HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune 2018•
L'
SpUTH 8 ip'^.f RS 0�..
f. y
i
CITY OF SOUTHBEND
x 186, � HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
MEETING AGENDA— MONDAY, JUNE 18-5:30 PM
COUNTY— CITY BUILDING, 13TH FLOOR, ROOM 1308
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. ROLL CALL
III. PUBLIC HEARING
a. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
i. 2018-0427 736 Portage #9574-05 Chapin Park
ii. 2018-0530 512 N St. Joseph #8949-98 North St. Joseph
iii. 2018-0530A 605 Rex #9574-05 Chapin Park
iv. 2018-0604 701 Portage #9574-05/6242-1977 Chapin Park/Local
Landmark
v. 2018-0604A 503 Riverside #8308-92 River Bend
vi. 2018-0605 608 Park #9574-05 Chapin Park
vii. 2018-0608 24888 Cleveland #55-1975 Local Landmark
viii. 2018-0613 504 E LaSalle #7591-1986 Local Landmark
b. PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK— FIRST READING —1040 W WASHINGTON, SOUTH BEND, IN —THE
ENGMAN NATATORIUM
c. PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK—FIRST READING —THE STRUCTURE LOCATED ON LASALLE AVENUE
SPANNING THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER BETWEEN DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BOULEVARD AND
SYCAMORE STREET IN SOUTH BEND, IN, KNOWN AS THE LASALLE AVENUE BRIDGE
d. PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK — FIRST READING —THE STRUCTURE LOCATED ON JEFFERSON
BOULEVARD SPANNING THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER BETWEEN DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BOULEVARD
AND NILES AVENUE IN SOUTH BEND, IN, KNOWN AS THE JEFFERSON STREET BRIDGE
e. PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK— FIRST READING —THE STRUCTURE LOCATED IN HOWARD PARK
SPANNING THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER BETWEEN ST. LOUIS BOULEVARD AND PLAZA PARK IN SOUTH BEND,
IN, KNOWN ASTHE GRAND TRUNK WESTERN NORTH OR THE HOWARD PARK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
f. PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK— FIRST READING —THE STRUCTURE LOCATED ON TWYCKENHAM DRIVE
SPANNING THE ST. JOSEPH RIVER BETWEEN NORTHSIDE BLVD AND LINCOLN WAY EAST IN SOUTH
BEND, IN KNOWN AS THE TWYCKENHAM BRIDGE
IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
V. REGULAR BUSINESS
a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
b. STAFF REPORTS
c. COMMITTEE REPORTS
i. DISPOSITION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ASSETS
ii. RENOVATIONS/SPECIAL PROJECTS
VI. OLD BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Telephone interpreter service is available upon request free of charge for individuals with limited English
proficiency. Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request free of charge.
Please give reasonable advance request when possible.
• PRESIDENT
A CEwrMED LLCM. GOVERNMENT EISCIA FEA.SEL
OF THF. NATIONAI. PARK SERVICE. HISTORIC PRESERVATION ADMINISTRATOR
EXCELLENCE ! ACCOUNTABILITY; INNOVATION 11 INCLUSION 1 EMPOWERMENT
1400S County -City Building 1227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.93711 f 574.235.9201 j www.southbendin.gov
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET
June 18, 2018
Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a
record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate
your status using the following letters: w (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If
you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D.
Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person.
NAME
,jhAT�sL�
ADDRESS W, B, F, D
H, O
(Q O 2e X
t
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 6 June 2018
Application Number: 2018-0427 continued
Property Location: 736 Portage Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Commercial Building/20"' Century Functional/1925
Property Owner: Urban U Partners LLC
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05; National
Register District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The apartment building is three stories with a rectangular plan and is
constructed of brick. Roof is hip covered in asphalt shingles. Most windows are original wood with a variety of
patterns including: casement, 6/1, and 1/1. Front entry features divided light sidelights on either side of wood door
with shed roof supported by wood brackets.
ALTERATIONS: Two original wood 6/1 windows were replaced with black aluminum full light casement
without COA.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "D lace n f e„+ faeing windews, ene .<Fwhich is badly damaged to mateh the 2 giat
have been r-eplaeed aiready. We would simply like te mateh the 2 windews that have been r-eplaeed. One of the 4
windows is beyond repair per Randy from Indiana Glass. This is a safety hazard and security issue for the
apartment. Plus water continues to erode the wood windows and allows mice and other pests which are health
• hazards."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: n epl.,ee fur- original wood 6/1 windows in front on base...o. +
level with new blaek a4uminum fall light easement windows, by Vinyl Gndt-, to mateh two windows r-eplaeed
pr-evieusly (withetA COA). The replaeoment windowswill not r-eduse the over-all size of the opening but will
shange the light pattem from 6/1 to full lilo.A. The existing windows have been deemed deter-ier-ated beyead r
Continued from May HPC meeting. Replace four (4) original wood 6/1 windows AND two (2) black aluminum full
light casements installed without COA with new Semco casement aluminum clad exterior/wood interior 6/1
simulated divided light with wider simulated meeting rail (see Semco sheet). The replacement windows will not
reduce the overall size of the opening but will resemble the original window pattern while providing the necessary
egress. The existing windows have been deemed deteriorated beyond repair by Preservation Inspector and window
repair contractor.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
March 21, 2018 I met with the property manager of 736 Portage, Valerie of VPM at the location. We discussed
window replacement for the basement windows at 736. Some windows at both buildings at the lower level have
already been replaced from the wood double hung to aluminum casements. Four windows are wood double hung
are not functioning and are damaged beyond repair. One sash is missing the meeting rail and another is completely
missing the mortise and tenon joint. The casement windows also allow a legal egress.
Steve Szaday, Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, CHAPIN PARK:
II. Existing Structures
•C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with
wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window
and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm
windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware.
When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new •
sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they
should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material.
STAFF RECOALVIENDATION: Staff recommends approval.
Written by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
Richards Bldg Supply-Southbend
E mco
1702 S Franklin Street
INDOWS®DOORS
South Bend IN 46613
574-288-4433
BILL TO: SHIP TO:
Phone:
Fax:
Phone:
Fax:
Customer
QUOTATION
QUOTEVIPMES
Quote Not
Certified
QUOTE .NAME
PROJECT. NAME CVSTOMERTO >' DATE. `PRINTED .
Val's- Historical
Val's- Historical 6/6/2018
QUOTED BY
-' Salespeirson Bid By QC7OTE NUMBER'
Tony Hessling
31805
LineIfem # = Description Net Price. QuantityExtendeil Price
100-1 $455.67 1 $455.67
RO: _
30.5" X 40.25" Complete Unit, Pine, ..
OA Frame Size Clad REPL Series, Double Hung, Operating, Product Code = CUSTOM CONFIG,
CUSTOM CONFIG
30" X 39.75"
Sash Split = Even, Frame Width = 30, Frame Height = 39.75, BB Projection Std Color = Midnight Black, Ntrl Int, Sill Support Leg Inward, ., Chestnut Bronze,FE
/A With Fingerpulls, No, Taupe, Full, Chcl FBG Mesh Scr,
mment/Room: Insulated, LoE 366, Std GIs Sper, Argon Filled, No Tint,
one Assigned Unit I Glass 1: 7/8" w/Sper, Trad Ext & Int, Colonial, 1 W2H 30
Unit 1 Glass 2: 7/8" w/Sper, Trad Ext & Int, Colonial, 3 W2H,
Unit 1: Clr Opening Wth = 26.0625, Clr Opening Hgt = 16.5, Clr Opening Sq Ft =
2.986328
Unit I Lower Glass, I Upper Glass: U -Factor = 0.3, SHGC = 0. 16,
OA RO Wth = 30.5, OA RO Hgt = 40.25
LineItem:# IL scription avetrrtc :t�uanntyx:Ytennea Ir e�
200-1 $533.03 1 $533.03
RO:
30.5" X 40.25" Complete Unit, Pine,
Clad REPL Series, Casement, Left, Product Code = RC30**, `L
OA Frame Size l
30" X 39.75" RC30 __.._...._l,_...."" .....
Frame Width = 30, Frame Height = 39.75,
BB Projection Std Color = Midnight Black, Ntrl Int, Beige Sash WS, Sill Shim Angle = None,
N/A Chestnut Bronze, Beige Keeper, Chcl FBG Mesh Scr, Chestnut Bronze,
Comment/Room: Insulated, LoE 366, Std GIs Sper, Argon Filled, No Tint,
None Assigned 7/8" w/Sper, Trad Ext & Int, Top/Bottom Only Colonial, SDH, Checkrail Thickness = 30
2 1/8", 3W3HT,
Unit 1: Clr Opening Wth = 22, Clr Opening Hgt = 34.625, Clr Opening Sq Ft =
5.28993
Unit 1 Glass: U -Factor = 0.3, SHGC = 0. 18,
OA RO Wth = 30.5, OA RO Hgt = 40.25
0
Page 1 Of 2
WAIVER OF STATUTORY TIME PERIOD FOR •
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
WHEREAS, county and city ordinances require the Historic Preservation Commission of
South Bend and St. Joseph County (the "Commission") to consider my application for a
certificate of appropriateness within forty-five (45) days after its filing; and
WHEREAS, the county and city ordinances require the Commission to issue a denial, if
they choose to do so, within sixty (60) days of receipt of my application; and
WHEREAS, the undersigned, as applicant, has requested that the Commission delay its
decision on my application.
THEREFORE, the applicant hereby consents to an extension of the time to act on my
application to and including o and accordingly waives any rights affected by the
Commission's postponed consideration of my application.
I affirm under the penalties for perjury that the foregoing representations are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant •
_ 2-ok ,p) - 0 4 -I
COA Number
t
Address of Property .
. Received: Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County
this 22 Day of '{`n0.�a . 20.
istoric Preservation Commission
tlizck+h Ner+ek
F.IDATAISHAREILegallWpdatalSEPwPCIWaiver of Time Period COA.doc •
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 9 May 2018
Application Number: 2018-0427
Property Location: 736 Portage Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Commercial Building/20" Century Functional/1925
Property Owner: Urban U Partners LLC
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05; National
Register District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The apartment building is three stories with a rectangular plan and is
constructed of brick. Roof is hip covered in asphalt shingles. Most windows are original wood with a variety of
patterns including: casement, 6/1, and 1/1. Front entry features divided light sidelights on either side of wood door
with shed roof supported by wood brackets.
ALTERATIONS: Two original wood 6/1 windows were replaced with black aluminum full light casement
without COA.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replace 4 front facing windows, one of which is badly damaged to match the 2 that
have been replaced already. We would simply like to match the 2 windows that have been replaced. One of the 4
windows is beyond repair per Randy from Indiana Glass. This is a safety hazard and security issue for the
apartment. Plus water continues to erode the wood windows and allows mice and other pests which are health
• hazards."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Replace four original wood 6/1 windows in front on basement
level with new black aluminum full light casement windows, by Vinyl Craft, to match two windows replaced
previously (without COA). The replacement windows will not reduce the overall size of the opening but will
change the light pattern from 6/1 to full light. The existing windows have been deemed deteriorated beyond repair
by Preservation Inspector and window repair contractor.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
March 21, 2018 I met with the property manager of 736 Portage, Valerie of VPM at the location. We discussed
window replacement for the basement windows at 736. Some windows at both buildings at the lower level have
already been replaced from the wood double hung to aluminum casements. Four windows are wood double hung
are not functioning and are damaged beyond repair. One sash is missing the meeting rail and another is completely
missing the mortise and tenon joint. The casement windows also allow a legal egress.
Steve Szaday, Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, CHAPIN PARK:
II. Existing Structures
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with
wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window
s
and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm
windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware.
When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new
sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they
should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recominends approval.
Written by
Elicia Feasel •
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
0
v�
APR 0 4 2018 MA
RP.e..No. 0Vi5D'12vcn
_�� ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
l �r LMAC tz County—City Building, South Bend, M 46601
t s ' http://www.southbendin.gov/government/department/coinmunity-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLY>»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS 11)OXn«««0F1PICE USE ONLY
Date Received: 14fvvf Application Number. L 7
Past Reviews: YES (Date ojLast Review), �O W �3 ❑ NO
Staff Approval authorized by: Title:
Certificate Of App riateneas:
u Denied ❑ Tabled
Address of Property for proposed work: 736 Portage Ave, South Bend, IN 46616
• (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of property Owner(s): Urban U Partners LLC Phone M 847-498-7757
Address of Property Owner(s): 1431 Portage Ave, South Bend, IN 46616
(Street Number --,Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of Contractor(s): Robert Whiting Phone #: 574-334-8989 ext 101
Contractor Company Name: Val's Property Management, LLC (VPM)
Address of Contractor Company: 1431 Portage Ave, South Bend, IN 46616
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Current Use of Building: Multi Family
(Single Fa)tiily—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government Industrial—Vacant—etc.)
Type of Building Construction: Brick
(Wood Franie Brick—Stone--Steel—Concrete—Othetj
Proposed Work: F1 In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New 0 Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition
(more than one box may be checked)
Description of Proposed Work: Replace 4 front facing windows, one of which is badly damaged to match the 2 that have
boon raplawd already. Wo would slmply Wat to match the 2 vAndows that have boon roplaced. Ono of tho 4 windows b beyond ropair per Randy from Ind'mnn Glass. This Is a sarety hazard and
security issue for the apartment. Plus water continues to erroda the wood windows and allows trice and other pests which are health hazards.
Owner c -ma' : p Ul.step@ICIOUd.COm _ and/or cont actor -mail.
valerie@vpmpr.com
X r and/or X
• Signature r Sigpa re of ont
By signing this application 1 agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Pannit, irappticable.
—APPLICA'T'ION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISPED ON REVERSE SIDE—
March 28, 2018
Historic Preservation Commission
Of South Bend and St. Joseph County Indiana
125 S. Lafayette Blvd.
South Bend, IN 46601
RE: Materials Description for 736 Portage Ave
To Whom It May Concern:
There are 4 windows on the basement level of the building that face the front of the
building that are in very bad condition. All 4 windows face the front and are the
original double hung wood windows. Two of these windows have frames that are
cracked/broken and/or completely missing.
We just took over the management of this building as of March 1, 2018 and so that is
why are just now addressing the building. We want to replace the 4 original windows
with the exact same windows that were already replaced. The 2 most south basement •
windows on the building have already been replaced with aluminum casement j
windows. We simply want to match these windows. The measurements of the
windows are 30 inches wide and 39 3/ inches tall. The windows would be black to
match the ones that have already been installed.
The old rotted windows are a safety hazard since they aren't secure, they are a health
hazard because mice and other pests can easily come in to the building and that
apartment. Randy from Indiana Glass has already looked at the older windows and
due to the severity of the condition of them he recommended having them replaced
to match the 2 newer windows.
Sincerely,
Valerie Swihart
Managing Broker
•
.:i!••i �� �. V.i', �. iiT�lt .�\ai`'i(1.1 '11 'l, c'li (;t 1.. ,)( i i ..'fit '��. t..'i si`, �,. ..,•. i't �\ ���:;. ,.
Elicia Feasel •
From:
Valerie Swihart <valerie@vpmpr.com>
Sent:
Friday, April 27, 2018 4:24 PM
To:
Elicia Feasel
Cc:
Adam Toering
Subject:
Re: 736 Portage
Attachments:
Letter from Randy Indiana Glass.pdf
Elicia,
1. Attached is a letter from Randy from Indiana Glass.
2. Window Specs: Black Aluminum Casement Window with sash opening for full exit for emergencies.
Measurement: 30 inches wide and 39 3/4 inches tall.
3. Yes, windows are on basement level
Thank you and let me know if you need anything further.
Valerie Swihart
Managing Broker
VPM & Pyramid Realty 0
1431 Portage Avenue, South Bend, IN 46616
O. 574.334.8989
F. 574.975.2836
E: valerie@vpmpr.com
Website: vpmpr.com
Like us on facebook
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Valerie Swihart <valerie@vpmpr.com> wrote:
Elicia,
Thank you. I will get this to you as soon as I can.
Valerie Swihart
Managing Broker
VPM & Pyramid Realty
1431 Portage Avenue, South Bend, IN 46616
O. 574.334.8989
F. 574.975.2836
E: valerie@vpmpr.com
Website: vpmpr.com •
Like us on facebook
xo
7.3'-f'-5 86 a
ar\A , ).018
Elicia Feasel •
From:
Elicia Feasel
Sent:
Friday, May 11, 2018 4:58 PM
To:
'Valerie Swihart'
Subject:
RE: 736 Portage
Very good. Thanks!
From: Valerie Swihart [mailto:valerie@vpmpr.coml
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 4:56 PM
To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@southbendin.gov>
Subject: Re: 736 Portage
Elicia,
The windows we will order will be aluminum per the application. The brand is called vinyl craft. I called our vendor
already to confirm. They will be black and match the ones that are already replaced.
Valerie Swihart
Managing Broker
VPM & Pyramid Realty •
1431 Portage Avenue South Bend, IN 46616
O. 574.334.8989
F. 574.975.2836
E: valerie@vpmpr.com
Website: vpmpr.com
Like us on facebook
On May 11, 2018, at 3:57 PM, Elicia Feasel <efeasel southbendin.gov> wrote:
The two non -approved replacement windows that are currently installed have been reported by the
Preservation Inspector as aluminum casements, however, the Vinyl Craft windows are vinyl; the material
will not match. Will they match in color? The full light pattern does not match the original 6/1 pattern.
The Standards and Guidelines for Chapin Park require that original windows shall be replaced with units
and trim resembling the original. In my opinion, the Commission will have concerns about replacement
of original wood windows with vinyl window replacements, especially to a brick structure. I recommend
investigating into replacement with wood or aluminum clad as well as the possibility of matching the
mullion (grid) pattern of 6/1 as exemplified on the original windows.
Thank you,
Elicia
1
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 6 June 2018
Application Number: 2018-0530
Property Location: 512 N St. Joseph
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1904/Hicks House
Property Owner: Dan Maloney
Landmark or District Designation: North St. Joseph Street Local Historic District, Ordinance #8949-98
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The two-story rectangular plan wood frame house has a cement over
brick foundation, and cross gable roof with asphalt shingles. A full width porch with hip roof spans the front of the
house and is supported by Doric columns. Siding is vinyl with vertical vinyl on porch. Windows are vinyl 1/1
double hung.
ALTERATIONS: Vinyl siding is not original. Vinyl and glass block windows are not original. The porch columns
and railing are not original. COA#2016-1109 approved an addition at the northeast corner of the house.
RME#2018-0122 replaced vinyl replacement windows with new vinyl windows.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "To make a two car garage"
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Reif Custom Builders, Inc. will construct a 24'x 24', one story
garage in the rear of the main house. The new garage will be constructed on the location of a former garage where
• the previous concrete foundation still exists. Existing foundation will be removed and new concrete foundation
installed. Garage design will resemble the house with a 4/12 pitch roof with a 12" overhang (same as addition) with
asphalt architectural shingles and silver-grey vinyl siding (same as house). There will be one 36" six panel steel
service door with no window and one 16'xT paneled steel overhead door with no window.
SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES NORTH ST JOSEPH STREET:
III. NEW CONSTRUCTION
New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new
addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the
neighborhood.
A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION
The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half
residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio.
Required
The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The
building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of
the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than
those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure.
Recommended
Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood.
Prohibited
Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new
height.
Not Recommended
New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or
spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions.
B. BUILDING MATERIALS
• Wall materials in the district are predominantly wood clapboard and its imitation in aluminum and vinyl. Some walls are brick. Patterned
shingles are common in gable ends and dormers.
Required
Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on •
an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as
possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building.
Recommended
Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and
style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.
Prohibited
Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed garage meets the Standards and Guidelines. Staff recommends
approval.
Written by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
CJ
o
MAY 3 0 2,01-8 M A
8EC -No. /q M5
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
County --City Building, South Bend, IN 46601
http://www.southbendin.gov/government/department/community-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Pmt Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLY -»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS 8c0X<—<<<OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: /I 'A Application Number:
Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) 01 r t � Q ❑ NO
Staff Approval authorized by:
Title:
Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: e] U n e- Z 0 \ S ,, ` —
El Landmark Local Historic District (Name) IVbr - r 1 O Seto
❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name)
Certificate Of App riateness:
f Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work: 6iZ t4, '&i
Name of Property Owner(s): DQM Phone 4: 57/—Q7 4/— q 7 d q
Address of Property Owner(s): 414,6 C) I
(Streebel=Street Name—City—Zip)
1� at ehaa 1
9 Name of Contractor(s): Phone #:
A
Contractor Company Name:
Address of Contractor Co
Current Use of Building:
Type of Building Construe
Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape PS,:1 New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition
(more than one box may be checked) /
Description of Proposed Work:
n
�J
Owner a -mail: � rnq[a t+\ and/or Contractor a -Ina ('t✓I (c? tyt '-eF --'o
M
X and/or X r
Signature of Owner Si ature of Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable.
—APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE—
Ask
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 5, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0530A
Property Location: 605 Rex Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled -front / 1899 or 1905
Property Owner: Joan M. Downs
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The house located at 605 Rex is a gable -front one and a half -story
structure with original shingles in the gable and clapboard siding and corner boards. There is a full width screen
enclosed porch with wood supports set on brick piers and rail with stone caps. There is wood and chain link fence
along the side yard on the west and a stockade fence along the east side.
ALTERATIONS: Original second floor street -facing window (described in the survey card as "very long paired
windows in gable") was replaced sometime after it was photographed in 1987. COA 2008-0903 allowed for the
installation of the wooden and chainlink fence around the rear of the property. COA 2011-0607 allowed for roof,
soffit, and gutter repair following ice melt damage.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "There is one modern, and inappropriate, window in the gable on the front of the house
and we are requesting permission to replace it with a new all wood double -hung window manufactured by Marvin
• Windows of Wisconsin. The inappropriate window has divided lights and is vinyl clad. The new window will
match the size of the opening but will match the composition and formats of the original windows. It will be
painted to match the existing paint scheme, something which is not possible with the current modern vinyl window
due in part to its artificial divided lights which are buried in the glass.
"The new wood window will also receive a custom-made wooden storm window."
"There are currently 3 modern coarse handrailings on the house.
At the front door
At the kitchen door
At the back door
"We are requesting permission to switch out the 2 x 4 handrailing for a proper beveled edge railing. In
addition, we would like to finish the post with a cap and a simple finial or ball. (see photos)"
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for
improvements on the structure including:
1. Replacement of one vinyl clad window facing the street on the second floor. This window is to be
replaced with custom wooden windows manufactured by Marvin replicating the original "very long
paired windows" visible in the 1981 survey photos.
2. Removal and reconstruction of three wooden railings and posts.
The third component of the applicant's original submission called for the construction and installation of custom
• wooden storm windows. This portion of the application was issued as Routine Maintenance Exclusion #2018-
0530B per Resolution #18-01 on June 5h, 2018.
SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK •
General Definitions
(B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
(W) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED)
Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation would not
require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are incompatible with the
defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would not require the duplication of the
original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and the district's defined elements of
preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be encouraged, but contemporary methods and
materials would be acceptable when compatible.
II. EXISTING STRUCTURES
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with
wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window
and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm
windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and
hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If
new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are
used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material.
D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS
Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are
covered by the main roof of the house.
Required
When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns,
brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with
the historic period of the structure. •
Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained.
Recommended
When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or
historical character of the building.
Not Recommended
Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project, as it is 1) in keeping with the
Standards & Guidelines of the Chapin Park Local and National Historic District, and 2) actively reverting the
structure to a condition more in keeping with its original character.
Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
0
1
f S a
1
('
g
Nq
J VA1 e 3t�P Sha li fY� '{k
,i
g
6.4d
{
qq
1,
in"fi
e
40
1
('
g
g
6.4d
{
qq
1,
Figure 3 - South east face. Entrance screened -in porch at left. Railing to be replaced at center.
Figure 4 — East side entrance.
•
L'
•
Figure 7 - Proposed railing style as seen at 853 Forest.
•
•
•
•
•
•
M Re-efi ma9SS3 L`aplp
MAY 2 2 2018
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
County --City Building, South Bend, 1N 46601
http://www.southbendin.gov/government/department/community-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Padc Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLYS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX --OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: 12-TYttat,l 1 q
Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review
Staff Approval authorized by:
Historic Preservation Commission Review Date:
❑ Local Landmark
❑ National Landmark
Certificate Of App ro riateness:
Denied ❑ Tabled
Application Number:( — 6`530 A
) ❑ NO
Title:
Local Historic District (Name) /1! '_.', Pe""'Lc
National Register District (Name) �
❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work: (0 05 Rex S-Frt e+- So o i�, Bend I n/ V(0 (0 1(v
(Street Number --Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of Property Owner(s):
.Soon 1'7owAo
Phone #: 6 -74 -SE -9 • (o 3 Y!p
Address of Property Owner(s): �S �{ Q Fot►t S + ASV G 5 VJt'h S C4%
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of Contractor(s): FQ a e e e t_ a e+ A Co 'V% Y o n 1 Phone #: 514 " 2 S 9 -Lt 4a,'Z
Contractor Company Name:
Address of Contractor Company: �j'�' -9as+ Mss h a.w ova Ave. SO ai► 6" ;N y(o& l5
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Current Use of Building:
Ingle Famil Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant--etc.)
Type of Building Construction:
Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape
(more than one box may be checked)
Description of Proposed Work: .SCP_ at Q cAe-A
New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition
Owner e-mail: t o w� b D W Y►S a -L Q ma 1 l• a nd/or Contractor e-mail:
X p �,> 1�---� and/or X
Signat of Owner Signature of Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable.
—APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE—
Certificate of Appropriateness
for 605 Rex Street, South Bend
Owner: Joan M. Downs
849 Forest Ave. South Bend, IN 46616
May 17, 2018
Description of Work:
This paperwork is for 605 Rex Street, in South Bend.
Wooden Storm Windows:
•
We are requesting permission to fabricate all custom-made wooden storm windows for the
entire house, except for two of the existing modern windows.
All of the windows are original except for three of them; is
-the rear window next to the back door is a modern casement window,
-and the kitchen window is a modern double -hung window.
These two windows will stay as is, and are not visible from the street.
There is one modern, and inappropriate, window in the gable on the front of the house and
we are requesting permission to replace it with a new all wood double -hung window
manufactured by Marvin Windows of Wisconsin. The inappropriate window has divided
lights and is vinyl clad. The new window will match the size of the opening but will match
the composition and formats of the original windowns. It will be painted to match the
existing paint scheme, something which is not possible with the current modern vinyl
window due in part to its artificial divided lights which are buried in the glass.
The new wood window will also receive a custom-made wooden storm window.
Handrailings:
There are currently 3 modern coarse handrailings on the house.
-at the front door
-at the kitchen door
-at the back door •
•
We are requesting permission to switch out the 2 x 4 handrailing for a proper beveled edge
railing. In addition, we would like to finish the post with a cap and a simple finial or ball.
(see photos)
•
0
,r
• STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 5 June 2018
Application Number: 2018-0604
Property Location: 701 N Portage Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Romanesque Revival / 1898 / Charles A. Brehmer (Architect)
Property Owner: Andrew Caspers and Amanda Shutts
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05; National
Register District; Local Landmark, Ordinance #6242-1977.
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Fire House #6 is one of the oldest extant fire houses in South Bend.
The triangular plot, of which the building is situated, has a long connection to South Bend's history. During the
Civil War, the land was used as part of Camp Rose, a training ground for local troops headed to war. The Saint
Joseph County Agricultural Society later owned the land and used it as part of their fair grounds. In 1896, the City
of South Bend purchased the land to build a "Hose House" on the property, serving the City until it was
decommissioned in 1967. The Civic Theatre used the structure as a theatre and workshop for nearly fifty years
following.
Fire House #6 is a two and a half story, brick structure, with rectangular plan and hip and gabled roof with dormer.
There is a hose tower protruding from the roof at the rear. The front first story features the main equipment door, a
thin, curved corrugated metal canopy supported by cast iron brackets designed with a sun and scroll motif. Brick
pilasters with stone capitals support a false brick arch at second story. Windows are wood, 1/1 with some fixed in
attic and hose tower. Centered between two second story windows is a large stone placard with No. 6 in relief.
ALTERATIONS: COA #1985-0819 permitted the cleaning of bricks, replace roof ventilator, windows, and rear
entry door. COA #1987-1019 permitted the replacement of the entrance door. COA #1988-1207 permitted the
installation of curbing at the Portage -Lindsey intersection as per Project no. MG -000-C Fed Rd. Region 5. COA
#1989-0208 permitted the installation of -security lights with wiring concealed by the eave material and covered in
metal conduit painted to match the structure. COA #1989-0602 permitted the removal of old roofing and re -roofing
with Owens Corning 3 -tab 20 -year shingles. COA #1993-1118 permitted the repair of holes and the straightening
of the edges of the canopy. COA41994-1215 permitted the grading of the drive and in-kind replacement of
limestone base. COA #1995-1025 permitted the removal and replacement of a dead tree. COA #1999-0713
permitted the installation of a pole, siren, and related electrical/radio parts all contained /attached to the pole on
Lindsey between Portage Avenue and Leland Avenue. COA #2003-1031A permitted the installation of landscape
lighting around the building, a new sign in the lawn, replacement of the front garage door sign, and re -glazing of
the scheduling boards on the windows flanking the garage door. COA #2003-1031B permitted the removal of
loose paint and dirt from the metal awning with water and/or Conklin's Rust -Off, caulking all seams on top of
awning, priming of the awning and the structural braces, and a final coat of paint on the awning. COA #2017-
1002G permitted masonry repair (in-kind) using Glen Gery Molded Series '53 -DD Spec Sand' or `250-M'.
Replace roof (in-kind), with Certainteed Highland Slate `black granite'; replacement of the house tower wall
material with Petersen Aluminum `matte black', replacement of the hose tower windows (in-kind) with wood
windows of the same size and configuration; install new gutters, downspouts, and flashing of copper. COA#2018-
0402 approved window replacement with new aluminum clad 1/1 double hung, fire egress casement, hose tower
fixed, restoring exterior wood moldings, replace garage doors with new steel bi-fold, replace passage doors with
new custom wood. COA#2018-0507E approved installation of 4' Elite decorative fencing with 4" space between
pickets, construct basement access, install 42" H black metal guardrail, construct 8' brick enclosure with steel
frame wood clad gate and door, install new steel door between enclosure and basement access, landscaping
including pavers, new concrete curbs and paver driveway.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "(4) new post lights — note I 1 on site plan; proposed cages for new condensing units" •
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
1. SITE
a. Lighting (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan and Sternberg sheet): Install four new Sternberg
Lighting, Tinley style, black finish fixtures with 5" square posts. Described by the
manufacturer as a large scale, dramatic Mission square edge design, featuring a tall, straight
four-sided decorative cast cage, a simple curved edge grille design, cast ballast housing
assembly, acrylic lens and a dramatic cantilever peaked roof design.
2. NORTH
a. Utility (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan and Post Guard sheet): Install new air conditioning
condenser units, for a total of four. Install Post Guard black air conditioning cages around each
unit to be set in concrete footers. Add loose gravel ground cover. Plant landscape screening
using arborvitae or similar plantings.
SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, CHAPIN PARK:
I. THE ENVIRONMENT
A. The District Environment
The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St. Joseph River,
Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the common areas of the district
(i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes).
Required
Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car thoroughfares.
The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as possible to their
architectural, historic and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district is required. Repair work to
fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever applicable. When utility work dictates •
the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete,
asphalt, fillers and similar materials shall not be used. All original streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View"
streetlights designed by Cutter Company for this neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood Association and the Historic
Preservation Commission to restore "Park View" streetlights to the district shall continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of
the Historic Preservation Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the
individual property and the surrounding environment and properties.
Recommended
The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns and tree lawns should remain open. New or
replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept landscaped appropriately while
vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary,
consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines.
Prohibited
Existing relationships of building and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or other
bituminous coverings or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways
and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or
barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be
used on main thoroughfares.
B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES
This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with
different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each
structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Park
will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Required
Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees
located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained.
A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure
or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damage or diseased trees should then be replaced with
an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall
be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed.
Recommended •
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and
newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front
yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause
structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as
planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A.
Prohibited
• No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before
evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots
nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial / commercial style fences.
The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where
they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible from a public street, or
ruled inappropriate after Commission review.
Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate
all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A.
E. MECHANICAL SERVICES
The majority of the structures within the district have oil or gas heat, and have brick chimneys through the roof. Some houses have one or
two window air conditioners.
Required
Required mechanical systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possible alteration of the structural integrity and
physical appearance of the building.
Recommended
Solar collectors and TV dishes should be placed in the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. Window air
conditioners and exhaust fans should be installed at the rear or an inconspicuous side window. Original lighting fixtures should be utilized
whenever possible.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, GROUP B LOCAL LANDMARKS:
The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a
historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate.
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and
upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B. Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re-
roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark.
A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it
significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of
. Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the
original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A
modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of
architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the
site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to
change or alter the following:
1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause
minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the
original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures
already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative,
documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of
the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the
landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed.
Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
(These standards apply to both A and B)
1. Required
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the
• property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as:
gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden
furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood
and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the
buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic •
documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials,
and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways,
outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard
areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as
TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as proposed projects conform to the Standards and
Guidelines.
Written by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
0
4 �ju
x
f
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
County -City Building, South Bend, IN 46601
http://www.southbendin.gov/government/departineiit/community-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Parc Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: LA WY -10- Application Number: — 0 (0 O
Past Reviews: 2 YES (Date of Last Review) Dri ❑ NO
Staff Approval authorized by:
Title:
Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: S. )\) n_e_ 11;? -1.1 Is
19"Local Landmark 191"Local Historic District (Name) � t n Cil f
-FINational Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name)
Certificate Of Appropriateness:
E] Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work: ID l Pt Mr1+ 6&-, Se, 1,V 4461&
(Street Number -,Street Name -City -Zip)
Name of Property Owner(s): jr N i✓" N X017 OE -TI (,A/ S"r VOW t) Phone #: Y-rk ` 7/ % 3/5"7
Address of Property Owner(s): s ?F tiwr d tz ` 1-0 S 14N &L &�1 CA 7402-32-
(Street
40Z3(Street Number -Street Name -City -Zip)
Name of Contractor(s):
Contractor Company Name: �% (a, G y n r rP .tit �1/ Ce iy rn 6"C ri vAl
Phone#: S7d-232"IZ0O
Address of Contractor Company: 2-3 1 T6 / 0-0 L,4 -,v0 Wil?
(Street Number --Street Name--City-:-Zip)
Current Use of Building:
A A/7 -
(Single
0
•
Type of Building Construction: 1410 0 7 F72 A -Ad 6- Wt TT/ AAA,-Tv.V K- V 4 f TC& L- 8 et4g;'-r/v 6- dr L 6rp"`` -rs
(Wood Fiame Brick--Ston"tteel-Concrete-Other)
Proposed Work: R1 In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition
(more than one box may be checked)
Description of Proposed Work: ( tl/6- e-0 S- : L r it 7-5 -- A(O7-C / / dA! Tf 7z;- ft-� `
(' R 0 P rdU CfiGLxS PDX AVG w f'orV01tr WTW & liru t � S
Owner e-mail: and/or Contractor
X and/or X
Signature of Owner Sig ture of Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable.
-APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE-
C
•
Elicia Feasel
From: Norrie Emmons <Norrie@hgchristmanconstruction.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 8:23 AM
To: Elicia Feasel
Cc: Acrowne (acrowne@gmail.com); Adam Toering
Subject: 701 Portage - Site lights and AC cage
Attachments: Sternberg Tinley post light.pdf, Post Guard AC Cage cut sheet.pdf
Elicia—
I've attached product info on the post lights and air conditioner cages. Make note:
• Post lights will be set on 5" square posts—selections for options are made with the red clouds.
• A revised site plan is attached to the AC cage cut sheet; we will keep the landscape screening intact from last
month's site plan.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Norrie Emmons
President
H.G. Christman Construction
23186 West Ireland Road
South Bend, IN 46614
574-232-9600 office
574-210-5931 cell
www.hgchristmanconstruction.com
LELAND AVE
®Q®®® O ®000®0000000 O O 0,00 0;00 000000
jar
it if gill pig I I I A al 1 9"11 �=
rs
om
� � m �—I J 'ofA e� ' coo N 0>
FO
D 2 z _ �
m : i :�� xCD
x _
t D
Z p (n OZ • o z boa aap o�c mr
z m z i r
F
•
•
prairie
matrix
0620 062OLED 0630 0630LED
Tinley II Tinley II Prairie II Prairie II
unru 0680 0680LED 0690 0690LED JV 1220
Mission II Artisan II Artisan II Homestead II Homestead II L Tinley
1230 123OLED 1240 1260
Prairie Prairie Paragon Craftsman
1270
Mission
PA130 PA230 RD130 RD230
• Prairie Area Lighter Prairie Area Lighter Prairie RD Prairie RD
10 1 Visit www.sternberglighting.com for more product details and LED updates
1280
Artisan
0660
Craftsman II
1220LED
Tinley
1290
Homestead
Sternber Li htin `-J4
9 9 9 Prairie Lighting Fixtures
ESTABLISHED 1923 / EMPLOYEE OWNED
GENERAL
Cast Aluminum
Roof and Body
The 1220 Tinley fixture is a large scale, dramatic Mission
NIGHTSKYO
squared edge design. It features a tall, straight four-sided
Roof optics
decorative cast cage, a simple curved edge grille design,
or Louver
optics
cast ballast housing assembly, acrylic lens and a dramatic
Available
cantilever peaked roof design. The roof shall be appointed
Type 3
with an aluminum ring finial.
or Type 5
Refractor
Available
POST FITTER
Arts! Crafts
The fitter or base shall be heavy wall cast aluminum, 356I ��-i and Mission
alloy for high tensile strength. It shall have an in -side dia- Design
meter opening to accept a 4", 5" or 6" square or round pole I o Photocell
(Optional)
or tenon. When ordered with a Sternberg aluminum pole, _ Post Fitter
the fitter shall be set screwed to the pole top or tenon.
BALLAST HOUSING EPA = 4.48 (ftz)
The ballast housing shall be heavy wall cast aluminum, WEIGHT = 53 LBS
356 alloy for high tensile strength. The housing shall be cast as an integral part of the fitter to
prevent water entry into the ballast compartment and to ensure high capacity heat sinking of bal-
last temperatures, keeping the ballast cooler and ensuring long life. The ballast mounting plate
shall be cast aluminum and provide tool -less removal from the housing using 2 ea finger latches.
ELECTRICAL
Fixture shall be U.L. or E.T.L. listed. H.I.D. ballasts shall be high power factor with lamp starting
down to —30 degrees C. Medium base and mogul base porcelain sockets are 4KV rated. The bal-
last/socket assembly shall be pre -wired when ballast is located in the fixture. All compact fluo-
rescent (PL) ballasts shall be instant start electronic with a starting temperature of down to 0
degrees F. They shall have a 4 -pin socket to accept quad or triple tube lamps. Ballasts shall be
DOE EISA compliant.
FIXTURE HOUSING
The 1220 fixture shall be 24" wide and the overall height shall be 37". It shall be made of heavy
wall cast aluminum, 356 alloy and lenses will be made of vandal resistant acrylic, available in
clear (CA), clear seeded (CSA), clear textured (CTA), prismatic (PA), white (WA) acrylic and art
glass (AGB). The 1220 fixture features a cast 12" wide window body with a simple curved edge
grille work design. The cast 24" square roof shall cantilever the fixture body and have a solid
aluminum soffit. The entire fixture shall be made of cast aluminum, 356 alloy.
OPTICAL OPTIONS
Refractors shall be 6"diameter borosilicate glass with an I.E.S. Type 3 (RE3) or Type 5 (RE5)
distribution. It shall be secured to the socket stem with 3/8" plated steel threaded pipe nipple and
rest on a cast aluminum holder with anti -shock gasket. The refractor will be secured to cast hold- •
er with a quarter -turn internal aluminum twist ring for ease of maintenance.
LIST NO. 1220 The NIGHTSKY®OPTI-SHIELD® Louver Optic System (LO) shall be a multi -tier reflector
TINLEY
SERIES with 7" diameter rings to produce an I.E.S. Cut-off Type 3 or 5 distribution. The Louver Optic 1_14
(Continiled on buck page)
SternbergLighting 1-�s
ESTABLISHED 1913 / EMPLOYEE OWNED
24"W 24° w 0 S4" RO
Roof Optics
1200 2, 3 or 5
N,
33" 37"
S5J1
S6"
L03
R6" RUG HSS FMC L05
1220 1220 Post Top RE5G House Side Frosted Mission Louver
w/ Post Fitter SIZES Refractor Shield Chimney Optics
CA s y CSA CTA PA WA AGB
Clearn Clear Clear Prismatic White Art Glass
Acrylic° Seeded Textured Acrylic Acrylic Brown
Acrylic Acrylic Marble
HCT Single Arm
;E-331, --)W;
47" 47"
HCT Twin Arm
F 72V ---�
HTPS Single Arm
HTPS Twin Arm
SPECIFY
75, OVERALL
g
IN 7INCHES
47112"--aDROP
-
1-14 HTPSWB Single Arm
HCH44 HSH44
Chain Hung Stem Hung
i
I
i
HSC
Single Arm
;•E--34Tie
HSC
Twin Arm
�..�.
63718
;
•�• -iEl
P1 PB
HSCWB Single Arm Pier Base
�I .I
SternbergLighting
ESTABLISHED 1923 / EMPLOYEE OWNED
POST & ARM FIXTURES
1--16
Prairie Lighting Specifications
CENTER
ARM MOUNTED FIXTURE POST TOP FIXTURE POST POST CAP LIGHT SOURCE OPTICS OPTIONS LENS FINISH
i (PT) BALLAST
NO.
OFARMS FIXTURE/POSTARM FIXT./FITTER (See Post Section) WATTS/TYPE/VOLTS
hi M — 12�0/ACT / PT/ 6SQ15 / SC / 00MH1'1241 / / PEC / .R'A / BKT
0
WALL FIXTURES PIER FIXTURES
LIGHT SOURCE OPTICS OPTIONS LENS FINISH Uses same information
FIXTURE I BALLAST boxes as wall fixture
WALL BRACKET WATTS/TYPE/VOLTS
d220!$TPSWB ' 1D4h4HP . 0° WA �. �K'<'
FIXTURE/ PIER BASE
FIXTURES
POST ARMS
WALL
BALLASTS 14
LAMPS`
• 1220
HCT single
BRACKET
• 35HPS'
• HPS35/MED
BKT Black Textured
FITTERS
• HCT twin
HTPS single
ARMS
• HTPSWB
• 50HPS
• 70HPS
• HPS50/MED
• HPS70/MED
• PGT Park Green Textured
.
• R3
HTPS twin
• HSAWB
• 100HPS
• HPS100/MED
• ABZT Architectural Medium
• R4
HSC single
• 150HPS
• HPS150/MED
Bronze Textured
• S4
HSC twin
PIER BASE
• 250HPS
• HPS250/MOG/ED18
•DBT Dark Bronze Textured
• R5
• P2PB
• 5OMHP
• MHP50/MED
*Smooth Finishes are available upon request
• S5
VOLTAGES
• 70MHP
• MHP70/MED
• 120
LENSES
• 10OMHP
• MHP100/MED
CUSTOM FINISHES
OPTICS
. 208
• CA
• 150MHP
. MHP150/MED
• OI Old Iron
• RE3
. 240
• CSA
• 175MHP5
• MHP175/MOG/BT285
• RT Rust
• RE5
. 277
•CTA
200MHP
MHP200/MOG/ED28
WBR Weathered Brown
. CD Cedar
• HSS
. 480
• PA
• 250MHP
. MHP250/MOG/ED28
WBK Weathered Black
• FMC2
• MULTI
• WA
• TT Two Tone
• L03
(120-277)
• AGB
STERNBERG SELECT
• R022
HANGING
FINISHES
• R032
BRACKETS
• VG Verde Green
• R052
HCH44
• SI Swedish Iron
• HSH44
• OWGT Old World Gray
Textured
OPTIONS.
• PEC Photocell -Electronic 120-277 Volt
• FHS Single Fuse and Holder -120,277 Volt
• FHD Dual Fuse and Holder -208,240,480V
• QR Quartz Re -Strike
• LAMPS Select from List
NOTES:
1 35HPS is 120 volt only.
2MED base only when used to
house lamp. Consult factory if roof
optic is required for mogul base
lamp.
3 Medium base sockets standard
With ballasts up to 150 watts for HID
Mogul base sockets are standard
With ballasts 175 watts and over.
4 -pin for PL.
4 Metal halide systems are pulse start.
b Consult factory for limitations.
Stern b e rg L i g h t i ng 555 Lawrence Ave. Roselle, IL 60172.847-588-3400 • Fax 847-588-3440
ESTABLISHED 1923 / EMPLOYEE OWNED www. sternberglighting.com Email: info@sternberglighting.com 1-14
•
0
FIL
§�
n
f4
«��yl
../gym
§
w
$
n
.C�o
8���
Mko
�k=rB
.
CO3
m
§ .
ca
§
o
-'0-
G
OR
§
K
§
wpm
Ln0
2
$
n
o=
L7
7 [
B
0
d
�
�\
42
0 �
2.
EB
m
CLƒe
-■
M
Q. o
"
kr
n
�
§
|
.
`
n
"N
r
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 6, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0604A
Property Location: 503 Riverside Drive
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: N/A
Property Owner: Larry Schohl
Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Local Historic District (#8308-92)
Rating: N/A (demolished structure formerly rated Contributing)
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: This lot on Riverside Drive is the southernmost edge of the River
Bend Local Historic District, and acts as the side yard to 507 Riverside Drive. There is a concrete paddock
accessible from the alley at the rear of the property, with a privacy fence shielding the parking area from Riverside
Drive.
ALTERATIONS: COA #2010-0907A allowed for the demolition of the rated house and preparation of the site for
eventual reconstruction. The previous structure had experienced foundation failure allegedly due to the existence
of a mill race that flowed through this location in the early 19t` century.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "New wood fence — Dog-eared fence, 6' x 8' panels, 10 panels all together"
From e-mail correspondence with the applicant: "[T]he fence is going to be dogear with 10 premade
•panels. It is going to be 12 inches off of the ground and 3 ft from [neighbor's] existing fence. It is only
going to go across the side yard. "
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for
improvements on the structure including:
1. Installation of ten 6' x 8' dog-eared fence panels along the southwest edge of the vacant lot. The
panels will be mounted 12" off the ground.
The fence will act as a privacy barrier between this lot and the neighboring lot to the south west which is outside of
the Historic District. The neighboring lot is slightly above the desired fence area.
The applicant's original contractor has backed out of the project, so either a) a new contractor will be selected, or b)
the applicant will execute the project themselves.
SITE VISIT REPORT: N/A
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: River Bend Local Historic District Standards and Guidelines
I. THE ENVIRONMENT
A. IN THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT
The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and its location adjacent to Leeper Park and along the St. Joseph
River. The district encompasses: two blocks of Riverside Drive beginning at Marion Street (from 503 Riverside Drive north) and ending at
Bartlett Street; two lots on the north side of Navarre street just west of the alley behind Riverside Drive; the north side of Hammond Place;
the east side of St. Joseph Street between Hammond Place and Bartlett Street; and the south side of Bartlett Street between St. Joseph and
• Riverside Drive. The District contains 45 residences and their adjacent outbuildings.
Required
Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets, alleys and building setbacks shall be
retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the
neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination
Engineering Society. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar
in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix). Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded •
all sections of the public sidewalks. Removal of shade trees over twelve inches (12") diameter, conifer trees over six inches (6") in diameter
or other major plant elements shall be subject to approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. Any subsequent replacement trees of any
size required by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be retained. The Riverfront character of the district shall be retained.
B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES
Required
Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and
development shall be retained.
Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and
newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory
structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and
appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be
removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission.
Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements
before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking
lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the
property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare.
The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from
the public thoroughfare.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed fence is recommended for approval.
Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel •
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
C.
Figure I - 503 Riverside Drive, viewed from the roadway.
Figure 2 - 503 Riverside Drive, looking from the alley towards the street.
•
•
Figure 3 - Representation of proposed dog-eared fence.
6/4/2018
Go-, le Maps 503 Riverside Dr
503 Riverside Dr - Google Maps
Go
503 Riverside Dr
South Bend, IN 46601
•
Y^
Map data 02018 Google 20 ft
httpsJ/www.google.comlmapslplacel503+Riverside+Dr,+South+Bend,+I N+466011@41.6822053,-86.2478047,21 z/data=!4m5!3m4! 1 sOx8816cd48f5877279:Ox9d8gi
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 7, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0605
Property Location: 608 Park Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/ 1910
Property Owner: Stu Harrison
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: 608 Park is a two story American foursquare set upon a brick
foundation. The exterior walls of the house are wood shingles with a bell flare at the lower course. The low pitch
hip roof has wide soffit overhang and molded cornice and is covered with asphalt shingles. There is a full width
front porch with shed roof. The porch has square supports with capitals, wood shingle solid railing, brackets at the
eaves and molded fascia. The windows a wood double hung 9/1 on the second and first floors; a fixed triple panel
window at the front. Most of the windows on the first floor have original wood storms. There are aluminum
storms on some of the second floor windows. There are 3/3 double hung at the basement level a fixed 6 light in the
basement and several fixed 3 light in the foundation level.
ALTERATIONS: The storm door is not original to the house. The window shutters were added before 1987.
The aluminum storm windows and the asphalt roof material are replacements. COA #2009-0109 allowed for the
installation of a temporary handicap ramp on the front doorstep. COA #2017-0720 allowed for the replacement of
• rotted wood on the front porch and back porch. COA #2017-0829 allowed for the relaying of brick of the chimney,
the columns, and the foundation. Multiple non -original windows exist, it is unknown when these were installed.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "See attachment."
"Installing Quaker Windows"
"Homeowner is desiring all functional, safe, and matching windows that would keep with the historical pattern of
the home."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
replacement of 10 windows (five double hung windows and five casement windows) with Quaker Classic Fit Series
aluminum clad windows. None of the windows to be replaced directly face the street.
The applicant has included their assessments of the windows with their application. They are also contacting
window restoration professionals for their estimates on whether the original windows could be rehabilitated, and
what that would cost.
Window distribution, size, and provenance as follows:
1.
North face window, corresponding to the interior stairwell.
a. 26" x 27 'h"
2.
North face window
a. 25 3/4" x 27 ''/2"
3.
North face window
a. 29 3/4" x 45 ''/z"
4.
North face window
•
a. 29 3/4" x 45 ''h"
5.
East face window
a. 23 3/4" x 45 ''h"
6.
East face window — casement window, facing the rear of the property.
a. 23'/4"x28
b. Preservation Inspector believes this casement window to be non -original.
7. East face window — casement window, facing the rear of the property.
a. 23 '/4" x 28
b. Preservation Inspector believes this casement window to be non -original.
8. East face window — casement window, facing the rear of the property.
a. 23'/4"x28
b. Preservation Inspector believes this casement window to be non -original.
9. South face window
a. 36" x 59"
b. Non -original vinyl window.
10. South face window
a. 36" x 59"
b. Non -original vinyl window.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
On April 30, 2018 I met with the owner of the property located at 608 Park. The owner applied to replace
windows on the first level of the house. The windows have a nine over one double -hung and either nine or twelve -
light fixed or casement style windows.
The double hung windows on the south side (right side when looking at front of house) are non -original
replacement windows with false grids.
The front (west) window is a vinyl replacement three bay casement window that the owner would like to
replace at a later date.
The rear (east) face has a three bay, nine light casement window unit. These are wood, but I do not believe
to be original, as they have a veneer of wood finish that is peeling off.
The north side has a twelve -light original fixed window, two nine light original casement windows, and
two original nine over one double hung windows with textured glass at the far end.
None of the windows appear to be deteriorated beyond repair. They all need work in order to be operable, •
although the secured -in-place exterior storms make that task difficult. The two nine light casements on the north
face have had some remodeling done in between by way of a closed doorway and a removed staircase. Water
damage from above has damaged some plaster and may have caused those windows to be out of square. The two
textured windows toward the rear are painted and and fastened shut. I believe the motivation behind the desire to
change the windows is efficiency and ease of use. The distance between the property and the neighbors on both
side make the sides of the house difficult to see from the street.
Steve Szaday
Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
General Definitions
(B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
(b2) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED)
Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation would not
require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are incompatible with the
defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would not require the duplication of the
original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and the district's defined elements of
preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be encouraged, but contemporary methods and
materials would be acceptable when compatible.
II. EXISTING STRUCTURES
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some
instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material.
Required
Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair,
cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of
the same design when deteriorated beyond repair.
Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to
remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle
brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is
missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of
application and joint profile.
When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and
• underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early
disintegration of the repair work and the original work.
Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from
moisture and insects.
Recommended
Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible,
aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the
original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables, eaves and other architectural
features.
Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration
or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source
of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like.
Prohibited
Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as
artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles.
Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This
method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration.
Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building
material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic
masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick.
Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces
by any means that damage the surface.
Not Recommended
Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a
specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of
the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed.
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with
wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window
and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm
• windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and
hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
0
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If
new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are
used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff would divide the components of this application into two categories: 1) the
replacement of non -original windows with Quaker Classic Fit Series Windows, and 2) the replacement of original
windows with Quaker Classic Fit Series windows.
The replacement of the non -original windows on the South and East side is received favorably by Staff, and is
therefore recommended for approval.
The replacement of the original windows is considered less favorably, and staff would recommend that they be
rehabilitated. In the event that the rehabilitation of the windows is not financially viable or physically possible,
staff would recommend that those windows be replaced by Quaker Classic Fit Series units.
Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Site Visit — Photos
Figure I - 608 Park Avenue from the street, April 30, 2018
•
U
•
•
•
•
Figure 2 - 608 Park, north face. Window #1, #2, 93, and #4 are visible.
Figure 3 - window #2
Figure 4 - window #31 parts of window #4
Figure 5 - Window #5
LJ
U
L'
•
•
•
Figure 6 — Windows #6, #7, #8
Figure 7 — veneer
Figure 8 — Peeling veneer
Figure 10 — Window 9 Figure 11— Window 10
L J
•
0
•
•
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
County�ity Building, South Bend, IN 46601
http://www.southbendin.gov/goveniment/depariment/community-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLYS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: 0(o 0 ?-Ol s Application Number: —
Past Reviews: n YES (Date ojLast Review) ❑ NO
Staff Approval authorized by:
Historic Preservation Commission Review Date:
❑ Local Landmark
❑ National Landmark
Certificate Of Appropriateness:
R Denied ❑ Tabled
Title:
Local Historic District (Name) �, 1 P r L-
National Register District (Name), :,n "•. 1'��' `-
❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work: (q o c ��<-k A V P, &7 —& r� ,
(Street Number—Street Name—City Zip)
Name of Property Owner(s): - IL a (�- )-\-a C r r Sven Phone #:
Address of Property Owner(s): (0 O
Name of Contractor(s): �So w, r�-� cl.O t CN Phone #: B % 4 - -&O AS--�17a-7
Contractor Company Name: Uce_n 6�"-u_ �tnn c�r��j res r h
Address of Contractor Company: a N O
Current Use of Building:
(Single
YYl 0'r rs i YAC k-�6 ye-
(StreetNumber—Stre Name—City—Zip)
'scant—etc)
Type of Building Construction: -Ct' C. rv-sX—
(Wood Frame Brick-StoneSteel--Concrete—Other)
Proposed Work: (more than one ❑ Landscape ❑ New o eplacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition
box may be checked)
Description of Proposed Work: SA -v- CIS AAq-(+sT1"4.gyNi
�C{�.Cs�` �� S
.Owner a -mail: '50SA �,1"i ani—) q-0 / andkor Contractor s -mail: 61 a.LA y�Cxxpv- J- G dl) -(Om
X and/or X
Signature of Owner snatfifeof Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable.
� rrr rir � mi��T i.r�>•rrrsr+s.-r.�rmn � �+ra �' TL'mTT AI.T TT�TT.1T [tT nrr. i.
Installing Quaker Windows .
Window #1 North Side of house
Window is on the landing of the stairs.
Homeowners are requesting the window to be replaced with tempered glass to
bring up to safety code.
Window #2 North side of house
Glass is broken and grids are damaged.
Window #3 & #4 North side of house
Window has frosted tape over all the glass.
Caulked and painted shut and the weights are cut.
Windows do not open at all.
Window #5 East Wall .
Window is Calked and Painted and weights are cut.
Wood of window is starting to rot
Window do not open at all
Windows #6, #7, #8 East Side of house
Rotting wood on all these windows
Swollen wood causing windows to not open
Hinges are rusted out
Found PVC Tape all over the window that is heavily glued
Windows #9, #10 South Side of house
Windows have been replaced with vinyl windows
Recommending replacing windows to bring up to historical code
"'Homeowner is desiring all functional, safe and matching windows that would
keep with the historical pattern of the home. •
.313 /43 Hoover 608
Quote 0: SQJMF000058 1
Line Label Quantity UOM Part -Number Unit Extended
1 1 EA
Quaker Unit
Series: Classic Fit (Pocket Window) B
Exact Size: 26 X 27 1/2 Outer Perimeter: 26 X 27 1/2 i �`sb-
i
IfAl
Color:White,Paint Type:2604,1nterior Finish:Natural Finish,
Glass:Energy8asic (Dual Silver),Tempered,Argon Filled,Muntin:5DL-7/8" MBG -916,
Depth:4 3/4" Overall Depth - 3 1/4" Pocket Depth,Ext. Casing16040 Trim Kit,Ext. Subsi1116040 Trim Kit,
Unit.1-Double Hung Fixed Direct Set Exact Size: 26 X 271/2,
NFRC - U-Factor:0.28SHGC:0.32VT:0.56AL::50.3
Rating: DP -50
Fixed Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DS8 - Stnd - Cardinal / Clear - DSB,Strength:Tempered Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Overall Rating: DP -50
l 3 EA Quaker Unit
Series: Classic Fit (Pocket Window)
(' Exact Size: 23 1/4 X 28 Outer Perimeter: 23 1/4 X 28
J U Color.White,Paint Type:2604,lnter�or Finish:Natural Finish,
Glass:EnergyBasic (Dual Silver),Argon Filled,MuntinSDL-7/8" MBG -916,
Depth:4 3/4" Overall Depth - 31/4" Pocket Depth,Ext. Casing16040 Trim Kit,Ext. Subs11116040 Trim Kit,
• Unit:i-Double Hung Fixed Sash Set Exact Size: 23 1/4 X 28,
NFRC- U-Factor:0.285HGC:0.32VT:0.56AL:<0.3
Rating: LC -50
Fixed Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Stnd - Cardinal / Clear - DSB,Strength:Annealed Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Overall Rating: DP -50
C
2 EA Quaker Unit
Series: Classic Fit (Pocket Window)
Exact Size: 36 X 59 Outer Perimeter: 36 X 59
Color:White,PaintType:2604,InteriorFinish:Natural Finish,
Glass:Energy8asic (Dual Sliver),Argon Filled,Muntin:SDL-7/8" MBG -916,
`
Hardware:Gold,Sash:Sweep Lock,
Iamb Liner:Beige,
x
Screen:Full Screen,Material:Better View (TM),Ship:Screen With Product,
Depth:4 3/4" Overall Depth - 3 1/4" Pocket Depth,Ext, Casing16040 Trim Kit,Ext. Subsi1116040 Trim Kit,
Unit:1-Double Hung w/ Plough Exact Size: 36 X 59,NOT Egress,
NFRC - U-Factor:0.31SHGC:0.25VT:0.42AL:50.3
Rating: R-50
Top Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Stnd - Cardinal / Clear - DSB,5trength:Anneaied Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Bottom Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Stnd - Cardinal / Clear - DSB,Strength:Annealed Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Overall Rating: DP -50
Page 2 of 4
r/
Quote Name: 08#0313743 Hoover 608 Quote b: SQJMF000058_t
4 1 EA
Quaker Unit
-0:- 1
Series: Classic Fit (Pocket Window)
Exact Size: 25 3/4 X 271/2 Outer Perimeter. 25 3/4 X 271/2
j
Calor:White,PaintType:2604,InteriorFinish:PrimedFinish,
Glass:EnergyBasic (Dual Silver),Argon Filled,Muntin:SDL-7/8" MBG -916,
Depth:4 3/4" Overall Depth - 3 1/4" Pocket Depth,Ext. Casing16040 Trim Kit,Ext. Subsi1116040 Trim Kit,
Unit:1-Double Hung Fixed Sash Set Exact Size- 25 3/4 X 271/2, 1".A
NFRC - U-Factor:0.28SHGC:0.32VT.O.56AL:50.3
Rating: LC -50
Fixed Giass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Sind - Cardinal / Clear - DSB,Strength:Annealed Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Overall Rating: DP -50
2 EA Quaker Unit
Series: Classic Fit (Pocket Window)
Exact Size: 29 3/4 X 45 1/2 Outer Perimeter: 29 3/4 X 45 1/2
Color.White,Paint Type:2604,interior Finish -Primed Finish,
Glass:EnergyBasic (Dual Silver),Argon FIIIed,Muntin:SDL--7/8" MBG -916,
L' Hardware:Gold,Sash:Sweep Lock,
3� T JambLiner.Beige,
Screen:Fuii Screen,Materiai:Better View (TM),Ship:Screen With Product,
Depth:4 3/4" Overall Depth -31/4" Pocket Depth,Ext. Casing16040 Trim Kit,Ext. Subsi1116040 Trim Kit,
Unit:1-Double Hung w/ plough Exact Size: 25 d/4 X v5 1/2.NGT Eeress.
NFRC - U-Factor:0.31SHGC:0.25Vr:0.42AL:<0.3
Rating: R-50
Top Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Stnd - Cardinal / Clear - DSB,Strength:Annealed Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Bottom Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Sind - Cardinal / Clear - DSB Strength:Annealed Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Overall Rating: DP -50
C 1 EA Quaker Unit
Series: Classic Fit (Pocket Window)
Enact Size: 23 3/4 X 451/2 Outer Perimeter: 23 3/4 X 45 1/2 f
COIor:White,Paint Type:2604,lnterior Flnish:Primed Finish,
S I I G`� i♦ Glass:EnergyBasic (Dual Silver),Argon Filled,Munfin:SDL-7/8"MBG-916,
L Hardware.Gold,Sash:Stvee,p Lock,
Jamb Liner.Beige,
Screen:Full Screen,Material:Better View (TM),Ship:Screen With Product,
Depth:4 3/4" Overall Depth - 3 1/4" Pocket Depth,Ext. Casing16040 Trim Kit,Ext. Subsi1116040 Trim Kit,
Unit:1-Double Hung w/ Plough Exact Size: 23 3/4 X 451/2,NOT Egress
NFRC - U-Factor:0.31SHGC:0.2SVi:0.42AL:10.3 .
Rating: R -SO
Top Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Sind - Cardinal / Clear- DSB,Strength:Annealed Glass
Muntin Spacing From Edge of Glass: 4"
Bottom Glass:LowE (Dual Silver) - DSB - Stnd - Cardinal'Clear - DSB,Strength:Annealed Glass
le
M
Page 3 of 4
•
Quaker Classic Fit Series Windows
• Material aluminum exterior
• Wood interior
• Top sash has historical 9 -pattern grid
• Divided lights
• Grids are aluminum exterior and wood interior
• Insulated windows
0
REPLACING YOUR OLD WOOD WINDOWS WITH
NEW WOOD WINDOWS IS NO LONGER OUT OF THE QUESTION.
x
Quaker's wood clad replacement w�inklows, i hc Classic I �it"'Scrics &I I istoric
Fit" Scrics, arc a triumphant blend of illlegilmrivc and diNvi-se (Icsign, rcilliled
with an ahsoturc demand for enenY-cificiency. Truly the perfect fit it
0
Practical Glass & More, Inc.
6749 S Westnedge Ave,Ste K
*mage, MI 49002
Name I Address I
Julie Rios
608 Park Ave
South Bend, Indiana
claytonhooverl@gmaii.com
574-298-1032
Estimate
Date
Estimate #
6/15/2018
1
Project
Description
Qty
Rate
Total
new glass for downstairs windows
985.82
985.82
rope and putty
90.26
90.26
labor
6,450.00
6,450.00
old glass used $ 2,191.56 labor and material are the same fora
tal of $ 8,761.82
Estimate good for thirty days
1/2 down to start job, balance due upon completion
cash, check and credit cards accepted
Total $7,526.08
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: June 12, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0608
Property Location: 24888 Cleveland Road
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Greek Revival / 1850-1870 / "Aaron N. Miller Farm"
Property Owner: Thomas and Sandra Martin
Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance #55-1975
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The site of the Local Landmark at 24888 Old Cleveland Road
originally comprised 32.70 acres encompassing the historic Aaron N. Miller farm. The property has been
subsequently subdivided into two parcels: the Miller farmstead is now included in a 10 acre rectangular tract of
land (tax key #04-1020-0328, owned by Thomas and Sandra Martin), while the remainder of the landmarked
property is on an irregular parcel of land comprising 22.70 acres (tax key #04-1020-032802, owned by James and
Barbara Kidder). The terrain is rolling and includes what is rumored to be the highest point in German Township.
The majority of the original 32.70 acres is wooded.
The circa 1855 t -plan house with later additions sits closest to Old Cleveland Road, with the barn and four ancillary
agricultural buildings to the south, including the visually prominent multi -story barn built into the rising
topography. The ancillary farm buildings have board -and -batten exterior walls and are sited on fieldstone
foundations.
• To the west of the farmstead is a section of land that has low brush and is concealed from Old Cleveland Road by
an approximately 50' deep grove of trees running parallel to the road. South of this grove of trees are fenced
enclosures for the horses and garden patches. A natural draw (draining towards Old Cleveland Road) separates this
land from the main farmstead area. This terrain rises to the south and west, before cresting and falling away
beyond the property boundary. The 1875 St. Joseph County Atlas image of the A. N. Miller farm shows a three-
story barn stood on this western plot.
The area across Old Cleveland Road to the north has been extensively developed into industrial warehouses and
distribution centers.
ALTERATIONS: A previous multi -story barn was removed prior to 1900. COA #1994-0321 allowed for the
replacement of the pea gravel driveway with one of paving brick. COA #1996-0319 allowed for the construction of
a wood board fence as indicated in the 1875 atlas image.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "150 x 60 Riding Arena and workshop on the west side of our property. Need horse
stalls tall enough for horses. Present historic barn has low ceilings on ground level. Horses hit heads on lights.
Will provide landscaping and trees (apple, pine, flowering). Color will be grey to blend with house."
From e-mail correspondence:
"The building will be 14 feet tall, 150 x 60. Color will be gray with white trim, steel construction. Windows will be
standard size, with mutton's similar to house, white trim, like the house. Yes, we will have a concrete footer, and
foundation in part of the building but certainly not in the riding arena. The design will be as drawn, the main
purpose is an indoor riding arena, and needs to be a large open building. We do not have manufacture specs, they
build to our needs, will try to get something before the meeting. Would like to get this project started to use it as
• intended, for riding and training my Ponies to pull a cart in a safe confined area. Please let me know when the
meeting is so we can plan to attend, and we will be able to address any additional concerns at that time."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for the
construction of a 150' x 60' enclosed riding arena and workshop area. The structure would be sited on the western
portion of the Martin's parcel, parallel to the street, concealed by landscaping, and built into the topography as it 40
rises to the west. The erection of the structure would be executed by AERS Construction of Wolcottville, IN, who
specialize in building metal farm buildings.
An approximation of the design of the building provided by AERS Construction is attached for contextual
reference. NOTE: This is not the final design, but a facsimile created by AERS Construction at the request of the
HPC staff for this meeting. Final design documents have not yet been created. Per the submitted initial designs,
the exterior cladding of the structure would be vertical metal siding. Windows and doors to be determined.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
Historic Preservation Specialist Adam Toering and Historic Preservation Inspector Steve Szaday made a site visit
on Monday, June 4t' to discuss the project and survey the proposed area. Both staff members expressed concern to
the property owner regarding the lack of information in the application, and fear that the project may be received
unfavorably by the Commission. The property owner expressed the desire to continue with the application after
hearing the concerns of both Historic Preservation staff members.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmark Group B
The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a
historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate.
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and
upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B. Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re-
roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark.
A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it
significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of •
Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the
original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A
modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples
of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall
appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions.
Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to
cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as
the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional
siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original
when renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative,
documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of
the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the
landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Sisns
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed.
Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
(These standards apply to both A and B)
1. Required •
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the
property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as:
gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden
furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood
and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the
buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials,
and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways,
outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard
areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV
reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff approves of the overall concept of this project, although the particulars of
its execution remain to be determined. Historic record indicates the presence of a multi -story barn at the intended
location, although the proposed single -story design does not mimic the former structure. Considerable natural
concealment exists to hide the proposed structure from Old Cleveland Road, and the property owners have
expressed interest in planting additional trees to further conceal and separate the proposed structure from the main
farmstead.
Staff are understanding of the importance of the continued and evolving use of historic farms, and that the existing
structures may not be best suited for 21St century purposes.
Staff recommends that the project be given a preliminary approval (indicating support for the overall concept of
constructing a new structure at the proposed site) with the following conditions:
1) That the applicant would...
a. engage a licensed architect to prepare a comprehensive site plan for the grounds around the
proposed structure, detailing new paths and plantings to ensure that the structure remains
obscured from the main farmstead and street,
b. consider taking design cues from the extant historical record of the previous structure that
stood at this site and attempt to include / replicate those features in the new structure,
c. finalize construction plans for the structure, including materials (fixtures, windows, doors, roof,
and foundation).
2) Having prepared this new information, the applicant would return to the Historic Preservation
Commission and present their completed construction and site plan for final approval.
Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
Figure I — The farmhouse at 24888 Old Cleveland Road, looking to the southwest from the driveway.
Figure 2 - The 1880 barn, looking south-southwest from Old Cleveland Road.
•
s
•
C,
•
Figure 4 - Looking west from alongside the garden enclosure. Old Cleveland Road is hidden behind the trees to the right.
Figure 6 - Looking east back towards the farmstead.
•
C.I
•
•
C,
•
•
•
MAY 0 7 2018
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION gee ND
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
Count) City Building, South Bend, IN 46601
http://www.soudibendin.gov/govemment/department/community-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021,
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
MA (qAq fay.
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received: ``d Application Number: 2L 14) — 0606
Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO
Staff Approval authorized by:
Historic Preservation ommission Review Date:
L Local Landmark
❑ National Landmark
Certificate Of App ro rlateness:
f Denied ❑ Tabled
Title:
❑ Local Historic District (Name) _
❑ National Register District (Name)
❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work: tc If'VE l R V'Ac1 kcac( �DU` 1 Banca Ti(.,i z*64 9
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of Property Owner(s):7h0ma3, �cendg',:�AaA i Phone #: 7q –q5 of – 84,16
Address of Property Owner(s):o`iS$ C')ev1Z(av)dl RJ- 'cerci% >C�
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of Contractor(s): (�n5 � ru.c h oyl Phone #: . �Q.O % �' �� 149"
Contractor Company Name:
Address of Contractor Company: o y y�b S. Vyo� Cott' / l lie.. 1 i\ LA(079s
(Street Number --Street Name—City-Zip)
Current Use of Building: O)D bArrg^1 \ou 11 11 F13- UV er CA COLA '% �" ekcx 1 t'�-"Vt%)o %S .
(Single Family—Multi Family--Commercial—Government—Industrial—1
Type of Building Construction Pole. -ut 1C)l n
ood Fi•ame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other)
Proposed Work: ❑In -Kind ❑ Landscape D9 New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind)
(more than one box may be checked)
Description of Proposed Work: ��� �O� r ATI VWL u V\A WL)171% SVkC>OV)
�,� C�.tc ncespza-Fv. N!�� hof�� S�a.tly 'lz�tt �sr�ucin, 4�rtnQrS�s. 1`GsevrR �l�;
❑ Demolition
i C WZ j f 1Nt� • -10Wer i v 'o 10r, 11 a hex
•Ownere-mail: J �t` re 5g1(e ' (a? q tract r 1 r GJVt and/or Contractor e-mail: Gi er5 e ('ye e en, ',1 . Corn
Xand/or X
Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable.
A ""T IrdN A TTd%WT A TT T TCITTT\ AAT CT71T
Adam Toeri
From: Sandra Martin <r2d2five@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 6:47 PM
To: Adam Toering
Subject: Re: 24888 Cleveland Road
We were on vacation last week. The building will be 14 feet tall, 150 x60. Color will be gray with white trim, steel
construction. Windows will be standard size, with mutton's similar to house, white trim, like the house. Yes we will have
a concrete footer, and foundation in part of the building but certainly not in the riding arena. The design will be as
drawn, the main purpose is an indoor riding arena, and needs to be a large open building. We do not have manufacture
specs, they build to our needs, will try to get something before the meeting. Would like to get this project started to use
it as intended, for riding and training my Ponies to pull a cart in a safe confined area. Please let me know when the
meeting is so we can plan to attend, and we will be able to address any additional concerns at that time. Thank you.
On Tuesday, May 8, 2018, Adam Toering <atoering southbendin.goy> wrote:
Thomas, Sandra, et al —
I had talked with Sandra in early April about your proposed project, and we had discussed the application process and
the particulars of your landmark property's status. I received your application yesterday— I'm sorry I wasn't able to .
meet with you directly when you dropped it off, but I wanted to touch base with you regarding your submitted
documents. As Staff to the Historic Preservation Commission, my role is to prepare a staff report for submission to the
Commission for their review and decision on your proposed project. The following questions are to add clarity for that
report to provide context for the Commissioners in their decision-making process. I will admit, I don't always know
which way the Commission will vote, but I like to think I have a good idea on what questions they are most likely to ask,
and what their concerns might be.
The Commission's role, however, is to ensure that the new construction is sympathetic to the existing structures, and
appropriate to exist in the context of the landmarked site. They will, as I stated earlier, have difficult questions.
1. Is there a modular/pole barn construction design that you are styling the structure after?
2. Are there design documents / manufacturer's specs?
3. What material will the pole barn be constructed out of?
4. What will the enclosures or windows look like?
5. Will it have a concrete foundation?
6. How tall will the intended structure be?
I encourage you to be as detailed as possible with your application paperwork. As I repeatedly say, "Error on the side •
of too much information." As I said to Sandra, building new construction on historic landmark properties is totally
'doable: I trust that you will construct a beautiful, functional structure. The Staff here fully understand that the
•
ti
0
'modern' owners of historic structures must be able to utilize and 'live-in' the context of their landmarked
property. These properties are not museum pieces — they are homes and businesses.
The deadline for the May 22nd meeting was yesterday, May 7th. Your application was received before the end of
business on that day, however, I do not have enough information at this time to submit what the Commission would
consider a 'complete application' for their review. If we are able to receive additional material this week, we maybe
able to add this project onto the (already long) agenda. If not, I can envision hearing this project on the June
docket. My experience with the Commission is that they deny applications with too little information — it would be
better to delay to the June meeting than be denied in May and forced to reapply for June.
Please contact me with any questions or concerns. I am available for consultations and office visits at your
convenience!
PS — I hope I have entered Thomas' e-mail correctly — I used ItiresellerOgmail.com — I couldn't tell if it was
ltireseller@amail.com . Sandra, please forward accordingly if I have it wrong!
PPS — I have included AERS Construction, as well as Elicia Feasel (Historic Preservation Administrator) on this exchange.
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Department of Community Investment
(574) 235-7478
atoering@southbendin.gov
City of South Bend
227 W. Jefferson Blvd., Ste. 1400
South Bend, IN 46601
IMPORTANT NOTICE! This E -Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying
or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E -Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly
prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E -Mail in error
please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E -Mail address. Please note that incoming e-mails are not
routinely screened for response deadlines, and as such, please notify the sender separately by fax of any message
containing deadlines. In addition, E -Mail information cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error -free as information
could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain virus. Therefore, the sender does
not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a consequence of E -Mail
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard -copy version.
0610812018 09:45
(FAX) P.0011009
atoeringsouthaendin.gov
Phone -768-8145
Fa_0-499*1
ON ADAM; Frt
Fax: date: -18
Rl: cc:
IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED OR ????..IE NOT CALL ME AT 260-499-0040
0
0610812018 09:45
•
0
TAX) P.0021009
atoGrin .-Oso-uth-be:n:din,.goar
sow
o a
0610812018 09:45
(FAX)
atooring-@,South-b.end in.g:Ov
o►®
P.0031009
0
49
0610812018 09:45 (FAX) 8.0041009
ato rin - out,hbend-inisov
C:
0
ul,
0610812018 09:46 TAX) P.0051009
at . South, bend-in.90v,
1.4 II
i'
�'i
r-�
u
u
0
0610812018 09:46 TAX) P.0061009
•
ri
atoerfnoasouttrw h d in-igov
K a
• / I 1-1/8-
� � s i� 5• r e� a� a• x x' a
ash
F Mo
;JIM
JZCD a
m
0610812018 09:46
H,
9E
(FAR) P.0071009
•
0
0610812018 09:47 (FAX) P.0081409
atperlng . outh-ben.din.gtov
•
-b
19
il
0610812018 09:47
TAX)
agd :4E ea9
i
P.0091009
i
•
•
STAFF REPORT
• CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 13 June 2018
Application Number: 2018-0613
Property Location: 504 East LaSalle Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate/Neoclassical/1900/1924/J.C. Lauber Company
Property Owner: Greater Lowell Holdings, LLC
Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance #7591-1986; National Register East Bank
Multiple Property Listing
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The J.C. Lauber Company building is described in the National
Register listing as a unique example of the Commercial -Functional style of architecture that combines utility with
ornament. The structure is comprised of several additions with the primary LaSalle Street facing constructed as a
one-story, rectangular -plan, commercial building with a foundation of concrete and rubble, walls are brick and
block. A metal cornice stretches seventy feet across the fagade. Roof is flat. LaSalle Street fagade features
modillions on ends of dentilled cornice with scroll end brackets. The front elevation has a strong horizontal
emphasis. Windows are divided into nine bays and are wood framed, fixed plate glass with solid transoms above.
Front entrance is a wood double door with glass. The 1924 addition, directly behind the 1900 building, is a one-
story, rectangular -plan, constructed of concrete block, with a flat roof. Windows are metal with multi -panels. The
rear of the building is organized by multiple additions and incorporate various garage doors. Signage exists on all
sides, both attached to and painted directly on the structure, reflecting different eras of the former J.C. Lauber
business.
• ALTERATIONS: COA 2005-1031 approved demolition of portion of building constructed in 1882 at northwest
corner of LaSalle and Niles. COA 2006-0413 approved reinstallation of J.C. Lauber Sheet Metal sign, formerly on
west side of 1882 portion of building. COA 2016-1128 to demolish 5,000 sq. ft. building was not executed.
Retroactive approval of 1801.f. of commercial grade ornamental aluminum fence enclosing northwest corner.
APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached plans by John Werntz dated June 6, 2018. An application was made and
conditionally approved at the April 16'b meeting of the HPC. The only exterior changes made since that date are the
West elevation whereby the plans now call for the installation of overhead doors in lieu of a double glass door and
Three (3) windows as previously submitted.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
1. West (Nile) fagade
Install new openings on west wall. One single door full glass panel aluminum with bronze finish was
previously approved. Install three new overhead doors with full glass panel aluminum with bronze finish to
match all others. This was originally an interior wall. The Structural Engineer recommends installing
openings in between interior structural columns to maintain the integrity of the elevation to protect the wall
from "twisting under the weight".
SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, GROUP B:
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the
general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all
• structure or sites.
B. Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such
improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially
enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark
or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the
landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness
may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with
the original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a
change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered
under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and
unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to
landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the
site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in
such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of
the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material
may be allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original
materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should
be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is
the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods
should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition
of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary,
the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. S_ iM
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics
will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
1. Required
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches
which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be
retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts,
green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be
compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a
public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in
photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that
are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant
materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should
not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate.
Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees,
fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's
history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor
blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall
not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares.
is
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the design of doors are the same as doors
• approved on South elevation and maintain the industrial style.
Written by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
•
:7
`� ¢r" � � � ��a � ��� rte; s� � � ��a°��4 � �a � , `� � .�,
� � � ;� �� �t ��,.r. � ,. w c '" d � 4Y :
[Y,'� '��#� � y��Y �0.. f ¢�i�y ,tea ��m, p ..� '� i. V { �U /+f k "� i c�`"� ��
.,tib!- a �p'd �$ - �'a' £X''� �. fyh i� c�, � '&.y� ,.xl'� 1 r� hx4�3��'}4�'�`1 �'� � a
-... -. .. -QTS l �r � ' ��� ,: t'C � � & X f ',f�aj}, S ' J -.
' � . � f � .:
� l �
� T
,, ..... � r .< �:
i.... i.
d.--
.. �f „ry Y.
tsY —wr.. :: .�
� �' t :.
��n�1 �,.� 4 � � �yi
� �, ; �» ,.+� .. rf y � ,
.. .__,.
� f � �� ��
n,.. ��: , vv - <
_.. ,
� --_
•
C�
•
EAST FACADE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY •
County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601
http://www. southbendin.gov/government/department/community-investment
Phone: 574/235.9371 Fax: 574/235.9021
Email: hpcsbsjc@southbendin.gov
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation
Administrator
APPLICATION FOR A — CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
OFFICE USE ONLY—» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY
Date Received:
Application Number: -
IPast Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review)
I Staff Approval authorized by:
Historic Preservation Commission Review Date:
❑ Local Landmark
❑ National Landmark
Certificate OfApp riateness:
Denied
❑ Local Historic District (Name) _
❑ National Register District (Name)
❑ NO
Title:
❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued:
Address of Property for proposed work:
(Street Number—Street Name—City--Zip)
Greater Lowell Holdings LLC Phone#: 574.532.5646
504 East LaSalle Avenue, South Bend, IN 46617
Name of Property Owner(s):
Address of Property Owner(s): 3617 McKiley Avenue, South Bend, IN 46615
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Name of Contractor(s): Al Lusk
Contractor Company Name:
Premier 1 Construction
Phone #: 574.532.1525
Address of Contractor Company: 105 East jefferson Blvd, Suite 216, South bend, IN 46601
(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip)
Current Use of Building:
Vacant industrial
(Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.)
Type of Building Construction: Masonry & steel with some wood on roof and facade
(Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other)
Proposed Work: (more than one ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition
box may be checked)
Description of Proposed Work: See attached plans by John Werntz dated June 6, 2018
An application was made and conditionally approved at the April 16th meeting of the HPC. The only exterior changes made since that date are on the West elevation whereby the plans now call for the
installation of overhead doors in lieu of a double glass door and Three (3) windows as previously submitted.
Owner e-mail: fperri@earthdesignsred.com and/or Contractor e-mail: alusk@premierl construction.com •
X
Signature of Owner
and/or X
Signature of Contractor
By signing this application I agree to abide by all local regulations related to project and to obtain a Building Department Permit, if applicable.
—APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE—
0
0
NLE5 AVE
-------r------------ -----
Tul 7rn
1:0
---------- v------------- ---
o�sr�� ii
0 -------------------
O
John W. Werntz
DEMO J.C. LAUBER BLDG
PLAN
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
I
0
P
P
A
NILES AVE
F MH
'p o® ap
Z � O i5
A
s u aj 4—
n
m m m I r-----I I r----i ; 1 -1
I I I I
1-HOUR WALL '
& to
FA
fD w o
r o
0
I I
s o
rn O o c
P �n
o Z ; �eoaew�wna �2 ll101 I
P -� ,q'O• 99.0• rr ffi j
��-,n,raTTs 5 Ill
0 0:2 I I
3 N Adz
rn----------�1---------1---------1---J
lJ lJ
4n 6 m mW
tY 3'O" 3'6" LW
rn
u rn rnrn
P Y V
mpg
rn aP oP §
F a
A i
P� zm
- _ • ern
W
� JoW. tz ■ onnnllpU��u -
DEMO J.C. LAUBER BLDG
MCH W
FLANsm�s ram„'�ntlsi sa vow — No. 3a3J `
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
■
•
C
•
•
•
0
ILS
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
1s,�>>�,�«"�.
emu
140.. 5.5"
m�p
N
N
Q
N /
6
O
1
b
m NN
m
I. >Ln
N O w a
Z
_
mN
z
65�
N
r
A
i
2
N
o
z
m
_
I
4'2'
15'5"
yril
D
147'
c
a
a
� oo �'o oom oom mol'
r7A C
3
�m A� Az
r A� by meati xPin Nin
�_
�
�A •� a„A � A
„E
O
�
N
r�
A� PAr Pam Pim
O
rno
_� a ti3a
3
N D
fail
!ny m inn rlm� Nn�
Y.
f�lA r A�1y ArN A>N
yy
� `TXXh.•
N
m3 mEn� mmy <Eo
$
--'
_
m M,
�-a mrmi mzA cml^
PH
cry c`i civ
rn
= rn
L J
� z
kk
o
c r'• r P � r I•
g"
7
1
m
o v
1e
a
I
0
^
\'
r 1 m
yyA
L J 3m
3
N
a
h A
C
Cl m
$
>
;
N
%'
r ,
r -7
1
r
�N' s
rnu'CJ
m
f< N
Z
29 3v�
'(Oyp
O
V
0
N
PLAN
__
Joh� W. W-t=
J.C.
LAUBER
BLDG
SpGmna,MCHIfECT
LV
DETA
- -
ILS
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
1s,�>>�,�«"�.
emu
•
LJ
•
J.h� W. Wefn`=°
SCHEDULES
J.C. LAUBER BLDG
w)cmM°. Ncvr
5J4',a,p°.,ma�,m�.�
i�
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
■
•
LJ
•
J.C. LAUBER BLDG
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
■ �on� w. wer�cz ■
vrmi f�mem �svn�
�•o++uw �pw
� No. 30.1) 1A
I
I
I
I
I
I
�
�
I
,
,
,
,
I
�
z
4
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
P
�I
Q
I
I
I
I
o
�
I
g
I
�
I �
I N
I
I
,
m
I
I
I
I
�
I
I
I
I
!11
I
I
�
�
I
�
r
I �
rn
3
00
�Ell
❑❑❑
❑°°❑
Q�
❑❑❑❑000
n
I
In
I
rn
�
I
IPM1
1
I
r
I §
N
_
O
z
z
z
=N2
1
�
�N
mar
�
zA
AOa
N
a
c A
�
�G
ELEVATIONS
J.C. LAUBER BLDG
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
■ �on� w. wer�cz ■
vrmi f�mem �svn�
�•o++uw �pw
� No. 30.1) 1A
pit
m p
zo- In
I
an
0
z
aw
m
z
m
m
c
'TI
-0 R zITT
m
Rp -0
Fi � 3j
m m L
>a m 0
m
z I
ITI
N
rx, I
o
NILES AVENUE --4-
(66' R/W)
—w
s 5
Sr Sr
S
- NOP00'001Y 100.01' IA _
vm=
M
In CD m
H
m
at
00000 800 0 GOOsmrP
�j g 1 g I ' I - 'm
" 1 !1 u g
H-9 !M, M'
-;--Z
33
tg!
48
Mil 9
id, t2
9 Hit,
P
%
PROPOSED RENOVATION OF: John W. WEMt'
ARCHITECT
SITE PLAN J.C.LAUBER BUILDING 52075—Squ.r.—d
G—o., Id— 4-
504 E. LaSALLE STREET, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46617 M �5741277— CELL (574N-9 N
0
0
0
•
•
•
m
m
z
n
0
I ®I
.-i�
• $A$af
I
m �My¢s}� 31a
\
e L
— PPP
sa
g 9-10
1 °
gg41
CE� $
�a i
°1919q!o9'� "I''.1�t j$I. D f
a+"ISHI'I�"
11
411
SSM
a°°jaa�Hilg p�
e
algs8±
Igo
dd°Sass
N
I�IIII
4 <... jf>�g
liilj € cf �- y<
2p E> haS aym "==m a ��o azo sg6gE
I�IIII fig~+ g K`¢v QgaN" �? $ Ao$ en Z .1A
qm
x o g
PROPOSED RENOVATION OF:mosmis us sumo ■ John W. Wemtz
SITE GRADING J.C.LAUBER BUILDING
ARCHITECT
510)5 Fa�minplon Square FoaE > No. J4J3 fNc
PLAN°d— 4e�1°
504 E. LaSALLE STREET, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46617"°01A
■ (514)2))-9681 CELL (5]4Aid0.]dl9 ■
I
m �My¢s}� 31a
\
e L
— PPP
pe€II��
N a
Igo
k
d
€0 I
C
pill i:4�5i1
u'�#°§ spS.�BA
jp£ 1°p9paa"
arIi!s 1011-1111 1 JIM 1111 1
e�3lRiqa�.IE°�g€ g € I�p
a� a'$
a4
�3$p"q 19 6 'HI F p[a p
F l4 IFM Hull S III
d
H.
N
I�IIII
4 <... jf>�g
liilj € cf �- y<
2p E> haS aym "==m a ��o azo sg6gE
I�IIII fig~+ g K`¢v QgaN" �? $ Ao$ en Z .1A
qm
x o g
PROPOSED RENOVATION OF:mosmis us sumo ■ John W. Wemtz
SITE GRADING J.C.LAUBER BUILDING
ARCHITECT
510)5 Fa�minplon Square FoaE > No. J4J3 fNc
PLAN°d— 4e�1°
504 E. LaSALLE STREET, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46617"°01A
■ (514)2))-9681 CELL (5]4Aid0.]dl9 ■
N �
s _
D'rn
�
S .'0
W v
£ ill y n S $ 2 Z
Y 3 _
s F $ 4$ m gp Rg O
lo
qH IN
fig
mg §� "- G
�6 � o
m— 2� A g is 1H B v "wm es€ o
�95 Nl` 283 ' '8' >n q S m
e� � a M y
"grga 55 m j;s
NILES AVENUE
iNEv/(54wi scHRuas
ti.
c F
g Zz
m (n
m Q' -
X No
I I Z Z
oz
o g
14' ALLEY
�. fl ■m
PROPOSED RENOVATION OF: sTiazote issue ■ John W. Werntz ■ o �w�W K',''p
r LANDSCAPE ,J.C. LAUBER 50)S Fer RCHFECT
pere
— BUILDING
PLAN ^mer. a
jahrtxem2®cmrast net CELL(5i0)3<A)849
■
d .
504 E. LaSALLE STREET, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46617
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
,
,
, I
, I
I
I I
I QpQ I
I 1
I I
I 1
I I
I � I
1 � I
I � I
I � I
I I
I � I
I � I
I I
rn
I 1
El
I
I I
Ilrn�
or Nz
{ ®O
> .y.
I N
❑❑❑❑ Orn I I
z ❑11011 rn I
❑❑❑o
' <I
I
0
°❑°❑°❑ z
oo❑❑ I
I
O I I
" I
orrn
\� rn I.
�rn <
r
o —I
°rn
< 0
O
z �N�
0
N
0Fq
�rn
g�
ELEVATIONS J.C. LAUBER BLDG W. Weft= a"N``
MCNIfECf off. ' `PZ
ms �,minA�sq, n�P000d]/]i d°
SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
■ ■ ,�
•
�J
Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County
June 18, 2018
in0.
Address
RME#
Applicant
Proposed Work Description
Staff
1623 E Wayne
2018-0501
Matthew Payne
"Tear down chimney to above roof line, rebuild with
AT
new block, flue lines, and stucco."
815 Arch Avenue
2018-0501A
Jason Pfledderer
"Reroof boat house and reconstruct handrail."
AT
553 Edgewater
2018-0503
Larry Delaruelle
"Remove silver maple tree in tree lawn per Brent
AT
Thompson (SBVPA). Replaced at time and location to
be determined."
226 Hammond
2018-0504
Realmad Holdings
"Tear off and remove existing roof material. Install
EF
& Investments
new Architectural Shingle asphalt roof, including
defective decking, underlayment, drip edge, and
flashing. Repair soffit and fascia using in-kind
material or wood."
827 Forest
2018-0507B
Gary Kern
"Replace existing asphalt shingle roof with new GAF
EF
Avenue
asphalt architectural shingle roof."
219 North Shore
2018-0507A
Sophie White
"Remove green giant arb from front of home.
AT
Drive
Landscaping and softscaping on property, removal of
chain link fence at rear (note here for record keeping,
but not governed by HPC)."
1619 Wayne St
2018-0507C
Gary and Rae Matt
"Remove soft maple tree east of the primary
EF
residence. Plant new small species tree in nearby
location, see site plan."
725 Park Avenue
2018-0508
Andy Yau
"Tear off and re -roof house, replace rotted
AT
woodwork as needed."
1236 Wayne
2018-0509
Richard Mock
"Tear off and replace roof on garage. Certainteed
AT
Landmark Architectural Shingles."
857 Forest
2018-0510A
Seth Brown
"Tear off and reshingle flat roof areas above wrap-
AT
around porch, above first floor bathroom, and above
first floor back -room"
221 North Shore
2018-0516
David Castellanet
"1) Remove of non -original brick.
AT
2) Reconstruction of front porch with brick in period -
appropriate pattern."
607 Leland Ave
2018-0517
Todd Zeiger /
"1) Roof and flashing repairs (in-kind);
AT
Indiana Landmarks
2) Replace entry door;
3) Install aluminum window well."
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
• OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
May 22nd, 2018
13' Floor Conference Room
County — City Building
South Bend, IN 46601
I. CALL TO ORDER
Vice President Hertel called the meeting to order at 5:30pm.
Members of the Public Present:
Norrie Emmons, 2318 Ireland
Karen Graubart, 802 Forest
Mateo Graubart, 802 Forest
Julie Rios, 2406 Mishawaka Ave
Valerie Swihart, 1431 Portage Avenue
Chris Wilson, 619 Edgewater
II. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Brandon
Anderson; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Becky Bonham; Velvet Canada; Greta Fisher, Architecture
Historian
Members Not in Attendance: Michelle Gelfinan, Secretary
Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Administrator; Adam Toering, Historic
• Preservation Specialist; Aladean DeRose, Legal Counsel
Staff Not in Attendance: Steve Szaday, Historic Preservation Inspector
MOTION TO AMEND THE AGENDA:
A. The applicant requested that COA #2018-0426 be withdrawn from the agenda.
Commissioner Molnar made a motion to amend the agenda. Seconded by
Commissioner Gordon.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to amend the agenda to withdraw COA #2018-0426 is passed.
B. COA #2018-0430, listed as 608 Portage, should read 608 Park Avenue.
Commissioner Molnar made a motion to amend the agenda to reflect this clerical
error. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to amend the agenda is passed.
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
• 1. 802 Forest COA# 2018-0412A #9574-05 Chapin Park Local Historic District
Representation: Karen Graubart, 802 Forest Avenue
1
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS •
Date: May 7, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0412A
Property Location: 802 Forest Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled -Ell / 1890
Property Owner: Karen Graubart
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The house located at 802 Forest is a one and a half story wood frame gabled -ell
with an irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. Window are wood 1/1 double hung with aluminum storm windows. Exterior
walls are clad in vinyl siding. The house has multiple gables with returns and a shed dormer in the rear.
ALTERATIONS: COA #2009-1005C removed a Linden Tree in the tree lawn as well as called for the trimming of the
remaining trees, per the city forester's recommendation. COA #2011-0809 allowed for the repair of the flat roof and flashing on
the north side of the structure. COA #2013-0607 allowed for the replacement of the 3' cedar picket fence using in-kind material
and the original posts.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "I request permission to tear down a collapsing deck addition to side of house back from the street. I
also request permission to replace it with a low -profile wooden or composite deck, [not visible from?] the street. The house has
siding so no historical character is being affected, and so I request permission [...] See attached from contractor. Photo from side
of house where deck located. Steve Szaday [... ]"
From attached,documents:
"We will remove an unsafe and deteriorating deck/ pergola type structure on the side of your home exiting the kitchen area. We
will build a new 16' x 16' deck of treated wood material, one step down from your home's floor level to put the deck closer to
the ground, to avoid the requirement of a new handrailing."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for the removal and •
reconstruction of the deck and the rear of the property. The current deck and pergola will be removed and be replaced by a new
deck that will be lower to the ground and will, according to the design description, be minimally visible from the street. The
replacement deck will not have a pergola attached above it, and will therefore be even less visible than the present structure.
Six new post holes will be dug to a depth of approximately 3' for the installation of six 6"x6" posts set in concrete. Beams,
joists, and decking will be installed to create the deck surface approximately 12" above the current yard surface. Overall size of
the new deck will be 16' x 16'.
The contractor has provided an option for the installation of Fiberon Horizon Decking. Fiberon Horizon products are constructed
of approximately 40% wood (wood fiber, wood dust or wood flour) and 60% Polyethylene. Applicant is interested in using
composite materials for their lifespan, but is amenable to using traditional wood products.
PRESERVATION INSPECTOR REPORT:
February 27, 2018
This morning I was contacted by Karen the owner of 802 Forest in regards to the deck attached to the structure at 802
Forest. She was taking quotes for replacement or rebuild. She requested an opinion if this needed to come down and if it had to
be rebuilt the same way or just the footprint remain the same. I deferred her questions to Adam Toering about the application
specifications but I quoted the Chapin Park Standards and Guidelines from the guidebook.
I went and photographed the deck after I received permission from the owner to be able to enter the property. The angle
iron base structure is rusted through. The wood decking has collapsed in areas due to the deterioration of the angle iron. There
seems to have been a concrete pad patio at one time where the deck is now. Perforated metal corner pieces are bolted to concrete
footers that are on top of the concrete pad. The metal risers for the deck are then bolted onto these risers. Both the risers and
metal angles are rusted through and most have some movement. The bases of the wood posts on the deck have also sustained
considerable water damage. The additional weight of the pergola has aided in the demise of the deck as a whole. Wooden 4x4
posts sit under the deck and serve as supports under each post that sits above the deck. This has lead to the deterioration of the
post bases and pooling of water around those bases. The deck and pergola are built separately from the house but has been lag
bolted to the house. I walked on part of the deck and was fine but felt the deck give to my weight toward the south west corner of
the deck.
Steve Szaday
Historic Preservation Inspector, Code Enforcement
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
pi
General Definitions
(B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
• (b2) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED)
Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation
would not require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are
incompatible with the defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would
not require the duplication of the original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and
the district's defined elements of preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be
encouraged, but contemporary methods and materials would be acceptable when compatible.
Il. EXISTING STRUCTURES
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In
some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material.
Required
Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through
repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or
replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair.
Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt
deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure
water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of
moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be
duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile.
When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact
mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and
may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work.
Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the
structure from moisture and insects.
Recommended
Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not
feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size
and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables,
eaves and other architectural features.
• Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating
any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The
Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods,
contractors and the like.
Prohibited
Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was
constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles.
Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and
sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration.
Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than
the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and
porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick.
Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from
masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface.
Not Recommended
Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless
required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and
can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding
should not be power -washed.
D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS
Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs
or are covered by the main roof of the house.
Required
When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters,
columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design
more in keeping with the historic period of the structure.
Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be
retained.
Recommended
• When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the
architectural or historical character of the building.
Not Recommended
Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original.
3
III. NEW CONSTRUCTION
New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new
addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and
setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic
•
buildings in the district.
A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION
The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several
houses that have L- or T- shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half
story bungalows. The most prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio.
Required
The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The
building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in
the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those
existing in the same block. Additions to the existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing
structure.
Recommended
Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood.
Prohibited
Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character
shall not be considered.
Not Recommended
New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features
and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in
the new additions.
B. BUILDING MATERIALS
Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard /
composite siding.
Required
Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with
adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall related to the existing or original
materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could
be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building.
Recommended
Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible
.
with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.
Prohibited
Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations.
C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS
Required
Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor
sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible
while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features and open spaces. Proportions and
materials shall conform to those required for new construction.
Recommended
Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood.
Prohibited
Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other guidelines and standards.
IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES
A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
Required
Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved.
Recommended
Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural
integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated.
Prohibited
Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and spaces is prohibited.
Not Recommended
Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building.
•
rd
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project, as it is in keeping with the Standards & Guidelines
of the Chapin Park Local and National Historic District.
• Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Fisher made a motion to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Bonham.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0 COA#2018-0412A is approved.
2. 62290 Miami COA# 2018-0416B #02-1981 Local Landmark
Representation: N/A
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 8 May 2018
Application Number: 2018-0416B
Property Location: 62290 Miami
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1908/George and Elizabeth Schafer Farm
• Property Owner: Randy and Suzie Krill
Landmark or District Designation: St. Joseph County Local Landmark, ordinance no. 02-81
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: 2 '/2 story, square plan house with pyramidal roof. Foundation is rock -faced cast
block. Walls are clapboard. There is a full front wrap around porch with cast block piers and round columns. Windows are 1/1
with projecting comices/bay window. Doors are full light. On the site is a large bank/basement barn, an English barn, a milk
house, a pump house, and a silo.
ALTERATIONS: COA 1988-0822 approved room addition to rear with wrap around deck, landscaping around house and
buildings, new driveway, moving historic wrought iron fence, replacing paddock fences.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Emergency removal of silo."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The foundation of the silo has failed causing the structure to begin collapsing
toward the driveway. An unusually high amount of water saturation near the barn and silo is a contributing factor. There is
evidence of an attempt to preserve the structure in the past by strapping the silo to the barn. The silo will need to be removed
proactively to prevent damage to the barn foundation. As the silo is not being utilized, there is no plan to rebuild. There is a
possibility for architectural salvage, including: a lighting rod, wall tiles, and perhaps the roof. The ground will be filled and
landscaped accordingly.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
May 7, 2018 This is a follow up to my visit on April 17, 2018. The department administrator, preservation specialist, and myself
visited the site and inspected the tile -walled silo. The silo base foundation has failed and the silo has begun to lean and at the
time was eight to ten feet out of square. The silo is a separate structure from the barn, but does have a feed room connection that
runs to the lower level of the barn. The silo has moved away from the barn and the concrete drive approach. Elements are
entering at this separation and is advancing the movement of the silo. Steve Szaday, Preservation Inspection
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. GROUP B LOCAL LANDMARKS:
The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or
addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate.
A. Maintenance
5
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B. Treatment •
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements
include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the
character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a
Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not
require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed
treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A
modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of
overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to
cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material
as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the
original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding.
Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when
renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the
only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be
made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark
shall be responsible for this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of •
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
(These standards apply to both A and B)
1. Required
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which
reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures
such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains,
fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and
neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to
the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be
immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic
documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style,
materials, and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways,
outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front
yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices
such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public
thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the silo to be dismantled and advocates for reclamation of the
lighting rod, wall tiles, and roof, if possible. Per the Standards and Guidelines, staff recommends that owner provide the
Commission with comprehensive interior and exterior documentation for the file. •
Written by
roll
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
• Commissioner Anderson made a motion to approve as submitted, and request that all the
work is possible to document the structure, as well as to retain the architectural details,
including the lightning rod, wall tiles, and roof. Seconded by Commissioner Fisher.
Six in favor, one opposed.
Vote: 6 —1. Motion to approve COA #2018-041611 is passed.
3. 108 N Main COA# 2018-0426 #8915-1998 Local Landmark
WITHDRAWN
4. 736 Portage COA# 2018-0427 #9574-05 Local Landmark
Representation: Valerie Swihart, 1431 Portage Avenue; arrived later, application
revisited with representation present.
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 9 May 2018
Application Number: 2018-0427
Property Location: 736 Portage Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Commercial Building/20th Century Functional/1925
Property Owner: Urban U Partners LLC
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05; National Register District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The apartment building is three stories with a rectangular plan and is constructed of
brick. Roof is hip covered in asphalt shingles. Most windows are original wood with a variety of patterns including: casement,
6/1, and 1/1. Front entry features divided light sidelights on either side of wood door with shed roof supported by wood brackets.
ALTERATIONS: Two original wood 6/1 windows were replaced with black aluminum full light casement without COA.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replace 4 front facing windows, one of which is badly damaged to match the 2 that have been
replaced already. We would simply like to match the 2 windows that have been replaced. One of the 4 windows is beyond repair
per Randy from Indiana Glass. This is a safety hazard and security issue for the apartment. Plus water continues to erode the
wood windows and allows mice and other pests which are health hazards."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Replace four original wood 6/1 windows in front on basement level with new
black aluminum full light casement windows, by Vinyl Craft, to match two windows replaced previously (without COA). The
replacement windows will not reduce the overall size of the opening but will change the light pattern from 6/1 to full light. The
existing windows have been deemed deteriorated beyond repair by Preservation Inspector and window repair contractor.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
March 21, 2018
I met with the property manager of 736 Portage, Valerie of VPM at the location. We discussed window replacement for the
basement windows at 736. Some windows at both buildings at the lower level have already been replaced from the wood double
hung to aluminum casements. Four windows are wood double hung are not functioning and are damaged beyond repair. One sash
is missing the meeting rail and another is completely missing the mortise and tenon joint. The casement windows also allow a
legal egress.
• Steve Szaday, Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. CHAPIN PARK_:
II. Existing Structures
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung
windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has •
been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm
windows; the other half have wood storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and
hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames.
If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm
doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of
canvas material.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.
Written by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Molnar made a motion to deny COA 92018-0427. Seconded by Commissioner
Anderson.
Vice President Hertel clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the
application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered.
Commissioner Molnar (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application due
to the applicant not being present and due to concern of how the front of the structure would look •
with mismatched windows.
Commissioner Gordon (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny this application for
the same reasons as previously stated.
Commissioner Hertel (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny this application due
to the applicant not being present and unable to answer our questions and the inconsistency with
the historical accuracy if they were to be removing these windows.
Commissioner Anderson (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application
due to lack of representation; I also would like to see the applicant to work with staff for the
retroactive approval or denial of the windows that were put in and to work together to continue the
preservation of this structure and its architectural integrity.
Commissioner Bonham (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application for
the reasons previously stated.
Commissioner Canada (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion to deny the application due
to the applicant not being present, and would like to see the applicant match the original windows.
Commissioner Fisher (AYE): I vote in the affirmative in the motion'to deny the application due
to the style of the replacement windows not being reflective of the original style.
Seven in favor, zero opposed. .
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to deny COA #2018-0427 is passed.
• After the vote to deny COA #2018-0427 was taken without presence of the owner/applicant,
the applicant arrived.
Commissioner Molnar made a motion to re -open COA #2018-0427 in light of the arrival of
the applicant in the hearing chamber. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon.
Seven in favor, zero opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to reopen COA #2018-0427 is passed.
Further discussion about the COA followed and the applicant indicated that she would
consent to postpone the Commission's determination and further discussion of original
COA 2018-0427 until the next meeting of June 18, 2018. The applicant signed a form of
waiver of time limit provided to her by Legal Counsel DeRose.
Commissioner Anderson made a motion to continue COA #2018-0427 until the next
meeting, June 18th, 2018. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson.
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to continue COA #2018-0427 is passed.
5. 608 Park COA# 2018-0430 #9574-05 Chapin Park
Representation: Julie Rios, 2406 Mishawaka Ave
• STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: May 9, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0430
Property Location: 608 Park Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/ 1910
Property Owner: Stu Harrison
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local (Ordinance #9574-05) and National Historic District
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: 608 Park is a two story American foursquare set upon a brick foundation. The
exterior walls of the house are wood shingles with a bell flare at the lower course. The low pitch hip roof has wide soffit
overhang and molded cornice and is covered with asphalt shingles. There is a full width front porch with shed roof. The porch
has square supports with capitals, wood shingle solid railing, brackets at the eaves and molded fascia. The windows a wood
double hung 9/1 on the second and first floors; a fixed triple panel window at the front. Most of the windows on the first floor
have original wood storms. There are aluminum storms on some of the second floor windows. There are 3/3 double hung at the
basement level a fixed 6 light in the basement and several fixed 3 light in the foundation level.
ALTERATIONS: The storm door is not original to the house. The window shutters were added before 1987. The aluminum
storm windows and the asphalt roof material are replacements. COA #2009-0109 allowed for the installation of a temporary
handicap ramp on the front doorstep. COA #2017-0720 allowed for the replacement of rotted wood on the front porch and back
porch. COA #2017-0829 allowed for the relaying of brick of the chimney, the columns, and the foundation. Multiple non -
original windows exist, it is unknown when these were installed.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "10 windows main flor left side back of house two back right 2 casements on the left 2 double hung's
• on the left one double hung on the back and three casements two double hung's on the right."
See attached documents.
0j
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for the replacement of 10
windows (five double hung windows and five casement windows). Grid / divided light patterns in replacement windows will
replicate the configuration of the original windows.
The contractor put forth two replacement options for consideration by the Historic Preservation Commission:
1. Andersen 400 Series
a. PVC exterior, wood interior
b. Muntins are aluminum exterior and wood interior.
2. Quaker Classic Fit Series
a. Aluminum exterior, wood interior
b. Muntins are aluminum exterior and wood interior.
Both window options have interior and exterior muntins. Per the contractor, the aluminum and wood Quaker Classic series of
windows are less expensive than the PVC and wood Anderson windows.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
On April 30, 2018 I met with the owner of the property located at 608 Park. The owner applied to replace windows on
the first level of the house. The windows have a nine over one double -hung and either nine or twelve -light fixed or casement
style windows.
The double hung windows on the south side (right side when looking at front of house) are non -original replacement
windows with false grids.
The front (west) window is a vinyl replacement three bay casement window that the owner would like to replace at a
later date.
The rear (east) face has a three bay, nine light casement window unit. These are wood, but I do not believe to be
original, as they have a veneer of wood finish that is peeling off.
The north side has a twelve -light original fixed window, two nine light original casement windows, and two original
nine over one double hung windows with textured glass at the far end.
None of the windows appear to be deteriorated beyond repair. They all need work in order to be operable, although the
secured -in-place exterior storms make that task difficult. The two nine light casements on the north face have had some
remodeling done in between by way of a closed doorway and a removed staircase. Water damage from above has damaged some
plaster and may have caused those windows to be out of square. The two textured windows toward the rear are painted and are
fastened shut. I believe the motivation behind the desire to change the windows is efficiency and ease of use. The distance •
between the property and the neighbors on both side make the sides of the house difficult to see from the street.
Steve Szaday
Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
General Definitions
(B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
(b2) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED)
Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation
would not require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are
incompatible with the defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would
not require the duplication of the original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and
the district's defined elements of preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be
encouraged, but contemporary methods and materials would be acceptable when compatible.
II. EXISTING STRUCTURES
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In
some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material.
Required
Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through
repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or
replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair.
Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt
deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure
water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of
moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be
duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile.
When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact
mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and •
may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work.
Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the
structure from moisture and insects.
10
Recommended
Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not
• feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size
and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables,
eaves and other architectural features.
Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating
any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The
Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods,
contractors and the like.
Prohibited
Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was
constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles.
Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and
sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration.
Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than
the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and
porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick.
Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from
masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface.
Not Recommended
Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless
required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and
can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding
should not be power -washed.
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung
windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has
been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm
windows; the other half have wood storm windows.
Required
• Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods
and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing
frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used.
When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used,
they should be of canvas material.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Some of the windows that the applicant intends to replace are not original to the house, and
staff would recommend removing and replacing those with a more appropriate and functional window model. The remaining
original windows may be repairable, but this process is inconvenienced by the fixed -in-place metal storms on the exterior of the
structure. Were 1) the windows to be determined to be deteriorated beyond repair, and 2) given the choice between the two
provided window options; staff would recommend that the aluminum -clad exterior / wood interior Quaker Classic Fit windows
be utilized for this installation.
Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Anderson made a motion to deny as presented, but encourage the applicant to
identify each window, what it is to be replaced with, and that the application fee be waived.
Seconded by Commissioner Gordon.
Vice President Hertel clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the
application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered.
11
Commissioner Molnar (AYE): I vote in the affirmative on the motion to deny the application — I
do applaud the applicant for their efforts to use appropriate materials but we need a little more
detail on the condition of the original windows. •
Commissioner Gordon (AYE): I vote in the affirmative on the motion to deny the application
based upon the condition of the original windows and, having determined that, going forward with
any replacement as needed.
Commissioner Hertel (AYE): I vote in the affirmative on the motion to deny the application due
to the unknown condition of the current windows, if they could be repaired over replaced, and due
to the lack of documentation as to the specific windows that were intended to be replaced.
Commissioner Anderson (AYE): I vote in the affirmative on the motion to deny the application
due to the lack of representation by owner and contractor, the documentation of the current
windows and if they are able to be restored, and documentation of the exact replacements including
sizes and also the retaining of surrounding material, and I do applaud the applicant and appreciate
the work towards preserving the building, and would personally lean towards the Quaker Classic
Fit series with the aluminum muntins.
Commissioner Bonham (NAY): I vote nay on the motion to deny the application, as I think that
they have put forth a good application here — I think there are some questions, but I think those — I
would recommend that the applicant work with staff to get a little more clarity, but I believe there
is enough here. I would vote `no.'
Commissioner Canada (AYE): I vote in the affirmative on the motion to deny the application, I
would like more information specifically the Quaker window. I also would like more information •
about replacing the vinyl windows that are there. I am very happy that the applicant did take the
initiative — you started somewhere, and sometimes the first step is the toughest. We are all willing
to work with you, and we have a great staff to help.
Commissioner Fisher (AYE): I vote in the affirmative on the motion to deny the application,
although I would support the replacement of the non -original windows with the Quaker product, I
think could use a more detailed application and a little more information about what could be done
with the original windows.
Six in favor, one opposed.
Vote: 6 —1. Motion to approve COA #2018-0430 is denied.
6. 619 Edgewater COA# 2018-0507 #6846-80 Edgewater Place
Representation: Chris Wilson, 619 Edgewater
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: May 11, 2018
Application Number: 2018-0507
Property Location: 619 Edgewater Drive
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dutch Colonial Revival / 1924 / "Opperman House" / Whitcomb & Keller
Property Owner: Chris and Sandra Wilson
12
Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Local Historic District, Ordinance #6846-80
Rating: Contributing
• DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 619 Edgewater is a rectangular two-story Dutch Colonial Revival set upon a brick
and concrete foundation. The exterior walls of the house are wood clapboard with one off -center chimney with a brick corbelled
top. A flared gable roof with full length shed dormer has a balcony over the front porch and a balustrade. A full length open
front porch has square posts and balustrade; a full second -story balcony has a matching balustrade. Windows are wood 6/1 and
8/1 double hung with Larson Silver Series 1/1 exterior storms.
ALTERATIONS: Skylights were added to the structure sometime after the construction of the home and before the
establishment of the historic district. In 1984, the property owner received permission to construct a boat launch on the river side
of Edgewater Drive. At some point in the late 1980s the southern basement access man -door and window were removed, as well
as the concrete access driveway. COA # 1996-0405 allowed for the removal of a chain link fence and its replacement with a
wood picket fence, although this may have never been completed. COA #2000-0629 allowed for the retroactive removal of a tree
in the tree lawn. COA #2000-1023 allowed for the in-kind re -roofing of the structure with asphalt shingles. COA #2006-1117
allowed for the repair and reconstruction of the front porch with new deck and railings. COA #2008-0417 allowed for the
removal of a Norway Maple in the tree lawn per City Forrester recommendation. COA #2009-050413 allowed for the removal of
the chain link fence with 6' white vinyl privacy fence in backyard. COA #2009-0909 allowed for the replacement of storm
windows with Larson Silver Series 1/1 storm windows. COA #2015-0626A allowed for the removal of a rotten Cottonwood
along the river bank per City Forrester recommendation.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Remove existing roofing materials, removal of existing skylights, removal of existing gutter drain
system. In-kind replacement of roof and gutter system with updated underlayment and new ridge vent. Replacement of skylights
x2 of same size, Velux Custom with solar powered skylights."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks approval for the following components:
1. Remove existing roof material and replace with new:
a. Ice and water shield,
b. Synthetic felt paper,
C. 6AF Timberline shingles, `Charcoal' colored
d. Pro -Start Eave/Rake Starter Strip
e. Cobra RidgeRunner exhaust vent,
• f. Seal -A -Ridge Protective Cap Shingle,
g. Drip Edge
2. Remove existing gutter system and replace with:
a. Englert Leafguard Brand gutter system
3. Replace existing non -original skylights with
a. Velux Custom solar -powered skylights
SITE VISIT REPORT:
May 8, 2018
On April 30, 2018 I visited the property located at 619 Edgewater Drive located in the Edgewater Place Local Historic
District. The owner had contacted HPC about changing out the two skylights in the roof. I photographed the outside of the
structure and determined that the skylights are in need of replacement. The presence of condensation in the skylights indicates
that the once gas-filled panes are no longer air tight. The discoloration of the roofing material down slope of the skylights would
also indicate that the material used to render the roof curbs water tight has begun to fail as well. I do not have the ability to get
any closer to skylights other than ground inspection.
Steve Szaday
Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. EDGEWATER PLACE:
11. EXISTING STRUCTURES
B. ROOFS AND ROOFING
Roof shapes in the district vary from hip and gable to gambrel. All are covered with asphalt shingles. Eaves in most cases, have
wood facias with gutters and downspouts. Some aluminum sided houses have aluminum covered facias.
Required
The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential
character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained.
Recommended
Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain
materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is
deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the existing or original in
• composition, size, shape, color, and texture.
Prohibited
Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof by adding architectural features or roofing materials
inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character.
13
Not Recommended
If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed.
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS •
Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block
structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been
covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall
be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original.
Recommended
Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing
frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original, design, and hardware
should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When
awnings are used they should be of canvas material.
Prohibited
Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place.
New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced.
Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of
the original windows and doors shall not be installed.
Not Recommended
Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the
building should not be used.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of this application, as it is in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines for the Edgewater Historic
District.
Written by
Adam Toering
Historic Preservation Specialist
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA#2018-0507 as submitted. Seconded
by Commissioner Anderson.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to approve COA #2018-0507 is passed.
7. 226 Hammond COA# 2018-0507D #8308-92 River Bend
Representation: N/A
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 8 May 2018
Application Number: 2018-0507D
Property Location: 226 Hammond
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Cross Gable Square/1903
Property Owner: Realmad Holdings & Investments, LLC
Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Local Historic District, ordinance no. 8308-92
Rating: Contributing •
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The house is a 1 '/z story square plan with a concrete foundation although it is
covered by siding. Siding is aluminum and vinyl. Roof is a cross gable with returns and is covered with asphalt shingles. There is
14
a full length front porch with a brick foundation, half walls, tapered piers and brick wing walls. The porch roof is hipped and
covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are wood and vinyl 1/1 double hung. There is a one-story addition with a shed roof
• in the rear. Front door is metal.
ALTERATIONS: A detached garage in the rear collapsed in the winter of 1993. COA 1995-0329 replaced roof with asphalt
shingle. 2002-0311 replaced broken windows, eaves, and soffits. COA 2012-0730 removed failing attached garage, residing
exposed side with vinyl, and install new solid steel front door. The rear one-story addition is not original. Aluminum siding is not
original.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Please see attached proposal."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
1. Windows: Replace all windows with Jeld-Wen vinyl single hung. Existing windows are an assortment of non -
original wood replacement, newer vinyl windows in existing addition, original wood double hung windows that
need repair, and original wood double hung windows that are beyond repair (see Site Visit Report). A rear second
story window that is installed below the roof line is causing moisture issues and is proposed to be replaced with a
new window designed to be symmetrical with the second existing window (see drawing). Two rear first story
windows in existing addition are proposed to be replaced with new windows that are 25% shorter to allow for the
installation of kitchen countertops along the wall under the windows. Staff recommended that applicant
investigate aluminum clad window material; applicant concluded that cost would be 50% more.
2. Siding: Remove outer layer of aluminum and vinyl siding. A layer of non -original asphalt siding will remain on
house. Install foam board insulation. Install new P1yGem vinyl 4" siding on entire house including existing
addition. Add new wood trim around windows and doors; no trim currently exists.
3. Fence: Install new wood 6' dog-eared privacy fence along side and rear of property, not to surpass front wall of
house (see site plan).
4. Porch: Remove existing aluminum porch ceiling. Depending on condition of original wood underneath, either
restore or install new wood headboard, product specification TBD.
5. Brick: Tuck point and power wash brick. Staff recommended that applicant power wash brick using only low-
pressure water and using soft natural bristle brushes.
6. Entry doors: Replace non -original front and rear doors both with new Mastercraft Craftsman Embossed steel
exterior doors.
SITE VISIT REPORT:
May 2, 2018 I met with the owner/contractor at the property located at 226 Hammond Ct. The owner is looking to perform
several projects.
-Windows
-Four windows on the North (front) face. The two on the main floor are wood but do not look to be original as they
have a slightly different construction and sash detail. The windows are in need of repair and look like new parting stops were
installed. The two windows upstairs look to be original and in desperate need of repair and even some structural repair to the
lower sash of both.
-Four windows on the East side. Two lower windows are both in need of repair including structural sash repair. The
upper windows are in worse shape and are soft to the touch. Both lower sashes of the upstairs windows are deteriorated beyond
repair.
-Four windows on South (rear) face. Two lower level windows are vinyl replacements and part of the addition. The
owner wishes to install smaller windows in order to utilize the addition as the kitchen, however to do so will need to raise height
above counter height. Two upper windows; one is a small non -original horizonal window and then a small double -hung original.
The double hung original is deteriorated beyond repair due to the roof of the addition finishing above the window sill. Water runs
into the window and wall. Owner wishes to install a smaller window to correct this issue.
-Two windows on West (side) upper level. These are both deteriorated beyond repair. There was roof damage and
water infiltration on the southmost window and the northmost window has sustained structural damage. The owner wishes to add
two windows to the lower level where a carport/garage once stood and was removed with an approved COA.
-Siding
Owner stated a desire to remove the aluminum siding on the house and replace with vinyl siding that matches what is
already on the addition and lower level of the west face. He is also looking to add trim around the windows to match the other
houses in the neighborhood more appropriately. When I was inside the addition, we saw that under the aluminum is asphalt
siding. I was unable to see under that layer to see what the original material was.
-Fence
Owner is interested in installing a privacy fence along the east edge of the property between the alley and house. The
fence would then run south along the alley at rear of the house and then turn north along the western property line. Within view
of the property there are both wood privacy fences and chain link fencing in the rear yards along the alley. Utility easements will
need to be considered prior to any fence installation.
• -Front Porch
Owner stated a desire to repair the porch overhang and possibly add a deck above the porch. There is such a structure at
the end of the block at Hammond Court and St Joseph. The roof is in need of repair and the porch ceiling is separating from the
structural beams. This may need to be stripped down to the structural truss. I did go out on the roof personally to test the strength
15
of the roof. I will point out that the brick porch may be an addition as it is the only brick part of the house and it does not tie into
the house proper. The porch sits higher than others in the neighborhood. The owner plans to make necessary missing mortar
repairs. •
Steve Szaday, Preservation Inspector
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. RIVER BEND:
I. THE ENVIRONMENT
A. IN THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT
The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and its location adjacent to Leeper Park and along the St.
Joseph River. The district encompasses: two blocks of Riverside Drive beginning at Marion Street (from 503 Riverside Drive
north) and ending at Bartlett Street; two lots on the north side of Navarre street just west of the alley behind Riverside Drive; the
north side of Hammond Place; the east side of St. Joseph Street between Hammond Place and Bartlett Street; and the south side
of Bartlett Street between St. Joseph and Riverside Drive. The District contains 45 residences and their adjacent outbuildings.
Required
Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets, alleys and building setbacks
shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the
character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by
the Illumination Engineering Society. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and
supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix). Streetlights should be
placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Removal of shade trees over twelve inches
(12") diameter, conifer trees over six inches (6") in diameter or other major plant elements shall be subject to approval by the
Historic Preservation Commission. Any subsequent replacement trees of any size required by the Historic Preservation
Commission shall be retained. The Riverfront character of the district shall be retained.
Recommended
Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings or streets
that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. Do not dump leaves and grass clippings on planted slopes as
this practice will kill much of the low ground cover and leave soil susceptible to erosion. When replacement of utility poles or
power lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along property lines.
Prohibited
Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening or closing of existing streets
and alleys or by introducing new streets, alleys or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing,
walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used The erection of
high walls or barriers which would alter the relationship of the houses and the river is prohibited The introduction of heavy
trucks or similar vehicles in the District shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on
main thoroughfares.
B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES
Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in front and a
larger lawn to the rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive generally have sloping front lawns
and flat back yards. The majority of structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties include a garage located
at the rear of the property accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees, shrubbery
and/or hedges. All houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. The district has a compact layout. Large homes are
constructed on small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Place, are constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of
the backyard areas or rear first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In recognition of this, greater latitude will
be allowed in the application of the adopted standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the individual
preferences of the property owners in the treatment of these backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn,
shrubs, walkways or semi-permanent surface changes in the rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent
structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets, sand -boxes, etc.
Required
Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and
development shall be retained.
Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings
and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance.
Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements
in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the
building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation
Commission.
Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements
before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into
parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the
setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot •
be seen from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted
in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare.
II. EXISTING STRUCTURES
16
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Original exterior wall materials in the District include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles and masonry block. In some
• instances, vinyl or aluminum siding has been applied over the original material.
Required
Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning
and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained or replaced by
replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry including brick and stucco shall be
cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with a method acceptable for the
preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. When repairing stucco, only appropriate
stucco mixture shall be used.
Recommended
Wheneverpossible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl may be used as an alternative to
maintaining or replacing the original surface material when it resembles the original surface material. When used over wood
surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood Every effort should be made to retain the original
trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the
structure when aluminum or vinyl is to be installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture
and/or insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar
is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint
size, method of application and joint profile.
Prohibited
Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with material such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles, which is
inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be
used on masonry or stucco. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration.
Not Recommended
Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless
required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and
can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointing should not be. Repointing should not
be done with mortar of high Portland cement content, which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building
materials. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing porosity of the material and the mortar — the end result
being serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint should not be removed from masonry surfaces indiscriminately.
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where
• synthetic siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm
windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware shall be
retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the original, should be used but should not damage existing frames. If
new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used When metal storm doors
are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas
material.
Prohibited
Original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window
and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced Inappropriate new
window and door features, such as aluminum and insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows
and doors, shall not be installed
Not Recommended
Awnings, hoods or fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing
character or appearance of the building.
D. ENTRANCES PORCHES AND STEPS
Most houses in the district have either an open or a closed porch across the front. Most porches have either gabled, hipped, shed
or flat roofs. Many frame porch floors and steps have been replaced with concrete.
REQUIRED
Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be
retained, or replaced with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions
reflecting later architectural styles, and which are important to the building's historical integrity, shall be retained.
Recommended
When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the
architectural or historical character of the building.
Prohibited
• Front porches and steps that are important to the building's style and character shall not be altered or removed.
Not Recommended
Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original.
17
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.
Written by •
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Gordon made a motion to approve COA #2018-0507D. Seconded by
Commissioner Anderson.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. Application COA #2018-0507D is approved.
8. 701 Portage Avenue COA# 2018-0507E #6242-1977 / #9574-05 Local
Landmark / Chapin Park
Representation: Norrie Emmons, 2318 Ireland Road
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 8 May 2018
Application Number: 2018-0507E
Property Location: 701 N Portage Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Romanesque Revival / 1898 / Charles A. Brehmer (Architect) •
Property Owner: Andrew Caspers and Amanda Shutts
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05; National Register District;
Local Landmark, Ordinance #6242-1977.
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: Fire House #6 is one of the oldest extant fire houses in South Bend. The triangular
plot, of which the building is situated, has a long connection to South Bend's history. During the Civil War, the land was used as
part of Camp Rose, a training ground for local troops headed to war. The Saint Joseph County Agricultural Society later owned
the land and used it as part of their fair grounds. In 1896, the City of South Bend purchased the land to build a "Hose House" on
the property, serving the City until it was decommissioned in 1967. The Civic Theatre used the structure as a theatre and
workshop for nearly fifty years following.
Fire House #6 is a two and a half story, brick structure, with rectangular plan and hip and gabled roof with dormer. There is a
hose tower protruding from the roof at the rear. The front first story features the main equipment door, a thin, curved corrugated
metal canopy supported by cast iron brackets designed with a sun and scroll motif. Brick pilasters with stone capitals support a
false brick arch at second story. Windows are wood, 1/1 with some fixed in attic and hose tower. Centered between two second
story windows is a large stone placard with No. 6 in relief.
ALTERATIONS: COA # 1985-0819 permitted the cleaning of bricks, replace roof ventilator, windows, and rear entry door.
COA # 1987-1019 permitted the replacement of the entrance door. COA # 1988-1207 permitted the installation of curbing at the
Portage -Lindsey intersection as per Project no. MG -000-C Fed Rd. Region 5. COA #1989-0208 permitted the installation of
security lights with wiring concealed by the eave material and covered in metal conduit painted to match the structure. COA
#1989-0602 permitted the removal of old roofing and re -roofing with Owens Corning 3 -tab 20 -year shingles. COA #1993-1118
permitted the repair of holes and the straightening of the edges of the canopy. COA# 1994-1215 permitted the grading of the
drive and in-kind replacement of limestone base. COA # 1995-1025 permitted the removal and replacement of a dead tree. COA
#1999-0713 permitted the installation of a pole, siren, and related electrical/radio parts all contained /attached to the pole on
Lindsey between Portage Avenue and Leland Avenue. COA #2003-1031A permitted the installation of landscape lighting
around the building, a new sign in the lawn, replacement of the front garage door sign, and re -glazing of the scheduling boards on
the windows flanking the garage door. COA #2003-1031B permitted the removal of loose paint and dirt from the metal awning •
with water and/or Conklin's Rust -Off, caulking all seams on top of awning, priming of the awning and the structural braces, and
a final coat of paint on the awning. COA #2017-1002G permitted masonry repair (in-kind) using Glen Gery Molded Series '53 -
DD Spec Sand' or `250-M'. Replace roof (in-kind), with Certainteed Highland Slate `black granite'; replacement of the house
18
tower wall material with Petersen Aluminum `matte black', replacement of the hose tower windows (in-kind) with wood
windows of the same size and configuration; install new gutters, downspouts, and flashing of copper. COA#2018-0402 approved
• window replacement with new aluminum clad 1/1 double hung, fire egress casement, hose tower fixed, restoring exterior wood
moldings, replace garage doors with new steel bi-fold, replace passage doors with new custom wood.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "See attached site plan with notes and product data/literature."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
1. SITE
a. Fence (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan and Elite Fence Products brochure): Install 4'H Elite decorative
aluminum commercial grade fence enclosing the property. Style EFS -15 with 4" space between
pickets.
2. NORTH
a. Utility (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan): Install new air conditioning condenser unit. Install 6'H chain-
link security fence around all four units, also enclosing top. Add loose gravel ground cover. Plant
landscape screening using arborvitae or similar plantings.
3. SOUTH
a. Basement access (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan): Utilizing an existing window well opening, install
new 8" thick concrete foundation walls and 36" — 44"W stairs to basement level. Handrail will be
painted steel pipe. New steel door (see A5.2 door 101, 103, 104). Install 42"H black metal guardrail
to match fence.
b. Dumpster enclosure (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan): Install 8'H brick enclosure with 6'-8"W steel
frame wood clad gate and door (see A5.2 door 106 and 105).
c. Door: Install new steel door in between dumpster enclosure and basement enclosure (see A5.2 door
101, 103, 104).
4. EAST
a. Patio and walk (see Enlarged Patio Plan, Town Hall spec sheet, and fire table photo): Install 27' x
22' patio outside of bi-fold entry doors using Unilock "Town Hall" permeable pavers. Fire table
installed in center.
5. WEST
a. Driveway (see C1.1 Proposed Site Plan and Town Hall spec sheet): Existing gravel driveway
updated with new concrete curbs to be flush with new Unilock "Town Hall" permeable pavers.
• SITE VISIT REPORT: n/a
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, CHAPIN PARK:
I. THE ENVIRONMENT
A. The District Environment
The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St.
Joseph River, Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the
common areas of the district (i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes).
Required
Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car
thoroughfares. The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as
possible to their architectural, historic and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district
is required. Repair work to fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever
applicable. When utility work dictates the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick
streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete, asphalt, fillers and similar materials shall not be used. All original
streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View" streetlights designed by Cutter Company for this
neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood Association and the Historic Preservation Commission to restore "Park
View" streetlights to the district shall continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of the Historic Preservation
Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the individual property
and the surrounding environment and properties.
Recommended
The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns and tree lawns should remain
open. New or replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept
landscaped appropriately while vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. When replacement of utility
poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along
rear property lines.
Prohibited
Existing relationships of building and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or
• other bituminous coverings or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials,
fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used.
The erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with
high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares.
19
B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES
This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography
and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are
unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have
•
property lines on Chapin Park will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Required
Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as
well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained.
A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to
a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damage or diseased trees should
then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the
street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic
character of a structure enclosed.
Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs,
drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type
and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close
proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them
at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A.
Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other
elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be
transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial /
commercial style fences.
The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in
areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible
from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review.
Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission
will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A.
II. EXISTING STRUCTURES
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In
some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material.
•
Required
Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through
repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or
replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair.
Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt
deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-
pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is
evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing
mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile.
When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact
mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and
may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work.
Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the
structure from moisture and insects.
Recommended
Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not
feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size
and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices gables,
eaves and other architectural features.
Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating
any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [ Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The
Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods,
contractors and the like.
Prohibited
Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new materials that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was
constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles.
Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and
sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration.
Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is
stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing
coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious
damage to adjacent brick.
20
Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed
from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface.
• Not Recommended
Waterproof or water repellant coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces
unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and
expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be
repointed. Wood siding should not be power-washed.
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double-hung
windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has
been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm
windows; the other half have wood storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and
hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original.
Recommended
Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames.
If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm
doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of
canvas material.
D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS
Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs
or are covered by the main roof of the house.
Required
When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns,
brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping
with the historic period of the structure.
Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be
retained.
Recommended
When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the
architectural or historical character of the building.
• Not Recommended
Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original.
E. MECHANICAL SERVICES
The majority of the structures within the district have oil or gas heat, and have brick chimneys through the roof. Some houses
have one or two window air conditioners.
Required
Required mechanical systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possible alteration of the structural
integrity and physical appearance of the building.
Recommended
Solar collectors and TV dishes should be placed in the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. Window
air conditioners and exhaust fans should be installed at the rear or an inconspicuous side window. Original lighting fixtures
should be utilized whenever possible.
III. NEW CONSTRUCTION
New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition
to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the
other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in
the district.
A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION
The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several
houses that have L- or T- shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single-story cottages and one- and one-and-a-half
story bungalows. The most prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio.
Required
The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The
building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in
the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those
existing in the same block. Additions to the existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure.
Recommended
Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood.
Prohibited
• Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character
shall not be considered.
Not Recommended
New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features
21
and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in
the new additions.
B. BUILDING MATERIALS
Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard /
composite siding.
Required
Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with
adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall related to the existing or original
materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could
be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building.
Recommended
Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the
original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.
Prohibited
Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations.
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. GROUP B LOCAL LANDMARKS:
The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or
addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate.
B. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general
cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B. Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements
include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the
character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a
Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not
require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed
treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A •
modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition).
Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular
examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of
overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the
additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following:
1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to
cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material
as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the
original.
a. wood—all wood trim should confonn with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding.
Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when
renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only
alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for
this documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of
the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be
disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Building Site and Landscaping
(These standards apply to both A and B)
1. Required •
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches
which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be
retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green
22
houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to
the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in
photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are
causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials
that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced
except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in
character with the buildings style, materials, and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing,
walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and
development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The
installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas
where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as all projects appear to conform to the Standards and Guidelines.
Written by
Elicia Feasel
Historic Preservation Administrator
Commissioner Fisher made a motion to approve as submitted, but removing section 2-A, and
requesting that section be resubmitted by the applicant. Seconded by Commissioner Bonham.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. Motion to approve COA #2018-0507E as amended is passed.
• IV. PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR
Joe Molnar, 1430 Longfellow Avenue — Corby Hall — "That was pretty frustrating, hearing
that it will be torn down, given about a one-month notice. I just, I want to say, if it wasn't
Notre Dame, there'd be other things going on. It's the third oldest structure on Notre Dame's
campus — it's a 19t' Century building in seemingly decent shape, in my not scientific opinion.
I just want to bring that announcement to the Commission."
Commission discussion clarified that the structure is in the County, and that Notre Dame is not
an incorporated municipality. Staff clarified the details of the landmarking process in the
unincorporated areas of St. Joseph County.
V. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. April 22°d, 2018
Commissioner Anderson made a motion to approve. Seconded by Commissioner
Molnar.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0. April minutes are approved.
1. COA Report — Distributed.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. BUDGET AND FINANCE
i. HPC GIFT FUND ACCOUNT BALANCE
23
Vice President Hertel brought up a discussion of the creation of a special ad
hoc committee to facilitate educational programs for the general public. This
committee was entitled "Renovations /Special Projects." Commissioner
Molnar volunteered to chair this committee. Commissioners Fisher and
Gordon volunteered to be members, as did Historic Preservation Specialist
Toering. Legal Counsel DeRose clarified that individuals outside of the
Commission could be added to special committees. Historic Preservation
Administrator Feasel recommended Tim Klusczinski for this committee.
2. HISTORIC LANDMARKS
ii. 630 WEST WASHINGTON — ENGMAN NATATORIUM
Landmarks Committee Chair Anderson expressed that he would reach out to
the committee in advance of the next meeting. The Landmark designation
process was discussed, and the particular agenda location and sequence was
determined. A first reading will occur on the June meeting in the Public
Hearing portion, followed by a Committee meeting between the June meeting
and the July meeting.
VI. OLD BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. DIVESTING HPC RESOURCES
Commissioner Bonham left the proceedings at 8: 00pm.
Vice President Hertel created an ad hoc committee for the Disposition of Historic Preservation .
Commission assets. Vice President Hertel named Commissioner Anderson the Committee Chair,
and named Commissioners Fisher and Molnar committee members, to be supplemented with the
HPC Staff.
B. PRESIDENT
Vice President Hertel established a discussion regarding the election of a new President for the
Historic Preservation Commission. Legal Counsel DeRose clarified via the By -Laws the election
of officer positions, and the necessity for a ballot system. Vacancies can be filled through the
ballot process at any regular meeting.
VIII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Anderson made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Fisher.
All in favor, none opposed.
Vote 6 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 8:20 pm.
Attest:
tele Gelfmi necret ti?�i e
24