Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
April 2017
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY County—City Building, South Bend, IN 46601 stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm Phone: 574/235.9798 Fax: 574/235.9578 Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government of the National Park Service Elicia Feasel, Executive Director MONDAY, APRIL 17, 2017 -7:00 p.m.- MEETING AGENDA COUNTY —CITY BUILDING, 13th FLOOR, ROOM 1308 I. , CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2017 -0331A 920 West Washington 2.2017 -0403A 50106 Bittersweet Trail III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. March 20, 2017 B. TREASURER REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT jw'� Local Landmark Local Landmark FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET April 17, 2017 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White /Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME 1�1�urR�� ADDRESS W, B, F, D H, O —�— �S���l cRS 6 f4 ffAavt-1& c,r. &im7 s ove 4 W F- STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 31, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0331A Property Location: 920 West Washington Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Queen Anne /1902/Freyermuth & Maurer Property Owner: Andrea Crawford Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two -story square -plan wood frame Queen Anne, has a 12/12 asphalt shingle roof, bell cast at eaves, and several brick chimneys. There are numerous gable dormers, flat soffits, and plain frieze. First floor walls are brick under porch roof and on side front; balance of house is covered in wood clapboard siding, cantilevered over first floor on north side, and supported by wood brackets. There are a variety of wood windows, predominantly 1/1 double -hung, but including a variety of elaborately divided lites and diamond paned casements, as well as various bow and bay windows. A porch stretches across the north fagade, featuring stone balustrade, mosaic tile porch floor, and concrete entry steps. It has a low hip roof supported by short round ionic columns on stone piers. The glazed single -leaf front door has divided side lites. ALTERATIONS: Originally located at 524 North Lafayette, this house was moved to its current location in 1978. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove two (2) original windows in kitchen and replace with Marvin wood windows according to drawings. Change from two window openings to four. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:, Owner proposes to remove two original wood windows in kitchen area, and replace with Marvin WUDH2422 wood double -hung windows, 2/2 simulated divided lite (with spacer bar); two windows on east wall and two on south wall, as specified in drawings, changing overall number of kitchen windows from two to four. Window height will be reduced from existing, as new windows will end at countertop height. (See attached drawings). Exterior wood trim to match existing; wood siding will be reused/replaced to match existing siding. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST'S REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES:, Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re-roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure — Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material — Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood —all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials —the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. ' Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. BuildinF4 Site and Landscap_ ina 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the original house fenestration included windows placed in various locations, combinations, styles, and divided lite patterns, and the new windows will be of the same style and material as existing in this location, the-proposed change of windows in the kitchen area would not detract from the historic character of the house. Therefore, staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ° lam' " 865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Syr H vyaco 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http: / /www.stj osephcountyindiana .com/departments /SJCHP /index.htm p: 574- 235 -9798 f. 574- 235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY» » »DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX« OFFICE USE ONLY -I Date Received: 1 I / 17 Application Number: (X0 17 — 0331A Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied El Tabled 31 ❑ NO Title: ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: C/`1 (Street Number— Street Name — City —Zip Code) A WfA C Name of Property Owner(s): Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): 9_,2o WftI f.& e,/ W L*�,/ (Street Number— Street Name —City —Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): 4 _,1� rs'G� i` Phone #:(57 ; '-'5 '1?Z?_' Contract Company Name: j �/� / l � y'IQ(04 Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name —City —Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 1,V6� I- ,A'j j /(( � (Single Family — itlti- Fami1�6— Commercial — Government— Industrial— Vacant —etc.) ' J Type of Building Construction: W0,9f) + F_ (Wood Frame—Brick--Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Descript' n of Proposed Work: o i 2 4 , 07w e l G2c� �In � s o2l 1 1,10 � r � , / , V��9 % l�if3� �✓� n Yom/- ���/L� ci/t i; i U ( � ��ll i.�' A) �I LLI2 AAA f�aWC- ! r &bQQ2 j 3J '7 7_ Owner /Contractor Fax #: e-mail: S AA, cl (Q A-er- V /_' Y u CU" " l (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X and /or X r Signature of Owner Signat ure of C rac or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON I EVERSE SIDE— Ann ChBra•8011ey kohitect. LLC 908 V3 Wag Washington Ave, sw•vsvur Wvaldon ttepurl, 1 1" q "I;bl9 R" "0") 6a a Wild I x110911 WI I n UR 110 uui "ODA WIN 009 WW eA1NNOTON OTPUT INS a• Mf M 1 ie 9 ,xYlau ! M'• It l+a. I1 i w M VY " LFl0 nua Nu 1A Crericside Mortgage Surveys, Inc. tie Ew,L YM�p Simi BsxLL eme. Mem IEeW _ __ II-,r a+,.) M.prye fl, Ie11) YII-bJil MIX Landmark Preservation Review Deter 04/6312017 Jub Na Drewingtim AHA CACBA2017 Baulh Bond, W 44001 303.723.3034 Aio/eaa Drawing AHd Ust Us Ghost/ Mal Plan Crawford - Pipponger Residence A HM i r e Dround Floor Plan: Now Design A 10.2 k ®round Floor Plan: New Design 070 West Wool ftten Mal South Bond, IN 40001 A Had Exterior Building Elevation (Bast) A H2,2 Exterior Building Elevation (South) MIX Landmark Preservation Review Deter 04/6312017 Jub Na Drewingtim AHA CACBA2017 Ann Chara-Bailey Architect, 1.11 608 14 West Washington Ave, South Bond, IN 46601 203-722-3934 o PORCH DN M FT i j� UP DN lowl.d. Crawford-Flippenger Residence 920 West Washington Street South Berq, IN 46601 Tift. Plan: New Design Landmark Preservation Review Data.. 0410312017 Job No. Dra.Ing N. Q Grou Floor Plan: New Design AH1.1 - ' Scale: t'- V CACBA2017 i i I I � I � I I II II I II II II u I _ rW, 13'-4" . [] a• a 1• 2' -6" 2'•a" Marvin Window WUPH 24.2 WUDH 2422 � _ 4 1 oY• . o ` I2 I - -- UP _01:} FIB i I DINING ROOM I I �J f T , Ground Floor Plan: New Design — — -1 . scale: P • v =R Ann Chara• ®alley Architect, LLC 600 V2 Wool Washington Ave, South Band, IN 46601 203.722.3034 Crawford - Pippenger Residence 620 Weal Wesldnglon Street Bou6t Band, W 48601 mra Plan: New Design Nokia Landmark Preservation Review D.W 84,83017 dca NM Orewing No. AH 1.2 ®ACBA2017 ,s. Ann Chara-Bailey Arch1tect, LLC 600 112 Wool Washington Ave, GoUth Bond, IN 40001 203-721-3934 i H R- N- U F D i0 L-1 0 I Crawford-Plippongor Residence 020 West Washington 80oot South Bond, IN 4000I THIM Elevation: Now Design IVAS: Landmark Preservation Review 04/0312017 Job N. Drawing No. AH2.1 VACEIA2017 NEW WINDOWS Marvin Windows #WUDH2422 Wood Double Hung Unit (Primed and Painted both sides) EXTERIOR TRIM P thick Cedar Wood Trim Primed and Painted Q Exterior Building Elevation (East) 2.1 Scale: V L-1 0 I Crawford-Plippongor Residence 020 West Washington 80oot South Bond, IN 4000I THIM Elevation: Now Design IVAS: Landmark Preservation Review 04/0312017 Job N. Drawing No. AH2.1 VACEIA2017 Ann Chara-Baileykchitect, LLC We IQ Wed Washington Ave, South Bend, IN 46601 203-722-3934 NOTE: Future Work Remove existing Porch and replace with Now Porch based on original design. Detalls to Follow. no" on ■ on WHEN I Original Porch Image: Exterior Building Elevation (South) 12.2 22 Scale: 11 PLEASE REFER TO RECORD PHOTO FILED WITH THE PRESERVATION. .. .. ....... .... .... . . .... .... ftad; Crawford-Pippenger Resi0ence 920 West Washington Street South B-4, IN 46601 1 TN. Elevation: New Design Landmark Preservation Review Data. 0410312017 Job No, Drawing IV. AH2.2 CACRA2017 ti MARVIN-"O& Windows and Doors A PRODUCT' CATALOG Z. O U w J J O U O in z_ U z W J m D O 0 W I-- Q H J D W 1- �1 N THE BENEFITS OF MARVIN° ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS With advancements in engineering never imagined by homeowners of days gone by, Marvin brings the classic double hung window into the Ultimate Double Hung era, assuring that this classic style will be around for generations to come. Marvin's exclusive integrated tilt lever allows the sash to be tilted in with one hand or removed for easy cleaning. Choose from a variety of size options including our new taller sizes. THE MARVIN PATENTED "EASY- TILT - RELEASE" ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW KAI 4 The sash in locked position Z t _ a 2 t Sash tilting freely into the room ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG SCREEN OPTIONS FULL SCREEN: Exterior screen with aluminum surround. HALF SCREEN Exterior screen with aluminum surround. The screen covers only the lower portion (bottom sash) of the window. TWO -LITE WOOD STORM SASH OR SCREEN: A wood frame containing non- removabfe glass. The storm sash can be removed during the summer and replaced with a wood framed screen. Available only for wood windows. ENERGY PANELS: Often confused with storm windows, an energy panel is technically a glazing option. It is a removable, exterior glass panel finished on the edges by a surround. Energy panels cover the exposed glass surface of each sash and offer added energy efficiency for wood windows with single glazing. STORM AND SCREEN COMBINATIONS: Acombination unit is composed of two glass panels and one screen panel. MAGNUM SCREEN: Made from durable extruded aluminum, held together by rigid extruded corners keys. Hi- transparency mesh standard. 14 ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOW BENEFITS G✓�`nV �_... ��e. sr .�v... 4., n, M1�w..�e .r.�. �.,..1 a_�..u.t.M<..w�.+. s. .x. i 01 Lf+ D 111 :illiP �I r. Unlocked position with tilt release activated Full Screen option shown 1; ,: ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS a ji ;H Sri The classic style of the double hung window has been the ultimate statement of quality and tradition ever since the country was new. Some of the greatest American homes, hotels, lodges, churches and statehouses have made architectural statements wifh ifs sfrong, foursquare design. Now this fradifion is improved with the Ultimate Double Hung Window from Marvin; classic windows in generous sizes that are crafted with the best of the modern window maker's craft. With advanced engineering, Marvin Ultimate Double Hung Windows have taken that rich, classic look and made it more durable, versatile and easy to use than ever before. With far smoother operation, tilt -in convenience and taller size options, it's the perfect window for remodeling, replacement or new construction. r pgm FULL & HALF SCREEN Consider a full screen to cover your entire window or a half screen that covers only the lower portion. Choose from several mesh and surround options. P = 16 ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS .m i s �# z ` I �t z . Vr t NEI Miff s. == !T _ F . h 4 )a v { {$ INTERIOR EXTERIOR r � i Ic DESIGN POSSIBILITIES These are only a few designs for divided lites. Visit Marvin.com for more possibilities. ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WINDOWS 17 . ; .' OEM- _ rY - t S ij m- WOOD ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG Ma s OP9- ( 2- 61/2_(6221 2-11/2 (724) - " 2- 81!2'(826) .'2-101/2(876) '- .3.01/2(927) 3 2 V2 (978) ' 3 _ 341P 4 01(2 Rgh.Opg.(mm) 1103/8(568) 2 23/8(670) 2 63/8(772) 2. 83/8(822)_ 2103/8(873) 3 0318(924) 3. 23/8(975) 3 3103/8(1178) trameSizi(min)11-93/8(54.3) 213/8t645) ' +'- _ 2;53/81746) 2- 7318 (797) -, 2-9318(848) 2-113/8(899) 3. 13/8(944) 3538{i05n 3.99/8({]53) ;; rt> Glass Size (mm) 16 (406) 20(508) 24 (610) - 26 (660) 28 (7m 30 (762) 32 (813) 36 (914) 40 (1016) O v ® 1 41 a ❑i Bli 'I o � a N WUDH1612 WUDH2O12 r N N � WUDH2412 WUDH2612 WUDH2812 WUDH3012 WUDH3212 WUDH3612 WUDH4012 - ' O clff FQ El E El -3 ❑❑ ❑ - =E" m rn M ;t WUDH1614 WUDH2O14 WUD 241 H 4 WUDH2614 WUDH2814 WUDH3014 WUDH3214 WUDH3614 WUDH4014 - C) � ❑ ❑I ❑ o ;❑ ❑� 3 4& '' I f 10 in Lq . 6 cn rl r? WUDHI616 WVDH2O16 WUDH2416 WUDH2616 WUDH2816 WUDH3016 WUDH3216 WUDH3616 WUDH4016 , T? fZ E ll 9 E l -�;r M r w WUDH1618 WUDH2O18 WUDH2418 WUDH2618 WUDH2818 WUDH3018 WUD143218 WUDH3618 WUDH4018 a : _ N m. ❑ ❑ 1 ❑ i :I I❑ ❑t T--p i �° WUDH7620 WUDH2O20 WUDH2420 WUDH2620 WUDH2820 WUDH3020 WUDH3220 WUDH3620 WUDH4020' „- ik Ll I In N v 4 , r W JDH1622 WUDH2O22 WUDH2422 . WUDH2622 WUDH2822 WUDH3022 WUDH3222 WUDH3622 WUDH4022 �ft I ■� ❑i u, d r WUDH1624 WUDH2O24 WUDH2424 WUDH2624 1YUDH2824 WUDH3024 WUDH3224 WUDH3624 WUDH4024,`'` ";.'t 1 F E ❑ ;❑ u „ - ,_ LL 1 1 to Ln m N W 1DH1626 WUDH2O26 WUDH2426 WUDH2626 WUDH2826 V WUDH3226 WUDH3626E WUDH4026E_K w'= dill" u Li Li Oe N W JDH1628 W JDH2O28 WUDH2428 WUDH2628 WUDH2828 WUDH3028E WUDH3228E WUD�H36�28E WUDH4028E "�..','_:'`4} In��? NOTES: E These windows meet national egress codes for fire evacuation. Local codes may differ. MULTIPLE ASSEMBLY CONVERSIONS ROUGH OPENING MASONRY OPENING WITH SMC Width Height Width Height Add all frame sizes Add frame sizes Add all frame sizes Add frame sizes plus 1" (25) plus 1/2" (13) plus 31/8" (79) plus 19/16' (39) Wood Ultimate Double Hung: 166 WOOD ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG WOOD ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG CONSTRUCTION DETAILS I I a a O i 1 m s i I q rn LL o I cy I f I HEAD JAMB AND SILL -OPERATOR R 1/2; Opening V2" Frame Size (13) ( ?T� (13) 1/4" (6) - Masonry Opening JAMB - OPERATOR r " 6 1 I N III OPERAT VERTICALMULLION WOOD ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG / SINGLE HUNG ENERGY DATA U- Factor SHGC VT CR ENERGY STAR 11 /16 Insulating Glass Air - 0-45 = 0.55 0.58 :43 11/16" Insulating Glass Air LoE 1$0 0.33 0. 0.56 53 11)16' Insulating Glass Argon LoE180 M 0:29 0.48, `- 0,56 56 N 11/16" Insulating Glass Argon LoE 180TM w /Combination 0.21 0.44 0.51 67 N 11/16 insulating Glass L6E'• -272 =' Air 032 _ 0.30 _- 0,51 53 'NC; SC 11/16' Insulating Glass LoE 272'' -' Argon 0.29 029 0.51 56 N, NC, SC ii /16' Insulating Glass LoP `=Argon w /Combination .0.21- 0.29 - 0.46 67 N, NC, SC _ 1V16' Insulating Glass L.9366"" Air 0.32 020 0.46 53 NC, SC, S 11/16' Insulating Glass LoP 366' Argon 0.28 '020 0.46 ' 57- ' • 14, NC; SC, 5 11/16" Insulating Glass LoP 366'"' Argon w /Combination 0.20 0.21 0.42 68 N, NC, SC, S ;718" Tri- Pane'LOE 180?M A�gon L05-180 0.25 040 0.49 - 64 N, NC ; 7/8" TrkPane LoE 18OTM Krypton -Argon Lo[ -180T" 0.22 0.40 0.49 67 N, NC 7/8 L.P 272' Argon LoE�- 272'=: „ 0.24 0.25 - 0.40 64 N, NC; SC, S 7/8" Tri -Pane LoE -272`= Krypton -Argon LoE -272 0.22 0.25 0.40 67 N, NC, SC, S -7/8' Tri -Pane LoP 366''- Argon LoE 180T 0.24 0.1$ 0.40 64 N, NC; 56, S - 7/8" Tri-Pane LoP 366 " " = Krypton -Argon LoE 180i 0.22 0.18 0.40 67 N, INC, SC, S 168 WOOD ULTIMATE DOUBLE HUNG : y „S.VF ;.-.:c.; +�c�n. •,.s..:,; rr snx:+"_-•= e: cr.. a.. ��rc. vxm�mav:, znnmzn :�;,���„�.,�;,- rs<rre,x.,z:��.. '. " NOT TO SCP F D IVIDED MARVIN' OPTIONS: WOOD SPECIES, C E R TIFIE D • • IN AN EXTERIOR WOOD O PTIONS: PINE ST AMAW MAHOGANY CEDRO MACHO DOUGLAS FIR sI. CHERRY PAINTED INTERIOR FINISH - WHITE VERTICAL GRAIN DOUGLAS FIR A... w PRIME WOOD MaTVjn Wundows and Boors has routinely purchased raw lumber from reliable suppliers certified to the Sustainable Forrest 6iaiit!ia �J (SR "), a pram that sups sound forest management. SFI operates in North America, while the Forest Stewardship Council"�' (FSC ") operates worldwide to assure biodiversity and high conservation of forests along with humane labor practices. Chain of custody for either certification means that the o SUSTAINABLE s 0 wood in our Marvin rod uct has been tracked from the forest from F sC FORESTRY Y P INITIATIVE h ch R was f rar: led to &e b+�i;P ng w it is installed. c�r��,n��. ��rf�ot,�fo�r w.rowemm�.y SM091! 68 WOOD SPECIES, DIVIDED LITES & CERTIIIFIED WOOD DIVIDED LITES: SIMULATED DIVIDED LITE SILL irs an energy-OidierAway lo create i 6A c& divided Me& SDL bars aTe permanently adhered to bdfb sides dl &e glass. `-X x. SIMULATED DIVIDED LITE (wHsPAcERoqR) tS SDL bars are combined with sparer bars irxsU' led between. the glass, creating the esseme dlAuierzc Diuided Lib z& AUTHENTIC DIVIDED LITE wo e- dr S eparate panes c4 gf. L haie been madesiin �fllie begrming. Now; Flarvid ChallabTe br wood uTT OnO 7 . . . . . . "U GRILLES-BETWEEN-THE-GLASS (czc) Grilles are permanently risfJ'A belween the glass pdr,--- 55 This low-maintenance grill"e. frs, mAlabile with a twaAlcrx- cph'--(% GRILLES Solid wood Grilles on the interior offer the took of classic divided Sites, but can be easily removed for cleaning WOOD SPECIES, DIVIDED LITES It CERTIFIED WOOD 60, t ' MARVIN' OPTIONS: GLASS, GLAZING & ENERGY EFFICIENCY Marvin wood and wood clad windows are more energy efficient than vinyl or all aluminum windows. Every Marvin window is hand - crafted and built to exactly fit your specifications, better fit can mean less money spent on heating and cooling your home. Your Marvin dealer can recommend the best options, production and glass choices for your climate. ENERGY - EFFICIENT GLAZING OPTIONS: Marvin windows are offered with LoE -272 insulating glass with argon as a standard option. A selection of performance related options are available to meet performance and code requirements. LOE Maximize the surfs warmth in colder months and minimizes its heat in warmer months. Choose from standard LoE -272, LoE -366 and LoE180. - TEMpERFD Tempered glass offers extra strength and safety in larger products or where code dictates. Available with LoE -272, LoP -366 and LoE 180. • LoE -272 - This all- climate glass features double metallic coating on the inside glass surface. Provides year -round performance and comfort. In winter, it 0 , 11ects heat back into the room. In summer, it rejects the surfs heat and damaging UV rays. • LoE -366 - The ultimate performance glass features three metallic layers of silver. Provides the best solar heat gain coefficient and shading coefficient with a high visible light transmission. Recommended for yea - -rounJ comfod w ?d energy savings. Great for warm climates where cooling costs are high and the sun exposure is intense. • LoE 180TM' - This high solar gain glass provides excellent insuLaUng. capacity, blocking heat loss to the outside and reflecting heat back into the room. Ideal for passive solar designs, because it allows the winter suns heat to pass into the home. 6 Y i i. 70 GLASS, GLAZING & ENERGY EFFICIENCY .� ul�rt � ♦\ ,, ��j� p• �� 1 }� i } `�-y�� Y nts;,'�i A,. y ' .'t i lq } + I`,t A r rl� i ' r ` „tww,}�:� ; �iV r` ;�)y -•r +� r` i rf !fir {I v I".f tir �' :_• ` 1W�1„1, "t, f a ll �° ^ t !�` ' _! E I � a S } r � I ��!(i t ���f� f�a . • ,,. , z �.e ern 4 iFU ti ,,/ "�•, p�aFRkplr�. G�' �' - ra�,,,�{r�;un>�'i�t�`b'��.y�x+ ray g p Y {{'' ; "�f � ' 4. . MgRll b" ¢ ty'. r5tlrpl t� " r I�',,I',,� � �ItC, l i ._... } �'�+fa "d `�i5 ���f�i� /i� '� � r � , �� � �► :' }� . ��_� � I I�;i + •'(�J�.�++��u'c�g,1�'�ti"' �v�µ�,�'�r Fr�. Y "7r��Yf���Y�'��rc I _ R �+49 �r�1 _ i .• ' I �"` _- f��. �, yy�� �, � `�1"n�r 5 w 4, � �/ .ax: .s . "'� I MIN t h !, c yPi s t j � r 1 s��✓ldr� C r: `k ''.ja"N£' , ° s, ^f3 a � I I 3! ~,, `'� R e� G ' }� �'����b�� - � "�,t�,;. Y} �����,� I, r 'I d . t,m .,:,x"}�t �ka •J' �.. .L Y,�,r h;t�r l !r`� :. x � 't>r `, ( i y ;,, I .% v + i.`' yr/ a" v, �y�r f' �1 an7• , `"�r � .+T y�. � ' � 7 1 '� 1 r:. n _ �� ...[ I v + v F+r% .II'R .'� I �" � "'�✓.'. .^ j. "T`y.'SYffl "`"' 1 , - "«s� II I � I III {! , ✓f � 1 � � '�' I r. .mac& - .. r I s 1r ��l � 4 . . � � i I lll ; < l ! �,, J/ ky� r , }f RYq r ✓-f - �'t r r tit- �4?,.� - �"' Lvy a�'� u b ' �!' - r�`` '9C /t �s! *,3��' m i'�.+ t �� { I!�!/� ll/ ' 4t <, ? {l.µJn" �df �t� �! rin r V l at t y' �2? ii f a I s '�". i�.::�r r/ ) i r yla fIYY Ylpp r—.. � 7 � t S �Ix� � .�li 4��:'`` 1, 6'+lltY�a�3r1 �, :� > l �,,, r,.J�n - �t Y . r !. �p�vi } t:�f r t k � :s '�'v�l�. �'nhlc ` 'k; /I �•r;�^�` : •..:`�.j�; I I ! Y���If�`�';�� �'�� � + 1 > N r Ys ` f / .i,,,,'�;�,1 "� ti �- •�;,� 1 ` 1 r i rr r'V�a�rfir�y ������t� . !- � ! "�•� ��:,' t) � rik$ + ! '� "� ��rr � , �y! � j� J�! � ^'` lit ,. ARM STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 3, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0403A Property Location: 50106 Bittersweet Trail Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: L- Plan/Italianate /1877/William C. Kownover Farm Property Owner: David A. Visser Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Kownover farmhouse is a 2 1 /2 story brick house with asphalt shingle roof and stone foundation. 2/2 wood windows with segmental arches, with keystones, brick heads, and stone sills, and two bay windows on the front. A portico with flat roof supported by square wood columns covers the front entrance. The property has a summer kitchen of brick to match the house, and a large gable -roof barn. ALTERATIONS: Original bay windows roofs have been replaced with higher pitch and wood shakes. Aluminum storm windows have been added. There is a small addition to the rear of the house. Between May 2012 and December 2014, the front portico was removed without a COA. The barn was taken down in 2014 without a COA. Recent repairs and improvements include development of green space with a stone wall built of original barn foundation stones, APPLICATION ITEMS: Barn (demolition), Green Space (replacement), Garage wall reface (in- kind), Corn crib (temporary support), brush pile removal, move above - ground electric to underground, remove wire fence/brush/old barnwood, add bathroom, add egress window, enhance outbuilding into cottage, gravel drive extension, and create dumpster pad. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: See attached document for detailed description of work. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: See 2014, 2015 documents included STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. - Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure — Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material— Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood —all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the current owner cannot be held accountable for the transgressions of previous owners, and recommends approval currently sought for the barn which was demolished. Work done to the property by the current owner without permits has been done in a sympathetic manner that does not detract from the overall historic character of the property, and has, in many cases, improved it. The work was done in a careful and intentional manner, with respect to the history of the property. As work accomplished by the current owner is in accord with the Group B Standards and Guidelines, and the owners are amenable to working with HPC and staff on projects moving forward, staff recommends approval of the outlined work which has been completed. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director .r- Application -FOR - CeYti acate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ° ` o 1865 : of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http: / /www.st osephcountyindiana. com/departments/SJCHP /index.htm p: 574- 235 -9798 f: 574 -235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephJn.us y.n... ... ...m......n1... I .iiI ...I. d.0 i... i i 111. A.. 1.- 111...1.., i i..... iWiii 1i.,I,.11 k'.ni i.. i I . ... ...i.I.i...Y.fuil�l��. OFFICE USE ONLY» » »DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX < << < << OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 13 1 Application Number: 301 — o 0 3 A Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: Local Landmark El Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled El Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) /� I Address of Property for proposed work: 6 01 E % G'�`w�' f 1,L 1A �la J�3CJ --� (Street Number -- Street Name — City-' -Zip Code) ' Name of Property Owner(s): I/,;. > SEv4- Phone #: 5 L/ v Address of Property Owner(s): Z5 . /q 1 trT T 141 �/ I /Z— (Street Number — Street Name — City —Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Phone #: Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: (Street Number— Street Name —City —Lip Code) Current Use of Building: /�1YLPT (Single Family —Multi Family— Commercialovernment Indust) 1'acant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: Ick (Mood Frame Brick — Stone — Steel— Concrete —Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind J&andscape New ❑ Replacement (not in -kind) Demolition (more than one box may be checked) ,( Description of Proposed Work: ��5"t.�'�' ©�.�) ` .0 C ✓�� 6�t�- �'fnetJl�/� �ra,l�G �1/I��l t A,0 _ R!O d15 'r.�� 1 ©a. ivzrt'i�. AD-7 £� B '�S fad ✓ /uc�s�isl. ENH4A1fr' ©WOOk" Ge7`TA60 1�AAlfrt_ Owner /Contractor Fax #: e-mail: X f°�` =� and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— r f r k r Y i.� �., �! of ,t� -�- i li zt " r.+-` '' �..�, j te T- _ ! ` _ - _.., '�� IN .. L ,. IV �.i�[*., . �._� F...,_ ...... �. .- _ .. � •. _ , .��.. ..ai � =mot`. - d ., .- �. .;.- ... -. , ... _ Introduction and property history since its purchase in 2015 I, David Visser, along with my wife, Karen Visser, of Edwardsburg, Michigan and 27 year residents of the greater South Bend area purchased the home at 50106 Bittersweet Trail in Granger, Indiana in July 2015. This was a purchase of love that is hard to describe in this objective document. We desired to create a home that we could share with people looking to enjoy a piece of history and flavor of country living in our community, and it has proven to be be quite attractive for exactly that. In doing so, we knew it would also create financial resources for healthy investment into the home and property. This home's financial backing would be sound, and its care would not be dependent upon the motivation or finances of an owner. We thought it ideal. In that purchasing process, we learned some of the history of the home and general principles of the benefits that historic registry affords regarding tax credits for approved improvements. Right or wrong, we were informed that the Historic governing organizations only had oversight of the main home and not the outbuildings, and that it was only the exterior of the main home that was of concern because visual exterior presentation was the main ordinance. We did not learn the names of the governing organizations at closing, nor from the previous owners, (nor, in all honesty, did we pursue that information, sadly). Now, even in our profession, Karen and I create and abide by standards above what are considered minimal governmental requirements, and have even created standards that don't exist in our field. We were confident that our mission of preservation and respectful improvement being so core in our beliefs, that it would naturally be in line with any agency that could have an opinion or authority. I say this with innocence and good intention, and not by excuse for not knowing what we now understand. With the limited awareness as known to us prior to the violation notice, we eagerly pursued the projects we saw that this property -in -need deserved. It was not performed in the spirit of deceit, but rather in genuine goodwill. We will outline these projects in the coming pages, for we now know that each as listed are items that should have gone, and now should go, through the approval process. We apprehensively, but with full honestly, disclose and share it all, with high hopes for understanding, leniency, and hopefully approval from you. Violation Notice At the end of January, my wife and I received the violation notice from the Building Department, bringing us awareness of violations, in part, to the standards of the Historic Preservation Commission that relate to our home. We immediately and without hesitation put a stop to any more work. We have made exhaustive efforts to communicate our cooperation in rectifying ALL issues that relate to this home, and our responsibility, by communicating with the Historic Preservation Commission, meeting with Elicia Feasel, communicating with the Building Department, neighbors of our property, and future guests of our home. We are certainly distressed and embarrassed over what we could have known, should have known and what could be the consequences borne by us, not only for actions done by us, but also those transferred actions by the previous owner(s) of our home. We have learned a tremendous amount which is certainly helpful, but also creates more anxiety over the work before you and us collectively, now. Outline of the upcoming documentation I believe the simplest categorization of the issues is to divide them into three categories: 1. Issue from prior to our-ownership 1. Original barn demolition 2. Issues from our work prior to awareness of appropriateness a) Restorations 1. Green space 2. Garage side wall 3. Corn crib 4. Brush pile b) Improvements 1. Exterior above - ground electric conversion to underground 2. Fence row, brush and barn wood c) Enhancements 1. Basement bedroom 2. Basement egress 3. Basement bathroom 4. Summer kitchen/cottage 5. Gravel drive 6. Dumpster pad 3. Prospective projects for which we will responsibly seek approval 1. Neighbor fence 2. Portico 3. Corn crib barn 4. Windmill 5. Silo cap Karen and I stand as optimistically as possible, but on shaky ground that is respectfully managed by your process and good graces. We have an outlook that truly is in line with what the Historic Preservation Commission would look for in the ideal property owner — a family who desires to respect, maintain and uphold the venerable nature of a historic home, and to be an example to others in right ways of handling this special responsibility. Let me begin... The main issue from prior to our ownership Original Barn Demolition The barn was no longer present when we purchased the home. When we first heard that the home was for sale, we looked on Google Maps and saw the barn structure. We were excited to consider that it could be a wedding barn, but when we finally saw the property, we saw that the barn was no longer present. The description of the former barn area and its remains at the time of purchase are as follows: • an uneven pit in the former barn site • a covered, open side of the garage barn that Barn as it appears on Ttulia website Aug 2013 butted against the previous barn • a pile of decaying barn wood in the space between where the barn previously stood, and the back pasture • a neatly stacked section of barn wood along the north fence line of the property. • a stack of boulders that had been part of the foundation of the previous barn What we understood at the time of purchase The barn was apparently decrepit, fraught with leaks and ridden with carpenter ants. The estimates for restoration exceeded $100,000. The decision of the previous owner was to have the barn professionally and safely dismantled. We learned that the barn was dismantled in late 2014, about 8 months prior to our purchase. The previous family had not yet completed the restoration of the east side of the garage barn that had butted up to the original barn, so it was exposed to the elements. There is a disagreement between information we received from the previous owner and the information on file with the HPC. Images in the home's HPC file shows more barn wood than what was present when we first owned, and the written reports in the file differ from the testimony of the former owner. The main difference being that the written report on file indicates it was dismantled in a manner that it could be reassembled, however, the pictures clearly show that it couldn't have been, and shows no evidence of labeling. It also became known to us that the barn was dismantled without a permit, too. Site of the former barn (Google 3D) Conclusions There were originally structural soundness concerns for restoration, extraordinary financial requirements requirements for doing so, and the process of dismantling the barn was not in a manner suitable for reassembling (see the HPC file photos). I am seeking a retroactive COA for this barn removal Additional support for barn removal COA • Repurposing barn wood on site: some of the barn wood has been repurposed to build an Amish -style dining table in the grand dining room of the main home, and a mantle in over the fireplace of the outbuilding called the summer kitchen • Repurposing boulders on site: the pile of rock boulders have been reassembled in a manner similar to the barn's original foundation, in order to form a retaining wall for the green space that now exists where the barn had been • Menace of carpenter ants: neighbor states that as soon as the barn was removed, their outbuilding was infested with carpenter ants and was destroyed • Garage barn restoration: it is presumed that part of the conditions for COA would be to restore the garage barn in the style of the original structure. This has been completed in like manner. Issues from our work prior to awareness of appropriateness Restorations Green space At the time of property purchase In the former location of the barn remained a pit as she the image. This space was was a blight, and in fact wa hazard due to some rebar and blocks that occupied the area. In heavy rains, it retained water that would rema standing for more than a week. A pile of boulders, presumably from the foundation of the barn, were in a pile away from this pit. In the appropriateness of barn removal, the restoration of this area would have been a natural restoration requirement. Vision The vision was for this area was to restore it to cosmetic fashion, and become a level green space. Process The height differential between the driveway parking area and the lower ground beyond the former barn site had to be reconciled. It was decided to repurpose the boulders into a retaining wall that would match the ground level of the drive parking area. This initial wall work was completed professionally and followed with back fill of clean dirt. Soil from the gravel drive clearing (see separate project) was used to finish the top of the green space before seeding. The flat space without a border was deemed a falling risk for people on the property, so a perimeter of stone was created. This erimeter was enhanced with perennials P P and a small arbor seat in period fashion. Tri -light light posts of the same model and style as the light close to the main house, were added to the perimeter of the green space. Switches and sourcing of electric were tied in with the restoration of the east side of the garage barn (see separate )roject). Former barn site (pit) at the time of pre - purchase viewing Stone wall built out of original barn foundation boulders. Garage side wall [For simplicity and distinction, I will call this building the "garage" so as not to confuse it with the original "barn ".] At the time of purchase The east side of the garage was without an exterior wall. The interior wall and studs were exposed, as was insulation and wiring. A door at mid- length of the east wall was present, with threshold about 1' above garage floor and about 3' above the exposed foundation and floor of the dirt pit where the original barn had been. A tarp covered the upper 2/3 of the exposed wall, but was untethered and allowed exposure to the elements since the barn's demolition. Discussion As stated above, the vintage barn photos do not show the garage. This building was separate and added at a later date. The garage appears on the schematics that are part of the historic registry, as we have learned, so it was at least present in the mid- 1980's. I presume the garage was built and attached directly abutting the side of the original barn and that it had no actual exterior wall. Vision Clearly the wall needed to be restored in order to preserve the garage and provide safety for the exposed electric and insulation. Although the garage was not vintage, it was our desire to restore the side of the garage in the same theme as the other sides of the garage. Process The plan was to bring the green space to a level just under the level of the garage floor so that it would not allow water into the garage, but also to correct the disparity of the garage door and garage floor (threshold was 1' above garage floor) and the proposed green space height (just under the level of garage floor) to bring them closer to a normal threshold configuration. The single non - vintage door was replaced with a double door configuration of repurposed vintage -style doors that swing open much like swing barn doors would. Exterior paint was matched to the rest of the building's current color (forest green). In conjunction with the restoration of the former barn site (pit), the electric was evaluated and tapped for providing power to the three post lamps on the perimeter of the green space. A single flood light was placed high on the wall to provide the option of more downward lighting and two sconce lights were placed beside the restored barn doors. The barn doors have not been painted yet. One reason, of course is that all projects are on hold out of respect, ; . ; „ rY for the process. The other is that we are uncertain if natural color vs. clear coat 3 finish will be employed. Corn Crib At the time of purchase Just for the purpose of noting issues that existed at the time of property purchase, I want to mention that the corn crib portion of the barn was decrepit as well. A large blue tarp covered most, but not all of the southern slope of the crib end of the barn. From the inside, the roof is open in some areas and the wood has water - related deterioration. The structure was deemed at risk of collapse. Vision Restoration is the plan. Prioritization of the current structural risks was important to address right away. Process Temporary planks were installed to provide support for walls and roof on the south end of the corn crib. These would stay in place until such time as a definitive restoration could take place. The tarp was replaced in 2017, but the project remains on the "future project list'. Brush pile At the time of purchase The pasture is the eastern half of the property. It is mostly clear of trees, but is mowed. In the center of the pasture, a brush pile about 10' high was present. It appeared to be clean brush along with branches up to approximately 8" diameter. Vision Removal of the brush pile Process In preparing to get a permit, we consulted with the Harris Fire Marshall, the pile was deemed too large to burn. We were informed of the proper steps to burn this pile (equipment present to feed a separate fire from the burn pile in small amounts at a time). Out of respect for our neighbors, and because we determined it would cost less to have the material hauled, we arranged to have hauling done instead, and completed the process and leveling the ground where the pile had been. Aside from normal mowing, this area now grows as naturally as the surrounding pasture. Before After Issues from our work prior to awareness of appropriateness — Improvements Exterior electric and cable At the time of purchase The main house had electric provided by above - ground wire and cable, coursing across the property from southeast of the house, through the trees via two poles on the property and ultimately connecting to the house on the east face of the two -story section. From there, it coursed on the exterior, down the wall beside the sun room and entered the house into the utility room at ground level. Some of the cable attachments to the home appeared tenuous, and the cables through the trees were at risk of falling limbs Vision Functionally, we desired to not have the electric power to to the home to be at risk of interruption, but also at risk of damage to the house if the lines were plucked from th building due to downed branches. As well, the aesthetics of the home were to be enhanced with the prospect of moving the cables subterranean instead. Process Researching the process of moving the electric involved communicating and strategizing with the power company. Representatives from AEP came to the home and determined that the electric, if changed, should come off of the transformer to th north and east of the home rather than from the original source. Permissions from of neighbor was obtained and the electric company came to make the new connection. trench had been pre -made from the transformer edge of the property to the house an( reconnected all in one day. The trench was filled and seeded. Resultant lack of visible wires in the finished project Schematic of old (red) and new (yellow) electric lines Former utility poles Fence row/brush/old barn wood At the time of purchase This area was occupied by a large pile of barn wood from the former barn, stacked in random fashion, and was noted as wood with only salvage value. Behind this pile was a wire fence line that was disconnected in some places, and over grown in a track about 10' wide with weeds. Ground hogs and raccoons had made their home in this area and it was deemed a nuisance. Vision In line with the goal of cleaning up the property grounds, the wood pile needed to be sorted for usable or repurposable pieces and the brush/scrub plant areas needed to be cleaned to be mowable. The fence was to be removed since it was not serving any purpose and did not seem to have a venerable function necessitating replacement. Process During most of last year, the wood pile was sought for pieces that could be re- purposed. Our first major project was the building of the centerpiece dining table that now adorns the grand dining room (see picture). As a home that can welcome a family of 18, it was build for just that size and purpose. Amish -style custom craftsmanship was used and the finish matches the vintage wood that likely also came from the property when the home was built. Other wood re- purposing projects included making a mantle for the cottage fireplace, and incorporating pieces into the custom counter tops of the cottage kitchenette. In January, literally the weekend before the violation notice was received, the remaining wood was removed and the weed growth area cleared, along with the failing wire fencing that crossed through there. Although projects are completely on -hold while working through this process, we had envisioned other projects with the barn wood — frame repair and trim replacement are considered "next -up" projects with the barn wood, and we have been discussing custom head and foot boards for beds in the home. Remaining wood will continue to serve future projects as well. Like the dining table, other pieces of furniture can be tooled for the home. Downed Trees At the time of purchase There were 2 -3 downed trees on the property at the time of purchase. I don't have photos of the others, but the plan was to clear the dead fallen trees. Vision To clear the property of blight and unsightly issues. Process Downed trees were dismembered and the wood was kept as fire wood. Issues from our work prior to awareness of appropriateness — Enhancements Basement Bedroom and Egress At the time of purchase The lower level northwest room was used as a storage room by the previous owner. There had been a billiard table and a perimeter of antique clocks. When this room was emptied, it had structurally sound walls with no evidence of water damage. The windows had multiple types of weather seal. The ceiling was lower than other parts of the basement, but was finished smooth. Vision We considered having it a game room so the entire lower level would be game - focused, but we ultimately decided that an additional bedroom would be best since a non- approval- requiring change of the sun room into a spa room was going to result in two less beds. Safety calls for legal egress for family safety. We decided the northeast window well was the best one suited for this. Process Egress window Again, right or wrong, at the time of making these decisions without the awareness of needing a certificate of approval, we contracted with a person referred to us by the former owner of the home. He was to excavate the area suitable for a framed egress well. We properly called to have utilities marked and the excavation was completed. We then installed the window portion of the egress and sealed it. It has yet to be framed on the inside. In keeping with the theme of curved walls in the home, the bathroom addition, which is overviewed in the next section, borrowed space from this bedroom, so we utilized a curved wall. Basement bathroom Vision There was no bathroom at the time of purchase. This enhancement became logical when the lower bedroom was conceptualized. There were two doors into the northwest room that became the bedroom, and it was quite large. A full bath was determined to be plausible. A shower, stool and single sink vanity, all in period style were designed. Process Over the course of 3 weeks 12 months ago, this work was completed at the same time as the egress window in order to create common dust. A lift pump would carry water and solids to the adjacent main septic pipe (which was showing corrosion, so we changed out a section with PVC and raised it to provide more head room in the den adjacent to this bathroom. An antique cabinet was converted into a bowl -top vintage style vanity and plumbed from the adjacent utility room through existing fenestrations in the existing lower level brick wall. Tile of earth tones and white were selected, choosing again to avoid anything pre -fab. The original door to the bedroom was kept as the bathroom door, adding a slide latch. The room has an exhaust fan as well, electric follows code of requiring GFI outlets where appropriate. The lift pump is behind the curved portion of the wall between the bathroom and bedroom (see bedroom image) with a hidden access door for servicing. Gravel drive At the time of purchase There was a stamped concrete section of drive beside the corn crib. It led nowhere, however there was an additional concrete drive beyond the crib. This was a low, shaded area collected a lot of water after rains and didn't fill in well with grass. As well, it made for difficult passage for our lawn tractor. Vision Our initial thoughts were two -fold. In considering having events like weddings at the home, we thought it ideal to have cars park in the pasture. Additionally, we considered linking the two concrete drives by adding a gravel section between them. Ultimately we elected to just make the gravel drive straight to the edge of the pasture. The top soil that was cleared in making this section was the topsoil used to surface the green space discussed earlier. Process Bobcat work preeminated for several weeks last year, and it became logical to combine its uses as much as possible. Many of the barn pit, retaining wall and other yard work were done in concert with each other. Cottage/outhouse/door latch At the time of purchase The outbuilding near the home has had a variety of names because of uncertainty about its original function. A former owner uses the name "summer kitchen and smokehouse" and that wording was used in the historic registry. In contrast, one Kownover descendent refers to it as the workshop. Another descendent now debates the smokehouse theory. In his words... "Your choice'The cottage' seems to me to be a better name for this building. As I have previously related, the term 'summer kitchen' that an earlier owner gave to the structure seems inappropriate to me since its ceiling was too low for that purpose. Summer kitchens generally lack a ceiling, and sometimes they are open on one side so that the kitchen heat is less troublesome during the sweltering summer days. The kitchen In the main house has or had a higher ceiling than the one that was found in this building, and it would have been more comfortable to have worked there during the summer ... Yet, neither my father nor grandmother could say how this building was used, although my grandmother suggested that it was probably used for storage" - Willem Van Kouwenhoven In any case, there is no debate that the part facing the home on the west side was the original outhouse. There is also no debate that the interior and some of the exterior trim was in disrepair with a falling interior ceiling, decay of the window sills, and broken windows. At some point in recent decades, electricity was brought to the building, but it too had become unsafe with exposed and frayed wires and loose outlets. The building was only used for weather- tolerant storage by the previous owner. Vision The quaint character of this building with its fireplace and back room looked more like a cottage. Our plan was to make this a small cottage for visitors to use as a guest house. The outhouse was only used as a garden shed for the previous homeowner. With its concrete floor and no other purpose, we envisioned the water heater for the cottage to be there and the building only used seasonally. Process Materials left in the cottage from the previous owner were removed. The electric was evaluated by an electrician, disconnected and a new plan for electricity was discussed. The ceiling which was falling down had to be removed. The original hope was that the ceiling was faux and that the roof support would allow it to be vaulted. Insulation which had been in the attic showed evidence of water leakage, verminous infestation, and debris. None of it was salvageable. It was also evident that vaulting would not be possible, so new ceiling board was put up with new roll insulation and a port to allow attic access. A drainable water line was brought to the cottage from the basement of the main house. A small kitchenette was added as was a shower and toilet in the back room, leaving natural the high parts of the "drying room" to maintain its original character. Tile was selected for the bath rather than some sort of contemporary composite and colors were chosen to fit the earth tones of the home's era. A mantle was constructed out of some of the barn wood as was the custom made vanity for the kitchenette. Counter tops were custom made out of local wood. The original u 0 0 b b a 0 u c� a a b 0 E v b a, co u a b a, a, co tA 0 a b a o CU C� •� u 0 c o u cu u � v 0 v F Dumpster pad (stone) At the time of purchaseThere was no dumpster at the property at the time of purchase. Vision A modest residential tote was deemed insufficient, so we needed to obtain a small dumpster. Our first location was close to the parking area, but in conversation with our neighbors, we elected to place it in a more cosmetic location near the road. Process This area was already cleared and had mulch. Leftover stone from the green space perimeter was used as a foundation for the dumpster pad. This spring, we will mulch the area around the dumpster again, and plant vegetation on three sides to provide more a more cosmetic site. Prospective projects for which we will responsibly seek approval (COA) • Neighbor fence Our driveway and parking area cause headlights to shine directly into the living room of our neighbor to the north. I have met with them and discussed this issue and wish to provide them some light and sound barrier protections. A berm and period -style fence was discussed and plans are being designed to present for COA. ® Portico At some point prior to our purchase of the home, the front door portico was removed and not replaced. We have vintage photos indicating the style and appearance of the portico and are in the process of designing and drawing up plans to present for COA. (image: original portico, current portico) • Corn crib barn Similar to the restoration of the side of the garage, we plan to propose a restoration of the original corn crib. This will entail structural work as well as roofing, and painting of the slatted structure, hopefully with minimal need for replacement of sections. We will present a defined plan in the coming months for a COA. (See images in early section) ® Windmill Vintage photos show a windmill on the property just to the east of the former barn site. It is our plan to get approval to have a vintage or character (non- functional) windmill installed on the farm again. We have begun our search regionally, but will seek a general COA prior to purchase to assure anticipated appearance, height, and suitability. o Silo cap The silo on the property does not have a cap. It also has a non- functional street light at the top of the structure. Our goal is to remove the light, secure the steps to prevent unauthorized access (safety reasons) and restore a vintage -style cap. We have similarly begun our search regionally, but will seek a general COA prior to purchase and installation. Epilogue We have been deeply disheartened by the revelation of our lapses in awareness of right processes with respect to the Historic Preservation Commission. It has been an inordinate education process, and we have learned a tremendous amount in these months. Although some students of authoritative processes can learn resentfully, we have and continue to learn respectfully with our eye on doing things in the right way going forward. Our hearts have always been completely in line with the idealism of respectful ownership of this venerable home, and we have aspired to bring it to life, both in structure and in function. We wish to celebrate its history, and we wish to share it with people who may never have a chance to experience a historic home such as the Kownover Farmstead. Before we even signed the purchase documents, we had performed genealogical tracing of the Kownover family all the way back to the 1400's in the Netherlands, a documentation that will be exciting to share. Additionally, we have contacted and met with many descendants of the founding family, some of whom still live in the area, and others of whom now live internationally. In this process we came to realize that one of our long -time clients was in fact a granddaughter of one of the Kownover children born in this home. Additionally, we have given tours of the home with other descendants, and have provided home updates to Willem Van Kouwenhoven, the self - professed family archivist, who lives* in the Netherlands and was instrumental in providing much of the information that was used in the historic registry process of this home. Karen and I have been humbled and pleased to have the support of the Kownover family in our efforts to preserve and celebrate the home and its history. Prior to the heavy and emotionally burdensome work in this process, our main focus was to have a Kownover family reunion of sorts this summer, inviting former owners of the home as well. If paper could shed tears, the emotional impact of this process on Karen and me that are now laid out in the words and testament here, would cause this document to do so. We deeply and profoundly apologize for our lapses, yet pledge our commitment to this home, to the Historic Preservation Commission, to our neighbors, to the Kownover family and heritage, and to the Farmstead guests past and future. Without asking, we have been receiving letters, testimonials and offers of in- person support and speaking on our behalf. I believe in this process and in the possibility that even this kind of situation can work out with cool heads, understanding and commitment in going forward with new awareness. We appreciate this opportunity to learn and to improve our stewardship of this beautiful home. And to those who may sadly feel otherwise about our intent and defend the heritage and tradition of this home, I simply believe they are friends and partners we simply haven't yet met! Very sincerely, David and Karen Visser * Willem Van Kouwenhoven passed away unexpectedly on 3131117. We exchanged several emails during our time owning this home. My last message to him, updating him on improvements we had made, was sent to him in January 2017(prior to violation notice). His comments about our improvements are in the attached email. 4/312017 XFINrTY Connect Fw W_C_KownoverPrintout Willem van Kouwenhoven <wfvkouwenhoven @hetnet.nl> Fw: W. C. Kownover To Bement Jerrald <jbement @beanstalk.net> • Kownover Thomas <mkownover @yahoo.com> • Poe Nancy Jane <janepoe @hotmail.com> • Rector Natalie <rec33not @gmail.com> - Tejchma Howard <howie1161 @gmail.com> • Melody Mary Ann <jmelody @dbstech.com> Boggs Jacqueline < paboggs7@comcast. net> • Kipka Donn <kipka @chartermi.net> - Waele Jen <kiopkah @yahoo.com> • Visser David <dviss830 @comcast.net> • Snyder Howard <hlsnyder203 @juno.com> Dear David, 2/2/2017 11:58 AM Thanks so much for your kind greetings. I greatly appreciate it that you have taken the time to tell me about the developments and improvements on the house that W. C. Kownover built in 1877. 1. The new bedroom in the basement will allow you to accommodate more guests in comfort, especially since you have included a bathroom in this new facility. 2. The spa that you have added sounds like a great plus point for the house. It is also pleasing to know that you are able to work so well with the Sokols. 3. Although it is saddening to learn that the barn has been razed, the new use of the space that it formerly occupied is heartening. A garage seems more useful in this day and age than a barn. 4. Your choice "The cottage" seems to me to be a better name for this building. As I have previously related, the term "summer kitchen" that an earlier owner gave to the structure seems inappropriate to me since its ceiling was too low for that purpose. Summer kitchens generally lack a ceiling, and sometimes they are open on one side so that the kitchen heat is less troublesome during the sweltering summer days. The kitchen in the main house has or had a higher ceiling than the one that was found in this building, and it would have .been more comfortable to have worked there during the summer. This structure very much resembles the combination dry house and smoke house on the Follmer farm with its low ceiling and small fireplace. As you have mentioned, a smoke house was part of this building, and Mr. Sokol mentioned in one of his communications to me that he discovered ventilation ducts when he was repairing the roof. Such ducts would have allowed wet air to escape from below. This too would suggest that this building was used in the same way as the one on the other farm, which was used for drying and smoking meat in the era before other means of preserving had become available. Yet, neither my father nor grandmother could say how this building was used, although my grandmother suggested that it was probably used for storage. It was only clear to them that the portion on the west side was used as a toilet. It is unusual to find an outdoor toilet of double brick with a separate chimney so that it could be heated for the convenience of the users. It is pleasing to know that the whole structure can now be used as an attractive accommodation for guests. 5. It is good to know that the removal of above ground electrical wiring has improved the appearance of the house. 6. It is so pleasing to know that wood from the barn was used to make a large table for the dining room. A portion of that structure thus still remains in use in the house. Your plans for further improvements seem quite exciting to me. https : / /connectxfinitycom /appsUtely= 7.8.2 -15. 20170302.190347 /printhtml ?print 1491204275586 1/5 4/3/2017 XFINrrY Connect Fw W C Kownover Printout 1. It seems appropriate that a corn crib be part of the grounds, and it is pleasing that you are planning to restore this structure. 2. In my opinion, you have made a good choice in your plans for the restoration of the front door portico. The picture that you enclosed of your plans show a structure that is quite similar to the entryway that stood there in the picture from 1905 that I am enclosing. In the photo from 1914 that I am including, it is clear that the porch that was found there at the later date was quite different. 3. Your plans for functional borders with the neighbors sound intriguing. Perhaps the photo that I am including of the south lawn about 1912 might give you an idea about how borders were designated at that time. 4. Hopefully your guests will benefit by your increasing experience as you continue to introduce new improvements to the house and grounds. Thanks you so much for your good wishes. I hope that the coming year will be good to you and your family. If I might be of help to you in some way, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Bill From: dviss830Ccbcomcast.net Sent: Saturday, January 21, 20171:32 AM To: Willem van Kouwenhoven Saubject: Re: W. C. Kownover Dear Willem -- Greetings from Indiana! First of all, I think of you often and am so glad that you are a willing resource for the history and heritage of the home. It means a lot to me. I would like to bring you up to date on the Kownover Farmstead here in Granger, Indiana. It has been a busy year, and the projects continue... We continue to have guests enjoy the home as a vacation rental property. It is quite popular and it is a rare weekend when we don't have a group visiting. Winter months are a little slower, and that has afforded me the time to write to you, along with other catching up. Here is a short list of projects we have accomplished this year... 1. We finished the basement northwest room into a bedroom, having installed an egress window for safety. We borrowed some space from that room to put in an additional full bathroom, as well. This required some plumbing upgrades. 2. The previous owners (Sokol's) had a dry sauna in the lower level and we decided to make the sunroom into a spa room. The sauna was moved there, and we added a hot tub. It is quite the relaxation spot!! The stamped concrete under the carpet turned out to be the perfect hops: / /connectxfinity.com /appsuitety= 7.8.2 -15. 20170302 .190347 /pririLhtmI ?print 1491204275586 2/5 4/312017 XFIN rrY Connect Fw W C Kovrnover Printout foundation for this improvement. Linda and Tim Sokol have become very good friends, and Linda and I now work together on projects, too. 3. The barn had unfortunately been demolished (for safety reasons) a few years before I bought the home, but the space where it was located has been finished into a "green space ", nicely landscaped at its perimeter to be a flat area where guests have had their weddings in the last year. The country setting of this home has been quite attractive, and there are several weddings scheduled for this year and next. The garage wall that was adjacent to the old barn had to be closed off since it didn't have a true exterior wall while the barn had been there, so we did that, too. 4. That beautiful summer kitchen left me conflicted in my mind. I know the heritage of its use, but to me it was a "cottage waiting to happen ". Keeping the exterior untouched, we converted the interior into a quaint little cottage, leaving all of the walls, but redoing the ceiling. The "smoke room" part was converted into a full bathroom. The back area just outside the smoke room is where a kitchenette now exists, and the front area has a queen bed and small dining table. We close the cottage for the winter, but it has been popular with the wedding parties, and larger groups. 5. We relocated all exterior electric wires to underground so the home and grounds can be visually unencumbered by wires and poles. It made a big difference, Willem! 6. My friend Ron who helps with maintenance and most of these projects is a fine craftsman. He made an 18- person dining table in Amish style for the dining room, using exclusively barn wood from the original barn. It is a true centerpiece to the home and fits so nicely with the wood floors. More projects are planned for this spring, too... 1. We will restore the roof over the old corn crib /barn soon. 2. Spring time will also be the restoration of the front door portico. It was removed prior to me purchasing the home, and I am very excited to be meeting with my design team this weekend to formulate our plan. I hope to front -light the home to highlight its beauty along with the majesty of the home's existing facade! (I am attaching a photo of what I understand to be the original portico, which will be our blueprint). 3. We will enhance the privacy of the property with a few cosmetic yet functional borders or fences between our property and some of the near neighbors. Doing so is as much for us as it is for them. I get nervous when I have a group at the home, and find myself hoping that no un- neighborly disturbance occurs. 4. Much of the rest of our ongoing work will be guest- experience improvements as we hopefully graduate from remodeling, to maintaining with hosting excellence. Willem, I hope that these things that we are doing stand in line with the goals of celebrating this wonderful home, and your family's history -- both here, and in the spirit of our shared Dutch heritage. I hope that as you read this letter, that you will reflect positively on this, and also continue to be a joyful guardian of the historical materials that you have from your family https J /connecWnitycom /appsdtety= 7.8.2 -15. 20170302.190347 /printhtml ?print 1491204275586 315 4/3/2017 XFINITY Connect Fw W C Kownover Printout and from this home. I would be honored at some point to be considered as a potential custodian of any of the things that are of historical importance. I of course leave that to your good judgement. Mijn vriend, gelukkig Nieuwjaar, en de beste wensen en de gezondheid van U en Uw gezin! Beste, David Visser From: Willem van Kouwenhoven To: dviss830t- com cast. net Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 11:31:18 AM Subject: Re: W. C. Kownover Hello David, Thank you for your response. I appreciate your sending the address of your website. I have read the information there, and I have viewed the photos that you have posted. The house and grounds look beautiful now. I wish you success with your plans. We shall see if the cousins want to plan a "homecoming ". Sincerely yours, Bill From: dviss830(&comcast.net Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 5:04 AM To: Willem van Kouwenhoven Cc: Bement ]errald ; Boms ]acaueline ; Kownover Thomas ; Poe Nancv Jane ; Rector Natalie Subject: Re: W. C. Kownover Thank you for reconnecting. I was indeed able to open the previous document and was also happy to receive the PDF file. I also wanted to share with you and your family the website that lists the stately Kownover Farmstead in its current vacation home state. We are always improving the listing, the home furnishings and amenities, so check back periodically. httos: / /www.airbnb.com /rooms /7038167 It may be special to consider a "homecoming" of sorts at some point in the future if you and your family would ever choose to consider that. Very sincerely, David Visser hops: / /connectxfinity.com /appsLite/v= 7.8.2 -15. 20170302 .190347 /print.html ?print 1491204275586 4/5 4/3/2017 XFINrrY Connect Fw W_C_Kavmover Printout From: Willem van Kouwenhoven To: Visser David Cc: Bement Jerrald, Boaas Jacaueline, Kouwenhoven Willem, Kownover Thomas, Poe Nancv Jane., Rector Natalie Sent: Friday, August 28, 201511:57:44 AM Subject: W. C. Kownover Hello David, It has occurred to me that you might have trouble with the format of the article about W. C. Kownover from Howard's History (1907) that I sent you. So, I am sending it to you with this e- mail in PDF- format. I hope that you are well and that you are enjoying your new house. Sincerely yours, Bill • Kownover portico 001 (4).jpg (949 KB) • FamilyGroup 1905 b.jpg (511 KB) • WC &Robert 1914 front lawn b.jpg (410 KB) • House 1912 southLawn b.jpg (452 KB) httpsJ/ connectxflnitycom/ appsdtel v= 7. 8 .2- 15.20170302.190347/printhtml ?print 1491204275586 515 Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist — HPCSBSJC December 22, 2014 At the request of Elicia Feasel Assistant Director of HPC I visited the local St Joseph County landmark located at 50106 Bittersweet Trail on Tuesday December the 16 of 2014. Elicia had heard from a family member of the former owner that the current owner had taken down the original barn located at the property. I visited the property around 11 am to find that in fact the large barn located at the rear of the barn seen from the road was in fact down and the material was sorted in piles around the property. After taking several photographs I approached the house and rang the doorbell. Tim Sikos the owner came out and introduced himself. We walked around the property and he showed me that the barn in fact lacked a foundation which is why it collapsed. He also showed me around the piles of materials and indicated to me that it is his intent to rebuild the barn after a proper graded and secured foundation is built. To further stress his position that he wants to re -use the timbers, the crew that disassembled the barn by hand was a Mennonite crew that even sorted and stacked it. I informed him that the out buildings including the barns were in fact part of the landmark designation and that any changes in those buildings required HPC review and approval. He informed me that he had been in contact with David Duval from the Indiana DHPA who informed him that the house and the summer kitchen were the only parts of the designation. Mr Sikos had purchased the property over a decade ago and had been in contact with the state DHPA to discuss tax credits. Mr Duval has been to the property and has talked to the owner and at that time informed him that only the house and the summer kitchen were part of the landmark designation as the barn that is visible from the street was built in the 1960s and was built onto the original barn making it not suitable for tax credit. The cement corn silo that is in the rear of the property and was adjacent to the barn was a later addition. The silo has a slight lean and the owner feels it unsafe and plans on falling that structure as well. To my knowledge Mr. Duval has never contacted HPCSBSJC in regards to his conversations with Mr. Sikos. After researching the file, the owners had the property re- designated to allow the acreage surrounding the farmhouse to be subdivided out and built upon. In the staff report dated February 9, 1987 the staff recommended the approval of the owners proposal due to the fact that, "The historic house and all outbuildings will be on Lot 20 and will still be included in Lot 20 as will the fence." The recommendation also states: "Because all of the buildings and major trees will continue to be protected by the landmark designation and because the new boundaries do not detract from the historic character of the property, I recommend approval." Signed Karen Kiemnec, Director HPC The file does not contain the result of the HPC meeting but does contain the agenda for the St Joseph County Council dated Tuesday, April 14, 1987. This agenda sheet states item # 19 -87: An ordinance to amend Ordinace NO. 117 -76, the same being an ordinance designating and establishing an historic landmark (50106 Bittersweet Trail) Approved 8 -0. 1 am unable to identify the details of that re- designation as the file is lacking the approved COA as well as the language presented to and approved by the County Council. Further research will have to be completed in order to determine what was actually designated and protected. The surveys in the file mention the main house, the smokehouse /summer kitchen and a "good" barn. The owner showed me a photograph of what the original front porch looked like as informed me that it is his intention to rebuild it accordingly. He also showed me some hardware salvaged from the barn as well as some of the original shutters from the main house. He informed me that he is planning on reusing original materials where he is able to. He was also kind enough to show me the interior of the main house and all the restoration work he has done including the original, windows, floors, and trim work throughout the house. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist HPCSBSJC South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD SOUTH BEND, IN 46601 -1830 www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e -mail: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President Tim Sikos 50601 Bittersweet Trail Granger, IN 46530 4 February 2015 Dear Mr. Sikos, A Certified Local Government Catherine D. Hostetler, Director It was a pleasure to meet with you on December 16, 2014 at your historic home in Granger. Thank you again for the hospi- tality and the tour. It is easy to see how much appreciation you have for the house and how much time and energy you have put into it. We had discussed the condition of the original barn and your intentions to be able to someday construct a new structure with some of the reclaimed material. I just wanted to say how glad I was to hear that. We still have to address the fact that the barn was brought down without an approved Certificate of Appropriateness appli- cation. We really need that to go in front of the Commission. The fact that the barn has already been brought down, (necessary or not) still leaves us without the proper procedures and documentation. Although you have convinced me with your descriptions and the site photographs I personally took, you will still need to apply for the application and have it reviewed. The application is a sim- ple one and needs to be sent with the $20 application fee. I will attach a hard copy with this letter. Additional copies may be down- loaded and printed from the Saint Joseph County Website/ departments / historic preservation and then COA Application. In order to — t this unto the agenda for the meeting, we need to receive the application by the first Monday of each month. The meeting for the te nth then takes place on the third Monday at 7:30 at the County -City Building, 227 W Jefferson, South Bend, IN. I know this seems rather trivial considering the barn is down, but in order to complete the procedure and to make our com- mission aware of your intentions, this needs to happen. Thank you for your time and understanding, Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County (574) 235 -9798 office COMMISSIONERS Thomas Gordon (Vice President) Mike Voll (Treasurer) (Architectural Historian) Elizabeth Hertel (Secretary) Kevin Buccellato Brandon Anderson STAFF Elicia D. Feasel, Deputy Director Mark P. Telloyan, Legal Counsel Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ? EST. 1973 ] OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY f .. "'!N° O WNW AS � t I y 4 kr j(aR + i Mif I 11 `� nT� �2i1 {tl ,6 r 1 �5r ,ut �, A ll, •C � , r 4 :.n I , y, H Wkr ro • r r� •. `'�`+r . � k� : *.ps ti x�,� �`s c } {` :�. x',�}� ° �+� •• J . ' atC� � �4; � . i 1 et q `�. -�'�� fit' � <�t f�{�. � �- „�•3O�q� `! .'i �:' :� ke',c i l , , I a r�, a " � ' � Y �.. - � �+, i ' ti mph '��, �y� ` 'l ! �Pt e, "�a �.w v p a ti �r, , 'v vi ikt.{ 3 rH p i � � � '�r� �� ry �� ' h '` � r�! s ` ! �'r '� �•"' I t �. z ed"r;,��'� ' . f a . . � ��! � 1 t \ ` f � ��`,�+ :; r � ��� S ,. � x { �, � j � • 'r n .e. ^'}' it `.X gill � �f Y3" ��� /,�j� �� �1 A ' '� 1' � � r I � r ' •r - � t ��i r f '. .p y } . � • � �,IMpir fr ,> � ' ; `� I t ; �C l l i 1�, i JJ � � !• � e j t t �. I 1 �Yi tar y'iit ! yb tifn�.w11pN1�yy,I }V,�b� �t '�' s 9 , A��H 4 i •M1 r r41} I ` ' rrr ti ; ? .. � _. IM It 1 ?I x f J yp ( r �f "Y 17'P 3 f {�� '. � • Y { � 4 J {4 cGI n (� � ) I I .I 1 ( {a a ,>•x { .' 411lIt' : r' I � �.,; t I �f ° J Y )� `',�” �; r { �t 1� 1 ;� n f 7p. 1 r •r�.._ ". i lY - { r. W, A� 1,6 UwA , QK' N i1e IMF 1 60 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY March 20, 2017 13' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Elizabeth Hertel, Vice President; Michele Gelfman, Secretary; Joseph Molnar, Treasurer; Tom Gordon, Asst. Secretary; Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Mike Voll, Kevin Buccellato Members Not in Attendance: Brandon Anderson Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist; Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel Members of the Public Present: Larry Clifford, Mark Bauer, Jennifer Smart, Sara Boukdad, Gary Gilot, Jory Fitzgerald, Leah Thill, James Hickner 11. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 813 Park Avenue COA #2017 -0216 Chapin Park Representation by James Hickner, 1006 Altgeld Chad Gajowski, 28600 Quinn Rd., North Liberty, contractor STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 16, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0216 Property Location: 813 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: T- Plan/1880 Property Owner: James Hickner Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story irregular plan house has a brick foundation. The asphalt - shingled cross gable roof with pyramidal hip roof in back has molded cornice at rake in gables. There is a small front porch. Windows are 1/1 double hung. Siding is wood clapboard. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door have been added, as well as concrete steps to front porch. Existing 1/1 double -hung wood windows have been replaced with new vinyl windows without COA approval. APPLICATION ITEMS: Pella 28x60 = 3 windows placed in back of house and on the sides and replace siding for (unsure of word) on kitchen wood. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner replaced first floor windows on back and south side of house with improperly sized vinyl windows, filling in the remainder of each opening with OSB. One window, part of a bay window in back, was replaced with a set of French doors. Work was done without COA approval. Following conversation between owner and HPC, owner plans to remove French doors and improperly sized windows, replacing with Pella ThermaStar vinyl windows, correct size and installed in correct location, including trim to replicate existing and replacement of window crowns where applicable. Small square window that was installed in rear will be removed and opening filled with wood siding to match existing. Several second -floor windows are currently vinyl windows. Update: Work has continued on this property, contradictory to what is applied for here (see attached photos). The Building Department has issued a violation letter and ordinance violation citation. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On February 15, 2017 at approximately I OAM, I visited the property located at 813 Park Ave. We had received an anonymous letter stating that the owner was replacing the rear and side windows. I found that to be true. I started walking around and photographing the newly installed, improperly sized windows. A member of the work crew came out and inquired if he could assist me. I asked to see their permits for the work they were doing. He responded by handing me a cell phone with the owner of the property on the other end. The man identified himself as James Hickner. He said he was unaware that he needed Historic Preservation approval for exchange of the windows on the rear and sides. He was under the impression that he could not the front fagade but could change the other three sides. I explained to him that was not the case and in any event, he would have needed a permit to legally change the windows in any house where the cost was greater than $400. He explained that the house was his parents' house and had been vacant for 20 plus years. He knew he had to save it because it was in a district. He inquired about had we ever allowed a property to be tom down in a district. He felt that the condition of the house was going to require more money than the house was going to be worth. He said he would rather just burn it down. I told him he probably should not say that to me. He told me he had been in the office to discuss a rear deck and had started the COA process but had not finished it as he wanted to complete interior repairs before that could take place. I explained what normally happens when someone applies to replace existing windows. The inspection by myself, the review of proposed new material by staff, then the decision by the commission. I told him it is impossible to inspect what was existing now that the original windows are in pieces in the bottom of the dumpster. I gave him the phone number to the office and asked him to please call as soon as possible and to stop the work. Update: On March 2, 2017,1 returned to the property to find more windows replaced and improperly sized and installed since the original visit on February 15, 2017. I took additional photographs and also wanted to clarify there were three older vinyl windows that were installed considerably before these new ones and are still in place. I also see that the rear patio doors have been replaced and one smaller improperly sized window now exists in the space. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases, where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: (regarding the application items only) As second floor windows are already vinyl, staff recommends approval of application for replacement of existing improper replacement windows with properly sized vinyl windows; replacement of all wood trim pieces replicated to match existing, same dimensions and thickness, including sloped sill. Window crowns, including sloped drip cap, will be replaced where applicable. Staff recommends removal of square kitchen window in back and replacement with two windows sized and trimmed to match original windows in this location. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director President Klusczinski clarified owner's agreement to Pella vinyl double -hung windows (with the exception of one casement), substitute all windows appropriately sized for the existing openings, correct trim and siding in keeping with the architectural style of the house and existing material. Commissioner Molnar moved to approve application as written in the staff recommendation, including all details agreed to by owner, and remand final review authority to staff to do on- site approval of the chosen styles and to work with the applicant. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Eight in favor, none opposed. 2 Vote: 8 — 0 COA #2017 -0216 Approved with conditions. 2. 1325 East Wayne Street South COA #2017 -0221A East Wayne Street Representation by Jory Fitzgerald, 1325 East Wayne Street STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 21, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0221A Property Location: 1325 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/ l926/Higgins House/H. Russell Stapp, Architect Property Owner: Jory Fitzgerald Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two -story wood frame "L" plan house has a slate gable roof, gable returns, and aluminum eaves. Windows are 6/1 and 8/1 wood double -hung with brick sills. The central entry features a pediment, sidelights, and brick stoop. There is a brick chimney on the west end. The house is sided with brick on the east and west sides; aluminum siding on north and south sides. There is a detached two -car garage, with two doors, gable roof, and brick and aluminum siding. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm doors and windows have been added to the house. COA 1997 -0502 approved installation of a rear yard stockade privacy fence. COA 1997 -0710 approved installation of a 15' x 16' deck at the rear of the house. COA 2006 -0104 approved a one -story addition at the rear, and replacement of existing deck at rear of addition. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace 90+ year -old slate roof with standard architectural shingles. The original roof has been inspected by three local contractors including Liberty Builders, Midland Engineering, Rick Scott & Sons certifying existing roof is beyond repair. Replacement w /new slate tiles would exceed $100,000. Also, replace gutters with aluminum gutters — see attached quote. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes replacing original slate shingles on gabled roof of house with Owens Corning Oakridge architectural shingles. Slate shingles are deteriorating, allowing rain and melting snow to leak into home at northeast corner of primary roof, causing significant damage to a portion of the second floor ceiling. Prior to a temporary repair, light from the sky could be seen through the roof. A portion of the roof on the addition at rear of property needs to be replaced as well, due to damage from the original gutters. Damaged original copper gutters and downspouts on main house roof to be removed and replaced with aluminum gutters and downspouts. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: N/A STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET II. EXISTING STRUCTURES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As a previously approved addition and garage have asphalt shingles, the current slate shingles are deteriorated beyond repair, and 17 of 19 homes in this block of East Wayne Street have architectural or 3 -tab asphalt shingles, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application with condition of round gutters in front, retaining scuppers and downspouts in front unless damaged beyond repair as determined by staff, and installation of gutters in rear to match existing gutters on addition. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA #2017 -0221A Approved with conditions. 3. Leeper Park COA #2017 -0228 Local Landmark Representation by Larry Clifford, 709 East Washington STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: February 28, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0228 Property Location: Leeper Park East Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: George Kessler Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating: Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park East is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. Joseph River, the River and Bartlett Street to the South and Michigan Street to the West. It is part of the 1911 -1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed by George Kessler. Its function as a recreational Park is secondary to its practical function as a drinking water well field dominated by the North Pumping Station which is a local landmark, the Reservoir and numerous wells located through out the area. The Sunken Garden at the northern end of the Park was rehabilitated in 2009 with new rose plants and gravel walkways and has been restored and maintained in 2015 by an all- volunteer group. The recreational area of the Park behind the North Pumping Station include the Zeigler performing center with fixed bench seating, signage for the Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre Cabin, Comfort Station, and a swing set and slide. ALTERATIONS: The water feature, fountain and statuary of the Sunken Garden were removed in the 1960s. The wading pool has been filled in and the pergola removed around the 1970s. The more formal gardens of lilies, roses, gladiolas and peony beds no longer exist. The Garden of Fragrance (originated inl954 and expanded over the years) that meandered from Michigan Street to the Herb Garden by the Navarre Cabin no longer exists, only the signage remains. The lift station was moved to the north side of the pumping station with new landscaping, plantings, sidewalks, and rehabilitated Braille marker with COA 2011- 1103A. COA 2015 -0504A approved restoration of Rose Garden and path system, including replanting and maintaining garden with volunteers. COA 2016 -1013 approved removal of brush and planting of willow tree. APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Building on previously approved projects to clean up and restore the Rose Garden, and installation of flower beds in the Reflecting Pool area, this project involves creating a narrow walkway between the two areas, which would then be bound by new beds, adjacent to the new walkway. Currently, to access the Garden, a visitor crosses from the Michigan Blvd. sidewalk, over a grassy area approximately 50 feet deep. At the top of the existing 8' wide concrete staircase leading to the Sunken Garden, an 8'wide walkway of crushed limestone is proposed. The walk would be bounded by two, 42" wide flower beds, and planted with similar materials as are used in the lower viewing pond beds. This would make the botanical area more visible to drivers and pedestrians. Additionally, the entire Garden would be irrigated with a new, timed, underground irrigation system, featuring a customized "drip" watering system for the roses, and a "sprayer head" system for the balance of the garden. This irrigation would be invisible, except when actually running. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park Standards and Criteria 9.2 Snatial Organization (incl. Views. Vistas. Landscape Snaces, etc.): 2. All views, vistas, landscape spaces located in the eastern section and central section of Leeper Park shall be preserved. 3. Original or later contributing special organizational features shall be retained in their existing configuration and shall be maintained through proper drainage, access and erosion control, pruning and removal of invasive vegetation or otherwise using recognized horticultural and soil management practices. 4. Alteration of existing or addition of new special organizational features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 5. Deteriorated or missing spatial organizational features shall be replaced with features that match the original in form, shape, color and texture. 6. When replacement of features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute materials may be considered. 9.4 Vegetation: 4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced with materials that match the original in size shape, color form and texture. 5. When replacement of vegetation materials and features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be considered if the convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom characteristics as the historic plant. 9.5 Circulation: 3. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation layouts will be considered if it can be shown that better site circulation is necessary and that the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 4. When replacement of circulation layouts is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute material may be considered. 8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Molnar moved to approve application as submitted, remanding authority to staff to approve planters, vegetation, and other currently undefined landscape elements before installation, and motion is contingent upon approval by Parks Board or appropriate Parks entity. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA #2017 -0228 Approved with conditions. 4. 224 Hammond Place COA #2017 -0301 River Bend Representation by Mark Bauer, New Day Construction Jennifer Smart, 537 Boyd Circle, Michigan City STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 1, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0301 Property Location: 224 Hammond Ct. Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Free Classic /1903/Mendenhall House Property Owner: New Day Construction Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This one and one -half story hose with irregular plan sits upon a raised concrete foundation. There is a steeply pitched hip roof with a gable on the front fagade, and gable projection on the east side. The front porch is one story with a hipped roof, concrete steps and deck, and round wood support posts. Windows are 1/1 wood double - hung with aluminum storms. There are two oval windows, one in front and one on the west side. ALTERATIONS: Synthetic siding has been added. The front door is a wood replacement with aluminum storm exterior and decorative shutters. APPLICATION ITEMS: Restoration of front windows, replacement of six windows found irreparable and additional 3 to have consistency, replacing front & back doors to code of 36 -inch width. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to restore both oval windows, as well as 1/1 wood double hung windows in front of house. Remaining windows on sides and back of house to be replaced with Edison double -hung vinyl windows, size and style to match existing. Non - original front and back doors to be replaced with steel doors. Front door will feature decorative 3 /< oval lite design; back door will have 6 -lite glass at top. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: At approximately I IAM on February 17, 2017, I arrived at the property located at 224 Hammond Ct with Director Feasel to evaluate the condition of the windows of this structure which is located in the River Bend Local Historic District. We met with the owners' representative and their contractor. The owner intends to repair the oval windows, but is applying to replace as many of the windows as allowed. The existing windows consist of one over one double hung wood windows, and two fixed wood oval windows. I photographed each window of the structure and found six (6) windows to be deteriorated beyond repair. The structure has triple track aluminum storm windows but many of the sashes are missing or broken which has allowed the elements to enter and moisture to slowly deteriorate sashes and sills. There has been some severe settling to the house as a whole which has resulted in buckling of some of the floors. Two of the windows are out of square and although not deteriorated, will more than likely require some additional 5 structural repair (Perhaps removal then shored -up and re- installed) in order to be operational. The remainder of the storm windows that are not intact should be repaired or replaced to protect any original windows that are to remain. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVER BEND LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where synthetic siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Many structures in the district have aluminum storm windows. Some houses retain wood framed storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the original, should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum and insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods or fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the owners are restoring the front and oval windows, and guidelines require replacement with units resembling the original, staff recommends replacement of existing deteriorated windows with vinyl replacements, as well as three remaining windows to provide continuity. Staff also recommends approval of non - original front and back doors. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner requested to amend application to include blocking in two basement windows in rear of house where load bearing beam rests on window and foundation is bowing. President Klusczinski recommended addressing only the application items at this meeting. Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve original application conditionally, restoring the large front window and two oval windows as recommended by staff, and remanding staff with authority to approve doors. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA #2017 -0301 Approved with conditions. 5. Leeper Park COA #2017 -0306 Local Landmark Representation by Gary Gilot, 1904 Lilac Trails Court Sara Boukdad, 1020 Wellworth Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 6, 2017 Application Number: 2017 -0306 Property Location: Leeper Park East Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: George Kessler Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating: Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park East is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. 0 Joseph River, the River and Bartlett Street to the South and Michigan Street to the West. It is part of the 1911 -1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed by George Kessler. Its function as a recreational Park is secondary to its practical function as a drinking water well field dominated by the North Pumping Station which is a local landmark, the Reservoir and numerous wells located through out the area. The Sunken Garden at the northern end of the Park was rehabilitated in 2009 with new rose plants and gravel walkways and has been restored and maintained in 2015 by an all- volunteer group. The recreational area of the Park behind the North Pumping Station includes the Amphitheater (also known as Zeigler performing center) with fixed bench seating, signage for the Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre Cabin, Comfort Station, and a swing set and slide. ALTERATIONS: The water feature, fountain and statuary of the Sunken Garden were removed in the 1960s. The wading pool has been filled in and the pergola removed around the 1970s. The more formal gardens of lilies, roses, gladiolas and peony beds no longer exist. The Garden of Fragrance (originated inl954 and expanded over the years) that meandered from Michigan Street to the Herb Garden by the Navarre Cabin no longer exists, only the signage remains. The lift station was moved to the north side of the pumping station with new landscaping, plantings, sidewalks, and rehabilitated Braille marker with COA 2011- 1103A. COA 2015 -0504A approved restoration of Rose Garden and path system, including replanting and maintaining garden with volunteers. COA 2016 -1013 approved removal of brush and planting of willow tree. APPLICATION ITEMS: The amphitheater is in need of improvement for ADA and to improve appearance and functionality. New stage and new audience seating, landscape beautification and lighting for stage. New benches with concrete pad, closer to stage, more intimate. See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The existing concrete slab in the stage area will be removed and replaced with a 20' diameter concrete slab. The stage will have posts that accommodate low key stage front lighting. Existing benches will be removed, a concrete slab poured, and new benches similar to those installed along the Garden Walkway Project in Leeper Park West (COA 2015- 0302A) will be installed. New concrete sidewalks will be poured to connect the stage and seating areas with existing sidewalks and parking area. All concrete will have color pigment throughout the mix. Sidewalks, seating, and parking will conform with ADA requirements. The brick building that serves as a backdrop to the stage will be cleaned, and boarded up windows will be replaced with more attractive faux windows in a color that better blends with the brick building. The amphitheater will allow education enrichment for nearby Madison STEAM Academy, as well as other community events. See attached site plan for detailed project notes. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park Standards and Criteria 9.2 Spatial Oreanization (inel. Views. Vistas. Landscape Spaces, etc.): 2. All views, vistas, landscape spaces located in the eastern section and central section of Leeper Park shall be preserved. 3. Original or later contributing special organizational features shall be retained in their existing configuration and shall be maintained through proper drainage, access and erosion control, pruning and removal of invasive vegetation or otherwise using recognized horticultural and soil management practices. 4. Alteration of existing or addition of new special organizational features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 5. Deteriorated or missing spatial organizational features shall be replaced with features that match the original in form, shape, color and texture. 6. When replacement of features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute materials may be considered. 9.4 Vegetation: 4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced with materials that match the original in size shape, color form and texture. 5. When replacement of vegetation materials and features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be considered if the convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom characteristics as the historic plant. 9.5 Circulation: 3. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation layouts will be considered if it can be shown that better site circulation is necessary and that the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 4. When replacement of circulation layouts is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 7. If using same material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute material may be considered. S. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9.7 Furnishines and Obiects: 4. Alteration of existing of addition of new furnishings and objects will be considered if the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9.8 Structures: 1. The general intent is to preserve the original or later contributing structures that enhance the historic landscape. 4. Deteriorated or missing structures, materials, elements, details and ornamentation shall be replaced with material and elements which match the original in material, color, texture, size, shape profile and detail of installation. 9.10 Accessibilitv 1. A three -step approach is recommended to identify and implement accessibility modifications that will protect the integrity and historic character of the property: a. Review the historical significance of the property and identify character - defining features. b. Assess the property's existing and required level of accessibility. c. Evaluate accessibility options within a preservation context. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As this project will refurbish an existing park feature and allow accessibility for all patrons, Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Larry Clifford, 709 East Washington, Resurrect the Roses, spoke in favor of the project. The building was dedicated in June 1966 and little has been done since. We are very much in favor of fixing it up. Commissioner Voll moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA #2017 -0306 Approved. III. HEARING OF VISITORS A. Solar Energy — Leah Hill, independent contractor in the MACOG office (providing support to the city for 6- months) — working with the Office of Sustainability to streamline the process of using solar, helping South Bend achieve Solar Friendly Community designation. Would like to find ways to improve owners' success when applying to add solar to historic properties, outlining what is acceptable rather than just what is not. Presented examples of ways solar panels can be compatible with historic structures. President Klusczinski confirmed the close relationship between Historic Preservation and Sustainability, and invited further information. The Commission would like to see some specifics, including examples of language used by other commissions. Leah will work with Staff to create recommendation to be included on a future HPC agenda. IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. February 27, 2017 —Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. Treasurer Molnar reported he has received no response to his letter emailed to the County Auditor regarding discrepancies in the manner HPC budget is presented in the county budget, as compared with other departments. He will hand deliver a copy of the letter to the Auditor. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. Discussion of Minimum Maintenance Standards surveys. 2. Executive Director — In Packet. 3. Deputy Director — In Packet. 4. Preservation Specialist —Distributed. 5. Legal — Discussion regarding Eric Boyd's appeal and subsequent Building Department action. Update on Tippecanoe Place window COA denial. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President —None. V. OLD BUSINESS —None VI. NEW BUSINESS - None VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. State Historic Preservation Conference — April 25 -28, in Wabash. Commission has received three scholarships which will be used by Executive Director Feasel, and Commissioners Hertel and Anderson. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hertel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 9:23 p.m. Attest: Mi ele Gel , Se�retary Date I t Location Budget as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 -01 -2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 0110112017 thru 03/31/2017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 7,196.28 23,987.72 23,987.72 76.92 76.92 000 General GovT. 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 9,392.28 31,307.72 31,307.72 76.92 76.92 000 General GovT. 14800 Fica Contribution 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 5,500.00 100.00 100.00 000 General Gov T. 14810 P.E.R.F. 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 8,051.00 100.00 100.00 000 General Gov'f. 14840 Group Insurance 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 10000 Totals' " " """ "' * *' * "" "`: 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 0.00 109,435.00 0.00 40,588.56 68,646.44 68,846.44 62.91 62.91 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 19.71 280.29 280.29 93.43 93.43 000 General GovT. 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 59.00 941.00 941.00 94.10 94.10 000 General GovT. 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00 000 General GovT. 20000 Totals *"" *` ' **' * *' * * " 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 0.00 1,525.00 0.00 78.71 1,446.29 1,446.29 94.84 94.84 31070 Other Contractual Services 1,500.00 18,890.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 280.00 4,121.14 15,988.86 16,268.86 78.42 79.79 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 3.29 50.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 0.00 6.58 46.71 46.71 87.65 87.65 000 General Gov'f. 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 95.00 100.00 100.00 000 General GovT. 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 Financial Syster- 04/04/201711 by ksobecki Page 52 Location Budget as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 -01 -2017. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 03/3112017 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Carry Forward Original AddVi Adi Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 100.00 100.00 000 General Gov T. 30000 Totals ...... :' : " "" 1,503.29 20,335.00 0.00 0.00 21,838.29 280.00 4,127.72 17,430.57 17,710.57 79.82 81.10 Location Totals"' "" 1,503.29 131,295.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 280.00 44,794.99 87,723.30 88,003.30 66.06 66.27 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Financial Syster 04/04/2017 1 = by ksobecki c 0.00 44,794.99 Page 53 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund /Location /Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence und: 1000 County General mac: 0037 Historic Preservation Vendor Budget PO Number Vendor Name Account Code Open Date 139565 061203 Szaday Steve 1000.31070.000.0037 03/23/2017 Location Total Saint Joseph Coanty Amount Age (Days) 280.00 8 280.00 Financial System 04/04/2017 11:32 AM by ksobecki Page 21 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 03/3112017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General GovT. Historic Preservation 03/10/2017 03/0812017 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:722764 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst03 /10/2017 03/2412017 03122/2017 Claim /PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:724080 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst03/2412017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 23,987.72 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 23,987.72 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 7,196.28 Cash: (7,196.28) 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General GovT. Historic Preservation 03/10/2017 03108/2017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:722765 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst03 /1012017 03/24/2017 03/2212017 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:724081 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst03124/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 31,307.72 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 31,307.72 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 9,392.28 Cash: (9,392.28) 1000.14800.000.0037 Fica Contribution General GovT. Historic Preservation F.I.C.A. Contribution Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 5,500.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 5,500.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.14810.000.0037 P.E.R.F. General GovT. Historic Preservation P.E.R.F. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 8,051.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 8,051.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,051.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.14840.000.0037 Group Insurance General GovT. Historic Preservation Group Insurance Historic Preservation 03/09/2017 03/09/2017 Claim /RegDocket 24,000.00 BK:008 CK:722693 Inv:INSURANCE FUND TRANSFER Vend:001558 St Jos Co Group Ins INSURANCE TRANS. Financial System 04/04/2017 11 by ksobecki Page 161 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01101/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/0112017 thru 03/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.14840.000.0037 Group Insurance General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,000.00 0.00 24,000.00 Cash: 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation 03/07/2017 03/07/2017 Claim/RegDocket 19,71 PO:137672 BK:008 CK:722439 inv:789367 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.71 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 19.71 Cash: 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General GovT. Historic Preservation 03/09/2017 03/09/2017 Claim/RegDocket 23.00 BK:008 CK:722695 Inv: FUEL REIMB Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 59.00 Cash: 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 03/02/2017 03/02/2017 Claim /RegDocket 320.00 BK:008 CK:722205 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 16 HRS @ 20 /HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 03/0712017 03/07/2017 Claim/RegDocket 61.14 PO: 138179 BK:008 CK:722353 Inv: 168035 Vend:000070 Adams Remco INC 03/09/2017 03/09/2017 Claim/RegDocket 280.00 BK:008 CK:722695 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 14HRS @ 20 /HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 03/23/2017 03/23/2017 PO /AutoPO 280.00 PO:139565 Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Financial System_ 04/04/201711 by ksobecki Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 (24,000.00) Balances 280.29 280.29 (19.71) Balances 941.00 941.00 (59.00) Balances 225.00 225.00 0.00 Page 162 Financial Syster 04/04/20171 by ksobecki Page 163 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2017 thru 03/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General Gov r. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 16,268.86 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 661.14 Unencumbered: 15,988.86 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,390.00 280.00 4,121.14 Cash: (4,121.14) 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation 03/07/2017 03/07/2017 Claim/RegDocket 3.29 PO:138180 BK:008 CK:722461 Inv:123116 Vend:001538 South Bend Tribune Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 46.71 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.29 Unencumbered: 46.71 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 53.29 0.00 6.58 Cash: (6.58) 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General Gov r. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 95.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 95.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 900.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 900.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 400.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 400.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Financial Syster 04/04/20171 by ksobecki Page 163 r Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01101/2017. Fund 1000 County General for 01/0112017 thru 03/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total Location Totals Current 0.00 Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 88,003.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,236.66 Unencumbered: 87,723.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 280.00 44,794.99 Cash: (44,794.99) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30,236.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 132,798.29 280.00 44,794.99 Cash: (44,794.99) Financial Sys te= 04/04/2017 1 —A by ksobecki Page 164 Financial Systems ti• , 04/04/2017 0--t by ksobecki Page 101 Location Budget as of 03 -31 -2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 -01 -2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts - Historic Presery for 01/0112017 thru 03/31/2017, Director: County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent 23240 Other Supplies 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 000 General Gov T. 20000 Totals "'"`"" " " " "" " " " "' 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 Location Totals " "` " "`"" 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 Investment Accounts v 0.00 Transfer Accounts 0.00 Financial Systems ti• , 04/04/2017 0--t by ksobecki Page 101 J Location Budget as of 03 -31 -2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 -01 -2017. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts- Historic Presery for 01101/2017 thru 03/31/2017, Director. County Historic Preservation Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent Fund Totals " " " *"' 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 0.00 0.00 Financial Syst 0410412017 CAA by ksobecki Page 102 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01 /2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts- Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 03/31/2017 Loc 0000 General GovT. 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen GovT General GovT. General GovT. Saint Joseph County Financial Syste 04/04/2017 0111 by ksobecki Page 243 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,383.06 (17,383.06) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 17,383.06 Financial Syste 04/04/2017 0111 by ksobecki Page 243 ' Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01101/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts- Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 03/31/2017 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 88.25 (88.25) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 88.25 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts &Contributions General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 57.50 (57.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 57.50 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,000.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,000.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,000.00 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 4,000.00 Total 0.00 145.75 (145.75) 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 145.75 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 145.75 (145.75) 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 145.75 Financial Syste 04/04/2017 0--`JI by ksobecki Page 244 w Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 03 -31 -2017 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2017. Fund 4103 Special Gifts- Historic Presery for 01/01/2017 thru 03/31/2017 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 17,528.81 (17,528.81) 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: Fund Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 17,528.81 (17,528.81) 4,000.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 4,000.00 4,000.00 17,528.81 0.00 0.00 17,528.81 Financial Syster 04/04/2017 0 ---A by ksobecki Page 245 r Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 07 March through 03 April 2017 Daily Highlights, 03.07 Meet w/ Leah of SolSmart re: solar guidelines for historic properties. Meet w/ owner of 319 William landmark. Schedule North Liberty meeting. 50106 Bittersweet follow up w/ BD. Schedule 620 W Washington meeting. Schedule 1240 W Thomas meeting. 03.08 Meet w/ Myles Robertson re: Taylor's Field property. Meet w/ Abdullah Karim re: 1519 W Linden Street, Saint Peter's Lodge #31. Meet w/ Amanda re: 701 Portage, follow up research. Correspondence w/ Auditor's re: Contractor payments. Washington Colfax Apartments follow up. 03.09 Meet w/ Larry Clifford re: grant application for Leeper Rose Garden. Receive COA application for 917 Leland. Venues, Parks and Arts "Best Week Ever" correspondence w/ Matthew Moyers. Restore Michiana planning w/ Deb and Paul Hayden. The LaSalle grand opening correspondence. 03.10 I Research Warren Township Lydick Bog. Research Campeau. 541 N Ironwood correspondence. 701 Portage correspondence w/ DCI. 03.13 Continue research Warren Township. 701 Portage correspondence w/ Amanda. Follow up w/ Myles. Correspondence w/ Jeannie re: Statewide Conference. Correspondence w/ Ann in Commissioners re: SJC employee training. 224 Hammond correspondence. 511 W Colfax correspondence re: new roof COA. 03.14 Troubleshooting St. Joseph County's HPC website with Bill Schalliol. Continue research Warren Township. Continue research Campeau. "Best Week Ever" follow up. Review February HPC meeting minutes. Review three MMS surveys. Correspondence w/ Stephanie Larimore re: research on modern houses and roof RME. 1240 W Thomas meeting at HPC with Code, DCI, Building. 03.15 1 620 W Washington meeting w/ Indiana Landmarks and property owner. Attend Studebaker National Museum presentation. 03.16 Correspondence w/ Leah of SolSmart re: solar guidelines. Correspondence w/ SJC Parks re: Geocache. Correspondence re: State Preservation Conference and registration. 03.17 Meet w/ Lou Sabo re: developing black and white silver prints. SJC Strategic Concepts workshop scheduling and filling out survey. Section 106: Coal Line Trail Phase I review. 03.20 Payroll. Solar Guidelines draft edits. Conclude Warren Township research. Prepare for and attend Treasure Hunt meeting. Certificate Of Appropriateness forms updates. North Liberty Stellar Community fagade grant meeting. Prepare for and attend HPC meeting. 03.21 I HPC meeting follow up. Building Department correspondence re: 426 Lamonte and 813 Park. Meet w/ George re: file organization. Treasure Hunt scavenger hunt correspondence. Payroll correspondence w/ Sue in Auditors. 03.22 Prepare for The LaSalle grand opening, present opening remarks and cut ribbon with gold scissors (: Correspondence w/ Bill Schalliol re: HPC website updates. 644 E Monroe correspondence. Correspondence re: Treasure Hunt. 03.23 Attend Redevelopment Commission meeting re: Firestation No 6, City Cemetery, and Burke Building. Correspondence w/ Larry Clifford re: Leeper Rose Garden plantings. Attend Polyzoides planning presentation in Mayor's conference room on invitation by City Planner. Review SJC Strategic Concepts survey results in preparation for workshop. 03.24 Attend SJC Strategic Concepts planning workshop. Correspondence re: Byrkit Cemetery damage. Correspondence re: Building South Bend project. Trouble shoot printing labels. Review accounts payable schedule. 03.27 Work w/ George on labels. Meet w/ Lou Sabo re: photography exhibit. Review fixed /capital assets policy. Trouble shoot printing labels w/ IT. Meet w/ Frank Niemic re: warehouses for sale in South Bend. Meet w/ Mic Perry re: Parks. 03.28 Work w/ Steve re: ordinance violations. Correspondence re: Treasure Hunt. Photo management. Correspondence re: Building South Bend. Correspondence re: Solar in historic districts. Review 1240 W Thomas correspondence. 03.29 Correspondence re: Dean /Lafayette Building. Scheduling Building South Bend meeting. Correspondence re: Cushing Manor carriage house. 03.30 Dean /Lafayette Building meeting, follow up correspondence. Meet w/ Leah re: solar in historic districts. Phone call w/ Becky re: Treasure Hunt scavenger hunt. Meet w/ Myles re: Taylor's Field property. Correspondence re: Cushing Manor carriage house. Tie up a gazillion loose ends. 03.31 Work w/ George. Research request. Scheduling a meeting w/ SB Clerk staff re: developing tours and training interns to guide tours. Reconcile budget. 115 S Lafayette document review. 1240 W Thomas document review. 04.03 Payroll. COA deadline. Work w/ Geo. Fagade Easements research. Meet w/ Andrea of Grass Roots Media re: carriage house. Leeper Park correspondence. Building South Bend correspondence. I Address RME# Who George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Who I Date /Time What Warren Township, Lydick Bog Campeau 714 Forest — chimney proposal investigation Washington - Colfax Apartments Routine Maintenance Exclusions Description Interns /Volunteers Project Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Phone Calls Regarding Research Requests Date Who Hours 03.10 Sam, Kil Architecture 2.0 03.08 Amanda, Entropy Design Studio 1.0 03.29 Kyle 0.5 03.31 Erin B, SBT 0.5 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — March 7 —April 3, 2017 _ Daily Highlights 3/8 Finished COA 2017 -0301, 2017 -0216, 2017- 0221A, and 2017 -0306. Print reports for packets. Research Walnut Grove and Our Lady of Hungary Church. 3/9 Prepare commissioners' packets. Work on MMS letters. Revise Restore Michiana materials to reflect change of date, from April 15 to 22. Meet with Dana Groves to help with New Carlisle walking tour brochure. 3/10 Finished COA 2017 -0303. RME 2017- 0306A. Mail commissioners' packets. Tour 820 West Washington. 3/13 Worked on Historic Preservation Education Grant. 3/14 Revised and printed new commissioner name cards. RME 2017 -0309. Worked on MMS letters. Attended Historic Preservation 101 talk at Havilah Beardsley House. 3/15 Site visit to review MMS photos. Meeting with Indiana Landmarks and owners of Tippecanoe Place regarding rear porch windows. Worked on MMS letters. Posted /mailed agenda for HPC meeting. Prepare meeting minutes template. 3/16 Section 106 review. Work on Historic District descriptions. 3/17 RME 2017 -0317 and related site visit to take photos for file. Work on Historic District descriptions. Section 106 review for Coal Line Trail Phase I. 3/20 Section 106 review for Coal Line Trail Phase I. Attend Treasure Hunt meeting. Work on Historic District descriptions. Attend HPC meeting. 3/21 Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Worked on minutes from HPC meeting. Sent letter for COA 2017 -0216. Sent letter and permit for COA 2017- 0221A. 3/22 Sent letters /permits for COA 2017 -0301, 2017 -0228, 2017 -0306. Section 106 review. Finished and circulated draft of meeting minutes. 3/23 RME 2017 -0322 and 2017 -0323. Restore Michiana marketing. Research for 920 West Washington. Create file for 744 Portage. 3/24 Meeting with Leslie Foster to discuss tours and historic sites for Chicago Pedalers group visit in July. Reprinted COA 2016 -1128 for Frank Perri's contractor. Site visit to Byrkit Cemetery for photos and to view damage. Check for historic properties in area of Mishawaka Ave. & 21s Street. Research Campeau Street area properties. Contacted Penn Twp. Trustee regarding Byrkit Cemetery repairs. 3/27 Create new MMS form and work on survey schedule for next week. 3/28 Work on MMS forms for survey. Download photos to files. 3/29 Finish district descriptions. RME 2017 -0329. Work on MMS forms for survey. 3/30 Attended Indiana Automotive Planning meeting in Indianapolis for heritage automobile related events. 3/31 Section 106 review. RME 2017 -0330. Started COA 2017 -0331, 2017- 0331A. 4/3 RME 2017 -0403 and 2017 -0331. COA 2017 -0331A and 2017- 0403A. Site visit to 224 Hammond. Section 106 review. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address 1409 East Wayne 917 Leland 1215 East Wayne North 644 East Monroe 224 Hammond 305 West Northshore RME# Description 2017 -0306A Replacement of existing replacement windows and two original windows with Andersen Fibrex fiberglass replacement windows. 2017 -0309 Removal of rear porch, siding, sheathing, roof and decking damaged in fire; rebuild /replace with in -kind materials. 2017 -0317 Remove existing asphalt shingles and replace in -kind with asphalt shingles. 2017 -0322 Tear off interlocking shingles and reroof with architectural shingles. 2017 -0323 Replace two back basement windows with concrete block to strengthen structure. 2017 -0329 Tuck point masonry on carriage house /garage. Cedar & Riverview ( Byrkit Cemetery) 831 North Park Avenue 224 Hammond Ct. 2017 -0330 Replace damaged fence due to car accident. 2017 -0403 Prune pine tree in front yard for vertical clearance over roof 2017 -0331 Replace existing wood frieze boards with 1x4" wood frieze boards to adequately cover gap between siding and soffit. Remove and replace aluminum gutters and downspouts. Replace drip edge as necessary. Replace basement window on southeast side of house with concrete block to strengthen structure. What Walnut Grove, Our Lady of Hungary Church 1011 East Washington & 315 Lamont 920 West Washington Byrkit Cemetery Campeau St. Prop. owned by Entropy Design Research Requests Date 3/8 3/10 3/17 3/20 3/23 Who Jim Houghton George Root Andrea Crawford Veronica Ortega (WSBT) owner Phone Calls Who Sheila Redding Greta Fisher Brian Moloney David Visser Realtor Penny Hughes Catherine Hostetler Ruby Constr. Leslie Foster Doris Portolese Kristi Matteoni Tyler Date /Time What 3/10 4:00 Reschedule site visit. 3/10 2:00 Contractor list. 3/14 2:00 RME 2017 -0306A 3/14 2:00 Former property owners' names, on March agenda w/50106 Bittersweet Tr.? 3/15 4:00 644 East Monroe and COA process 3/15 5:00 336 West Navarre 3/16 3:00 Windows out on Birdsell house. 3/17 2:00 Roof replacement in East Wayne historic district. 3/24 2:00 Tours. 3/27 5:00 Byrkit Cemetery repairs. 3/29 3:00 Tippecanoe Place COA — not all glass bids are in, may need to postpone until May HPC meeting. 4/3 2:00 Checked historic status of 228 West Colfax. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT April 17, 2017 Hello Commission! Projects started without COAs/RMEs/Permits: 1077 Riverside Dr -New Membrane roof on front porch 244 Hammond Ct- New sidewalk and Roof 745 Leland -Block windows where basement wood windows were 531 S St Joseph -new aluminum storm windows 1328 E Wayne- Approved COA but no permits obtained- building department informed 336 W Navarre - gravel driveway now paved Code Hearing: No Code Hearings since last meeting for Local Landmarks or properties located in Local Historic Districts since the last HPC meeting in March. Due to an opportunity to do some sub - contract work I have been recording considerably less hours. As these two projects wind down I will return to a more regular work load. I am taking advantage of other opportunities while we are slow so that I can use more hours during our busier times. I appreciate the director and the deputy director assigning work to me through the Asana application and graciously allowing me to work as time allows. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist -.1 The SolSmart Technical Advisor has drafted a resolution that would provide supplemental guidance and recommendations to applicants wishing to obtain a COA for a solar energy systems. In addition, a reference document is provided in Dropbox which contains design principles, example guidance from other communities, and example decision cases compiled from National Trust for Historic Preservation and National Parks Service documents. Last year, the Common Council of the City of South Bend issued a resolution in support of a reasonable transition to cleaner sources of energy. This year, South Bend is participating in the SolSmart program to receive free technical assistance to become designated as a "solar- friendly" community. As part of that effort, South Bend is working to reduce barriers to solar development by increasing transparency and providing clear guidance related to local processes. Leah Thill, MSES /MPA SolSmart Technical Advisor Sustainability and Solar Energy Consultant [o] (574) 287 -1829 ext. 801 1 [m] (812) 653 -9730 Ithili @solsmart.ora RESOLUTION NO. XX -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA GUIDANCE FOR THE DESIGN AND SITING OF SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS WHEREAS, the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana issued Resolution No. 16 -57 in support of a reasonable transition to cleanensources of enerav for South Bend, and WHEREAS, the City of South Bend is interested inexp`lorng cleaner energv's potential to add local iobs. reduce energv bills, and reducero'o'llutionn a manner that preserves �%i� ; _ � iii reliability and affordability; and [Copied from Common; council Resoltion No. 16 -571 WHEREAS, the City of South Bend is working to reduce barriers foti /' / /ice. development by increasing transparency and providing1lear guidance related p rocesses; P and � WHEREAS, the Historic PreserQ /!Qbmmission of/�Sbuth Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana (the "Commission ") seeks£to'�baianceyhistoric preservation with energy VS/115, "`" conservation and cleaner sources of energy and, r.2 % ji rid" „� WHEREAS, the;.Com�missltiri shall iss e %a''.Ce `if cafe o��Appropriateness (COA) prior to the construction, reconstruction, all'eration, demolition or moving of any exterior feature of any building, structure or useincludin ta[1 solar energy .,systems; and [Copied from Commission esoltction Not 7.0;' r, ; //; / 1 ,./ VIA WHEREAS, the`Bvlaws Art cIe.,2. Section 3a ( Code of Ethics — Responsibility to the Communii v' ncourages thaf /f0 ConTQsion and its designated Staff representatives continually evaluate and updatAfitirs pla s ' uidelines and procedures to ensure they meet the community's curreri't�and future needs. [Copied” from Commission Resolution No. 17 -01.J jWIN, WHEREAS, proactive communication potentially reduces the [time and cost/burden] owners of the installation a cl ,t eyCommission by encouraging applicants to design and site solar energy systems in a manner,that is most likely to be approved by the Commission and to provide complete information tbNallow the Commission to make a fully - informed decision upon reviewing the first COA application; and WHEREAS, the Commission may impose reasonable restrictions on solar energy systems but may not adopt any ordinance which has the effect of prohibiting or of unreasonably restricting the use of solar energy systems other than for the preservation or protection of the public health and safety according to IC 36- 7 -2 -8; and WHEREAS, IC- 37 -7 -2 -8 defines reasonable restrictions as those that: (1) do not Page 1 of 7 significantly increase the cost of the system or significantly decrease its efficiency; or (2) allow for an alternative system of comparable cost and efficiency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: 1. Guidance for Solar Energy Systems: The Historic Preservation Commission hereby issues supplemental guidance for applicants wishing to install a solar energy system in a Local Historic District or on a Local Historic Landmark. a. Recommended: Solar energy systems in Local Historic Districts and on Local Historic Landmarks should be designed, sized, and located to minimize their effect on the character of a historic building. Before designing a solar energy system, the applicant [should /is encouraged] consider'the following: i. Energy conservation measures such as insulation, "weather stripping; caulking, or new `or,repaired storm windows °should be considered <as- Ahe'most cost - effective method of cutting energy costs for anypfoperty,' historic or` "otherwise prior to investing in solar energy systems. ,f ii. Before applying " for 'a. COA, applicants should verify that enough sunlight is` °available :to maket e proposed system viable. iii. Place solar, energy systems to avoid obscuring significant features or adversely affecting .the - perception of the overall character of the / property., .. .. iv. Consider installing solar energy systems on an addition or secondary structure where applicable. v. Solar,'devices on non - historic windows, walls, siding, or shutters which do not face public streets are encouraged. vi. Systems not attached to the building may be screened with landscaping or other means to limit visibility from a public thoroughfare in such a manner that the system maintains access to solar energy. vii. The preferred location for roof - mounted solar energy systems shall be on a non - character defining roof line which is not readily visible from public thoroughfares in the lease visible location where at least 85% of optimal system performance can be achieved. If the Page 2 of 7 I- south side is publicly visible, solar energy systems should be installed on the west or east side if less publicly visible and shade factors are appropriate. viii. Minimize visual impacts by locating solar energy systems back from the front facade. ix. Single installations on a single roof plane are preferable to disjointed arrays or arrays on multiple roof planes. If more than one array is needed, it shall be limited , ,to one panel section on each side of the structure with rear location' referred. x. Use the least invasive methgO 151 jt attach the solar energy system to a historic roof such that it avQ�ds damage to significant features and historic ing vials and can bel'ffimoved so that the � % 4 /�� / original character is�asily restored. g xi. Solar shingles may be W6d to a�r� fi/s urface visibla',from a public thoroughfare�if low or non , '.refle shingles are us i�e edand the installatio is reversible with'o paating the roof or elements on the food.. xii. ign of r". cif they be included in the m as a later addition, r of the roof. xiii. �`Bhotovo" glazing rii' e integrated into non - historic windows SRO � or <sky ights�4prg�' ded that glazing visible from public 1 thoroughfares includes>,a non - reflective coating. xiv. 0 "n pitchedt solar energy systems should be installed flush wit0he pitclit - f the roof provided that an appropriate gap allows %. for air; circulation to maintain system efficiency according to the manufacturer's instructions. On flat roofs, the system may be �. elev ted'if not highly visible from public streets. g Y p xv. `1Vlechanical equipment attached to the building fascia may be painted a similar color as the fascia in order to blend into the building, provided that doing so does not obscure any labels or signs required by applicable codes and standards. b. Not Recommend: i. Avoid placing solar energy systems in the front yard or yards adjacent to a public thoroughfare. Page 3 of 7 ii. Character defining elements such as historic windows, walls, siding, shutters, dormers, original roof line, chimneys and other features should not be removed or altered in connection with the installation of solar energy systems. iii. Trees should not be removed to improve access to solar energy, unless a tree or portions thereof is dead or diseased and the applicant complies with the Guidelines or Standards for tree removal. 2. Supplemental Application Materials: The Historic Preservation Commission hereby�is" sue s recommendations for the submittion of applications for a COA for solar energy... systems. Applicant are encouraged to refer first to the official COA-applicatiori:: When preparing application materials, the applicant sho ldleep in mind iliat it is difficult for the Commission to conduct a fair and objective review and make'a final decision if the application fails to clearly shows the visual and aesthetic "impact of the solar energy system and all associated equipment or components. In addition to the materials required by the application checklist,,applicants should consider providing the following: -<-, a. Sketches that visually der "onsitate how the solar energy system and all associated, equipment "and components will appear from any nearby public thoroughfare'-Components,may include'any additional meters, inverters, di9 sw it" chers, c o m" b 11 ' inerg , visible wiring or conduits, etc. b. Manufacturer specification sheets for the solar energy system and all --,-----,components; ' c. Full -color img a es or drawiri g s "of�the p solar system. An .,- .., p p energy Y example,- „on,similar "buildings, especially with t same or similar roof ” 11 style is recommended. d." of the; building and property showing the location of the proposed installation as viewed from adjacent public thoroughfares. e. A site la that clearly shows the location of the solar energy system and all components. If an image of the actual property is not used, sketches should show the solar energy system drawn to scale in relation to the roof and other structures or structural design features. 3. Existing References to Solar in Local Historic District Guidelines (emphasis added): The Commission provides a list of references that may affect the siting and design of solar energy systems in specific neighborhoods to provide the applicant with a starting place. Applicants should refer the applicable documents to understand the Page 4 of 7 M overall intent of the documents and determine if other characteristics of the property may be impacted by the proposed project. If there are no direct references to solar collectors or other mechanical devices, this does not mean that solar collectors are prohibited nor that reasonable restrictions do not apply. Refer to applicable guidelines and standards to understand the unique and distinguishing characteristics of each neighborhood. Guidelines and Standards are available on the website for the Commission. a. West North Shore Drive, p. 24 (2003): "Accommodations to the energy crisis and mechanical devices /. /�/ Preferre New approaches to energy conservationsitch as solar panels and wind /, generators may well become a pra ti -)ONdAnecessary part of our future. If you are considering the installationn /of strch a"# consult the Historic Preservation Commis on�so they m vl- mmend how this could be done without interferiQ with the visual integrity of vour house. vii / � i %iii //r Place television antenna anc 'ther mechanical equip�itent such as air conditioning units in inconspO otts, preferably hidden, �a "cations. b. River Bend, p. 26,1/lNorth Saint Joseph Street p. 23; Lincolnway East p. 25 (2003): „j "Required l Required j to echanica1 sy the � leds� possible alterafio ////i %;ac/ appearance Mt, he bttildin� atYhe rear ofthe'property ayne 's FOVAb. 21 !s steal Abe, placed <iriaareas that will result in y /��� of the stAOM& tr..al integrity and physical Solar collet diftnd TV dishes shall be placed iii shielded by sl rubbery and landscaping. 45;" ide Drive p. 26 and p. 32 -33; The idstcillation of%iinsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar�collectors hall not be permitted in areas where thev can be viewed froin'the publ cl Mechanical;%systems shall be placed in areas that will result in the least possiblilldW to the structural integrity and physical appearance of the buildi Solar collectors and TV dishes shall be placed at the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. " d. Chapin Park, p. 69 — 70 (2003): "Prohibited The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the Page 5 of 7 public view of the building or are highly visible from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review.... The Commission hill evaluate all installations as ivell as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a [Certificate of Appropriateness]. MR Solar collectors and TV dishes should be placed in the rear of the property and shielded by shrubbery and landscaping. " e. Edgewater Place (2003) No direct reference. 4. Existing References to Solar in Local Hist ricLandmark Group B Standards (emphasis added): a. Group B Standards, p. 5. "Prohibited The installation of unsightly "devices such as. TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted °in'areas` where they can lie viewed from Public thorotteh 5. Effect of this Resolution: " ° - ",, a. This guidance .is provided'as recommendation ' "with which applicants may voluntarily - comply. Compliance with the, "suggestions provided in this Resolution does not guarantees that a COA�W'ill be approved. ntil L"ocal;Historic7`District Guidelines and Local Historic Landmark Stands are"p, ated and "adopted to incorporate additional references to solar e "nergysystems, this guidance should not be interpreted to impose additional alter existing Local Historic District Design guidelines,, alter Historic Landmark Group A or Group B Standards, [or narrow thelauthority of of limit the discretion of the Commission.] c. ``This Resolutioain no way limits the Commission's authority where otherwise provided by law nor should it be seen as a means to contradict, hamper or' avoid local building and zoning regulations. [Copied from Commission Resolution No. 17 -01.] d. This Resoultion does not supercede other requirements where there are conflicts between this guidance and other requirements adopted by local or state entities having jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable City [or County] Ordinances, or building, fire prevention, and electrical codes as adopted by the State of Indiana. e. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the Commission. [Copied from Commission Resolution No. 17 -01.] Page 6 of 7 v i ADOPTED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on ( 12017, in the Conference Room, 1308 County - City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY / ATTEST: Page 7 of 7