect nor a need for a cleaning regiment. Overcrowding, disease, landscape degradation, hybridization, water pollution, and other issues prevail. Organizations such as zoos and aquariums have had to adjust how they think and treat animals through the years; parks systems are no different. As a community, we must do better in our responsibility of stewardship for the local wildlife. We recognize that residents love the duck pond because of the experiences they have created there. We understand the value of having a place where families make memories and share rituals with children and grandchildren over the years. We appreciate how people enjoy watching the changing seasons and sharing in the growing of the ducklings and goslings. We don't want to take any of that away. We are striving to create upgraded place -making for those kinds of experiences. Our plans endeavor to allow people to experience all those connections to nature and more - in a safer, healthier, more natural environment for the community and for the birds. Additionally, we'll continue to be in consultation with the DNR, water and soil experts, zoologists, our Ecological Advocacy Committee, the Audubon society, the Historic Preservation Committee, environmentalists, and waterfowl experts. We are still several months away from a decision point in this matter and would like to stress that there is no urgency here. We look forward to working together as a community to take care of our native animals, our natural resources, our shared spaces and shared history. HISTORIC VALUE OF THE PARK One of the things we've been most concerned with throughout the planning process is maintaining true to the spirit of historic plans. Some of this work is unfolding even now. As approved by Historic Preservation Commission and in conjunction with a STEAM partnership involving Memorial Hospital and Madison School, a host of historic upgrades have been completed at Leeper Park. This includes the following: • The introduction of paths and significant landscaping features that were envisioned in early 2011 century Leeper plans. • A soon -to -open lavender labyrinth. • Restoration of the Ziegler outdoor performing arts centerjust north of the Leeper rose garden. • Support of efforts to "Resurrect the Roses", investing in the volunteer -led initiative to return the historic rose garden to its formerglory. • Refurbishing of the widely popular tennis courts, with plans to further upgrade the facility. • Support of a community -led initiative to restore the historic Studebaker Fountain and propose to place it in Leeper Park, not far from where the Bugbee Fountain stood in the early 1900's. There is a deep sense of history in Leeper Park and the surrounding neighborhoods that nurtures a significant amount of civic pride. This is something we never want to see fade. *Conceptual plan for review and discussion SOUTH BEND RNERFRONT PARKS 8, TRAILS 2017 C: • • ANIMAL WELFARE & ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP Over the past several decades, society's understanding of and compassion for animals has evolved. What was once acceptable in zoos and aquariums is no longer thought to be humane. This is the same in our parks system. Across the country, cities are forgoing unnatural spaces in favor of more organic habitats. Our research on the topic of duck ponds specifically as it relates to animal and environmental welfare includes: Malnutrition' Through evolution, wildlife species have developed skills to obtain food that contains the essential nutrients needed to survive, reproduce and live a healthy life. These skills help maintain a balance between animals and their natural habitat. This balance is compromised by hand feeding, which is physically harmful to birds and is one of the primary causes of malnutrition. It would seem that providing food for ducks and geese would Visible symptoms of poor nutrition and advanced make them healthier. However, stages of starvation are often seen at artificial this is not the case. Waterfowl feeding sites. For example, waterfowl may have at artificial feeding sites are drooping wings or may lose their ability to fly. often found to suffer from poor nutrition. In natural settings, waterfowl seek and feed on a variety of nutritious foods such as aquatic plants, natural grains, and invertebrates. Many of the items commonly used to feed waterfowl (bread, corn, popcorn, etc.) are low in protein and are very poor substitutes for natural foods. 5 Natural foods are also widely scattered. Ducks and geese are able to find these foods and eat them in relative seclusion. At artificial feeding sites, competition for each scrap or kernel is high. Some ducks and geese (usually the youngest) are unable to compete for handouts. Visible symptoms of poor nutrition and advanced stages of starvation are often seen at artificial feeding sites. For example, waterfowl may have drooping wings or may lose their ability to fly. Malnutrition leads to: • Low energy and muscle deterioration. • Development of deformed wings in young birds. • Loss of flight later in life. • Lowered ability to avoid predation. • Decrease in successful reproduction. • Lowered life expectancy. Dependency3 Waterfowl, particularly mallards and Canada geese will congregate in areas with abundant food and space. Unfortunately, hand feeding can cause birds to become concentrated in small urban areas that are incapable of supporting large numbers of birds. The birds then become dependent upon humans for food and can become nuisance animals. Some birds can become aggressive and may need to be removed. Geese are territorial birds and will not hesitate to protect their nest and eggs from a human or house pet they see as a threat. An aggressive adult goose can easily knock down a child or senior citizen, and geese can fly up to 50 mph. An aggressive goose will hiss at you and rear its head and then perhaps charge. • Geese will fly up and hit a human, cat or dog in the face. This is especially likely if the goose has nested in a place near human traffic, including a parking lot or shrubbery near a building. Artificial feeding often attracts birds to human habitats, parking lots, fast-food restaurants, and retention ponds, where they are more subject to accidental death. Natural cover, which can provide protection from bad weather and predators (even dogs and cats), is often lacking at these feeding sites. Waterfowl can rapidly become conditioned to, and dependent on, handouts. Fed ducks and geese behave differently. They 1-1 become more aggressive and eventually lose their wariness of humans. Some will not survive because they can't compete. Many will lose the quality which endears them to most of us, their wildness. Fed ducks and geese behave differently. They become more aggressive and eventually lose their wariness of humans. Some will not survive because they can't compete. Dependence upon humans for food causes: • Loss of their natural fear of humans, which creates aggressive behavior. • Concentration of birds near highways and airports, potentially causing motor vehicle and airplane accidents. Overpopulation of small wetlands and ponds. Delay or halting of migration to natural wintering or nestingsites. Disease Lowered nutrition and overpopulation allow disease to spread more quickly, potentially infecting thousand of birds with fatal diseases such as Avian Cholera, Duck Plague, Avian Influenza and Avian Botulism. Although these diseases have always existed in waterfowl populations, the risks from the diseases increase when populations become concentrated at feeding sites. When ducks and geese feed on scattered corn or bread, they eat in the same place where they defecate. Not healthy. In addition, large concentrations of waterfowl would facilitate the spread of disease. Also not healthy. Diseases generally not transmissible in a wild setting find overcrowded and unsanitary conditions very favorable. An infected bird may spread the disease to many other birds by infecting the water supply. When the birds are scattered over a large area this does Diseases generally not transmissible in a not pose a serious problem. However, when the wild setting find overcrowded and birds are bunched close together, their chances unsanitary conditions very favorable. of contracting disease increase and the result may be disastrous. Canada goose feces contain disease -causing organisms which include salmonella, giardia and cryptosporidium. While there are no proven links of human illness from exposure to the droppings from Canada Geese, some dogs seem to be particularly susceptible to giardia. You should keep your dog from snacking on goose droppings while out on walks. Most waterfowl die -offs in the past 10 years have involved artificial feeding: • 2,000 mallards and black ducks were killed in an outbreak of Duck Virus Enteritis in Central New York. • Another fatal disease, Aspergillus, occurs when food is scattered too liberally. It piles up and becomes moldy. • In Cheektowaga, New York, hundreds of ducks were killed in an outbreak of Avian Botulism at a feeding site. 0 c: • Environmental Degradation 2 Waterfowl naturally congregate in wetlands, when and where natural foods are plentiful. However, when hand feeding occurs, the over -concentration of birds may ultimately cause overgrazing and degradation to the landscape. Feeding attracts birds in unnatural numbers, beyond natural food and water supplies, and frequently in numbers beyond what people will tolerate. Over -grazed and badly -eroded lawns, golf Over -grazed and badly -eroded lawns, golf courses and school playing fields are often the result of overcrowding. Grassy areas such as ball fields and golf courses can become unsanitary and unusable. courses, and school playing fields are often the result of overcrowding. Grassy areas such as ball fields and golf courses can become unsanitary and unusable. Some parks have been forced to close down until goose droppings could be cleaned up, which can be quite costly. High concentration of birds cause: Overgrazing of vegetation, leading to soilerosion. Degradation of the landscape, making it undesirable for other species and unsightly for humans. Unsanitary conditions due to large quantities of birdfeces. Water Pollution' People will often feed Canada geese or ducks at the local pond or lakeside beach. This not only causes a nuisance situation with birds begging for and stealing food, but also contributes significantly to water pollution in the form of fecal coliform bacteria. activities. As a direct consequence of the concentration of this organic matter, water quality suffers from the excess nitrogen that subsequently runs off the land during the usual storm events. Too many nutrients in the water then leads to an overgrowth of algae, called an "algae bloom," which blocks sunlight from entering the water and, thereby, adversely affects fish and other organisms in the aquatic environment. Vegetation around the immediate feeding site is also impacted, because the overabundant waterfowl pull up the grass, trample the banks and otherwise damage the plants in adjacent habitat. In areas where waterfowl congregate to feed, E -coli counts can swell to levels that make the water unsuitable for recreation or other activities. events. Feeding the ducks and Canada geese can: • Cause them to become a nuisance by begging and stealing food andgarbage. • Can cause unnatural amount of water contamination, leading to algal blooms, and the death of fish. Increased Hybridization' At many feeding sites, domestic geese have interbred with Canada geese, further compromising the wild population. Locally at the Leeper Park Duck Pond, it is evident that residents have abandoned domestic ducks at the site. This furthers the hybridization issue and creates an unnatural scenario where the animals are no longer able to able to survive in natural environments. Delayed Migration 2 Feeding alters normal migration patterns of waterfowl by shortening or even eliminating them. Ducks, reluctant to leave in the winter, may not survive sudden cold. If the artificial feeding is stopped in time, ducks and geese can quickly adapt to finding natural foods and will follow their companions north. In West Haven Connecticut, 30 swans died from starvation at an artificial feeding site during the harsh winter of 93-94. Meanwhile, over 800 swans survived nearby on natural food. companions north. Overcrowding in Unnatural Sites' Feeding attracts birds in unnatural numbers, beyond natural food and water supplies, and frequently in numbers beyond what people will tolerate. Over -grazed and badly -eroded lawns and parks. Grassy areas such as ball fields and golf courses can become unsanitary and unusable. Maintenance costs for cleaning and keeping these popular gathering areas aesthetically pleasing become high. Artificial feeding often attracts birds to human habitats near roads and public areas where they are more subject to accidental death or disfigurement. Natural cover, which can provide protection from bad weather and predators is often lacking at these feeding sites. Costly Management Efforts' Many damage -avoidance techniques such as chemical repellents, fencing, or noise makers are costly and may even be useless once animals lose their fear of humans. At times, it is necessary to destroy nuisance waterfowl because of the damage they cause. Devaluation' From treasure to nuisance... wildlife managers recognize that the public's perception of the value of wildlife is Artificial feeding often attracts birds to human habitats near roads and public areas where they are more subject to accidental death or disfigurement. often reduced when numbers swell. When any wildlife population exceeds the number that can be naturally supported by available habitat, this can polarize the public and exaggerate conflicts between landowners who suffer damage and those who visit the site to feed the geese and ducks. The existence of duck ponds can no longer be considered a best practice for the environment or wildlife. • • • This isn't a conversation about maintenance standards or even what to feed the ducks. In places like the Leeper Park duck pond, the evolved situation is only partially solved by enhanced landscaping, additional upkeep, and new public policies. The only scenario we can condone the creation of artificial spaces to house and feed wildlife is one that is under constant supervision of trained professionals such as a zoo, aquarium, or farm. Even so, these environments must be created in a way that promotes the health and well-being of the animals in the most natural environments possible. Unless it's done in a very controlled manner, the pastime of feeding wildlife for amusement is one that must come to a stop. Despite the nutritional value of a Keeping the pond, in any improved or existing particular feed or food product, condition, troubles involving overcrowding, dependency on human feeding causes malnutrition, inbreeding, migratory patterns, and migratory issues, overpopulation, animal welfare ethics would continue to exist. overfeeding and a suite of health-related problems. Keeping the pond, in any improved or existing condition, troubles involving overcrowding, malnutrition, inbreeding, migratory patterns, and animal welfare ethics would continue to exist. This would result in the department havingto implement additional, and presumably unpopular activities. These include strict enforcement of no -feeding policies, a reallocation of departmental resources away from other priorities, a reduction of the park's greenspace, and wildlife management techniques such as relocation, egg depredation, or controlled animal killings. FEEDBACK AND MORE INFORMATION The concept is now available for review and commentary. We remain committed to opportunities for 40 residents to become educated and weigh in on this topic. One way to do so is on the website at www.riverfrontparksandtrails.com or at a public community meeting at the NNN Community Center on June 14th at 6:00 p.m. located at 109 Portage Ave. We have already gathered a significant amount of information from these sources and would encourage people to become educated on this topic. 1. "Stop Feeding Waterfowl." Stop Feeding Waterfowl - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation. New York State, n.d. Web. 07 June 2017. <http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/7001.html>. 2. McRuer, Dave, MSc, DVM, Dipl. ACVPM. Consequences of Feeding Waterfowl in Public Parks (n.d.): n. pag.Www.wildlifecenter.org. Wildlife Center.Web. <http://wi ldl ifecenter.org/sites/default/fi les/Consequences-of-feed i ng-wi Id -ducks -i n-pu blic- parks.pdf>. 3. Palus, Shannon. "Don't Feed the Waterfowl." Audubon. Audubon, 14 July 2016. Web. 07 June 2017. < http://www.audubon.org/news/dont-feed-waterfowl >. 4. "Indiana Department of Natural Resources." DNR: Solutions. DNR, n.d. Web. 07June2017. <http://www.i n.gov/dnr/fishwild/3002.htm>. 5. "Please Don't Feed Waterfowl." Please Don't Feed Waterfowl — Audubon Society of Portland. Audobon Society of Portland, n.d. Web. 07 June 2017. <http://audubonportiand.org/wcc/urban/Waterfowl >. 6. "Don't Feed the Ducks." Mass Audubon. Mass Audobon, n.d. Web. 07 June2017. 7. <http://www.massaudubon.org/learn/nature-wildlife/birds/don-t-feed-the-ducks> See AppendixA for additional information on water quality at Leeper Park Duck Pond. 0 r. Appendix A a&l reatla I e 3505 Conestoga 0 Fort Wayne, IN 46808 260.483.4759 �; LABORATORIES algreatlakes.com ` Scientists who don't mind getting dirty." Account Number: 84038 Page: 1 of 4 Soil Test Report Reported To Sample Information Customer Information CITY OF SOUTH BEND Report Number F17160-0127 Report Date 6/13/2017 LEEPER DUCK POND 321 E WALTER ST SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 Lab Number 33621 sample ID OUTSIDE To Be Grown TREES Analysis Soil Test Rating Analysis Result Low Low Medium High Very High Organic Matter, % 4.7 Phosphorus, m P (Bra -1 E uiv51Potassium, m K 61Ma fer nesium, m M 250Calcium, pm Ca 2400Sodium, m Na 12Cation Exchan a Ca acit , me /100 14.3■■■■®■■■■■■ pH 7.5 ■■■■®■■■■■■■■■■■■ Soluble Salts (1:2), mmho/cm 0.1 ■■ Sulfur, ppm S 9 ■■■■®®®■■■■■ Zinc, ppm Zn 34.2 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Iron, ppm Fe 48 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ Manganese, ppm Mn 49 ■■■■■®®®®®®®■®®® Copper, ppm Cu 4.4 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■ Boron, ppm B ' 1.8 ■■■■®■■®®■■■■■®■■ Annual Nutrient Requirement Pounds per 300 Square Feet Pounds per 1,000 Square Feet Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium Magnesium Lime Sulfur Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium Magnesium Sulfur (N) - (P20S) (K20) (Mg) (S) Lime (N) (P205) (K20) (Mg) (S) 0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 3 0 3 0 0 Suggested Fertilizer Application NPK Fertilizer Description Annual Application Rate Grade lbs per 100 sq. ft. lbs per 1,000 sq. ft. Product 12-0-12 Phosphorus Free Fertilizer 2.5 R 25.0 0.0 R 0.0 Comments Use the fertilizer listed above or another of similar NPK analysis. Broadcast the recommended amount evenly around the drip line of the trees in the late fall or early spring. Avoid application after July 1st since late growth is more susceptible to winter injury. The soil pH is high (alkaline). Some species such as oaks and maples may show chlorosis (yellowing) of the See Fact Sheet #10, Interpretive Guide, located on our website, for an explanation of soil test results. to&lg reada kes LABORATORIES • Scientists who don't mind getting dirty. 3505 Conestoga Or. Fort Wayne, IN 46808 260.483.4759 algreatlakes.com 3505 Conestoga Dr. �yne, IN 46808 L ,.„ reatLakes Fort W a 260.483.4759 (4i]I LAB OR ATO R I ES algreatlakes.com Sclentlsrs who don't mind gerfing dirty. "' • Account Number: 84038 Page: 3 of 4 Soil Test Report Reported To Sample Information Customer Information Report Number F17160-0127 CITY OF SOUTH BEND Report Date 6/13/2017 LEEPER DUCK POND 321 E WALTER ST SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 Lab Number 33622 Sample ID ISLAND To Be Grown - Analysis TREES Soil Test Rating Analysis Result Very Low Low Medium High Very High Organic Matter, % 1.2 so MONO Phosphorus, ppm P (Bray -1 Equiv.) 314 ■■■■O■■■O■O■■OOO■■O■■■ Potassium, ppm K 124 ■■MOO■OM®MON Magnesium, ppm Mg 140 ■■N■■■■ Calcium, ppm Ca 2650 ■■■■NO■■■■■■■00■®OM■NM Sodium, ppm Na 22 ■■ Cation Exchange Capacity, meg/100g 14.8 ■■ ■■■■■O■■■ H 7.5 ■■■OO■ ■O ■■ OOO Soluble Salts (1:2), mmho/cm 0.2 ■ Sulfur, ppm S 12 ■ ■■ ■®M■M Zinc, ppm Zn 38.0 ■■■■■ O■■■■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ Iron, ppm Fe 81 ■■■■■■■■DODO■■■■ ■■ ■ Manganese, ppm Mn 51 ■■■■■■■OND■■ ■DODO■■■■ Copper, ppm Cu 3.5 ■N■■■■■■®■■■■DODO■■■■■ Boron, ppm B 0.7 N■MM■■■NON■ Annual Nutrient Requirement Pounds per 100 Square Feet Pounds per 1,000 Square Feet Nitrogen Phosphorus Potassium -Magnesium Sulfur Nitrogen Phosphorus' Potassium Magnesium Sulfur - Lime (N) (P205) (K20) (Mg) (S) Lime' (N) (P205) (K20) (Mg) (S) ,. 0 0.3 0.0 0.0 J 0.0 0.0 0 3 0 0 0 0 Suggested Application NPK Fertilizer Description` Annual Application Rate - Grade lbs per 100 sq. ft lbs per 1,000 sq. ft. Product 20-0-0 Ammonium Sulfate 1.5 R 15.0 0.0 R 0.0 Comments Use the fertilizer listed above or another of similar NPK analysis. Broadcast the recommended amount evenly around the drip line of the trees in the late fall or early spring. Avoid application after July 1st since late growth is more susceptible to winter injury. The soil pH is high (alkaline). Some species such as oaks and maples may show chlorosis (yellowing) of the See Fact Sheet #10, Interpretive Guide, located on our website, for an explanation of soil test results. ID a&lg reatLa Fels �t* LABORATORIES Scientists who don't mind getting dirty. 3505 Conestoga Dr. Fort Wayne, IN 46808 260.483.4759 algreatlakes.cotn Account Number: 84038 Page: 4 of 4