The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSeptember 2017HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 sjcindiana.com/438/fIistoric-Preservation-Commission Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578 Email: SBSJCHPC@sjcindiana.com Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2017-7:00 p.m. -MEETING AGENDA COUNTY—CITY BUILDING. 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2017-0818 620 W Washington #6569-1979 2.2017-0831B 410 Manitou Place #9574-05 3.2017-0905 519 S St. Joseph #8952-98 4.2017-0905C 612-614 Carroll #8952-98 5.2017-0905D 803 W Washington #10443-16 III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. August 21, 2017 B. TREASURER REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 2018 BUDGET VIII. ADJOURNMENT Local Landmark Chapin Park Taylor's Field Taylor's Field Local Landmark Telephone interpreter service is available upon request free of charge for individuals with limited English proficiency. Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request free of charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET September 18, 2017 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME la 1 t�o� ADDRESS SU Ww1F5vrw(G1 410 ki6"--ZV FL 4M AWAJ I -Mu 7' wi. W. A)AAMIAi7W low & /q _- —C— 9 AA Jv W, B, F, D H, o HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMNUSSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT September 18, 2017 Hello Commission! Projects started without COAs/RMEs/Permits: 1416 E Wayne -new roof on south side of garage, RME same day 553 Edgewater -new roof RME same day (Advanced Roofing) 809 Forest -new roof RME three days later (Advanced Roofing) 1164 LWE- new driveway and steps 625 N -Lafayette -new roof-- Code oof- Code Hearings: 939 Johnson (Hay Barn) -LL, Repair items have been addressed, -HPC has been contacted by a roofing contractor for an RME for the roof repair 417 W Navarre -Chapin Park LHD, -$500 Civil Penalty imposed Nothing upcoming until after 10/05/2017 Hearing Docket 18 folks attended the September First Friday Then and Now Architectural Tour 10 environmental reviews since last meeting. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & $T. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA President's Report for September 18th, 2017 • 08/21/2017 7:OOP (County -City Building; Room 1308): HPC Monthly Meeting 08/22/2017 9:OOA (HPC Offices): Meeting to discuss department transition. Attendees: Elicia Feasel, Steve Dalton — Budget Consultant for St. Joseph County, James Mueller — Ex. Dir. D.C.I., Deb Fleming — County Commissioner, Brandie Ecker — HPC Legal Representative and Ben Dougherty — Assistant Attorney for the City of South Bend. • 08/24/2017 2:OOP (HPC Offices): Staff meeting. Updates on Marquette School and other matters. • 08/28/2017: Attempted to contact Mr. Douglas Gibson regarding follow-up to Routine Maintenance Exclusion for 1025 Hudson Avenue. • 08/29/2017 11:00A: Received call from Mr. Douglas Gibson. Addressed his questions. Informed that the RME was available for pickup at Building Department. • 09/06/2017: Verified RME processing for scheduled tree removal at 616 Park Avenue. • 09/08/2017 3:30P (HPC Offices): Invited to staff meeting between Elicia Feasel, Adam Toering and James Mueller — DCI; South Bend. Mr. Mueller gathered information and outlined aspects of HPC transition to the City and expectations for contractual relationship with County. • 09/13/2017 1:10P (HPC Offices): Review HPC Press Release and FOIA request from South Bend Tribune. Advise Director Feasel to forward to Brandie Ecker for compliance. • 09/14/2017 3:OOP (HPC Offices): Advise Director Feasel on items slated for September Agenda and received update on the preparation of packet materials. • 09/15/2017 2:OOP (HPC Offices): Staff meeting over various topics including department status. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS mate: September 12, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0818 Property Location: 620 West Washington ---- Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Richardsonian Romanesque/1889/Tippecanoe Place/Henry Ives Cobb, Architect Property Owner: Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #6569-1979; West Washington Street National Register District; National Historic Landmark designated by the National Park Service (only NHL in St. Joseph County and of only 42 in Indiana) Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This four-story house with an irregular plan has a 12/12 red tile covered central hip roof with numerous intersecting hips, towers, and gables, and a simple eave line with copper gutters. The exterior walls and foundations are rough stone, with limestone window and door trim. The house has large bay windows on the north fagade, a four-story tower at the northeast corner, projecting turret with conical roof at the southeast corner, a steep gable on the port-cochere at the west end, and six stone chimneys with simple banding and cut stone caps. Most windows are one -over -one wood double -hung; there are also windows with double transoms, as well as a few Gothic windows. Generally, windows are deeply recessed and feature stone lintels and sills. At the west end of the house, colonnettes flank six windows with double transoms on the fourth floor, while first story windows are set in rounded heavy stone arches with colonettes. The front entry porch is enclosed by round stone arches supported by clusters of Romanesque columns. The porte-cochere has intersecting gables and large arched openings. The rear veranda stretches around the south and east, featuring short Romanesque columns with a variety of capitals. Doors are wood. ALTERATIONS: COA 1979-1107 to convert house into a restaurant through exterior changes listed in Appendix I (including #10: enclosing rear garden veranda) was denied. COA 1979-1217 addressed concerns discussed on previous COA to convert house into a restaurant; it was conditionally approved pending treatment of the porte- cochere. COA 1980-0219, upon review for the third time, approved conversion of the house into a restaurant, enclosure of the porte-cochere doorway openings with nonfunctional paneled wood doors, and enclosure of rear veranda with 6- and 3- light casement and fixed wood windows. COA 1980-0317 approved construction of a stone sign south of the Washington Street entrance. COA 1980-0903 approved construction of a wooden fence to enclose area south of building to install a freezer. COA 1982-0524 approved repair of roof. COA 1988-0721 approved in- kind replacement of front steps and repair of north garden wall. Six- and three -light casement and fixed windows enclosing rear veranda have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval, in violation of Ordinance Section 21-100(10). COA 2017-0214A to replace wood windows in rear veranda with vinyl windows encased with wood molding to cover all exposed vinyl was denied. COA 2017-0601 (to remove and replace vinyl windows) applied, subsequently withdrawn. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of a total of 21 vinyl windows. Install 4 58 5/8' x 61 3/a" INU3161,owe- Insulated Units Low E 1" Glass Panes on the east side. Install 4 104 %2" x 61518" INU316TmpLow E -Insulated tempered glass 1" panes on the South side from The Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC and Indiana Landmarks. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to historically match. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Please see attached diagram scope of work. Due to our seasonal time as well as the cost incurred we are requesting to complete the Southeast side Spring of 2018 and the back -South side fall 2018. K&J Building Contractors on our behalf will obtain permits with both City of South Bend and the Historical Commission if needed. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant proposes removal of 21 vinyl windows installed without HPC approval, and installation of single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass windows from The Glass Doctors, for an in-kind replacement of the windows which were first installed when this area was enclosed to provide seating space for the restaurant. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to match existing trim on house. Although the porch was not originally enclosed, the proposed treatment will seek to simulate the open -porch that existed before. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Request has been made to install new windows on the southeast side of the rear porch in Spring 2018, with the balance to be replaced Fall 2018, due to the seasonal time as well as the cost incurred. Mr. Todd Zeiger of Indiana Landmarks was consulted by both the building owner's representative (Kristi Matteoni) and the contractor (K&J Building Contractors) to create a working solution for this project. Mr. Zeiger submitted diagrams and photographs detailing his recommendations that accompanied the original application, as well as were furnished to this office independently. His e-mail correspondence and diagrams are included, see attached. A site visit by Deputy Director Adam Toering and Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday in conjunction with Mr. Zeiger was held in the afternoon of Tuesday, September 1211, 2017, and confirmed the total window count and enclosure dimensions. There are at present the following distributions of windows in the concerned area: eight windows on the southeast face, twelve windows on the south face, and one window on the south west face (for a total of 21 windows). Application does not reference the south west window's fate, other than its removal. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT (Edited): On September 7, 2017 at approximately 4 PM, I visited the property located at 620 W Washington commonly known as Tippecanoe Place. After review of the COA application to remove the existing non -original vinyl windows and replace with fixed glass with wood frames. I wanted to confirm sizes and quantity, as I saw nothing listed for the west window near the door but had all 21 windows removed but only south and east side windows being replaced. I have emailed Todd from Indiana Landmarks in regards to size and quantity and he is the understanding that everything between the transition boards will be removed and that all windows will be removed and replaced with the proposed glass and wood items. I still have concerns on whether the new windows will fit in the openings properly. Todd has offered that we set up a call with the owner to answer the concerns. We will do so as soon as possible. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or -flashing signs will be permitted unless they -are original to the structure. -Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The vinyl windows currently installed replace wood windows that were not original to the structure. Group B Standards state that change of materials should be consistent with the character and style of the structure. Renovations, Section C 1, state "Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction." As the porch was originally open, but is now used for dining, enclosure is necessary. The proposed design as recommended by Mr. Zeiger of Indiana Landmarks reduces the protrusion of the windows from the existing porch fagade whilst simulating the look of the open porch prior to the installation of the windows in 1979, thus providing a consistent visual appearance; therefore, staff would recommend approval of a window design in keeping with that as proposed by Mr. Zeiger. Additionally, staff would recommend approval of the proposed time schedule, with installation of windows on the most visible southeast side in Spring 2018, with balance of windows to be installed Fall 2018. However, as the application's textual description differs in detail of dimension and construction from the recommendation of Mr. Zeiger, staff recommends that these items be rectified: 1) exact dimensions of the proposed windows could be confirmed by the contractor in accordance with Mr. Zeiger's recommendation, 2) descriptions of the proposed framing (specifically dimensions, material constitution, and profile) could be established, and 3) allow for the intended replacement for the single window on the southwest side to be determined. Written by Adam Toering Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness ' `(% -;'' m- HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION m 'A1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephAn.us OFFICE USE ONLY-- DO NOT CObIPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Application Number:'_K)k—I Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) 2 0 k-1 " (Dun 1 Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: D'Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark ACertificate of Appropriateness: 1-1 Denied ❑Tabled ❑ Local Historic District (ivame) ❑ National Register District (Name) —to D` .) ❑ NO Title: ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: 620 W. Washinaton St. South Bend, IN. 46601 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Phone #:408 238 7971— 574 303-9698 Address of Property Owner(s): 5832 Firestone Ct. San Jose, CA. 95138 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Jason (A.J) Germano and Kevin Proffitt Contract Company Name: K&J Buildine Contractors Phone #: 574 532 3978 Address of Contract Company: 52222 Pickwick Ln South Bend, In 46637 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: Commercial (Single Family—Nhtlti-Family—Commercial—Government Inditstrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: Stone (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone--Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed `York: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) MCA i Description of Proposed `York: Removal of a total of 21 vinyl windows. Install 4 58 5/8' x 61'/a" INU316Lowe-Insulated Units Low E 1" Glass Panes on the east side. Install 4104'/2" x 615/8" INU316TmDLow E -Insulated tempered Glass 1" Danes on the South side from The Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC and Indiana Landmarks. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to historically match. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Please see attached diagram scope of work. Due to our seasonal time as well as the cost incurred we are reauestine to complete the Southeast side Spring of 2018 and the back -South side fall 2018. K&J Building Contractors on our behalf will obtain permits with both Citv of South Bend and the Historical Commission if needed. k' Owner/Contractor Fax #: 408 238 2441 e-mail: kristiematteoni2roun.com (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE - 0 Note l: This piece to remain Note 2:This piece to remain All this materials including trim and framing will be removed and replaced with a single piece of clear insulated glass set in plane (in line) with wood trim adjacent to columns (Notes 1 and 2) that remains. Bottom wood sill and header to remain. All wood to be painted brown. Note 1: This --piece to ------- This framing and trim to be removed Applied trim to sill to be removed. Sill (behind) to remain. Note 2: This piece to remain All material from this point over to be removed. New thermal pane clear glass window set in plane/in line with wood that remains. All this foam and caulking to be removed — residual caulk and foal to be cleaned from limestone column. Sill to remain — trim applied to sill to be removed. v -y Alp F `4 1 Ia A iA P am ji r0 v -y Alp F `4 1 Ia ME lit am ji r0 lit Ow ME lit 1(mm u tt "k l �•& C ��CC{ 41 � � 1 li •S', i. :� l �'A 1! ,�btt4j it In \ \V� �i /r t 1 y..\ I .. ' t, !IP''' />. E 1 S ` t •(�aL/ //,5\� `1i,� .� rLow' I 1?'v. t• .�,� may' ,�.'. .� � r y;", ";i }7 r� r i�l� 1 L1:i�4 �� ,� rj� t�.. ii'�,i ir�l y 1t�,. 1 , ,�... C. '•�. 1• xtr >,� v:'rhx b �r) . tr r ury+i r,,?it �.- i� p �hl �f , h�?C A6, '� ..7'rYI �• a ,,4 'J n .. r�'}t i �"�t�t ^P P"rr v r; � . S { a iL*k i� r �{`r ,� a{ � 1 :J ' ,.Y �.�? 1 ''�'•iL �n �.a�t� Yo,+�h. ..Y�1' lYy .... F 1 tl +ar' { r }t,1 � Vit '' 1. Y„ t :tz z,l ov __�� f..,`"� + �q t x , ''' tUh' PI,. i r tti { I J � d 41 .rG' t ,dkN+!"f . ;� ••:f`�'�us.ro 4 � ('j.� ...x ,` ; ,l y IYt •, cfl it i t t � / 1 r �''. 4©f 4�'�'"r�' y � 9 .'h • fr MA +. �� } ".`!t ''♦ �.:t ,/.i 4 .,Y Rtri�, .R:F •1 h_h't r 4tt�„ S i l�}rr -., `'?'..,,:.�4 t+ Olt .., _„;.ter»`. w J ' w-�,,,.•tiC'� .Mz •yy ..t•, ,,z, 1 4 # i%t • to / : v F'�'j .,� ; Ci j,. ,�, r�"� 7 .Saari,-'��• 9 ��,�� "t ` � t j � `' �' L ; � �� ,� "`�� ,j •' M.,�_.....�� z'Vr� t .'2'wl� ��,{-!'1 ,t/err:'. :, rlr �� _ iY r� �� I �.i ,r� w��f�l +t �, t� �ij�7 `l1�'f/�.. ?g.+ �i "NKA, .�. .'%� jam• � 't� 1 1� ,,i '"�y` '.' �� a%i, • "'"'";� a 1 �;��.` �'iz�u�?..`'�r /' � '�3a+•�Ys(�r �.'� - � e c >ti'4�:""ice �'.l�iry.=d �"r''^' 'u I.; • µv \1 • 1 ?I ::•.. !' ��' ; z '3 ,� � {x��.a'eJ �i'+' 1 t�tt '.�, ,yt '+:.k• _ ¥:v '(�. i+`�',,,� •�,� ,�(j�[ a Y ,n tu... ' •. � � � "� t' � _ - - r; M+'b� t^, '.:� M � M; 1 J � �,, _ t.. ",t"'.1:3�in w+Wf_ 't'p ''..,awn �.-_�..... M� Mn•.r.� , iw, ! � r r �� til ;±y+ t i��, 1 A,. '•�wrl}.��li�lfi_`�s7 - �'s� �i � �' ��' i � t ,i / _ _Y{\ /�, . g" �-7 � ,r ,r t'E`. 4 ''' !ti� _ _ 3 .ii u'a'raa��aa�`tL*t� Psl+'t(,7�".;+tf�� Fr�k,�,r,Y�ep�.�.`r,'s. , t 5: t J _:,. �,�� t 4 t� �• rY K1� rC ,•ck.� R ,r,f�l j n -- �S" k� V'r F° sY�l4v�r4, it r �a/�' ,, aft �c s;!�,, � �•. ,! - f V�• ¢; .Y�..:,:9 Yy� '. t I '� ,�� l�"��}"I i�r��.: . ', (1� ��.,{;'. D%, r~ r�i:r�f�.'tL`_�.�• , ` . ' _ ((_ A - � ��,•I v%�};t�i,�1 Z��"f t �`�. ../g + s + s , � � �'1't". �� i�i�tt7 � ,� S +�� v �'s r ti 4! � i s � �•} �'� { I •,V � u�� f �,�,. ta, i` I � � r i r'' ,� It,lr� = _ ,"�tl v .l;py •k!{ I,aiW Ua!+ ' � r >,�i �' �..' � i r 4' • ? r � s j��. i- - Y ,,7��,.�m•jj��,`"� 1 ! � ��,,' t]{".,.,S;�vl t •„tib n!r(,. � "u` ��'t�f,f�+ f ��.+h. �i' t ., .. .. (( ! t l i.. ' 1"4i `d+3"i'.`+�U.�t. +t�1tCs3,^+,1l�. di ty� chAt Pt1,��ii,d�t! r•;'+ r, ” r /r.;. � .. "``',""�p4t, ;�b�•a{ t�!l ' I ! r *�ut7�k�'''4It ?,'�'� tr Fd� tiy"�' ibt1.,`ONE' �r t. 'i�•'i' l �.�., ,}�Lj�.�l11 l 4" t. 'fi `r� �: 1.. ".t "',!rr•.' f r• � rf �� z�, ,n � � t� jj'{..y f�J�1`9?r ••aw a , },� . r 1� ,,, i+�N '� i r'.4."� n 1 h�� u. � �+. i a^ t t •1 1 y J, +'� .AFS -- \ 1 �'t :+'. • i�4. ))!! ty �.. ,ky,. i;(T I, .4 .! V SI}• 1 - r i'",+ 'J,?, t �'. r'•y rl i It �t:�VE!'� , "'nir `, J1 `� Zu�,_ r•: rr': g {�nl.k t� R l'+ 'tt N' ',. ,;� t •:?�'� 1;�;. �r4{ tt� '�. ,,1 �,. A: f� �y�� L• 'O.:�v •. i i�• 3; �. 1 q'_', ��i? r.l , qt.' V, t ' i' �j t ,4>+n�.l Y" t�'( N{'4i 1�• . �.4 }!{i' ,>ri{ r,>, i,..,i''*d41P 1 �`, cy �4 ' i.�,t.,C Yi t ry(i ! it q,'.,:'.ht��j1I4��^Ss�,.�i}.I�y�•+'Ty ",r a,•;,A!! l.(+ �, �p ltti� � Vf.�u•. � j//1,� it .y� -:.r ,�'r�, Ilp+ L�.4� �r,. s , ic�.i ' $„1 la,t: _ �s(;:x. ' S. "rF '•y.�"t V S n, .! � t.. N,'U it :+ (y �+ti �:: !!„�' 1 kJ , . ' d'( ��uy t�l, t k y.p',1 E t Y,. .� 4t�l�tn}5,� .; . } 'd'"• ��'' r1' .:I�h °�' a-. t aa��'. ., r �st•.. ,,� .t�i� $;d;7t,. '!"' �6 '�s" Cc'i b� i4. �, �t�. +l ,' rig `_ ,,Y �` I t � `�, a;' c , �: % �+• �ir� �+U�'�i� .�ii� '��'Irk d14.;.tJ" '} �' 7;�nt1 � tr �l. i ddJJ,,.. y y ds:�'4Ft `+ � vlt , %, '�a�it ��tyl4p,�¢� �: �j • '�3h,, {�,��i ''�i{ut r'a:zk..x 1 �Yp}�, ti k^is��yy,,1,, a,+ St\ rrd} f'k• s41,.Yss. a. ti+ti °i '_- dy a\� rf.. /,+ . t . A"i�A-3.'� ,�yy.rk .1 V a'i7 i' 4 ',txt! tAA;'V' 7'?2 .':., �'t4L •ti 1,, Itc. •;1,. 5±,�. =.n r.+ s:.�C t_ i r ai4r [ `4 + � / S;T5,,7 �' n�d�.�+di:l 'ri tit•�d�,, +t3tt < ° �c! ' �s'p(1�,I��k i. .,., �*as„> �ci��^E- !,; • i t+atr! 4 1 r lu 'r.+Mur:".' 1 5 H 4. +! a \ •[l }„ ... 4 \ �- �iV } 4Y L ''�'� �'” t •.rj t fd , ?+ n >iL ��y '1� f I v rt ` 1 �7 M1+ ��u '}4 1 {; �="� Ea.., �., V. a• I•r. `" � � `.'�^f 9f � i r + r� '(illliSUliifit{itltiil liiiini iti Nifi tiilliPn+i+uselnrl+aut¢Ilr,n+in+I+ini A i.. ,' , °, � t`��°'`,, ` r> , � 111,IiCl(IICIiI�IC(Ci��ICiCI�Itl�l�lllll�I111111iIIiIC(��IIIIIIII�I�IIIGIIIiIGiI F I Ji' Y iry f�t� � #sir a j � i �' .. s1lU�a4 C� � pI1It�Itj I�IITp1 ;;t�III�IIII+I!tt(tltltltlt 1ffIj�Ilt I1If1jjII�1,�tIpl�+Itljiltllljll�, r�1pA�1r11J7p�Jrtlittttttll/!1t � "�i Al �"� 4A r;�.i. � .;i' III VIII Iiil��I ilili i[int i!"IIUtI7i�ilittl �iii(t�ilitil��i itU t:. Q� - —. ' i I i 1 �" � 1 m �_ �� 1 IIU! !! �J111!(10!!Cl!llllltllllAlUW AILIIIUIN+IUIIMllU!(!!ltilP � ' �i {` "r IV o v.,.,r�.w-�'ICYp:i7ddii,ec=mservsn r 1' I �� f .•..y � i , aw�+- '!' J _ i ,. r � � � � i ;• � �4xi�,�.ti'� •.�i�'.�y .Iii:..,- . �� tt I 1, .:. , '+5w�' 1• . ,, i � i, i, -: • _. r I �,, { 1. f . .tt I fit« .�k �'�{5 5'!. �3 n::.- �.iv +.��y �}ti I.f� 45l� ':._ I • !1 •• '~ � S a i -- ji t '•+ ;� ,j, VP tAR,Y�,��+�All INU Ell{ Po'. f5 ....:.....•..—..,+-:.•.r.w.^o.:.. yt ... ��"��, �� - /j•� - ` � �� i +�rr' � '.r �}'.}1�11� �}p� 5j � � I Vrtr . VAN Ml 1 .. i �, � , s 6�' �. .�4�MC1�r �iA� it�l,{= � r. � �1v"� r •1 r ' it f c��?I !t tt �.! +�.�..,� � t aQ� s � Adam Toering From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Todd Zeiger <TZeiger@indianalandmarks.org> Wednesday, September 13, 2017 11:05 AM Kristi L. Matteoni;jasongermano@gmail.com Adam Toering RE: 620 West Washington Windows Tippecanoe Place porch window detail August 2017.pdf Hello, Kristi and Jason, A quick follow up regarding message below and just wanting to take the extra measure to ensure we are all talking the same proposal. I have attached the document that outlined out understanding of the window project and the associated existing construction removal. This is the form that Kristi confirmed was the intention for the removal/Installation and what we have approved. From the measurements provided in the COA and as verified on site yesterday— it appears that the proposal is calling for the 2" x 6"framing members adjacent to the transition boards to remain. That is not what was outlined in the attached. Maybe it's a matter of semantics but wanted to be extra caution. Let's plan to confirm this before Monday's meeting. Thank you Todd ........................................ Todd Zeiger Director, Northern Regional Office .................................... Indiana Landmarks 801 'W. Washington South Bend, IN 46601 Office. 574-232-4534 Cell - 574-286-5765 www.indianalandmarks.orz Indiana Landmarks revitalizes communities, reconnects us to our heritage, and saves meaningful places. Become a member I Subscribe to our e -letter I Find us on Facebook I Follow us on Twitter From: Adam Toering[mailto:atoering@sjcindiana.comj Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 5:03 PM To: jasongermano@gmail.com Cc: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@sjcindiana.com>; Todd Zeiger <TZeiger@indianaland marks.org>; SSzaday@co.st-joseph.in.us Subject: RE: 620 West Washington Windows FYI, My e-mail for Todd Zeiger ( tzeiger@indianalandmarks.org ) was wrong. Please update accordingly. My apologies, still getting a hang of this new e-mail account. Adam Toering Deputy Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Boulevard, South bend, IN 46601 P: 574-235-9798 1 F: 574-235-9798 1 E: atoerinR@sicindiana.com 1 From: Adam Toering Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 4:59 PM To:'jasongermano@gmail.com' <iasonRermano(cDRmail.com> • Elicia Feasel <efeasel aPsicindiana.com>;'tzeiger@indianalandmarks.com'<tzeiRer(@indianalandmarks.com>; aday@co.st josepWn.us' <SSzadav(d)co.st-ioseoh.in. us> Su ject: 620 West Washington Windows Jason, Thank you for returning my call this afternoon and being so agreeable to discuss and resolve my questions regarding the proposed window work at 620 West Washington ("Tippecanoe Place"). As I mentioned on the phone, I was joined by HPC's Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday and Indiana Landmarks' Todd Zeiger in a site visit today where we discussed and measured the window enclosures. Here are my concerns: 1) The proposed application calls for four 'new' windows on the south side to replace the 'existing' vinyl windows ("'Install 4104 '2" by 615/8" INU316TmpLow E -Insulated tempered glass 1" panes on the South side from The Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC and Indiana Landmarks."). Each enclosure, from transition piece to transition piece (inside the supporting and decorative pillars) measured more than 110". For the purposes of my report, there are some concerns regarding the overall dimensions of these windows and the "remainder" space between the new windows and the supporting pillars. Updated and amended dimensions for all four of these would be beneficial. 2) The proposed application calls for four 'new' windows on the east side ("Install4 58 5/8'x 61 %" INU316Lowe- Insulated Units Low E 1" Glass Panes on the east side."). These enclosures, from transition piece to transition piece (inside the supporting and decorative pillars) measured more than 65". Updated and amended dimensions for all four of these would be beneficial. 3) Beside the man -door on the Southwest wall there is a single window. The application as received referenced its removal with the others ("Removal of a total of 21 windows vinyl windows."). As a break -down: twelve windows are on the south side, eight are on the southeast side, leaving a single on the southwest side. What are your intentions for this opening? Dave, from The Glass Doctor, expressed his optimism that this could be resolved, and looked forward to supplying the expected glass in any dimensions. Once again, thank you for being so open to address these concerns in a timely manner for the sake of our Commission meeting next Monday. We expect to send out our Staff Reports to the Commission tomorrow at end -of -day. I have CC'd the following people on this exchange: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director and Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist — both of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County — and Todd Zeiger, Director, Northern Office (Indiana Landmarks). Adam Toering Deputy Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Boulevard, South bend, IN 46601 P: 574-235-9798 1 F: 574-235-9798 1 E: atoering@sicindiana.com ,. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 15, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0831B Property Location: 410 Manitou Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-Ell/1884 and 1892 Property Owner: Charles and Carol Rosenberg Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District, local ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two-storey Gabled -ell house built in 1894. One shed -roof addition on the south side (unknown date), enclosed porch/entrance at northeast corner. Street -facing windows are casement, south facing windows are 1/1 Double Hung. Aluminum siding. Detached garage facing the southern alley. ALTERATIONS: COA 2006-0926, replace kitchen window double hung sash with Pella Double Hung Jambliner Precision Fit Window sash. Wood sash with exterior aluminum cladding. COA 2007-0426, remove non- functioning chimney on main roof. COA 2007-0601A, three -layer complete tear off and install new 30 year shingle asphalt, ice and water shield at all edges and valleys. COA 2009-0623, remove 2 Cedar trees — dying and nuisance on east side of house between 406 Manitou and house (`approved by Brent'). APPLICATION ITEMS: Installing 20 solar panels on southern roof (roofs) — invisible from street. No other exterior changes except for a disconnect box on rear of house beside electric meter. From additional attached document: "Install 20 39" x 77" Mitsubishi 360W solar panels on the south -facing roofs (see attached diagram). Each panel will have an optimizer on its underside. The panels will be mounted on the shingled roofs on racks 5 inches off the . roof, flush with the roof slope. A disconnect box, measuring approximately 12" x 4" will be mounted on the rear of the house beside the electric meter. All of the installation can be removed after installation with no alteration or damage to the existing structure. The project is completely reversible. Because the house faces nothing will be visible from the street (see photographs). The placement of the garage and trees at the rear of the property and height of the roofs means that the panels will also be virtually invisible from the alley (see photographs). A SolarEdge SE 7.6 kW inverter will be installed inside the house." STAFF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Installation of 20 39" x 77" Mitsubishi 360W solar panels on the southern roof surfaces. According to the attached design schematic, seven panels will be installed on the original roofline, an additional thirteen will be installed on the shed roof (later addition). Additional mechanicals and disconnect box will be installed on the south side of the house. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: (Excerpt September 7, 2017) The property is lined with a very tall tree canopy and the southern roof is not visible from the street nor from the rear alley. A garage at the rear of the property blocks most of the view of the rear of the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum -sided houses are covered with the same materials. Reauired The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. E. MECHANICAL SERVICES The majority of the structures within the district have oil or gas heat, and have brick chimneys through the roof. Some houses have one or two window air conditioners. Required Required mechanical systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possible alteration of the structural integrity and physical appearance of the building. Recommended Solar collectors and TV dishes should be placed in the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. Window air conditioners and exhaust fans should be installed at the rear or an inconspicuous side window. Original lighting fixtures should be utilized whenever possible. Prohibited Holes shall not be cut through walls or roofs in areas that can be seen from the street to accommodate air conditioners or other mechanical equipment. Not Recommended Exterior electrical and telephone cables should not be attached to the street elevations of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: With consideration and understanding of Chapin Park's Guidelines and Standards (specifically the sections detailing roofs and mechanical services), staff would recommend approval of the proposed project. Written by Adam Toering Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.st osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCBP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-jos6phJn.us OFFICE USE OtNLYS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN TFUS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: f11 1 i Application Number: of -1 .Y ) (nteoiLat Reiw) PastReviews: ES ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: �? ❑ Local Landmark Ef Local Historic District (Noose) fit 1� i a ❑ National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) " Address of Property for proposed work: q117 Mf}}jJ 1 roti pI�� s©, MND 46b[(, lie (Street Number—Streekame—Cit)—Zip"Codee)).�, Name of Property Owner(s): c_t'►FP�L('�g/).i�� Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): 1+10 �%Wl-rOV PLP46 S©. PrND— "rt-av(b (Street Nuihber—Street Namel City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): 67,) -90&� 1-DFR Phone #: S-4� 773--o546 Contractor Company Name: -S LAP- ewm, \1 Address of Contractor Company: (qs2 (Street Numbers Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: S/luG,t 4Mii_�l (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: __ i)nOD M,5 (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone--Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ® New ❑Replacement (not in-kind) ❑Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: 26 SOS M C--" ON SOt?' �RM t 4vc�t- nr7 -/fir rKc r- s [ . N() u ttM rx tcrctuu� Owner/G. nt ete, : #: a -mail: jG(rlP✓r� ('G�� f"Q ��/`t�r �Omil ,s,, c%�tsi�^�dohC-f✓kgil;• info Gj5e5(nCjJqhCt. C0M and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 410 Manitou Place, Chapin Park Historic District, South Bend, IN 46616 WRITTEN DESCRIPTION. MATERIALS TO BE USED: 1-� Spec sheet for Mitsubishi 360W Solar Panels 3 Spec sheet for SolarEdge Power Optimizer G Spec sheet for SolarEdge Single Phase Inverters r_> SolarEdge information sheet showing how system is installed and works Photograph showing panel mounts and racking on a shingle roof Photographs showing disconnect switch box SITE PLAN: Aerial view of house showing orientation to street Aerial view of house showing panel configuration on south -facing roofs PHOTOGRAPHS: 410 Manitou Place from the street 410 Manitou Place from the rear ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION Photograph of an example of solar panels mounted on a roof Solar Home Improvement Agreement (contingent on receipt of a COA) Project location: 410 Manitou Place, South Bend, IN. Project description: Install 20 39" x 77" Mitsubishi 360W solar panels on the south -facing roofs (see attached diagram). Each panel will have an optimizer on its underside. The panels will be mounted on the shingled roofs on racks 5 inches off the roof, flush with the roof slope. A disconnect box, measuring approximately 12" x 4" will be mounted on the rear of the house beside the electric meter. All of the installation can be removed after installation with no alteration or damage to the existing structure. The project is completely reversible. Because the house faces north, nothing will be visible from the street (see photographs). The placement of the garage and trees at the rear of the property and height of the roofs means that the panels will also be virtually invisible from the alley (see photographs). A SolarEdge SE 7.6 kW inverter will be installed inside the house. Homeowner: Charles and Carol Rosenberg Tel: 574-232-6616 e-mail: charles—rosenberg@yahoo.com Contractor: Solar Energy Systems, LLC 1952 W. Market St. Nappanee, IN 46550 Phone: 574-773-0546 Contact: Brian Burkholder e-mail: brian@sesindiana.com IPOWERFF] may.' .-A Positive power tolerance 0^'+4.99 watt 13 aOO as Withstand strong snow load 5400 Pa /wind load 2400 Excellent low light performance 3.5% relative eff. reduction at low -irradiance (20OW/m2) 100% EL inline inspection Better module reliability Ammonia resistance According to IEC 62716 Ed. 1 U Reliability & Certification Product guarantee: 10 -year Linear Performance Warranty 1 -year: 97% power output then power degradation 0.7% per year till 25th year 25 -year: 80.2% power output 10 -year: 90.7% power output IEC 61215 / IEC 61730, CE, MCS, UL1703, CEC -y Please refer to NSP product warranty for details �••-,.,-.-• -••_,:7777. TOVP.heiniand `� 'f •„ ' zrom I000 0 0003saLa C u5 C E LISTED PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULE E33O639 10 year 90 7% NSP F Slandarct-w—nenly Year; n . Ln Li 30 For more information, please visit us at www.nsp.com Copyright © 2016 NSP Corp. All rights reserved 5pecifications are subject to change without notice. me A Electrical Data 41 DC ].000V Maximum Rating Power (Pmax) 350 W 355 W 36o W M 'dul `•' Efficlep -^c '''176 �' `=18b%�; e - 83 - ••r, Open Circuit Voltage (vac) 46.89 V 47.16 V 47.44 V •MdXI(i1IfrI1 eOVJejaiOltage (Vmpp):38.34V � 0 Short Circuit Current (ISc) 9.54 A 9.70 A 9 77 A Maxm`i1diP01NECCUIietlttlmppf_" % 9:i3A- J;i9.A. 923.0 "Pectrical data under standard Test Conditions (STC): Cell Temperature of 25'C. Irradiance 1000 W!m'. AM 1.5 "Values w/o tolerance are typical numbers - 'Specifications subject to change Mechanical Data RilitilDimension 1956mm (L)' x 992 mm (W)' x 35 mm (D)'- / 77" (L)' x 39.1" (W)' x 1.38" (D)' Weight' 23k"`r561 I6i"t, '- Solar Cell 72 monocrystalline 6" silicon cells Frcritelass,'d3-t.'Anlj.=reflective tempered sola) glass, 3.2 mm thickness Cell Encapsulation EVA (Ethylene -Vinyl -Acetate) oitiposite`filrjij-lNtife"+ Junction Box IP 67 rated Frame:=':., r;t ::: ' .'•: Qnori'ied `ailirpitiuiri fra}tle :original or black Package Configuration 30 pcs per pallet, 660 modules per 40' HQ container i ;With assembly tolerance oft 2 mm It 0.08"I 7 :With assembly tolerance oft 0 8mm it 0.03"1 Operating Conditions Mechanical Load 11 Pa (Certified byTOV Rheinland) lvlvfrnum System Voltage DC ].000V Series Fuse Rating 15A Operating Temperature =40'to 85 aC Temperature Characteristics k IR Item �...� SpeclficatloR;K :� s� � OperatingNominal 1 Temperature Coefficient of Voc '0.318 %/ •C Temperature Coefficient of Pmax';;,.. ?''fb;427,!%"C • Nominal Openting Cell Temperature (NOCT): Irradiance SCOW/m'. Ambient Temperature 20'C. Wind Speed t m/s ' Please refer to NSP's standard Mudule Installation Manual before using the product ' Reducdori In efficienrf from 1000 W/m'tn 200 W/m' at 25'C• 3.5%t 2% Front View & Back View 992 mm 139.1" I; E m 11 mrn / 0.43" 35 mm/ 1.38" I IA , _i2rFrme 021nane Naka A A -A Detail Detail B Dependence on Temperature too � l2n i ts. VOC s 60 Pmax . a •' 40 romp Corff. of ISL = 0.042 m 1Temp Cnsff of Vu E 0.318 -20 Temp. Coeff. of?max=-0.4279;![ - -2i 5 IS 35 55 75 9!1 Temperature r'C) ASA1.5G 1000w/m' Dependence on Irradiance to n lnoo w/m= a a 6 w 5 600 W/m1 u' -0 a 400 W/me 2 I 200 W/m'........-...-...�.�..-...,.w,-....'+� 0 0 5 to 15 20 25 30 3S 40 45 50 Voltage IV) Temperas re 25"e Contact Us MITSUBISHI For sales, contact Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. ELECTRIC 5900-A Katella Avenue Ph: 714-236-6137 Cypress, CA 90630 Email: pv@meus.mea.com SOLAR INNOVATIONS wwW.MitsubishiElectricSoiaccom Copyright © 2016 NSP Corp All rights reserved Specifications are subject to change without notice. Neo Solar Power Corporation Headquarters: 7, Li-Hsin 3rd Rd., Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, 30078, Taiwan 946 mm 1372 M � 0 � _ i E E E c 9B 0 m v �ffi , o t m , _i2rFrme 021nane Naka A A -A Detail Detail B Dependence on Temperature too � l2n i ts. VOC s 60 Pmax . a •' 40 romp Corff. of ISL = 0.042 m 1Temp Cnsff of Vu E 0.318 -20 Temp. Coeff. of?max=-0.4279;![ - -2i 5 IS 35 55 75 9!1 Temperature r'C) ASA1.5G 1000w/m' Dependence on Irradiance to n lnoo w/m= a a 6 w 5 600 W/m1 u' -0 a 400 W/me 2 I 200 W/m'........-...-...�.�..-...,.w,-....'+� 0 0 5 to 15 20 25 30 3S 40 45 50 Voltage IV) Temperas re 25"e Contact Us MITSUBISHI For sales, contact Mitsubishi Electric US, Inc. ELECTRIC 5900-A Katella Avenue Ph: 714-236-6137 Cypress, CA 90630 Email: pv@meus.mea.com SOLAR INNOVATIONS wwW.MitsubishiElectricSoiaccom Copyright © 2016 NSP Corp All rights reserved Specifications are subject to change without notice. Neo Solar Power Corporation Headquarters: 7, Li-Hsin 3rd Rd., Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu, 30078, Taiwan sPlar =@@ SolarEdge Power Optimizer Module Add -On For North Ame rica P300 / P320 / P400 / -P405 U so lar=@@ SolarEdge Power Optimizer Module Add -On for North America P320 P400 P405 P300 (for high-power (for 72 & 96 -cell (for thin film (for 6Q cell modules) 6D -cell modules) modulesl modules) NP_0 R 320 400 ................. .......... �..300. .................... ............................ ........... ...... .. .... ............ ........... .. W Absolute Maximum Input Voltage 48 $o Vdc'. peratur)..... ............ ............... .................................................... .............. ........... ..(Y�RS,atlowestte ........... ........e MRUPPnift M%e 8-48 8-80 ................. 12.5-105 ..... . ................. Maximum Short Circuit Current (Isc)11 ......................................................... ....Adc .......... ......................................... ............ Maximum DC Input Current 12.5 ............................ ....... I .............. 13.75 12.63 .......................... Adc ... ...... . .....I.. 99.5 Maximum . Efficiency ......................................... ................................................... R % : ...................... .............. ........... .................... ...d..E..ffid.n.q ..................... ............ .................................... ..98.8 ....................................................... .....% ...... Overvoltag6 Category11 lo 0 TPUTOURIN QWER*jOPTI IZER NNECTE6.1 P - urn Output Currc . .................... Maximum................................................................ Adc .............. M...................... 60 aximum Output Voltage Vdc O . UtpVt D"I-jR*IN'O��"D.O'i.(P.'QWttt*OVTIMI itWD'StONNEdtD FROM SCAAREDGE. INVERTER.OR 90LAREDGE INVVITER.'60) Safety Output Voltage per Power Vdc Optimizer .,STANPAR �Com CE, -.5F EMCFCC IEC61000--2, IEC610OG-6-3 Parl:15 Class B, 6 Y., .............................................. .............. ............................ 7 .......... atqw .................................... .................................................................. (c ss ....................................IEC62109-1................. .. 11 sa tYj,....... ................................... . ............ RoHS Yes TDN .I STALLAT,O SPIECIFICA Maximum Allowed SystemVbltap ................ ....................................... 10.00 ............... ....................................... .... Vdc..... 7Compitibleinverters, All SolarEdge Single Phase and Three Phase inverters Compatible ... .................... . . . ........ .. .............. ....... 128 x 152x 27.57 Hi,x* m /..i.n Dimensions (WxLxH) 5x5.97x1.08 5x5.97x1.37. .....5x5.97x196..... ......' . .........m. ...... ............................................... ......... ................................�.......................,.... Weight including cables).....................................76011.7............. ... ....... ...... . ......830 1.8 ...............1064/ ...... ?.A.......... rindt Connector ........................... .......................................... . ............ ... .......... ........ ...................... Output W Type .Doublelnsulated; MC4 Compatible ............... .................... ............. ......0.95/3.0.........................................1.2 3.9.........................m Output Wire le° h................... ..........................................0:95X8:0......... Operating Temperature -40-+85/-40-.+185 -F ...E1..... .........................................................................................I Protection Rath ..................................NEMA...................................................... ............. e Humidity0100 *4*..................... ........................................... .............-........................................................... ' ........% ...... Rated S'T'C*'p*o*w*e*r'o*f'themoduk-- Module of up to +S% pawertolerance allowed. Minimum String Length 8 10 18 JeRyerqpftize!s) ...................... ..................................... ..................................... ..................................... .............. Maximum String Length 25 25 so (Power Optlmlze!s) .................................. ... .............................. I ...... ..................................... ..... ;�i ...... ...................... Maximum Power 5250 6000 .... ..................................... ...................................... ..................................... 12750 .............. Parallel Strings of Different Lengths Yes ............................................ ............. ................................................................................................... .o..r Orientations .............. P3 ft is not allowed tomix P405 with moolmoo/pwolpmo in one string. SolarEdge Single Phase Inverters for North America S" -U ' SE380OH-US / SE500OH-US / SE600OH-US <S 760OH-Ut , fE USA -CANADA -GERMANY -ITALY -FRANCE -JAPAN -CHINA -AUSTRALIA -THE NETHERLANDS-UK-ISRAEL-TURKEY-SC)UTH AFRICA -BULGARIA www.solaredge.us Single Phase Inverters far North America solars ms SE3000H-US / SE3800N-US / SE5000H-US / SE600OH-US/ SE7600H-US to Forother regional settings please contact SolarEdge support 01 Ahighercurrentsource maybe used; theinverterwiii limit its input current to thevatues stated PI Revenue grade inverter P/N: SEx=d1-US0Q0NNC2 141 Power de -rating from SWC - m-40 version P/N: 5E=tKH-USW0NNU4 SE3000H-US SE38OOH-US ! SESOOOH=US I SE6000H-US , SE7600H-US 1 • t:06TPU.T:15rat�i�l.`E ... .- ^":.�','� ^T.>� _.<°�^::- :r;g2:A:•fH w:»✓k. ..,__, ... .'R,.1`�s:{:. ` 1 Rated AC Power Output 3000 3800 5000 6000 7600 VA »» ACFowerOutput................................ 6000........,....,7600..,,..... VA..... s AC Output Voltage Min. -Nom. -Max. {183 - 208 -229) .......3000 ..........,,..3800....,.. ,......5...........,..000 - '� ............... - ............... ......... Vac i,..... ......................................................... ' AC Output Voltage Mln,-Nom,-Max,{211-240.264)......... ............. ........ `V f......... '�.....,...............,..... .....Vac...,. 1 AC frequency�Nominal)..,.,,.,..'................................... ................. ,..,, ,... 59.3-60-60.51'1 H...... MaxidiumCantimousOutput Current 208V 24 ....... • . ..................:..... Maximum Continuous Output Current 240V »» »»»»» 125 .. ..... .:...... 16 .... ......�.......:....., 21...,... ....... ...................., 32»» »»»»» » A ,....A...... iGFDIThre............hold .............................. i Utility Monitoring, Istanding Protection, ..................................................:Z...,......,........................................ yes Counrt ?ofi irableThresholds Vic- A4. W= _ ..A'-:.. ,x.�. v >,t-...?.. >..z.J,r.: Ka'r'l-�,.•.,l•. w:at+..>. .-. .r : ..,.e : r - ..-_ �-�'T��r v .. Maxirsiuml7CPower t 4650._....,�.......5900....,..�7750..,.,.....,...9300,...,,.1......11800........ ....,W.,.... ..., :.. Transformer -less, Ungrounded Yes .................................. ... „ ................................................ i Maximum Input.....Voltage» .......... 480 Vdc .............................. .Nominal DC lnputVoltage ..................... .................. 380 ....... .. ......................... ........... Vdc,.... MaximumInoutCurrent 208V 121 .85 .. ......i:'..,.. T: .................... ......... ..,...... Adc,... .Maximum !Hoot Current 240V m 10 5 + 13S 16S 20 Adc fMax. input Short Grcuit Current.................................>,...............,..,..,...... ... 45,,.....,......,..........,........,.,......,.......... Adc..... 3; Reverse-Polarity»Protection ...........................i. .... .......... ... ,. ,........... .... ,... YeS. ` ""Ground -Fault isolation Detection I :. 600ksSensitivitY ............................................. .......... ...........I....... .... ........ tMaximum inverterEificiency 99........�. ,....,........,........... 9:2.»...,.................................... 'fi .... .............. CECWeighted Efficiency 9�,,................................................. ............. ...... ............................................................ Nighttime Power Consumption - :,, U 5-..�.,r.;...y:..,a.:3s.-.:.,,:7,]r�,>.::ws..e._;r:.,..nS.,,. �e...z,.,.,.,...z ... .,. ., n -_..:. ...,. ... .. ... .... .. _:,- .: ...,•,. ,. ,. _ r .Supported Communication Interfaces .»..............?..... hernet.2igBee{optional}_Cellutar(opiional� __ ..» :: .::— --. . Revenue Grade Data, C12.20 .........., Optional? .................................................... _ . .. ...................... .............. _..._ .. _ m -Rapid Shutdown - NEC -2014 and 2017 694.12 ". Aotorriatic Rapid Shutdown upon AC Grid _ "Disconnect < r3G Ci'n^'3;r.i.l' ,.. lA4M ": :i'jlit M. �Sl'iKNDARCI:COMP.l1ANCE,,..,�fi..f........:...,. ;w,.. ,-_.-,..=.,.„.,.,.s:�.... ,..-...._..........,.....>- :..+.:...e... ..,..,, :.1_.. j Safety!,»»»•»» Uti742,Ut1742SAiU116998.CSAC22,2,CanadianAFCiaccordingtoT,i.LM-07 »»»» »»»»»» Grid Connection Standards . Rule 7-1,Rule 14 (HI) » . ...................................art Emissions ......................... FCC Fart 15 Class B fv • PtNS]•ACLATIONSPECIF[CATIQNIIS.;-,-:,:-,.,....•:•.'r�r.:-._�.��.,,.<,:r;,,..,ac_,.,,;,,,,,-�:...,,:�:,::..,�>,;.:.,_.a::m, ,..._.. - ,, .• 1 ...,-- AC Outout Conduit Srze /AWG Range ................ .. 0.75,1"'Conduit/ 14 6 AWG .......... j DC Input Size J # of Strings J AWG Range..................................0...... • Ca•nduit... 2 strings/ 14.. AWS ............................ ............. I Dimensions with Safety Switch (HxWxD) »» 17.7 x 14.6 x 6,8 / 450 x 370 x 174 in/mm » . » »»»»»» Weight with Safety Switch..,.,...» ,.»» » 251/11.4..........,,,,.,., ..2».11.9::,.,,.•...,_..... /kg... ....................................22/10 j Noise.. .,......._.:...l. <50 d8A ..., ...:. .......................................... Natural convection and Cooling Natural Convection internal fan (user freplaceable) _OperatingTemperatureRanke -13 to+140/_25to+60("1.(gptF -40'Caption�f5} .............. .F. C Protection Rating......................................................................NEMA 3R (Inverter wfth Safety Switch.,......................................... to Forother regional settings please contact SolarEdge support 01 Ahighercurrentsource maybe used; theinverterwiii limit its input current to thevatues stated PI Revenue grade inverter P/N: SEx=d1-US0Q0NNC2 141 Power de -rating from SWC - m-40 version P/N: 5E=tKH-USW0NNU4 > Making PV Modules Smarter THE SOLAREDGE SOLUTION As a PV inverter and power optimization leader, SolarEdge has shipped more than 2.9GW of its DC optimized inverter solutions to 91 countries. SolarEdge's cutting edge technology gives you smart system control that manages your array for maximum performance. Power optimizer OV 1%'� POWER OPTIMIZER By connecting a SolarEdge power optimizer to a PV module it becomes a smart module. This allows: • Harvest of up to 25% more energy from each module • Constant feedback on the performance of each module • Designed to automatically shutdown each module for maximum safety in case of an emergency INVERTER A simpler and more reliable Inverter: • Responsible only for DC to AC conversion, as all other functions are handled separately for each module by the power optimizers Compact, light weight and simple design Ur,IGesmanyl Italy) FramallsraegUSAI W nada IlapanlChinalAustraBaiNalhcdandslTurkcyl5outh Africa) Bulgaria Inverter Monitoring MONITORING By displaying real-time performance data, the monitoring portal allows: • Visibility of your system's performance • Easy access frorn a computer, smartphone`, or tablet S\fk;f7 �4 574-773-0546 inro(r)scsindiana.coni solar- o o InioNA@solarrdga.aom . x�uwsolaradgo.<om/us 11 • •. w W, f aaa_ n f f C an.t ' lrrrier� ae .y. .rrrxrrxx Connecting SolarEdge power optimizers to PV modules makes them SMART MODULES that Moduce MORE POWER 1 410 Manitou Place, COA Application Panel mounts and racking on a shingle roof. 410 Manitou Place, COA Application Disconnect switch box (exterior and interior views) to be located beside the electric meter on the rear of the house. r Location of electric meter at 410 Manitou Place 410 Manitou Place, COA Application Satellite view showing Rosenberg house at 410 Manitou Place, South Bend Panels to be mounted on the south facing roofs at the rear of the house, invisible from the street. Each panel will have an optimizer on the underside There are 2 strings of 10 panels each going to one inverter The panels will be mounted 5 inches off the roof flush with the roof slope 410 Manitou Place, COA Application 410 Manitou Place from the street. View from in front of 410 Manitou Place View from the east View from the west Solar Energy Systems 1952 W. Market St Nalipanee, IN 46550 Phone: 574-773-0546, Fare: 574-773-0546 www.sesindiana.com Solarize Northern Indiana is not liable for anything beyond this point This contract is only between the Customer and Solar Energy Systems, LLC Customer: Seller & Installer Charles R Carol Rosenberg Solar Energy Systems 410 Manitou Place 1952 W MarketSt South Bend; IN Nappanee, IN 46550 Installation Location Salesperson: 410 Manitou Place Brian Burkholder "iris Solar Home Improvement Agreement (this "Agreement") is between Solar Energy Systems ("we" or "The Contractor") and you (`you", "buyer", "O Nmer", or "customer'), collectively "The Parties , for the sale and installation of the solar system described below (the "Project") at your home (the "Property" or your "Home"). We look forward to helping you produce clean, renewable solar energy at your Home. The Parties agrees as follows: KEY TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT AND DESCRIPTION OF THE SIGNIFICANT MATERIALS TO RE USED AND EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED ITEi4f ` Meter Number for this site: Photovoltaic System Size: Modules: Inverters) Mounting System: 0 7.2 Opt. 2 Mitsubishi 360 SolarEdge SE 7.6kW Pitch Roof 2. CONTRACT PRICE The Contract Price for the Project is : before sales tax and any incentives. The Contract Price can only be changed by change orders, which are agreed upon in writing by both parties. System Pricing Details ' Installed System Price (including tax): 3. INSTALLATION TIMELINE The Contractor will install the System within a reasonable amount of time after we sign this Agreement. Once The Contractor starts, the job shall be complete approximately weeks. The timeline is an estimate and may be adjusted as provided in this Agreement, including delays due to late payments, weather, or unforeseen conditions. 8/25/2017 Solar Energy Systems 1 4. SCHEDULE OF PAYMENTS _Date Timing Amount Initial Deposit (501/o) After panel installation (251/1o) Completion of Job (25%) Total Sale Pricer Additional Contract Provisions: 1. All payments are due Net 10 days. 3% interest per month carrying charge. 2.• System completion occurs upon building or electrical inspector's signoff. 3. This PV system includes ten-year limited warranty for all labor from Solar Energy Systems. 4. All warranty on materials will be given with the owner manuals at the end of the project. Buyer's Initials 0Ake Owner's Name: Charles & Carol Rosenberg . Solar Rep: Brian Burkholder Signature: /1 n_a4 Signature: 9411� �� m Date: 8/25/17 Date: 8/25/17 8/25/2017 Solar Energy Systems 2 RESOLUTION NO. 17-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA REGARDING THE USE OF ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY TECHNOLOGIES IN HISTORIC LANDMARK BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County (the "Commission") is open to and encouraging of the use of appropriate energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods in historic landmark buildings and districts which are in harmony with existing standards and guidelines for such structures; and WHEREAS, the Commission wishes to encourage all owners or potential owners of properties designated as historic landmarks or located in a historic district to contact the Commission if they are considering or interested in the use of energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods for such properties; and WHEREAS, the Commission is committed to working with owners and potential owners of properties designated as historic landmarks or located in a historic district to determine the most appropriate energy conservation and sustainability methods for each individual property; and WHEREAS, the Commission will consider applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods individually, with due regard to the circumstances and specifications of each specific property, in the same manner as the Commission considers applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for all proposed alterations. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Historic Preservation Commission is open to and encouraging of the use of appropriate energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods in historic landmark buildings and districts which methods and technologies are in harmony with existing standards and guidelines for such structures, and encourages all owners or potential owners of such properties interested in such technologies and methods to contact the Commission. SECTION 2. The Commission is committed to working with owners of such properties to determine the best fit for each property, and to consider each application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for such technologies and methods on an individual basis, in the same manner as all other applications for Certificates of Appropriateness are evaluated and considered. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage S�f IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Resolution has been adopted on tbisA/ tray of 4(t6U,5'T 2017. ATTEST: Aecreta�, HO—okfic ervation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County R i hR s u i i 'tf 4t lL i�& M1rM1 t 5� � ��s�i�5��\� t � � Z°Y�,yt,�'h �t� .L ♦ �� L t � R f ? i",< � � �` r,t7 l �� 1 i •- 1 � c -�s,- V`1ti p ii ''tcai`.,iT x y t`tti T c >r t � tx2S t` ♦ a 4° � }- 4 � �` -..i ; 3Cy t '•.W� �.i .,v, s,t` v til♦`v ♦ R t, L..ai ». t� �` s ♦ �, x (5 !' t , i t ? ? , ; �rj�%. .� .µc. i3 -V, .\x. ,711 v . It �T.,a�_R '..- �tr�-.'\! :I.;O.r+ alb L ,�'% rias _At ;� C } •♦._ r fy %, i K}41 r \,, „ . 7 :l: Ir ; t.�. tN,�'Gy.• f.:. t X*.\\ lr� "1a4 \t t. 71 .4 "`,.2. ..,i,i t.n ♦'F l.'c. i S1 i :w i Y1 t. ,. :� ;_. �,,.. ., >; r �' ;,: �. .. '' �.r': sr'. "'':�si tS`:%y `� '., q,-•• .., :�� i.. t � r.t i,♦ t/ t`<;' s .a, >`�``a u ? .x t,, r .,, �\ ..% .y.. 'i14.`tr. �v' a\R ,.sem.. :+,t•~. � - ; n eolM"...... � � �,M,.. � �,�'""°rr�°fr"`,,'i�7�. ��''d" 1` } r�, ��i' \� t � �t " ,jl •L* r�;l y }!...,, „ ,� � .:, . ! ;ei:rl° i i ''�1� r 4 '! r �� x �;. •., ,..awd'1+� � rP�l..+,'�'"'Sa'yrg' .;r \{r �lv �CL 'r J� �\ ` � ll t' ' M1"{ht' ' ,�g�. '� yw•*`..�1 J a +•S1M+ t r s4( i 1 n: x .Y'�7 ``r"y'. �•--`yrs,.",",.� ��r�a�;,y,•'-�"�S'"" } � ,) � �}'f �y7f47 t ,r'r, ^ l / Vk'�1' rl!$ (1r,? _'r qJ q . .F.1 �" ?r mra�"au�,: _a"•'c•4':?..°,, } 1.: r .:,:, .;,�_ •-" ! �, � � irll r 1.1 r L ,�i .�.-. ,' ,si,bi 1,s' 1' .: •-. .'„(, ,._ -. .. _ pv ! \E� r wt t�r.1}�„ W. l P¢' t ii rl,t ixY� +5 „• y ::2'. y! ,r ,.t', •.. .._.,.. ,-_:._iu:. ., , .. _.., .. N '. \� L � '� J' l , .t.at\� Zr .; n �Z ��N. , y4 {1 L kiri !I # 1�',j '.11 � A7 �v\ Z• � � ; i r 4�r i A'j � � l d yglt v �' riQ t, f }rlf r { � . r r•,r : 1 ��j1,�* ' r 1 ve � (°rPI t!e Y`d,t i 1 1yt'�! 6i r, }� Ir 1 JIB r;. N y V �•. T �.'� L y f 'eJvi9 t r II \� yl/� .� , tyr�� } 7 � \ w (}k \fit yr I � , ':r 1 r/ `. r d r R •tjr v+ „ a . ,. J )� r r ' !! aal �r r w,+ t yfs 5 7 } •r ! r p.iJ, rh;( + , il1 � �� tF�l {'t�A rr �t � yr.., 1 G I,: �a'y �'Yr�,n4i )�If:\�e 41 r 4i a,r I 'i. ',1. !• 'P'�ii1�r:'. ,,. �{' ;"r N �r'?S�r i��r 1Q�. rr(•I h �LI.a ' l4U 't 1' as Jl f P '.J A• : r tVb r �{r tin • "Ia M1� i}, Itr��1S-�V � �� anpIRS "1 r, �'�'v�a l'a 6�l t•q, J, .ryfr "1rEI �t a 4 Is, rw+ �itf n,. , w • Ar r s�+! s *�\ � J rr.;y y: tI i �' ,1 /'.,Jf r.,tF/n ' :'�I M r , �44n , y Uri 1 c ,t lkt. 4i M.,• I y M C� 'i r 4i y r !Ii L �� Yy{�rtjr. ',irgr �nr Y:A'�l ��,Ji%t,,.EE �i ["l i. -s 'l'.% �, t.r�i u l! j! yr r Jf r i .\l ir� �: ' - n\! 1�\� Ver 4• f4 V. r% F ,f / ` t j y � •.1 j My 4 '� -- i :. ;< �.af, ., r r f ,! 1 � � O J �+1 t�' / l ; I /,.,:''I at'+,�"'aht ft VSy� r I! I•\ n !(i+' 3� { � l'. €i\V r t r r f w t a s a 4♦ w �� !rf tiy a ��;;-�1` {!iy S 1., ar r�l ` .'ii �';r.::� ",,..Yr ri< rf , F�ff t • a D ,rl �ry y !} f�... �j�'i (r ''y,l+ ,y, i:, t d t 7r lU 'j'' M1J• '� i .� 't '1`'` %' j4 h i, r ii'� k • �y�y,},{I((�r y r�rH} rsa<<ti a �/, �•�":ih�/ /kF,.^. rt r >�/:ilk �, i i;�,p F`C C"e�. �Kei i1 ��'rt j , l �.r rL4.l: iPa r ',5'h51�4 at r y\�i,�•,', t r ,f ! ;:� s?' ✓'"" 1 ' � r , lh" r r. � � [ r N4 �y�,atG >, ' '' �,' 'l .. '..rl r:. '.� -:.cJ' r .. �r��', e �r��.Gx; rz .✓k.. . t: ; �1 .. ;,.::y�7,��"• r � �� : S � r : ✓� 1 �" s t<a,1. •k. u¢hl t.4' � .1”' Y -i r.• i '�r :�, �$'M!'\r•a ' S tJ , � V� 'y �► r ,/� :1. � ,::ate �q::�'. � #'r .:;� .) tnn ":.� � � .��;W a �i:�` r LL { tt.,.r "'"c7•' td Ar. �a»Wl Ny 'LG'.I' ;'I �f `�'�'iu,'il ,5 `.,11 t 1t, r,lt! N., q P�" r � � r., > ri J,�.:G� Et �Y!f-�i� rF rG`�,�. ' '-�leil A•i wY. w.�} � y ,. VI iv f;�` 4�@{ M1'S''11 +11 ,, .r roj{ �,. ,.l. .�� lJ r �,z .s .r I ;_v� r .1` fr :;:r•� � rI r h. 1,. n.,i`+J,i 4,1 �(k�. \ ! ',�� t :ry Ad .� �i;, `I. Yrtrh {�, I rt , 1YV l ., ,} •aji 1 ! .';G R qi ,: i e t7 'Jf .•L '' / i „v f r R9 ,,, ,r1 �, ,y; y Ir <� N V ♦y�'y }} r ' r „, + Sf, yrv4 Jrr �i'It rw i 14 t D�Jry!>JtJ E ,1 `�I..::li' Y rS 1 ;.'Ar I, `Ii ( . 7.`~ r\• r 1/y. i �%a, rye"�L if`, sir/r+{�rJYj� I .ty ! .5:i 1Sy' ti, { rW� 1. • ,,,.. , rG'r (i i10 ✓n n ♦ :�' y . �y''<vT '< - cn ctrCr' �.t l.'+i l t`•,,,,,,$ / { 1 1 f ry ! r+!. ! i x,, L"� "'i o nk. rrf l7• r. �„ i t r, !l M y/ •1' , . `yt' 1`.. r� -2, v! W� �,ai/ A •,� l4 - ,wl {f¢iCr •{ S t n !t, ly 4' f. •' ? ti � '$, }F, t Y�i 'r, t v�:+µ � rYS/ � i ,tv{ r , �� Yr t r •'�..! / �. t v r a Q " a fG d v Kt,y,y�( �"as. u '1 -:s� t +'. ! • ' Y 1 1 + t l r ,.. .. ,�,- r 1 -'� � . i-':'..'- `,.• ,,.�[. :.9 f' r�t�: '...,/.,.\t'ta.i+r�J16.., �f r` „'�e'C�' ��\f� l:N 'Y�x,.^ra�"n��\ni. s;:3 '.'q i`�w, it :,'�� r ,..1, {��i r{, rl .,,,. !y, ��, .,�,'r ",•^!'�,r, '• .;..Y /r� ��' `$ � S"`ti� i� l r,.r�� y ti J .�., k. dt •}yn,�v, ��ai �E'YAUjy ,� 1' `,,I,' r' A, � }V"ti�:', t ( °a�, r r }y r. , }` v 1 i ,>J ...0 fua ...G�i t \ ;�a�•A„ � u-�.,,, d,.'- ti hb d , R k}N ,.°'. 11 1 E } n , Y •u. r �.,J•� r w3'�..yrr Jt - "r �' '^S.i{ I 1 rp 'i' . Ott d , { `4 +rk \ ! •• rJ/r `l: r i.... k�w=9>R'y4" '$>` 4jlr'�ua .-W�.,,i , �i t y�'1'a Il n u,j� !- 1 - r,'�y^r, w Ok,.. iM1 _f• jr•'• \ .. \. '' '�t h l �+ `..., p ,) R Y\.1�� ` ^ �l.Yr�13. 'd :rY IYr'W j`� { y''4W,"r�!'iil tr r'^. �^" V 'a•�++T 1; l'( jV, El (�'�y*.' FV �i `+"`. !' "` yr'I f ':,AWS irl{L , Jid .,l' t•G ) 1: �j • r : (r �:r C� / F r •.ty} S DRQ V 4{ t :. !', + t ;v,,,V4 as t \ 1 ,•+?.. y Ip,•' r f lr' :Y' r ILra) r�yr h 9 l �A�I 10 .. 4li - Y'N (,..,"f r ; -r .�, r �� h$. :, � � - •a•yrt%' k � "^'.t � r 4! „�,r � h �G 'i A ti�,� �. aiP .,"jl 1 . + 'I. I 4.MrY r I'. :.. i ,W�, A. $'c•ri..i; � Rl yi >.M,,, LSV ,"j / r r i �, l a I.�'�!� I,si: r YlV�gh't v9 i lJ ry'yle:. V�l � 1 +1 11� I.. �i ,:y�i ;�e��r.�'r� }r,h, ,vl r 1 ,v,.:,t, J a'N}.,r'.'.- •oJ.?+: �,,yn �\ ,yy, C,;,//i i� +yl'. 4'"b?I, C1rv11Ykr, })4+pr.rs y N,:4MM1nr'. !r 1, rl i... { ""1",. J r� � _ I,• I , *ter-.- } !s- i A `k s1i<t',I 1� iii{ „jli yr JsSr 5 1 d Fi Ni iA '!�„ 1 � J .{,Cn4f.�,;+'�s'� �;� l� •i �ti`h i J r r��; rf W� y �r� uk flr Lr I� lYll4r. E ' t "!,,. i .tir , ; in• , Ct n 5mi '?L+n '� v8, i./4"•�,'. p ! ;;t, / / ,rlt Irrr>{ ^fir f f �' r� r!i: I,G > (In?I 'hf �A < r t+YI,M\�*.n 1 A I: ': x i4: J� l/" t\ f y '� 4 /ur r �(P i ,}•. r, J J 1 ,. ,. •1t h'`+ J ., - ,.^.."b' K4, .�y ..... ,'u`" / ,,��yy '+/ , .�, \. �:. Yip :\;i '! 5 ,'t: ,ems: n�A►. ^.�..,�� '��iD' v -pai /r�;J .r-0�Ittll��',+r, tt t 1 rr { ® �,v,+••�.ryr,;, r ? r a . ` 4 �/; 19I f r 1, I �a"il}` -1 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 14 September 2017 Application Number: 2017-0905 Property Location: 519 S Saint Joseph Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1900/Free Classic Property Owner: Sheila McCarthy Landmark or District Designation: Taylor's Field, Ordinance #8952-98 Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey phis attic Free Classic has an irregular plan and is situated on a rough cut stone foundation. The exterior walls are clapboard siding with Corner boards on the first floor only and bell cast shape to second floor wall. The pyramidal roof is covered with asphalt shingles and has large intersecting gable facades on the south and east (front) sides. There is a full width porch across front with wood flooring and balustrade, paired ionic wood columns, concrete steps and lattice work at base. The windows are wood 1/1 double hung throughout; there is a multi -paned fixed side lights around the Palladian window in the upper storey south gable. ALTERATIONS: The house was restored in 1981_by Historic Landmarks of Indiana and Southhold Heritage Foundation. The iron railings could have been added then to bring it up to Code. COA 2001-0228, In-kind reroof of entire structure from asphalt shingles to asphalt -shingles, replacement of decking as needed and gutters and downspouts. COA 2012-1017, Complete tear off and re -roof; redeck, repair roofing and install new ice shield and architectural shingles. COA 2012-1031, remove addition in rear which has deteriorated beyond repair and is crumbling; replace any missing clapboards, restore facade. APPLICATION ITEMS: Eight solar panels on the south side of the roof, with the majority being in the back, the sw side. None will be on the front, the street facing east side. See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant proposes installing 8 NSP Plus 72 -cell Monocrystalline Photovoltaic Module panels on the south face of the roof near the peak. According to the attached hand -drawn schematic, two panels are to be installed east of the southern dormer, on the portion of the southern facing roof closest to the street. The remainder of the panels would be `behind' the southern dormer (and obscured), more towards the rear of the house. According to the schematic, the two panels on the southeast portion of the roofline would sit above the peak of the eastern dormer, indicating that they may be visible from the street depending on sight -lines. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On September 7, 2017 at approximately 8:30AM, I visited the property located at 519 S St Joseph located in the Taylor's Field Local Historic District. The owner has applied to install solar panels on the south and west faces of the roof. I took photographs from all four directions and from the street level. The south view has a house within twenty feet of the structure and the west view has a 2.5 story barn/workshop located less than forty feet away. The north view has a tree line and a house directly after that line. The only clear view of the south/west roof is through an opening looking north from South Street toward the alley. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gable, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood facias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl- or aluminum - sided houses are covered with the same material. Reauired The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period of the building. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building: E. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS The majority of the structures within the District have oil or gas heat, and have brick chimneys through the roof. Some houses have one or two window air conditioners. Rea uired Mechanical systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possible alteration to the structural integrity and physical appearance of the building. Solar collectors and TV dishes shall be placed at the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. Recommended Window air conditioners and exhaust fans should be installed at the rear or at an inconspicuous side window. Original lighting fixtures should be retained whenever possible. Prohibited Holes shall not be cut through walls or roofs to accommodate air conditioners or other mechanical equipment in areas that can be seen from the street. Not Recommended Exterior electrical and telephone cables should not be attached to the principal elevation of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: With consideration and understanding of Taylor's Field Guidelines for Historic Preservation & Developments (specifically the sections detailing roofs and the visibility of mechanicals), staff would recommend approval of the proposed project. Written by Adam Toering Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR - w �. mace � a Certificate of Appropriateness R m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stjosepheountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLY " 11'DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«<• OFFICE USE ONLY ' i1 Date Received: �� Sit- 0 Application Number: ® Past Reviews: &YES (Date of Last Review)-'/ 1012— ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: s �� ) 2 b I - - ❑ Local Landmark En Local Historic District (Name) TC ,',,\ \ Or, ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ TabledElSent To Committee F1Approved and issued: (Please Print) X19 S, 5rt/,_( T& Address of Property for proposed work: 1 / T (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): STS, �6� 1 - t_CC—dh }l Phone #: �Z 0 �5 6 7? Address of Property Owner(s): (Street Number—Street Naine—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Tory 16';S� Phone #: 57,- 7 7 051-16 x Zvi Contractor Company Name: So lv FevA y s'Of'tS Address of Contractor Company: �z �/� /" to Gid _ (I 5 . (V.z' ��Gt/0 _ �i%) 6S'�C) (Street Number- Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: v �, L2 _ (Single Family Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: wooA -rj-aeV�e_ (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) c (- Description of Proposed Work: �ic V`� SOIGf 6iIiil5 /_j J -hV, % Wt Av r, tt Le,,� bP, r9n -hAA, fr-or,-F J110 4-,.o' Vic, J =r_a9fs,dc'< <he Ef&cam. Owner/Contractor Fax #: X Signature of Owner e-mail: -5m q eI.jr edtL) and/or X Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— NSP Nus _ NEO SOLAR POWER 72 -cell Monocrystalline Photovoltaic Module; I Authorized Vendor _ POWERED BY MITSUBISHIs • j ®ELECTRIC HIGH -EFFICIENCY SOLAR INNOVATIONS FOUR BUSBAR CELL Mitsubishi Electric is collaborating with Neo Solar Power (NSP) on the NSP Plus, a new series of 72 -cell monocrgstalline modules designed specifically for the commercial and industrial market. The NSP Plus combines the strength of Mitsubishi Electric's innovative cell design technology with NSP's manufacturing expertise. FEATURES Linear performance warranty Workmanship & Un ®' materials warranty Positive power ` ..a tolerance Maximum system voltage • • Mechanical snow load Quality Starting from the Core With more than 40 years' experience in the photovoltaic industry, Mitsubishi Electric recognizes the importance of selecting high quality materials, beginning with the cell. Each cell produced bq Mitsubishi Electric undergoes a rigorous selection process to ensure that all cells in the module have uniform characteristics for optimal performance. As a pioneer in the four bus bar cells, Mitsubishi Electric builds cells with less electrical resistance and greater output. This reduces the chance of micro -fractures, making the Mitsubishi Electric cell one of the most reliable and durable in the industry. Built with Manufacturing Excellence Recognized bq Deloitte & Touche among the top 6 in Deloitte Technology Fast 500 in Asia. NSP is a growing global module manufacturer known for outstanding quality and customer satisfaction. NSP's vision is to provide clean, renewable and cost-effective energy through technology and manufacturing excellence. NSP modules are certified key independent laboratories to maintain the highest quality products possible. Like Mitsubishi Electric, NSP is focused on building reliable products that exceed industry standards. 574-773-0546 info@sesindiana.com -:. POWERED BY 0 MITSUBISHI L= ELECTRIC SOLAR INNOVATIONS r -. • 4 HIGH -EFFICIENCY FOUR BUSBAR CELL C C �L us j LISTED t]ap,ml. e f Through innovative research and development, Mitsubishi Electric's four bus bar design maximizes cell efficiency. Reducing the distance between bus bars decreases resistance, increases power output, and maximizes cell strength. Ammonia resistance tested Excellent low light performance v 100% EL inline • • inspection Accelerated aging test e 2000 hours damp heat test 400 thermal cycles Quality Starting from the Core With more than 40 years' experience in the photovoltaic industry, Mitsubishi Electric recognizes the importance of selecting high quality materials, beginning with the cell. Each cell produced bq Mitsubishi Electric undergoes a rigorous selection process to ensure that all cells in the module have uniform characteristics for optimal performance. As a pioneer in the four bus bar cells, Mitsubishi Electric builds cells with less electrical resistance and greater output. This reduces the chance of micro -fractures, making the Mitsubishi Electric cell one of the most reliable and durable in the industry. Built with Manufacturing Excellence Recognized bq Deloitte & Touche among the top 6 in Deloitte Technology Fast 500 in Asia. NSP is a growing global module manufacturer known for outstanding quality and customer satisfaction. NSP's vision is to provide clean, renewable and cost-effective energy through technology and manufacturing excellence. NSP modules are certified key independent laboratories to maintain the highest quality products possible. Like Mitsubishi Electric, NSP is focused on building reliable products that exceed industry standards. 574-773-0546 info@sesindiana.com -:. POWERED BY 0 MITSUBISHI L= ELECTRIC SOLAR INNOVATIONS r -. • 4 HIGH -EFFICIENCY FOUR BUSBAR CELL C C �L us j LISTED t]ap,ml. e f Through innovative research and development, Mitsubishi Electric's four bus bar design maximizes cell efficiency. Reducing the distance between bus bars decreases resistance, increases power output, and maximizes cell strength. J I Module Specifications Model name Cell type Number of cells Maximum power rating (Pmax) Warranted minimum Pmax PV USA test condition rating (PTC) Open circuit voltage (Voc) Short circuit voltage (Isc) Maximum powervoltage (Vmp) Maximum power current (Imp) Module efficiency Aperture efficiency Tolerance of maximum power rating Mechanical Load test passed Number of bus bars per cell NSP Plus by Neo Solar Power DW320RAME D6M32SE4AME DSM330MAME Mitsubishi Monocrystalline Silicon, 156 mm x156 mm X X C 72 cells X a 320W 325W 330W 320W 325W 330W 286.OWp 290.6Wp 2953Wp 45.46V 45.65V 45.92V 9.16A 9.24A 9.32A 37.09V 3722V 37.38V 8.64A 8.74A 8.85A 165% 16.7% 17.0% 18.2% 18.5% 18.8% +4.99 W 5,400 Pa 4 Drawings and Dimensions Unit: inch (mm) 39.1 (992) I 1 1I l i h rITII �rrr7r� - Electrical Characteristics Electrical Performance Cell Temperature: 25°C - Current -Voltage 10 9 I taoowim' 8 soa Wim' 7 6 60ow"? 5 \ u 4, � 400wim' \ 3 2 20OW10 1 L -- a - 0 25 5o Voltage M Authorized Vendor 140 Normal operating cell temperature (NOCT) Maximum system voltage, DC Fuse Rating Dimensions Weight Number of modules per pallet Number of modules per container (40 ft. HQ container) Output terminal Output cable, (+) & (-) Certifications Fire rating Temperature dependence of Isc, Voc and Pmax 120 � 100 isc -2 80 Voc Pmax 3 60 1 € 40 z Temp. Coeff. of Isc (a) = a0.042°/ol°C 20 Temp. Coeff. of Voc (8) = -0.318%/°C Temp. Coeff. of Pmax (y) _ -0.427%/°C 0 .25 0 25 50 75 100 Cell temperature M ) Neo Solar Power Corporation MSM 7, LI-Hsin 3rd Rd., Hsinchu NEO SOLAR POWER Science Park. Hsinchu, 30078, Taiwan 3 44°C ± 2°C 1000V (UL), 1000V (iEC) 15A 77.0 x 39.1 x 1.38 Inch (1956 x 992 x 35 mm) 50.7 lbs (23kg) 30 660 Renhe05-6 472 inches (1200 mm) UL 1703, IEC 61215/IEC 61730 Type 2 A B 00 irradiance dependence of Isc, Voc and Pmax Cell Temperature: 25°C 140 120 Voc Isc , Pmax 100 R 1 80 60 J 40 z' 20 o' 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Irradiance (Whm' MITSUBISHI K ELECTRIC SOLAR INNOVATIONS For sales, contact: Mitsubishi Electric US,.Inc. 5900-A Katella Avenue Cypress, CA 90630-5019 Ph:714-236-6137 Email: pv@meus.mea.com www.MitsubishiElectricSolar.com 37.2 (946) X _ �S O X X C y rv_ m C X a N O c p " 'o B c v m 0, _I C O Frame Drainage Holes (x12,1 A Temperature dependence of Isc, Voc and Pmax 120 � 100 isc -2 80 Voc Pmax 3 60 1 € 40 z Temp. Coeff. of Isc (a) = a0.042°/ol°C 20 Temp. Coeff. of Voc (8) = -0.318%/°C Temp. Coeff. of Pmax (y) _ -0.427%/°C 0 .25 0 25 50 75 100 Cell temperature M ) Neo Solar Power Corporation MSM 7, LI-Hsin 3rd Rd., Hsinchu NEO SOLAR POWER Science Park. Hsinchu, 30078, Taiwan 3 44°C ± 2°C 1000V (UL), 1000V (iEC) 15A 77.0 x 39.1 x 1.38 Inch (1956 x 992 x 35 mm) 50.7 lbs (23kg) 30 660 Renhe05-6 472 inches (1200 mm) UL 1703, IEC 61215/IEC 61730 Type 2 A B 00 irradiance dependence of Isc, Voc and Pmax Cell Temperature: 25°C 140 120 Voc Isc , Pmax 100 R 1 80 60 J 40 z' 20 o' 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Irradiance (Whm' MITSUBISHI K ELECTRIC SOLAR INNOVATIONS For sales, contact: Mitsubishi Electric US,.Inc. 5900-A Katella Avenue Cypress, CA 90630-5019 Ph:714-236-6137 Email: pv@meus.mea.com www.MitsubishiElectricSolar.com )riliy r-I\bf. iy}/ �� Y a�1 Ky i•� Em 77i,. -C Oki jl,,, K.q MIT Nuns, a A 51, Alzi I COP jr lot 9/l/2017 Erle Flaps 519 S St Joseph St 519 S St Joseph St - Google Maps "— rr'cq"OeI 1 \ Imagery ©2017 Google, Map data ©2017 Google United States 10 ft https://www.g—�=om/maps/place/519+S+St+Joseph+St,+South+Bend,+IN+46601 /@41.67023991"91 351,27m/data=! 3 m 1 ! 1 e3!4m5!3m4! 1 sOx8816cd302d917ec1:Oxe7afae43032AAm2!3d4... 1/2 RESOLUTION NO. 17-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA REGARDING THE USE OF ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY TECHNOLOGIES IN HISTORIC LANDMARK BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County (the "Commission") is open to and encouraging of the use of appropriate energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods in historic landmark buildings and districts which are in harmony with existing standards and guidelines for such structures; and WHEREAS, the Commission wishes to encourage all owners or potential owners of properties designated as historic landmarks or located in a historic district to contact the Commission if they are considering or interested in the use of energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods for such properties; and WHEREAS, the Commission is committed to working with owners and potential owners of properties designated as historic landmarks or located in a historic district to determine the most appropriate energy conservation and sustainability methods for each individual property; and WHEREAS, the Commission will consider applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods individually, with due regard to the circumstances and specifications of each specific property, in the same manner as the Commission considers applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for all proposed alterations. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Historic Preservation Commission is open to and encouraging of the use of appropriate energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods in historic landmark buildings and districts which methods and technologies are in harmony with existing standards and guidelines for such structures, and encourages all owners or potential owners of such properties interested in such technologies and methods to contact the Commission. SECTION 2. The Commission is committed to working with owners of such properties to determine the best fit for each property, and to consider each application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for such technologies and methods on an individual basis, in the same manner as all other applications for Certificates of Appropriateness are evaluated and considered, SECTION 3. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Resolution has been adopted on thisrday of 66tt,ST , 2017. i President, Hist ric Preservati of South Ben and St. Joseph ATTEST: �j A O 11_V_n ecretary, H toric esexvation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County Adam Toering From: Sheila McCarthy <Sheila.A.McCarthy.146@nd.edu> nt: Friday, September 15, 201710:08 AM -W: Adam Toering Subject: Re: 519 S Saint Joseph COA2017-0905 Hi Adam, Thanks for the affirmation, and for the agenda. I'll give my solar guy a call and ask if there's a way they could all be in the back. It seemed that there wasn't enough room for more than six, but I'll ask. I'll also ask about installing them on the ground instead, but the lot does not go more than a few feet beyond the house in the back or sides. The view from the thoroughfare, as you will see from the site visit, does not reveal a change the essential character of the roof, as the house is on a hill, and the roof is quite high. The panels, even towards the front half of the southern facing roof, are still obscured. As it is a gabled roof, the east facing roof is primarily what is seen from the street. Best, Sheila On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Adam Toering <atoerin2 a,sicindiana.com> wrote: Dear Sheila, I'm in the process of reviewing your Certificate of Appropriateness application for the installation of eight solar panels along the peak of your southern -facing roof at your home on Saint Joseph Street. Your application is on the agenda scheduled for next Monday at 7pm on the 13' floor of the County -City Building (I've attached the meeting agenda to this e-mail for your convenience). I discussed your application with the Elicia Feasel, the Executive Director of HPC, and she recommended that I reach out and inform you of any concerns I might have. For clarity, your application called for the installation of eight NSP Plus 72 -Cell Monocrystalline Photovoltaic Module panels near the peak of your southern -facing roof. Two panels are to be installed east of your southern dormer, on the portion of the southern facing roof closest to the street. The remainder of the panels would be `behind' the southern dormer (and obscured), more towards the rear of the house. While reviewing the Guidelines for Historic Preservation & Development adopted by the Taylor's Field Historic District, I came upon verbiage that raised some concerns regarding your application. The Guidelines' Mechanical Systems section is rather specific that "Solar collectors and TV dishes shall be placed at the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping," whereas the Roof section additionally states that "Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house." The use of the word "shall" is rather specific: "shall" is defined as an expression of something that is mandatory or must be done." With this text in mind, the proposed panels to the east of the dormer may be a concern. The office plans to supplement our existing photographs with another site visit today, and anticipates favorabl� recommending this project. Thanks again — as an aside, I thoroughly enjoyed looking through your completed projects in our file on the house — you have done a wonderful job in all of your renovations and improvements! i i Adam Toering Deputy Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Boulevard, South bend, IN 46601 P: 574-235-9798 1 F: 574-235-9798 1 E: atoerinR@sicindiana.com STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 13 September, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0905C Property Location: 612-614 Carrol Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne / 1901 - Property Owner: Francisco Gonzalez Landmark or District Designation: Taylor's Field, Ordinance #8952-98 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This Queen Anne Apartment House is two storeys with attic. It has wood frame construction and siding that set upon an irregular brick foundation. The roof has side gables with an intersecting front hip and a front gable dormer. The roof has asphalt shingles. There are entry porches on either side of the front with Doric column supports, wood balustrades, steps and floors. There is a front bay window on the south side of the first storey. Those front windows are Jen Weld casement windows. The windows on the rest of house are 1/1 wood double hung. ALTERATIONS: COA 2002-0128A, tear off deteriorated asphalt shingles and reroof with new asphalt shingles of quality at least equal to those removed. COA 2007-0607, roof patching, replace decking as needed, replace rotten siding wood, paint exterior, fix porches (front and rear) repair foundation where necessary, replace security doors, repair and replace windows. COA 2009-0211, code enforcement demolition of deteriorated garage in rear of house. Structure to be demolished, debris hauled away and site cleaned and graded. COA 2012-0314, remove vinyl windows on first floor side and install three fixed double hung sashes in the dining room opening (84x55) and cover with storm windows; construct a fixed window to resemble double hung window in the two 5400 openings and cover with storm windows. Owner is to work with HPC staff and preservation specialist. COA 2013-0429, re -roof over one layer of asphalt shingles with new architectural shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace broken windos with new windos. there were wood end now I hat to go with vinyl one facing west on the second floor — 2 on the north of second floor — window match the exting opening. [sic] Window clarification, in margin of application: 2 Pellas 59" x 34.5", 1 Jeld Wen 60" x 32" to match openings. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner requests retroactive permission to install three windows (2 Pella 59" x 34.5", 1 Jeld Wen 60" x 32") on the northwest corner of the house. At some point since 2012, three windows on the same north wall (facing the alley) were replaced with vinyl windows. As of this application: six of the ten windows on the north facing wall have now been replaced with vinyl, significantly reducing the historical character of the house. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On July 17, 2017 at approximately I OAM I visited the property located at 612-614 Carroll St. located in the Taylor's Field Local Historic District. I noticed two new windows located at the direct front of the house (northwest corner above north porch). The new labels for the windows were still attached. I photographed the property and upon returning to the office, I emailed the building department and copied Director Feasel. The building department placed a "Stop -Work" order on the house and had placed a tag on the front door. The owner, Francisco came in the following day to apply for his COA. He has applied for the installation of two Jeld-Wen vinyl windows and one Pella ThermaStar vinyl window. I assisted him in his application and his product information. Upon my next visit, I realized that there were actually four new windows. I do not know if the window located the farthest east of the front porch was changed at the same time as the others. My previous photographs had the view of the window blocked by a tree or I had simply not noticed it. It is clear to see that the three windows are the same manufacturer as the screen is continuous on the exterior as opposed to the other Pella at the front of the house. These are all different from the previously approved and installed vinyl windows located on the north side first story. I attempted three times to call the number on the application to clarify and got a busy signal all three times. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where additional siding has been applied window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors and windows are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of original wood windows being replaced with vinyl windows. Staff would prefer to see applicant propose a wood window option. Written by Adam Toering Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAAI ED IN THIS BOX—OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Application Number: (./7I— I — U" 0 CJ Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ NO Title: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: 9'14160-- C AR Qv I l If (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) —Name of Property Owner(s): ,f Y G.M C tS Co 6 a oj? A i -e Z_ Phone #: Wi 16 2.2 Address of Property Owner(s): %-SOL ( S 0 V 4ie flevv4 1W q b 4fl (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): LV A V I✓L Phone #: r 7q 7!0 971m. Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: Current Use of Building: Type of Building Construction: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) M(jL+j ;vkr+(LY (Single Famil}---Mzdti-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: Py itm P (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) ❑ Landscape Yom, New a Replacement (not in-kind) at,fi*ce �rakeN b3s�✓�o _ wtk� Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) b P cNiN 9 X and/or X Signa ure of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— ■ ❑ Demolitions Re15 5q X3�F5� T t v Nxl /1ll� 1. 1 5�� V 99 L1A \ �i 1 -'' '78� � �� i �\ ,. �' \t'�.��`�. •'4�'!•"�� ay'�h� y�"'�i",�'''q'"`j�. � ,.h, ` \\,\\ ... .-. '{! r '1 ' j i 1 ' \ ` �� `•+,�\�''y�lt`rh�Y' �.?�•rii tri dt 5i, Y"«*"'�� ^ �r�v>re^��kr � ; ` \' r�Ol YII� .. = I - .f �� 1'i 1 I - \ .....1` . 1 _ _.1, .. .., X.JS�r SU n •... f. s . � 'N_..v..l.. ! •... Y.�+JCtJ�C aU.vM'EM l�D��' , �11�1"�iS:,�. �... _ � , �: \'r-,. 1 JE L113rWEN. WINDOWS & DOORS 'Builders Vinyl Window & Patio Door Features Double -Hung I Single -Hung I Sliding I Fixed, Radius & Geometric Sliding I Patio Doors Remove this label after final inspectiod; SAYE for future reference 'Pella Corporation.: -« 25 Premium Ne* Conslruclion 1VFRC Dbub le'NUng.-- Annealed mg: Annealed ihermastar Cho Wide 6y� adoneil Fenestration L'owE;1801 Clear Rating Council® Argon Gas L"ZINtIMICIP PEL®N—'109-00187-00001. ENERGY PERFORMANCE RATINGS U—Factor Solar Heat Gain Coefficient 030 170 0.50 ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE RATINGS Visible Transmittance w 0 . 6 0 diilitttlt sElpulates that these ratings conform to appncabie NFRC pracedurastor determtntng ale product periormance. NFRC ratings are determined tar a Entad set of environmental conditions i a specific product site. NFRC does net recommend any products and does net warrant ENERGY STARO shitabllity of any product tar anp specfliryuse. Eor mare Information, tali (6411621-3114 rifiit fhe elle web si#e at wrrw.pella.cam or v#sn the NFRC web sits at www.n re,arg Certified in Highlighted Regions s ItUla.iH't.'I1f13 �. -�ectlon; SAYE tot future reference Remove this label after final insp Pe113 Corporation ' 25 Piemlum New construction : Dtftt6le Huntt� a LNC y Annealed tine Wide .... _... • taatibnal Fenestration taw E 180 f dear Rating Councils Argon Gas PES N-1a9—'MANGE RATINGS t' elm -21,111,14 , ENERGY PERFOR Solar Heal Gain Coefficient U—factoron � ■�� lusn-1' ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE RATING Visible Transmtllance ....um tl 0.13O ..-..,inn �.nnalll4'a$#at deform roducts and d,es not warrant 4lanutacturer stipulates that these tatMgs co g 1641621 3114 whale product pertormanae. NFRC ratings ata determined for a fixed sa a redacfor any specdic use: For mote nfarma�on�w.ntiro.org 4,112 nd a speclllc product size. NFRC d aha tom ar vrSt the NFRC web�ty the sultahi{ity of any p ar vrsit the Fella web site att www.p w 1 e MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY March 19, 2012 13' Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Mike Voll, Sandra Rossow, Jerry Niezgodski, Kevin Buccellato, Alice McLane Members Absent: David Steinhauer, Lynn Patrick Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director; Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: Francisco Gonzalez, Marco Mariani, Carole Miller, Jennifer Feeney, Alicia Fullenkamp, Donnie Rogers, Todd Zeiger Motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Alice McLane to amend agenda to include COA 2012-0314 612 — 614 S. Carroll. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous H. PUBLIC BEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 1223 E. Wayne Street COA#2012-0305 East Wayne Street Representation by Alicia Fullenkamp, Owner STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 5 March 2012 Application Number: 2012-0305 Property Location: 1223 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1927 Property Owner: Alicia and Joe Fullenkamp Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The home at 1223 E. Wayne South has a 2 storey frame construction that is faced with brick on "L" plan. The house has a gable roof with gable returns, modillions and cornice moulding and covered with asphalt shingles. There are three pedimented gable dormers with casement windows flanked by fluted pilaster detailing; casement windows on the body of the house have transoms with brick header course sills and soldier course lintels. The second storey front windows have window boxes. There is a low pediment over the central entry with fluted pilasters and sidelights that flank the single entry doorway. There is a curving brick walkway leading to the brick steps up to the front entry that has a brick half wall with a concrete cap. There are copper downspouts with decorative collectors. There is a one storey addition at the rear with vinyl siding with Pella windows and sliding French doors surrounded by a multi level wood deck. ALTERATIONS: The original slate roof was removed after 1949. The rear addition and decking were constructed prior to 1986. The replacement dormer windows were replaced with casements with COA 2003-0603 along with the French doors in the addition; the asphalt roof was replaced with COA 2004-0928. A wooden privacy fence was installed with COA 2008-0508 APPLICATION ITEMS: Third floor renovation -new windows, replace east and west windows. Demolish front walk and back deck -replace with stone, brick or cement. North addition -replace vinyl siding with cement clad siding, replace 30 year old Pella windows and replace old glass block window in basement on East elevation with glass block. All per plans and drawings submitted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to construct a rear roof shed dormer with pedimented gable; the dormer will have asphalt roofing to match existing and smooth trims and painted 8"siding. The dormer will have 4 Marvin Wood Casement 9 pane windows. The central set will be surrounded by Tuscan columns and outer ones will have fluted pilasters at the outside edge. The fluted pilasters will match an architectural feature of the original house. (See 44) They propose to replace 3 deteriorated steel casement windows on the east and west side of the third floor with Marvin wood narrow Ultimate Replacement Casements with a muntin pattern to match the originals. (See 3 & 2 and photos 2-6). On the rear addition, they propose to remove the vinyl siding and Pella windows and replace the siding with 8" cement board siding and fluted pilasters at the comers and replace the windows with wood Marvin Ultimate Casements with muntin pattern to match the rest of the house (See 92 and photos 1 & 7). On the west elevation they propose to add anew 10" Tuscan column to the existing roof overhang. (See #3 and Photos #7) They also propose to remove the multilevel wood decking and re landscape with a ground level patio area with pavers and add new stone capped brick piers and seat walls around the perimeter of the patio. There will be a pedimented portico addition over the entry supported by Tuscan columns that will lead from the patio into the existing family room addition; that will have brick steps up to the French Doors. (See # 1 & 2 and photos 1 & 2) They also propose to remove the curved sidewalk to the house and replace it with a straight walkway of concrete with a brick boarder and install new stone paved entry stoop and steps with brick risers. (See # 1). Also, they propose to replace an existing deteriorating glass block basement window on the east side with a new glass block window. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half-timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the guidelines for new construction and materials as well as landscaping in the East Wayne Street District. The addition of the rear dormer and proposed enhancements to the addition are sympathic to the architectural character of the Fullenkamp home. The proposed patio with its perimeter walls and the front walkway and entry are also in keeping with the character of the home. The replacement of the deteriorated steel windows on the third floor was recommended by Mark Camey, the craftsman who restored all of the steel casements in this home. Staff recommends the in-kind replacement of the glass block window in the basement lavatory. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Mike Voll to permit applicant to amend COA to include a potting shed. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Kevin Buccellato to approve application as amended. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. COA#2012-0305 AMENDED - Approved. 2.501 W. Washington COA#2012-0305A Local Landmark Representation by Todd Zeiger of Indiana Landmarks, Owner and Jennifer Feeney of Kil Architecture and Planning Member of the public, Donnie Rogers, neighboring property owner, voiced his support in general and concerns regarding the increased foot traffic and liability issues. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 5, 2012 Application Number: 2012-0305A Property Location: 501 West Washington - Rushton Apartment Building Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neo-Classical/1906/Austin & Schneider Property Owner: Indiana Landmarks Landmark or District Designation: a Local Landmark in the West Washington National Register District Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a four -storey Neo -Classical style apartment building. It has a rectangular plan, flat roof with metal parapet coping, iron/steel cornice scupper, one over one double -hung wood frame bay windows with simple surrounds, limestone base bay window supported by bracket and simple one over one wood double -hung window units through out with limestone sills. The building has brick masonry walls with limestone quoining, brick dentils and limestone cornice. It has a wood and glass entrance door with decorated surrounds, arch cornice with keystone and concrete steps with the inscription "The Rushton". The porch entrance is supported by decorated brick piers with eyebrow cornice and brackets on each side with concrete step, concrete floor and concrete foundation. The south entrance door has an oversized, full light and the west door is &half light (nine over nine divided light configuration) with arched transom. ALTERATIONS: Some aluminum storm windows have been installed. APPLICATION ITEMS: Please see attached written description. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: A representative from Kil Architecture submitted the proposal on behalf of the owner, Indiana Landmarks. The rehabilitation plans are in the beginning design phase and are intended to give the Commission an overview of the proposed exterior improvements and an early chance to offer suggestions. The application items that are considered in-kind are available in detail in the submitted attachments and can be considered Staff approved or Routine Maintenance Exclusion and will not be elaborated on in this report. The application items to be considered by the Commission include 1. Removal of an existing deteriorated metal fire escape that is tucked into an alcove carved out of the building footprint to accommodate the addition of a new fire -rated stair enclosure, elevator, and ADA -accessible entry vestibule on the west fagade. It is within this alcove that the new one storey accessible entry and full four storey height elevator will be built. The addition will be brick selected to closely resemble the existing common brick as seen on the west side. The door will be a wide stile aluminum door (5" stiles, 5" head and intermediate rail and 10" bottom rail) with upper and lower insulated glass light. The frame will be aluminum. See west elevation and site plan. 2. Replace existing low sloped membrane roof with new white colored TPO adhered roof including new flashing, roof drains, and drain stacks to be tied into storm drainage system. 3. Remove existing aluminum storm windows. Install Marvin sash pack replacements (one over one, wood interior/aluminum clad exterior) within the existing frames. Exterior wood trim will be repaired, scraped and repainted with an oil based primer and two coats of a high performance latex paint. Exterior sills will be repaired or replaced as necessary. Steel lintels over windows will be repaired and repainted or replaced in-kind if deteriorated beyond repair. The projecting window bay metal roofs will be repaired, re -flashed and repainted or replaced in-kind if required. See March 5 letter from Indiana Landmarks regarding the state of the windows. Staff concurs that rehabilitating what is left of the original windows may not be the best option. There are about 130 windows on the Rushton, not counting the alcove where the new entrance is proposed. Many windows have entire sashes missing and a good number of the windows qualify as deteriorated beyond repair. The aluminum storm windows are nothing but frames, no screen, no glass and have not protected the windows for at least a decade. The proposed replacement is a suitable selection for the building as it will provide minimum visual change and will allow for the existing jamb to remain in place. A prototype unit is intended for installation for everyone to weigh in on. 4. The plan is for the doors to be repaired but they have been boarded up for a long time and haven't been thoroughly evaluated yet. If replacement is necessary, the owner proposes to retain the existing frame and replace the panel with a new unit in wood or aluminum that will be compatible with the original style. 5. Regarding masonry, the proposal is to perform selective tuck -pointing and repair to the limestone as required. Cracked or damaged brick will be replaced with brick to match as closely as possible. Old metal anchors will be removed and holes repaired. Open vertical joints are proposed to be ground out and repaired with a soft sealant joint to allow for movement, reducing the possible damage to the adjacent brick. 6. New exterior lighting is proposed under the covered south porch at the entry door and at the new west entrance, style to be determined. GROUP B LOCAL LANDMARK STANDARDS: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should a make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is prefeffed to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for all in-kind repairs. In addition, Staff recommends approval of the proposed projects with the condition that the unspecified elements related to the doors and lighting receive additional review by the Commission. Staff asks that Indiana Landmarks notify the Commission when the prototype window unit is available to preview. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Mike Voll to approve application as submitted. Chair clarified that the motion includes the recommendations as submitted by Staff. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. COA#2012-0305A Approved. 3.612 — 614 Carroll COA#2012-0314 Taylor's Field Representation by Francisco Gonzalez, Owner STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2012-0314 Property Location: 612-614 South Carroll Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1901 Property Owner: Francisco Gonzalez Landmark or District Designation: Taylor's Field Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This Queen Anne Apartment House is two storeys with attic. It has wood frame construction and siding that set upon an irregular brick foundation. The roof has side gables with an intersecting front hip and a front gable dormer. The roof has asphalt shingles. There are entry porches on either side of the front with Doric column supports wood balustrades, steps and floors. There is a front bay window on the south side of the first storey. Those front windows are Jen Weld casement windows. The windows on the rest of house are 1/1 wood double hung. ALTERATIONS: The glass block in the basement windows is not original. In 2002 COA#2002-0128a was issued to replace roof with asphalt shingles. In 2007 COA 2007-0607 was issued to repair and patch the roof, replace rotting wood siding, repair porches and foundation, replace security doors and to repair and replace windows; the front Jen Weld windows were installed at that time replacing windows that did not appear to be original. In 2009 COA 2009-0211 was issued to demolish the deteriorated garage in the rear of the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Fix the windows and replace the clapboard. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: % Original windows were removed on the north and south side of the first floor. The windows were not standard side and were replaced with 4 Pella vinyl double hung windows. A smaller sliding vinyl Crestline window on the north side was installed in the opening which will have clapboard infill to match the existing siding. There are also 5 windows on the second floor that if they cannot be repaired will be replaced with wood windows to match what is currently there and fill in with clapboards if necessary. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where additional siding has been applied window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors and windows are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. The windows that were in the house have been removed and discarded. Staff is working with the owner to make more appropriate choices if window replacement is needed for the second floor. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Mike Voll to continue the application with the condition that applicant work with Staff to obtain a suitable quote to get windows appropriate to the house and for Staff to give an opinion on the original window style. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. COA#2012-0314 Continued with conditions. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. West LaSalle Street NR District -Update. 1st reading in April, public hearing in May. III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —February 27, 2012 second draft approved by consensus. B. TREASURER'S REPORT —Distributed. Chair notes that Commissioner Rossow departed the meeting but we have sustained a quorum. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence —Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals —Distributed. 3. Director's Report —Distributed. 4. Assistant Director Report —Distributed. 5. Preservation Specialist Report —Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel —Larry prepared and distributed an Activity Waiver and Release of Liability. Also prepared and distributed access language to be included on COA application. Larry reported that 1922 Portage Local Landmark proposal will be on the Common Council's March 26 agenda. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report —Distributed. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Southhold Preservation Awards -Nominating Committee of ALL Commissioners set for Monday April 2 at noon at the HPC Office. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Various Fee Structure -Discussion of what to charge for salvage, in particular, the window sashes. B. Upcoming Events-Elicia reported Old House Expo Grand Rapids March 24, Kalamazoo April 14; Lincoln Exhibit IUSB Shurtz Library until April 12; Street Scenes at Center for History April 4; DTSB First Friday themed Mystery in the City to include an architectural scavenger hunt; Preserving Historic Places: Indiana's Statewide Preservation Conference in Whiting April 11 —13 VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Alice McLane to adjourn. Vote: 6-0 unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Attest: Secretary Date 0 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 7, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0905D Property Location: 803 W Washington, South Bend, IN 46601 Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Romanesque Revival / 1890 Property Owner: Indiana Landmarks Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Ordinance # 10443-16, West Washington National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kizer House is part of the West Washington National Register Historic District. The house is in the Romanesque Revival style with a full three stories and basement. The house is built of coursed gray granite, which contributes to its style including heavy massing and round arches. The mortar is a red color with a raised beaded or grapevine joint. There is a central hip roof with numerous intersecting gables and towers, a massive parapet at the west gable, two round towers on the fagade which terminate into conical roofs. The original dormers feature a conical roof with terra cotta clad sidewalls and terra cotta ridge cap. There are three dormers added c. 1940 with a low slope roof and copper sidewalls The original roof was covered in square edge red clay tile — similar to that on Tippecanoe Place. The current asphalt roof replaced the original tile (first in the 1980's, most recently renovated in 2017) retaining the decorative terra cotta ridge cap. The roof was completed with a decorative copper cornice and gutters. Elements of the copper flashing remain, although the original copper downspouts have been replaced with galvanized metal and the valleys are asphalt. All entry steps are of cut granite with rough stone balustrades. The front porches and porte-cochere have slender stone column supports. The front porch has a shallow hip roof while the porte-cochere has a gable roof with a decorative terra cotta shingled pediment. Windows around the house are 1/1 double hung wood windows throughout with stone sills, plain jambs, and massive lintel stones. The Port Cochere was added at some point following the original construction. A rear porch and kitchen wing has a matching addition assumed to be added at the time the porte-cochere was also added. Three tall chimneys — two in the front and one in the rear — punctuate the roofline. The Carriage House in the rear of the property replaced an earlier wood frame barn c. 1915 to house automobiles with an apartment above and a full basement in poured concrete. Original basement windows have been replaced with new glass block. New wood carriage style doors were installed in 2015 along with a new wood entry door. A new asphalt shingle roof was installed in 2015. The Carriage House is constructed of hollow core clay tile block with a smooth faced red brick. The roof is a steep gabled roof with asphalt shingles and a wide bracketed boxed eave, multi -lite 6/1 double hung wood windows. The Site has been highly altered with a majority of the land being paved with concrete —the exception being an area east of the driveway extending to the sidewalk on Charles Martin Black Boulevard which is grass with scrub trees and decorative red -buds. A small area of grass is also located to the west of the carriage house. A brick wall extends from the west elevation of the carriage house along the north alley to the neighbor's property line. A modern eight foot tall wood fence is constructed along the west property line on the Kizer House. A six inch concrete curb runs the length of the Kizer House property line. There are two driveways to the site entering off West Washington. The original driveway entrance is near the corner of West Washington and Charles Martin Black Boulevard. A shared drive entrance is located at the west property line with the neighbor. ALTERATIONS: COA 2012-0213 approved removal of non-contributing windows installed in carriage house door openings and associate rough sawn siding; installation of finish grade exterior plywood in openings as temporary cover and paint; removal of later enclosure of rear porch and associated doors and windows; removal of scrub brush and associated stumps along west property line; removal of chain-link fence along east property line and install dirt and grass. Extensive site and structure modification occurred prior to the above listed improvements, including (but not limited to): construction of carriage house, addition to the rear of the house and of the porte-cochere, addition of the concrete drive and parking area, and re -roofing of the house in the 1980's. COA 2012-1219 approved removal of two chimneys due to deterioration; chimneys to be reconstructed at a later date as part of a roofing project (materials stored on site). COA 2014-0401 approved a re -roof of the carriage house; repair of gutters and downspouts; removal of scrub trees on property and one maple in tree lawn to restore original landscaping; removal of non-contributing/non-original picture windows and replace with wood replicating garage door pattern until permanent solution found. COA 2014-0917 approved a complete tear -off and re -roof of the Carriage House with Highland Slate Designer Shingles. COA 2016-0318A approved re-tuckpointing of exterior; rebuilding of east and west chimneys (re -added 10 courses); removed and replaced asphalt shingles to match carriage house; replace/replicate downspouts, gutters, and copper flashing; remove, repair, and paint all windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1) Landscaping/Site work (see attached site plan for detail) • New curb cut/entrance on east side of property. Remove existing walk and curb to install new 22' wide drive. Existing tree to be removed; existing street sign to be relocated. • Remove all existing concrete on site. • Remove curb along west property line to the wood privacy fence. Curb along west property line on the west side of the wood privacy fence will remain. • (R1VIE) Wood privacy fence to remain and be repaired in-kind. • Adjust grade of front yard to allow storm water to be retained on site and allow flow to new drainage structure and installation of missing step to front porch. The site will be lowered approximately seven inches in the front and along west elevation and approximately four inches nearer the parking area. • Install new 13 -space concrete parking area between house and carriage house; new concrete drive, new concrete walk along Washington Street; 6'-0" concrete walk from front steps to front walk; 5'-0" concrete walk from front sidewalk to driveway. • Alternate: install brick pavers in area of original drive from W. Washington public sidewalk to carriage house to reflect original concrete drive and parking area in front of carriage house. Product: Unilock TurfstoneTM, see attached. • Install new concrete walk from parking area to the west entry door. • Remove existing scrub trees on east side of property. Evaluate potential to relocate red -bud trees to serve as additional screening along north edge of parking area. • Install new curb along southern property along West Washington Street to recreate missing tree lawn. Plant trees as approved by City Forrester in tree lawn area as noted on plans. Install grass in tree lawn area. • (RME) Set additional stone step (stored on site) at front porch entry stairs. • Install new lawn as indicated on site plan; • Install new trees and planting beds as indicated. Install evergreen screen along north property line, east of carriage house. • Install reinforced CMU structural wall infill with waterproofing along retaining wall near northwest corner of carriage house. Backfill abandoned steps with compacted fill. • Create concrete area for trash receptacles with 48" aluminum fence with solid infill panels. • Relocate gas services to west side of main house near south elevation. • Install new AC condensers and electric meters along west side of house near southwest corner. • Install new sign, 42"H x 48" L shaped sign at southeast corner of property. Granite base (repurposed stone stored on site from masonry repair project), wood background, vinyl lettering. Lit from above. Located to meet City of South Bend requirements. • Install 70' of new 48"H decorative wrought iron fence along west edge of property, from walk to existing 7'H wood privacy fence. 2) Masonry and Porch Floor Repair • Rebuild support wall of Porte-Cochere to match. • Rebuild floor of rear building utilizing concrete stained to match color of original side porch floor. • Repair front porch floor removing deteriorated floor tile and installing new concrete floor finished to match side porch floor color. Salvage reusable tile and install in band around perimeter of porch floor. • (RME) Repair basement window sills and any necessary tuckpointing along base of house once concrete around perimeter of house has been removed. 3) Accessibility: • Remove existing stone steps leading to the rear porch and relocate beside basement steps on north wall of rear porch. Create approximate 48" opening in rear porch wall at its connection to rear wing. Salvage stone to infill existing rear porch wall entrance where stairs are being removed. • Install new ramp per drawings with black aluminum guardrail and handrail. Ramp to be masonry with poured concrete floor and faced with Quarry Ridge Cobblestone Chardonnay (or similar) synthetic stone laid similar to existing masonry. Walls will be capped with concrete caps to match limestone caps installed on basement step entrance. • Remove north wall of east side porch to floor level. Salvage granite for rear porch wall infill and repurposing on site. Raise porch floor to interior floor height approximately seven inches. Shift stairs on east side of porch to be flush with inside edge of porch wall. Reinstall all stairs including those temporarily removed and stored on site for vehicle access. • Convert window on side porch leading to rear parlor to serve as handicapped entrance door with automated opener. Install handicapped opener on the north side of former window/handicapped door. Door to match existing paneled door on side porch leading to middle parlor. Install compliant hardware. • Construct a dormer on the north face of the main roof to accommodate new interior elevator as indicated on attached roof plan, section and elevation drawings. Clad in copper to mimic existing dormers added in the 1940's renovation. • Install aluminum handrail on both sides of front steps, along top of basement stairway cap, along both sides of relocated stair to rear porch and alongside porch stairs to match that on handicapped ramp. 4) Carriage House • Replace existing new solid wood service door with wood door with top light and paneled bottom. • Install %2 round painted galvanized gutters and downspouts. • _ (RME) Remove all deteriorated wood storm windows. Install new wood storm windows. • (RME) Repair stucco on front dormer to match. • (RME) Prime and paint all exterior trim and stucco. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicant proposes to remove all concrete on the grounds and adjust the grade to slope to new drywells. Re -grading the property will reveal a number of features of the historic house, including `lost' steps and damaged basement window sills, both to be rehabilitated. The area between the house and the carriage house will be rebuilt, including the addition of a new 13 -spot parking area. The existing street access in the front of the house on West Washington will be removed and anew street access from the east side of the property will be installed. The porte-cochere drive will be replicated / simulated with brick pavers, but will not connect to West Washington. New access walks will connect the house to the existing sidewalk and the new parking area. The stairwell abutting the carriage house connecting the grounds to the alley to the north will be filled-in. Extensive landscape work will compliment all of these changes, including the addition of new trees, transplanting existing trees, and planting new greenspaces. Details of these changes pursuant to the recommendations of the City Forester will be provided at a later date. A new wrought iron fence will be installed along the west edge of the property and will connect with the existing privacy fence, also to be detailed at a later date. New signage will be installed in the southeast comer of the grounds, design and structure to be determined at a later date. Mechanically, site utilities will be relocated from the north side of the house to the west side. A/C units for the main house will be installed on the west side, directly to the south of the new utility meters. Although on the low - visibility northwest corner of the house, additional landscaping will be utilized to minimize these features. The carriage house will receive A/C placed atop the filled-in stairwell to the alley. A new area for trash receptacles will be added at the northwest corner of the property, to be enclosed by an aluminum fence (details to be determined). With regards to accessibility, stone steps and access to the house at the northeast corner will be removed and repositioned directly to the west of the current exterior basement access. An ADA -compliant access ramp will be added to the east side of the house in the area vacated by the aforementioned transplanted stairs and entryway. The ramp project will also coincide with reconstructing the porte-cochere support walls and pillars. This ramp will connect to the porte-cochere landing, which will be raised to be flush with the existing and proposed entrance thresholds. An existing window will be enlarged to create a new ADA compliant entryway into the house. Where possible, granite from the existing building will be removed and reused in these masonry projects. Additional new masonry material will be utilized to demarcate and differentiate the new ramp construction. Both the front and rear porches will be rehabilitated, including saving elements of the existing mosaic tiles in the front. The addition of an elevator inside the main structure will necessitate an alteration to the existing northeast roofline in the form of a small dormer. This dormer will be constructed mimicking the style of the dormers added to the house in the 1940s. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Group B: Group B Standards The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modiflcation, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall.not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the existing proposal. The proposed work is in keeping with the historic characteristics of the house, carriage house, and grounds while continuing to rehabilitate same. Proposed additions are in accordance with existing Historic Preservation Commissions Standards and Guidelines as well as the National Park Service Preservation Brief 14, "New Exterior Additions to Historic Buildings: Preservation Concerns. " Applicant has stated their intention to revisit those projects that lack detail and definition at a later date before this Commission. Written by Adam Toering Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION °m i®' o`' x 1865 x of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osepheountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 1 ' 5 17 Application Number: 2-011 — ()q0,3 0 a Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date ojLastReview) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ' ❑ Local LandmarkElLocal Historic District (Na»te) ❑ National LandmarkElNational Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ TabledElSent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: 201 W, ` AM A O T'0 4 (Street Number—Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of PropertyOwner(s):-19DIANA LA1dMAR.KC) Phone#: (N) uD- 4.5N Address of Property Owner(s): _.201 W. W o tJan . t-)quy ftw) 04(to I (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Contractor Company Name: Phone #: Address of Contractor Company: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: II cio. (Single Famil),—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government Indztstrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction:)(] k Ii6e (6Vood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed `Fork: ❑ In -Kind ® Landscape ® New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: See 0461C'Y M Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: r�= t26 X . ` and/or X Signature of Owner/ Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— i _ t K I L ARCHITECTURE _ _ PLAN N I N G '�� I 910UTJ. B ND'IN s .6m) E Eumm) REMOVE DOSING �� sRnfl S WALK AND CURB _ GREGORY A. KIL pL LINES OF FOR �_,-- I NO RB AIA ARCHITECT DisTINO 3' WII \` BE= UTCH eVw _ ^ _� A R C H AIX of •2110 ♦__. / mom �� _ .klarchNxlOro.eam I sEr Dux ' ■ ` 1 PdE EXISTING 5• WALK _ _ •�� _ ■ _ _ �� EXISTING SHVE ■ _ .■ . 11/.09, TREE TO REMAIN - - I mVOEE--_ ■ • i / ��'--•••-\ __ .. ` Dmnp SmRT Dam WHEMOMR — `• ■ 71 uaO Lau RAMPS TO REMAIN I RDIOVE VEGRAITATINGEXISTING I I j PONJ PCRIE-COCHERE \ RENO'E��P X01 I NC ORNE RME JO` � OUTLINE CO _--------- REMOVE EXISIWC--------_• I I 1 - E,pO' uBnr POE-• ( CONCRETE AND T1 \\ I Q PREP .N .I.. NEW I \REINYE E705TWP CONC. DRIVE REMOVE DOS TING CONC. DRIVE /..--L-AWN- I 1 ' ACC.I.. RAN, _ I 1 I - � STING ---- I � I 1 T. . / 1 _ _ ' N + I�I \ j I REHABILITATION 105J SF I ; Ir1 ISD PaE ATTREFORMER tQ�MRRHGE SE ON EXISTING EDCE OF EXISTING I II Onx■ KIZER HOUSE MUMCPAL LATER AND SEVER I CONC. PANNG EXISTING J (� I YA1q /FOX DISTINIC SiOM MIXED MIN 800DING- I I rust I 803 W. WASHINGTON �"L / STONE STEPS FOR USE sI MIlERE I n ST. SO UI AB NN A OtxpTIRG BORDINC j / REINSIAIUTN)N (SEE J232 SF NE C1.1) J STORY STRUCTURE ON EXISTING 0 8 8 0 1 -----�.'( e n (MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER I .��1 i■I I LJ ' ftCNOYE PftmECnaxJ I I .. DUSTING BUILDING I I I I s, i i�� PREP R INFILL— BOlEAR05 AND I J o I OUTLINE ILIJIJI BASENE T ■ALL I pELOCAIE CARNpCE I EXISIWG CURB UNE o MSTING BASEMENT I EXISTING OPENIN AND Ipo$E CAs SERVICES TO BE REPLACED W c I STEPS TO REMAIN -REMOVE EXISTING -\q -- H `L `i IC BACKF DF I (SEE C1•,) PROPOSFJX PARKING „I CONI _ I DEMOLITION ABANDO ED STEPS LOT PANNG RELOCATE 3 STORY C \ t II I SITE PLAN Dw. jJ' BRK'N ,e I i ■OIeOs�_-"` �- SIDI (SEE \\"�� oEmoO � !�� smm xo _.: SIROCNRE CAS I SCREEN WlM. room xn�--------------- ■I I ATOPS I aulAEsi "'------- ■I I BET G WAIL I _S _ _ -� - --------------- -- I/L---_"`=---r'---------------—rt�DG�Eia'slwc coNa WAAix ----� ---- I I OATS AuOutl i8, 2017 i --- - � �� ■ .. �,r ■ ■ eeeeee� . ■ e-198.80' �s ■ ��' I -AI J / LusxNU UItIY, I I I I REVISED: 1—� j 1 CAenl Ravbw Sel I I � I ■tIR CurE I I EXISTING Y MLTf� I I so.WOOD FENCE 1 I I CX.,µ,.=1•SCC:G.�Xn�. � C.;L::�-".,: :•..ice«..�.^i �$ EXISTING SITE PLAN ( r ■ 0 SCALE c 1' - 10•-0' xL Anciu rinunet.uxNIo 1 CLEAR SICIB� EXISTING 5' WALKS AREA ?�4 Is 1 - _ NEW CONC. PAWING LOT-� ■ _ (SEE SHE C1.2 FOR ■ PROPOSED CRADEs) I CVAB , T■ ■ I Pat cm -J ' I ■ I ?D ■ I I '}--_18'-0• 1 i II e6 i i 6 ■ %I'RNC 2 I Si RY CARRIAGE GN2 i1053S5F STING NEW AC CONDENSERS B MONIICIPAL GUSER ' ANDEXI SEWER PROVIDE REINfOR IED CMU u TTflUCTUftA1 WRI BTFlLL C WITH WATERP OOFING• I BACKFILL ARANOONSTEPS WITH CO PACTED, I - ENGINEERED Fl IN 8" ' PI LIFT (MAX). titID51Wc amlmir�I OTA IXISTINC ONRY� p RDRNI C WALL,NEW .,.,I I - 42' AO GRADE "JJjL-- ON TH OPPER _ I LEVEL �rriwr waRY Pat 18'-0 � EXISTING Cm I TO REMAIN I I I ;w NEW (13) SPACE ON-SITE PARKING LOT -NEW m ONDERCROOND METRO -NET FIBER OPTIC LINE AND CONNECTORS NEW aNDERGNDUND WATER LINE T' - _ -- CARRIAGE HOSE NEW CONCRETE PARKING LOT amuo� 0 AVING I x ��-- NEW FACE OF COftB I BE NEW UNDERGR AO -NEI FIBER OPDC $ Mp8 CONNECTIONS CBflB 0 t II'\\!'; I� ---0C} ' TJ - ;.I :.�--1'I■--- I 1 I E':', .'i• •'_'�.L I .I I I I•'' ,`r Y;r, 11' RICK PAVER '.:'I,';': •� t'1 il'_ L ��L..' , ,IN, _ fl'::iU CIBtB ��i,q+ i'':'I :I;•, it ''� —CLEAR 5LTR AREA .- _ 1. -- ,'NEW BRICK PAVCR DRNE'A ' ANEW �Bfi'ICK PAVER ORNE'`• ,l ''i :'� �Ii: rl •'. �. c] `i,l^�; �Io '�''•'.I„li' �':'ir' L: II i1I' .i: i•1 ,d�.'i:i I:�I��i",�i:i::ii ';'1'. SII^ .1,.: 'i. ''�J' x VI--'--_---"-'� ----. PL NTIN 117.' P2 EB v IX89xc, i w NEW CONC. WALK � ■-'tumsa¢ 7 I _ I I I I ■ � Ocs1xN NEW BEING. NA1X STORY MIXED USE STRUCTURE 7272 SF ] STORY STRUCTURE ON EXISTWCI MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER RELOCATED CARRIAGE AND 3 STORY STROCTORE CAS SERVICES CREW AC CONDENSERS \ RELOCATED ELECTRIC METERS (IF REQUIRED) "NEW CONCRETE. WAJR NEW LAWN T� P2 J 191,.80' • 22'- WOOD EXISTING SOLID WOOD / FENCE AND REPLACE TWO FENCE POSTS / EXISTING 7' HIGH SOLID WOOD FENCE 5T0 NEW LAWN 'PIN ED LAWN P2 ox -I RAINABE STRUC TYR (SEE SIR. 1.2 1"` � EXISTING E )0' OF NEW, 41,” TALL, I 2VC-WRBL16.r IRON FENCE NCE I ' 2-11 LAWN ER SERWC,TAP AND CURB BOX SHUT C F, FROM WEST i■ x WASHINGTON STRE MRN (VERIFY ■ . EXACT LOCATION uuu(((111D MAIN SIZE I WITH WATER OEPARI I . - MENT) I T,` '__SET -In FACE OF CURB fl� `SEF ADDITIONAL STORE STEP AT I SOUTH ENTRANCE ADJUST FRONT I I YARD GRADES TO RETAIN STORM WATER ON SITE AND FLOW 10 NEW WATm VAW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. II �a PROPOSED SITE PLAN w pp SCALE: 1- . 10'-0" n 1 K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1126 LINLOLNWAY EAST SOUTH BEND. IN GREGORY A KIL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 574,288.2854 fFAX.2 BB. 2120 .kUw WtwcNrw.wm REHABILITATION ATTHEFORMER KIZER HOUSE 809 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH BEND, IN D I A N A 4 6 6 0 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN DATE -..1..2.11 REVISED: I Cxanl Revlew Sw1 I �:'•a'i::".ter ':_F.ii-:.:�_ I SITE NOTES: I GENERAL 1. CONCRETE - PROVIDE CONTROL AND EXPANSION JOINTS FOR ALL NEW CONCRETE PLACEMENTS PER ASCI GUIDELINES, 2. CAS SERVICES - RELOCATE EXISTING GAS SERVICES PER PINI. 3. WATER SERVICE - PROVIDE NEW WATER SEflVICE, TAP ANO CGRB BO% I SHUTOFF. FROM WEST WASHINGTON STREET MAIN INTO WN STRUCTURE AND FEED THROUGH TO CARRIAGE HOUSE PER PIAN, SIZE NEW SERVICE 1. AS REQUIRED. METRO -NET - PROVIDE NEW METRO -NET, FIBER OPTIC CONNECTION TO 2 ST AND CAflRMCE HOUSE. A2.1 5. ADDEXISFNG STEP - ADO FRONT STEP -SET STONE STEP AT SOUTH AND DES TONR. ADJUST FRONT YARD GRADES TO RETAIN STORM WATER ON SIZE AND ROW IX F TO NEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES -17,-B � MD EN - 22'-0 DRIVE WI NH NEW PARKING _ I �._ LOT ENTRANCE mmxc urtH B1vN _ - �•cl= CLEAR SIGHT c'YAREA EXISTING W WALK EXISTING SHADE _ - II4 p8• TREE TO REMAIN - 'c PROPOSED SIGN, 42' W % 4B" - LONG WITH GRANITE BASE, WOOD "�"�-"'µ'_ NXB • BACKCRORND AND VIM -F1-. '- 7 _ • umvq urmlol[ LETTERING, UT FROM BELOW. I - �� _ - _ -- - � r 0 oosma snlar FINAL LOCATION DETERMINED BY CITY LINE OF SIGHT GUIDELINES. `x -.�_-_ • 76.25' - ucm w¢ EXSRNG WTIEELCHAIR NEW LAWN '•`�-, .I IXsnxo IIl4N NA! 70 REMAIN I CJ ' EJ NEW CONC. 6'Xf' CaRBS EITH OE OF ■ J "NEW LAWN • • 10 ;w NEW (13) SPACE ON-SITE PARKING LOT -NEW m ONDERCROOND METRO -NET FIBER OPTIC LINE AND CONNECTORS NEW aNDERGNDUND WATER LINE T' - _ -- CARRIAGE HOSE NEW CONCRETE PARKING LOT amuo� 0 AVING I x ��-- NEW FACE OF COftB I BE NEW UNDERGR AO -NEI FIBER OPDC $ Mp8 CONNECTIONS CBflB 0 t II'\\!'; I� ---0C} ' TJ - ;.I :.�--1'I■--- I 1 I E':', .'i• •'_'�.L I .I I I I•'' ,`r Y;r, 11' RICK PAVER '.:'I,';': •� t'1 il'_ L ��L..' , ,IN, _ fl'::iU CIBtB ��i,q+ i'':'I :I;•, it ''� —CLEAR 5LTR AREA .- _ 1. -- ,'NEW BRICK PAVCR DRNE'A ' ANEW �Bfi'ICK PAVER ORNE'`• ,l ''i :'� �Ii: rl •'. �. c] `i,l^�; �Io '�''•'.I„li' �':'ir' L: II i1I' .i: i•1 ,d�.'i:i I:�I��i",�i:i::ii ';'1'. SII^ .1,.: 'i. ''�J' x VI--'--_---"-'� ----. PL NTIN 117.' P2 EB v IX89xc, i w NEW CONC. WALK � ■-'tumsa¢ 7 I _ I I I I ■ � Ocs1xN NEW BEING. NA1X STORY MIXED USE STRUCTURE 7272 SF ] STORY STRUCTURE ON EXISTWCI MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER RELOCATED CARRIAGE AND 3 STORY STROCTORE CAS SERVICES CREW AC CONDENSERS \ RELOCATED ELECTRIC METERS (IF REQUIRED) "NEW CONCRETE. WAJR NEW LAWN T� P2 J 191,.80' • 22'- WOOD EXISTING SOLID WOOD / FENCE AND REPLACE TWO FENCE POSTS / EXISTING 7' HIGH SOLID WOOD FENCE 5T0 NEW LAWN 'PIN ED LAWN P2 ox -I RAINABE STRUC TYR (SEE SIR. 1.2 1"` � EXISTING E )0' OF NEW, 41,” TALL, I 2VC-WRBL16.r IRON FENCE NCE I ' 2-11 LAWN ER SERWC,TAP AND CURB BOX SHUT C F, FROM WEST i■ x WASHINGTON STRE MRN (VERIFY ■ . EXACT LOCATION uuu(((111D MAIN SIZE I WITH WATER OEPARI I . - MENT) I T,` '__SET -In FACE OF CURB fl� `SEF ADDITIONAL STORE STEP AT I SOUTH ENTRANCE ADJUST FRONT I I YARD GRADES TO RETAIN STORM WATER ON SITE AND FLOW 10 NEW WATm VAW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. II �a PROPOSED SITE PLAN w pp SCALE: 1- . 10'-0" n 1 K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1126 LINLOLNWAY EAST SOUTH BEND. IN GREGORY A KIL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 574,288.2854 fFAX.2 BB. 2120 .kUw WtwcNrw.wm REHABILITATION ATTHEFORMER KIZER HOUSE 809 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH BEND, IN D I A N A 4 6 6 0 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN DATE -..1..2.11 REVISED: I Cxanl Revlew Sw1 I �:'•a'i::".ter ':_F.ii-:.:�_ Dsmxa sn¢t Ilan PQE�.». IDOSTNC V WI WIL. R xuaw Q fNaE % LEGEND MCI` 1. Any roof cl n apauls that on aaawnty connected la has manfclind amen (,loran ar ® DW -X DRYWELL ./ CATCH BASIN swilory). an to he disconnected and retained an is in the new dry well/iatenl'wn ayelem. (SEE DETAILS ON SHT. C2.2) 2. New alarm water drainage and retenBan to comply with City at Smith Bend Engineering ® CATCH BASIN Standard. 1 Al nn dryweee to b cant -led and inedaOM per CAy at Santa Bend En4wearing — — — PIPE OR PBGORAIED PPE N GRAVEL Standard, (aee :heel DS) —e CRADNG (ROPE) ODRAINAGE ZONE T 2 �— 6" MRS - SEE SHE C2.2 FOR DETAILS A2.1 awlwDa 1 fA1M eavl w/ - _ UAaAIo Is fan w+QMIso 9J DEwla O1M a1iN _� _ � Ai°"'" ra[ I I PON FTAEiARIea`.T PON FENCE �8 SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SCALE: 1•' - 10•-0" ) 1 le—,- lan.... iR PWwNA/al■SWNX- VN Sy ... X+i aP6fAAMId6Rw:!Pxa - wl rMAlrmrU - iepl s... Iws . PaaPOSm SWMr rlblafn . PFlafMNY a1 im ... Dx PrewnAW0511rwX- NX pI in ... fa una Uar6k- few r... fans . Naaem n _roan a aeaw vaoaosm IVAa marAtE < Ewrslc IUAO mQaQ gWAPaE ,,11,1E wliFNAMY eaeau%f,INGr aapik 0.% Pawn mewl p wk n% vaomrleAu .wrsk n% %roma Plaza nn aPrwMls aro R.wnflR QI1 arnwnom aE01Mro (I- al ." awAasE Knee . .3 v nelfsmw vaaww Red: 'Al IN!I! Q aAPanlrterem •f1!Q tr r r Rnrrw.m Pwa . = rola. — . 115 Q RElOn1011 a[avaa 1lur 9l lalaYE alIR Q Pfi(Nnrl Paal� 'm Vt. tArO . S IlI 1n U f —NO. 11!Q 1r V r Ren mPPE : 313-a711. waI. 11 u vaawE, aee uminwt nmawm Onew,eI to wxelr al(m vin . oro Q nEXxnel MeNala.) - ITrr tl W1e1Qwlmrp - VI E ]r V Y PENIQ6N PPC • VISE 1a1A PAPAnfO • ro roan Q BgIWnnePPF6OareOl IRs wAAI nt10mM rtauuo Rwn w4*),MW REG aEiFNnwr PmAI. rot(I) IDQQ,ranII ,t.Q 1rd or t r manallM,aa l . 1nQ I- Pnvmm . aQ'Inw Q BAaRa anexsvam Pef6 ro armor (u vwq Ti41E: SEE STORM WATER RETENTION STRUCNRE DIVALS ON SHT. C2.2 1 AT SO-TH ONT YARD RN WATER NEW I I LEGEND I O nSIINC GRACE MJ ON PROPOSED FINISH ELEVATION K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 112611.11 NWAYEAST SOUTH BEND, IN 4 6 6 w I GREGORY A. KIL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 574.255.2554 FAX.219.1421 wnmA6arddtedwa.com REHABILITATION AT THE FORMER KIZER HOUSE 607 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH BEND, N D I A N A 4 a S 0 1 SITE DRAINAGE PLAN DATE August 18. 2017 REVISED: OW RoI Set D4" "w C1.2 MCI` x. A®cwleciuu ivlixlNeo 1 1 1 z I _ _ __ _ — A2.1_ A2.1 D�1a5 SI9Ffi DAM POIF _— EXISTING 5' WALK 0050X0 MICH BISN __ �'®➢ D]SIIXC NAB � _ _ SHADE TREES ' 4 Iax-O r _ '___ EXISTING 5' WALK EXISTING SHADE _ �- r 11409, TREE TO REMAINr v �ilp _ r r ORNAMENTAL TREES En510S xNF 40'-0• • r Daum a 76.25' IxHr EXISTING 70' DF NEW, 46' TAL DEC-0RATWE-mw NON FENCE �a PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN a a SCALE: 1" a 10'-0" _NCW SHNEJTREES 1 K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1126 LINCOLNWAY EAST SOUTH BEND, IN 8 6 0 1 GREGORY A KIL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 574.200.2854 FK.209. i 420 .kOarcNlleclwe.can REHABILITATION AT THE FORMER KIZER HOUSE 807 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH BEND, I N D I A N A 4 6 8 0 1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN DATE: Au9us110, 2017 REVISED: I CHIN Revlev Ssl 1 C1.3 �o 00 rRAa' aw tAwx A nARA I �'At Lss ado I e „vr V Ewp[AUwW +•Ns OwA acro On W-4 Ao �+ I EAmxo wun wnx /) PwagSm CNDE N UXN PROPOSED PARKING I PROPOSED TAWN I I EIM. WALK I PARWWAY I CHAPN Si. PROPERLY ONE SECTION THRU PARKING CLOOKING NORTH SCALE: 1/4" -0" NOTES: I -I u I. BASS A' CONCRETE TO DED IN ALL WALLAS AND APPROACHES 2.RADII AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS 3. SIDEWALK WHEELCWUR RAMPS REQOIRED AS PER INDOT STANDARD DRAWINGS, - RAMPS ARE TO BE RUSH W/ EXISBNG PAVEMENT. 4. UM" POLM KMRWM ETC. MM BE DWANSIDN ,ousE (ardA)PWIORTOTO CONC POOR MATERIAL5. CONTRACTION JOINTS REQUIRED ON APPROACHES AS SHOWN ON PIANS PmnlSm MIX PROS° W05�4(�S.E PAx m W. 'CURING CONCRETE' - AS PER WDOT N WDKa°r0a1STANDARD SPEC. SECTION5DI— _(PARAGRAPH 50130). USE ACURING T-- -- — -- — —• — — — — — — _ _ — COMPOOND IMMEDIATELY _1u:y_ROA —i.AS CREHIGHAS T MSiNKce BBE AAF LEASTof E4 e •' — SHOAH LmOER OF NOM"ILORKNSIONSnD x SHALL NOT BE MEDTDEOOA THE Mw R " ® SPECIFIED DMENSKX Q ALL WALKSANDRE COAPPROACI SHADPER PROPERTY LWE WOOi STN10Nt0 SPEC, SECTION P01 PROPOSED PAWING (BEYOND) - ppryE I MN J) ( CHAPIN ST. 9. (PARAGRAPHS APPROACH SHOWN AT NEW Ptwma _ u,Ns DRIVE - 24• MAX AT THROAT. 20• W. RADN15. IXRT. WALK 10 BLANKETS SHALL BE UR® OR BEYOND) CONCRETE WHEN TEMPERATURE 6 E)IPECTED 10 FALL BELOW 57. SECTION THRU ENTRY CDRIVE - LOOKING NORTH ° 2 SCALE: 1/4" 1•-0"®®� 1 14'-4'4 LEGEND I DOPE rAA. WRM FEW M aroC a4 Ri a ¢r . �:.. •., •.. L_`.: , . f... .. fA1STING CRAVE ELEVATION ns• •ml— PROPOSED FINISH ELEVATION �w _IA PRAFlw1Y uR I IIEw -I" CSECTION - BUSINESS APPROACH ° ' Y D 3 SCALE: 1/2" - 1'-O" (Q °vAsr ro Dw.Dc Yml coActtrt Rp s PERFORATED STORM PIPE (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) M' YN IOPSOL or YD DavN.TED ND DxDAm nu / I I uuDwsm sa J � I 1 ' ' � mmslwem s¢ I PPF pNTM RNARw � : ' ; •. ,- SMD PIPC (SQ PUN mP SCE) � r SANG Dm • rAf R[0'D CSECTIONS AT STORM DRAIN PIPE NOT TO SCALE 5OIIn STORM PIPF (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) CSECTION AT DRYWELL 4-�ANS— MSIOLOEOCOxfINUDU9 xT cx" .. NOT TO SCALE i UT SE�A�LPA,Mu ITH CONCRETE PAVEMEM CONCRfIE PAEMEM _ N ?MB Ew�ONTROL Ys]COMPACTED- - EGATEBASE AGGREGATE— AGGR N—EMODM00WELAT1rOC DRAINAGE STROCTORE CHART COMPACTED SUBOMDE COMPACTEO SUSGRADE ORAS mRECTEDOH THE PUNS COMPACT TD 05% COMPACT TO Ds% CONCRETE JOINT xD mE DR uPADR RPE Da P CONCRETE CONCRETE oR-1 D6PYBL ./aiw nASN Yd'AJL• :Mxo sQ UN E -r DA P� PAVEMENT AT DRIVE P2 PAVEMENT AT WALK Dmwu./artxBix vim• BDu sQPUN CCONCRUE PAVEMENT DETAILS NOT TO SCALE llt'PHS—IED C11111N, ONl AaIACENTBRICK PA ERe SEE PIANI El,l JOINT JOINT FIM-5SIIH el.f JOINT SEALER MAIL fia D.G PAVERS (SEE PIAN) OPEN JOINTS TO OPENJOINTSTO ALLOW DMINAGE TOPCWRSE•C —CENT r N .11ElIC ESI3EE1 1 r UWNIANOSCAPE }--r WNRANOSCMB PAVE.NTIEEEPIANI J�r 1.1?MA%. DEPTH o11J•,S r THICKNTNCRETE�9ANO BEO DEPTH SAND BED I I �LANOSLAPE.� ' ill,—R.IIa J IA I I R, tN• 0..w u 1=8 S'THILKpS] � 1^ b .,/5• COMPACTED I',.•••• '.•; ',' AGORECTED - _ GREGATE BASE _ - ACOTMPACTED _ - - 1•THICNISJ GATEBASE _ - rTNCN YS] AGGREGATE EASE CDMI—TEO - - - - - - COMPACTED COMPACTED SUBGRADE (2) IS BARS CONT. COMPACTED SUBGRAOE RIYMBAR—H, AGGREGATE BASE - -I\ Co.—MPACTED SUBGMOC A OREOATE BABE COMPACT TO 95% COMPACT 7005% \` TD 9s% (Npfi BW3 CONE. COMPACTEDSUBGRADE IDp5BAN5 CONE, COMPACT TO SS% AT DRIVE - AT DRIVE - TOP LEVEL AT PAVEMENT - TOP AT PAVEMENT - TOP 0C� ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT C2 PAVEMENT NOT USED C3 LEVEL WITH LAWN C4 LEVEL NOT U SED LAWN CCONCRETE CURB DETAILS NOT TO SCALE K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1126 UNCOLNWAY EAST SOUTH BEND •IN 4 6 6 0 1 GREGORY A -KL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 5742882654 FIX, . 266. . 2120 k0er<Nllaclwa.twn REHABILITATION AT THE FORMER KIZER HOUSE 803 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH SEND. IN D I A N A 4 6 6 0 1 PROPOSED SITE DETAILS DATE: A.I.-I I6. 2011 REVISED: I COS. R.Nw 301 llji I I C2.2 r wL aPSEa PDBOMRO PNC ./ SDOI (ITERDI ITSsvq�li 77,e IN IT umrsnDem saM� I i IT PNCIN4R1ONA60N I '_•^ ': � FLICII DBRIC MAV T r ITY� T� —0111 IND MUST T.,. -110 iT3' hT;YIro� �..��. .�:. k�T, o o..� 9? IS IT S o o a a L�•T,f �iY PERFORATED STORM PIPE (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) M' YN IOPSOL or YD DavN.TED ND DxDAm nu / I I uuDwsm sa J � I 1 ' ' � mmslwem s¢ I PPF pNTM RNARw � : ' ; •. ,- SMD PIPC (SQ PUN mP SCE) � r SANG Dm • rAf R[0'D CSECTIONS AT STORM DRAIN PIPE NOT TO SCALE 5OIIn STORM PIPF (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) CSECTION AT DRYWELL 4-�ANS— MSIOLOEOCOxfINUDU9 xT cx" .. NOT TO SCALE i UT SE�A�LPA,Mu ITH CONCRETE PAVEMEM CONCRfIE PAEMEM _ N ?MB Ew�ONTROL Ys]COMPACTED- - EGATEBASE AGGREGATE— AGGR N—EMODM00WELAT1rOC DRAINAGE STROCTORE CHART COMPACTED SUBOMDE COMPACTEO SUSGRADE ORAS mRECTEDOH THE PUNS COMPACT TD 05% COMPACT TO Ds% CONCRETE JOINT xD mE DR uPADR RPE Da P CONCRETE CONCRETE oR-1 D6PYBL ./aiw nASN Yd'AJL• :Mxo sQ UN E -r DA P� PAVEMENT AT DRIVE P2 PAVEMENT AT WALK Dmwu./artxBix vim• BDu sQPUN CCONCRUE PAVEMENT DETAILS NOT TO SCALE llt'PHS—IED C11111N, ONl AaIACENTBRICK PA ERe SEE PIANI El,l JOINT JOINT FIM-5SIIH el.f JOINT SEALER MAIL fia D.G PAVERS (SEE PIAN) OPEN JOINTS TO OPENJOINTSTO ALLOW DMINAGE TOPCWRSE•C —CENT r N .11ElIC ESI3EE1 1 r UWNIANOSCAPE }--r WNRANOSCMB PAVE.NTIEEEPIANI J�r 1.1?MA%. DEPTH o11J•,S r THICKNTNCRETE�9ANO BEO DEPTH SAND BED I I �LANOSLAPE.� ' ill,—R.IIa J IA I I R, tN• 0..w u 1=8 S'THILKpS] � 1^ b .,/5• COMPACTED I',.•••• '.•; ',' AGORECTED - _ GREGATE BASE _ - ACOTMPACTED _ - - 1•THICNISJ GATEBASE _ - rTNCN YS] AGGREGATE EASE CDMI—TEO - - - - - - COMPACTED COMPACTED SUBGRADE (2) IS BARS CONT. COMPACTED SUBGRAOE RIYMBAR—H, AGGREGATE BASE - -I\ Co.—MPACTED SUBGMOC A OREOATE BABE COMPACT TO 95% COMPACT 7005% \` TD 9s% (Npfi BW3 CONE. COMPACTEDSUBGRADE IDp5BAN5 CONE, COMPACT TO SS% AT DRIVE - AT DRIVE - TOP LEVEL AT PAVEMENT - TOP AT PAVEMENT - TOP 0C� ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT C2 PAVEMENT NOT USED C3 LEVEL WITH LAWN C4 LEVEL NOT U SED LAWN CCONCRETE CURB DETAILS NOT TO SCALE K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1126 UNCOLNWAY EAST SOUTH BEND •IN 4 6 6 0 1 GREGORY A -KL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 5742882654 FIX, . 266. . 2120 k0er<Nllaclwa.twn REHABILITATION AT THE FORMER KIZER HOUSE 803 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH SEND. IN D I A N A 4 6 6 0 1 PROPOSED SITE DETAILS DATE: A.I.-I I6. 2011 REVISED: I COS. R.Nw 301 llji I I C2.2 r wL aPSEa PDBOMRO PNC ./ SDOI (ITERDI ITSsvq�li 77,e umrsnDem saM� I i ;,;jtt i � `wDmwem sDE PNCIN4R1ONA60N I '_•^ ': � FLICII DBRIC MAV T r —0111 IND MUST PERFORATED STORM PIPE (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) M' YN IOPSOL or YD DavN.TED ND DxDAm nu / I I uuDwsm sa J � I 1 ' ' � mmslwem s¢ I PPF pNTM RNARw � : ' ; •. ,- SMD PIPC (SQ PUN mP SCE) � r SANG Dm • rAf R[0'D CSECTIONS AT STORM DRAIN PIPE NOT TO SCALE 5OIIn STORM PIPF (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS) CSECTION AT DRYWELL 4-�ANS— MSIOLOEOCOxfINUDU9 xT cx" .. NOT TO SCALE i UT SE�A�LPA,Mu ITH CONCRETE PAVEMEM CONCRfIE PAEMEM _ N ?MB Ew�ONTROL Ys]COMPACTED- - EGATEBASE AGGREGATE— AGGR N—EMODM00WELAT1rOC DRAINAGE STROCTORE CHART COMPACTED SUBOMDE COMPACTEO SUSGRADE ORAS mRECTEDOH THE PUNS COMPACT TD 05% COMPACT TO Ds% CONCRETE JOINT xD mE DR uPADR RPE Da P CONCRETE CONCRETE oR-1 D6PYBL ./aiw nASN Yd'AJL• :Mxo sQ UN E -r DA P� PAVEMENT AT DRIVE P2 PAVEMENT AT WALK Dmwu./artxBix vim• BDu sQPUN CCONCRUE PAVEMENT DETAILS NOT TO SCALE llt'PHS—IED C11111N, ONl AaIACENTBRICK PA ERe SEE PIANI El,l JOINT JOINT FIM-5SIIH el.f JOINT SEALER MAIL fia D.G PAVERS (SEE PIAN) OPEN JOINTS TO OPENJOINTSTO ALLOW DMINAGE TOPCWRSE•C —CENT r N .11ElIC ESI3EE1 1 r UWNIANOSCAPE }--r WNRANOSCMB PAVE.NTIEEEPIANI J�r 1.1?MA%. DEPTH o11J•,S r THICKNTNCRETE�9ANO BEO DEPTH SAND BED I I �LANOSLAPE.� ' ill,—R.IIa J IA I I R, tN• 0..w u 1=8 S'THILKpS] � 1^ b .,/5• COMPACTED I',.•••• '.•; ',' AGORECTED - _ GREGATE BASE _ - ACOTMPACTED _ - - 1•THICNISJ GATEBASE _ - rTNCN YS] AGGREGATE EASE CDMI—TEO - - - - - - COMPACTED COMPACTED SUBGRADE (2) IS BARS CONT. COMPACTED SUBGRAOE RIYMBAR—H, AGGREGATE BASE - -I\ Co.—MPACTED SUBGMOC A OREOATE BABE COMPACT TO 95% COMPACT 7005% \` TD 9s% (Npfi BW3 CONE. COMPACTEDSUBGRADE IDp5BAN5 CONE, COMPACT TO SS% AT DRIVE - AT DRIVE - TOP LEVEL AT PAVEMENT - TOP AT PAVEMENT - TOP 0C� ADJACENT TO PAVEMENT C2 PAVEMENT NOT USED C3 LEVEL WITH LAWN C4 LEVEL NOT U SED LAWN CCONCRETE CURB DETAILS NOT TO SCALE K I L ARCHITECTURE P L A N N I N G 1126 UNCOLNWAY EAST SOUTH BEND •IN 4 6 6 0 1 GREGORY A -KL NCARB AIA ARCHITECT 5742882654 FIX, . 266. . 2120 k0er<Nllaclwa.twn REHABILITATION AT THE FORMER KIZER HOUSE 803 W. WASHINGTON ST. SOUTH SEND. IN D I A N A 4 6 6 0 1 PROPOSED SITE DETAILS DATE: A.I.-I I6. 2011 REVISED: I COS. R.Nw 301 llji I I C2.2 7"" it -1=�.. ..cc•.�....__ .I.:.,.... OEAST BUILDING PERSPECTIVE NIS K I L ARCHITECTURE P LA NN INA IR6 lNCGINNAYEAST OU,H BEN, IN OREOORY A. KL NCARA AIA ARCHITECT e T..zea.zes� x�x.xxx.xxxe .x4,d,SeGGacmm �\� Apr 01 ,�' v\ REHABILITATION ATTHE FORMER K I Z E R BUILDING SOS W. WASHINGTON ST SOUTH SEND I N D I A N A 4 8 8 0 1 / EAST BUILDING PERSPECTIVE - •, �BCHEAIPIC �E&IGN�'S • _ JREVIIECI I ` 1`•ti �A4.1� '� do 30M /do AVMiSIOH /!: Eli Hosed <? aroiS M3N _ lol N3H011X HONOd Na 31vs ONI831VO MUM 3 J 8801 P 0-11 �rr/ii�0111iri�j%/// I -- L �n dWVN I aooa M3N IfI ,S'ZC- I I 4� - — do dwva a� r WNW $ CIM WN ! I 0-00 mGM do dIn 831NVld M3N i. I amis PARTIAL 1st FLOOR RAMP & STAIRS 0 z'—B• S'—a' 10'-8~ 11108-3a 10 3/16" = 1'-0° I I I I I ! I I I I _ � I I-7—T-1--I-`I--=1-�4--1-_I I J I kT CPARTIAL EAST ELEVATION 33/16" = 1'-0" K I L ARCHITECTURE P LA NN I NO 1116 LINCCLNWATEAST ;011TH BEN0.1N 6 L e ET N GA R BA. KR AIA ARCHITECT 614.4 AA.EA B, f%.x IB.]txe macnlN�w..mm 1 � REHABILITATION ATTHE FORMER K I Z E R BUILDING 883 W. WASHINGTON ST SOUTH BEND I N D I A N A 4 8 8 o 1 RAMP PLAN & ELEVATION DETAIL a�swl peEs cNxola I REVISED: 1 I 1 A2.2 TCS S�zti u '� -�"r.� •Tr ,._�� YNN PWF OR UXE OF MART ROOF O 11 REMOTE ROOPoNC, UGSR k M NC O AY NGSMAY ""' FA LLVSL - fF111N0 'C"' CUT PROWDE TUIP. SHORING 8 SECONDARY ROOF R BLOC ROOMER HA C ROOR U015 S ON NEW L L 12 me TI DIM O 3 CUT AT NORTH IDP OF NNN RWF /N NLW CNU WALLS - PATCH RODR N0 COUNC MORE AS REO'D k REMOTE YNLLY 4 BGµ RWWt% RDCRNC k CBUNO 13 EX MASONRY MICRO WNL NEW HCISTWAY - BEAR REMNNINC ENDS OF UPPER SUN k RATERS ON 14 EX PoOD SRIO FOUND WNL C W NOISMAY ANIS O 6 DL SND WNL IS OETERNNED TO IS BE LOAD BMNC PRUDE BEW k OfFAR ENDS OF UM'ER BEATS k RAFTERS ON DL UDDER ANCHORED 70 POSTS TO REPLACE REMD0 WNL OUTSIDE OF CNV IWISMAY I B UNDERPIN IX WNL OfD/CrE MISONRf SRL 0 NEW BOOR 4 FTDEEP CONG HOMMY PR k If nil O FULL UWALS FIG ON CRUW/ LWiAS 7tPE �l' IX PORCH SA NL - A k N. W 78 PROM E SVS FOR MALL REAGIN k M' STRDO.. DOOR ADM NEW HARP — 19 ALUM C.MCRUL RWDRAL k UTE ORIE -FIN RUM ROORNC SYTEII ON D NL SDES -'"ING IMO IXISE. RESET IX. CRWRE STEPS ANO 20 ROMINO AT NL "WALES PROWDE NEW LONG MAB 2-IIR FIRE RATED 8 CMU NOISRAY O W/ BOND BON 0 FA MOR - 21 NMYIO FOR I NR PATE FN -CIG BRUCE MINN. k 9i' DRYNW. 0 ASSEMBLY ALL DPOM WALLS SHEET PTINC DESCNED k INSTNIID 10 QSTS. SUBBMED BED& W FLOOR, V12 12 22 O IAFT BBY TERS LYON� H06TNAYEk �) O RODRWQ PGSIFA k DMWNL CLC - WANT I -HR FIRE BORIC \2 BUILDING SECTION LOOKING NORTH 1/8' o I'-0' K I L ARCHITECTURE 1P LA NN I N G SIOUTT. SEND IN A e R o GREGORY A KIL NCAR B AIA ARCHITECT B}1.288.2854 fR.}i9.2A}e .xuMwmeWer.,n, BUILDING SECTIONS @ -'far HOISTWAY LOBBY NtW LLLY U,:COPRIOOR MECH. — \ ;�, , "'E'er°iic oEr 30'2ole I B04 (SCHINDLE BIo ou ��I°scHB swN t 20 n........ MODEL J'3 04 la n A L______ R2 t...: :........................::. \ =Y=� �_I REVISEG �I BY -s ' I[ I II .CBUIII .: " Ft. - 0 BUILDING LDING SECTION LOOKING SOUTH 0 4' 9' ts',' A2.1 F}OOR _ \ REHABILITATION AT THEP RIMERK I Z E R 13 B U I L D I N G ECOND ROCR 80'W. WASHINGTON ST SOUTH BEND I N D I A N A 4 8 R 0 1 BUILDING SECTIONS @ -'far HOISTWAY LOBBY NtW LLLY U,:COPRIOOR MECH. — \ ;�, , "'E'er°iic oEr 30'2ole I B04 (SCHINDLE BIo ou ��I°scHB swN t 20 n........ MODEL J'3 04 la n A L______ R2 t...: :........................::. \ =Y=� �_I REVISEG �I BY -s ' I[ I II .CBUIII .: " Ft. - 0 BUILDING LDING SECTION LOOKING SOUTH 0 4' 9' ts',' A2.1 0 10 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN a D 4' B' 18e K 1 L ARCHITECTURE P A NN II NG ,�O UEU ; EN/O IN OREOCRY A. K6. HOAREAIA ARCHITRCT 671.266.=664 fAX 31/.7111 xllercnneaMxAmm Jal/b � REHABILITATION AT THE FORMER K I Z E R BUILDING E03 W. WASHINGTON ST SDUTH BEND I N 0 1 A N A 4 6 6 0 1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN I -.T -- v-6EnIRME., REVISED! I 7]17 mzzI A1.5 0 Checklist -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://w�vw. stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us To ensure your application can be processed in a timely matter without delay, include the following documentation when appropriate: Certificate of Appropriateness Application Written description of the project (Scale, dimensions, construction methods, alterations, etc.) Materials to be used (Supplemented with manufac- tures' brochures and specifications) Site Plan showing existing buildings & structures and - proposed project (for new construction, additions, paths, terraces, patios, fences) Photographs Blueprints/Drawings - one (1) set Application fee - $20.00 Kizer House site and accessibility project Description of Proposed work 1)Landscaping/Site work (see attached site plan for detail): • New curb cut/entrance on east side of property. Remove existing walk and curb to install new 22' wide drive. Existing tree to be removed; existing street sign to be relocated. • Remove all existing concrete on site. • Remove curb along west property line to the wood privacy fence. Curb along west property line on the west side of the wood privacy fence will remain. Wood privacy fence to remain and be repaired in-kind. • Adjust grade of front yard to allow storm water to be retained on site and allow flow to new drainage structures and installation of missing step to front porch. The site will be lowered approximately seven inches in the front and along west elevation and approximately four inches nearer the parking area. • Install new 13 -space concrete parking area between house and carriage house; new concrete drive, new concrete walk along Washington Street; 6'-0" concrete walk from front steps to front walk; 5'-0" concrete walk from front sidewalk to driveway. • Alternate: install brick pavers in area of original drive from W. Washington public sidewalk to carriage house to reflect original concrete drive and parking area in front of carriage house. • Install new concrete walk from parking area to the west entry door. _ • Remove existing scrub trees on east side of property. Evaluate potential to relocate red -bud trees to serve as additional screening along north edge of parking area. • Install new curb along southern property along West Washington Street to recreate missing, tree lawn. Plant tress as approved by City Forrester in tree lawn area as noted on plans. Install grass in tree lawn area. • Set additional stone step (stored on site) at front porch entry stairs. • Install new lawn as indicated on site plan; • Install new trees and planting beds as indicated. Install evergreen screen along north property line, east of carriage house. • Install reinforced CMU structural wall infill with waterproofing along retaining wall near northwest corner of carriage house. Backfill abandoned steps with compacted fill. • Create concrete area for trash receptacles with 48" aluminum fence with solid infill panels. • Relocate gas services to west side of main house near south elevation. • Install new AC condensers and electric meters along west side of house near southwest corner. • Install new sign, 42"H x 48" L shaped sign at southeast corner of property. Granite base (repurposed stone stored on site from masonry repair project), wood background, vinyl lettering. Lit from above. Located to meet City of South Bend requirements. • Install 70' of new 48"H decorative wrought iron fence along west edge of property, from walk to existing 7'H wood privacy fence. Masonry and porch floor repair • Rebuild support wall of Porte Cochere to match. • Rebuild floor of rear porch utilizing concrete stained to match color of original side porch floor. • Repair front porch floor removing deteriorated floor tile and installing new concrete floor finished to match side porch floor color. Salvage reusable tile and install in band around perimeter of porch floor. • Repair basement window sills and any necessary tuckpointing along base of house once concrete around perimeter of house has been removed. 2) Accessibility: • Remove existing stone steps leading to the rear porch and relocate beside basement steps on north wall of rear porch. Create approximate 48" opening in rear porch wall at its connection to rear wing. Salvage stone to infill existing rear porch wall entrance where stairs are being removed. • Install new ramp per drawings with black aluminum guardrail and handrail. Ramp to be masonry with poured concrete floor and faced with Quarry Ridge Cobblestone Chardonnay (or similar) synthetic stone laid similar to existing masonry. Walls will be capped with concrete caps to match limestone caps installed on basement step entrance. • Remove north wall of the east side porch to floor level. Salvage granite for rear porch wall infill and repurposing on site. Raise porch floor to interior floor height approximately seven inches. Shift stairs on east side of porch to be flush with inside edge of porch wall. Reinstall all stairs including those temporarily removed and stored on site for vehicle access. • Convert window on side porch leading to rear parlor to serve as handicapped entrance door with automated opener. Install handicapped opener on the north side of former window/handicapped door. Door to match existing paneled door on side porch leading to middle parlor. Install compliant hardware. • Construct a dormer on the north face of the main roof to accommodate new interior elevator as indicated on attached roof plan, section and elevation drawings. Clad in copper to mimic existing dormers added in the 1940's renovation. • Install aluminum handrail on both sides of front steps, along top of basement stairway cap, along both sides of relocated stair to rear porch and along side porch stairs to match that on handicapped ramp. Carriage House • Replace existing new solid wood service door with wood door with top light and paneled bottom. • Install 1/2 round painted galvanized gutters and downspouts. • Remove all deteriorated wood storm windows. Install new wood storm windows. • Repair stucco on front dormer to match. • Prime and paint all exterior trim and stucco. Front view — install additional stone step at front entry; adjust grade, install new curb to recreate tree lawn, install new front lawn (All work per site plan) Side view of front — new front lawn, tree lawn, sign, curb, grade, walks, drive and additional front step, as noted on plan. All concrete to be removed. (All work per site plan) F � ,a '105 Ale,- Add roof dormer to accommodate new interior elevator. (per plans) Infill area of retaining wall; backfill abandoned steps. Hang original gate fixed in opening. (all work as noted on plans) Remove existing concrete — install new 13 -space concrete parking area. (per plans) Northwest corner — AC condensers and electric meters. New decorative metal fence to be installed from front walk to existing wood fence. New concrete walk to west entry door. Window sill repair as needed along base. Remove concrete along perimeter. (all work per submitted site plans) �i coioto be matched rah to handtoagped s\de P° eCior wird°W °o ise P°Cch {ioor to \n side edse do°C Ra flush with. �r Sh to be pht ��, stars lPeC su�m`tted piansl porch wa\�. Vii, NOc: 4 P �7y Vii, NOc: 4 pi Relocate rear porch steps beside basement steps. Create 48" opening in rear porch wall. Remove north wall of east side porch to floor level. Install new ramp. (All work per drawings.) Install new AC condensers at north end of west Carriage House wall. New fenced concrete pad for trash receptacles to the west along retaining wall. COUNTRY LEDGESTONE Country Ledgestone Glacier Country Ledgestone Mojave Country Ledgestone Madrid Country Ledgestone Tuscany Country Ledgestone Midnight " f!7'a'3:� TurfstoneTM I Unilock TURFSTONETM For erosion control and supported turf. https://unilock.com/products/driveways/turfstone/?region=3 rurfstone has long been a favorite of landscape architects and engineers for areas requiring a supported turf. Its filigree hakes it an attractive and permanent solution for emergency access areas, embankments, spillways, and environmental )arking areas. Turfstone has the option of being filled with grass or aggregates depending on the project's drainage requ COLORS NATURAL SPECIAL ORDER SHAPES & SIZES 1 of 3 9/13/2017, 11:48 AM TurfstoneTM I Unilock IdNI-V -1, STANDARD 60 CIA X 40 CM X 8 CM 23.625" X 15.75" X 3.125" FEATURES 4pplications Commercial Vehicular j Residential Vehicular Surface Texture Standard PATTERNS Turfstone A standard (100%) https://unilock.com/products/driveways/turfstone/?region;--3 2 of 3 9/13/2017,11:48 AM TudstoneTM I Unlock PACKAGING Standard Special Order https://unilock.com/products/driveways/turfstone/?region=3 Sq. Ft. Bndl. Sq. Ft. Layer Layers Bndl. Lbs Bndl. Unt 80 10.00 8 1975 Uditional TurfstoneTM Information Sold in full bundles only. Product is shipped on refundable skids. Turfstone 10cm is not a stock item. Contact your territory manage ime. IMPORTANT INFORMATION Turfstone has long been a favorite of landscape architects and engineers forareas requiring a supported turf. Its filigree Yesignmakes it an attractive and permanent solution for emergency access areas, embankments, Spillways, and environmentally sensitive parking areas. Voids are filled with grass or colored aggregates. Base Requirement & Bedding Course — standard paver base specification. -landling and Installation — Do not compact with a large compactor. Care must be taken to avoid tossing stones so thai )ang against each other. Damage to the surface appearance can happen if handled too rough. Jointing Material and Joint Stabilization o Soil and grass seed. All measurements are nominal 'olors, product data, and availability are subject to change without notice. Please confirm all details with your local Unilock Dealer 1-800-UNILOCK (1-800-864-5625) for availability in your area. The colors shown should only be used as a guide. Final color select always be made from actual samples. 3 of 3 9/13/2017,11:48 AM MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY August 21, 2017 13' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Brandon Anderson; Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer Members Not in Attendance: Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Mike Voll; Kevin Buccellato Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Brandie Ecker, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: n/a Members of the Public Present: S.A. Studer, William Andrews, Victoria Kunlo, Tim Overmyer, Doug Anderson, Jennifer. Zachman, Mike Szymanski, Katherine Turk, Mike Danch, Adam Toering, Dan Plank, Steve Luecke, Deb Cyrier, Fran De Freuo, Jerry Niezgodski, Todd Zeiger H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 2017-0803 108 North Main Street #8915-1998 Local Landmark Representation by Mike Danch, 1643 Commerce Drive, Danch Hamer & Associates Dan Plank, 600 E 84h Avenue, Merrillville, Centier Bank STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 3, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0803 Property Location: 108 N Main Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neo-Classical/1910/Solon Beman and H.G. Christman builder Property Owner: JMS Development, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Historic Landmark, ordinance # 8915-1998 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: John Mohler Studebaker built this eight story Neo -Classical style office structure in 1910. The fagade is comprised of six bays to the west and three to the south and is covered with white terra cotta classical detailing. It is also clearly divided into three registers that are separated by strong projecting and intervening cornices. The bottom of each cornice is punctuated by volutes and honeysuckle designs placed between each bay. The middle of the structure is articulated with a three bay system, which continues to the second intervening cornice, once again embellished with classical detailing. The top floor is further distinguished by the use of arched bays, which are topped by elaborate egg and dart molding. The overall decorative detail of the structure tends to reflect the impact of the Colombian Exposition of which the architect, Solon S. Beman, was a major participant. However, the frank expression of the steel frame links the building to the Chicago School of skyscraper construction. The building has a flat roof with robust projecting cornices that have egg and dart molding and decorated voluted brackets. The windows are 1/1 double hung with simple decorated spandrels, except for the eighth floor, which has round even spans and cartouche keystones. ALTERATIONS: COA 2016-0705A approved replacement of the non -original storefronts at ground floor with new aluminum windows and sill flashing and 7 door openings with standard hardware. Vinyl/aluminum windows have been replaced with an historically appropriate Quaker style aluminum that will restore all full original window openings, including arched heads. Further approvals with COA 2016-0705A include: awnings, in-kind; close up windows behind elevator core; masonry restoration, in-kind; remove skylights; install stair tower and trash chute near center of north fagade, all finished in EIFS. COA 2016-0801A approved removal of JMS sign, and installation of blade sign, sign on north elevation, and Studebaker Lofts sign. APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached written description. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Installation of a fagade sign on the southernmost portion of the east facade of the JMS Building, approximately 90 feet above the first floor elevation, avoiding the historic architectural terra cotta. The overall dimensions of the sign will be 14'-5" wide by 27" tall, featuring Centier Bank's logo and lettering made out of white plastic faces placed in an aluminum frame. Maximum letter height will be 20", with remaining letters at 10" and 15". The sign will be internally illuminated LED, and secured to the brick fagade to meet the approval of the City Building Department and building codes. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks GrouD B: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment changes of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure - Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material - Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood - all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials - the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although only one sign has been installed to date, approval has previously been given for installation of two Centier Bank signs on the structure. The sign proposed in this application will be in addition to, not in place of, the previously approved signage. Three signs would violate the Group B standards which specifically state "Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business." Additionally, staff believes this sign will have limited visibility from the east due to nearby structures. Staff recommends denial. Written by Deb Parcell Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Staff clarified that two signs have been installed to date. Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application on the grounds that it does not fit into the guidelines and it would detract from designation as a landmarked building. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — Commission has already created those allowances for two signs rather than just one and believe that we have to ensure that we are not setting a precedent for others to have their signs on the building and detract from the historical nature of the structure. Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — It is outside the guidelines for this landmark location. Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — Primarily is that it is not in keeping with Group B standards as they are written right now. Even before the exception could be considered, I believe the commission should have a comprehensive plan from building owner or developer. Commissioner Gelfman (AYE) — Vote to deny on basis of our guidelines and setting a precedent for more than two signs which is already over the amount we normally allow. Commissioner Molanr (NAY) Vote: 4 —1 COA 2017-0803 Denied 3 2. 2017-0804 717 Riverside Drive #8380-92 River Bend Representation by William Andrews, 717 Riverside Drive Victoria Kunlo, 717 Riverside Drive STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 4, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0804 Property Location: 717 Riverside Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/ 1914/Grieger House Property Owner: Victoria Kunlo & William Andrews Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Historic District, ordinance #8380-92 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story wood -frame Foursquare sits on a rusticated concrete block foundation. The hipped roof has asphalt shingles, a hipped front dormer, and overhanging eaves. A one-story porch across the front has a hipped roof, aluminum sided half walls, and square wood columns. Windows are 1/1 wood double -hung with aluminum storms. The multi -paned paneled front door has an aluminum storm door. A 2 -car garage sits at the back of the property. It has a gable roof, wood siding, overhanging eaves, and a single overhead wood door. There is a chain-link fence in rear. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum siding, storm windows, and doors have been added. The attic dormer window has been replaced with a vent. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of chain link fence and installation of 6 ft. pressure treated dog-eared wood fence. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to remove 66' of existing chain link fence, and install 10' of 4'high pressure treated dog-eared wood privacy fence 8' back from the front fagade of the house (behind the tree and large bush) south to property line, then install 54' of 6' high pressure treated dog-eared wood privacy fence west to even with front fagade of garage, then 2' north to connect with garage. See attached site plan for placement diagram. 4"x 4"x 8' posts to be cemented at least 2 feet in ground. No gates. Although this does not follow the current fence line, moving the fence more towards the front of the house will increase the side yard area while allowing some privacy. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVER BEND LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT LTHE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in front and a larger lawn to the rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive generally have sloping front lawns and flat back yards. The majority of structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties include a garage located at the rear of the property accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. All houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. The district has a compact layout. Large homes are constructed on small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Place, are constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of the backyard areas or rear first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In recognition of this, greater latitude will be allowed in the application of the adopted standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the individual preferences of the property owners in the treatment of these backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn, shrubs, walkways or semi-permanent surface changes in the rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets, sand -boxes, etc. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the new fence will be installed 8' back from the front fagade of the house behind a tree and large bushes, and is only 4' high in the front, it will not detract from the appearance of the property; therefore, Staff recommends approval. Written by Deb Parcell Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Commissioner Anderson moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Unanimous COA 2017-0804 Approved 3.2017-0807 Demolition 1905 College Street #9807-07 Local Landmark Representation by Mike Szymanski 215 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Drive Dr. Katherine Turk, 215 Dr. Martin Luther King Junior Drive STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION Date: August 12, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0807 Property Location: 1905 College Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Collegiate Gothic Revival/1936/Austin & Shambleau, architects/Thomas Hickey, builder Property Owner: South Bend Community School Corporation Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9807-07; National Register Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Marquette School was begun in 1936 to house 13 classrooms, a gymnasium, library and a 683 -seat auditorium with a separate entrance on Brookfield as a two-story brown English bond brick rectangular building with stone stretchers, a stone string course at the water table and stone first level sill course and stone string courses at the roof line. The building is constructed with a blend of poured concrete and a steel frame. The roof is flat and covered with tar and gravel. There are art deco bas-relief stone sculptures above the front and side entrances and triangular pediments above the East and West Hamilton Street entrances. The College Street entrance has a 40 -pane fixed wood window that illuminates the stairwell. There is an opaque leaded glass window on the west side of the east Hamilton Street Entry. There is a round window with nine panes of clear glass with limestone surrounds in the balcony area of the auditorium on the south side wall. Throughout the rest of the building there are large double hung wood windows with 4/6 and 6/9 sashes set in flat stone lintels. There are stone casing and mullions on all doors and granite entry steps. The original 1936 building is intact and maintains an outstanding level of integrity with most of its original materials and windows. Famed local architects, Austin and Shambleau designed the building with construction by highly regarded local builder, Thomas Hickey. Forty five percent of the $262,760 cost of Marquette School was funded by the United States Government through New Deal projects of Franklin D. Roosevelt. A small addition was constructed in 1948 and a larger one in 1953 off the northeast comer of the original structure on College Avenue. The 1953 addition to the building is symmetrically arranged; the south end (at the north end of the 1948 addition) and the north end have a wall that forms a corner bay, though the top of the wall is equal to the adjacent walls. The corner bay has wide brick pilasters that step inward toward a center bay. The center bay has a 6/6 window centered in its first level and a 6/9 window centered in its second level. The windows have stone sills, but are not framed with stone trim. At the center of the 1953 addition is a narrow wall that forms a projecting bay, though the top of the bay wall is equal to the adjacent walls. A small, narrow 1/1 window is located in the first level of the bay; it has a wide stone sill. The stone sill course on the ___- 1953 addition is located on the corner bay walls only. Between the corner bay and the projecting bay are two groupings of four 6/12 windows; these groups are also framed with stone trim. _- — . ---- --- --- ALTERATIONS: All windows are boarded. All original paneled doors have been replaced with modern clear glass and metal doors. The only significant alterations are the reduction of the Hamilton Streets entrances twin towers from six brick courses and seven limestone string courses to two and three respectively and the removal of decorative brick and limestone pediments that crowned the top of each tower. APPLICATION ITEMS: After obtaining the Certificate of Appropriateness, the SBCSC will move forward with finalizing the 5 project bidding documents and accept bids to remove the required asbestos containing materials, demolish the entire building, & develop the site for use by the Marquette Primary Montessori Academy students, staff, & community. Included are preliminary site development drawings showing an expanded playground area, open play area/soccer field, walking paths, raised garden beds, garden storage blk., monuments incorporating materials repurposed from the old school. (See attached correspondence by Mike Szymanski and Katherine Turk and Exhibits A — E) STAFF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: South Bend Community School Corporation proposes demolition of Marquette School. A 2007 School Board decision to build a new Montessori Academy building abandoned the original public school upon completion in 2011. Although the building served as the home of the Casaday Costume Collection from 2011 until 2015, it has been vacant since 2011. Applicant has deemed the current condition of the building as "very poor" (see attached correspondence by Mike Szymanski and Katherine Turk). Although the building is suffering from deterioration by neglect due to a lack of maintenance, Staff is unaware . of any Code violation that indicate a threat to the public safety. No structural report has been provided. In a June 8, 2007 memo authored by Bill Latoza of BauerLatoza Studio (Architect of Record of Chicago Public Schools since 1994 with over 300 schools), addressed to HPC Director Catherine Hostetler, Re: Marquette Primary Center — South Bend, Indiana, Mr. Latoza noted his findings and thoughts concerning Marquette School. In summary, "I'm in agreement with the architects [Hebard & Hebard] that the school is structurally sound and could easily and cost effectively be renovated into a state-of-the-art facility. The building is in good condition, and is an excellent candidate for renovation." "Marquette School could be renovated for far less money than a new school — and would perform as well — if not better than the new school that has recently been constructed." In a December 5, 2007 letter authored by Mayor Stephen J. Luecke, addressed to South Bend Common Council President Rev. Timothy Rouse, Re: Veto of Bill 61-07, Mayor Luecke had several requests concerning this site of the South Bend Community School Corporation: "First, please maintain and operate a quality school at this location. Second, though I respect the process and due diligence used in choosing to build a new school rather than renovate the existing building, I do not believe that the general public is fully convinced that this is the best choice. Also, some believe that there is new information which should be evaluated. So, I respectfully request the School Corp. to revisit the analysis of costs to renovate Marquette and to also take advantage of Bill Latoza's offer to share his experience with the Chicago School system. There is time to do this "value engineering" of the decision before the bond is approved. It may lead to the same conclusion, but residents will be assured that you have fully investigated all possible options. Third, if a new school is constructed at the site, please have the architecture complement the neighborhood and site the building in such a way that demolition of the existing school is not required. Finally, if a new school is constructed, please be open to alternate uses for the existing building. If a viable use is found, with financing and a feasible business plan, please cooperate with a developer to help renovation of the building to succeed." Staff is unware of any motivated attempt by SBCSC to cooperate with developers to help renovation of the building succeed, though we are knowledgeable of at least one interested developer that has been denied a requested tour of the building. It was the Mayor's request in 2007 that demolition of the building would not be required even if a new school were placed on the site. In April 2017, Indiana Landmarks included Marquette School on their annual 10 Most Endangered List, reaching out to the Superintendent prior to publication of the list with a proposition to create a team to look at future options for the repurposing of the building. Staff is not aware of any further correspondence in response to the letter sent by Todd Zeiger. Staff supports a new use for Marquette School that sustains the historic character but allows the building to serve the next generation in a way that is sustainable. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Excerpt from August 15, 2017 Steve Szaday At approximately 12pm I met with Mike Szymanski and his associate (Steve) to photograph and walk-through the structure located at 1905 College commonly known as Old Marquette School. I photographed the exterior of the building on all four sides then walked through the structure from basement to rooftop. My photographs will show areas of water infiltration from the roof above in certain areas and also some ground water penetration which is pumped out via four sump pumps in sump basins. These were intermittently running while I was in the area and it was not coming from above. I photographed a ground level door that is severely water damaged. I walked through several areas where plaster ceilings had succumbed to weight and moisture. Expanded metal and mesh are exposed where plaster had fallen off and the above deck can be seen. The first floor had about a dozen patches where water from above had broken through and large areas of plaster had fallen. The second floor had about the same number of spots but the areas were much larger including entire rooms where water infiltration had occurred. We walked the roof from end to end and all directions. There are obvious depressions in the deck and many areas around roof drains that are in need of repair as I suspect that much of the water filtration is happening around those faulty drains and why the areas of water infiltration are mimicked from the second to the first floor. I could feel some give in certain areas but nothing that would suggest that the roof is unsafe. Especially given all the weight of the deck and stone has not caused any collapse. The areas around the drains definitely need some repair on both the decking and the membrane. There is currently no heating or cooling system in place leaving moisture to fester and mold to be visible on furniture and carpets. The exterior of the building show signs of some needed masonry repairs especially on the non-functioning smoke stack which is currently reinforced with metal bands and bracing. There are a dozen areas of spalling and mortar failure, but none that would represent any structural weakening. Many previous mortar repairs have been performed with favorable results, although without color match. The majority of the window sashes I saw look to be the original wood windows and to be in good condition. Some of the sills, exterior stops, and exterior trim work have many areas where replacement of those components would be required. This could be a result of a lack of maintenance and some of the boarding being improperly sized. This is most noticeable on the western and southern sides of the building. 2 I had also noticed while entering the rooms how many doors, cabinets, shelves, windows, fixtures, blackboards, and lockers were still intact and in good shape. I even noticed a piano, desks, chairs, tables, and even a few rows of theatre seats that all could be salvaged or reused. I mentioned to Mr. Szymanski that if the application was approved that the school corporation should really salvage some of these pieces rather than just discarding them. Not just from an environmentally responsible position, but also from a position where those who may have a personal connection to the school may get access to some of the physical history. He seemed receptive to the idea as well as mentioned that in the past, the demolition contractors had always gotten salvage rights. He and Steve both mentioned times where they were able to utilize some lights and fixtures in other buildings where they would fit. He also mentioned that some of the limestone architectural details are in the plans to be reused in the monuments that will be installed after the demolition if approved. The amount of brick alone in this structure is staggering. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. -When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaoine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient documentation demonstrating a threat to the public safety. The evaluation by Bill Latoza of BauerLatoza Studios is highly regarded. Demolition is not the only alternative. Staff suggests that the South Bend Community School Corporation honor the request made by Mayor Luecke in 2007 by developing a marketing packet to be used to promote the sale of the property and by working with potential developers to identify a viable use and that a list of developers that have contacted SBCSC in attempt to explore alternate uses of the building be made public. Staff recommends denial of the application item as it does not meet the requirements of the Standards and Guidelines for Local Historic Landmarks. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Doug Anderson, 1733 Stucker Place Deb Cyrier, principal at Marquette Jennifer Zackerman, 1730 Stucker Place Stephen Lueke, 810 Leland Avenue Fran Defuro, 1320 Marquette Boulevard Jerry Niezgodski, 1113 North Elliot Street Todd Zeiger, 801 W Washington Commissioner Anderson moved to deny, second by Tom Gordon Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — [I am] voting in the affirmative of denying the application as presented, my rationale is that the Historic Preservation Commission continues to serve under the charge of preserving our historic built environment. As preservationist we know that we can't preserve every historic building and save every building from the wrecking ball, however it is clear from the information presented to us that this historic landmark building is structurally sound and should have every chance for a future life including adaptive reuse. By both barring potential investors from even viewing the site and by not responding to direct offers to form study groups with help from state preservation offices it shows that the school corporation has no desire to see out any outcome besides demolition, or demolition by neglect. The school has allowed us to be the bad guys, and we need to explore options, no negotiations have been present, and presented to us. This building does not need to be abandoned and torn down. Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — I vote to deny this CofA. I do not have any documentation that I have seen that requires demolition through public safety hazard. Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — I vote in favor of the motion to deny the application. Approval of this application is not in keeping with Group B standards, specifically Item D: Demolition, Historic Landmarks shall not be demolished when a landmark poses a threat to public safety and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made both of the exterior and the interior of the landmark. There has been no public hazard decree by the either the building department or the code enforcement department. As a quasi-judicial body, this commission has an obligation to evaluate its findings against the standards that are applied to all other designated sites and structures. The evidence submitted by the petitioner does not support historically or architecturally remedies for the deferred structural maintenance of this particular landmark. The evidence of structural deterioration suggests that it is an example of demolition by willful neglect. The evidence has been provided to establish that the landmark is now a public hazard that supersedes the public's interest in establishing a community asset, a local landmark. And so the decision to support the application becomes a public detriment for the failure to honor landmark standards, and sentences a national register and local landmark to an early grave, and the loss of $800,000 demolition funds. I have doubts that the claims of financial hardships and maintenance will exceed the hazardous N remediation and the cost of full-scale demolition. I also believe that if the petitioner is willing to engage the public and organizations supporting the adaptive reuse and repurposing of this building, the financial benefit for the educational goals might be more easily realized. Commissioner Gelfman (AYE) — I vote to deny this CofA. There's been no submission of structural deterioration beyond repair also there has been no effort to have any joint cooperation with Indiana Landmarks or anyone that might be able to assist with this particular structure. And according to section D in our bylaws for demolition, it doesn't meet the wording that we have. Commissioner Molnar (NAY) Vote: 4 — 1 COA 2017-0807 Denied 4.2017-0807A 315 Madison Street #9574-05 Chapin Park Representation by Bernardo Contreras, 1115 Autumn Trails, Mishawaka STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 7, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0807A Property Location: 313 (aka 315) West Madison Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer -front bungalow/ 1877/1915Benz House Property Owner: Bernardo Contreras Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District, local ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This wood frame house with irregular plan sits upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are wood shingle covering wood clapboard, and the steep -pitched gable roof and front dormer are covered in asphalt shingles, with two brick chimneys with corbelled caps. There is a porch across the full width of the front, with the roof being an extension of the main roof, supported by brick piers with small cross design at capitals, brick railing with stone caps, and concrete steps and floor. According to the 1987 survey card, windows are wood 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures, with a large picture window in front, although most windows are boarded up for protection and this cannot be confirmed. The house is located on a spacious site with a large gambrel roofed garage at the rear of the property, also with wood shingle walls covering wood clapboard. ALTERATIONS: The house was originally built in 1877 and remodeled in 1915. According to the survey card, aluminum storm windows have been added. COA 2015-0303A for demolition of house and garage was denied. COA 2016-0623 approved removal of overgrown landscaping and installation of new architectural shingle roof. COA 2017-0214B approved completed replacement of basement windows with glass block, and renewed COA 2016-0623 to reflect a new contractor for the roof installation. COA 2017-0706 approved removal of the existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of the siding underneath; if determined by staff to be deteriorated beyond repair, the proposed LP Smart siding is approved for use, approve the replacement of existing windows with the Andersen 400 Series aluminum -clad windows, that match the size of the current openings, except for the oval window, demolition of the rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition; siding to be sympathetic to siding on house, to be approved by staff, 6' wood privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets, strike the garage and the 6' porch addition to the garage from this application to be addressed on a future COA application, but allow all in-kind maintenance to garage. 0 APPLICATION ITEMS: Proposed materials for the Madison remodel as follows: 1) SIDING: We will remove the existing cedar shake siding that is in disrepair, with pieces missing. We will then encapsulate the existing wood siding underneath that may have lead paint issues as well as degraded conditions, with Tyveck wind wrap. We then propose to install LP Smart siding with a Quad 4" pattern to mimic the existing siding. This will Insure a better finish and low maintenance. Comers will also have Comers will also have 1x4 smart trim Siding will have primer and two coats of exterior latex paint. WINDOWS: The existing windows will be removed due to degraded conditions, and standard sizes as close to the original to be used. We propose to use Andersen® 200 Series double -hung windows have low -maintenance Perma-Shield® exteriors, clear pine interiors or a white interior finish. We Propose to change the large picture window on the first floor south side front room to a two window double hung using the same size to mimic the Dormer above in the scond floor bedroom. DEMOLITION /ADDITION: We propose to break in the walls and fill in the existing cistern to the West side of the existing rear door. We then will remove the rear porch area of the existing house approximately 4'-D" x 214" We then propose to construct an approximate 14'-0" x 262- story addition on the North side of the existing house. GARAGE: We propose to upgrade the existing garage into living quarters. We will remove the existing shake siding and Install the 3" reveal smart siding. We will remove and replace the existing widows with new windows using the existing sizes and locations. We will remove the existing garage door and side over the existing opening. We will also extend the roof over a new 6' porch on the west side. this porch will be supported by four (4) 8" Tumcraft 96 -In x 8 -ft Unfinished Fiberglass Square Columns. This will become the new entry with to added windows and a Therma Tru Benchmark Door 6 -Panel Insulating Core Left -Hand Inswing Fiberglass Prehung Entry Door (Common: 36 -in x 8D -in; Actual: 37.5 -in x 81.54n) The porch floor will be an extension of the garages concrete floor. FENCING: We propose to install a Sierra Pacific 8' Dog -Eared Cedar Fence Picket, to be constructed with treated 2x4, 4x4 posts and two swinging gates of the same construction. ALLEY ENTRY we prop[opse to enlarge the alley entry porch and roof, and add railing to make the porch access 8" wider. This is to insure a safer entrance. SECOND STORY ENTRANCE We are proposing to add a second story stairway, deck and doorway to the rear of the addition. This will give us two exits from the second floor. CONCRETE SIDEWALK We are proposing to Install a 4'-0" wide sidewalk from the gate entrance to the multiple Access points of the house and garage. STAFF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Siding: COA 2017-0706 approved removal of the existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of the siding underneath; if determined by staff to be deteriorated beyond repair, the proposed LP Smart siding is approved for use. Staff has determined that clapboard on house and garage that is brittle would be further exacerbated by the removal of nails. Each cedar shake has no less than 4 nails. Staff approval is granted for LP Smart siding but in a 3" reveal to more closely resemble the clapboard, not 4". 2. Windows: COA 2017-0706 approved replacement of existing windows with the "Andersen 400 Series aluminum -clad windows", that match the size of the current openings, except for the oval window. Anderson 400 (or 200) does not have an aluminum clad option therefore applicant has submitted a specification sheet for Crestline Elite aluminum -clad windows (although application item specifies Anderson 200 from last COA). New Crestline Elite aluminum -clad windows are to match the size of existing windows, except for the oval that will be restored. The 77" x 70" fixed wood window in the front is in need of glass replacement but otherwise is not deteriorated beyond repair, is an original, character defining feature and is a good candidate for restoration. 3. Demo/Addition: COA 2017-0706 approved demolition of the rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition; siding to be sympathetic to siding on house, to be approved by staff. New site plan depicts west wall of main house as demolished with a new wall 2' out to enlarge footprint of main house. There is no written application item for this change. 4. Garage: Staff defers to Building Department for use as "living quarters". Staff approval is granted for LP Smart siding but in a 3" reveal, not 4". Windows, if approved for house, will be Crestline Elite aluminum clad to match size of existing openings. Need specifics on half round window on east side above door; Staff preference is for restoration of original unless determined to be deteriorated beyond repair. Staff has recommended that applicant reapply for garage extension on west side as previously submitted. Addition is a compatible extension of roof and floor in a way that is sympathetic to the architecture and scale and does not detract from the main house. 10 5. Fencing: COA 2017-0706 approved 6' wood privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets. Applicant has submitted a new site plan that includes both wood and vinyl with a footprint that extends into an alley to the east that applicant is hopeful to vacate and that is approximately 13' south/closer to street but still satisfies setback at the porch. Applicant seemed amenable to Staff recommendation of an all wood fence and agreed that fence in front of house would be open between the pickets, although it would be installed approximately 13' south/closer to street. Staff worked with the Building Department to determine what is allowable for maximum height and setbacks. Regarding fence relating to alley vacation, until finalized, no Certificate of Appropriateness application item can be considered as it is not owned by the applicant. 6. Alley entrance: Enlarge the alley entry porch and roof by 8" to increase the overall width from the current 28" to 36" as required. Add railing to porch. Staff has requested an elevation to convey the alterations; proposed deck and stair material; and proposed railing material, design, and height. This application item is incomplete. Additionally, until alley vacation is finalized, no Certificate of Appropriateness application item to enlarge can be considered as property line appears very near existing construction. If alley vacation is not realized, a variance would be required as per Building Department to expand. 7. Second story entrance: Although adding an exterior second story stairway, deck, and doorway to the rear addition will provide a secondary means of egress, a majority of single family, two story homes do not have a second story stair exit. Staff defers to Building Department regarding use as anything other than a single family. Aesthetically, if exterior stair is constructed as per site plan submitted, it will not be visible from the street. 8. Concrete sidewalk: Install a 4'-0" wide concrete sidewalk from the gate entrance to the multiple access points of the house and garage. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Excerpt from June 19, 2017 9AM Steve Szaday The large window in the front of the house is a single pane sash with 1/8" thick glass that is broken. The glass measures approximately 74" inches wide b5,50" inches tall. The sash is in good condition with the exception of a piece of the interior which is broken at the point where the glass was broken from the outside. Excerpt from August 14, 2017 12PM Steve Szaday With the owner, we confirmed dimensions for the front picture window. The dimensions are approximately 77 inches wide and 70 inches high. My previous measurements were incorrect. The owner is proposing two windows in this space that are 36.5 inches wide by 69.75 inches high. The intent is to have a 5 to 6 inch support in between to match the windows directly above on the second floor. I measured that support and the exposed trim work is 6.5 inches with the actual space in between the windows being approximately 5.5 inches for weight pockets. Excerpt from August 16, 2017 I looked up the International Building code in regards to the requirements for the glass itself on a window of the size and location of the large picture window. Due to the size of the glass (greater than 9 sq. ft), the location from the floor (less than 36' above walking surface), the height of the glass (greater than 60" above floor) and the location from the front door (less than 48"), the glass would have to be tempered. I called a local glass company: Quality Glass on Edison Road in South Bend and talked to Ross. Ross quoted a price of $589.91 to install a tempered piece of 1/4" thick glass measuring 77" wide and 70" tall in the existing wood sash on site. This includes glazing points and glazing. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park 1. THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St. Joseph River, Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the common areas of the district (i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes) Required Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car thoroughfares. The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as possible to their architectural, historic, and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district is required. Repair work to fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever applicable. When utility work dictates the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete, asphalt, fillers, and similar materials shall not be used. All original streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View" streetlights designed by the Cutter Company for this neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood Association and the Historic Preservation Commission to restore "Park View" streetlights to the district shall continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of the Historic Preservation Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the individual property and the surrounding environment and properties. Recommended The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns, and tree lawns should remain open. New or replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept landscaped appropriately while vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. 11 When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways, and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or replacing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl, or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves, and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration of rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration - materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and doorframes are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm 12 doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles, and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height, and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have "L" or "T" shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one and one and a half story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are: 1:1 and 1:2, height to width ratios. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features, and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Siding: Approved 2. Windows: Staff recommends Crestline Elite aluminum -clad windows to match the size of existing windows, except for the oval that will be restored. Staff recommends restoration of window in front. 3. Demo/Addition: Approved. Staff does not recommend 2' enlargement of footprint of main house as there is incomplete documentation. 4. Garage: Staff recommends garage extension on west side as previously submitted. Staff recommends Crestline Elite aluminum clad to match size of existing openings, if approved for house. Staff recommends restoration of half round window unless determined to be deteriorated beyond repair. 5. Fencing: Staff recommends previously approved 6' wood privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets and recommends Commission approval on an installation approximately 13' south/closer to street. 6. Alley entrance: Incomplete application item. 7. Second story entrance: Staff recommends stair design, per site plan. 8. Concrete sidewalk: Staff recommends concrete sidewalk, per site plan. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director On a motion by Tom Gordon to amend application and strike all reference to item number three and number six from this COA with a second by Michele Gelfman. Vote: 5 — 0 On a motion by Tom Gordon to approve COA 2017-0807A, as amended, adopting the staff recommendations for item one, two, four, five, seven and eight with a second by Michele Gelfman, with conditions subject to staff approval. Vote: 5 — 0 Unanimous COA 2017-0807A approved, as amended III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS 13 A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 17, 2017 — Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. Discussion on 2018 HPC budget. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Executive Director — In packet. 3. Deputy Director — In packet. 4. Preservation Specialist —Distributed. 5. Legal — Met the first deadline for filing paperwork with the Eric Boyd appeal. They are requiring that he submit a position statement of how the current appeal differs from the previous appeal. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President — Distributed. Also attended the pre -budget discussion with County officials accompanying Commissioner Molnar and Director Feasel. V. OLD BUSINESS A. RESOLUTION 17-02 "Solar Initiative Policy" Commissioner Molnar moves to dispense with Resolution 17-02 with a second by Commissioner Anderson. Vote: 5 — 0 Unanimous. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. RESOLUTION 17-03 "Regarding the use of energy conservation and sustainably technologies in historic landmark buildings and districts" i, Commissioner Klusczinski sponsors the Resolution with a second by Commissioner Molnar. Vote: 5 — 0 Unanimous. B. RESOLUTION 17-04 "Staff Commendation for Debra Parcell, recognizing her service, dedication and support of local preservation efforts in her capacity as HPC Deputy Director" Motion to continue Resolution 17-04 by Commissioner Gordon with a second by Commissioner Molnar. Vote: 5 — 0 Continued. C. DEPUTY DIRECTOR JOB DESCRIPTION Motion to ratify Deputy Director job description by Commissioner Anderson with a second by Commissioner Gordon. Vote: 5 — 0 Unanimous. D. DEPUTY DIRECTOR HIRE Chair will entertain a motion to ratify the Executive Director's decision in executing her administrative authority in hiring the Deputy Director for the Historic Preservation Commission and welcome Mr. Adam Toering to the Commission as its newest staff member. On a motion by Commissioner Molnar with a second by Commissioner Gelman. Vote: 4 — 0 —1 Commissioner Anderson abstained. VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. TIPPECANOE PLACE Update on COA 2017-0601 with new COA application. 14 B. EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT correspondence re: basement flooding C. PLEASE NOTIFY STAFF IN ADVANCE OF ATTENDANCE FOR HPC MEETINGS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Joseph Molnar moved to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Vote: 5 — 0 Meeting adjourned at 10:08 p.m. Attest: Qz4-,- IV —16-1-1 Mi hele Gelfniah, S6etary Date r� 15 Location Budget as of 08-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Ihcludes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation • Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 19,669.83 11,514.17 11,514.17 000 General Gov'T. 36.92 36.92 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 26,611.46 14,088.54 14,088.54 000 General GovT. 34.62 34.62 14800 Fica Contribution 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14810 P.E.R.F. 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 8,051.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14840 Group Insurance 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 0.00 0.00 10000 Totals ""*«, «««««.««««««««««« 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 70,281.29 39,153.71 39,153.71 35.78 35.78 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 54.97 245.03 245.03 000 General GovT. 81.68 81.68 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 104.00 896.00 896.00 000 General GovT. 89.60 89.60 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 151.63 151.63 000 General GovT. 67.39 67.39 20000 Totals ""'""""'"*""""«:««`" `"""""":""""'""'" 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 232.34 1,292.66 1,292.66 84.76 84.76 31070 Other Contractual Services 1,500.00 18,890.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 860.00 7,001.14 12,528.86 13,388.86 000 General Gov'T. 61.45 65.66 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 3.29 50.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 9.87 36.84 43.42 000 General GovT. 69.13 81.48 33100' Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 51.24 43.76 43.76 000 General GovT. 46.06 46.06 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 Financial System 09/01/2017 12:13 PM by ksobecki Page 48 Location Budget as of 08-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 30000 Totals ""*":"**"*"""""""""""""""' 1,503.29 20,335.00 0.00 0.00 21,838.29 866.58 7,062.25 13,909.46 14,776.04 63.69 67.66 Location Totals *'"""""""""*""""""`*"""'*"" 1,503.29 131,295.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 866.58 77,575.88 54,355.83 55,222.41 40.93 41.58 Financial System 09/01/2017 12:13 PM by ksobecki Page 49 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence Fund: 1000 County General =c: 0037 Historic Preservation Vendor PO Number Vendor Name 143564 061203 Szaday Steve 140027 001538 South Bend Tribune Financial System Saint Joseph County Budget Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 1000.31070.000.0037 08/17/2017 860.00 14 -, 1000.33010.000.0037 04/11/2017 Location Total 866.58 09/01/2017 12:27 PM by ksobecki Page 19 Combined' Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Note Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 08/09/2017 08/09/2017 Rec/AutoRcpt 890.00 Rec:140816 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 890.00 0.00 Total 0.00 1,635.00 (1,635.00) 0.00 0.00 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 08/11/2017 08/09/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:732720 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/11/2017 08/25/2017 08/23/2017 Claim/PayDocket 479.75 BK:008 CK:733897 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/25/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 08/11/2017 08/09/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:006 CK:732721 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/11/2017 08/25/2017 08/23/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:733898 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/25/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 1000.14800.000.0037 Fica Contribution General Gov'T. Historic Preservation F.I.C.A. Contribution Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General Gov'T. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 1,635.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 11,514.17 1,679.13 Unencumbered: 11,514.17 19,669.83 Cash: (19,669.83) Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 14,088.54 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 14,088.54 26,611.46 Cash: (26,611.46) Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 5,500.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 5,500.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 09/01/2017 12:28 PM by ksobecki Page 155 Combined- Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General GovT. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 1000.14840.000.0037 Group Insurance General GovT. Historic Preservation Group Insurance Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 Cash: 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 54.97 Cash: 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/17/2017 08/17/2017 PO/AutoPO 25.00 PO:143565 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/24/2017 08/24/2017 Claim/RegDocket 25.00 PO:143565 BK:008 CK:007383 Inv:FUEL REIMB Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 104.00 Cash: 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General Gov`T. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 8,051.00 8,051.00 0.00 Balances 0.00 0.00 (24,000.00) Balances 245.03 245.03 (54.97) Balances 896.00 896.00 (104.00) Balances 151.63 151.63 (73.37) Financial System 09/01/201712:28 PM by ksobecki Page 156 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Note Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 08/04/2017 08/04/2017 PO/AutoPO 480.00 PO:143146 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/07/2017 08/07/2017 PO/AutoPO 480.00 PO:143203 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/08/2017 08/08/2017 Claim/RegDocket 400.00 PO:142688 BK:008 CK:732433 Inv:2017-0719 20HRSS Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/17/2017 08/17/2017 PO/AutoPO 860.00 PO:143564 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/22/2017 08/22/2017 Claim/RegDocket 480.00 PO:143203 BK:008 CK:733570 Inv:2017-0803 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Total Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 880.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 860.00 7,001.14 Cash: 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Balances 13,388.86 12,528.86 (7,001.14) Financial System 09/01/2017 12:28 PM by ksobecki Page 157 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 43.42 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 36.84 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 9.87 Cash: (9.87) 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General GovT. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 43.76 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 43.76 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 51.24 Cash: (51.24) 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 900.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 900.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Financial System 09/01/2017 12:28 PM by ksobecki Page 157 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 400.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 400.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 55,222.41 Normal Current 0.00 890.00 0.00 5,714.89 Unencumbered: 54,355.83 Total 0.00 1,635.00 (1,635.00) 132,798.29 866.58 77,575.88 Cash: (75,940.88) Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 890.00 0.00 5,714.89 Total 0.00 1,635.00 (1,635.00) 132,798.29 866.58 77,575.88 Cash: (75,940.88) Financial System 09/01/2017 12:28 PM by ksobecki Page 158 Locbition Budget as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Aalnt Joseph County Account Carry Forward Original - Addt9 Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 3,991.74 4,051.74 000 General Gov'T. 98.52 100.00 20000 Totals ••••"•"*•••••'•"'•' 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 3,991.74 4,051.74 98.52 100.00 Location Totals 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 3,991.74 4,051.74 98.52 100.00 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:41 PM by ksobecki Page 101 Lodation Budget as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017, Director: County Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Carry Forward Original Addt9 Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent Fund Totals <':<:<.««.::«.:«.+.+.+<+.. 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 3,991.74 4,051.74 98.52 100.00 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:41 PM by ksobecki Page 102 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery =c: 0037 Historic Preservation Vendor PO Number Vendor Name 143563 012322 HISTORIC LANDMARKS FOUNDATION Saint Joseph County Budget Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 4103.23240.000.0037 08/17/2017 60.00 14 Location Total 60.00 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:45 PM by ksobecki Page 33 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0000 General Gov'T. 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen Gov'T General Gov'T. General Gov'T. Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:52 PM by ksobecki Page 261 • Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 II Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 183.75 (183.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 183.75 4103.02707.000.0037 Charges For Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 51.74 (51.74) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 51.74 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 193.50 (193.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 193.50 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/17/2017 08/17/2017 PO/AutoPO 60.00 PO:143563 Vend:012322 HISTORIC LANDMARKS FOUNDATION Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,991.74 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:52 PM by ksobecki Page 262 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 428.99 (428.99) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Location Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 428.99 (428.99) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 4,051.74 3,991.74 428.99 0.00 0.00 428.99 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:52 PM by ksobecki Page 263 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 08/31/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Fund Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 60.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 4,051.74 3,991.74 17,812.05 0.00 0.00 17,812.05 Financial System 09/01/2017 02:52 PM by ksobecki Page 264 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 08 August through 05 September 2017 Date 08.08 08.09 08.10 08.11 08.14 08.15 08.16 08.17 08.18 08.21 08.22 08.23 08.24 08.25 08.28 St. Joseph County St. Joseph County Department Head meeting 2 hour. County Council meeting recognizing Lou Sabo 30 min. Review Demolished Barn memo 30 min. Review St. Joseph County Department Head meeting notes 15 min. St. Joseph County Department Head meeting 2 hour. Daily Highlights. St. Joseph County and South Bend Private tour scheduling 15 min. New hire research w/ HR 30 min. Neitzel reunion preparation 15 min. Process Contractor PO 15 min. Reconcile budget 30 min. Host Open House for Deb P departure 2 hour. Prep for Solar in Historic Districts meetings 30 min. Employee Termination processing 30 min. Update Language Services on Agendas 15 min. Meet w/ Jennifer P and Viveca R re: Building South Bend 1 hour. Meeting prep 2 hour. Meet w/ Tim K re: HPC 2018 1 hour Meet w/ Bill S re: HPC 2018 1 hour. Process Contractor invoice 15 min. Prepare documents for Holy Cross presentation 30 min. Meeting prep 1.hour. Work w/ Lou S on portfolios 1 hour. Meeting prep 3 hour. Meeting prep 4 hour. Process payroll 15 min. Meeting prep 2 hour. Attend HPC meeting 3 hour. HPC meeting follow up 2 hour. HPC 2018 meeting w/ Deb F, Tim K, HPC Legal, James M, City Legal, Steve D 2 hour. Prep for and present Solar in Historic Districts meetings at MACOG 4 hour. Meet w/ Bill S and Jessica C re: HPC 2018 1 hour. Meet w/ Adam T re: Deputy Director 1 hour. Meet w/ Tim K re: HPC 2018 1 hour. HPC meeting follow up 2 hour. Prep for and interview w/ WSBT re: Marquette School 2 hour. South Bend Review Boyd Appeal 1 hour. Meet w/ Bernardo C re: 313-315 W Madison 1 hour. Review Boyd Appeal 30 min. Staff Reports 3 hour. Staff Reports 3 hour. Review City Cemetery correspondence 15 min. Staff Reports 3 hour. Staff Reports 2 hour Meet w/ Bernardo C re: 313-315 W Madison 30 min. Meet w/ Merrisue re: 427 Lamonte COA/RME 30 min. Meet w/ HPC Legal re: 1240 W Thomas appeal 45 min. Meet w/ Mougin re: xxx 30 min. Meet w/ Ann M re: RME 15 min. 08.29 Meet w/ Deb P re: COA. 08.30 Process Contractor PO 15 min. Meet w/ Ann M re: RME 15 min. 08.31 09.01 Process payroll 15 min. Work w/ Lou S on portfolios 1 hour. 09.04 Holiday Holiday Holiday 09.05 Training new Deputy Director. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 755 E Lincoln Way 2017-0818 Tear off and replace asphalt shingle roof, IN KIND. 759 E Lincoln Way 2017-0818A Tear off and replace asphalt shingle roof, IN KIND. 1521 E Wayne Street 2017-0821 Replace asphalt shingle roof with new asphalt architectural shingle roof, replace copper valleys in-kind with new copper valleys. 24845 State Road 23 2017-0823 Construct new handicapped accessible ramp at back door (north of brick and east of frame) using marine plywood. 1025 Hudson Avenue 2017-0825 (1) Repair/Replace/Paint cedar lap siding with identical cedar lap siding. (2) Repair/Replace current front railing with identical railing (cedar). In-Kind. 1236 E Lincoln Way 2017-0828 Replacement of asphalt roof shingle with new asphalt architectural shingles. Install new Classic Gutters gutter and downspout. 608 Park Avenue 2017-0829 Re-lay chimney top. Replace/re-lay brick under column and re-lay several brick on foundation in rear of house. All work in-kind. 810 Arch 2017-0830 Tear off and replacement, in-kind, of wood porch floor with treated tongue and groove wood. Replacement, in-kind, of two wood columns that are 6/12" square and 6'-10" tall. All other original columns will be reinstalled after floor replacement. 809 Forest Avenue 2017-0831 Complete tear off of existing asphalt shingle roof. Replace IN-KIND with new architectural dimensional shingles. New plywood. New flashing. 710 Park Avenue 2017-0831A Roof repair and internal gutter repair. Remove 12'x18' section of roofing. Remove tar and rubber from integrated gutters. Replace deteriorated wood and install new rubber. Install new shingles to 12'x18' section. Remove and replace section of soffit with 5/8" wood panel. 616 Park Avenue 2017-0905A Remove (1) Basswood tree in tree lawn (South Bend Park Permit #181). Remove appx. 66' of city sidewalk, replace in-kind. Remove appx. 55' of city curb, replace in-kind. Reinstall existing bricks on street, in-kind. Approval is granted for new tree, if possible, in the same or a nearby location. Interns/Volunteers Who Project George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Eric Stalheim Preservation Specialist Taylor Driscoll Building South Bend Phone Calls Who Date/Time Regarding Ann Kuntz 08.14/3 pm 24845 SR 23 COA/RME Gene Wilkeson 08.14/12 pm 401 E Haney Street Research Requests What I Date Who Hours Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — August 8 -10, 2017 Daily'Highlights: 8/8 Section 106 reviews. COA 2017-0804, 2017-0803. Worked with Kristi Matteoni on Tippecanoe window COA. Meeting with Dave Relos and Todd Zeiger about Fat Daddy's building, creating new entrance signage to West Washington Street district, TIFF financing. 8/9 COA 2017-0807A. Open house. RME 2017-0809. COA 2017-0807A. 8/10 COA 2017-0807A. Meeting with Todd and Elicia regarding Tippecanoe Place windows. Start commissioners' packet assembly. Meeting with Adam. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 1414 E. Wayne 2017-0809 Remove and replace existing asphalt shingles, in-kind. . I Research Requests What Date Who Who Date/Time Abe Marcus 8/8 7:00 Alison Credi 8/8 2:00 Joe Sipocz 8/8 3:00 Kristi Matteoni 8/9 7:00 ?? 8/9 2:00 Kristi Matteoni 8/9 10:00 Bruce -Milestone Const. 8/10 2:00 Todd Zeiger 8/10 5:00 Phone Calls , What De -designation of a local landmark Repair windows at 315 West North Shore (COA not needed) Deputy Director position 620 West Washington Deputy Director position 620 West Washington 815 Leland fence 620 West Washington Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Adam Toering — September 5, 2017 9/5 Transcribed meeting minutes from August meeting. Completed County HR orientation. Receiving COA applications from Indiana Landmarks for two properties. Address RME# What Date 625 E. Jefferson, Rubin Cleaners 9/5/2017 Description Time Who 20 minutes Randy Whiteman / US Signcraft Who Date/Time What