Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
March 2017
o4s°uTHB�� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION �g5�°NSOs, OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY' 'o 2, a; County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 _ b stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCBP/index.htm o .' Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578 1865 Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us * 1 y Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Di- MOND AV i-MONDAYMARCH 20, 2017-7:00 p.m. MEETING AGENDA COUNTY -CITY BUILDING, 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I: CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A., CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2017-0216 813 Park Avenue Chapin Park 2.2017-0221A 1325 East Wayne Street South East Wayne 3.2017-0228 Leeper Park Local Landmark 4.2017-0301 224 Hammond Place River Bend 5.2017-0306 Leeper Park Local Landmark III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. February 27; 2017 . - B. TREASURER REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. _Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal _ D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President - V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII: ADJOURNMENT FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other'services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. NAME HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET March 20, 2017 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. Mw tF--&K-- N�d.r c alar Ck, I otiv k -'T 10-- ll1n 7� l ADDRESS 04bC (�zs wPYPe 5—,. -.!5- f do( Flaar 6�— MACo - Cil„ aailb W, B, H, O w W W F, D F STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Aate: February 16, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0216 Property Location: 813 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/1880 Property Owner: James Hickner Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story irregular plan house has a brick foundation. The asphalt -shingled cross gable roof with pyramidal hip roof in back has molded cornice at rake in gables. There is a small front porch. Windows are 1/1 double hung. Siding is wood clapboard. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door have been added, as well as concrete steps to front porch. Existing 1/1 double -hung wood windows have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval. APPLICATION ITEMS: Pella 28x60 = 3 windows placed in back of house and on the sides and replace siding for (unsure of word) on kitchen wood. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner replaced first floor windows on back and south side of house with improperly sized vinyl windows, filling in the remainder of each opening with OSB. One window, part of a bay window in back, was replaced with a set of French doors. Work was done without COA approval. Following conversation between owner and HPC, owner plans to remove French doors and improperly sized windows, replacing with Pella ThermaStar vinyl windows, correct size and installed in correct location, including trim to replicate existing and replacement of window crowns where applicable. Small square window that was installed in rear will be removed and opening filled with wood siding to match existing. Several second -floor windows are currently vinyl windows. Update: Work has continued on this property, contradictory to what is applied for here (see attached photos). The Building Department has issued a violation letter and ordinance violation citation. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On February 15, 2017 at approximately LOAM, I visited the property located at 813 Park Ave. We had received an anonymous letter stating that the owner was replacing the rear and side windows. I found that to be true. I started walking around and photographing the newly installed, improperly sized windows. A member of the work crew came out and inquired if he could assist me. I asked to see their permits for the work they were doing. He responded by handing me a cell phone with the owner of the property on the other end. The man identified himself as James Hickner. He said he was unaware that he needed Historic Preservation approval for exchange of the windows on the rear and sides. He was under the impression that he could not the front fagade but could change the other three sides. I explained to him that was not the case and in any event, he would have needed a permit to legally change the windows in any house where the cost was greater than $400. He explained that the house was his parents' house and had been vacant for 20 plus years. He knew he had to save it because it was in a district. He inquired about had we ever allowed a property to be torn down in a district. He felt that the condition of the house was going to require more money than the house was going to be worth. He said he would rather just burn it down. I told him he probably should not say that to me. He told me he had been in the office to discuss a rear deck and had started the COA process but had not finished it as he wanted to complete interior repairs before that could take place. I explained what normally happens when someone applies to replace existing windows. The inspection by myself, the review of proposed new material by staff, then the decision by the commission. I told him it is impossible to inspect what was existing now that the original windows are in pieces in the bottom of the dumpster. I gave him the phone number to the office and asked him to please call as soon as possible and to stop the work. Update: On March 2, 2017, I returned to the property to find more windows replaced and improperly sized and installed since the original visit on February 15, 2017. I took additional photographs and also wanted to clarify there were three older vinyl windows that were installed considerably before these new ones and are still in place. I also see that the rear patio doors have been replaced and one smaller improperly sized window now exists in the space. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases, where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (regarding the application items only) As second floor windows are already vinyl, staff recommends approval of application for replacement of existing improper replacement windows with properly sized vinyl windows; replacement of all wood trim pieces replicated to match existing, same dimensions and thickness, including sloped sill. Window crowns, including sloped drip cap, will be replaced where applicable. Staff recommends removal of square kitchen window in back and replacement with two windows sized and trimmed to match original windows in this location. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONL Y>>>>>>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX-OFFICE111 USE ONLY 11 Date Received: &I I u I X017 Application Number: do I I — 031L, Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Dare of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark® Local Historic District (Name) VA'a 111 ?nik. ❑ National Landmark M National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: 8 Pint Ave. (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): Phone #: ( $ i a 1 S41 - $a o Address of Property Owner(s): 813 Pods Ave. (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name ofContractor(s): 1ampc; iiiplfiry Phone#: (913) 941-9390 Contract Company Name: J Address of Contract Company: woo �I ym 50'11% B0l1(! (Street Number— Street Name—Cit),—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: _A - fo Alla L( (Single Family Multi-Family—Commercial--Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: wood i= nA e (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ® Replacement (not in-kind ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked Description of Proposed Work: p C1 xn �6 c) ili'r°� ✓f/1n`71/v�'Q./ ��t�.1(/ � .��o , ,nom 1?„ ./,l�✓Y�' .�\2il/�i�lU 0 Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X and/or X a_P/', j" Signature of Owner Si6ature of Contract ' —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— �- ..�. � „�, _ � ,���� i tom? ,��' ,"`� n '�� `r,;�.,• �,� �� Easy -care vinyl. Encompass byPellaPvinytwindows and patio _ doors offer the energy-efficient options that will meet crexceed ENERGYSTAM certification in all 50 states' Exceptional energy efficiency. &compaesby MawirdoesvrirhAdvarced IowZ brwiating double -pane glasswith argon belp reduce the snoutofsinrgyused to beatortool yawhome. Strong and sturdyframe. Mtfid rbered hams and fuilywelded sashreducesound transmisdon and Improve strength end Merino] performance. And our precision welding pm cesshelpspreventthe frame, from warping and twtenng overtime like otWryvlrpt inn. Added wind resistance. f ifforced,MedodcNg window sash and ehaduausadd wind rosistance to help Improve energyel®encys Wigs fade -resistant vinyl formula ]spedormance- tested for excellentweatheMg. durability wA colorretenhom Some comp eth]veformulas use low<ost alternative Ingrsdlents, t � s i f i t I 1. Float Glass: ASTM C 1036, Quality 1. Specifier Notes: Delete the following sentence if tempered glass is not specified. a. Tempered Glass: ASTM C 1048. 2. Type: Exterior face -glazed, 3/4 -inch, sealed insulating glass. Specifier Notes: Specify type of glass. Delete glass types not required. Tempered glass is an option for each type of glass. Consult your local Pella representative for more information. a. Clear [tempered] glass. b. Multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass. C. Multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass with argon. d. Obscure, multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass. e. Obscure, multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass with argon. f. Obscure [tempered] glass. g. Bronze, multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass with argon. E. Weather Stripping: 1. Vent Sash: Fin -type, pile around perimeter. 2.3 OPTIONS Specifier Notes: The following paragraphs specify optional products. Specify required options. Consult your local Pella representative for more information. A. Grilles: Specifier Notes: Specify grill profile. 1. Profile: [3/4 -inch] [1 -inch] contoured. 2. Type: Aluminum grilles -between -the -glass. 3. Finish: Factory finished. a. Color: Match window frame. Specifier Notes: If insect screens are not specified, delete ASTM D 3656 and SMA 1201 from Article 1.3 References in this section. B. Insect Screens: 1. Compliance: a. ASTM D 3656. b. SMA 1201. 2. Screen Cloth: Half-size with black, vinyl -coated, aluminum frame fitted to window exterior. 3. Complete with necessary hardware. 4. Screen Frame Finish: Baked enamel. a. Color: Match window exterior. 18/14 mesh, fiberglass screen cloth set in ThermaStar by Pella° Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 5 2.4 HARDWARE A. Rollers: 1. Vents: 2 nylon roller housings, with 2 Acetal rollers each. 2. Rollers: Remove for cleaning and maintenance. B. Lock: 1. Type: Factory -installed, zinc-die-cast,.self-aligning, cam -action lock on meeting rail. 2. Color: Match window interior. Specifier Notes: Limited opening hardware is optional. Delete if not required. I C. Limited Opening Hardware: 1. Nominal Opening: 3 inches. 2. Rubber bumper installed at head of window. 3. Color: Off white. 2.6 TOLERANCES A. Windows shall accommodate the following opening tolerances: 1. Horizontal Dimensions Between High and Low Points: Plus 1/4 inch, minus 0 inch. 2. Width Dimensions: Plus 1/4 inch, minus 0 inch. 3. Building Columns or Masonry Openings: Plus or minus 1/4 inch from plumb. 2.6 FINISH A. Window Frame and Sash Vinyl Extrusions: Integral color throughout profile. B. Exposed Surfaces: Smooth, glossy, and uniform in appearance. Specifier Notes: Specify the color. C. Color: [White] [Almond]. 2.7 INSTALLATION ACCESSORIES A. . Flashing/Sealant Tape: Pella SmartFlash. 1. Aluminum -foil -backed butyl window and door flashing tape. 2. Maximum Total Thickness: 0.013 inch. 3. UV resistant. 4. Verify sealant compatibility with sealant manufacturer. B. Interior Insulating -Foam Sealant: Low -expansion, low-pressure polyurethane insulating window and door foam sealant. C. Exterior Perimeter Sealant: "Pella Window and Door Installation Sealant" or equivalent high quality, multi-purpose sealant as specified in the joints sealant section. ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 6 Specifier Notes: Factory -applied jamb extensions for 4 -9/16 -inch and 6 -9/16 -inch wall depths are optional for vinyl sliding windows only. If not required or if specifying replacement frames, delete the following paragraph. C. Jamb Extensions: Factory -applied, primed -wood jamb extensions for [4 -9/16 -inch] [6 -9/16 - inch] wall depth. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Examine areas to receive vinyl sliding windows. Notify Architect of conditions that would adversely affect installation or subsequent use. Do not proceed with installation until unsatisfactory conditions are corrected. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. Install vinyl sliding windows in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Install vinyl sliding windows to be weather -tight and freely operating. C. Maintain alignment with adjacent work. D. Secure assembly to framed openings, plumb and square, without distortion. Specifier Notes: The following paragraph applies to vinyl sliding windows installed using installation fins only. If the windows are not being installed with installation fins, delete the following paragraph. E. Integrate vinyl sliding window installation with exterior weather -resistant barrier using flashing/sealant tape. Apply and integrate flashing/sealant tape with weather -resistant barrier using watershed principles in accordance with window manufacturer's instructions. F. Seal vinyl sliding windows to exterior wall cladding with sealant and related backing materials at perimeter of assembly. G. Place interior seal around vinyl window perimeter to maintain continuity of building thermal and air barrier using [backer rod and sealant] [insulating -foam sealant]. H. Leave vinyl sliding windows closed and locked. Specifier Notes: Field testing is optional. Delete Field Quality Control if field testing is not required. If Field Quality Control is deleted, delete AAMA 502 from Article 1.3 References in this section. 3.3 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Field Testing: Field test vinyl sliding windows in accordance with AAMA 502, Test Method A. ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 7 3.4 CLEANING A. Clean vinyl sliding windows in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Do not use harsh cleaning materials or methods that would damage finish or glass. C. Remove labels and visible markings. D. Keep window tracks clear of dirt and debris. E. Keep weep holes open and clear of obstructions. 3.5 PROTECTION A. Protect installed vinyl sliding windows to ensure that, except for normal weathering, windows will be without damage or deterioration at time of substantial completion. END OF SECTION ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 8 Pella Corporation 102 Main Street Pella, Iowa 50219 Toll Free (800) 54-PELLA Phone (641) 621-1000 Website www.pella.com Product Guide Specification March 2013 Specifier Notes: This product guide specification is written according to the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI) 3 -Part Format, including MasterFormat, SectionFormat, and PageFormat, as described in The Project Resource Manual—CSI Manual of Practice, Fifth Edition. The section must be carefully reviewed and edited by the Architect to meet the requirements of the project and local building code. Coordinate this section with other specification sections and the Drawings. Delete all "Specifier Notes" after editing this section. Section numbers are from MasterFormat 9995 Edition, with numbers from MasterFormat 2004 Edition in parentheses. Delete version not required. SECTION 08562 (08 53 13) VINYL SLIDING WINDOWS Specifier Notes: This section covers "ThermaStar by Pella" vinyl sliding windows. Frame and sash are manufactured from extruded, rigid polyvinylchloride (PVC) material, with heat -fused mitered corners for a fully welded corner assembly. Consult your local Pella representative for assistance in editing this section for the specific application. PART1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A. Vinyl sliding windows. 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS Specifier Notes: Edit the following list of related sections as required for the project. List other sections with work directly related to this section. A. Section 07270 (07 27 00) –Air Barriers: Water-resistant barrier. B. Section 07920 (07 92 00) – Joint Sealants: Sealants and caulking. ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 1 1.3 REFERENCES Specifier Notes: List standards referenced in this section, complete with designations and titles. This article does not require compliance with standards, but is merely a listing of those used. A. American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA): 1. AAMA 303 - Voluntary Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Exterior Profile Extrusions; American Architectural Manufacturers Association. 2. AAMA 502 — Voluntary Specification for Field Testing of Windows and Sliding Doors. B. ASTM International: 1. ASTM C 1036 — Flat Glass. 2. ASTM C 1048 — Heat -Treated Flat Glass --Kind HS, Kind FT Coated and Uncoated Glass. 3. ASTM D 1929 — Standard Test Method for Determining Ignition Temperature of Plastics. 4. ASTM D 3656 — Insect Screening and Louver Cloth Woven from Vinyl -Coated Glass Yarns. 5. ASTM E 283 — Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls and Doors Under Specified Pressure Difference Across the Specimen. 6. ASTM E 547 — Water Penetration of Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls and Doors by Cyclic Static Air Pressure Differential. C. Screen Manufacturers Association (SMA): 1. SMA 1201 — Specifications for Insect Screens for Windows, Sliding Doors and Swinging Doors. D. Window and Door Manufacturers Association (WDMA): 1. ANSI/AAMA/NWWDA 101/I.S.2 — Voluntary Specifications for Aluminum, Vinyl (PVC) and Wood Windows and Glass Doors. 1.4 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS Specifier Notes: Performance ratings for "ThermaStar by Pella" vinyl sliding windows vary by product and size. Current performance information is found in the "ThermaStar by Pella" Architectural Design Manual at www.pellaadm.com on the Design Data pages of each product section. Consult your local Pella representative for more information. A. Windows shall meet Rating HS -R -PG[ ] specifications in accordance with ANSI/AAMA/NWWDA 101/I.S.2/A440-08 or ANSI/AAMA/NWWDA 101/I.S.2/A440-11. B. Window Air Leakage, ASTM E 283: Window air leakage when tested at 1.57 psf (25 mph) shall be 0.18 cfm/ft2 of frame or less. C. Window Water Penetration, ASTM E 547: No water penetration through window when tested under static pressure of [4.5 psf (42 mph)] [5.25 psf (45 mph)] after 4 cycles of 5 minutes each, with water being applied at a rate of 5 gallons per hour per square foot. 1.5 SUBMITTALS ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 2 A. Comply with Division 1 requirements. B. Product Data: Submit manufacturer's product data, including installation instructions. Specifier Notes: Delete the following sentence if shop drawings are not required. C. Shop Drawings: Submit manufacturer's shop drawings, indicating dimensions, construction, component connections and locations, anchorage methods and locations, hardware locations, and installation details. Specifier Notes: Delete the following sentence if samples are not required. D. Samples: Submit full-size or partial full-size sample of vinyl sliding windows illustrating glazing system, quality of construction, and color of finish. E. Warranty: Submit manufacturer's standard warranty. 1.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE Specifier Notes: Edit the following paragraph as required for inclusion of field testing. A. Mockup: 1. Provide sample installation for field testing window performance requirements and to determine acceptability of window installation methods. 2. Approved mockup shall represent minimum quality required for the Work. Specifier Notes: Edit the following sentence as required for inclusion of the mockup. 3. Approved mockup shall [not] remain in place within the Work. 1.7 DELIVERY, STORAGE, AND HANDLING A. Delivery: Deliver materials to site undamaged in manufacturer's or sales branch's original, unopened containers and packaging, with labels clearly identifying manufacturer and product name. Include installation instructions. B. Storage: 1. Store materials in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. 2. Store materials off ground and under cover. 3. Protect materials from weather, direct sunlight, and construction activities. C. Handling: Protect materials and finish during handling and installation to prevent damage. PART PRODUCTS 2.1 MANUFACTURER ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 3 A. Pella Corporation, 102 Main Street, Pella, Iowa 50219. Toll Free (800) 54-PELLA. Phone (641) 621-1000. Website www.pella.com. 2.2 VINYL SLIDING WINDOWS A. Vinyl Sliding Windows: ThermaStar by Pella. 1. Factory -assembled windows with sash installed in frame. 2. Frame and Sash Material: Extruded, rigid polyvinylchloride (PVC) complying with AAMA 303, having minimum ignition temperature 824 degrees F. when tested in accordance with ASTM D 1929. Specifier Notes: Specify frame type. New construction frames have an integral vinyl fin on all four sides with heat -fused mitered corners. New construction frames are also offered with integral vinyl fin and brickmould profile J -channel on all four sides with mitered corners and can be used with vinyl, aluminum, or steel siding. Replacement frames (no fin) can be used in new block walls or as replacement windows in pocket applications. B. Frame: 1. Type: a. Integral fin. b. Integral fin with brick mold profile J -channel. C. Block Frames (No Fin). Specifier Notes: Specify overall frame depth. 2. Overall Frame Depth: a. Integral Fin Frame: [2-11/16 inches for 1 -9/16 -inch wall depth]. b. Block Frame: 2-11/16 inches. 3. Nominal Wall Thickness, Vinyl Members: 0.065 inch to 0.075 inch. 4. Frame Corners: a. Mitered. b. Heat -fused, fully welded corners. 5. Sill: Fitted with weeps. Specifier Notes: Include the following sentence when specifying replacement frames. 6. Jambs: Factory -drilled, counter -bored, installation screw holes. C. Sash: 1. Vent Sash: Removable for cleaning exterior glass. 2. Sash Corners: a. Mitered. b. Heat -fused, fully welded corners. D. Glazing: ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 4 1. Float Glass: ASTM C 1036, Quality 1. Specifier Notes: Delete the following sentence if tempered glass is not specified. a. Tempered Glass: ASTM C 1048. 2. Type: Exterior face -glazed, 3/4 -inch, sealed insulating glass. Specifier Notes: Specify type of glass. Delete glass types not required. Tempered glass is an option for each type of glass. Consult your local Pella representative for more information. a. Clear [tempered] glass. b. Multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass. C. Multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass with argon. d. Obscure, multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass. e. Obscure, multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass with argon. f. Obscure [tempered] glass. g. Bronze, multi -layer, low -E coated, [tempered] glass with argon. E. Weather Stripping: 1. Vent Sash: Fin -type, pile around perimeter. 2.3 OPTIONS Specifier Notes: The following paragraphs specify optional products. Specify required options Consult your local Pella representative for more information. A. Grilles: Specifier Notes: Specify grill profile. 1. Profile: [3/4 -inch] [1 -inch] contoured. 2. Type: Aluminum grilles -between -the -glass. 3. Finish: Factory finished. a. Color: Match window frame. Specifier Notes: If insect screens are not specified, delete ASTM D 3656 and SMA 1201 from Article 1.3 References in this section. B. Insect Screens: 1. Compliance: a. ASTM D 3656. b. SMA 1201. 2. Screen Cloth: Half-size with black, vinyl -coated, aluminum frame fitted to window exterior. 3. Complete with necessary hardware. 4. Screen Frame Finish: Baked enamel. a. Color: Match window exterior. 18/14 mesh, fiberglass screen cloth set in ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 5 2.4 HARDWARE A. Rollers: 1. Vents: 2 nylon roller housings, with 2 Acetal rollers each. 2. Rollers: Remove for cleaning and maintenance. B. Lock: 1. Type: Factory -installed, zinc -die-cast, self -aligning, cam -action lock on meeting rail. 2. Color: Match window interior. ISpecifier Notes: Limited opening hardware is optional. Delete if not required. C. Limited Opening Hardware: 1. Nominal Opening: 3 inches. 2. Rubber bumper installed at head of window. 3. Color: Off white. 2.6 TOLERANCES A. Windows shall accommodate the following opening tolerances: 1. Horizontal Dimensions Between High and Low Points: Plus 1/4 inch, minus 0 inch. 2. Width Dimensions: Plus 1/4 inch, minus 0 inch. 3. Building Columns or Masonry Openings: Plus or minus 1/4 inch from plumb. 2.6 FINISH A. Window Frame and Sash Vinyl Extrusions: Integral color throughout profile. B. Exposed Surfaces: Smooth, glossy, and uniform in appearance. Specifier Notes: Specify the color. C. Color: [White] [Almond]. 2.7 INSTALLATION ACCESSORIES A. Flashing/Sealant Tape: Pella SmartFlash. 1. Aluminum -foil -backed butyl window and door flashing tape. 2. Maximum Total Thickness: 0.013 inch. 3. UV resistant. 4. Verify sealant compatibility with sealant manufacturer. B. Interior Insulating -Foam Sealant: Low -expansion, low-pressure polyurethane insulating window and door foam sealant. C. Exterior Perimeter Sealant: "Pella Window and Door Installation Sealant" or equivalent high quality, multi-purpose sealant as specified in the joints sealant section. ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 6 Specifier Notes: Factory -applied jamb extensions for 4 -9/16 -inch and 6 -9/16 -inch wall depths are optional for vinyl sliding windows only. If not required or if specifying replacement frames, delete the following paragraph. C. Jamb Extensions: Factory -applied, primed -wood jamb extensions for [4 -9/16 -inch] [6 -9/16 - inch] wall depth. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.1 EXAMINATION A. Examine areas to receive vinyl sliding windows. Notify Architect of conditions that would adversely affect installation or subsequent use. Do not proceed with installation until unsatisfactory conditions are corrected. 3.2 INSTALLATION A. Install vinyl sliding windows in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Install vinyl sliding windows to be weather -tight and freely operating. C. Maintain alignment with adjacent work. D. Secure assembly to framed openings, plumb and square, without distortion. Specifier Notes: The following paragraph applies to vinyl sliding windows installed using installation fins only. If the windows are not being installed with installation fins, delete the following paragraph. E. Integrate vinyl sliding window installation with exterior weather -resistant barrier using flashing/sealant tape. Apply and integrate flashing/sealant tape with weather -resistant barrier using watershed principles in accordance with window manufacturer's instructions. F. Seal vinyl sliding windows to exterior wall cladding with sealant and related backing materials at perimeter of assembly. G. Place interior seal around vinyl window perimeter to maintain continuity of building thermal and air barrier using [backer rod and sealant] [insulating -foam sealant]. H. Leave vinyl sliding windows closed and locked. Specifier Notes: Field testing is optional. Delete Field Quality Control if field testing is not required. If Field Quality Control is deleted, delete AAMA 502 from Article 1.3 References in this section. 3.3 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Field Testing: Field test vinyl sliding windows in accordance with AAMA 502, Test Method A. ThermaStar by Pella° Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 7 3.4 CLEANING A. Clean vinyl sliding windows in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Do not use harsh cleaning materials or methods that would damage finish or glass. C.. Remove labels and visible markings. D. Keep window tracks clear of dirt and debris. E. Keep weep holes open and clear of obstructions. 3.5 PROTECTION A. Protect installed vinyl sliding windows to ensure that, except for normal weathering, windows will be without damage or deterioration at time of substantial completion. END OF SECTION ThermaStar by Pella® Vinyl Sliding Windows (East) 08562 (08 53 13) - 8 e9aa�fAI i `;��j� ►�'�`1 ,� ter' ���,����{'���rc��le�. �� � {� t :' y : , "k, Amill L`,� • : ��'!�ti1�lUA����1-., f�lfijia�'���I'�^y�f � ��W� �' ���y 11 ik.l dd ����g{t� f i� +�oo � R i• a k e9aa�fAI i `;��j� ►�'�`1 ,� ter' ���,����{'���rc��le�. �� � {� t :' y : , "k, Amill L`,� • : ��'!�ti1�lUA����1-., f�lfijia�'���I'�^y�f � ��W� �' ���y in J2 ; `SN°'f� MW W"WA VIM . ,. �t `�� �����' •',:'��9���d�����i����� .. �31 ` i � �t t, �� �, rte' � i � ^�`r �.,�,(f � � r � � i S 13 ''f ' 4 t c � � U���f 1 t{'� �, � (�,,,•ti� "• :M T. yx, ,. �-�fF1 'I��taIQ ,I , ,1t ( tJu �' • �lll " �.�► �ti . � r ��� P I ,,�z N .>r ��, ; til , � f '�I'���I���� �`����':, , ", ,� t � � �, .. ' �: ♦i Y �:'� i i..''v���I� � •�• 7 � 1 +� � 1 � f �' I�, ^t i !I Va �� �`,k r,e't`ti . II ie- :'�y� i ti.: � � � �, .: � ` r J���ZIP � °r � '� �• f �� ' �� _= ui�y.l� �j� � t�Wii�lil,�� ` ) ' iR�(� ♦��, ,� ' f� F , �D�.:a'�a. �; I kyr r rY\..;� •'� 1�' 't :.. Cy �. �� �,::\ ��tr �:�� Yl },• `—`'� i � r{, I f� ani' �I `���t va \Ja �y •�. '1 , y • �\� �r . , X � � � � t '�„ t��i�iL��i����ll��,t��LGY' �,� 2 , r !�!, .z-.. .",��. Ar:,o... <�___f �.\::�,'�►��-�-ii'e .. .,: _'`.,. ..�.. w ..,_. :'� ii�5r:. h.F.1y$: :$ir..�fr:�1 �,���.. 0 10, r ti f �:f• / t o f a �/—�UEftQQQQIDm1A@dl�t�6 � 'p A ( E7 I ) r � Exam " m mc�d �r'yu r lv�; "i4•F`�.,rlii I�\ w ���'• fir �{ c r rt, E•i t, Y � �[ i�rft Y •V fit: 'ri I I r / \ i '�uJ7dta/�ultllFltit��3ii t�t[flYl4i{f�VY�f](i��(�I+i;riJ ' Px'g( / � 4 it'1511 (S (r 7 ! !fl =' � k '• 1 t : on J 1 1 t 1 j r i'2 �:`- � ( - _ � ! ' Orr x a v � .N,:, �➢ +�'� r 1 i' f III d 1 ��'"�� �3�.0��� � ; ��i(a4',�J;� ' ` i , • ; ,`.� YY,. "'�, ��'�1q,� •' � KAI1a � ��`�"' ������ r��/� n�"��y'I t /i���'(� i - .,,,\ �,� t ' 4\ �'4 i „<^.+�� `tx�� # 1�,. Y'•-`v"i �.;:� fi��iy i��� � l ( % ��� 1„t.{ I NO. r�NMI �r , aF{+F"�� ��� I 1 � ���� �♦� y `�j � ��� ��r'�� �"It t I/ta i dA�� "" v� � f ia.y._���D��IU :� � � ` �>:,t<x • � A�'�R,StG�? � � _(��• �.,.ti� i "r`'�" i } �d {' i�<. Lf:`�, aS� '".... t Iii.(Ye'AxA4.i ..P-.�-��..-.»_.1 t r,�,•��.' -�V .. .. ... ... IX IN S INVII-M MR. a A9 aii ,p1�Y f tir i fln � Yq 6 .�1C"'k?' �j���s'�frt' �i �4 f - _ _ i - _ ""'•."'...°`, �CN^� r t ._�',T,{aJ�'�G; ��`,'�£� r iJ'F" y "a,,''.�'. �� ,.��:,`f rt,( y -'�. � � �c*�..r ,e/ z,�, �;,�yyar✓".t. al►���ir'a.�' ����� �l� >< ,r: t � �E.ms ..jti i.. .; r rr .: , ' rl ;fF t r'r ,a �, �, r,� � � �{ "� ✓� ��;;�;,,�--�5��r'2�-�-�• wy4rr ���� •,- / t ®".h .! � y'h!{r r( , �x{4 /l�s��t9lr.�r � ' � � t� r ��� / r ii��'i ♦e{:�i'laa� to 7'qt�y' � /` n us..,l Y .:�� t'y^rt j�sy�wf;,. [ r ( ...S �1y! x. i/ ''/I r /: r ( ;� r'. } `, � VlqrM� �•.�.'. a rr��� �z t? .,, x u 4r u. f �t` xa,y�,zi : „� rwr� / f ! t. ->`. ,�,,P' � t � r ��a1 �., ,+ �} � n'vr �'1' I ,�{v a f �r r ^fr f,,.., a ,� •• j :l ! ti t , �fS`, v, .WI � t,•,,, \: ,� t �.: . { s f 17 li: � - ,i. .d �.`'' �� � " a tV/ i' t `', a. ,ryp )h �� - �©��� ,Sls%F>. ✓.�' erY�.A-,/t r ,>s. 1 -a1/1` -?%: rt a' %r. t. / 1/ ' �.d�, �'>: F r ui�Tf"i•` i h, ,t} { t'lr�, r j tr.,..i; l !«. l � i F,;-„,��v c ;4„,�;,, ,.� ;i” i � ➢ "�,�G� J. L: lorry / .'�,, . �, �_• ri tG<, . ..u`..,,, � �•'. / " . � ,.: l _..... .te^.Y\6`.'Y.. rm++.•., r("i'^.r(��v��, t' ur ie.-' I r I� '-�>}' �S'l� y..�i5(u,"�a� ;�•:�l / r� r � _ '_r°>I� 1 R 1a.. S - � . � �•�.aearrasewerzu+�.a' r r.�,tltA t `Rrrr! .rY���L,.t.r ! � r k., dS i+�"tie t � � <� .'( � t . t ,,.,: - ddr ✓, LAY(f t t* �,( {, �.`. 7 fi ! ' i 'j I • r �MWMYRl� 441 • AimOID'. __ c:5t'u"'ai trik..• +, 4f.f -.r. `�'�. 5 -J r '1 "fr r : ;l. � c �'..ii c�>. '// l! �. ! i (, iy t } �F } - ti ,��k/rt r(� a° .. � •r� �#� 2 �'.j s :Ij � � -arm.': �=��=' �� 1.:,_ L ;,,, �, ":,..— _..: j` t y it3 � yrr,� (r {•k ,. r� �.��r f{,T�f �r 7n%t ri �' � _ ,� � 1 rr<4 y l,N NNE"', a'erJO ,r✓" �� 1111M_Nt+, f7u_i 8r%M 'yrti/ .Cp`Zp •�7 "A"! tliIiia t i".di is i t�lr IGl sy) zr 7� rr r, It j1j;jj `�+^.;.fr�`,,,t,'rr•'r r.pC s,S !-I'.;.::1 '..i, la t +���'" .+n�,;,, "w, .�„lF.vi(.�.n.•v'J r, ,' "..::_ _ _ �`1 II`� r .Y t.. rry S:i4 L1 f/7 1% �yI!i .,+1 '/ 1 ," y� ,yr i'� t'` mw4�i.±r'. tl »; „ M A G rf 1h , i ar f .. O At � 7 1' , riot A I � , r It • '�"���U, ' ��jj :. � 4 ��' � ' I� i E ,. TOMMY, t!' r t i 1 �( ht yE t tl tGt!ir i { � I �� j ��t i �, ti>•t I t S4•I��P lag s: r 1 f ,�{ •� ,t � ! � 1 fzM ���+�lt �I�t J �'`, � �tt !�i111d t����j(�6��il�fffi�M�'�, WJ44jt���� itl�;t�f" f , %%% �lrtt,Ut�tultl�nliu.�'nttt�tzttttraa P , >, ' 1 r � � � w � f � a e, �,d �---•,'•—�---aE�a.c,:am �, r i y, jf P }P tFt7 r�. 4.ri P !„ t ii t)v °r+•i; a t� ,v.....,. ! 'C Ewan 1 01 , 1 �� c � I V' 4 ? 3 ��t�� P 4 71n+ Y Ll A✓. I J't �i-�!f i :.;` � 1���! I t�. _ ,', j t 4�: 1 - _ -- �. -"'!.'���'Fi� ✓'til �" t � ��(d " � �,;� �, kx � - � �� ��,.�� � a i;� i tJ' � Boos ood 1 ` ^. t '= 4 ' ' �'� ' , '�` ��' : II7 ll�� '1741•' `i C"al"i4:4' ( .. �'i l :..,, 'hV,, 1 z �� t�.-� � : ``-'�� � ,r �� ,•.\, 4,nnrt�t,rr�E,u�s �' � ,it f � ''�'�",� Py i• a 11�l. t j{ �e. > r ).: n j4, t t t; I( r `� r -�� � '�� 1�•�;� >; .,y '`lI �• � � i_�}-i�.iy�i �1�' .I, � . t , ;''"�. . +f'%?` r f� 11�` � � ..t`' : ,�1 it itr141 : 4s • / _ 1 fj, t BROW 1Z, +;l' e. 4:^i :a 1 r tt, li` f �LttttJj} t N�7•t�tt}� ..,?y '��� 1 li£: !'.�,,', 'e �'(s !1 !' r f ' iy :?t �1 rf• ;�: :. >°P4 _ 1 ,fi J.`��. S`� n0 a1, �}} rQ,l t�t� r : +: . a 1 Y,-, r 4 I '•� ' � � .:P \,P r f ljuifi{R: •d I it 1 � Jr �i ...,lrJ'• ' ! i • r `g' �,'- ,;J�z, t,�.yt`, � �� � o�, ,>k (•� J a ,k ,,, # 7{{'t,tst.t..4\ !P�, r ,.1 E�'i�%y¢ j „ �. 1• � •.i 'k''SrS,,r 1%`rit.tl y1 J rmrr `�. I"'�`� )! , S '�C��.: t�Y1�,.Y t:dfr P[1 ��., I � fs k •i �:'�,� �� S I..�.i...\ \t I {i y :' : t� �. 1': 3. ✓ {✓. — .(,t1,.1 a. •� i� rv�, l:., �r 1,:1 -f;,a �Ory .L7�J4J674TL!&VE'll��'1G1�'3'�! a" f r •: r9 , t ' � �� P _ } ' �;.> , ?!#�cx;;. � ) t � �, , i t '_� t r: � t� �i � _ t �; � e °ir^fi' 't •'' ii7� �"� l'�i'tl ��) r� ;/ � ,1 � Il1Jl rA� � �i� '{d t rY j� `try. ... _.fli�iri�t�l,ifiiril�i't 7 4 �• jVr alRRR l} r � 'J P.' ;� . '` � � - k I. '• j � �r£rr��t ix( C' ! d4,� �:--,�.-.._, t a � tq„ >44!".,.._iiiYYY...}�E I r q f Old d. �, 4 t, Y £ �.• � � y {�ylf i�.a� :.jy � r .�# l�yi�t �� ..., _ _ .... r ��„q., , ,te # f. (} �-j' (s t 1t ��L(z. �? 1z�{�e r. Kw u" iw > e• jr' l��j VtV v�' L+�i+.^r �i.Vi#t*�@',4�"C' 4n';� t 'r nr».n ... 'i•tr t .� , ft. _ # fr� '. 4� k= � �, �. ' ; iuyyyy Ir. A'=�.P "., t � 4 F;. ., � ,.�-.µ. ,,.,nx„,t..:. _ ,,, k � �' � �YO� N � ,...•� .>t°'% / I// , � _ .. ^i � t -CP i x`V p �' t { .d , � j ..._._ �$ r ��± 14: � �.��� �Y_AR1.Yr � ', � �:rll r -u %�l✓� ,�� _ �_ , Jd 1� f r i � + t: I r ; i �I' , t ,'` 3 , i : ,�`9'''M P };�—.:�irrr✓ .,>-r�!//�,,� _ - <_.._ ...: _. 1 t y N .1 t Wool 1 't 1 7 ,:� tjAf!t �rt; �', loin dl�t��hlj�r,�t,;f°APt���B�!�in 9 �t;ssiom SouTrt a� ST. JOSEPH COUNTY o4 CITY OF SOUTH BEND x,�e{ace V 3z BUILDING DEPARTMENT x~ x ORDINANCE VIOLATION CITATION Date: 3/6/2017 Citation #: 2017-034 Fine: $100.00 ® Is'CITATION ❑ 2nd CITATION ❑ 3rd CITATION _ CITATION COUNT VIOLATOR'S INFORMATION Name: James L Hickner Street: 1115 Autumn Trail Drive City: Mishawaka State: IN Zip: 46544 LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Street: 813 PARK AVE City: South Bend State: IN Zip: 46616 YOU ARE HEREBY CITED FOR VIOLATION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND ZONING ORDINANCE Section(s) Violated: 21-101(2) Violation Description: The failure to obtain an improvement location permit when one is required by the terms and provisions of this Ordinance, Section 21-100(2), specifically doing construction remodeling without application for applicable building permits. Enforcement Official: Ayoka Paek Position: Zoning & Business Services Administrator MANNER OF SERVICE ❑ Hand Delivered © Mailed ❑ Posted to property ❑ Other VIOLATOR'S OPTIONS: 1. Pay the fine within fourteen (14) days from the date of this citation. 2. Petition within ten (10) days of this citation for a zoning map change, variance, special use or development plan approval to correct such violation, in which case you must indicate the intent to file such a petition and provide the Enforcement Official above a copy of your application. 3. Appeal within ten (10) days, the decision of the Enforcement Official pursuant Section 21-09.03(c), as an Administrative Appeal before the Board of Zoning Appeals. After fourteen (14) days from the date of this citation The City of South Bend attorney, Zoning Administrator or appropriate enforcement official may file a lawsuit as provided by applicable law to enforce the terms and provisions of this chapter § 21-10(h)(5) EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayette Bvld. I Suite 100 1 South Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.9554 1 f 574.235.5541 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Aate: February 21, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0221A Property Location: 1325 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1926/Higgins House/H. Russell Stapp, Architect Property Owner: Jory Fitzgerald Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story wood frame "L" plan house has a slate gable roof, gable returns, and aluminum eaves. Windows are 6/1 and 8/1 wood double -hung with brick sills. The central entry features a pediment, sidelights, and brick stoop. There is a brick chimney on the west end. The house is sided with brick on the east and west sides; aluminum siding on north and south sides. There is a detached two -car garage, with two doors, gable roof, and brick and aluminum siding. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm doors and windows have been added to the house. COA 1997-0502 approved installation of a rear yard stockade privacy fence. COA 1997-0710 approved installation of a 15' x 16' deck at the rear of the house. COA 2006-0104 approved a one-story addition at the rear, and replacement of existing deck at rear of addition. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace 90+ year-old slate roof with standard architectural shingles. The original roof has been inspected by three local contractors including Liberty Builders, Midland Engineering, Rick Scott & Sons certifying existing roof is beyond repair. Replacement w/new slate tiles would exceed $100,000. Also, replace gutters with aluminum gutters — see attached quote. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes replacing original slate shingles on gabled roof of house with Owens Corning Oakridge architectural shingles. Slate shingles are deteriorating, allowing rain and melting snow to leak into home at northeast corner of primary roof, causing significant damage to a portion of the second floor ceiling. Prior to a temporary repair, light from the sky could be seen through the roof. A portion of the roof on the addition at rear of property needs to be replaced as well, due to damage from the original gutters. Damaged original copper gutters and downspouts on main house roof to be removed and replaced with aluminum gutters and downspouts. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET II. EXISTING STRUCTURES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a previously approved addition and garage have asphalt shingles, the current slate shingles are deteriorated beyond repair, and 17 of 19 homes in this block of East Wayne Street have architectural or 3 -tab asphalt shingles, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director ()IJ T Application - FOR- Certfficate ofAppropriaten,ess ,e HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY .... 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., S6iith Berid, IN 46601. http://www.96ostphcouni} indiaiiA.6om/departmeiits/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574235-9578 e:*SBSJC SBSJCHPC@co.st;joseph.in.us ....... . ....... OFFICE ilSt 6M 6 NOT COMPLETE'. - ANY ENTRIES CC&TA1NE6 B j) j C <<<<<< U& ONLY Date Received: 1 3113017 Application Number. 3m oniA PastReviews: YES (Date qfLWRMew) 11413006 NO Staff A pprovAl authorized -by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission REvJew Date: ElLocal Landmark Local'HistoricDistrictiVow) Cog[ Wovip- 04fee� ❑ National El National RegisOr District &ante) Certificate of Appropriatepess: ❑ Mnled ❑ Tabled F Sent To Committee ❑A00t0edind issued: (Please Print) - z!5�r Address 'of Propertyforpro'posedviork. 5- p, y t4 c- (Street *Number—Street N6m6----.:City—Zip Code) r s Name of Property O*fier(s): JOA y F, C--,7 r—_- A A L -b Phone #: -57*-97fw400i Address ot-Property.Owner(s):. �-tsn\.4c P-5 A IS =WG (Street Number—Streel Name-0tV--Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): -ST-G:,v;Z; V,-/ P% c-)-4 -5 Phone Contractor Company Name: L /,,S e4e 7- V fS L,/ t~2) r-? -5 Address of Contractor Company: ?IoX -7(- MI-T,4AVVAIZA /,,j -1-�S (Stre4 Number-" Street Name-±Cjty—;Zip 'Code) Current Use of Building: 6, t-10 - i a,i1 I (-V (Single Family—Utilli-1,-amilj—Commercial—Gove.rnmeni—indtistdal—Vacant—eic.) Type of Building Construction: WDakb )':X 1&t,A 6- .1 0 i< I CIL (w6od Franie—Brick—Sione—Steel—Conciete—Oiher) Proposed Work., ElIn-Kind E] Landscape [I New [3 Replacement (not in-kind) ElDemolition (more Phan one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: . -A A 4 67 q Yr, -A L -- ,D m P= ork lnt i -r)-4 IA Pet 1) 1 0- L e --S Wace qufle(r, - gee. dfvAeJ 0 Je OCR�:7 '1-5 7a-Z7-g7b S-1 -7342 e7z7- /_e C- L- 6-1 (_1 A L . C, -j P -L7 N/ A.IC-14-w -Se--77- Owner/Contractor Fait #: 6 -mail: T -e v 9"' W A C -)-t -T C;) YAf A4 e -P L P- C C-7 \ 1-(k 5 1) Ir w1 N C- V% j - 5 1- /�}'E ,7C. xand/or X St a of 6vne:!:0 Signature of Cofitracitor* —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— To: Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend From: Jory Fitzgerald (homeowner) 1325 East Wayne Street South I South Bend 146615 Date: February 20, 2017 Re: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness My residence located at 1325 East Wayne Street South in South Bend requires a full tear off and replacement of the roof and gutters on the original structure built in 1926. The original gabled roof is covered with slate shingles, over 40 of which are currently missing. Many of the remaining shingles disintegrate upon handling. The roof is in such a state of disrepair that rainwater and melting snow has leaked into the home at the northeast corner of the primary roof causing significant damage to a portion of the ceiling on the second floor. Prior to temporary repair, light from the sky could be seen through the roof. Since this repair in the Fall of 2016, a second hole has emerged on the northwest corner of the roof. In the Fall of 2016, I contacted three roofing companies to schedule the repair and determine what steps needed to be taken to resolve the issue long term. The first two roofing companies I contacted would not assess the roof reporting that few roofers in the area work with slate roofing. After further research, I determined that Midland Engineering does repair work and replacement of slate. It took six weeks before Midland Engineering was able to assess our roof due to the pace of construction at the University of Notre Dame. Two weeks post -inspection, I was contacted by Ken Sage, Vice President of Development at Midland. Mr. Sage quoted the cost to repair and replace the missing shingles to be in excess of $15,000. Further more, Mr. Sage explained that given the age and condition of the roof, Midland Engineering recommended an entire tear -off and replacement, stating the existing roof was beyond all reasonable repair. Mr. Sage estimated the cost of tear - off and replacement with like materials to be more than $100,000. Mr. Sage, a lifelong resident of St. Joseph County with a strong understanding of property values, recommended replacing our existing roof with traditional architectural shingles stating we would never recoup the cost of a new slate roof at the point of sale. Next, I contacted two general contractors who have done extensive work on our home: Rick Scott & Sons who completed an addition to our home in 2005 and Liberty Builders who completed several home improvement projects. Rick Scott & Sons is unable to bid on the roof at this time due to health issues. Steve Wachs of Liberty Builders provided a quote for total replacement of the original gabled roof with architectural shingles to match the shingles used on the addition. The total cost of that nroiect is estimated at $6900. A portion of the new roof on the addition also needs to be replaced due to damage from the original gutters which also need to be replaced (see photograph). This will cost and additional $1000. I am requesting the Historic Preservation Commission approves my request for roof and gutter replacement for the following reasons: 1. On the 1300 block of East Wayne Street South, 17 of 19 homes are roofed with architectural or flat asphalt shingles, including the homes on either side tveignbor curectly west Neighbor directly east 2. Our existing home addition and garage (visible from the street) are roofed with architectural asphalt shingles. 3. Very few roofing companies work with slate shingles. This makes it difficult to obtain competitive bids and to schedule repairs in a timely manner. 4. The existing roof is beyond repair and the replacement cost of like materials is in excess of $100.000, far exceeding reasonable expense for homes which sell for between $200,000 and $350,000. S. Our home is under contract, the sale of which is contingent upon the replacement of the roof and gutters. Additional Photos (1325 E. Wavne Street Southl Front of home t�. Rear of home [close-up of damaged copper gutters & roof) Liberty Builders of Michiana, Inc. "Building America, employing Americans" P.O. BOX 76 Mishawaka, IN 46546 Office: 1-574-993-1425 Invoice Jory Kelly _574-876-1068_ Name of Buyer (Print Name) Phone No. 1325 E Wayne _South Bend, IN _46615_ Street, Road or Rural Route Number of Buyer's Principal Residence City & State Zip Code WORK COMPLETED: Reroof 2°d level house and install new gutters Remove existing slate shingles Install new drip edge Install ice and water shield to code on eve edges and in valleys Install 30# felt or better to remaining slopes Install 30+year dimensional shingles to all sloped surfaces Remove existing gutters excluding back addition Install new aluminum gutters and downspouts Provide dumpster, clean up and haul away all debris Total Estimate 6,900.00 -* PAYMENT TO BE PAID BY CASH OR CHECK PAYABLE TO LIBERTYBUILDERS OFMICHIANA, INC. ** LIBERTY BUILDERS OF MICHIANA, INC. GUARANTEES: LABOR IS GUARANTEED FOR I* YEAR UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS (WHICH DO NOT INCLUDE FIRE, TORNADO, ICE BACK UP, MOLD, ABUSE, OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND OUR CONTROL) UNDER THE CONDITION THAT THE WORK PERFORMED IS NOT ALTERED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTOR, COMPANY, OR INDIVIDUAL. * Roof repairs carry NO Guarantee BUYER SHOULD NOTIFY HOME OFFICE IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING WHENEVER ANY SERVICE RENDERED IS NOT SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AGREEMENTS WRITTEN IN THIS CONTRACT. BUYER TO PAY ALL COSTS OF COLLECTION, INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES IF COLLECTED BY LAW OR THROUGH AN ATTORNEY OF LAW. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL - THE ABOVE SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO DO THE WORK AS SPECIFIED. PAYMENT SHALL BE MADE AS STATED ABOVE. CUSTOMER SIGNATURE Oakridge® Shingles Technical Specifications Warranty Length * Limited Lifetime (for as long as you own your home)* Wind Resistance * 110/130 MPH ** Algae Resistance * 10 Years Nominal Size 13 1/4" x 39 3/8" Exposure 5 5/8" Shingles Per Square 64 Bundles Per Square 3 Coverage Per Square 98.4 sq. ft. Technical Documents • 3 -part spec (pdf) • 3 -part spec (word) • Data Sheet • Install Instructions • LEED Certification - Roofine Shinoles 1 • UL Evalutation Report • Owens Corninc Roofer's Guide Applicable Standards • ASTM D3161 (Class F Wind Resistance) • UL 790 (Class A Fire Resistance) • UL ER2453-01 ' • ASTM D228 • ASTM D3462 • ASTM D3018 (Type 1) • ICC -ES AC438 3 • ASTM E108 (Class A Fire Resistance) • ASTM D7158 (Class H Wind Resistance) *See actual warranty for complete details, limitations and requirements. **110 MPH is standard with 4 -nail application. 130 MPH is applicable only with 6 -nail application and Owens Corning Starter Shingle product application along eaves and rakes in accordance with installation instructions. 1LEED® is a registered trademark of U.S. Green Building Council. 'Underwriters Laboratories Evaluation Service Evaluation Report. 3International Code Council Evaluation Services Acceptance Criteria for Alternative Asphalt Shingles. or� m -- flll,, _ _ ��' In ��. �,� •a � � �.r: PENN! �1 +'l�] - �S- -�.,1 �... ! "' /'' '£rYr„•"f_.�`�`'ti.`{44��s., � _ � H � /#+ ^y"�i fnl ' :: n•i� d' � b•.�' � E � , •- t _� -- } 1-1�- , ]Z.i�'+. � 11,,,!SSS! liu`?�'t�y-�;y `�,'f,�"i"..e`u.l A'fi �,W O� a z ^ e."'r yi(' II � IJJ, I �..11 �� L` , r, f l ?t m y. '�:� I7 � ��Jf ,( ��y„ •�v1,�s1 ��tl��1� .. �,1 �4t'`-i'` ii). ;tl ^._fl,l�. I� �It i 1- ,�l> ! I _ v I���� S• �I� i�I�t41 t, I >1g�llfli+,er:,,.vl��v� yiW���� ���,izt ,� _ Wa��.IiAul;- 10,i gy`a,.s. + �a�t,�.iC.i® '..r2�r � ter. - �' � I� 4 / r_ ky7 1�f�n1a ♦ n 1 i� i`" �.�. q�j �a .,���. tea`►,; yt�'i.hy (�i!.r T�L1'W'G'f�a�%�/��Mf�y�"� 1 pl. xq f�A�� W��q ���_�., ����4��f� �/�� // �\ '-•�� Y ) � „ , •V�'4'J�J.4 ��Ilri I ,1' J 41 LL4�'r �.i �! I� � AMM 4% �.-f ���:���y � iv �j ' J l� r l \`.y��� •`t`'`" �%�'y{�! I ink ld � C1"`"`L�.`i _� T c , t;.--� ✓ 414f, ` ti� r� 1�._ ( i �-- ^�t-yu i " I�J I r // " ^f�y�r���v.'"'"������'�}�. rar'f,'.Ett�i?1 S.C'u.'i�r'tllrlpr 4 ✓}�Y\w��- 4 � n�;�,��� i f� 1 5�'�� I( I MAW ��.�:� J�r'L•; ,f yhrJ��1f >�J�� � ,/r � a Sii'�4 �'.Y- � t t Frl r� � 1 � - � 7 M77 N t r° ti 1 l i��t� f`+I �% `�fsr� _ +} i±.��y i { �1 '. �� l y � i �• Ir rat4t r t r ` _._�ta1 I r3 ! 1, y )t4•1C1i t �.t rf w Y5 S f -. � Z, i � �1 r i +-ver 'i -- ..... ... �. �f'":1,�� 9�t �.a',z_ �'.e�. $�+,'4�'�'�•n�.�r}YI1f }N:?. �j5 ,jy:i �11.,..,. ri .� .i. j,- ,L ,. ,� .TY,� ._ � , t' u , a r , _._ J, «+ 1a I.1Yl, 6{{•a R yypqG f '' �t `�! �.1 'a�JMY't"` C tw" 4#'yri1�3 ',,� ^' 1 iv}sir 1u t�"��'x�"a tv °#%�" ��v✓� Itl p'at,�. �n ,f.i. 'j � �5 � pE� fit, v{'� !a 4�, �'?•1! d �, 1�, t* t',x �t,( t � }y;<r by ii s� y�'ii�5 s r tY#_ .`+S'� ipN�•�gp�V �Qf, a�75 ���a�, � 11. z3f�o i• 4 v P VAry4�g�' x,��� kykyY ,,�i �1 ry I �y®p� 8. �iGGr � fr I'f4 �4i,,1 �i/4, k1f V9'�A41. 19f 14g� Y1 M1E �Nf +F',illr rf „'VC 42 �1 '� T.'h.� 11M x`i4 i�t`"✓{'�`ttJ il°'Cy� �{ 15t ky � }>'��� , p ll I , 'c%�?r"" I , a n ! kt ESQ i' ICt' I,k w I v t ,0l a J t E +{ bixd a t tlra s tv 4,t i a{� s re pkt fig• f. 4 cti -,2 E Y fiIw z 9 }v x full�Sd LXI if L +9 Lai 04 v; � 'f� } � y , • r # t�1 � t � H � .. ��.' E' t -b' G'� GrSi 7772 . ,r5: IR «9.. . _ yy r, 4 r , !. t,yE �i���LI F'Prf S rC°�: I; ��� s�.tesEj �1�� trd i6ti'�E,� »,I� 4t's ta,:. tdx.na. �,� .fir tlul J-t9grl. �1.� >; � to s.;,,; ••�+�—.yE`3..a f, o� #_: ..tea. - + + � t+s �.: d `,} . d [� { E �:�� � j�Pl ui'E_ II "� ,�E �• I { I`� 'C]4 4p1 6t kEi � go� STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 28, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0228 Property Location: Leeper Park East Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: George Kessler Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating: Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park East is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. Joseph River, the River and Bartlett Street to the South and Michigan Street to the West. It is part of the 1911-1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed by George Kessler. Its function as a recreational Park is secondary to its practical function as a drinking water well field dominated by the North Pumping Station which is a local landmark, the Reservoir and numerous wells located through out the area. The Sunken Garden at the northern end of the Park was rehabilitated in 2009 with new rose plants and gravel walkways and has been restored and maintained in 2015 by an all -volunteer group. The recreational area of the Park behind the North Pumping Station include the Zeigler performing center with fixed bench seating, signage for the Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre Cabin, Comfort Station, and a swing set and slide. ALTERATIONS: The water feature, fountain and statuary of the Sunken Garden were removed in the E960s. The wading pool has been filled in and the pergola removed around the 1970s. The more formal gardens of lilies, roses, gladiolas and peony beds no longer exist. The Garden of Fragrance (originated in 1954 and expanded over the years) that meandered from Michigan Street to the Herb Garden by the Navarre Cabin no longer exists, only the signage remains. The lift station was moved to the north side of the pumping station with new landscaping, plantings, sidewalks, and rehabilitated Braille marker with COA 2011-1103A. COA 2015-0504A approved restoration of Rose Garden and path system, including replanting and maintaining garden with volunteers. COA 2016-1013 approved removal of brush and planting of willow tree. APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Building on previously approved projects to clean up and restore the Rose Garden, and installation of flower beds in the Reflecting Pool area, this project involves creating a narrow walkway between the two areas, which would then be bound by new beds, adjacent to the new walkway. Currently, to access the Garden, a visitor crosses from the Michigan Blvd. sidewalk, over a grassy area approximately 50 feet deep. At the top of the existing 8' wide concrete staircase leading to the Sunken Garden, an 8'wide walkway of crushed limestone is proposed. The walk would be bounded by two, 42" wide flower beds, and planted with similar materials as are used in the lower viewing pond beds. This would make the botanical area more visible to drivers and pedestrians. Additionally, the entire Garden would be irrigated with a new, timed, underground irrigation system, featuring a customized "drip" watering system for the roses, and a "sprayer head" system for the balance of the garden. This irrigation would be invisible, except when actually running. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park Standards and Criteria 9.2 Spatial OrEanization (incl. Views, Vistas, Landscape Spaces, etc.): 2. All views, vistas, landscape spaces located in the eastern section and central section of Leeper Park shall be preserved. 3. Original or later contributing special organizational features shall be retained in their existing configuration and shall be maintained through proper drainage, access and erosion control, pruning and removal of invasive vegetation or otherwise using recognized horticultural and soil management practices. 4. Alteration of existing or addition of new special organizational features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 5. Deteriorated or missing spatial organizational features shall be replaced with features that match the original in form, shape, color and texture. 6. When replacement of features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute materials may be considered. 9.4 Vegetation: 4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced with materials that match the original in size shape, color form and texture. 5. When replacement of vegetation materials and features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be considered if the convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom characteristics as the historic plant. 9.5 Circulation: 3. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation layouts will be considered if it can be shown that better site circulation is necessary and that the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 4. When replacement of circulation layouts is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute material may be considered. 8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director L b� 1c`atOak ion e,l- `�;..::..;�3 Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osephcountyindiana. com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY>»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«« «OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Aaal dol I Application Number: 3M — 0339 Past Reviews: ® YES (DateajLastReview) 01Ll bo 16 � NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Co ssion Review Date: Local Landmark F] Local Historic District (7vame) F] National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Nage) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied Tabled E] Sent To Committee Approved and issued: IAV _ (Please Print) J� - pay ' Address of Property for proposed work: C�l� 1 (Street Number—Street Name—Cit)—Zip Code) Mame of Property Owner(s)• s�� &4 pal1, 6 44 Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): (Street Number Street Name—CityZip Code) Name of Contractor(s):Cl_ 2- Phone #• (y °J " Contractor Company Name: Reek rV P_ t Aso , Address of Contractor Company: / �l) ��' VV aS ►t 5tt _ - �. %���✓J / t (Street Number4Street Name—City—Zip Code) t Current Use of Building: C �s Z��/�14t%✓1 (Single Family—Mitlti-Family—Commercial—Government Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: f v jk — ` (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: In -Kind )N Landscape New Replacement (not in-kind) Demolition (more than one box may be checked) j� 1 Description of Proposed Work: <; 0 Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: l _{�ii1 eq W�r plus-1 , c4M t X - and/or X Signature of OwnerSign tur RESURRECT THE ROSES: SUNKEN GARDEN AT LEEPER PARK: ---Phase Three February, 2017 Request to the Historic Preservation Commission THE SUNKEN GARDEN AT LEEPER PARK is attributed to George Kessler, an early landscape architect and city planner, who created park and boulevard systems. His parks throughout the Midwest were typically connected by landscaped boulevards, and it is this concept of "connectivity" which typified the Olmstead -Kessler parks of the day. Consequently, the concept was one of a grand design, rather than plans for individual plants. (The Sunken Garden at Leeper Park was originally planted and begun as a day lily garden, and it was not planted with roses until 1926, long after both Olmstead and Kessler were dead.) Thus, the parterre garden concept is an overall design concept ---and the proposed expansion, suggested here-- maintains the historical Kessler style, and highlights and extends the "connectivity" theme of his original style, while striking a balance between the Kessler style, and principles of current botanical husbandry. THIS ALL -VOLUNTEER, LEEPER PARK PROJECT has progressed very well, in a relatively short period of time. The volunteers began the project in late April, 2015, after several months of planning, consultations and preliminary work. Unfortunately, when we began the project, the Garden was massively deteriorated, and dying. IN PHASE ONE, the volunteers dug out, cleaned up, and re -shaped the weed -infested rose beds. We pruned, replaced, mulched, fertilized and resurrected the roses and the beds. Every rose was pruned, moved, and dead plants were replaced. Some "old-time" perennials were introduced to the outer beds of the Garden, to add a diversity of color, and to add seasonality lacking in the modern Garden. By the end of the summer of 2015, there were all new beds, hundreds of new buds, dozens of new plants, and the once nearly -dead garden was alive, and blooming again ! ! PHASE TWO: IN THE FALL OF 2015, we returned to the HPC, and received permission to work on Phase Two, for the summer of 2016: The Reflecting Pool Area. It had been many, many years since the Reflecting Pool had any water in it. Unfortunately, we all recognized that a water feature here was not practical at this time. Instead, we proposed the creation of new, central flower beds in the old "reflecting pool" space. That Phase, although it was a massive project, has now been completed. New, central flower beds were installed, to "mimic" the original water feature/pool—reflecting a new, open feel for the space that was originally contemplated_. (We are still working on repairing and replacing the historical statuary from the pool, to place them strategically into the new beds, on footings. Unfortunately, that has turned out to be extremely complex and massively expensive, but we are continuing those efforts, although for a later completion.) The central beds, however, were completed in 2016. This revision has given the new beds the peaceful, contemplative feel that was historically intended. As you know, the Sunken Garden is comprised of "outer" beds in three, concentric half -circles; on either side of the former reflecting pool area. When we first observed the "pool area" in early 2015, we saw that it was horribly overgrown with weeds and grass, and all kinds of debris. At some point in the relatively recent past, a "weed barrier" had been installed. But, instead of keeping weeds out, it simply became a new platform for new weeds, and a collector of a variety of stray plants and pieces of ground covers, and other noxious weeds. In Phase Two, the volunteers remedied all of those ills. We removed the existing soil and weeds, and other noxious growth. We removed the recalcitrant weed "barrier," and added fifteen yards of new soil and compost. We defined new beds with metal edging, and added walkways of crushed limestone. We planted the new beds, on both sides of the new walkways, with appropriate plant materials, designed for the spring, summer and fall seasons, to add diversity and color throughout the seasons. (Roses, three varieties of iris, several varieties of day lily, additional annuals, and floral and foliage plants.) These new "reflecting pool" beds were made possible by private donations, and separate grants from the South Bend Awesome Fund, and from the South Bend Brew Werks. This work has re-established the open-air, connected concept of the original "Kessler" feel of the Garden, with it's "walk-through" design; and it now mimics the originally intended "circular, connected" pathways of the historic Sunken Gardens. Now, visitors don't just look from afar ..... they are now able to walk "through" and "among" the plants of the new Sunken Garden. Advancing on the idea of "connectivity," and the open-air concept of the Kessler plan; RESURRECT THE ROSES proposes to further solidify these ideas into this PHASE THREE for the Sunken Garden: The Sunken Garden is currently Dis-Connected from Michigan Street itself; and even more Dis- connected from the western half of Leeper Park by an expanse of lawn between the Garden and the Boulevard. This proposal intends to begin to re- CONNECT these pieces, in line with the original Kessler concepts of connectivity, and the circular, open-air, "walk-through" design. PHASE THREE: This new phase calls for connecting the existing, lower part of the Sunken Garden to the street level by creating a narrow walkway between the two areas, which would then be bound by new beds, adjacent to the new walkway. Presently, an eight foot wide concrete staircase leads into and out of the Sunken Garden, on the western edge of the Garden. To access the Garden, a visitor crosses from the Michigan Blvd. Sidewalk, over a grassy area, approximately 50 feet deep. For Phase Three, the volunteers propose to Connect the sidewalk parallel to Michigan Boulevard with the Garden by creating a new walkway and beds, leading up to the existing stairway, and down into the Sunken Garden. At the top of the existing staircase, an eight foot wide walkway of crushed limestone (the same that was used in the viewing pond beds) would be bounded by two, forty two inch wide flower beds, and planted with similar materials as are used in the lower viewing pond beds, to create a connectivity, and uniformity between the upper and sunken beds. (See diagram.) This would also make the botanical area more visible to drivers and pedestrians. As an additional part of this connection of the beds, the entire Garden would be irrigated with a new, timed, underground irrigation system, featuring a customized "drip" watering system for the somewhat "fussy" roses; and a more traditional "sprayer head" system for the balance of the garden. This irrigation would be invisible, except when actually running. The Resurrect the Roses volunteers look forward to working with the HPC, and the Parks Department to make this beautiful park area the botanical jewel that was originally intended. Enc: Drawing Respectfully Resurrect the Roses at Leeper Park Horticulture Curator 709 East Washington Street South Bend, IN 46617 574-850-1979 larryc709@gmail.com 53c2f0661 a 53c2f0661 sI. ' t 1 L s int t��l�te h tPitl ;16fd Ili �.ft'� t lt�r •.,�.,, r r�k r � �t a ti ill' r pgt�r� u��xS t`i,ir i"it {"((�kwt tt 4��9k , br7rkgvvQj�y z x� ° *�. r k t�+" ) A tip ;1j f f: x i¢5!Y (� ! ttl t adJwtV't'�ri s• �.m��.k,'r;"r ,y9"gylvi •a^^. sit f,. }w fil(�34i PW8 3 ! (tt! tt {Ar 7 t t ton tMi17r �. t1 f '� WW ��y.,..•+^` 'N a V (! 1 c ` r ,Y+.7 V`lllyt�a i 1 rt i�y t (�1^`��� �� i iy k l Ss7 rry Y ''r✓ry j' �U R"�_'s", ys ', vttR ti 1fi t � �� i � ^�,� t ti'^ f iI>tr 4! t ✓� Y t t i t� j� # Y�..�,�. At.. tvY�J,et } ryt i t ^5t ! I ,Pi,! r"c:t t �is �t �f"t { {sYpN ��t , r t�,ktC a u+ t� v JkIw',5'� .{i 4 7 ��� ��"i'(+i4tiV sj 2'MdY r1 4 t��r 91rj"� ✓~ ,�t; o}trr�ir � ,ti°2ri6!?(t� �J�<;�+/� —"2''? .nc,+.�•�. r/y �'[��ao( kt FO`�A'l07t","'VF? t�i..g`� ; "- i^I INy V nr4 1 xand y 4k !1 �y r+ t iS�� .�1 r r 1 'etWS y{ yp ski V� r L t�h� �' tt�i tt ix T Kf4 i 'y i t (3 xt tt) ) k 1i y 311 {�> q�AL6�;'fit �^s 24 'It t 'Nt�tr {*dy*k`P (� �iEttr t 4V. ri(f'S sx t si `�Fµ�rhF k� Y�+Yt�f.:=`... ^�' tt , v�. ?..•^ � � j i a^%7 �.�;hr,,,.. � r, 7.. •fi,,.,i ° �r�iz4 r,C�`�i: ;�i"�".'i� ,�s.$ STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Aate: March 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0301 Property Location: 224 Hammond Ct. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1903/Mendenhall House Property Owner: New Day Construction Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This one and one-half story hose with irregular plan sits upon a raised concrete foundation. There is a steeply pitched hip roof with a gable on the front fagade, and gable projection on the east side. The front porch is one story with a hipped roof, concrete steps and deck, and round wood support posts. Windows are 1/1 wood double -hung with aluminum storms. There are two oval windows, one in front and one on the west side. ALTERATIONS: Synthetic siding has been added. The front door is a wood replacement with aluminum storm exterior and decorative shutters. APPLICATION ITEMS: Restoration of front windows, replacement of six windows found irreparable and additional 3 to have consistency, replacing front & back doors to code of 36 -inch width. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to restore both oval windows, as well as 1/1 wood double hung windows in front of house. Remaining windows on sides and back of house to be replaced with Edison double -hung vinyl windows, size and style to match existing. Non -original front and back doors to be replaced with steel doors. Front door will feature decorative 3/4 oval lite design; back door will have 6 -lite glass at top. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: At approximately 11 AM on February 17, 2017, I arrived at the property located at 224 Hammond Ct with Director Feasel to evaluate the condition of the windows of this structure which is located in the River Bend Local Historic District. We met with the owners' representative and their contractor. The owner intends to repair the oval windows, but is applying to replace as many of the windows as allowed. The existing windows consist of one over one double hung wood windows, and two fixed wood oval windows. I photographed each window of the structure and found six (6) windows to be deteriorated beyond repair. The structure has triple track aluminum storm windows but many of the.sashes are missing or broken which has allowed the elements to enter and moisture to slowly deteriorate sashes and sills. There has been some severe settling to the house as a whole which has resulted in buckling of some of the floors. Two of the windows are out of square and although not deteriorated, will more than likely require some additional structural repair (Perhaps removal then shored -up and re -installed) in order to be operational. The remainder of the storm windows that are not intact should be repaired or replaced to protect any original windows that are to remain. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVER BEND LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where synthetic siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the original, should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum and insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods or fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the owners are restoring the front and oval windows, and guidelines require replacement with units resembling the original, staff recommends replacement of existing deteriorated windows with vinyl replacements, as well as three remaining windows to provide continuity. Staff also recommends approval of non -original front and back doors. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- Cerii icate of Appropriateness _1A HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION YsbS of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46501 http:/Avww.stjosephcountyin4iana.coax/departrnents/SJCBP/indexjltm p: 574235-9798 f: 574235-9578 e: SWCHPC@cost }oseph.in us . „, . , aFMC9 UW OAT 15— »> 10 carr r.nMTT TTE ANY EN 7 RM9 CONTAMD nv TMS sox«««UFFIC F USE awY - Date Received: ( 1 I @017 Application Namber: 3 017 — 0 301 Past Reviews: YES. Mxe.afLastR_k_) NO • LIQ-5tc(-.'�73tr VQAn;fe! Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ! -1 LocalLandmark Local Historic District (Name) i� I ll P/410/1(1 National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied Tabled D Sent To Committee Approved and issued - (Please print) Address of Property for proposed work. P4AtF r <0077- - 13 E6t31_)- Ike '0�6,CJl (Street Number--StreetName—City—ZipCode) Name of Property Owner(s): jye&► �/r/ %�r)nJ �S m IC-�% D£S Phone If., I -S-A 1A I4OJIc Address of Property 0wner(s): S37 S -5e' V Ii L%aGLz, M )61+1 6`AX7 C ) i_ 1 1 j tj Yea. -L 13 (StreetMmber—;StreetName—City—Zrp ode) Name of Contractor(s); hi?A-P— e A -U ER— Phone #: 2 A/ 0202 i " -5a)4 Contractor Company Name: Q91,0 b/i Address of Contractor Company: %53 7 Ed'] C7 G- / e - G C -.f- M i G i -1 0 C 1 � � l 10 L/ bs% D (Street Numb)r— Street Name—Cify--Zip Code) Current Use of Building. FA7n / L'/ (Single Family --Multi Famib—Co/nmercial—Government Industria�—Yacant—ele.) Type of Building Construction: L000 b ��.-i�7"✓Z, (Wood Frame Brick—Sfone--,Steel--Concrete—Ocher) Proposed Work: In I{ind Landscape E] New 0Repiacemtent (not in-kinco ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: P.e S 1Z EA-0.)EV r-"—, A I .r &J I/VDO UJ S, S!V 40 ru/)Iva) LZ P-A-VILC- ��r�.3,u� �t�....r�tV�% d- �t✓� �r�2s �c� cd��. ar - 3b �,vc.�- tv�lQ r'�, OwnerlContractor Fax 0: a -mail: /Y► � �CtaU � t ` % �l-f �, J � t l . C d /i L X, _ !lflrlJ and/or X,I�1/11 Sig�atu of Owner Signature of Contractor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Edison Double Hung Features & Benefits • Solid color -through virgin vinyl maintains a natural appearance and will not chip, peel, corrode, rot or requires painting or scraping. • Multi -Chambered I -Beam structural mainframe provides superior strength and rigidity while offering the most adaptability for all installation methods. • Modern fusion -welded beveled frame combines excellent energy efficiency and beautiful aesthetic appeal. • EdiSeal Triple Protection includes triple weatherstripped sashes, and integral interlock with foam filled bulb seal Low -profile fusion -welded sashes subtly frame the view and allow abundant natural light into your home. • Shadow -grooved sash welds give the consistent appearance of mitered wood joints. • Extruded lift rails are an integral part of the sash design, giving seamless beauty and ergonomic fingertip -functionality that will last a lifetime. Bio -Maxx composite cam locks will never rust or break and proved a secure defense against forced entry. Two locks are standard on windows over 24" wide. • Flush mount tilt latches with unique shuttle design are ergonomically easy to operate. • Push-button activated Dual Vent Latches allow the luxury of limited ventilation. UPGRADE IDEA: Sentry System multi -function locking hardware integrates the lock and tilt functions into the same lock housing. It also includes Deluxe Night Locks that are ASTM F588 Forced Entry Resistant. Sentry System is standard on Classic Oak interior windows. • Heavy-duty G3 stainless steel constant force balance system maintains flawless sash alignment while offering the industry's smoothest and quietest operation. • Full balance covers conceal the balance operating track. • Concealed sash stop system gives a clean, finished appearance. • Double paned glass enhances insulation and reduces sound transmission. • PPG's Intercept Warm Edge spacer system's structural design gives the best combination of energy efficiency and longevity, virtually eliminating condensation and seal failures. • Aluminum slimline screen frame with integrated removal tabs resists bowing and denting. 1Ja. Pljy 0 IMPROVED VISIBILlrYINSECTSCREEN patented Bettervue TM screen mesh increases airflow and improves insect protection by utilizing a 30% smaller mesh opening and thinner fibers than standard screens. The result is higher light transmittance, improved curb appeal and a significantly clearer view from inside or out. Product Information Description • Decorative 3/4 oval lite design • Rust- and corrosion -resistant galvanized steel • One-piece polystyrene core provides long-lasting insulation • 2 coats of neutral, low -sheen, baked -on enamel primer enables easier finishing • Door system is ENERGY STAR® certified • Limited lifetime warranty • Pre -hung door unit ready for installation Specifications Collection Name Hampton Hinge Finish Satin nickel Jamb Width (Inches) 4.563 Common Width (Inches) 36 Common Height (Inches) 80 Privacy Rating N/A Glass Caming Yes Caming Finish Platinum Brickmould Included Yes Weatherstripping Included Yes Lockset Bore Ready for lockset and deadbolt Sill Type Adjustable Sill Finish Aluminum 3 -Point Locking System No Impact Resistant Glass No Commercial/Residential Commercial/Residential ENERGY STAR Certified Northern Zone Yes ENERGY STAR Certified North/Central Zone Yes ENERGY STAR Certified South/Central Zone Yes ENERGY STAR Certified Southern Zone Yes Door Thickness (Inches) 1.75 Door Style 2 -panel Common Size (W x H) 36 -in x 80 -in Actual Width (Inches) 37.5 Rough Opening Width (Inches) 38.5 Actual Height (Inches) 81.75 Rough Opening Height (Inches) 82.25 Construction Insulating core Door Handing Left-hand inswing Warranty Limited lifetime Fire Rated N/A Wood Species N/A Impact Resistant No Lowe's Exclusive No Works with Iris No Glass Style Oval lite Slab or Prehung Prehung Finish Primed Manufacturer Color/Finish Primed Door Configuration Single door Material Steel Glass Insulation Tempered Color/Finish Family White T , t , r 1 ) �i7 _ 'N4ILVPY!!lJ.S111lLPlSIJIY.I! Jll G t ' 1 1 c`�`.(..nu«�...M•c„P«�...:.. °IrV Ti Jj , i�>! �, t t,' N a J Y a-rv�i.�r�-•,y„. � ! a 1 YSS{{}}!! � }�t t� 37! 7' . - Sill ilk , 2, '',!; �� ...�,� I' Y��ite7.»w.,.....2., ,.,, •t• ,,; +,.f, r r�� i �' I' y 3 ''r 1 1, yh. Y`1q y4 +ti K j,l' J' '.91 'I�•31 ��” "k ��'"C, 'y k i t ,���?r',x,�•v."2 ,�Pr•�,�� F# �"° ht. ,���„�,, a 1rs j � t � J �'( C� , r{1?'r'�?� „r. �3, ':'r'. ' J''',' '�+� - ,1 t ski `j�`�� ��,1 �{ �”' r, ' }s ''i'. ' ;:'• ,:` ' "� ,:,'� ,,,.,. �4�}� ,�; ,G4 °J �' I . .k� 4'�',;�&', .1! qpj •4 � k I r' r , �. t � > �'ar �'tM •<lCmv' j, yam..] t r{)�)`}y .i, �¢i Y A>';,� ,,':3 i _ .�.i 1�f,b�%, ''rS, `4yn ,l i�,•+ L 7,( •P .r'4+1�• �wr�'v.. ,,.,��`,k. �. pf } � r,� ", �, Cf.' E i I '4 7 YsI, - �y,`.n' � l..F s "�t�r� r s �'��I '+ q{ J a •I, � _ r ., h » ! �Y •tea �^�,'s,�t+.;�Jnu<:•.�;u'"`�';,�:`�' " ' ra , 7,7 IZI 14 f'� 3�It` ;T, Pb � t�,r Oxy + ^• `'' a��: ,...,f�,�^:J Y s E i + r' Y; 7-' `fiCO;t.N iPn, l�PIe �.in f,. 1 , 7 (•'P.'77' xmr,7��{�,'" ;;yi'�" ri>r.',sis 2„y,•. ;;i:...: a;1;y :C' _ •�' , ;q^ ,�`•�?� i” +s - `-�``'_ r T, m; s ■P�"'+ Ii 1,' n�$(' t a 6E n�a 1�w 3.!L`n. �. p .,N`g 'i^ %n'.L..'%✓�, 5 3v-�i" :1«. 7 .. (/%- ,'O' .�"..$ 4 `1 yy 8ya} VAT, 1Y 1xj 49 11.. nn .G%•'' -x lm7uatfl�,Up' .,...':t .�ry',:uep iC:',t �i �! � rq' + � t. t T 5 ' ti o + n. I a �.` ,� ""si% P,tt y■I 7 � a � I�% yy A',7 N lg %itld �r< 1) x r c, rl�f �. t�, .-. ?,'. +jJ■y¢¢�� ,��,.•�� � 119 ,���� `� Y ��`�Q6� r t� .., Product Information Description • This Craftsman door design features elegant, uncomplicated clean lines Simple panel profiles celebrate the handicraft of the arts and crafts movement • 1 -lite, 3 -lite and 6 -lite glass options available • 1 -piece polystyrene core provides long-lasting insulation • Pre -hung door unit ready for installation • Lifetime limited warranty Specifications Collection Name Craftsman Glass Hinge Finish Satin nickel Jamb Width (Inches) 4.563 Common Width (Inches) 36 Common Height (Inches) 80 Privacy Rating N/A Glass Caming No Caming Finish N/A Brickmould Included Yes Weatherstripping Included Yes Lockset Bore Ready for lockset and deadbolt Sill Type Adjustable Sill Finish Aluminum 3 -Point Locking System No Impact Resistant Glass No Commercial/Residential Commercial/Residential ENERGY STAR Certified Northern Zone No ENERGY STAR Certified North/Central Zone No ENERGY STAR Certified South/Central Zone No ENERGY STAR Certified Southern Zone No Door Thickness (Inches) 1.75 Common Size (W x H) 36 -in x 80 -in Actual Width (Inches) 37.5 Rough Opening Width (Inches) 38.5 Actual Height (Inches) 81.75 Rough Opening Height (Inches) 82.25 Door Style Craftsman Glass Style Craftsman 6 -lite Construction Insulating core Warranty Limited lifetime Fire Rated N/A Wood Species N/A Impact Resistant No Lowe's Exclusive No Works with Iris No Slab or Prehung Prehung Finish Primed Manufacturer Color/Finish Primed Door Handing Right-hand inswing Door Configuration Single door Material Steel Glass Insulation Tempered Color/Finish Family White 7/yW 60 _ ,, t r" 1"I''. � I R z> 1"I''. tiff k X tR15 IS, In. IN Vt E2 t 0 y STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 6, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0306 Property Location: Leeper Park East Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: George Kessler Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating:Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park East is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. Joseph River, the River and Bartlett Street to the South and Michigan Street to the West. It is part of the 1911-1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed by George Kessler. Its function as a recreational Park is secondary to its practical function as a drinking water well field dominated by the North Pumping Station which is a local landmark, the Reservoir and numerous wells located through out the area. The Sunken Garden at the northern end of the Park was rehabilitated in 2009 with new rose plants and gravel walkways and has been restored and maintained in 2015 by an all -volunteer group. The recreational area of the Park behind the North Pumping Station includes the Amphitheater (also known as Zeigler performing center) with fixed bench seating, signage for the Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre Cabin, Comfort Station, and a swing set and slide. ALTERATIONS: The water feature, fountain and statuary of the Sunken Garden were removed in the 1960s. The wading pool has been filled in and the pergola removed around the 1970s. The more formal gardens of lilies, roses, gladiolas and peony beds no longer exist. The Garden of Fragrance (originated inl954 and expanded over the wears) that meandered from Michigan Street to the Herb Garden by the Navarre Cabin no longer exists, only the signage remains. The lift station was moved to the north side of the pumping station with new landscaping, plantings, sidewalks, and rehabilitated Braille marker with COA 2011-1103A. COA 2015-0504A approved restoration of Rose Garden and path system, including replanting and maintaining garden with volunteers. COA 2016-1013 approved removal of brush and planting of willow tree. APPLICATION ITEMS: The amphitheater is in need of improvement for ADA and to improve appearance and functionality. New stage and new audience seating, landscape beautification and lighting for stage. New benches with concrete pad, closer to stage, more intimate. See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The existing concrete slab in the stage area will be removed and replaced with a 20' diameter concrete slab. The stage will have posts that accommodate low key stage front lighting. Existing benches will be removed, a concrete slab poured, and new benches similar to those installed along the Garden Walkway Project in Leeper Park West (COA 2015-0302A) will be installed. New concrete sidewalks will be poured to connect the stage and seating areas with existing sidewalks and parking area. All concrete will have color pigment throughout the mix. Sidewalks, seating, and parking will conform with ADA requirements. The brick building that serves as a backdrop to the stage will be cleaned, and boarded up windows will be replaced with more attractive faux windows in a color that better blends with the brick building. The amphitheater will allow education enrichment for nearby Madison STEAM Academy, as well as other community events. See attached site plan for detailed project notes. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park Standards and Criteria 9.2 Spatial Organization (incl. Views, Vistas, Landscape Spaces, etc.): 2. All views, vistas, landscape spaces located in the eastern section and central section of Leeper Park shall be preserved. 3. Original or later contributing special organizational features shall be retained in their existing configuration and shall be maintained through proper drainage, access and erosion control, pruning and removal of invasive vegetation or otherwise using recognized horticultural and soil management practices. 4. Alteration of existing or addition of new special organizational features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 5. Deteriorated or missing spatial organizational features shall be replaced with features that match the original in form, shape, color and texture. 6. When replacement of features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute materials may be considered. 9.4 VeEetation: 4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced with materials that match the original in size shape, color form and texture. 5. When replacement of vegetation materials and features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be considered if the convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom characteristics as the historic plant. 9.5 Circulation: 3. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation layouts will be considered if it can be shown that better site circulation is necessary and that the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 4. When replacement of circulation layouts is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute material may be considered. 8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9.7 Furnishines and Obiects: 4. Alteration of existing of addition of new furnishings and objects will be considered if the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9.8 Structures: 1. The general intent is to preserve the original or later contributing structures that enhance the historic landscape. 4. Deteriorated or missing structures, materials, elements, details and ornamentation shall be replaced with material and elements which match the original in material, color, texture, size, shape profile and detail of installation. 9.10 Accessibilitv 1. A three-step approach is recommended to identify and implement accessibility modifications that will protect the integrity and historic character of the property: a. Review the historical significance of the property and identify character -defining features. b. Assess the property's existing and required level of accessibility. c. Evaluate accessibility options within a preservation context. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this project will refurbish an existing park feature and allow accessibility for all patrons, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Ll Application -FOR- Certificate of FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION COAUMSSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCBP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLYS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 0) l2 I go l I Application Number: L1101 1 — 0 ,� 0 G Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ NO Title: ❑ Local Historic District (Name) © National Register District (Name) �,Q, d 90 0 ne J ,nA d M (1 E ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) moi_ Q M� Address of Property for proposed work: s v `� �v� �`"'C� �� ��` k,G$+-X r/(Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) �� �/ parrs icc �.^-i a -e - Name of Property Owner(s): A V l9`�. �l°i-J j l �� k5_4 Phone #: 2-`3� 5 �] (T Address of Property Owner(s): -? Z (U.=- t� (Street Number— (Street �N,(acme—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): l ` t� 1(5� 011 nn iL��� c'cn ��',10 j�Vnl v1 Phone #: Contract Company Name: ��.{.�"l� P�- �1`-� t^'LJwI tih C:r1 �►v I (�`f`�1 �� iz y ,s C:4 `V (C E l.O li e� 6 riCV10' . hh c LtLI�L�+f' �` pp V ll ✓�0�'�G�v�1. `ito� Address of Contract Company: 7-1 �_ Yt r ( (Street Number— Street Naine0ty—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: �1�� �� I ° �� t1CC�°- °�- S`� ge.1 �f�s , St Q4i w j & Pte, A5i f s' (WoodFrame—Brick—Stone--Steel—Concrete—Other) APA (0-tt&Slope,/ i ticrLi' Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind © Landscape ❑ New ® Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: ne cLtm � 'coJE4y o �p N aw staq e. �e,w g,v%,Al S &4 -PV. 6t.4- k/% " C,4_*0, Uc 6 AL S i 0, k`F( y Fo 5+&.qi e e -W bpaa�e-s W t` o ,n e. a--�e_ tP cl C. 5 P_ 5 +Za ,� V � M ov-,-- t ti'i VV -tate. , S e &1-1� ct,e-,ln e Owner/Contractors#: �g `' `a 0 e-mail: t 6 v1 dt (1 (Staff will correspond with only ohne designee) X ' (/�J-X� LYP1 5 and/or s �t`� Signature of Owner �a ; �&Mf Signature of Contractor �rSh C� (�� IVl��SSfl� ��%-,%4 � APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME College of Engineering March 6, 2017 Gary A. Gilot, P.E., Director, Engineering Leadership and Community Engagement 128 Geddes Hall Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 tel (574) 631-0282 email Gary.Gi oLl@nd.edu To: Historic Preservation Commission and Staff From: Gary Gilot, Volunteer Community Service Engagement Project Representative Subject: Certificate of Appropriateness Application for Leeper Park Amphitheater Improvement Project On Behalf of Venues, Parks and Arts as Owner and Madison Primary Center as Contractor Grant recipient of Memorial Health Enhancement Program This is to supplement the design drawing attached by Marry Murphy of Alliance Architects on topographic survey done by Lang Feeney and Associates. The drawing includes a site plan showing improvements and a landscape plan. The hardscape depicted on the design drawing will be concrete with color pigment throughout the mix. Sidewalks and seating and parking will conform with ADA requirements. The benches will be very similar to the ones along our earlier service project in Leeper Park West (west of Lafayette and south of the Tennis courts). The Brick building that serves as a backdrop to the stage will be cleaned, some unsightly equipment removed and the turquoise paint boarded window will be replaced with a more attractive faux window that is in a color that blends better with the brick building color palette. The landscape will seek to better frame the stage and define the amphitheater space. The stage will have posts that accommodate low key stage front lighting. Madison is transforming from a failing K-4 Primary Center to what we expect will be a more successful STEAM Academy. The school has been certified for Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) curriculum and will add in the Arts for STEAM. The amphitheater will allow education enrichment for 500 K-4 stidents who come from some of the poorest families in the community. The Civic Theater has agreed to partner with the Benches on East Leeper Park Amphitheater refresh will be like the ones installed along Garden Walkway Project in Leeper Park West, previously granted COA SITE PLAN ' innW Fs,u»Y ! Iuxayain. hro' i Soto Selfnilflf TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY to S � Sf MN 1 i= 94, OF rHE pI qR lGE ralY +�P a1. JOSfPN x r SW. loin m N"" SlKV 664 SpUiN 9iNa Nt1WN �5/� G/0 dGrt ll°An'�r iiQ' O 20' 40' x BENCH MARK LEGEND ' DONT POLE,. 6 VWHOLE rr I WATER VMHOLE VALVE V �; 7 p WATER • WATER METER + WATER fOWAyN SANITARY SEWER VMHOLE ♦ STONE SIARKER ` SION r FLAG POLE -, PNE 0 TREE 0 BUS" 0 JOa�w°'oa� h4�'aQQ' LANDSCAPING PLAN �� AM °^ T06ERBVt9Bl� EXISTING BUILDING I.T' NORTH ELEVATION i .iforrocr+� INFILL PANEL DETAIL aw.uurn EXISTING BUILDING 1 WEST ELEVATION oAl Amphitheatre, from Riverside looking toward stage Dedication Plaque Ziegler Performing Center Amphitheater current seating conditions View showing east "' Building that is stage backdrop MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY February 27, 2017 131 Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Brandon Anderson, Mike Voll, Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer (arrived at 6:54 p.m., prior to reading of letter from Indiana Landmarks, COA 2017-0214A) Members Not in Attendance: Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Kevin Buccellato Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Members of the Public Present: Sara Boukdad, Paul Worland, William Jackson, Kevin Jakiel, Ayoka Paek, Gary Gilot, Jack Smith, Deb Martin, Andy Grintkowski, Erin Camilleri, Steve Bognar H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 325 West North Shore COA#2017-0210 West North Shore Representation by Paul Worland, 325 West North Shore STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 10, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0210 Property Location: 325 West North Shore Drive Architectural Style/Date: Neo-Classic/Sears Roebuck's "The Magnolia"/1926 Property Owner: Paul Worland and Deirdre Mylod Landmark or District Designation: West North Shore LHD Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 325 West North Shore is one of six known Sears "Magnolias" in existence. It has two stories set upon a square plan with projecting porches all on brick foundations. There is a Porte-cochere on the west fagade. The exterior walls are recently restored clapboard siding. The windows are 9/1 double hung. There are aluminum railings around various porches and balconies. The roof is a truncated pyramidal with asphalt shingles and a front dormer with a classic pediment; the roof peak has a flat roof. The porch and balcony are distinctive features with the classic portico front entry that has triple ionic columns on both front corners; bracketed entablature with a flat roof enclosed by a wrought iron fence. According to the 1977 survey card, there is a "newer frame garage with apartment of a `style that detracts from the house."' (Brian Crumlish) ALTERATIONS: COA 1991-1202 approved enclosing existing second level balcony to create a laundry room. The "guest house" was revamped with siding and new door configurations in 1995. COA 2015-0601 approved removal of the aluminum siding and restoration of wood details and trim, and restoring/replacing the bead board porch ceiling and soffit. COA 2015-0722 approved demolition, rebuilding, and reinstallation of front porch slab and foundation; rebuilding pillar foundations; remove non - original Porte Cochere and rebuild to historic specifications, and in-kind replacement of asphalt roof shingles. COA 2016-0801 approved installation of wood storm windows and storm doors, replacement of newel posts and rails across the front porch, Juliette porch, above the sun porch, above the porte cochere, and above the front portico, and replacement of flat roof of carriage house with Gambrel roof and two dormers on either side. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace existing asphalt driveway with a concrete driveway. Replace existing facebricked walkways (1980) with concrete walkways. Eliminate curved front walk and replace with a straight walkway from the limestone steps of the front porch to the sidewalk. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to: 1) replace existing deteriorated asphalt driveway with concrete driveway. Although there is no definitive evidence of the original driveway material, early photos show it was light colored; definitely not asphalt. 2) Eliminate curved brick paver sidewalk in front of house, and replace with concrete sidewalk straight out from front steps, as is typical in other Magnolia homes and in original Sears catalog illustration. (see attached photos) STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: West North Shore Drive Local Historic District L THE ENVIRONMENT C. LAWNS The current or historic landscaping character of lawns should be preserved. Paving and blacktopping of existing lawns so as to transform them essentially into parking lots or spaces rather than residential lawns must be prohibited. Front yard areas, trees, and lawns must remain open. Fencing in front yards is prohibited. A fence on the Michigan Street side of lots 12 and 13 may be permitted if done in a distinctive way and is compatible with the character of the structures on these lots, with consideration being made for the high density and speed of traffic on Michigan Street. Trees contribute greatly to the beauty and charm and indeed the historic character of the North Shore Drive neighborhood. Street widening or other public developments. Street widening or other public developments calling for widespread destruction of large, healthy trees must be prohibited. Replacement of trees must be compatible in variety with those presently growing. The vacant lots must be kept as landscaped or appropriate recreational, or other similar residential development. This is not intended to prohibit the sale of such lots, nor new construction on these lots. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner clarified that the maximum sidewalk width would be 5', and driveway will remain the same width. Commissioner Anderson moved to approve application as submitted with inclusion of the maximum 5' width of sidewalk. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2017-0210 Approved. 2. 1328 East Wayne Street South COA#2017-0213A East Wayne Street Representation by Erin Kennedy Camilleri, 1328 East Wayne William Jackson, 1119 East Eckman STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 13, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0213A Property Location: 1328 E Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/I925/Marcus House/H. Russell Stapp, Architect, Whitcomb & Keller, builder Property Owner: Stephen Camilleri & Erin Kennedy Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This L -plan 2 -story frame house sided with wood shingles, has a gable roof with asphalt shingles. Windows are 8/1 and 6/1 double -hung with wood trim and sills, and ornamental louvered shutters on second floor windows. The house front features a central entry canopy with gable roof and round arch under gable. There is a detached 2 -car frame garage with asphalt -shingled gable roof, and clapboard siding. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and doors have been added. An enclosed east wing was added to the house in 1937, and a 13'x19' rear addition in 1959. COA 2008-0716 and 2015-0624 both approved complete tear -off and re -roof with asphalt shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: Kitchen remodel and second floor addition on the rear of the structure within the footprint of a rear porch that was previously added. This porch is not original to the house. The addition will include a new master bedroom and bath. Additionally, a new bath will be built in the basement. See attached document for complete description. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owners propose to add a second floor at the rear of house, over the existing, one-story non -original back porch addition. The ridge of the new addition will align with the existing house ridge and will not be visible from the street. The original house details will be used for the addition. On the first floor, a mudroom will be added where the exterior porch currently is located. On the second Floor, a Master Suite will be constructed over the back porch. Siding to be machine split, number one grade clear cedar shingles by Edmund Allen, to match existing painted wood shingles; painted wood trim to match existing. Windows will 0) be Marvin Ultimate Magnum wood double hung windows with mullion, scale, and simulated divided lites to match existing windows; trim to match existing. Proposed Velux FS deck -mounted skylight to be added at southwest side of new gable to allow light to enter stair hall. Existing exterior door will be reused. Architectural shingles on the new roof to match existing roof. Eave and gable rake details to match existing house. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street Local Historic District III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half-timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell. Deputy Director Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2017-0213A Approved. 3. Leeper Park COA#2017-0213B Local Landmark Representation by Gary Gilot, 1904 Lilac Trails Court Sara Boukdad, 506 West South Street Deb Martin, 23133 Arbor Point Drive Andy Grintkowski, 835 Ashland Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 13, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0213B Property Location: Leeper Park West Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Park/George Kessler Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating: Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park West is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. Joseph River, Park Lane to the South, Lafayette to the West, the bluff of Chapin Park to the extreme West and Michigan Street to the East. It is part of the 1911-1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed for South Bend by George Kessler. ALTERATIONS: The duck pond was restored in 1979. The formal gardens were grown over in the 1980s. The playground equipment is not original to the Park. A Parking Lot south of the Tennis Center was added during the Madison School renovation along with lighting without COA. The tennis courts were replaced in 2007 and the "odor garden" was installed in 2008. New Playground equipment was installed 2013. A garden for vegetables, flowers and fruit trees was established by Madison Primary Center in 2015. APPLICATION ITEMS: New public ADA accessible formal labyrinth garden with an emphasis on restorative health and meditation in existing open space of Leeper Park with interpretive, education signage and benches. See Attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Addition to the park of a therapeutic, ADA accessible contemplation garden labyrinth. The design for the circuitous labyrinth path at the center of the garden, a 40'-0" diameter area, will be surrounded by a perimeter of lavender plants. Additional plantings around the labyrinth core will include ornamental plants, annuals, perennials, and grasses. At the maximum extent, an 80'-0" diameter circle outer concrete walkway will be provided blanked on either edge with more lavender. A standard non -slip, all-weather surface of stained or colored concrete path will be provided for access by all users. See attached Concrete Coloring Summary. Exact location will be based on professional survey, with major axis of walks to correspond with the center line of Main Street, and outer radius of the pathways to be a minimum of 10'-0" setback from duck pond perimeter walk. Auxiliary connector walks to other areas of the park may be provided in the future and are not part of this project. Proposed access walks, meeting City of South Bend design standards, will connect the Labyrinth Garden from the adjacent edge of Park Lane and lead directly to the new garden and will also be planted with lavender edging and trees. Benches matching the current style and materials of adjacent parks will be provided, as well as an interpretive educational sign/marker. Waiting on confirmation of tree removal from City Forester, Brent Thompson. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES Leeper Park Standards and Criteria Landscapes: 9.1 Introduction 3. The standards and criteria acknowledge that there will be changes to the landscape and are intended to make the changes sensitive to the historic character of the landscape. 5. Since it is not possible to provide one general guideline, the following factors that will be considered in determining whether a later addition(s) can, or should, be removed include: a) Compatibility with the original property's integrity in scale, materials and character. b) Historic association with the property. c) Quality in design and execution of the addition/alteration. d) Functional usefulness. Labyrinth: 9.4 Vegetation 3 Alteration of existing or addition of new vegetation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9. Maintenance of, removal of, and additions of vegetation materials and features should consider maintaining existing or intended vistas and spaces, screening instructions, creating new spaces where appropriate and maintaining defined areas of shade and sun. Walk: 9.5 Circulation 4. When replacement of circulation layouts is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. Benches: 9.7 Furnishings and Objects 4. Alteration of existing or addition of new furnishings and objects will be considered if the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 8. New furnishings and objects should be designed using vandal resistant standards. 9. Location of signs shall be guided by a master plan. 10. Signs shall conform to a simple sign system. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Kesler's 1915 plan shows a garden in this location, and Leeper Park drawings through 1998 confirm a round formal garden continued to exist here. As the proposed labyrinth will to some extent replace an original feature of the park, staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director rd Commissioner Gordon moved to amend the application to specify that DAR memorial tree is not to be removed as part of this project. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 - 0 COA#2017-0213B Amended. Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2017-0213B Approved as amended. 4. 620 West Washington COA#2017-0214A Local Landmark Representation by Kevin Jakiel, 2651 Bogey Boulevard, Chesterton, IN Steve Bognar, 19079 Strawberry Hill Rd., South Bend STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 14, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0214A Property Location: 620 West Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Richardsonian Romanesque/1889/Tippecanoe Place/Henry Ives Cobb, Architect Property Owner: Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark; West Washington Street National Register District; National Historic Landmark designated by the National Park Service (only NHL in St. Joseph County and of only 42 in Indiana) Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This four-story house with an irregular plan has a 12/12 red tile covered central hip roof with numerous intersecting hips, towers, and gables, and a simple eave line with copper gutters. The exterior walls and foundations are rough stone, with limestone window and door trim. The house has large bay windows on the north fagade, a four-story tower at the northeast corner, projecting turret with conical roof at the southeast corner, a steep gable on the port- cochere at the west end, and six stone chimneys with simple banding and cut stone caps. Most windows are one -over -one wood double -hung; there are also windows with double transoms, as well as a few Gothic windows. Generally, windows are deeply recessed and feature stone lintels and sills. At the west end of the house, colonnettes flank six windows with double transoms on the fourth floor, while first story windows are set in rounded heavy stone arches with colonettes. The front entry porch is enclosed by round stone arches supported by clusters of Romanesque columns. The porte-cochere has intersecting gables and large arched openings. The rear veranda stretches around the south and east, featuring short Romanesque columns with a variety of capitals. Doors are wood. ALTERATIONS: COA 1979-1107 to convert house into a restaurant through exterior changes listed in Appendix I (including #10: enclosing rear garden veranda) was denied. COA 1979-1217 addressed concerns discussed on previous COA to convert house into a restaurant; it was conditionally approved pending treatment of the porte-cochere. COA 1980-0219, upon review for the third time, approved conversion of the house into a restaurant and enclosure of the porte-cochere doorway openings with nonfunctional paneled wood doors. COA 1980-0317 approved construction of a stone sign south of the Washington Street entrance. COA 1980-0903 approved construction of a wooden fence to enclose area south of building to install a freezer. COA 1982-0524 approved repair of roof. COA 1988-0721 approved in-kind replacement of front steps and repair of north garden wall. Previously approved COA 1980-0219 enclosed rear veranda with 6- and 3- light casement and fixed wood windows have been replaced with new vinyl windows as proposed in this application without COA approval, in violation of Ordinance Section 21-10(j) (10). APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replace windows with in kind -wood against the columns and top and bottom of the granite, as well as in-between supports. Encase enclosed energy efficient vinyl framed window with wood molding completely covering the edges and center piece of the windows with no exposed vinyl. Idea is to mirror the look of the upstairs windows of the house. The upstairs windows are window over window, while the non -historic windows on the sun porch were made to look like 6 pane window panels. In reality, they were a sheet of glass with strips of wood attached to give the appearance. (one of the photos shows the inconsistency in the appearance). The look will reflect the overall appearance of the historic structure. Material used: American Craftsman white vinyl window with nailing flange. Solid Wood Frame to cover all vinyl, see attached photograph of frame." DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: History: October 6, 2016: Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday investigated report of windows being replaced at Tippecanoe Place. (see attached report). October 7, 2016: HPC President acting as Inspector Tim Klusczinski and intern Millie Latak initiated a follow-up visit to verify the new window installation, observing the work in process. President Klusczinski spoke with the manager at Tippecanoe Place and a contractor on the job confirming the scope of the project and lack of permits. President Klusczinski documented the discarded windows, inspected the remaining original windows (not yet removed), and condition of sills; pointed out failure to apply for COA or Building Permit, and non-compliance of vinyl windows with standards and guidelines. (see attached report). Written request to Building Commissioner to issue a Cease and Desist order. (see attached letter). October 12, 2016: HPC staff meeting and conference call with Todd Zeiger of Indiana Landmarks regarding recent vinyl window installation. Indiana Landmarks holds a fagade easement on Tippecanoe Place. It was determined that the removed windows are circa -1980. President Klusczinski drafted a letter of notification of violation of Group B Standards for property owner. (see attached letter). October 18, 2016: Indiana Landmarks notified property owner of violation of their Historic Preservation Easement. (see attached letter). October 19, 2016: Building Department issues Cease and Desist Letter. (see attached letter). January 26, 2017: Building Department issues Ordinance Violation Citation. (see attached) Project: Existing 6- and 3 -light casement and fixed wood windows were removed from previously approved enclosed porch on back side of property. These windows were approved as part of COA 1980-0219 to (Appendix I, item 10): "The rear garden veranda will be enclosed with three casement windows per bay, with heavy wood frames designed to fit around the columns." Windows have been replaced with Andersen American Craftsman 70 -Series Pro vinyl double -hung 1/1 replacement windows. Window openings have been reduced in size and the style deviates from what was previously approved. A solid wood frame is proposed to cover all vinyl on the exterior. The wood frame appears similar to a storm window, however, there is no glazing. Wood frame will be attached to vinyl windows by screws and caulked. An opening at the bottom is intended to allow water to escape. Not part of the application, a door with transom above in the rear veranda has been replaced. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On February 17, 2017 at approximately LOAM Director Feasel and I visited the property located at 620 W Washington. There we met with Kevin the manager of the restaurant housed within the structure. We were on site to document the window installation at the rear enclosed porch. We were told that the wood used under the windows above the limestone was pressure treated pine. We were also told that cedar was used in between the windows. The transition pieces between the windows were the same ones that existed with the last window installation but had been stripped and repainted. The new windows appeared to be vinyl replacements. There appeared to be some installation issues. -The original transition pieces were set too far away from the limestone columns and foam sealant was installed to fill the void, in most places at least 1 inch on all sides. -The windows themselves were framed incorrectly as the outsides of the windows are clearly visible with at least % inch of gap between the window and the framework all around -Foam sealant was used around all the new framework in lieu of the proper caulking. The transitions be flexible not brittle after freezing. Wood and limestone expand and contract at different rates and therefore need a pliable transition material. Some original transition material was still present and appeared to be a type of rubberized caulk. -Some new caulking beads were well over V2 inch wide and stood % inch above grade We also noticed a new transom above the new screen door to the porch. The original transom window and framework were left by the dumpster and were photographed. The window was not deteriorated beyond repair. Steve Szaday STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. n b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Siens No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscanine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for replacing windows recommends "using the same sash and pane configuration and other design details. If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible when replacing windows deteriorated beyond repair, then a compatible substitute material may be considered." Staff believes that the approved COA 1980-0219 windows satisfied the Secretary of the Interior's Standards as they were of wood construction and were designed to resemble the pattern and repetition exemplified in the existing windows with transoms on east facade and double transoms on west facade. As the new windows do not retain the same sash and pane configuration that was previously approved by the Commission, are a change of material from wood to vinyl, alters the style and original form in a way that detracts from the character of the landmark, and replaced existing windows that were not demonstrably deteriorated beyond repair, staff recommends denial. Staff recommends that if the applicants reapply for a COA with another option, the Commission request to the Building Department a hold on the Ordinance Violation Citation. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Letter by owner Kristi Matteoni, read. Explained owners' intent was to maintain the integrity of the building, not to jump the process. Discussed previous maintenance on the property, and openness to exploring window solution for the project suggested by Indiana Landmarks. Ayoka Paek, Building Department, 125 S. Lafayette: responded to question about Building Department regulations regarding installation of wood storms over vinyl windows, deferring to the Building Commissioner or Jim Markle as the person better suited to questions involving structures and commercial building code, as her position involves zoning issues. Public Comment: Jack Smith, 220 South William Street, gave an impassioned plea to do what is right for the building, maintaining its integrity. Don't touch it with vinyl. Paul Worland, 325 West Northshore - taught early that windows are the portal to the soul of the home. Given the importance of this building it is incumbent on the commission to hold the 7 owners to the highest standards in maintaining the property, and restoring the damage that has been caused. Steve Szaday 548 River Avenue — water damage is already evident due to improper installation of vinyl windows. Kevin Jakiel, Tippecanoe Place General Manger — spoke in defense of the owners and how much they care about the property and the great investment they have. Assured the board that the owners want to work with the commission. Letter by Todd Zeiger, Indiana Landmarks, read. Expressed opposition for the COA application to allow installed vinyl windows to remain and be covered with wood frames. Indiana Landmarks holds an exterior and interior easement on the property; this work was performed without required approval. No request for approval of this project has been received by Indiana Landmarks before or since project commenced. Addressed concerns about change of materials, quality and longevity of window installation, and door replacement at west end. Recommended alternative window solution. Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Anderson (Aye) — All the reasons stated before, not appropriate treatment for local and national landmark building. Commissioner Gelfman (Aye) — Materials not appropriate for the particular landmark and need to be addressed properly. Commissioner Voll (Aye) — Many reasons: improper materials, improper procedure, no building permit, could have saved money by coming to the Commission first. Out of line for this particular property. Sets a bad precedent. Commissioner Klusczinski (Aye) — This is a high-profile landmark, one of 2500 National Historic Landmarks in the United States; it is the only National Historic Landmark in St. Joseph County. No permits or COAs were obtained for the work. The installations show structural detriment to the building going forward. The materials and the style of the windows chosen do not support Group B Standards for all landmarks within St. Joseph County. The public sentiment was clearly in favor of denying this application, and I believe firmly that alternative proposals are currently being explored and should play out; allowing this particular application would not let that happen. Commissioner Gordon (Aye) — All the same reasons. The procedure was not followed to get an approval, but even if the material installed would have been brought to a COA, I believe it would have been denied because it does not stay in style with the context of this property. Commissioner Molnar (Present) — unable to make an informed decision due to not being here for the entire public hearing. It does put the Commission in a tight spot when things are brought to us after they have already been done. Vote: 5 — 0 - 1 COA#2017-0214A Denied. III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. January 23, 2017 —Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. Treasurer Molnar circulated draft of a letter to the County Auditor asking for clarification of seeming inconsistencies in budget allocations. President Klusczinski agreed with the letter, and recommended forwarding it to HPC staff for insertion on HPC letterhead; it will be signed by Joseph Molnar, Treasurer for the Historic Preservation Commission. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. Executive Director Feasel highlighted the recently completed 2016 State of the County Report, streamlined from four pages to two. Also, announced the Statewide Preservation Conference will be held in Wabash, Indiana, April 25-28. Several scholarships are available if commissioners would like to apply for them to cover costs, excluding travel. 2. Executive Director — In Packet. 3. Deputy Director — In Packet. 4. Preservation Specialist —Distributed. 5. Legal — none D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President — none. V. OLD BUSINESS — none VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Gelfman moved to adjourn. none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m. Attest: i hele Gelf , Secretary Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Six in favor, 3-Zo- (7 Date 9 Location Budget as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loa 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Office Supplies Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total 19.71 0.00 Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 4,797.52 26,386.48 26,386.48 000 General GovT. General GovT. 84.62 84.62 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 6,261.52 34,438.48 34,438.48 000 General Gov'T. General Gov'T. 84.62 84.62 14800 Fica Contribution 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14810 P.E.R.F. 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 8,051.00 000 General Gov T. General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14840 Group Insurance 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 24,000.00 000 General Gov'T. General GovT. 100.00 100.00 10000 Totals """"""""" """""""":""` 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 11,059.04 98,375.96 98,375.96 89.89 89.89 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 19.71 0.00 280.29 300.00 000 General Gov T. 93.43 100.00 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 36.00 964.00 964.00 000 General GovT. 96.40 96.40 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 225.00 000 General Gov'T. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals """ `"`"""`""`"`" "`:......,...,.:..: 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 19.71 36.00 1,469.29 1,489.00 96.35 97.64 31070 Other Contractual Services 1,500.00 18,890.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 61.14 3,460.00 16,868.86 16,930.00 000 General GovT. 82.73 83.03 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 3.29 50.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 3.29 3.29 46.71 50.00 000 General GovT. 87.65 93.83 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 95.00 000 General Gov T. 100.00 100.00 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 coo General GovT. 100.00 100.00 Financial System 03/01%2017 03: �-y ksobecki Page 41 Location Budget as of 02-28-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original AddVI Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation - Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 000 General Gov T. 100.00 100.00 30000 Totals ...... 1,503.29 20,335.00 0.00 0.00 21,838.29 64.43 3,463.29 18,310.57 18,375.00 83.85 84.14 Location Totals 1,503.29 131,295.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 84.14 14,558.33 118,155.82 118,239.96 88.97 89.04 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 0.00 14,558.33 Financial System 03/01/2017 03=—y ksobecki Page 42 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence =II und: 1000 County General Jloc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Budget Vendor PO Number Vendor Name 137672 031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 138179 000070 Adams Remco INC 138180 001538 South Bend Tribune Saint Joseph County Budget Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 1000.21030.000.0037 01/24/2017 19.71 35 1000.31070.000.0037 02/07/2017 61.14 21 1000.33010.000.0037 02/07/2017 3.29 21 Location Total 84.14 Financial System 03/01/2017 03:25 PM by ksobecki Page 16 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 /0112017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General GovT. Historic Preservation 02/10/2017 02/08/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:720657 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst02/10/2017 02/24/2017 02/21/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:721855 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst02/24/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 26,386.48 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 26,386.48 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 4,797.52 Cash: (4,797.52) 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General GovT. Historic Preservation 02/10/2017 02/08/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:720658 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst02/10/2017 02/24/2017 02/21/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:721856 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst02/24/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 34,438.48 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 34,438.48 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 6,261.52 Cash: (6,261.52) 1000.14800.000.0037 Fica Contribution General GovT. Historic Preservation F.I.CA. Contribution Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 5,500.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 5,500.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General Gov r. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 8,051.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 8,051.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.14840.000.0037 Group Insurance General Gov r. Historic Preservation Group Insurance Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 24,000.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 24,000.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial Systen- 03/01/2017 03 by ksobecki =age 115 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Saint Joseph county Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 L"oc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation 02/09/2017 01/24/2017 PO/Adjustment (42.25) PO:137672 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc ADJUSTMENT Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 300.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 280.29 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 19.71 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General GovT. Historic Preservation 02/09/2017 02/09/2017 Claim/RegDocket 21.00 BK:008 CK:720583 Inv:REIMB GAS Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 964.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.00 Unencumbered: 964.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 36.00 Cash: (36.00) 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 225.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 225.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 02/02/2017 02/02/2017 Claim/RegDocket 260.00 BK:008 CK:720109 Inv:13HR @ 20/HR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 02/07/2017 02/07/2017 PO/AutoPO 61.14 PO:138179 Vend:000070 Adams Remco INC 02/09/2017 02/09/2017 Claim/RegDocket 300.00 BK:008 CK:720583 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 15HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 02/16/2017 02/16/2017 Claim/RegDocket 200.00 BK:008 CK:721423 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 10 HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 02/23/2017 02/23/2017 Claim/RegDocket 360.00 BK:008 CK:721984 Inv: PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 18HRS @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 16,930.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,120.00 Unencumbered: 16,868.86 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 61.14 3,460.00 Cash: (3,460.00) 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General Gov T. Historic Preservation 02/07/2017 02/07/2017 PO/AutoPO 3.29 PO:138180 Vend:001538 South Bend Tribune Financial System 03/01/2017 03:====y ksobecki =age 116 r Financial System 03/01/2017 03:--=y ksobecki =age 117 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 50.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 46.71 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 3.29 3.29 Cash: (3.29) 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General GovT. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 95.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 95.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 900.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 900.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 400.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 400.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 03/01/2017 03:--=y ksobecki =age 117 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total Location Totals Current 0.00 Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 118, 239.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,670.52 Unencumbered: 118,155.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 84.14 14,558.33 Cash: (14,558.33) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,670.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 84.14 14,558.33 Cash: (14,558.33) Financial System 03/01/2017 03:=====y ksobecki image 118 I Location Budget as of 02-28-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 000 General Gov r. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals """"""`""' 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 Location Totals "':""""""""' """ 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 0.00 0.00 Financial Systems 03/02/2017 OJ by ksobecki Page 105 Location Budget as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Fund Totals ......•••••••• Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County Carry Forward Original Addri Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent *•*••••••••••••: 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Financial Systen— 03/02/2017 09— by ksobecki Image 106 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 02/14/2017 02/14/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 88.25 Rec:138448 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 02/14/2017 02/14/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 88.25 Rec:138439 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 02/14/2017 02/14/2017 Rec/Adjustment (88.25) Rec:138439 BK:007 Void AutoReceipt Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 88.25 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 88.25 (88.25) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General Gov T. Historic Preservation 02/14/2017 02/14/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 57.50 Rec:138448 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 02/14/2017 02/14/2017 Rec/AutoRcpt 67.50 Rec:138439 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 02/14/2017 02/14/2017 Rec/Adjustment (67.50) Rec:138439 BK:007 Void AutoReceipt Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 57.50 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 57.50 (57.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 88.25 Balances 0.00 0.00 57.50 Balances 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00 w Financial System 03/DZI20171Q==�Wy ksobecki image 275 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total Location Totals Current Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,000.00 0.00 145.75 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,000.00 0.00 145.75 (145.75) 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 145.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 145.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.75 (145.75) 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 145.75 Financial System 03/02/2017 10:=may ksobecki image 276 i • e Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 02-28-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 02/28/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 145.75 Total 0.00 17,528.81 (17,528.81) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Fund Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 145.75 0.00 17,528.81 (17,528.81) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 4,000.00 4,000.00 17,528.81 0.00 0.00 17,528.81 Financial System 03/02/2017 10:�y ksobecki =age 277 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel —14 February through 6 March 2017 Daily Highlights 02.14 Attend City Cemetery stakeholder meeting. Attend County Department Head meeting. 620 W Washington correspondence. Setting HPC meeting agenda. 02.15 Meeting w/ Tim and Todd re: 620 W Washington, follow up meeting w/ Building Department, working on Staff Report. 813 Park violation report to Building Department, phone call w/ owner. Budget reconciliation. Review Staff Reports. 115 S Lafayette correspondence. 701 Portage correspondence. 323 W Navarre correspondence w/ BD. Working w/ IT re: Payroll in Financial System. 02.16 620 W Washington Staff Report. 1855 Courthouse meeting w/ Bob SJC Building Engineer, Brian Maintenance, and C&S Masonry re: column repair, research, prepare file report. Leeper Park site visit. 917 Leland meeting w/ new owner. Phone call w/ Mic re: Common Council PARC committee citizen appointee. 02.17 620 W Washington site visit w/ Kevin manager, finalize Staff Report. 224 Hammond Place site visit. 813 Park follow up w/ Building Department. 701 Portage correspondence. Mail HPC meeting packets. Begin 2016 State of the County report. 02.20 County Holiday 02.21 1855 Courthouse meeting w/ Brian Maintenance and Ziolkowski Construction re: column repair. Update HPC forms and templates. 310 W Monroe correspondence re: Local Landmark inquiry. Review details of employment reference for former HPC volunteer. 620 W Washington correspondence to schedule meeting w/ owner. Pick up Perley School cornerstone box from Mike V. 02.22 Research Perley School. Budget reconciliation. Continue 2016 State of the County report. 310 W Monroe follow up. Continue updating HPC forms and templates, particularly Local Historic Landmark designation. 02.23 620 W Washington site visit w/ Kristi owner and Kevin manager. Continue updating HPC forms and templates. 02.24 701 Portage meeting w/ Dave DCI. Meeting w/ Lou Sabo re: Perley School cornerstone. 620 W Washington meeting preparation. 1240 W Thomas meeting preparation. 320 W Washington report to Code Enforcement. Treasure Hunt correspondence. Edits to HPEG Grant for Deb. Continue updating HPC forms and templates. 310 W Monroe correspondence re: potential Local Landmark designation. 02.27 Finalize and submit 2016 State of County report. Follow up w/ Pam Meyer DCI re: HPC budget. Treasure Hunt meeting at ND Center for Arts and Culture. Lead meeting re: stakeholder/partnership at Health Department w/ Whitney Griffin. Prepare for and attend HPC meeting. Prepare for and attend Common Council meeting re: 1240 W Thomas Boyd vs HPC appeal of a COA. 02.28 HPC meeting follow up. Common Council meeting follow up. Correspondence w/ Kristin Bien re: Historic Tax Credit. Correspondence w/ Solar fellow re: solar on historic buildings. Building South Bend planning for DTSB First Friday event March 2. Meeting w/ potential developers of Washington -Colfax Apartments re: Local Landmark designation. Meeting w/ Larry Clifford re: Leeper Park Rose Garden COA application. 03.01 1240 W Thomas correspondence w/ South Bend Tribune request for information by Jeff Parrott. Correspondence w/ Tim DCI re: Historic Tax Credit. Correspondence w/ Pam DCI re: scheduling meeting. Correspondence w/ Jack Smith re: Tippecanoe and 1240 W Thomas appeal. Correspondence w/ Commissioner Gelfman re: administrative file organization at HPC. Correspondence w/ Larry Clifford re: NIPSCO grant. 03.02 Meeting w/ Pam DCI re: HPC budget. Meeting w/ Adam ND Architecture Library re: slides, negatives, artifact scanning. Meeting w/ Venues, Parks, and Arts re: Riverfront Trails relating to Leeper Park. 03.03 115 S Lafayette meeting. Meeting w/ Lou Sabo re: partnerships and to update portfolios. Deliver Perley School cornerstone box to SJCPL Greta for digitization. Downtown South Bend First Fridays event for Building South Bend. 03.06 Payroll. Accept COA applications. 813 Park correspondence w/ Building Department. Correspondence w/ State Preservation Office re: Statewide conference scholarships. Meeting w/ owner re: 50106 Bittersweet Trail, follow up w/ Building Department. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 313 Madison 2017-0214B Renewal of COA 2016-0623 to reflect new contractor: Install new architectural asphalt shingle roof, replacing decking as needed, IN KIND. Work is complete. Replace basement windows with new glass block, IN KIND. Work is complete. Interns/Volunteers Who Project George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Phone Calls Who Date/Time Mary M 02.17 Aladean D 02.24 Pam M 02.24 What Solar on historic buildings Regarding Restore Michiana repointing workshop 1240 W Thomas appeal Work performed by HPC for City of South Bend Research Requests Date Who Hours 03.06 Leah, SolSmart Technical Advisor 2.0 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — February 14 — March 6, 2017 Daily Highlights 2/14 RME 2017-0214. COA 2017-0213A and 2017-0213B. Work on materials for commissioners' packets. 2/15 COA 2017-0213A and 2017-02138. Work on materials for commissioners' packets. Cancel demolition workshop. 2/16 Finish COAs. Prepare commissioner's packets. Prepare forms for MMS surveys in county. Finish and mail RME 2017-0213. COA 2017-0216. Refund tickets for demolition workshop. 2/17 MMS surveys in county. 2/21 Posted meeting notices. Updated Restore Michiana website. RME 2017-0221. COA 2017-0221A. 2/22 Grant prospectus for Restore Michiana workshops. 2/23 Attend Redevelopment Commission meeting regarding 701 Portage. Meeting at Tippecanoe Place. Section 106 reviews. Work on grant prospectus. Scan documents for 310 W Monroe. Meet with Todd Zeiger's Historic Preservation students— explain HPC and staff responsibilities, research 701 Portage, make scans and send to students. 2/24 County MMS survey paperwork. 2/27 Submitted prospectus for HPE Grant for Restore Michiana Workshops. County MMS survey paperwork. Update Local Landmarks form. Prepare meeting minutes template. Attend Treasure Hunt meeting. Attend HPC meeting. Attend Common Council meeting— Eric Boyd appeal. 3/1 Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Section 106 reviews. Sent landmark lists to Commissioner Gordon. Worked on minutes from HPC meeting. Attended program at History Museum. 3/2 RME 2017-0302. Prepared and mailed COAs approved at HPC meeting. RME 2017-0302A. Completed first draft of HPC meeting minutes. 3/3 Edited HPC meeting minutes. Wrote and mailed denial letter for Tippecanoe Place. COA 2017-0216, 2017-0221A, 2017-0228, 2017-0301, 2017-0303. Researched 123 E Michigan, New Carlisle. Received approval from Indiana Landmarks to apply for HPE Grant. 3/6 Mailed COA permit 2017-0302. Research landmarks near proposed AEP power line. Complete COA 2017-0228. Worked on COA 2017-0301, 2017-0216., 2017-0303, 2017-0221A. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 1607 E Wayne Street 2017-0214 Tear -off and re -roof in-kind with architectural shingles. 419 La Monte Terrace 2017-0221 Replace approx.. 22' section of concrete sidewalk in back yard damaged by sinkhole. Material and profile to be replaced in-kind. 1137 E. Wayne Street 2017-0302 Remove tree in treelawn that is breaking up sidewalk. 918-920 Leland 2017-0302A Remove and replace aluminum soffit around entire house with vented aluminum soffit. Remove and replace 5" gutter and downspouts, in-kind. Research Requests What Date Who 1033 West Colfax 2/14 New owner 701 Portage 2/23 Notre Dame HP students 123 E. Michigan, New Carlisle 3/3 Dana Groves 20545 Johnson Rd. 3/6 Jacqui Oberlin Landmarks along proposed AEP power line 3/6 Harry Brignac Who Date/Time Ann -1312 LWE 2/14 3:00 Sheila Redding 3/1 3:00 Pam DeCola 3/1 2:00 Charles Sapen 3/1 2:00 Sheila Redding 3/1 2:00 Pam Meyer 3/1 2:00 Jeanne Laurita 3/1 4:00 Brad Miller 3/1 4:00 Charles Farrell 3/3 3:00 Jim Houghton 3/3 2:00 Steven Visser 3/3 2:00 Suzanne Stanis 3/3 2:00 Jennifer Smart 3/3 3:00 Barney Brooks 3/6 4:00 Jacqui Oberlin 3/6 4:00 Phone Calls What Window replacement and porch repair. 541 N. Ironwood Tree that needs to be removed —1137 East Wayne Soffit work on 918-920 Leland 541 N. Ironwood Looking for copy of interlocal agreement between county & city re. HPC 644 Monroe questions & contractor list LaSalle Hotel LWE historic district signs Request to do research next week Bittersweet Trail barn Indiana Humanities Historic Preservation Education Grant application 224 Hammond Ct. 917 Leland, Steve's contact info, scan of survey card 20545 Johnson may be torn down. What can she do? HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT March 20, 2017 Hello Commission! Projects started without COAs/RMEs/Permits: 1344 E Wayne South -Roof (No RME yet miscommunication between owner and contractor -contractor had appointment with staff and failed to show) 918-920 Leland -Soffits and Gutters Updates: 918-920 Leland -Update: RME for Soffits and Gutters 917 Leland -Fire damage. Met with new owner and helped with a plan of necessary RME, COA and building department permits to secure structure and begin repairs Code Hearing: 721 LWE- exterior repairs to roof, windows, and landscaping by August of $500 civil penalty. This is also the owner of the Birdsell. The hearing officer wanted to make the owner aware the property would be next for hearing. Just a final reminder: I will be presenting the hands-on workshop at the State's Preservation Conference, April 2017 in Wabash. The topic will be wood floors. I will be having a Power Point presentation followed by a hands-on repair and use of sanding equipment. The entire event schedule may be viewed at: httns://www.indianalandmarks.ora/tours-events/Dreservine-historic-places-conference Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist