Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAugust 2017HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCBP/index.htm Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578 Email: SBSJCIIPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director MONDAY, AUGUST 21, 2017-7:00 p.m. -MEETING AGENDA COUNTY—CITY BUILDING, 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2017-0803 108 North Main Street #8915-1998 Local Landmark 2.2017-0804 717 Riverside Drive #8380-92 River Bend 3.2017-0807 Demolition 1905 College Street #9807-07 Local Landmark 4.2017-0807A 315 Madison Street #9574-05 Chapin Park III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 17, 2017 B. TREASURER REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 2a. Special recommendation asking that the MACOG solar resolution be disregarded following its use by Ms. Ecker in developing a substitute comprehensive resolution. 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President V. OLD BUSINESS A. RESOLUTION 17-02 "Solar Initiative Policy" VI. NEW BUSINESS A. RESOLUTION 17-03 ".Regarding the use of energy conservation and sustainability technologies in historic landmark buildings and districts" B. RESOLUTION 17-04 "Staff Commendation for Debra Parcell, recognizing her service, dedication and support of local preservation efforts in her capacity as HPC Deputy Director" C. DEPUTY DIRECTOR JOB DESCRIPTION D. DEPUTY DIRECTOR HIRE VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT correspondence re: basement flooding VIII. ADJOURNMENT Telephone interpreter service is available upon request free of charge for individuals with limited English proficiency - Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request free of charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET August 21, 2017 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include A Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME ADDRESS W, B, F, D H, O 7 1 I "" [(;am A nareujs -or JYM 1 16- 1 V I�.t P.V►11Q �r 1L Ores iAA �<t h OICt 11 V (At K -�J-- I R',vers;Je I- I C' s Seo /A /I Sf lace S� P3) 1-7- 3 W WF - C4,7 5-' � A447--'W'L ZK4 kz"�' A/r. W9 at9s - OY, Ac('6f VV w 1(A3 tom. 0— Z 3 � S - NOTK- O?w `r) o 4,- y"t/ 4 /*e I�q0 0Y 6( G�3- 20��� 1113 tel/. 20/'r 1'174 X03 w W�Aw, —B P STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 3, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0803 Property Location: 108 N Main Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neo-Classical/1910/Solon Beman and H.G. Christman builder Property Owner: JMS Development, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Historic Landmark, ordinance # 8915-1998 Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: John Mohler Studebaker built this eight story Neo -Classical style office structure in 1910. The fagade is comprised of six bays to the west and three to the south and is covered with white terra cotta classical detailing. It is also clearly divided into three registers that are separated by strong projecting and intervening cornices. The bottom of each cornice is punctuated by volutes and honeysuckle designs placed between each bay. The middle of the structure is articulated with a three bay system, which continues to the second intervening cornice, once again embellished with classical detailing. The top floor is further distinguished by the use of arched bays, which are topped by elaborate egg and dart molding. The overall decorative detail of the structure tends to reflect the impact of the Colombian Exposition of which the architect, Solon S. Beman, was a major participant. However, the frank expression of the steel frame links the building to the Chicago School of skyscraper construction. The building has a flat roof with robust projecting cornices that have egg and dart molding and decorated voluted brackets. The windows are 1/1 double hung with simple decorated spandrels, except for the eighth floor, which has round even spans and cartouche keystones. ALTERATIONS: COA 2016-0705A approved replacement of the non -original storefronts at ground floor with new aluminum windows and sill flashing and 7 door openings with standard hardware. Vinyl/aluminum windows have been replaced with an historically appropriate Quaker style aluminum that will restore all full original window openings, including arched heads. Further approvals with COA 2016-0705A include: awnings, in-kind; close up windows behind elevator core; masonry restoration, in-kind; remove skylights; install stair tower and trash chute near center of north fagade, all finished in EIFS. COA 2016-0801A approved removal of JMS sign, and installation of blade sign, sign on north elevation', and Studebaker Lofts sign. _ APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached written description. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Installation of a fagade sign on the southernmost portion of the east facade of the JMS Building, approximately 90 feet above the first floor elevation, avoiding the historic architectural terra cotta. The overall dimensions of the sign will be 14'-5" wide by 27" tall, featuring Centier Bank's logo and lettering made out of white plastic faces placed in an aluminum frame. Maximum letter height will be 20", with remaining letters at 10" and 15". The sign will be internally illuminated LED, and secured to the brick fagade to meet the approval of the City Building Department and building codes. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Groun B: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment changes of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure - Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material - Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood - all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials - the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The _ installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMAMNDATION: Although only one sign has been installed to date, approval has previously been given for installation of two Centier Bank signs on the structure. The sign proposed in this application will be in addition to, not in place of, the previously approved signage. Three signs would violate the Group B standards which specifically state "Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business." Additionally, staff believes this sign will have limited visibility from the east due to nearby structures. Staff recommends denial. Written by Deb Parcell Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director v.�Application tuslo;tg:tnrsr—v*ijtm i t�,ts>t 5taix `�`��"`�'��' #�`:ittilttiilttit.4tt�!7'!.EtlSrl'l11!tltti9-r1' •+� +f� . rt im 4, tfit-ji,fie lttvti; snm[lilt•.rrt, w d!uni jitp 'w%v?v%!Jw-rrbdi ti iallrtarmahkpittlitlrllt".:.1dItsif9.l.-zltlni II �' � !I,!u_ I II (+ll. IIIII1�II JI4I.IIIJ:1lI_'•" � I III 1111!I!1S! III+� i -II_ - urt "Ittrntrr•-.:,.[t�tzliWi imurin impeltun-rift*rr+ivrnitk��e..==.=ierrrt t.tFtsul ffitt tfccalfir t. — �?trtti�•.>cielts{Inntlediti. . q Mats PsnemtSbti� f'tr+omh+lo+irrs:-m I t arr. 1►rafl�rP+tntti ©i�!n111*f!rirbiart!tttis,! _ ,N44*110I plxtrm■tIt 1.IttJll lfull.td ill+ltitl j%_1 CrtillltYrt i# 4pp*)-tfirt"1 1, 0h,r,�d �Ttbt{rl 1]litut7p['aunulrin j"jit9n�*�rudlflureF _,. .. i( __ -t----. t4ltsrtfei l°rnjttrtj lar pr m•rtl hath' �G�t� t +_ '►� -SDUT1j C 0 4.44 of t �(�y fa-Pjinrnii�+!m�rr—,`xtr»fAt�nr—firy�- Ntnts 1!119vtrrif (tart(tt .1 4TG� �r.44hlrune tr 'i4.rP - -1-1att , 14tt.lirivofPvpvrttlilastrt(%) its •�6��i?(1 $ft^�i•i_ il,`�9� G�.y�llL}� F„n r(57nrslti'var�rr--�Shrrfl„t+.r..f:a'r—.'rrrf'"c,d^; �r��,,� ?:ttnr.siCunnsriin[st; 9rnOver f .JtiaFtfuv etIRiJIJ} 17.?0li G1lstt_t 171.�P4a, , i _. ... Pt.9+ll+swv.tt:niaetlnr{"rnr{-~u}- �e!�!Za 5�m� r', ��i��� � r�?�1 44vS10f.-.. f (�rl'�P PYQJnrrtt vtiY(I l lt!rtrt*' f iia .*'1Pt f ii%) C6Iirito 11ty of lfnllAm-T! flu+'x?��t���`�i�ltSfelftn',4►1+r1�I C3,ttm:ytt,�%.ts`lar�:mare6....t•frrttl"!�t iil'+iet� X4'1 ti pantttuttttrn>„t:n�ctttnrtta: (t(t�>•f¢'lmn= (;!i:( etlrl•=,Pt•r% f2�vrv�--•racusti Nigrairti 9YutLt � hi vuld � lrsntangi m Ntd"yyllrpl><tetmat Ftt f+l { ,.r, n littn01.0, (:..ulr 1P+,N1 )ttrll�+r anv rtt'�iK'li>1+ Iltertiltiewetull•MNuuJt9i'aaU: ? �.L�#lii�r{�1 •__-" x)” ..�CSC,f+- Simi .Jrt ai fwrrr SigRetnrrn(I'a,iitarigt e—c',11`i it, .ttl!titf 111 !i i ti.,utf, t,ItiT1-i1 ON (I1:11Ti7!�1'l tilTli;— ��� t�uTtr j1 Application tj C `Pyl�t'tlr" tij - FOR Certificate ofAppropriateness t � ti�lt'�{G.J�% � • L PRESERVATIONV . n+' •C t•..�2.._l� HISTORIC COMMiSS10N • r �w �'�,X tsa , �,•, orSOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEI'fl COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, 1N 46601'. hUp:itvtv�ti'.stj6sephcolntyindi nrt�.c nnurJ�puu m_tttstSJCi-ifi ndca.httn p:574-235-97193. f.574-235-9578 e: Sl35iC11YC{Ft?cq.st joseph.tn.tn OFFICE llvE ONt,r»»»l10 NOT Cohn `LF.TF ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN T11 IS tIOX«««OFFICF VSE ONLY Dntc Received: Application Number: vast Reviews- ❑ YVS (nmr�q)f.+nx.rfm} ❑ NO StalTApprm•al authnr)zcd by: _ _ Tillm Ilistorie 1'rescrvalian Commission Review Dale: ❑ I.acal Landmark ❑ Local Ilistm is Dimicl IN d) ❑ Nationall.andmarh ❑ National Rc9isterbistrictim-I _ Certificate orApproprlatcncss: ❑ Denied D Tabled ElSent'ro Committee ❑ Approved and issued: i '• i i i i i iii J (1'lcarse1'1int) l' A Address of Property for proposed work- lo(v M.Mita it1 �KU 4-6'rs STH SWfl s W 4 6601 (Str•eet Nttl))bcr Strect Atamc—(.'ity •71p Code) ---IorProperty Olvncr(s): J IJeV'lIApR'►e'4 Ll"6 Phonefl: M'C+'LY.O ��I�aDl.f4.1'D� Address of PropertyOwncr(sl: ��� Ila.So se�"6vrt ©{VU.1 s".1pe zoo+ 'C 88r'I �-�+ (.SlrectNnttuber—SbcetAIame• 17,70 -7ipCodc)) A a' /� Name of Cantractor(s): 11r'r'1 Chex- f71t er+'Pl�t°•41CtL ' Phone #: r;74..CJgZ.6DD0 6.0�J t Contractor Company Name: arta,4na t5igr,-6omi�?i1L&I Address of Contractor Company: .lo&z5 56 e i"romd i,to i � mos, t W 4�s'5o%f (Bare"et A'ernhor• Cart Atsne Citi-7Jp t:adcl Current Use ol'Bullding: CAmmC4-"'1A 1 ring1cFojn11jx M7rlti-Family/Commercial ! tin1CT17lneill—Ltdnsrrlal i'acelm etc) Type of Building Consiructinn: vT iC/C��t'Q a -!• R� (lihnrf Frrtms—Tri; k- Slane -StrcJ C:ancrete 01he1) Proposed Work: ❑In -Kind ❑ Landscape © Ne>w34 ❑ Replacement (totbrkind) ❑ Demolition (store than one bar may he checked) Description or Proposed Warla *e -e, a AA e--keA O+vnerlConlraclorFax #i;�` - - - - canall: !-�• � .,-"—___..-, _ X Signature of Oivncr "tin tr cf attar —APPI,IC.ATION IWQUIREMENTS AR LISTED ON REVERSb: SiDI Date: July 22, 2017 Certificate of Appropriateness application information: Property Address: 106 N. Main Street, South Bend, Indiana 46601 A). Written description of project: 1). The request is to allow for the addition of a fagade sign to be placed on the east face of the JMS Building, located at 106 North Main Street, South Bend, Indiana. The proposed fagade sign is for the recent tenant, Centier Bank who is occupying a portion of the JMS Building. Centier Bank had previously requested and was approved to allow for a fagade signage on the north face of the JMS Building by the Historic Preservation Commission. 2). The proposed fagade sign is shown on the attached diagrams. The sign was designed by Vanadco Sign Company. The sign consists of the Logo for Centier Bank along with lettering which spells out "Centier BANK". Shown on the diagram is the proposed sign raceway which will hold the logo and the lettering. The logo and lettering will be placed in an aluminum frame with the logo and lettering made out of white plastic faces. The copy area of the sign would be 32.43 square feet. Maximum letter height would be 20 inches, with the remaining lettering being 10 inches and 15 inches. The length of the sign with the logo would be 14 feet, 5 inches. The sign would be placed on the east fagade in the brick band just below the top band of the building's roof cap. The sign would be placed on the southernmost portion of the building's east fagade. The sign would be internally illuminated. The sign height would be approximately 90 feet above the buildings first floor elevation. 3). The proposed sign is being placed on that portion of the building which is brick. The sign will be affixed to the brick fagade per the latest building anchoring techniques' and as approved by the City's Building Department and City Building codes. This portion of the JMS Building east fagade contains no terra cotta materials that are located mostly on the south and west facades of the building. 4). The proposed sign will not have a negative impact on the historic architecture of the existing building. The proposed fagade sign was purposely placed so as to not detract or interfere with the historic terra cotta clad south and west building facades. L, 172 SMS IOILDINIC., Slfl toy M. Nog et966f 5pwm Umol 19 - Page I of I CIOA --- p7l') 1 MAl 7 Google Maps Google Map's, Page 1 of 1 Imagery 02017 Google, Map data 02017 Google United States 20 ft DOWNTOWN SOUTH BEND - JMS BUILDING P T -I 2711 2011 1 1 WHITE PLASTIC FACES, FACE -LIGHT SURFACE APPLIED 3M TRANSLUCENT VINYL GRAPHICS PMS BLUE TRIM CAPS AND RETURNS 14'-5" COPY AREA WHITE PLASTIC FACES, FACE -LIGHT 32.43 Sq. Ft .4 PMS 288 BLUE RETURNS AND TRIM CAP / RACEWAY PAINTED TO MATCH BRICK t��Vanadco Signs East Elevation 10625 ST. RD. 10-ARGOS,IN 46501.574-992-5000 LED Channel Letters Mounted on Raceway www.vanadco.com All drawings/designs/derivatives:©2016, Vanadco Signs, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Due to the limitations of the printing process, printed colors can vary from actual colors. Al 1" 10" 5 I � SCALE: 3/16"=1' 3/8"=1' DATE: 06-13-2016 I FILE:Centier SB JMS East Letters A sq It specs.cdr ARTWORK APPROVED BY: APPROVAL DATE: Alf Mir ON 4`ti:lll ��1���'11t[1�.d5�ci rjaY��,.7,S:w, � Il�i�i�v. a2 (.L�tiF�iiY�E•,}�lw..�s��l $'��1Jv#i��}�>^.}'.. • tr+�nR� 4�;�k. O//�� i/!/�L�' / �', �� r // J �I�90'I �.. � A.4 ;atl .41W to, , ""m ce - L�f STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 4, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0804 Property Location:. 717 Riverside Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1914/Grieger House Property Owner: I Victoria Kunlo & William Andrews Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Historic District, ordinance #8380-92 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story wood -frame Foursquare sits on a rusticated concrete block foundation. The hipped roof has asphalt shingles, a hipped front dormer, and overhanging eaves. A one-story porch across the front has a hipped roof, aluminum sided half walls, and square wood columns. Windows are 1/1 wood double -hung with aluminum storms. The mulii-paned paneled front door has an aluminum storm door. A 2 -car garage sits at the back of the property. It has a gable roof, wood siding, overhanging eaves, and a single overhead wood door. There is a chain-link fence in rear. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum siding, storm windows, and doors have been added. The attic dormer window has been replaced with a vent. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of chain link fence and installation of 6 ft. pressure treated dog-eared wood fence. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to remove 66' of existing chain link fence, and install 10' of 4'high pressure treated dog-eared wood privacy fence 8' back from the front fagade of the house (behind the tree and large bush) south to property line, then install 54' of 6' high pressure treated dog-eared wood privacy fence west to even with front fagade of garage, then 2' north to connect with garage. See attached site plan for placement diagram. 4"x 4"x 8' posts to be cemented at least 2 feet in ground. No gates. Although this does not follow the current fence line, moving the fence more towards the front of the house will increase the side yard area while allowing some privacy. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVER BEND LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT I.THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in front and a larger lawn to the rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive generally have sloping front lawns and flat backyards. The majority of structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties include a garage located at the rear of the property accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. All houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. The district has a compact layout. Large homes are constructed on small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Place, are constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of the backyard areas or rear first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In recognition of this, greater latitude will be allowed in the application of the adopted standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the individual preferences of the property owners in the treatment of these backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn, shrubs, walkways or semi-permanent surface changes in the rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets, sand -boxes, etc. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the new fence will be installed 8' back from the front fagade of the house behind a tree and large bushes, and is only 4' high in the front, it will not detract from the appearance of the property; therefore, Staff recommends approval. Written by Deb Parcell Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osepheountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: alio lG VI tYU 1 / Application Number: wo 17 — 9904 Past Reviews:❑ YES (Date afLast Review) ® NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ® Local Historic District (Name) t MJ �WPJ IQ ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) 1 V� Q M k Vi�,� V v\ m �) %)d I N %tQ, 01 Address of Property for proposed work: OV, (Street Number S�tyreet Name—Cih(�J—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): '�i �/1_��a i� V �i I �I !"1 f 1��1rYhonje #: Address of Property Owner(s): 11 O UT & DP, %A dam/ r\ Ul , -t: N q� (Street Number—Street Name—City Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): k l(� p ,` 11� � �( `T C I�'(1 Phone #: L4 — 25q — 310 1 Contractor Company Name: M M%r\e R h bk LLC Address of Contractor Company: �Jvl� Imo' c{-��h�e� �1'�� �� �Il� ��'Q `7 1(l,5qS (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (SSiilln`glle((��Famililyl—�Mpulti- amily—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: ��p1.91A l V�& (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind dLandscape ❑ New ffReplacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) A �,� Description of Proposed Work: ( 5ce U`ftlo � t11 esI mcl+e s) Mri%ovAl 0t G\til\i%hV -P V\U OM intibahM\ny\ G� Of4 pepav", �uc;ktcd 66_ - e aaA uwd -h=er &ue Owner/Contractor Fax #: 151 L) 4�"l'� U`'1 e-mail: {>k QZ X and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— MILESTONE FENCE LLC '/AFQ MEMBER (&MMEI q400. American Fence NnnomLAssoa TPN 13399 McKinley Hwy Association CVHOMBBUILMRS Mishawaka, IN 46545 (P)574-259-3101 (F)574-259-3104 www.milestonefence.com PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO: Victoria Kunlo PHONE: 443-878-5160 DATE: 6-27-2017 STREET ADDRESS: 717 Riverside Drive JOB NAME: CITY, STATE & ZIP: South Bend, IN 46601 JOB LOCATION: Same ATTENTION: tori.lcunlo u;l_xmail.com DATE OF PLANS: I FAX NUMBER: WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR: Remove and dispose of 66 linear feet of chain link fence. May require 1 end post for chain link where tear out stops. Install 56 linear feet of 6 foot high and 10 linear feet of 4 foot high AC2 pressure treated wood privacy fence, no gates. The 4 foot high goes in the front 10 foot fence line. Gas meter not far from where she wants 4 foot fence to terminate at house. May effect position of fence line. House is in historic district, customer to get approval before work begins. Pickets to be 1" x 6" x 72" (48" on front fence line) dog eared, sections to be no more than 8 feet wide with 3 each 2" x 4" x 8' stringers per sections. Posts to be 4" x 4" x 8' (6 foot on 4 foot section), all posts cemented at least 2 feet in ground. We build our wood fence on site and do not use prefab sections. Customer responsible for clearing obstacles from fence line such as trees, stumps, shrubs, etc., and for locating and marking any buried electric, gas lines, septic systems, sprinklers, etc., not covered by normal utility locate services prior to work beginning. Total including material, labor, tax and permit: $1,795.00 PLEASE READ TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE SIDE Payment to be made as follows: 50% DOWN, BALANCE DUE ON INVOICE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: BRUCE GUSTAFSON NOTE: TI ITS PROPOSAL MAYBE WITIIDRAWN BY US IF NOT ACCEPTED WITIHN 30 DAYS. I HAVE EXAMINED THE ABOVE PROPOSAL, READ THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON THE REVERSE SIDE FOR THE CONTRACT, AND THEY ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED. ACCEPTED We take care of obtainine all fencine nermits. Generally the price is fieured into vour estimate. If the cost of Permits is not fieured into vour auote. the Dermit fee will be added to the final invoice. 11 bA: V a All 1 114 V " �Elill not STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR DEMOLITION Date: Aug ist 12, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0807 Property Location: 1905 College Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Collegiate Gothic Revival/1936/Austin & Shambleau, arehitectslThomas Hickey, builder Property Oiiner: South Bend Community School Corporation Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #9807.07; National Register Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Marquette School was begun in 1936 to house 13 classrooms, a gymnasium, library and a 683 -seat auditorium with a separate entrance on Brookfield as a two-story brown English bond brick rectangular building with stone stretchers, a stone string course at the water table and stone first level sill course and stone string courses at the root line. The building is constructed with a blend of poured concrete and a steel frame. The roof is flat and covered with tar and gravel. There are art deco bas-relief stone sculptures above the front and side entrances and triangular pediments above the East and Test Hamilton Street entrances. The College Street entrance has a 40 -pane fixed wood window that illuminates the stairwell. There is all opaque leaded glass window on the west side of the east Hamilton Street Entry. There is a round window with nine panes of clear glass with limestone surrounds in (lie balcony area of the auditorium on the south side wall. Throughout the rest of ttie building there are large double hung wood windows with 416 and 619 saslies set in flat stone lintels. There are stone casing and mullions on all doors and granite entry steps. The original 1936 building is intact and maintains an outstanding level of integrity with most of its original materials and windows. Famed local architects, Austin and Shambleau designed the building with constriction by highly regarded local builder, Thomas Hickey. Forty five percent of the $262,760 cost of Marquette School was funded by the United States Government through New Deal projects of Franklin D. Roosevelt. A small addition was constructed in 1948 and a larger one in 1953 off the northeast corner of the original structure on College Avenue. The 1953 addition to the building is symmetrically arranged; the south end (at the north end of the 1948 addition) and the north end have a wall that forms a corner bay, thougli the top of the wall is equal to tiie adjacent walls. Tile corner bay has wide brick pilasters that step inward toward a center bay. The center bay has a 6/6 window centered in its first level and a 619 window centered in its second level. The windows have stone sills, but are not framed with stone trim. At the center of the 1953 addition is a narrow Avail that forms a projecting bay, though the top of the bay wall is equal to the adjacent walls. A small, narrow I/] window is located in the first level of the bay; it has a wide stone sill. The stone sill course on the 1953 addition is located on the corner bay walls only. Between the corner bay and the projecting bay are two groupings of four 6112 windows; these groups are also framed with stone trim. ALTERATIONS: All windows are boarded. All original paneled doors have been replaced with modern clear glass and metal doors. The only significant alterations are the reduction of the Hamilton, Streets entrances twin towers from six brick courses and seven limestone string courses to two and three respectively and the removal of decorative brick and limestone pediments that crowned the top of each tower. APPLICATION ITEMS: After obtaining the Certificate of Appropriateness, the SBCSC will move forward with finalizing the project bidding docuarients and accept bids to remove the required asbestos containing materials, demolish the entire building, & develop the site for use by the Marquette Primary Montessori Academy students, staff, & community. Included are preliminary site development drawings showing an expanded playground area, open play arealsoccer field, walking paths, raised garden beds, garden storage blk., monuments incorporating materials reptirposed from the old school. (See attached correspondence by Mike Szymanski and Katherine Turk and Exhibits A — E) STAFF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: South Bend Community School Corporation proposes demolition of Marquette School. A 2007 School Board decision to build a new Montessori Academy building abandoned the original public school upon completion in 2011. Although the building served as the home of the Casaday Costume Collection from 2011 until 2015, it has been vacant since 2011. Applicant has deemed the current condition of the building as "very poor' (see attached correspondence by Mike Szymanski and Katherine Turk). Although the building is suffering from deterioration by neglect due to a lack of maintenance, Staff is unaware of any Code violation that indicate a threat to the public safety. No structural report has been provided. In a June S, 2007 memo authored by Bill Latoza of Bauerl~atoza Studio (Architect of Record of Chicago Public Schools since 1994 with over 300 schools), addressed to HPC Director Catherine Hostetler, Re: Marquette Primary Center -- South Bend, Indiana, Mr. Latoza noted his findings and thoughts concerning Marquette School. In summary, "I'm in agreement with the architects [Hebard & Hebard] that the school is structurally sound and could easily and cost effectively be renovated into a state-of-the-art facility. The building is in good condition, and is an excellent candidate for renovation." "Marquette School could be renovated for far less money than a new school — and would perform as we] 1-- if not better than the new school that has recently been constructed.'" In a December 5, 2007 letter authored by Mayor Stephen J. Luecke, addressed to South Bend Common Council President Rev, Timothy Rouse, Re: Veto of Bill 61-07, Mayor Luecke had several requests concerning this site of the South Bend Community School Corporation: "First, please maintain and operate a quality school at this location. Second, though 1 respect the process and due diligence used in choosing to build a new schoof rather than renovate the existing building, l do not believe that the general public is fully convinced that this is the best choice. Also, some believe that there is new information which should be evaluated. So, I respectfully request the School Corp. to revisit the analysis of costs to renovate ]Marquette and to also take advantage of Bill L,atoza's offer to share his experience with the Chicago School system. There is time to do this'=value engineering" of the decision before the bond is approved. It may lead to the same conclusion, but residents will be assured that you have fully investigated all possible options. Third, if a new school is constructed at the site, please have the architecture complement the neighborhood and site the building in such a way that demolition of the existing school is not required. Finally, if a new school is constructed, please be open to alternate uses for the existing building. If viable use is found, with financing and a feasible business plan, please cooperate with a developer to help renovation of the building to succeed." Staff is tinware of any motivated attempt by SBCSC. to cooperate with developers to help renovation of the building succeed, though we are knowledgeable of at least one interested developer that has been denied a requested tour of the building. It was the Mayor's request in 2007 that demolition of the building would not be required even if a new school were placed on the site. In April 2017, Indiana Landmarks included Marquette School on their annual 10 Most Endangered List, reaching out to the Superintendent prior to publication of the list with a proposition to create a team to look at future options for the repurposing of the building. Staff is not aware of any funlier correspondence in response to the letter sent by Todd Zeiger. Staff supports a new use for Marquette School that sustains the historic character but allows the building to serve the next generation in a way that is sustainable. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Excerpt from August 15, 2017 Steve Szaday At approximately l2pm I tnet with Mike Szymanski and his associate (Steve) to photograph and walk-through the structure located at 1905 College commonly known as Old ;Marquette School. I photographed the exterior of the building on all four sides then walked through the structure from basement to roollop. My photographs will show areas of water infiltration from the roof above in certain areas and also some ground water penetration which is pumped out via four sump pumps in sunrp basins. These were intermittently running while I was in the area and it was not coming from above. I photographed a ground level door that is severely water damaged. I walked through several areas where plaster ceilings had succumbed to weight and moisture. Expanded metal and mesh are exposed where plaster had fallen off and the above deck can be seen. The first floor had about a dozen patches where coater from above had broken through and large areas of plaster had fallen. The second floor had about the same number of spots but the areas were much larger including entire rooms where Nvater infiltration had occurred. We walked the roof from end to end and all directions. There are obvious depressions in the deck and many areas around roof drains that are in need of repair as I suspect that much of the water filtration is happening around those faulty drains and why the areas of water infiltration are mimicked from the second to the first floor. I could feel some give in certain areas but nothing that would suggest that the roof is unsafe. Especially given all the weight of the deck and stone has not caused any collapse. The areas around the drains definitely need some repair on both the decking and the membrane. There is currently no heating or cooling system in place leaving moisture to fester and mold to be visible on furniture and carpets. The exterior of the building show signs of some needed masonry repairs especially on the non-functioning smoke stack which is currently reinforced with metal bands and bracing. 'There are a dozen areas ofspalling and mortar failure, but none that would represent any structural weakening. Many previous mortar repairs have been performed with favorable results, although ~without color match. The majority of the window sashes I saw look to be the original wood windows and to be in good condition. Some of the sills, exterior stops, and exterior trim work have many areas where replacement of those components would be required. This could be a result of a lack of maintenance and some of the boarding being improperly sized. "['his is most noticeable on the western and southern sides of the building. 1 had also noticed while entering the rooms how many doors, cabinets, shelves, windows, fixtures, blackboards, and lockers were still intact and in good shape. I even noticed a piano, desks, chairs, tables, and even a few rows of theatre seats that all could be salvaged or reused. I mentioned to Mr. Szymanski that if the application was approved that the school corporation should really salvage some of these pieces rather than just discarding them. Not just from ail environmentally responsible position, but also from a position where those who may have a personal connection to the school may get access to some of tile. physical history. He seemed receptive to the idea as well as mentioned that in the past, the demolition contractors had always gotten salvage rights, lie and Steve both mentioned times where they were able to utilize some lights and fixtures in other buildings where they would fit. lie also mentioned that some of the limestone architectural details are in the plans to be reused in the monuments that will be installed after the demolition if approved. The amount of brick alone in this structure is staggering. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all stricture or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original forth. Such improveinerus include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environinent may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original forst and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the folloti -ing: 1. Structure ---Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood --all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition Is the only alternative, documentation by ti4ay of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of bout tile exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movin Tile moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to tite Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. S. igris No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G, Buildine Site and Landscavin2 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development sliall be retained. Dotninant land contours shall be retainer(. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swinuning pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style. materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shalt not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFr, RECOMMENDATION: There is insufficient documentation demonstrating a threat to the public safety. The evaluation by Bill Latoza of BauerLatoza Studios is highly regarded. Demolition is not the only alternative. Staff suggests that the South Bend Community School Corporation honor the request made by Mayor Luecke in 2OD 7 by developing a marketing packet to be used to promote the sale of the property and by working with potential developers to identify a viable use and that a list of developers that have contacted SBCSC in attempt to explore alternate uses of the building be made public. Staff recommends denial of the application item as it does not meet the requirements of the Standards and Guidelines for Local Historic Landmarks. F:licia [-easel Executive Director BauerLatoza STUDIO 541 South Lake Street Gary, Indiana 46403 Phone 219.938.87821Fax 2 t 9.939.3877 MEMO Date: Jane 8"', 2007 To: Catherine Hostetler From: Bill I_atoza Re: Marquette Primary Center— South Bend, Indiana Pursuant to our meeting and walk-thru on Friday, May 4"', 1 -ranted to take the opportunity to discuss some of lny findings and thoughts concerning the above referenced school. I was pleased to have the opportunity to walk thru the school with you and discuss some of the issues that were addressed by the teachers and the report that was prepared by Hebard & flebard. I'm in agreement with the architects that the school is structurally sound and could easily and cost effectively be renovated into a state-of- the-art facility. The building is in good condition, and is an excellent candidate for renovation. The current heating system is close to the end of its productive life along with the pneumatic controls. These items will need to be replaced. The interstitial space between the roof and the second floor would provide the space necessary to install ducts for a new HVAC system and would provide the school with the type of heating and cooling they desire. Electrical upgrades for the building should also be done at this time and would not pose any problems or additional expenses to retrofit. As we discussed, the windows could either be restored or replaced — the costs being equal and the windows that we have recently restored on our numerous Chicago Public School projects have shown to be as energy efficient as new replacement -windows. Classrooms are adequate, but could simply be reconfigured if the need arose to have larger classrooms. Storage is always a question in. schools, but by reconfiguring the current classroom storage areas and adding sonic additional cabinets and closets, the future needs of the teachers could be met. Based on my -walk-thru - Marquette School could be renovated for far less money than a new school -- and -would perform as well — if not better than the new school that has recently been constructed. I would be pleased to come back to South Bend later this month to discuss in greater detail and show drawings that would clearly show how this could be done. Please let me know when you -would like ine to come down to discuss Marquette School in greater detail. I look forward to your response and coming down. ORDINANCE No. 9807.07 Passed by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana November 26, 20 67 Attest, S-tA A - cityClerkJOi E Attest; /a _ 2, _ President of Common Council Presented by me to the .Mayor of the City of South .Bend, Indiana November 27, 2D 07 City Clerk JOHN VOORDE Approved andsignned by rn,, 20 A -tailor ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AN HISTORIC LANDMARK FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9905 COLLEGE, IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND INTENT The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County (the "Commission"), has petitioned for the designation of the following described real property, commonly known as Marquette Primary Center aka Marquette School, South Bend, Indiana, as an Historic Landmark under the Ordinance No 5565-73, as amended to wit: Marquette Primary Center .9995 College Tax Key #098-2996-4254 The above -referenced property and the improvements located thereon shall be commonly hereinafter referred to as the "Property". The Commission recommends that the designation of the Property be designated as an historic landmark. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana as follows: Section I. The Property commonly known as Marquette Primary Center aka Marquette School, South Bend, Indiana more particularly described as follows: Marquette Primary Center 9905 College Tax Key #0'18-2'196-4254 Be and hereby is designated and established as an Historic Landmark under Ordinance No. 5565-73, as amended. The zoning rules and regulations applicable to landmarks shall be applicable thereto upon the passage hereof. . This designation shall expire upon the Commission's approval of a demolition permit for all of the improvements thereon. Section II. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after adoption by the Common Council and approval by the Mayor. TO THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND: Your Committee of the Whole, to whom was referred: BILL NO. 61-07 A BILLAMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AN'HISTORIC LANDMARK FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1905 COLLEGE, IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA Respectfully report that they have examined the matter and that in their opinion, this bill is being recommended to the full Council with a no recommendation at this time with a motion to have a hearing on October 23rd being a walk through of Marquette and Public Hearing continued in the Council Portion and 3rd Reading on 11112/07. Karen L. White Chairperson 5 October 2011 Carole Schmidt, Interim Superintendent South Bend Community School Corporation 215 South St. Joseph Street South Bend, IN 46601 RE: Marquette School Dear Superintendent Schmidt, Please be advised that the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County held a public hearing on 4 October 2011 to place Marquette School built in 1936-1937 located at 1905 College, South Bend, IN 46628 under Interim Protection while it files for its placement on the National Register of Historic Places. We have enacted a.resolution to provide Interim Protection in the alternative; in the event that it is determined that Ordinance No. 9807-07 does not ,protect Marquette School Interim protection means that this structure cannot be moved or demolished for the next six months. Interim protection also means that the exterior appearance of the building and the building's site inky not be changed by alteration, reconstruction or addition. This does not preclude painting or routine maintenance. Any additions; alterations or reconstructions, including demolition must be reviewed and approved by this Office and the Historic Preservation Commission prior to any building or demolition permits being issued for this site. The authority for this action is the South Bend City Code Section 21- 13.02 subsection (d) 5 as the Commission may declare such proposed new historic landmark to be under interim protection. A copy of this Ordinance may be obtained in this office or the office of the City Clerk of South Bend during normal business hours. Sincerely, Catherine D. Hostetler, Director CC: Carole Schmidt, Interim Superintendent Charles Bulot, Building Commissioner, Common Council, Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Attorney RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH SEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA ("HPC') PLACING M.ARQUETTE SCHOOL, LOCATED AT 1905 COLLEGE STREET; SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, UNDER INTERIM PROTECTION WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana was established in 1973 by South Bend Ordinance No. 5565-73 and is charged to "Survey, identify, plan for and advise the Common Council and the Area Plan Commission concerning the establishment of Historic Preservation Districts [and] the designation of Historic Landmarks. South Bend Municipal Code § 21-13.02 WHEREAS, the HPC is a Certified Local Government Agency, and is the local authority charged to identify, study, and recommend those local sites and structures with qualities recognized by the State of Indiana or the United States National Park Service for historic designation or for inclusion in the National Register of Historic .Places, respectively. WHEREAS, Marquette School has been endorsed as a candidate for the National Register of Historic Places by both the National Trust for Historic Preservation (Exhibit A) and the Indiana Department of Natural Resources -- Division of Historic Preservation and Archeology (Exhibit B). WHEREAS, on November 26, 2007 the South Bend Common Council, passed Substitute Bill No. 61-07, thereby establishing Marquette School as a Local Historic Landmark. WHEREAS, on December 5, 2007, Mayor Stephen Lueeke sent a letter to the South Bend Common Council stating that he would veto Substitute Bill No. b 1- 07. WHEREAS, on December 10, 2007, the South Bend Common Council, at its regular meeting, ratified the opinion of its Counselor, Kathleen Cekanski- Ferrand that, "Under the relevant Indiana lav and the relevant provisions of the current South Bend Municipal Code, the Mayor does not have the authority to veto an ordinance passed by the Common Council which establishes a local historic landmark". WHEREAS, Substitute Bill No. 61-07 became Ordinance No. 9807-07 [Source: Council Record, Book #49 on file in the Office of the City Clerk] WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the South Bend Tribune reported that: Mayor [Luecke's office issued a press statement late Tuesday that said he disagrees with council attorney Kathy Cekanski-Farrand's legal opinion and that his veto should stand. The statement also said that city attorney Chuck Leone feels the mayor has veto authority on historic landmarking. "While this matter could be resolved through the courts, I also believe that it is not very productive to spend tax dollars to do this," Luecke said.] WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9807-07 was published in the Tri -County News, Inc. and the South Bend Tribune on January 4, 2008 and became legally effective thereafter. VdHER.EAS, in a letter sent to Commissioner Cheryl Musgrave of the Department of Local Goverrvnent Finance ("DLGF"), dated June 18, 2008, Mayor Stephen Luecke states that "though the original financing documents called for demolition of the current Marquette Primary Center, the School Corp., at my request has agreed to consider alternate uses for that building. It is my preference to save structures when. possible and to find suitable alternate uses Nvhen the original use is no longer practical". (Exhibit C) WHEREAS, on June 26, 2008, DLGF, Commissioner Musgrave approved a petition from the South Bend Community School Corporation ("SBCSC") including the construction of a new school on the Marquette site and "As a condition of this Order, SBCSC, over the next 12 months, shall work in good faith with the City of South Bend to explore viable alternative uses for the existing Marquette School Building". (Exhibit C) WHEREAS, in an effort to formally recognize Marquette School for its architectural merit as an unaltered example of the. Collegiate -Gothic Revival style with Ail Deco influence, its design by Austin and Shambleau, workmanship by Thomas L. Hickey, historic significance as a Public Works Administration project of the Roosevelt Administration and for its continuous use as a neighborhood school since 1937, the HPC prepared its National Register application in conjunction with Partners in Preservation, Inc. WHEREAS, the ultimate listing of any structure within the National Register of Historic Places, will in no conceivable way limit or hamper its current or future purpose, use, disposition or adaptive reuse. 2 WHEREAS, Marquette School's listing within the National Register of Historic Places is an honorable status and offers rehabilitation tax credit opportunities which are a benefit for any alternate or improvised use. WHEREAS, on September 22, 20112:05 PM, a letter was sent by Andrea L. Beachkofsky, Deputy City Attorney, Dept. of Law; City of South Bend to the Building Department Commissioner and states as follows: "Please be advised that no COA [Certificate of Appropriateness] is needed in order to grant a demo permit for the Marquette project. While an ordinance was passed certifying the school as a local historic landmark that ordinance was VETOED by the Mayor. Therefore, the school is NOT A HISTORIC LANDMARK and a COA is NOT NEEDED as a prerequisite to granting a demo permit." (Exhibit D) WHEREAS, on October 3, 2011, the SBCSC adopted a Resolution "Opposing the Nomination of Marquette Prinnaty Center to the National Register of Historic Places." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY THAT MARQUETTE IS UNDER INTERIM PROTECTION. 1. OUR POSITION IS THAT THE ORDINANCE NO. 9807-07 IS IN EFFECT AND THE VETO WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE ORDINANCE WAS ENACTED, PUBLISHED AND REMAINS IN EFFECT. 2. THIS ACTION IS TAKEN TO SECURE THE STRUCTURE FROM CHANGES AND DAMAGE THAT WOULD OTHERWISE COMPROMISE ITS HISTORIC AND ARCHITECTIJRAL INTEGRITY. 3. THIS RESOLUTION SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT UPON ITS ADOPTION BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 3 Timothy S..Klusezinski, President Lynn Patrick, Secretary Michael Voll David Steinhauer, Architectural Historian On this Attest: Secretary 4th day'of October, 2011 Jerry A. Niezgodski, Vice President Sandra Rossow Alice McLane 4 Old Marquette School - Indiana Landmarks 10 Most End... htfps://www.indianalandmarks.org/endangered-property... IdkMd-% -Scho &-A 1905 COLLEGE AVENUE, SOUTH BEND {Photo: Historic Preservation Commission or Sot:th Bend and St. Joseph Count)") Thinking Outside the Box Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal ---- a massive make-work program to pull the country out of the Depression --- paid nearly half the cost to build Marquette School at 1905 College Avenue in 1936-37. In 2011, the school system opened a new school north of the old one. The replacement plan had been underway for years, so the old school was long neglected before it was emptied, with demolition expected as its ultimate fate. The building won National Register status in 2013 over the school system's objection. Now it undergoes slow demolition by neglect. 1 of 2 8/1812017.6:12 PM Old Marquette School - Indiana landmarks 10 Most End... htlps://www.indianalandmorks.org/endangered-property... Solidly constructed of steel and concrete with brick facades and limestone trim in the Collegiate Gothic style, Old Marquette has the usual classrooms and gym, and a 683 -seat auditorium with stage lights and a projection booth. Reliefs of seated figures decorate each corner of the limestone main entrance. Additions in 1948 and 1953 enlarged the school. 'We hope to save the school system the considerable cost of demolition by identifying a developer who can repurpose the landmark, an aim the 10 Most attention will help us accomplish;' says Todd Zeiger, director of Indiana Landmarks' northern office in South Bend. FOR MORE INFORMATION Todd Zeiger, Director Indiana Landmarks Northern Field Office 574-232-4534 tzeiger@indianalandmarks.org (mailto:tzeiger@ indianalandmarks.org) Elicia Feasei Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County 574-235-9798 efeasel@co.st-joseph.in.us (mailto:efeasel@ co.st-joseph.in.us) 2 of 2 8/18/2017, 6:12 PM 1v� INDIANA t_Ai4f1HARli? :\':)ITher 1; Regional Oflic,- 402 %k'ect Washing Im; SIrccl.`nuI!i Bond, l\ -16(101 March 27, 2017 Dr. Kenneth Spells Superintendent South Bend Community School Corporation 215 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard South Bend, Indiana 46641 Dear Dr. Spells, We are writing today to open tip a dialogue about the future for the former Marquette School building. Each year properties front across the State are suggested for listing on our 10 Most Endangered List— for 2017 the historic Marquette School has been included. We respect the sensitive nature that inclusion on the 10 Most Endangered list may present to owners of a historic building so our practice is to reach out in advance to talk about positive messaging that may be included as part of a focus on these buildings. The intent of the list is not to put owners in a bad light, Rather we use the list to focus efforts on important places in comnnrnities that are facing uncertainty or loss in hopes of finding a positive path for their reuse. For the Marquette School we are writing to you to propose the creation of a team to look at future options for the repurposing of the building. Ideally, if you are supportive of this idea, we could include the creation team of the team as part of our public anttouncenient of the 10 Most list in late April. The historic Marquette School building has been included this year due to the limbo it has been for the past many years. This limbo traces its origin to the legal stand-off between the South Bend Community School Corporation's board decision to demolition the building, the action by the- Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County to designate the site and associated actions by the City Council and Mayor's office. While this status has not changed, the relocation of the Cassidy Collection and the resulting vacancy prompts its to seek discussions about possible repurposing opportunities that may exist. The suggestion to create a team to look at options would be based on two key tenants- any new use would meet security requirements as related to the adjacent nexv Marquette School and financial constraints of the School Corporation. Vie ,, ould suggest a team that includes a staff person and Commission member of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Ineinbers of your staff you deers most appropriate, a member of t11e South Bend Community School Corporation Board, a member from the neighborhood and a representative of Indiana Landmarks. You may not be familiar with our organization. We are a non-profit organization created in 1960 with a mission to save historic properties. We work to preserve a wide variety of special places in communities all over the State through our network of nine regional offices and our headquarters in Indianapolis. Our 111OIANA LA-MMARKS REVITAL12ES CONHUNITIES. PECONNECtS US SO OUR HERITAGE AND SAYS t1EANINGFUL iIAG£S. mission is aided by our nearly 6,100 members and over 40 full tine staff. Our web page — wtv%,v.indianalandtiiarks.orp- -- contains more information about our organization and our current antl past efforts. We recognize that the South Bend Community School Corporation has a number of priorities appropriately focused on the education of the children in South Bend. Because of that, the future of the Marquette School building may not be front and center. We wish to assist in finding a solution for the property to turn a negative for both the South Bend Community School Corporation and those seeking its preservation into a positive for both. We are hopeful that a collaborative, team approach to explore options moving forward will result in a positive outcome for all interested in. this site. Let nie close by noting that we enter this conversation not with the expectation that the South Bend Cotmmunity School Corporation will be asked to undertake or fund the renovation or repurposing of the building. Our working idea, unless the team identifies a more viable path, is to identify a developer who tnay be interested in a project on the site — perhaps for senior housing or other suitable use. Thank you for your time and attention to this request. I may be reached by entail at tzeiaer((itittdianalandniarks.ora or by phone at 571-286-5765. Regional Office 2 rage i of L Elicia Feasel - FW: FW: Marquette School Building From: Marchelle Berry <rnarchelle@realamericallc.com> To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@co.st joseph.in.us> Date: 7/31/2017 11:05 AM Subject: FW: FAV: Marquette School Building Good Morning, Elicia. Following is the email I received from Michael Szymanski about the use of the Marquette School. Thank you. Marchelle Berry Real Estate Associate (0) 327 815-5929 (M) 317 509-6778 March elle PRealAmericaLLC.com www.RealArnericaLLC.com From: Michael Szymanski lmszvmanskiPsbcsc.kl2.in.usl Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10,02 AM To: Marchelle Berry <marchelle@realamericallc.com> Subject: Re: FW: Marquette School Building Marchelle, Sorry, you were on my return calls list, just our busiest time of the year, At this time the SBCSC vision for the old Marquettte building and site does not include selling or renovating it for other uses, I believe a building tour would be of Little value at this time. I will be on vacation tomorrow and most of next week. but feel free to call me anytime if you have any further questions 574-315-1931. On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Marchelle Berry <marchelle@realamericallc.com> wrote: Mr. Szymanski, Elicia Feasel, Executive Director of the SB Historic Preservation Commission, recently told me about the vacancy of the Marquette school building. Our company is the owner and developer of The LaSalle apartments, the renovated historic hotel in downtown South Bend. l i 1 file:///C:/users/EFeasel/AppData/LocaUTemp/XPgrpNvise/S97FOF03InternalPLEXISPD 10... 7/3112017 y� "avdi•� :4uy�:y:,: •::rl :: 5�:, :-�:;a? };:::.;�'�{fe,mo:gn:: :;,•�+;Y.c>:. ,.:�5. •. J;'.'srtj:,, .. .n.ttn.. is �i. ;:a::e«.L+ i:. t: .t, , ,!•ilii:'.. � .�:,. i.::. .,.dY. •� . >{' fig •.: t' �` nili .., ' '.% Irrainl.+ItwXNh-. :.i .S.. I: "��'' .nl : F.Rtttn)fta)*•• ..,��n.; nAl Zi :;:'.!'. '1wn...!'xx>t ,�'•.. \arl.\.)L,J S 1. mx� I� ....,. . , .. ._ _ _..... .......:. ��•:":oN:91�ry � � iutiviax:."i12�brdmRiegrll�a<A�!N�tlkMh�".° t. . IkSI. WxFYl:iv :ulNiutlly I{ � .:b �)4 { I e5 1 „ N Xlv �i„wr 1... !Yrc•NMv?NNIMamIM�UW.ai ..�.({ w� .:u r!::.. (..,-�.v:.•.: n.;.::;!�::.''::::, •.:i:'::, i:i�: .. .." ` .,.. t. . IkSI. WxFYl:iv :ulNiutlly nw ,r ,:,yi+"5ysv 1°"q'p+'rr, nL la5'•'1'�' �rI ,i„ • 'r., t,. r..f,.Y,.r�..nrAT. 'rT..'i}.'�.:'t..Tf .,Yl •V}"? ira ,n -5-- -ky;', -sr ti:�hYi' :y5,}r;;, Y,•.n.S i:(q �''v:ki�::.r]yr,x)7 .rti' S:..A - g:? r m: ,.` �: !,,,1' .J,:R'; ",I .1. T .-r.: 4. at'S'i•,: .r" ••':rl •.. ,rr •w; Y,. . •,l ,r'�I Yr. �`Nr r•::� lA.. „hM ,A L. A. yr :.�:!.•li:+f S':"� .v P.; '�'•"V). Z4 vILY1r ,' -•r..f \ •.a7. �.•(. qq Y'YQ. A• .',^�kr,,r-� sr1'•» a5.*'> dry♦.>•'tY .f 4 : rl"s+�Y °a. {, , ,1;.. } c i.!•r,.,:: , ,fY}J ,Atciv rV•�' <'1.�.. l..t J. `YP :'Jor1,r.... ,Y•,t 1 .A., k.n. .i. i U�. ` •t�. t. 1 (►' L j� . '�i. •. ..�i e., ri •I. • n '.rl.. rip . e::.. .r.J•nr I � t , J,r.. (t.,.+, tt l Y., t)... `.. \ A.. . �'�," prr:•',k Lt k r,•:+~•�..... r .•AI %'• �1.r.� ret :�-• .�� L •�Lirvra" 1 •Sj. j l r fir•' J. ,Siir: �A.. 'a• ( y;. ,aS IS• �,. ` 1 .• it 'a s , .r^' 'C•.i`ar rl :. t rs.r •I• �1 •:r �'s !a1' s r•'" :.,rNk,. ,t ''?r. , i . r.'. 'f+t SS�� y i t 'i,!.�r. t r}i .,.i 'r tr' : • r . �( 'r� n.rf ., .l r Git A.i vr, •l• � 1 ��. ,.. ..1:r•r.:: •.,. .,11 .. .:. :.. .. .: "::";,p. .. .t r..h':. ,,.. ':.a"" .I. 1 r\f 1..,,r t �vi.lrti,:t••. +. ti ,li •! 3n,. � tS:J : t'E i�. tE. )),•5,,:(:�Y '4'.,•..,,. ,t..n� ,::{•: ]7`+t r..5 7V ,tyJ ...i '!i:'•• ,.A'' eR / 7 p: 5 �',$1 F{.:. :2 > 'l 1r � N : •�6> . , . , \ , . /'' :e:L:'r F55ir;.,"5::•i''•'h. i M r ,. rr.. ,.11:x.. t ,1 rri �< r•ar. 4i' ":i J �•�'k'kr"^f•a. r I.I t a' rr S ! r ••1, 4 , ii ..X < . I J, :•F•.. !':'fir., } 19' . t..,. t'A :. f , . "h "Aa '•>:' �. . A ons , .+r+"yy. Y . •1:::'r: y:r : l :'1 •v .n y.� C5Y 'J li� ! : 4 .ti .fi.,;,. Y.„o-�0.."-• "jw. 1 Ski%� • r <„ ,.t„+ ,•r., .e,,,...., ,'�1.. ''t:,•, ;i':'•Yf.- ',; 'te'r ,F...,•..•:, . Y Y."Y+ i •., N. � MIN •rl.1/ I Urn'.:;':: , I�'t:: 'r't r.,vr dr •taw.«: y •s Y.. 5 ., ,�5:: R., t,, :Y ` ,f ), r r l:' ::(',. J' :. ,r ,d.. .•tr i5, r•\"t .. :irai'. A,v. ,r, JT:,awr t e 7. ,�S- -.:::i•o -rI•': r,•t,< '., a' ,..ti.: •''z,tJ. S Y:». ":Jh•< "�.. ,,,:(5 •,w� „' :,:5:f')t':.... :.':•>�'.: .ry,.,��:',�• r: �::' :«5 �' .r ro r,l:'. 4: •. .< t <rr . Jr, ,,\. �;F� t ::1^•r' ..l`!�'� 'l:P':i'.�. 2 . I I .+(., i.f' •1v �'S )Y` / ': YJ [ �'lV - i x'..y is I ! ♦ .d. it r r 'i<•: ,y 'r' C `�fi . :.:t ir(i t yq Wim,.: 'r 1 , .•�'•r ••ift . , '1, . ,y I , .SIS i .!. N"•' « •+i.. iC , ,5.. :i`:• J'r Kr, �rIV,.. i'.,r. '�i`' r'trvri„• !+jt;:f:.:..e:`.+': <t•„ k e. '� "• fH •,t f •.+•r in,•rt"r. E,_ >'i'+ti:'.'. r'. I.l: aL' Y { ` C ,. . r.. k :�''t!•:a.:•�•.'.'r:.r:.• 'J 'Y: 'G s sv `!•r.. ,. 1, �"%j ,'� :^:,b J :i'� I t j� r^r .. .p ••r r:r''•w. ..�: A, ., rr t, .k . s. �` , 1. , •..r. , ;n,;:tY,..,. arra;::!.:.. I p,,:.: ;,•..,.A(,,;, ..ti.2•,.k-+ ><;:...._] '�,X�':. J ?:r7 v.�• ..9 t , 5t�, r.i o. ,, •;:r+�:. ..t „ ✓ . `FGK "f,. "h..g, .t.., 'fit , , � :',i' I .., i''t� •,y l.,Jti 1•:E.l;"r+< . � .. Iw. ''�n " •V. ••Y.;i1::'. ii�� l 't S off?' ..r ....r' r "•,,i. s .. V}ti ri .I . •+,:.• . r i. 0 •.. ,.n!:. . : ,I r. .p i ., r .. t ... 4 ... .. r rSr:>J31, 4.�... ,".,.•::::. .,t... . bf ., ..,arr "'iv+••:a9:.V, : nl:.. :a . ^..0 .`Ib:^."i> '; c4Y'h.': aai� j�•'j�ir'r•'. r ly 5 `.,+, w, ., ,..t!:I 5:,., ...t..i. I I ,,^v.. t. ,,,•. >.t, MS+':� .,:',' :':Y7, y, .t: >.rl'�.. •`wf:.n r ;vn .V Ir u : r . ,�, J^ ,n+•-•'• Z .a 'r.: v' . ,• +ii(5`''.'rd, �::a,•ct !v . 11rn ... .� .. , ,- , ,.. ::•. ,,, l y., .,. ,..... .;;t�ty.\,..�". t:?:r iE; '^% .t,.. :.,m.. Cr+.� ave. •r.,n yr.. .. ..I s.. ,.. .r .. .. l.. ,r ,. v , ... ... ,.�::...:.::.. •,:.,r. .... .iOir+ri .r'I�t'!r;�'. p?t'�� .. rL . *, . A :. i ... , .•...5...,..r 5 ...� . ,. ... ,.. , .. ,., r , ..y,;. • .:3.i n Yr • iel �`.Y..V .NI I tw A. .,, it R. .ls i .� ..a. .}1?., .x,,. <••R ..hr,, L':G rle ," [ 'rA< !L'. a: , '3:E}l��'I•' rt.,n ri5I ,£ ,;.��'.4 ,,�.���.@i ..', ,..S�,.Y ' ka Iti,:.r:p f •: i!°( i. /.a. :h,:,t< •:S•�Jt. �l.n. l�,jr,!":,,.. p, ;,.A,J .w�;: :�;4V•.'•t^:l'trwa•f'5pp,l t,',.!, ::1.:'''„`", 'i+: r'.,:4r••:,.,"/ rt i.r;,f:,x4,'ieY"...p� `Ernb"+„SL'•..."',,:., .r5}1Er, W4'^<I:!• ...r !1Y :k. 5tJ:,'•.A� 1..,:f.+ • Y:n.:,:fKr •r.�• %•py. If , 'd. .r'Y.•! ,J „•I f. ..,1J” • r . »V ?tir" ,X4 '.•=t'• ,ai'f.. :.1 :. ..r....,�Yr �A' �6' :• •I ••{r,5:! J .Vfi = i{ .. .. + F +`rl, .. !,... , )dar:.•i. 'rl. l.n;„' • • •' X ! I ,- .. ... Mr+..'/n• M!'r` .r'1.,,, i'.v .: i %•�:! :I>)�z5: .. l • }L'�d ,n!k,.$f .}shka t �.... .Il � �S•.,,:. Iri:::i v . 1. xf.,r �l., ,)., .., r. v yy5Y r r , r.�. i .ai+wS?'' 'S , trn :.a , p>r!, L �:!''i.' q;i, ;.�`+ .•S 5n ,c• i 1 �+i:r. .''v+ :7 .r y:fl� n.].L •;'<:>.. ..: r ai' ,'^'ir 1, ..' :Liatf,M1 W. � int •„lr'!, 1''Vp• .f, 7, .:�,h'!,., r� ..aiki •' I:,�,'e d.n: ,.., ,�t�,, '�I :,;SSy,.:,:a°•�:. ..,i Irr.N, ,�. .51 . ..I ' , t. 'r • ' ..t.Y ..,TI, I{.F•rz;:i>:i': } :IN .. . tZ .` •�. , uG l,:S + rr,., ,. r n :,J; {., t : . Eq„w (5 .rl• .i :!�• r J I,. ,. s7A'•L .r: ,. , I ,f/,Y 5(;::!r; 5• x, .r.�,,.. V. •, v. , r, • ✓ Jrs ,,,.; „ ?Y„h t•.r q •;K i.. . .r.• UN. YhY, .4.. .n. 1Jl•» ,x (. ".IS', ...`{e' : 1..T • '.A,. ,: .�.{ N,°.+i:, I,:l ,.k.: •.tf• . fk 'lrr.(' .':.,}"5 •,r. r.,t'r:.: .. ",. I,.. r•+, )' ,...,..,'p, 11. , J.�I :.fir. _i; �y,. J ' .'6':.:'v. r•L'�. •,fir. •�r r.. J,1.:,J♦c v tl+cSR��''�ar:a,.::vr,v er�„>~. :t' v L ,'.� i' .. ,.•?,. 't, G: ,v:k.: !t• . iv <P ). ,14 .1°if• 'S ,.hf '.p'v.f t. :<'+:s:•.,n�r, ,.,r+rot`. JYG»: u+Yr' .-.,.+.:nr,.'rd,^ A"i:.]':rJ is ."s ,Y.,.t:•,.•.: l� .: � .�,a .itA,.: .:: ...:„:� y4::.„•' •'R :•' lt!"t 9tn1. ,r•:.. ,.� ,rvll n' `. •it n,�: ,'I' .,`f,• 1,� '.i: I:t-""..Y[t. .Y,•1t .r.SJ�.. A 'L J�:r• 5 a 3... s. ,:.a.: , ,4•, w. R ,.!J "n• s {• R Y a L { n<n � I.r. •,iYr, C :J r` YI:rI i y 1L, �, ] S -, 5+" '�( .,A„•,::t .. '.q tri a r:. 'r't • ".�`. i. .t Nr51 ' L•r.l. � .S. ".;•:,w�SP''< 1.. S'Jr'Y!:`•~�•r ; �i• r, f )1iits' S.S 1tY 'Y I�, • '�. I I r•. .,.}J . K' •%:'h,:S.. Y,��1"N., •Y.a ..)... .'1+,: fr... • 1 .+ ;].} .A F y r fr r' k :tr5''I',. ,r..',' r i:+aiirU': i. �1 L'� Ar. . F.. i ,I . r •.^-:"n. ' 1. -:,M .,, w A:i;? i:k�•f t:::. J• :%!:•,Y„•, , I 15,1 . d�1 l ' a"^..":'$:' ,•k' r. a t'q: ;•: a .9t• . s. 'sw ":rJ'•;•r.r. .ry.5•'hi<F:''!:'r, r: �. ( _ L Y �� ..tir.. i . .: J"..'} l,. :I!� • .,.{!• r s. • sC^' ".I�1� Ri11n. :t J ,1� .7. . st S�: •'r. "Ci:.' ,'vt 41:�.,.. � , r. ') yy iIl Lrj11�tl,. l!��, nt •].5.., YII• Y. •'l. •t .l:' C,"a�S"ia Vl r +, .i5'r^ •� •t. rt = Y,1t;. � •: „i-' k` i I:. •: nt 1•> t5.j ' r I .,. � ,.,r,,..i . .4;'.r' F: wt ,S;r :.,.,...,,., rw e,,. I w. ' i^r ( :n., a'e�:.. 's,..;J ,1 r '"1• t I,..r•r 1,.;..' +.F^p' uv i,)li'rv,:y,Y;a'.,u.' .,,P+. Y,.d),, %5.�1tr'Y+"'S" rAii-liy.:� itj f �r� ,k,: t1`X( !:5 <:r. , '••' er:,(.,,:};, J:7.:.rYr a.A , 1 !6r ,a.rk.'';: fzT S}'.r ., !11 I,+ {I i,I r. ,. !. ,Y:: 11'L-r.' r'J,•f"'�rr+`,'ki!, ,'1k,!ra:'t.,.k' .. rl ;e•t.r :rit,•.;liv. •�Y�r .. 1Z•'•n,,144f •Y'IalYlr rrift,' ,<'r,K : .r: e. },,.. �Si ..1 r. Irr, .. ff N1rD ,. 1... Y::w"liiJ •, ,h. :: SUN 1i� I. C.wr .4. ( !L .. N;i: •: ;siF• •'.CCS,k':' :!'i':. ,.lw. .4 ,;i}.•t..1§!i•:...II .YI7tr r�„M1•i. .$ �„ r, ;�,�!q_... :'•'7r�; l.. p}. is i' 1N ly,r .N• :.N,.. Kt: I,'!,t�!'+tS�;,, ;r• a �ilf 'S'I,:a{r., ,:{' i, pp a {�n; ' x e:(.. at . �0`i"'•.. rlt.,, ti'r l I '.51�.3 .G'. ,}(d.. 't.�•� '�+,.:, .y. •.0}.,3.. �G•r �. Yl I lh I+St I . •r ., A A Asks 4 f ?�':• i �' ' rA• e +L�. ;.r;. :I{ n y, i r. t rY5 .rrr,,: 1 R y IV4• :.�•, v'. I E �” r. , , ' J. i. I,t'] •'i 1. ', •. .t ' i, � 9'd '��i l r•.y ..:'1 ,tl} 'r".i.. .,i.,,.. •f rt .l, r u?:3f t: ••,,A• rrs '&-•. .)r! y+' : l Y r5}. pp 11 YYII jII 44�� ' i'tl� .�'afti i, ,1•. iM Nip r ! k• 5't<. /•r. •4... t ,A h • )r[! ,�,. ) 1•:+ b. .r :::Ir �'s I'I U, I'k�lrL,l. n ..�. �'� � T ..t •s7-•. � Si:M' R'. . t.r. w55 +.5t", .:,i.,<:;' ,,c. ::'i!'"••:�:.. a, m:N'�:4'f.}. ;,i,.. 11L5.. I. S. r• .,i. i ! 1, 1 i S :1. ...Yd ,,, ':'r:''x :wi, .•J� :a':,: ..,,... w:�.:}i'�};I'J[;r:Y 11. f. .J,}5 1 • f � ,' 7 Jt•:.i, 1 . F: ,. � . 5.' (R t= . 4ti4` •(' r;l` 'r: t I' ri+ :,'}:^'•Nrrfii:ri�r: :s.- .,.< ,} I ..f3�sKnU;1,fILr�ftCl j i.:?.rriadua;trrikhlc ,:. 7:.r a ;,+s`:« �::Lr:A• ,�•,, .•+"y. .,� 1• .,"' n..r 3kii}.:ari .. illx•<,A,I .i,. �I:G':�'`I:t;V:illk!iEYli�l4, FYi r. N !.. •,h-'rt. � f ' •�i, �i'` E,�.L'. , id ,1'7'K I! • "fYl ^i : �� Itt,.kni sr ..•!.,. ,(.j. !fti` ':5;f•` ' 'et..1Ye s'. . � J"' i {. 'S•r ,.i?•• �'� '.vV " •' '.il`r'; �?'{;G 4. ,ry. •,.r t. �� �"'Z'�' ,J "A-! r'�� "r.,a' •r'•��'�t. ti r5r rn,}::yt: rF• (k:,Ima;A�•• " .:,•; IN _.r, "+,•Y.•�,ea3,,:> :i1 Y t•SJ. +t }'j ,,T.l.'''b•r:J iSar; A'.4}P 1'#I. ff4 . r,..y;,.•,>7.�,x , i s f J:7 r.r;y.}ui+�1 .I ,r >'�?�"'!k'! �'•a 'ar :''''''"l`I, ,I r!, .i, :�\ r°1�o ,� s* �� ,'•Y{ t t... ,3.+�}., ' i;1'glrly,I� {�,It I � ' ' .I:: 4 MI �qrV � •'tY ,� , � . ! 1'• I 81141.1— : ,�' . I, i I'.J �fl I u SF' .�Wtr, ,11r sb 'a •�'A, t+ty�� . r.+}'}'FY.' +y. r f ,t G > t tl, . ,Y• ” v,''� 0;.yv, ,,'����'iYy":'4'•';.». },l. , a , ;%�:> „' .�ri." „>,;Y,'1a ,)., ' .'kms ,a a.. �•,+. firs:«. r4.,i'12 R u dQ�Fw• •}Z,. ,✓tf 11,}. '',f nJ'•.: ^'tlr'l t 'i J : r<!n' Ya : , ,t . ! r .�,.°G,• w � 1 m, Wr”' •• � "L .4,. � f ,e'I: .ar .f q - ,•5 r .Iy . ,$M:r $vtt.L. +iY:, Ja'•n1t . 7•• •:::� r"ib.,�>�' flgµ.� ':,,: :� y ..,; r rY�..+r. Xr. 1Y,. �f �s rf r� L to%�'.'qy, t a•'SAM1• � y*,r:fr . ,5'da};:':. .1•f r, �, `. �,. - •'S�v"y.r5�rl Id`:'i� � :,:�';: � ' �y 1 p. a.� .a , .w ;w � ")1 ,rs •d4. ro . 'ry d .Q�sr'� Lt ..� I •�S� i, 'iI1 �Z. 5«: �• �i ':Y�• J,:�."+,.: �,.r d`. I�� •+,.�,.� f, Z. i .'!.}-., 41 . ,�:srwt.F:'a551yrtrgpJ .I,il' ;;,;�;;;ir 15� .� •t a1 �. t,. SS .,J.., ']� ' Jk ,':`� "rj, •Ir ,; , :.FJi : w i, •ni•!o�,n ' SCJ l �,�:' ,S i, ]1 �3;:`ct.::t.: r.J ..r:•.: •i • . 7: r s.. ,.1rh. i �.. �( 7• , r.: '�l , ,t•UJi •tlr� .Zip i,;.: .rk . � i A,� I J� i>'L'. • t l'^.' :.:r l t, �n ti'k 1jkltr .. YCI:.. G� (, tt. �V•'j+.!}"^'• ..: .'. : f..ri3.`f, 2: � � p� .,,A �i':' .x+) ..F�. G7 ,711N q R 6...{X'R: �:: ':r.� :A.., j`?f .:�{: Z+, S7y� .V . . )M: /'!'�Y'(�"f4::.i'jlyy�{�.k,; V�l:�S� � �) R•,i'4JJJ r,� •ll'!nJkst�'i<:.4,+}•'y .� T .,Nn rn'. ' i' MIN ter... r? f4 �) I y al S•r 5�•� L 1 A�r� 'IY'�i �,.,:• t. I I. ".'r �` , 1 '�tl�. , �+. �• ty:'�/`:"Y•"' yF 9! ,t i f I d,�!, � I ,, . M .fit:.: 'JYr .h.. ¢>,.,�� f •,tt . i!Ir'v,. R.' , Y ,. rY.. 1r ! ,+ arI. 1' r �I f� 'Ij �fi,t. r ,r.. �.e„ ✓ �+u` !.S)G' ", Y 'r'!r w 1 r 4' % l• i . ... ,f.0 A•. .y.A N'. rdi7,i .i4 E...r !, ;r J,. •.,v„ ." J� " il- � e1,. r I k ' J. r•.J" I h f c r ;.S» .ate• •ri r tn I':r u•• r;•, :r. 'fir •;tro 'I.r' t I'J t . y• . 'I l','MVj'[:-_ , •. i. .t I ^ Ali , ra� �i. ' a. ' •l• I I � ,� ra . a 1. > i 7r f 7'' f I la r' +rl J �'S. t��}'r`»ii'(a ,'.4' a ..t `i•'Ar,: '�•YF. ,.t� ' g, r,•A aM:'> y .I.+. ��} .',W': 1 Wr,ts?•• .v,•..f•,,F� v4Vi• t ,{I{� ,4r • .r ( :•IY:' +::. 'rJ, . ' .SP. :Ynid!' ' r'r�S . .'R,• 1 i '•:,.+:: .?•Nr•. t"k > '`i $ � i]A'• •c.. 1'.'fi'P^: ' .u•,.• .:,, . , f) . � r ,,Q,.. , I : � .�,. ,<•r.. !' r>. . ?'TMr'�A t✓., it•,r;:: .{i•: ..f' '�: r. cr.ty. v, '.S`'+'::' .'"/ji!?, 1. �i..,. :}r":.r 'ri,.^+ ,T,, .5r�•r.;r';:_.,r,:,,f,. ''e. .L �• 'a.r1�±� .tt }.. ./ _{)rrrV ^81J. ,v%Y 1' 9i7!K.• ,�. ..'� r r u . ^'•d; +:'•t"n ''•Y A. �} ,! � L„ r,r,.v'R','Gi' ' Y >> l ' J!".'t�'> i'P E 1,. ..{�'.�,. :1, Y•a`..:' .! :JI G�. "•'.r, r.. / F � M : i!lrrJ.•. �t°' h .. � ' ::1r .' i, I II!” I' 1?' ,+�, ^. r]�; . rr):•...w ':j a'r, ,rl;r•If.I' �.. G:h. <.. .":n•r'.: .,,YI „ r , r . r r t •. ,.s:.1....>•. .a,•: ,.I I"' , t ,�_,I+•!,ir,r • ,.,.r: , t."•;r.' , r I 3!� ' n II r 7 t! rf Cf�' S,). t,sS,Irr)kt;,.,�a"•'• ::�:. ,..y,/ ^.'i^'.tFP'�'� aT! ,u. �'4,,^.:'a<:, r� .�J ':'F• ,r,yy I {,'S' � ++ + r :,1�. JIE t, i. is r,,. •tk,'i . `:;E rS ' rtl., f1 ,•', '+ 1 t {'� ' ,r•7::.:' ..s .:J':, r�J1 AW 1.. r h•• { r` ., r, 7• v;N,,. , qr "n.,•J" p tl '+ 0��. , .-,'1Jt: r: .r' , 0.15, • 7 r� .L .. •Y af� u� I.:r., S .! S• .'I 'Sri • .✓! .. �y / 1 I f fi rn17• . i II v{ ar>:: 7 •t(4 1,' r'rFa•..'f�',''�1 . a .1"' : fin: + Xl'r , a. ;f...�. 'R'is!Y,:y s. s' t V R•. ,r .'Yi r r •'.,� :a,''Y t. ry'w' 55 ... �y'• s. I � .� � 1 .�rti"J,•. , 1 , 1 f . 1 r "J •'i w h.y. i • -f ' .,P `'}' : 1.. .,5 . rr •:a 'nl ., r ( 4 p .J 4. 1 ,L� A'..rrr. �.w"i r ♦7'�Vs J"'rr''w. • �,.rT>Y � - u":uE: • „ ✓A . S. , a, . t ..n ,r ,il f n„ "I HER, i • "tr ,,y... r•! 1' ih'', ,:>•. :.,.uyr L. � ,fir., 1 N A. ,,r}Yir A L ti J r. . t t�, is . ti.-..t. "Y•v rs . 1 _+'.. •:.h •`!:�'i : Yr� : u rrs�r r)�."<, °',t'y.. ,.v •r r x v�l •r. n` i ` Y. f[;; ,• 5� w Jr s.' i ��.� 'f v•. . •'tk.;'� • .f z: rr I ..t':' ' Vi /., . W (fJ . r. - , ,"1� :• ...14 rY'Y , 5 ' Irl � . i''^w. :.s. ) r �"tit; .5 "."I . at r.• ( 1: _ k F l V , Jn `i 1n . �. <•.:, iN^ .i : t„•, rYy4 : c '4 rf� 1 1 i>: i •r I.. . c 'rA 'i , •h•' , 5y, ( •�= ;'• � . , L•r' '•,+`w 7 V »jf , Y».: E;ry Ya,! . t .-T=". ix.S :T,:•7: >:'r� �•Tk f .r ( • M st k ItY v ,a J : wA::i �.1t� r ,� ..•Y:'�i' ./'''.' TJ01, hr� ''A.' .1'.. I..t S! ,: e:Y.,, v y� rrf•:'• :��,Y A�I, I, '''% , ,?S„'�. t: ry".t':N:: 4"q �. Ir , ,.y'" `. _ r,.. IA: ''•1iJ; i�:.: ;(•'., 'A•. R„ rl i .!1 r `' t ' Y"��"o" Jrr! ".:,, : •'J' �' s 3 • sv v;,. c.l :. b h'" •�: , / jl .. s, s , aM• r...... , •tl r':f- a,+A .,Fl:.l, ..r+, 'S�(,.. ,).: . rrn .; ..I,'il c,1 '•. �p ", k; .. a "ia Jt.' •••h :S 1, .r J .l` rf •;w'�.. :ata: :',:•. ..r:, n :oe•.'.,, .rlY''`r' .rr�p'57.. .VJrlr } ..e .: !.-y!'JP,': ;+��:.' '•C5^�,i,y";.,, .., ntJ,lS.r :.:!•.� •1'?+ ».m .��g .L� Y. J\.,.t:.' , �r. JY ,:' 'Z, y,r' } Y. , d:: . 1 t"• t` t r Res tx .n 'tisSn.. 5�• �7r, T l ..t,-. v •L�J�r W ' d'. . N rt N ! f rwr,,..t r ✓..ly R M,/ a ^if •..!tial �ir.. ,"'ri.•t' , t'r yS ,. .1.. •Y. V�:,�.:?!": .hr rf ''.yi :'.!:' i( •:7":� 'N A.',N::, .,{.•i,: "J.y;.. rr", 1..?r•, rv:w'M' .��Flj< a:1 >: +4.'e .r?,'., .\1 ,�,6 ., M' ,.G� M»i%j r `.iir''^:T :r•:45A i'•.::'a..''I: ' 1 �: of .. ./. Ji 6R: r./.. ;•r.. ;yr, °.'! !%%'' .nl,..rJ."a L . ".irY...-4 ..', a1 .":.ia^r,., ..r l+!:. •. .!;,,, 1` +ti`5:5r, .r ,r7� , .Vy.�r �•)``, •L , il. '1 ,• �%" :. .d?•ri ,. e"i" a:"" +'S .^•.,T!.'I ...Li f.:" +i1t}.+.,i ,r 7 �J... . �. }r`'' A�.: J . 5'!x..1 ''i.:ry ..l(i•rY,°.',,l 5`I�.•', �- r,, 4..> ,k.,''' :,'y,t"x'• r � ,t� � {! ,.;t.r; b . ,..,r:�5.: ,, `: ,zel,: .•Y•5'•C }} , t. x ,5,:'::v: sir':• '.,k„ .� '1i.�!r+..,•:,. •,l:s fti�:', ."t��1J vet• ,r.f .. ,, �, a ,..z:d�w::• :•'i:� %.r1.7!, ..t i'•.I' .M ,.ir. ,;•r>%,• ��} n `n.' `^•Y.: 'fir 1: : ” i.. � .,t'Y,..�t ."V• Ir:r .I:: ' !.. rr�. .1 :5 t .r n. • `•M 3 ,>�. +'f. rt:5.a'T,.r,. )i!.:•J' r!Gi:, .y.. .,.r. • cFi"•. :I,1 .. 'r t� '..i r, / s:f s..r,.7P: .q 'd • i[:i°v..: r::•��`'�,i,.r I. , t• ,.,� �'iv'a , ` iVr,• ,S ' t•.. 5rt'.:1 . ,r,,,i "jln r.. m r r;..;."I:...P . ,;,�,: , I,:u, ".�' .,•,-:!'w, ,7•X-!'I'j:','S5 7� '%. �', ':I•.. c�N'E't :A'., f:•s •>f ,, JL,•i:'ti' Y ,'lam' J1 ,+5.•.: .. 11 :fA q:'••:f {;?r, 5, .. r••E•:r..t ,..'.,:3,•::: r f.P•••' I. �,r,1e,",{{a •="'rak .s�'r ,i r .,.1 " J £.r •,n.w••I,nk. .I . ! r ..,. ,.', t � W�M.X ' k I••' .y i, :+,: ;W:: ,,: :,'ri L'. .•''a4 +:.: 1tt:Lr \ r. ✓r•�t'-,.'. �.r� - .1i,lSr_: : ,,;1: <, .IJ".�. :�t�i::,,i. RS•r:,-ex'fr",::4 `.d,, ,'•MF' ter;'+, <I 1 rq v'> �.L":t.•�. . 1 ,` �'r:i;;,;:�i !:� •,.t. Y:!"! � I:�; �� . y!w:'.Sr ., R, ry�.. h. <'N."��n.r!IIL, 1 +'i+4ni, •'fi ,,.r : ..;r: .''aF' ' �''V'�:' .. ":r::. J.:.�;)\� *: tlh iy: v 1;:.'�y :�::',.�y`y�'i!�i. .,y ^��Sij :'`r: Iq :.J•:.. ., «••, �: s. �K'.. s� •'G r r. . 5• eti•� x'. J.l ` r uw. I. •R . J iJ171•.. ,:y : f,`' �: f'.' ;�y..>y ¢. •LS `:i': .,'Y:1' • .:�%v �:(��/')hv��,j:: 7;jn', "LFi';w�a,,.; ,.a r%]J, �'� •,','i' ;;'r�,:n,.' `: ri1YlL{u,L,.t ,. .. :'r•G+i+i�Y'�'ymis.;'; @•:i'.i' ".';jr"'��nk�r• �.r^'.P�'� r'Y. . rY43�yya •.;V.L:+••. ,,,. �:hriti �'.J"�; .y1a�.�.l��'•�j•;y�':, eB'r;••�.r . 14N� .. . ! r'�1..• - . � 1R,•.•'.:'' ��'i.d.ry�F+� :�F.��� fl ,., x..,..f:.. ,�...:.� h,' r.�..r:,&n;Yr,,,....,. w.��:M�.ff .:. rtr�Fa�,.., �tf�.t,� ,.,,.•. >:' ••. ••71'S t':.:;,i, ":f,S T, t:: ,:t;.•"i5'i;?.:', �LIYjI'iiv�tiy�K :�;i�4'.'.r'_�:F: T`� ' •''��`",�{'.r'�y: }:'.r �e!:Y k'tiCd,!5?.T } 7�p �il�:%,:',j, ,��ra .4�•7h,��11 :•�'r t.,..,.::•nl>,'•:�>v::9%�':i: i1::►�+Fy. "y �;D •t r '„j,, .y;. �,}C^ i :+ . r.,; : i .} � Yi ,'.'X^Y,,.... r 's,3i'ii % ::Pry:,I`f�:A . . o •.�i`• 1y `?:�{! :25.':%, : I::::. S.. . � 5ri'S +� r :ii . L. t•.• tf4 SS �tC>.'': 11.. i:j �::.i .1 MY"'} ,t;.n �:,1.r ,'t+: :yx� :�:":�,_r,.. r^.e4.A: /.i}.yy �:1�.r •$. �py,•T '.8S''yd � � t,.Aii`i�_ .9r{.:. �.!tt..� r: v' .. i., :�:,. °::;i1T<v: ',,? •. S .:� .la +:�Y.?%'",aX',: {t, .v �T t � ✓, %/.,�t\.' M 7''.e .; �i"': .: i..lr;; 5., }•':!u}, tt�� .uA'! .,1...t..�.:.x ;�!;+'; •�ta•,5: .r. 'v+(& r;d',,:::.1,5�r'.•:n.ev4..i. .:m.• :..j.,,:.' .1:. +U.,.,t�,.f..:r .a+:'.:... '.l '!" Tlv �L,n •'i>, .�.,.c x, h'. ¢,S<. .it.fi .,. :V ;'�y. ,. /.;• til' 1. ilt'• i .�. 't .i,.„Ml.::ty`:. .r.., tH' :'f r'!'K,. '`Yrs :1 v!' } .I?� � n'�'ln::'y�' '�r'y r. 1. ¢ '�li•,' 7,^5.. f,I:J.('�,, : \�'::'n•'%.1 Y.'! .Y �.�� . �.ite�. jj } I.Y' {{ ;;5, '�.'�' .:�Y...4 �� X511 i•:!<�.M1 •. w E t 5 I• `. ::rJi.S�re.J +.''r:qd�. .1 • I � i," -F;,. !: tril. , . ` .1. , a.. • �i ...��!;r' :•i:w.:. � t 41 .,1 ,..r> :.., :,,,.,:.?.,,.,•.yrs¢•..,.: � ��rn:,✓;;�i'':;'%:, :,+,.ir..'f�'a,,}jy�."t, ..1'2iil. �',.: �;3i•;a.:�. y'�'f:,i:j:5.,.y�,i+:;:•..,`:.,.,.i ;i { � ; E R 't• .....;i....j.Y',;'r..,,:r,.yl,r�•11:.:.•i•:n.i.; ..'�:/�+�..n,, w., .,4r�:�1's'1�.::r '7i•ir'i`.'`.';'f:;::.dQC �..y',l:^.., i'J:• .y,; �:.. �,•, w.' �,, 4'•, �' ����' f: ���,.1..4,i':. ;.�. `<ir�.:li•}Y}LI'^�'l •As i�'�•'�'� ,,.:r• :;r�.. ,',:r'i �.�". fed'.I:r;',.ig1:�i;��,,ty,'},:1.8 Fti�i`.�}.11,;,.1 :...1 ,i.: `5`' •;s',t�,a•; �4<<•f,;l l :., , .,7;;,t.,>',. , L:.;I ?:•Z:, �"^.,a's';.y i;.,: i•, .s'a .Ir?:., rl 'J.i t;:Y'';,p;• i.5, •i,,. 'qR AJ •t, ,'i' '`�' >t.:, �}� ''h'!il:t"I�,I,",I:>•.,.; ..I:7;.a�'�` �,, rye .;K ',�\�,,'•':•: <5. ','rlt• :.I. `+�t�•s, \r:..i::; .'X4.1 ., • �:'rr+ . 1.. ii `1 q T �i 4:j i%yt> 4 z..., All`y Si. I` A' (i 1 S 1 L• r` .s t 5:.. 3 "s l' 1 I. 4 ,1. 1' ICtI �+ •S .5 ,j •IJ ' <tl F Y'4 A `a A t` d Vis, Y rf f � 1i ,c2 � ..'tri :Ilr•. 21.•' tI I ? i i; Ee k :t. :i. y'. is (yti s' •'4 - i''S `r.7 , l,.I,.a`t '( /?n�1rAt,�.i31�'rSutf�t\1a3; j} ..`,4)\.{•ir I I:11>,11,.f ial�alF,1,::.1�y ....ryy s 5. 'il : S { iiA''r M1 \ . q t` ,t 1'" Vii A: l) ri %• t�>:5. �\�; '7`i: 5 'l .e 7t 9i'ji AO I}\`•:.elJ"11y IA SS rlY v S� t ,•:N .. �A'�..i :, 1. �. y: } :�! }I : a.: •I<s is �'MA 1 1 •I I A' a A. [ .r I}' �tiitiJ`Tc i p. ian 5Wv16 .. ... .. : t/:: rY<}ii' :,\t:.i:t :+liA4!: i:rtit' :�}.y..t:i14 Y:• i .. ,yi1`K\`:.>::> : `illij�..•: •••?:.c% 'r'.{ 1` iii"':i�J�£i2ly •'Yxa\�'a ly: !F �o, :��; o�Y C}l k' f' rl 1 ... ... ... .....:..:. . _.._......1.1_e.�i.?xy,. it YI .` >ll i•SfW,�I','v , ' •hLt?, l VM :, tir 1, • tt' it �I� trll _ AASY}. t R5. f y :p 'r. • I l7 5i tl. l . •'f.. «�li"s~':�"1.,, s.'lc�i'411....If':;>.C�,F.i.>: >.g.,4!,��',:,y.::•; :'�y;YY;I'",l'ii, grF.i:§':::'.t.' "�l•.,, v.iNi ,',"%:�>?'[:}iil;. `}tf?.�'+" td ax ' i,. tir "•ul . t 1 4., bY� :Tt n s 1' i •t r N„r• ;1 4< ,•i ,i! I 'i t•Ca:S . t �i %11Nt1e17 YIWYli1,Y0!«y♦;'?.e1Wixne!•:r•n!:.v.n,•Y�prMfll���ai,yniiY,A\ii E 'i .4� ...... : 13� L, }: St> ?niY6:t tC+FfAf :w ""Y.'^5St8�.V':•: Sv, , Il. ,xskta4?.�w fC `S t n, 1 `4\I 1 s.a 4 j l j Y•I1 `+5 } ti ,tldj l!.1 T 2' i\> t21�5ti 'Ira t •\ i ( 1$ Vii:• S\,.. .. < .���,o •_.. . _. • t , i... Vie:, :jv? i�yiy �:=� , i t� 1 A :5< 4:1\ •. I\: SS .�f z ".i ;:3 t t I %r ..1 y Y� f t �a , , It l }\ 5��• 5s \ `+�t�•s, \r:..i::; .'X4.1 ., • �:'rr+ . 1.. ii `1 q T �i 4:j i%yt> 4 z..., All`y Si. I` A' (i 1 S 1 L• r` .s t 5:.. 3 "s l' 1 I. 4 ,1. 1' ICtI �+ •S .5 ,j •IJ ' <tl F Y'4 A `a A t` d Vis, Y rf f � 1i ,c2 � ..'tri :Ilr•. 21.•' tI I ? i i; Ee k :t. :i. y'. is (yti s' •'4 - i''S `r.7 , l,.I,.a`t '( /?n�1rAt,�.i31�'rSutf�t\1a3; j} ..`,4)\.{•ir I I:11>,11,.f ial�alF,1,::.1�y ....ryy s 5. 'il : S { iiA''r M1 \ . q t` ,t 1'" Vii A: l) ri %• t�>:5. �\�; '7`i: 5 'l .e 7t 9i'ji AO I}\`•:.elJ"11y IA SS rlY v S� t ,•:N .. �A'�..i :, 1. �. y: } :�! }I : a.: •I<s is �'MA 1 1 •I I A' a A. [ .r I}' �tiitiJ`Tc i p. ian 5Wv16 .. ... .. : t/:: rY<}ii' :,\t:.i:t :+liA4!: i:rtit' :�}.y..t:i14 Y:• i .. ,yi1`K\`:.>::> : `illij�..•: •••?:.c% 'r'.{ 1` iii"':i�J�£i2ly •'Yxa\�'a ly: !F �o, :��; o�Y C}l k' f' rl 1 ... ... ... .....:..:. . _.._......1.1_e.�i.?xy,. it YI .` >ll i•SfW,�I','v , ' •hLt?, l VM :, tir 1, • tt' it �I� trll _ AASY}. t R5. f y :p 'r. • I l7 5i tl. l . •'f.. «�li"s~':�"1.,, s.'lc�i'411....If':;>.C�,F.i.>: >.g.,4!,��',:,y.::•; :'�y;YY;I'",l'ii, grF.i:§':::'.t.' "�l•.,, v.iNi ,',"%:�>?'[:}iil;. `}tf?.�'+" td ax ' i,. tir "•ul . t 1 4., bY� :Tt n s 1' i •t r N„r• ;1 4< ,•i ,i! I 'i t•Ca:S . t �i %11Nt1e17 YIWYli1,Y0!«y♦;'?.e1Wixne!•:r•n!:.v.n,•Y�prMfll���ai,yniiY,A\ii E 'i r1 'I E 1 ...... : 13� •'� .1 �. n,, ?niY6:t tC+FfAf :w ""Y.'^5St8�.V':•: `SAs,vl��+,niinta ,xskta4?.�w rl :!.,. n, 1 4 j l j :•S t i T 2' i\> t21�5ti 'Ira t •\ i ( 1$ Vii:• S\,.. .. < .���,o •_.. . _. ...... : 13� i..i:l\,�ffq\�j;.1i:'i..::l•,1 ��;!':.:•: :t 1, `5,•1S1WI V1, T 2' i'T.. c • 4:1\ •. I\: SS .�f z ".i n t .i Y� f t �a •: n•x'v4fNYs 5��• \Y'� kiTF FLrltiFY a .iron .\ 5'•�'Yd11C* :'t N x,x MM ......... .... i WOli14 "n We" Ry i. 'To, W ...... MON. MON MON me. ........ ...... k . .. ...... .. ............. "pW ... .. .. ........ .. .. ..... . a. ,5 tt.......... KOM LLLLLLLL ... .. . . . m 0 .:..' _. .. , ", - � j "T�'�;� �'f,jl�"�V-I It P'1:1' W�Zll Uf 714, SPIV �".�!',:�"T"'. ,� . , ,:� . . - �i.. - , "t. - ... � � _�4 : '�: :�� '. :;','�::'4;�".�,*. *�: �':.,2Iv.­�:�!;-':'. :­_'.�il` ",��', '�­,'��­;�:�';" ", � �'.!� ",'� - : .�' '�:�:-'�"�:, '."i'�j.%�'< "' 'N. , �"' --,) � � - .11�n!�"�.-�� "I, . . . , � , - - .. . . , , . : ; ,,, :I!'� , -,!..!-�'�;'.�.�;�M' L4.qZi Z' __ - � ­. . ll'� . '­ vwgn ,:*... ..:,:. '' . t '%� .. .. I, ""... - . - � . I I . '�."'. ��. -.11: M---'- . %. �'- � I .', ' ' , - .. :." 1. � ,.�",�.::,::,�.i::"�.','-.',.'��r :,'i'::".�"�:­�";;:�' "��-".%'�:',':,', , ,�.".-'-.'��..,..*,l.�,:-..�...*.�'���:.";.."�-1, ... . ::,�..v ".. I , �i�,'�,,3�i����il,�"5*;i.,-.'�-,',;'..,t.y�,�',�.-.'...':�'�4'�,'��1�, "�'�;q:--"ji�--�".�.':." ";."i '.�jl'��.--.-`--`i. --- " , I -.1. I ... ..' �:1 q.'��; eo!�O�. � , i�,-"�z.f,.�,;"�f;:�,'��."..�":..,."V�:.,i;:���;" . , . , 'I " MW ..' , - ,:., . .-:!.;,`,�:*!�;'.-._.' �' , '.--`:�:�' .l... I......W... . . .� .' , . :;::j�:_­ - ­. �� ..�. , . . . ... . . - - - ... '�'!-.�'�"�-�'-':%",­ 'M�9` %."'�;­."::�;F- :i�.. ,,, .. .%, � ,:. I. ��­ . .'­­:.`�:-�'-� ... ... .... li�­ _"��;_�"� ­­ . . . 4?.2 " �.11l -1 s.- '­.­,.: ", .. ........ . . !, ,��,�.�%��.1-1�,��,�l�:����".'�:.�. , ", .... �" �� I '' . ; I .:, � % .�. , .. , -m-&-o", .z .' - - __: � - - ­­ -'."',.'.-�.,-.!:�"��:'� ��.1,1,�.,�,::�.'-.�.",,-�.".-,.'.�.�,,-.,,,�,-�j��" W':jj �.':; �. ... ..��.::�",!;::��,�,.�f��..�:�','*..�:f.�i,.t , 'i�t:l��,�;.?.i;..",�l'.�.".t"I " -_'-_;l �`�.'..':'­:­ '..�(5' �"�-:-.`� ...�":- ­­'.-:��. - ,:1.4.�..:!:.:.�,�.'�'-',.-',��;* , ." . . I 'I I ... :� , �" 'f �"-::�'�'�*,�";i; ':�l'�'!"-.'.-:"­ ..;o: 111.1 - A . ... .'­�' - k;l.,:6.,� . . . .. .- , .. .':.:'� I; .'.'�.. I -;�', ,',,'. ,t:� � " �'!.,:: .1 . ''�; ' . :.. :_'.%�:'�Y:.�'..' I, -.� '. ll�_ ,. _" ­!".`q� ii"�'� - I *�.�,t'�,:�:.;,�,�.�..'�t*�,,�-.-.,.'.'.-�:.���.;'-Pl,�'!!.:.�,-�.'..",""".�.,��::��,*:e,.�',,,,.:";�,�: ­ _"..''..' ­11- � . ' - . . ,��,�.,,.-::.:,�:�.:.ii.��::"., . . 'Y�"�;:I' - MR"Smq�:' _%.:::::..-'­ - ",'­.'�' , .� %�"" �'. �.'%:,�'��:" !' .. �jIz I 'Q', '.Y.':'l_l';qZ'(�-:,�' " . " .:. .. ' - ':;-, I I -A, -I..".. I .. ..... � I �jz , " R';% . . ' - ':.�'O`-_,,'� , . ..,."�..�.�.�.-.,,���'�-,;�,:�1'.�'r�,, I"... j. -1 " .. - ': ,: ...: �.'�.' i% ":. .'.."'... .".. ..'....... :......�.''..;...,...�"*.,-�:f:.;,:�l.�,,,;:.�...�:�l,'�k:"-",'�,� - �,:t.'% I.;. � ':�i�''.: '.,�.'�,��-';'�."..i'�-.�.,...'." ."'-*".­�:-'.'.."',� -'."""-"-.,.�� .,.),�,,.-,*.-......,.,,.�'���.�l,�..--'.i,::����..,����'...'.,,."-�.t�,�.,,,�;�;,',��-.*,.,..".,.�,i",;;..I;�-.,�,�;� " I ."..." , _ �'. ..'. �...% �. ��'. ..' , . , :��'­'Q�'�il! . .;4�-'�'.'.' .'*t�'�.-� . - � �'� e.�. - .. ", �",:.�.",.:*".��.'�.,!:,�-',�. ,. , %­- - ,.,*:,:.,, "' , - �1,111.1 i . low � , , - -�,���.:."::i;:,:.�..-�-...��*-Z.�."-�-�".**�l�,:' �:_' ..' .. .� �: 4. � �...-' "':':% . . .. , - -'-z.*�.' _,__ I --jIll., __WWWywA"sq:OAOn"v;>_"Op Vlw"'� ' .' ': , __ . - - _... - V--.1 ­_', , . , ." � Tvwx wwwwK . ��..*. .�40-'�.%:�--.'..� .�'-'". .%l'_l,`.::'­ ' - , : r�. .'Zr W..', ,t ­"!'-'­.��:�­;­.­ --'-�"� ... .. . .. �.'*�.*;,.',�.'�.'-,'i,',,.'.�,�*��,.-*.',,'i�;�---�-.-.:.'�*.,'���',�a,qna,-'�-"<ANA5415 j, ' ': 'r, " : P;MX'ili �"_�­ �;" -,..'f .-. -­ ... ;'. _.' , ,. .: :. .. . ,; : , :. .- .". ! �' :. -.. : ,. .: :::. : ... ;�:,; ..','; ,'� , , - ,�� �!,'L'.j I ; .'.. .. ., '�. . , . ." . . I I , I�' ,. - ;: .. � . :.'. : j: � V: A �. A. .a.:. ��'-':%k, i. .. , I I "t, 1� - I . 'w I. I ...... i , " . . . . ; � !I .. ; .�.-'! ':.-'.-.'.' �; � !.' �;' �', 1. .,.: � � 1. :� . %, � : : �:. :' � . � '. � ; ; : � ... � � � ...... , � """'�' i �.:�'!�� ":'�� - "_";'�'Y"tk�"� , . .. : ��"�": . , V"�'i�" , , '; " ..%....' 1, .. Z �.`�-�� .7, , � . ­.. � ...... . :'.:­�.;­'­'�: ..:."::.,.::!:.,.,�,i,i.,..�:i�.��....",�,',-.'�3k , - �' ' '�. � .., I ':�. : �. � : .;.. .. � I','�'; -;�:'�;.:"...i�....:����;;,.,.;:�:.�,',,.�'��-.'.�-,.,!�,,;.,-"�,"e -,�-'�"'�.':­ � " , :. .�: .11 '_:�' ". . � . � .. 1-i --- �"'­�- �.: -..'���:.t,��,'.�...��,:�,,,�.."..'�j.�.:."..*,�,..':.�,-.-.�:-...��1.1,11-- i 11 1, I.. , �;.'�,',-.-.."-,.,.,,-.-�,,A�i-,I",..tQzo�,.�,-,..��..�.-,,,�j,�, , , , . �­. . . Ii-�J" ".�w " � , . , - :.' 111064N'*?�' %:,.��.��,���:.;.,.�'�:�'�..��.,�'..",,.,�.��.-"�.,�.,�,:�', ��"",......'�..,.-..,,.�,,.,",�;,�".�.: . .. 1� �" : . : %:.'..:. . . . . z . . : ,. , , IM's...' '��N",e'V '�)...'.' �.! I 1, , . .'.;"!',l.".: .... . . . . : ". �­.;: �:.: -": .'.::: .:: �-....:,:.:':'%�"�'. . �' .'" �.'.:..��:-.._: :... '," "' ,'I, . . .. 1%"'__.:-'-,�. , . il i"- � '� , :' � ''�:� � , , - . . .:. � %'..;"� �,j.":-;�"' '� �.�'f% 1 ,..:.,:,����-.4.;.,..;,�.�:,::���::."I�-11�":.,;:�;.,.: - ...."'. ' ":. ��'.�.'­ . , �" � . '.. - .. : �'�` .:� .: :":' . 1- .... ,. �'�'� '�' ". � � ­�':.:�""r;"'� ' �lv ll,'j' " ' 't ""'N�"'!�. .. , Z , t "k ;""'."! i �;',�:!�:Pii�:�:':'.-k '�""�: .`--`.':. .'.,:. -_;; ' .. , � ,__ ...- '.." __._.:.v._'�'*�­� _-:-_::::.':-*-- .:.::�".- I'...".. '­j�'.. �.;.��'....::..'��.��::.".I��..:.�;i�i-l�*,..;),�::%�,',��.!.;.�:.,.........,,-..,�'..,:....'%%:...:�.: .. .. � . t� , iol � ­:� .'., -�:. ...";"­ ­. :. " - -1 .";".�'--:�,:-'��S , J'z""�'�f .­':%I�. ' �.'�" � .'� " , , �� . ....... ��z�*�'�.­.-:'..,.'-'.. . ­��-..,:":--.---_,�:-.'-_. *'-:�,:��.,.,��������..�,;�.�.,'�z ,.�.,�,-.-.-,��"2�:.:",��,'�.".:.�',�,.;-.,'�.�,"..�,..,:. ,.:" "'I".-,", .'�"" i;"j! I � i , � - . . � .. .: . , -..'-.�'�?�'g"'�'jgjtqg %'� "'..' �! i.'!.' , ' �� _'.. � � - -, � :' ,,- .. - - . . ��":.':' w--� ....... � .- ­'; �-�'�'-..:_:� �......: �...,� , , . , ';��"""A.i!,'.�%,4��" �"""' , � I , � , - .--.....� ... ... W ­�.. ,­�li�'� , '. � -...'-' --: :� -, " . . . 'l­"N'­'­gT'v'- ... -.1, I ,.i,;�,���,,�.;�"',-'�'.:�:,�'-'.�-.',!..-�."�,'..'.'..,...!.,6�";.�..�i�,'. -.:",- - "4""".';-.. ��i a:��.";. _ ;" .. �%�' - �:�'*' .­V­��'.':�­" '.'Atpii""-,�' "'�.' .. 1 ; '. .:,.... I '�. - ......:. ''. , " .. . '� -� "'. :.,:. I. .. .. ";;§L,�,..\,'-�.�!��.',,,(J.l��..-. 4;.-'.�.::��A:-"- W.. " . , � � 't�� � .� ';�� I - . . . , . .�� . I 'r, �' ,:;; -""�..� � .. ..' ,:�h. .:, �' '' . , ... " � �. %�'',... .i:' ., . �."'I"'I"O"I", 1, OIN , i: �' '�' " . .. . .... . , -':'.."2:.' ,I,::.: .". . � ,:: :I *:�:..."..,;�":��:.",�,�i�-,�. ".,.. 1"'. . .*. _:' :�. '.' - . l.. , _ .' � ., ,. ,,,-:,.,:. :' "i , _� ', '.' , - ::.%.'-'-'l:i' ',;­jtl ,,"'��'­';--­'­'­�. '��,.-,.�;..%.­:� " , � ..`:.'::-..'.. 4".��.: ": . . I �.... ,;;�l'.�,�.,.�.,!�.'�,:"."�.���� '­.­'­".­'.. . ', ':�.-..�'..,�",'-'-' ;,'..'. _"_ . ) , � '61YMIA�%'Wl�i:; ,,,,, iNN'�-Z... ..­;.: .. .. . . �"'­"'­ ---�,.%.!,:���:�.-:i..:%?�,�:..��% ; , _: - - �`,_: �.'; -I..", ­­­ I " .. . .:. . � . :'�,.­"'.'­11�11 '1'l':, -i-.". ;l ..' .�'-�­ �. � I '��' , . , t� � I . ....� �­... ­'� .' ll:�... ' 1 ­;��lf-'.'�!.' - - , , . . . .: "... ':..... ... �. - . - � . ...:�'­.'.. -, -:.*.'!'!:.';�:'%- '-.':::%."�j.jij,'.' ,,��.j".��;t���"-,,:-i.�*,�'�*,,.�...-, '. "', _"--'e'lel'-_l " ,,, !,"�,".�.--�'�,k�,�";!��,����"",;,�,".,,,�4i"�k.'*i'�,'�.,".,�"�'�:��,0=0mo&Qoo WQwA9Aw�4w__-_wMQj"'z j-"'­'Y.*4",�-;"..',!.` - . .. . - . . . . �­-':�s'i:�" I ­ . -?'��:' "ll", -.­-�'�%.'.: .. -.-�_�', --,,,�:.�..,,�,.�.",;-.-.,;:�.,,..%.,.."�- .;.. ".. '."-s . '_ , .'. . ':,",; . . . -:7�11'::iij�l '._�:;.�:: � � � '.. � . � , - � - ""T Ny .. , �� ': : .,:,: " , ...' � . .::, � NO N::�" , , ��. . :'':,. %!�" . . .:...�' ' �i' "IN -�."' .. ';'..:4%'4�;;""'-:--:­%' .�*�.�'.,,�-.'.��:�:.',,��:!:.,:""�,Ni',�?',�,� I "I" �.� . 1".. ',�'*Y"Vxw � .­::�­.. . . . " '��.' � : �.�'* �' . " . : ":: " .. , .' .�:. " - '. � �i.' ;:: �� 'L��!'� .... �­"" �'.: *'�'.'!' IV%M. j","'�J."'-)'Q'�V� � I , -:.'!�',"� "� -, . "N" . �' � ... ..' �''.. , � : - .... - '.' , ", ...� :,:�..".:,�,,�.��".�...",,�..;..:,.,.":�,�i-.:; "', I � ... " , ;�. !)'.';�Egi"i,'�"" I W'W'O"'. '.'­­.'­, ... ... ��;��.%,;."�,�,�*.-'.:I�::,,,,.;:... I ., , ... I I , . , " '!;�'�:.!.li�,,:I:'�� '_ 111, 1 ""I'4j "141.,, ... �'%.* '. , _... ..% ". ..,:. I I .. - -.."�;�,-��:��"! , '&"""�4 'A.`.',4-:: , '.:��:S�­' .�jlltj.�' �­'�',i.'."" "..' ­ - : ... ��­_ -'�:.,.��.��-.:.-�:i�l:-,',',i��.1-:�,,�'I'�..,.�...,.�t. - .. ... Q�11111P'(Aj I, ,,, I El MMY p ':�':' "_ - , -, . �. .� - , . '� -.'..' : -�-.: .... MIMM '.:�.;':' .�� L - - �'�:'.:'._: ' . :� .1 .... . ,.:��'.�,,-�q:�.,;.,.�:.,�."�.:�,;����;�,:'��,:,."����..!k*,...,.....-,�.�-,,�,14 . , . :­., "i - I....: '. " '­ , - "" ":..''.' ­ , � . - .­;..'.. �­"' _ _­.' ��' ­­e:S :,:-�',':-%:':�.:";��.'.kk:��.,�,� , '. _.:'.-� .:. - - : - " -�:. .. .� .' . I .. :�*.'�.."*-',': . - .1 :? � .. -: " , i. , : _.:_'A ill.i- . .. - _ _ , . - , - e�Nq,m­--'�;,�. :,.� .'�.. , ... . � .;..:��.:'.��:;"��*.:...,!.:%,I�,��!��'.'�,:.,".'.'�-,",�,,�i�,i6�'..�� �" W� -, " kzl I "'­v'�':-��:" '_� -'��`� -��-::-.:�.�;,-,�'..*.,:,..:."::,�,.�..-�-.-I�;�.�...;";.i�,'��-,-, -, %n",.'� ...." - '. - � . .". :.::'*.'��_­;��. _ '' ._­. '. -;,","N5.�Wl.'Nl ,�j,� .' ' ';ZQ ' ", ­_ .5,71K': '� ' - '.' � -�. 'U " %, �9 `.�'�'--';'-'*.'*�".;-' ..�ll.'�:11;�:..�.!,..;.��.:;.,.�*:.:...":...;"",:.�:1'4..��.'..,Y"""�,�11.141", - I , ��,..:�;�:��.,'�::�;%:,-��..."�,,,-.���:11.,":!(,.,."�'�,!<�,,�ll"�-.%:";l.,-'., I " . , : '. -"�-'�-.:-'�:: 'I',- ��I�1:: ��i.-Sul �;'.�""M . 0 . :.­ . :.­ . ;­ . '­ ,,IT 11 "li-eil ­=N­�,P­�t'?:�� "�*-,,,��.*,-�.�.'�.*���,.:".:�:;.��:"";. "..'f...*..;��..'.'-V"":'� --'.­,.'-':.:." ", z "I"' %",11Ufl*lV ; ��: �� , . - ' ' " �'::­' �:' - - , .'!, , ` .�;�;,`�z" T""', ,.IT, . � m : . - - . - � .' �' � '.':.:.�,:'... � � ..� ._�_-""-.:. ':4�,��.'4'�'-��ik , , . . ,' � � , . '��"i Sf'�- "'( , "' - ::��m.'�,**:-.. " , , "' j 1.� , - . .!'�.­- .: ; :. .,.:. .li��W'.'.�jl""� "I . � .1 _f , ,� �..,.",�.�'..-.'*'.',-,,���,�.",..,..",.-,-.,. '11 -;' �A. , 1� IN" ,01 M w �..::'.. . :�- ��'-'\ .,:.:. �'. . '. ... '; 1. "D '_....'. I :-�"-:�-.�-_-�. _'.. _ ""', ,� -11 i �� � . , rl�"'_V " ;� A N%'�'�!"j�;' ."t!'.'Z'j'� ,':'*:� � .. .. .':' �%*�N,..lr - �*'ii �11 ,I. �'_ . . '� � ,� � .. '­'."' � , _ K "�' , , ...... � ,. . .'�.' .til�� , ,2930 .*2"`.i�I.R"' , . � '.. '�. ", %" '�' '�'�""' "� ��; , * w- , . .. . ), " -�" I ".. ...'�. � '.-_��:' ­':��"-:�t �: '..�; �: * : .. :' ..... I". . �.' - - - -':' . : ', ;:... . , , I � 11", '. I] �� , i . '­' Y , . '� .. -"." ..'. ev � .. . -�...;,�It'..�'�;�,..;,..!;.-�i�i . '."-�'��­,-. . -.:', , � - .. . � . ' ' ' - . . . .: .i:.--:.'�'--,':-'�-'.'Vl %1; '�v.:­".%wxl , �tl­ . .. " - . . �..'-��-. . -.'.'..:--'.-�'::.'��'..:� . .. �lu'M' R!",Ml" li 'l - I . - - t: � �! !:�;"-:-:-%�',A�-`�7'.- ��:%-.i -;��:...".""Il.,il,.,�,Al��,�;�.�.*;��-�,;!..,\ I. , .:.::.:, I.I�.�,�,,....,�-.:�,.,�:.,,�i:"..:�::,��',,.'.;,;, '....::., ':­�' .. .­­��',:� �:��:'�--�.'._� " � 4*:'�'' , . . ��: ;' � '.."'� " -A , . . '%­ . ...... � . � �� - � � , � .'�."::-_'. ��::­­';:�_;'p - . - *�,:I..�',tl,�"?""i!���",�,;�� t' ..' ','�"' !."�-.-'," , "I"', ' , i i':. '�' ' ,..-"�.�.�,,,�,��-��,,,t�,�."",.�,.,�* ".*",��:..'�"­_ ", . . 'V_�':::: i':�� .'."�";: .. ,:.: . . , - . .;�i'�" �:'� ".�'�.",_ �';" 4. ".NA�X. .'...;.lt'�­..'. '.P�,..a:��:�:'� 5D , - , ' '� -�­ "', ­e�'%­ 'NT��' ,�'%' % n -, �'�3�-',, ' '. .-::"'.' .:,'.''.- :�;�. � �X' , * * ­ . ­­' .. .. '.� "�,;­�­'�� .-:�"'­­'­'�; "I ' , -,'�-:-��-.'���-��;�,.�;:����,,i�, '�� '�;'­­'N!_�. �,::.',,,',.;-�:.:i.,��-.:..'�:��,�' "�; . w - MI, tj '-r , '�� , . 11.1-...'' ­ 41-11; 1-1"q"; ...... . �.­.:"'�'-.-�y"�: . �'�-:�*: � z� - . 11L�� , ,I, , ", , ": .... . . :,�.-."..i:,�:,,,�i��i�,%�,.,:i,�,�,::!..:�,,,-,:;:�:,ii,��,��:�,, "... .. ..' . :..� :. 1, - . .-.t T*Agiijim I." . . . . . . . . I .. .; lVi; .-"-�. . f", . � i�­' ' ' ' ' ' * ' . �.. ­.. . ' ", '�" , ,,, il i *:.,�'.*,�'.',',�.;:.*��*::.,':::.Z;,�',:�::.�i-�:."""��.�z,:.� , . � '� : -�' ":..-.'�:,.:� " ' * " ' "' : �­ ' , * : ".' �'--_ ' , - . .:' . I. "P "i 11 19. iM , � ' * . . � .'. - Ml'll� �" ,l x v . � ... . " ..� ..." - ��l..,.:.�:,���.'*�.-.�.�";�,l����..&.",,*,.::".:":�� ---�-' ----'-.`�� -"'g �j,'�W'41'11. .*v ".*.'.'."-�'*.- ..':��'. .�;.-i-,.��-:.,.�..".....,:�:*��-: -:*." .' - .1 . � I. -I... ..".1 ,!!)*'%'l'.'�' N'�"� K'�;'.;�@; _ , -:. : ,:. I ''::", �: ��; �.��.�;'.,.', ­'­�. .... , . �.' .......:.. . Aino% , A"�.;'..�-­' I.\.' � ��%\ll """'�\",,�� ��4'-:--�A­ -*�.`�: ;i:'--.- .. . - :. , :4 - --l-I.-MM"Ay". ?, ", ..% f::"'�-:.�'j"'-�-:^'%:.�. .... ".. .. .e....:.... '­...... ­... �� .. - . . :. �7- .. - , - . .. - 'YO I ", " " ,;Iti"."�ii'.*�l"'�.;.�:���-""".,I��!�*.,.--."� ...W...'. ': ", .. .. % ..' . .. -.:.- � ;� " . . '�-. ":7 ... �." r ; "ev ',".<. .%"��' '� :;, � � :I - ---*�:' ....' .1 I '. " .. .. "*1 � .� l'i �' - ; - - `­ - :" ': � - - : .- -I.... � _'. .. - :.. ,�..­'' . . ' , _.�Zzl %%­ , �' 6 � ­­­afk`.',�� , ­" _.'A'lM't'.)..'M'. "',�'!...i.-x,'e- - ­ : � � _.­'­­_�� �.­- __%z- .. 1, - . � � - , � -'_.-:l---- - -.'�� "� It, �' u - � - � .. - , ig" , - - � .. Raw -"I'%';'� -.-..�...:I.,�,�,,.�.%.�'�::..,.*,�-;.%,,�,,��,e�-,-�i�: �­­%"��'.­!;:� 4" '..':- -..% ".. ..: .': , . .' ...' . . '. , . - .,�'i'�i?�e"",�JA*'�k�,'�.,.�z , .... " . : . . � ­.' .'...�:.,*'­.':. ­..­� .si, .1 , � .� . � ., 1-111.1-1, � , ­' . .� '� ' . , � " . . . tt 'l'. , ", � ... . . ."' � , , , � % . � ., � � �:� l:---"�-:.-.'..­:�. , � - .. *: ':� -:':,':- �­'.- �. .'-.'­,­;--�:' ":: - : . .� .. �' ..'."'... ,"21,4I , ,J), - 'j ..' . '..... , , . .'� ..."""'.',:� r� t ,,�i:..--..,:,,,,�-�.::�.�,�..:.,�..�.,.�- ".�c ":.1, -::� . , , , . '.e� " K" -�- * ..c,. � �.-`��:��-':�:'.�. : . ... �' ngnm-w-w- . Ot 5 , 7'. � � . m'I -� .. ' . :� - ,,'4 �. I � ., �' %, :�' . _ .. .. � ...... IN-, vl'j' y"mymmows lopf"WQQQ w"'.. .1'1­11.....�'Z. - .-" - �� . � : .I.."."... �".. I�l ;.......' - - AM R M ......... �- �:. - - ;''.": ­':- .. " '. , . - . i .l.:-" " ­. I ':. �. �' . ... :. "�� - - .. , ' " " . ' ` . 11 ...... - I , . ...... , .,.....:. ,,, --11 - .,::. ". ,.�"':...'��"- --.�?�"" " �.';"'�':'-%-.'"��:�� . - .. . ' � � . . � . '_ " 'w 1.,��' '' 4 - �- 1, ':.'�� � .. . , :. ... ­ . '� '�::,.�.',��,,,�-,,,;�i:�,,,*��, !.'�.�Jl' ­.' .: -._-_.'-.11' ,"....".1,'. __. -._'�:�:�' : - - . , - '�-!:. -'!:'."� "I"; '­_-..11­.-',�",z::' Y`..�F­_ ,.! . - !��-%-��"*:-;�� .:�� . :;.:iZ4t,"�­�4, 1 � - ,: - ", . � _ . ,.,. . 'I, � __ , .;.. � - - - , . . �� ) )�%�' � : . .' �'--;�'. . � . ��'�: - ,,, -:l� � -.',�:-'�.':-*­7N"'-'-* :- . , �' i'_ , -­'�"-'.'QA� ',I I --`.­'�� ....... -:1 � ... q-'. * , w , , . , "f " N" ",-, -'--�'� .. �� *. .' * � � �:.- : . : � &A .' , .. . , , :: � , - � !-�, C.. �. 1. '�;.'­ __."­�f� ."�_.j 4 v .. � �,` . , . ,�-�,�-ii;-.-���'-"��t�,.(�,,��'�"!'. : - , - I Wl­­ I 11.11�:�". :. �'-;:*.--:y.�". '�' � �;;,' `.!�. .� ��­. . '...- - *' tP, �' I :�?��i'..�'.,.'-,:;.;%!,.',i�.-'.-.-.'.-i�:.�,.,:�.',,.,��-,-�,�..**.�-*.���,,'�,;,*.�.."f".:,."���:t�..!�-,,�,',�,!",....,.....',."',-',.'t. .11".�-;'.,.!",��l.;.�."-.�t,..,,*�,*,�,..",-�,,' _ ! q� ... . �::*�.'� .'% , , ... .��' �­ " , '� - . �� .. - N'R -'&�4 --Z �' " ': ' '. ..:: '. ­ " ".-W.'. - �.:.'.(-::'t' ;Q;f.qT."'?,we.� . ....'j- "..... .....- ,'.'.'�.!.,:',*�.'.-.,".�'.,';�..z.,;,�,:"!.�...,::.,.,��- - � ........ . - .M.Il -W'.'%'IZl"l)l.11' �'n�-!. :' I I . .. . .. .,��..i ..; I. . "... "' .. .... I, , , , .. ,! � � .�. - .. ­". '' ! .....' � . ... ­�':.." 1,:".`:�, ^- ", ,..:: .. C..�..; 1: I %. , "". � ". . -4%"�%'�­Q""J�. �"� ..:!.,.".".,.,.,i,.,�i:�:",���,'��f..;:, .. . �-' "':� '.�'� �­ " "; .. .... .... _ -'. � - - � ..' ""'W"i.1.1-ill '�!' , I -.-'�.*�"'-".­ .. 1. � . I � '��' .: .�'. .... . " WO " , ��" .: . .. .-1 -1. .�' p � �""'..";�';'­*"�­ ­;"' ;� �,� . " "'.' �'�"- ..,.-;". -, �'.­;4'. �.-�­� . .. " . . V." :'k&' , " ; I W , - -� -Z � t . � _. " _ .: ,"-;"�'%' .' , . .. I - ­:l'l;�1'I'K..-;".i ."':'. , _:, .. :..:�%��:..! r:,.-.:.'rA' , , �" � j.�li­1111.11',. � . , . . � . . , .". -:1" ... . . . I I . , .....;;.�:,�.-z;,�,,,;.�(f;P.��. "'� -" V;�' 'l .... I M � ', - .:.. .. 'i-::."*.':; �'�nl­� �:,­.:�n ;. , " . , � .V%�"N'4 "jzjK" 1 n . � . �:�_ , . . �",�'.�' ,. � -j-,", ""...:... � ,q .".�'.';' .. �, �­­­­"'.'-­ __:_."_ . - . .- _ __11.11. - I .. ... - -1-1.11-1-1 , � ' t',��,!."..�i',�.'.��"'�."��:�:.;�-��,,'�-%�:%,��',,,�z%.!'�"..;.,�;'.:,�,. �il '.i�.I.��",;��,..:�',..-�..,.,- * O -,j :....% �:= , 5 ...w= -j��" I I N � - - .. . :� ,: N, �: . ..' -.�.-."�"--_:'� .*,��.,.���.;,:.��.:.,.:�:,:�,,� . � , .. . .... " . "".'j."'. 4 :"�-!':'.-."': �.:�'�*. .-;".:.i��',"-' ,.,.r,..%'-.' -_'.-"'­­. �'%::,"Jl'�, I . . . . , � -­' ":i... �'4 1 - , " �111�� 1� *1 I . . � - .. ". .:.i. , . � . . !N& , ­­ - .:.;. , � - , . __ .. . , . � .. . , . . - /':�4'..�'J�11".. . . , ", 'li g :�' - , ..:,.:, " , � . , . I . '. ',:P.�-�'.* :'. ,.* �­.:'.%':.'::':.;:i' �.' .'. ��"': � 1;11 :­..�i'%O"'; " o. . w -­� I ­.. . " -�'. -1 .. - - ... � ..." ­ � _ '� �1�1 �; , .- , , �: ,'' - . .�­ `%�' - i.:". -�" . , ��.:�;7'7i;!�'�"` " - . �.��'. .� .�' , � �:-� ; * �;-. - .. � � � � . � . ".- ", " . �:�..:��'�": r'� l:'j ' .:.*.:..;, . '�i....;N,'.:�."-I""� -��.:�'.-�,'�'*��",�-,'��,:.;.,�:,:. ..!. - "I'll"I'll, �"�." �. , 1"'n' '�.' . . . . , , . ,: . � , , : '.�� ", � '-.":';:-�'-"� .�. :::- - . '� `_,*�,'-.:�:*."'---*��' -.'.� .--o. '..' . , '_ -..: �' �.%;� ..'­' � .- 'I � .� -� , "t , . - '�: � " - , .-. ­':,_ '. �� , , , � , - . . ­.. :� .F� . . . ..' : � , .. ."r � , I , 4 .� ;'A" .'.' '�Z�. �"'�" " , � �'5_0��,.';"'!!'_' ­1�!��*'­` -'-"'-.""'�;�--�'.".�l ;. :,�i��:-�,:*..*:.�:,;*,-�..,..'.�,'�.-.�--.�,,;:�::�;...'� -i-. ::�,­,:� , '.'.'� - _-'-!�' -,--""'."' "'kZ' . . . . . , .. ... � . . , .. . , �� :: . .; . '�*'�:. .. _' " .. ';' -,- -- -W ' -':­� :'. , . .' . . , , , .. . . .1 "I", - f `.� I': - .-11-1 .... 11. - ;��":��"..Z. t':*"` . . ".i I . , ' . ..'i . . '­.: ; ... ". ... - :,.,. .'��':;t'*."'�.�."; ", �,�",;;.�'�'.�'�::�i�'�:�,*�17:!.�',�.','*,i�:%� � .'�� __" - ,"'.. , � , ��,�;,'-' ,"', �*�i A.- , - ...... . ... '�,'-':-; ;j -:-'f":;:;.' �,-..."Iz:*".�.ii;,%-,j.-.-,.��1,1�..,.I���--l.,!::";.::.-. �' ."_­ ....... t .- ­­ - - .. ' , " , "� ­., ­.". ­­. �' ..- '�"',,?iiz"�..;*."Ii,"��,�,?,�-��;,.,�,-�:".,;��.f.!":".,.".,,.'.'-�.,,dl"i�,"*.'.'�!,"�%,�.,�""",",,...^.�..�.��: _ .' - . .. ,,, " Y ���.'.'�':':�"!",'."q , , , �� , . ... _ ... _� � -, -' I .. " . ...."...' . , %, .... .. I.: ..' I" . ��"";"4 , .�.!�..' . , ;: '­�: :*��-:*�. - , " : ��:- .:. :I.::- ... .�. . .. ' . . , :. . . 't.�'-'.*"I"�7�-; �..--' ". �.-�"�"`.' �* -':'�!."*-"..'-' .'.'� �'-':."-..-"': ,"'.� 1 �'-- � J.-: i �*;: " : .:::.�..,."�,,�,...-...-.�.-..'.�L�,,�,����, � , . . � '. ..... " , ,.,::.: . . ".:� - . � .� -� :i:'%';'�� ��.' : " - - :. , - �: �' , . '_ "-. - , ":�' . � .. I '.­�'�:' '.: :_;. � �� � , . . , I ''. '"...". - "� ':��� ,; . . :� .! ':�V';.' v _'�:' , 't . . ..... I 't'! . . - I ..I',.,,.. �� �i._,�'. .. -�.': , I w ­� '.',�.;�,�.�,.�,.;,*:,.�.��.�,,�.-�.,,,,.,, ' . ': !'z:..'.'�.:'.":-*'��:.�:'. .__ , . I. ' � , , ,t' .". . , , - . �4 ­­­," 1P 1� "­._",­::::��'-��' ',,��'.'��'�:,�i�,'-,,:;',�.-�::����?,�".�"..Y�,,�l;l�.i:l��I ....."T, ','..' � , , -:' - , -'.�":�;:.,�;,-t,..",�,"�,,,j,�.,k,�, . ; V �' ... � ,. . - .:.. , - I - , , . '�;: ' ,. . I, . . , , _. �`, ".. 'i -.';%�' - , _. ', I ­;':�,7�i` , .' - , , .. . - .- .. I ... . .. .. .7 .1 . �' -I.:: I-; .. -.�::'.-';'�"*��".". , " � .- . .. i'�:. i�,�-.'-..'����,",�,.�-�:;�:��:.,..."�; .. .... �'-�­ " ". "'.­' ,��l't--.�.,.,.::��;���:.�!'4i�,��.:.��:�;",.,:.-.-�,,.',.'-.';.I.:,�'�:;."...'.���: .'-':.,"'...*.-�_�� . . ,' ""N . � '.. .. ,:.:. .. .:. .. . . �- . v I - , ' . ,� : �o::f: - " " - '. , , . �A � , � � . . .:: : , . . . , . " . -1 "'­"' -:,�,*:",..,�i.��,��'..".!;.,�'�...,I,v."..,:�E:�i�'��.'-�,f,�,�,�:;.�.�'�',�..."*�.,.*,.,,��; .... ..... �"­!-:.'".�'-­'---­ . ,.":�.,.::��'!.�,,�t,.,..�,.',':.�,it�,c,t; .' . _ ., '' . . .z. , ,. : I.: I` 1. �;':% - , % I.".., '0�'tW' 1 an � -:..,..' . _ , " , : . � ." ""'��N ."::,. , .%%�,-�,�..-;...".."".,��-,'.'�".:I.,:�,:::.,;.�::,�".,.7. .. .. - ' - ' . *'. , ... k; : '� . . , - : , , - , '* � '_ ­.:.,' - � . - - �:'�' �� , �._. " - , , 'i': � :`:�._�.. * � _� :­'. --.-,i�. ,."�­ ... * � :-, �.:' - ': _ ,':.N"`x"--. �'. - :.. . , I. " - �--S.4,:��.-,.,���,,�.';.,,�.",.,:.,--�",:,�...��:�' , . . ., . :.p,,. " , I., . , " __ .. � �� - . ..' .,,.���;.,�-�'.,.':..t,�,'�,.,.",i j:ii;'�.';-".k�' '�*%i�' - .'�' '�'-,�':-;� , ;"�'��j­R �. � * '� �.-�_; .. . '. . .":. - P A',*.-,: � " .. . - - 'i';�-'--'­'� --.%,.�,�-i�t,'.�,��,,�,�z'�,','!'.'�."�,tt .��%;'.'.'-" "'��"F�'.'j.� ..' ,_,"!` ." � '� '.: : , .: �':�'-.':�*.:"!"'j ?M . . . � X::�....�.�. I .. . �.O ..' '..". ". ' .-,' '.."': ��' :i.'-. - � '. .: *:� , - :.' *:*: '. , . 1. I 1. - , , .' ,. " - - .. -'T.A. ��::.­ � . ..,-: . '. . :: �!; , , . . -,:'�. - .% '!i'...."r -. �.:.'�� ":4 '!:�' i �;�;- .. �i � -. �.N Z! � � K' ": I!0 ��; - � � - , ..;�..�.:,�:�..:.....��;,�:...,:t,:� . '.. . , -.* . � �.,.�.-�::�*.,*..�.'.-.'.'..',��ij�i.�,��k,�,"� �'� !'_�'. .. .�'%:'�*. � '.. �.:�%"� ...... �_�':.' �­ ." ,':;�'. : , ..�- .:,-",:, � I,' 'Yz�:;;e� ";....�'..'. .;�'�::i. 5�.',�'�:"�. �:'��";:-- 4��`---?i;' - - , , ... ' ":'.'!�%:':.-� � . .� :so . ..... , � ' " �:":t""�.!:*,-.-;�.,,,..,.".;i, " ';"R'� I'�:,�...-,::.:.,.;�;:..!:;.:��..,-�:.i�.�,..'-..:�,��'.'-.,!','�,,�-r�.:., ' '. t'c""', ... 1: - " _', - " . . �.: '.'.:l�'.:-:: � . 1 . 11 . , . .1- 1, -.';� � .' �' ...' '. .,' . ':�:�. -'A , , . , . " .,it Rk 11 p !W!�'�:*,' , 1. T." ­A :*!';-;�"'L­Z:��x_ _;' , , " __'."­. , " , � , ..''. . � ".;� '� .-,N"' .:,"', � NL om-� , " 'Q '�� I -..; "'.' �� i gq , �in --- .. �: �%" '..:i.,!.";,�""i:.�!'.�,�::�'.'."�.'..','.."..:I�:".."�l�'*,-',",'�.*�,,��-..O; --- * - ' '�""C­14";� - - w , '� � �'�-__ - ­� - "";fs l',IX"'j­ffl'4 -W� v ay " 'OA �:. ::. - �'. ; � .'l;`lY':I;w -',"� ­.."... .. . - I . : 0 '. ; , =w " , , ��". :,..:% '�­ .. .:'': :.� . , ...: OUG6�:""...".�'�c:��l'i�,;�..,�,�;"��-...-..:��l;.;*�il:�*,,,�,)�,,,'�i�)I -WIll�'�tt'4'N'Wih, �..',.,���i�'i,r.,'��!;�,."'.i.i�i�,;�,';.�'.-'.-��'i,"���-,-��,."-::-:.:"..-.� ' �;',:-"-*�� ­: , - �. -i�-'li-':" " � � t.q �.'...�....' � '' .. ' . , �"':- ... ',',�.:..'.� . '�' j":j:::l',l�...-." '�.'-j':�: .. .... �'- .":...:. �.­.: . ..... '. - '.- - , -.�.'-.-;%":�i- .1, i : � :'. i.: ,: .I :' ,' ' '.�:.�;:'-"�.: '.-.'.'-;'.' �: '-'..�:�.--: .... :�j�"" I , jw p"?, - 11-1111, .... -1 - -7. 4 1,�".A;i�fAl;.,i,;:-.",..-.'2�-� �'.�i,'.,,",.k"'�.-.',..�lk;��,���N*��'.1t! �,,���.,��,.,?;"i:,.,.��"."ii�,,�,,��.l�l, "".:-. � , , 'K7"::'�"'."i __ ­ .::,.., . � .� �,;:::.",�.", - "i, .'q�"Ii ;1" '! . - " . ':-'.-'..�."4'.':.,;'�:%�'. , .; �' pqg klf'g ..:: ­.­ �... %, : _. - .:� *�', "� �1:.` 1-11-11-11.10M,", ':'4 � �i. , - f':i:�:: :.""i,;:��.,.,;�,'�.*..�."��*e�'�,',-���:.!.��'..-�l- "10; --l"'I". "'�ikV'�li_ 4� (' " .- '��n" -�'-';��' � , - . " . ' -.'.'.' , i'�'-.-- . � , . ' _W';� "'�­Ps"'.'; � !�' .' 1. i , . � " '. , � ' ,'..I.'. "..� ", " . : ...:� �: . . . . �:.... " - I - " ":';.�-C"�' :��"'?:.' .":�'� . .�� �,'.':'­. W-': - .', -.1-111 i M " , .� �: w , . . .:: . .. "', -1s. -I I- I'�,�:.�;"��:-�::j�,�:.'.'.""�l",'Il�;!,�',,7i "T;':� '�"....'�'. - , . '!;'�.��"-,"':,'il�.��'.' . . , , . ' _­' t"' " -.';'-.!� I ... "I - .. ',�" '%'� '��';*'��j�: - I ,N '11��"I'sl K . ",.. :._. ..:,.,. I I . .: . � -:�'::'.'?; il- "I'll' '��I,' , -.1 ;I .... i, . " _11 ." -9'�i".-T "��;' - '?� .­�.Ril" W."��rp'A�"""�":;' .: .. .... � . , "_:..'::"­�:".: .--I� .. . . ... , .. � " 'I , ," . . . _q'. '.",171� '111'1'oi�" Z� It'; ;�. " ,7 . . . , . I , . . , ."�.�'�!!�;'�-:+' .... . � .... 'W' 1'. ' ,A"";.,, jiI'-�'lfgi��." � ,piv��k"�.".?.I:,:�)�%,�,',����";�--,��;� - - R OR , , sw&A:�.11;11' * ':.1 -.,..,' � : - � . . , � Vol -MM I '. �'.. , � ', �': - . .N."u.i. fg­ g.--'-.-��-��­.- .11b.- l­­.'.V";!�!ji . �' . , '. , . . _' , .'.� ;'�")'.' WE ,:: h'..' i�'­­ .... . .: '� , , ,,, 11, (I , .� �' :%:...' , !'..... .: :. , I I , - . , . . - I � �: '�. 0111 �' . � � %, �'l;Aq ��,­g I jl"�5jq._ . )Mv ! 3­"'�� , .. , .. � " 'a , � .' '� , i� � ,�4 11 I ,M,QLWVIJ,j�A'�­�iC�` '&` `­­ .. ." '. . - ". -.!..,;"".":�.-.",.,�:.*.�,�.,...-...-",.",..i���.!'..,-;,;"�.,'-.i,!.-.��.....'*if)'�',.,,*!:!...,�",.;,�....,:,.I? ',. .� :. . . . % .'__,'..-','�"g '. . w-��.-��7,z:�-.':i` ,!,';'!.�.,:Zi,T,.;..,::,..,�,-:..'�-.;-,.., '. .:. . , .. � . �i � 0. ;;�'��'I-' I um"O. '111�� �1�6' ; .", .::.' , . � '�'.! , . . el : ,%� " t'�,.t,;�4�,��\i,',����,i:��,��,',�� -.:,..' - g �m �­P­ .j.w'. � � . ,� 'A 1 "Z--'. ­"':'�"'�" ­". ­"­­"­­' ". I. . �': 6' , , . � , mmmil�l�.,��,.�;"!.:��',�i��.-,.'..,!��,".:,��":�,..""��,'.'.�7�,.,..�,,,:;,:. .. , . .. . , .. . . .".�. "Mll�kl;jsi' I 0 A , '� " lll� -, , f wwavywy? %A-lv "y � �%'�':�; � � 'i�'.'_` I `� ) , ,,�,'.-*!�,�,,�"""..,�,�.�"",i",.. ...t.-,.. . W ­l gglygy-Ow-MMAMR1 5 , � - . � NI'M �i 11 t Ml g . � 'kD �' - a , il"R'­j","�'(' IS IN ,%4W, li"� M91 ,. v .. . ."R , g$& .- ­�:;-:.-­ , I Mfflo' v, .'." " ... ;,.:,�",\"�,it",,f�4".".�'l.;. p'lil;.�'e'rl"'��' ,� - . . ";".�.-."�'�.�-.'j�..'�,;��;�.'*...;If�,.:����)::,., j..: . � .. V, -' ... . . '�:.-. m; , , r% . . !�­: ".� ': ) "I � ... . �' . .:. � I -*.!�',. " ", ­""-i...�"':��Yll . ­.. : ' 1. " . . . " ." I :� --�:'­­"'M"'Ilj2� , , �g'�lj ?;'�..*-*!!i--"-.' '. I "j'i r�? , " ". ."".,. "­.' ..��l..."."..�.--"":Izll"�,�..:.;".". ,. " , N , , , 'k -"�;"""�t""'4 , . . ...-Ill .. .... 1�tW­11,�. �' I t�g '. �% _f �'�4"',"�' ,,�:�'i:�i�:i��,*,;,�'.'.,I�',"'.'O."*�'�'��,.,:.:�-�,,i� "'. ' � I . . , 1A "A , '�� , j''g 9��'j , , , g , ';�\�I"g'�l , �Viq' .5.i&NU O � .' tj-"I'��'- "�"'g'g��g �' � ! .1 , I " M". . ),w.'�-'� . !�"; -w� A;"'��'*"�`�i;4' X� � f..': -�"-:.,:-."'�' ::, `rl'*�NM.l Ii, 91, �11 . ... .... � . ..... I..i.,�.I..-"I,;�.'�R,,',,".'�"L;��l.��'.����. - .' ... �..';"�. `.i. I -%-� kl... - �:,"'-.. - .,- - 1. - - , . . � ` I ,4 W'� 1%1111.1"NYZ�'- ­�Og ""$ ... :- , - - ..' .; �� , .;�.'. _ . 1 j'�41111�!::;k'!',M"'.'� I',,", ).­­lRv .- ........ ,,­ "'... . . ..': � .1 I ... ­.'.'.­ll'."'4.'­..' � - ­."'­;w,tjj! � I "'l.l"%J­ll" , :";.,,,'�.z.,�,!;���'.'�,.',��'�-' ;:� � : - .., . , �'�­­ .... , " � . -.-­�111­"' '\K." ' .;:, �% ' ' "4,4 I - -­.'.�� . � - � , '_­'_IA4�� � . ­_ . , - .�:i,"':.-v�� . .� w-�.- " -� "". � ­,';pw"'­-. ON'I'Ql'��j , . � " �_�":"�:��O' . � , I , . - - , ."­.. !'�'._� �::. !:R' , '. .7� - "I , "S",-- - -,:" �.. .. , ; � . .:, .. .. . . V.- , ­ '. � :0.- .'�- 7'. Ig -I4a4z"t'K%�'--'j .-: .' i ., oi�� ')" ,,, t . ..; -�t­n" - "..' . k�?"`\�""Aq-"2"�" , , ­­.. . , :�::'.-.'. " .. .:. ... , - � .�! - - ., '­'­ ... - -, ,. ,:! '��..i.:,'�. - , lt'�%�­.­- '111.­"�­ , 'i� ;�'lg"",g.�' , . , . . . � ',&'; .'�,�.;,�'�;�.:.�'ll,�.,�I&I��z."",�,", - , -.'.'j'. �"",I.r.,�,�,,,;���,�,��?r"�, "'Ntq;'�' '.­";.-;�.­�'­.'.s ;-"....�..-:�-4.,Zi�i)�:...."..;.,.� :"-'�-'.o"-%*-""'.':--�' , , ...­'_"'_"".'lg'gl .:', ­,".:­ ' .. , .� , - .; - �:.,.": � .. .. , ­ .. . '-s....""", , �. I . _. " '',:::v - . , - - ': - ' I, W11:11, _'.l'w"i'Z"�3'jI!'llzy "I' ­­'..',�'.:".:"'il' ,e' - I-x';"' ­-*". .. . ...". -,:,-, - it :' w - ' __ , I i�"­_ '%�' " �';' � � . , ".." ""k!"�' ": ..1.11 :.1 ..� . "...' " , , .:�*:".' .. � : " W. I i;�. I.% � - I F.' � %. � 'k, � '.." , ". �.' -�---.' vi-`.' *.; � .� � T, '. ,,.�.-�,,,,,",.ii"l��N',t��.*'."*��-i � '-, - ' � 1.tli: .'�':" :. " . , '� , f,��g!,.,��l!"s�',,.%���,,�,�,-.,�.:,\.:� - . , I , -��,% -fm �' �­' - AlkWIM-Wil , , '% , y '. , . .. ...' , . ,: .. .. 11 Ili— t'4: K7 �--.'N' ­.';ivj'.!�!��4 "�g��".'.�"'�-'. �� I .. "_:,� � "':i, -, - , ,�"' , .. _ ­:-.4�'i'll- I.--", �.�6' :-- .. . '- ­­ - , �'-'-. ,q.A"".*qq" ... MN I 'Y ?';�t :V., ''� "., 'k ...... . . ". "'�'%""� " g , , I " .,;��'�.�*,,�i.;�4�,;".;.,!.,;,�,�,,�,(�.',MW " Q __ w- M j .. . ..' . .. . , , "'_ ":. - AW � r%"V<R`� --h -��A,.%­'�r' i . !!'!�� � ­;-� R7, MI I I I � - � � -:....� r;:".'!' ',." " -.'."'..N"R'��' ,;;; .... t""':"� ..... I . :' , _'� ,' .. . ll ""�� .' , '�:.�' . 11 � . � �� --!Al , - � - ::, . . .:. . � ,I _1 � Tl4.f_'�-'Vi"'ll."l_': ..;,'­.- - k :: IN ( i X�.'� - - .:,:. ' '::��' A� '� " - I . , g"'L"i ..�.­ -�. .� , : ". ���' ." �'��'..:, " I '�'Ig �l.:.:.*.4�:.."�".,.:�:,�;-.t.:. _� _��j:�-' W '� P �,,�...:.�i"y.,;,*�:.''.".,.,.I���,..!,,,k�l.i,�t!,',%�k� �,\?.,I�"i,;""�t;::,�,�...��,.i.�..���",'.!:.,..�-'.'.��:�.'�- "�� . .. . . I . . �� **** � , � , . . .0 � �J 1.11 '? I 'M RQ"Mz�­�-�::;.' I !, ll�llrlrxk'�' �i . � to mm"T��QMRM ! .k;,�',�,�".,N"I"l���"!:".".�",-,%.. �. . -, '­.- ­, , , ' - ' ' "I;":��'-.-jO�';.% N"&-"a-w�w ,,,, - . " 115 . I "�K�ill".�,�",X,i"�"I.k�..'�""���lt"�l�,�-- `_--'lll',_­_­'­ ....... . !;�,�ii:li":"�..�,�....�%'�,.�l%,.,.��'- .. "�i �'� . ". I I., � I "� . . ''. .� � . . .:.. '�:;�., �:'��_�.�_�e' .. ..."'I'MI&Y, � 'f�6yz;.'�"�."':.t�'�- '.. ..."', . . �:;�.. "'' " tg lvg;'.lVi' - .�' , � _.�'_', , .:.. �'ggw' , . , " " .. . �:`;`_'!:.�"��_:�`.�.. � � �'-,'-' A'A"O'A" !! gi"��'I�i' q. , , . M �'��"!.'!-'.`�" . � . 96010 .%.. NP �'�*�:; ...... _.- �. . �:��'.:-�-';�,-�� 'gaug"',' I � 1; -'4"R' -'.I!f� , , , :�" "I. '' �!'I'.)�­t ---- 'r :'.� MAN I � ..7-;":'- �­ ­"­ ...", ""i\-,ji, .'-;fi� �'i'�'s�Wlzi:.'�.�y.i'e_ -.,�--,�.:,:",��"'.4�,l�,�",���i�'. . j ' ""'' - qwwmws�j l'l%.'.l�:__"'.. � .. ...... �"�.- . .. �.... .11-WIMM vi; i k�"'��4!.,;�i;,�-'-"�;,�.-,,-,t���-;��.-..�z,,i,.�--.-,.---�., ­­­::"-;.'.f*­'f"A , �!"' . , I . - . � , .q . . ..... ",& "'��§qliip"'*e�.'i�:�j � , , '-.':i:. �" .�::�.�:� , , I I PN, NIM': ­) . ... . ............. ­.­ " .W' . "-';."�"-.;'­' ��K-,.,,��,�,lt\',,���,,�*;",�,.'��.',,"",�,,��,*,,�,,,,, ­�.:. - I I I Il �' 111ky, 'KX . . '' ,. . '. � �.­. , -k '� R 1"... , � " ". � I&RIMIR " .i; , '�Z' " �� - - , ly-" ;Rk"-."':."_:-'X ,Mv--'-..-�f`�.�"i-' ;""""' ".. ­" . "';-�%L"P:.. , I il " , ,�lll,,�,,,,',�, R, �l "'� .1 , . . , - - . � r.- �Rp � " I M '� '� ll"� , -�','Vkllli."�",,�,��::;;.!,",,;- . "*: ..'...P. �� , �i­­� ' , V� � �4 I a2z". "'l:W.;�:­ ' -�"':::.�.-: � '�O'Pj ,.""�*.��i;!.,.:;.".."".,.:�l*,�.j..,, ':.�'.* " - , "� . It gy'll � '�"i%�t - - � .� �gi' .,I). !?�'�"' __'_ � -'- 1 . ig & �s .%% � ".".­ , � "WU& ..", 1'�'7 ME q M. , - m5samml.* BW.� . R .1 " .1`1:1.�Y;I.h - W"'-"'VQiV ��' . . , - . I'�,��I)T..YI?4�","-e*"�'ll,�',�ll,��,.�I , I " M I � . �' '' . ,:. .- .. .... -1 P" RK - .." -, ." .��' , . , . P. . .. ... - .�:-'-�:":� ,-:-'.-:�. 111 !"""'j� I I MM4 - ". A Ww% - , *1 .:" �:� � �:' .:__,", ..� 1'.. �'p , !.':'��. 711 %% j'�',-��4"';-::: � -',;A*' . i��!. .�"\g \,I ;�- ijj"V4`�"I'� '-'Sl'��` I-— . ,".'Zi, " ...... . , .. - ." �'. , k � R 11 'Z" ,. . . . Y�'� ly'�-Vi"- �'!'. l'­';j'K'­'� ,�.'t�'�';'i��' �' "':_.: ..- ,,, i � " - ' ' :. � . -, � 'T - - . " , �'�..� - :��;�"�":..' :.,.: - !I,"::,."...:_, . ,.... 'I " 1'ql'�ll � �Z!"'.": '. �: . :- - � � -1 RI-i"I'lls"n . W!; �� "'pv".m� �-��-,�((�.�z�.',!-�'k�"f".z��-', -.-:�r,'-:'� -, T -71 "RONNONW -'.� , " wg& "'! �.! . I . _4'.,. : ' tA v I'M g R .:- � ... �� 'g% 1 �" 'I , , , . � .. _�:. , I �:::'... .' *. ' "jip'­""' "":­' ..' ' - I ::��'-:`::: �"�'��:' . , , I I _-� ' � I , I '�� 11tw. I , V... - RN i?, .!�� .-� 4 1 � . '. - MM. Q;W' .'; l O K - 1. . � " � % . 1 � � , ... 1 .'.. "W�4: 1 X'! I "i 1 W ""f' ' . ... �:�.'._.".. ".:­�'�'�mv'l I �sx"-.';�'q - I I— . .'. � , j� -�" - -%­'� ,? - " ',�lit,.�l,""�,115t���N�.11,,, - ' ". . . . �k' � � - -i �" t.... : ' � , ** I � � '." N t 'g -g';�� ;;�,m�il!li"�lil�,N-!..2i�.�.�.� I . . . . IPON!'%- � ; � ..: :':- .' �� 11 - ' .... Ag k '. �11_y," - - �� � . SIM I '��11.1\,.; : �­ � . � . � I I � � LyLg t M ; . �...' "".1 .'.. . . ` " a �:'�i' �. .. . , , . . , � , . I . � ,�,l��'Y'��""�,,",�i,���,,�'�-.i,�i,,,��,�,,�.�: :.-I,. i I IN! _�' 1 , I .' - , .,:, - ­.,:..:.:_ o Ill, .. �Ax - ',.' � . g� M-*.�;'!': * � . 'v, ��z ggg 1� , �'Ml `\ ... I f, "A'41111�1�;'�'i�;: ,I " ­;)"�- .". - .. � � k5 . " " , , 1 P, - ?I ! I , N:..-- I �':��'i,"'-�"'�'�'.'�' I., .,,,.,,:t,i�.;",::....,���;.;�k�.�'�-.;�.-,.,. �f 2 ­­_. �. .l"-.l'::l�:�'-.i'.-:­ '-'.':��.- 14 , "'! S " a no ­­ , I low Nov � . ­ , ­ �� . .... - 11 . - `!­ ' ' AWl4AllwM.lrrv� . '--'4`l;':, "� - �. . @�)� . 1. -11 W!"'W'.... . �;' ;'�'-;:: . . . ,V��,,,�,)%,'O.',I',��'.�l.,�"'.' �': -'. .­ .. � �- - - �.'o "', , "��: i , = � - � :'V'kl'tw.��"v �- � '�'­" . � ""I" . , .'M � t'.� ".� ... I , - , - - - I '51",11YI I \A k :�jlk-'L` I...." � 4_.­,,�,'.�4�'.:'._ :.:..; ,. ''.�: ,'.':". M." , , . I 1 N , gig �'%.�'. � '�� ' . . Mam &"O�Y- f � -� " ,If � ' - p " % ­ - �Wwmh 'I., - , I , � -..:s � '-'.'� - - -'�� �:. . . ". -* tt'�livi;'-kz�r �V'Irt�.::'. .� *� ." ,'; VIM - . �:,�';'�!'m' � , ll� ..�"M' � - � , , , :,.�.": :...,. ; gkgjf'� �"' V, '! . " : : *.' "I 8 , 1 , , a .� __:.�'-: "'­'�".' - . . -, .'.%.t'.:'.'-'.�' .. ;' , A -, I, PiI .,.l?"" 1, "' = ., ".­..';"'�%'�� �:!. , '. ... i "��.' I,; z g. i - �. - - - Awan ", '� r,!� '�'I.i�"' I - . . %, O"I: ", , '�':.­.. '�`.. . �' � 4 4 . "" v I �wf.­;��..i,'­.��'�� '­­-:'�. � �' �' I'll, , " , '11'1:�.�'!i,!­.�'.�� "� ��'',_ � � . . - I -- ­ .. g pq I 1 * il, www v �O7� - --.. .. �.' , .. � . I -1 Mgm .i.:%�:.�.::, ... .. �.; , '.." ,.'.-,-.- . .1- . . . � � . � 'M*_wM 11 I I M I . , . - R " , , i . � .... , .. .' , , ­"' , *. �' W Mw g- ; ,,, ' '�" ie,,,�!,I�,i�,�,.",..-;,��.'ii':' R.� . "��' R .' . . � . . 1. :" .. . ,. �.�' �:-. .. i �1.�'�f.. '. `,:`�-:..�,-.... : . . : ,. . , . . I %� , ' 11 �"' ___­ . 5� " I - � � �" I o" g ' � � ��'. . I M -t. -J. I R . li 'W" . , . . . , . ' - : , I �.,... � w ( I ..': ,-'. . . . __ .. ' 4"�*."*X'.. .. - : �: - - : �') W-1- '�`�*lq -::*fM-"": 'A I . i �"� "I'M " , . . _." , � "" . 1. 1 - 4'- E kk�' ". , ".i .4"". I , . 1,,-'.,�!J -.:,.*,,. ­': . . ... ......... ". ". , "g. ,. �.'.. "' 2 I ly _� �lfz 'j I 01�17. � ��J.. § �.-'ffl"�. � � . ". " '. .' 4"".""4 ,: .. - .", '. .:,: : . .��_' ". , . ..' I , " ­"' C.- .' " ''. . " . . - �:11:4!5't " '. �'V-44'yg';k- ;-g ---- :..:,l,.:: '­� . . , . '­.'�'_. � , - .:, �. :-1111 Rq : ! o I, L, � 1. . .:. .: . """ " ' "' ""' `_ ' 1 "".4 , '. _ . [ . . " � j..�" . . . "' " " I I I - I .1 1, 45, " "", ll��,"` � M ' . . �- ,I *IA'i-:A' A 01114 : :. & W. I �� -; , " '...--".i "l.".*:%.r -�--: , . , . 5 I�N " ' `­ """ .' . , . v �o; � , _�"":"' - �� .'� A .' 11 . _ """'%"---.'--i'.;'l . : ' " I.'� ' , "il W, .-IM . v-" � i QA I . _.: ' -' , -1: I qj, :�-'�:�;:;:: `11 -11 . 11 "I "A.""ll;T�N .. " , .. . I., , M 10M. ve jQQ_ - , - �I`�N'.' ..:� "I *%'��'lf 11 MANIAl i � ' . �... "I .. , '. � ,'.... O " 6 i 'P ," ".....�".%,,.,!,,�,�-,--i:i-,.����,��,-,�:-.'.!-�-'�*, ',� ..".": I 1. I '' !�'� I -'.�'��:,��!::-.'-:::..-.. , .1. I "\R �' , It, � � N g , , 'Ngt" 11"'Noy',,"ll., � -1, U, -;; . � �140�i!::.'. :: .. _ .'� " .'�.". '4.814. g'i.'. � �1'1' '­'. . . ,�� '. , . �"..� ..-..�;��.,,,..,.k.....-�,!,�:.�.!.I.- �6'.'e� s I --.?�D'r.i.' _ .­:'.;:­!!,,.-- -�-' � . 11 ".. - M . , ;:..::'j:�..-: : ' - "Ill. � g'�: I �'� , � ... ... . I . "I,-- " , , � I", ­" ­ I Mv ON , � ". �� '� ��,,�,,,,�,�i'��,."�,��i-.�,�,�""t".�;� '_:... � ". �Q�� n � ' - I -v M'. , "... -, " . , , I I lif, , '.. . , , - �� . I , , ��� , 6 � , � i , I� '5.� � � ", - I , , I , " ';'*"X-":" ':--.-� t- ..'...' "",I I ... I � 'I �. - " , � � , L. I j, '' . ..--.� I - .W'( I � ��,'.­'._? � - .. - , . . � -= P, " ' . .III-, - g � � I � 8' 8'.,,,,��,i�li-_!�' ,'.:'.�4 ... ­� !� . � "­--"� �lt I � �_*'� I j� !on 0 '� - 1, �:'� - 10; .,'�I, '�� ­ I I % gg'� 31 - . � IS, m-WOM '(� I . ' I.". - .. , �-::--:.�'��'� .: � .. -'...' - I'll � ' 11., q 0 1 :,.'.: ."'., , " , , � i; . "I'll j , "' ­ , I " - ��� �1: I 1 i � � �.:.; i k"A L " ':� ,`.'. ... 11 4 � t'-'".-.'l.':�- .�_ - - ­ , , " ... : . . . . . . ...;fr GuM. ,..ar,. fi G r+ Z Y '2 u , ,.Y °MW R. c i , ?y,,,.,., ,r. !{�'rg �•:.r; .,j�,` Yi1,fi""ry •tr �' iq �: �' rd rri'>,v�; r 4i._...rl`'FC 1K+L#� NWMY:A111�r4rdfp.7>"+lri >p tiap��;,'."t ;'n!r: :hL,{ os:•.......... ....._ ,,1;.,it;{( i,Cl,�t,e�n\:r:�,C{Y�1)yiS s1`iS�� s�s\FCV?�,'(',, r)jl;, .,14''LY3�...,rn>.,ac-r,.i<,tra'�„i'i<.nan:.;;:o•.,pa..... .. . . ;a•• i�.l`ly,6�,.r�' .t ,r> a� ii?Ys,..� :.tti,',i.: "(u, .,i.,:.:,i.'. Sv s <., s 1 ,,.;,,•.,..,_:.:::;^,.;::.•:;:.:,::...:,... ,, a �. e.SU. to e ...\ •l5•e :�iti='Xty,,kl:i:., - ••1••ytC!'�V, x'i.i'. J r •iyra••vl{t a:ol:�. � •:1-..� p.. �,.,.a' •:r.:g:. , ? , :65�. --_-.. _.,...:.,.�•Mwaumvr:r,.s. YY,YJas.uk3lhl,.I. .. - --._......._.. ., .. _. _....,.,r,,:„..wx>L..a.,a.K:e>`1f4..�,.0'”lift:...:t.l.a.i..,B.I�i.S�h'�'�i 4: :.....e�>r„...:41..,. a. d.,.'�•.. SS�A�1.4.d Sn YfL ,... �. ��'l �� `• of � .. . �., � �,_.. •'�� :_ .lL� ,.�y � . �Y ��.l. j. .• .. . . � .. .: :. . �. rw�YrC. ui1:�f."' • ,�� �..:_12t... �...wrwnr� yj N m'.iu .q , ..Y'i`�'...x,�'r .�.�.t..... i ,.1 ,� 'i..�:'.�..y.J (';` l��,w ..�y . u•: .. :.'iC :• �.��!. W,.r . ;•. Vis', y .. .. � < � c..zz�� � � � *�� � 2. � � � $� \�� � � y� � � � � � � � y� ƒ ..����qk�����\�/���'\��� _ � � � � ƒ % 23��<� ; � � \}\ \ ����>�»c..= , _ ,. ����9�����: "WAN, . .. ...... . .. 7. a js p, -q NSA mum gs Tom ................ Application - ICOR - _�N Certi cate of 14 �pry riaie�tess W 1�ACRi_ �;. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION • `�"L of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY rsGS 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http:l/w►vw.stjosephcountyindiana.comldepartments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPCQco,st-joseph.in.us OFFICEuSEaNtt3»»>nnHo7•cffaiPfS!-,,KAN� PWRIPS Date Received: V)AL Al4_sN_� Application Number: 0907 Past Reviews: ❑ YES k, NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: l C1 Z Local LandmarkElLocal Historic District(vame) ❑ National Landmark �AlatlonalRegtstarDistrictnam�t Certificate of Appropriateness: Dented ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work; 1905 College Street, South Bend, IN 46628 (Street Number— Street Nance—City --Ztp Code) Name of PropertyOwner(s): South Send Community School Corporation phone#; 574-393-6000 Address of Property Owner(s): 215 South Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 (Street Number—Street Name--City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Hebard & Hebard Architects, Inc. - Design Project Phone #; 574-234-8907 Contract Company Name: To be determined through bidding process Address or Contract Company: (Street Number-- Street Name—city—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: Vacant (Single Family -M:rill-Farntly—Comnrerctal Government—Jndustriai—Yacaxt—elc.) Type of Building Construction: Brick, Steel, -Concrete (Wood Frame—Brick---Stotw--Steel--Co►rcrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ® Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not !n -kind) 191 Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: After obtaining the Ct'__ffLcpte of Ap roQiLaenPss_ the SB S(; will moue forwardwiffifinslizing th___project bidding documents and accent bids to remove tha required a sbssj s cmI rialsj h the entire building, & develop the site for use by the Marquette I?t mourry Montessori Academy �tii�iQJlts, staff, {� cnrn_rnuttity. Included are preliminary[ site development drawings showing an exeanded,plpyaround area. oxen oIav areal soccer field, walking paths, raised garden beds, garden storage bid., monuments Incorporating materials repurposed from the old school. Owner/Contractor Pax II., 57 _2£lq.sgoo7 e-mail: ms niaUkj@,$J1csc.ic12.jn �G (Staff wfll correspond with only one designee) X �, -' ..ai✓ and/or X nsture of Otif�c"r'l 3 Signature of Contractor s f� —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON "VERSE SIDF,-- M 07 August, 2017 SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION 215 SOUTH DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. BLVD. SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 45601 TELEPHONE: (574) 393-6000 Elicia D. Feasel VIA Hand Delivered Executive Director Historic Preservation Commission Of South Bend and St. Joseph County Law Building 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. South Bend, Indiana 46601 SUBJ: Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to Demolish the Old Marquette School. Dear Ms. Feasel, This correspondence is intended to provide additional information to he included with the South Bend Community School Corporation's (SBCSC's) application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the Old Marquette School building, located at 1905 College Street. y A feasibility study was conducted by Hebard & Hebard Architects and presented to the School Board of Trustees, on April 23, 2007. its purpose was to give the School Board logical options and costs needed to evaluate and decide whether to renovate the old building or construct a new building. Four (4) options were developed, our elected School Board voted to build a new Montessori Academy in lieu of renovating, investing $17,000,000 in the Marquette area community. (See attached Study Exhibit A.) The original construction plans called for the demolition of the old Marquette School after construction of the new building was completed. That part of the property where the old building stood was to be used as green space for use by the students, staff, and Marquette area community. The South Bend Common Council passed Bill 61-07 at the request of the Historical Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County designating old Marquette a Local Historic Landmark. The Mayor at that time, Stephen J. Luecke, vetoed bill 61.07. The Councils legal advisor and the Mayor's legal advisor disagreed over the Mayors power to veto, and this legal standoff still exists. (See attached Exhibit B) A The Old Marquette School last housed students during the 2010/2011 school year after which they were moved into the New Marquette Primary Montessori Academy (MPMA) in ,lune of 2011. The James Lewis Casaday Costume Collection was displaced from its home at the Rise Up Academy, and until a permanent home could be arranged, it was moved into the first floor old the Old Marquette during November of 2011. It remained there until the summer of 2015 when the costume collection was relocated to its present home at LaSalle Academy. The Old Marquette is now vacant. 9 The Current condition of the building is very poor, the heating system is no longer viable and the natural gas supply has been removed. The water service has been removed and the piping system is now plugged with rust debris. The electrical service is still turned on for the security and fire alarm system to work. The electrical service is old and under sized, it barely served the needs of the old school and could not allow for the use of A/C, or some kitchen equipment. The roof is beyond repair, has pulled away from the parapet wall, and leaks into the building in many locations. The building's masonry requires a total restoration and the smoke stack requires rebuilding and is currently fenced off to protect people from falling debris. The window frames are rotted and barely able to hold the plywood covering them. The list goes on and includes all items related to the building e.g., asbestos removal, and all interior finishes, A.D.A. compliance, lighting, technology, security, life safety, Kitchen, Cafeteria area, Administrative areas. The Hebard & Hebard study identified theses needs in the feasibility study. (See attached exhibit A) 9 The SBCSC's vision for the Old Marquette building does not include repurposing or selling to a developer for alternate uses. The Old Marquette building is located in the backyard of the new MPMA and is just thirty (3 0) feet away from the edge of the parking lot and is just a few more feet to the playground area. They are both located on the same seven (7) acre lot with the old building taking up about three (3) acres, and the new building having the remaining four (4) acres. The State recommends seven acres of land for a primary center. The long term safety of children, along with long term functionality of the new building requires that we retain the whole site. The current daily parent drop off and pick up extends south down Brookfield St. and wraps around Hamilton St. The students attending MPMA do not have the same access to outdoor learning and green space as the other primaries. With the current security challenges that are faced by all schools today, voluntarily allowing close access to our children or fixture access as properties change hands makes alternative uses not an option. ➢ The SBCSC has three historic buildings it currently uses for the education of its students, they are Jefferson Traditional Intermediate Center, Madison STEAM Academy, and Monroe Primary Center, The SBCSC has invested millions in the renovations of these buildings and continues to take excellent care of them.. Over the past several years we have replaced, with accurate detail, the storm damaged cupola at Jefferson along with replacing five (5) roof sections, and cleaning/ repairing the limestone. At Madison we have repaired the masonry, and cleaned the limestone/ brick on the original part of the building. We also replaced the slate roof section on the south side this year. We continue to maintain the Monroe Primary Center after a total $18,000,000 renovation was done in 2010.1 believe the SBCSC has shown its commitment to these historically designated structures. 2. ➢ SBCSC's primary mission is the education of children. The SBCSC currently has five million sq. fl. at Forty-one (41) facilities including the Old Marquette bulding. A 2012 Hebard & Hebard Facility Study showed in its Facility Conditions Assessment, that our facilities are in need of $91,159,705 in capital project needs, that amount has risen since 2012 as now estimated to be $102,000,000. These dollar amounts do not include any major remodeling or additions, just maintenance needs and upgrades. Our CPF has been severely affected by the Circuit Breaker tax caps, decreased assessed property values, non-payment of property taxes, and pension liability. Our enrollment and school utilization rate is declining due to the effect of school vouchers, charter schools, and open school district boundaries. The idea of creating a program or remodeling the Old Marquette building for SBCSC use under these current enrollment and financial , challenges is unrealistic. Investing any resources into the Old Marquette building when we are struggling to maintain the school buildings currently used to educate the children of our community would not be a wise use of limited resources. (See attached exhibit C) ➢ .The SBCSC feels it is time to move forward and create a site that enhances the (MPMA) and the Marquette neighborhood community. Deborah Cyrier, the Principal at MPMA, has just been awarded a Farm to School Planning Grant with the goal of becoming a recognized Farm to School Program. (See attached exhibit D) We have the support of the MPMA parents, PTO, and the surrounding neighborhood community. (See attached exhibit E) ➢ We have submitted the architectural drawings showing our vision for the site, it includes two (2) memorial monuments on the south end of the property, they will incorporate the medallions removed from the Old Marquette building into their construction. There will be enough irrigated green space for the children to learn, play soccer, as well as other physical educational activities. The sidewalks will be repaired, new '.walking paths with benches will be added, and trees and landscaping will be planted. There will be gardens for the school to use for planting and learning and a brick maintenance shed to house the equipment. The funds for the demolition and site work have been maintained in the budget in the event the veto status could be resolved. ➢ The SBCSC wishes to thank you for your time considering this application and if you would like more information, please let us know. Respectfully, 0 Mike Szymanski, I. Director of Capital Projects Dr. Katherine Turk, Y - Chief Financial Officer ----------- Marquette PrimM Center 1. Facility Evaluation: General Data: Rated Capacity. 450 Enroffirtont., 319 Grades Housed: K-4 Number of Floors: 2 + Basement Number of Classrooms and Teaching Stations: 21 + Library Gross Area of Buildings: 62,700 Square feet (includes basement) Site Acreage: Developed: 21(approx.) Total: 7.2 Acres Year of Original Construction: 1936 Years(s) of Additions: 1948 and 1953 Year(s) of Renovations: 1999 Rotary Summer Rehab Is' floor toilet core renovated for ADA compliance in 2002. Year(s) of last Roof Replacement: 2005: All purpose RM (Portion) Year(s) of last Painted: Inside: 1982 Outside: NIA Construction: Masonry and concrete Is this school designed to provide accessibility to the handicapped in compliance with Section 504: NO Location I Site Exceeds: Meets Below Impedes Learning (Yes I No] 2sile is large enough to X No ,met educational needs. Site easi3 accessible X No ,and conveniently located Removed from undesire - X ;able noiseand traffic 7 Topagraphy varied to P. ovice X No :desirable appreaf ance W ithout. steep inclines Site has stable, well drained X No soils free from erosion Si(e is w ell landscaped X No HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc, Exhibit A_ South Bend Community School Corporation Marquette Primary Center Marquette Primary Center 1/ page 2 1. Marquette Facility Evaluation (continued): Mee- ie ow Impedes -LocationISIte J�.Exceeds., Learning (Yes Nol Skiew alks are adequate w ilh x ,desi naled crosswalk, curb ;and correct slope ;Sufficient on - site, SOW r x ;surface parking for start i 'visitors and handicapped Tlaygroundfrecr eafionalareas x ,are well separaled from streets and parking ,Administrative &Service iFacilltlos ,Administrative office areax :includes adeqbate reception t :and wailing areas. :Adrifnistrative personnel are x f ............ :provided sufficient work space: `teacher's s orkroom : Work area is adequate. :(125 - 250 SF) fWork areas provide access of x conyriunicalioWs technology, i Counsefior's Office 4 x ::Counselor's office has ;adequate space (100 -125 SF). *Counselor's office insures X prWcy :Counselor's office has easy x access to student records. South Bend Community School Corporation View North up Brookfield Street Playground fenced and adjacent to College Street HEBARDA HEBARD Architects, Inc. V Summer of 1999 — Rotary led an Interior Rehab project page 3 Feasibility Study ... .......... ......... _.... ...._,_...., 1. Marquette Facility Evaluation (continued): South Bend Community School Corporation .......... Library, Media and Exceeds . Meets ; Below Impedes Technology Center Learning ' (Yes / No) _.._ ._ `l_ibrarylResource/Media ' X Yes Center provides appropriate :space. :Space for technology, including X Yes computers is provided and Kindergarten Classrooms i :Classroom area adequate X Yes :(50 SF per child) i ;Classrooms have sufficient X Yes equipment and rroterial slorae; ;Aticlassroorrss have sinks X Classrooms 1 -4 ;Classroom area adequate X Yes 4. (28 - 30 SF per child) note: ave. 750 SF this is 150 SF belmvstatstateguidelines i _....-.......... ....... :..._ ..............._.._ s. . _ Leafing area provides various X communication technologies Storage is adequate. X Yes Equipment and materials are X Yes adequate. - Chalkboard, bulletin` boards, connputer stations and audiovisual equip, note: limited bulletin board -K-4 Remedial :Classroom area adequate X Yes (28 - 30 SF per child) !vocation is adequate to general X `instruction areas EquJI:iment and materials X Yes :are adequate. HEBARD & FIEBARD Architects, Inc Computer Lab Typical Classroom Bulletin Boards page 4 South Bend Community School 4 Feasib111tr S#udy_ _._._._. 'I. Marquette Facility Evaluation (continued): :Specialized ; Exceeds : Meets Betovr fmpedes :Instructional Areas Learning [Yes 1\40] 'Art area is adequate in size X Yes (45 - 50 Sf per child) :note: 700 SF- approx. 30 SF per child Art area has access to natural i X - ;and artificial Vbhl ........_..r-� s :. _. _ y.. .-. -.. __.. .�.-_..... _ ._.._.._ _ .. .... .. ;Art roomstorage is adequate. X Yes note: lint ted to ariglnal built in 1 cabinets -Art equipment and materials X Yes _ ....... .... ....__.. are adequate - 2 deep sinks ' counter space, display facRities ,bulletin boards, outlets, :Kiln ..etc. _..:...,.........- ---- -- - .. ............._ ... ... ... .. .. . ;note: room Is typical classroom ' :of 750 SF i a Music area is adequate. = X Yes -(38 - 44 Sf per chid) note: area is ok, but located In the basement- not designed °for use. :Music area located ave ay from i X .quiet areas of the building Vusic storage area is available° X yes '(350 SF) Music equipment and materials X are adequate - counter space ' display facilities, bulletin boards and outlets. HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. my Corporation Typical Window at Classrooms Stage in dining !auditorium gage 5 gas South Bend Community School Corporation t-easiotlity stuay,.......... _................. 1. Marquette Facility Evaluation (continued): <�--- ._ ..._ toot .. ..........._.__ -• -toot..,. ---...._......_..............._ ;f=ood Service : Exceeds Meets Below impedes .. . Learning [Yes 1 No] :Area provides for receiving toot X 'storage, cooking, serving _ . ..__ .. toot ;and dining. .. .. ........... ... toot.. inote: receiving, storage and toot . ... ............. ..:.. <cooking all in 475 SF .._ toot. ............................ .........._..... .......... -Area is convenient to service . .......................;:_..�.... toot... X _ ..._..;.. drive fro detiveries and removal ,_toot_____...--- .. .. _... _ ---...._.._..._.....:_.._:...... of waste. toot...-._.. ............................ .. .... toot.. note: drive accessfor street .................... � ......._._....: _._...........;. .: fhrora..gh small 3x7 doo....r. toot . -Seating area accomodates 113; X ..__.,_...__..........._ ... ...-.. toot. . toot ..:...... .. ..: :student capacity. , Teacher's dining area is X provided and of adequate size ;......... _toot.. .....................:. (250 - 300 SF) - note: adequate size remote _.. - _. :.......... ............ - ....._........:...._...... .:... ...; 'location ... _ toot _ Kitchen is adequate in size _.. ... X note: receiving, storage and cooking all in 476 SF ,toot .. ........... ... toot. ................ , - 'Food and non food storage ' :.... .. ........ .... toot ... . • X .. ..-..._—.— _..— —... .. toot ..2 .. is adequate. _. ... •, ----... ... ._. ... _ . -toot ._.......,... ........ . ;Other equipment is available X toot ................ ..:........ .toot ... -. toot toot. Health Service Units ... ...•...._. :Health area is adequate size toot. .. toot X . (250 - 400 SF) -note: area including toilet toot.._ is 125 SF Health Service equipment and :furnishings are adequate - curtained or small rooms with _toot_ ... . ....................._... _:..:.. ... ; cots, H.0 toilet, lavatory, scales t oil ............._..... . medicine cabinet, re#rig. With locked storage, work counter X Dining entrance Kitchen delivery door HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc.VW 1W Page 6 South Bend Community School Corporation 1. Marquette Facility Evaluation (continued): Description Remarks :Architectural Ago"' Roof :1 yr- old water infiltration in spots Exterior walls 'Original =Brickveneerwith Tair condition tuck pointed in 199 :CMU back up .Windows 'Original ':Wood - single pane :highly inefficient- in need of pain B;4er'io­r* Doors ,1996 A lu in in u f n-repla &.a 1. � �� , ced original in 199G... ;Original Wood in fair condition iCellings ',.Original, Migh plaster In fair condition 'Replaced �,Suspended Accoust. :Areas replaced in good condition -interi-Walls :Original .Plaster In fair condition FiOOT Base „Original Carpet /wood base Carpet should be replaced ;terrazzo in corridors jerrazzo cracking - VCT 9x9 Asbestos In areas i___1......... LCasewo!k., ?Original Mood built in inadequate forprosent day needs .'Equipment i TV I VCR on carts .4 student PC stations :Pull down screen essibility =N/A :No Elevator access to second floor One toilet core remodeled -balance original ;,Life Safety systems =1983 iEM lighting and exits ;Corridors only 1 Structural System v Age Description -.Remarks Foundations ;'Original Toured concrete Taircondition Vertical Load resisting system original CMU load bearing :faircondition Lateral load resisting system Original Cast concreto in place. fair condition HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. V page 7 i. Marquette FaGility Evaluation (continLied): :88ochm _�l Syntom___� _} �Age � Description�moaV r---''--'------ �' -� � :3�u. ^ :Steam boilers � - ' . . | __-__---__'-'---_`- ��,oUnD8yo�m -__ � _-- |-'�' / -�' � , ' annmnoerSteam � heat |y� 'Claoamom:OdQ�n| �-- _----'_---'-.......... :Steam�s-� i--�� -'--------------' !Temperature Controls +---__-- iunknown � '-' :Pnoumodo � - - ' . 'PlumbNUo �m ... '������'���'��'� � . ;Originaloe�c - / . � - - . � � �South Bend Community School rCorporation '--r-- _ :Remarks ' - 'Two natural gas fired, steel tube boilers with a 5.23million BTUs per hour *a.'These :units have exceeded their useful life and should | �rapmoedw�haho�� o( heating-' system-u«�-' i ' ___--'_ :highn#ociennynu�m|gas �rodb�|om' 7 --'-------' '-----'--- -'-- ' / !There onm%voubmm'on�mnhand|�gunhsthut 1 �_'.. - - - --'_---_ `.--' pirmide ventilation air to the pyrn and the auditorlurr :Another unit located in the basement provides venitlation air to all other portions of the original 1; .The daesnx�m�i»the nohB�ai_buiW�g�are .bna�d �md��rS�ca�dbo�w�avinduws. Tha1. 1A53 � /-_----_'-_''- ---__' uddNnniaheated wUhuhuamfinned tube ho�w `8e��windows. ' - ''--'----- i '��-- . ::Thermostats, control valves etc. are used through 7,11is recommended these pneumatic controls be :replaced with a new DDC system which will :provide more accurate and flexible co�fro'l`a'rnd :the ability to connect to the corporations system Most of the water piping appears to be original. Jhere is a water heater in the boiler room that ,appears to be new and in good condition. The :unitserves hotwater to the original Jhe building does not have afire protection - � ` HE8ARO&HE8AROArchitects. lmc. �� South Bend Community School ,'Corporation Feasibility§Nqx . . ........... .. ............. . ..... .............. .. -------- 1. Marquette Facility Evaluation (continued): ziiiecir61 System Age f Description :Electrical Service Updated 600A, 2081120V,3 :The M UP w as part of the 1966 renovation of the 11966 ;e)dsfing service. This service feeds panelboards ... ... 'through outthe school. Some of the panelboards were updated in 1966 while others were left in "as 1s" condition. There is insufficient electrical :branch circuits and general dutyrecept`s through'i .............. 't the school for present day electrical needs. ou A Emergency Power and ;unknown JO& 208112OV, 3ph ..... ...... Jhe emergency panelboard services some of the i .( ­­,.­-.-------. -- --- ___ __ -....111-1 . ....... .. it-ighting egress lighting and fire alaram system. Additional', :dual head battery emergency lights have since ,been added. Some area of the school are .. . .... ... 'deficient in coverage or the emergency lights do not operate p(opoit :This panel is tapped ahead of the MDP and is not; :,an accepted method today byState and Local codes. 'General ilium Mationries Incandescent and !Some classroom and selecthallways newer TIourescent :Fire Atarm unknown ;Simplex -This addressable system needs to be updated to jodays NFPA and ADA code requirements. intercommunication System Narles Sys to m near capacity ;Civil /Site ; Age escription Remarks :WaterSupPy ?i "main Nu.n.icipa-11 Service.... 'Storm Water Drainage I Municipal Service as Service :Parking I Paved areas unknown :Asphalt :utility Garr pany Poor condition HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. IMF page V Feasibility Study 2. Marquette Primary Center Existing Plans: South Bend Community School 4 Corporation ....... .... _............ v The New Marquette of 1936 was built behind and to the North of the then existing single story wood framed six classroom school. The School was constructed for $262,760 dollars with 45 % of the funding coming from the Federal Government. The district paid the balance of the cost out of savings without having to go out for bonds. The Architects Austin & Shambleau were hired in 1935 to design the school. This firm also designed The Tower Building and James Madison Elementary along with our present office building on Eddy Street. An eight classroom two story addition costing $296,789 was built in 1953 North of a smaller addition completed in 1948 bring the total classroom up to 26. In 1963 the Tribune published Enrollments of the district's schools and listed Marquette with 823 student in 29 classrooms. HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. page 10 PLA i' ;•.,�:a-u ' "�iYyr �• }deirl r, fnt^yjsj1;, e. ;s1�i.:'+"n"i1r S �I ,11. ..-��+7ifr�'" <•�;tnrrr.A s?s ,,}Nd ,p ni aytii'r �' s:i?i'•89:�1�{� �3 t''+ �Y`}�.[y�,j��n �4�Y :: • Fk':� y1'.'• ?'Enw,i, � y 1: ` t • � Q n, rjp r�, d• �'��` �iy^ir+ i{,i•,':�"r ;�!.` �,":' x r 1� w,1 �' "'Fr ! g,,3 u �!t,1 i• ��'db:1)rn n:..e�:Y��'i nsvw•�y;`' ..3.�ienCS:l: �.,i^st�• '061'07 STUDENT ENROLLMENT ()C9 MAIN FLOOR t?�l UPPER FLOOR W(] TOTAL W W ENROLLMENT QYZ >.` 1248ADDfTION Cvld'T cT STUDENT ENROLLMENT CAPACITY ()C9 MAIN FLOOR 1182) UPPER FLOOR [256) TOTAL CONTRACT ENROLLMENT CAP (448) �v EXISTING MAIN FLOOR PIAN tsoarri M.SCNOOL nuarlm m '"mm ROaH' rr�yy� I RANYxu:sx _•!{Y F 003 us PURPOSE w 015MISUL MOW PkttrNT PICK -Ltd► MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION If Ham 8 Ku A,,NW% k I ...................... ,.... .... .._................. ................................... ...................................................... . c VZy�RyS;q(gd '.F'•'�-�i� r:`fr.:'.'bin`'sH,P+v'.eys Q ! /•� �;Li Jf1aC 'F, r'' T:;,� 1; 1> is^.:T�"S 8 `hvV'� �f �n"N�+'A4y ti)�"•+A:;�'... h'r�,nM1" ��'4• 'tiw�'t��.���a�'i �E:':'�'�.� 'i&dr H `•i<'x:'r;4:C5",: `x v;� ,.:✓sTJ� lY:'.� a "'rsx. � tr.n' 1 ;'r: • y;;�A`;�I:Siwl. l` 1$68ADDtTtON roar 107 STUDENT CONTRACTSTUDENT ENROLLMENT i-X7X ENROLLMENT CAPACITY UPPER FLOOR Wj UPPER FLOOR EAST1NG SECOND FLOOR PLAN r3� MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH SEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORAMON If NEW B Mz Weh k Feasi�itity study . __...-- 3. Marquette Primary Center Attendance Boundaries: vow HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. uffPage 11 South Bend Community School Corporation ............... WN ,.f..:i`.C�'•lisr-.ter-...;^3if.\^'7''1<-YcSt-i :n: 1-'�s.:.�-f::•'.:.. A,rz Total Year Y Enrollment 1996-97 353 1997-98 355 19.98-99 373 1999-00 364 2000-01 357 2001-02 365 t 2002-03 336 2003-04 323 2004-05 310 2005-06 326 2006-07 319 vow HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. uffPage 11 South Bend Community School E Corporation 3. Marquette Primary Center Attendance Boundaries: _ `viz� <"�'•�"'-` �.: ��s�.-• Year Total Enrollment 1996-97 353 1997-98 355 1998-99 373 1999-00 364 2000-01 357 2.001-02 365 2002-03 336 2003-04 323 2004-05 310 2005-06 326 2006-07 319 HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. Vpage 1'i South Bend Community School Corporation f=easibility StudY__....._.___....... . Marquette Primary Center 1, Facility Options The basis for each planning option were developed through discussions with SBCSC administration. The student capacity, grade configuration and programmatic needs were reviewed and fine tuned in an effort to provide the Board of Trustees the most logical options to evaluate. Renovation and Additions in comparison to New Construction use the same educational program and student capacities to provide and effective comparison. In our experience, overlaying present day Educational Space Guidelines and finding appropriate locations to add onto existing structures often create larger facilities than would result if building new. These inefficiencies and larger areas often offset the savings one would expect to find in a renovation. The only way to evaluate which direction to proceed is to develop concept plans of both New and Renovation using the same criteria. The Programmatic Space Summary will change slightly through the Design Phases with Staff, Administration and Community input, however based upon our experience the presented scopes should be very close to the final solutions. As part of this study we were asked to add the `what if° Marquette were to use a Montessori curriculum and how would this affect the plan and resulting cost. At this time the funding to support the cost and transportation for a Magnet Program are not resolved. We have provided several options for your consideration in evaluating this subject. Please find the followina Plannina Ootions: 11. Option 132 -- Renovation 1 Addition to existing Facility 500 Student Capacity 2. Option A2 — New 500 Student Capacity Traditional Curriculum 3. Option A3 — New 500 Student Capacity Montessori Academy 4. Option Ad — New 500 Student Capacity Expandable Montessori Academy These are followed by the Construction Cost Projections at the end of this TAB 2 HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc.VW rf page 12 Feasibility Study Marquette Primary Center --Option 132 Renovation 1 Addition to existing Facility - 500 Student Capacity Four Section K - 4 In Option B2 total 91,500 SF and overlays present day Educational Space Guidelines used in the layouts of Options A2 -- A4 onto the existing building. Through additions and rearrangement of existing uses, this plan brings the 1936, 1948 and 1953 structures up to present day standards. The additions are located where this work can occur during occupancy. Key areas of the existing school that are undersized: 1. Administration and Student services 2. Food Service 3. Media center/ Library 4. Gymnasium By adding a new gym and kitchen area to the North of the existing stage, we opened up existing areas to be reconfigured and improve circulation at the same time. By converting three undersized classroom into two we can achieve similar classroom sizes to the now solutions, however due to layout this is not feasible in all areas and some classrooms will remain smaller than those that are reconfigured. HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. South Bend Community School Corporation Hiuhli0ts: Curriculum: Traditional Capacity: 500 K - 4 Area: 91, 500 St; Hard Cost: $14,024,322 Total Project: $17,810,888* 'Hard & Sort Costs Page 13 OUTDOOR COURTYARD EMT To .10 PLAYGROUNDS OPTION "B2" MAIN FLOOR PLAN „ORT„ 99,540 S.F. r...rrr cr�rncr Yv rEaecrrrr DROP-OFF/ PICK -Up =T1 ExT#iY TO Rus XWOP.OFIR PICK P If MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUN TY SCHOOL CORPORATION NEW a RENOVATIOWADDSTION TO MOnNG FACILITY. SM STUDENT CAPACITY (7RADfTl0NAL CURR:CUWM) Ldrhdiv k ................................................................................................................... OPTION "82" UPPER FLOOR PLAN NoArA SCAM 11.4= $3,500 S.P. APPLII R607! '1SD- 3 a 6 0 0 0=0.0 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION 3 �� RENOVA,IONlAMMONTOE)G=NOFAMITY-500STUDENTCAPACITY{7RADMONALCVMCULUM) J*Wtmc MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K -4I OPTION "132" ADDITION/RENOVATION: TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA PROGRAM SQUARE FEET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - MF PrEncipa}'s Office 250 Small Conference Room ......._.... - - ._.....__.._._-._ 150 -- - ---•..__._ Wait�n�t -- - -- - - --- 400 RecepfionlSecretary 200 Executive - -_- 200 FileslStora a t-----•••__.__....---...__.._------.-.-_-- --- --- ----- - -- 200 - - ---._ ---- -- ----- Staff Toilet 50 Staff Toilet 50 _.._...._-------------• Shared Work Room ------.-.._-------- 718 TOTAL 2,218 STUDENT SERVICES Counselor Office 120 Meeting Room 120 Akple Room 440 Health Clinic Waiting 150 ._.-.-----------....__._ Health Clinic Office i 120 Nurse Office i20 Occu-IPhys. Therapy 200 Cot #1 50 H. C. Toilet 5p Cot #2 50 Group Meet}ng1Conference Rm. 150 Social Worker 120 Flex Office/Psych., etc_ 120 Stora. a-- 100 Waiting.-.- -- 150 Speech - ! 250 TOTAL-- - _2,310--- _ MEDIA SERVICES Media Center 2,616 Media Work Room/Office 600 A(V Storage/Head End 684 Computer Lab -- --- ... - - -........ _--------- 800 -- -.----- _.-------._... _TOTAL 4,700 _- _.......---.-----........._.-- ART ArtlPro�ect Roorn 1,200 ---- - - - 200 TOTAL- 1,400 MUSIC ----...._...-_._.-.._.._.__....----------.-_------------------ --......__...__...---- Music Room 1.200 - Sfarage_ _.....__._ 200 TOTAL 1,400 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-41 OPTION "132" ADDITION/RENOVATION: TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA I PRELIMINARY SF FOURTH GRADE 918 FOURTH GRADE 918 FOURTH GRADE 918 FOURTH GRADE (FLEX) 605 TOTAL 19,356 ACADEMIC GRADE STRUCTU-RE 1,260 60 Storage 50 KINDERGARTEN 1,292 Toilet50 Storage 50 KINDERGARTEN 1,038 Toiletso Storage 50 KINDERGARTEN 1,124 Toilet 50 Storage,----- 50 .. . ..... -V1fiST GRADE 690 FIRST GRADE 750 FIRST GRADE 918 FIRST GRADE 918 (SECOND GRADE 1,178 1 SECOND GRADE 1,180 1MULTI-AGE 983 (SECOND GRADE 771 SECONDITHIRD GRADE0 THIRD GRADE (FLEX) 689 THIRD GRADE[ 742 THIRD GRADE 944 FOURTH GRADE 918 FOURTH GRADE 918 FOURTH GRADE 918 FOURTH GRADE (FLEX) 605 TOTAL 19,356 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K4 I OPTION "82" ADDITION/RENOVATION: TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA PRELIMINARY SF SHARED LABIINSTRUCTION AREAS Project Room/Lab A _Storage 990 -- Project Roomll-ab B - Storage 990 ---._.....__ TOTAL 1,980 SPECIAL NEEDS ------.................. -• Primary S eci� Needs 628 Intermediate Special weeds _ _ ------------------ - - 689 NOTAL 1,317 ---------- ----- PHYSICAL EDUCATION PHYSICAL Gymnasium_ 5,000 P.E. Office ---------- .....- - ---------... - - 120 - -- —-.............- Equ�ment Storage - _ 100 Equipment 5toracle 200 Boys Lockers75 ToiletlShower; ---- --- ...__.......:......---....._........... ........ -......... 75 ----- .........- Girl's Lockers --- --- - - 75 ToiletlShovrer 75 ---- - - --- -- TOTAL. 5,720 ._......_..... - -- ---_ - ---- .......... .... FOOD SERVICES Dining Roorn - 3 Stages f- 2_00 Ea. TablelChair StoraOe _..---.--------------.-_ 300 Chair Storage - - -- 200 _ Full Service Kitchen „) - - - 4,300 _ _..._..TOTAL -- _ .......__8,250 FACULTY SPACES - -- -.._ ----- -........... _.__....._...---- ................ Staff Lounge Staff Work Room 320 Staff Work Room 200 Staff Toilet 50 Staff Toilet - - 50 Staff Toilet ---- 50 - Staff Toilet 50 TOTALI - ---.._----- .-------- ._....._... --- ..... --..__... - .._..------- .. -.......... 1,370 ------------ -------- ---- - -- -.......... ------- _............ ----- ... -j-- I ....-------------- --- - ...----.... -.......... ...._ _-- --- -- -- - ... 3 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER ' SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K4 ! OPTION '132" ADDITION/RENOVATION: TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 SUMMARY OF SQUARE FOOTAGE BY AREA Administrative Serivices 2,218 Sludent Services 2,310 Media Services`- 4.700 Art _ - ---- _— --- - I ------- 1,400 Music 1.400 Traditional Academic Grade Structure 19,356 Shared Lob/instruction Areas 11980 Special Needs 1,317 Physical Education 5,720 Food Services 8,250 _Faculty spaces - �� 1,370 TOTAL PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE. � 50,021 Toilets - MechanicallEfectrical Systems -1 37,479 Circulation/Storage_ Walls tyai 42.8% Factor Mechanical/Electrical Systems Mezzanine - -- -. (N.f.0 - Gross Area) - Basement - Non -Program Space 4,000 Main Floor 54,750 Upper Floors 32,750 _ Total Buiidinq Gross SF 91,500 S.F. A South Bend Community School ;Corporation I Wn V lea... ...... Study ................................ ................... _...._.........._..........................._........................._...............---- Marquette Primary Center —option A2 Hiahlirrhfs: New 500 Student Capacity Traditional Curriculum Pour Section K - 4 Curriculum: Montessori Capacity: 500 K - 9th In Option A-2 the New 71,600 SF school would be built on the North end of Area: 71,600 SF the site urith the main entrance off of Bergan Street. Parent drop off would be Nara Cost: $13,875,402 internal to the visitor parking lot / entry off of Bergan Street and would be Total Project: $17,621,760* separated from the Bus staging drop off 1 pick up lane on College Street East 'Hard & SoftCosts of the NewSchool. Staff parking and playgrounds would be to the South of the new school and constructed after the existing school was demolished. HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. page 14 KINDERGARTEN PLAYGROUND DUT! ENT" TO BU8 EXIT/ ENTRY TO Bus DROP-OFF! PICK-UP DROP-OFF/ PICK-UP I1L COUP. LAD n MEDIA CENTER OPTION W" MAIN FLOOR PLAN W.A4CO--+a07 70,600 S.F. I 5 I I DINING 7YEXIT TO ! P w f > PLAYGROUNDS MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH SEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION NEW 500 STUDEW CAPACITY 9 W.3MONAL CURRICULUM) f oOPTION "A2" UPPER FLOOR PLAN NpRTf} scA- I -•.aa, 71,600 S.F. i ...............,......�..v�un+i s....,.....�......._.......... .._ _......:::;;: I DIKiNg BELOW 4 j MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION NEW Sao STMENT CAPAWY "ADl7lQdM CUMCULUMj If MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-41 OPTION "A.2" NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA 1PROGRAM SQUARE FEET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - MF _------- Principal^s Office ; ----•-----........------------ t-.._._ ....---------150 `_......---------....._... Small Conference Room E Waitirt T-........_...... - 400......- - ---- Reception/Secretary--- - -- -- ---.200 •--------- Executive Conference --- - - --- - ---------...----- 200 - - ------- Files/Storage 200 _ 1 200 _....._...--- ._._.... ----- ........._.._...---- ---- -.............- Staff Toilet 50 --_..-...__.._._..._____..____....E ...___.....-_.•- _. _._-_____- Staff Toilet 50 Shared Work Room 500 2000 TOTALI 2000 STUDENT' SERVICES ------ - ----.......... Counselor Office ---- -... --1 ..-...._........_..... i -----...._......_.....-...... - i50 Meeting Room 150 Apple Room ? 500 Health Clinic Waiting 150 Health Clinic Office ► ---1 20 Nurse Office i --- -- - 120 Occu./Phys. Therapy ---....__.----200 --------__.... __.-..-----•- Cot##i - ----- 50 ------.._._......__..._ H.G. Toilet -" --- _.... Cat#2 ---._..._.w.._._ —._.._.....__... . 5D _.-._........... - Group Meetingjgonference Rm._.. 200 Social Worker _--.----1-------.---....._._. - - - - - --- 120 Flex OfficelPsvch.. etc_ ----.....__. ---._..._._...- 120 Storage - 100 Waiting -----...._. -----... - --- 150 Speech 250 -- - - -- -- -TRZI -- -2500 --- - MEDIA SERVICES --- - Media Center__----_- --- Media Work-RoomiOffice AN Storage Computer Lab TOTAL ART 3200 250 200 900 4550 Art/Project Room � ___.........--_-- 120_0 StDrage -- -- 200 --- --- - ----__..-------_..._--f TOTAL 1400 --- --..__...._._....__...._.._-.... ......_.._......... ............. .....---..... -....... MUSICISTAGE Music Room 1600 200 --TOTAL 1800 —.......... ---......... _...... ... _...._---._....-_......__... ---.......� ..............._.. - - ._... - --- ...._...... ------------------- ---------- ---.._.........._.. - ......-....... - --- _..._._-----.._.._....------- ....... - -�-- ----- ----.._...---._..-------------- --..._...... -_......... ......... ... - ........... ...... ..... ....... ............. .,- ....................... ....... - - __..........._ 1 I MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4 / OPTION "AT' NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA PRELIMINARY SF FIRST GRADE- 960 ACADEMIC GRADE STRUCTURE 960 fC1Nt7ERGARTEN `s 1260 Toilet i 50 StoEqse 960 so KINDERGARTEN SECOND GRADE 1260 Toilet 1 THIRD GRADE I Storage THIRD GRADE 50 KINDERGARTEN 960 1260 Toilet FOURTH GRADE 50 Storage 960 50 KINDERGARTEN (FLEX) TOTAL -1 i26F Toilet 50 Storage 1 50 FIRSTGR.4DE FIRST GRADE- 960 FIRST GRADE 960 FIRSTGRADE 960 (MULTI-AGE 960 (SECOND GRADE 960 I SECOND GRADE 960 SECOND GRADE 960 SECONDITHIRD GRADE SPLIT THIRD GRADE I 960 THIRD GRADE 960 THIRD GRADE 960 FOURTH GRADE 960 FOURTH GRADE i 960 FOURTH GRADE 960 FOURT14GRAVE 960 TOTAL -1 20800 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH SEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4/ OPTION "A2" NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA t PRELIMINARY SF SHARED LAB]INSTRUCTION AREAS Project Room/Lab A 985 Stora 200 Project Room/Lab B 985 Stora 200 2370 S�OEC[fil NEEDS ,_ecial Needs,...._...._........._. - ---....1 --... ---.......__9& -------- Toilet50 lntermediat2_Speclal Needs..----------- 960 4970 TOTAL PHYSICAL EDUCATION GymnasiumGymnasium..... ..... 5000 P.E. Office ---------- 120 100 gquipment Storage 200 .__..._------ 2LS 1 2!Lk—e _rs - ------75 Tollet/Shower f 7S' Girl's Lockers 75 Toilet/Shower 75 ALI 5720 f-001) SERVICES' --'------- Dining Room - 3Stag9s cr 200 Ea. Table!Chair§t�ra _Chair Storaj(e Full Service Kitchen TOTAL Staff Lounge Staff Work Room Staff Work Room Staff Toilet Staff Toilet Staff Toilet TOTAL 3000 300 2500 6000 300 300 50 50 1300 E MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4 I OPTION "A2" - NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 SUMMARY OF SQUARE FOOTAGE BY AREA Administrative Serivces 1 2000 Student SerAces1 2500 Media Services 4550 Art1400 Music/Stage 1800 Traditional Academic Grade Structure 1 20800 Shared Lablinstruction Areas 1 2370 iipecial Needs1970 Physical EdtTc—a1i;W'----­--­-5720 "­­ Food Services � 6000 Faculty Spaces 1300 TOTAL PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE. 50410 TRIOS - Mechanical/Electrical Systems - I 21190 Circulation/Storam - WallsO/o Factor. Mecharkal/Eiactritcal Systems Mezzanine 1 (2600) (W C - Gross Area)I Main Floor 48.550 Upper Floor 23,050 Total Building Gross SF1 71,600 feasgbilitystudy - South Bend Community School _ Corporation ......... ...;; Marquette Primary Center --Option A3 New 500 Student Capacity Montessori Academy Four Section K - 4 In Option A-3 the New 81,800 SF school would be built on the North end of the site with the main entrance off Bergan Street. Parent drop off would be internal to the visitor parking lot / entry off of Bergan Street and would be separated from the Bus staging drop off / pick up lane on College Street East of the Neter School. Staff parking and playgrounds would be to the South of the new school and constructed after the existing school was demolished. Note — the increase in building area is due to the Montessori classroom (1500 SF) being larger than 'traditional classrooms (960 SF). HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. Highlights: Curriculum: Montessori Capacity: 500 K - 4 Area: 89,800 SF Hard Cost: $15,400,146 Total Project: $19,558,185* 'Hard & Solt Casts page 15 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER ' SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-41 OPTION "A3" . February 28, 2007 AREA IPROGRAM SQUARE FEET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - MF t'ricipal's Office 250 Small Conference Room -__.___...---•__,.. 150 Waiting— 400 200:.. - Executive Conference _....__.._..-----....._.._20f3 �ileslStorage...... .—.._........... — ..... ... _.__,...._ -•n._._ 200_..-- -- -- Staff Toilet 50 _- Staff Toilet 50 Shared Work Room, 500 2000 TOTAL 2400 STUDENT SERVICES Counselor Office 150 _._..__ _._ _._._.__......._....._._......._....._..�__.... tAeeting Room 150 Apple Room — _.._..._.__ 500 ._...._ _._—. Health Clinic tNaitinq_._... 150 Health Clinic Office— __-- 120 ._ Nurse OfiicP _y120 Occu./Phys, Therapy _— _-_--__--- 200 Cot ##1 50 H.CTToilet 50 -- - —_.._......_._._—.__..__---.--.. Cot ##2 50 GroupMoetinc IConference_Rm. —_ 200 Social Worker 120 Flex OM e/Psych., etc. _— 120 100 - Waiting - 150 -- Speech _ I _..___._..._------........._._TOTAL 250 — 2500 MEDIA SERVICES Media Center 3200 Media Work Room/Office - — _ _ 250 AN Storage ----- .. 200 Computer Lab - _ 900 _ _._......._ TOTAL 4550 ART-_ _ _ -. __ _ _--_----------- ___------•--- � �_ ArtlProect F2oom 1200 Storage... ........ _ - ..........-----.._...._...TOTAL 200 _......_.._ - - -- 1400 MUSIC Music Room 1200 ---- Stflrac�e_._._.__._. 200 -- ..... ....—__._...— TOTAL ...._. - ._.._....__. ..-------- _.__.._....., 14130 --_._..._.._.._ .......... - -------.-..._...--. MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-41 OPTION "A3" February 28, 2007 AREA j PRELIMINARY SF '4CADEMIC GRADE STRUCTURE 1. Mtjiti-Aqe Montessori Classroom 1500 2. Mulfi-A e Montessori Classroom 1500 3. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 4. Multi-Aqe Montessori Classroom 1500 5. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 6. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 7. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 8, Multi-Aqe Montessori Classroom 1500 9. Mufti -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 10- Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 10. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 .12. 13. Multi-Aqe Montessori Classroom1500 14. Multi -Age ko-f€ssorii Classroom 1500 15. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 16. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 17. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1600 18. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 19. Multi -Age Montessori Classroom 1500 20. LA� qlk��qt Montessori Classroom 1500 TOTAL: 30000 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4 / OPTION "A3" February 28, 2007 AREA PRELIMINARY 9T- -- SHARED LAt311NSTRUCTION AREAS 300 Project Room/Lab A _.__. ---............._------............_....----.-.-.---..985 Storage--------------- Full Service Kitchen 20Q Project Room/Lab B _ ----........------ 585 Stora Storage — 200 TOTAL 2370 SAECIAL NEEt1S -...._— ... -._..._._.............._- Primary Special Needs gsp 50 --- Staff Work Room TOTAL 9010 PHYS[CAL t;DUCATION.._..._.__.--____........_...---...._ Staff Work Room G�rmnasium ------------- — - _- Staff Toilet 5000 ... P.E. Offtce Staff Toilet 120 Equipment Storage Staff Toilet - 100 -Equipment Storage Staff Toilet 200 gy s LOCkers 75 Toilet/Shower - - - ---- ----............ ..... 75--- Girl's Lockers__ Toilet/Shower --._...-- - .._..-- - _._......._-. 75 _ -^--- 75 - -- --�- TOTAL - 5720 5720 --- -- -- FOOD SERVICES -- _____-.._...... - -- -_...---�-........._..-. IJininq Room - 3 Stages @_200 Ea. 3000 Table/Chair Storage 300 Chair Storage 200 Full Service Kitchen -- 2500 TOTALI Staff Lounge S00 Staff Work Room app Staff Work Room 300 Staff Toilet 50 Staff Toilet 50 Staff Toilet - - -50 _....._._.. Staff Toilet ------ _ ------------------- 5p TOTAL 9304 ------ _....._....._._.._.-- ...... --... ..................._._------_..._.._.......-.........._..........._.... --...._._._.__..._ r MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-41 OPTION "AW February 28,2007 I It (SUMMARY OF SQUARE FOOTAGE BY AREA Serivces 2500 IAdministrative Student Services i 2500 I Media Services 4550 lArt 1400 Music/ Stage 1400 Montesson Academic Grade Structure 30000 Shared Lab/instruction Areas 2370 Special Needs 1010 Physical Education 5720 Food Services 6000 Faculty Spaces 1300 TOTAL PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE.' 68750 )Toilets - MechanicallEfectrical Svstems - I 23050 ...... Circulation/Storage - Walls (a), 28% Factor. MechanicallEtectdcal Systems Mezzanine (4,000) (N. 1. C - Gross Area) Main Floor 51,700 Upper Floor 30,100 Total Building Gross SF. 81,800 South Bend Community School Corporation Feasibility S#ud.y Marquette Primary Center --Option A4 New 500 Student Capacity Expandable to 750 Montessori Magnet Phase 1: Four Section K - 4 combines two 960 SF traditional classrooms for a total of 1860 SF to form a Monlessori classroom as compared to a typical Montessori classroom of 1500 SF. Instructional support areas such as art, music and media center are increased in size to accommodate 750 students versus 500. Also, building systems would be sized for future expansion and add to the initial Phase 1 costs. HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. Hard Cost. Phase 2:$ 4,463,795 Total Project: Phase 2:$5,669,019* ` Hard & Soft Costs nage 16 Highlicthts: In Option A-4 the New 90,700 SF school would be built on the North end of Curriculum: Montessori the site similar to Options A2 and A3. The Staff parking and playgrounds Capacity. Phase 1: 500 would be located and configured further to the South of Phase 1 Construction Phase 2: add 250 to accommodate the Phase 2 addition. K-4 This option provides for a pair of traditional classrooms to be "opened" with Area: Phase 1: 90,700 SF the removal of an internal wall and be converted to a single Montessori phase 2: 31,400 SF classroom. A future addition can be added to the south of the Phase 1 building. Hard Cost: Phase 1:$16,061,940 Note -- this added flexibility increases the building square footage because it Total Project: Phase 1:$20,398,663' combines two 960 SF traditional classrooms for a total of 1860 SF to form a Monlessori classroom as compared to a typical Montessori classroom of 1500 SF. Instructional support areas such as art, music and media center are increased in size to accommodate 750 students versus 500. Also, building systems would be sized for future expansion and add to the initial Phase 1 costs. HEBARD & HEBARD Architects, Inc. Hard Cost. Phase 2:$ 4,463,795 Total Project: Phase 2:$5,669,019* ` Hard & Soft Costs nage 16 =M mITRr TO WJ9 Dwor orvp PICKur PLAYGROUND 9=1 CNrw To $-Ar& rrvrsrsoR _ ruiwno 2$ CLASSROOMS 0 78 E& a SU STUDEW CAPAWY OPTION "A4" MAIN �FLOOR PLAN NO N .W PAHSE t - 90,700 S.F. PHASE 2 - 31,400 S.F. a= m xy TP wu11 owoRar"mc"r 1�CI.Y1f140M , �) rlrrsl,ts AOOITIO.Y G"►tAaa a? DINING +� rr ry��p 74 p.Wslopm VVfVRi AMMOM IWgC LriIAiL�Sj MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION NEW 500 STUDENT CAPACITY EXPANWkSLE TO 750 MONTESSORI MAGNET i I I L-.-- a OPTION "A4" UPPER FLOOR PLAN WORY14 Scup 11-saar PARSE 1-90,700 S.F. PHASE 2 - 31,400 S.P. 9 ,auurwxarx 1 �€ 2 r m i 6 1 M'IYramAL1f7OM MC /bdYgN 03* MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER 50UTH SENO COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION NEW SW STUOENT CAPACITY EWANOASLE TO M MCNTE WM MAONET MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4 I OPTION "A4" NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL PHASED TO MONTESSORI CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA PROGRAM SQUARE FEET ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - MF Princi al's Office 250 Small Conference Room 150 Waiting----- - - -- -...— -- - --400._ - - - -- Reee 200 — -- --- - Executive Conference200 _..._.._._..._...._._.._....._ -- -------- .._..---- ---._...._..- Files/Storage __—___............- 200 - - - Staff Toilet 50 Staff Toilet50 Shared Work Room — - - _._.___._.__...._... 700 TOTAL 2,200 STUDENT SERVICES - Counselor Office --...... 150 Meeting Room _--..._..------.............-•-------...----------- 150 --------..._....----- Apple Room Health Clinic Waiting 150 Health Clinic Offrce 120 Nurse Office 120 OccuJPhys. Therm Cot #i1 50 RC. Toilet 50 Cat #2 50 _ Group Meefing/Conference Rm. 200 ~ -- -- _ Social Worker --...—.__..__•_..-. - 120 - ____------------ Flex Office]Psych.,-etc. 120 _ Storage — 100 Waiting_.................�.._.. 150 --- - - -- -- --- — Speech- - 250 -- -...- -... ---•............._._--_. TOTAL ------ 2,500. - .........._---- MEDIA SERVICES, Media Center 4,200 _ — Media Work Room/Office 500 ANStarage 400 Computer Lab 900 TOTAL 6,000 ART ArUProiect Room 1,700 Storage300 --- -- ......__......�...----------- -- --- TOTAL 2,000 M USICISTAG E Music Room 1,500 Storage _._......--------- - _ 200 _... _ TOTAL 91800 MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4 ! OPTION "A4" NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL PHASED TO MONTESSORI CURRICULUM April 23, 2007 AREA I PRELIMINARY SF PHASE (1) ONE TRADITIONAL ACADEMIC GRADE STRUCTURE KIN©ERGARTEN--- Toilet 50 Storage 50 KINDERGARTEN ---- -� 1,400 Toilet 50 Storage 50 KINDERGARTEN -- 1,400 _._._..._ Toilet- 50 Storage 50 KINDtRGARTEN 1,400 Toilet 50 50 FIRST GRADE -' -- _- 960 FIRST GRADE 960 FIRST GRADE_ - --- M- -- 960 -- FIRST GRADE 960 -- ^—_ FLEX. CLASSROOM960 SECOND GRADE 960 - SECOND GRADE ] 960 SECOND GRADE 960 SECOND GRADE I- 960 --_ THIRD GRADE_ 960 THIRD GRADE -- 960.._.__........._....._. THIRD GRADE -- ---- - 960 THIRD GRADE s 960_ _ _ _ _ -- FOURTH GRADE 960 FOURTH GRADE - --� _ 960 FOURTH GRADE ----- 960 ------ FOURTH GRADE --- 960 - �TOTALj 22,320 PHASE f?1..TWO MONTESSORI CLASSROOM ADDITION 1. Monfessori ' 1.500 2. Montessori - 1.500 - _- 3. Montessori11500 _..w _ 4. Montessori� _ 5. Montessori ( --- 1.500 _6. _Montessori -�-__. --- 1,500 7, Montessori1,500 8. Montessori ----- 1,500 9. Montessori ....-. 9. .... _...... — - - - ..-.. 1,500 _-..._......_.-_. 10. Montessori - 1.500 --. 11_ Montessori _ — --- 1,500 ' 12. Montessori --- 1,500 13. Montessori - -- 1,500 --- --- 14. Montessori _ --- ---- 1,500 TOTAL! 21,000 f MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-4 ! OPTION "A4" NEW SCHOOL BUILDING -TRADITIONAL PHASED TO MONTESSORI CURRICULUM Staff Work Boom April 23, 2007 Staff Work Room AREA I PRELIMINARY SF SHARED LABIINSTRUCTION AREAS i Sta€f Toilet Project Room/Lab A p 985 Storage 200 Project Room/Lab 8 985 Storage 200 ................_...._.........._._....._TOTAL . - 2,370 _ --- --.... _- - -- -- - -- --- --- ..- -------------- ----------- Resource Resource Room Primark Special Needs 960 Toilet 50 Intermediate Special Needs_- --_--_960 Flex. Classroom ------------------------------_..`---------T©TAL _ --- _- 960 _ 3,830 PHYSICAL EDUCATION -5,000 P.E. Office j - - ----- - --..._... — ---- -- - - 120 - --- _ _......... _...........-- Equipment 100 fw uipment Slarage_— ( 200_ o Bs Lockers - 75 _ ToiletiShowef ------ ----75 Girl's Lockers 75 Toilet/Shower 75 TOTAL 5,720 FOOD SERVICES Dining Roorn - 3 Stages @.233 Ea.3,000 _.....-...._- TablelChair Storage -- j �. 300 Chair Storage 200 FullService Kitchen _ - ........._.__-.--_-._-. -. 2.500 TOTAL 6,000 FACULTY SPACES Staff Lounge __- 500 Staff Work Boom 300 Staff Work Room 300 so Sta€f Toilet 50 Staff Toilet -- - �.._ - ------ .....------ ...... 50 Staff Toilet - - - -- __ ._ _ -------- -- - 50 --- - --- - --. .............. ------.._..._..--- .......... TOTAL -11'300 ........._.. - - -- - - -- - --- - - -- _ MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL. CORPORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY K-41 OPTION °A4" NEW SCHOOL BUILDING - TRADITIONAL PHASED TO MONTESSORI CURRICULUM April 23, 20D7 PHASE (1) ONE SUMMARY OF SQUARE FOOTAGE BY AREA lAdministrative Serivices 2,200 Student Services 2,500 Media Services •-----• 6,000 Art 2,000 _...._�... Music/ Stage 1,80_0__ — Traditional Academic Grade Structure 22,320 ^ ~ Shared Lab/Instruction Areas _ 2,370 Special Needs 3,830 Physical Education 5,720 Food Services -_ 6,000 Faculty Spaces 1,300 TOTAL PROGRAM SQUARE FOOTAGE: 56,040 Toilets - Mechanical/Electrical Systems - 34,_660 CirculationlStorage - Walls Q 3 8% Factor. _Y Mechanical/Electrical Systems Mezzanine (3,000) (N.I.0 - Gross Area) Main Floor 55,400 Upper Floor 35,300 Total Building Gross SF Phase 1 90,700 PHASE (2) TWO SUMMARY OF SQUARE FOOTAGE BY AREA Montessori Academic Grade Structure 21,000 Toilets - Mechanica!/Electricai Systems -1 10,400 Circulation/Storage - Walls @ 33% Factor. Main Flood 16,100 _ Upper Floor 15,300 Total Building Gross SF Phase 2 31,400 Combined Building Gross SF Phase 1 90,700 Phase 2� .-.-•..., 31,400 Total .. _ __ Total Building Gross SFj __-_ 122,400 CITY OF Sou l: i BEND S-I-BI1HE 1. Luu-'-KE, MAYOR OFF "a O `:: 1'%4AY(-'R l��L'ct771�Cr -�. 1007 Rev. Timothv Rouse. President South Bend Common Council 227 W. Jefferson Blvd. 4" Floor, County -Cit!: Building South Bend. RN' 46601 Re: Vett) of Bill 61-07 Dear President Rouse: Exhibit B On November 25. 2007 the South Bend Cormnon Council nassed Bili 6l-07 by a vott! of -5-3. '!'lila 'illtl amtncteti the zoning ordinanee and esw',-liz,!-xd an historic landmark tor [tic property JucaLtzd at 1905 Cailege. specifically :Marqucttc Pritnary Center and the propert-y identified by Tax Key w 0 US -7-116-4254. The Common Council acted within its authority and best judgment to desigiiate this site as a I:indrnark. However, the Board of the South Bend Community School Corporation. another elected bony. has decided in its best judgment. that constnic.tinn a new buildin--.at that site is in the best interests of strident; and the communit:. Became of their decision. the School Corporation opposed the etfi)rt to designate yEarquette School and its sut-rounding property as historic. I respect the processes used and the conclusions reached by both. Bodies. In addition. a public remonstrance was filed against the bond issue which would fund Several SEX'SC projects. including construction ofanew Marquette School. i -lie results of that ••vote' are not yet certified, but I believe that result should also can'; weight in this decision. After much deliberation and consultation u:-ith numerous individuals, both pro and can. I have decided to veto Bill 61-07. Nly first priorit%! is that an elementary: school remain at this location. Though I personally would favor renovation of the existing building, 1 aril keenly aware: that historic desi4rration status does not guarantee that a school will remain in tilt building_ SBCSC can still move for%vard with new construction either on this lot, or at.another location. Because the entire parcel is desi-�,iiated. it rna4 be more dillicult for the School Corp. to build on this lot. CoU,\rY-C.'TY .be;iLM;G • 227W I MERSON BOULaVtaD • INDLANA 46001 PHONE 5741235-9261 - Rk-, 5741235-9812 • TDD 57-11235.556 Exhibit Rev. Timothy Rouse, President Deccniber 5. X007 Noe fit addition, past practice of the Common Council has been to seek the consent of tete owner when designaun_; a building as historic. I reco-nixe that this is not required by Ordinance or State law'. however it has generally led to better upkeep when the owner seek- the historic stattt;. An exception can he made for publicly owned buildings, but the turner's acceptance is important td1 the success of iartdtnarkiri f. I note ►rich pride that tete School Corp. has Successfully renovated several scltouls in South Bend, including Jefferson, Madison and Adatns. Renovalion OfMonroc School is part of the work to be clone with the proposed bond proceeds. 1 recall that when the Historic Presm--ation Commission sought historic designation for Madison School, the School Corp. did not appose that status. Thev ltzzwe actively opposed such designation for �larcluettc. 1 veto Bill 61-07 for the following reasons: • It design: es the entire parcel as historic rather titan the buikiing and a portion of land around it. • It does not have the support of the owner. IN The public remonstrance should cast the final vote in whether or not the School Corp. can build a new school at this site. As I veto rhia bill. I also have several requests concerning this site of the South Bend Community School Corporation. First, please maintain and operate a quality school at this location. Second, though I respect the proccs5 and due diligence used in choosing to build a new school rather than renovate the existing building, I do riot believe that the; ocne:rai public -is fully convinced that this is the best choice. Also. some believe that there is rteW information winch Should be evaluated. So, f respectfully request the School Corp. to revisit the analysis of costs to renovate Marquetry and to also take adi,antagc of Bill Latoza's offer to share his experience xvith the Chicago School system. Them is time to do this "Value enaince:ring' of the decision before the bond is approved. It may lead to the ;ame conchmion, but resident; will be assured that you have Belly investigated all possible options. Third, iia new school is constructed at the site, please have the architecture complement 111-1 neighborhood and site the building in such a way that demolition of the existing school is not required. Pinally, if a new school is constntcted, please be open to alternate users for the existing Wilding. If a visible use is found, with financing and a feasible business plan. please Cooperate with it developer to help renovation of the building to succeed. I appreciate the tont; hours. good intentions and difficult decisions by both the Common Council and the School Corporation Board. Thank yott for your dedication and hard work. Sincereb.:. {, pben J.1-ttccke Mayor South fiend Common Council Historic Preservation Commission Ur. Robert 'Lirnmerttian South fiend Community School Corporation Board -;J Facility Condition Assessments Exhibit The Table below summarizes the building deficiencies by "Priority" as defined on page 26 of this report. The Primary Centers: 1. Immediate needs (priority 1) = s 159,800 z. Nearterm with in 5 years (priorities 2&3) s25,427,400 3. Longer term with in 5-10 years (priorities 4&5) = sa2,96o,3oo Table: Primary Centers- Priority Budget Summaries ::::..:.:> fivric.`:'.':' ;.:.,:... I Coquillard 0 162,000 445,000 929.600 185,000 `::I 72: ,00fl Darden 5,000 190,500 2,950,500 677,000 1,053,000 Hamilton 8,000 17,000 1.068,500 338,500 161,000 Harrison 1,200 25,000 48,000 0 Q 74;2{it}::.' Hay 41,000 351,600 990,500 910,100 147,000 Kennedy 8,100 118,100 912,300 433,400 -- 515,000 i.98690Q:;: Lincoln 0 24,000 - 107,000 268,400 6.000 Madison 1,000 35,000 305,700 187,500 0 Marquette 0 McKinley -- - 22,500 31,600 1,405,600 1:198.600 168,000 Monroe 0 Muessel 9,000 68,500 307,000 24,000 155,000 `:_=6359D-: Nu* nor 0 101,000 157,000 60,000 97,500 -175,000 9:5 5b4" Parley 18,500 156,500 1,282,700 919,000 Swanson 0 29,000 1,254,500 707,000 128,000 f185D <. Tarkington 6.000 77,000 847,500 559,800 200,500 Warren 22,500 86,200 959,100 1,317,000 165,800 =;255tilg'.: Wilson 17,000 177,000 736,500 913,600 360,000 (---utb Bend. Cotw-viunit-y., School C,-Orporadon Facility Condition Assessments The Table below summarizes the building deficiencies by "Priority" as defined on page 26 of this report. The Intermediate Centers: i. Immediate needs (priority i) = s 65,700 2. Near term with in 5 years (priorities 2&3) = $22,783,005 3. Longer term with in 5-io years (priori 4&5) = s16,725,600 Table: Intermediate Centers — Priority Budget Summaries ........ .. . .. Brown 0 94,000 1,052,000 3,034,000 Clay 1,000 287,000 8,261,600 690,000 Dickinson 43,500 1,025,200 3,217.205 1,428.600 110.000 Edison 1,000 208,700 1,640,000 195,000 65,000 Greene 1,700 88,000 1,074,500 686.000 Jackson 1,500 76,500 1,187,800 2,468,000 640,000 U. Jefferson 10,000 124.000 432,000 394,500 26,000 LaSalle 0 25,000 1,650,000 2,135,500 1,167,000 Pill -3,000 83,000 739,400 1,515,000 325,000 Navarre 4,000 155.000 1,362,200 1,622,000 225,000 1 i 1 ill Qj;i! ME& L 1- Be -ad .1ji. School "i lCorpori'€t.ton E+; Facility Condition Assessments The Table below summarizes the building deficiencies by "Priority" as defined on page 26 of this report. The High Schools: 1. Immediate needs (priority 1) 5 21,500 2. Near term with in 5 years (priorities 2&3) = $11,928,700 3. Longer term with in 5-10 years (priorities 4&5) = s 6,126,000 Table: High Schools -Priority Budget Summaries Tif Adams 15,000 72,000 829,000 153,000 232,000 ';' 301004:;: Clay 4,500 216,000 8,357,000 2,925,000 770,000 ' Riley 64,000 742,200 271,000 50,000 ;:'`-:`'[''1.210;:;;; Washington 2,000 140,000 1,508,500 1,170,000 555,000,3355tlfi.?; The Table below summarizes the building deficiencies by "Priority" as defined on page 26 of this report. The "Other Buildings": z. Immediate needs (priority 1) = s 4,500 2. Near term with in 5 years (priorities 2&3) = $ 2,727,700 3. Longer term with in 5-ao years (priorities 4&5) - $ 2,229,500 Table: Other Buildings -- Priority Budget Summaries .. :.......,.::.............. rtr#y:, ::>::; a #T Early College (Studebaker) 1,000 45,500 1,548,000 37,500 32� �©11: Eggleston - - Alternative (Rise -Up) 500 48,500 648,200 992,000 37,000 - '_ 7 6;ZQ Bendix 38,000 80,500 348,500.00 3,500 ::-170'5060'..".. Lafayette 3,000 48,500 270,500 333,500 477,500 :;-;:;_::13iiU0, GENERAL INFORMATION: Number of Classrooms Date of Occupancy Grades Housed Acreage Current Insured Value Student Capacity Sauare Footage IMPROVEMENTS MADE: MARQU ETTE PRIMARY MONTESSORI ACADEMY 1818 West B ergan Street School No. 7577 2213 2011 PK -4 7.16 $14,881,000 536/429 79.056 STUDENT ENROLLMENT: 2011-12 479 2012-13 491 2013-14 584 2014-15 538 2015-16 424 2009-2010 Constructed new building. Occupied June, 2011. Demolition of old Marquette building is pending. EXISTING CONDITION: The building is in outstanding condition. Upgrade energy management/temperature controls. GENERAL INFORMATION: Number of Classrooms - Date of Occupancy 1936 Grades Housed Acreage 7.16 Current insured Value $0 Student Capacity - Sauare Footaae 56.771 IMPROVEMENTS MADE: EXISTING CONDITION: The building is in below average condition. 11-95 OLD MARQUETTE BUILDING 1905 College Street STUDENT ENROLLMENT: 2011-12 - 2012-13 - 2013-14 - 2014-15 - 2015-16 - tsitr[ui ! South Bend Community School Corporation Mail - OLD WMA Plans Exhibit D � y ago Michael Szymanski <mszymanski@sbcsc.k12.1n.us> OLD MPMA Plans 1 message Deborah Cyrier <dcyrier@sbcsc.kl2.in.us> Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:02 PM To: Michael Szymanski <mszymanski@sbcsc.kl2.in.us> Mike, MPMA received the Farm to School Planning Grant in June of 2017 and with this project will be creating a Farm to School Action Plan for our bigger goal of becoming a recognized Farm to School Program. The demolition of the old MPMA facility would open up tremendous potential for our programs development as we work to partner with Unity Gardens, Purdue Extension Office, UofND, IUSB office of Sustainability, the Health Department and Food and Nutrition Services to provide more readily available locally sourced healthy options for our students. Although we are just in the beginning stages of this work several ideas have been brainstormed that could not happen without the land where the old MPMA sits. Most notably the addition of a green house for us to grow produce year round. This would be a learning lab for our students and would greatly improve our ability to sustain our "healthy choices" snack program through the cold months. We also desire to expand and make more readily accessible garden plots for the local neighborhood through a partnership with Unity Gardens (much like is at McKinley). With many families in our immediate area lacking transportation this level of access to fresh produce has the potential to greatly change nutritional habits. The garden beds next to the classrooms are great for teaching from due to proximity but to actually grow quantity we need space. We have also considered the addition of chickens to the property following city ordinances. The lack of green space currently and the reduced playing area for our students impacts instruction daily. Knowing that a piece of our approved playground space is sitting under a pile of dirt is sad for our students. The quiet reflective naturescapes that we envision being created in the footprint of the old MPMA would open doors for other outdoor learning experiences as well. I think the foot print of the old MPMA could be developed into an inviting space for the greater community and MPMA students/families. Removing the OLD MPMA also says to the community that we value you and your child enough not 'to have an eyesore that is a safety concern proximate to your child. Please keep me posted about further developments and if you need me to attend a meeting. I'm happy to do so. Deb Cyrier, Principal Marquette Primary Montessori academy z8iS Bergai Street https:llmail-geogle.comlmaiYul0l?ui=2&ik=b948c45cdl &jsver=HFKfDbXmXEv;.en.&view=pt&search=tnbox&th=15d9bbee53a18927&siml=15d9bbee53... 112 Exhibit E Douglas Anderson 1733 Stocker Place South Bend, Indiana 46528 doug@douglasanderson.net 574-210-0877 July 31, 2017 Historical Preservation Commission of St. Joseph County County -City Building South Bend, Indiana 46601 Dear Historical Preservation Commission of St. Joseph County, I am writing in support of the South Bend Community School Corporation's submission for appropriateness to demolish the old Marquette School located at 1905 College Street. I have been a resident of the northwest neighborhood for over 27 years, Marquette Park for the last 10, have attended the "old" Marquette during my elementary studies and have two children currently enrolled in the Marquette Primary Montessori Academy. My family and I have been committed to South Bend, its public schools and the Marquette neighborhood out of choice; a choice to invest and grow in the community we love and value, a choice to show our children and our family the benefits of urban and diverse lifestyle. It is for these reasons I offer that my support and perspective an this matter is not inconsequential. The actions taken by the SBCSC and the HPC on this matter directly impact the education and safety of my children, the morale and vibrancy of my neighborhood and the values of my neighbors and my own properties. I value the actions of the HPC to offer protection for my community in regards to its historical assets. I also recognize the numerous renovation projects the SBCSC has executed successfully to keep highly functioning and modern school buildings while still honoring the historical heritage they present and fiduciary responsibility to tax payers. I believe that the SBCSC has executed a thorough due -diligence to find a practical use to the "old" building; however time has made it apparent that neither the SCBSC nor the private sector have found viable functional uses for the facility. Therefore it is in my opinion that the building needs to be razed before it becomes a permanent scar on the neighborhood. I have seen far too many empty buildings fall into a state of blight simply because they go unutilized. A building out of service attracts much negative attention and nuisance. As a taxpayer I recognize that the SBCSC has done much more than other property owners to keep the building secure, safe and minimize the negative appearance of the building. However all would question if this is an appropriate way for a public entity with the primary purpose of educating our youth to be spending its precious resources. I thank the HPC for its shepherding of the "old" Marquette during its transition out of service as a learning facility, however I now ask for the HPCs support of the returning the land to a highly functional use as community green space and learning space for the students of the MPMA as per the plans drafted by the SBCSC. Sincerely, 1' Douglas Anderson The Marquette PTO is writing in support of the South Bend Community School Corporation's decision in the demolishing of the old Marquette. The land currently being occupied by the abandoned building can be of better use for the school, its staff, students and the surrounding community. From natural learning habitats and gardens, to simply having more space for overall expenditures, the lot will not sit empty and unutilized. As an Officer of the PTO, I am ready to put forth a lot of personal time to see to the land being operated to its fullest potential. Christine M. Anderson Vice President of the Marquette PTO — I OWNER: JriL xEt ARCHITECTURAL: SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY. !'nM LECTION Ne.: — E-0 WNemucarEErw SCHOOL CORPORATION.-- REBARD & HERE arEETNa MECHANICAL* 07 N,0 Ed = A 4 7 ��n Fu 574-2344M ELECTRICAL— BUILDING DEMOLITION and SIT'F-, OE, ' T'LOPMENT SETINDEX a0u�— C-1 C-iO SUCLEMMGMD0�0N LANDSCAPE:— MARQUETTERPALOOL C40 snmwo� C-&1 on�mmpmu" C42 0a SOUTH DIANA C4, an�-�V CID snmpu L.1.0 Lao ewwATIOxPWt A.M Board of School Trustees , " Administration ': -4 "A EMVA�8.80�300DVAU AO -20 9ASEYENTIF01NDAT AD -11 SMDWGRRSTRDORDEDOt1VWRM en Superintendent AO -22 NRfOW MWNDFL°ORDEYIXDIO ADAO �ELVA�� PROJECT ADDRESSES: Michelle Engel %,,!�e President Interim Exec. Dir. of Operations Services Dawn Jones Secretary Director of Capital Projects BUILDING CODE: John Anella Member Jay Capqp,,-.ri,,,,,,- Member OCCUPANCYTYPE Member Member, CONSTRUCTION TYPE: �T�10S� F F N :V X, om ft G T :1 = Z� M.— P H e Zl— Ix— U 0 V Z. R W L t. PROJECT D A T A SYMBOLS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: --cm MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER t . MCI .4g— oATE I—ECT.-- I- LECTION Ne.: — E-0 WNemucarEErw arEETNa PROJECT DESCRIPTION: --cm MARQUETTE PRIMARY CENTER t . MCI .4g— oATE I—ECT.-- I- SURVEY PREPARED FOR: SOUTH BEND SCHOOL CORP. SURVEY DATED: 1/14/08 FILE #: 070280 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECtION 34, T.38 N., R.2 E. CITY OF SOUTH BEND, PORTAGE TOWNSHIP, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA -�------------- _ +Id '------------------- -1--�I°+a``ir'6 �1'u il� __ — �rS � —� e m � a � � .s o ��eF� _�� —•z= _ �. _ � — a' gra-4yr'-� N� BRQOKFIEfrST• a 45!.,D—.ST- -T. r . ..xx... Y �a +I ciE .H,wMsfrnax a HANE mx sr. AMD cal(Ecc �x40 x0000 D,EYAna1 PER uses Nn• (—NO MESO 1gxAl eE00EaC 9ImIL'l OANN OP 1929 rAw ear a nMf KmM.xr ox ort WEsr aaE a FdlEfOE sr. PPR9K aro rx>mm 1s TxF 9fRM9EcmK WM HwLr9n sr. EiEwnox . mau - roP ear oP FIF4 Krauwr aK rxc swM sxf rc efMCNI smfcr .PPnaK 91a .Est v nx xrmsfnwx Wm, cau[cE SrMEET. wYx; Mfos xErx:.Manua Aro Pa Mrs sxPxx. xo ExfAOApwfxrs sHowx As A eanaaW �OrPUtt�x6 SI.9EGnPPA0nNA1E LacxER nmNa AxW swxuA urr. I. nAfO E. nrt°ficcwnn a down°rxi01ir`w. EXI.1-0 LEGEND ams,v� 9 .axe awa 07.mn �ixfFT wiOxNAnOn: BMOaNxm SrMFfi1 AM) CatEGE SIIEFl NiDM OtOY � encx a aw m ena v wMe xa: efeuxMCYrosrMEn Na HxALian srMEn .orx mwl exex ae elcx a uxe a1•: N1 ROMe AME A$PH^LT PAVED 1 - ....olOCx ,mr m�nxTMcra .w _ P.sw x ewwe man aorAuarwwnr�«°•9fwwewmur�O�•ieouw w r..xa...af1m°.a9Hr PAorcr n«. ...,.A, n.x19x® 9,r [4nx�M irwc x •stow x _ .ma firm camr r"i[xwns spwr.eu - win � �rocxwf•x�x P.af9 ar xn4tt NTMe �a�va an . OMY x414 �. axNr,M aEWW MNHxE coN_Nrunax s*veMsWerAM snAxmlMc UTILITY NOTES: CAS SHOWN SCALED FROM MAP FRGADEO BY NIPSCO. PHONE SHOWN FROM UTILITY LOCATE MARKERS. WATER SHOWN FROM FIELD LOCATION AND CITY MAPS. COMBINED SANITARY AND STORM SHOWN FROM FIELD LOfAT1OM .0 CITY MAPS. SANITARY STUBS ALONG BERGEN SHOWN PER CRY PIANS. SITE ELECTRIC SHOWN FROM UTILITY LOCATE MARKERS SEWER CONNECTION FROM OU9DING NOT KNOWN. R. l NA9x A FN9MW MEG 0i00a9 0 20 40 60 1 11 SCALE HEBARD 8 HOW Archifech Inc THE TOWER BUILDING 210 W. WeWn9Mn SL BONN B9xd, In' /8801 574-23 8807 __J o O F o O 0 _ Z O U" 0 VJ O W " Z Wo U O A' u I..� to = Ca N O rn SITE SURVEY EXISTING BUILDING AREA Meas 7 rw.o:1T I` C-1.0 Iy HIM IpEJtOILH �ryI O -z-0 [L t0'IO_®tH NOIlIIOW3a T ONNV310 311S _ :S31ON IV83N39 NOIlIl0W30311S MMI y�va.�,.nro�,.�o ���".o ,o,�.• C o-- », o z \e C fn �. o m o � :.q M N m o o o / 0 ooh x om 0 zap Zra 9I :S310NA3H •OW3O 311S N`dld NOIlIlOIN3a'8 JNIHV316311S ® Q ^, 3L3 4'NOLLf10W30 '`�y1S 3AilO313S ON cpo j0 S11WIl 'ZS �T.'3IaIJIOt)2iH ��N. Fie R f I, T�nrn.. SiN3W3A0lldWl 3 1 3113 3ALL�31 4 D m .: ...: .. 'a o m - m m 0 0 o :S310NA3H •OW3O 311S N`dld NOIlIlOIN3a'8 JNIHV316311S ® Q ^, 3L3 4'NOLLf10W30 '`�y1S 3AilO313S ON cpo j0 S11WIl 'ZS �T.'3IaIJIOt)2iH ��N. Fie R f I, T�nrn.. SiN3W3A0lldWl 3 1 3113 3ALL�31 4 10MMOLMON6 SITE - --------------- COLLEGE ST. --.-- o ------ !,�l pm 39 )3' T FIIIIJI I IT III7r je-I­'.. 71 1 JIII ......... • N. BRO0KE_lELjD__.ST,_. "4 )4r i LIMITS OF BUILDING SELECTNE SITE SELECTIVE SITEJE DEMOLITION & SITE IMPROVEMENTSi IMPROVEMENTS SITE GRADING PLAN HEBAM flEBU If k(w1lD , Inc TNC TOWER SUIUCIING 218W.St IM�l 674-234890 F.V�9LN01 _j 0 z 0 2 0 0 0 cl) 0 0 w z w 0 clz w SITE GRADING PLAN == C-3.0 H110IM0 I v HEBARD HEBARD kckfe.J I, Inc THE TOWER BONNNO 21S W. WWtl g -St Saran Brig War 4 M1 574.234.8807 F-Blri774%0 ®n J I I �' III �' x` -J Z Zd LL -11 I I, I I O= 0 I. z r--C--� 2E L I r- �,' I oai 1_ n � I° Z W �- ----- -'-. 5 W 22 /�—+- 0 0 ---------------- r-----_— ------ I r ---�'��----------------- o ' ---r�--------------------------------------------- —Z �. °------ 9 m ------ G LIMITS OF BUILOINO SELECTIVE 817E SELECTEMEW I IMPOLi EMefSITE IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT IMPROVFMENi9 ® SITE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN w -„ PLAN KEY NOTES LEGEND GEIJERALJVOTES _ I 1 SITE STORM WATER POLLUTION �._ ._.. ®�.r- .• .•� PREVENTION PLAN F C-3.1 —� n1181ut y VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT MEASURES keen end Purome ae.a..r er�.ee.-r�ar�eao�. �w �aw�rwy ,.TMa .r+�.a..wr..a.r *R...a..r...a.�r..�r ew-w...a. w. aw.w......a.,..a.w w...,w+. VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & WASHING AREAS F... a.«e.srw mrr �.w rpr le«w. avrr.a,. W • rvwwrt.r..wua.a.r xrwmm...r •� raw.w.ra...rwrwwxwrraro..r. ,wr.r_..n«.wwr.,r..wlb.rren.a._ • .w.r. �'aYw..9w.ar.�rw«.b«oowawe ..m/.w+.ra'aww.m�wa.�ra4er..ars e rwa K..W�.P+w.+/aw.aw�w ui.-� wa.pw.ra«+.wwaw.wnwr urly.pr..rrm • ..r+o �.a.a.a.wi.+wvbw�bra.o4 TY ...r.w M1Y.IgrrYy...w.aw.Y - n.o.m.a.w.r.a.s..aaw...�wu.w.+•w�.w • wa....w.er..rw.w..nwar. u..a.rr CONCRETE WASHOUT .rww, p.r.,+me.lrm.. reu.iw.+ �.r.M w..r.+ewn a.«Nr.w..we.e.ra wa.�w.a CONCRETE WASHOUT ARFA TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT PAD DESIGN ftEGUIRMENT9 INSTALLATION AWNTENANCE erwrww 6vwwwww TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT PAD wT SAW RAT F RARRIFRR SIIL„T..FENCCE�J am�F e.wwr SGL,'li'iCi I -N ..ros.re SILT FENCE SILT FENCE Mo. Ts INSTALLATIONi.eeevor��r� i...+- IA4NTEWWCEw.m.+.ewrrr.wi vwwawr CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE r.. rr.r �•e.r I'" `r... wwar �..r .r.r eBEi1L-rF� TEMPQRARY SEEDING APFucAnoN��"�TMw` � �� LWNTENM E ,w.wcwccueaww.ar. TOPSOIL (SALVAGE AND UTILIZATIOM NEGUIREMENIS .tale.axe.r.+ ®cnnori �..w.wr+r..� err SPREADING TOPSgL •m.wwase�w..ssn..� MAIMENANCNEr ..ww .wrwvww..ur.vr SOIL CHARACTERISTICS �r�,rWa.-.�Yar�gm,Mjg.p+En.1 � ertua.. rn¢..gNm eau eawwe WFn bxaFTKeirz e.F.n wcrw mBeix�fl9�iMl�M�.FI�YAEswnwva� UpvAJIR., sn6TynbeongNA a 41 F..rY aeFr uw.wlw.++e�wr. rn..�.M sw.a Trn. w wrr w..o wa. .rw...srw a rw.a.4 x..rx,pr...s wMy6a.awr`��+."a..a UrNJIR.a Y.IJUIW W ea.pla,f ba p.rt.M.bptl Mr �.+r+W awr ewtr .a...,b,.. r.. a r � ........rar.w w._warr.r,w.b.a,r.ww..rwrY�, c«raa .,w,o.aon.w. arap..a w aq.mt ma.y ear SOILS MAP STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS m ,%R,2L0,o S«O.lME TC NIROI.PRACTICES MIM ANE�STABRJIgr SON ®a LORIWATER MPNAGEMENFCONSIDERATION STORMWATER POLLUTANT PREVENTION LOCATION MAP PROJECT INFORMATION HYDROLOGIC 14 UNIT CODE 04050001240040 PROJECT NARRATIVE —.XXZ- EX"NG SITECOtOn0M If HEBARD &`' HfBARD kc6lE01.. IRL THE TOWER BURRING 21e W. —.gt. St S.m Bang Indana am 57423"907 Fn S1NOHW1 —j o I 090 Z Oa 2 U" cn 8 WN Z r W� O LJm O �LyL W m o o F 7 U) PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE Re+xurzo.N.see aFcaemmrnoM _ F r rar..uFwuoNeoNmarAewesmro.roecavxwaeuuall000bulaxarz�r�rAvowoowwoveunaa ^„-„� �"•.¢,�' xFPwx ua FI/m! Aownorwbt NIOEION CON,,,0..t W.PEd N N[CFb W a' RRNo NL Nb11LCRJN MV Fa. SOIL STABILIZATION CHART ,Nioawle rtbaoe aF aueuenTCN rveoob RrR..e. �.........�..: I.ux �nr. locr INw F' --N• F•_; ___; —•, . I Ne �An �•w �,.. Iecr ��+w �oac I i�xw �nwnN �iwrx �e.sa ra a+r�itw� ert�nw� ' wr r uuR Fax eoe. erswTION..FwFa rn,.., ro an ar aualn I SWPPP DETAILS, NOTE SCHEDULES N,A11 `o4.nn F C-3.2 I~ N7101Cii ` COLLEGE ST. SELECTIVE SITE I LIMITS OF SNLDITNG E IMPROVEMENTS DEMOLITION 6SffE (COORDINATE N7TN34 IMPROVEMENTS -- e -----+--------------------------------- \,rs GARD & HEBARD THE Tavist BULDWO gWR i z,ew.wnnmzmnat 8o6 4-2 I4-801fiEa 674-234-8807 . F.614- °oal EJ E=J IM -0 02 -t _t idBBBJ6 _+ _------------------------------- i i I — _J i j II dJ o Rill I I i I I i I I_ v� d L0�0Z rr �- 1) tto ',I I .I. I 0 mo ! 07 = L ---------------------------------J I o cyz z m w co \�--- ------ ------------T _.._ _... =.i., c- -- _--` to to o "•_.v.."._r. cc i I N. BROOKFIELD ST. I LIMITS OF BUILDING SELECTIVESRE SELECTIVE SITE, DEMOLITION 6 SITE®�.".....--..,,.,,.. IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENTS'( IMPROVEMENTS � I � SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN ASPHALT COURT w �— PAVEMENT DESIGN: SITE DEVELOPMENT KEYNOTES: BENCH SEAT SPECIFICATION: ..,,..,.,..� �"��..._. — �.... ow _._......w_...... r SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN .o 0^ _ .wr H1806 �O10l1T C-4.0 r COLLEGE ST. I Ll f- - I IM _ c yf 1+ . J 1 I + ' � rrrrrrrr a . 111.111+I1fi1 � , N. BROOKFIELD ST. • -'\ r BrLLECTIVE 317E I �MPROVEE MENTS OXWITH ® SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - AREA'B' ) ASPHALT COURT PAVEMENT DESIGN: BENCH SEAT SPECIFICATION: SITE DEVELOPMENT KEYNOTES: If HEBARD HEBS kclifed I, Inc THE TOWER BUM NO s+e w w.w�perr s Bauer Wee, 14-880 Bol 6]4-234.8807 Fv374- N SITE l DEVELOPMENT PLAN—AREA'B' =1 —a.nn I�- C-4.1 1 IY H1101G7 r 161 DETAIL STANDARD for .r.. CITY SIDEWALK -RESIDENTIAL oB All WALKING PATH DETAIL -SECTION 1! •per T" 7! PIAN _� ❑ r= RAISED GARDEN ELEVATION PLANTING BED DETAIL SECTION is MONNUMEENTSIGN •ate ea.o ec.l. c•s.0 a ' � . .`.` :tea DETAIL STANDARD for 21T TS REETCURB o2 yr ca. L �► §IDEWALWSLAB DETAIL to •c•LL.rr ,e Gs0 Ar PLAN v+. o �1 - � --[ u.....s .o• � L---� �� :-'.°'-•-','vim, _1 1w s I I ` I I I I ELEVATION !MOtlU ENT SIGN os a C•5.0 SECTION (M. PIER o7 k„A.,..,o r • it .`. \T •mr � �'p �- : Tf � ' P • i r•munr rrow ; M�•r ELEVATION•TYMC FENCE LINE HAIN LINK FENCE ELEVATION Q GATE SECTION 0. PANEL oa wva.sr.rc G5.0 If NEBARD NEBARD A��ifed s, Inc THE TOWER BUILDING 210 W. W W- SL Sa BFnQ W- 40001 57+2348907 h6riDLA0F och Uo ~ _ y Wto oz 0= W 0 8 = U O � z d z�m 13 co co =m w o 0 SITE DETAILS F C-5.0 r- -HH- I ir TREE PLANTING DETAIL xrnTGecuE La➢ SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL /, NOT T➢KNE Lan I ® 1~I I 1 LI I I � UNN i I a I, SELECME SITE I Imrnvv,:mtrvs i EVERGREEN PLANTING DETAIL MOTIOtTIL6 LAD I �3t�I1111�• — �= 11 = '`•:� 111111 � - �� 111111 11■ I) f I I 1 L I LIMITS OF BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS' I IMRROVEN. ® LANDSCAPE PLAN I PLANT LIST �I. N. BROOKFIELD ST. % Y BID ALTERNATF• GRASS SEEDING / SOD NOTES: ---------<------ --- -- o HEBARD 8 HEBARD THE TOWER BUILDING reW. Wm�tGm L Bowe Bang lnaw s 57* 43"907 Ftv A�L48A01 rm z o pis D -o kk O O I _ c1. 0i ®/ 0U� Lu 0 to ° s o W }.0 LAWN n I Z F' Z I 0Wo w :D08 Cy C3 G Z Z _ 9 �m In -� LG I a mom. LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES: GENERAL NOTES: - oME - - PLA N 1 L-1.0 lu H110141➢ I t l611L".N REMOTE CONTROL VALVE o, wlro�'"• E. GEAR DRIVE SPRAY HEAD LIMITS OF BUILDING + ° COLLEGE ST.,: � _ ME d SITEIMPROVE I • �uryILS__. -. -.-"��a.-`-• - ............ _l............................ t.�........... ...... BASE BIC I LIMITS OF'SUILDING SELECTIVE SITE.I, DEMOLITION 6 SITE . 'RM3,4f EM75 � IVlrnwcmcn la I I I f 1 Irl 171 r1 Tl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 )--I I I I I I -I11 I I I I I I I I I I I ............................................■......................I. ... ..... IALTTT:INNATE•-------- --_---_--___--__ BIonLTERNAre N. BROOI{�1 D. ST ® IRRIGATION PLAN ELECTRICAL SERVICE: IRRIGATION DESIGN: IRRIGATION KEYNOTES: GENERAL NOTESL AM — If HfBARD & HfBdRD Archiiedl, Inc TXETOWERBUBOING 218 W W. ,gto8 BB B 8•88. 1B .. 880, 157 - 34-8907 F.9�9H°71 IRRIGATION PLAN H1&'t5 �a.0°1T Ir L-2.0 Ire X110,420 Q I I �4I. 117 Q ROOF EME GENERA RLAN 4QTES [LF _80 fflDPLAN ol NY 0 FOOF FRAMING PLAN 101 m FLOOR PLAN POISR-AN (9 =%lm_l_j=,="=v__ FpgF " gENEIK NOTED A s E Ram a I E ME- DESIc%I ="N M&A"ING PLAN FlOCIRMAMINOPILM GE143" NOTES FLOOR PLAN NOTES* CE, ROOF FRAMIND PLAN PLAN W NOTES ED G) Ii ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE m 5 I ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE KEYNOTES I ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE UFCEND DOOR -11 UTE 6CHE 7 FRAME SCHEDULE KEYNCTES UTE SCHEDuu LE -ND:. WALL TYPES: FOUNDATION PLAN Eo 101 WAMMKIFY NOTES FRAME TYPES! DOOR TYPES: INSUL HM INSUL ON HM mum JAMB DETAIL ue JAMB DETAIL \zv If HEBAR01500 kcN„, Inc THE TOWER BUILDING 216 =ffijt1& I �d 574��890 F,PSN,D I LINTEL SCHEWLE N"FCMM@Mnuo” BUILDING PLANS SCHEDULES 1 I H1W5 —01.0117 7=7 A-3.0 r- I � _jli ;ea� 18 S 1#g1;�eC atiF; ;g ii tiiiir 1 it 111 Si ��Fii'��i ci ii SFSgiial !S ti Q!`A i w ,& Sty i5 g1 t 1 as .1 11 9 ,rl, Ia�IjF � IF4j 1# jet : a€al# ej=a ti 1 s fir gl 3y • , iA • � 1 g ig 0,111 r ,:i' �8 Fgj ' a Ri 9l ill gpi�rig s Fm igafr> �iigsgl ��iia°1 S pi� •�i i:l i�t �S. €ii. i �9 hill IN a i � 0 Cl) m i ti a:•lasaitiA a9•,`-gs a4i 'tBE� I i jj m r" 1 i ja p9.Fip j OR _ 9sai F BUILDING DEMOLITION AND SITE DEVELOPMENT. + C> FA lea a a C a gi�aaeR6 §% iai �a a'i gee Ii MARQUETTE SCHOOL W r z — isiFael11 i e-0 1,1 ,Ft s e;i SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION .a Z q : n_S }` tag - . e•�Q9i" ; i°?i1� 1 SOUTH BEND. INDIANA g its i --fJ a N m f s, EON] o 9 I -4 ® BAjl! 1VENT/FOUNDATION DEMOLITION PLAN v.� I GEHER-LL Qj MQ�ITION j�JQTEs 'AD -2' DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: If KBARDNfBARD Arcl fe 6, Inc. Txe TOWe0. BUILDING 210 w.. %%W.YIan st .8.641-4651 574-234-8007 Fn67�Mll%1 5p_ aO Z o a O U °Va ° W a Z Z o o o Zo z m� 9Q�m m�0oo BASEMENT & FOUNDATION DEMOLITION PLAN rims �aosn AD -2.0 �"•'� Nno6.�om m -1 r0 1 ® FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN 'AQ_2' GENERAL DEJUQLITIOgNOTES 'AD -2' DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: ®�-��.'•��:: ems: ®�����s.-� �q o� ��,.� ,_- =_ If CARD &NEDARD kchife Inc THE TOWER BNLDINO 710 W. Weeltln.on St E*t B.W,,=�08e1 674234..07 Fwfmm] m Q z J F a O Z o a O U 0 O �_ W N Z Z O � � W o W o Z z 0 ca -g=m C3 o � N O N BUILDING FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN Riess �a.os.n AD -2.1 I '"r N1102 9 R SECOND FLOOR QFMnl ITK1N PIAN 'AD -2' GENERAI DEMOLITION NOTES 'AD -2' DEMOLITION KEYNOTES: ��- V, HI MARD & HEBAM Ardli}ed6Im THE TOWERS MUG 11a W. WWW4. ac Bouts 8.4 ISM.. 09 x01 574-234.0807 F.a14pON0a —jo o�Z a.0oL a o U �Vo N UU F 2 Z O_ F W W = U O a 2 Z n/ m mZ co BUILDING SECOND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN H193a �O10a17 f _ AD -2.2 Itir H1101A072 Z Ir — . r.METZ.'V=— —WDOOR.• —.MED . 'M WMDREMRNT— ETusxEDrooWNER _CCRVAININGMU—LTUNDER BOB EIOCRPEEBLLro BE RF]IWFD MMSMDRETURNMCMIER VAM M. —.K—D—. ToOVRE:R v KBARO & HEBARD kcHiedk Inc THE TOWER SUMNO 216 W. W. W4 U S.uDI B 'k— EE90 574434-8007 F.Mylm —J zo L o o0 uj 0 t= 0 co LU a z Z LU 0 2 LL,= 00 a co 0 9) MUSEUM EXTERIOR ELEVATION ROTOS = =1 AD -4.0 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS mate: August 7, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0807A Property Location: 313 (aka 315) West Madison Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer -front bungalow/1877/1915Benz House Property Owner: Bernardo Contreras Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District, local ordinance 49574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This wood frame house with irregular plan sits upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are wood shingle covering wood clapboard, and the steep -pitched gable roof and front dormer are covered in asphalt shingles, with two brick chimneys with corbelled caps. There is a porch across the full width of the front, with the roof being an extension of the main roof, supported by brick piers with small cross design at capitals, brick railing with stone caps, and concrete steps and floor. According to the 1987 survey card, windows are wood 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures, with a large picture window in front, although most windows are boarded up for protection and this cannot be confirmed. The house is located on a spacious site with a large gambrel roofed garage at the rear of the property, also with wood shingle walls covering wood clapboard. ALTERATIONS: The house was originally built in 1877 and remodeled in 1915. According to the survey card, aluminum storm windows have been added. COA 2015-0303A for demolition of house and garage was denied. COA 2016-0623 approved removal of overgrown landscaping and installation of new architectural shingle roof. COA 2017- 0214B approved completed replacement of basement windows with glass block, and renewed COA 2016-0623 to reflect a new contractor for the roof installation. COA 2017-0706 approved removal of the existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of the siding underneath; if determined by staff to be deteriorated beyond repair, the proposed LP Smart siding is approved for use, approve the replacement of existing windows with the Andersen 400 Series aluminum -clad windows, that match the size of the current openings, except for the oval window, demolition of the rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition; siding to be sympathetic to siding on house, to be approved by staff, 6' world privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets, strike the garage and the 6' porch addition to the garage from this application to be addressed on a future COA application, but allow all in-kind maintenance to garage. APPLICATION ITEMS: Proposed materials for the Madison remodel as follows: 1) SIDING: We will remove the existing cedar shake siding that is in disrepair, with pieces missing. We will then encapsulate the existing wood siding underneath that may have lead paint issues as well as degraded conditions, with Tyveck wind wrap. We then propose to install LP Smart siding with a Quad 4" pattern to mimic the existing siding. This will insure a better finish and low maintenance. Corners will also have Corners will also have 1x4 smart trim Siding will have primer and two coats of exterior latex paint. WINDOWS: The existing windows will be removed due to degraded conditions, and standard sizes as close to the original to be used. We propose to use Andersen® 200 Series double -hung windows have low -maintenance Perma-Shield4 exteriors, clear pine interiors or a white interior finish. We Propose to change the large picture window on the first floor south side front room to a two window double hung using the same size to mimic the Dormer above in the scond floor bedroom. DEMOLITION ! ADDITION: We propose to break in the walls and fill in the existing cistern to the West side of the existing rear door. We then will remove the rear porch area of the existing house approximately 4'-0" x 21'4" We then propose to construct an approximate 14'-0" x 26'2- story addition on the North side of the existing house. GARAGE: We propose to upgrade the existing garage into living quarters. We will remove the existing shake siding and install the 3" reveal smart siding. We will remove and replace the existing widows with new windows using the existing sizes and locations. We will remove the existing garage door and side over the existing opening. We will also extend the roof over a new 6' porch on the west side. this porch will be supported by four (4) 8" Turncraft 96 -In x 8 -ft Unfinished Fiberglass Square Columns. This will become the new entry with to added windows and a Therma-Tru Benchmark Door 6 -Panel Insulating Core Left -Hand Inswing Fiberglass Prehung Entry Door (Common: 36 -in x 80 -in; Actual: 37.5 -in x 81.5-1n) The porch floor will be an extension of the garages concrete floor. FENCING: We propose to install a Sierra Pacific 8' Dog -Eared Cedar Fence Picket, to be constructed with treated 2x4, 44 posts and two swinging gates of the same construction. ALLEY ENTRY we prop[opse to enlarge the alley entry porch and roof, and add railing to make the porch access 8" wider. This is to insure a safer entrance. SECOND STORY ENTRANCE We are proposing to add a second story stairway, deck and doorway to the rear of the addition. This will give us two exits from the second floor. CONCRETE SIDEWALK We are proposing to install a 4'-0" wide sidewalk from the gate entrance to the multiple Access points of the house and garage. STAFF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Siding: COA 2017-0706 approved removal of the existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of the siding underneath; if determined by staff to be deteriorated beyond repair, the proposed LP Smart siding is approved for use. Staff has determined that clapboard on house and garage that is brittle would be further exacerbated by the removal of nails. Each cedar shake has no less than 4 nails. Staff approval is granted for LP Smart siding but in a 3" reveal to more closely resemble the clapboard, not 4". 2. Windows: COA 2017-0706 approved replacement of existing windows with the "Andersen 400 Series aluminum -clad windows", that match the size of the current openings, except for the oval window. Anderson 400 (or 200) does not have an aluminum clad option therefore applicant has submitted a specification sheet for Crestline Elite aluminum -clad windows (although application item specifies Anderson 200 from last COA). New Crestline Elite aluminum -clad windows are to match the size of existing windows, except for the oval that will be restored. The 77" x 70" fixed wood window in the front is in need of glass replacement but otherwise is not deteriorated beyond repair, is an original, character defining feature and is a good candidate for restoration. 3. Demo/Addition: COA 2017-0706 approved demolition of the rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition; siding to be sympathetic to siding on house, to be approved by staff. New site plan depicts west wall of main house as demolished with a new wall 2' out to enlarge footprint of main house. There is no written application item for this change. 4. Garage: Staff defers to Building Department for use as "living quarters". Staff approval is granted for LP Smart siding but in a 3" reveal, not 4". Windows, if approved for house, will be Crestline Elite aluminum clad to match size of existing openings. Need specifics on half round window on east side above door; Staff preference is for restoration of original unless determined to be deteriorated beyond repair. Staff has recommended that applicant reapply for garage extension on west side as previously submitted. Addition is a compatible extension of roof and floor in a way that is sympathetic to the architecture and scale and does not detract from the main house. 5. Fencing: COA 2017-0706 approved 6' wood privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets. Applicant has submitted a new site plan that includes both wood and vinyl with a footprint that extends into an alley to the east that applicant is hopeful to vacate and that is approximately 13' south/closer to street but still satisfies setback at the porch. Applicant seemed amenable to Staff recommendation of an all wood fence and agreed that fence in front of house would be open between the pickets, although it would be installed approximately 13' south/closer to street. Staff worked with the Building Department to determine what is allowable for maximum height and setbacks. Regarding fence relating to alley vacation, until finalized, no Certificate of Appropriateness application item can be considered as it is not owned by the applicant. 6. Alley entrance: Enlarge the alley entry porch and roof by 8" to increase the overall width from the current 28" to 36" as required. Add railing to porch. Staff has requested an elevation to convey the alterations; proposed deck and stair material; and proposed railing material, design, and height. This application item is incomplete. Additionally, until alley vacation is finalized, no Certificate of Appropriateness application item to enlarge can be considered as property line appears very near existing construction. If alley vacation is not realized, a variance would be required as per Building Department to expand. 7. Second story entrance: Although adding an exterior second story stairway, deck, and doorway to the rear addition will provide a secondary means of egress, a majority of single family, two story homes do not have a second story stair exit. Staff defers to Building Department regarding use as anything other than a single family. Aesthetically, if exterior, stair is constricted as per site plan submitted, it will not be visible from the street. 8. Concrete sidewalk: Install a 4'-0" wide concrete sidewalk from the gate entrance to the multiple access points of the house and garage. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Excerpt from June 19, 2017 9AM Steve Szaday The large window in- the front of the house is a single pane sash with 1/8" thick glass that is broken. The glass measures approximately 74" inehes wide by 50" inehes tale The sash is in good condition with the exception of a piece of the interior which is broken at the point where the glass was broken from the outside. Excerpt from August 14, 2017 12PM Steve Szaday With the owner, we confirmed dimensions for the front picture window. The dimensions are approximately 77 inches wide and 70 inches high. My previous measurements were incorrect. The owner is proposing two windows in this space that are 36.5 inches wide by 69.75 inches high. The intent is to have a 5 to 6 inch support in between to match the windows directly above on the second floor. I measured that support and the exposed trim work is 6.5 inches with the actual space in between the windows being approximately 5.5 inches for weight pockets. Excerpt from August 16, 2017 1 looked up the International Building code in regards to the requirements for the glass itself on a window of the size and location of the large picture window. Due to the size of the glass (greater than 9 sq. ft), the location from the floor (less than 36' above walking surface), the height of the glass (greater than 60" above floor) and the location from the front door (less than 48"), the glass would have to be tempered. I called a local glass company: Quality Glass on Edison Road in South Bend and talked to Ross. Ross quoted a price of $589.91 to install a tempered piece of 1/4" thick glass measuring 77" wide and 70" tall in the existing wood sash on site. This includes glazing points and glazing. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St. Joseph River, Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the common areas of the district (i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes) Required Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car thoroughfares. The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as possible to their architectural, historic, and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district is required. Repair work to fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever applicable. When utility work dictates the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete, asphalt, fillers, and similar materials shall not be used. All original streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View" streetlights designed by the Cutter Company for this neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood Association and the Historic Preservation Commission to restore "Park View" streetlights to the district shall continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of the Historic Preservation Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the individual property and the surrounding environment and properties. Recommended The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns, and tree lawns should remain open. New or replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept landscaped appropriately while vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways, and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or replacing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl, or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves, and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration of rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration - materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and doorframes are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles, and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height, and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have "L" or "T" shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one and one and a half story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are: 1:1 and 1:2, height to width ratios. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features, and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1. Siding: Approved 2. Windows: Staff recommends Crestline Elite aluminum -clad windows to match the size of existing windows, except for the oval that will be restored. Staff recommends restoration of window in front. 3. Demo/Addition: Approved. Staff does not recommend 2' enlargement of footprint of main house as there is incomplete documentation. 4. Garage: Staff recommends garage extension on west side as previously submitted. Staff recommends Crestline Elite aluminum clad to match size of existing openings, if approved for house. Staff recommends restoration of half round window unless determined to be deteriorated beyond repair. 5. Fencing: Staff recommends previously approved 6' wood privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets and recommends Commission approval on an installation approximately 13' south/closer to street. 6. Alley entrance: Incomplete application item. 7. Second story entrance: Staff recommends stair design, per site plan. 8. Concrete sidewalk: Staff recommends concrete sidewalk, per site plan. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osepheountyindiana.com/departments/Sf CHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLYS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ON pp jj 7 n ONLY D Date Received: ,�71 a u Application Number: '3017 — ogaA Past Reviews: ® ITS (Date of Last Review) 711, I ?017 ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: /� r ❑ Local Landmark � Local Historic District (Name) l fiopi n pok ElNational Landmark National Register District (Name) it `t Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: e �� - v�� j-�J (Ni -l //' 6 �" C�/ (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Cocke) Name of Property Owner(s): Y i� .d Phone #: �.�� �% - `51,5 Is Z, Address of Property Owner(s): �� �S^ (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s):Phone #: Contract Company Name: f��-,/ J�J/��Gi�. '. /�?�j�✓�%�' Address of Contract Company://�� /� y�,.?y! �� �?i�¢�/ C%4,-'�/, (Street Number Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 1_11/ e& el (Single Family—Mttlti-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: �-In-Kind E]Landscape❑ New ElReplacement(not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box ma)7be checked) Description of Proposed Work: Gf Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will c es p . nd with onli; b esignee) X and/or- Sigi late Owmer­�, `'� yS5;n`ate of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— NOTE EXISTING GARAGE UPGRADED WITH INSULATION WINDOWS, FRAMING, DRYWALL, EFFICIENT WINDOWS AND NEW 30 YEAR ARCH ITECTUAL SHINGLE ROOF ALLEY 6' Richmond WHITE VINYL Privacy Fence 24'-0" 5'-7" 7'-6" b N —6' Richmond `fVHITE VINYL Privacy Fencc- 4'1* 5'-7" 4! V 2f T-6". t 5'-7" l NEW SIDE-WALKCONNEcrING ALL EN7 RANqES 7'C" 26-01. 6'-10' SINGLE SLOPE 4 ENTRY GATE COVERED PORCH Lu —T—lam V -0'.T-0' ---8' DOG EARED FENCE to o i4 ? 7— -- ------------------------------ C14 PROPOSED ------------------ -------- ........... ------------------------------ EXISTING !� -- c' 00 A 4'C PEN WHITE PICKET VINYL FE CE 4' ENTRY GATE O 04 7— x V-9" LO pooro(z)se� pk 00 Cl) 10j 6-4- j313/4 8'-1 V2" C14 25'-10'/." pooro(z)se� pk R- 'x ,x X-0" x 3._0" wJU 0 2'-0' U Y-01 Lj"A — T-10' 1 6'4- 4110' lyll Is, n1 ST FLOOR PLAN NOTE THESE DRAWINGS FOR 1/4'=l' QUOTING PUPOSES ONLY. ALL LOAD SIZING OF BEAMS BY LUMBER SUPPLIER. r- Uocument Uate: 1.17.17 Document Phase: Schematic Documents data .—k 6-7 N.—"x 1ST FLOOR PLAN '-A T-8" x 5'-0" T-51/2" 2-6* T-OY." T -O" 3-8%" 2'-6" 9'-2- 2'-6" 13'-4%" f f f f f 12'-0" x 4'-0" 2'-6" x 5'-0" Z' -b-, X 0--0-' 2'-6" x 2'-10"- 11A Cf) o�9 0 9 on, 2'-6' ro LL 5.-o Z 2'-6' u2'6" < P IS =1 Z1i ;np O Cl 'o cm, -M m, 2 >0 2 om mo, cn9 0 G) (n m (1) 2', ]X 5 Tff (n -n Fn -n 00 0 co z;u m �X- T-8 -.71/4' 8'-7Y4" 2'-6- AV -6%. > 6'-2" .. . ..... T-31/? Z 4 27--8Yf? ll -6%" 13'-7" 22'-BY2" ® -n --x - "- Cl) r -I -4 Why Crestline° Elite Premium Clad? We're More Than Just Vanilla windows Vanilla ice cream is good, but sometimes you want more choices. It's the same with windows and doors. Instead of settling for the basic, discover the possibilities with Crestline Elite. As you read this brochure, you will see that there are no limits to what you can do when designing your windows and patio doors. With Crestline, if you can dream it, you can have it. Uncompromising Craftsmanship Cut corners? Not Crestline. Since 1892, we have been handcrafting some of the finest doors and windows on the market, which means you can count on them to be exceptionally beautiful, reliable, and easy to operate. OPTIONS, OPTIONS, AND MORE OPTIONS Crestline offers a full line of new construction and replacement products, all with .the options you need to set your home apart. Choose from a wide variety of styles, standard and custom sizes and shapes, elegant wood interiors, unlimited exterior colors, designer hardware colors, and glass, grille and trim options. With so much to choose from, you'll discover the perfect windows and doors for your home. Ours Other Manufacturers WORRY -FREE. EXTERIORS' Ouruniquely designed extruded aluminum cladding -is 50% stronger -than thin roll -form cladding used 'on. many other windows. And stronger:._ cladding means. -better protection . against water and _air, infiltration, - denting, and fading. ENERGY-EFFICIENT SYSTE# Crestline's Real Warm Edge°spacer system bonds the two panes of insulated window or door glass together. This non-metallic spacer limits the amount of heat or cold that passes through the glass, making your home more comfortable. WOOD,S_HIELDTM 30-Y.EAR WARRANTY .:, Wood components used in the production of.Crestline L © windows and. doors are treated with an advanced =_ process called Wood ShieldTM :that prevents any rot and decay. This warranty coverage includes .all al ' err wood species: offered, with -30-year coverage on l... _` clad wood windows.. 3 A Time -Honored Classic alassic double hung windows are popular for their timeless beauty and of use. Both sash open so you can enjoy fresh air from both portions of your window at the same time. Select from a variety of grille options. Security for Your Home Our stylish recessed lock and concealed keeper look great and create a secure, weathertight seal. Count on Our Construction From the solid wood construction to the Innovative Constant Force Balance TM system, Crestline® Elite double hung windows outperform. Recessed latches enable you to tilt or remove both sash for cleaning. A built-in lift rail eliminates unnecessary hardware, keeping a clean look. OPTIONAL WOOD JAMB An optional vinyl jamb liner with a solid wood insert is available to conceal the balance system. All --hardwood species have a matching insert; pine units have a maple insert. Clad units also have a matching exterior clad filler.. CREATE AN ANGLE BAY Add drama to your room with multiple double hung windows combined into an elegant 301 or 451 angle bay. IX? -7 I.V I .3� p 44 ez ce ev Print I Close Window Subject: COA 2017-0807A From: "Elicia Feasel" <efeasel@co.st joseph.tn.us> Date: Thu, Aug 10, 2017 3:04 pm To: <tnfo@bernardos.com> Cc: "Debra Parcell" <DPar'cell@co.st joseph.in.us>, <bryheath5@gmail.com> Attach: COAApplication.pdf E Bemardo, r i It is obvious that you are motivated and have a strong interest in spurring further redevelopment in the immediate area by the improvements you propose to make at 315 Madison. I can assure you that HPC Staff is doing our best to convey your projects accurately and with adequate detail for the Commission to render its decision. In drafting the Staff Report for COA 2017-0807A (the current application) and finalizing Staff Approvals from COA 2017-0706 (following the conditional approval); we are not clear on many points where there are inconsistencies between the application jtems and site plan, or that more detail is needed. It is the Historic Preservation Commission's policy not to add -- applications that do not include complete documentation to the public hearing agendas (see attached, pgs 2-q and i htto://sjcindiana.com/777/COA-Form ). After deliberating the details that are inconsistent and/or missing, I am willing to :. include this application on the August 21 agenda set for the board but must receive the necessary documentation/clarity by August 16 at 8:30 am (prior to the public posting of the agenda). Please see below for list of needed documentation (either to clarify discrepancies or to provide needed specifications): 1. Windows -Proposed states, "Anderson 200 Series". Product specification provided is for Crestline. Please confirm which is being applied for. -Approval was previously giver' to replace windows that match the size of the current openings, Proposed large picture window with two windows. Please specify size of two new double -hung windows: Will there b&a,mullpn'(trim piece) in - between the two windows? 2. Garage -Proposed states, "extend the roof over a new 6' porch on the west side.." Site plan depicts a V-10' single slope covered porch on south side. Please confirm which is being applied for. If south side is proposed, an elevation is required, particularly to convey the roof extension. -Please confirm that the south facing windows remain in their existing location with door in between; if new location of windows is proposed, please include on elevation. -Staff is assuming that the half round window above existing garage door will be retained; please advise if other alternative is proposed. 3. Fencing -Proposed states, "Sierra _Pacific 8' Dog -Eared Cedar Fence Picket, to be constructed with treated 2x4, 4x4 posts and two swinging gates of.the same construction". COA 2017-0706 approved fence under following condition: 6' wood privacy fence ! on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between the pickets. Site plan notes 6' Richmond WHITE VINYL privacy fence on east and north sides, 8' dog eared fence on west side, 4' open white picket -vinyl fenc,eronsouth sid�A entry gate is shown on site plan on east and south sides. The proposed is not qualified for staff approval as the material has been substituted from wood (previously approved) to vinyl and west fence is proposed 2' taller than approved. As such, this application item requires board review. Please provide product specification and photograph of Richmond white vinyl fence, both privacy and open picket. Please provide an elevation of south fence design. 4. Alley Entry i -Please provide elevation to convey the alterations. at is p oposed de and stair material? What is the proposed railing material, design, and height?— ur r� � , f C 5. Second story entrance %� 14 �''�'�, -Design on site plan is good. What is proposed deck and stair riatteerial? What is the proposed railing material, design, and height? Please let me know if you have any questions. ThanksM Elicia 1 of 2 8/10/17,4:10 P: I 26'4• i �pOp 0 i< N % I BEDROOM #7 BEDROOM #8 ----------------- ------ --- ------------------------------------------------------ --------------- i 0 B'1, F ,r -sr EXISTING DEMO M -------------- -----�_-•--------•---- . 0 t2' -t• e BEDROOM # N n ly BEDRO M #5 " m m l B'�B' 2'-B'b• 2'-B' 25'-10•h• PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR PLAN NOTE THESE DRAWINGS FOR QUOTING PUPOSES ONLY. ALL LOAD SIZING OF BEAMS BY LUMBER SUPPLIER. Q J O O U - 0 N Uorment Date: 7.,7,17 Document Phase: Schematic Documents data remark 2ND FLOPOR PLAN 26'-4" 1r -o^ 10'-4" 5'-0" t 1'-11(A T-0" 4'-2'/." 117 � 7-10 N BEDROOM #7 b BEDROOM 4i8 b ------- -------------------------F---- -----=`-------------- ------------------ ------------ --- o im ---------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------------------- ----------------------- - BEDROOM #3 N 12'-5" m F1 H C I ------_"-R l l BEDRODM #5" 2.$/" O VZ x s -s 5'-2" 1'-5' 25'-10%" PROPOSED 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN A2.1 1/4" = 11 4- NOTE THESE DRAWINGS FOR QUOTING PUPOSES ONLY. ALL LOAD SIZING OF BEAMS BY LUMBER SUPPLIER. t rr l N o� N b ! r+ d' O o� 12'-5" m F1 H C I ------_"-R l l BEDRODM #5" 2.$/" O VZ x s -s 5'-2" 1'-5' 25'-10%" PROPOSED 1 2ND FLOOR PLAN A2.1 1/4" = 11 4- NOTE THESE DRAWINGS FOR QUOTING PUPOSES ONLY. ALL LOAD SIZING OF BEAMS BY LUMBER SUPPLIER. f 5��'r a }' �•.��� tr � �1`hjls FS f`1�` ��n r'n � RRI 1 I mum noir �t �1 J i F,n• '� � t—�` r __,.. ��n a a, s - .�•'�. .��lM1iI11lA'AIAnr�:"€� .. n ... w �•I.,, �.;,�mm..�.., 1 3a MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY July 17, 2017 131 Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 Filed in Clerk's Office AUG 2 9 2017 - CAREEMAH FOWLER CITY CLERK, SOUTH BEND, IN I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Brandon Anderson - - - .Members Not in Attendance: Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Mike Voll, Kevin Buccellato Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Brandie Ecker, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: -Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Members of the Public Present: Victor Lopez, Bernardo Contrenas, Darla Karafa, Leah Thill, Turina Hoover H. PUBLIC HEARING . - A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 509-511 Harrison COA# 2017-0623 Local Landmark Representation by Victor Lopez, 509 Harrison Avenue Turina Hoover, 509 Harrison Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 23, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0623 Property Location: 509 — 511 Harrison Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1921/Palmiter Apartments Property Owner: Victor Lopez Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #8021-1989 Rating: not listed in 2007 Sites and Structures Inventory DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story structure with rectangular plan sits upon a cement foundation. The walls are brick, and the very low hip roof has wide overhanging eaves. A two-story porch with three brick support pillars and two balconies spans the front side. The second story balcony is covered by a roof shingle type of material. ALTERATIONS: COA 2002-0618 approved removal and replacement of asphalt roof shingles. COA 2016-1031A approved replacement in-kind of asphalt roof shingles and installation of new gutters. Vinyl windows have been installed to enclose the second -floor front porch, and second story balcony shingles have been replaced with vinyl siding, both without a COA or building permit. APPLICATION ITEMS: Add new double hung vinyl windows in framed area of porch and replace dilapidated siding. Code enforcement was pressuring me to complete work DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner is seeking approval of Andersen Silver Line Standard vinyl windows installed to enclose second floor front porch, as well as Market Square double 4" vinyl siding which has been installed to replace existing deteriorated balcony shingles, and triple 4" vented and unvented vinyl siding which has been installed to replace existing unvented soffit. Owner seeks to prevent further damage to second -floor decking by installation of windows to prevent exposure to weather. All work has been done without a COA or building permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certifidate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Group B Standards, section A, state "The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark" Prevention of second -floor porch deck deterioration could be accomplished in a manner that is sympathetic to the historic structure and in compliance with the Standards for Local Landmarks. Similarly, the soffit and balcony siding could be replaced with more appropriate materials, as Section C, item 2 states, "Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original." As none of the application items conform to Group B Standards, staff does not recommend approval. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director N MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY July 17, 2017 131 Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Tom --Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Brandon Anderson — -- Members Not in Attendance: Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Mike Voll, Kevin Buccellato Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Brandie Ecker, Legal Counsel Staff Not in Attendance: Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Members of the Public Present: Victor Lopez, Bernardo Contrenas, Darla Karafa, Leah Thill, Turina Hoover H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 509-511 Harrison COA# 2017-0623 Local Landmark Representation by Victor Lopez, 509 Harrison Avenue Turina Hoover, 509 Harrison Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 23, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0623 Property Location: 509 — 511 Harrison Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1921/Palmiter Apartments Property Owner: Victor Lopez Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark, ordinance #8021-1989 Rating: not listed in 2007 Sites and Structures Inventory - DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story structure with rectangular plan sits upon a cement foundation. The walls are brick, and the very low hip roof has wide overhanging eaves. A two-story porch with three brick support pillars and two balconies spans the front side. The second story balcony is covered by a roof shingle type of material. ALTERATIONS: COA 2002-0618 approved removal and replacement of asphalt roof shingles. COA 2016-1031A approved replacement in-kind of asphalt roof shingles and installation of new gutters. Vinyl windows have been installed to enclose the second -floor front porch, and second story balcony shingles have been replaced with vinyl siding, both without a COA or building permit. APPLICATION ITEMS: Add new double hung vinyl windows in framed area of porch and replace dilapidated siding. Code enforcement was pressuring me to complete work. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner is seeking approval of Andersen Silver Line Standard vinyl windows installed to enclose second floor front porch, as well as Market Square double 4" vinyl siding which has been installed to replace existing deteriorated balcony shingles, and triple 4" vented and unvented vinyl siding which has been installed to replace existing unvented soffit. Owner seeks to prevent further damage to second -floor decking by installation of windows to prevent exposure to weather. All work has been done without a COA or building permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movin The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildine Site and Landscanine 1. Require Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Group B Standards, section A, state "The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark" Prevention of second -floor porch deck deterioration could be accomplished in a manner that is sympathetic to the historic structure and in compliance with the Standards for Local Landmarks. Similarly, the soffit and balcony siding could be replaced with more appropriate materials, as Section C, item 2 states, "Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original." As none of the application items conform to Group B Standards, staff does not recommend approval. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Hertel moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — loss of architectural integrity to a local landmark Commissioner Parker (Present) —Abstained. "Not comfortable with a vote on this just now." Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — the project supports stylistic and material departures from the original intent of the structure. Material choice is not in keeping with the Group B Standards and Guidelines for local historic landmarks, especially where the fagade is concerned. I support the staff recommendation for more appropriate choice in materials. We have a general lack of information regarding the need for this particular construction, and I believe that supporting this - -- project also supports a desire to degrade a landmark beyond its current rating. --- Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — because of inappropriate material and not staying with the integrity of the building and outside the standards. For me, there could have been some difference in my opinion if it was just in a district and not an individual landmark. We are really changing the look of an individual landmark as opposed to a house in a district that may have had other similar houses. An individual landmark, I can't see getting this far away from our standards Commissioner Hertel (AYE) — it does not meet the Group B Standards and Guidelines, and the materials used compromise the historical and architectural integrity of this landmark. None opposed. Vote: 4 — 0 - COA#2017-0623 Denied. 2. 1069 Riverside Drive COA# 2017-0626 Riverside Drive Representation by Darla Karafa, 1069 Riverside Drive STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 26, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0626 Property Location: 1069 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/Craftsman/1910/Hughes House Property Owner: Andy and Darla Karafa Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District, ordinance #7469-85 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a 2 '/z story American foursquare house with Craftsman features; walls are stucco with wood trim and wide soffits. The roof has a high hip with hip roof dormers covered in asphalt shingles. The front porch is enclosed on the east and open on the west side. The windows are 1/1 double hung with wood surrounds. ALTERATIONS: The attic windows are replacements with COA 2005-011813. A mudroom was added to the rear of the home with COA 2006-0627. The roof is a replacement. COA 2016-0726 approved removal and replacement of an Ash tree, installation of an inground swimming pool, replacing patio and extending around pool, new siding and roof on garage and extending roof of garage 6' to create a covered patio, installation of retaining wall in front yard, installation of two Craftsman - style porch lights and low -profile motion -detected security lights for driveway, and installation of architectural shingles on house roof. APPLICATION ITEMS: Extend existing driveway 20 ft. to the end of the house — will not enter the backyard. Move fence back to original position. Concrete — to match existing driveway. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to: 1) extend concrete driveway 20 feet to the end of the house (see attached site plan); 2) move existing wood fence and gate back from end of existing drive way to end of extended driveway (original position). PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the 3 homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. --- - — - Prohibited—­ No rohibited—_- No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the extended concrete drive with relocated fence and gate will in no way detract from the historic appearance of the home, Staff recommends approval of both elements of the project. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Parker moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2017-0626 Approved. 3.315 Madison COA#2017-0706 Chapin Park Representation by Bernardo Contrenas, 1115 Autumn Trail, Mishawaka STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: July 6, 2017 Application Number: 2017-0706 Property Location: 313 (aka 315) West Madison Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer -front bungalow/1877/1915/Benz House Property Owner: Bernardo Contreras Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District, local ordinance #9574-05 Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This wood frame house with irregular plan sits upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are wood shingle, and the steep -pitched gable roof and front dormer are covered in asphalt shingles, with two brick chimneys with corbelled caps. There is a porch across the full width of the front, with the roof being an extension of the main roof, supported by brick piers with small cross design at capitals, brick railing with stone caps, and concrete steps and floor. According to the 1987 survey card, windows are wood 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures, with a large picture window in front, although most windows are boarded up for protection and this cannot be confirmed. The house is located on a spacious site with a large gambrel roofed garage at the rear of the property, also with wood shingle walls. ALTERATIONS: The house was originally built in 1877 and remodeled in 1915. According to the survey card, aluminum storm windows have been added. COA 2015-0303A for demolition of house and garage was denied. COA 2016-0623 approved removal of overgrown landscaping and installation of new architectural shingle roof. COA 2017-0214B approved completed replacement of basement windows with glass block, and renewed COA 2016-0623 to reflect a new contractor for the roof installation." APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes: 1) Removal of existing cedar shake siding, encapsulation of wood siding beneath with Tyvek house wrap, and installation of LP SmartSide engineered wood siding with a Quad 4" pattern to replicate the existing siding. Comers will have 1x4 Smart trim. Siding will be primed and have two coats of exterior latex paint. Cedar shake is in poor condition. Condition of wood siding under shake is unknown but can be assumed to have significant maintenance needs due to shake application over top and decades of deferred maintenance. Staff requests an opportunity to document siding underneath shake upon removal. 2) Removal of existing wood double hung 1/1 windows and replacement with Andersen 400 Series vinyl -clad double -hung windows, sized to fit existing openings. Most windows have been mothballed for decades; improper sizing of boarding has allowed water to enter. Oval window will be restored in-kind. 3) Demolish and fill in cistern to the West side of existing rear door; remove rear porch, approximately 4'-0" x 21'4", and construction of a 14'x26' 2 - story addition on the North side of existing home (see attached plans). Windows and siding will be continuous as installed on main house. 4) Convert existing garage to living space. Remove existing shake siding and install SmartSide with 3" reveal to match main house; remove and replace existing windows to match existing size and location; extend the existing gambrel roof over a new continuous 6' porch on the west side (porch floor will be an extension of the concrete garage floor); support porch with four 8" Turncraft 96"x8' unfinished fiberglass square columns; -install-a Therma-Tru Benchmark 6 -panel insulated doo _5) Install a Sierra Pacific 8' dog-eared cedar picket fence and two swinging gates of the same material, to be constructed with 2x4 and 4x4 treated posts. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Excerpt from February 16, 2017 10AM Steve Szaday I am familiar with this property as I had personally on my own time helped the owner secure the property after multiple break-ins over the last four years. Many of the boarding that had taken place prior to my involvement especially those done on the second level utilized poorly fitting boards that allowed elements to enter at the top and settle on the window sashes and sills. Luckily, there are storm windows on most of the windows. Most of those had been broken instead of the actual sash glass. I counted ten storms with broken glass and six sashes with broken or missing glass. The structure has been without permanent occupants or heat since the 1980s. Fortunately, the roof that was in place had no leaks and only minor water damage in the plaster on second floor comers as a result of failing gutters. The end result of my inspection is that one in three windows are in sound condition and not deteriorated beyond repair. Those windows had properly fitted boarding and intact storms. They are all however, painted shut and without weight ropes. The remainder have suffered severe structural damage and dry rot as a result of having elements enter but not having anywhere to exit. The most damage is to the sashes and the sills. The side framework is structurally sound other than in those areas where damage was sustained during break-ins. The large fixed picture window in the front is broken with a large hole. (the glass is 1/4" thick and has a green hue) The iconic oval window on the west side needs some frame attention but is in good shape. The windows located at the rear "mud - room" addition have had most of the frame work broken out and currently have either plate glass or plexiglass in place. Excerpt from June 19, 2017 9AM Steve Szaday I photographed each window on second and first floors and there are 14 windows that he is looking to replace. The structure has been boarded up for decades with the exception of six windows. This has helped the longevity of some windows but has caused some damage to others where the boarding was improperly sized or installed. I will break this down into groups based upon their condition: (1) One window is completely gone and is merely a plexiglass non operable storm window (2) Three windows have sturdy sashes that merely need re -roping and paint removal, however they are spread out throughout the house. (3) One window is the oval window that is completely deteriorated. The framework is dry -rotted and in places missing. The glass is intact but not original as it is thinner than the other window panes in the house. (4) Four windows have sashes that are in need of repairs but are salvageable. These windows were not boarded properly but were sized short of the top allowing elements in and to be trapped. In addition, a galvanized sill wrap was installed but not caulked. Water infiltration has seeped around the galvanized metal and has rotted out the sills and bottom plate. I can apply pressure to the sill and have sponge -like movement. The interior plaster shows water damage off the lower corners that runs to the base board trim. (5) Three windows have structural damage due to abuse and vandalism(break-ins). These sashes could be repaired but parting and interior stops are missing or broken and will need to be replaced (6) One window has an upper sash that is painted in place and appears to be in good condition but is missing the lower sash. (7) One windows is a large picture window at front of house. This window is a single pane sash with 1/8" thick glass that is broken. The glass measures approximately 74" inches wide by 50" inches tall. The sash is in good condition with the exception of a piece of the interior which is broken at the point where the glass was broken from the outside. The only intact storm window is the non-operable one where there is no sashes left inside. None of the remaining storm windows are complete and will all need to be replaced, I did not find any screens. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The Chapin Park Local Historic District is a particularly fine residential area located close to downtown South Bend, the St. Joseph River, Memorial Hospital and Leeper Park. This section is meant to protect and guide appropriate maintenance of the common areas of the district (i.e. visual landscape and streetscapes) Required Brick streets contribute greatly to the character of the neighborhood. These streets have always been essentially passenger car thoroughfares. The appointments of the streets (i.e. lighting, curbs, horse hitches and monuments) should contribute as much as possible to their architectural, historic, and residential character. Retention and maintenance of existing brick streets in the district is required. Repair work to fill voids and gaps must utilize brick paver materials and acceptable installation methods whenever applicable. When utility work dictates the removal of street sections (pavers), the original materials will be reinstalled. Brick streets shall be patched with brick pavers. Concrete, asphalt, fillers, and similar materials shall not be used. All original streetlights shall be maintained, especially the George Cutter "Park View" streetlights designed by the Cutter Company for this neighborhood. Present efforts by the Neighborhood - --- ---- -- Association and the Historic Preservation Commission to restore "Park View" streetlights--- ---- — to- the --- district- ----- sh-- all continue. Any change in lighting must receive approval of the Historic Preservation Commission. New or different fencing requires a C of A and shall reflect the style and character of the individual property and the surrounding environment and properties. Recommended The current or historic character of lawns should be preserved. Front yard areas, common lawns, and tree lawns should remain open. New or replacement trees should be compatible in variety with those presently growing. Vacant lots should be kept landscaped appropriately while vacant, and may be used for recreational or residential development. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed by widening existing streets, applying asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways, and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers, which would alter the relationship of the houses, shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead -- - lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application, and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or replacing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl, or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves, and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration of rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration - materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and Z sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power-washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and doorframes are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other-_ -_ half have wood storm windows. ------------------------- - ----- ---- -- - - - Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles, and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height, and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have "L" or "T" shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single-story cottages and one and one and a half story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are: 1:1 and 1:2, height to width ratios. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features, and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco, wood clapboard and shingles, and aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard/composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture, and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 1) Staff recommends approval of removal of existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of siding underneath. If siding underneath is determined to be deteriorated beyond repair, Staff recommends approval of LP Smart siding. 2) Staff recommends approval of replacing windows with units that resemble the original in respect to the size of the openings although vinyl clad is not recommended over wood or aluminum clad. 3) Staff recommends demolition of rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition, per attached plans. 4) Staff recommends modifications to garage but defers to Building Department regarding use as "living quarters". 5) Staff recommends a 6' wood privacy fence on the east, north, and west sides as the proposed 8' can be interpreted as a "high wall or barrier" that is prohibited under Environment. Staff does not recommend a privacy fence on the south side (or front), but recommends a fence that is less tall than 6' and has spaces between the pickets. Written by Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Approved by Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commission Questions: Commissioner Klusczinski asked the applicant to clarify the type of windows he plans to install, -- — vinyl--clad-as-stated-on this -application or-alummum-clad. The applicant stated he will only use aluminum -clad windows. Klusczinski stated if different windows were used than listed on this application, further review may be necessary. Commissioner Anderson questioned whether the front door of the house would be replaced with a 6 -panel door. The applicant responded the existing front door will remain., Commissioner Gordon moved to delete the garage addition from this COA; remand authority to staff to document need for replacement of all windows with aluminum -clad windows; remand authority to staff for determination of deterioration of existing clapboard under the shakes and to approve the replacement siding; require the fence to be within the guidelines of Chapin Park and remand authority to staff to approve fencing style(s). Motion dies for lack of a second. Commissioner Anderson moved to approve the application with conditions: 1) Remove the existing cedar shake siding in an attempt to evaluate the condition of the siding underneath; if determined by staff to be deteriorated beyond repair, to recommend approval of proposed LP Smart siding. 2) Replacement of existing windows with Andersen 400 series aluminum -clad wood windows to match the size of existing windows, except for the oval window. 3) Demolition of the rear cistern and porch and installation of new 2 -story addition; siding to be sympathetic to siding on house, to be approved by staff. 4) 6' wood privacy fence on east, west, and north sides; fence on south side to be less than 6' tall in a style with spaces between pickets. 5) Strike the garage and the 6' porch addition to the garage from this application to be addressed on a future COA application, but allow all in-kind maintenance to garage to match house. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2017-0706 Approved with conditions. III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 19, 2017 —Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report —Distributed. President Klusczinski and Treasurer Molnar will join Executive Director Feasel for a brief budget meeting July 19 before the County Council Budget Committee meeting. HPC has been asked to reduce the 2018 budget by five percent; however, Executive Director Feasel has proposed a 5% reduction of HPC budget less grant from the city and employee benefits, rather than 5% reduction of total budget. 8 C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Executive Director — In packet. 3. Deputy Director — In packet. Commissioner Hertel questioned Cressy & Everett request for historic district guidelines and whether any attempt has been made to provide this information to local realtors; also, landmark status of Firehouse #9. Discussion. 4. Preservation Specialist — In packet. 5. Legal — new legal counsel in attendance, Brandie Ecker, of Thorne Grodnik, LLP, will officially begin her counsel position July 18. - - -- - -D. - COMMITTEE REPORTS - --------- - - - - - — - -- -- --- 1. President —None. 2. Standards and Maintenance Committee — Chairman Hertel noted this will be covered during New Business section of meeting. V. OLD BUSINESS —None VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. Solarize South Bend — SolSmart advisor, Leah Thill, an independent contractor in the MACOG office (providing support to the city for six months) reviewed documents she prepared regarding solar use in historic districts, to improve communication and possibly change language in historic district guidelines. In preparing these documents, Ms. Thill drew on best practices for solar that have been used in other historic communities, and examples of guidelines and zoning codes from the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Discussion. President Klusczinski recommended commission members take time to read documents thoroughly, review by legal counsel, and determine possible next steps. VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS 1. Commissioner Hertel suggested creation of a document explaining how to apply for a COA. This could become part of a packet for realtors to present to those purchasing property in historic districts. Executive Director Feasel pointed out that this information is available in the historic district guidebooks as well as on the website. The information could be edited to make it more concise. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hertel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Four in favor, one opposed. Vote: 4 —1. Commissioner Gordon opposed the Motion to Adjourn for questions over procedural etiquette and asked that his vote appear on the record. President Klusczinski clarified that the rules allow for a member to initiate a Motion to Adjourn before the chair calls for it. However, even if adopted by the majority, the meeting is not officially adjourned until the chair declares it so. As such, no rules were violated. Meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m. Attest: JMc hele Gel rr an,,Secretary 't -d-1 " 17 Date 0 Ldcatio"get as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation 1 L �= eph County Account Carry Forward Original Addrl Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 ! 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals " 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 i 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 Location Totals "'•'•"'•""'•'•""*" 100.00 100.00 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Financial System 08/02/2017 06:59 AM by ksobecki iPage 99 l Location lKet as of 07-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017, Director: County Historic Preservation Carry Forward Original Addt'i Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent Fund Totals *******'*"'*""*'*''*':"""""`*"`**"' 4,000.00 0.00 51.74 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 4,051.74 100.00 100.00 Financial System 08/02/2017 06:59 AM by ksobecki Page 100 Combindger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc 0000 General Gov T. 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen GovT General GovT. General GovT. Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 j 0.00 Cash: Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 I Cash: S -eph County Balances 0.00 0.00 17,383.06 Balances 0.00 0.00 17,383.06 0.00 0.00 17,383.06 Financial System 08/02/2017 07:16 AM by ksobecki iPage 253 � f_ CombinJAger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 III SailJdsAph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 183.75 (183.75) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 183.75 4103.02707.000.0037 Charges For Services General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 51.74 (51.74) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 51.74 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 193.50 (193.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 193.50 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 08/02/2017 07:16 AM by ksobecki Page 254 r Coinbin�dger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation �eph County Estimated Expenditure Unreceived Revenue 4,051.74 0.00 Unencumbered: Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 I 0.00 Total 0.00 428.99 (428.99) 4,051.74 0.00 Investment Current 0.00 Cash: 428.99 Total 0.00 Transfer, Current 0.00 Total 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 428.99 (428.99) 4,051.74 0.00 �eph County Financial System 08/02/2017 07:16 AM by ksobecki Page 255 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 4,051.74 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 0.00 Cash: 428.99 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 428.99 Financial System 08/02/2017 07:16 AM by ksobecki Page 255 . _ Combined -t ger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Fund Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,812.05 (17,812.05) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 4,051.74 0.00 0.00 Cash: Sahli JU11ph County Balances 4,051.74 4,051.74 17,812.05 0.00 0.00 17,812.05 Financial System 08/02/2017 07:16 AM by ksobecki Page 256 Locatio Iliilliiget as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2 Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Object Description 11075 Deputy Director 000 General GovT. 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 000 General GovT. 14800 Fica Contribution 000 General GovT. 14810 P.E.R.F. 000 General GovT. 14840 Group Insurance 000 General GovT. 10000 Totals' """"""""""""' 21030 Office Supplies 000 General GovT. 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 000 General GovT. 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 000 General GovT. 20000 Totals ...................:.....:.............. 31070 Other Contractual Services 000 General Gov'T. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 000 General GovT, 34040 Auto Liability 000 General GovT. Financial System 08/01/2017 04:19 PM by ksobecki Page 51 a I =seph County 017. Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total I I Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 'I Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.001 17,990.70 13,193.30 13,193.30 42.31 42.31 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 23,480.70 17,219.30 17,219.30 42.31 42.31 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 8,051.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 ', 65,471.40 43,963.60 43,963.60 40.17 40.17 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 i 54.97 245.03 245.03 81.68 81.68 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 79.00 921.00 921.00 92.10 92.10 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 73.37 151.63 151.63 i 67.39 67.39 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 207.34 1,317.66 1,317.66 86.40 86.40 1,500.00 18,890.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 I 400.00 6,121.14 13,868.86 14,268.86 68.02 69.98 3.29 50.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 6.58 j 9.87 36.84 43.42 69.13 81.48 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 51.24 43.76 43.76 , 46.06 46.06 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 100.00 100.00 Financial System 08/01/2017 04:19 PM by ksobecki Page 51 a LocatiorMget as of 07-31-2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Lou. 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt9 Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 30000 Totals""""'*""'"*":""""**"*""'"*'*** 1,503.29 20,335.00 0.00 0.00 21,838.29 406.58 6,182.25 15,249.46 15,656.04 69.83 71.69 Location Totals """"**"*"*'"*':* ..................:.: 1,503.29 131,295.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 406.58 71,860.99 60,530.72 60,937.30 45.58 45.89 Financial System 08/01/2017 04:19 PM by ksobecki Page 52 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017 Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence Fund: 1000 County General Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Vendor PO Number Vendor Name 142688 061203 Szaday Steve 140027 001538 South Bend Tribune Budget Account Code Open Date 1000.31070.000.0037 07/21/2017 1000.33010.000.0037 04/11/2017 Location Total Saint Joseph County Amount Age (Days) 400.00 10 6.58 111 406.58 //r Financial System 08/01/2017 04:23 PM by ksobecki Page 17 CombineU Diger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 0.00 0.00 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 07/14/2017 07/14/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:731254 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst07/14/2017 07/28/2017 07/26/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199,38 BK:008 CK:732065 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst07/28/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General Gov r. Historic Preservation 07/14/2017 07/14/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:731255 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst07/14/2017 07/28/2017 07/26/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:732066 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst07/28/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 1000.14800.000.0037 Fica Contribution General Gov'T. Historic Preservation F.I.C.A. Contribution Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General Gov'T. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 Saint Joseph County Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 745.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 13,193.30 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 13,193.30 17,990.70 Cash: (17,990.70) Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 17,219.30 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 17,219.30 23,480.70 Cash: (23,480.70) Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 5,500.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 5,500.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 8,051.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 8,051.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial System 08/01/2017 04:26 PM by ksobecki Page 171 CombiriN ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General Gov T. Historic Preservation 0.00 Cash: Estimated Unreceived Revenue 0.00 i Unencumbered: Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General Gov T. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appropriation 0.00 53.29 Appropriation 0.00 95.00 Appropriation 0.00 900.00 Appropriation 0.00 400.00 Encumbrance 6.58 Encumbrance 0.00 Encumbrance 0.00 Encumbrance 0.00 Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 9.87 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 51.24 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 i Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: -seph County Balances 43.42 36.84 (9.87) Balances 43.76 43.76 (51.24) Balances 900.00 900.00 0.00 Balances 400.00 400.00 0.00 Financial System 08/01/2017 04:26 PM by ksobecki Page 173 Combinger by Location (Current Month) as of 07-31-2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 07/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total Location Totals Current 0.00 Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 60,937.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,209.52 Unencumbered: 60,530.72 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 132,798.29 406.58 71,860.99 Cash: (71,115.99) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,209.52 0.00 745.00 (745.00) 132,798.29 406.58 71,860.99 Cash: (71,115.99) Financial System 08/01/2017 04:26 PM by ksobecki Page 174 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 06 July through 07 August 2017 Daily Highlights 07.06 Meet w/ Bernardo Contrenas re: 313 Madison COA. Meet w/ Lou Sabo re: photography. Solar in historic districts research. 07.07 Meet w/ Eric Ford re: 705-707 Lincoln Way East threats from owner. 07.10 07.11 Process payroll. Meet w/ Leah re: Solar in historic districts. 07.12 Process Contractor PO. Meet at ND Architecture Library re: Building South Bend. Meet w/ SBCSC re: Marquette School COA. 07.13 Meet w/ Lou to scan slides/negatives at SJCPL. Review Minimum Maintenance Standards letters. Progress on Scavenger Hunt. Building South Bend follow up. 1636 Lincoln Way West follow up. 07.14 - —- --- 07.17 Budget reconciliation. Building South Bend meeting at Architecture Library. Prep for Snippets of South Bend. Prep for SJC budget meeting. Prep for and attend HPC meeting. 07.18 HPC meeting follow up. Prep for Snippets of South Bend. Prep for SJC budget meeting. Meet w/ Code Enforcement in field re: recent breach at 115 S Lafayette. Meet w/ Area Plan Director Larry Magliozzi re: changes to BZA that relate to HPC enforcement. City Cemetery correspondence relating to entrance redesign. Correspondence w/ Robert Wolosin re: basement flooding in East Wayne Street, follow up email with Department of Public Works. 07.19 Attend SJC budget meeting. Process Contractor invoice. Prep for and attend Snippets of South Bend. 07.20 315 W Madison site visit re: windows and siding. Building South Bend work. Review Legal Counsel draft resolution for energy conservation and efficiency. Finalizing Scavenger Hunt, print and deliver flyers. 07.21 07.22 Attend Treasure Hunt North event, staffing tours at City Cemetery and facilitating Lou Sabo Photography Exhibit. 07.24 Process payroll. Meet w/ John, owner at 705 Riverside Drive re: concern for a RME issued at 701 Riverside Drive, follow up w/ Building Department and John. Review July HPC meeting minutes. Review St. Joseph County Policies Handbook. 509-511 Harrison follow up phone call w/ referral to Building Department re: violations and suggestion to apply for new COA. Work w/ Eric to review new reports and templates. City Cemetery entrance design meeting at DCI. 07.25 St. Joseph County Department Head meeting at MACOG, follow up tasks. Meet w/ Code Enforcement in field re: another breach at 115 S Lafayette. Begin Section 106 Review 1600074 Corby Blvd, Ironwood Dr, Rockne Dr Intersection Improvement. 07.26 Process Contractor PO. Field work in River Bend. City Cemetery Sexton Cottage correspondence w/ Dixie Thurin of Questers. Treasure Hunt follow up. Building South Bend correspondence re: Lou Sabo Collection and SJCPL and Taylor's Field photography. Correspondence w/ Samantha Salden, ND Architecture re: private tour for students. 07.27 Meeting at ND Architecture Library re: Pattern Books. Correspondence w/ County Commissioner office re: Lou Sabo exhibit dedication. Section 106 Review Corby Boulevard, Ironwood Drive, and Rockne Drive Intersection Improvement Des. No. 1600074. Correspondence w/ DCI re: South Michigan Street. Draft deputy director job posting and letter to SJC Commissioners. Correspondence w/ SJC HR re: deputy director job posting. 07.28 07.31 5105 Ironwood Road correspondence w/ Deb, Steve, Building Department. 315 Madison meeting w/ Bernardo Contrenas, follow up site visit. Finalize deputy director job description, forward draft to Tim, forward final to SJC HR for County Commissioner approval. Correspondence w/ Marchelle of RealAmerica re: Marquette School. 08.01 Prepare for and attend County Commissioners meeting re: dedication of Louis Sabo Photo Exhibit. Promote deputy director job opening. 08.02 Reconcile budget. Process Contractor P0. Correspondence re: Solar in historic districts. Correspondence w/ IT re: phone system and applicant program. Meet w/ Tim and Legal at HPC re: various topics including ordinance violations. 313 W Madison meet w/ owner re: new COA. 08.03 Meet w/ County Department Heads. Meet w/ Roger Parent re: Odd Fellows research. Draft 8/21 HPC meeting agenda. Correspondence w/ Mike Symanski re: 1905 College Street. Correspondence re: South Michigan Street. Tracking down SJC Ordinance No. 117-76 for Legal. 08.04 08.07 ' COA deadline. Process payroll. Interview for Deputy Director. Heritage Tour scheduling and send invoice. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 1615 East Wayne Street 2017-0712 Replace and rebuild structure of four seasons porch on west side of house, including installation of replacement glass, in-kind, into openings. 701 Riverside Drive 2017-0717 Minor in-kind repairs to existing garage (side panels and doors) and lean-to. All work is in-kind, Routine Maintenance Exclusion. 520 East Colfax 2017-0718 Repair or replace all damaged crown moldings, fascia boards, and soffits. Materials to be used would be as like in style and wood species. Repair or replace all damaged exterior window trims including sills. Repair storm windows as needed. Any missing storm windows will be duplicated to match existing storm windows. All material to be primed using oil based primer before installation. Top coat exterior trim using Sherwin Williams products, colors to match existing. Interns/Volunteers Who George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Eric Stalheim Taylor Driscoll Project Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Preservation Specialist Building South Bend Phone Calls Who Date/Time Regarding Brian Kane 07.12/4 pm 1215 Riverside Drive COA process for tree removal. Chris Barth 07.12/4 pm Contractor List Art Russell 07.25/10 am Centier's Community Reinvestment program Robin Becker 08.01/2 pm Advice for new position at Career Analysis Research Requests What Date Who Hoosier Brewery/South Bend Brewing Association 07.12 Indiana Landmarks Foreclosed properties 07.18 Walk in Odd Fellows 08.03 Roger Parent 1905 College Street 08.03 Indiana Landmarks Hours 0.25 0.25 1.5 0.25 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — July 10 — August 7, 2017 Daily Highlights .'. 7/10 COA 2017-0626, 2017-0706. RME 2017-0710. Attended Treasure Hunt meeting. 7/12 Section 106 reviews. Assemble and mail commissioners' packets. Minimum maintenance survey letters. 7/13 Minimum maintenance survey letters. Section 106 reviews. Prepare meeting minutes template. 7/14 RME 2017-0714. Print certified mail receipts. File maintenance. Minimum maintenance survey letters. Proofread Treasure Hunt Program/map. 7/20 RME 2017-0720. Section 106 Reviews. Update forms and templates to include new legal counsel. Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Worked on minutes from HPC meeting. File maintenance. 7/21 -Meeting with Victor Lopez.- RME 2017-0721Work on minutes from -HPC meeting. Mail permit for COA 2017-0626. RME 2017-0721A. Meeting with Bernardo Contrenas. 7/24 Research 928 Riverside. Finished draft of HPC meeting minutes. Attended Treasure Hunt follow-up meeting. Denial letter for 509-511 Harrison. Approved with conditions letter for 313-315 W. Madison. 7/25 Responded to information requests. Mailed letters from July HPC meeting. File maintenance. Sent June 26 letter returned from James Hickner to new address. MMS survey letters. RME 2017-0725. Site visits to 25618 Quinn and 68437 Pine. Updated job description. 7/27 RME 2017-0727. MMS survey letters. 7/28 Took photos of Rose Garden and Lavender Labyrinth for Indiana Landmarks. Sold old windows. MMS survey letters. RME 2017-0727 correspondence. Sold windows. 7/31 5105 Ironwood demolition. RME 2017-0731, 2017-0531A. Worked with owners of 509-511 Harrison;. 425 W. North Shore; 61723 Oak Rd. Research 611 W Washington. Letters to 61601 and 60500 Bremen Hwy. Mailed MMS survey letters. 8/1 RME 2017-0801, 2017-0801A. Start Marquette School COA. File maintenance. Sold windows. 8/2 Marquette School research and COA. File maintenance. Started August meeting agenda. 8/3 Start 313-315 West Madison COA. Copies and scans for Roger Parent. File maintenance. Access and deal with voice mail. 8/4 Returned all voice mail messages. Sold windows. COA 2017-0803, 2017-0804. 8/7 Printed minutes and sign -in sheet for meeting. Worked on COA 2017-0804. Discussed repointing and spalling problems with owner of 65150 Redwood. COA 2017-0807, 2017-0807A. Routine Maintenance Exclusions '. . Address RME# Description 740 E. Bronson 2017-0710 Repair/replace existing flat roof; work and materials in-kind. 841 Park Avenue 2017-0714 Repair/replace 50' of curb and sidewalk; repair/replace 608 Park Avenue 2017-0720 Leeper Park Assets East 2017-0410 644 East Monroe 2017-0721 609 Rex 2017-0721A 605 N. Riverside 2017-0725 202 E. Bartlett 2017-0727 front sidewalk from city sidewalk to front steps; work and materials in-kind. Repair/replace wood on front and back porch; flash chimney; work and materials in-kind/replacement of original. Confirmed use of this previously issued RME to include a second pilot well, as the first had a high iron content. Removal of Norway Maple as required by City Forester. Remove 3 -tab shingles and reroof with architectural shingles. Replace rear entry door, in-kind. Repair to break in water line in back yard Replace concrete side steps with wood to match original (discovered under concrete during demolition) and install wood hand rail to match front steps; replace 3 front doors and second floor railing at 36"H. All work and materials to be in-kind. 844 Park Avenue 2017-0731 Tear off existing 3 -tab shingles and replace with architectural shingles. 540 River Avenue 2017-0731A Replace roof shingles and gutters on house (COA 2016- 0511), repoint chimney, replace fence at driveway to match fence surrounding back yard. 425 West North Shore 2017-0801 Replace plexiglass windows of sunroom on east side of home with clear tempered glass. 66401 Walnut 2017-0801A Repointing and masonry repairs; replacement of deteriorated porch on west side. In-kind. Research Requests What Date Who 928 Riverside 7/20 Frances Parker 611 West Washington 7/31 owner Odd Fellows Building 8/3 Roger Parent Who Date/Time Brad Miller 7/10 1:00 Elizabeth Farr 7/10 2:00 Tom — Four Winds 7/10 5:00 Robert Wolosin 7/10 9:00 Virgil Wesco 7/10 8:00 Elizabeth Farr 7/12 2:00 Bill Long 7/13 2:00 Todd Zeiger 7/13 1:00 Julia Deslauriers 7/14 8:00 Jonathan Rios 7/20 4:00 Cressy -Everett 7/20 6:00 Frances 7/20 12:00 Evie Kirkwood 7/20 2:00 Diane 7/24 5:00 Katie Rutledge 7/25 5:00 Catherine Hostetler 7/25 4:00 AJ Construction 7/27 9:00 Mark Barrett 7/31 4:00 Don Nuner 7/31 10:00 John DeClark 8/1 10:00 Mary McDowell 8/1 29:00 Linda Riley 8/2 3:00 Catherine Hostetler 8/2 3:00 Joan Downs 8/3 2:00 Bernardo Contrenas 8/7 1:00 Deborah Close 8/7 9:00 Sheila Redding 8/7 3:00 Kristi Matteoni 8/7 7:00 Phone Calls What Treasure Hunt cemetery tour COA for flat roof repair in Edgewater Signage for Union Station Water in basements in East Wayne Street district Historic status of property at Dragoon & Ironwood Placement of COA permit at jobsite State historic markers Information request form 701 Riverside - new doors installed on garage, turned in to Bldg. Dept. Will be in 7/17 to fill out COA application. 608 Park Avenue repairs Chapin Park standards & guidelines; available tax credits and grants 928 Riverside COA questions Owner of 53117 Olive — follow up from MMS letter Historic district guidelines; contractor list 701 Riverside COA for roof at 761, 757 LWE 425 W North Shore - replacement storms for sunroom MMS survey response 61601 Bremen Hwy. Window replacement, RME, future plans for property Contractor list 202 Bartlett, 702 N. St. Joseph Windows being installed at 730 Park COA for 315 Madison 65150 Redwood MMS letter response 541 North Ironwood Tippecanoe Place windows HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT August 21, 2017 Hello Commission! Projects started without COAs/RMEs/Permits: 1164 LWE -Driveway and new steps 1236 LWE- new roof on rear barn 1417 E Wayne St- removal of tennis court with intent to construct fence - - --- ---- --- 612-614 Carroll St=installation-of new windows "— - Code Hearings: 127 Franklin Place -LL, 30 days to finish siding without civil penalties 518 S Michigan St -LL, $500 Civil Penalty - 939 Johnson (Hay Barn) -LL, hearing Tuesday 08/21/17 @ 1:30 417 W Navarre -Chapin Place LHD, hearing Thursday 09/07/2017 @ 1:30 We had 35 folks join us for the August First Friday West Washington Tour. We also had 12 new ND graduate students for a private Architectural Tour and 32 SBCSC primary teachers for a private tour as well. 12 environmental reviews for rapid rehousing or demolitions since last meeting. Just a follow up to the schoolhouse that was torn down at Ironwood and Jackson, the designation was done by Resolution not Ordinance, so it was never officially a locally designated landmark. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA President's Report for August 21St, 2017 • 07/17/2017 7:OOP (County -City Building; Room 1308): HPC Monthly Meeting • 08/02/2017 2:OOP (HPC -Offices): Discussion with HPC Attorney Brandie Ecker, esq. and Director Feasel related to pending Appeal by Mr. Eric Boyd and miscellaneous legal matters. • 08/02/2017 3-:30P(HPC Consult on letter drafts under preparation by------- Director y____.Director Feasel. • 08/07/2017 11:30A (HPC Offices): Sit in on an interview session conducted by Director Feasel for a applicant seeking the HPC Deputy Director position. • 08/09/2017 12:30P (HPC Offices): Farewell gathering in honor of Deb Parcell — Deputy Director, who recently accepted a position with Indiana Landmarks' Northern Regional Office as its Preservation Specialist. I thanked Ms. Parcell for her service to the Commission and dedication to her duties as deputy administrator. She will be missed (especially for her exceptional ability to prepare transcriptions). HPC also looks forward to working with her in future projects that further promote local history and preservation of the built environment. • 08/15/2017 11:30A (HPC Offices): Staff meeting with Director Feasel regarding the 2018 budget and the potential impact upon administrative duties and public service. 08/16/2017 1:30P (HPC Offices): Staff Meeting with Executive Director Feasel and HPC Legal Counsel Brandie Ecker, esq. Focus on various topics related to Council request for documents (Boyd v. HPC), Building Department enforcement policy and HPC enabling legislation through South Bend and St. Joseph County. • 08/16/2017 3:OOP (HPC Offices): Advise Director Feasel on items slated for September Agenda and the preparation of packet materials. RESOLUTION NO. 17-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA REGARDING THE USE OF ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY TECHNOLOGIES IN HISTORIC LANDMARK BUILDINGS AND DISTRICTS WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph .County (the "Commission") is open to and encouraging of the use of appropriate energy --conservation and sustainability -technologies and methods in -historic landmark -buildings and districts which are in harmony with existing standards and guidelines for such structures; and WHEREAS, the Commission wishes to encourage all owners or potential owners of properties designated as historic landmarks or located in a historic district to contact the Commission if they are considering or interested in the use of energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods for such properties; and WHEREAS, the Commission is committed to working with owners and potential owners of properties designated as historic landmarks or located in a historic district to determine the most appropriate energy conservation and sustainability methods for each individual property; and WHEREAS, the Commission will consider applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods individually, with due regard to the circumstances and specifications of each specific property, in the same manner as the Commission considers applications for Certificates of Appropriateness for all proposed alterations. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: - SECTION 1. The Historic Preservation Commission is open to and encouraging of the use of appropriate energy conservation and sustainability technologies and methods in historic landmark buildings and districts which methods and technologies are in harmony with existing standards and guidelines for such structures, and encourages all owners or potential owners of such properties interested in such technologies and methods to contact the Commission. SECTION 2. The Commission is committed to working with owners of such properties to determine the best fit for each property, and to consider each application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for such technologies and methods on an individual basis, in the same manner as all other applications for Certificates of Appropriateness are evaluated and considered. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Resolution has been adopted on this _ day of , 2017. President, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County ATTEST: Secretary, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County �g,021ERS Ops? Cour1yofSaint_0sg3N h i1ana o r a;.rG.L.�c—LofHumanResamoes 227 West 3efferson Boulevard t b South Bend, IN 46601 Phone: 574-235-9547 Fax: 574-245-6602 Department: Historic Preservation Commission Position: Deputy Director Opening Date: August 1, 2017 Closing Date: Until filled Salary: up to $32,120 plus benefits Location: 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend Days/Hours: Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. with occasional evening and weekend hours for meetings or special events. This position full time, exempt, and is covered under the Saint Joseph County Employee Policy Manual. DESCRIPTION The Deputy Director is the public face and day-to-day assistant manager of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and Saint Joseph County — a dual governmental agency responsible for the preservation of historic buildings, sites, and structures in Saint Joseph County, Indiana. The Deputy Director is responsible for assisting with the activities of the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) office, including technical services, architectural and historic reviews, Certificates of Appropriateness (COA), personnel, and with directing and managing in the absence of the Executive Director. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS Preservation Efforts ►► Prepares documentation required for County/City work, including: homeowner relations and education of Standards and Guidelines, Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) process, National Register nominations, and grant application and administration. ►► Provide technical assistance to owners of historic properties in Saint Joseph County including government officials, community organizations, and private property owners along with other groups and individuals interested in preserving historic structures (this includes providing restoration recommendations, designating new properties as local landmarks or local historic districts, helping to list properties on the National Register of Historic Places, helping to evaluate the scope of restoration projects, providing research assistance and guidance, etc.). ►► Plans, directs, and supervises work projects for assigned staff, contractor, or intern. Prioritizes and delegates assignments, establishes work goals, motivates staff, provides training, interprets policies and procedures, ensures proper completion of tasks and conformance with policy, recommends corrective action when necessary to the Executive Director. ►► Identify endangered structures within Saint Joseph County (by conducting Section 106 reviews of federally funded projects); determine the significance of the structures and what strategies, if any, the organization should undertake to preserve them; design and implement action plans to save them. ►► Supports Executive Director as a liaison between the HPC, County, and City departments maintaining interdepartmental relationships, rapport, and communication. ►► Supports Executive Director in communication with law enforcement, City and County Council members, State and National Preservation Organizations. Equal Opportunity Employer Educational/Promotional Efforts ►► Organize, develop, and present educational programs (speeches, public programs, workshops, etc.) to a variety of audiences across the County. ►► Supports Executive Director to communicate with media outlets (newspaper, television, radio, social media, etc.) as a spokesperson for preservation -related issues in the County. ►► Supports Executive Director to communicate with elected officials and community leaders throughout the region. ►► Effectively market publications, activities and miscellaneous preservation efforts. Sunervisory Functions ►► Assists with supervision of staff members including a contracted Preservation Specialist/inspector as funding permits. This may include interns and volunteers at various times. ►► Assist in determining staffing needs; train staff when applicable. ►► Assist with the Agency's budget; prepare and present reports to the Commission and City and County Councils. Other Functions ►► Prepare for and attend monthly HPC meetings and participate on committees as required. Complete monthly HPC meeting minutes and distribute. Update meeting binder each month. ►► Perform other related duties and responsibilities as directed by the Executive Director and Historic Preservation Commission Board. ►► Answering phone calls ►► File maintenance ►► Fulfill research requests ►► Minimum Maintenance Standards surveys QUALIFICATIONS Education/Exoerience ►► Bachelor's degree in historic preservation or a related field is essential. ►► Demonstrate ambition and relevant experience in the field of historic preservation, government agency, administration and/or community development organization. ►► Valid Drivers' License, required. Knowledqe, Skills and/orAbilities ►► Knowledge of historic preservation principles, as well as national, state, and local laws and procedures related to historic preservation; ability to apply the Secretary of the Interiors Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. ►► Knowledge of governmental framework and processes. ►► Basic construction knowledge/familiarity. ►► Ability to recognize various architectural styles; knowledge of architectural history as well as national, state, and local history. ►► Ability to understand and interpret a variety of technical data, such as architectural and engineering drawings and specifications, primary and secondary research sources, maps, etc. ►► Familiarity with real-estate development and business law; business investment and project/real- estate pro -formas. ►► Successful marketing skills including authoring press releases, designing collateral and communicating with media and through social media. ►► Knowledge of budgeting processes or ability to learn. ►► Excellent ability to interact and communicate with a variety of people, both on a one-on-one basis and in group settings, including public -speaking engagements (such as presentations, hearings, and meetings). ►► Ability to work alone with minimum supervision and with others in a team environment. ►► Ability to multi -task and manage projects within time constraints and deadlines. Equal Opportunity Employer 236 South Notre Dame Avenue South Bend, IN 46617 Ms. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Historic Preservation Commission 125 S Lafayette Boulevard #100 South Bend, IN 46601 Dear Ms. Feasel, et al. August 2, 2017 I am excited to submit the following application for the position of Deputy Director with the Historic Preservation Commission of St. Joseph County. I am currently the Public Programs Coordinator in the Marketing Department at The HistoryMuseurn here in South Bend, where I am responsible for contacting, scheduling, and hosting our speakers, performances, specialty tours, and promotional events. Reaching out and building relationships with individuals and organizations from diverse backgrounds and professions remains the highlight of my current position. I succeed in this role because of thorough event planning and research, conscientious and thoughtful appreciation of my constituents and guests, and effective and timely communication with my partners. As an example, I arranged for May's lecturer to be Mr. John Parsons, Vice President of Planning and Marketing with the Northern Indiana Commuter Transit District (1`IICTD). His lecture coincided to the day with the vote in the State legislature to fund the railway's "double -track initiative," which plans to drastically reduce transit times to and from South Bend. Prior to moving to South Bend I completed my Bachelors of Arts in History at Purdue University West Lafayette, focusing on the history of technology and innovation (where I worked closely with Professors Michael G. Smith and Vernard Foley). History remains my greatest passion. Sharing that passion is my greatest pleasure — both in my hobbies (with over two decades of living history experience) and in my professional pursuits. Behind my academic success lies a foundation of sixteen years of customer service experience; this provides invaluable insight in my daily exchanges and interactions and ensures that I am constantly aware of the human element in all of my activities. I look forward to the opportunity to discuss how my experiences, qualifications, and interests can benefit the Historic Preservation Commission and assist in the execution of its mission. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Adam Toering C: 765.637.8998 E: actoering@gmail.com Adam Toering 236 S. Notre Dame Avenue, South Bend, IN 46617 C1 765.637.8998 El actoering@gmail.com WORK EXPERIENCE: The History Museum — Public Programs Coordinator July 2016 — Present - Responsible for contacting, scheduling, and hosting speakers and social events for the Northern Indiana Historical Society's history museum. - Created, planned, and hosted twenty-one special event'afternoon teas' in conjunction with the traveling exhibit, "Dressing Downton: Changing Fashion for Changing Times." - Administered ticket sales and exceeded market expectations -- added additional event dates to accommodate increased demand and interest in signature history museum events. - Doubled expected gross profits by simultaneously increasingly number of events (42 events from August '16 to January'17 compared to half that amount the year before by my predecessor), streamlining operations, and mitigating expenses. The History Museum—Assistant Registrar January —July 2016 - Inventoried, cataloged, rehoused, and shelved objects in the Northern Indiana Historical Society's 500,000 item collection. - Rehoused and reorganized objects in the historical society's storage building. - Prepared, staged, and interpreted exhibits throughout the NIHS' galleries. - Executed a preliminary audit and inventory of the upper level of the storage building. - Isolated errors in the museum's records management software (Past Perfect); initiated an efficient 'housekeeping' of records, updated and 'cleaned' in excess of 20,000 individual entries manually. - Trained, supervised, and managed The History Museum's Spring 2016 undergraduate intern, Connor Eckler. - Represented The History Museum at the opening ceremonies for the "Indiana in 200 Objects" exhibit at the Indiana State Museum. Harry's Chocolate Shop — Doorman July 2014 —April 2016 - Ensured a safe and enjoyable atmosphere at a landmark Purdue University bar - Inventoried, re -stocked, and cleaned Purdue Institute for Civic Communication — Student Assistant May— September 2015 - Selected to edit the 2014-2015 PICC Civic Competence Poll Appendix by Ambassador Carolyn Curiel, PICC founder and former speech writer for President Clinton - Created, edited, and distributed PICC copy, update digital media, reorganized office layout for efficiency Jake's Roadhouse — Manager / Head Doorman April 2003 —July 2014 - Responsible for the day- and night-time management of a Big 10 University bar. - Handled, counted, and deposited monies (in excess of $20k cash). - Worked over 100 "Breakfast Clubs," carnival -atmosphere events held during special weekends at Purdue University requiring heightened states of awareness and long hours (typically working 29 hours out of a 36 hour period). - Trained new employees, instilled professionalism and a calm demeanor in security staff. - Represented Jake's Roadhouse at community outreach and public safety meetings, including a decade of representation at the Campus Community Bar Retail Coalition. - Acted as a primary point of contact in events requiring interaction with Police, Fire, and Paramedic personnel. - Handled exceedingly stressful situations calmly and professionally. - Maintained a safe environment for patrons and staff. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 http://stj osephcountyindiana.com/43 8/Historic-Preservation-Commission Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578 Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President 11 August 2017 ----Dear Mr. Toering,- - A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director I am delighted to extend this offer of employment for the position of Deputy Director with the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County. Your credentials, past experiences, and abilities working with the public weigh heavily toward this decision. The board must ratify this offer upon your acceptance and will have an oppor- tunity at their upcoming public hearing on August 21 at 7 pm. Starting salary is up to $32,120 per year. Start date can be decided on upon acceptance of the offer. Please confirm acceptance at your earliest convenience. —lank you, `Q l9' Elicia Feasel Executive Director COMMISSIONERS 4-lizabeth STAFF HISTORIC Hertel, Vice President Michele Gelfman, Secretary Deputy Director PRESERVATION Joseph Molnar, Treasurer Thomas Gordon, Assistant Secretary Brandie Ecker, Legal Counsel MI SSIO N COMMISSION COMMI Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian Kevin Buccellato Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist/ UT OP SOH B ST.J COUHn Brandon Anderson Mike Voll Inspector _'9P N Adam Toering 236 S. Notre Dame Avenue South Bend, IN 46617 P 1765.637.8998 El actoering@gmail.com Ms. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Historic Preservation Commission 125 S Lafayette Boulevard #100 South Bend, IN 46601 Dear Ms. Feasel, et al, August 14th, 2017 I am delighted to accept the offer of employment for the position of Deputy Director with the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County. I am excited to start my new role at the posted salary of $32,120 (plus benefits) on Tuesday, the fifth of September. Thank you again for providing me with this wonderful opportunity! I look forward to working, learning, and preserving our architectural history with you. Sincerely, Adam Toering E: actoering@gmail.com From: Kieran Fahey <kfahey@southbendin.gov> To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@co.st joseph.in.us>, Bob Wolosin <rwolosin@gmail.... CC: Eric Horvath <eho rvath @south bend in.gov>, Kara Boyles <kboyles@southbend i... Date: 8/17/2017 2:51 PM Subject: RE: Basement floods in East Wayne St Historic District Hi Elicia, Bob, In 2017 the City has received 378 total calls from across the entire City regarding water in basements. 10 of these came from East Wayne St. and almost all were from a storm event around July 4th. Despite the relatively low numbers we are absolutely fully aware of the issues in the locality. _ We_have (and are currently) CCTVing the area's sewers. The crew was there Tuesday and yesterday of this week. We are deploying a sensor network consisting of smart sewer sensors to better understand the hydraulic behavior of the area and reveal the hotspots. I have spent three days there in the last fortnight selecting the exact locations for these. We are making the area a pilot study for inlet restrictors. I've been meeting with our sewer department, (maintenance, construction, asset management folks), EmNet (the smart sewer firm), and talking with peers in other regional city's regarding this work. This will target the largest offenders of excess inflow. We will roll this out very soon. I'm very excited and optimistic between the sensoring (data gathering) and the pilot inlet restrictor program. The city does offer a "Basement Valve Program". This provides a 50% reimbursement, up to a total reimbursement of $1500 for the installation of a back flow preventer. Even if someone has one and it doesn't work they may replace it via this program. Maintenance must be performed on a regular schedule in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. A properly operating backwater valve allows water to only go in one direction (out), preventing sewage and stormwater from entering the home. I personally walked all the area's streets this week and was disappointed to see how many houses still have their downspouts connected to the sewer. These connections are often the cause of basement flooding. Or may be the cause of one flooding ones neighbors basement! There simply isn't the capacity in the system to handle the roof rainwater and in storm events the water is merely being transported via the downspouts to the basement level. Common homeowner tasks to mitigate flooding: Check downspouts to make sure they are not still connected. Make sure sump pumps and the foundation drainage system around the home are working properly. Keep gutters free of debris. Check the grading around the home to make sure water is directed away from, and not toward, the structure. Fill in any low spots in the yard/near the house that may allow water to pond. Never pour grease, paint or other thick liquids into sinks or drains. Avoid flushing items not suitable for sanitary sewer. There are many (beautiful!) trees in the area and root invasion in private laterals should be tackled by homeowners (e.g. rota -rooting). Kind regards, Kieran -----Original Message ----- From: Elicia Feasel [mailto:efeasel@co.st-joseph.in.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:00 AM To: Kieran Fahey Cc: rwolosin@gmail.com; Eric.C.Stalheim.1@nd.edu; Eric Horvath; Randy Kelly Subject: Re: Basement floods in East Wayne St Historic District Kieran, The August 21 agenda of the Historic Preservation Commission will highlight correspondence on this topic. Prior to the meeting, would you be able to provide detail from the database of sewer back-ups and offer any City perspective on a solution to this topic? Thank you, Elicia >>> Kieran Fahey <kfahey@southbendin.gov> 7/18/2017 4:38 PM >>> Hi Elicia, The City maintains a database of all reports of sewer back-ups, yes. I'll be back in the office Thursday, please feel free to call me with any queries, 574-235-5993. We can easily create a GIS layer from the database to map it. Best regards, Kieran From: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@co.st joseph.in.us> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 4:18:07 PM To: rwolosin@gmail.com; Eric Horvath; Kieran Fahey; Randy Kelly Cc: Eric.C.Stalheim.1@nd.edu Subject: Re: Basement floods in East Wayne St Historic District Robert, am including our Preservation Specialist Intern Eric on this reply. He is currently researching the subject from a preservation best practices point of view. Eric has asked if any of the houses have additions added to them? Thank you for your note. Eric (Horvath) or Kieran, Does Department of Public Works still maintain a map of reports of basement flooding in South Bend? Thank you, Elicia Elicia D. Feasel Executive Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 574/235.9798 >>> Bob Wolosin <rwolosin@gmail. com> 7/18/2017 3:46 PM >>> Elicia -- Delightful speaking with -you just now.) hope you can help -in -the way you indicated. Attached please find a redacted (no names, no exact addresses) compilation of the reports of basement floods in our District stemming from the hard rain of July 3/4. Here is your formal request: As President of the East Wayne Street Local Historic District, I request that The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County use whatever resources deemed appropriate in assisting residents of the East Wayne Street Local Historic District prevent future basement floods. In particular, assistance with convincing the City of South Bend to assume responsibility for solving the problem is requested. The document I have attached attests to the extent of the most recent incident, which occurred the night of July 3, morning of July 4, 2017, and I think it fair to say that some of the District's residents are frustrated by a lack of effective solutions on the City's part. I would be happy to convene a meeting with your Commission and selected neighbors if you think that would be useful. Thank you for considering this request. Robert Wolosin, President East Wayne Historic District Association Page 1 of 2 Elicia Feasel - Re: Basement floods in East Wayne St Historic District From: Bob Wolosin <rwolosin@gmail.com> To: Elicia Feasel <efeasel@co.st joseph.in.us> Date: 7/18/2017 7:24 PM Subject: Re: Basement floods in East Wayne St Historic District Yes, I know that some of the houses in the District have additions, but other than one or two, I couldn't tell you which ones. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Elicia Feasel <efeaselaco.st-ioseph.in.us> wrote: Robert, I am including our Preservation Specialist Intern Eric on this reply. He is currently researching the subject from a preservation best practices point of view. Eric has asked if any of the houses have additions added to them? Thank you for your note. Eric (Horvath) or Kieran, Does Department of Public Works still maintain a map of reports of basement flooding in South Bend? Thank you, Elicia Elicia D. Feasel Executive Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 574/235.9798 >>> Bob Wolosin <rwolosin(a),amail.com> 7/18/2017 3:46 PM >>> Elicia -- Delightful speaking with you just now. I hope you can help in the way you indicated. Attached please find a redacted (no names, no exact addresses) compilation of the reports of basement floods in our District stemming from the hard rain of July 3/4. Here is your formal request: file:///C:/Users/EFeasel/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/596E6074InternalPLEXISPOI0... 7/25/2017 Page 2 of 2 As President of the East Wayne Street Local Historic District, I request that The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County use whatever resources deemed appropriate in assisting residents of the East Wayne Street Local Historic District prevent future basement floods. In particular, assistance with convincing the City of South Bend to assume responsibility for solving the problem is requested. The document I have attached attests to the extent of the most recent incident, which occurred the night of July 3, morning of July 4, 2017, and I think it fair to say that some of the District's residents are frustrated by a lack of effective solutions on the City's part. I would be happy to convene a meeting with your Commission and selected neighbors if you think that would be useful. Thank you for considering this request. Robert Wolosin, President East Wayne Historic District Association file:///C:/UsersIEFeasel/AppData/LocallTemp/XPgrpwise/596E6074InternalPLEXISPO l 0... 7/25/2017 Page 1 of 1 Elicia Feasel - Robert Wolosin (574)289-8933 From: Debra Parcell To: Elicia Feasel r��� Date: 7/10/2017 2:55 PM Caller: Robert Wolosin --Pre( I dent F.tiSA- W ut�tinQ- �-) 14-6 n c SD�SAY ck— Company: East Wayne Street HD Phone: (574)289-8933 + R Telephoned © Please call � 1- ❑ Will call again El Returned your call -�- -FA ()- I o'OY-\ ❑ Wants to see -you ❑ Came to see you ❑ Urgent He is concerned about the large number of homes in the East Wayne Street district that are experiencing water problems in their basement. They have had no luck with any city department so far, and are trying to garner HPC support in hopes of getting something done to prevent further damage to the homes in this area. The city's only recommendation was to install check valves, which has helped some, but others not. He believes the root of the issue is a high water table and antiquated sewers. He would like to talk to you and see if there is anything our office could do to promote their cause. Please contact him by phone, or email rwolosinPamail.com. Thanks! '6bL -h(Be�d file:///C:/Users/EFeasel/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/59639563InternalPLEXISPOI0... 7/18/2017 Reports of basement flooding in East Wayne St. Historic District the night of July 3, 2017 July 4 Anyone take in basement water this morning c. 3 AM? July 4 We got water up the sewer drains from the storm, and we almost never get water. Drains clearing now and rain stopped. Thank goodness for the water sensor we put in since last August! July 4 Yes, don't know about the time. We're on 1600 block July 4 1700 block here and all of ours was ground water. Storm was from roughly 3-4 AM. Radar was totally clear except for red patch over South Bend. July 4 Yes -We are on Jefferson near Eddy and had water coming up through the drain,- around 3 — - am. Luckily we had installed a water sensor near the drain after the storm last August. We have not had water come up through the drain since August. I was already waking up from the storm when the alarm went off - such a heavy, heavy rain! We were able to close the drain, get rid of the water we had, and the drain starting clearing water around 3:20am?? Hope our neighbors didn't get hit too hard. Not an enjoyable pre- 4th of July surprise! July 4 1300 block of E. Wayne got it July 4 We got water on 1400 block. Even with the laundry tub shutoff valve closed, we still woke up to a full tub and sewage all over the floor in 4 rooms. We just moved in 2 years ago and the basement has flooded three times with over $20,000 in damage. We are sick of having mold growing down there! July 4 Luckily all clean water - we had a good amount - all drained and dried out now - thankfully! - installing heavy grade vinyl instead of carpet again on the basement floor after last August's storm was a brilliant decision if I have to say so myself! 1700 block July 4 Even with a new backup valve I have some water in basement. July 4 Yes, 1300 block got it, as well. Ugh. July 4 1200 block got it too. Awful! July 4 Just a little bit at 1700 block - all dry now, but quite the welcome back from vacation! July 4 We got it too. 1600 block. July 4 We had a small amount from the sewer drain. We're at 1100 block Wayne. July 4 Not that this makes anybody feel any better but it was all over the area. Bader and Greenlawn, Esther and Lasalle. also SunnyMede avenue. It's all over the place. Imagine how the people moving in on Madison near Greenlawn feel. They had a parade on their block to welcome them and a basement that flooded. Happy 4th July 4 We got sewage backup at 1400 block, E Jefferson:(. July 4 We did get water, no sewage fortunately. Bob, put on all the pressure you can. Can't hurt. 1400 block Wayne July 4 Agreed. At the very least I want to see their new flow data from the sensors. July 4 1 spoke with friends at Greenlawn and Bader. They got water but the house across the street who put in that new valve that the city paid half did not get water. the house next to her did get water. The person who installed it told the homeowner who bought it that as more people bought the back up valves that more pressure would be put on the sewers of the people around them who did not have the valve. July 4 When my valve was put in last summer, the fellow from Lincoln Plumbing told me the same thing. July 4 1400 block wet again, but it seemed to be mostly groundwater seeping up through the floor and some forcing up past the closed drains. My rain gauge measured 2.5", so no wonder. Everything down there is raised except the cat's rug and one box I was going through. Sigh. Anyone have recommendations on sealing-type companies? July 4 We've only been in our home on 1200 block of Wayne North for about a year, but we haven't had any water issues--including nothing during the floods last August that hit quite a few people. The owners before us said they never had basement issues either. We have Everdry waterproofing. Everdry was installed in our home at least two owners ago--so at least 10 years—and appears to still be holding up well. The warranty is transferable to a new owner. We pay $50 a year at this point or something like that. That is just a yearly account fee NOT what the original people that put it in paid. That I have no idea on the actual cost. Someone mentioned that they think everydry is over priced and that may very well be the case. I don't know the answer to that. I just know we haven't had any issues. Maybe everdry is the reason or maybe we just gotten lucky. We are rookie home owners so a lot of you know way more than us about what works and doesn't but figured it couldn't hurt to at least mention! Hope everyone has a great rest of your 4th of July! July 4 We have EverDry and are well satisfied. We get water when there is a torrential rain, and the water comes up the drain. Otherwise, our basement is dry and the walls are as well. I am planning to check with Sean Burns to see if he can install a cut-off valve. July 4 Yes, please. Getting ready to list my house in a few days. Floor in finished basement ruined once again. This is a problem for us Realtors to explain when we are asked if there is a moisture issue. July 5 1300 block E. Wayne South ... ground water only this time. July 5 1 am in favor of requesting another meeting with Eric. He needs to hear that we took his advice, made upgrades etc. and with 2 inches of rain (not the 100 yr rainfall) still had neighbors underwater. Curious if anyone monitoring sensors due to holiday evening? 1400 block Wayne July 51 don't think it would hurt to contact the City. We, however, did not get the cut-off valve, so our getting water might be put on us. Our next door neighbors, however, did install the cut-off and still got a couple of inches of water. ??? July 5 Will wait until the conversation diminishes a bit, then get in touch with Eric Hovath. July 5 ABSOLUTELY we must more strongly address this ongoing issue with the city. We installed the backflow preventer as they suggested. In addition, we had EverDry complete their extensive and expensive enhancements. Yesterday, we again woke up to black water after a 1 year restoration. Somehow, it was able to find its way in through their sewer system and around the new protections! Ugh! ENOUGH of the excuses S.B.!!!! July 5 Hi All, "thought" there was talk last fall about introducing water flow restrictors to the street catch basins... This would seem to be a relatively easy and inexpensive solution; one that the city should consider if they're not going to separate the lines. For example, would something like this help us?: httos://www.ezflor)lates.com Here's a description of a similar system: httr)://www.mswmaq.com/online exclusives/2014/10/stormwater management the flow restrictor sol ution Best, 1600 block Wayne July 5 We had sewer back-up so plan to install a valve. I have been researching online and there is quite a bit of advice on the internet although I don't know how reliable it is. Looks like this is a common issue in several parts of Canada although I have no idea why. I have seen repeated recommendations to get an automatic backwater valve. Specifically the "Mainline 4963 Automatic Backwater Valve" is reported on several sites as being the industry gold standard, and supposedly near 100%, solution. It reportedly withstands 50psi(equivalent to 100 foot column of standing water). It appears that proper installation is very key as is proper maintenance. I have a call in to a distributor listed in Indy( which appears to be closest option) to see if they can recommend a plumber in the area with expertise with this valve since it sounds like installation can be involved. Has anyone used this specific type of automatic backwater valve and/or can recommend a plumber with expertise in installing this? Thanks! July 5 And if everyone installs that valve, where does all the water go? July 5 I'm not an engineer but I would think it would fill up the sewer system rather than following the current path of least resistance into our basements. I suppose worst case scenario it would come up through the sewers into the street. I don't have any idea what the sewer system capacity is. City engineer could probably answer that. At that point I think it would inarguably be the city's issue. July 5 In case you haven't heard already, the big rain early Tuesday morning caused some unfortunate water issues all up and down Wayne Street - along with streets both north and south - had water coming in through every corner of the basement (all clean, clear water - thank God!) and while our floor drain stopper held, we did get water coming in through the laundry tub. Luckily easy to clean it all up so it didn't completely wreck our 4th holiday... Question - could the road and sewer work being done on Wayne St west of Eddy be part of the issue?? While it was about 2.5 -inches in less than hour, I'm thinking the street drains should be able to handle that — any thoughts, comments would be appreciated - good number of comments among neighbors on who is at'fault' on this! Thanks. 1700 block E. Wayne St. July 5 We did as well, only others time was the big rain and even then we only had a little. It appears our check valve failed. Had it replaced and an additional shut off valve installed. Can anyone confirm that this is being reported to the city engineer? July 6 Just an FYI that our house is one of the East Wayne neighbors with flooding. The suspicious thing is that the rain was only about 45 minutes in duration, there was no deep soaking of the ground in the 24 hours prior to this, and we have the shutoff valve on our sewer main and a ball valve on our floor drain (Kieran himself came to verify this last fall 2016); our gutters are also all fully detached from the sewer system and feed adequately onto hard runoff surfaces (driveway). Our basement's water intake was about 15 minutes after the storm began, and lasted until about 10 minutes after the storm subsided (it rose and diminished in proportion to the rain intensity). We had 100% ground water seepage, which is better than direct sewage. I walked our house perimeter during the storm at about 3:15 AM; the gutters were all functioning properly and the driveway was also draining preprly to the street --it was a very heavy rain. However, I also think there is a secondary link to the sewer line backup problem --my guess is that when the sewer backs up, it also leaks at its joints and directly floods the groundwater. How else would 2.5" of rain in 45 minutes saturate the ground water 12' below the surface to the point of local flooding? And the basement flooding goes at least as far north to Greenlawn and La Salle, if not further north and east. For us, this is the 3rd time in twelve months. Thankfully this time we had our own water pump installed, which worked for about 25 minutes in total, and which according to our pump's rating means we had about 650-700 gallons total in -flow to our basement (including the adjustment for the vertical lift out of our basement). That's less than what we got from the rain last August (we easily had 2000+ gallons then), but still astonishing given the conditions. To put it into perspective, that's substantially less rainfall than August 2016, but still a lot of water *despite* having the sewer totally shutoff to our house (the shutoff functioned correctly). That is, if we got 2.5" this time (August 2016 was 8"), and we moved 650 gallons (vs 2000+ for 8/2016), our total intake ratio DID NOT SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGE (the ratio of 650:2.5 versus 2000:8 is 1.04:1. Let's be honest --this is a new normal for the greater neighborhood, that is, until the city can remedy the problem it has likely contributed to. We will work with our community members and elected officials closely to find an effective solution. We're grateful for any additional information and the city's continued partnership and help. Yours, July 5 At the meeting after the August flooding, Eric Horvath made it a point that the City needs to hear from you - I have already sent him, Kieran Fahey and Randy Kelly an email about the water problems we had at house on Tuesday morning. Mostly all clean/clear ground water seeping through walls and floors - our floor drain has a ball valve that kept out any water - but our laundry sink did fill up and overflow. July 5 1 don't think it would hurt to contact the City. We, however, did not get the cut-off valve, so our getting water might be put on us. Our next door neighbors, however, did install the cut-off and still got a couple of inches of water. ??? I am in favor of requesting another meeting with Eric. He needs to hear that we took his advice, made upgrades etc and with 2 inches of rain (not the 100 yr rain fall) still had neighbors under water. Curious if anyone monitoring sensors due to holiday evening? 1400 block Wayne July 7 Hi (Name), We are taking a two fronted approach to tackling this right now. 1. Sewer department- I'm coordinating with the sewer department manager to firstly gather data and secondly get logistics such as sewer line cleaning and inspection undertaken. 2. Smart Sewer network- We will densely populate the area with smart sewer sensors to assist in full diagnosis. Also I'm currently investigating ways we may tap into and monitor the groundwater levels there too. I know that groundwater is often high in the area and is, I believe, a key contributing factor. I'll revert to you with more information as it becomes available. Sincerely, Kieran Fahey July 7 Hello (Name), I received your message. I have faith in our Public Works staff to let us know what's going on and I'm sure they'd be willing to get together again. Perhaps a smaller working group that represents the neighborhood this time might be productive. And thanks very much for your support. Randy July 7 Eric - Kieran - Randy... Just trying to confirm you received earlier emails - I have always been a big SB city supporter - just trying to get some/any answers - a good number of neighbors are getting very restless - now there's talk about class action suits! Any response at all sure would help. 1700 block E. Wayne July 7 It's been discussed in the past that plugged up street drains would help to keep the sewers from backing up as quickly, correct? (Obviously not good for street traffic) Perhaps those of us that are home and near a drain could cover it before the next storm hits any minute? July 7 (Name) also brought this up. Perhaps it's a solution (can't hurt at this point, right?). But we'd need tp block off the upstream points to affect our downstream locations. The question is where and.which points upstream. July 7 Even if that blocking is done for each storm, that's a temporary fix. It sounds like all Wayne from Eddy to Greenlawn needs permanent drainage solutions. July 7 All, Perhaps the correct answer is a class action suit against Mayor Buttigie... July 7 1 completely agree! While it may be one thing to have a leaky basement wall, it's another when you get city sewage backed up into your basement. Will it take a death or serious hospitalization before the city acts? July 7 1 would also like to posit the high likelihood that there is a direct link between the sewer lines *and* leaking basement walls. In other words, blocking off your sewer. lines will not prevent water in basements and may actually increase groundwater seepage as backflow leaks from the aging pipes or otherwise infiltrates groundwater. It's cleaner water, for sure, but it's still water. What is also proving true (as others have pointed out) is the increase in backflow valves in the Wayne area is sending sewage into higher ground (Jefferson and north to La Salle and possibly further). Please note that this only goes so far before the pressure collapses the downstream valves (as we're beginning to see). In which case, it's only a matter of time before all of us see sewage rushing in once again. We need to work with the city towards a comprehensive plan. After all, the area is a pretty healthy tax base, but only insofar as the property has value. Flooding will quickly erode that value. July 7 Of course we need a permanent solution. That's the main objective to our discussion as a neighborhood and with the city. I offered my suggestion since there was discussion this morning on the issue and a storm system on the way today... I live on the southeast corner of Eddy and Wayne with 3 drains on the corner of the street- my side alone. I will gladly cover them up and block the water as best can if there is a chance it could help sewage coming into our homes. I cannot say I will be able to every time there is a threat of large rain. Yes, it's not permanent, but possibly temporary. Temporary is better than nothing in my eyes- esp. re sewage. July 7 1 agree and am very thankful for your efforts—all of our efforts—both collectively and individually! Isn't this a basic service the city should provide? July 7 Dear Neighbors, We just had plumbers here. Apparently, there was so much pressure on our sewer line Tuesday night, that the check valve actually snapped. We are now looking to have a new check valve installed and hoping we don't get a storm in the meantime. There is nothing in place to prevent another backup into our basement until the new valve is installed. This is going from bad to worse, and it has gotten much worse in the past year. We never had such problems in the past. July 10 We had water (not sewage) back-up through our sink and an old capped drain early on July 4th at 300 block of S. Sunnyside Avenue. We had had no back-up's for the first 10 years we have lived here but this is the 3rd time in the last year - twice last year and then on July 4th. July 10, 2017 We had sewage back up in the basement, and have had a few times since we have lived here, five years now, last week. We will call 311 as well, but if you could add this to your report, that would be great. We are at 1300 block of E. Wayne St. N. July 10 We also had water come through our drain July 4. We had major water damage last summer as a result of 4 inches of standing rain in our basement. I live at 1600 block of Wayne. July 10 Some water through our basement drain as well. No sewer stuff fortunately. 1300 block of East Wayne St. South. The City is surely aware of these continuing problems since we did have a neighborhood meeting with city officials where this was all explained in detail. You worked hard to schedule the meeting and we do appreciate your efforts. I find it puzzling that our real estate values for tax purposes continue to rise when we have these continual water problems. If problem is not corrected, and I am skeptical the City will act because of the cost to correct the problem, then, legally and ethically, disclosure of the problem will have to be made to prospective buyers. July 10 Bob, last year and this year we had water come in through the laundry sink that is unprotected. 1200 block, E Wayne South. July 11 Thanks to everyone who is working to come up with a solution to all of these basement woes. I just called and reported ours (July 4) to 311 and will continue to report future water issues. We have ball valves in our drains that prevent the water coming up through that route, but water seeps in through cracks in the floor and other areas (e.g. around support posts). Though the water coming in seems to be "clean" ground water and not sewage, we are frustrated with the repeated cleaning required after rainstorms. Am happy to do what what I can to be part of the solution. 1600 block Wayne.