HomeMy WebLinkAboutDecember 2017HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601
sjcindiana.com/438/Historic-Preservation-Commission
Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578
Email: SBSJCHPC@sjcindiana.com
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director
MONDAY, DECEMBER 18, 2017-7:00 p.m. -MEETING AGENDA
COUNTY—CITY BUILDING. 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308
I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL
II. PUBLIC HEARING
A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
1.2017-1120 814 Forest. #9574-05 Chapin Park
2.2017-1204A 50106 Bittersweet Trail #117-76, amended 11-1987 Local Landmark
3.2017-1205 906-908 Leland #9574-05 Chapin Park
III. HEARING OF VISITORS
IV. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. November 20, 2017
B. TREASURER REPORT
1. Location Report
C. STAFF REPORTS
1. Correspondence
2. Executive Director
3. Deputy Director
4. Preservation Specialist
5. Legal
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. President
2. Nominating
V. OLD BUSINESS
VI. NEW BUSINESS
VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Telephone interpreter service is available upon request free of charge for individuals with limited English proficiency.
Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request free of charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET
December 18, 2017
Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a
record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate
your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If
you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D.
Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person.
NAME
U177Hx.Y.y
lint G9&9 sr.
3a3 3
�Lt a Fc' re 5+- (R b (a Le Lonci
515 3,7K�� i
-7o5 -Fr aKk-1s� 51. �1/ajlpara�soZF.l
W, B,
H, O
W
F, D
I
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 6 December 2017
Application Number: 2017-1120
Property Location: 814 Forest Avenue
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gable-front/1880
Property Owner: Joseph Segura
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Historic District, Ordinance #9574-05
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: This 1 '/2 story frame house sets upon a concrete block foundation
facing west onto Forest Avenue. The roof is hip on gable, with hip roof dormer on the north side and asphalt
shingles. The structure has as an exterior chimney at the rear of the house as well as a central interior chimney. In
the front of the structure is a half -width front porch with turned wood supports and moulded cornice. The exterior
is covered in wood clapboard with corner board and a moulded cornice. The windows are orginal wood 1/1 double
hang on the second story and 6/6 double hung in the front on the ground floor. A single oval window is at the south
west corner on the ground floor. Two 4 -light casements are on the North fagade. All windows have moulded
entabulatures. Aluminum storm windows are present on the second story.
ALTERATIONS: The structure was moved from 111 West Bartlett Street to the present location on December
11, 1980. White picket fence enclosing portions of the property was removed sometime after March of 1987.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "8' x 12' wood frame mud room, 10' high." See attached.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Application is for the retroactive approval of an addition to the
primary structure. Addition is an elevated mud room built on the south side of the house, measuring 8' x 12'. The
addition stands 10' high, with a low-pitched, hipped roof sloped away from the original house towards the south.
The roof is covered with Owens Corning weathering -grade asphalt shingles. Exterior siding is vertically -hung
Arauco North American 5/8 (19/32CAT) 4x8 Textured OC wood siding. The western (street facing) portion of the
addition has two Larson windows. The southern wall has three Larson windows. The eastern face has one Larson
window and one Larson door with Lincoln storm and screen door with wooden steps. The addition is, according to
schematics received from the applicant, 5'8" away from the lot line. Applicant intends to paint the addition to
match the house.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
On Saturday, November 11, 2017 I received a text from a resident of Chapin Park LHD that a new addition had
been built at 814 Forest Ave and they wondered if that was approved by HPC.
On that following Monday, November 13, 2017 I confirmed with the office that we did not have an approved COA
for the addition. I then visited the property located at 814 Forest and took photographs. I noticed an addition on the
south side of the structure that seemed to be on "stilt" legs with an overhang that seemed very close to the
property's fence. I also noticed that the siding was a plywood based wood siding with vertical grooves. This is in
contrast to the horizontal clap board that is on the house. I left a business card on the front door and then forwarded
the photographs to the director, the deputy director, and the building department when I returned to the office that
same day.
Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
General Definitions
(B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
(b2) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED)
Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation would not
require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are incompatible with the
defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would not require the duplication of the
original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and the district's defined elements of
preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be encouraged, but contemporary methods and
materials would be acceptable when compatible.
IH. NEW CONSTRUCTION
New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to
an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other
buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district.
A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION
The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have
L- or T- shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half story bungalows. The most
prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio.
Required
The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building
height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing stricture and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block.
Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no stricture with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block.
Additions to the existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure.
Recommended
Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood.
Prohibited
Additions that would add new height or change the existing facade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character shall not be
considered.
Not Recommended
New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features and spaces of
the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions.
B. BUILDING MATERIALS
Nall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard / composite
siding.
Required
Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent
structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall related to the existing or original materials of that structure.
Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the
basic structure and appearance of the building.
Recommended
Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the
original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.
Prohibited
Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations.
IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES
A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
Required
Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved.
Recommended
Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural
integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated.
Prohibited
Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and spaces is prohibited.
Not Recommended
Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. Staff would suggest two
modifications: 1) that different siding material may be more appropriate than the vertical wood boards used, 2) that
wooden lattice be installed beneath the porch.
Written by
Adam Toering
Deputy Director
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
t 6
'der �� AAi At�A\ tity`
t\�\tSPO
(
x •�✓�'�� i �.Sy� ' ,+lar i - u,,, :: f�
a I.
.dui♦ F(�..
ki
tl�}l,�i. Fl;, ,ul '1, IpHI gHiW7H'dWU - -
jj f 9H691H990�( .
lilt
tl�t lli 't tl�I � . 1�18i
.� $� 1 } � " 19H 9G➢H
f 4S i�S}'�,i �• �
fir.+1
`5��11`�tt �• S, i I u��itl, +.. rir�)�;1'.> � ''1` ':.t. + t �•'��.�. � � :r��Y'.ti*i: z .
��� �q dc4h��.�.� t :; lk �. •. i. � �. � r ..
¢ ti 7 yid 5(:I ,+J) t; � JC(Ir
t t
t
v.. 1ye��1 ` _' e�C'.l`.u.+ i ^ '\�; (� �4(C� r 3 L � ��•`1 ��jY.
1*
t l
oaf; -tip }
1 4
1:45 AA-1;111'
t�Ri �y ., q,sl"�q #' r^ - 1 �' �' � „Y . o-� •A `.,•�j �"�y • r�' _�
tiY t � ✓
Y•„ v r7-�,z. X }tom
�$y�.a. .a., . - •,y
' c
0.
419 a .�4vtr !; 5u qa +� w,i)tF�^y�' al rtly l,7ilS1'r2.a)v� ��� �. M��� ',�}`�h .�5� a �y p m`��. atk:�., za'"Y cy4 S`d ' ^' �',��'`C�,,•�." � 'vt• K.
' 1
..�,, x`' » �! 1 ! n t •{� t P � �isn.S�a tt4`S ,v, f -. , r' .�' . Hyl . „ ��.em � ,rte y �'`a
`z
•
� `� -• � cam*
1 i ' � � ; Qlt't l jv 3 � j� • ..r a 1. t� ;+ C M 'i��, i, l� ;s ; _ � . + � ��4:. •\w��� � k v
�t e 4 F r � �,i�, �� �.,�t4� vk i; �� !t3yv'�C� ti. • '� �l. � � �u¢�.-.
14
�
L F•4"1tl
da
�70-
-
��'•.'` w"'5..�: vTY F K;f y
Aoi -
Imo_ -tips
Aw
q^ 'kx.�•CY y. ter- j �, v- na : �'�; � �� r - ��'
4w le.
rV 2 e 4�
-IV
44 �; ,
x z
.. R"F i L fi"J'd •/ n` _ -w .Sri.' ��ID
Al :, "--i�+G._•"—."._T J `�
AIL
r
.... . .....
ICA
........ ..
Liv
y
or
FX
Ffd
: t
• w
�Y n'
a � Y_T. - �'Fa r' "::.n+wf�;��''��y`�'4�^'i: �3• i z�.-_• tt 3' c
k& a`
mi
4 --- 'r"� ��,;sreRc-';';gg?c.r;;`v�,•�'�v`�.�-,>*:5��..3`w- zx
- t ..'•Snt ( 2'-y`^.;' r:3;Yg_•:-':.-'<vi":s��y':=. d$.-, :.Y,i:Pg'mrK d14 .•g '�. �..
77
pp
,' /�! ..:rim N.r"r.;.�� �;Mt�a wefa•
r - ^-:;man:'a`.•...;�:'�:'.i�-<�;wcn•:J'�� mac:.... :.# _x:h ].:ip ;27: .5 �,
zr%H2:
� .>� r - 'n 4 R _ - k _ i .� $y _Y -^tee•,•-• - `•i? .R
-
�`."'.t
.c_ _, -. „_ ..- .. -.. ..- ... �..,z.u., _.• ,._ _. ...—a:. vl....edl c.....wv� rv�r� .v�t.,a ra..rx..w+ d'
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: December 7, 2017
Application Number: 2017-1204A
Property Location: 50106 Bittersweet Trail
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: L-Plan/Italianate/1877/William C. Kownover Farm
Property Owner: David A. Visser
Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, Ordinance No. 117-76, amended 11-1987
Rating: Outstanding
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kownover farmhouse is a 2'h story brick house with asphalt
shingle roof and stone foundation. 2/2 wood windows with segmental arches, with keystones, brick heads, and
stone sills, and two bay windows on the front. A portico with flat roof supported by square wood columns covers
the front entrance. The property has a summer kitchen of brick to match the house, and a large gable -roof barn.
ALTERATIONS: Original bay windows roofs have been replaced with higher pitch and wood shakes. Aluminum
storm windows have been added. There is a small addition to the rear of the house. Between May 2012 and
December 2014, the front portico was removed without a COA. The barn was taken down in 2014 without a COA.
Green space at site of former barn has been developed with a stone wall built of original barn foundation stones.
COA 2017-0403A approved installation of egress window on north side of house and landscaping to screen
window and adjacent A/C unit, creation of dumpster pad along south side of drive adjacent to road, to be enclosed
with fence, gates, and evergreens, and extension of gravel driveway. COA 2017-0501 approved installation of 6'H
dog-ear wood stockade panels along north property line. Appropriate shade tolerant plants and/or junipers to be
installed as necessary.
APPLICATION ITEMS: `Barn demolition. Barn was demolished in 2014 without COA and documentation of
the need. Also done without permit. Property sold to Vissers in 2015. Seeking retroactive COA for building that no
longer exists so that permit can be issued, and to settle the unresolved issues." See attached.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:
Background: This application is a continued effort by the owner to obtain a retroactive COA on the barn that was
demolished by the previous owner. At the April 2017 meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission, COA
2017-0403A was amended to strike the barn demolition due to lack of information on the condition of the barn and
the COA was continued as amended with conditions including, HPC petitions for leniency for the current owner on
barn demolition and seek the previous owner make restitution. Although staff has petitioned the Building
Department for leniency for the current owner and that the responsibility for the violations be directed at the owner
responsible for the barn removal, it is their policy not to pursue any other owner than the current for violations.
Condition of barn: What is known about the condition of the barn has been gathered from two sources, Mr. Sokol,
previous owner of the property and responsible for the demolition of the barn and the site visit report made by
Steve Szaday, preservation specialist. In summary, Mr. Sokol details the neglected condition of the property upon
taking ownership. Specifically, holes in the 4+ layers of roof, rotten wood, animal infestation, missing and
weakened fieldstone foundation, beam on top foundation rotten from animals, insects, and water, and a bat
infestation. Quotes for some of these repairs began at $110,000 plus materials. See attached. According to the
preservation specialist, the building lacked a foundation which contributed to its collapse.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: See attached 2014, 2015 documents
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B
A. Maintenance
The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and
upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites.
B. Treatment
Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re-
roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark.
A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it
significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of
Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the
original surfaces.
C. Renovation and Additions
Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A
modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to
landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail.
Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions,
materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the
following:
1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause
minimal visual change to the original style and construction.
2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any neve material in the landmark should be of the same material as the
original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original.
a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size.
b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding.
Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when
renovation is considered.
D. Demolition
Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only
alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the
exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this
documentation.
E. Moving
The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the
landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness.
F. Signs
No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure, Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed.
Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business.
G. Buildine Site and Landscaoing
1. Required
Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the
property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio
decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, neve walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and
other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed
from a public way.
2. Recommended
New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and
newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic
fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable
flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing
appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale.
3. Prohibited
No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways,
outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas
shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception
dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the described condition of the structure and the financial burden that
restoration and maintenance would have levied on both the previous and current property owners, staff
recommends approval of this Certificate of Appropriateness.
Written by
Adam Toering
Deputy Director
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
Steve Szaday
Preservation Specialist —HPCSBSJC
December 22, 2014
At the request of Elicia Feasel Assistant Director of HPC I visited the local St Joseph County landmark
located at 50106 Bittersweet Trail on Tuesday December the 16th of 2014. Elicia had heard from a family member
of the former owner that the current owner had taken down the original barn located at the property. I visited the
property around 11 am to find that in fact the large barn located at the rear of the barn seen from the road was in
fact down and the material was sorted in piles around the property. After taking several photographs I approached
the house and rang the doorbell. Tim Sikos the owner came out and introduced himself. We walked around the
property and he showed me that the barn in fact lacked a foundation which is why it collapsed. He also showed me
around the piles of materials and indicated to me that it is his intent to rebuild the barn after a proper graded and
secured foundation is built. To further stress his position that he wants to re -use the timbers, the crew that
disassembled the barn by hand was a Mennonite crew that even sorted and stacked it.
informed him that the out buildings including the barns were in fact part of the landmark designation
and that any changes in those buildings required HPC review and approval. He informed me that he had been in
contact with David Duval from the Indiana DHPA who informed him that the house and the summer kitchen were
the only parts of the designation. Mr Sikos had purchased the property over a decade ago and had been in contact
with the state DHPA to discuss tax credits. Mr Duval has been to the property and has talked to the owner and at
that time informed him that only the house and the summer kitchen were part of the landmark designation as the
barn that is visible from the street was built in the 1960s and was built onto the original barn making it not suitable
for tax credit. The cement corn silo that is in the rear of the property and was adjacent to the barn was a later
addition. The silo has a slight lean and the owner feels it unsafe and plans on falling that structure as well. To my
knowledge Mr. Duval has never contacted HPCSBSJC in regards to his conversations with Mr. Sikos.
After researching the file, the owners had the property re -designated to allow the acreage surrounding
the farmhouse to be subdivided out and built upon. In the staff report dated February 9, 1987 the staff
recommended the approval of the owners proposal due to the fact that, "The historic house and all outbuildings
will be on Lot 20 and will still be included in Lot 20 as will the fence." The recommendation also states: "Because all
of the buildings and major trees will continue to be protected by the landmark designation and because the new
boundaries do not detract from the historic character of the property, I recommend approval." Signed Karen
Kiemnec, Director HPC
The file does not contain the result of the HPC meeting but does contain the agenda for the St Joseph
County Council dated Tuesday, April 14, 1987. This agenda sheet states item # 19-87: An ordinance to amend
Ordinace NO. 117-76, the same being an ordinance designating and establishing an historic landmark (50106
Bittersweet Trail) Approved 8-0. 1 am unable to identify the details of that re -designation as the file is lacking the
approved COA as well as the language presented to and approved by the County Council. Further research will
have to be completed in order to determine what was actually designated and protected. The surveys in the file
mention the main house, the smokehouse/summer kitchen and a "good" barn.
The owner showed me a photograph of what the original front porch looked like as informed me that it is
his intention to rebuild it accordingly. He also showed me some hardware salvaged from the barn as well as some
of the original shutters from the main house. He informed me that he is planning on reusing original materials
where he is able to. He was also kind enough to show me the interior of the main house and all the restoration
work he has done including the original, windows, floors, and trim work throughout the house.
Steve Szaday
Preservation Specialist
HPCSBSJC
South Bend and St. Joseph County
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD
SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830
www.stjoseplicoLintyindiana.coin/sjchp/index.liti-nl
Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578
e-mail: SB SJCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us
Timothy S. Klusczinski, President
Tim Sikos
50601 Bittersweet Trail
Granger, IN 46530
4 February 2015
Dear Mr. Sikos,
A Certified Local Government Catherine D. Hostetler, Director
It was a pleasure to meet with you on December 16, 2014 at your historic home in Granger. Thank you again for the hospi-
tality and the tour. It is easy to see how much appreciation you have for the house and how much time and energy you have put into
it. We had discussed the condition of the original barn and your intentions to be able to someday construct a new structure with
some of the reclaimed material. I just wanted to say how glad I was to hear that.
We still have to address the fact that the barn was brought down without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness appli-
cation. We really need that to go in front of the Commission. The fact that the barn has already been brought down, (necessary or
not) stili leaves us without the proper procedures and documentation. Although you have convinced me with your descriptions and
the site photographs I personally took, you will still need to apply for the application and have it reviewed. The application is a sim-
ple one and needs to be sent with the $20 application fee. I will attach a hard copy with this letter. Additional copies may be down-
loaded and printed from the Saint Joseph County Website/ departments/ historic preservation and then COA Application. In order to
get this unto the agenda for the meeting, we need to receive the application by the first Monday of each month. The meeting for the
month then takes place on the third Monday at 7:30 at the County -City Building, 227 W Jefferson, South Bend, IN.
I know this seems rather trivial considering the barn is down, but in order to complete the procedure and to make our com-
mission aware of your intentions, this needs to happen.
Thant: you for your time and understanding,
Steve Szaday
Preservation Specialist
Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County
(574) 235-9798 office
COMMISSIONERS
Thomas Gordon (Vice President)
Alike Voll (Treasurer)
(Architectural historian)
Elizabeth Hertel (Secretary)
Kevin Buccellato
Brandon Anderson
STAFF
Elicia D. Feasel, Deputy Director
Mark P. Telloyan, Legal Counsel
Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
COMMISSION
\�y EST. 197
OF SOUTH SCNO & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ,,.
� to>!re
y , �� ,/ � ►.,� k�4 ,111 �. . �rE� �f's
} r..s: r c��t L �s � 'w{.� tiv% '�1 t .. •� ♦^t t�k.
��
ti g�✓r �.
!.:..,tib >r ,,., r ti ja �. rr p �" •'� � i$
r�r� X ltR t r� of r,
.es i
5 s
��. � fir-„` 4���t1• s s} � i � '' � "w i �.�.. ��f ,.
-• ./ ”-. ,Ll-� Y �'ft ?l tw-, r1 W� _H .,�k�? ;g� �Y •fit �Y+�
�,�,..�..�..�.5, s,YLs.;-.sr� # �,n=ttsrx-1.,.ve. ''` ':4 � �.+..,,'i�J�_�f►���i
rt �n
K W
Introduction and property history since its purchase in 2015
I, David Visser, along with my wife, Karen Visser, of Edwardsburg, Michigan and 27 year residents of
the greater South Bend area purchased the home at 50106 Bittersweet Trail in Granger, Indiana in July
2015. We desired to create a home that we could share with people looking to enjoy a piece of history
and flavor of country living in our community, and it has proven to be be quite attractive for exactly
that. In doing so, we knew it would also create financial resources for healthy investment into the
home and property. This home's financial backing would be sound, and its care would not be
dependent upon the motivation or finances of an owner.
Violation Notice
At the end of January, 2017 we received a violation notice from the Building Department, bringing us
awareness of violations of the standards of the Historic Preservation Commission that relate to a
previous demolition of the barn that had existed on the property — it having been done without a
certificate of appropriateness, and having been done without a permit. (There were two other
violations based on zoning and property use that have since been resolved).
Remedies:
We have actively and cooperatively made efforts to rectify ALL issues that relate to this home,
renewing our responsibility awareness, and working with both the Historic Preservation Commission,
the Building Department, neighbors of our property, and future guests of our home. Over the course of
the year we have met with the HPC staff several times, presented at HPC meetings (April 27, 2017,
May 15, 2017), submitted and successfully obtained CoNs on other projects, and have received
commendation for our approach and documentation.
Summary of situation:
• The barn was dismantled without approval nor permit by previous owner
• New owners are being held responsible for the obligation to obtain retroactive CoA
• New owners are being held liable for the permitting, a mark which remains on the title until
resolved,
• Building Department will not approve permit, nor relieve new owners of liability unless there is
a CoA from HPC, out of respect for due process.
• HPC has petitioned for leniency on new owners, but has required more documentation of the
worthiness for demolition before being able to approve a CoA without setting a precedent for
demolition without proof and subsequent approval.
• On an important side note, there is understandable concern for the transition work going on with
HPC restructuring, Building Department restructuring and change -over of the current HPC
board. For best continuity/conclusion, the timing of this CoA makes this meeting paramount in
my opinion.
Goal:
I am hereby submitting the best documentation available in this unfortunate and retroactive situation,
and appeal to the HPC board to approve this CoA, not for the purpose of setting a president for
unapproved demolitions, but for the purposes of alleviating this grievous situation — for the Vissers, for
the board, for the invested community members, and ultimately for the property and its more uplifting
future.
Outline of the application support
1. Documents
a) Original barn demolition
b) Associated improvements
c) Repurposing of barn wood
2. Testimony
a) Written testimony from former owner, Tim Sokol (who will be in attendance at the
December meeting)
Original Barn Demolition.
The barn was no longer present when we purchased the
home. When we first heard that the home was for sale,
we looked on Google Maps and saw the barn structure.
We were excited to consider that it could be a wedding
barn, but when we finally saw the property, we saw that
the barn was no longer present.
The description of the former barn area and its
• remains at the time of purchase are as follows:
an uneven pit in the former barn site
• a covered, open side of the garage barn that
butted against the previous barn
• a pile of decaying barn wood in the space
between where the barn previously stood, and
the back pasture
• a neatly stacked section of barn wood along the
north fence line of the property.
• a stack of boulders that had been part of the
foundation of the previous barn
Kowoover Farm (undated aerial photo)
What we understood at the time of purchase Darn image from Trulia website 2013
The barn was apparently decrepit, fraught with leaks
and ridden with carpenter ants. The estimates for restoration exceeded $100,000. The decision of the
previous owner was to have the barn professionally and safely dismantled. We learned that the barn
was dismantled in late 2014, about 8 months prior to our purchase. The Sokol's had not yet completed
the restoration of the east side of the garage barn that had butted up to the original barn, so it was
exposed to the elements.
There was discontinuity between information we received
from the previous owner and the information on file with
the HPC. Images in the home's HPC file shows more
barn wood than what was present when we first owned,
and the written reports in the file differ from the
testimony of the Sokol's. The main difference being that
the written report on file indicates it was dismantled in a
manner that it could be reassembled, however, the
pictures clearly show that it couldn't have been, and
shows no evidence of labeling. It also became known to
us that the barn was dismantled without a permit, too.
Site of the former barn (Google 3D)
Support for demolition
• Testimony and photographic documentation of structural timbers of the barn after dismantling
from former owner, Tim Sokol (who will be present at the meeting).
• I am awaiting testimony from a structural engineer. I hope to have the info prior to your
application submission deadline. If not, I would like to request allowance to either bring a
report to the meeting or have him as a guest that night.
• Conversation with property neighbors Dale and Pam Weaver (12336 Rocky Ridge Tr,Granger
IN 46530) — neighbor states that as soon as the barn was removed, their outbuilding was
infested with carpenter ants and was destroyed within a year.
• HPC inspection record (I don't have copies) indicates concern for the foundation as well.
Dispute with HPC records
• The report indicates that the barn was dismantled in a manner to allow it to be reassembled.
The process of dismantling the barn was in fact NOT in a manner suitable for reassembling as
evidenced in actual HPC file photos.
Support for the stewardship of barn removal materials
• Repurposing barn wood on site: some of the barn wood has been repurposed to build an
Amish -style dining table in the grand dining room of the main home, and a mantle in over the
fireplace of the outbuilding called the summer kitchen
• Repurposing boulders on site: the pile of rock boulders have been reassembled in a manner
similar to the barn's original foundation, in order to form a retaining wall for the green space
that now exists where the barn had been
• Garage barn restoration: it is presumed that part of the conditions for CoA would be to restore
the garage barn in the style of the original structure. This has been completed in like manner.
Green space
At the time of property purchaseIn the former location of
the barn remained a pit as shown in the image. This space
was was a blight, and in fact was a hazard due to some
rebar and blocks that occupied the center area. In heavy
rains, it retained water that would remain standing for
more than a week. A pile of boulders, presumably from
the foundation of the barn, were in a pile
away from this pit. In the appropriateness of barn
removal, the restoration of this area would have been a natural restoration requirement.
Former barn site (pit) at the time of pre -purchase
viewing
Vision
The vision was for this area was to restore it to cosmetic fashion, and become a level green space.
Process
The height differential between the driveway parking area and the lower ground beyond the former
barn site had to be reconciled. It was decided to repurpose the boulders into a retaining wall that would
match the ground level of the drive parking area. This initial wall work was completed professionally
and followed with back fill of clean dirt. Soil from the gravel drive clearing (see separate project) was
used to finish the top of the green space before seeding. The flat space without a border was deemed a
falling risk for people on the property, so a perimeter of stone
was created. This perimeter was enhanced with perennials
and a small arbor seat in period fashion. Tri -light light posts
of the same model and style as the light close to the main '
house, were added to the perimeter of the green space.
Switches and sourcing of electric were tied in with the s
restoration of the east side of the garage barn see separate i
project).
Stone wall built out of original barn foundation boulders.
Garage side wall
[For simplicity and distinction, I will call this building the "garage" so as not to confuse it with the
original "barn".]
At the time of purchase
The east side of the garage was without an exterior wall.
The interior wall and studs were exposed, as was insulation
and wiring. A door at mid -length of the east wall was
present, with a threshold about 1' above garage floor and
about 3' above the exposed foundation and floor of the dirt
pit where the original barn had been. A tarp covered the
upper 2/3 of the exposed wall, but was untethered and
allowed exposure to the elements since the barn's
demolition.
Discussion
As stated above, the vintage barn photos do not show the
garage. This building was separate and added at a later
date. The garage appears on the schematics that are part of
the historic registry, as we have learned, so it was at least
present in the mid -1980's. I presume the garage was built
and attached directly abutting the side of the original barn
and that it had no actual exterior wall.
Vision
Clearly the wall needed to be restored in order to preserve the garage and
provide safety for the exposed electric and insulation. Although the garage
was not vintage, it was our desire to restore the side of the garage in the
same theme as the other sides of the garage.
Process
The plan was to bring the green space to a level just under the level of the
garage floor so that it would not allow water into the garage, but also to
correct the disparity of the garage door and garage floor (threshold was V
above garage floor) and the proposed green space height (just under the
level of garage floor) to bring them closer to a normal threshold
configuration. The single non -vintage door was replaced with a double
door configuration of repurposed vintage -style doors that swing open much
like swing barn doors would. Exterior paint was matched to the rest of the
building's current color (forest green). In
conjunction with the restoration of the former
barn site (pit), the electric was evaluated and
tapped for providing power to the three post
lamps on the perimeter of the green space. A
single flood light was placed high on the wall
to provide the option of more downward
lighting and two sconce lights were placed beside the restored barn doors. The barn doors have not
been painted yet.
Former barn wood
At the time of purchase
This area was occupied by a large pile of barn wood from
the former barn, stacked in random fashion, and was noted
as wood with only salvage value. Behind this pile was a
wire fence line that was disconnected in some places, and
over grown in a track about 10' wide with weeds. Ground
hogs and raccoons had made their home in this area and it
was deemed a nuisance.
Vision
In line with the goal of cleaning up the property grounds, the wood pile needed to be sorted for usable
or repurposable pieces and the brush/scrub plant areas needed to be cleaned to be mowable. The fence
was to be removed since it was not serving any purpose and did not seem to have a
venerable function necessitating replacement. OEM
Process
During most of last year, the wood pile was sought for pieces that coulc
purposed. Our first major project was the building of the centerpiece d:
that now adorns the grand dining room (see picture). As a home that ca
family of 18, it was build for just that size and purpose. Amish -style cL
craftsmanship was used and the finish matches the vintage wood that li
came from the property when the home was built. Other wood re-purpi
included making a mantle for the cottage fireplace, and incorporating p
custom counter tops of the cottage kitchenette.
Although projects were completely on -hold while working
through this process, we had envisioned other projects with the
barn wood — frame repair and trim replacement are considered
"next -up" projects with the barn wood, and we have been
discussing custom head and foot boards for beds in the home.
Remaining wood will continue to serve future projects as well.
Like the dining table, other pieces of furniture can be tooled for
the home.
Epilogue
We have had an inordinate education process about historic preservation work, and we have learned a
tremendous amount in these months. Our hearts have always been completely in line with the idealism
of respectful ownership of this venerable home, and we aspire to bring it to life, both in structure and in
function. We wish to celebrate its history, and we wish to share it with people who may never have a
chance to experience a historic home such as the Kownover Farmstead.
Before we even signed the purchase documents, we had performed genealogical tracing of the
Kownover family all the way back to the 1400's in the Netherlands, a documentation that will be
exciting to share. Additionally, we have contacted and met with many descendants of the founding
family, some of whom still live in the area, and others of whom now live internationally. In this
process we came to realize that one of our long-time clients
was in fact a granddaughter of one of the Kownover children
born in this home. Additionally, we have given tours of the
home with other descendants, and have provided home
updates to Willem Van Kouwenhoven, the self -professed
family archivist, who lives* in the Netherlands and was
instrumental in providing much of the information that was
used in the historic registry process of this home. Karen and I
have been humbled and pleased to have the support of the
Kownover family in our efforts to preserve and celebrate the home and its history. Prior to the heavy
and emotionally burdensome work in this process, our main focus was to have a Kownover family
reunion of sorts this year, inviting former owners of the home as well.
Very sincerely,
David Visser
* Willem Van Kouwenhoven passed away unexpectedly on 3/31/17. We exchanged several emails
during our time owning this home. My last message to him, updating him on improvements we had
made, was sent to him in January 2017(prior to violation notice). His comments about our
improvements are in the attached email.
13ARN DEMOLITION AT 50106 Bittersweet Ti -ad,
Grange- IN 46530
My name is Timothy J. Sokol, my wife Linda Sokol, and I were the previous owner's
of 50106 Bittersweet'i'mil, Granger IN 46530. We both owned and occupied the
property with ow• 3 children for over 10 years.
We originally purchased the property with interest to preserve and upgrade the
interior and exterior to the original condition. During the time we lived there, we
spent tens of thousands of dollars restoring and rehabilitating the property -The
interior structure had been significantly altered, and the overall condition of the
interior and exterior was considerably neglected. All of the original light fixtures
were previously stripped From the house and replaced with cheap lighting. We
decided to seek a state tax credit to assist with some the expense burden. We
researched the history of the property and documented in a paper and submitted it
to the state of Indiana for Historical Registration. More than two years after our
initial application we were granted State Registration.
The barn was one of our biggest concerns from the start. 'There were several large
holes in the 4+ layers of roof and the structure looked compromised.
It wasn't until after we purchased the property that we discovered the barn to be
home to raccoons, squirrels, owls, bats and rats. I bought an 18,000 lb. man -lift for
the sole intent of maintaining the barn roof as best as we could. Several times l
attempted repair of 4 + layer roof. The roof should have torn off many years ago
and replaced and the expense of waiting to do that at that time was enormous. 'rhe
last quote I obtained in 2012 was for $36,000 and that didn't include tearing off the
roof. I went on that roof several times to tarp and attempt to fix the damage. I tore
off portions of it and replace the underlying wood structure. The problem only got
worse because new areas of damage would form from the animals that infested the
building.
In my researched of the historical records of the property I found that the barn was
constructed well over 120 years ago. The structure was very tall and heavy and was
built for the purpose of harboring livestock, pigs and horses.'The foundation was
made of fieldstone and at the time of our inheritance, we found the original
foundation to be weakened and missing in many areas. The lower perimeter beam
that the foundation supported was rotted be either animals, insects and water. (See
pictures) Water has flooded the foundation over a period of many years creating a
huge sinkhole. The interior had an enormous bat infestation and stunk with bat
vermin with huge piles of guano everywhere. The bats were such a problem, that
even the main home had a huge infestation in the attic and upper story walls that
had to be addressed.
The barn was an inherited liability from day one. Our realtor told us this and
wouldn't even go in the barn because of a safety concerns. 'Che decision of what to
a
do with the barn down was a struggle from when we occupied the property. It
should have been condemned. fearing the barn down was one of the most difficult
decisions we had to make and we waited until selling the property before doing so.
When the decided to sell the property and downgrade, we listed the property with
Caldwell l3anker Realty l'or a contract period of 11 itiondis, During that time, we
had no offers but a lot of feedback. The most negative feedback was the barn. It was
considered a liability that many buyers (lid not want to deal with.
We had several contractors come out to look at repairing the barn, Most didn't want
any part of it. One Amish contractor gave us a bid to tear 4 layer of the roof off, jack
the foundation and replace beams with a starting cost of $110 thousand, plus
materials. To map and disassemble starting cost was 200 thousand plus midden
damage cost, which most likely would have cost over a half of a million dollars.
LOCAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY:
We have seen the local historical society once in the 12+ years we lived there.
My interactions with the Local Historical Society were contentious after the barn
was taken down. One day, a person by the name of Steve showed up to my property
unannounced. Steve did not introduce himself when he came to my door, l -le
started the conversation "what do you think you are doing"? He did not offer
credentials until our conversation ended. After the visit, Steve sent a letter calling
Mr. Sika. My name is Sokol, not Siko and i consider that an act of passive aggression.
I le said that I needed to go in front of a board and that the neighborhood was angry
that I tore the barn down. I asked to provide me one name but he refused to my
request.
I was not aware of any local requirement to have a certificate of appropriateness
until after the barn was torn down. I humbly apologize and my intent was not to
Ignore the local law. I didn't (understand what an after -the -Fact certificate would
prove and viewed this as an exercise of humility and that I had to appear before a
board committee to explain why I decided to tear the barn down. Please see the
attached exhibits for proof that the structure was beyond reasonable economic
repair. Thank you for your consideration.
Signed
1/r»oTNy a. Sokol.
Date: November 23 2017
N ti
29'14
Al
MA
.A T Ala,
c ahdAMR
�
�l
----- - -
777 7
`av Ar.
Mr?>. ��a � + t i5'ti ri i ` s �J iw" 1 Tfi ` f `r 7 _ e � i• �} t �� , 1 (�'I� it xr �'"�� .,
vk - "
.t
`Pf
l y'titi y r 4 °"• l.y,c "s"" rhn 1 '_'J r r
ry., ,�P'>tr�' , { A 1', k � h.4• a;,,wiy4�b,.p ki�;t' t!r nlx $j� >a, �t �1 i� 4 � M. � y ^ I M t+�, ... i � I
i. ., �L �,, rry,�t }''� ate -t �'-. 'n a•„.c F. ,ni,p;r.m't'a ;'�., ,x,fi, s t5. " ;,; i 'i ,'' f :�, 'fi, rr,z.F,=`,:t. .,,r`5,"'� ><
.t, ,t, _.ia y,j.Vs; i -i!' l •mak ,w ,, .� v Y,,•}v', r.#sh:`,'` r„a:r,'r'o ,^1"r ;� 5,, :rt,;}, ..nr�',',,'.„,,',s, ,�,, Y; Ni,i, era, nr•t Y'r 9'"a. .':
v.y>r r�,.M •�� ,tip tl;�y,P�'tsii i�'•i0}, t, s ;yr m,� „y, �,�' l tiY aa`r,,1, .S"..'r., r. ,ar,J it. ,1 r � r J 1 v.. i � t;;tori
'� "'� '"7nFr: ,: id �'.�yi 1 ,�• 'ar ,:JYtl SY r aa�J ,, 'L �h��'•k, r {i 1, w'1. ,. ,4,J�.S'« - � ''fin ,y�,tiy i""•ir^rj,�T n�,
.�: Fw •r, aa�;c� mv'Jo-a,:i'.,Yr„,,,t�';p� •.trailaw, ''u r,k�4Y�}jq;•i,.,,>.J,"-,t,<�u,'rr,.,.:.:.a�.tT'. v.. , t r',f ,,' rr^tr}.:F:��,,,,f
,�, ,'w'�` f e `n Pa^:',`4s•^y,��t.... , n-� � _ _ t a -v, ''ti' ti_
•���$ ;a�tk � �,x1"„s`v •�>*A' +y }'1'""` r;:;,,, �E � a -ry � 4 } � +t;.
- ., �qrg-e i„ka ''� :'g: `.S` �::� ._a. i ;Y c, ��• �3<rs, .,2'7"^ y/�, -T Y 1 „ti to 1a =i:
� ' t � a~r, �y;,� s y '' t + r ;E, •• ,� "�"Y"t`+� ',C 6 a s. ^, i t ,� i '�. _ r ,J' xi f_ � ''
,: �wru.,s .� Kt .�4Ay. , Jt' _ J. �;, r� k "� .,e �, ,c' ” Sp `'• r. ,a �l of
�'' i ' � � . � m "^",ra c` '.Y � �,- ,�i`.z -�y:� t .�,;y",. epi �� -1, w•.., $ t d ';'«, t r � .r t, ' c
!•' ��'' J•'""�t v3�W ,��: '"�� '� s"3C1+,;°;�`�r �y,ti ,�,�,:�,�a'} n, �' ": � r,i� �c' u^',,,
r� 5•'^*' ,+r .y r, s. .t y ; `,+ Y''Li <r" p > (v ^v',^ j i +*, i;.y�.�.a.r =s.,y t - tl 4 ron �" y.,:
' �_ _ � =amu F`'.n: � -,n i., , �' ytW"�"^s ^. +^ �, 7 .�ja. .t.•.-; iTM, • .,;��.5yer, ,t i.:'-. < ;.......,.- ~r, -� � i �„s"^ � u
�`�: .c + _ t •a..' ci � "v"Sa" .�` L” z rw��^' "•' S9 ' �.L.� ; , z- -"+ ; '>
s � :; a:�'+°'we k ' "e ',�• .,-' I � � a+^ C�� � ''y. ,, .•��,�•,t.�,A '1«�','-..C�^”. a';'� rY �'�.i f' - - w��,7 F
"."bk 'i'l t,,•�":,,' r'{LY '"��"`' 3! '' :�j +:'aha m �i v, .."' '.,5�, '1t..,^44. ,`s ^�.��• Ly f'r "�,vjh ' t&t't•`$ s
S `'�`," re k 7, ''s�+r„ 'ry.evr "3,�9: '!,, �`�. .a� t ! a "w '�- Y•.
' �'..> ^'y t t,F �r, .a '^�'� � 'M.. •a,.a '"� t., � �� ga •n +i �7 ra�"��,4$ t'(f h�." Y"1 nr'ta�:
M tr:.,F,,: $ ,ad'�i'"1 #'a°5a""n';,, •�yy'':1'L4,` .x y.+er Y, y,.,,,"'"';•w'A'^r'' Sax°uo.t n$,ty`
is y x �t
rrtt ' F ft� { •y w'A 6d4 J' } l h J„G:p:.,', a7u( .+,
' 7d e .,.a r� tl' i • 'K(:Iwc f ' Xw � � »,a¢"� b„r•-.ry' �."_^tht�l 'i\.:"i,4rcW r r0.„!;. �_„o'a "'•,,.�wgxw1� s.,y,{a ,`',`,JI w•',�ytt.',y°+'t"U"''t�t,
app ,a.�dk a�, 4 I M't 7,;,, nA _�. „.,r"`'";?..yi`':'4'./y,},,; na w1:>y"'yd+t''rV`":'�TY''?$S�r,.,v ''pL`"''•.>�,r,'Ci:,:' 'P'6�y°,�"�'°�A.
r , . �:r� r t��2}>,'"'a t "' ' , i .r4+t tfi `' " 1 rze L ` }: ,rA�1".<���4ivKr+�Sd''„F"'� Y: ;,�' +. .F}+w``^Y'�..�,a•> � :' - ° any 11 P
_
n ' 4F iv-++••�' ' s.'� yy, L► t `d, Y�+w: >: ;a}yi;�, •�a+�,� '�h"` c 'i”
' 1 e n + >d- •:'n R 3 "} ' 'i ,f" .,+; Lr;,. r•s< l ,4
• ., 4, t � kL $ i� `Y " � i,""• J , r�` P •• .F-� s i , ..eP... ,f-br,•v —r "dil.' v; +. \�<i,�\,,.y„�,
+p auy �i,�T:'a��rwsy�w,vs..p< ,'"r
`` r^ '- °'+e'e`§ t�3 �� r ^ •«. ��iq,.r �}�k a , � tti �".+,.'-'( ..r•As> '.., `w.0 ;.•<,. wt
' n/i rF i x r�.„'''„`i� �✓.. ,yy',1"'T�, "!' �• � , �i r' i�, �rr�� �Yu�" �5' r .�,�� i.� � :+'.'� Y �• ..�� "t'•t�^`". �, "t�
IIS t ✓,* i '1 ,'Jf N'�JbY9T" t "^Fr .roG;ii 7 T�4n-''rs.r�'
n5`p as,'�-r, a", �t' r�i't, ,G�;;�. �y'�'c
s :'# �s .ri, a( t+ gt>1�,"sS, itet c�,+,L>. s'7,f' :•^"^yr' • y^ '•�„'4 'Fs%i,!sd,»':'&5, i%rr �..
i !" �'' f e �. `✓rr. i '`<Jva';n. jr� JR`n"L.ka 3; -*✓u' ".f" a.- � '+�� T�,�'"qt 1}`.,•.
gym,
�_.'.�,' � - L r ,� a ,, '^ ''�, 4..... r,«; ">� atwi ^'•`„"ry"7� :.,.;, ;" �, ♦ r•,�>�=v w,'e
`°A+lt�+y,_
�'n�" ) *, f ar' a � v� iry ;vF T,-' �.n F:• ""__kt,, * rp'`-0, e.+*p�� ��i�Y �•.�� a,�;''�` `,:,fi •�Fi.•
y' p f § iYVY, 24 v.,. ,; %s,:S >�+s^""4M xA +-i"• 7.!!a 3'e*`", ,.� _1,�: y►`4
i+ tai`'*' cltKa lr �� r`•ac: �"' "t 'r
F i-
e( - $, ��• A. "� � '+y(•V Ate] '1'� ',i ll• ^�Y, ,, i�'>K•A""^ �il'.' `i •^�y �+„�k X'L a�': a-1�Q��T�” 7 }�t v �h�� l+�"��ai„•��h.. .Q'^^�/, dw
sr', -^ f •i :, v `.ya'r!t ,. `l F,iP' '/.. �`+' 2i,tr''`' v %..A'' r' -''♦r Y"r'�`•'+s�
waar/
„pC N+n,:,Y •:3•=""'..^h s"'"'".'^."''' �'�,' a ,�,�„, 'y, 'rt 7 7t Y `1^k u '� ai '�"t ¢ T"`
;•.Y?`".-�. .�yX,, '1,�A;i= y,�,�r�f�. ria' .r'i .l;y}, a-r.ec"-'v .;a'"`< .>o- F j,` ,.•J'. -h �:�., ,'
L - ,:. � •t _ F : `t .'i;': Cy F,•,,, c •J°s , "'' �y 'a•�r�,s�,o 4 >, g•'.,�.,• - �,..+�.�' .,�,� ,�,. ,� a „"� _r.a„� !^
r .i,.. .t, t1:.-�y�.r{•-.,� (:r ,Fi,,,,.n,:c�,'i a, .ry ._ :a_ ,^�"'�,''�< ..1 �� }:;.;= ,, s;;F"'_ <tt.. �'•`'"^" ;.$, ( . � r, � f � +�:. 'A a�,,,,, '�
- a ,Qx ;'a'- . !�i�;� - ::p, " 'f, ..;t _ ,,..%i;4%'�a'. :+.. - /;�,r� .'. 43y �, a � �y �,�. ,.l ,�h•'-°���'�r •aj •. �, rF __:i+"`
t." r'7` � �'f,°r': `.Y: q � ,�"' ../�,`.e•,.�' ;•;: i,t '� '^••� 5:; F ,v �:. �2' •�:dit�.�, `•-..r�.,Y} Ce rC ,n.j .;�1... r-, � �,,�•:�'r;3'
. �.'=s: ;4°. R. rr,'• ;�,v; .a rl{: �/." C. .I' -'f", i•b r3. 'C .� F. '3; r�. �'. Y'� g �t'/"+�':.�'Ta"':"`a .'�'1RF� �.+.,.
�`L
•''s,'' ,.I. *^4. '"'•�„ ,.��,�'«dv {�` t.. F. �t�., � .41" ,'. r``� ae- ''iw, tg.dv'.ctGt ,G:Y ✓,-'=�'.,••ai: :;^ 'F-``+..,,, .'...�..�.^�,: ��"�j-.
:�: .r ,'� .p.'�'� ra�S': �,r.; �'n"•F-. `-,r.• ."1'i,,. 4 c F a•a ',;•, ci . �1:- s •r.,l; j( ., - r, +, v A �'rt+': r. r r"r: a q., :,, .-�.�;'i1Cca:,,',..;�`�' Fc�c} u�,,. •:r: �'s I,,. "�.,,r *'=y-•.' % �•_'�'`•a"
is 7, .1✓e'gs ,F' :Sr v t' .ei' ^ ,f" 's .�y ,y� e4 , ir''. I.,.,-Jr'ri"`va , »rj 'J'rxr ..>,.�1, ;i^ ",.f L".i • ��%�:y�Y:r - .ter r
- 'd� ''�. 'y f�'•; �l- ,»`�,c•�a", - .1. 6�.: Y'�t ':,"„'r1« ,�,': �� + . ;U y�a1! .� ••� .^.r �t,'?.:-.:��..,._ ..,iA- ja'�;;�.
.?}:� ,'v ;:r:: ; 1 �: ..r � ;'t .t ,.,,. .LC.�.+' < .- : ••� �� �.i'�' 1• r ,Yri '.}r••«+ fir",
•.t -.'R."a° �r7. "{ 5. r✓ . -y ,p .r., �. r',,, f. �, ,+: i:_,+, �. � 5 ,�t.•.; s.i'tM'r.N: yr .•y:N .. rA,r � �ro.� ":.�-"S.cY.
�' X' /' - p . f1F.. ,' 1 .; �:�'' .4.ny �Tf .,:Y.,��« _ r wr:,; - , }:;�f,' ::o, ,.,., ,�i , {yam �s�fj� a � ^,. rf' ' �rr 'ti' �,.... r,,.._�'< , a>,- o`^c ..,h•
.._t.•; l�M1~ - #- 't.°
`.a.1 .4. ^4. .1� .Ir J .+t '..r,..'h - T Jti�;�;, a .4 �,.¢a7 ',+^,... •a» -'�' w••. .�., v:
S �fn. .,:1 �4 ,`'t.pX�•Y�. a!'L.'� .{' 1• j�, >�a�'�w. �v ..4. "�'�' -
i , a• § '1"; r - 1 a; >: _3M [ J 4: sa 9r ;• s''as
,'Ni:•- Y':.,{• / 4' sf;i Yr•n
•-J: �.f nl�l a>FI•['••.1,r''-ti.� �Y. •A
., ,��,ra•' .. Sa'r �'S;'!i�i,',w,.':��; .W Kr
't ,t r��r
g,, ,`�.,, .,r*'ca.f'. •!, 'V ':�. .:§_,r .�-L >i;�;,�•,,,b•,�"'. ;a�J 4.0 �•;-w,,.,,,o %' ..}."�� ,„t..rc.:.,.. a`.� !
{:", ?;i
`dr ,� •<`^ i,. „y tct .\
^: d .f . i F I ';�;,�".; ,d +, -,•,'' t - . FA ,x4t" Jp'i"' a'r•cM1 <?' e, ?� ;;t-, •y(y> a•, 't' .'ti.:; i•:. s:.r E'' �,.. r "—"p'-+
' �t- , 1";ae�n ,�� J r�4R �,i'.i v.w. ro,+'.. .tr "'1' .,,(+,,,t. a �'f, '',w a h' ,.ii J y^�. �?a'.L4'�e• .�} yxa 'rV.�;•`+%/�:J��
�i
.ve
!�',, ,r;7ta 5,,v , .rrPst ,,,t'i,: r?.�i ".;'w '�^"`�..i,: j�,C .'1 Nkk -^•a. a y, 4, ,v, J .•a y r., ,9,r.,t 2�i t6 (v., �+,'a; 1, '�%jl°•'a'•,j..1 t• y y> •,F.rl^4 w .. /�'
ti � .,0,} !'� X, y'.a t, re!^ "J,;• ..tY/'ad ., tTa �t+�i 61i . (' `di,, f' 1"�:•'••, (r�Q�i..�•�F..i ?.,. ir':s ;,,"Lr '�� ,£i'_, v.4,,�.�5 2 �:y¢ ati1L���,�'^jk:%.Cz`%3"rv�y"9�,�,•�y.�^.•,a;,r�j'Y neo,.. , X: ".�,'•,;.+✓ ,�rr•.� �", . �•. r s �k�'pr-c. J r 7 '^`� fm,yl- v j,{,,aw„' P't, a � r GY,<' u� t; ...ya�'F s', :p .F t:`�,ry �:i � , ,�.^ �^ !'£,'x^. � • .*5'�:�' .�w M'a�� '
ra � � { .1 " iri. t:" �' '4 ' fii ;;'i .1' •`�-,; r 't;:i+, ? � ,"�," t „r �c;`e.Y$-'' :•+'iK�< 9, . � � ..a'Sk..
>; v.i r" i�, ,,11 ,'.p ,B.P �" >✓ Q,_F.. "'"'-wr f' 1. >"7`
(r:�� if;,. �I .!,,'G"te"kp`t. .. 1„ Y-t'l�" ,f,, 'y�i �'t�,r}�•'°,J/ r, t r', t;a+ff j.a, vu� '�:�ct`d.I",r>.t4?'.{,��"S�.,V .;yAk ir'�'P>w�cY. ;'}%',v,_�L�'v 'i,,:',Jd,�,l�" ,.,��,*. ',aJ°",C> �,'z.� r��•.
n,y, F .� ^ , S t y 4 ' 4; P �%•}.. c v(d�y.{ nt 'Ye;o x,. ;!<, ! .� '.t ,axr� S,s• N r ^, r a t,,'�"f 'f T�: 1�,,y 1 � i- 'Sr,.J l -s^i •
l
dA
a r rr, ( ;!F ?v �'�,'r -,• •/f;.,F Y �pyy r •rc<,Y,,..••".;,: �. ^`":"+, �,�,+. A! ,t."
!d' !.• i n,n: '" rf6.{ rt t,, ,9• i 'r : i1 '.4�1.y'� F..t';,"' f•,Fif IIVK 7"9(';•ifa ,+q• .err,Y .3 «sZy.,,,,. a' "wi.•.i+'.�f'
k '
'1 F,�"jµF; d i ,�', , y/' Y r�r fM':.e P �r: M it'^y;�i r ' t p ,nab �,+�,'� ;y'�'d � ��` 7 ,'1 � 1r: f �'P: + s' l';? �,Sy� d:$Lg .r ; �' � i 1 "l� i��'� :1""%Ai.d •+, 5;,t",.: j, l'g7.4.: J•.f,`.I,q,,�,y[��(xRr,�vaw ."j." t �"�Y. ��iyf?�cc+�� .:.(,,, r:.
rn;: d :'.'a l££,}, ,y �„'f .:�ia.4',''; al ', Y!, f.i ;;i' J, l:r r8' �., '8���ri}I:st„',�t,.^” �%r�41�,,s/. trF4+,.a.`s..,�r,'i'k,S�t.,•c.: 'ftI'�y>o't,,t" ,,,,�;,,,i{'r �';.!rpSu✓ �y "!": u+�<3�,
.T' is =. r.' fy,( M. ,,'e, ti"�a� '1,,'Jr ., ,+�'/',r f{�, M��y ,�,%,.}trk �,+p�i,t at �r �F`. it+,�.tl,,, :!q„� .°(�jrr, ..+y�'� rrz.� :,'t''i� f,��.'"•t ,a,�.F7�� a':_i"!(•':iw,�,"�� ,li 1�r � �w` a„cr.,(ake�"G�"R.
,IJ,�% i gr '_ 'v'.•'S S' , r., �J'Y;i„ t �� „„y n! ,J ,, 7• ,� }, S,Pa ' ;•M �i' r'1� y G,�'_' 7 k. lf,}r,}. t: :";�;�'� i ��,.. ,w .a,., v,4!' � fi-a,�:%„� +4 :"`9 ..
..,°A 1 e e ;a J` 'r+; 7 � !I ,Mr �� f ! �, ✓< K. �.Y`" at r,'t
<.ry{ - t -g / 1 .',($ "ra r , .t ”+:F,r y.. ,t :.'}:*'' ;:.h' t, f + rr ,+,' f s fi-, _ , 5 {t?;mi:. .r .,^,4. x� ,.'''` �yr., c':., y i•.,»
y� i .,_, .t .,.e ...... ''I rl i �tr., r • '4�e a !,Y•'. •�'s ,.(...,,t : `r- t^, It.',,.,�+,!a .,, �" ,, "k.`:e`;,,.,i l' .�.a,,., '„}, J S � (, ,(P'�., .�. ,e� � `cV.�-
rr �'„i' �'�'>: ,,fa{ y S, §,. �+.,.x:M? xer,ti, ,y' ",R"t,i4p ,r,' W'"^” .fb, /,�.x. �. �,':dl✓''fa�..�,y; t•;r,J'4 pA!'� �R,. ''��,, .,,':.:"f�gWp.,t��g:ti,>„ ' ,�t „�, I• rt z a i.t a4 ,a";;""1t :a� '+'" "�,u, e„ d, ?, _ ,,c, .r w P �t .,,,t,�, _�~ �• ..� '
4 ":°s:i,,, "'i , ” 1 (. a- i PJ y_ +e 6:4;t a: r r ': s 7 f 9"''' '+p�j} 'c...,;;,%><t: ,' •':�::'.1 p -di ,/r�, f'4}�� "' t` "' J r,x ,''` ':$ ,> i 'a.•'�'�'<✓•''W�ka'�'"�+/'
I ,Tr • .,y,;f,y., ra
„+s°t�/ rkt' 3 ,}f}:r°� '�, „r%;�'Y. y>dRiF". p'4+ 1, p'r^ 4{ va v •{'8, jJ�7}'f aw h^t Wr'kltl�h 4. aY ,yA :± r'+,
t•,�rr {,`'i. .1' � 4"^r "i•4s �-� r `Rd i" "'rk "k� ,,; -•,; #:,� ��M',,
F , ;;�'� r �"7 w, yy 1 1 k t. ( ' ^ r�; ',a:' ±y �• r 6 �( q '! '}` p r:` �, a%Jfir• ) ,�+-��p'xy, ',t .a�'
.Y,`.rW,'.,, f•. x C�°'"• •7>:M.,T'. ,f '�+f .A:+` ,",u w; '•'n' �.y r.
q, i• 4 f��
rr r ..•fis � tArG ' ,t�t _ i t �,rI" ,v'. }� rri'r •(,,,rp 4't� yy.. d�'r' �' r ��' '^�
''3 V
-r d 'a' J � d i`'"$rr I:'f i tP �;d ' �`'r�
w h t (t`,`,1:;;`.,-E•� '��(t;,,; ?`','f,+� ��• rAOr•.���F'✓ � �' r ,%�.i11 �Yi '�'"� y i,R'""rth 4.. � ,•«'% Ai`'" . )` �•', .? ; 1.” r'S,. S+'. • t :r< F t 'r=jF, F+M.. 6 "*' ^•h+;�, `+r:,.
, � ,a:„ t ' s +:y.:� Y} , �.:. , _t � 4: �4�' tia y.. `if':•� f ; v�• i , t�
" '� ;�'� 1 +d t �', ( -a � ';1t i i,+�>a, „� , � c,' T ,Z �; �•.+� K �r.:� � �i' � :}.vr, n��+ "'r .•,� e ,
"'r.i ;:5 �r 'r, y w � '�' f,.� y .�„ p. � ,f (t }'.. K:,•�. hYr. 5v:, y�,i:i .R. ' P:"' �"t+r".a �}
<,, '?' aw7 t a,' m .,Y,J, w, , zar. is r Yr,. ,f r :<.i, t 4 'y : ,�,,,,; .St��.+. +,Y gXo-,.•a ( j: %, �^. • "'�'!_.1(ra• r� I;S+ kx'! � t' 4!•'.v •'a«„_, "y;
a .:�, rt /•,/t t ,T„+. ,J;dt$a, .,l� i4 t�Yr4„,.f..hl'}``.yLG�J.�,,:�., F{�jKicl�.4y tet' F'}i:,rr,?i,,,�a.1..n�., w",I
r. ',,rr,.,P:1;,:. A:�(ft,.aa. P �// {;,f.��' � y k"he�i :'t.�' {�3=. r ,& y t 'y" 7 .�"lty �^ I.t„ .S• ntrt.r'a :;Y.y�•!yy�,;�"re, ".�[r/j'r "•( ,}'.�: ,�•i,v:. 1l'. yr� '4•ry;,,•,•t•,:'•�4w"�F.,+t�” 1�
, A .5.: ${e . l.�.Y> .> :�t "M Y'rf t / Y y.°' � G 1� 'moi" �„ ., F ,�', , � �, � *J�y �, aw`f.,. /±S:,U '!+lK .�� ! �r ,^,•.r' �"V ,, �'.ti.. � AF�<3� h- � ''L' ^rel,, T'k .
�;{t 't• 7f •;�,_ ,K,,Y, Y +1Yi..G`�'"`: t.b� "'L.+�„ �?�4',i,> >' a e }"�� ��iiy i^ .,>. +r1• >; z.; tT+"`.^^'b� �''�i t: l :�' :;G •."��rj "� �"n; �'� iii»,�,y'n4 `� .,� ',,e,s `�.'
f f$ r t , if,a°" 1. !ea4t''.n:. ,1 ,,w.tl:.3.. y T ? r -F<;ri a �j� w �. ',dam .t, .af,Y" ,s r, r^, Y. • s ,
"'�,� :: %; #' ,.t .r ��` ',7rr.,rr u: `,.1.-r:,fiy.',�,_ �+i 'f4 m. Yr '*n; {,.'�-. .� kr 1 ,r rpF a;^'f.!s;t, r,.w., �•ri.'`s+,-Y' �%i,..l f..^�Ct'/ °.M,.>�j' •,v', .r,�lk�`�Z^rSF �:ti �.+�,y *-,G' ;r. ��r
-y•4,,: �,1 `,L�, ;,,a..€ }"r a:
±' .dJiF3` k k• :� �t;;r.,.r,,.�:.3'-= » !�,•1 a^r � �'(� ti•�•p'
'a�+./ 'ar '` �,� .-i«�'J: t d r �. •1 rr^s', i ( f' N a•r r � d r=��r...v..n��iid.>��..taii?e,..5.a,ev.dR.3..t.�..,:.Sza,G?+.G:e�_ ' ✓,$, •• IN,
�,i.,r.i:.'c.�i.�.., - i5' -irV y�"• «+ ,
-v
i; .
1�•
m
!V
t 3}t;F`kTr`�� F y�` "• <;ctc�r rsz�:ac,y`�'i�,�",^r frac`s;yaL(fiYstYFy`Aaa�'�`p:'sro
Fy R�H�1`��it4
'r' lt,+'a .�i.��ilyL�
`R," r x„ r. tigj. �.�•
t�,� r '- .rr
i'b..r 4 u } a+ 3 t<���' ,+•j�"w ,� wY r„ s:H �q*�,��;.zip Js� ). r C '; Ssr:d swr,
` ` gni �a {t° Yt 6ux F%ric33 /,. •F>,�:'`
. ,,:/ a k a "(.� rC' i9 ,r - •, t 'a a s
d �Ja�J!Fa,A1. }r } �icd+F' �
•)�'' s• ��i..)f
nn.,•), *n.
f+ \ 1P�} 9i,, : ' a: O>: F�(7a,/1 �,.�%••, r w z
�;, 'Ci• � t .3 �'. .f�t�+ ,yj;1 � ., +�,s*yr„�'r`�F';y` 'f '£�1'+�F:.,j�r�'�4rr t � iJ; <• iys r� rr,
�'-_Gi��j 4�Y�`.t °a�`„`i i t� �l iii+ c�i •7`[5;..,>�f, -s'.`.+'.X n ^ -4 t � �
,i'�dF//��,,,. ( T7: -s • i).,��C�n^•S,Y j r•�,� .C,.?^'":.y 1...:F:`f `,''4 t :{ t�.
'.tt' t�r. 'Lr'V:••"is 4K'i �r9 fT-y,y,:."S'_°y1y-d':,:z MEMO; ' :,;Ti
MANI t
(5s- i. s ; ��r u� rs
r4 ,,. r, -~ ♦ 'e v^ , �.�+ n: ;t;{rig '�7r`,�'a "''1l�'YZsi i11.f " S' t - ) ti t t - ~ SY' it i r7�
�N; ti M K"{+•. }r. %Sjt; ?a,. 54g, �.�.5t. �^'i�. "•1 �4'. 3,"...,� =°r
.Y� \ Y ,•..' i 1•a� ',' d''}vt"?r 'Y i ' r17 ,.1 , i,]i a1 ••4wi )t. '�,p(lr.rp r� t,',xy'dS
f•'�^...2.�>>rif•'�o�i ��\,.�^i'tL
\, ;1, / 1,.,5sr' .\`rt�T"-�. "�. +,'.'�.�iYi�y' vrc�`,•� h �'t2Y•Yti;Ce'..,�Uq•\S `1"�+r ��V':}���:b4 t`,'., -,w;'\t �4's v„k� r-i't r- , `'•�'� '�°�3M y', a', '`:.;,;vat yv�
:*a �-, "hT�" � ''� '3 ._� �4 r.�;r• � !f .V.}r _ 4- ??%"tit�.�!..r+ (mow 1 �}rcep
i p -owl
'. �. - % ` • ,.�:"1=` . ' 1� yti ''v . :,,,i . � � •Std,?'t.1tt i''±`' ' Y > 54'i.il-%t.. �;t,'{+;'� rr-+,, :r` S ' �,. ', + - x"` . ti r s 8_ c , � h�3i
7 � � ;4,� G.. ',, �. :,': :;."wir�,'+.:,.:�. ' S.�/�uy'i t'� d f !�� "rS �i . i :�'u``-�•:�4 �;`�`F f.. :.'.i+t ' y ` � ',t ' a,;r.:.:
i t•v\�', 5 � it 5,, �! r\ Q . s;.c."`t'; i, ' c y , �w �. '� �� : �}„ii'ce 4'��:r'`, . \' ,. ;..! ^ '. V'- 5 ¢ s'N;� ifi v
�, ,, \ „�. �3 � '"� Z., „" t`,-, '!+. w,;a 5 �{s•'� v.T r',.�. ; �,A.,,'.t?a�°'t�.•'�: i s 1' f�ri - � r, j� •x ;�' � r r s•=°G t"^';°' "i',,w,k„�;i
�:-'�` i !�.-..�, i- `4, "`'yt ' a. +"-'r;. � :1. "1` .1• t „� l:. ii.�^; :�. r., 7= 1'. ^:Co-.' t.�' i 1 '' ,t , fi�-� 'r ;�, 4F`r s�
- 1 YJ �� :� � ,xS, c t V �R.m, �.' ` yy F• `<r.a 4: r, rrjj{((,,�� f l('f'Yi.' .!G'+�'(. }%�";^"� 1.2,r-- •\-.`ej}} \i }� ,4 i t 'A „ a ' � 'rf �I �Pr hr. aF', b:C 1 �P� i �%`ex Y,
. `r- ,,,�.� I. `.:X _ _. * F .crw;I ,, �� F . +c:I +'4� *;�. •�' vC[, 5�+ �'� �i t N�` � f7 �:'w� v \- t 7 r ey, w'� r �c'sr.u•; �a�:"a
.''� • .r( , s n:� 7 ..5 r 1 \i"";tt .`t),rn.iF<°,v�.»M ,r,( t� d y$r .++.1Y ; )C..4.. e•r,"' r":
\y8 l.d
-„•:-,:{.. rr�t{I,,.,.,a '""t ti,: �• ,�.,5, ;'lir' n ,, �" �'v"' rt
Cr'i,.'T• :-c•'� �•�r 1 tta 4�s-`ry' �: fi'"+;cf,. {xr,, ,, rt,»�'y--t •�.``�tr;'.. *yr r_.., •.;#�. ��"�`{7';�, �,: �"2,,�� .{ .4.,m,1 'b r';; , j� rt,Y,e,r��.'°y ,,;,,;•�,; .{«,
'i " �``•.v 4�� „E� `-y; '� `+ to-,bi>." :...�� ��r � W���'. ��/% `�}}4'f'.:4 i � t' .t,�4 �: y,C d.7 J. �y, , 1. �Yq'Z o C # 4 yrt�'.
�. Gr � ';� - _ ..r..M � v;.. Js. .r7'^`�q."'• �^.": ;�:,;',-, :�.• •a•` a "l1. F��.ei,. `;,., T r. 1
- y `, "(" `.t,`' . '�" ` '�:::�' �• 3 - „4�, ""1:'`' •.k' � (•�.. '�;a7.r�.; pi.;.,. u""�°'rtr, P w� xW� tt r
., � " -�l.r. .'?.� :'r t 2�,'>.F4�h..Xi G:»'�,�r�A;3' �✓, �-K' YAP �:� \."�y� a;,+:.n:•,s.�i\r'.R' ,v.`,'w. 2;z'. ^;c?,rr'.-y.,,,.'.�w
r -•V 1 ��" 3' it ; 'tt. +'?;� `'.�1 , !\ au, .:/,,. rk1 ,`a- Ci 3 ,y �.x0 :p�ti't.• �•. � { >! t,�„ F
) r� ':✓' ^{• ,r.. N, •`, ?.• ,,,,;,.,�Z„``• "+Pr '�.y'-`+i.\, :.K 'b,.k �V 9��. ,P� us�, � ; a3 "-''v"��'� ,i\rt'��'._4 �, t"r'y �. s::y+i�-. .��' 4 wat-' �r,.�„.n '�d�"
- i { ''e' rr 'y �;., '. .>�; �`, :'d, :,+,t "'��.7, 'r"+.y�1�+•_Ut.,N, �;re ( ga'VJ.'{r �; `y y.,, rxt rF .�rea�,.Z+��«a4�7!•e��«6 ;r3,
t�,,k a °' i � 1 �i, � 5„ � "��. �.' '�� �` :��� 8 +S'� �.+�*e e,�` t,� '^.c. ,.�, � rQ .c•,d6n,. w+,� rn+r v f}, w"�(�,vre,
} I .�;�, •+.+J,.,, � � S `YS..,ry.. ,, h �.�%� 'j� F {,,,s� y { � y {30 ,�� ,},x �.�' vY <'�"'"11,. LL�� C'kr �. �y,�w- �H '�*i" :,6:�'�L�dG 3
.,,?iii.t t", i. `uyr CC 1' 'F'r." i•.:'rM1,, f''0" \vi"\iFr'I T' i`��}�y\�F'�r �, '{r`57.,"`"�nr'e" F M�ie''g ,y. 61
- _ '•\'4.'"�'•V'' >w,• :�,. �';; °;� Q� ' ;'1',•�`1;,.�:.' ' a. ; t.. +..' 'S�3#' \..� - `� � � w• �'i. c. 'QS` `r�, :`a�.y$®;
s�
�"+4•,i �' t:'�e ��' ',.,r,,'�,.�t•�,1`�M'a'�
y:, t) :�,y��� t , s r 5 r^,• .r �5 �. F 1 {! 3. r�' Ir gC ,Z i y4 �¢ry x wn
,f". �•-' ,"'�`t:47?� `;o*.' may, 4 y �',�. �•tav'M„ "�"�.�N.i rr ��a, 15.x,,,. � "°�k'`�?' ra,�'�S�t^�.=,:py� �
- -. `' r �.. "a i"°°'''.. ,, ` S' - x , tr•. 4 , 5;, arh + r ,r' w �.Z' ��, �l, y /f
""r%}, v . (ra,e \� `�!. A''}kr .,r .. i"�.d, 't . ti •,;as ti �" ,. t s. •- ta" ' � F S �• p. 1., M• f
w•'tp vw 1° 4\ y`�' .4•' "t+, 'v't,. ', +..�tF�'{'.Lq=� c'''��r T'f
�5y��� rx tw.4k i' -a.,°+,( 4�`,W +'� 'a^3f ti- 'k •, .�4.� 'i.i' ,sl tt, ."ti. t�v� t,{,"1"' ,�' �' 4`�I..�Y�G.'�"� �.7�'4"[�Y,'�"'
e,
. zt"r^6;•C�`• .'ifZ t �F�,`� �5 v' '',r7i J, ` „t,',. - 'S, .,,� moi`,-. ��� ".F' s nyr.,'�,.� t{1 s,to,•'^4 Vr b y��e.,1�. ,!y+. vy,. ,s.
g'(.r.Y'tilrLr; a, v'•.Lyly 4Y }aSw f,y' r' h .\. `'. �\ -t' x -�'%' �.qv'" �.X' �"ts'k�
+. rJ "Y at s b , I \ \ ,. +' i '. `j� %pa^.�► Lz. a ,r ,�"?o, ,.,
S 's ,�h\, r, �6�i `r Y A\ a r{ `, JJ(,}' J,mr sm
Z" ' v `"4, r rn+rt J,x 2 ' Vd•; fL. 4 .r i m _ '1, b
s' ,-4-'"�' s •>. �, Yw t ;, , 1' ti, �" "t ,. +. �y,,. N v v, �� p��rad' a '.+'� .:,J` �'
�• ,lc,t s a `y 4s f t', :=4k � 1' �::.` t,'M,,`�,� �' � r`�° aj�. � �;� „ • y�+• "� y +r.' �, yy
''YY+�'G 1 1 d rr �' r�•i � , J' � k,, ,.,t�•• 'L'�t "Kt `� -Ftr v p�, � + ryµ >k'k w
•ate Y �4 I t ' 'ti 8 \ ' r4, k0 � n �ar,4 l' � a '�''.: , \ ' jo- Ya j y �I 'F,S�'�M .,, l� '`hr°�'' � """ rr � xq��+�c, "+ N' N+
r�'' y+
�yv,,, v'!m•
A' 1� �x pr,�rFi`(' 4• r' F�4 � 7 'J (+Z-�i� �' •'';. � r *A;• '`*y - v �� '� a � VSE ra m 'j�r.�. y p'�y' r
+�., �; Ari 1 r✓','� ',.. � ay,, ..' ,'.\: "'^m"''*,�' �;;,.�, `'�'� � -" �e 1, s'� ' 7 a y ,p�.�v,�' �'y, k;�t�d, xa+; �d;'
,j. R&Nb fY9.ti;� ��, :t° ,�.\ � •,�'v'-#r� yFt'�S+pM`!y„r.,, '"rn4' .��', v,E: 5'^, •. '�,,, .s, '+:�''K.�.�y,, t�`•vi�Y.;�s,+y ..L "4� iq '� ti'�k^, 4+�u`Yf ,i',.fn+";', y��w., wr�
�! 'Y r 4F �y, ' .Y• '.l. r t i�1:, '"i' '`k ..4 ',.',[",,Fr , .} � y •'�. ik.,� ,, "t,'• v �' :,M S" , �a 'c � 1 ! x t� + +y � •�y,.� 'J4
.�/-� t,�,✓i�,7r��1yt'Gt, ' ar' rt • .4 ,:'3: 'a. .i'rY;,i'it ��1 w'a .y,, : "f�"`� yw f'1. 'h}Nt;T��t,�t'. � a, `�.; �a '+t,+ ry„ �"Svu• Y�Y� .«•�'A."m"' i, r
T
,i �.r i�"r4 t _ 'a "�'4.. ~`n. �"•.��,. `r rr.1t, •Erti' _ e•%,; 'h S?" "'fid-• \• ,�„ x,� 3'' ,�(p.,;•.a�"`4°-,,
i" : i` ,,.? r:<�� t,t" S ;"" "` t "` �,.•- ra'v� �'�N 1 �� �'• �': caa`,•• �� w,�'«, r ��k��" `'� vF°w� yeyu"? r 't�1rJ�t.r t SM .
�" �'1�, .'�"Y.c+.;�'rr:f/,•' s ,t ��x�'�,t� ° 4' "' '{.l. f1'y R i h,°b.. � '�. r - � x , i�' +iwt.`�,`r` .�; jz a .�44.1�Ya ', P�
a �'^' �`cri `,�/�t9A qy ',4`t#.Y kik; "� � y. •i�,�, F, ,, \a ;S.i�Ct ,, .�a4,� kp i,yc '�� i ,1 '� i ,;.;, ''"�. *,r.y. �'°°t ''�• ti aafi•.. 4 " , Ar "}��^'�,ir; lnNt44 t,., fir.+r, '
'^+•' �°.�. i.�.L�,t h:�k's!l.fl �`rx Y��1%�t �r� Y.,• � ftitla
',•'r, .'Y f,' 1 ',�. �1
� 2. t wk;
F`i'" .• �f'�r} 'wWu,�+, . '�+1' it�«,k �'\ ' 1u "'.' ) s a'� s.4.� t.. i' 'rpt' ' v f :•5"�''vya '. `w; r),{)' 7 4,i, ,� "5Gst6•
-'a,"&--';:k°•'.i»'','«.oyy,,;",,,r
4 eay3
,��� \i`:,g,'�1b�7 ,C,n.'�[, �,rs r'i 1. '� t`'t.'L�,`•v :`-� '--'� �
�hJ,.arJ+l''t�`r.�,•. .41 l" �h� h �.
&. .,,,•^e 'n� 4. .•f+l } F�� ."('v : K,' +
r" )x}J� Y',¢z10`jy'!�Sl'y�rp nr
' - "yl;4. A r• .C4i a • r '`;. �,• 'i 'k.'' ,� ' of ) 1 t„
'�:� �s :f a� av n,n"f r •� x�,�..L t1y.Aix 1 r �4, ky �'°3y5,"��$' L... �„ � r 1." _ 4, v . ; ti `.. • t'� '� 'st „sz.�,�'w A, tt4 � I
�r b ,A,;<.1C"'5� 'r•t° ,ijl".fit'.,'' ',r ,`i�°%�rt.;^"'z�, °'"�Z,aS: �, %et'a, s,_;', _ s•t ,v �„'r"°. `'>ti r"tiw ''�' i,'.Fr �'S4'�u ,,',�,�
•t',,
� ��f'�!b .4.y C's"ti 'ls j+,,{ ti�7"�. \ "a 4 � iy, .•E�;. 'S^�•
•'�1 '1�``'e ��:`�,,�. 'y•�" {.. .�, "�,'a �`i•'>'�.�y,,f Iia v ~ FL� ^��iv�,1
),��� .•��.�� gF�'P� �'fft"'^ „�ik.- � :1��. '\' ^��t i��r, '�s+1;��i�t�x.�,�t1��Mr����L Y�,,�,j y�� !•�,�.. `x �'�r+?, � 'b,,��,, 'aa ^�' � 5� 1rx a„"H
N � � A '�� �, .� a 4 ���-sz'' -i ' st s��-+\.� 8a't', x<1;`v;.•\ ♦ h, �. i3'St +.� x "r a'w 3y;�"'
...: II. . i''s�;a.;°:R*q,
�`(r4?"1JtiyFt & c:. Yt •" ,5�. Y �`a,,a'';i�•,.�,^, ;I 4'
,. q i'"W. ' :.�, C �iY �' ' •', `.,�\', y, '� ti., �, t `' `. 7t,'t,y z:.:.y ,, ..4�;� , .`-a 'r"'zty . `�.`R6r�'a `t s'. 1 +' '�t T??
�.,;�''r, �✓ i" :3 ''�;,t 'a '� l t�lw "i','�k'_'. " J+l,� ng.; ., i :..4y� .`1 ",f�<.. �,..'F';'.,,.- ..�1, AWLS,
.IN r„
g' f .',r+iir' \; ,\,Yi y�'�`i 5 tamdG. :'`�'.e1F `4`' - `j•q',i,..`•. .'.: ':
-,,.� �' ,.err 'a3 •t .. ;'.. __s.. '"}4. •0.`tro4. •Y" -! _ k'r.
y a;�r�b�' �. �_j'+� a rti � �4 `i��'�lRs a,U v` -p ` (,'.� s.�4i-�, uv ''�„ �� yt•� s- ' f t ��'y a
';� r;
3 v.,( i Y . `y.' `Q °.S .v )�� 5- _ "4e -:r =i. et', •`_,i%,�ti «- _ .,�•�. ak v .2' +errti.ti
1
', � '• � 7� ,�,.�5r _ n r �",k 'y�%�;*, t \r -'t 4�?: -a e 4q r �• � � �., . �•a. �� 4„�
)', �• a,,pk..+,�a.,fj a+" �t� Vy t� ;�j�. �, •J.� 4';�;,. ,(, r `" �.
�,
Vol
a;fir-rr - :�dF.��* i,� - !f.}1{Si�!'S{r:S' � � y�r ��. .i `. �� �'�:��� ;,['i,k�x '� . �i.�.. _:A. C; `��: R.- ��.�"�r ', • �y-.1-'+�
Friday, December 15, 2017
David Vissor
Vissor Properties
50106 Bittersweet Trail
Granger, IN
Report on Deteriorated Timbers
David Vissor of Vissor Properties asked me to review eight photos of deteriorated timbers from
a barn on his property in Granger Indiana.
Photo 3 shows a timber with a blackish coloring. This may be due to a wet rot fungus,
Coniophora Puteana or a similar fungus. An attack of this fungus consumes the wood and
causes it to be soft and spongy. The wood loses its load carrying capability and destroys the
integrity of the structure.
Photos 4, 6 and 7 appear to show damage from termites. Termites consume the wood fibers and
leave the remaining timber with a weak straw -like lattice. This also destroys the load carrying
capacity of the'timber.
Much of the timber from this barn shows evidence of severe structural damage. Because of the
legal and moral liability of allowing an unsafe structure to remain, even if unused, it is prudent
to demolish buildings with severe structural damage.
17455 Douglas Road /' South Bend, IN 46635 / (574) 273-5014
� � V
vr•,
. S •T�:z—
•i
-=,ate 7�.�>�y
c
r
' �,r
� r ."yr t f'i•.'- #y._ J,...4.- y F `/Si vA s'�
r S
i. � ,':�'' i 3! .} - ._a. �o- �.✓-'max f ,,}(' J j! { s < `�
_ J
' r
SA<
53.E 1 � � ` • i i ��'' � i'f' t
�No
' ,.� .. ?�=,-5�^v,•%� � t ', s -� .�fa��Y� _� r J � <�iN,� nx ~o• t J ..
WK
n .^` &'.*T. T
ytr'�„-:-3q�jF'�„��,Y � t `. c .t �/ i Ef � t , � <,S� r �� F 2�r 5* s • _
r/20
t f
MtW
JVIP
ISM
`�,�� ��.� �.� ':�� ��' i�� �-� }fir•
d�� •µms. -� t� .y�iatLh`�rfi''`T=t1 L
Report on Deteriorated Timbers
Vissor Properties
If you have any questions or comments on this, please call or email
This report is being emailed. A hard copy and invoice will be mailed.
Yours,
Paul Fujawa, P.E., S.E.
Paul Fujawa Engineers, Inc.
Friday, December 15, 2017
Page 4
PE60860536
0 0
STATE OF
17455 Douglas Road / South Bend, IN 46635 / (574) 273-5014
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 8 December 2017
Application Number: 2017-1205
Property Location: 906 Leland
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Buil(ler: Bungalow / 1912?
Property Owner: Joan M. Downs
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Historic District, Ordinance 49574-05
Rating: No Rating
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The structure at 906 Leland was built by the Hans family sometime
around 1912 behind their primacy residence (908 Leland Avenue, a Contributing -rated gabled -ell built in 1898).
The structure is a small hip -roofed bungalow on a rusticated concrete block foundation with wooden siding. A full -
width porch with four pillars and simple replacement railing faces the street on the western side and covers two
windows and the main entrance. The north face has a single protrusion (containing the bathroom), two windows,
and a small covered side entrance. The east and south faces have two windows each. A brick chimney is centrally
located in an asphalt shingled roof. Windows appear to be wood 1/1 double hung.
ALTERATIONS: Porch railings appear to be a later addition/ replacement. RME 2017-IOI OB called for
masonry work on the chimney. RME 2017-1115 removed a large maple tree that compromised the sewer between
906 and 908 Leland.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "To prepared for a kitchen remodel to be described later in the proposal, we will remove
the existing side porch, and build out the kitchen to a similar footprint, utilizing the existing roof line."
See attached documents.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness for
improvements on the structure including:
I. Porch reconstruction, including new posts, steps, railings, framing, and tongue -and -groove fir flooring
2. New addition (to the kitchen), including: new foundation, framing, flooring, installation of one wooden
Pella Architect Window 3/0 x 2/0 with simulated divided light external grid (3 wide, 2 high), moving
existing side door to new location, new siding (1/2" x 6" Clear Cedar Bevel Siding) and exterior trim,
and construction of new wooden storms for entire house.\
3. Site work, including: removal of concrete driveway, excavation and installation of new sewer line, lay
crushed Iimestone for service driveway and alley, and pour new concrete steps for the `new' side door.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: N/A
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
General Definitions
(B) PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
(b2) Rehabilitation (ADOPTED)
Maintaining the existing character of the district, and whenever possible returning it to its original condition. Any rehabilitation would not
require the removal of all non -original materials but would encourage the removal of all such materials which are incompatible with the
defined elements of preservation for the district. The design of new construction or alteration would not require the duplication of the
original design and construction, but should be compatible with existing structures and the district's defined elements of
preservation. The use of original materials or construction techniques would be encouraged, but contemporary methods and
materials would be acceptable when compatible.
_III. NE�V CONSTRUCTION
New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, -orany newaddition to
an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other
buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district.
A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION
The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have
L- or T- shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half story bungalow's. The most
prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio.
Required
The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building
height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block.
Fagadc proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade voider or narrower than those existing in the same block.
Additions to the existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure.
Recommended
Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood.
Prohibited
Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building. and change its scale and architectural character shall not be
considered.
Not Recommended
New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features and spaces of
the building. Any, style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions.
B. BUILDING MATERIALS
Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum. vinyl and fiberboard/ composite
siding.
Required
Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent
structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall related to the existing or original materials of that structure.
Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the
basic structure and appearance of the building.
Recommended
Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the
original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.
Prohibited
Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used.
Not Recommended
Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations.
IV, SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES
A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
Required
Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is preserved.
Recommended
Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural integrity of
the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated.
Prohibited
Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and spaces is prohibited.
Not Recommended
Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project, as it is in keeping with the Standards
& Guidelines of the Chapin Park Local and National Historic District.
Written by
Adam Toering
Deputy Director
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
.--wA. P
At
t�rccr ..--• .:.::..--
t } i
�I t
\�
Am
Get
i I
j � r
� 1'��t��a1�t��t1,§1�i5 1�� ��i'•t 1 Fy4!k�l�tt�.,'�"'
t �s ,� t+ � � y� j'4}flt �tsl� dl��}+C} t t l �, •i111`� t t�� � `}Y,j�,�ti
i ozo= t lolf
ei
i
BEDROOM
KITCHEN A
(00
0 0
5TAIRCA5E
ENTRY PARLOR N
DINING
Existing
storm Lul
—screen - — — — — — —
V4 T
F\
2;0
0
storm wl
screen.
zo
BEDROOM KITCHEM7
C/—q'-101/2"
storm W/
1 screen
P11,
STAIRCA5E
PORCH
1UP
ENTRY PARLOR
DIMING
storm wl
screen
I ( � 9 't
storm wl
7
screen
11z---------------13'-b"_------------IV-1"-----=I—
NEW — — — — — — — -- - — — — — — - I V-1"
NEW
r"DIE{TM%0.1I1M� � �fa ME, ". 11-- I
ll [TI [
906 Leland Ave JI
SCALE: DATE: I
Joan Downs Cottage Renovation I) 1J4" tz/a/2oL7 K
South Bend, IN 46616 I
1I 1
.wKCrmmrlf .
II IIII I, " SCALE:
Joan Front Porch Leland Alve rw'!
:xoi�rsrt
y 2
eno onrw"n@ South Bend, IN 46616
New Expanded Kitchen
Preserve existing Roof
Relocate existing Door
New Window at bumpout
Window: Pella Architect,
wood interior, exterior
Poured Foundation (crawl)
with two courses of block
to match texture of existing
as close as possible.
\ Existing Bathroom
Bumpout
Existing Sill & Reuse of existing
Crosshead details exterior door, new
considered with new location
window installation.
Existing Porch
Clapboard Siding iwoxcr"u M i ,� 6n o scaimiaH DATE:
to match existing I CK I I Side Porch/ I h. ['r
11SCALE;
as close as possible -9066 L LelandandA Ave Kitchen ExpansioNone sz/4/zoiz
nnu connnnr South Bend, IN 46616
a
1:'
K:
\ Existing Bathroom
Bumpout
Existing Sill & Reuse of existing
Crosshead details exterior door, new
considered with new location
window installation.
Existing Porch
Clapboard Siding iwoxcr"u M i ,� 6n o scaimiaH DATE:
to match existing I CK I I Side Porch/ I h. ['r
11SCALE;
as close as possible -9066 L LelandandA Ave Kitchen ExpansioNone sz/4/zoiz
nnu connnnr South Bend, IN 46616
Exterior Work
Concrete Removal/ Kitchen Expansion
General Description
To prepare for a kitchen remodel to be described later in the proposal, we
will remove the existing side porch, and build out the kitchen to a similar
footprint, utilizing the existing roof line.
Removals/ Foundation Work
• Saw cut for new sump pit and trench as needed.
• Repour when plumber is done with installation.
• Demo posts at porch after roof is braced up by others.
• Excavate for new addition.
• Form and pour footers and foundation walls for new room addition.
• Drill and pin new foundation walls to existing using #4 rebar pins.
• Install 1/2" x 8" galvanized anchor bolts every 6 linear feet
• Saw cut access into existing basement, demo and haul away debris.
• Dampproof foundation walls.
• Backfill foundation using existing soils.
•Demo existing concrete driveway and haul away debris.
• Excavate for new sewer line.
• Backfill and compact trench after plumber is done with installation.
a
• ***NOTE: Tree nearby will have roots ripped out and could
eventually die - Universal Services is not responsible***
• Supply approx. 18 tons of #8 crushed limestone in driveway for
construction and remove and re -spread as best we can in alley when
work is complete. Gravel work not to delay final payment or closing
out job.
• Pour concrete steps in small section leading from new exterior door to
side drive area. Lowest step should be flush to house and not extend
past.
Section of kitchen wall removed. Half walls and floor of porch removed.
Railing Detail/ Stair Parts
Changes to specified parts on change order:
Top Rail:
2" x 4" Treated (Set at height:
Bottom Rail:
2" x 4" Treated
Baluster:
2" x 2" Square
Front Stair Posts (2):
6" x 6" w/ Cap
Treads:
5/4 Decking
Risers:
1" x treated
Lattice (sides only):
Treated
Painting
All painting by others.
Front Porch Price:
Exterior Window Trims
Removals
Homeowner Initial
Designer Initial
��?
We will remove existing wood sills, previously notched for vinyl siding
installation. Remove existing storm windows.
Exterior Trim
We will install new 2" x 8" wood sills, leaving existing
We will install new Kotter 5668 -BB Poplar Trim crossheads on existing
windows.
Painting
Painting by others.
Exterior Trim Price:
Homeowner Initial
Designer Initial �"1)
Masonry
We will install two courses of block to match existing as close as possible
from readily available stock from local suppliers.
Framing/ Sub Floor
We will frame for a new subfloor to include sill plate, 2" x 10" floor joists.
Glue and power nail tongue and groove 3/a" OSB to floor joists.
Framing/ Exterior Walls
We will frame exterior walls of approx. size of your existing porch (6.5' x
3.5') to create a large kitchen space. New 6.5' wall will be framed for a new
window, final size TBD. Existing window opening reframed for the existing
exterior door which will be reinstalled at the new location.
Roof
The existing roof will be preserved and left in place.
Ceilings
Ceiling height is determined by the existing roof line. The bumpout area
will feature approx. 7.5' ceiling, lower than the main kitchen area.
Windows and Exterior Doors
One Pella Architect Window 3/0 x 2/0 installed in new wall section.
Window is wood interior, wood exterior, prefinished white.
Window features Integral Light Technology for a simulated divided light,
external grid. Window grid is 3 wide, 2 high.
Existing exterior door installed at former window location to lead from the
kitchen space to the new concrete steps.
Siding- Exterior Trim
We will install new wood clapboard siding, style %2" x 6" Clear Cedar Bevel
Siding. We will install new wood window trim and crosshead detail at the
- new window and new door- opening. The exterior trim work on other - - -
openings for your home to be detailed elsewhere in this proposal.
Storm Windows
Removals
Removing existing storms described in Exterior Trim section of this
proposal. Existing wood windows are to be left in place for this proposal.
The refurbishing of existing windows to be addressed elsewhere.
Construction and Installation
We will construct new custom wood storm windows somewhat in the spirit
of windows you had built for a home at 612 Portage.
Five new windows will feature a frame constructed out of 5/4 wood
material, fixed glass in top half, a removable framed glass panel, and an
additional removable screen panel that can be swapped out through the
course of the year.
Two new windows will feature a frame constructed out of 5/4 wood
material, fixed glass in top and bottom half (Entry Parlor window facing side
yard, Kitchen Sink window facing backyard).
�.r One new window will feature a frame constructed out of 5/4 wood material,
with one piece of fixed glass, with no divide (Dining Room window facing
4 --backyard). This window is not a double hung, and has a horizontal shape.
Final Design, Materials, to be reviewed with homeowner. All painting of
storm windows by others.
Storm Window Price:
Homeowner Initia
Designer Initi
Front Porch
General Description
We will remove the existing front porch and construct a new safer and more,
visually appealing front porch, leaving the existing roof and posts.
Removals
Remove existing porch railing, porch ceiling, floor framing, porch floor, and
steps. Preserve 4 posts which will remain as -is with scraping and painting
by others.
Framing
Frame new porch floor with new treated joists and beams. Floor framing 2"
x 8" joists every 16" on center, parallel to the house to allow for wood porch
flooring to run perpendicular to the house at a slight pitch away from the
front door. Treated stringers for two stairs.
Roof
The existing roof will be preserved and left in place.
r
Ceilings
We will install new tongue and groove porch ceiling, painted or stained by
others.
Possible change order to preserve ceiling with credit to owner.
Electrical
Described in first section of the Exterior Proposal.
Porch Floor
Install 1" x 4" Tongue -and -Groove Fir porch flooring perpendicular to the
house.
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY
November 20', 2017
13' Floor Conference Room
County — City Building
South Bend, IN 46601
I. CALL TO ORDER
President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7pm.
Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Michele
Gelfman, Secretary; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Brandon Anderson;
Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian
Members Not in Attendance: Kevin Buccellato; Mike Voll
Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Adam Toering, Deputy Director; Steve Szaday,
Preservation Specialist; Brandie Ecker, Legal Counsel
Staff Not in Attendance: n/a
Members of the Public Present:
Nancy Coiro, 706 N St. Joseph
Mike Illes, 706 N St. Joseph
Stan Molenda, Code Enforcement
James Mueller, DCI
H. PUBLIC HEARING
A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
1. 706 N St Joseph Street
Representation:
Date: 6 November 2017
COA# 2017-1101 #8308-92 River Bend
Nancy Coiro, 706 N St. Joseph Street.
Mike Gillis, Champion Windows
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Application Number: 2017-1101
Property Location: 706 N St Joseph Street
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare / 1905 / "The Good House"
Property Owner: Mark Zimmerman
Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Historic District Ordinance #8308-92
Rating: Contributing
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story American Foursquare sits on a fieldstone foundation. The second
story has a slight overhang. The hipped roof has asphalt shingles, hipped dormers, and a center brick chimney. The street facing
side has concrete steps and stoop, an iron railing, and a corrugated metal overhang. Windows are 9 -pane fixed on the front first
story, 1/1 double hung. The dormer has a 6 -pane casement. Windows have aluminum storm windows, a wood front door with
aluminum storm door. A detached one -car concrete block garage with a flat roof is to the rear of the house.
ALTERATIONS: Siding is not original and predates the district designation. Large overgrown shrubs were removed from the
front yard with COA # 2001-0608-2. Asbestos shingles were replaced with the current asphalt shingles with COA #2006-1024.
- - -- - At some point, -vinyl windows were installed on the south side of the main floor. - --- - - - - - - - -- -
1
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Install 5 replacement windows."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks to replace 5 windows with white Champion Comfort 365
windows in the following locations: in the living room on the west side, a picture window (51 ''/2' x 65"); in the front room on the
west side, another picture window (51 ''/2' x 65"); on the north side, one double -hung window in the stairwell ( 23 1/2" x 45"); in
the living room on the north side is a 2 -Lite slider window (42 3/4" x 23"); and in the kitchen, a double -hung window (29 3/4" x 39
3/4").
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
On November 6, 2017 at approximately 1:30 PM I visited the property located at 706 N St. Joseph within the River
Bend Local Historic District. I met with Mark Zimmerman to document the condition of the windows that they have
applied to replace. In full disclosure the owners of the property Mark and Nancy are personal friends and I have
performed work on the house prior to my tenure at Historic Preservation. I am familiar with the status of the front
windows in particular as I had previously attempted to help winterize those years ago.
The first two windows on the application are the front (west) picture windows. These were not originally picture
windows but actually double hung. The previous owner of the house removed the sashes, then took the wood storm
window and installed it in the first set of tracks between the interior and parting stops, they then added an aluminum
storm window to the outside. This setup is ill-fitting at best and has had different filler wood to help keep the wood
storm in place. Air infiltration is prolific on both front windows as both of these have had the same treatment.
The third window is the horizontal window near the northwest window. The sash itself is in good shape and has a
wood storm window on the exterior. The desire of the owner is to have a window that operates since they have
never had airflow towards the front of the house.
The fourth window is a double hung on the north side of the house at the landing of the stairs. The bottom sash has
significant deterioration and due to settling and damage from nearby construction and roadwork, the window is out
of square. Photographs will depict the repairs the owners have made to the plaster walls. The lower left corner of the
frame has enough of a drop that outside water has blistered the interior wall. Upper sash is painted in place but is
separated due to pressure from being out of square.
The fifth and final window is a non -original aluminum replacement window that does not stay open and faces the
rear yard of the house.
I will point out that the two windows on the south side of the structure are vinyl replacement windows that were
replaced prior to Mr. Zimmerman moving into the house.
Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
River Bend Local Historic District
C. Windows and Doors
Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases
where synthetic siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have
aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and
hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the
original.
Recommended
Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the original, should be used but should not damage
existing frames. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware
should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the
existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material.
Prohibited
Original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in
place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not
be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum and insulating glass
combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed.
Not recommended
Awnings, hoods or fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the
existing character or appearance of the building.
2
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would prefer to see wood windows installed on this structure. That being said, vinyl windows are already in place on the
south side on the ground floor, and an argument can be made that the aesthetics of the property would be better served by
creating continuity on the entire floor. With consideration of the existing Standards and Guidelines of the River Bend Local
Historic District, staff recommends approval as applied.
Written by
Adam Toering
Deputy Director
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
Commissioner Molnar moved to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Parker.
All in favor, none opposed, one abstention.
Vote 6 — 0 —1 COA#2017-1101 is approved.
2. 805 Leland / 808 Ashland COA# 2017-1101A #9574-05 Chapin Park -
Representation by Stanley Molinda, 223 W Jefferson Street / Code Enforcement
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 8 November 2017
Application Number: 2017-1101A
Property Location: 805 Leland Avenue / 808 Ashland
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne —Free Classic/ 1902 (1929 Remodel) / Wandell & McErlain
(remodel?)
Property Owner: Ingersol Financial LLC
Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Historic District , Ordinance #9574-05
Rating: N/A
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: The 2 -story free classic irregular -frame house sits upon a concrete foundation. A
garage space at the rear of the structure provided the foundation of an extensive later non -conforming addition. The house is
encased in asbestos siding and has louvres and gable returns. The roof is hipped with cross gables and has a central chimney.
The front of the house has a 1/3 -width shed with replacement baluster and support posts. The windows are 1/1 double hung with
molded crowns and trim. Replacement storms encase the windows.
ALTERATIONS: Asbestos siding is not original and predates the district designation. Extensive modification of the existing
garage space created additional living space prior to the establishment of the Historic District (ca. 1929). CoA #2011-0811
called for the replacement of the wood deck and railings of the front porch. CoA #2014-0724A removed a storm damaged pine
tree leaning over the house as well as overgrown bushes.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Demolition of house."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Code Enforcement of the City of South Bend submits an application for a
Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing structure.
Property has appeared regularly at Code Enforcement hearings for the past two years during the tenure of multiple owners.
Continuous enforcement and repeated fines have been imposed on the property owners of record. City has continued to maintain
the property in the absence of an attentive property owner, including securing the building and the maintenance and care of the
grounds. ,
__.Continued neglect has degraded the structure to a deplorable state, and little activity by the property owner has been witnessed in
multiple years. Owner of record ("Ingersol Financial, LLC" or "Ingersol Financial Midwest Land Trust") appears to have a
ranging portfolio of properties in the Midwest. Although not indicative of their entire portfolio, a property in Muskegon,
Michigan was declared "substandard, dangerous and a public nuisance" on August 3, 2017; bids for demolition were requested
by the city; and the city subsequently awarded one on November 31, 2017 (see attached documents and news articles).
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
On November 6, 2017 at approximately 10 AM, I met with inspectors from South Bend Code Enforcement to walk through the
property located at 805 Leland/806 Ashland. I am familiar with the property as I did a previous walk through in 2014. The
property has had a number of owners by way of tax sales and transfers. I have attended 6 different code hearing in regards to this
property since 2014.
This last owner had done a down to stud removal of walls on the first floor. There have been numerous repairs on the rear portion
of the structure and some ceilings that were down in 2014 that are now in place. However, the ceiling on the south side of the
structure on the second floor has indications of water damage and infiltration. The outside photos show an area where the roof
meets the fascia and the roofing material is hanging. This is the same room that has the water damage inside.
The rear addition was actually an attached garage that had a second story added later on. As well as an additional story added to a
lower level located at the northwest corner. Although the addition above the garage appear sound, the addition added later is
"spongey" to walk on. There was movement as I walked across the floor both from the floor and the wall that separated the two
additions.
I walked through the basement and could see areas where the mortar has failed as well as some attempts to make repairs.
Disintegrated mortar is in plies as a result of water infiltration. I saw from the outside symmetrical cracks on both sides of the
east wall about 12 inches off the corner. These cracks go from the siding well into the ground level. The foundation on the
exterior is concrete but the interior Michigan basement is brick. Photographs will show daylight from the interior of the
basement.
I do not find the structure to be deteriorated beyond repair. However, the rear additions would need to be removed as they are not
structurally sound and add burden to the rear wall of the original structure. The roof line at the addition has failed in the past as
water marks and ceiling cave-ins have been indicative of that. The east wall of the basement would need serious repair and
bracing. The chimney has had stucco applied over brick but is out of square and is leaning.
Steve Szaday
Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK
IV. Safety and Building Codes
A. Building Code Requirements
Required
Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is
preserved.
Recommended
Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the architectural
integrity of the structure. Variances for historic properties should be investigated. [...]
V.GENERAL
A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where buildings pose a threat to the public safety, and
demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially
homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the
Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference.
B. A Certificate of Appropriateness is required before moving any building or structure. The moving a building within, out of or
into the district is discouraged; however, moving is preferred to demolition. Building incompatible with existing structures in the
historic district shall be prohibited.
VL ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
Enforcement of the preservation guidelines and standards for the historic district is made possible in the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of South Bend, ordinance No. 5565-73, as amended and the Historic Preservation Commission's Preservation Plan.
The Historic Preservation Commission may petition the Building Commissioner to use the legal means available to him/her to
force the maintenance and/or repair of any building or structure within the historic district in accordance with the intent of this
ordinance.
This ordinance, however, does not prevent the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building or structure which does not
involve a change in any exterior feature, nor does it prevent the reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any building
or structure which the Building Commissioner or other official has determined to be a hazard to public safety.
[... ]
In making its determination, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider three factors: first, appropriateness of the
proposed work to the preservation of the building and district; second, the detriment to the public welfare if the proposed
work is permitted even though it is not deemed appropriate; third, the potential hardship that the denial of the Certificate of
Appropriateness would cause the applicant.
0
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City of South Bend has maintained the property (to the limits of their ability and legal
obligation) on behalf of the owner of record for this duration, and will incur an undue financial burden by continuing this
process. Seeing how the property owner:
failed to respond to any attempts at communication by representatives of the city;
failed to offer representation at Code Enforcement hearings;
failed to execute the requested improvements to maintain the property to keep the structure in compliance with code
enforcement requirements;
and most deplorably allowed this property to degrade to its current state where it poses a threat to public safety (as
determined by the Code Enforcement representatives),
staff recommends approval of the request for Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition. Furthermore, this finding is based
upon adherence to Building Department requirements and Chapin Park Historic District Standards & Guidelines. We are pained
by the property owner's inability (or lack of desire) to attempt to maintain, improve, or sell the property, and saddened by the
inevitable prospect of demolition (be it through neglect or otherwise). The Chapin Park Historic District and the City of South
Bend are both ill -served by the continued degradation of this property.
Written by
Adam Toering
Deputy Director
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
Commissioner Anderson moved to approve as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner
Gelfman.
Five in favor, two opposed.
Vote: 5 — 2 COA#2017-1101A approved.
3.705/707 Lincoln Way East COA#2017-1101B #6846-80 Edgewater Place
No representation.
STAFF REPORT
CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
Date: 8 November 2017
Application Number: 2017-1101B
Property Location: 705 / 707 Lincoln Way East
Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare / 1920 / "Seider
Apartments"
Property Owner: Mariana Lara
Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Historic District #6846-80
Rating: Non -Contributing (Staff disagrees with rating and would deem it at least
"contributing")
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story `American Foursquare' is rectangular in construction and sits on a
brick foundation. The first story is brick, while the second story is wood shingle with a molded overhang between the two
stories. The roof is gabled with a wide overhang; a pedimented gable and dormer is on the southeast roof face. The front of the
structure has a full open porch with brick piers and walls. Windows are double hung. First story front fagade has wide paneled
windows, second story has French doors leading to the balcony. One centrally located chimney has a brick corbeled top.
�1
ALTERATIONS: COA # 1989-0118 permitted the installation of a 2nd floor porch railing including posts, balusters, and railings.
The full balustrade on top of the balcony has been removed or was never installed. COA # 1992-0618 permitted the replacement
of existing copper lock asphalt shingle roofing with 3 -in -1 tab asphalt shingles. COA #2015-1203 retroactively permitted a
complete tear -off and re -roofing with dimensional asphalt shingles, as well as the installation of new gutters.
APPLICATION ITEMS: "Replaced 6 windows (exact same size, vinyl windows). Old windows were broken and really
deteriorated. Painted the back stairs and porch to comply with code enforcement."
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Applicant seeks retroactive approval for the installation of 6 vinyl windows in
place of previous wooden windows. The subject windows are on the northwest side of the structure. On the ground floor, the
following windows were installed: two one -over -one windows are closer to the front of the house and one six -over -six window
closer to the rear of the house. On the second floor, the following windows were installed: two one -over -one windows (directly
above those on the ground floor) and a six -over -six window.
For reference, multiple windows remain boarded up (and painted over) on both the first and second stories on the northwest side
of the house. Basement access windows are also boarded up and painted over. A single one -over -one `original' window remains
on the second story towards the rear of the structure.
Unfortunately, no manufacturer information has been provided for the installed windows by the applicant.
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT:
I thought it best to provide a timeline in regards to my interactions on this project.
• December 3, 2015 -Work was being performed on the roof at 705 LWE without a COA/RME or permit. I
stopped and gave my card to a worker on site. Within hours Mariana Lara was in the office and received an
approved RME for roof repair. This information can be corroborated through my photographs and invoices.
• January 19, 2017-A Code Hearing was held at RM 1307 at County -City Building. Mariana Lara was in
attendance. The Hearing Officer ruled 6 months on the exterior with all necessary permits be pulled from
both HPC and the Building Department. The owner agreed and no civil penalties nor performance bond
ordered.
• July 6, 2017- I noticed new windows installed at the west side of the structure. (I was living in the
neighborhood at that time) I left a business card on the front door and on the windshield of the vehicle
parked at the rear of the address. On the back of the business card, I stated that window replacement
needed an approved COA from HPC and a building permit.
• July 7, 2017- I emailed the building department to make them aware that work was being done at 705 LWE
without the necessary permits. Later that day I stopped at the address when I saw someone parked at the
location. I informed him that the Building Department would be coming by to place a stop work order (red -
tag) on the property due to a failure to obtain proper permits. I walked to the front of the house to see that
my card that I left the previous day was indeed taken from the front door. Mr. Lara was the one there at that
time and was angry that we had done that and we couldn't make him stop although he was already done
with the windows he was going to replace. He stated that we should have sent letters and not approached
him telling him he was going to be red -tagged. I informed him that at the previous code hearing they
agreed to get all the necessary permits but failed to do so. After several minutes of cursing, Mr. Lara sped
off down the alley.
Three inquiries were sent via email checking on the status of a COA application prior by the Building Department
prior to the Violations Letter being sent on August 16, 2017
Emails show that a COA application was sent via email to the Lara's two weeks prior to the August 7, 2017 deadline
to be heard in the August HPC meeting. A completed application was received November 1, 2017.
Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:
Edgewater Place Historic District Guideline for Historic Preservation and Development
IL EXISTING STRUCTURES
A. BUILDING MATERIALS
Required
Existing exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented
through repair., cleaning, and painting. [...]
C. WINDOWS AND DOORS
Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels;
masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied
,n
window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other
half wood storm windows.
Required
Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and
hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or
original.
Recommended
Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not
damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or
original, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized
or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material.
Prohibited
Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re-
used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building
should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass
combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed.
Not Recommended
Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or
appearance of the building should not be used.
IV. SAFETY AND BUILDING CODES
A. BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS
Required
Building code requirements shall be complied with in such a manner that the existing character of the building is
preserved.
Recommended
Local building code officials should be consulted to investigate alternative life safety measures that will preserve the
architectural integrity of the structure. Variances for historical properties should be investigated.
Prohibited
Construction of new stairways and elevators that would alter important architectural features and spaces is
prohibited.
Not Recommended
Fire prevention equipment should not damage the appearance or fabric of the building.
VI. ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES
Enforcement of the preservation guidelines for the historic district is made possible in the Zoning
Ordinance of South Bend, ordinance No. 5565-73. The Historic Preservation Commission shall issue a Certificate
of Appropriateness before any construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any house or
structure within the historic district boundaries is commenced (see Appendix A). This ordinance, however, does not
prevent the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building or structure which does not involve a change in any
exterior feature, nor does it prevent the reconstruction, alteration, demolition, or moving of any building or structure
which the Building Commissioner or other official has determined to be a hazard to public safety.
The Historic Preservation Commission will accept applications for Certificate of Appropriateness only
from the property owner. Property owners wishing to do or have done any work affecting the exterior of their
building or land must apply directly to the Historic Preservation Commission on the form prescribed by the
Commission (see Appendix A). The Commission will review the application and either issue a Certificate of
Appropriateness or else deny the application, stating in writing the reasons for such a denial. Upon such denial the
applicant may appeal to the Common Council.
In making its determination, the Historic Preservation Commission, shall consider three factors:
first, appropriateness of the proposed work to the preservation of the building and district; second, the
detriment to the public welfare if the proposed work is permitted even though it is not deemed appropriate;
third, the potential hardship that the denial of the Certificate of Appropriateness would cause the applicant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is relieved to see the applicant has painted the back stairs in compliance with the request of Code Enforcement, as it will
ensure the continued preservation of that portion of the structure in accordance with the Standards and Guidelines (II. EXISTING
STRUCTURES, A. Building Materials). The proposed (and installed) windows, however, are not in keeping with the Standards
and Guidelines of the Historic District, and are therefore inappropriate. Staff recommends denial of the window installation
application. Staff further requests that installed windows be removed and appropriate wooden windows be installed in their
place.
Written by
Adam Toering
Deputy Director
Approved by
Elicia Feasel
Executive Director
Commissioner Gordon moved to deny. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. President
Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative are supporting the motion to deny. Roll call was
ordered.
Commissioner Gellman voted (AYE): I vote to deny the application, as the property was not done
to the standards of this particular district, and was done without a Certificate of Appropriateness.
Commissioner Parker voted (AYE): I vote to deny the application based upon lack of
information in the Certificate of Appropriateness application and the use of vinyl windows.
Commissioner Anderson voted (AYE): I vote to deny due to lack of additional information,
change of material, and lack of representation so as to understand the work that was completed and
plans for the future.
Commissioner Hertel voted (AYE): I vote to deny due to lack of information, the use of vinyl
windows, and that the old windows were not observed, so it is unknown if they could have been
repaired.
Commissioner Klusczinski voted (AYE): I vote in favor of the motion to deny the application, as
there is lack of representation from the applicant this evening, there is a lack of information, and
the project proposes a change of material that is not in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines
for the Edgewater Place Historic District.
Commissioner Gordon voted (AYE): I vote 'Aye' to deny the application, as there is no
representation, although it wouldn't have made a difference due to the inappropriate materials and
the lack of a certificate of appropriateness applied for prior to the work being completed.
Commissioner Molnar voted (AYE): I vote to deny the application due to the applicant not
being present to answer questions and also do to the lack of information being provided.
Seven in favor, none opposed.
Vote: 7 — 0 COA#2017-1101B is denied unanimously.
III. HEARING OF VISITORS — None. .
IV. REGULAR BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. October 16, 2017 —Commissioner Klusczinski moved to change the location of
text that appeared under old business and move it under "President's Report."
E:3
Seconded by Commissioner Gordon.
Vote: 7 — 0 minutes unanimously approved as amended.
B. TREASURER'S REPORT
1. Location Report —
1 Executive Director Feasel detailed out -of -line account transfers,
including:
a Recording Local Landmarks in unincorporated St. Joseph County
b Building South Bend
2
C. STAFF REPORTS
1. Correspondence — Distributed
2. Executive Director — Distributed
3. Deputy Director — Distributed
4. Preservation Specialist - Distributed
5. Legal —
Boyd Appeal — Legal Counsel Brandie Ecker explained the Boyd Appeal.
HPC Transition — Legal Counsel Brandie Ecker updated the Commission
on the adoption of the Interlocal Agreement and updates to the ordinances.
D. COMMITTEE REPORTS
1. President —Nothing.
V. OLD BUSINESS
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. 2018 Building South Bend Partnership — Appropriation of funds work detailed by Executive
Director Feasel.
1. Commissioner Klusczinski made a motion in favor in authorizing the Executive
Director and her Deputy associate to appropriate $3,738 to the Building South Bend
appropriation digital archives and development project. Seconded by Commissioner
Parker.
Vote: 7 — 0 motion unanimously approved.
2. Commissioner Klusczinski made a motion for the out -of -line appropriation of funds
to file designated properties in the unincorporated county with the county recorder at
the approximate value that the Executive Director cited. Seconded by Commissioner
Hertel.
Vote: 7 — 0 motion unanimously approved.
3. Commissioner Klusczinski made a motion to provide the Executive Director with the
discretionary authority to transfer and relocate the monies from the county's 4103
account. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel.
Vote: 7 — 0 motion unanimously approved.
B. Nominating Committee
1. Commissioner Klusczinski made a motion to form a nominating committee with
Commissioner as its chair, comprised of all voting commission members excepting
the President. This committee is ordered to convene and deliberate on candidates for
the executive office positions for next year and present those candidates for
submission at next month's regular meeting. Commissioner Hertel seconded.
Vote: 7 — 0 motion unanimously approved.
C. Commissioner Gordon said congratulatory comments to Executive Director Feasel for her
comments at Holy Cross College's "Seminar for Success."
6
VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
A. Executive Director Feasel introduced James Mueller from the City of South Bend's
Department of Community Investment.
B. Commissioner Hertel requested the Unsafe Building and Unsafe Premises Code be
distributed by Legal to the Commissioners.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Parker made a motion to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel.
All in favor, none opposed.
Vote 7 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 9:10 pm.
Attest:
Mi hele Gelfm , ecre :ary Date
10
Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County
Deputy Director Report — Adam Toering — November 6th to December 4th, 2017
Daily Highlights
11/6 CoA deadline day.
11/7
11/8
11/9 1:30pm HPC / DCI Transition Meeting;
11/13 1:OOpm Treasure Hunt Meeting, 4:30pm NNN Lead Affinity Group, 1240 Thomas Common Council
Appeal
11/14
11/15 11:30am Industry (Hospitality) Luncheon, 5:30pm African American History Group @ Civil Rights
Heritage Center
11/16
11/17
11/20 2:OOpm DCI Planning Team Weekly Meeting, HPC Commission Meeting
11/21 Lunch with George Garner/IUSB Civil Rights Heritage Center (Landmarking of Natatorium),
11/22 Issuance of CoAs from meeting (2017-1101, 2017-1101A).
11/27 4:15pm Common Council Committee Meeting regarding Interlocal Agreement passage, 7:00-9:OOpm
11/28 10:30am HPC Digitization Meeting with Jennifer Parker, Eric Stahlheim; 5:30pm-7:20pm Out -of -Line
Transfer Request at County Council Committee Meeting; 7:30-8:45pm Near West Side Potluck
11/29 3:30pm Document Managing/Scanning with South Bend IT,
11/30 12:30-S:00pm South Bend Planning Team Retreat
12/1 9:30am HPC/DCI transition meeting with James Mueller; 'desk shopping' with Mary from DCI; 1:30pm
meeting with Building Department 3:15pm ND students with Leeper Park Bridge Research.
12/4
Routine'Maintenance Exclusions
Address RME# Description
820 Ashland 2017-1108 Remove and rebuild chimney from roof (with replacement
199 W North Shore Drive 2017-1106
906 N Leland Ave 2017-1115
1328 E Wayne S 2017-1116
1328 E Wayne S 2017-1117
1614 E Wayne St 2017-1117a
51387 Portage Road 2017-1128
911 N Leland Ave 2017-1204
Who Date/Time
Darius Lipsey 12/1-4:15pm
Betsy 12/4—10:OOam
red brick as needed)
Removal of diseased and disruptive trees on property, to be
replaced.
Removal of large Maple Tree that has compromised the
sewer pipe between 906 and 908, subsequent replacement.
Remove existing driveway and replace, as well as widening
by one foot. 100'x 12', as well as a 20' square portion
behind the house between It and the garage.
Replace current sidewalk
Garage Roof clean and repair, Side entry door replaced,
Jams replaced/repaired, Masonry repairs at lower corners.
Replace 3 lower flat roofs using certainteed flintastic
roofing.
Re -roof of house in advance of Solar Panel installation (COA
2017-1002C).
Phone Calls
What
Interested in finding out about the River Bend Historic District
Standards and Guidelines, potential home buyer.
Clarifications for the 911 Leland Solar Panel job with Solar Energy
Systems
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT
December 18, 2017
Hello Commission!
Work started without COAs/RMEs
517 S Carroll -9 new vinyl windows
529 S Carroll -3 new vinyl windows
Code Hearings:
1311 Prinz Ct., LWE-LHD repaired by owner
621-623 Rex, Chapin Park-LHD, hearing to be 12/21/2017
6 environmental reviews since last meeting.
I worked with Eric Boyd of 1240 W. Thomas St. to find wood windows from our store
room that would fit the openings on the second floor/new addition at the rear of the
structure. I believe we have found structurally sound wooden sashes that would be in-
kind in style and material.
I have received a verbal offer from the Department of Community Investment to be the
Inspector for Historic Preservation. The official written offer should follow shortly as my
drug test clears and new hire paperwork gets processed. My orientation is scheduled for
January 2, 2018.
I find that I am optimistic as we move forward into our new employment with the
Department of Community Investment. I think this is an opportunity that puts us at the
table from the very beginning with projects that involve Historic Preservation as opposed
to getting involved after plans are formed or decisions made. I am excited that I will be
able to continue to work with the talented and passionate director and deputy director that
I work with currently; as well as the wonderful commissioners that we have the privilege
of serving.
Steve Szaday
Preservation Specialist
Prescr;bQd by State Board of Accounts
p. Governmental Unit
General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A)
To.................................................................................... Dr.
IDEM South Bend Tribune
225 West Colfax Ave
............................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628
Tax ID# 35-13-1571
PUBLISHER'S CLAIM
LINE COUNT Ad #: 350307
Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type
in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ...................................
Head --Number of lines ...................................
Body -- Number of lines ...................................
- Body -- Number of lines ...................................
Total number of lines in notice
�07
COMPUTATION OF CHARGES
9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.3751 cents per line
Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work
(50 per cent of above amount) ...................................
Charge for extra proofs of publication
($1.00 for each proof in excess of two),,,,,,,,,, $0 00,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $0.00
DATA FOR COMPUTING COST
Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Size of 8 point
Number of Insertions 1
Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just
and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has
been paid.
1 also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size,
which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune:
12/04/17.
lot4. kl,�
publisher
South Bend Tribune
225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628
ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR
$0.00
Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571
ALLOWED
IN THE SUM OF $0.00
Attest
Cheryl Ju e Morey, Notary
Residen of St. Joseph County
My Commission expires December 21, 2024
That it is duly authenticated as required by law.
That it is based upon statutory authority.
That it is apparently
correct
incorrect
I certify that the within claim is true and correct; that
the services there in itemized and for which charge is
made were ordered by me and were necessary to the
public business
.;'"Ad #: 350307
Historic Preservation Commis-
sion of South Bend & St. Joseph
County will meet December 18
at 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun-
ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN.
Agendas available by request at
SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us
T. Klusczinski, President
Hspaxlp 1t 12:4