The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJuly 2017HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION -OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 stjosepbcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm Phone: 574/235.9798 -- Fax: 574/235.9578 Email: SBSJCIHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director MONDAY, JULY 17, 2017-7:00 p.m. -MEETING AGENDA COUNTY—CITY BUILDING, 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2017-0623 509-511 Harrison 2.2017-0626 1069 Riverside Drive 3.2017-0706 315 Madison III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 19, 2017 B. TREASURER REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. -COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President 2. Standards and Maintenance Committee V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. Solarize South Bend VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Local Landmark Riverside Drive Chapin Park FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET July 17, 2017 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include A NAME �I Z5 N') WT Qc- TNM Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. F-11111 to33%1 W, B, F, D H, O MAcoG, (It)- ��oo( Cm.,yc4,j aim STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 23, 2017. Application Number: 2017-0623 Property Location: 509 — 511 Harrison Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1921/Palmiter Apartments Property Owner: Victor Lopez Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #8021-1989 Rating: not listed in 2007 Sites and Structures Inventory - DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story structure with rectangular plan sits upon a cement foundation. The walls are brick, and the very low hip roof has wide overhanging eaves. A two- story porch with three brick support pillars and two balconies spans the front side. The second story balcony is covered by a roof shingle type of material. ALTERATIONS: COA 2002-0618 approved removal and replacement of asphalt roof shingles. COA 2016-1031A approved replacement in-kind of asphalt roof shingles and installation of new gutters. Vinyl windows have been installed to enclose the second -floor front porch, and second story balcony shingles have been replaced with vinyl siding, both without a COA or building permit. APPLICATION ITEMS: Add new double hung vinyl windows in framed area of porch and replace dilapidated siding. Code enforcement was pressuring me to complete work. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner is seeking approval of Andersen Silver Line Standard vinyl windows installed to enclose second floor front porch, as well as Market Square double 4" vinyl siding which has been installed to replace existing deteriorated balcony shingles, and triple 4" vented and unvented vinyl siding which has been installed to replace existing unvented soffit. Owner seeks to prevent further damage to second -floor decking by installation of windows to prevent exposure to weather. All work has been done without a COA or building permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscat)in2 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Group B Standards, section A, state "The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark." Prevention of second -floor porch deck deterioration could be accomplished in a manner that is sympathetic to the historic structure and in compliance with the Standards for Local Landmarks. Similarly, the soffit and balcony siding could be replaced with more appropriate materials, as Section C, item 2 states, "Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original." As none of the application items conform to Group B Standards, staff does not recommend approval. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: WR3/ 17 Application Number: �O 17 — 0 6 a3 Past Reviews: © YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ® Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled i 1olm/ 2011e ❑ NO Title: ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: ��°,,,�N - (Street Number- Street Name -City -Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): { xnR L-t�Pc- 7 Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): j C-) ;LN,4 DL/0 ��i{ t� �� , Sit" j�,� � 'r-tv Lit -1_-4, (Street Nztfiber-Street Name -City -Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): �r e-r�R_ Lj-)4r-_ i Contract Company Name: Phone #: iL4 - 9:SD0 70J�_ Address of Contract Company: Sn M _ A& A- RZ) V,'_, (Street Number- Street Name -City -Zip. Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Family-Mttlti-Familj,,LCommercial-Government-Industrial-Vacant-etc.) Type of Building Construction: ( K (Wood Frame -Brick -Stone -Steel -Concrete -Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape Z New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: _� ®Q W& i -A 7 ®n 6 , R(S �(� fuP�y%U In iA)( RX24 Ij At- 4- is -1 to ts-T ^ ArC-i� _ � D X\ f Le! -1-4. t0_0f V___ Owner/Contractor Fax #: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X [l, �,-bl A& /,0 9i.L Signature of Owner e-mail: and/or X Signature of Contractor -APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE- Silver Line byAndersen WINDOWS -DOORS Ki 'a IN Ki 'a The Silver Line® 1200 Series double -hung window provides simple aesthetic appeal and energy efficiency in a modestly -priced window. Several standard features and options let you create a window that will not only fit your design needs, but your budget as well. Features & Benefits • Simple, beveled design matches any d6cor • Tilt -in top and bottom sash for easy cleaning • Fusion -welded vinyl offers low -maintenance convenience • Interlocking sash offer an effective seal against drafts • Vent latches allow for easy ventilation while helping keep your windows secure • ENERGY STAR' qualified with the appropriate energy efficient optionstt 18 tt Visit www.silverlinewindows.com for performance information. i s; msVH f ' j 18 tt Visit www.silverlinewindows.com for performance information. �j P- ZKET SQUARE' Product [ode: D4STD Product (ode: D45DLSTD Product (ode: D55TD it 'Not avoilble in Smart Styles Expressions colors. T 1 smart stv es -Panel Proectidn f P6 1 01 -aspen white Thickness .044" 08 - driftwood r7 .7 1 0 beige 9 -country bei Pcs/Ctn 10 - clay 6 12 - ivory A Inishq argra 13 - harbor blue in Panel Projection 5/8" 14 pearl 'Pcmblth leng, Thickness .044" 15 - 7 honey oak $s/,C -gr 19 eystone PCs/Ctfl 22 1 21 - saddle Lbs/Ctn 88 6ns/Skid 12 26 - desert Speualarder Price 32 - rye 35 - mocha Panel Prolection 5/8 Panel 2'36 bone j L :Thickness 44 37 - cypress - Pcs%Ctn 20 77 wheat smart stvlW L /SI d' 17 expressions 22 - graphite' U, E4 23 slate' � 247olive' <x - Ip - - '`4jg =. .�® 25 - nutmeg' 7 stratford blue' iri lye C M OM waliu= 29 - espresso' 45 - lighthouse red' -regatta' tegaftal 20 Exterior Portfolio Sr 'FITS 1 7-1 M-11-01- MR -15 �i Triple 4" Product Code: T45S 12" Triple 4" Product Code: T4FS 12" Not for sidewall applications. pf Triple 4" Product Code: T4CS 12" Not for slde.uoll applications. 'Available in Aspen White, Musket Brown, Country Beige and Clay only. Qlr F1'UYV -Toy 01:- asben.whitel.,, , :Panel L 07 -musket brown' -.- e -7— 08- driftwood 09- country beige' 7- 05 M 10- Clay, 1 -d - 5E X R, ki ice 12- ivory Tinish. -.Not6rd Srfioot 13- harbor blue Style Fully -Vented 14- pearl 0 _'S P_- 4 12' greystone ThuPanel Length 19 H 21 - saddle Sqs/Ctn 2, N_ 32- rye C I — - _. I ... -,-, Lbs/Ctn 75 35 -mocha L T n S Aii d Price bon - e 37 - cypress LS Style Ceriter'ed-Vented �7 - wheat .7 Ctns/Skid t% if I •� - �4 'VA.uiA t 1 7Prr I I� �r '.:.y r(_ t�t�`R`T— ' "f I ` 11' i'1�`I•Y�• j ✓I !f��`ilr� �'� r/_'1� ' 'd fir NJa !a �� 1!•. i�`p4��J, tits �,� ,,��,i, MAI - IM N CI • r61b� l { X 11! ,b'a. ' � • �\�� V \\\1\`V,�\ 1i `�i 11}'�i ��'�'i'' II 111 I(n'�t�a1 v .� Aiy h i ��Vi f vl 1 c 1� i+ll i I rIX341 O I I7 r ISI �1 r• MNypp SI r 1n„fill J l r (I �, � I 4 � j rtlt x -•. ffr1 '1y ryN�l - >�' Oleivl�l� a I r r♦jl '� u. � til ' � II ., 'i `, i , I I ' I I j`�. . ��,� � _ � '• 111 ! y III' f i I _1_ r ,v2 ` ��rk Y�� t�`!•zt�tP L. vrv�t �N{}4i ., ilk..,X• "3r vi Sr..... i �vrl OWN �_._--j---- �`pt;AS,$SIO,y�S a U w � s3 June 13, 2017 Victor Lopez 1110 Lincoln Way West South Bend, IN 46616 I• R D Current Occupant 509 HARRISON ST, South Bend, IN 46628 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CITY OF SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Violations of County Ordinance at 509 HARRISON ST, South Bend, IN 46628/First Notice To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to advise you that you are in violation of the City of South Bend Zoning Ordinance, at your property located at 509 HARRISON ST, South Bend, IN 46628. This property is zoned "MF I" Urban Corridor Multifamily District. The above -referenced property has the following violations: 1. The failure to obtain an improvement location permit when one is required by the terms and provisions of this Ordinance, Section 21-100(2), specifically doing construction remodeling without application for applicable building permits. 2. Failure to comply with any other provisions of this Ordinance, or other applicable federal, state or local law or ordinance, Section 21-100(10), specifically the failure to acquire a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission for improvements made to the above noted property, located within the Riverside Drive Local Historic District (Ordinance No. 8861-97) VIOLATION REMEDY OPTIONS Immediately remove improvements made without permits or application and approval for Certificate of Appropriateness from the Historic Preservation Commission; •a Apply for Certificate of Appropriateness with the Historic Preservation Commission; and if approved apply for applicable building permits. EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayel.e Bvld. I Suite 100 1 South Bend. Indiana 46601 I p 574.235.9554 1 f 574.235.5541 Sl --JOSEPH COUNTY I CITY OF SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Application for the Certificate of Appropriateness can be found at the following link: httr)://www.sti oseDhcountvindiana.com/deoartments/si chn/coafomi/12C OAADDlication.Ddf Permit applications can be picked up at our office or found at the following link: httt)s://www.southbendin.eov/residents/contentibuildina-hermits. Be advised that application for the required permits will be charged a triple fee as per Section 21.6-4.1(e) or the City of South Bend Ordinance. If these violations exist on or after June 26. 2017 citations will be issued. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. Ayoka Paek, MCP, MCIP Zoning and Business Services Administrator cc: Historic Preservation Commission EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I! INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT 125 S. Lafayette Bvld. I Suite 1001 South Bend, Indiana 466011 p 574.235.45541 f 574.235.5541 2 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 26, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0626 Property Location: 1069 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/Craftsman/1910/Hughes House Property Owner: Andy and Darla Karafa Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District, ordinance #7469-85 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a 2 %2 story American foursquare house with Craftsman features; walls are stucco with wood trim and wide soffits. The roof has a high hip with hip roof dormers covered in asphalt shingles. The front porch is enclosed on the east and open on the west side. The windows are 1/1 double hung with wood surrounds. ALTERATIONS: The attic windows are replacements with COA 2005-011813. A mudroom was added to the rear of the home with COA 2006-0627. The roof is a replacement. COA 2016-0726 approved removal and replacement of an Ash tree, installation of an inground swimming pool, replacing patio and extending around pool, new siding and roof on garage and extending roof of garage .6' to create a covered patio, installation of retaining wall in front yard, installation of two Craftsman -style porch lights and low - profile motion -detected security lights for driveway, and installation of -architectural shingles on house roof. APPLICATION ITEMS: Extend existing driveway 20 ft. to the end of the house — will not enter the backyard. Move fence back to original position. Concrete — to match existing driveway. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to: 1) extend concrete driveway 20 feet to the end of the house (see attached site plan); 2) move existing wood fence and gate back from end of existing drive way to end of extended driveway (original position). PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the extended concrete drive with relocated fence and gate will in no way detract from the historic appearance of the home, Staff recommends approval of both elements of the project. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLY% >> >DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: OR 6 I M7 Application Number: �O 17 — 06@G Past Reviews: ® YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: 7fac�iao�V ❑ NO Title: ❑ Local Landmark © Local Historic District (Name) I�IPl6i t? ill(i�/p ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ TabledEJSent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) f n, - � j q b I Address of Property for proposed work: 1 l 71 Q `( A"vusldeY_ e YIUI "1 %� ,.` (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) '7 ( /� `� Name of Property Owner(s): A n c1 q -- Z�CJ (jam . VCL QA( Phone #: � [ bl �LI "/ –� 41cD Address of Property Owner(s): lC) La 9 1\4 P,cs 1(Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): (� 1C ��ls e_ Phone #: ,21? Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip. Code) Current Use of Building: 1 \ Cl Im t l L% (Sing1AB'amily—Multi-Family—CommePcial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: In -Kind ❑ Landscape Lp New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may a checked) Description of Proposed Work: 4f f) J 0 X 1 5 e9D–( A-- �-�`� (n, V') -4 AANQ.` bca c_ 4 y CA - to , 1-'t o J �. P ,h1�� k--` ` c� _ Ned— on S' -`- r,>( . C � rc�� e — - rvtc�-CA\ e K 1 �A 1 Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X (Staff_ � and/or X Signature of Owner 1 (/ Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— 1. Rating El Outstanding ❑ Significant /Notable Contributing C/10 14. Historic Name Maurice ,& Florence Kahn 8. Address 1069 Riverside Dr. u Martin & Jane Murphy 12. Ownership Owner's Address (if different) ❑ Public [N Private 2. County 3. Survey No. St. Joseph 3A��a8' 5. Township Preliminary No. Portaq_ e 1° 1e_ r 7. City 8. Quad Name South Bend, 'IN 4h1616 State of Indiana Department of Natural Resources State Form 168221 Revised 1986 11. Endangered Igl Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes X1 No 13.'Use Present Past 14. Category 15. Surveys / Legal Protections Residence t CX DC7 .Building(s) Riverside Loc. iii s. Di s. Commercial '❑ ❑ ❑ District ❑ ❑ ❑ Site ❑ ❑ ❑ Structure El Object 19. Time Period(s) (Dates) 20. Style(s) 1909 American Foursquare I Removals Replacement 23. DESCRIPTION Al 1 Explain 16. Location Notes / Legal Description 20' east side Lot 81, 20' west side Lot 80, Shetterly Place 3rd 1-8-1061-2579 22. SPECIFY ALTERATIONS I Additions Stories 2-1, Plan Squai e... IFoundation Concrete Iwaiis, stucco with wood trim IRoof high hip with hip roof dormers., asphalt shingles (Porches full front porch, has frame for en-closina. hid- is open I `Openings dbl hung - 1/1, wood surrounds; 12 light attic window sing of -wood; porch entry has side & transom blends IGrounduildings I21. Architect / Builder 1l. C;ondition X] Excellent ❑ Good ❑ Fair ❑ Deteriorated ❑ Ruins Other 24. SITE PLAN f 18. Building Integrity M Unaltered ❑ Altered ❑ Moved Date Building was moved 1 N 71-1 1 A j j)\ X11\4 �4 Ow c� yY�...•.^'. � Z Lv My r �4 Ow c� yY�...•.^'. � Z Lv My r f \ sr5,, 5 � at t. ei1 �4 N STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 6, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0706 Property Location: 313 (aka 315) West Madison Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer -front bungalow/1877/1915/Benz House Property Owner: Bernardo Contreras Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District, local ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This wood frame house with irregular plan sits upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are wood shingle, and the steep -pitched gable roof and front dormer are covered in asphalt shingles, with two brick chimneys with corbelled caps. There is a porch across the full width of the front, with the roof being an extension of the main roof, supported by brick piers with small cross design at capitals, brick railing with stone caps, and concrete steps and floor. According to the 1987 survey card, windows are wood 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures, with a large picture window in front, although most windows are boarded up for protection and this cannot be confirmed. The house is located on a spacious site with a large gambrel roofed garage at the rear of the property, also with wood shingle walls. ALTERATIONS: The house was originally built in 1877 and remodeled in 1915. According to the survey card, aluminum storm windows have been added. COA 2015-0303A for demolition of house and garage was denied. COA 2016-0623 approved removal of overgrown landscaping and installation of new architectural shingle roof. COA 2017-0214B approved completed replacement of basement windows with glass block, and renewed COA 2016-0623 to reflect a new contractor for the roof installation. APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes: 1) Removal of existing cedar shake siding, encapsulation of wood siding beneath with Tyvek house wrap, and installation of LP SmartSide engineered wood siding with a Quad 4" pattern to replicate the existing siding. Corners will have 1x4 Smart trim. Siding will be primed and have two coats of exterior latex paint. Cedar shake is in poor condition. Condition of wood siding under shake is unknown but can be assumed to have significant maintenance needs due to shake application over top and decades of deferred maintenance. Staff requests an opportunity to document siding underneath shake upon removal. 2) Removal of existing wood double hung 1/1 windows and replacement with Andersen 400 Series vinyl -clad double -hung windows, sized to fit existing openings. Most windows have been mothballed for decades; improper sizing of boarding has allowed water to enter. Oval window will be restored in-kind. 3) Demolish and fill in cistern to the West side of existing rear door; remove rear porch, approximately 4'-0" x 21'4", and construction of a 14'x26' 2 -story addition on the North side of existing home (see attached plans). Windows and siding will be continuous as installed on main house. 4) Convert existing garage to living space. Remove existing shake siding and install SmartSide with 3" reveal to match main house; remove and replace existing windows to match existing size and location; extend the existing gambrel roof over a new continuous 6' porch on the west side (porch floor will be an extension of the concrete garage floor); support porch with four 8" Turncraft 96"x8' unfinished fiberglass square columns; install a Therma-Tru Benchmark 6 -panel insulated fiberglass door. 5) Install a Sierra Pacific 8' dog-eared cedar picket fence and two swinging gates of the same material, to be constructed with 2x4 and 4x4 treated posts. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Excerpt from February 16, 2017 LOAM Steve Szaday I am familiar with this property as I had personally on my own time helped the owner secure the property after multiple break-ins over the last four years. Many of the boarding that had taken place prior to my involvement especially those done on the second level utilized poorly fitting boards that allowed elements to enter at the top and settle on the window sashes and sills. Luckily, there are storm windows on most of the windows. Most of those had been broken instead of the actual sash glass. I counted ten storms with broken glass and six sashes with broken or missing glass. The structure has been without permanent occupants or heat since the 1980s. Fortunately, the roof that was in place had no leaks and only minor water damage in the plaster on second floor corners as a result of failing gutters. The end result of my inspection is that one in three windows are in sound condition and not deteriorated beyond repair. Those windows had properly fitted boarding and intact storms. They are all however, painted shut and without weight ropes. The remainder have suffered severe structural damage and dry rot as a result of having elements enter but not having anywhere to exit. The most damage is to the sashes and the sills. The side framework is structurally sound other than in those areas where damage was sustained during break-ins. The large fixed picture window in the front is broken with a large hole. (the glass is '/4" thick and has a green hue) The iconic oval window on the west side needs some frame attention but is in good shape. The windows located at the rear "mud - room" addition have had most of the frame work broken out and currently have either plate glass or plexiglass in place. Excerpt from June 19, 2017 9AM Steve Szaday I photographed each window on second and first floors and there are 14 windows that he is looking to replace. The structure has been boarded up for decades with the exception of six windows. This has helped the longevity of some windows but has caused some damage to others where the boarding was improperly sized or installed. I will break this down into groups based upon their condition: (1) One window is completely gone and is merely a plexiglass non operable storm window (2) Three windows have sturdy sashes that merely need re -roping and paint removal, however they are spread out throughout the house. (3) One window is the oval window that is completely deteriorated. The framework is dry -rotted and in places missing. The glass is intact but not original as it is thinner than the other window panes in the house. (4) Four windows have sashes that are in need of repairs but are salvageable. These windows were not boarded properly but were sized short of the top allowing elements in and to be trapped. In addition, a galvanized sill wrap was installed but not caulked. Water infiltration has seeped around the galvanized metal and has rotted out the sills and bottom plate. I can apply pressure to the sill and have sponge -like movement. The interior plaster shows water damage off the lower comers that runs to the base board trim. (5) Three windows have structural damage due to abuse and vandalism(break-ins). These sashes could be repaired but parting and interior stops are missing or broken and will need to be replaced (6) One window has an upper sash that is painted in place and appears to be in good condition but is missing the lower sash. (7) One windows is a large picture window at front of house. This window is a single pane sash with 1/8" thick glass that is broken. The glass measures approximately 74" inches wide by 50" inches tall. The sash is in good condition with the exception of a piece of the interior which is broken at the point where the glass was broken from the outside. The only intact storm window is the non-operable one where there is no sashes left inside. None of the remaining storm windows are complete and will all need to be replaced, I did not find any screens. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St. Joseph River, Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the common areas of the district (i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes) Required Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car thoroughfares. The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as possible to their architectural, historic, and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district is required. Repair work to fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever applicable. When utility work dictates the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete, asphalt, fillers, and similar materials shall not be used. All original streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View" streetlights designed by the Cutter Company for this neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood Association and the Historic Preservation Commission to restore "Park View" streetlights to the district shall continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of the Historic Preservation Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the individual property and the surrounding environment and properties. Recommended The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns, and tree lawns should remain open. New or replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept landscaped appropriately while vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways, and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or replacing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl, or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves, and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration of rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration - materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and doorframes are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing.. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles, and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height, and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have "L" or "T" shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one and one and a half story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are: 1:1 and 1:2, height to width ratios. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing facade of a building and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features, and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco, wood clapboard and shingles, and aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard/composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture, and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Staff recommends approval of removal of existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of siding underneath. If siding underneath is determined to be deteriorated beyond repair, Staff recommends approval of LP Smart siding. 2) Staff recommends approval of replacing windows with units that resemble the original in respect to the size of the openings although vinyl clad is not recommended over wood or aluminum clad. 3) Staff recommends demolition of rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition, per attached plans. 4) Staff recommends modifications to garage but defers to Building Department regarding use as "living quarters". 5) Staff recommends a 6' wood privacy fence on the east, north, and west sides as the proposed 8' can be interpreted as a "high wall or barrier" that is prohibited under Environment. Staff does not recommend a privacy fence on the south side (or front), but recommends a fence that is less tall than 6' and has spaces between the pickets. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCEFC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USEi/j OANLY»»»MP DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX« <<—OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: dWu U (� i-1 Application Number: Z o n — 0-1 () �0 Past Reviews: 1ETYES (Date of Last Review) R14.117 - ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled Title: July f"1 EV Local Historic District (Name) National Register District (Name) ® e ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) �% Address of Property for proposed work: �� 1�'/ /�,�/l i�tGi e� c f / n (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): ,�ij ��i//!i/GLd� (_� O/n �Y�/I//� P Phone Address of Property Owner(s): 111(P (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) t Name of Contractor(s): lz/, Ilol laol Phone #: �> Z Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: // /,5^ s X 12 i`d ,'1lq ,[ (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip. Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: l& --..e (Wood Frame=Brick—Stone tee'—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: kIn-Vnd ❑Landscape ❑New Replacement not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: +5�,�-� .7 '7 X116 t - Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: Gam/ (Staff will re o ith o* one designee) -------- and/or X re of O� er Si�f�re of Cont actor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Proposed materials for the Madison remodel as follows: 1) SIDING: We will remove the existing cedar shake siding that is in disrepair, with pieces missing. We will then encapsulate the existing wood siding underneath that may have lead paint issues as well as degraded conditions, with Tyveck wind wrap. We then propose to install LP Smart siding with a Quad 4" pattern to mimic the existing siding. This will insure a better finish and low maintenance. Corners will also have Corners will also have 1x4 smart trim Siding will have primer and two coats of exterior latex paint. WINDOWS: The existing windows will be removed due to degraded conditions, and existing sizes to be used. 4a I) We propose to use Anderson Andersen°, . #Series double -hung windows have low -maintenance Perma-Shield° exteriors, clear pine interiors or a white interior finish. 3� DEMOLITION /ADDITION: We propose to break in the walls and fill in the existing cistern to the West side of the existing rear door. We then will remove the rear porch area of the existing house approximately 4'-0" x 21'4" We then propose to construct an approximate 14'-0" x 26' 2- story addition on the North side of the existing house. GARAGE: We propose to upgrade the existing garage into living quarters. We will remove the existing shake siding and install the 3" reveal smart siding. We will remove and replace the existing widows with new windows using the existing sizes and locations. We will remove the existing garage door and side over the existing opening. We will also extend the roof over a new 6' porch on the west side. this porch will be supported by four (4) 8" Turncraft 96 -in x 8 -ft Unfinished Fiberglass Square Columns. This will become the new entry with to added windows and a Therma Tru Benchmark Door 6 -Panel Insulating Core Left -Hand Inswing Fiberglass Prehung Entry Door (Common: 36 -in x 80 -in; Actual: 37.5 -in x 81.5 -in) The porch floor will be an extension of the garages concrete floor. FENCING: We propose to install a Sierra Pacific 8' Dog -Eared Cedar Fence Picket, to be constructed with treated 2x4, 4x4 posts and two swinging gates of the same construction. I UP —M Ildi, I G- ALLEY LEY_,. C—.,. h.. 1.1amenbgn W, DoWs. rT—Ike"SII_ "' We napeae1. .0 S-� XXIIII-9 FENCE d. D-1 eOmeNM —d Spa Oebagm. bIM IIS �j . I —lbg h.. We --.11 � 1 2V 2- sU It XHIX, , 4— ft MIIIIIN L W S..g. -9 i"T 7— ung U. M M. ..1-g gauge -X A. xa I W.. Ih. V p.h . ft — 11M.. - -h b..Thu mA ' --Md III FENCE FMemlen u.. B. —* D" 6-1.11-1-9 N -g F -III z EXISTING GARAGIl up—CeG, XTN"�—'. aalenggn ...... i WIN00WS.F MING, D—L, EFFICIENT WINDOWS IFF -m-7 - - .. X .. . — NEW X) Y� —leCTU SHINGLE ROOF 0 W, -XM, 11, 1-1 k W DE..d C— F— FIX— I-- k.ld 2.4. "`g -g 2"' W NOTE MOOG REM—FIRPORC—P SPEIIATON EARED FE - 2— 6, tij ME r qL "ENNE EEO IL k --J ui Document Phase: schem Ile D—...tS w EXISTING na I DEMO PROPOSED PROPOSED SITE PLAN I '.PROP[OSED SITE PLAN NOTE THESE DRAWINGS FOR I- lo. QUOTING PUPOSES ONLY. AM ALL LOAD SIZING OF BEAMS BY LUMBER SUPPLIER SOUTH ELEVATION EXISTING WITH SHAKE SIDING NORTH ELEVATION PROPOSED WITH GREY SMART SIDING PROPOSED WITH GREY SMART SIDING Document Date: 0.9.17 Document Phase: Cons1-000 C9c —ta v. dale oath la Olgve pinWnl ELEVATION #1 SCALE 3116" = V Al ,a atm Itk , l�lsli'.v2�;n4u,,.; EXISTING WITH SHAKE SIDING PROPOSED PORCH EAST ELEVATION PROPOSED SMART SIDING WEST ELEVATION PROPOSED SMART SIDING de: ease: encs nark 'ION #2 SCALE 3116" = 1• Al EnX w. 6 Ln z to W • O r '® O ' '4 rif Ln �,+� •_},ter.,- •7i�; ,; • ;r. ,;� �.f -__.� I •- 1 Ln .. Cat. Prop 65 Warning: Use of this product may result In exposure to wood dust, known to the State ofCalifomiatoausecancer. i OR R*2,fr^`Vbp�r ;5-''. F7 ✓.x .G=am _ `v ..x .'3 =F+: �9..T_;s"iS�rra �«� � v ._"=.s:�':.,. -'-`ems "gis 5 �v �Nif,UMEfySERVI�.c=%Sa w. 6 Ln z to W • O r '® O ' '4 rif Ln �,+� •_},ter.,- •7i�; ,; • ;r. ,;� �.f -__.� I •- 1 Ln .. Cat. Prop 65 Warning: Use of this product may result In exposure to wood dust, known to the State ofCalifomiatoausecancer. i OR R*2,fr^`Vbp�r ;5-''. F7 ✓.x .G=am _ `v ..x .'3 =F+: �9..T_;s"iS�rra �«� � v ._"=.s:�':.,. -'-`ems "gis OULU rRU1=1LP=b APOU1 GENUINE DETAIL * This extra -wide 16" siding comes in three profiles: Quad 4", Triple 5" and Double 8" * Pre -primed for exceptional paint adhesion * 16' length results in faster installation * Available in fiber substrate YEAP -ED LP SMARTSIDE QUAD 4" SOLD PROFILES LAP SIDING (CEDAR) T. -.mei T LIP SMARTSIDE TRIPLE S" SOLD PROFILES LAP SIDING (CEDAR) iT LP SMARTSIDE DOUBLE B" SOLD PROFILES LAP SIDING (CEDAR) i t fEXTIIBE LENM AMALWIDTH AMALMOMESS 16 " (-92 IN.)(4877 IM) X594-(405 -1-) ..45- - (Et --) WINDO WS•DOO NS1 :„k F ID An ersen I ':;ei'.;'<,:N;:'r::4`”-','�i.�:A bpi �.�;i,-,;d,.�1`�?wss.�,r„�0.,�,.,,,,w•;.t!�j�?S!;Sx} �! mwG*,,,,�1t� ''�; . v..i.,�'�Iti.�r,x.l.. J.;'+'.i .e•r'�'', �f, "'�1�:.w.. ...,.,�rw r;�I'..r :it^Ft'y:�i�lriir. :x: f, TILT -WASH DOUBLE -HUNG WINDOWS AndersenQ° 400 Series tilt -wash double -hung windows are engineered to provide outstanding performance and style. Combined with the tilt -to -clean sash, it's easy to see why it's our best selling double -hung. Exteriors use three different levels of protection from the elements. On the inside you have the choice of natural pine or low -maintenance white, dark bronze or black' finish. For added style there is a wide range of grille patterns and hardware options. DURABLE • Virtually maintenance -free • Perma-Shield1° exteriors never need painting and won't peel, blister, flake or corrode' • Frame exterior is protected by a lough vinyl cover that resists dents and repels water and provides long-lasting protection • Available with Stormwatch* protection for coastal areas ENERGY EFFICIENT • Weather -resistant construction for greater > '" 4 comfort and energy efficiency • Weatherstripping is designed to seal out EM drafts, - drafts, wind and water • Variety of Low -E410 glass options are available to help control heating and cooling costs in any climate • Many 400 Series tilt -wash double -hung windows have options that make them ENERGY STAR" v. 6.0 certified throughout the U.S. BEAUTIFUL • Seven exterior color options • Natural pine, white, dark bronze or black' interiors • Add style with grilles, exterior trim or patterned glass EXTERIOR COLORS 13M�7( While Canvas Sandlone Terralone Forest Green DarkBron7e Black GLASS OPTIONS • Low-E40D glass • Low -E4 glass with HeatLock® technology • Low -E4 Sun glass • Low -E4 SmartSun" glass • Low -E4 SmartSun glass with HeatLock technology Additional glass options are available. Contact your Andersen dealer. PATTERNED GLASS Ideal for letting light into the home while obscuring vision. Available in four attractive patterns. . r Obscure Cascade Reed Fern EXTERIOR TRIM Available in 11 colors to complement your exterior. GRILLES - Choose from dozens of popular designs or work with Andersen I_ to create custom 0-1-patterns.B INTERIOR OPTIONS HARDWARE FINISHES ,. Gold Dust Oil Rubbed Polished Satin Nickel Slone white Bronze Antique Brass Black Bright Brass Distressed Chrome Bronze Pine While Dark Bronze' Black' Naturally occurring variations in grain, color and texture of wood make each window one-0fa-kind. All wood interiors are unfinished unless prefinished While, Dark Bronze or Black is specified. HARDWARE FINISHES '7777 {'t6p��'y��k Gold Dust Oil Rubbed Polished Satin Nickel Slone white Bronze Antique Brass Black Bright Brass HARDWARE Standard ( 57] : e Black I Gold Dust Stone I While Stone finish is standard with wood interior units. White finish comes with prerinished interiors. Estate toptlanaq Antique Brass I Bright Brass Brushed Chrome I Distressed Bronze Distressed Nickel I Oil Rubbed Bronze Polished Chrome I Satin Nickel WINDOWS•DOOR5 `Qvk nrnnia and Flack lnlenars are only available with nark nrnrve arxt Black rxlnnnrs w�1 fLrA�^ ■�1 NT we- resprinting finfli eons p evearsexact dealer lar dfirilDllily. n V 1 3e, ■m Printing Ilrnllahmts prevent exact color one hnlsh duplication. See your Andersen dealer for 1� actual Ilnish samples. 'A ld-1. I" and all ollmr ncuks when danolad arc trademarks of Andersen Cor)wrallon. 020 16 Andersen Comoralion. All fights reserved. SS 07407/16 For more information, visit andersenwindows,com/400series For help finding an Andersen product or dealer near you, please call us at 877.577.7655 or visit andersenwindov--=m. '7777 {'t6p��'y��k Gold Dust Oil Rubbed Polished Satin Nickel Slone white Bronze Chrome Brushed Distressed Distressed Chrome Bronze Nickel HARDWARE Standard ( 57] : e Black I Gold Dust Stone I While Stone finish is standard with wood interior units. White finish comes with prerinished interiors. Estate toptlanaq Antique Brass I Bright Brass Brushed Chrome I Distressed Bronze Distressed Nickel I Oil Rubbed Bronze Polished Chrome I Satin Nickel WINDOWS•DOOR5 `Qvk nrnnia and Flack lnlenars are only available with nark nrnrve arxt Black rxlnnnrs w�1 fLrA�^ ■�1 NT we- resprinting finfli eons p evearsexact dealer lar dfirilDllily. n V 1 3e, ■m Printing Ilrnllahmts prevent exact color one hnlsh duplication. See your Andersen dealer for 1� actual Ilnish samples. 'A ld-1. I" and all ollmr ncuks when danolad arc trademarks of Andersen Cor)wrallon. 020 16 Andersen Comoralion. All fights reserved. SS 07407/16 For more information, visit andersenwindows,com/400series For help finding an Andersen product or dealer near you, please call us at 877.577.7655 or visit andersenwindov--=m. Gold Dust Oil Rubbed Polished Satin Nickel Slone white Bronze Chrome Distressed bronze and oil rubbed bronze are 'living' finishes that will change with time and use. HARDWARE Standard ( 57] : e Black I Gold Dust Stone I While Stone finish is standard with wood interior units. White finish comes with prerinished interiors. Estate toptlanaq Antique Brass I Bright Brass Brushed Chrome I Distressed Bronze Distressed Nickel I Oil Rubbed Bronze Polished Chrome I Satin Nickel WINDOWS•DOOR5 `Qvk nrnnia and Flack lnlenars are only available with nark nrnrve arxt Black rxlnnnrs w�1 fLrA�^ ■�1 NT we- resprinting finfli eons p evearsexact dealer lar dfirilDllily. n V 1 3e, ■m Printing Ilrnllahmts prevent exact color one hnlsh duplication. See your Andersen dealer for 1� actual Ilnish samples. 'A ld-1. I" and all ollmr ncuks when danolad arc trademarks of Andersen Cor)wrallon. 020 16 Andersen Comoralion. All fights reserved. SS 07407/16 For more information, visit andersenwindows,com/400series For help finding an Andersen product or dealer near you, please call us at 877.577.7655 or visit andersenwindov--=m. DuraGlass Non -Tapered Structural Square Columii LOAD BEARING I ® EASY TO CUT AND INSTALL ® ROT AND DECAY RESISTANT ® LOW MAINTENANCE ® IMPACT RESISTANT LIMITED LIFETIME WARRANTY * READY TO PRIME AND PAINT m CUSTOM SIZES AVAILABLE (call for pricing and availability). Actual shaft net widths may vary jrom nominal size shown. Necking on 8; 10'; 12" is shipped loose. Necking on 6",14"and 16" columns is integrated with the shaft. Proudly made " c i C r. f; DuraGlass Non -Tapered Structural Square Columii LOAD BEARING I ® EASY TO CUT AND INSTALL ® ROT AND DECAY RESISTANT ® LOW MAINTENANCE ® IMPACT RESISTANT LIMITED LIFETIME WARRANTY * READY TO PRIME AND PAINT m CUSTOM SIZES AVAILABLE (call for pricing and availability). Actual shaft net widths may vary jrom nominal size shown. Necking on 8; 10'; 12" is shipped loose. Necking on 6",14"and 16" columns is integrated with the shaft. Proudly made All �T�UaR�Np.C��R�.A��T. POLY—CLASSIC 0 ''� , �:* { , �';. �.: v, `,!;' ,� of a�k rM s�+,'; -I L LIGHTWEIGHT FIBERGLASS COLUMNS Poly -Classic' DuraGlass square columns from Turncraft offer the classic beauty that homeowners and commercial property owners appreciate. Made from lightweight fiberglass, these columns are easy to cut, easy to install, and strong enough to carry heavy loads. Like other Poly -Classic' columns, DuraGlass square columns are decay resistant and require little maintenance. They are simply beautiful. LIGHTWEIGHT DESIGN IS AN EASY CHOICE Don't let the lightweight material fool you. DuraGlass columns have an extremely high strength -to -weight ratio, and pound -for -pound are stronger than steel. Available in square, non-tapered Tuscan styling, Turncraft Poly -Classic' DuraGlass columns are made from pultruded fiberglass, This advanced material weighs approximately 65% less than FRP (fiberglass reinforced polymer). Just like wood, DuraGlass columns are easy to handle and can be trimmed on site. CUSTOM SIZES AVAILABLE With our new manufacturing process we are able to make these DuraGlass fiberglass columns in sizes up to 20" square and up to 24' in length. Call for pricing and availability on these custom columns. Poly -Classic" my -classic" PO Box 2429 DuraGlass Tuscan DuraGlassruscan White City, Non Tam-_,_ ware Non -Tapered with Ne 66s4ing square Proudly made =rcgon 97503 E— info@turncraft.corn Shop Therma-Tru Benchmark Doors 6 -Panel Insulating Cor... https://www.lowes.com/pd/Therma-Tru-Benchmark-Doors... FINAL DAY: 10% OFF SITEWIDE + FREE SHIPPING FOR MYLOWE'S MEMBERS. GET STARTED> WE s' Open until 10PM! South Bend Lowe's Therma-Tru Benchmark Doors 6 -Panel Insulating Core Left -Hand Inswing Fiberglass Prehung Entry Door (Common: 36 -in x 80 -in; Actual: 37.5 -in x 81.5 -in) Item # 228474 Model # BMTTSFG1 1 30LB (6 Reviews) Prices, promotions, styles, and availability may vary. Our local stores do not honor online pricing. Prices and availability of products and services are subject to change without notice. Errors will be corrected where discovered, and Lowe's reserves the right to revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors, inaccuracies or omissions including after an order has been submitted. $199.00 Common Size (W x H) 36 -in X 80 -in Door Handing Left-hand Inswing +i �l O SAVE GQ FREE Store Pickup 0 3 available today at South Bend Lowe'sl Aisle 45, Bay 14 63) In -Store Map 1 CHECK OTHER STORES G SHARE l e® Delivery ® Delivery available as soon as tomorrow! 1 of 4 7/11/17, 6:00 PM Shop Therma-Tru Benchmark Doors 6 -Panel Insulating Cor... https://www.lowes.com/pd/Therma-Tru-Benchmark-Doors... ODescription 5% OFF' Every Day or 6 Months Special Financing" $299 minimum purchase required for Special Financing. Subject to credit approval. Credit offers cannot be combined. Get Details > Product Information • See the beauty in fiberglass with deep embossed panels and a smooth paintable surface; an iconic American-style door, the traditional design complements a variety of home styles • Fiberglass doors are low -maintenance and high- performance; unlike wood or steel doors, durable fiberglass is resistant to cracking, warping, splitting and denting • Therma-Tru Benchmark Doors consist of a complete door system including all necessary components; jambs, weatherstrip, sill and hinges in complementing finish colors, all engineered to help ensure a precision fit for years of trouble-free performance • Door system is Energy Star® certified with a polyurethane foam core - delivering exceptional energy efficiency • Security strike plate and 12.5 -in solid wood lock block improves resistance against forced entry • Draft and moisture -resistant, with an adjustable sill and foam -filled compression weatherstrip that remains flexible and helps seal the entryway against moisture and air infiltration • Therma-Tru Benchmark fiberglass provides peace of mind with a lifetime limited warranty • Ready -to -install door with frame QSpecifications Collection Name N/A Hinge Finish Brass Jamb Width (Inches) 4.5625 Common Width (Inches) 36.0 Common Height (inches) 80.0 Privacy Rating N/A Glass Caming N/A Common Size (W x H) 36 -in x 80 -in Actual Width (Inches) 37.5 Rough Opening Width 38.25 (inches) Door Style 6 -panel Actual Height (Inches) 81.5 Rough Opening Height 82.0 (Inches) 2 of 4 7/11/17, 6:00 PN Consistent... i Sierra Pacific Industries is the source for consistent'high quality fencing product s. Our of the art sawmill was built exclusively to a variety of fencing -� state produce ; products. Outstanding Quality... f Whether it's our #1 2 -face EI Dorado fencing for the most discerning customer, or ! SQUARE TOP i our Placer products which are graded with less stringent requirements, we're confident of our capability to meet your needs. Anti Sap Stain... Dipped in anti sap stain to minimize mold and mildew and a brightener to help maintain a fresh appearance. DOGEAR Variety of Products to Choose;From... ' The sawmill manufactures a variety of products in 1 x 4, 1 x 6, 1 x 8 and 1 x 12 nominal widths available in 4', 5', 6', and 8' heights. Full widths available upon request. d I We also manufacture posts and rails. Delivered When It's Needed... Sierra Pacific supplies their sawmills from 1.7 million"acres of forestlands and s STOCKADE ._ practices responsible forest management under AF & PA's third party certification. Highly Durable... #' Incense Cedar is exceptionally resistant to decay and is highly durable when exposed + to the weather.The Forest Products Laboratory classes Incense Cedar with woods that hold paint longest and suffer least when protection against weathering becomes inadequate. Where humidity is high ormoisture is ever present, Incense Cedar gives lasting services with little or no maintenance. GOTHIC . i - Calle"today to place your o rde r. 530.378.8 00 0 i SUSTAINABLE e u FORESTRY INITIATIVE' , ; I . FRENCH GOTHIC '1 a -a- ° o j -- :13.','-�,5 �5�.il'1.:?.11n -� o:j4 x L"CLtttr1L131.-y-; C�''"4a i� c•'4.�`E _s C.� .:-i,_"-) , .. , - �-�,f+��,g��.s:-+a d� _ �" , "C��1 1�A'��. a .tt�,�r.�*^ - _ttom�;;.y-� ii;;� tr,r.?��r`�l`�i��•7�• rt. �, � t arr_3 -- �� a z *-c9•�'\•iY:�,� .I:��,�.i.� - _l:�i �0.�4.i.°:��i e _��}�a1.�3�f- u,-i�,a a --_.i5.`4-'�*'��.c..3.�1ai '-"F L�-�'") a MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY June 19, 2017 13' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Brandon Anderson, Kevin Buccellato, Joseph Molnar, Treasurer Members Not in Attendance: Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Mike Voll Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Katlyn Foust, Legal Counsel Members of the Public Present: Roman Sysyn, K&J Building Contractors, Mark Wenkus, Mike Fernander, Deb Fernander, Beadenual Williams, Mike Illes, Karl Nichols, Leticia Morris, Theresa Johnson, Kevin Jakiel, Eric Boyd, Aaron 66, Michael Boyd, Gloria Jones, Unetta Jones, Kirstin Champer, Steve Mihaljevic, Gladys Muhammad, Derek Wright, Todd Zeiger H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 1327 East Wayne Street COA92017-0508 East Wayne Street Representation by Mike and Debbie Fernander, 1327 East Wayne STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 8, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0508 Property Location: 1327 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1941/Mills House Property Owner: Michael & Deborah Femander Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District, ordinance #7796-87 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE Two story, rectangular floor plan, wood frame construction with limestone first story and asbestos shingles on balance of exterior. Side gabled roof with gable returns and simple entablature. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles, 8/8 double hung wood windows with ornamental louvered shutters. On the south of the home, there is a one-story porch wing with flat roof and diamond pattered wood railing. Porch wing fagade has plain entablature and plain pilasters, enclosed with sliding glass doors and pergola. Attached two car garage is on the south end of the home. ALTERATIONS: The survey card, updated in 1998, notes "major" alterations to this home including: aluminum storm door and windows, enclosed south porch wing, and siding. COA 2002-0522 was approved for the removal of "existing gray asphalt 3 -tab shingles from roof of home and garage and replacement with light `shake wood brown' color asphalt architectural shingles on roof and garage." COA 2009-0601B approved an 8' x 31' kitchen addition and 7' x 20' covered porch. COA 2013-0620 approved removal and replanting of a maple tree on street lawn. APPLICATION ITEMS: Fencing along 3 sides of yard. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes installation of 5' wrought iron gate at northeast corner of garage, attached to a 38" high decorative wrought iron fence continuing 23' east to sidewalk, then running between shrubs and sidewalk (P off sidewalk) north 28'and west 38% transitioning to a 6' high wood privacy fence running 34' west, terminating at existing 6' high wood fence (existing fence to remain). Fenced area will be closed off between south end of existing wood fence and house with 7' wrought iron gate with two side pieces. Although this plan proposes a fenced area in front of the house, this would be on the Jacob Street side, not East Wayne Street, as the house actually faces Jacob. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although the proposed fence would extend in front of the setback line of the house, the siting of the house on the lot would position this fence near Jacob Street, not East Wayne Street. A similar fence project was approved for 304 T,,vyckenham with COA 2011-0606. Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Hertel moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0508 Approved. 2. 812 Golden COA#2017-0523 Riverside Drive Representation by Leticia Morris, 812 Golden STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 23, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0523 Property Location: 812 Golden Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911 Property Owner: Tim & Leticia Monis Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD, ordinance #7469-85 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 story frame house has a square plan and is set upon a concrete block foundation. It has a high hip roof with a gable projection on the main fagade and it is covered in asphalt shingles. The walls are aluminum sided. Some of the upper floor windows and the front fagade windows appear to be original 1/1 wood double -hung. All the windows have aluminum storms. There is an open porch with concrete block pillars and piers with wood Doric columns. The front door appears to be original. The house is situated on a very small wedge-shaped lot with a narrow front and side yard; the garage completely dominates the rear yard. ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided and all windows have aluminum storms. The steel security door at the rear of the house is a replacement. The garage appears to be original. The storm door is not original. The south kitchen window has been reduced in size and replaced with a modern vinyl replacement window (1985). A south basement window has been replaced with a vinyl replacement window and the other south side basement window has a deteriorating aluminum storm and wood window. A window at the rear of the house has been removed and/or covered with aluminum siding (1985). The roof was replaced with COA 2007-0316. COA 2010-0802A for vinyl replacement windows was denied with the exception of the front third floor window, as it was determined by the Preservation Specialist that existing windows could be repaired and/or rehabilitated. COA 2016-1019 approved tear down of existing garage, and conditional approval of installation of a new wood deck and French doors (replacing windows) at back side of house; removal and replacement of existing wood windows was denied. COA 2016-1205 and 2017-0103 for removal and replacement of existing wood windows were denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace existing stone retaining wall in front yard with landscape blocks; add landscaping plants, and plant flowering dogwood (Cornus florida). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Owner has removed stone retaining wall in front of property, and installed dry - laid landscape block retaining walls along sidewalks. New plants, shrubs, and a flowering Dogwood (Cornus florida) have been planted in the yard. This goal of this project was to improve soil retention, as well as the overall appearance of the property. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Riverside Drive Local Historic District I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the new retaining wall and landscaping will prevent erosion, does not detract from the appearance of the property, and is similar to other retaining walls in the Riverside Drive historic district, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Public Hearing: Barbara Gatto, 808 Golden: Supports the Morrises as they are good neighbors and are good for the neighborhood. They have improved the neighborhood. Angela Philpott, 1077 Riverside: Before this retaining wall was put in, there were loose rocks there, and kids would pick them up and throw them. This will be safer. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Hertel pointed out for the record that the installation of the retaining wall was completed before the application had been filed and that the applicants should have had knowledge of procedure from recent COA projects. Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0523 Approved. 3.511 West Colfax COA#2017-0526A Local Landmark Representation by Steve Majalevich, 117 Franklin Place, South Bend STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 26, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0526A Property Location: 511 West Colfax Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/ I898Birdsell House/Wilson Parker, Archt. Property Owner: Steve Mihaljevic/Anisah Michael Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance #8609-1995/West Washington St. National Register Historic District Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The wood frame house has field stone veneer facade on the first floor, second floor is brick veneer, gable ends of house are Tudor -style half timbers. The foundation is concrete and stone and the half-timbering in the gables. Wood windows are diamond patterned 4/1. Verandah is supported with stone columns with ornate capitals. The porte cochere has a hipped roof. ALTERATIONS: Original roof has been replaced with asphalt shingles. COA 2000-0316 approved a wrought fence around the property, and a rear yard chain link fence was approved with COA 2001-0129, although neither of these fences were installed. COA 2008-0604A approved reconstruction of chimney. ' RME 2016-0825A approved repair of five original double hung windows in second story south and third story south. COA 2016-1018 to replace the existing asphalt shingle house roof and metal front porch and porte cochere roofs with standing -seam copper was denied. COA 2016-1128A approved copper standing - seam roofing material to be used on porch and Porte cochere, and alternative (reproduction), synthetic materials for the main roof, subject to commission approval at a later date. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace current shingle roof with combination of faux slate, copper caps, copper gutters, copper valleys, coper caps, copper drip edges. Main roof will consist of faux slate, porte cochere and front porch will be all copper. Additional work that will be occurring: -Repainting of all exterior surfaces (wood) stucco, windows. -Repair of woodwork (in- kind). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This is a reapplication for items approved with conditions on COA 2016- 1128A. Owner proposes to install EcoStar Majestic Slate synthetic slate tiles with copper drip edge, copper valley, edge trim and flashings on house roof, and copper standing seam roof material on front porch and porte cochere. Historic photos show the original house roof to be flat clay tile, and the Portage Township Assessor's card lists a tile roof in 1935. The original porch and porte cochere roofs, as well as gutters and accents which still exist, are painted metal; the original house roof was replaced with asphalt shingles. Additionally, the owner proposes to repair all woodwork, and repaint all exterior surfaces: wood, stucco, and windows. These items to be approved as Routine Maintenance Exclusions. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: The current roof material is asphalt shingles on the main house and metal raised -seamed roofing on the front porch and porte- cochere. Several patches and alternative coverings are in place in multiple locations where the asphalt roof has begun to roll up and deteriorate. From the interior of the house water damage is evident on the southeast, northeast, and southwest corners. A large area on the northeast has the most significant damage. The exterior patches and correlating interior damage would suggest that an inspection should take place to identify any necessary roof deck repairs or replacement that should take place prior to installation of any new roofing material. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movine The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Siens No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscanine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the proposed synthetic slate material closely replicates the original flat clay the roof, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 5 COA#2017-0526A Approved. 4. 1067 Riverside COA#2017-0524 Riverside Drive Representation by Roman Sysyn, 1067 Riverside STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 24, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0524 Property Location: 1067 Riverside Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911 Property Owner: Roman Sysyn Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District , ordinance #7469-85 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a typical square plan, 2 plus stories built in 1907 by real estate developer Frederick Keller of Whitcomb and Keller. The foundation is rusticated concrete block, the first story is clapboard with an enclosed porch; the second floor is wood shingles above a string course. The roof is a high hip roof with three gabled roof dormers, exposed rafter tails, wide overhangs and is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are 1/1 double hung; the porch has horizontal 1/1. There is a bay window on the east side. ALTERATIONS: The porch windows are not original to the house. The roof is a replacement (1986-0417) and re -roofed over with Art Lock shingles (2007-0705). The porch had a complete tear off and re -roof with asphalt shingles (2007-0705). COA 2009-0826 approved removal of existing chain link fence and installation of new wood fence. COA 2013-0422C approved restoration of wood spindle rail on 3 sides of front porch. COA 2015-0929A approved removal of dying Sugar Maple in front lawn. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install one replacement window. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes installation of new Champion vinyl replacement window in front attic window opening. Currently there is only a triple track aluminum storm window in the opening. The new window will be an interior replacement type, installed behind the existing aluminum storm window, and therefore difficult to see. Existing wood trim will be retained. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: This morning at approximately 9:30 AM, I met with the owner of 1067 Riverside Drive at the property. He has applied to change his attic window (north/front side) from what was there to a vinyl Champion window. The current window is nothing more than an aluminum triple track storm window which will remain in place. There was a wood and glass sash hinged in place that the owner installed himself in 1973. That window was not original but fit in the jamb frame on the inside of the storm window. That sash had finally fallen apart and the owner no longer had possession of it. There was a double hung window there once but that was prior to this owner purchasing the home in 1973. The owner would like to have permission to install a new vinyl double hung window installed inside the existing window framework without any grilles. The house currently has double hung windows without grilles that are covered up by the aluminum storm windows. The new window will also be covered up by the existing storm. The proposed window is an interior replacement type and would be difficult to see after installation. Since the pane that was in place was not available to inspect, I am unable to determine its condition, I am relying upon the owner's account. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the new window will be difficult to see when installed behind the existing storm, Staff recommends approval Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commission Discussion: Evidence supports that only a storm window exists to cover the current opening — the original window no longer exists. Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0524 Approved. 5. 620 West Washington COA#2017-0601 Local Landmark Representation by Kevin Jakiel, 620 West Washington Street Kevin Proffitt, 52222 Pickwick Lane, Nappanee STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0601 Property Location: 620 West Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Richardsonian Romanesque/1889/Tippecanoe Place/Henry Ives Cobb, Architect Property Owner: Brian and Kristi Matteoni/Norm Matteoni Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #6569-1979; West Washington Street National Register District; National Historic Landmark designated by the National Park Service (only NHL in St. Joseph County and of only 42 in Indiana) Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This four-story house with an irregular plan has a 12/12 red tile covered central hip roof with numerous intersecting hips, towers, and gables, and a simple eave line with copper gutters. The exterior walls and foundations are rough stone, with limestone window and door trim. The house has large bay windows on the north fagade, a four-story tower at the northeast comer, projecting turret with conical roof at the southeast corner, a steep gable on the port- cochere at the west end, and six stone chimneys with simple banding and cut stone caps. Most windows are one -over -one wood double -hung; there are also windows with double transoms, as well as a few Gothic windows. Generally, windows are deeply recessed and feature stone lintels and sills. At the west end of the house, colonnettes flank six windows with double transoms on the fourth floor, while first story windows are set in rounded heavy stone arches with colonettes. The front entry porch is enclosed by round stone arches supported by clusters of Romanesque columns. The porte-cochere has intersecting gables and large arched openings. The rear veranda stretches around the south and east, featuring short Romanesque columns with a variety of capitals. Doors are wood. ALTERATIONS: COA 1979-1107 to convert house into a restaurant through exterior changes listed in Appendix I (including # 10: enclosing rear garden veranda) was denied. COA 1979-1217 addressed concerns discussed on previous COA to convert house into a restaurant; it was conditionally approved pending treatment of the porte-cochere. COA 1980-0219, upon review for the third time, approved conversion of the house into a restaurant, enclosure of the porte-cochere doorway openings with nonfunctional paneled wood doors, and enclosure of rear veranda with 6- and 3- light casement and fixed wood windows. COA 1980-0317 approved construction of a stone sign south of the Washington Street entrance. COA 1980-0903 approved construction of a wooden fence to enclose area south of building to install a freezer. COA 1982-0524 approved repair of roof. COA 1988-0721 approved in-kind replacement of front steps and repair of north garden wall. Six- and three -light casement and fixed windows enclosing rear veranda have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval, in violation of Ordinance Section 21-100(10). COA 2017-0214A to replace wood windows in rear veranda with vinyl windows encased with wood molding to cover all exposed vinyl was denied. 7 APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of a total of 21 windows. Install single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass 1: from The Glass Doctors as recommended by HPC. To restore to the previous 1979 installation per pictures attached. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to historically match. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Due to our seasonal time as well as the cost incurred we are requesting to complete the Southeast side this Fall 2017 and the back -South Side next fall 2018. K & J Building Contractors on our behalf will obtain permits with both City of South Bend and the Historical Commission if needed. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes removal of 21 vinyl windows installed without HPC approval, and installation of single glass pane Low E DS Insulated Glass windows from The Glass Doctors, for an in-kind replacement of the windows which were first installed when this area was enclosed to provide seating space for the restaurant. Exterior trim will be installed and painted to match existing trim on house. Although the porch was not originally enclosed, the proposed treatment will restore to the previous 1979 installation per pictures attached. Existing interior trim and concrete pillars will be resealed and painted using proper materials and procedures by K&J Building Contractors. Request has been made to install new windows on the southeast side of the rear porch in Fall 2017; with the balance to be replaced Fall 2018, due to the seasonal time as well as the cost incurred. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B B. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Re uq ired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended Il New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The vinyl windows currently installed replace wood windows that were not original to the structure. Group B Standards state that change of materials should be consistent with the character and style of the structure. Renovations, Section C1, state "Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction." As the porch was originally open, but is now used for dining, enclosure is necessary. The proposed windows will restore to the look of the windows installed in 1979, and will continue to allow dining in the porch area while providing a consistent visual appearance; therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed window installation. Additionally, staff recommends approval of the proposed time schedule, with installation of windows on southeast (most visible) side in Fall 2017, with balance of windows to be installed Fall 2018. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Public Hearing: Jason Germano, 52222 Pickwick Lane, Nappanee: In an effort to expedite this project, is there any way to access previous plans/drawings to determine what the actual window size was in 1979? Todd Zeiger, Indiana Landmarks, 801 West Washington: Indiana Landmarks has an easement on the property. They were understanding the project would be replicating 1979 windows, not just swapping out wood for vinyl. Indiana Landmarks supports the three divisions between the stone pillars, replicating what was installed in 1979. Any information in their files from the previous window installation will be made available to help determine the original window size. They will continue to work with the owners and HPC to reach an agreeable solution. Application withdrawn by Kevin Jakiel, on behalf of the owners. COA#2017-0601 Withdrawn. 6. 1240 West Thomas ' COA#2017-0602 Local Landmark Representation by Eric Boyd, 1240 West Thomas STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 2, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0602 (Application delivered by property owner to Building Department on June 1, 2017) Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/ 1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric A. Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9037-99 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse #4 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/comice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl 6 siding. COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part of building, and second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building with vinyl siding and replacement windows was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Two story addition, brown vinyl siding and three windows. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See COA 2016-0809, pending with Building Department as a Violation of City Ordinance. Not in compliance with the Violation Remedy Requirements as ordered to be completed by March 13, 2017. Owner has constructed a second -floor addition with gable roof atop one-story brick portion at rear of building. It has been partially vinyl sided to match existing brown vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings. Three windows, that appear to be vinyl, have been installed. The proposed work has been installed, without a COA or Building Permit. This is not a free-standing structure; it is attached to the main building. No report of structural inspection has been submitted with this application. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B C. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: ' 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movine The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Sims No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscaoine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 10 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, December 16, 1991, state that "all landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration, and shall be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration of such property from defects or conditions which in the judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of the landmark, structure or property in question." In particular, this property exhibits the following from the itemized (but not exclusive) list of detrimental conditions: b. Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging, splitting, buckling, crumbling, holes, missing shingles or similar conditions; e. The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof and foundations, including broken windows or doors; h. The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe condition or conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After careful review of this application, it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building Department. As in COA 2016-0809, Staff recommends approval of rear second story addition with gable roof. Staff does not recommend the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an incompatible material as reference in C, 2. Staff recommends approval of a wood siding or fiber cement siding to complete the new second story addition. Staff recommends double hung windows, wood or aluminum clad, without rounded tops in the same style as the original windows in the main structure. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner concerns: 1) HPC office was closed twice when Mr. Boyd tried to turn in COA application, and he eventually turned it into the Building Department. 2)He did not receive a copy of the staff report and agenda in the U.S. mail, but rather had to come to the office to obtain a copy to prepare for the meeting properly. 3) Structural report included with second COA is also relevant to this COA. Owner noted discrepancies: 1) Boarding of windows was done to comply with Code Enforcement regulations. 2) He stated that his project is in compliance with the Building Department, and provided copies of correspondence stating application for COA would be a remedy for non- compliance. Public Hearing: Gladys Mohammed, 808 North Ironwood: worked for South Bend Heritage. Goal to reinvest in the west side of South Bend, and get residents to do likewise. Eric has a dream and is trying to pursue it. It appears that someone in the city made a mistake and they need to fix it and not make Eric pay for it. She is encouraging HPC to allow Eric to pursue his dream, and advise him right, and not have to pay for someone else's mistake. Would like to see the building be something valuable for the community. Mike Boyd, 1207 West Thomas: big brother of Eric. This is the neighborhood where we grew up. Here to support his brother in his dream, to see what the process entails, hopes this can move forward. Communication is important. Carl Nichols, Gethsemane Church of God, 308 South Walnut: church adjacent to the land Eric owns. They own property between viaduct and Firehouse and are in the process of developing it. It is not appropriate to leave the Firehouse vacant and abandoned. The neighborhood is growing. No one cares what the building looks like; they care that it is not vacant. Please approve the COA. 11 Beadenual Williams, 1209 Thomas Street: She has wondered since she moved in what was going to happen with the Firehouse. There aren't a lot of houses on that block, but we try to maintain what we have. Eric is improving the building. It looks nice now; not like the ghetto. Somebody took pride and did something with the building.. She supports Eric; he made a change to the neighborhood. Gloria Jones, 2705 Fredrickson: We all grew up on Thomas Street. It is time something happens with that building. 25 years from now Eric will be putting her away and using that building. She supports the COA. President Klusczinski stated for the record this is a 1920s structure. There are standards and guidelines we use that are universal for single -site landmarks like this. There is a law that the city of South Bend passed that declared this building an historic landmark to the city of South Bend, and gave the Historic Preservation Commission jurisdiction for review of exterior changes to the structure. The HPC has supported preservation and stewardship of this badly damaged landmark. A Routine Maintenance Exclusion was granted in 2011 to replace the roof on the structure. The current project happened without a building permit and without a Certificate of Appropriateness. The HPC supports Mr. Boyd in his efforts to preserve the building, but we have a set of standards and guidelines that are very objective for the kinds of allowances that we could permit for the exterior of the structure, and in that we try to maintain some discipline about things that are in the best interest of the structure, to keep its 1920s appearance, or to accept installations of additions that are sympathetic with that original intent, architectural and historic. Commissioner Gordon moved to approve second floor addition remanding final review authority to staff to approve double -hung aluminum clad or wood windows as replacement for existing second floor windows, retaining existing vinyl siding and installing siding to match on balance of second floor addition exterior. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Five in favor, one opposed. Commissioner Hertel (NAY) - Vinyl does not fit with the historic integrity of the building. I love this building, this building is beautiful, but I think we are doing it a disservice putting vinyl on it, and it is not the original intent of the building materials. Vote: 5 —1 COA#2017-0602 Approved with conditions. 7. 1240 West Thomas COA#2017-0602A Local Landmark Representation by Eric Boyd, 1240 West Thomas STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 2, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0602A (Application delivered by property owner to Building Department on June 1, 2017) Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric A. Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9037-99 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse #4 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl 12 siding. COA 2016-0809 to construct shed roof over part of building, and second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building with vinyl siding and replacement windows was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Mono roof 4/12 pitch, rise west to east ending at center of building resting on ledger/East stud wall. Low profile mono roof resting south brick wall and interior brick wall. Open courtyard. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See COA 2016-0809, pending with the Building Department as a Violation of City Ordinance. Not in compliance with the Violation Remedy Requirements as ordered to be completed by March 13, 2017. Owner has constructed a 4/12 single sloping roof surface over part of, roughly one half, of the main building, from the west exterior wall 30' east to a 10'H wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a V overhang at west wall. Concrete floor of open courtyard is 6-8" lower than adjacent floor. Owner plans to utilize existing floor drain and lower floor height to manage accumulated moisture in the courtyard. This roof has been installed without COA. See report of structural inspection by Siqueira, LLC, submitted with this application. In summary, the inspection reveals inadequate joists spanning 17.5' running east -west at 16" oc, supported at masonry walls; roof level beam sag, exterior walls that lack bracing, trash pile in "courtyard", recommended provisions to dispose of snow and drain rain in "courtyard", multiple deficiencies in the framed mono -sloped roof at North West, and 2x4 joists spanning 10' that are insufficient. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B D. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movin The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscanine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to 13 the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, December 16, 1991, state that "all landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration, and shall be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration of such property from defects or conditions which in the judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of the landmark, structure or property in question." In particular, this property exhibits the following from the itemized (but not exclusive) list of detrimental conditions: b. Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging, splitting, buckling, crumbling, holes, missing shingles or similar conditions; e. The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof and foundations, including broken windows or doors; h. The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe condition or conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After careful review of this application, it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building Department. As in COA 2016-0809, Staff does not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends approval of a flat roof covering the entire main structure. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner and that all work is remanded to the discretion of the Building Department prior to installation. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner corrected staff report reference to structural inspection by Siqueira, LLC, regarding inadequate joists spanning 17.5' and 10' as these reference the second story addition in COA 2017- 0602A and do not reference the roof project of this COA. Commission Questions: With respect to discussion regarding the withdrawal of the current application to allow for changes that better reflect design guidelines, President Klusczinski asked the applicant if he wished to withdraw his application. The applicant declined. Public Hearing: Mike Boyd, 1207 West Thomas: Could this application be withdrawn and come back with application with different options for roof— different dimensions and/or style? Executive Director Feasel reminded that when denying COA 2016-0809 for this same roof project, four Commissioners specifically requested additional quotes/design options. Mr. Boyd further hopes we will work together to move this project forward. Theresa Johnson, 2630 Prairie Avenue, Apt. 1-108: Asked for clarification on what needs to be done for this to pass. If Eric followed the suggestions proposed, would it be OK? The Commissioners explained what details they would need to approve a project that would be more in keeping with the guidelines. Unetta Jones, 1204 Thomas: Questioned what kind of roof the Commission wanted to see? President Klusczinski explained that to be approved, a new roof would have to be more in keeping with standards and guidelines. 14 Karl Nichols, Gethsemane Church of God, 308 South Walnut — church adjacent to the land Eric owns. They own property between viaduct and Firehouse and are in the process of developing it. It is not appropriate to leave the Firehouse vacant and abandoned. The neighborhood is growing. No one cares what the building looks like; they care that it is not vacant. Please approve the COA. Kirstin Champer, 1240 West Thomas: Supports project not just because she is Eric's wife, but because of what its improvement has done for the community. This building is becoming a community hub. Before the windows were boarded up, kids were breaking them out. A lot of the things Eric is doing takes into consideration the area where this building is located. A new roof is necessary to preserve the building, but a flat roof may not drain as well, and is economically not feasible. At the end of the day, it came down to saving the building and securing the community or making the roof look pretty. It's not a cute roof, but in this case, it comes down to purpose over aesthetics, for the safety of the building and the protection of the community. Gloria Jones, 2705 Fredrickson: You need to understand the history of the firehouse. It's not like Tippecanoe Place or Kizer House. It is a simpler structure that's part of the fabric of the local neighborhood. The Commissioners assured that this building is just as important as Tippecanoe or any other landmark. Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Hertel (AYE) — under Standards and Guidelines Group B Section C this would alter and modify the structure and change it greatly by adding this type of roof; plus, we are lacking information on the materials to be used for completion of the roof. Commissioner Buccellato (AYE) — The design simply does not meet the existing character of the structure. Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — It would alter the fagade, architectural integrity, and its style, which are some of the most important things we have to make a decision on as a Commission. Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — It is not in keeping with the guidelines for this building, does not keep the historical character or look of the building, and we are missing some information of how that roof would be covered. Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — Ordinance 9037-99 designating 1240 West Thomas Street as a Local Landmark details a number of stylistic features, specifically two-story Period Revival Fire Station with flat roof and limestone parapet coping. Long term preservation of the structure and safety of its occupants are not served by the installation which is both inadequate and architecturally inappropriate. I affirm the staff recommendation for flat roof and the noted remedies for violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards and seek the support of this body, the Building Department, Code Enforcement, and the owner's cooperation to effect changes that will preserve this unique and special building. I also believe that the current roof being proposed is not in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines that the Commission must use in review of all the local historic landmarks under its jurisdiction. I believe that other more appropriate remedies exist and should be explored instead of granting this particular application. Commissioner Molnar (AYE) — The design is too far outside of the mandated Standards and Guidelines which the Commission, by law, must follow. The roof would be prominent in display in the front of the structure, as opposed to the rear. I would be in favor of looking at something with a lower pitch, not necessarily a flat roof. None opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0602A Denied. S. 821 Ashland COA#2017-0605 Chapin Park 15 Representation by Derek Wright, Access Properties, 623 East LaSalle Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 5, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0605 Property Location: 821 Ashland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1901 Property Owner: Robert & Carlotta Levy Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Historic District, ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Contributing . DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story wood frame house with square plan sits upon a brick foundation. The hip roof has asphalt shingles, and a brick chimney offset from the peak with three simple corbel courses. The house front features a full height bay with windows. Windows are wood 1/1 wood double hung with diamond pattern muntins on front fagade. A hipped roof garage is at the rear of property. ALTERATIONS: House has had aluminum siding, storm windows and doors added. In 1949 the front porch was removed and a front stoop was added, with a small plastic porch roof over the entrance. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demo garage structure, haul away debris. Pad will remain, possibly for extra parking since very limited street parking. South Bend Code Enforcement affirmed demo. (Stan Molenda) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to tear down garage. Building is composed of several garage structures/additions, some block, some frame, in varying conditions, all of which are to be demolished. The 1932 Portage Township Assessor's card lists a 2 -car (19x19) block garage noted in 1949 as being used as a shop, as well as a 1 car (24x12) wood garage. There is also a note from 1955 listing a 23.5x24 concrete slab car port. Demolition order on garage was affirmed at June 18, 2015 Code Enforcement meeting. Debris will be hauled away, but concrete pad will be retained to provide extra parking. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: June 9, 2017 1 had received a call from Derek of Access Properties giving me permission to enter the building last evening. I went first thing this morning and was able to take interior photographs. There are multiple sections to the structure. There is an apartment in there as well. The roof has collapsed in the "breezeway" between the apartment and garage. The roof of the garage itself has two areas that have holes and deterioration. The pads of the garages are in fine condition and could be reused even for just parking. The additions are really where the deterioration is the worst. The makeshift walls are rotted through and the exterior walls are a combination of block and doors. The two strongest walls are those that run north and south and are part of the original garage structure, but the removal of the rear wall and all the additional weight of the newer walls on the original has begun to pull the structure apart. The argument could be made to save the original small garage structure; however, the roof and framework of that roof would still have to be removed and rebuilt as well as the rear wall rebuilt. It may be more effective to tear down and rebuild a solid larger structure that utilizes the entire pad area. The main house is currently used as multi -unit apartments (4, I believe by . the number of mail boxes) Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT V.GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While evidence from the Assessor's card shows several of the garages have been on the property for some time, the current arrangement of connected garage structures does not contribute to the historic character of the property. Demolition has been affirmed by South Bend Code Enforcement. Due to significant deterioration of the later additions and compromised integrity of the altered original garage, staff recommends demolition of the entire garage, and retention of the concrete pad, and would further recommend owner propose a new garage design to be built in the future. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0. COA#2017-0605 Approved. 10 9. 813 Park COA#2017-0605A Chapin Park No Representation. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 5, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0605A Property Location: 813 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/1880 Property Owner: James Hickner Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Historic District, ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story irregular plan house has a brick foundation. The asphalt -shingled cross gable roof with pyramidal hip roof in back has molded cornice at rake in gables. There is a small front porch. Windows are 1/1 double hung. Siding is wood clapboard. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door have been added, as well as concrete steps to front porch. Existing 1/1 double -hung wood windows have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval. COA 2017-0216 approved replacement of five wood windows on back and side of house with vinyl windows. RME 2017-0517A approved replacement of existing front and back doors with 36" fiberglass doors and replacement of temporary support post on front overhang with square turned posts. APPLICATION ITEMS: Project upper deck with stairs coming down to ground level deck surrounding french doors. I plan to sink (6) 6x6 posts in areas close to the house to support the structure of a second floor fire escape door and decks also part of the stair structure. All structure beams will be wood. Decking is preferred to be composite. Spindels and rails will be wood. Decking also already partially approved is landing for the back french doors that I would like to have connected to stairs and upper deck. The addition of French doors and decking that connect to upper stairs door. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: In response to an anonymous call to the HPC office, Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday visited the property on February 12, 2017, and as part of observations noted the installation of French doors replacing an existing double -hung window in a first -floor bay window at the rear of the house. On a return visit March 2, he noted the French doors had been removed and replaced with an improperly sized window. Owner now proposes to: (1) reinstall French doors in bay window, with wood steps beneath doors leading to a composite deck built over an existing sidewalk at rear of property; (2) install a door and build a deck on the second floor at rear of property as a means of second floor egress. Second floor decking will be composite, with wood rails and balusters. Deck will be supported by six 6x6 posts. Stairs will connect second floor deck with first floor deck adjacent to new French doors. See attached drawings. Preservation Specialist's June 7 site visit revealed the French doors have been reinstalled. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases, where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. 17 III. NEW CONSTRUCTION C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS Required Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features and open spaces. Proportions and materials shall conform to those required for new construction. Recommended Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood. Prohibited Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used. Not Recommended Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other guidelines and standards. IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS Required Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved. Recommended Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. Prohibited Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and spaces is prohibited. Not Recommended Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (1) French doors, and related steps and deck are located at the rear of the house and, if properly installed and trimmed, will be compatible with the structure. Staff recommends approval of the installed French doors trimmed to match existing doors and windows on house, as well as steps and deck constructed to meet Building Code requirements. (2) This property differs from many in that it is zoned and utilized as multi -family, necessitating proper egress from all units. Installation of a second -floor door and stairway at the rear of the house will provide proper egress while providing no change to the historic character of the building as viewed from the street, and will not alter important architectural features; therefore, staff recommends approval of the second -floor door, deck, and stairway, constructed to meet Building Code requirements. Proper permits should be secured before commencing project (1) and (2). Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Anderson moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Hertel (AYE) — questions that cannot be answered Commissioner Buccellato (AYE) - lack of information to make a ruling Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — lack of representation and questions not being answered. Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — no representation Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — unable to approve the application for lack of information and representation by the applicant. We are unable, as a body, to continue the application because it requires a waiver from the applicant, and our only recourse at this point is to deny the application to prevent things that we don't yet understand from happening. Commissioner Molnar (AYE) — lack of representation to answer questions about the project None Opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0605A Denied. 10. 314 West LaSalle COA#2017-0606B Local Landmark Representation by Mark Wenkus, 314 West LaSalle 18 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 6, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0606B Property Location: 314 West LaSalle Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Parapet Front/I892/Frederickson Candy Store Property Owner: Mark Wenkus Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #7050-1982 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Frederickson Candy Store is set upon a brick foundation with a rectangular plan. Walls are wood clapboard with comerboards and decorative shingles in the front pediment. A full front porch at entry has a wood floor, turned columns, wood steps and railing. The door has a double panel with etched glass top lite and transom. Windows are wood double hung, 1/1, with wood surrounds and wood shutters. ALTERATIONS: Front door has been replaced and most wood shutters have been removed. APPLICATION ITEMS: Overlay roof. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to install Certainteed Highland Slate fiberglass shingles over existing 3 -tab shingles. Existing shingles will become the underlayment for the new roof as they are laying flat, and ice and water shield were properly applied. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B E. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movine The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Siens No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscanine 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, 19 fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Although no specific evidence of the original roofing material could be located, recommendation for roof repair at the Frederickson House, which was once adjacent to this building, state "to be historically correct, the house should have wood shingles." As synthetic slate would achieve an appearance more in keeping with possible original material and profile, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 COA#2017-0606B Approved. III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 15, 2017 —Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. Budget for 2018 seeks a 5% reduction and comingles the annual grant from the City of South Bend. Treasurer Molnar will continue in his efforts to rectify. Discussion. C. STAFF REPORTS Commissioner Hertel moved to suspend the agenda and defer staff report questions for the next meeting, with the exception of legal. Seconded by Commissioner Klusczinski. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Executive Director — In packet. 3. Deputy Director — In packet. 4. Preservation Specialist —Distributed. 5. Legal — Brett Hummer has left to take a job with Thor D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President — Distributed. 2. Standards and Maintenance Committee — Referencing topics of sustainability and deterioration by neglect, Chairman Hertel reported that they have determined that everything should be viewed on its own merit. No official policy at this time. V. OLD BUSINESS — None 20 VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. Commissioner Buccellato discussed need for better documentation, particularly inclusion of a site map, with COA application to expedite decisions and meetings. Staff will continue to work to improve this, and follow COA application documentation checklist more carefully. B. Commissioner Molnar thanked the Commissioners for the tone of their conversation with COA applicants, and reminded them of the importance of attitude with the public when representing a government agency. VII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hertel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Six in favor, none opposed. Vote: 6 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 10:37 p.m. Attest: Michelep�elfman, Secretary Date 21 L'atak ,;,1�ocat"ijdn Budget as of 06-30-2017 Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addri Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent BalancelPercent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 15,591.94 15,592.06 15,592.06 000 General GovT. 50.00 50.00 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 20,349.94 20,350.06 20,350.06 000 General Gov'T. 50.00 50.00 14800 Fica Contribution 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 - 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 000 General Gov'7. 100.00 100.00 14810 P.E.R.F. 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 8,051.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 14840 Group Insurance 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 0.00 0.00 10000 Totals 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 59,941.88 49,493.12 49,493.12 45.23 45.23 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 54.97 245.03 245.03 000 General GovT. 81.68 81.68 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 79.00 921.00 921.00 000 General GovT. 92.10 92.10 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 151.63 151.63 000 General GovT. 67.39 67.39 20000 Totals' ""' 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 207.34 1,317.66 1,317.66 86.40 86.40 31070 Other Contractual Services 1,500.00 18,890.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 200.00 5,441.14 14,748.86 14,948.86 000 General GovT. 72.33 73.31 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 3.29 50.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 9.87 36.84 43.42 000 General GovT. 69.13 81.48 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 51.24 43.76 43.76 000 General GovT. 46.06 46.06 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:01 PM by ksobecki Page 49 -,Location Budget as of 06-30-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 30000 Totals """"`»'«*'»""""`».."«»""«"" 1,503.29 20,335.00 0.00 0.00 21,838.29 206.58 5,502.25 16,129.46 16,336.04 73.86 74.80 Location Totals """"""'*'»"*""""'»"*"«*«""" 1,503.29 131,295.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 206.58 65,651.47 66,940.24 67,146.82 50.41 50.56 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:01 PM by ksobecki Page 50 r Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 06-30-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence Fund: 1000 County General Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Vendor Budget PO Number Vendor Name Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 141812 061203 Szaday Steve 1000.31070.000.0037 06/15/2017 200.00 15 140027 001538 South Bend Tribune 1000.33010.000.0037 04/11/2017 6.58 80 Location Total 206.58 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:05 PM by ksobecki Page 20 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Revenue Current 0.00 Total 0.00 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General Gov'T 06/02/2017 05/31/2017 Claim/PayDocket 06/16/2017 06/14/2017 Claim/PayDocket 06/30/2017 06/28/2017 Claim/PayDocket Estimated Revenue Current 0.00 Total 0.00 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General GovT. 06/02/2017 05/31/2017 Claim/PayDocket 06/16/2017 06/14/2017 Claim/PayDocket 06/30/2017 06/28/2017 Claim/PayDocket Estimated Revenue Current 0.00 Total 0.00 1000.14800.000.0037 Fica Contribution General Gov'. F.I.C.A. Contribution Estimated Revenue Current 0.00 Total 0.00 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General GovT. P.E.R.F. Financial System Unreceived Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 745.00 (745.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Historic Preservation 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:728279 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst06/02/2017 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:729288 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst06/16/2017 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:729879 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst06/30/2017 Unreceived Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 Historic Preservation 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:728280 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst06/02/2017 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:729289 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst06/16/2017 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:729880 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst06/30/2017 Unreceived Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 Historic Preservation Historic Preservation Unreceived Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 Historic Preservation Historic Preservation 07/06/2017 03:08 PM by ksobecki Expenditure Unexpended: 3,598.14 Unencumbered: 15,591.94 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 4,696.14 Unencumbered: 20,349.94 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 745.00 Balances 15,592.06 15,592.06 (15,591.94) Balances 20,350.06 20,350.06 (20,349.94) Balances 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 Page 162 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General Gov'T. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 8,051.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 8,051.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.14840.000.0037 Group Insurance General GovT. Historic Preservation Group Insurance Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 Cash: (24,000.00) 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation 06/20/2017 06/20/2017 Claim/RegDocket 22.48 PO:141111 BK:008 CK:729474 Inv:852400 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 245.03 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.48 Unencumbered: 245.03 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 54.97 Cash: (54.97) 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 921.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 921.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 79.00 Cash: (79.00) 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 151.63 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 151.63 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 Cash: (73.37) 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 06/01/2017 06/01/2017 PO/AutoPO 160.00 PO:141444 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Financial System 07/06/2017 03:08 PM by ksobecki Page 163 •.Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation 06/06/2017 06/06/2017 Claim/RegDocket 260.00 PO: 141145 BK:008 CK:728528 Inv:2017-0517 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 06/15/2017 06/15/2017 PO/AutoPO 200.00 PO:141812 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 06/20/2017 06/20/2017 Claim/RegDocket 160.00 PO:141444 BK:008 CK:729507 Inv:2017-0531 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 14,948.86 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 420.00 Unencumbered: 14,748.86 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 200.00 5,441.14 Cash: (5,441.14) 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 43.42 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 36.84 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 9.87 Cash: (9.87) 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General GovT. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation 06/06/2017 06/06/2017 Claim/RegDocket 51.24 PO: 141144 BK:008 CK:728422 Inv: 177869 Vend:000070 Adams Remco INC Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 43.76 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.24 Unencumbered: 43.76 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 51.24 Cash: (51.24) 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 900.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 900.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 400.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 400.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 07/06/2017 jii18 PM by ksobecki Page 164 `-Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Location Totals Current Revenue Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 67,146.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,788.00 Unencumbered: 66,940.24 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 132,798.29 206.58 65,651.47 Cash: (64,906.47) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,788.00 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 132,798.29 206.58 65,651.47 Cash: (64,906.47) Financial System 07/06/2017 03:08 PM by ksobecki Page 165 Location Budget as of 06-30-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017, Director: County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals '+`««._«_.«_«._.:«_._«__.+.+«+«__«__.+.+ 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Location Totals """""""'""""'""'"""""«""" 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:45 PM by ksobecki Page 104 Location Budget as of 06-30-2017 hint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Carry Forward Original AddVI Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent Fund Totals'" 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:45 PM by ksobecki Page 105 Combiried Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0000 General GovT. Saint Joseph County 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen GovT General Gov'T. General Gov'T. Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:57 PM by ksobecki Page 276 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 lalntJoseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts-Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 183.75 (183.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 183.75 4103.02707.000.0037 Charges For Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 51.74 (51.74) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 51.74 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 193.50 (193.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 193.50 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:57 PM by ksobecki Page 277 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Location Totals Current Revenue Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 0.00 428.99 (428.99) 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 428.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 428.99 (428.99) 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 428.99 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:57 PM by ksobecki Page 278 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 06-30-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 06/30/2017 i Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 Total 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,812.05 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Fund Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,812.05 Financial System 07/06/2017 03:57 PM by ksobecki Page 279 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 06 June through 05 July 2017 Daily Highlights. 06.06 Meet w/ Tim re: Leeper Park and COA applications, follow up correspondence. Review HPC ordinances and Minimum Maintenance Standards. Correspondence w/ Karen Haun re: History Tour by Bicycle 2018. Meet w/ Margaret Fosmoe SBT re: Leeper Park. 06.07 Work w/ Geo on Building South Bend, correspondence w/ Adam, edit district write ups, follow up tasks. Correspondence w/ Carol Nichols re: City Cemetery brochures. 06.08 Correspondence w/ The History Museum- re: Treasure Hunt City Cemetery tours. Correspondence w/ Leslie re: Geocache issues. Review VPA memo re: Concepts for Leeper Park improvements. 06.09 Work w/ Lou Sabo on HPC website updates. Attend a Studebaker Fountain meeting. Correspondence w/ Chris Harrell re: 1636 Lincoln Way West grant. Review St. Patrick's Park Challenge Windmill fundraiser. 06.12 I Payroll. Work w/ Eric on orientation and on updating forms/templates. Correspondence w/ BD re: 509-511 Harrison violation. North Liberty fagade grant correspondence w/ Sue Solmos. 06.13 SJC Department meeting. Correspondence w/ Evie re: Bendix (Studebaker Clubhouse) local landmark status. Correspondence w/ VPA and DCI re: working with The Questers to rehabilitate the Sexton Cottage at City Cemetery. Work w/ Eric. Draft 2018 County Budget form. 06.14 Process Contractor invoice. Meet w/ Tim and Joseph re: 2018 Budget. Finalize and submit 2018 County Budget form. Meet at The History Museum re: Treasure Hunt City Cemetery tour. Interview w/ WSBT re: Leeper Park Duck Pond. Prepare for and attend Leeper Park Duck Pond forum at NNN. Work w/ Beverly in Area Plan to update Quick Access Map for Historic Properties. Correspondence re: Dillie Probst local landmark. Correspondence w/ Leah re: Solar in historic districts. Poll for quorum. Work w/ Eric. 06.15 Budget reconciliation. North Liberty fagade grant follow up. Work w/ Eric. Correspondence re: Marquette School. Solar correspondence w/ Leah. Correspondence w/ VPA re: City Cemetery Sexton Cottage. Correspondence re: 1636 LWW grant. 06.16 Budget follow up. 06.19 I Meet w/ Becky Emmons re: Treasure Hunt Scavenger Hunt. Treasure Hunt meeting and follow up. Prep for and attend HPC meeting. Subdivision redraft correspondence w/ Larry, Area Plan. 06.20 Meet w/ Building Department. Phone call w/ Eric Boyd re: windows and suggestions for roof. Meet w/ Eric Boyd re: windows. Purchasing new policy review. 620 W Washington correspondence. Provide reference for former intern Bethany Emenhiser (she got the job at the Kansas SHPO). 06.21 Meet w/ Leslie and Greg at City Cemetery re: Geocache. IT review of email migration. Correspondence w/ John Timmons re: family reunion speaker. 06.22 06.23 06.26 I Payroll. Meet w/ James Mueller, Executive Director, Department of Community Investment re: HPC budget and discussion re: County/City position. Meet at DCI re: City Cemetery branding and marketing. 06.27 06.28 06.29 06.30 07.03 Holiday 07.04 ( Holiday 07.05 COA deadline. Visit to Casaday Costume Collection. Correspondence w/ Bill Schalliol re: Bendix local landmark. Scheduling meeting w/ Jeff Parrott, SBT re: 1240 W Thomas. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address I RME# I Description . Interns/Volunteers Who Project George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Eric Stalheim, Preservation Specialist Phone Calls Who ( Date/Time Regarding Matthew Moyers Evie Kirkwood John Timmons 06/06 Leeper Park 06/06 Leeper Park 06/12 Firehouse No. 6, Marquette School Research Requests What Navarre Cabin in Leeper rental Date Who 06/06 VPA Hours .25 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell —June 6 —July 5, 2017 Daily Highlights - . > -- :`: 6/6 Section 106 review. RME 2017-0606 and 2017-0606A. COA 2017-0605A, 2017-0605, 2017-06068. 6/7 Research 302 W Washington. COA 2017-0602, 2017-0602A, 2017-0605, 2017-0605A, 2017-0601. RME 2017-0607, 2017-0607A, 2017-06068. Site visit to 832 N. Lafayette. Work on refunds for Restore Michiana. 6/8 COA 2017-0601. Prepare HPC meeting packets. File maintenance. Mailed staff reports to most owners/contractors. 6/9 Revised COA 2017-0605, 2017-0601, 2017-0605A. 6/12 RME 2017-0612. Section 106 reviews. File maintenance. Researched 302 W. Washington. Mailed commissioner's packets. 6/13 Minimum Maintenance Survey in county. 6/14 Posted/emailed HPC meeting agenda. Follow up on county MMS. 6/15 State Byways Conference, Nashville, IN. 6/16 File maintenance. Minimum maintenance survey letters. RME 2017-0616, 2017-0616A. 6/19 File maintenance. Prepare meeting minutes template. Attend Treasure Hunt meeting. Attend HPC meeting. 6/20 Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Worked on minutes from HPC meeting. Issued/mailed COA for 1327 E Wayne N, 812 Golden, 511 W Colfax, 1067 Riverside, 314 W. LaSalle. Drafted denial letter for 1240 W. Thomas. 6/21 NEH Public Humanities Projects: Historic Places webinar 6/22 RME 2017-0619, 2017-0620. Minimum Maintenance Survey in county. 6/23 Worked on HPC meeting minutes. COA 2017-0623. Section 106 review. Mailed permit for 821 Ashland and 1240 W Thomas denial letter (certified mail). 6/26 Research 1515 E. Jefferson. Section 106 review. Finished first draft of HPC meeting minutes. Meet with James Hickner. Withdrawal letter for 620 W. Washington. Denial letter for 813 Park. Letter for Eric Boyd, COA 2017-0602. 6/27 Revise and mail letters to 1240 Thomas and 620 W. Washington. Revise HPC meeting minutes. Section 106 review. COA 2017-0623. 6/28 Meeting at Tippecanoe Place to discuss rear porch window options. COA 2017-0623. Section 106 review. 6/29 COA 2017-0626. Section 106 review. RME 2017-0629. Site visit to 717 Lincoln Way East. Address 523 S. St. Joseph Street 806 Leland 528 S. Eddy (Jefferson Intermediate) Routine Maintenance Exclusions RME# Description 2017-0606 Remove of non -original concrete staircase on south side of 2017-0606A 2017-0607 832 N Lafayette (Madison 2017-0607A Primary) 318 Lamont 2017-0612 10708 Edison Rd. 2017-0616 house. Replace existing deteriorated shadow box fencing in same location with addition of one 4' section in back yard to conceal garbage containers. Replace flat roof sections 2,12 TPO. Misc. Tuckpoint and limestone repairs. Remove old fire escape. Add roof hatch & ladder to access roof. Clean 8,000 SF limestone. Replace existing slate roof on south side of building with EcoStar Empire Slate shingles. Miscellaneous spot mortar repairs of face brick and limestone. Clean 28,428 SF of limestone. Tear off 3 -tab asphalt shingles from garage roof, replace damaged decking, and install new 3 -tab shingles. Stabilize, repair and restore front porch, all work and materials in-kind. Extension of COA 2016-0726A. 1007 W. Hudson 2017-0616A Remove dying maple tree in front yard between sidewalk and curb. 826 Leland 2017-0619 Replace collapsed garage roof, in-kind. 314 W. LaSalle 2017-0620 Replace metal coping on top of front parapet with bent aluminum flashing; remove chimney towards rear of structure and install new decking boards. 717 LWE 2017-0629 Remove existing 3 -tab shingles and install new Sheriff Goslin interlocking shingles on house roof. Research Requests What Date Who 302 West Washington 6/7/17 Sue Blasko 3510 & 3520 West Western Street 6/7/17 Lynn Patrick 1515 E. Jefferson 6/26/17 Forest Walton 501-513 S. Michigan 6/26/17 Dave Relos Phone Calls Who Date/Time What Allen -Cressy Everett 6/6 7:00 Standards and guidelines for historic districts and COA process Matthew Moyers 6/6 3:00 Leeper Park duck pond Rene Casiano 6/6 3:00 Contractor list Marlen Lechlitner 6/7 3:00 66963 Cedar barn Lynn Patrick 6/7 3:00 3510 & 3520 West Western Street history Sharon Sunderlin 6/8 11:00 Pella window rep ?? 6/8 3:00 Restore Michiana Workshops, Indiana Landmarks North Ind. Appraisers 6/8 2:00 815 Leland historic status Taurean Small-ABC57 6/9 3:00 Kizer House Barb -Bldg. Dept. 6/12 7:00 Power washing in a historic district Pat Ashton 6/14 2:00 COA for 520 E. Colfax Kathryn Kerr 6/16 2:00 Contractor list Liz 6/16 3:00 City cemetery tour info Vernon Walatka 6/22 6:00 East Wayne Street standards and guidelines Sarah Lopez 6/23 6:00 COA for 509 Harrison Linda Thibaut 6/26 3:00 Donate an oak/mahogany table? Mary Prince 6/27 3:00 Garage roof replacement at 826 Leland Bill Nash 6/28 9:00 Re -pointing info, Fire House #9 Paige Wassel 6/29 3:00 Leeper park HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMNUSSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT July 12, 2017 Hello Commission! Projects started without COAs/RMEs/Permits: 705-707 LWE-vinyl windows installed without permits/COAs-Building Dept. stop work 635 LWE-Re-roof garage. Got approved RME Code Hearings: 621-623 Rex -(4h time for this property) Environmental (debris in yard) lack of progress on structure -end of June deadline or civil penalty. Update: $2000 penalty imposed. 655 River -all issues completed by owner 705 Leland -cleaned by owner 805 Leland -demolition affirmed $5000 civil penalty imposed 516 S Michigan -$2000 civil penalty imposed 530 S St Joseph -Repaired and cleaned by owner 315 W Madison -demolition affirmed but rescinded with performance bond We had 45 folks join us for the July First Friday West Washington Tour. 14 environmental reviews for rapid rehousing or demolitions since last meeting. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County County -City Building South Bend, IN 46601 To: Elizabeth Hertel, Standards and Maintenance Committee Chair Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County From: Leah Thill, SolSmart Technical Advisor for the City of South Bend on behalf of the Michiana Area Council of Governments The Department of Energy will soon designate the City of South Bend as a "solar -friendly" SolSmart community. During the designation process over the last six months, there has been an increase in inquiries from residents in historic districts seeking more information about how to install solar in local historic districts. Additionally, the Commission may expect to receive even more inquires as the Solarize South Bend initiative launches in July 2017 with the guidance of the Michiana Area Council of Governments and the South Bend Office of Sustainability. The purpose of the attached "Guidance for the Design and Siting of Solar Energy Systems" document is to improve transparency and compile best practices from Department of the Interior guidelines and existing practices in other communities. This document is not intended to alter any existing guidelines or requirements. Italicized text is for reference only and may be struck from the document. Sincerely, Leah Thill SolSmart Technical Advisor d 'South ,�e�a� What is Solarize South Bend? To Participate, Attend a Workshop This Summer: July 19th., Aug. 5th., or Aug. 17th ■ A short-term, community -driven initiative to organize homeowners and businesses to leverage their buying power and receive a discount on their solar photovoltaic systems, while providing education and resources to simplify the process of going solar. ■ Powered by volunteers and community members ■ Guidance provided by the South Bend Office of Sustainability and the Michiana Area Council of Governments, Why Solarize Now? ■ The Mayor of South Bend signed the Mayor's National Climate Action Agenda in June 2017. Solarize is a quick strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while accelerating the transition to clean energy, facilitated by individual action. ■ Cities across Indiana have or are launching Solarize initiatives in July 2017: Goshen, Elkhart, Indianapolis, Evansville, Carmel, Columbus, Muncie, and Bloomington. ■ South Bend will soon earn "solar -friendly" community designation from the Department of Energy SolSmart program due to efforts to streamline City processes and remove barriers to solar development. ■ Recent state policy changes to net metering start to take effect for systems installed after Dec. 31, 2017. Systems installed before that date have the most financial value. What are the Benefits of a Solarize Campaign? 1. Make solar even more affordable: Receive below-market pricing through a negotiated discount (historically 10-15%). Reduce utility bills for decades. 2. Educate and Build Awareness: Dispel myths about viability and cost, reduce complexity for consumers to navigate permitting, utility interconnection, financing, etc. 3. Mobilization: Harness social networks to catalyze solar installations before year-end. 4. Demonstrate Power of Local Action: Go farther together. A successful Solarize campaign requires a grassroots effort to scale up. 5. Leverage Partnerships: Collaboration with the Michiana Area Council of Governments (MACOG), South Bend Office of Sustainability, faith groups, neighborhood associations, non -profits and other community leaders will magnify the impact. 6. Support Local Jobs: Solarize initiatives stimulate demand for solar and support the developing local solar industry. Contact: Leah Thill, So/Smart Technical Advisor for South Bend, 574-287-1829 x 801 Ithill@solsmart.org RESOLUTION NO. ' 17-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA GUIDANCE FOR THE DESIGN AND SITING OF SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana issued Resolution No. 16-57 in support of a reasonable transition to cleaner�,sources of energy for m�, South Bend; and %i%% WHEREAS, the City of South Bend is interested in exploring cleaner energy, s potential to add local jobs, reduce energy bills, and reduce pollution iii a manner that preserves reliability and affordability; and [City of South Bendy omrrmon Council Resolution No. 16-57] WHEREAS, the City of South Bend is wo development by increasing transparency and provi processes; and �l,. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation;( /o County, Indiana (the "Commission") seeks f ba VVII conservation and cleaner sources of energy and WHEREAS, thQ;Commissionshall issue to the construction, reconstruction, alteration, de any building, structure or se includingail solar ResolutionrNo.. 17 the Communi07-Z continually eval `hte and update community's current:and future WHEREAS, proactive the applicants and the Corrriiss systems in a manner that is mo`s complete information to allow t to reduce barriers to clear auiUnce related Bend and St. Joseph ,ation with energy eate`of Appropriateness (COA) prior or moving of any exterior feature of ;stems; and [Commission of Ethics — Responsibility to the mission and its designated Staff representatives dans`guidelines and procedures to ensure they meet the [Com"mission Resolution No. 17-01.] rA nication potentially reduces the effort required of both encouraging applicants to design and site solar energy My to be approved by the Commission and to provide Commission to make a fully -informed decision; and WHEREAS, the Commission may impose reasonable restrictions on solar energy systems but may not adopt any ordinance which has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy systems other than for the preservation or protection of the public health and safety according to IC 36-7-2-8; and WHEREAS, IC -37-7-2-8 defines reasonable restrictions as those that: (1) do not significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency; or (2) Page 1 of 7 allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: 1. Guidance for Solar Energy Systems: The Historic Preservation Commission hereby issues supplemental guidance for applicants wishing to install a solar energy system in a Local Historic District or on a Local Historic Landmark. This guidance is intended to provide a summary of best practices and does not alter existing requirements: As existing requirements vary by Local Historic Districts, refer directly 4he,appliacble District Guidelines. a. Recommended: Solar energy systems in Local'Historic Districts and on Local Historic Landmarks should be designed, "sized, and located""to,minimize their effect on the character of a historic "building. Before designing a solar energy system, the applicant is encouraged -to consider the following:... i. Energy conservation measures such.,as insulation, weather stripping, caulking;°or".new, or repaired storm windows should be considered as the most cost-effective"method of cutting energy costs "for any property, historic orotherwise prior to investing in solar "energy systems:../ ' ii'"" ;Before applying for aCOA, applicants should verify that enough sunlight-is.available to make the proposed system viable. iii: Place solar energy systems to avoid obscuring significant features he perception of the overall character of the or adversely affecting t property. -iv. Install solar energy systems on an addition or secondary structure where applicable. v. "Install solar devices on non -historic windows, walls, siding, or shutters which do not face public streets. vi. For systems not attached to the building, consider screening with landscaping or other means to limit visibility from a public thoroughfare in such a manner that the system maintains access to solar energy. vii. The preferred location for roof -mounted solar energy systems is generally on a non -character defining roof line which is not readily Page 2 of 7 visible from public thoroughfares in the least visible location where at least 85% of optimal system performance can be achieved. If the south side is publicly visible, solar energy systems should be installed on the west or east side if less publicly visible and shade factors are appropriate. viii. Minimize visual impacts by locating solar energy systems back from the front facade. ix. Single installations on a single roof plane are preferable to disjointed arrays or arrays on mu�ltiplb"',roof planes. If more than one array is needed, it is pre erg limit the system to one panel section on each side of the structure.vVrth rear location preferred. X. Use the least invasive method feasible to atfach the solar energy system to a historiefy, f such that it avoids damage to significant features and historic materials and can be rem6ued3so that the 4;NY , original character is easily restor/i,, xi. Solar shirigles'J"' ay be appropriate if added to a roof surface visible from a puble�thoroughfare if lowor;non-reflective shingles are used and the nstallationis xeversitilewithout impacting the roof or elements on the,<fbod. ldingntegrate " /solar systems arncouraged to be included in initial design of ne, construction, rather than as a later �% l3 ition„especially A e"'V' blend in with the character of the roof. ay lie integrated into non -historic windows L glazing visible from public a non -reflective coating. xiv. On pitched roofs, solar energy systems should be installed flush with the%pitch of the roof provided that an appropriate gap allows N,/l for atr circulation to maintain system efficiency according to the /i cif,• mufacturer s instructions. On flat roofs, the system may be elevated if not highly visible from public streets. xv. Mechanical equipment attached to the building fascia may be painted a similar color as the fascia in order to blend into the building, provided that doing so does not obscure any labels or signs required by applicable codes and standards. b. Not Recommend: L Avoid placing solar energy systems in the front yard or yards adjacent to a public thoroughfare. Refer also to applicable zoning Page 3 of 7 code for setbacks and other design guidelines applicable to ground - mounted solar energy systems and any associated accessory structures. ii. Character defining elements such as historic windows, walls, siding, shutters, dormers, original roof line, chimneys and other features should not be removed or altered in connection with the installation of solar energy systems. iii. Trees should not be removed to improye access to solar energy, unless a tree or portions thereof is dead or diseased and the applicant complies with applicable local requirements for tree removal. 2. Supplemental Application Materials The Historic Preservation Commission/hereby issues recommendations for the submittion of applications for a COA for solar energy systems. Applicant are encouraged to refer first to the official -COA application. When preparing application materials, the„applicant should keep'in mind that it is difficult for the Commission to conduct a fair and objective review and make a final decision if the application fails to clearly`shows,the visual .arid aesthetic impact of the solar energy system and all associated equipment or components. In addition to the materials required by the application checklist, applicants should consider providing the following: a. Site Plan: A site plan that clearly—shows the location of the solar energy system and all components. If ;an image of the actual property is not used, %sketches should show the..solar`energy system drawn to scale in relation to -the`roof and other structures or structural design features. b. Site Photos: Site"'photos of the building and property showing the location of the proposed installation as viewed from adjacent public thoroughfares. c Representation'of Visibility: Sketches that visually demonstrate how the `solar.energy,system and all associated equipment and components will acfually.,appear on the specific site from any nearby public thoroughfare. Components may include: any additional meters, inverters, disconnect switchers, combiners, visible wiring or conduits, etc. d. Example Images: Full color images or drawings of the proposed solar energy system. An example on similar buildings, especially with the same or similar roof style is recommended. e. Equipment Specifications: Manufacturer specification sheets for the solar energy system and all components. Page 4 of 7 3. Existing References to Solar in Local Historic District Guidelines (Emphasis A dde d): The Commission provides a list of references that may affect the siting and design of solar energy systems in specific neighborhoods to provide the applicant with a starting place. Applicants should refer the applicable documents to understand the overall intent of the documents and determine if other characteristics of the property may be impacted by the proposed project. If there are no direct references to solar collectors or other mechanical devices, this does not mean that solar collectors are prohibited nor that reasonable restrictions do not apply. Refer to applicable guidelines and standards to understand;the unique and distinguishing characteristics of each neighborhood. Guidelines �ancl`Standards are available on the website for the Commission and by contact theCommission. a. West North Shore Drive, p. 24 (2003): "Ol'"" 41 ,,, o Accommodations to the every—Ocrrsis and mechanical devices Preferred /%%- w I 4., >,^. New approaches to energy cp�nservation such as solar:panels and wind generators may well become a practical and;necessary pai;tof ozir future. Ifyou are considering the installatibn,ofsu�i an innovation;fnsult the Historic Preservlfi&fi Commissio;UN {% ev may recommend how this could be done W&W it terferinQ ividiltlie,.visual intezrity of your house. Place television anti and%tether mechal I equipment such as air conditiont , conditioning units in i „ %� b. Rive%Bend; p "26; No 11 p:2.5'(2003): !? at the Wa ►r's locations. p. 23; Lincoln -way East h6h.. vl systems shall, be placed in areas that will result in as w� � > Ale alteration, of thetructural integrity and physical Othe,building'Solar collectors and TV dishes shall be placed tip,,;%, thews operty mzd shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. " 'treet, p. 38"and p. 45; Riverside Drive p. 26 and p. 32-33; 21 and 28 (2003): ThNatallat ori of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes om;,m;%i and solnwcollectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed Froin the public thoronehfare." "Required Mechanical systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possible alteration to the structural integrity and physical appearance of the building. Solar collectors and TV dishes shall be placed at the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. " Page 5 of 7 d. Chapin Park, p. 69 — 70 (2003): "Prohibited The installation of unsightly large devices, sttch as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a buildine, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are hiehly visible from a Public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review.... The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a [Certificate of Appropriateness]. "Recommended Solar collectors and TV dishes should be placed in the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. " e. Edgewater Place (2003) No direct reference. 4. Existing References to Solar in Local Histori / ndmark Group, B, Standards (Emphasis Added): a. Group B Standards, p".5:...,,, "Prohibited The installation of unsightly devices such as TV.reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in,areas,ivhere they can be viewed from public thorotrlrfares." 5. Effect of this Resolution:".. a. This ;is provided as.:a recommendation with which applicants maywisfi voluntarily comply.'Compliance with the suggestions provided in this Resolution does not guarantees that a COA will be approved. b. Until Local Historic District Guidelines and Local Historic Landmark ``Stands are updated and adopted to incorporate additional references to solar energy'systems, this guidance should not be interpreted to impose addition a l`restrictions, alter existing Local Historic District Design guidelines; alter Historic Landmark Group A or Group B Standards, or narrow the authority of or limit the discretion of the Commission. This Resolution in no way limits the Commission's authority where otherwise provided by law nor should it be seen as a means to contradict, hamper or avoid local building and zoning regulations. [Commission Resolution No. 17-01.] d. This Resoultion does not supercede other requirements where there are conflicts between this guidance and other requirements adopted by local or Page 6 of 7 state entities having jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable City or County Ordinances, or building, fire prevention, and electrical codes as adopted by the State of Indiana. e. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the Commission. [Commission Resolution No. 17-01.1 ADOPTED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on F 2017, in the Conference -Room, 1308 County - City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46% ATTEST HISTORIC PRESERVATIONCOMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND%AND ST. JOSE -PH COUNTY 111TS", Page 7 of 7