Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
June 2017
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578 Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director MONDAY, JUNE 199 2017-7:00 p.m. -MEETING AGENDA COUNTY -CITY BUILDING, 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING 1. May 15, 2017 B. A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. Location Report 1.2017-0508 1327 East Wayne North East Wayne Street 1. Correspondence 2.2017-0523 812 Golden Riverside Drive 3. Deputy Director 3.2017-0526A .511 West Colfax Local Landmark 5. Legal 4.2017-0524 1067 Riverside Riverside Drive 1. President 5.2017-0601 620 West Washington Local Landmark 6.2017-0602 1240 West Thomas Local Landmark 7.2017-0602A 1240 West Thomas Local Landmark 8.2017-0605 821 Ashland Chapin Park 9.2017-0605A 813 Park Chapin Park 10.2017-0606B 314 West LaSalle Local Landmark 111. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 15, 2017 B. TREASURER REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President 2. Standards and Maintenance Committee V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET June 19, 2017 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME Ie/11pt-4/ s y S LiN %` ,c.✓�.c.S iC �'6 h ►-SSD 912'r7vlAl xloiG � 'ck'J A\A A a i h (A�cess Pra P� For 6a61 Ca/ Io f}u Levi/ ADDRESS 1067 RIkF_kS115rz_ /3P- 5702? 31L $ZZ _a Pkv>cac <; 13�2_ 7 1,�, yh = s� A-1 '9 ti /0 67 �-[clews cD� 1151 C'0 51z &70L -7)t e— 10N e— ,5eo I- f —)r;S 1 Q �7.�� TSF, � 7.1, :;ro VY -50 W, B, F, D H, O Gt/ 0 C ..,j STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 8, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0508 Property Location: 1327 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1941/Mills House Property Owner: Michael & Deborah Fernander Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE Two story, rectangular floor plan, wood frame construction with limestone first story and asbestos shingles on balance of exterior. Side gabled roof with gable returns and simple entablature., The roof is covered with asphalt shingles, 8/8 double hung wood windows with ornamental louvered shutters. On the south of the home, there is a one-story porch wing with flat roof and diamond pattered wood railing. . Porch wing fagade has plain entablature and plain pilasters, enclosed with sliding glass doors and pergola. Attached two car garage is on the south end of the home. ALTERATIONS: The survey card, updated in 1998, notes "major" alterations to this home including: aluminum storm door and windows, enclosed south porch wing, and siding. COA 2002-0522 was approved for the removal of "existing gray asphalt 3 -tab shingles.from roof of home and garage and replacement with light `shake wood brown' color asphalt architectural shingles on roof and garage." COA 2009-0601B approved an 8'x 31' kitchen addition and 7'x 20' covered porch. COA 2013-0620 approved removal and replanting of a maple tree on street lawn. . APPLICATION ITEMS: Fencing along 3 sides of yard. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes installation of 5' wrought iron gate at northeast corner of garage, attached to a 38" high decorative wrought iron fence continuing 23' east to sidewalk, then running between shrubs and sidewalk (1' off sidewalk) north 28'and west 38'; transitioning to a 6' high wood privacy fence running 34' west, terminating at existing 6' high wood fence (existing fence to remain). Fenced area will be closed off between south end of existing wood fence and house with 7' wrought iron gate with two side pieces. Although this plan proposes a fenced area in front of the house, this would be on the Jacob Street side, not East Wayne Street, as the house actually faces Jacob. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although the proposed fence would extend in front of the setback line of the house, the siting of the house on the lot would position this fence near Jacob Street, not East Wayne Street. A similar fence project was approved for 304 Twyckenham with COA 2011-0606. Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director W Application -FOR- Certi ZCate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, iN 46601 http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLI'y»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES '1 ' ' ' I 1 If 1i j1 '. ' f .' S CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 0 0117 Application Number: x017 —U=99 0509 Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) b 13013013 ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ® Local Historic District (Name) C04 tidadpe C1 eet ❑ National Landmark - ❑ National Register District (Name) n Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: „,,.... ..,.,.„....... ... ,.„,,.,,1 11 „,.. , ......... . 1, „, , , . .. (Please Print) l a� Address of Property for proposed work: / 3-2 (Street Number Siree e—City—Zip Code) (e�j } Name of Property Owner(s): W6 one Address of Property Owner(s): /: W M - �/ S e .41! Oc (p lJ umber— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Phone #: Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 5e�,. , (Singl 'gamily—Multi-Fam' ommercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked Description of Proposed Work: J � � Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: 4/L[3 -,t GCS- �(� �dQ,C �•� (Staffwill correspond with only one desi X and/or X Signaure of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— a -, - r- vo CN 10 XJ, 0 Of to flD �fA %)sS. NID tp E 8-2 72 d say Q 7 ` —Z 4; Z4; e "' . - iftaAcK h£'?.2! �'4!► RTH 70' R/VAYNC STREET NO ASpHALT PAVEMENT) r X35.9 Gam��anner �Ganred by .o (-,"L)DOj �F�e Ae(.)j �[� " ( s -ft -Q.61 &�Jf wa�� v4cc TWO _ - moo ov, ^ \ \1 \ i I d �,1C..'I\U\��i�a�l �_j"� vt�t 1 I I t5 �� \vV�•�.y� ��?q'G' 1 M1 \I `U1 I "WR MR, I 1 �,ya Y��t�' � tv!�'}i{D• �, lt(v'i1`'i F •, du I F7 �xa�• Q r Ij Nf. 'v > ' 4 ♦ L{r.4fYY�Y r. ,"�yh4�'ot o i haw ,p i Irp it I f F t4^'v.: a1tc G'-triri.;bl, Al .,r. , Ihyrt.i q 4 s'u'r�'s+y�f -, a.:�5�'i�'n�;' WN AN � � �%SsaN,#q � i rr, f�? '��^as`st+Lx�1�`�iaw'�� ti a�r�/ �t �•y� S AW si,� rt+ ,.j' ,.. rFyt �"� •� 7' �S �,Y it '{`�� 4'"�') 4 6 tis'< rr/p +,' ^Yvi� ✓?�``` `"�'>.s�� ,,.c k;F7Y �t� •'�gm`�Vl � \ I i ,.� � �• ��'• s �` �!'I.. � 1 ;Q � 'a' '� � � � '>- I � 1 .r _:.+....ti.. �It+✓�'R:�� 1, ; : '},. R- �Y �@w �br'�. ,� "y�P,�� .. .�+rn•, � I: IFR va?e �.600 D1 v '� VIII III. m ���F at r't5 r fs7••> o�"�. _-- r� - "� � 7N PIMA, b d I 3" ti ISM quo m���. `t :'t t I ra Y a` P�s••�� 4 F t r`.vs �.. m �D�.. 1 s Ali ?u+�,iz(, J.y,L der nl^5�`X+`�D """���st- � , Q�b`L• d1,jM1 7�N i �p �,J t. ism I � y tt' 1s�4, ��K��,t'• y��•,{r1(��ti ti �i „��' ',]u .�} ��• 1 •.s 4 i 1 I i ,, y r{qt {� t,�ws..j}�•�l jt,�•iy ��-D'�t r ��-�v ��C�t i . I ow V�31•: J II �il 7i l• ,���.. !�{Y�hy1n, I' "�M" a�' 1' � c' I 1 6� � `°�ltiat7 ..•tilt'` i c { s�'�aa. � tX ' ��:``. GP'ej«� `Mwx 's ,�ti s•+, \ 4t1 q -Sf j t r .,z '''`'yV,j - .r ,�L;�, . s�y�/, 4ii7af.�. I �p� '} �•s u i� air �.! ,7.E l a !� ::.. �•' !� F t> � `�k�. �� —. , �FSi?�. t ��� i r�. 0.. Ilk�—r�#`+sy"'�-���,7r��►+]'yFfr�i� t'`attsi�� i46Wo AX ,.:rarY�t�+'i� � �41`�`/1'x! 4 Tr 7.. ..2 iw,��2��f'�)!ily�R✓list' ,p ss,r I r i, r 9r9�1 .ar�Cbir �aIDv4�{ �+ /J nG r Fw� r •ti��>r ° 1 � V /r/ a a I r , r , •fir/��, f, \ I I{ I � " z 1 J • rl Omni r - r t , r I J I ,t Omni tYe DP 3si61'7F�J t. '-'?d A d °. , 4N X,. A�fF�l 1Qr M° tsMa� %.4" i att»y��Icc"° :P., Y,r,�°'7� � C�Ly�• 4 � .ty d,,����. a ! I 1 1w0 r 1 Na t+ 1'i a L�j+.iJ''r.''w�,PA e61�t�yy fy� \CXvk{1M1�2 •' 4flk Vr,i �l pw�� , �Qv�'Yq �r li•"i��I4e�;��- � c . .. V'"t i li j '� {�.�'(� !.�n 4`.d�'! rjY'a wq�� V" q f + : I➢r<a im I r, WTI m �IfKIDi�H.�'G'.tyvl M Qq, , ;, � 4 ,'?11 V� � V Q ( (' ,, � `"1! � . �`��^,�j'' r y. Ar 111 �}lik�Yt� di,'},t21� .............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 23, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0523 Property Location: 812 Golden Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911 Property Owner: Tim & Leticia Morris Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD, ordinance 47469-85 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 story frame house has a square plan and is set upon a concrete block foundation. It has a high hip roof with a gable projection on the main fagade and it is covered, in asphalt shingles. The walls are aluminum sided. Some of the upper floor windows and the front fagade windows appear to be original 1/1 wood double -hung. All the windows have aluminum storms. There is an open porch with concrete block pillars and piers with wood Doric columns. The front door appears to be original. The house is situated on a very small wedge-shaped lot with a narrow front and side yard; the garage completely dominates the'rear yard. ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided and all windows have aluminum storms. The steel security door at the rear of the house is a replacement. The garage appears to be original. The storm door is not original. The south kitchen window has been reduced in size and replaced with a modern vinyl replacement window (1985). A south basement window has been replaced with a vinyl replacement window and the other south side basement window has a deteriorating aluminum storm and wood window. A window at the rear of the house has been removed and/or covered with aluminum siding (1985). The roof was replaced with COA 2007-0316. COA 2010-0802A for vinyl replacement windows was denied with the exception of the front third floor window, as it was determined by the Preservation Specialist that existing windows could be repaired and/or rehabilitated. COA 2016-1019 approved tear down of existing garage, and conditional approval of installation of a new wood deck and French doors (replacing windows) at back side of house; removal and replacement of existing wood windows was denied. COA 2016-1205 and 2017-0103 for removal and replacement of existing wood windows were denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace existing stone retaining wall in front yard with landscape blocks; add landscaping plants, and plant flowering dogwood (Cornus florida). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Owner has removed stone retaining wall in front of property, and installed dry -laid landscape block retaining walls along sidewalks. New plants, shrubs, and a flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida) have been planted in the yard. This goal of this project was to improve soil retention, as well as the overall appearance of the property. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Riverside Drive Local Historic District I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's. historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they.can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the new retaining wall and landscaping will prevent erosion, does not detract from the appearance of the property, and is similar to other retaining walls in the Riverside Drive historic district, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director W Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCIIPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY-- DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: %OLLI 2-'3• Zel —7 Past Reviews: ' YES (Date ojLast Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Application'Number: c� 11 — (=)S 23 131 3017 ❑ NO Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: 13ln.-rl�2 ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) Y2,lUe v -5)(A(,- National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) El Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: ... _ ..,,...... .... ........ ....... .,..,.., ,.......,,,,�._ ...,.... „,� (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: t� CSTOL -D �C U SOUT L IS�C1S'� ( � (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) LUOLO �0 Fame of Property Owner(s): t ��T� C-1 A S U( Z? \ S Phone #: S --t:> G tZ3 8 Address of Property Owner(s): 813 NoldpA Appip, SOuth Bolid (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Owl)ev Phone #: Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name—Cit)--Zip Code) Current Use of Building: Sin_ le �amil Aingle Fami¢y—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial-1 Type of Building Construction: WOOd CffQtAP. (YVood Frame Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) tt _Q Description of Proposed Work: min _o , iA. V)A 66e(dain'iill ffoA.om blook, add lands;r!anr�lr� rilnnfg. Qnd nlnn�o��le/�vt3 doa�.ar, �C'n/ r . 1. owner/Contractor Fax e-mail: eta, ff will 96,lrrespond with ly one des' ee X ,Q and/or X Si ure of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATI N REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— '1A m 47S, ... . . .... . It r Al ... . . .... . 1 P r'1 i/ I 'fig -I 'It 1 � `t �Rlf (� � � r ] • 1 f t . AAA V� 1 \i9S > , '•YI t !. a,. d Gl,y�[(i dy Rih r �4 r'r�. JGI� rN j A Igs;'e�: S•' Z�l`Y+�}; TI W01 FM1 <l1 +4 CH11�L11 rf 'FIp., 1 tit ri: k.'rSt:y�.!!1N.PG�xlt'.S � S!a>'�ar Yo 41 rr`rr�r, � } t �rVr rr tS,fY rf5 � �/IL l r Ira n.r.—� `ti P• °� � / 5. r a s t r�`lrlr,Y, . I • > 1 rf r1 } rt r r I �h � ri! r,( , r3rjl d,�l •� itrr � .Tr r,`��ry�#rt?'yl y'�l r�ti N"�•ae tp'{t�t,. � '� 7-1 1 F +"stjjY jlt r �I IIS�,f{ � V rtr� gyp(WMVit, ! J t1111U �1 ++I�p �ft 11 i�I{ 05/y a t',j�l %;��}Y�ri �"��'/lid;}t,�, �,,,::a . ��• I' ; J ,� ` r � rrll } �•lr ,Yg r � I 1 3 A ',b • I, 1 t' Y �Rl §4 . ,�r'x �tS .r - i •.t, 7�����1 'F ``. X„ ....,�" •. ,. Ery i��� ��: �\` ' ��� a, . MIN -'A IMP., Yf AiRE 9 tit it, .1 'zl IQ� VA, STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A ' CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 26, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0526A Property Location: 511 West Colfax Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1898Birdsell House/Wilson Parker, Archt. Property Owner: Steve Mihaljevic/Anisah Michael Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance #8609-1995/West Washington St. National Register Historic District Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The wood frame house has field stone veneer facade on the first floor, second floor is brick veneer, gable ends of house are Tudor -style half timbers. The foundation is concrete and stone and the half-timbering in the gables. Wood windows are diamond patterned 4/1. Verandah is supported with stone columns with ornate capitals. The porte cochere has a hipped roof. ALTERATIONS: Original roof has been replaced with asphalt shingles. COA 200070316 approved a wrought fence around the property, and a rear yard chain link fence was approved with COA 2001-0129, although neither of these fences were installed. COA 2008-0604A approved reconstruction of chimney. RME 2016-0825A approved repair of five original double hung windows in second story south and third story south. COA 2016-1018 to replace the existing asphalt shingle house roof and metal front porch and porte cochere roofs with standing -seam copper was denied. COA 2016-1128A approved copper standing - seam roofing material to be used on porch and Porte cochere, and alternative (reproduction), synthetic materials for the main roof, subject to commission approval at a later date. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace current shingle roof with combination of faux slate, copper caps, copper gutters, copper valleys, coper caps, copper drip edges. Main roof will consist of faux slate, porte cochere and front porch will be all copper. Additional work that will be occurring: -Repainting of all exterior surfaces (wood) stucco, windows. -Repair of woodwork (in-kind). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This is a reapplication for items approved with conditions on COA 2016-1128A. Owner proposes to install EcoStar Majestic Slate synthetic slate tiles with copper drip edge, copper valley, edge trim and flashings on house roof, and copper standing seam roof material on front porch and porte cochere. Historic photos show the original house roof to be flat clay tile, and the Portage Township Assessor's card lists a tile roof in 1935. The original porch and porte cochere roofs, as well as gutters and accents which still exist, are painted metal; the original house roof was replaced with asphalt shingles. Additionally, the owner proposes to repair all woodwork, and repaint all exterior surfaces: wood, stucco, and windows. These items to be approved as Routine Maintenance Exclusions. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: The current roof material is asphalt shingles on the main house and metal raised -seamed roofing on the front porch and porte-cochere. Several patches and alternative coverings are in place in multiple locations where the asphalt roof has begun to roll up and deteriorate. From the interior of the house water damage is evident on the southeast, northeast, and southwest corners. A large area on the northeast has the most significant damage. The exterior patches and correlating interior damage would suggest that an inspection should take place to identify any necessary roof deck repairs or replacement that should take place prior to installation of any new roofing material. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Si ns No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildina Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the proposed synthetic slate material closely replicates the original flat clay tile roof, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application - FOR - Ceti icate of Appropriateness m o HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION o co of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY syr r1a 125.S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephAn.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT CONn'LETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX««< <OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 'DJ, 117 Application Number: o i7 — 95a1t Past Reviews: ® YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ® Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: II lab/Ile ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (Name) ElTabled❑ Tabled F1Sent To Committee ❑ NO Title: ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: `i • Cr'1Sol 41.-, 12,,A _T/V C4 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s):,,"�-kWe, _t� f `A,V)0 r IC' (!1 C Phone #: s r- Address of Property Owner(s): ( ,� , C P ,X �e � � �)u L4 (a (9 1 6 (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): a h("n R4 Q �( �(' Phone #: Contract Company Name: ()t )C' ('1 C/1 p ()rA� j L Address of Contract Company: Q e 1," n (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Current Use of Building: ��� n cc 0 (Single Family—Multi-Family—Comm$ ercial—C-o-vernment Indztstrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: Aofe, R((r k �. s4u cco (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New gReplacement (not in-kind ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of P posed Work: J) � fAaC _ _ 5:1—a -,tEle f- t -u r �k C-0 "'II IZc�i 7 ' t: t^ LT- rcl- t �(3�'''n�� ,� - ' cf t�'I n rfl�!� iii t,I1 C�ns�S_� tsv4 c,�ia, /� inn�',tsc � _ i1n�1� -CZrVV pn Owner/Contractor Fax e-mail:1���n',I�,�r (Staff will correspo wone designee) X an&gr X Sienature.oi Owt4r, Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Mougin Roofing LLC 9325 North 850 East New Carlisle, IN 46552 (574)993=1396 mouginroofing@gmail.com ESTIMATE ADDRESS Steve Mihaljevic Mag Mile Properties LLC 511 West Colfax South Bend, in. ESTIMATE # 1240 DATE 03/08/2017 RCTIiFtTY .�,, ..'� L?�Y t__RATE .AMfltlt�ti' AGTIVITY QTY. Roofing 1 Proposal #1: Reroof of main house with Ecostar imitation slate *Does not include porch or carriage port -Remove existing roofing thoroughly clean up/haul off/dispose of debris -inspect decking for damage -if decking needs replaced it will be done at a cost of $16 per 10'-1 "x8" -Install proper undedayments -ice and water shield in valleys/on eaves/around penetrations -install #30 roofing felt on remainder -Install copper drip edge on perimeters -2" face/16 oz copper -Install "w" style copper valleys -16 oz. copper -Install Ecostar brand imitation slate shingles -these will be a blend of colors these will be installed with stainless steel, ring- shanked nails -step flashings and counter flashings will be of 16 oz copper as well -new boots will be installed on pipes -install copper hip and ridge caps -maximum stretch out 16" on hip/ridge,a larger size will be additional cost Roofing 1 Alt. #1: Installation of copper eave/gutter detail on main house -Fabricate and install copper eave detail -a box style gutter will extend up from eave approximately 22" (this will leave approx.18" exposed copper from eave to imitation slate) -heavy duty copper/brass straps will be installed to firmly secure gutter -these will be mechanically fastened and soldered -all joints will be properly soldered Total Cost $21,750 RASE AMOUNT - 93,125.00 93,125.00 21,750.00 21,750.00 Roofing 1 16,685.00 16,685.00 Proposal #2: Installation of standing seam copper panel system on porch and carriage port -Remove existing panels thoroughly clean up/haul off/dispose of debris -install synthetic metal roof underlayment -install copper drip edge -install copper valleys -install copper standing seam panels -install copper hip and ridge caps -install copper counter flashing Total cost $16,685 Roofing 1 4,635.00 4,635.00 Proposal #3: Reline built in gutters on porch and carriage port with copper -Fabricate and install tapered copper gutters -fully solder seams Total cost $4,635 .............. ...................... ............. ............ . ............. - ..... ... ............. ........ Mougin Roofing is a family owned company that stands behind TOTAL $1365195.00 their work 1 000/.,we guarantee the best quality workmajiship available. Mougin Roofing LLC requires half down of entire proposal to start this projectwith the remaining balance of each proposal or alternate due upon completion of each proposal or alternate (Proposal #1,#2,#3,Alt #1). Acceptance of this estimate constitutes a binding contract governed by the laws of the State of Indiana. Invoices unpaid after 30 days will be charged Interest at a rate of 1.50% per moth (181% per year). If it becomes necessary to hire legal counsel to enforce this contract, the accepting party agrees to be responsible to pay all costs, including reasonable attorney fees incurred by Mougin Roofing, LLC for the ehforcementtheieof. T N Accepted Date LI 4W Designer Series Slate �.�„ _:�-�i..., fie�llso_ :_: ;.- �,��I�l�u,�l.,l�..w.,ul�u►,I�.i..�,�,ld.�,�ae, r.atl�E Many unique shapes and designs have been seen in slate roofing throughout history. Designer Series Slate tiles allow building owners the opportunity to continue that expression of individuality. EcoStar LLC, the leading manufacturer of premium synthetic steep -slope roofing products, offers three classic shapes as part of the Designer Series Slate collection. Made with the same formulas and offering the same benefits as Majestic Slate— and Empire Slate—, Designer Series Slate offers unlimited creative possibilities. Available Colors: Majestic Slate 11 color palette, Empire Slate 12 color palette, =d a wide range of custom colors. Note: Sample pieces, photographs or color samples may not accurately represent the true color level or variations of color blends that will appear on the roof. Before installation, ten tiles or so should be laid out and reviewed for conformity to desired color level. If color levels are unsatisfactory, advise your dealer before proceeding with installation. Colors and specifications are subject to change without notice. EcoStar is not liable for color variations or shading. Was must be randomly blended for best results limited warranties carry terms and conditions. as/la p 2014 by EcoStar LLC. EcoStar, Empire Slate and Majestic Slate am trademarks of EcoStar LLC. See www.ecostarlle.com for available warranties PIW— AA RP(1_T1£ e'r RCRRTIiM.RT-ATTR r•Trr RLRRIC Beveled Edge Beaver Tail The look of scalloped edges in a hexagonal pattern Chisel Point tiles form a beautiful diamond pattern on makes beveled edge tiles a classic. This rare style g tY The rounded look makes this classic slate tile perfect - for designing unique roof patterns or creating a true carriage house appeal. Available Colors: Majestic Slate 11 color palette, Empire Slate 12 color palette, =d a wide range of custom colors. Note: Sample pieces, photographs or color samples may not accurately represent the true color level or variations of color blends that will appear on the roof. Before installation, ten tiles or so should be laid out and reviewed for conformity to desired color level. If color levels are unsatisfactory, advise your dealer before proceeding with installation. Colors and specifications are subject to change without notice. EcoStar is not liable for color variations or shading. Was must be randomly blended for best results limited warranties carry terms and conditions. as/la p 2014 by EcoStar LLC. EcoStar, Empire Slate and Majestic Slate am trademarks of EcoStar LLC. See www.ecostarlle.com for available warranties PIW— AA RP(1_T1£ e'r RCRRTIiM.RT-ATTR r•Trr RLRRIC Beveled Edge Chisel Point The look of scalloped edges in a hexagonal pattern Chisel Point tiles form a beautiful diamond pattern on makes beveled edge tiles a classic. This rare style g tY the roof, reminiscent of European roof designs. can be intermixed with traditional slate tiles or used ....�., separately for historical applications: Available Colors: Majestic Slate 11 color palette, Empire Slate 12 color palette, =d a wide range of custom colors. Note: Sample pieces, photographs or color samples may not accurately represent the true color level or variations of color blends that will appear on the roof. Before installation, ten tiles or so should be laid out and reviewed for conformity to desired color level. If color levels are unsatisfactory, advise your dealer before proceeding with installation. Colors and specifications are subject to change without notice. EcoStar is not liable for color variations or shading. Was must be randomly blended for best results limited warranties carry terms and conditions. as/la p 2014 by EcoStar LLC. EcoStar, Empire Slate and Majestic Slate am trademarks of EcoStar LLC. See www.ecostarlle.com for available warranties PIW— AA RP(1_T1£ e'r RCRRTIiM.RT-ATTR r•Trr RLRRIC Chisel Point Chisel Point tiles form a beautiful diamond pattern on the roof, reminiscent of European roof designs. Available Colors: Majestic Slate 11 color palette, Empire Slate 12 color palette, =d a wide range of custom colors. Note: Sample pieces, photographs or color samples may not accurately represent the true color level or variations of color blends that will appear on the roof. Before installation, ten tiles or so should be laid out and reviewed for conformity to desired color level. If color levels are unsatisfactory, advise your dealer before proceeding with installation. Colors and specifications are subject to change without notice. EcoStar is not liable for color variations or shading. Was must be randomly blended for best results limited warranties carry terms and conditions. as/la p 2014 by EcoStar LLC. EcoStar, Empire Slate and Majestic Slate am trademarks of EcoStar LLC. See www.ecostarlle.com for available warranties PIW— AA RP(1_T1£ e'r RCRRTIiM.RT-ATTR r•Trr RLRRIC ��tr. 1;, .,.�rk+r (Mz�r4itJ.'T.ti�xr�•ss�.:� - r ,, r' -. �/�yS .,, ��r { v � r. tr t K nt • ,..^�""".' I i'..q-•,.a.._.+ •.l f rr/ � 'C�.4 ! , /7lY't n.� '1l � '"y �, r�r• /�� r a. t �r 'rr ; I rt .Hi{{��`�ir�i 6•sr`!r 1 '� �'�� 1 � � s Ar�� i 7' 'i: •t?����u'��7 ��'�i11� r e is r� 1J �'�lr { �1f �i ��„ �.+ I • rp ki 11i. �C.i,r � ; fY ���R 'in f r,ii ilf �+I '$� f ,;,p..rc.wxt � � :t � � -r r4 F' f� r�''r t r���('[�'`,.7f1.t� :{ ! x `: 4 �• � i � f !S' irY �yc,r r�f r M i f y� 1'� e trul� t�t 11.2r .�YuyJ. ij+t vJ y!> y r i57;45� rid rl I I 7r r i BlwV'r;� r f 61V ! d � t •w '. II G 'pW :..; •i ti � f x 1 '7r y' �� � • � ��� ' s r� � tier �i �t� l 7,� �l d�il�S '�i �,��1�� n ! � t+{ r I i 3 �,t`�b d� .i 1• 1... r r 'e, `trrq , j rl y j' , pyo 4 ea M n t' i eM, s' TdriIMM, l' 4I{t1 1 VA �y ry tTFaz,., S�If �+ry E•; 4 t t - �• � r}: r Ip�uq�59 .v ...:'�v 'i 4 { I'. ': � J � /"`-..� t , ' `�@1 � • ,r *dor^ �'(�! � i n J ty��i,� q ' ',. 3"J'' � -��I�g ° r.,,r .1 w`"r 1 " a�� d,�! �J,�t/ t+ `�'� I � " `'` ;• tt iii,► {"'` 1 j. �r r � � {� rNr (� }r 'r )� r t � � r s ,3 Jtfy ,; � 7 r� , s.,;' ,. � _ f •1' ,�: it '� 4'r'. 5�! ,N � ,�,. , r ,? � , ,�; r r � . { x • d „141; wr,. e, ♦ :, IPj'{r N7 Mir I{ �r r (+i i� ry .,. v ► yy�: �,. .S 1i,) ..�.' ,� ! rI �' r 4 1 �s ,� lrN����� 1: y. �w $` f i // f ,%' !' I d t x, in •::1. # Y i' t lr r 1 0,r t I r 1 /' r4, 6ga��a:,t 1 t,,, rS �1�,.,P•"v, sA1 o pd'>{ tkln �':: ' r r +r .'S r"7 -:v�j .f•,. ,� a .�j f.` �AI'x.� },,,yt 'r Y � [ nitrj; 1a 1^kVA Sq r 1 f` 1 rr y k, r� f r .;fir �,✓ � ,,t', + K tstir,+'..+$y �,e,� rkfi,r,r4 .w `til Ing ' '.`"+ ki•:��i.i,� Ii ':r� } qO „ • .. :, .r;.; r /v`ssrr� e .; -. y �, - ;~Si : r, t kti . ��AJ, .1' , 1 t r C ', t / r.r 11'l;+t.-., I K . I ., r.�... r ,:. h ,. +�. ;/ N� /�L � �.: fet � ! 4�v'•: Y kk Mu A e t Ay 6t ., 4 li �eurAhi, STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 24, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0524 Property Location: 1067 Riverside Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911 Property Owner: Roman Sysyn Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District, ordinance #7469-85 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a typical square plan, 2 plus stories built in 1907 by real estate developer Frederick Keller of Whitcomb and Keller. The foundation is rusticated concrete block, the first story is clapboard with an enclosed porch; the second floor is wood shingles above a string course. The roof is a high hip roof with three gabled roof dormers, exposed rafter tails, wide overhangs and is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are 1/1 double hung; the porch has horizontal 1/1. There is a bay window on the east side. ALTERATIONS: The porch windows are not original to the house. The roof is a replacement (1986- 0417) and re -roofed over with Art Lock shingles (2007-0705). The porch had a complete tear off and re - roof with asphalt shingles (2007-0705). COA 2009-0826 approved removal of existing chain link fence and installation of new wood fence. COA 2013-0422C approved restoration of wood spindle rail on 3 sides of front porch. COA 2015-0929A approved removal of dying Sugar Maple in front lawn. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install one replacement window. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes installation of new Champion vinyl replacement window in front attic window opening. Currently there is only a triple track aluminum storm window in the opening. The new window will be an interior replacement type, installed behind the existing aluminum storm window, and therefore difficult to see. Existing wood trim will be retained. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: This morning at approximately 9:30 AM, I met with the owner of 1067 Riverside Drive at the property. He has applied to change his attic window (north/front side) from what was there to a vinyl Champion window. The current window is nothing more than an aluminum triple track storm window which will remain in place. There was a wood and glass sash hinged in place that the owner installed himself in 1973. That window was not original but fit in the jamb frame on the inside of the storm window. That sash had finally fallen apart and the owner no longer had possession of it. There was a double hung window there once but that was prior to this owner purchasing the home in 1973. The owner would like to have permission to install a new vinyl double hung window installed inside the existing window framework without any grilles. The house currently has double hung windows without grilles that are covered up by the aluminum storm windows. The new window will also be covered up by the existing storm. The proposed window is an interior replacement type and would be difficult to see after installation. Since the pane that was in place was not available to inspect, I am unable to determine its condition, I am relying upon the owner's account. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT Il. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the new window will be difficult to see when installed behind the existing storm, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director j U.11 a -1 LLFbnco 6:&1 Application -FOR- Certif irate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-josqphJn.us OFFICE USE ONLP>»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX—OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: mail N R017 Application Number: x017 — 0534 Past Reviews: © YES (Date ojLast Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: V NO Title: Local Landmark © Local Historic District (Name) i�II/P15rdP_ National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied Tabled Sent To Committee EJ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: 10to'l 0C o Loh Q�P rind. --1 5 (0 Lo I (.P (Street Number—Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): 44iOrryi- 1(V� 1-i(�1 Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): 10t,-1 \Vet 8(c�:< i`7 i d7U 0\\ k —I -I�� 4(,,(n( G, f , - (Street Number --Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s):(�I� i �lof-1 1.q� 1 CI�OI,L2S Phone #: 6 7'-( r)�3-(oaOO eA Contractor Company Name: 1 a-DOr-N I� �i 1 fl(�f)11�5 Address of Contractor Company: .1 .15 uc)aAeof1 'f-)i6ha_uo J Q �(o (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 11P I (Singl alt, Type of Building Construction: t , 000X 'ti (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) proposed Work: �( In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: ,A� (;+n Q ox\� i i '1 Y1Ni)? 4 Owner/Contractor Fax #-' /7 cA59 -03�e mail: _-�roy�1,�2/J� V X and/or X Signature of Owner Sign` a re of Cln ctor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON VERSE SIDE— All Champion windows feature our quality frame, which provides the maximum glass size so you get the best view out your window without sacrificing strength, performance, or beauty. ............................................ 12 Point Fusion -Welded Frame for greater strength ....... . ......................................... Stainless Steel Constant Force Balance allows for dependable and easy sash operation Pure Vinyl Construction ..................................... for optimum strength and performance— `" no impurities, no alloys Insulated Glass . ............................... using Champion Comfort 3655 Glass/Argon gas enhanced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Safe Composite Lock Locks together sashes for a weather-proof seal while helping protect against intruders N 'N j Elis .......... ......................... Over and Under Interlock at Meeting Rails Helps prevent air leakage al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. Double Hung Tilt In Sashes allows for easy cleaning ............... Maximum Viewing and Light With Champion's trim -line design ............... Heavy DutyTriple Weather Stripping ................. to help prevent air/water infiltration ........ Additional Insulation no metal, with foam enhanced Insulated vinyl frames for higher efficiency DeepPocketSill Less drafts, helps protect against intruders Garetarr OF:C1 Awr.irvq J t Happu Cal -,MOM Doubte-Hung Say S All Champion windows feature our quality frame, which provides the maximum glass size so you get the best view out your window without sacrificing strength, performance, or beauty. ............................................ 12 Point Fusion -Welded Frame for greater strength ....... . ......................................... Stainless Steel Constant Force Balance allows for dependable and easy sash operation Pure Vinyl Construction ..................................... for optimum strength and performance— `" no impurities, no alloys Insulated Glass . ............................... using Champion Comfort 3655 Glass/Argon gas enhanced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lead Safe Composite Lock Locks together sashes for a weather-proof seal while helping protect against intruders N 'N j Elis .......... ......................... Over and Under Interlock at Meeting Rails Helps prevent air leakage al . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................. Double Hung Tilt In Sashes allows for easy cleaning ............... Maximum Viewing and Light With Champion's trim -line design ............... Heavy DutyTriple Weather Stripping ................. to help prevent air/water infiltration ........ Additional Insulation no metal, with foam enhanced Insulated vinyl frames for higher efficiency DeepPocketSill Less drafts, helps protect against intruders Garetarr OF:C1 Awr.irvq J t Happu Cal -,MOM Doubte-Hung Say Comprehensive Credentials • ENERGYSTAO— certified inall 50States. • AAMA —American Architectural Manufacturers Association tests and certifies windows in three areas: air leakage, water leakage, structural strength. ' • NFRC— National Fenestration Rating Council tests overall thermal performance of windows: 1. U-factor—measures how well a window prevents heat from escaping. The lower the U -Factor, the more energy efficient the window. Z Solar Heat Gain- Measures how well a window blocks heat caused by sunlight. The lower the SHGC the cooler your house will be on hot days. 3. Visible LightTransmittance — measures how much light comes through a window. The higher the number, the more visible light is transmitted through the window. • 131313 Torch Award — for ethics and integrity in the marketplace. 7777�4 Champion windows come in a wide range of custom styles to suit your home's needs. Peaturo 2.1.Ite Slider 3�1 � a NNE 3 -Lite Slider with Fixed Center Casement with Fixed Center I � �7NMvt P _ W •---T.. t ks » 'r" '�/," L'r�•t c,,yt rrt .,1i + 'rt S t.4 ray-.t,'r �r✓,� a t' N,F JVi�1 '1 o , t itlr N Ay � F r < 'i`• r, d`.ki ''�`r r�t ��'— tf 1'-u+ + a ra Y> �FYJ� f°y R,y„J{•4J K tF+ '} it � f`+- "t ✓ C � y.+ ✓ J 1pS��,h sett .,,rift hs� t e t f•�=''ui r r } :.9 �,� + },+ J + r tufi',+`�.i'V •f hr 67 iY.5�1 ,.o3.:d f �+1;�+�7�1 rV r,� �1� .r . M v tx`L Jm. ° 'f 1S �2%y t � t J 1 • I r; 1 T I y r: }tl t i5 rr II b �fhllkf��" 4 �II �ti y OSr'"'I �4T K$' { � ''H^S.;Y�,2} �'y 'RY;9" K�q+YW' .•4." y'� ��� � i 'y� 1L} �q> 1� 1�' � "''iM"ti•'d ��"' ' Y x +h1 ixfr�'� } Y �$ ! 1 �' +--"`_^�--yam, r�V1W i M"". y` •. f /.t I• , �.�_t.,,aa r3 G. I "dGt IY F IR', h.�Rai'�`a.n,+ I4 b.y,4,t ,�'6ji�ik YC"1'.' JuSsfY i I +i i9 RNtM t Z 1 VIVO ago � al', Al i •li' O1� T� x YhT�. r��A`';'5����le�n'. tire, a�a.4.}.�k' ,�.Lf..,;. �.,..?.. '�� n--.�4 i. '�...M4 �' d �" Y 4j�,. Tr,?�•i��� rr �ti y I• , �.�_t.,,aa r3 G. I i 1K. a STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0601 Property Location: 620 West Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Richardsonian Romanesque/l 889/Tippecanoe Place/Henry Ives Cobb, Architect Property Owner: Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #6569-1979; West Washington Street National Register District; National Historic Landmark designated by the National Park Service (only NHL in St. Joseph County and of only 42 in Indiana) Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This four-story house with an irregular plan has a 12/12 red tile covered central hip roof with numerous intersecting hips, towers, and gables, and a simple eave line with copper gutters. The exterior walls and foundations are rough stone, with limestone window and door trim. The house has large bay windows on the north fagade, a four-story tower at the northeast corner, projecting turret with conical roof at the southeast corner, a steep gable on the port-cochere at the west end, and six stone chimneys with simple banding and cut stone caps. Most windows are one -over -one wood double -hung; there are also windows with double transoms, as well as a few Gothic windows. Generally, windows are deeply recessed and feature stone lintels and sills. At the west end of the house, colonnettes flank six windows with double transoms on the fourth floor, while first story windows are set in rounded heavy stone arches with colonettes. The front entry porch is enclosed by round stone arches supported by clusters of Romanesque columns. The porte-cochere has intersecting gables and large arched openings. The rear veranda stretches around the south and east, featuring short Romanesque columns with a variety of capitals. Doors are wood. ALTERATIONS: COA 1979-1107 to convert house into a restaurant through exterior changes listed in Appendix I (including #10: enclosing rear garden veranda) was denied. COA 1979-1217 addressed concerns discussed on previous COA to convert house into a restaurant; it was conditionally approved pending treatment of the porte-cochere. COA 1980-0219, upon review for the third time, approved conversion of the house into a restaurant, enclosure of the porte-cochere doorway openings with nonfunctional paneled wood doors, and enclosure of rear veranda with 6- and 3- light casement and fixed wood windows. COA 1980-0317 approved construction of a stone sign south of the Washington Street entrance. COA 1980-0903 approved construction of a wooden fence to enclose area south of building to install a freezer. COA 1982-0524 approved repair of roof. COA 1988-0721 approved in-kind replacement of front steps and repair of north garden wall. Six- and three -light casement and fixed windows enclosing rear veranda have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval, in violation of Ordinance Section 21-100(10). COA 2017-0214A to replace wood windows in rear veranda with vinyl windows encased with wood molding to cover all exposed vinyl was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of a total of 21 windows. Install single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass 1: from The Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC. To restore to the previous 1979 installation per pictures attached. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to historically match. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Due to our seasonal time as well as the cost incurred we are requesting to complete the Southeast side this Fall 2017 and the back -South Side next fall 2018. K & J Building Contractors on our behalf will obtain permits with both City of South Bend and the Historical Commission if needed. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes removal of 21 vinyl windows installed without HPC approval, and installation of single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass windows from The Glass Doctors, for an in-kind replacement of the windows which were first installed when this area was enclosed to provide seating space for the restaurant. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to match existing trim on house. Although the porch was not originally enclosed, the proposed treatment will restore to the previous 1979 installation per pictures attached. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Request has been made to install new windows on the southeast side of the rear porch in Fall 2017, with the balance to be replaced Fall 2018, due to the seasonal time as well as the cost incurred. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other •f descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movini --T'he moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is iecessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscanina 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The vinyl windows currently installed replace wood windows that were not original to the structure. Group B Standards state that change of materials should be consistent with the character and style of the structure. Renovations, Section Cl, state "Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction." As the porch was originally open, but is now used for . dining, enclosure is necessary. The proposed windows will restore to the look of the windows installed in 1979, and will continue to allow dining in the porch area while providing a consistent visual appearance; therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed window installation. Additionally, staff recommends approval of the proposed time schedule, with installation of windows on southeast (most visible) side in Fall 2017, with balance of windows to be installed Fal_ 12018. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director t Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCH?C@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN TRIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: b) 1117 Application Number: 2017 — QUO I Past Reviews: 0 YES (Date ofLas:Review) - Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ® Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark 31 0 13017 ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District(Name) ❑ NO Title: thrk IlLgh4 ► w2p+ Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: .,„, ... .. „... . .. ...,..... ..........,..,. ......... �. „,,. .,.. „.. .,... 11111 6.. (Please Print) Address of Property for proposedwork: 620 W. Washington St. South Bend. IN. 46601 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Phone #:408 238 7971— 574 303-9698 Address of Property Owner(s): 5832 Firestone Ct. San Jose. CA. 95138 (Street Number— Street Name—Cit))—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Jason (A.J) Germano and Kevin Proffitt Contract Company Name: K&J Building Contractors Phone #: 574 532 3978 Address of Contract Company: 52222 Pickwick Ln South Bend. In 46637 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: Commercial (Single Family—Multi-Famil)—Commercial—Government Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: Stone (Wood Frame Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑x In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: Removal of a total of 21 windows. Install 21 single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass 1" from The Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC. To restore to the previous 1979 installation per pictures attached. Exterior trim will be installed and Painted to historically match. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and n ainted using Proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Due to our seasonal time as well as the cost incurred we are requesting to complete the Southeast side this Fall 2017 and the back -South side next fall 2018. K&J Building Contractors on our behalf will obtain Permits with both Citv of South Bend and the Historical Commission if needed. Owner/Contractor Fax #: 408 238 2441 (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X e-mail: kristi0matteonigroun.com angor "X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE-- K&1 Building Contractors 52222 Pickwick Ln South Bend, In 46637 574-532-3978 jasongermano@gmail.com 21 April 2017 Dear Kristi, Per our conversation, here is the bid for work to be performed at Tippecanoe Place by K&J Building Contractors,LLC. 1. Removal of a total of 21 windows and any necessary exterior trim in Sunroom. 2. Glass panes for the windows will be provided by The Glass Doctor. Their numbers have already been provided to you, but will be included in this bid, plus $20 a window if muttons are installed. 3. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to historically match,as closely as possible, pictures provided to KU by Tippecanoe place. 4. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed, and painted as necessary. 5. Included in this bid is the cost of permits, both City of South Bend, and the Historical Commission. Totals$5433.54 (Glass Doctor) + 7417.39 (K&J)= 12,850.93 Sincerely, A.J. Germano Rr' 3! ✓''gyp 'c- /�"n%J�ir'!''' �4m `'S'b' d'�,fJ"S 'rz*'9 r'� ` ✓' ' /� t` ?f MR, go\'� � �V/r7� •�/i9m ct+ t y Iw ly�i�' .a,�Cy - n7C ,� �i _,moi .` 1 al�Yt n"\� f ipf f� �% ilfi t Yrs .y! t r , Rem4i�1 \t VVAt1\ Vr �t X,���� �� VA ti \�A 1i iY'�<�/t 0.�� 1' {�?:_ ssy"e� ■( Q t „6h VUa \\�\l. \vp, ye`,,Ils ti L I` 14, 42 .d NX, r INNIRlav,, "A "Cl y � � p � }it 1 V t�.V \ •iJ\ i h�!_ i- ku'� .�i �rM f YtsM L. rc� sl 4 • g HtS r..' k Yn d QC c r y y ,� art;-,��� t • ,, � i ,� �c;�t F 1 � a � � �� � ��t{ Y`rlr� �C j �f ! (Jt{. ' 1 � � �, /}_. ��xya of•,� f� �� •w / r � 6 f t ,i 1 x ,t.7. LK l'a.li✓tis 1 y k �a� P a _ tY�Y l�Nif F\ f4C �i �4 4 • g HtS r..' k Yn d QC c r y y ,� art;-,��� t • ,, � i ,� �c;�t F 1 � a � � �� � ��t{ Y`rlr� �C j �f ! (Jt{. ' 1 � � �, /}_. ��xya of•,� f� �� •w / r � 6 f t ,i 1 x ,t.7. LK l'a.li✓tis 1 y k �a� P a bLb( SMOPV1 M v" ' '-"~,=`'^+^c_r_�� � ��' `~� -`'__~_--,` '-' ._ ti: ---•..s ;„,K�q � � � ie.�j ��,. �' r' t ;?. i aS ,� { k.q,., gyp! j��( ++ �,f ,} 1>r.--� << .�.'} liis+. ".:,fA'=-'y'tt p{i��itfi�. '� ya�?ih�Vnrr,•:^,,, l� � #r, fr ; �1 k�. �. S; r 1 1 J �t� Ii�� �i�l��� ,�� m^,•r,,,.l ,rca it �'�.»r?��xRlArs 'v10 -:r }.+.w.�.w'^"+ p a 4u W b 7 4 z t l i,., ' .�,,.--^' rx j t" b �1 e , �}cpn varYi r * c k r". irr s r!'•I < x»,w ,}i t•'7 ^+�r- ..�.- -hR----------- ow� ° `r s } 1 0 '_ �; s 1. ,� . ���� i � ,�— ,�'-" �r1 � �" � r { tG'rt•� f 1 ( j �� � i Nk '" ` �' t�a5�x+j �,�'„ i%i'�a _ 41��c�i� "��.s' �%`�-S5E �i`"`��z ' •t _;' ` ..��'!� d+a.,aT r rt nr �is+u F '� �� x"-`^ �' ���Fl;'" 7 •. i ,� _,`R E5r r ks.t ^ '�`'� � '� � i r w hSi tJ ��%lI .; E; •,+"._,,r►'%-' �'."'�."..y �� t"•� t 1'Sr �r`', �rr�'� �v'�� in•-, � � � � t�C`! , "�'r ret�,s -`� s '"� /('1j,��o- i:..7 "�U'r !RB",da� riff ..;i .it r 5 r •e R j � 11�� I�'�I�1 `titf�'. .ai o ;., { , r�, )Y .or���j' fi 7�tf�',,.�n,,a :. � �. i,rAr< �•1S'��e�' S, r45. w:t'S.y...., r s,t i+�„{sS sa ' s. �i'” r .:.1t...•S. •, +StJI'.-"' RA i.:b �, fro \ag1��1y,.�y:�; �F �� � r h5�f }, �( lig ' I �l(((���((( fj'� �I. � �jjj���j� � �jl���' (�`• .1C.. r" ,ti,•j`xrr�� .1 '�aT''f i''. � 4�Q'?t 50¢^ t,7 yy • 3 �! G.- 4' 44`�}�}4}' .r � �r prr nr t���r li r�hr n�Niih�Yny �F'.....- 'S raw FRI, ✓ ci1 v errr� ` " \t :'iY ^' �`LLSi'YCiI� •': , K.v :+'Cl �? r=�'�,:4� C,'r'a. 6 :Mc. r ;'� � � ..�. r -- r..N \ �- ,-»'+Lt2 � r r. ^t r+.fi �'t � Y� t� ��w°a _ i t E �t I 'i �i'�::: ✓ Q: +�.�1 I "�s'�✓ t 7 4�•, ,S F t Y l •J � " ':rr, 1 ' � r ``, � ! ps).i.- c+;l• rte+' ,t'��Y�� � (� �(�,ht°� r�:+ .,fir �. �. v :f " i fy ,� ti r < '• :g'.. a 4 , ��. �R44�5r'`ita��� rr'a. ' 7 i • ° r. ✓ �.. ',.7 r�. ,�v il� 11it,i STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 2, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0602 (Application delivered by property owner to Building Department on June 1, 2017) Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric A. Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9037-99 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse #4 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There Js a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl siding. COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part of building, and second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building with vinyl siding and replacement windows was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Two story addition, brown vinyl siding and three windows. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See COA 201670809, pending with Building Department as a Violation of City Ordinance. Not in compliance with the Violation Remedy Requirements as ordered to be completed by March 13, 2017. Owner has constructed a second -floor addition with gable roof atop one-story brick portion at rear of building. It has been partially vinyl sided to match existing brown vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings. Three windows, that appear to be vinyl, have been installed. The proposed work has been installed, without a COA or Building Permit. This is not a free-standing structure; it is attached to the main building. No report of structural inspection has been submitted with this application. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, December 16, 1991, state that "all landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration, and shall be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration of such property from defects or conditions which in the judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of the landmark, structure or property in question." In particular, this property exhibits the following from the itemized (but not exclusive) list of detrimental conditions: b. Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging, splitting, buckling, crumbling, holes, missing shingles or similar conditions; e. The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof and foundations, including broken windows or doors; h. The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe condition or conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After careful review of this application, it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building Department. As in COA 2016-0809, Staff recommends approval of rear second story addition with gable roof. Staff does not recommend the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an incompatible material as reference in C, 2. Staff recommends approval of a wood siding or fiber cement siding to complete the new second story addition. Staff recommends double hung windows, wood or aluminum clad, without rounded tops in the same style as the original windows in the main structure. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Page 1 of 1 Elicia Feasel - Fwd: 1240 Thomas COA Application From: Debra Parcell To: Elicia Feasel Date: 6/6/2017 2:09 PM Subject: Fwd: 1240 Thomas COA Application >>> Ayoka Paek <apaek@southbendin.gov> 6/1/2017 3:47 PM >>> Hello, We accepted a COA application HPC's behalf. Please pick it up as soon as you are able. We have it in our safe, so if either myself or Elizabeth is not here mention that it is in Elizabeth's "safe folder". Warm regards, Ayoka Paek, MCIP Zoning and Business Services Administrator (574)235-9554 apaek@southbend i n.ciov St. Joseph County/City of South Bend Building Department 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, STE 100 South Bend, IN 46601 The information provided in this email is in response to the specific information requested and does not necessarily represent all of the restrictions and allowances applicable to anyproperties identified in this email. file:///C:[Users/EFeasel/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/593 6B799InternalPLEXI SPO 100... 6/6/2017 0 Appi cauon -FOR- t61 0` cawficate, ofApproplateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMNUMON Ds ary ,ofSOUfH FEM & Sr. JOSEPH COIWff 125 S.tdqyeftBlvd, SuWhB=d, IN 46601 http-Jtwww4osepheoii[itykdima.CDM/depmtmmtsWCHPrm&mhtm p: 574-235-9798 E 574-235-9578 e: SBSICHPC@coslrjosq*.!.us OMW VSECMr,>->m>D0N(YrC0MPIM ANY ENTRM CUNTAWWINTIWB0X-C<<<<<0FMCff USE OMY Date Received: Tme 2. 301:7 AppucafiaaNmnbw. 3-017 060) YES WIM-OfLM&'w Rofb n NO staffAmrova numorized by. Tide: rutalit'Prummuflun Conn fuslau Review IDat4- IA VAL 0 %-1 LocdL=dM2* n nNaYionallsndmask 0 Cerfficaft orAppropflatme= nDenied ❑ Tabled n SeetToCon umWee nApproved and issued: (Mm pfino Addrbm of Property for proposed work: -M. r (SYfte f Aimb er-- Sftet K= e— Code) Nphone k g/; q -- 3 40,9- meofFrop erty Owner(s): Elf Address Of prope'ay OMU(S).. (Mreet Number—Sbvef]Vme-Ctty—� Code) Name of Cantmetor(s): 461(c 1-dZ.Wc+ Phone #-. ContractCompuyName: A5;.Vj Address of Cortct 1ptqnpmuy., Current Use of Budding: Type ofBandfag Canstructlanz qo 0, (SWvet Number— Shvef Name--afr—MW Code) p-mgk Family—Muni Family—Co mmvvkd--Government--Indo&kd--Vacmd---eta) Proposed Work n Yu -Mud (more than one box may be checked? Desa#fiouofProposed Work -owner/Contmctor Fax#: t -mail: t�,OVJ A6 andfor. Sigmature,6f0mar z-ofCoirtrador —ATWI Yr-AqMnV JDI?inTTFDVWgVWM AVIV I IM -Mn n-aUVUVDCV Cyn -V Project Title: �� d4 n. s �� r • a , 'o�� `� 6�- ouc e 11.4 ome Description: Date ----------------.................................................................................................................................... ..................... ............................................... ................. ................ ................ '•••ear- !. a '.n .................. V ........................................................................4....................................................... _.._..................................................................:............................................... C .::.:..�.. ........�............---........................................_........................................:...............................---...._..._....................................................._......_............................................ i ......................................................_................ ............................................ ............ ........................ —...:----------------------------- ------- —---------- .----------------------------- —------------------- ...-................ ............................... ..... .............................. ................... ............................................................ .-------- ....... ...... ....................... ........................... _......... ............................................................... ............ .................................... ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Concept: t _ 'e�-.,,•.'>M;�=�'t 1 S I j f-•- --;-'- !�!/'��'. '•.: ;`ti's. E E � � � '=` �� y � °�µ_ ! 1 I_ V� I _ ( I l S � S - • . 7�.-u -�—� r'`"� _ s_ Yi 't I — ! j ! . . E i i �.''• t�_a�,.�,,,"' i$" t i int 1}_ 5?; i (. i i�—r- F 1!.! I lit Iit � a I � . a !say ' ..`T-.;_ "': - � - .. .. fir• - � f I + - ( E'-- i-= I !` I�.__ Y: :1' # i jt k 'a��...i'._..?_-3'`,:a:- + 1 I - - i : i ,#_ . 1 1 i ! i !.. I t ` I _i ! I I !! I I fi i 1 I f I I I I I1 I Action Steps:Date - - - - -- -- -------- ------ ----- -------------------------------- ---- ..... -........................ ........................ ........... ... -'T .................................................................................................................................... ;r r: - t. - 0 2004 PlanAhead A.) Window &,Siding Treatment Application Items Current Window in East and West wall of 2' Story Addition (A) Proposed Window for South Wall of 2' Story Addition (B) LN Proposed Siding for 2' Story Addition (C) C.) Note: All Windows and Siding have been donated. :016 1:27:14 PM 3e $125.00 :1492 $125.00 wsk 497 No. 4999-17$125.00 $125.00 - ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AND CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA September 20, 2016 WHEREAS, BOYD SERVICES having this day paid to the Building Department the sum of One Hundred Twenty Five Dollars. and Zero Cents is hereby REGISTERED to operate in the unincorporated areas of ST. JOSEPH COUNTY and the CITY OF SOUTH BEND, as a Building Contractor THIS REGISTRATION EXPIRES: August 6, 2017 I �-,Building Commissioner Charles C. Buloi'— 1240 W. THOMAS ST. = SOUTH BEND, IN 46601 (812)704-3005 THIS REGISTRATION IS NOT TRANSFERABLE „ .... W,,. .,, ,,,,, 1 s 140, Ing. "r+�1� ,7.� P% a„ �. •y ,d -7 •b ,,.yt �-"��rf'7�9 'y7� y vim• "f'i �-.�L�..�,; '(.,,,;1_'''w _. - _.�.. .. )44 (12 Id a •oi•�•� hxa J. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0809 Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse #4 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded tip prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA or Building Permit on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered vvith plywood or vinyl siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: Roof, window replacement, apply for addition siding vinyl and window replacement is long term. Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons (2 replacement windows have been broken). Color of vinyl siding is brown. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: HPC Staff has worked with the current owner in recent years to support a tax abatement and rezoning petition. Although an RME was issued for a replacement roof in 2011, the details of what was actually installed were not presented at that time. Additionally, the Building Department has provided a statement that indicates the current roof configuration was not approved with a Building Permit and has ordered all work to stop until a formal submission and plan is set for the proposed work. This property was heard at a July 26, 2016 Code Enforcement hearing where a date of January 26, 2017 was given for Code compliance. Owner proposes a 4/12 shed roof be constructed over part of the main building, from the west exterior. wall 30' east to a 10'H wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a 1' overhang at west wall. Second floor addition atop one-stoiy brick portion at rear of building is to be vinyl sided to match existing brown vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings; replacement windows to be used to fill window openings in this addition. Existing windows in building are to be left boarded up for security reasons. Most of this work with the exception of the windows and vinyl in the rear addition have been installed without COA or Building Permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its enviromnent may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform .with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original Nvhen renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildinv Site and Landscavin.R 1. Rewired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden firrniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends rear second story addition with gable roof, however, is not recommending the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an incompatible material as reference in C, 2. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate FOR- Certi icate ofAppropriateness Appropriateness - - a' HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 x 1865 R of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, M 46601 http://www.stj osepheountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/l*ndex.htm p: 574-235-9798 £ 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED 1N THIS BOX«« OFFICE USE ONLY i (� n _ Date Received: -1 1110 Application Number: Vu 10 —A U 9 I Past Reviews: tf ITS (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO e Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: AA,(&A ti hil D dLocal Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Naxre) i ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Nance) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑Tabled ❑Sent To Committee ❑Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: (Street Number= Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): G ' L�� W • 1,5,-Y-2 Phone#: elm— 70 V— Address of Property Owner(s): 1 �� ° l' . t <1a -,,j i�,/. �p,Y/< d,—/_ (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): �F r� ��r� Phone #: 5a i&�e Contract Company Name: 5r� Address of Contract Company: 12-r-10 W, ! Grorv.C,j Vi • �'.Vz (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Farnily—Mzdti-Fantily—Corrirnercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: If,"_ K (Wood Franie Brick--StoneSteel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: 120, LHwi(1/•dtiS lJBGly� +f ELS ��vJ /`'�^t�-JSar.-- C� �+ /`�P �ISG� innvti�pt� �IEGG �e+G", Li NG �� Gal / � 1/sri-'d� S r C-/tn.r /JrOWr` • . Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: e'a+" (Staff will correspond with only o e designee) / X ' c and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— .Aex . I "I t! ;7 tit yo {PI se 7—�f Z t�s �v SIT 1120- ,1 KIT SIT 1120- ,1 I o 4 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY/SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ' 12 5 S. LAFAYETTE BwD. n ti f�i Surrl. I00 f f SOUTH BFND, IN 466or (574) 235-9554 JANIEs D. MARKLE, R.A. Design/Plain Review Specialist August 10, 2016 Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation Ra (574) 235-5541 CHARLIss C. BULO"r AYOKA PAEK, MCP, MCIP BUILDING C01'•IMISSIONER Zoning & I3USinCSS Services Administrator Re: 1240 Thomas, South Bend, IN Dear Elicia: On October 13, 2015, this office issue a Building Permit for Commercial Roofing at the above - referenced address. What was to be a structural repair and reroofing job has now morphed into a partial roof on the main building and a new second story addition on the rear of the building. None of this has been properly permitted. I recently met with the owner and indicated that all work is to stop until this department receives a formal submission and plan set for the proposed work. We will not issue any additional permits until such time that all proposed and current work meets basic building standards. This is a case where our best intentions to help preserve the historic integrity of a local building did not pan out as expected. Sincerely, Charles C. Bulot, C.B.O., C.F.M. Building Commissioner St. Joseph County and City of South Bend Building Department (674) 235-9554 DATE: 10/13/2015 PERMIT NUMBER: BD15005044 ADDRESS: 1240 THOMAS, SE CRN WITH WALNUT, N OF WESTERN AVE. CONTRACTOR: BOYD SERVICES PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT: PARTIAL ROOF Lot No. Add'n. 48 COMMISSIONER`S OF S PT BANK OUTLOT 85 & 86 BOYD. ERIC (812)704-3005 Owner's Name Phone 1207 W Thomas St South Bend, IN 46601 Owner's Present Mailing Address/Email Zoning MU Twp. PORTAGE Multiple Unit Count Valuation $500.00 Height Acreage 0.19 018-3074-2*912 ABZA Date: State No. Front Rear Side Building Permit Fee $30.00 Contractor BOYD SERVICES (812)704-3005 boydmaster455@yahoo.com Electric Permit Fee Contractor Plumbing Permit Fee �- Contractor Heating Permit Fee Contractor Subtotal $ 30.00 Penalty $ Total S 30.00 kwidawsk Signature Charles C. Bulot - Building �mmissioner The person or contractor listed above hereby certifies that the statements contained herein are true and correct and in consideration of the granting of the permit agree to save St. Joseph County and City of South Bend harmless from any and all damages and agree to perform the work covered by this permit in conformity with the laws of the State of Indiana and the Ordinances of St. Joseph County and the City of South Bend, Indiana. I agree to call for an 'inspection approval before any concrete is poured for footings and walls, or any framing, electrical, plumbing, or heating material is covered. I understand that a Final Inspection may be necessary and a Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued prior to occupancy being allowed. I also understand that this is only a Building Permit. Separate permits are to be obtained for any heating, ventilation, air conditioning, electric or plumbing work. Understanding of the laws and rules regarding this permit is certified by applicant's signature above. This permit is valid for two -(2) years from date of issuance, or -as determined by the Building Department. This Placard ,must be posted until project is completed. Failure to comply will result in a citation and fine. - 0.9 A -- ------ - - - -TV 919 N!"'v" y (4c 0 t - Am0 l/ Zeta--- t.;-- -c- Andt. =F ` .. `:Bei[ Tawe •'�-; vl - p � h .s r.- OKI! I 1'i'ti'�•{�i'+ WTV j";"=; -.q -:v xL.. '. �A ��� �� �l r ems' w x`Y ,� is IiJ�+t� / 1 '� �� �� 1 p yJ �J dt,.. �{ (�,s.r South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Timothy S. Klusczinski, President September 27, 2016 Eric Boyd 1240 West Thomas Street South Bend, IN 46601 Dear Mr. Boyd, 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e-mail: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us A Certified Local Government Elicia Feasel, Executive Director The Commissioners, at the regularly scheduled monthly Historic Preservation Commission meeting on September 19, 2016, unanimously denied approval of the items originally listed on COA Applica- tion# 2016-0809: "Roof, window replacement, apply for addition — siding vinyl and window replacement is long term. Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons (2 replacement windows have been broken). Color of vinyl siding is brown". Following is the record from the meeting concerning your project which states the reasons why your application was denied: Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Hertel (AYE): the best course of action in maintaining the historic integrity of the building Commissioner Parker (AYE): due to the architectural character of building, and the lack of other op- tions/quotations Commissioner Anderson (AYE): lack of conforming to architectural integrity of historic building Commissioner Gordon (AYE): not in keeping with the integrity of the landmark status Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE): work is not in keeping with Landmark standards and guidelines, work was performed without prior approval by the HPC and the Building Department, evidence suggests that the new changes are not structurally sound and in compliance with current building code, there is only one quotation obtained by the applicant for in-kind work, and there is insufficient documentation to consider alternative pro- posals at this time. Commissioner Voll (AYE): a tough decision because of all the work the owner has put into it. The build- ing, if it were restored, in that neighborhood, would be a classic piece. That is a difficult option here, but there is hope that there may be ways to achieve that. Commissioner Buccellato (AYE): project does not meet standards and guidelines, in particular that addi- tions to Landmarks should not detract from the original form. This roof, as proposed, will detract from the orig- inal form. Would like to see the building saved, and recommended that if a sloped roof is necessary financially, the owner would come back with a proposal that does not detract from the form of the structure. Commissioner Gelfman (AYE): architectural integrity, lack of other quotes on a flat roof, changing from flat roof to gabled roof, losing the structural integrity of the building as -is historically, and materials being used. COMMISSIONERS Thomas Gordon (Vice President) Mike Voll (Treasurer) Jennifer Parker (Architectural Historian) Elizabeth Hertel (Secretary) Kevin Buccellato Brandon Anderson Michele Gelfinan Joseph Molnar STAFF Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist HISTORIC P RE S ERVATI O ISI COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY EST. 1073 South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e-mail: SBSJCI-IPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Molnar (AYE): echoes Commissioner Voll's statements that this is a tough choice. Suggests checking with Community Investment to see if they have anyprograms that could assist in this project. Nine in favor, none opposed. Vote: 9-0 COA#2016-0809 Denied. Please contact this office with any questions or concerns or for any assistance. Sincerely, Debra Parcell, Deputy Director COMMISSIONERS Thomas Gordon (Vice President) Mike Voll (Treasurer) Jennifer Parker (Architectural Historian) Elizabeth Hertel (Secretary) Kevin Buccellato Brandon Anderson Michele Gelfman Joseph Molnar STAFF Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY EST. 1973 March 2, 2017 Eric A Boyd 1207 W Thomas St South Bend, IN 46601 N Current Owner/Tenant 1240 THOMAS ST, SOUTH BEND, IN 46625 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CITY OF SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Violations of City Ordinance at 1240 Thomas St, South Bend, IN 46625/Third Notice Dear Mr. Boyd, We recognize the effort to reduce violations of the City of South Bend Zoning Ordinance, at your property located at 1240 THOMAS ST, SOUTH BEND, IN 46625, zoned "MU" Mixed Use District. However, the property is still in violation. The above -referenced property has the following violations: 1. The failure to obtain an improvement location permit when one is required by the terms and provisions of this Ordinance, Section 21-1069(2), specifically doing construction remodeling without application for applicable commercial building permits. 2. Failure to comply with any other provisions of this Ordinance, or other applicable federal, state or local law or ordinance, Section 21-10(0(10), specifically the failure to acquire a Certificate of Appropriateness for new construction from the Historic Preservation Commission for a building identified as a South Bend Local Landmark, (Ordinance No. 7591-86) 3. Failure to comply with the terms, provisions or conditions of any other permit required as a prerequisite to the issuance of a improvement location permit, Section 21-1069(8)(C), specifically the failure to comply with the Historic Preservation Commissions decision against the work that has been recently done to the building. VIOLATION REMEDY REQUIREMENTS Immediately remove the additions to the building installed without issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission and EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayette Bvld. I SEIIte 100 1 Sougi Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.95541 f 574.235.5541 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY I CITY OF SOUTH B'E'ND BUILDING DEPARTMENT apply for an inspection by our department to verify the unapproved work has been properly demolished. If these violations exist on or after March 13, 2017 citations will be issued. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Ayoka Paek, MCP, MCIP Zoning and Business Services Administrator cc: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Commission Randy Wilkerson, Code Enforcement EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayette Svld. I Suite 1001 South Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.95541 f 574.235.5541 2 t { II' �, I` ' •� wA��iif1, rtirak t i�it ak r if lrI'mo{ 11 I � •' 1 � ' ! ri� I ,l 17, gll t�' F` Pel14 4jr$4}, � 1 Irl 1 G b.71 5. <at Ff v''J4ia l+ it ! i 1— Vl [+�+x ` ��.y t w at}" ty y 1 1 ' 1 I 'T*! a• I .I , `r I.�r _+�zji�i�ik�`^I � �' ;j;s f I I na,alf I�III Iry -- rty � 1� iL++�" lrC.�� tL .— 1 t 1 �� 5� � � dill �� , I r `•1 j ��� ' + ' �dt r��at+r rs ,y t({ b,l �i I, 1 �'� . rF1�`a1 y Wy ! ,'t t l , a •, jjj{ i "4r� �r�.*h+"�'ytF_,�aYc t I ' 1 ?Y �au�ia,c•'.�. �:i .I'1 1�1,I�r.T __ p .. I ..� �� filth , � � ie� , s ,,: , i, G ,�id»nv �1 . �, tP� "�' .�•. `i ! _.I ��Y:I >* I :r :��.�JII ,._ r � i F- dZ'`.tL ' t »} } � +�Zq�j'..�.:`��`i.�.iG.: k S 1 r�31�'�{ '. �� li �e �, .. '�:) � W �� �S �, • 11 t� �� i �.. � {s ji��f i�llliti� , �r�t � I` i "il[S .aP` ry"' •+ ?�� '� :�' �� � ��.� _ I - — ILII �`;' �� r. �l r ! � i N r l I r p.n ,t i � t!!It � 1�;~I`� - VS, y'�►k` -. ITIS � n //l� r��l� Jl i�,����� � 9�'� aj�f ', '• is � , �. I'r m } i A'P"{ •>�.,•� ,'.; Yt Urni✓ll (y IF rlryd' 1 ?:V •' la �': .t. iry 7 ddt ..li 1 ;.� �.:� ,at `! t.. -{.t• y ,, s:'S i}, � .1 ,.t •2 1!'I 1 :,hr,�s Ii 'i• -`'4 ../ ,}Jkl ,b. , rY •a.ltY t'i` r;�1 , J ,els• 1 'p:�;.,.11. ♦ 't, . d 1 •• I t d 1 5y4t/�%:•Y Ir•� VS! iY t P))7/,: • � �..�; 1. � `{45 1 !.? I f r;/i:. jiJ fYY: � ! % t 7 � I, I l 4 i n } � • ` � ( � I tEY/ whN -I f'�'iFfllfj`7�1In Irl :i '••fi s3Ms,;'Yt•..tl. i'int <1tS !., t I} ,4Y'.L :,S �_:.r. t ,y, ..7 . P v �...`.S':r1Niti' :,,. i;/J7�, ,��,YEr :_ r jjJJ d ,► r Vii. ip',. ,`ti t :, r >•� .:II i".. SCJ r �.., �^ f t . 1, „', -a., 1 � ,' �.. lI[< z 1. , t ` "I_�. ` B:!, `� i.Y 4 a ,..'t c 1 t + �4-.j�p'� � t t'�• r ::.; iC , �- �n , � •�,`•`. �F: pore � 1 � . 14N''' n; s � :7' C µ t ': y7 1 1 t... ! D I L ': 7i. A+ti yl 4 rid :7` ,:f, Ir w, �, ��Ibt I S"� :Sid �/ a.,x ) t1' ,}.e• 1 Sulu uu„?'0.Y I ,�y%(�,, sy k, :,� { �I r'it b�4:.'v .;}, ♦,v Ott. r'Y'.!,�9ts- '�,1.,y7�,'Ft 1{>�tld. I I...}l`r1 f. ,n ,1�f 1.,. 1 'n•:; e�S.t� `i� Ile t, r,. _N 1 f yA#.4,+,.„!., t, �' Y t.i, �. a°. l,f.i h.d r. ,tc,,, .}I✓, 1 �r p+'::I 'et k.t.air” .L �,Y,"4r, fr ., ,7: 1�.",,.,Yi;� %r �.". s..tli �, 'I ':'i. ;.'y�W . , �1 1 F,.r,.1 r..4 ;�f'a.•, ,. hlS Yk• ,� f'1'ry+�'l:' !li'�L. �`` R•S'W ,.;1 ,r J,a� �y� Mc•,�+•, I (i'''[4 � Jhl-. i ),,1� d; .'.I. Q(.3I. �i SPY � �! �+' r �FK�” ��i 7 s�' � ,.7 A4 p ,1�`:,c ! �r. ^�+�uY�rk• r„ . {� �, u,ti � Y �i •�'� � t { ( , � , i � t . � ' ti'1 t �r�A'�.I �.;• a, :i"'i r i r` i . i:wxi 1 ; ,. ,i,1�s. �: �tS;. :� �s }, 1 !`� 6 , a +t i t- ✓ slat , — rp 4 F"'+ � I ai?S,r �;.-.Sz :B,4, :i� �'i': 1• tU: �4�i4 obi 'r. --- -- f+ � J'I ?'I E��';T�?:3 ��S 1C�y�,�i!';:�vii*5�h�'�.. �`I�i{'. 1':�r :.I l�! y ;ir�i' _+:• it ,t 1 ' � Y � 3 s • i '1 �a r ] c, I } ,,• A >;`' �,, ++''6 . ;: , :, r,ll'� •1 1 1, t �,� � �t ., ,.h ; ;.;. . ` L1,,�,: •,1 +!�`V �. `Y;� v -�•f� � yr 4i I :.It,(�,: pp I'!{ .11 �,.5.�7�E5� n s�'tMr_el J tl� dew '�SQ fle^• i •. S'�. Sid \rlf � .fl .�"�' �b� ,2r'? _"lil♦u j�kl1: .r�lt'I �� '�4 i`rll J) .r,},. y,, ,�.ov7!.`F 7t '. ,7 9., ,%,7 �' 7 \ ! d (�'vr'� �..i4�,t,^ t, � '�i �c C" '� '',•� I { .:i,�. . t r � I ':; �. r gip' vf,.;iff',{ deeik.,�. - sk'1'�d 1' �9W,,�n� y � �S :.y d q tiiL ...ilp . 11i{ �I,S. - .d,�,� 11' , 1: ����i iSla :✓�i Fft' '4� Ae�i �', ;,�f•c,�c Y:dK /S�; i �",3S p I Z h ddl:r t �•.� �� � .� ��,�'� �f,.�l ;:III{ I ;i� ..� ,i7�� ?��4r;,�����M r 1A�9��W� �t{ I(cr' 1—.YIN. _ _ _ £.s�� '/ tg; �1I,W .dt4 r' ''�' �p �� II' .i.•..1.� t-::1. i �. rr. a�.r/7�i�,rnt�,� !, w (.�v� ,,t �., r N dSlrl',ill 11 l� N Ljl'lll{ �.._. _.�,, t}��(.. Y� s, S,,,eto,;•1'io"It?,}�. i�+l:ti5.��$FE° "•`•" til l}r 4,�t �I j"r`! 7V.1 al'wl � `�. III,I:: 1�p it Ul lind11 L1{� I�1� i, .';I ;� 3z'��.�e`•It.'t�"'✓37 �F h�Vr,• n:yt 't - kSM, � i y r �+ h r } 1 1„ �; 1 1' S 1 r r "7 34•� '� ti 7 '` �;;. �,, �?��, Sb SU }{„ Ilrw � pkl,l 'f' I'.•� tr'� v /rn ,, �� - E at �v� �,�� .� -. �3 It�ry Id.11 1 i I il. �� I �' a. `ti!' "• - .,,c "'71.,. � '++ti �� ,t..r l� ��E�'�\ ��' ' I ,I i',�I,I �) 1,iliJ �, a �• 'tE; ,� cry ,�'. it S'�+rd ^!1 34}. r\Itt ; ,, �,1 1 ,1 ildilll�l.�l, 111911 � t; `.: i`9i .1 �•ln.,^'!r a���YL,ti. "p' �' µ�' • } I I U� I'� � I � r' 1' ( ��'�� .' �. 914 ° Y''lr i��f �.r h4 �a. r`F'u'Y�s� �.�'^�o r; �' i �• 4�: 11,1 �I ���lillll ���e�j!j�l �} I La��'.�i�N,{i t -.. .' r.. ' ".... 1,.. W�� �l , rr��1' ' � _. � -%f• I' i• I 1 Iqt" ..... y'/h, �Lj�}' n..f�t i _{i I ''•';�. :. -.� t` so I I ��5� �7 YY '.i7'Y �"a li. ,JA'r oaf �\ aP�� �. �r.� i I�111��1 �p}.I :, .'Ii I �j�}r1!'{ rI R �!...,r��1��1 I l �• ►`7+ to �. � ,LFII I � j ml �i pI' I \ I , t �T 1 1 _ t�!/''�I I •� 1 " 1111 i�..,n - � ♦ 1` - � Ont y...1 'Y-+�„V 1 {{,,,,,, N �,���{"���•� i 1[I t I I1 � \ Y-.. x r� >a 7 C a •�� ,'�34v\ �'�aoS''t�;�jr�iL,`�1tY 'fit �t �i'*'• '1n?Ml,i;xFr• ' Ili 11� � I}I ry+il,� — 4m �y�'�rs. ar� .Sit �� �1�'t et 1'lil' � �I t.', } 1 Y ;•z ia�x}N ^fta ��'r,y�.,�: �.- t �Itl�1� �i� ��I;' - d�41 >��C"� i r r� z- n - F t t - 11 , .0.i, e - r, ..c F �, � 's a• ,� r� kY'� �, IPP{� x`drvt5 ,1 ,I} ' ' ,jl #1 �`3r{,� 46u�t'i"ad �r•y , SYI ✓� 4p}t� { h s �;1 r d1 � s`C'a. • � � ' { � 1 tu;3t Y '�5t t,�u'G� 'S 'I .. ..r.a ,,,Y"'JT.. i; --• _ ,'r.�:y u3:":q�:.ri' �{ �t � 1 !E �,�f�a t, ,7 xynb 3 bk�,,'�,rl;;"4 �� I' I:'-,� I• 1 3 s +,'x ikut t}1'yr it r�s,y i 1 �iI 1 ! ID II 4 'I s` 1 If X ll�n�lt glrytdlrA,�, �'hvyg � 1 k •.,� or � qle Jlv I�f1ly n fs.",�y.�"r �� - -.. •;,a rk; }i a f 1� +t kk 4 �n � r �"',Fs•a �' 'vSt I , �X r' x,p n� {�� I�'' it `. tai.:., k��}� 5r��\� ��"�:�ii+•����""b�� �;xi� �S�it't, :.�+, Y,vt �4' v 1�i�• \ r t. � ti' �. � �r'y s� ;'�� �k4r`t 1� t �, t as ✓^ .fit �, •Y a ,� Y •,� aF ,. +r 4� �Y t F e G, At a ya i.. 0 �. .y.:ttti,4• yP STifi�tf, y ri�ILa+b day :. t s,j�t• ,qr\�i" S rc ircitri111;"i' rial 01 `1y>. �,+, ni�� r 'v.� s rea��.�zy'dt'^",'`a,� ,4 _"� i1 �• �q�t,� �9 . � t�ctir� VN .. Tt`c �.?'��?�r �,4.Jv oxo'' zr. i � � � 1! �t«��. ai.•-. �,2F �� a �'��+`r fire, r' +.tet •t ���'� � .y, � �, i ' u N I a� ctC" ui e. a +-n ro >• , n,� r 'Ni ti pVrr'54 N �"" Ftp t ✓ r', alit a $ ✓Aa'. 4'»,F 's V _ ` �+,` "- rr * �' Ar j{ .. t `-'746+b»wtiM..a,.._. r t,,,,,... i t .u;•" k t+.*Y' �k4i _ w rwresMwl4 �Z ■ F i �v �,� + � d �y a� .irR�{69rt .A �:,N���� fix,- s.,+ • ,; �� � "� : -.. 't . ` ,. i - � g , �"r+���,'�� r. a: ♦tet - - ,§a—,�� R R� ^ 'w.. � ��-.', - Z f i f 4Ft.q, x yf }iri r-d.Rz�l.'4, f71 7 ex � +y�i � � tr:f J s• .J •�� 444' si3 _-, • r.j t.. t.� #7 y 4F [+� 4 iet1 .. - {.`r"9` +-,tw�� -tea°�� ��F! � -,a? �y�x°�t��•D,t�eafar�{���gnti�}�f37 _ ,;;sA #;Y4�S "+'fk 15 �a?SIP, - - - �'- _ Vii - '.r ` r F,".';R' z_ �%� "3.r i r f -ti i„t �'S-• + ij F i 4� i��^ Fi° }. AXi -' - '! �3� x � �a °''/y �''t hi '"?x+t+§,�t, s'fy a�5{•+'° t ' ' - b' y� t-'e?'��� At ilii ' � i •.t �* ``� J^ #` I' ,V' F �s# t i Fe Y@iP 'L a. ____ - 7 fey VA vz'— W,1 4 jry'k— ;5s - 7.;a w ,1a' .l to w.. Y.y,.- (».�aR ` `M'IJr , L',y «.t A d ei ���.even 4" r f •), '41 "ow ROT. 1A At "N*N VC Yo PIZk b - ZC� ,•J STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 2, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0602A (Application delivered by property owner to Building Department on June 1, 2017) Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric A. Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9037-99 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse #4 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl siding. COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part of building, and second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building with vinyl siding and replacement windows was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Mono roof 4/12 pitch, rise west to east ending at center of building resting on ledger/East stud wall. Low profile mono roof resting south brick wall and interior brick wall. Open courtyard. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See COA 2016-0809, pending with the Building Department as a Violation of City Ordinance. Not in compliance with the Violation Remedy Requirements as ordered to be completed by March 13, 2017. Owner has constructed a 4/12 single sloping roof surface over part of, roughly one half, of the main -building, from the west exterior wall 30' east to a 10'11 wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a 1' overhang at west wall. Concrete floor of open courtyard is 6-8" lower than adjacent floor. Owner plans to utilize existing floor drain and lower floor height to manage accumulated moisture in the courtyard. This roof has been installed without COA. See report of structural inspection by Siqueira, LLC, submitted with this application. In summary, the inspection reveals inadequate joists spanning 17.5' running east -west at 16" oc, supported at masonry walls; roof level beam sag, exterior walls that lack bracing, trash pile in "courtyard", recommended provisions to dispose of snow and drain rain in "courtyard", multiple deficiencies in the framed mono - sloped roof at North West, and 2x4 joists spanning 10' that are insufficient. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Si ns No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, December 16, 1991, state that "all landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration, and shall be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration of such property from defects or conditions which in the judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of the landmark, structure or property in question." In particular, this property exhibits the following from the itemized (but not exclusive) list of detrimental conditions: b. Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging, splitting, buckling, crumbling, holes, missing shingles or similar conditions; e. The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof and foundations, including broken windows or doors; h. The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe condition or conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After careful review of this application, it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building Department. As in COA 2016-0809, Staff does not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends approval of a flat roof covering the entire main structure. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner and that all work is remanded to the discretion of the Building Department prior to installation. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director 1 0.G 1 Vl 1 Elicia Feasel - Fwd: 1240 Thomas COA Application From: Debra Parcell To: Elicia Feasel Date: 6/6/2017 2:09 PM Subject: Fwd: 1240 Thomas COA Application >>> Ayoka Paek <apaek@southbendin.gov> 6/1/2017 3:47 PM >>> Hello, We accepted a COA application HPC's behalf. Please pick it up as soon as you are able. We have it in our safe, so if either myself or Elizabeth is not here mention that it is in Elizabeth's "safe folder". Warm regards, Ayoka Paek, MCIP Zoning and Business Services Administrator 15741235-9554 aoaekPsouthbendin.aov St. Joseph County/City of South Bend Building Department 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, STE 100 South Bend, IN 46601 The information provided in this email is in response to the specific information requested and does not necessarily represent all of the restrictions and allowances applicable to anyproperties identified in this email. file:IIIC:[Users/EFeasel/AppData/LocallTemp/XPgrpwise/593 6B799InternalPLEXISP0100... 6/6/2017 �a.M ops°',gd A.p -FOR- its, �% Cern cute ofAppropfiateness. HISTORIC PPIESSERYATION COIVIlVIIMON �sss ofSOMM MM & ST. JOSEPH Coufff 125 S. i afayeft Blvd, South Bend, IN 46601 . bttp:1/www4osephwmAymdima c arddgmim=WUCE[P mdex htm p: 574-235-9798 B 374-235 9578 e: SBS7CHPCQa Co.St-joseph is us u.���„���„r.,�,. �.���� n.�... ���.��y�....� �.���.����� u...��..i�. ni1emu. 11.1b,.11 UFFICEi/ 0Mr-I»9i%b0 NOTC(RM=ANYENI=CONTAMUDIlYMSEO%E«<<<0]WLffMEONLY _ Date Reeeived: �� �7 Appliimnai Nnmher. W17 — o b a a A PastReviews: YES (cf�l $,� f ����! ("� NO Staff Approval autiiorimil by: - Historic Prescrvtffi= Commission Review Date:O (AVF P, I q 17,011 ��I�calLandmark LeedBIisWrkDistactjw.4 Natioudlmdmark 0 Naft0vARegisEerDist ictPk.,j CerE'dicate oiApgropriatenes� Dented TATO SentTo Committee Q Approved and issued: (P ease Print) , � Address of for ro used work: 02 �I�''� Property for P P s�!?,lc S• (SrredKmnber—StreetNmne—City—Tap Code) Name ofProperty Owner(s): Vj l I Address ofProperty Owner(s): �% 6 Name of Contractor(s): e t .tc Contract Company Namee Phone#: y -- 360- PreetNumber—SYreetNmne—City—Tip Co*) d4v,fPhone#: Address of Contract Company; . aZ ND r s�r� �.L preetNwnber--- Street N..:..e—Qtj—Zip Code) CurrentIIseofMadbW �a /77 (SingleFmraly�tfirlii-Family—Commercial=Govarnmer�t—Irahrstriab—Yacmr�etGJ . Type oflBmlding Consttnction: oYoodFnww Brick—SMe—SYeel—Con=k-- ther) Proposed Work In Mud ❑ Landscape ❑ New ER Replacement (rot ink ❑ Demofftion (more than one box may be checked) Descripiioa�pf Proceed Work:ntaa q1 t-- if .4AA Owner/Contractor Fax #: a -matt:, 'd,-ZIYK. 4e!'` �-�S� Y4491- . CGtk (SwffwiII cwraTond with only one designee) X % r� and/or, X Sipiat&e,40wner S�gnatnre of Cotttractor ADDS Tr+A9`lf WW DMWkTiiD VrLMVr 9rQ ADL` T TQTCII ALIT DLR7ITDQL` C7ilV I '01 ;7098 unread? - bo ster455 - Yahoo Mail Eric Boyd 9-1.0-]A.pdf 2 oft E_^ic Boyd S • S . 1 s 9' .. ' r 88L i �.• al r OIL e x 908 W,800 Arlf99 Mill Ur 31! UI 797 Job: Eric -Boyd Mark: TI 25 MONO 250600 5 2-'0- 0 0 Scala: 0.115" a 1' - • F:rSa Boyd - 0C f-5 Ira 10-11-13 O 1 � •'{'ISI' a' I':.�':'. �' ^1. �' • • Q 0 AAS', • -.-« rP N J L N 9n1R T V X A 0 w+'e++r1oY+-.e - wu:rsmex 4.tYua++.u:i 88L Job: Brio -Boyd -Mark: T2 2 MONO _230600 5-__2- 0- 0 0.9caIa: 0,119" a 11 https://us-mg5.mail.yaboo.com/neo/launch?.ra 3fdr78gbf Cr. -/r- cc SS Od.q Pb -"C CnF9"1"1 IATaF9119302013 Va,O A30A.023 MApb WaMr0l Por PcOn 8' VC911 tAal E3 AM PnOa i 1 of l - /2014 2:31 ��:�::^"r •:::..:,•.yng...�. ....w+vns?Mrs.,r•.-n?!�cwxe»�mremwar;'+keYr.'.s°m«v�,v,.•.-,mnmM!�'�;e";aa;+'Ram,"�^.�«+q,'. .+p.?'�:°+..':�TC'nRr...�:aF",'l:fi.�+^�'�•R-�mrrZ�esr.-,: s;a... +spy c+-� <ryry:yq•..wR:rc+^�s Kiro,•.•.+`�ky,�,.leMa,,m�o;^:-;�r rY.-.,: u.. -i:: �:,^,�:.,e�.. .. r.. .i .J�± = �. '. .� a. _.a ... i., ,.. ,- ;.. .,6 ... ...} , ,. !iai - •; . ' :r' k „!'#: ,i,i.. A-..:. .. r.. � ' �': ... r::`.9i �,. .. { ... :.. .... :...:.s.. r.. :. ...< .... �;. ter,.. .. :: y °'.�.. ,. e. '. .: ... .. y:�.,� �.. n. , •... . n4.. .. ..,: v:. �., q, .. .. �.. .. �.. �v� .. :.:.�; ... ... ... .�.. . �: ,::r.. .. �... .. y.y ....�. :�. .,�_. .t: •• ..: ..:..�'::'.:. ..i i :' ,' ...'� , ,' r; :. �n: :v � .: i ::� ::. �' - .r l.:'. �-�:�. .. .f ). .. ... SIQUEIRA; L.L.C. November 23, 2016 Re: Eric Boyd, 1240 W. Thomas, South Bend, IN Gentlemen, 1 was asked to do a structural inspection on the building at the above referenced address on November 21, 2016. The inspection was limited to specific issues as stated below. Eric stated that all joists, rafters & beams used were pine — (SPF) #2.1 assumed any studs to be SPF stud grade. 1. Joists spanning 17.5' running east -west at 16" oc, supported at masonry walls. I find these to be inadequate. A 2x4 stud wall should be added north -south, to support joists, limiting joist span to 14'. Assuming a 6' opening, the header should be (2) 2x10. 2. Steel beams at courtyard —south face at 2"d floor level & (2) at west face at north end —(1) at roof level & (1) at 2"d floor level. These are adequate, except that the roof level beam at west face is sagging. Eric intends to build a 2x6 wall (16" oc) under it, which should take care of the problem. (3) studs should be placed under where the east west steel beam meets the north south beam. 3. Courtyard wall bracing. In the absence of a roof and 2"d floor, the exterior walls lack bracing. The north & east walls need to be permanently braced. At the least, (3) beams — each (3) 2x12 across the width should be installed at between 15'-18' above 1St floor. These beams should be placed at Y points along the length of the courtyard. Then, beams running north south should be placed at the end bays, from east west beam to wall at mid courtyard width. The beams should be extended into a 4" pocket into wall. Alternately, a 2x12 ledger — 2' long with (2) %" x 6" bolts, 16" oc min hor, can be used in lieu of the pockets. At the 2x6 stud wall, the beam should bear on the face of (3) 2x6 studs. Also, it is suggested that the trash pile in the courtyard should be removed. It is also noted that without a roof, provisions will have to be made to dispose of snow & drain rain water in the courtyard. 4. Framed mono -sloped roof at North West: A ledger (2) 2x8s should be added to the east stud wall, raised up to be snug under the birdsmouth cut rafters. Hurricane clips should be added - rafter to ledger. 16d nails at 8" oc — ledger to wall top plate and (2)16d nails to each stud below. Note that the 1st 2x8 should be nailed as above & the 2nd 2x8 nailed to the e— 2 rows 16d nails at 12" oc. Add blocking 2' oc at north end bay at rafters to ext. framed wall. Attach wall to masonry at top of existing parapet. S. At the South West end at 1St floor ceiling, the 10x10 timber beam running east west bears on a built up column. The load is calculated at just over 2700 lbs & the built up column should be adequate. 6. Just to the north of the office, 2x4 joists spanning 10' were used. This should be removed and replaced with 2x8 joists at 16" oc. =TEXAS FLORIDA INDIANAy COLORADO 15635 EMBERS DRIVE, MISHAWAKA, IN. 46545 E-MAIL:SVSIQQCOMCAST.NET TEL:734-341-3681 SIQUEIRA, L.L.C. If the above corrections are made as stated, these specific issues will be resolved. Sincerely, i B an V. Siaueira, R.E. �i A m>c. - o -a — �• _�•••.•.^•••.•••�-..••• 4.✓+vi'n"•LdN.'Ta.t.431..e'-'� :'h3�o'Yi"J}4M:3 •��f • ��L �FiLrdv..-s.J TEXAS FLORIDA INDIANA COLORADO 15635 EMBERS DRIVE, MIBHAwAKA, IN. 46545 E-MAIL:SVS1&; CCMCAST.NET TEL:734-341-3881 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0809 Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse 44 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA or Building Permit on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: Roof, window replacement, apply for addition — siding vinyl and window replacement is long term. Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons (2 replacement windows have been broken). Color of vinyl siding is brown. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: HPC Staff has worked with the current owner in recent years to support a tax abatement and rezoning petition. Although an RME was issued for a replacement roof in 2011, the details of what was actually installed were not presented at that time. Additionally, the Building Department has provided a statement that indicates the current roof configuration was not approved with a Building Permit and has ordered all work to stop until a formal submission and plan is set for the proposed work. This property was heard at a July 26, 2016 Code Enforcement hearing where a date of January 26, 2017 was given for Code compliance. Owner proposes a 4/12 shed roof be constructed over part of the main building, from the west exterior wall 30' east to a 10'1-1 wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a P overhang at west wall. Second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building is to be vinyl sided to match existing brown vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings; replacement windows to be used to fill window openings in this addition. Existing windows in building are to be left boarded up for security reasons. Most of this work with the exception of the windows and vinyl in the rear addition have been installed without COA or Building Permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movine The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Sins No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscavina 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden fiirniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends rear second story addition with gable roof, however, is not recommending the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an incompatible material as reference in C, 2. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner. Elicia Feasel Executive Director � �, _• _ _ — _ � - _ � II I � , v I' i10 - if iy� : ,. :zr J, 1 f:�',tf%: �1 y •. -- •�,•}�-_—_ --_ _ __ - ___ is JANIEs D. MARKLE, R.A. Design/Plan Revic%v Specialist August 10, 2016 Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation ST. JOSEPH COUNTYISOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 125 S. LAFAYETTE BLVD. SUITE I00 SOUTH BEND, IN 466oi (574) 235-9554 FAX (574) 235-5541 CHARLES C. BULar AYoI\A PAEK, MCP, MCIP BUILDING C0NIMfSSIONER Zoning & Business Services Administrator Re: 1240 Thomas, South Bend, IN Dear Elicia: On October 13, 2015, this office issue a Building Permit for Commercial Roofing at the above - referenced address. Whitt was to be a structural repair and reroofing job has now morphed into a partial roof on the main building and a new second story addition on the rear of the building. None of this has been properly permitted. I recently met with the owner and indicated that all work is to stop until this department receives a formal submission and plan set for the proposed work. We will not issue any additional permits until such tithe that all proposed and current work meets basic building standards. This is a case where our best intentions to help preserve the historic integrity of a local building did not pan out as expected. Sincerely, Charles C. Belot, C.B.O., C.F.M. Building Commissioner NOTICE OF PERMIT St. Joseph County and City of South Bend Building Department (574) 235-9554 DATE: 10/13/2015 PERMIT NUMBER: BD15005044 ADDRESS: 1240 THOMAS, SE CRN WITH WALNUT, N OF WESTERN AVE. CONTRACTOR: BOYD SERVICES PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT: PARTIAL ROOF Lot No. Add'n. 48 COMMISSIONER'S OF S PT BANK OUTI.OT 85 & 86 BOYD. ERIC (812)704-3005 Owner's Name Phone 1207 W Thomas St South Bend, IN 46601 Owner's Present Mailing Address/Email Zoning MU Twp. PORTAGE Multiple Unit Count Valuation $500.00 Height Acreage 0.49 018-3074-i912 ABZA Date: State No. Front Rear Side Building Permit Fee $30.00 Contractor BQYD SERVICES (812)704-3005 boydmaster455@yahoo.com Electric Permit Fee Contractor Plumbing Permit Fee "- Contractor Heating Permit Fee Contractor Subtotal S 30.00 Penalty $ Total S 30.00 kwidawsk Signature Charles C. Bulot - Building 1�4mmissioner The person or contractor listed above hereby certifies that the statements contained herein are true -and correct and in consideration of the granting of the permit agree to save St. Joseph County and City of South Bend harmless from any and all damages and agree to perform the work covered by this permit in conformity with the laws of the State of Indiana and the Ordinances of St. Joseph County and the City of South Bend, Indiana. I agree to call for an inspection approval before any concrete is poured for footings and walls, or any framing, electrical, plumbing, or heating material is covered. I understand that a Final Inspection may be necessary and a Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued prior to occupancy being allowed. I also understand that this is only a Building Permit. Separate permits are to be obtained for any heating, ventilation, air conditioning, electric or plumbing work. Understanding of the taws and rules regarding this permit is certified by applicant's signature above. This permit is valid for two (2) years from date of issuance, or as determined by the Building Department. This PIacard must be posted until project is completed. Failure to comply will result in a citation and fine. , 5.t X 0 -a 49 49 �JT Cj 11 'eri I .1o, I�e%o Ila /44 j ox 34. al I .1o, I�e%o t p,19 - k 11 i ORAVAR Alto, W,� B" W v B�E�f2C 01 Moto NNW- YWQ, .................. 6-0 Pil 1.1,o. not ver I r��: VI-CLA- South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Timothy S. Klusczinski, President September 27, 2016 Eric Boyd 1240 West Thomas Street South Bend, IN 46601 Dear Mr. Boyd, 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e-mail: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us A Certified Local Government Elicia Feasel, Executive Director The Commissioners, at the regularly scheduled monthly Historic Preservation Commission meeting on September 19, 2016, unanimously denied approval of the items originally listed on COA Applica- tion# 2016-0809: "Roof, window replacement, apply for addition— siding vinyl and window replacement is long term. Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons (2 replacement windows have been broken). Color of vinyl siding is brown". Following is the record from the meeting concerning your project which states the reasons why your application was denied: Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Hertel (AYE): the best course of action in maintaining the historic integrity of the building Commissioner Parker (AYE): due to the architectural character of building, and the lack of other op- tions/quotations Commissioner Anderson (AYE): lack of conforming to architectural integrity of historic building Commissioner Gordon (AYE): not in keeping with the integrity of the landmark status Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE): work is not in keeping with Landmark standards and guidelines, work was performed without prior approval by the HPC and the Building Department, evidence suggests that the new changes are not structurally sound and in compliance with current building code, there is only one quotation obtained by the applicant for in-kind work, and there is insufficient documentation to consider alternative pro- posals at this time. Commissioner Voll (AYE): a tough decision because of all the work the owner hasp tit into it. The build- ing, if it were restored, in that neighborhood, would be a classic piece. That is a difficult option here, but there is hope that there may be ways to achieve that. Commissioner Buccellato (AYE): project does not meet standards and guidelines, in particular that addi- tions to Landmarks should not detract from the original form. This roof, as proposed, will detract from the orig- inal form. Would like to see the building saved, and recommended that if a sloped roof is necessary financially, the owner would come back with a proposal that does not detract from the form of the structure. Commissioner Gelfman (AYE): architectural integrity, lack of other quotes on a flat roof, changing from flat roof to gabled roof, losing the structural integrity of the building as -is historically, and materials being used. COMMISSIONERS Thomas Gordon (Vice President) Mike Voll (Treasurer) Jennifer Parker (Architectural Historian) Elizabeth Hertel (Secretary) Kevin Buccellato Brandon Anderson Michele Gelfman Joseph Molnar STAFF Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY EST. 19]3 South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e-mail: SBSJCFTC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Molnar (AYE): echoes Commissioner Voll's statements that this is a tough choice. Suggests checking with Community Investment to see if they have any programs that could assist in this project. Nine in favor, none opposed. Vote: 9-0 COA42016-0809 Denied. Please contact this office with any questions or concerns or for any assistance. Sincerely, Debra Parcell, Deputy Director COMMISSIONERS Thomas Gordon (Vice President) Mike Voll (Treasurer) Jennifer Parker (Architectural Historian) Elizabeth Hertel (Secretary) Kevin Buccellato Brandon Anderson Michele Gelfinan Joseph Molnar STAFF Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY EST. 1973 March 2, 2017 Eric A Boyd 1207 W Thomas St South Bend, IN 46601 AND Current Owner/Tenant 1240 THOMAS ST, SOUTH BEND, IN 46625 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CITY OF SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 4S°l3TFI g� W 4�ElACE x x. lSG5 Re: Violations of City Ordinance at 1240 Thomas St, South Bend, IN 46625/Third Notice Dear Mr. Boyd, We recognize the effort to reduce violations of the City of South Bend Zoning Ordinance, at your property located at 1240 THOMAS ST, SOUTH BEND, IN 46625, zoned "MU" Mixed Use District. However, the property is still in violation. The above -referenced property has the following violations: 1. The failure to obtain an improvement location permit when one is required by the terms and provisions of this Ordinance, Section 21-100(2), specifically doing construction remodeling without application for applicable commercial building permits. 2. Failure to comply with any other provisions of this Ordinance, or other applicable federal, state or local law or ordinance, Section 21-100(10), specifically the failure to acquire a Certificate of Appropriateness for new construction from the Historic Preservation Commission for a building identified as a South Bend Local Landmark, (Ordinance No. 7591-86) 3. Failure to comply with the terms, provisions or conditions of any other permit required as a prerequisite to the issuance of a improvement location permit, Section 21-100(8)(C), specifically the failure to comply with the Historic Preservation Commissions decision against the work that has been recently done to the building. VIOLATION REMEDY REQUIREMENTS Immediately remove the additions to the building installed without issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission and EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayette Bvld. I Sulte 100 1 Saudi Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.9554 1 f 574.235.5541 ST. JOSEPH COLNTr I carr Or SOUTH BUND BUILDING DEPARTMENT apply for an inspection by our department to verify the unapproved work has been properly demolished. If these violations exist on or after March 13, 2017 citations will be issued. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Ayoka Paek, MCP, MCIP Zoning and Business Services Administrator cc: Elicia Feasel, Historic Preservation Commission Randy Wilkerson, Code Enforcement EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayette Svld. I Suite 1001 South Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.95541 f 574.235.5541 2 lbr ry J[ 1.fjl/ �y ) �$ M 1 ,I M1 d IY (f t;�r 4 1t) l e r� rl r/tre. y/r r i rl I I 1� U 1 ,( IIu111�{1YYY1 IrIT A�J1 _++a1�° //11 ligi :Sll r�gllyjl a Ytisl l,�M1 r1i S� _".1�'a( /l, t / ArsJ/l�iJ r � id 7++ 'SI I 111 t� /'y /11�� 1. i rl r i� rttr Vlh�f -jrf 6'k X { {/rY , +1i w ; tq rt+1 irr i7 IY b �{.r 1sI �I 1, iip�/('�a�9hlr II , , Ir i + 1� � �Y r�Y•�'1�� tsi Y%'t � if i r :.7+/I �/11r //,ff /' � [ `+'! tls 4 1 �n / �'-r.-4 l li t1Yl1 it t7��4�t{h 1��77�1���1 `)i lir �t���E�/i �� flier +hl4Yflft,l�sN'41f�(Nt� 7 +1� l'i/(�+Y��kY/sk�+✓`I r1/,�{�/�1�f/ f���r.a + � „� � .L,O it t tY i g � �k YYI �:tv�4 ��41 ftS%t, i J7 r5 jiu,�7 I 1yl�hts ,�;�+t{rF\+� i/��t�/�61�,irrSllYr�+ ✓i. Y"(.6. yF7I,i �f55 )/ t.,'t{Nara%r i yr tr la t/ j 4' �rllr Ft S t j(��4 ti j 1,,���1\\S) �t��`�\\\ f 2 �ljly rY ����� rr171 tF�7i v /,+�7✓� r/l n �/ ' Spic 1 1 7 S jfY ! / tflP tlii'i/ �s4+s1a/.IS<��pir`// d,I ij tfdp c� rj I 7 �y t t t r I t♦ I t4 1 t t 1 rt Y �Ir r /} * 15`e as ii F r f f r III r>a 7 r !Ir t; ) )`stn 1 /�S q�`; Ir/ r1✓r JT RJ 1�y�rlr e , �,� r r f Ya jA ,1 �Ill�drr��, 7, / tl /✓/i s / r i,, A 1a 4/IV' ft�`r �r �t 'I 1(I /yl �a S{r ,/3 r�Y Y+ sr ltt vrll /rJ r�'tl/!✓>.le� �+� r? !; �. ��ttll� t , I! 77 O`` r�,�Y: 7 A�('�Fr t �� �! io+s d}/;✓ t</ �/ ��pr t�/ •'/ i ���'! 1 � r 9 Y� I k- l (} [� 7 ) %i I Ff l�✓ �/ �" t A I r fNNH�Il[N •J r S iS, / 1I//fJ/ ji Ir 9/h�i4��'/y��t��Pvl///+r�/�1�r�r6t J"/,�iyr ry /�n'4 i Ir : .+h..,..a..v"."r::•';' V �i '4 ) l; ., r l9r' d tl-f I�'r'r/,ti•Igrr/eit �d�k. ifL114�ytfl/IR .1 F�rylfl 6t 1''f Vit ll' }`1 / i./a ✓//�' d•^tr + t aJ" (Y .la r 4 %FrVl f W/f.Gli../Ct a/ 3 Iry i� 1 ✓ f+f 'I !1)4 /r)f t iY /HYh ryS Yp 7 J j:1 lrf n / r 4a✓< bi71 i/F yv �s i� tai`'. r%pd •+/ +.fia .a,✓+� r ♦1 , �,a1 +1.,+ Y(I�+ I0111y1`716aY�1 �1111�l, F�, T4r5�a1 1 "1,f(i ,i/. /// 471f Q(f' /'i'rr� yrk'iS it Y ,Y cQcI�Q �IC G)rl�QL cQuQ �n a IIIttluyu ''vveIl f[QI IIII I I jl`�t t It Ip� nrl r;v def Fo'rn( ��S,r, t fsC �4 a �akrlG 1 r t.4. x'rrt C -"5Y �r t t 1 tt4 ti ry t 7 j � 1 prS rl d a S )r ><Y + 1, Iw u>•7 t l 7-: es my Ni�F'i 1t t1� Y!'� "f�N STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 5, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0605 Property Location: 821 Ashland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1901 Property Owner: Robert & Carlotta Levy Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Historic District, ordinance 49574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story wood frame house with square plan sits upon a brick foundation. The hip roof has asphalt shingles, and a brick chimney offset from the peak with three simple corbel courses. The house front features a full height bay with windows. Windows are wood 1/1 wood double hung with diamond pattern muntins on front facade. A hipped roof garage is at the rear of property. ALTERATIONS: House has had aluminum siding, storm windows and doors added. In 1949 the front porch was removed and a front stoop was added, with a small plastic porch roof over the entrance. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demo garage structure, haul away debris. Pad will remain, possibly for extra parking since very limited street parking. South Bend Code Enforcement affirmed demo. (Stan Molenda) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to tear down garage. Building is composed of several garage structures/additions, some block, some frame, in varying conditions, all of which are to be demolished. The 1932 Portage Township Assessor's card lists a 2 -car (19x19) block garage noted in 1949 as being used as a shop, as well as a 1 car (24x12) wood garage. There is also a note from 1955 listing a 23.5x24 concrete slab car port. Demolition order on garage was affirmed at June 18, 2015 Code Enforcement meeting. Debris will be hauled away, but concrete pad will be retained to provide extra parking. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: June 9, 2017 I had received a call from Derek of Access Properties giving me permission to enter the building last evening. I went first thing this morning and was able to take interior photographs. There are multiple sections to the structure. There is an apartment in there as well. The roof has collapsed in the "breezeway" between the apartment and garage. The roof of the garage itself has two areas that have holes and deterioration. The pads of the garages are in fine condition and could be reused even for just parking. The additions are really where the deterioration is the worst. The makeshift walls are rotted through and the exterior walls are a combination of block and doors. The two strongest walls are those that run north and south and are part of the original garage structure, but the removal of the rear wall and all the additional weight of the newer walls on the original has begun to pull the structure apart. The argument could be made to save the original small garage structure; however, the roof and framework of that roof would still have to be removed and rebuilt as well as the rear wall rebuilt. It may be more effective to tear down and rebuild a solid larger structure that utilizes the entire pad area. The main house is currently used as multi- �m.t apartments (4, I believe by the number of mail boxes) -Ateve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT Application -rOR- �`�' d Certificate of Appropriateness y t m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 , " W a 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osepheountyindiana. com/departments/SJCHP,rindex.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLri»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX/«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: b k mi 201-7Application Number: �� — ✓ �� PastRevievs: ❑ YES (Date oftasrRMv ) NO StaffApproval authorized by: Title: j �ij / I Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: �J tie 1 I Zo ( /� i ❑ Local Landmark [�Aoeal historic District (Name) + ' o, io I " t ❑ National Landmark lational Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued. (Please Print)! Address of Property for proposed work: r r <? x f tI) f,f J � i c`i?f: ;' r fl �y r•'fr d (Street Number— Street Naine—City—Zip Code) 7 ' �e n -T, of Property Owner(s): /1 '°I c'% i f t� (�?i"I/i?t% i 1 r Phone #:" v.. / —= `! [. f, Aces l A Address of Property Owner(s); I s�'C ;_ P, t ,; - 11,r;ai' L. �'<4 / t L'(" l�; ;'"t y', t Ca Z 3 z Lct SCt //•e �� i `flJ. �`F%� (Street Number— Street Name=City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): /l; r'tr; c ,K� r r . i. 7t 6 e:, IS Ld c r, )yzl' �' Phone #: Contract Company Name: 1 U'- - �'. r r_t'rt I Address of Contract Company: ` r' . '�`` 4, 6r, t%L1 &✓ - . I/ii V6 (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (Sin/gale Family—Mzil(i-Family—Commercial—Government—Indztstrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction:t- (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape E]New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) i( Demolition (more than one box may be checked Description of Proposed Work:�'�G.'!Y'G" ���fit'Er I t �' il�L �iC; �' A�!'i ./ `Ll t/ :I f''e D i.0 G;J, // /P.iIiI�ICf i n O/l SS %% ��/ 77J./ t? X � G,' .,OGI /"ll i r]r-i Si hC-P ✓G'/� z/ �i i'YI % fC/i/ . s✓e�f �onr/�,'�,; .� �5:,>tti /�'� Carl,'r�arc�.ytJedN����� i Owner/Contra ax e-mail: (Staff tivill co e and iv th o desi 'eq) X and/or X Signidure f Ow r Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— ��.5?{.N �• � •' J � � •..tl' it ' •.1' . •� `' ai� i;i • Ir I'j, '!, `Y�r�. s�yyr�'rl .� �� �'�! i f,.�,� � 1�. •f j+��'s �'^ � i J,. M1�•"' �� • i:r tx� r. ('", ['lav" ;' s. ' -. ' '•' f �v:,-•rte. •s. +d..'�^'.• p�+j,jd te'j` my ,'-v M1{t It _�j���rtiNl"tt r�. ��' �',y. �"S'•?�,Y nim' �, •�'� <. ,tel • � \ s.. ��,• rIum. jvulll uLiiv Vuuc civ rvnucmcivi a14e0011U0 INTER -OFFICE MEMO TO: Michelle Engel, Hearing Officer u014414ulu II:cJ tudo r.uul/uuo FROM: Randy Wilkerson, Director of Code Enforcement SUBJECT: Results of Hearing - June 18, 2015 The following properties will be brought before you for hearing on June 18, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. in Room 1308, County -City Building, 227 West Jefferson, South Bend, Indiana: ADDRESS CASE NO & TYPE INTERESTED PARTIES 314 N Walnut St 15-199(Repair House/V&S/CE/ David Davis SF2-Single-Family Res. CP) Rebecca Davis Repair order on house is affirmed. Vacate & Seal order is rescinded. All repairs are to be completed by 6/18/15 or a 4500.00 Civil Penalty is imposed. 2213 Hollywood Pl 14-200(Repair House/CE/CP) Tatum Minoz SF2-Single-Family Res. Amro Mortgage Group Repair and continuous enforcement order on house is affirmed. All repairs are to be completed by '6/18/15 or a 41,000.00 Civil Penalty is imposed. 1226 Oakland Ave 15-195(Repair House/Garage/ David M Ellis S F2 -Single- Family Res. CE/CP) Sherrie Ellis US Bank/Broadview TRF I LP Repair and continuous enforcement order on house and garage is affirmed. All repairs are to be completed by 6/18/15 or a 43,000.00 Civil Penalty is imposed. 510 N Walnut St 15-200(Rapair House/Fence/ Steven -D Wall SF2-Single-Family Res. CE/CP) Repair and continuous enforcement order on house and fence is affirmed. All repairs are to be completed by 6/18/15 or a 41,500.00 Civil Penalty is imposed. 1015 Cleveland Ave 14-161(Repair House/Garage/ Ashley A Hertel SF2-Single-Family Res. CE/CP) Repair and continuous enforcement order on house and garage is affirmed. All repairs are to be completed by 6/18/15 or a 41,000.00 Civil Penalty is imposed. 745 Leland Ave 11-160(Repair House/CE/CP) Rozilyn G Gorski SF2-Single-Family Res. (Demo Garage/Wall/CE) Repair and continuous enforcement order on house and demolition order on garage and wall are affirmed. 8:21AshlariId-:Ave 14-085(Repair House/CE/CP) Robert E Levy SF2aMly Res. (Demo Garage/CE/CP) Carlotta E Levy Chase Home Finance LLC Repair and continuous enforcement order on house and demolition order on garage is affirmed. All repairs to the house are to be completed by 6/18/15 or a 44,000.00 Civil Penalty is imposed. 537 Leland Ave 15-191(Demo Shed/V&S/CE/CP) Michael J Dotzler SF2 -Single- Family Res. Washington Mutual Bank iT?'it i�lz i�)��i I)r ,H �'i}��st��'� "�..� 1 I 'f 1 Io w I r �� 11 u i f6 �I"�cs f •y, t o r i 1 r + ( 1 )' SIA � 1•>ji bl 145��I � °:� r,l\ � .��t \ T `j1 UAL +l I,'� X9511 u�r 10" 2a I I � �da ;d„ zlal g �IA 5 .I ,\ f P� i 'S1f7rvx 1 A 1 Ly° j'`1�i{ s5�1 t Y Tl l 'Sr it Asn ''rG�n4� z7r1 .6 .i� t ;kii rjx; 21-lt -.-FA ti oil Al rjx; 21-lt -.-FA ,a Y tirt� C i,W�}}c5r'art6 4. ik�, S ! r .; `L .. �R � i � , \ �d ll SiS�k hCii,.��• i � .. �� � � •- } '4hv.. l+a�3� i•�� orf +>��� a v `rA �� � , { \ L Y• T tit 3i"rhi S ,�i ��� ¢ t t � A AN too zil l IN h4v� U +,1,vN4 t�i \ h�� }�Spp 4 fi�j � j �� t t,�t a� 4�t'• `\ \`i\� \ `\+:� t4 +� ����j 1 �Y �ri• r ?} �'R � 'iy i i }, �� � ASA f. � �, s� Y h,•r, i + w i � Jr y:� iSy' � � ��` t �� � u yy y .i P• i� d: x. �� � .yam _ _ - �, �� � h:' �'� � i STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 5, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0605A Property Location: 813 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/1880 Property Owner: James Hickner Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Historic District, ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story irregular plan house has a brick foundation. The asphalt -shingled cross gable roof with pyramidal hip roof in back has molded cornice at rake in gables. There is a small front porch. Windows are 1/1 double hung. Siding is wood clapboard. .. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door have been added, as well as concrete steps to front porch. Existing 1/1 double -hung wood windows have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval. COA 2017-0216 approved replacement of five wood windows on back and side of house with vinyl windows. RME 2017-0517A approved replacement of existing front and back doors with 36" fiberglass doors and replacement of temporary support post on front overhang with square turned posts. APPLICATION ITEMS: Project upper deck with stairs coming down to ground level deck surrounding french doors. I plan to sink (6) 6x6 posts in areas close to the house to support the structure of a second floor fire escape door and decks also part of the stair structure. All structure beams will be wood. Decking is preferred to be composite. Spindels and rails will be wood. Decking also already partially approved is landing for the back french doors that I would like to have connected to stairs and upper deck. The addition of French doors and decking that connect to upper stairs door. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: In response to an anonymous call to the HPC office, Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday visited the property on February 12, 2017, and as part of observations noted the installation of French doors replacing an existing double -hung window in a first -floor bay window at the rear of the house. On a return visit March 2, he noted the French doors had been removed and replaced with an improperly sized. window. Owner now proposes to: (1) reinstall French doors in bay window, with wood steps beneath doors leading to a composite deck built over an existing sidewalk at rear of property; (2) install a door and build a deck on the second floor at rear of property as a means of second floor egress. Second floor decking will be composite, with wood rails and balusters. Deck will be supported by six 6x6 posts. Stairs will connect second floor deck with first floor deck adjacent to new French doors.- See attached drawings. Preservation Specialist's June 7 site visit revealed the French doors have been reinstalled. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases, where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About It half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS Required Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features and open spaces. Proportions and materials shall conform to those required for new construction. Recommended Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood. Prohibited Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used. Not Recommended Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other guidelines and standards. IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS Required Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved. Recommended Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. Prohibited Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and spaces is prohibited. Not Recommended Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (1) French doors, and related steps and deck are located at the rear of the house and, if properly installed and trimmed, will be compatible with the structure. Staff recommends approval of the installed French doors trimmed to match existing doors and windows on house, as well as steps and deck constructed to meet Building Code requirements. (2) This property differs from many in —that it is zoned and utilized as multi -family, necessitating proper egress from all units. Installation of a second -floor door and stairway at the rear of the house will provide'proper egress while providing no change to the historic character of the building as viewed from the street, and will not alter important architectural features; therefore, staff recommends approval of the second -floor door, deck, and stairway, constructed to meet Building Code requirements. Proper permits should be secured before commencing project (1) and (2). Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/S JCHP/index.htm „ "p. 574-235-9798f. f. 574-235-9578 e. SBSJCHPC@co.st-j1oseph.in.us . 1u OFFICE USE ONLY -»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: l / Application Number: 60\ — I — 01170,J Past Reviews: IR YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark 1 �itf RQ {7 ❑ NO Title: © Local Historic District (Name) l II0D41 O -1L MNational Register District (Name) u % Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: g (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: S13 1014 k tL '4 V t �7` 0vp, (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Q Q Name of Property Owner(s): J Y� m_ -:s14 cc, � r Phone #: v Address of Property Owner(s): o L 3 ►On -,,.k, [C' p (J e— S4 VA' r 3 Ct-J t3 e -J (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Phone #: Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building:/ -/1 /'-0r4 / /Y (Single Family—Multi-Famil)—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: Woon (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ji� New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) , �,,��✓�+ Desclription of Proposed Work: Cfy�� �L r,i G� %a CEJ Ex D' Q J.lniv.> 12A'a i,o GL ,I.%}.1�f7�Wn� 9 _,i�—� fl'v►n , ,%4v 1 16 i X9.2 -QS.' ltlfllrtQ ��• �!.D�%�.vey� ✓UCi -�?/1 �% /I �� J .v,... o L��� !1�/ea Ownertontractor Fax #: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) 1A— - �l.�r AA -e) A ,AaA).-e� X SG �and/or X. v /) Ger,,ry, Si re of Owner ' Signature of Contractor t� —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Pal LS 00 bpt t27,15 po" 0 0 V 99 C ov)d Uk7o-Atq5 pa+k Ton rke. a,(j o 0 C+ C, P-0 rlicS n. Zj I'f- tj 'I. t Kit., r A , i;%w f,' -r% n,- A410 .. . ... . . 1p .-Post. I L 11 -11:sn I I I I ill 1 I -r-11 I I I I i! I� � _, � i I I �_I �� \ -L-L ' �' I I. ► I I I I i t V�lu I I I I I\ I! '..�� I I I I I I I I � �, �� I I I I� `I I �� �_��� � f I\I �� I I 1(N IIS I /� , , ( I -.I 7m, I IT ri \I- NY I Ai T 'I I I r rI I I I I I I i I I I A I l i I rE r xas S 1. ` h ' I I ':'� , 7AW .f rr `tom (- r t't 1J � t say"` '�,?�r� rx�^ ^S .'c �`��H���'..�„ wre,M��I����i'x?u � �s"'""-x".e„''�'-. 'a t� • F ti ..� �t ' °r;" �1 .v. as .x: +s: s' .s.rd^"". ..�V�' .,..r'�;�'c, .«:. .{ •.t. t+ ` Ct' r n 4 � + '�',�., qi:~�,,,,,'�^`�.t r�r -• .�r r-�'-��"�.s"`"..ma:._...,.� ,ate••"' 'Z4` yv�sr,�t'a• 4 sT";\ 1,• , ""' zs+`..,. .._,a*"_'P. 1„ v ' r- F . 1 y�{?tai 3:r�r5} #y� s . v<... � ' tt . ¢, �R1 )fin ;yyfr y �, �., ,..5 r` t` t... 1`t.r r"'"`,`ti - •...•ra"",�1.aa^� :as "'3 F ;A,st _yt fy' j.. !�+4�MAIM ,f.y 4i���,,^ t�16u ` ^ `tic:kq ' .T•" t v L yy y r� '{s�* � i s "" .-o r e�a;�{ t.':, �.a'•! It',J � 1 5 UT-�'., t .r). � a',. .''{ i, t1+4= ;1. ��k N �*�91 y{ tiw�.�...r s3:V i j' �� , F,r'i e''. ?i :'t!- ,.„, Ali' '•� 4 L,,, =.sG� � L} � 14. ; � tit(, ,,� , '`�y�y � •;' r ��t 5 � r �'�t , L . � 1 � �f, 1F ;c .�s -. _ IN,1,p���^ . ,^� l - ` �� 4 t! t ��A. "wtt� -- iA • $ -: x�1 aL1 1� 1( ?. er: '? ..l, `. +1E:SAf'ti'15 / ^fit ,�.""'1 y.� ' tio'f 1 L IN i s z :}t t @� all t ad '*r�l� ;; 1 �, ��',1fy�i 1� �, t .i; n � ��+ • y �� !� tt " e ,,� ..,hy�"� , s�,,: �k.•iyt /\ .7�.r �Lt7 tom`. i"', r :.e 4^ •.:V v� E' ��,+t�P,•' � f.!�t,�' �ONO' �';� �' � �. , ; l�• ' ��'�' �`�` � 4�, t� r�G "'�0'� ' :i12 �s4 `.�1 X11{- S� .�s;' tN:t.a ! ".y'. r. C v'J!+.r, 11.' 'j��a�s� ,,,M i�1f��vti��r ,ii r' •`+:;' �'y,� r,,t. �p t .'�'� - S �`"-. '•'' � 'A �1i'"... �� � \�� 1,' Y 4 r �. '. i.h, i � A �' 'i �" ,p;..%<a �µ. it la titi '=. �' .+�,.� � �i; � "���� s, � �� '�` )fix" ,��, t�, � - ' �^-- d �,ia y.l.Z a\ i 47`h `� 5�! i�r'^'•. �+ u �`•'�;�V(�c��.,,. `k -" .::r --r �t:�' t!"�� j �2Za`:ff FI �y�� 4 ' 'Y\k,n,:5�,3 l= k'k„ :.rrt' •,�. R, t3 , i it i a, `15 u �4' �. ��nkh,� s"^s`'�,f � :�+;1,• �; 'iW:: r� (� p4� "a"�tt'Yt is� � s e {';: \.;�y ,.k,,f ":.'!'XFCa r.�{ gY C� 'M,', ,.- ��1 ,x� + , 1 � ].:,. f "�- '• v .j3 .!. .,.-i ''" 2•:� '"laA'�u"� i.�,, \, aJt1 .._ �_�-«...,.. „�� :u.��..��.__.yy.,,^,,�,�..``t�.� �''c.}k ��4 ,. .• R;'' + ;!� a 'aI. r. , "..'x �:.,�, - . V�4 .tt, M'lF=dit!"`.,,� w P;' ^\`�. i 1� y; .'. m!',i„� .,+! ,. .,t4`�. fy t,bV -.i%r ��� �'.: .` f!. f�� . �r•, ` .':�: ” J �r \.S t'� r- .,{. X..zt it �, s ��: ,.s .. �of.e. a�•, !� t SMS f, �'.Ft -�h 1 � tti C � aia 1' h1.�' ..7 1i ., i. %Fo`-`+ ;i ','q. ���,�1 1 L :J,,,,r � -.,.0 �. k •�� `��; .,,\ t�f -� �. .._�,S.d �. ,i', „'r+, ...tt:. � "" � : ;at �a n t,: r .. ➢ t� r dj,�f .1 i �� i '� ti���j. h�i ti 1 �-'r ,� �.'.� ' r:. f � , t!,?' ,r,',�'!r' ;t"' �yy i .. ' � v in �,x. �' trL z� �hif•. �'^'• r STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: –June 6, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0606B Property Location: 314 West LaSalle Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Parapet Front/l892/Frederickson Candy Store Property Owner: Mark Wenkus Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #7050-1982 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Frederickson Candy Store is set upon a brick foundation with a rectangular plan. Walls are wood clapboard with comerboards and decorative shingles in the front pediment. A full front porch at entry has a wood floor, turned columns, wood steps and railing. The door has a double panel with etched glass top lite and transom. Windows are wood double hung, 1/1, with wood surrounds and wood shutters. ALTERATIONS: Front door has been replaced and most wood shutters have been removed. APPLICATION ITEMS: Overlay roof. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to install Certainteed Highland Slate fiberglass shingles over existing 3 -tab shingles. Existing shingles will become the underlayment for the new roof as they are laying flat, and ice and water shield were properly applied. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. It a JA 4SOUT88� Application �A WISSIpryfRso - FOR - \ FACF. o sa ' - ''� Certificate ofAppropriateness y W �\ /j a p HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION x 1865 x of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCflPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 61 l7' @0(% Application Number: 3017 — O&M) _Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) ��1 ��1 �q�S ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: (�LI e 19, 17101% ��i ULo-29 FP2 to hq- addeA to t (@Q aQej, L) Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To CommitteeEJApproved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: (Street Number !S'Ireet Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): ��CZ l� / Q,,rAk Phone #: 2 Z q1_7Z Address of Property Owner(s): 6 G`�i+,., n r.� 14A sol( h_&A >j `f mzJ'4k eet amber— treet Name—City—Zip Code)Name of Contractors :R, // \ Phone #: Z���/ () Contract Company Name: ,7 Address of Contract Company: 11q- n(Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 4 &///1 41G /CA (/ (dingle Family—Mzalii-Family—Commercial—Government Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: F'11�11t_4 D (Wood Frame—Brick--Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond vith only one designee) khr- and/or X gnate- n �/ " Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Qj notrairsilm MEW rr z• x J r _ - r - 4� ti T S } t f J dor Brown* rr z• x J r _ - r - ROOFING SHINGLES' LifetimeearSuLf Transferableern arranry* - Sttaad rt FIBER GLASS SHINGLES_ PRODUCT DATA COLORS SPECIFICATIONS ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance ASTM D7158 Class H Wind Resistance Bundles Shingles Starter: UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance Presidential Starter Size Exposure Per Square Per Square �+ ® H®V►%� Lifetime Limited Transferable Warranty* Black Pearl 18" 8" 5 50 - `z� 10-yearSureStartTm Protection Brownstone x ASTM D3462 15 -year 110 MPH Wind Resistance Warranty** Colonial Slate 36" ICC -ES ESR -1389 8r ESR -3537 ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance Gatehouse Slate Hip and Ridge. ASTM D7158 Class H Wind Resistance Georgian Brick Solaris Accessory 15 -year Algae Resistance Warranty Sherwood Forest Starter: UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance Stonegate Gray Carriage House Shangle ASTM D3462 - Victorian Blue (8" exposed portion removed) Miami -Dade Product Control Acceptance Black Granite# 18" 8" b CSA Standard A123.5 Fieldstone# x Hip and Ridge: ICC -ES ESR -1389 & ESR -3537 New England Slate# 36" Shangle Ridge 44ayer coverage when applied Saddle Brown 355 Ib per square Smokey Quartz PRESIDENTIAL SHAKE" TL Triple Laminate. Starter: Presidential Starter Hip and Ridge: Cedar Crest Lifetime Limited Transferable Warranty* 10 year SureStartTM Protection 15 -year 110 MPH Wind Resistance Warranty** ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance ASTM D7158 Class H Wind Resistance 15 -year Algae Resistance Warranty UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance ASTM D3462 Miami -Dade Product Control Acceptance CSA Standard A123.5 ICC -ES ESR -1389 & ESR -3537 480 lb per square Aged Bark 141/4" 4" Autumn Blend x Charcoal Black 40" Chestnut Classic Weathered Wood (Original Blend) Shadow Gray Weathered Wood Aged Bark 14 t/4" 4" Autumn Blend# x Charcoal Black 40" Chestnut Shadow Gray# Weathered Wood# Classic Weathered Wood# #IMPACT RESISTANT- VERSION AVAILABLEI —SPECIAL ORDER (select colors) Certified to meet UL 2218 Class 41 FULL TRUCKLOADS ONLY Starter. Presidential Starter Impact Resistant Hip and Ridge. Cedar Crest IR PRESIDENTIAL LifetimeearSuLf Transferableern arranry* Max Def Weathered Wood 14V4" 4" Sttaad rt 10 -year SureStart Protection 15 -year 110 MPH Wind Resistance Warranty** 15 -year 110 MPH Wind Resistance Warranty** x 40 ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance ASTM D7158 Class H Wind Resistance 15 -year Algae Resistance Warranty Starter: UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance Presidential Starter ASTM D3462 Hip and Ridge: Miami -Dade Product Control Acceptance Cedar Crest CSA Standard A123.5 UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance ICC -ES ESR -1389 6r ESR -3537 355 lb per square Aged Bark 141/4" 4" Autumn Blend x Charcoal Black 40" Chestnut Classic Weathered Wood (Original Blend) Shadow Gray Weathered Wood Aged Bark 14 t/4" 4" Autumn Blend# x Charcoal Black 40" Chestnut Shadow Gray# Weathered Wood# Classic Weathered Wood# #IMPACT RESISTANT- VERSION AVAILABLEI —SPECIAL ORDER (select colors) Certified to meet UL 2218 Class 41 FULL TRUCKLOADS ONLY Starter. Presidential Starter Impact Resistant Hip and Ridge. Cedar Crest IR PRESIDENTIAL Lifetime Limited Transferable Warranty* Max Def Weathered Wood 14V4" 4" ��a+ ,, AA DD �s SOLA RIS" Gold 10 -year SureStart Protection 15 -year 110 MPH Wind Resistance Warranty** x 40 ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance Starter: ASTM D7158 Class D Wind Resistance Presidential Starter 15 -year Algae -Resistance Warranty available UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance ASTM D3462 ICC -ES ESR -1389 8r ESR -3537 Hip and Ridge. Miami -Dade Product Control Acceptance Solaris Accessory CSA Standard A123.5 Meets ENERGY STAR requirements FULL TRUCKLOADS ONLY 355 lb per square Hl bland Slate® Lifetime Limited Transferable Warranty* Black Granite# 18" 8" b 10 -year SureStart7 Protection Fieldstone# x 15 -year 110 MPH Wind Resistance Warranty** New England Slate# 36" ASTM D3161 Class F 110 MPH Wind Resistance Saddle Brown ASTM D7158 Class H Wind Resistance Smokey Quartz Starter: 15 -year Algae Resistance Warranty Tudor Brown# High Performance Starter UL 790 Class A Fire Resistance Venetian Red or shingle itself with ASTM D3462Max Def Weathered Wood 8" lower portion removec Miami -Dade Product Control Acceptance CSA Standard A123.5 Hip and Ridge: ICC -ES ESR -1389 & ESR -3537 Cedar Crest or 240 lb per square Shangle Ridge #IMPACT RESISTANT VERSION AVMLA13LEI — SPECIAL ORDER (select colors) Certified to meet UL 2218 Class 4 FULL TRUCKLOADS ONLY Starter: High Performance Starter or shingle itself with 5" lower portion removed Hip and Ridge: Cedar Crest IR *See warranty for specific details and limitations. **Warranty upgrade to 130 mph available. 90 PRESIDENTIAL SHAKE" 90 . 90 50 s. 4 J f ! f7. �•t)5� n. 1 tip; j je r f .1t 1 •i s. 4 J f ! f7. �•t)5� n. 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY May 15, 2017 13' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Kevin Buccellato Members Not in Attendance: Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Mike Voll, Brandon Anderson Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Members of the Public Present: Nancy Myers, Victor Myers, Joann Huff, Joan Cappuccilli, Thomas Huff, Jason Pfledderer, Joshua Mougin, David Visser H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 50106 Bittersweet Trail COA#2017-0403A Local Landmark Representation by David Visser, 25614 Harold Court, Edwardsburg, MI STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0403A Property Location: 50106 Bittersweet Trail Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: L-Plan/Italianate/1877/William C. Kownover Farm Property Owner: David A. Visser Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kownover farmhouse is a 2 % story brick house with asphalt shingle roof and stone foundation. 2/2 wood windows with segmental arches, with keystones, brick heads, and stone sills, and two bay windows on the front. A portico with flat roof supported by square wood columns covers the front entrance. The property has a summer kitchen of brick to match the house, and a large gable -roof barn. ALTERATIONS: Original bay windows roofs have been replaced with higher pitch and wood shakes. Aluminum storm windows have been added. There is a small addition to the rear of the house. Between May 2012 and December 2014, the front portico was removed without a COA. The barn was taken down in 2014 without a COA. Recent repairs and improvements include development of green space with a stone wall built of original barn foundation stones. APPLICATION ITEMS: Addition of egress window, gravel drive extension, and creation of dumpster pad. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Waiver was signed at April 17 meeting to extend this COA. Projects to be addressed include: 1) Installation of egress window on north side of house. Window is installed, and landscaping to screen window and adjacent A/C is proposed. 2) Creation of dumpster pad. Dumpster is currently sited by road; proposed enclosure with fence, gates, and evergreens, per site plan. 3) Extension of gravel drive; work complete. See attached document for detailed description of work. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Siens No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscaoine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Screening egress window and A/C unit, as well as dumpster will make them inconspicuous from the road. The gravel driveway extension is not visible from the driveway, and regardless is in keeping with the site and structures. As all projects remaining on this COA, completed and proposed, are consistent with the historic character of the site, staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application (as continued) for all items with a contingency for the dumpster and its screening to be removed if zoning request is not realized. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, one opposed. Vote: 5 — 1 COA#2017-0403A as continued Approved with conditions. 2. 815 Arch COA#2017-0417B Local Landmark Representation by Jason Pfledderer, 815 Arch Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 17, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0417B Property Location: 815 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1921/Ernest W. Young Property Owner: Jason Pfledderer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place LHD/Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house sits on the corner of Arch and Edgewater. It is two stories with a rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The main level is red brick laid in running bond. Above a continuous band, the upper level is stucco with half timer expressions on the west end. The broad sweeping asphalt shingled roof lines extend down from the central hip with a variety of intersecting dormers and narrow overhang lines with moulded wood frieze board. ALTERATIONS: All of the windows were replaced between 1985 and 1989. The roof is not original to the house. The doors are replacements. The surfaces of the front walk way, porch steps and porch stoop do not appear to be original to the house. COA 2015-0803A approved a concrete driveway and pad, new concrete steps and sidewalk. COA 2014-1002A to sculpt a dead tree in the front yard was denied. COA 2016-0628 approved removal and replanting of a dead tree. COA 2016-1003B approved stucco repairs on main house and boat house. APPLICATION ITEMS: 2 new 9'x7' sliding doors on north side facing river to replace (2) 9'x4' windows. Landscape and new — tie in sidewalk & patio to front of house along entire front; possibly brick. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to remove two 9' wide windows (each unit consists of stationary glass in center, with casement windows on either side), and replace them with two 9' wide Marvin aluminum -clad sliding glass doors, on the east side of house facing the river. Current windows have grilles in casements only; doors would have no grilles, giving full view of the river. Brick patio to be installed outside new doors, and sidewalk installed connecting patio with main door on south side. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EDGEWATER PLACE 1. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Many properties have a straight driveway along one edge of the lot leading to a garage at the rear of the house. This driveway often has a sidewalk along one side leading to the front entrance either in the center or at the side of the house. Driveway and sidewalk materials include asphalt or concrete. All of the properties have trees; many have trimmed shrubbery and hedges. All of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Existing plants, trees, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs, and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the buildings that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing old plants, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings and other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, with the exception of properties along Lincolnway, which may be fenced, but not with enclosed stockade -type fencing. Not Recommended Telephone poles with high intensity overhead lights should not be used, with the exception of along Lincolnway. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the current windows are not original, and expanding visibility towards the river and providing patio area will improve the relationship of the house and its environment, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Buccellato. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0417B Approved. 3. 336 West Navarre COA#2017-0420 Chapin Park Representation by Victor Myers, 336 West Navarre Nancy Myers, 336 West Navarre STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 20, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0420 Property Location: 336 West Navarre Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1891/Unruh House Property Owner: Victor and Nancy Myers Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story wood frame house with brick foundation has a central brick chimney with corbelled cap. The steep hip roof is covered with asphalt shingles, and has numerous intersecting gables, and aluminum soffit and fascia. There are two small dormers with shed roof. The main entry porch has a low hip roof with pedimented central bay, supported by turned wood columns. Windows are 1/1 wood double hung. ALTERATIONS: Two car garage with hipped roof and sliding wood doors was added at rear of property in 1935. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace existing driveway (gravel -grass) with concrete. Replace two single garage doors with one double door. Add gutters to house. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to: 1) replace an existing 7'W gravel/grass driveway at west side of property, with 10'W concrete driveway, and add concrete pad in front of garage to allow space to turn vehicles around. This project is completed. 2) Replace two existing sliding wood garage doors with one 16' x 7' overhead door, allowing easy access for two passenger cars. (see attached description) 3) Installation of 5" K-stylc aluminum guttcrs and downspouts to allow proper runoff and prevent water damage. No gutters currently exist on house. 2 PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK 1. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property_found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor black -topped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum - sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storms windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended 5 Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of all three portions of the proposed project for the following reasons: 1) The driveway replaces an existing one, only slightly wider and a change of materials from gravel/grass to concrete, to better accommodate modern vehicles. The pad in front of the garage will allow better use of the garage and does not change the appearance of the property. 2) The garage was constructed over 40 years after the house and one door is currently so narrow as to be virtually unusable by a standard car; the change from two sliding doors to one overhead door will allow effective use of the structure by allowing two cars to be parked inside. It will not negatively impact the original character of the neighborhood. 3) Gutters may have existed on this house at one time; they will help prevent structural deterioration, and be similar to many other houses in the neighborhood. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application with condition to allow homeowner to investigate price of half -round style gutters and remanding authority to staff for approval of that style. Seconded by Commissioner Buccellato. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0420 Approved with conditions. 4. 50106 Bittersweet Trail COA#2017-0501B Local Landmark Representation by David Visser, 25614 Harold Court, Edwardsburg, MI STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0501B Property Location: 50106 Bittersweet Trail Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: L-Plan/Italianate/1877/William C. Kownover Farm Property Owner: David A. Visser Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kownover farmhouse is a 2'/z story brick house with asphalt shingle roof and stone foundation. 2/2 wood windows with segmental arches, with keystones, brick heads, and stone sills, and two bay windows on the front. A portico with flat roof supported by square wood columns covers the front entrance. The property has a summer + kitchen of brick to match the house, and a large gable -roof barn. ALTERATIONS: Original bay windows roofs have been replaced with higher pitch and wood shakes. Aluminum storm windows have been added. There is a small addition to the rear of the house. Between May 2012 and December 2014, the front portico was removed without a COA. The barn was taken down in 2014 without a COA. Recent repairs and improvements include development of green space with a stone wall built of original barn foundation stones. A Waiver extending time to act on COA 2017-0403A, addressing screening/landscaping of the dumpster, installation of an egress window on north side of house, and installation of gravel driveway, was signed at the April 17, 2017 HPC meeting. APPLICATION ITEMS: Privacy fence, berm and landscaping along the north property line, extending across the back property lines of neighbors, directly north of our home and parking area. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes installation of 6' tall dog-ear stockade panels along north property line, acting as a visual barrier to block headlights of vehicles parking at rear of home. Appropriate shade tolerant plants and/or junipers to be installed as necessary. See attached document for detailed description and location of work. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B 6 B. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Siens No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscanine 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the owner has noted in his project description, the north property line is currently wooded and somewhat obscured; therefore, the proposed fence will blend in the existing surroundings, while maintaining privacy and being respectful of neighboring property owners. Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Public comment: Joan Huff, 18592 Garwood Court, South Bend - She and her husband landmarked the property, with their many priority being protection of the barn, and she is outraged that the barn was. allowed to be taken down. Tim Huff, 10187 Jackson — Questioned who is responsible for the barn coming down, where was the Historic Preservation Commission during the process, and how the current owner purchased the property without knowledge of its landmark status. It seems that there should be some notification process when historic property changes ownership. Joan Cappuccilli, 26464 North Bittersweet Trail, Mundelein, IL — Has developed a subdivision in Illinois with covenants that are attached to the title when property is purchased; it would seem that a similar thing could be done with historic landmarked properties in this area. She implored the Commission to set the property back on its historic path. Thomas Huff, 65961 Walnut Road, North Liberty — Opposes this COA, and believes the Commission has the authority to require unapproved changes to be removed and property restored to the condition it was in when originally landmarked. Christopher Huff, 1831 College Street, South Bend — Opposes this and all COAs until this property has a plan to bring it in conformity with the property as it was when originally landmarked. Commissioner Molnar moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0501B Approved. 5. 1417 East Wayne COA#2017-0501C East Wayne Street Representation by Josh Mougin, Mougin Roofing, 9325N 850E, New Carlisle STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0501C Property Location: 1417 Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/ I 929/Knute Rockne House/H.Russell Stapp, architect Property Owner: Joseph and Morgan Candle Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Tudor Revival house is a 2 -story frame on an irregular plan. It has a gable roof with several cross gables, half-timber rake trim is covered in asbestos tile shingles. The body of the house is mainly brick with a half timbering and stucco in the front gable that also has a square bay and stucco in the entry gable that has a round arched entry door with diamond pane glass and brick tabbing at the door surround. There are original windows with paired 6 light casement windows with four light fixed transoms on the first floor. There are wood replacement casement windows on the second floor. Some of the windows have brick header course sills. ALTERATIONS: Portions of the roof were replaced in-kind in 1988. There are 11 wood replacement casements on the second floor approved in September 1994. The rear porch was enclosed. The tennis court is a later addition. COA 2008-1013 approved replacement wooden fence in rear of house. Replacement of single pane windows with glass block was approved with COA 2014-101413. COA 2014-1204 approved replacement of rear door. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removing/replacing roof, currently has asphalt/fiberglass/fiber composite shingles, want to replace with Certainteed Highland slate asphalt shingles, 2 low -sloped areas (not visible) currently have tin, want to replace with 0.060- 0.080 TPO membrane, copper drip edge, copper valleys. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Contractor proposes to remove existing slate -look shingles and replace with Certainteed Highland Slate designer shingles. This choice of material mimics the look of slate, although in a consistent pattern, unlike the current random -look shake roof. The contractor is unaware of any product currently on the market that would accurately replicate the existing roofing, and other synthetic slate options have proven too costly. 0.060-0.080 TPO membrane roof will be installed on flat roof areas to replace existing tin. Copper valleys and drip edge will be installed. 8 PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET II. EXISTING STRUCTURES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While the proposed slate -style roofing will have a more consistent pattern than the existing roof, it will have a distinctive look that is in keeping with other homes in the area, and as the current random -look shake roof cannot be easily or economically replicated, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0501C Approved. III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 17, 2017 —Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. Treasurer Molnar reported there has been no response to his letter emailed to the County Auditor asking for clarification of seeming inconsistencies in budget allocations; a response request will be mailed soon. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. Discussion of Minimum Maintenance Standards survey process. 2. Executive Director — Distributed. Executive Director Feasel reported HPC is partnering with Brownfield Coalition (1636 Lincoln Way West) for a grant to stabilize the Local Landmark building. Commissioner Gordon questioned progress with Marquette School, which is on Indiana Landmarks 10 Most Endangered List for 2017. Discussion. Reports on state Historic Preservation 0 Conference recently held in Wabash, and first Downtown South Bend tour of the year. 3. Deputy Director — In packet. 4. Preservation Specialist —Distributed. 5. Legal — Hearing is set for May 24 on Eric Boyd case. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President — Distributed. 2. Standards and Maintenance Committee — meeting will be scheduled to look_ into topics of sustainability and deterioration by neglect. V. OLD BUSINESS —None VI. NEW BUSINESS - None VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hertel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 8:54 p.m. Attest: Miche elfman, Secretary Z� ll" Date W117 .4 Location Budget as of 05-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addri Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4.051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 000 General Gov T. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Location Totals 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0,00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Financial System 06/02/2017 09: U*bv ksobeckl Page 105 Location Budget as of 05-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 05131/2017, Director: County Historic Preservation Carry Forward Original AddVI Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent Fund Totals "***•*'***"**••***"'**•"**""******•**** 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Financial System 06/02/2017 08:32 AM by ksobecki Page 106 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0000 General GovT. Saint Joseph County 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen GovT General GovT. General GovT. Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Financial System 06/02/2017 09: y ksobecki Page 272 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/02/2017 05/02/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 60.00 Rec:139487 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 05/18/2017 05/18/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 35.50 Rec:139755 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 95.50 0.00 Total 0.00 183.75 (183.75) 0.00 0.00 Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 183.75 4103.02707.000.0037 Charges For Services General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/18/2017 05/18/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 51.74 Rec:139755 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 51.74 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 51.74 (51.74) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 51.74 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/02/2017 05/02/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 65.00 Rec:139487 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 05/18/2017 05/18/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 10.00 Rec:139755 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 05/18/2017 05/18/2017 ReGAutoRcpt 61.00 Rec:139755 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 136.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 193.50 (193.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 193.50 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 05/31/2017 05/18/2017 Approp/AddtlApp 51,74 QUIETUS 139755 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 Current 0.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 06/02/2017 09:47 AM by ksobecki Page 273 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total Location Totals Current 0.00 Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 0.00 283.24 51.74 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 0.00 428.99 (428.99) 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 428.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 283.24 51.74 0.00 0.00 428.99 (428.99) 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 428.99 Financial System 06/02/2017 09: y ksobecki Page 274 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 283.24 Total 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Fund Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 283.24 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 51.74 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 4,051.74 4,051.74 17,812.05 0.00 0.00 17,812.05 Financial System 06/02/2017 09:47 AM by ksobecki Page 275 Location Budget as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Office Supplies Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total 22.48 32.49 Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 11,993.80 19,190.20 19,190.20 000 General GovT. General Gov T. 61.54 61.54 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 15,653.80 25,046.20 25,046.20 000 General GovT. General GovT. 61.54 61.54 14800 Fica Contribution 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14810 P.E.R.F. 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.0.0 8,051.00 8,051.00 000 General GovT. General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14840 Group Insurance 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 000 General GovT. General GovT. 0.00 0.00 10000 Totals """"`:' 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 51,647.60 57,787.40 57,787.40 52.81 52.81 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 22.48 32.49 245.03 267.51 000 General GovT. 81.68 89.17 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 79.00 921.00 921.00 000 General Gov T. 92.10 92.10 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 151.63 151.63 000 General GovT. 67.39 67.39 20000 Totals """"""""" """"""""""': 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 22.48 184.86 1,317.66 1,340.14 86.40 87.88 31070 Other Contractual Services 1,500.00 18,890.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 260.00 5,021.14 15,108.86 15,368.86 000 General GovT. 74.10 75.37 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 3.29 50.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 9.87 36.84 43.42 000 General GovT. 69.13 81.48 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 51.24 0.00 43.76 95.00 000 General Gov T. 46.06 100.00 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 Financial Syste 06/02/2017vl by ksobecki Page 49 Location Budget as of 05-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original AddVI Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 000 General Gov T. 100.00 100.00 30000 Totals """""" """""""':':""""' 1,503.29 20,335.00 0.00 0.00 21,838.29 317.82 5,031.01 16,489.46 16,807.28 75.51 76.96 Location Totals 1,503.29 131,295.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 340.30 56,863.47 75,594.52 75,934.82 56.92 57.18 Financial System 06/02/2017 08:54 AM by ksobecki Page 50 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/18/2017 05/18/2017 Rec/AutoRcpt 260.00 Rec:139756 BKO07 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 260.00 0.00 Total 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 0.00 0.00 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/05/2017 05/03/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:726382 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst05/05/2017 05/19/2017 05/17/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199,38 BK:008 CK:727521 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst05/19/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/05/2017 05/03/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:726383 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst05/05/2017 05/19/2017 05/17/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK008 CK727522 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst05/19/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 1000.14800.000.0037 Fica Contribution General GovT. Historic Preservation F.I.CA. Contribution Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General GovT. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Financial Syste-- 06/02/2017 W by ksobecki Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 11,993.80 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 15,653.80 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 745.00 Balances 19,190.20 19,190.20 (11,993.80) Balances 25,046.20 25,046.20 (15,653.80) Balances 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 Page 160 .0 -Combihed Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General Gov'T. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 8,051.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 8.051.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.14840.000.0037 Group Insurance General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Group Insurance Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 Cash: (24,000.00) 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT, Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation 05/17/2017 05/17/2017 PO/AutoPO 22,48 PO:1411111 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 05/23/2017 05/23/2017 Clairn/RegDocket 12.78 PO:1140026 BK:008 CK:727772 Inv.832610 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 267.51 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.78 Unencumbered: 245.03 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 22.48 32.49 Cash: (32A9) 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General Govr. Historic Preservation 05/18/2017 05/18/2017 Claim/RegDocket 20.00 BK:008 CK:727454 Inv:GASOLINE REIMB Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 921.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 Unencumbered: 921.00 Total 0,00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 79.00 Cash: (79.00) 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General Gov r, Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation 05/23/2017 05/23/2017 Clairn/RegDocket 7137 PO:140025 BK:008 CK:727688 Inv:030317 Vend:059228 CENTRAL SERVICES DIVISION Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 151.63 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.37 Unencumbered: 151.63 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 Cash: (73.37) Financial System 06/02/2017 08:58 AM by ksobecki Page 161 ,.Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 05/08/2017 05/08/2017 PO/AutoPO 620.00 PO:140826 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 05/19/2017 05/19/2017 PO/AutoPO 260.00 PO:141145 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 05/23/2017 05/23/2017 Claim/RegDocket 620.00 PO:140826 BK:008 CK:727803 Inv:2017-0418 021770505 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 • 0.00 0.00 620.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 260.00 5,021.14 Cash: 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/23/2017 05/23/2017 Claim/RegDocket 3,29 P0:140382 BK:008 CK:7277951nv:33117 Vend:001538 South Bend Tribune Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.29 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 9.87 Cash: 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General GovT. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation 05/19/2017 05/19/2017 PO/AutoPO 51,24 PO:141144 Vend:000070 Adams Remco INC Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total' 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 51.24 0.00 Cash: 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General GovT. Historic Preservation Current Total 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription Dues and Subscriptions Financial Syster Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: General Gov r. Historic Preservation Historic Preservation 06/02/2017 U ( r by ksobecki Saint Joseph County Balances 15,368.86 15,108.86 (5,021.14) Balances 43.42 36.84 (9.87) Balances 95.00 43.76 0.00 Balances 900.00 900.00 0.00 Page 162 Saint Joseph County Balances 400.00 400.00 0.00 Balances 75,934.82 75,594.52 (56,118.47) 0.00 0.00 (56,118.47) Financial System 06/02/2017 08:58 AM by ksobecki Page 163 combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 05/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Normal Current 0.00 260.00 0.00 6,258.96 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 132,798.29 340.30 55,863.47 Cash: Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: Location Totals Current 0.00 260.00 0.00 6,258.96 Total 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 132,798.29 340.30 56,863.47 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 400.00 400.00 0.00 Balances 75,934.82 75,594.52 (56,118.47) 0.00 0.00 (56,118.47) Financial System 06/02/2017 08:58 AM by ksobecki Page 163 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 02 May through 05 June 2017 Daily Highlights 05.02 Meet w/ Tim, phone call w/ Brett. Phone call w/ Chris Harrell of Brownfields Coalition re: grant application for 1636 Lincoln Way West. 1905 College correspondence. Review intern application. Review Human Resources correspondence. Jefferson School and Howard Park correspondence. 05.03 Attend photography reproduction of Main Street w/ Lou Sabo. Work w/ Lou on portfolios. 05.04 Meet at DCI re: City Cemetery application proposal. Tippecanoe COA correspondence. 520 E Colfax correspondence. Review National Trust for Historic Preservation's Atlas of ReUrbanism. Meet w/ Frank Perri re: East Bank properties. 05.05 520 E Colfax correspondence. 1636 Lincoln Way correspondence. Process Contractor invoice. 05.08 Correspondence w/ Catherine re: North St. Joseph Street historic district and Leeper Park. Correspondence w/ SJCPL Rona re: possible participation in a lead program. 05.09 Attend SJC Department Head meeting, follow up tasks. 531 S St. Joseph correspondence. Coal Line Trail correspondence and scheduling meeting. 05.10 Correspondence and meet w/ Kurt Klosner and Okpe re: Lafayette Building. 1636 Lincoln Way correspondence. Best Week Ever correspondence. Follow up w/ intern prospect. 05.11 50106 Bittersweet Trail correspondence w/ Chris Huff. Coal Line Trail meeting w/ DCI staff. 05.12 Correspondence w/ potential summer intern. Correspondence w/ John of DLZ re: North Liberty fagade grant. Correspondence w/ Kurt Klosner. Participate in Questers Studebaker Chapter presentation on an invitation by Lou Sabo. 05.15 Payroll. Treasure Hunt correspondence, meeting and follow up tasks. Poll Commission for quorum. 812 Golden correspondence w/ BD. Fulfilling contractor listing request. Scheduling John of DLZ for meeting. Correspondence w/ BD re: violations. Prep for and attend HPC meeting. 05.16 Review memo from County IT re: new phones. Correspondence w/ BD re: violations. Schedule meeting w/ John Carlson re: HPC website design assistance. Correspondence w/ Rona of SJCPL re: Lead program. Meet w/ John of DLZ and Tim re: North Liberty fagade grants. Meet w/ Margaret Fosmoe re: Bartlett House. Attend St. Joseph County department budget meeting. 05.17 Work on Building South Bend w/ Geo. Correspondence re: Lead program. Treasure Hunt. Process Contractor invoice. 05.18 Correspondence w/ BD re: violations. 05.19 Correspondence w/ BD re: violations. 05.22 Treasure Hunt. Correspondence re: 812 Golden. 05.23 Meet w/ Eric Stalheim re: summer internship. Correspondence re: Howard Park. Review Redevelopment Commission agenda. Process Tim's alert of a sink hole on Park Avenue. 05.24 Correspondence re: 813 Park windows. Work w/ Geo on BSB. Meet w/ John Carlson re: HPC website design assistance. Meet w/ Chris Huff re: 50106 Bittersweet Trail. 05.25 Budget reconciliation. 1071 Riverside Drive correspondence. North Liberty fagade grant. 05.26 Payroll. North Liberty fagade grant. 05.29 Holiday 05.30 North Liberty fagade grant processing w/ Tim. Review all correspondence re: Leeper Park, study Standards. Correspondence w/ Kaylee, ABC 57 re: Leeper Park. 05.31 Finalize North Liberty fagade grant. Review COAs. Work w/ Geo on Building South Bend. Process Contractor invoice. Firehouse No. 6 correspondence w/ new owner. Correspondence w/ Chapin Park resident re: COA process. 06.01 Work on HPC website w/ John Carlson. Review Leeper Park, West Lagoon (Duck Pond) file, correspondence. 06.02 06.05 COA deadline. Receive COAs. Work on HPC website. Tidy around office. Interview w/ WNDU re: Leeper Park, West Lagoon (Duck Pond). Budget reconciliation. Routine Maintenance Exclusions. Address RME# Description 116 E South 2017-0523A Restore original masonry on east, west, and south windows. Replace steel lintels on north side windows and door. Interns/Volunteers Who Project George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Phone Calls Who Date/Time Regarding Mary Jane Chase 06.05 Linoleum floor contractor - Research Requests What Date Who Hours Photo identification 05.04 The History Museum 0.25 Hank's Pool Hall and 501 E Howard 05.04 Aladean 0.25 Oldest house in South Bend (Bartlett House) 05.15 Margaret Fosmoe SBT 1.0 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — May 2 — June 2, 2017 Daily. Highlights 5/2 COA 2017-05018. COA 2017-0403A extension. COA 2017-0501C. COA 2017-0501 changed to RME and permit issued. Make site visits and take photos for recent COA applications. 5/3 Site visit to Bittersweet Trail. Finish RME 2017-0501A and issue permit. Prepare agenda for May HPC meeting. Section 106 review. Print photos and finish COAs for May meeting. COA 2017-0403A extension. 5/5 RME 2017-0505. Print, assemble, and mail commissioners' packets. Completed April meeting minutes and sent for review. Research 1636 LWW. 5/8 Research Jefferson School and Howard Park; sources of HP repair/improvement grants. Met with owner of 62290 Miami Rd. regarding potential COA application items, and contractors for barn repairs. File maintenance. COA 2017-0508. Prepared template for May HPC meeting minutes. Worked on Best.Week.Ever Scavenger Hunt. 5/9 Completed Best.Week.Ever Scavenger Hunt clues. Met with James Hickner regarding 813 Park; Terry and Jennifer, new owners of 1602 E. LaSalle. 5/10 Photo research request. Confirmed permit has not been issued by Bldg. Dept. for 813 Park. Posted notices for May HPC meeting. MMS letters. 5/11 MMS letters. Met with Marverick concerning historic districts/properties in South Bend. 5/12 Finished and mailed MMS letters. Researched Firehouse #7. Forwarded photo of retaining wall installed without COA at 812 Golden to Building Dept. 5/15 Communicated with Building Dept. regarding 812 Golden. Attended Treasure Hunt meeting. Cancelled Restore Michiana series. Initiated refunds. Notified presenters, partners, and participants. Prepared for Commission Meeting. RME 2017-0515. Replied to email from owner of 10708 Edison Rd. 5/16 Took more photos of 1327 East Wayne for COA. Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Worked on minutes from HPC meeting. 813 Park correspondence. 5/17 Worked on minutes from HPC meeting. RME 2017-0517. Approved windows and Issued COA 2017- 0216. Mailed all approved permits. 5/18 Finished meeting minute draft: Section 106 review. 5/19 File maintenance. Section 106 review. MMS problem property follow up. RME 2017-0517A and 2017- 0519. 5/22 Site visit to 812 Golden for landscape work without COA. Communication with owner and Building Dept.; also, owner of 61601 Bremen Highway. 5/24 Edited May HPC meeting minutes. Communication with owner and building dept. regarding 65753 Cedar Road. COA 2017-0523 and 2017-0524. Section 106 Review for Coal Line Trail. File maintenance. Preparation for next MMS survey. 5/25 Site visit to 812 Golden. MMS survey preparation. Section 106 Review. Communication with owner and building dept. regarding 60500 Bremen Hwy. 5/26 RME 2017-0526. Section 106 Review. MMS survey preparation. COA 2015-0526A. 5/30 Revised May meeting minutes. Finish COA 2017-0526A. File maintenance. 5/31 Section 106 reviews. RME 2017-0530, 2017-0531, 2017-0531A. Completed COA 2017-0524. Met with John and Sheila Redding regarding landmarking 541 North Ironwood. Met with South Bend Schools rep. regarding repairs to several Elementary Schools. File maintenance. 6/1 File maintenance. Prepare agenda for June HPC meeting. Begin COA 2017-0601. 6/2 COA 2017-0602, 2017-0602A. Staff -approved half round gutter selection for 336 W. Navarre. 'Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 1029 Hudson 2017-0501 Repair/replacement of existing 16' high retaining wall; addition of 8' retaining wall adjacent to provide additional strength. Space between to be used as a planter. Concrete steps to be poured between tops of walls on each level. 201 E. Navarre 2017-0501A Tear off multiple existing layers of roofing and replace with 5/2 architectural shingles. 1205 E. Wayne N. 2017-0505 Tear off and re -roof with architectural shingles, in-kind. 713 W. LaSalle 2017-0515 Jack up and stabilize porch roof, remove and replace rotted 5/5 2:00 wood, remove and replace brick, install new mortar, Kathryn Hochstetler 5/8 repair/repaint railings, and replace stone steps with new Leeper Park projects. Eleanor Hughes stone steps of the same size. All work to be completed with 2:00 Demolition contractor? Sent contractor list/reminder to get permits. in-kind materials. 405 W. Wayne 2017-0517 Replace wood cellar door, in-kind. 813 Park Avenue 2017-0517A Replace non -original front and rear doors with 36" W Lafayette Building Mark Peterson fiberglass doors. Replace temporary 44 supporting front 2:00 Photo of Studebaker Guard House. overhang with two square turned posts. 307 W. Lamonte 2017-0519 Remove Box Elder and Norway Maple in backyard for new Cindy Diamond 5/11 AEP service wire, per Brent Thompson, city forester. Basement door replacement. James Hickner Renewal of COA 2011-0524. 511 Riverside 2017-0526 Remove existing 3 -tab shingles on garage and replace with 5/12 4:00 architectural shingles. 336 W. Navarre 2017-0530 Remove trees by street and in back yard, per City Forester. 825 Ashland 2017-0531A Remove rotten, dying Box Elder tree in back yard 2:00 Material samples for HPC meeting. overhanging this house and adjacent one. 1202 E Wayne S 2017-0531 Remove and replace 38 courses of brick; replace any other Krista - Mish. HPC 5/17 damaged brick on remainder of chimney. Replace damaged 611 East Dragoon 1222 Eckman owner flues as needed. All work in-kind. 3:00 Historic home information and contractor list Research Requests What 2:00 Date Who 1636 Lincoln Way West 5/18 5/5/17 Chris Harrell Jefferson School and Howard Park 5/8/17 Jonathon Geels Sources of HP repair/improvement grants 5/8/17 Anne Fuchs Studebaker Guard House photos 5/10/17 Mark Peterson (WNDU) Firehouse #7 5/12/17 Pat Lynch (SB Heritage) Phone Calls Who Date/Time What 5/2 2:00 1052 Portage — historic status, grant availability Andy Beckman 5/3 2:00 Who owns Erskine Manor? Building Dept. 5/5 2:00 1029 Hudson — confirm height of retaining walls Kathryn Hochstetler 5/8 2:00 Leeper Park projects. Eleanor Hughes 5/8 2:00 Demolition contractor? Sent contractor list/reminder to get permits. Josh Mougin 5/8 10:00 Birdsell roof & 1417 East Wayne roof Kurt 5/8 5:00 Lafayette Building Mark Peterson 5/10 2:00 Photo of Studebaker Guard House. Marlene Botka 5/11 2:00 Historic status of 815 Leland. Cindy Diamond 5/11 2:00 Basement door replacement. James Hickner 5/11 Received sketches of proposed project via text on cell phone. Pat Lynch 5/12 4:00 Firehouse on ND Ave. — proposed exterior changes Gordon Reiff 5/15 2:00 511 Riverside garage roof. Jason Pfledderer 5/15 2:00 Material samples for HPC meeting. 13546 Brick owner 5/15 3:00 Subdivision of property Krista - Mish. HPC 5/17 3:00 611 East Dragoon 1222 Eckman owner 5/17 3:00 Historic home information and contractor list Danielle Kennedy 5/18 2:00 Lafayette building Pat Lynch 5/18 7:00 Firehouse on ND Avenue Steve 5/18 3:00 202 East Bartlett — new roof, no COA Dave — DCI 5/19 4:00 Daryl French 5/22 2:00 Tim Morris 5/22 10:00 John DeClark 5/22 11:00 Tim Morris 5/22 3:00 victor Myers 5/22 5:00 Champion Windows 5/24 4:00 Roman Sysyn 5/24 3:00 Marlen Lechlitner 5/24 5:00 Seitz Masonry 5/25 2:00 Randall Meert ( 5/25 4:00 Sheila Redding 5/25 2:00 Cathy -Irish Realty 5/26 7:00 Ross Havrick 5/31 3:00 Scott Richards 5/31 6:00 Ed Talley 6/1 10:00 Julia Douthwaite 6/1 3:00 Kristi Matteoni 6/1 3:00 John Martinez 6/2 1:00 Eric Boyd 6/2 6:00 Roof replacement for Portage Ave. firehouse. Reference for someone to repair church windows in Columbus, IN 812 Golden front yard landscaping 61601 Bremen Highway COA for work at 812 Golden Tree removal -336 West Navarre Clarification on window for 1067 Riverside 1067 Riverside window replacement 65753 Cedar Rd. barn demolition and new pole barn. COA application MMS for 60500 Bremen Highway; emailed COA application; planning to paint house this year, possibly barn if funding can be obtained. Schedule meeting to discuss house, May 31, 1:00 p.m. at HPC office. COA application for roof 1202 East Wayne Street. Diseased tree at 825 Ashland Window replacement —116 South 812 Golden Selling 1207 Riverside 620 W. Washington COA Duck pond 1240 W. Thomas COAs HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMNIISSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT June 19, 2017 Hello Commission! Projects started without COAs/RMEs/Permits: 1154 Lincolnway East has a new decorative fence in front yard. Turned into Building Department last month. Inspector will revisit this week Code Hearing: 519 % S St Joseph and 116 E South St have the same new owner RME has been obtained for 116 E South and paperwork picked up for 519 % S St Joseph 621-623 Rex -(4t' time for this property) Environmental (debris in yard) lack of progress on structure -end of June deadline or civil penalty 821 Ashland -garage demolition. Owner agreed and is on today's docket We had 60 folks join us for the June First Friday Then and Now walking tour as part of the Best. Week. Ever. We were able to enter both the Morris and LaSalle where ND Architectural Library had the Building South Bend model and Oculus on display for interaction and viewing. 12 environmental reviews for rapid rehousing or demolitions since last meeting. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist - `i,. _ . A. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA President's Report for June 18th, 2017 • 05/15/2017 7P: HPC Monthly Meeting (County -City Building; Room 1308). • 05/22/2017 1:14P: Telephone conversation with Deputy Director Parcell regarding enforcement procedures. 05/24/2017 8:30A: St. Joseph Superior Court (Room #7); Judge Hostetler presiding. Observe hearing "Boyd vs. Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County, et al." (Cause No. 71D07 -1703 -MI -000086). HPC was represented by Deputy County Attorney — Brett Hummer. Mr. Hummer had previously introduced a Motion to Dismiss based on a breech of the 30 day limitation for proper filing (by Mr. Boyd). Defendants named in Mr. Boyd's case were never presented with a summons despite the fact that the case was filed with the court. Judge Hostettler ruled in favor of the Defendants agreeing that dismissal was in order. He promised his formal,written decision within a few days. Following the outcome, I met with staff members to discuss the court's decision. • 05/23/2017 6:20P: Discovered a suspicious depression in the brick street in front of my house (617 Park Avenue), three feet north of the manhole cover. Reported to the Department of Public Works and HPC staff, by copy. • 05/25/2017: Received an email reply from Sue Ellen Doudrick, P.E. — Assistant City Engineer who confirmed that an underground water main was leaking and responsible for the new sink hole at Park Ave. South Bend Water Works was directed to repair the issue. Work was completed later this same day. 05/29/2017: Draft and publish formal HPC response to counter public outrage (NNN-Listserv) following recent Tribune article ( "Studebaker fountain might be reborn Leeper Park" May 27, 2017) which suggested the installation of the Studebaker Fountain in place of the duck pond. Communication became necessary to counter misrepresentations that HPC had already reviewed such proposal. Other members of the public had mistaken the flat work for the recently approved labyrinth to be related to the fountain and duck pond removal. Response was intended to clarify status and advise the public of procedural process. Messages prompting my response are available upon request. Electronic post as follows: -----Original Message ----- From: Timothy S. Klusczinski [mailto:tsk617@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 02:19 PM To: 'NNN-L@LISTSERV.ND.EDU' Subject: FW: [NNN-L] Leeper Park: Historic fountain sans duck pond All, The Parks Department Board (City of South Bend) routinely considers proposals that may impact public assets within its domain. Opportunities for public input are entertained bvthat authority. Even then, whenever those projects exceed the final, public authority of that body (e.g. public utilities, traffic management, zoning or historic protections. etc.... additional review processes are automatically triggered. |nthis case, Leeper Park |Sodesignated historic site within the City of South Bend. As such, formally proposed changes to landscaping,structures oramenities must be reviewed bvthe Historic Preservation Commission ofSouth Bend & St. Joseph County The HPC board is a quasi-judicial body, entrusted by law to manage the designated historic assets within South Bend and the unincorporated territory of St. Joseph County. As a governmental body with voting privilege, the HPC fully complies with the requirements of Indiana Open Door Law and the public's right to express its views. Todate there have been N[} applications presented hothe HPC regarding the installation or placement of the Studebaker fountain in Leeper Park or the removal of the duck pond. |fand when that happens, apublic hearing date will baset. Members of the public will be invited to express their opinions about the project, at that time. For the record, the HPC has entertained three other applications, this year, related to improvements or changes at Leeper Park, These include: 1. March 2O,2O17:LeeperPark East; "Improvements bzAn\ohith8abec" 2. 2. March 20, 2017: Leeper Park East; "Miscellaneous Improvements to Rose Garden." 3. 3.February27.2O17:LaeperParkVVemt|''Nevvpub|ioADAacceosib|ehznno| labyrinth garden [ ... ] inside existing open space of Leeper Park with interpretive, education signage and benohao." ***Mr. Kepschull,|believe work related to this project is what you may noticed on your walk. The current site work is not related to the proposed Studebaker fountain. Next, after reviewing the link provided bvCouncil Member, Tim Scott (re: riverfnzn¢)arknandbai|$.onm) | could only find anonlprehensiv8 plan for Howard Park, but none for Leeper Park. However, within the PowerPoint link to "RPT Community Forum #3," a conceptual site plan for Leeper Park West showing a "Studebaker Fountain" feature, is apparent on Page 24. See httr)://anvflir).com/hcqn/dciwa/ | sometimes hear folks describe the Duck Pond asoDuck Jail orPrison. For sake let me point out that our winged companions are the only ones who can come and 0oosthey please. Maybe the rest ofuoare locked inside agiant prison infull quarantine from them? | can appreciate if chain-link fencing might lend itself to the mentaimage ofmprison (less the barbed wire of course), But it's hard to argue another screen or fencing stylethatisa more durable, cost-effective or provides better visual and open-air transparency (for taller adults or the wee ones). As a point of historic reference, chain-link has been used at the duck pond since the early 2UthCentury. None ofthis should beconstrued 0osupport apathy, stagnation oralack ofmaintenance by tax payers or custodians. Mylight-hearted response to the "Goose Scrooge:" If teachers have no pencils or paper, it seems like a conversation with school corporation officials would be in order. Likewise, | wouldn't advocate for getting rid ofPotovvotomi Zoo because the animals spaces require tidying up. Let's reject the aU-or-nothingapproach. The more features that we discontinue or let go because there's work involved gives the rest of us less reason to revisit unique places of interest and tradition - places where families and children build those fond memories. Leeper Park is indeed a special place where generations since have forged memories from those very features realized from George Kessler's vision and the City Beautiful movement. I think the Tribune article has provoked some valid responses from this list, among neighbors and social media. It makes me proud to live in such a dynamic neighborhood, an historic area, a vibrant city! A solemn and relaxing Memorial Day weekend to you all, Timothy Klusczinski Park Avenue President - Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 05/30/2017 11A: Stellar Communities Fagade Grant Committee (HPC Offices) with Elicia Feasel (co -committee representative). Finalize the portfolio of prospective building grant beneficiaries in North Liberty, Indiana as provided to us by DLZ. Develop a priority list from criteria based upon corridor location, property grouping, historic and architectural merit including the most recent survey rating, and the potential to improve the current rating after rehabilitation work. Final recommendation was returned to DLZ and will be used to determine grant appropriations. 06/05/2017 10A: Staff meeting (HPC Offices). Review pending agenda items with Executive Director Feasel. Address questions from Margaret Fosmoe — Reporter at the South Bend Tribune about Leeper Park and HPC review authority for use in an upcoming article. See S.B. Tribune: "Changes at South Bend's Leeper Park require historic commission approval; Landscape got landmark label back in 9996" By Margaret Fosmoe South Bend Tribune Jun 7, 2017. 06/08/2017 6:30-8P: Community Forum on Lead Contamination (St. Joseph County Library; Humphrey's Multimedia Room). Invited to participate as a panelist by Rona Plummer — Technology and Research Manager; SJCPL for this public forum on lead hazards. I was joined by Todd Zeiger — Executive Director of the Northern Regional Office of Indiana Landmarks, Whitney Griffin — Environmental Health Specialist at the St. Joseph County Health Department and Kathy Schuth — Executive Director; Near -Northwest Neighborhoods, Inc. Discussion was moderated by Taylor Popielarz — Multimedia Journalist; ABC57. The event was covered by ABC57 and WSBT-22. Event was free and open to the public, with an opportunity for questions. • 06/12/2017: Conference call with Director Feasel and Attorney Brett Hummer. Mr. Hummer relayed that he will be taking a new job soon which will effectively end his service as Deputy Attorney for St. Joseph County and as HPC's legal representative. Mr. Hummer expressed to Elicia and I how much he's enjoyed working with the agency, its staff and membership. • 06/14/2017 1P: Joined Director Feasel and HPC Treasurer Molnar for discussion on next year's department budget following notification from St. Joseph County.