The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSeptember 2016AGENDA OF THE SOU THg I3ISTORIC PRESERVATION .COMMISSION o SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 1865 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 COUNTY—CITY BUILDING MONDAY SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL r� �+ II. PUBLIC HEARING O A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2016-0805 609 Riverside Drive ISI 2.2016-0819 1329 East Wayne Street South 3.2016-0809 1240 West Thomas Street O 4.2016-0907 1071 Riverside Drive M� 5.2016-0907A 237 North Michigan Street River Bend East Wayne Street Local Landmark Riverside Drive . Local Landmark VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS & MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. SOUTHHOLD PRESERVATION AWARDS/NORTHERN INDIANA H: PRESERVATION AWARDS NOTICE: M� FOR HEARING AND SIGHT VIII. ADJOURNMENT IMPAIRED PERSONS III Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. O III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS o A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES O U 1. August 15, 2016 M� B. TREASURER'S REPORT a� 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President 2. Indiana's 2016 Bicentennial. 0 V. OLD BUSINESS o VI. NEW BUSINESS River Bend East Wayne Street Local Landmark Riverside Drive . Local Landmark VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS & MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS A. SOUTHHOLD PRESERVATION AWARDS/NORTHERN INDIANA H: PRESERVATION AWARDS NOTICE: M� FOR HEARING AND SIGHT VIII. ADJOURNMENT IMPAIRED PERSONS III Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET 19 September 2016 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include A Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME ADDRESS W, B, H, O 03 6s1eee. e 6V. r (v F, D I STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 5 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0805 Property Location: 609 Riverside Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1912 Property Owner: Derek Swiscz and Beatrix Patla Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This square 2 -story house has a concrete block foundation, 3 -tab asphalt shingle hipped roof with hipped dormers. There is a one-story, flat -roof porch across the front with round posts and concrete foundation and steps. Windows are 1/1 double hung. ALTERATIONS: COA 2014-1031 approved installation of vinyl siding, restoration of front bay window and replacement of all other windows with vinyl double hung windows, replacement of exterior trim (except soffit and fascia) with vinyl trim, repair and replacement of gutters and downspouts, installation of 12' x 12' deck at rear of house, and replacement of basement windows and front door. COA 1997- 0904 approved reroof in-kind. APPLICATION ITEMS: Build a garage. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner/contractor proposes building a 24'W x 28'L x 10'H garage at rear of property. It will have one overhead door and one service door. Double -4" vinyl siding to match house (approved with COA 2014-1031). The roof will have architectural shingles, with plans to match the house roof to these at some point in the future when the house needs to be reroofed. Current house shingles are 3 -tab. Other rear yard garages exist in this neighborhood. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVER BEND LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary of may suggest motifs from the historic buildings. New construction design should be clearly differentiated from the design of the historic buildings. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories in height and are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building_or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Wall materials in the district are predominantly wood clapboard and its imitation in aluminum and vinyl. Some walls are brick. Patterned shingles are common in gable ends and dormers. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture, and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick may not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. C. NEW SHEDS AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Required Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features, and open spaces. Proportions and materials shall conform to those required for new construction. Recommended Shed and accessory structure designs should be compatible in character and mood with the residence and neighborhood. Prohibited Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used. Not Recommended Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform with all other standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell Deputy Director Elicia Feasel Executive Director �i�! r •r,+x •�(ZiWgggY2l 't�; 4S r�.rYfff '( i{ �•�r� 1 k �y. �,•r ' �'+itt r ��!%�F��. et� � aai,x� i `%�i��w7: ,�7,Ik ��G� AIM �31fe" �thvrj�4;,1"'�.`r �a�'7..+, n� ( :'"Sill r*�' .'Sf�Yf�i. A5 r r�.5f�,,'jr�adi "'`•''t:��'' PV Y,•�r�Atp;lj i�ral;,�'ii,.t` ) rt,�..yt�,.ia hr'Tr�.,4y-� jt. $ :mt ArTfi ii ! w'ir �'iY rt • , �. , � r`i', ( �+}Y'E' �a� � �l;% ill"`* ail = .;'11 �Yi.S't�,.. e_ 7 �•' r i ��_^p,.��,��t,��3 y +{�S i 1• A � - TX i' r t ° tr X t' /j 'xy4 TIE, t�� c ,<�.�p ,�,�, ....r-• r ,,,� �.,-i..r 'r .�.�Tt-nx-•+^rt � N 'r*•-.�. -r'-...+.->+-s at. �,.,rxw'_.,-.-.-••'3 3a ..�+-n j s•;�....• `'�' ""''T^!.' f k ryy ! 14 :� ��: �. t s � ..: �� t. ,, t.•, t t� 11 i��,�,; y,.. �a': �" '• i ?yp . ,,y, r' 3�; '?�+"':ti'fiK 1, 3 • may,, lY� '�r`Z �� % o'kl l , s- iy:� �� . Mrd at, * < �, w� err r f- ,�f• a �y��! ? ;q�� 531 h Q t r a� ,1.�• ( „�., i�n4p? Al •� 11 .�• /i il' •'1 I J� .4 lo" 1 1 /f>� `. � � syl r` •fes' r ��it ��`� � 7� +• W Al Application . FOR - Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 E 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONL YS»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFIC ' „ E USE ONLY Date Received: Application Number: �01U — OW Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) �0 - 1031 ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Title: 504em hes 1q, ao e ® Local Historic District (Name) ' i i,q ej&AA ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: ........ ..... .. ,. .,,,,,,,, „. ,,, ■ (Please Print) (� Address of Property for proposed work: 901 SIL. (, J r�� (�� V, "� �"� -1 l� b \ l (Street Number -L --Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): fisl�.4P_ IYI�T I �FCLE� 54,E K,_ Phone #: CF� � —W O Address of Property Owner(s): Ile-.> f? t.'j f!2 -ft (0<(* S6, t -�L 6( 6 6 Ci \ (Street Number— Street Name-City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): kh LA t (i Of. ,y, e_ pec l I` Phone #: _ ' —7 —7 (O 2 J Contract Company Name: / (� Address of Contract Company: (/%�� IG l(% Fa _N LC (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Famil //Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: 't l Ot`l �! �> ti► (Wood Frame Brick--Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape � New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked Description of Proposed Work: IJ i Owner/ ntr ctor Fax #: (Staff w' 1 co espond wit my a esignee) X Signature of Owner —APPLICATION R e-mail: P/ S (-v 1 el (�_ �6 & . Co "� and/or X Signature of Contractor ;NTS LAItE ISTED 0 SIDE— Estimateld: 63014 � Pagel of 3 �� 611312016 Items Selected: Gable roof wl 5112 pitch, Standard Trusses 2' O.C. Truss Design Location Zip Code: 46601 2x4 Wall Framing Material 24' Wide X 28' Deep X 10' High Vinyl Dbl 4" Lap Siding - S. Stone 1l2" OSB Wall Sheathing Typar Housewrap 12" gable/12" eave overhangs 1l2" OSB Roof Sheathing Castlebrook, Weathered Wood Shingles Mongoose Ridge Vent White Vinyl Soffit & Fascia White Premium Roof Edge 1- Garage Door Opener Smokey Sable Options Selected: The options you have selected are: Deck Defense Synthetic Underlayment 1- 360 Service Door— CPI Flush Steel RS 1-16x8 Overhead Door— Insulated Ribbed Front View Back View Estimated base price: $5,089.22 Estimated price; $6,734.83 The base price includes: 0" Eave/0" Gable Overhangs, Framing Materials, 7116 OSB Roof Sheathing, 20 yr. Fiberglass Classic- Onyx Black Shingles, Pine Fascia, Galv Regular Roof Edge, *Today's,estimated price, future pricing may go up or down. 8'' Textured Vertical Hardboard Siding, All selected overhead, service and sliding doors are included. *Tax, labor, and delivery not included. Windows and other options are NOT included. ***Take this sheet to the BuildinMaterials counter to �urchase your materials.' Floor type (concrete, dirt, gravel) is NOT included in estimated price. The floor type is used in the calcu ation of materials needed. La or, foundation, steel beams, paint, electrical, heating, plumbing, and delivery are also NOT included in estimated price. This is an estimate. It is only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding contract between the parties based on this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon the market conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE GUEST WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY MATERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this form, other than price, has been provided by the guest and Menards is not responsible for any errors in the information on this estimate, including but not limited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUE: BECAUSE OF THE WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE ARE NO REPRESENTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. THE PLANS AND/OR DESIGNS PROVIDED ARE NOT ENGINEERED. LOCAL CODE OR ZONING REGULATIONS MAY REQUIRE SUCH STRUCTURES TO BE PROFESSIONALLY ENGINEERED AND CERTIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Estimate -Id: 63014 Here are the wall configurations for your design, Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected Gable Front View —2'� TX 8' �10' Eave Front View (1) - Pare 2 of 3 61312016 Gable Back View -F f: �•-'`:. '�;=�""�`�` --- ..�- :?,-"�="=- Wig. �''-"`_-": -.�.• 3=�:: ry ,.s� �,.��=� a:;3;L :��'.;< a �-�'�',J-�`-�'-�"`��"< Eave Back View (1) - Building Size: 24 feet wide X 28 feet long X 10 feet high Approximate Peak Height: 15 feet 5 inches (185 inches) 1#1p: Overhead doors may need to be "Wind Code Rated" depending on your building location. Confirm the door requirements Oth your local zoning official before construction. 22'-6" i 2'-6" Menards-provided material estimates are intended as a general construction aid and have been calculated using typical construction methods. Because of the wide variability in codes and site restrictions, all final plans and material lists must be verified with your local zoning office. Menards is a supplier of construction materials and does not assume liability for design, engineering or the completeness of any material lists provided. Underground electrical, phone and gas lines should be located and marked before your building plans are finalized. Remember to use safety equipment including dust masks and sight and hearing protection during construction to ensure a positive building experience. Estimateld: 63014 *** Garage Floor Plan, 2'-6"+3' x 6'-8" 24' Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected Building Size: 24 feet wide X 28 feet long X 10 feet high Note: Wall construction is 2x4 @ 16" on center 22'-G' 16'x8" i 1 Pace 3 of 3 61312016 24' C= miawasl manuiaciunng, tz-au ulaire, WI b4fuzi f -61U 8 Jan 2.9 2UI:) MI IOK t- IndusInes, Inc. InuUcj29jj:2b:j920jb agol " I ID:S?AiRygwVi43PHZEPuRVp5zEfeq-X6VToMaEI053nQvM4mAp4THwuySTPOcuUi x3wiyOZmE -1-Y 0-0-0 4-0-0 0-0-0 8-0-0 10-0-0 12-0-0 14-0-0 10-0-0 20-0-0 -0-0. 4-0-0 2-0-0 1 2-0-0 . 2-0-0 2-0-0 . 2-0-0 2-0-0 2-0-0 2-0-0 4-0-0 2t(),-%�G-0 %_Aac 0 j M =0 4x4 SCale: 1/4"-1 Cl - 5.00 12 5 9 23 24 4 - - 10 4 1 3 FT 4 STT4 F13 S1.3 S12 c -T12 1 12 LI 1 13 — — — — — — — — — — — ^_ D ----1---------- Io 3x4 = 22 21 20 19 16 17 16 15 14 3X4 5X6 = 0-0-0 4-0-0 6-0-0 B-0-0 10-0-0 12-0-0 14-0-0 16-0-0 1&0-0 20-0-0 24-0-0 4-0-0 2-0-0 1 2-0-0 1 2-0-0 , 2-0-0 2-0-0 1 2-0-0 2-0-0 1 2-0-0 4-0-0 Plate Offsets (X.Y)-- 118:0-3-0,0-3-01 LOADING (psf) -0 TCLL(roof) SPACING- 2-0-0 CSI. DEFL in (loc) Well Ud 30.0 PLATES GRIP Snow (Ps/Pg) 27.7/40.0 Plate Grip DOL 1.15 TC 0.21 Vert(LL) 0.01 13 n/r 120 MT20 197/144 TCDL7.0 Lumber DOL 1.15 Be 0.11 Vert(TL) 0.01 13 In/r 90 4 BCLL 0.0 Rep Stress Incr YES WB 0.12 Horz(TL) 0.00 12 n/a n/a BCDL 10.0 Code IRC20061TP12002 (Matrix) - Weight. 81 lb FT LUMBER- BRACING - 'TOP CHORD 2x4 SPF No -2 TOP CHORD Sheathed or 6-0-0 cc purlins_ BOT CHORD 2x4 SPF No.2 BOT CHORD Rigid coiling directly applied or 10-0-0 oc bracing. OTHERS, 2x3 SPF Stud *Except* MiTek recommends that Stabilizers and required cross ST5:2x4 SPF Stud bracing be installed during truss erection, in accordance REACTIONS. All bearings 24-0-0. with Stabilizer Installation guide. (lb) - Max Horz 2=-57(LC 10) Max Uplift All uplift 100 Ib or less at joints) 2, 19, 20, 21, 22, 17, 16, 15,12,14 dr Max Grav All reactions 250 lb or less at joint(s) 2,18,19,20, 21, 17, 16,15,12 except 22=363(LC 14),14=363(LC 15) FORCES. Qb) - Max. CompJMax. Ten. - All forces 250 (lb) or less except when shown. WEBS 3-22=-267/103,11-14=267/103 JOINT STRESS INDEX 2=0.45,3=0.51,4-0.51,5=0-51,6=0.51, 7 0.35,8 0.51,9=0-51, 10=0.51, 11 0-51, 12=0.45, 14 0.51, 15=0.51, 16 0-51,17 0-51, 18 0-31, 19=0.51,20=0.51,21 =0.51 and 22=0.51 NOTES - 1) Unbalanced roof live loads have been considered for this design. 37 cc 2) Wind: ASCE 7-05; 90mph; TCDL--4-2psf; BCDL=6.opsf; h=25ft; Cat- 11; Exp B; enclosed; MWFRS (low-rise) gable end zone — and C -C Exterior(2) zone; cantilever left and right exposed; end vertical left and right exposed;C-C for members and forces & MWFRS for reactions shown; Lumber DOL=1.60 plate grip DOL=1.60 M Tri iss designed for wind loads in the plane of the truss only. For studs exposed to wind (normal to the face), see Standard C" TFMstry Gable End Details as applicable, or consult qualified building designeaa�er ANSI/ TPI 1. LU on nano 2 d- r O M t� as W Mldwest Manulaclunng, frau U121M, wl b4/U3 l.610 s Jan 29 2ulb MI IeK InduslneS, Inc. I hu Ud129 11:2b:1.Y2o1b rage 2 ID:S?AiRy9wV143PHZEPuRVp5zEfeq-X6VToMaEIQ53nOvM4mAp4THwuyBTPOcuU1 x3wfyOZmE NOTES, 4) TCLL: ASCE 7-05; Pr=30.0 psf (roof live load: Lumber DOL=1.15 Plate DOL=1.15); Pg=40.O psf (ground snow); Ps=27.7 psf (roof snow: Lumber DOL=1.15 Plate D0L=1 _15); Category II; Exp B; Fully Exp.; Ct=1.1 5) Roof design snow load has been reduced to account for slope. 6) Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for this design. 7) This truss has been designed for greater of min roof live load of .12.0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 27.7 psf on overhangs non -concurrent with other live loads_ 8) All plates are 1.5x4 MT20 unless otherwise indicated. 9) Gable requires continuous bottom chord bearing. 10) Gable studs spaced at 2-0-0 oc. 1 1) This truss has been designed for a 10.0 psf bottom chord live load nonconcurrent with any other live loads. 12) " This truss has been designed for a live load of 20.Opsf on the bottom chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-6-0 tall by 2-0-0 wide will fit between the bottom chord and any other members. 13) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 100 Ib uplift at joint(s) 2, 19, 20, 21, 22, 17, 16, 15, 12, 14. 14) This truss is designed in accordance with the 2006 International Residential Code sections R502.11 .1 and R802.10.2 and referenced standard ANSI/TPI 1. LOAD CASE(S) Standard k7 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 19 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0819 Property Location: 1329 E Wayne Street S Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/ 1 926/Mortland House/H. Russell Stapp, Architect Property Owner: Demetra & John Schoenig Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two-story wood -frame house was built in 1926 with a square plan and wing. The main part of the house has an asphalt shingle pyramidal hip roof, with a flat roof on the wing.- Windows are 6/1 double hung with ornamental louvered shutters. Small pedimented entry with concrete steps at front of house. There is a two -car, two -door garage with pyramidal hip roof at rear. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum siding, aluminum storm windows and doors have been added. COA 2015- 0713 approved removal of three Ash trees. COA 2009-0928A approved replacement of cracked pads of concrete on driveway and in-kind replacement of concrete steps. COA 2009-0226 approved tear -off and in-kind re -roof with asphalt shingles, and removal of one tree. COA 2001-0606 approved construction of a wood deck in rear yard, not attached to house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Take out & install new fence 6'. Remove 32' existing stockade. Install 100' cedar board w/dog ear tops and 4'gate. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Application is for a new wood privacy fence that will connect to an already existing wood privacy fence in the rear of property, creating an enclosed rear yard to protect young children from a shared driveway. The fence is 6' high and has a 4' wide gate in same style and height as fence. At time of application, the section of existing wood stockade fence had been removed and new cedar board 6' high fence with dog ear tops had been installed without COA or Building Permit; project was consequently red tagged by the Building Department on 8/19. The lack of COA was a misunderstanding as to who, contractor or owner, would apply — this COA was applied for on the same day it became apparent to the owner. On August 18, 2016, Staff received two phone calls regarding fence installation in regards to if permission was given and if the design met the neighborhood standards and guidelines. Along the property line in the same place as the fence is installed, there was an existing fence of the same style and an overgrown 6'-8' tall hedge, see Photo "A". The hedge was taken down a few years ago and the fence at the time of new fence installation. The new fence is at the setback of the house and its four season room. The applicant has provided several examples of existing wood privacy fences installed in East Wayne Street that Staff will circulate at HPC meeting. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certi Kate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osepheountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us 'OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX« ««OFFI • CE USE ONLY Date Received: 1" y/71`t-,/],, ql tf Application Number: OW Past Reviews: 9YES (Date ojLast Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: IeL `�Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: -1 01 1p Local Landmarkocal Historic District (Name) «(� KR. ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: .. ....,, ...............�.,,.,,.., . .....,,..,.......,..,..,.,,,„, „, , „,.,..o„ .,. .....,.... -, .. .....,.,,.,....,,.„a p►� (Please Print) �__��t11 +k Address of Property for proposed work: 13 21 c. WAYNE ST. � • J +' CCtA ij Yb15- (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): T) -:� M.t r (moo ,. J t - mi sd' It 6" Phone #: S'11- 331 - 3 V11. Address of Property Owner(s): f 3 2g F- • W,%yj+i- JVU�Cj S6.4" 14vrm n eA/o E'/ 16CI, (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): �`i 17hv 0.10 (r— Phone #: ��"g�' -aoeZ Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: Ci ®a S / (2-1) 19 V e1Yh-'pAl2,1,eG L/1,, Y66a-0 (Street Number— Street Name—Cit),,—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Famil),—Mzrlti-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: W0Vd r�HCgg (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ® New � Replacement (not in-kind ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked Description of Proposed Work: R)R C)Lpf- /deal r-r-'Ct-,7 I- t &CmvV�. 37-' E?C1.517ING /,-.(7Au... jQO' U'DAR &APZ TU *4,tT- (Ji tb � � T,bPS f1 �Na T "TE, - - Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond with only one des' ee) X and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— �� \ IL $ i�." "0"0. _xrt44 ~jttAtItM-Affi-ll 1-1 UARPW tt vi RIP ^ STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0809 Property Location: 1240 West Thomas Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Period Revival/1920/Firehouse #4 Property Owner: Eric Boyd Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Firehouse #4 is a 2 -story rectangular brick building. It had a flat roof with limestone parapet coping, metal parapet scupper/cornice with brick brackets underneath and ornate limestone detailing at the ends. The windows are 1/1 double -hung with limestone sills. There is a brick side chimney, and a roof penthouse with hip roof. ALTERATIONS: Most of the windows in this former firehouse have been boarded up prior to a 2007 fire. RME 2011-1110 approved replacement of metal roof to secure the building and protect it from the elements, although there is no evidence it was ever installed. An asymmetrical gabled roof has been installed without an approved COA or Building Permit on approximately half of the main structure, as well as a second story addition and gabled roof on the rear of the building. Areas where large overhead garage doors were originally located have been covered with vinyl siding. Most window openings have been covered with plywood or vinyl siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: Roof, window replacement, apply for addition — siding vinyl and window replacement is long term. Current plan is to keep windows boarded for security reasons (2 replacement windows have been broken). Color of vinyl siding is brown. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: HPC Staff has worked with the current owner in recent years to support a tax abatement and rezoning petition. Although an RME was issued for a replacement roof in 2011, the details of what was actually installed were not presented at that time. Additionally, the Building Department has provided a statement that indicates the current roof configuration was not approved with a Building Permit and has ordered all work to stop until a formal submission and plan is set for the proposed work. This property was heard at a July 26, 2016 Code Enforcement hearing where a date of January 26, 2017 was given for Code compliance. Owner proposes a 4/12 shed roof be constructed over part of the main building, from the west exterior wall 30' east to a 10'H wall built on existing brick interior wall, with a 1' overhang at west wall. Second floor addition atop one-story brick portion at rear of building is to be vinyl sided to match existing brown vinyl siding used to fill garage door openings; replacement windows to be used to fill window openings in this addition. Existing windows in building are to be left boarded up for security reasons. Most of this work with the exception of the windows and vinyl in the rear addition have been installed without COA or Building Permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Stens No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildina Site and Landscataina 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends rear second story addition with gable roof, however, is not recommending the proposed window and siding treatments as they can be considered an incompatible material as reference in C, 2. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION co of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY syr *tip 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/S JCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us yl OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED�yIN THIS BOX«®««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 01 110 Application Number: (x\11 ( 0 Past Reviews: YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: dLocal Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) _ Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: Name of Property Owner(s): Address of Property Owner(s): Name of Contractor(s): Contract Company Name: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) 9—, ti%c- W_ 1:5,,4�cl Phone #: y/,I-- 70 V— �o�s a- y (Street Number— Street Name--City—Zip Code) �F tl � / � • �GYC Phone #: 5e? f _ � Yq4 - //' Address of Contract Company: 12-* W, 51- 5o.w /' (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (16' _"_=%/ (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government Indztstrial—Vacant—etc.) // Type of Building Construction: 0 ,,- k (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) 0 Description of Proposed Work:i`at,�/l✓� Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond ith only o e designee) X ` r `� �/L and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— r-- rJi I L �` \ •iL M iiiPT e RI's".''. � �t;'"'.'1 �,,,�;"" ®'Ecs _; aht1P N,.,'ir , "c '.�fl It9 _. ;�:..`, h; l,- �vt• ,.,, �-r� "iQ° "�`t�"y4 r! -f,'s r}ger t--A.,tr r* a vl w r ,-�''�•r- tl .. ' • J 1 L` ' �1�1 �t' >,,: u✓rl�+. ?�+,ij7 tlj Ih' (F° t. {}� � � �^rli' � G sr,; Y4 r� �}t 7 �e `d t i ---1rl n6yi i' ll. I i.Ir 4f�1r1 r+ 1 r r�,� it ��]L t 1 r 1 I I I: � I � I I� a r t t(( .� sir Ik I' �t•� I writ j. C,, EI �I�{ �� tl k H' t " 1 `u !� 1 I + i pt✓I �r e�'SI t' ys. 11 r fs 1i -r (.t 't,.t a 1 VIA ,Lb,-, ;, ' � 1' 1 tt1 1�1��,•ill �� I ^{,I �1 ��k'[�1��'� �A� '4111 tt'1�,� it{y� rt9,,4,I 0 cry' �\ JLI 6 S c�� I r ti� tYjl��fd�J l N+ i thgt ' � �t� 1�(" i nulg}p t ;ty�fb , � I � t �, �I�isl. ; ,� f„ t• �! �I � 1, I �; I t 4,}>.t' ( I ` :� t ''rJ'' r! ,'j� r'� It fio ° { r b ("rI Via' •° + � rst l; ( i'. 11�hlr��r�� +l ; IP,(�(I I i' , 'r/ far I• :bw } �.� � �iI!' 1` ItLg,1 1 d}i I I• t: �: f�I ! �� I��I� � if l r n i� }'•i I I I � I ti.:� �l " � - �� , ��, its r fi,I) ...�y tB li, +��LII4,j1lr ,.•� / '-� .:� -^� IIII Itl li I 11' /u11r. Bill,1Yu le(i u trvx �r 1j, 1 k 1 5 1,• 11�a 4r s� K t�`1f '` 1 ICl '�,� yt I I1�,�4 ��u� e�{},I( pp1fillr s tii p r i3 �.I :M• r' e t u6 I�f 11 '�.+rl<�'��'.1 ��, I' �, i N�'f; i�: F d P:No,4 : lf.:l f5 v4f I ?il a,:. i � 1•. ,�; � 4 i ,i. }.4 � S { ' �Of+v6��' i9 : �rl � v ....: dr;, 6 ,i'� �' i y. }n � )< �iYM1r � � , `�d•��,�� 1 1 I , ...t t. �1 "')i , '� RR"j�Ap'• ;1�^ 'ltirt,p° y I ��Y� •I �iwr./1'tY��r � .,si w �v1� ,t y .\„ !!!�. I " � b �G ta.a�Fs` rl JAMES D. MARKLE, R.A. Design/Plan Review Specialist August 10, 2016 Elicia Feasel Historic Preservation ST. JOSEPH COUNTY/SOUTH BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENT 125 S. LAFAYETTE BLvD. SUITE too SOUTH BEND, IN 46601 (574) 235-9554 FAX (574) 235-5541 CHARLES C. BULOT BUILDING COMMISSIONER Re: 1240 Thomas, South Bend, IN Dear Elicia: AYoKA PAEK, MCP, MCIP Zoning & Business Services Administrator On October 13, 2015, this office issue a Building Permit for Commercial Roofing at the above - referenced address. What was to be a structural repair and reroofing job has now morphed into a partial roof on the main- building and a new second story addition on the rear of the building. None of this has been properly permitted. I recently met with the owner and indicated that all work is to stop until this department receives a formal submission and plan set for the proposed work. We will not issue any additional permits until such time that all proposed and current work meets basic building standards. This is a case where our best intentions to help preserve the historic integrity of a local building did not pan out as expected. Sincerely, Charles C. Bulot, C.B.O., C.F.M. Building Commissioner NOTICE OF PERMIT CONSTRUCTION St. Joseph County and City of South Bend Building Department (574) 235-9554 DATE: 10/13/2015 PERMIT NUMBER: 'BD15005044 ADDRESS: 1240 THOMAS, SE CRN WITH WALNUT, N OF WESTERN AVE. CONTRACTOR: BOYD SERVICES PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT: PARTIAL ROOF Lot No. Add'n. 48 CONMSSIONER'S OF S PT BANK OUTLOT 85 & 86 BOYD. ERIC (812)704-3005 Owner's Name Phone 1207 W Thomas St South Bend, IN 46601 Owner's Present Mailing Address/Email Zoning MU Twp. PORTAGE Multiple Unit Count Valuation $500.00 Height Acreage 0.19 018-3074-2912 ABZA Date: State No. Front Rear Side Building Permit Fee $30.00 Contractor BOYD SERVICES (812)704-3005 boydmaster455@yahoo.com Electric Permit Fee Contractor Plumbing Permit Fee Contractor Heating Permit Fee Contractor Subtotal $ 30.00 Penalty $ Total $ 30.00 kwidawsk Signature Charles C. Bulot - Building C-o'nmissioner The person or contractor listed above hereby certifies that the statements contained herein are true and correct and in consideration of the granting of the permit agree to save St. Joseph County and City of South Bend harmless from any and all damages and agree to perform the work covered by this permit in conformity with the laws of the State of Indiana and the Ordinances of St. Joseph County and the City of South Bend, Indiana. I agree to call for an inspection approval before any concrete is poured for footings and walls, or any framing, electrical, plumbing, or heating material is covered. I understand that a Final Inspection may be necessary and a Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued prior to occupancy being allowed. I also understand that this is only a Building Permit. Separate permits are to be obtained for any heating, ventilation, air conditioning, electric or plumbing work. =nderstanding of the laws and rules regarding this permit is certified by applicants signature above. This permit is valid for two (2) years from date of issuance, or 'as --nnined by the Building Department. This Placard must be posted until project is completed. Failure to comply will result in a citation and fine. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 7 September 2016 Application Number: 2016-0907 Property Location: 1071 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911/Lippman House Property Owner: Greg Suth Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This Foursquare house with concrete foundation has a low hip roof with asphalt shingles and stucco soffits and chimney. The first story has wide clapboards; second story is stucco. The front porch has a low hip roof and clapboard covered piers. Windows are 1/1 and 6/1 double -hung; middle window on second story is multi -paned. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm doors and storm windows. COA 2005-0715 approved tear -off and replacement of roofing and decking. COA 1992-0616 approved replacement of poured concrete walk on east side of house, and a poured concrete patio on the south side. COA 1992-0124 approved replacement of exterior lighting fixtures and garage door, and installation of wrought iron rail at front steps/landing. COA 1992-0108 approved replacement of existing wood fence surrounding rear yard with metal fence, and replacement of gutters and downspouts. APPLICATION ITEMS: Recover soffit area w/aluminum material. Current wood lath and stucco that had all given up was falling & crumbling. Add aluminum storm windows to current windows all storms have been broken & discarded. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Existing deteriorated stucco soffit has been replaced with aluminum soffit. Contractor proposed to replace existing wood storms with aluminum storm windows. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On August 8, 2016 I was contacted by Director Feasel to investigate 1071 Riverside Dr. at approximately 12 noon for unauthorized work including new storm windows, soffit, and gutters. I approached the house and met with the neighbor, Ed Talley. He explained that the painters of 1071 hired out the crew to install new soffits and gutters in the last week or two. He did not know the painter's company name but knew they were the same crew that painted 1069 Riverside Dr. After a lengthy conversation with Mr. Talley, I left a business card on the front door and moved on to the next appointment. Approximately 30 minutes later I received a phone call from the tenant at the property whom I have met before. In 2015, I had visited the house with a contractor list and had made a walk through inspection with her informing her of problem areas including the soffits and paint. She informed me at this time that the owner had given the painters the work of repairing the soffit, installing new gutters where needed and finding storm windows for two small first story and two basement windows as well. When she returned home and discovered that they had installed new aluminum over the existing wood soffits she called the owner right away and he by and swears to her this is not what he paid for them to do and was as surprised as she was. He does not know what to do from this point, but is willing to complete a COA application and seek approval for these changes although this is after the fact. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the district include limestone, flagstone, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, sandstone and masonry block. In some instances, vinyl or aluminum siding has been applied over the original surface. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry including brick, limestone, flagstone, sandstone and stucco shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture compatible in composition, color and texture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when metal or vinyl siding has been installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and/or insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. It is emphasized that, prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort, the property owner should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County which is located in the County/City Building of South Bend. The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material which is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Brick surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the material and the mortar which can result in serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces indiscriminately. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointing should not be repointed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required v Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The standards and guidelines for this historic district state: "The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair," therefore, staff does not recommend approval of the soffit replacement or storm windows, which recommend: "Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original." Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application f� \ - FOR - �Xm Certificate ofAppropriateness\FCF y ;0.- - r — ' x HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, fN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us . , . OFFICE USE ONLY-- D0 NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINEDINTHIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Application Number: lXO1 — 0907 Past Reviews: VJ YES (Date of Last Review) 2005, 0715 ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local LandmarkLocal Historic District (Name)i1i�l�II�P, t►IrIJ2 ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ElDenied ❑ Tabled ElSent To Committee ❑Approved and issued: (Please Print) /� Address of Property for proposed work: 107 ( K.i Lt ll'�,. 0". &,.L -:?:7,17 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): P""' t "I'_31 _1 Phone #: Z� / s 0 %n � Address of Property Owner(s): jke4r.L1 tkA\ Or,mo, 1 l�%` iij T912-() (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Cdde) Name of Contractor(s): � -_}—r.r-'_eJ4 Phone #: 4::q7e/ X7.0 2,Z70 Contract Company Name: J{ el ,ti—rN-,l ✓� ► ; ;�,. (`� Address of Contract Company: ? -7 t) Z m l (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: Sr .� /'__'`� �.v+ , (� (Single Family—lditlti-Family-Commerc aal—Government—Inditstrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed `York: ❑ In -Kind 1:1Landscape ❑ New © Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed `York: &i k � `Qty," L" Ll to , w-.._, r_!-t II r.1/f, ,t�.n �ri�vk t✓,.. ton // A ! , ;'t�7� k"_S �/4 UJ -2� �_ P_,�,n �i�ZJ tie+ -1 /�f''�'�ed Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: r (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X and/or X Signature of Owner Signature o ntr / —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— � � v r•� ��, � fYy Z9?� •In.�tl l � r`. � Y r I a+, a t I � r y��., ;� �•v v�, � � i �� I1 i41�tr.0 �lfa s' 1 �. '1.=r � �fr . t r'� � V.;�\e, �� .�" .i,��R+ q�'3'1�.��;��}5��",tai (iq r. et fr��i�.• ,�,��C �� fp>` .., .�� 1 vu �� +�' ��-Yui--1.. �.� �n<j{�a: .:i,: 1 � �c �3�,5^^ •, �+F,., r„,.� �•r q��r.. gay R �F z i 42)s ival i,✓e�,tl(n, `�s Nk t F� a Y I tl 1 C r\�ri , "Y ✓F� ,. + t b • J i or A %- �R�r r_' I'' '�,��a `�°•� felt �a + >t F, Y, l 1 - .a• �FI ' \ \ fl tf.: dvks€�` ,.�� .rvdc y�"F.� z �— :, ul as t S• >! Y :: k' y r ";`�* -k,. r r, l,. YI, 4i!• {,--� �� . �d'i qE1' F. ,'( r. h= ^f5'�`"r� ,�+; q r. jat: r l �/ iP' 42� 11 � ,I• �6 i.�A it@� �—ryes,.. _ �, � .:. �,`'� t•.: �Ay .�P�;. } 4' M r 1 v , r ri . rZa ,•y _{ !+#L+"4t . i.. 11 fyq, rNt?�'f`rvitt VIM '4• �'`, Z, fA •r. � p.,.� J �s�~. y� t-: rl� �� '1tjy�#1 �>�i�r, r�y,=1�,v�h�#f'C F;. �., %.��v1- tib' �. %ve a y' 1 , t !'F��'.C, fy}�,�y"kar •� , tyie4 Vit, ire •.�#3'�` �i �vyr,. 7d r �ht yY,N �. ''�M.;N ��iiR�h4�,�++t �'�., v:, .dr . fax k;.,1•,: 'x '4k%zj '�x°yry `� ri L .• 'Y ��# �,,. � xrf 4 z Y a l x � f x.�{ • :? � �"C (.,��'` #f _ I, � F y gbh' +•r �. r I f� Mix'. t ti •� y f, r• y -TSRag } �Y cr ta � e r J L vQ-W of �}d� t vy�p Ste) w fjii�10y. POW � �'M .�+�' i P,12:)J ��fAa f f r f 7vv l di k Ar ��v�� + ��'��,� it � �} + •' ;� :Lra r/ s r I i . vt i yi r•c•r}.;r �� • • z y -0xT '. + ;dt ;�a"�Tj' f .>R � ' � r �+� a ,:V • 1 Ott• �,'�y ) ; � e c'-. - r.:i .. W.. i t t eY I t �. i•'•, f• �..;...:,. °.: �.: 1`_--,.�. _".'M�� ,:"AM1=?�11�`;',111 a tii t 4 r spy. �;% ,/ �;i" ry.•+.. -'" ,.ism' i +'r � ; f � ✓ x :" -' � r j Ilk f f. �{ (, .. 111 --Lf [ ii ,i.�� .Jl STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 7 September, 2016 Application Number: 2016-0907A Property Location: 237 N. Michigan Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival/Chicago School blend/1921/ Nicol, Schuler and Hoffman Property Owner: LaSalle Apartments, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark and Multiple Resource National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The LaSalle Hotel is located on the southwest corner of LaSalle and Michigan Streets; it is a nine storey hotel constructed of stretcher bond laid brick with decorative and plain -cut stone string course. The first and second floors on the east and north facades are treated as one floor. The windows and doorways are flanked by spiral columns and surmounted by round -arched windows with tracery, voussoirs and keystones. A projecting string course separates the second floor from the third floor which has limestone window surrounds, as do the single end bay windows and the ninth floor windows. A projecting string course separates the eighth and ninth floors and the building is surmounted by a wide overhanging cornice. The windows on the first floor are large, fixed sash plates with multi -light side lights. Other windows are double hung sash in pairs. ALTERATIONS: All of the single light double hung windows on all of the facades were vinyl replacement windows from the 1980s -1990s when the Charismatic Renewal Services owned the building. COA 2015-0326B approved repair and repointing of brick and masonry, replacement of existing vinyl replacement windows with new aluminum clad wood replacement windows, replacement of doors and awnings, and restoration of existing wood storefront windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: The exterior sign will be a replica of the original as shown in the attached historic pictures. One location at the east entrance, second at the north entrance. Owner proposes to install two new exterior neon or LED signs, 96"W x 39 1/4"H. One to be installed at the east entrance and one at the north entrance of building, mounted perpendicular to building with brackets and bolts; possibly additional angled guide wires. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GROUP B STANDARDS The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it IV significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and supergraphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor !' blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness o m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafavette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://%vn,iv.stjosephcount),indiana.com/depat tments/SJCB P/l*ndex.htm p: 574-235-9798 P 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THiS BOX«««OFFICE USE OA'LY Date Received: Past Reviews: ❑ 1TS (Date aftarfReview) StaffApproval authorized hy: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Application Number: — ❑ Local Historic District (hare) ❑ National Register District(jva,,,e) ❑ NO Title: Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Z �� {�, �-1 -7N I l Address of Property for proposed work: 1 t t VL t oYY1 �f . :J O � N "1 kL' o f C (Sh•eet.\rirnibe[—Siireet Nanie—City—Zip Cole) Name of Property Owner(s): L,,5 ,11..Q_, ;D�„ -i<,,�,,.c� `,,L Plio►e #: 311 7 1 S -5 te� � 1 Address of PropertyOwner(s): i'l,0.. WeAN, 5�2 Zoo i " �%Ow (Sh•eetMum ber treetAraine—City--Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): T K] 0 Contractor Company Name: — �2 Address of Contractor Company: Phone #1: (Street Arimiber=Street Ara»ie—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: i t t V ��► ' 7 y,u i 1% (Single Fanii!}=-1llulti-Fantll} Connuer�ial- CrorernnrenlArdtrsTrial—Ijtictntl—elc.) Type of Building Construction: t i "r- iL (iflood Fi anreSrick—StoizeSeel—Caricrele—Otliei) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape 1� New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: Thr" -k �-fo' SI.C�M �•�- � ,�` )+ trr� 1 , `L.�n hnn ,,��1�(un� � i4_. O NA KL+M 1.4 ,_ i o n S 1 /17_ttan �r� t �r � i cI P M�vwm t� 0 Owner/Contractor Fax#:e-mail: rQtalGVY-,DY-1 .o,.I�i..(-.0 X and/or X Sign- i -e of 014 er Signature of Contractor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LTSTED ON REVERSE SIDE— �'14�1 �/lid4•YI.1.5J•I IJ• �dl>`ilAfy11+d1'll}1i•IIY.91'I.4�•l•i'i" 1�H1'MUI. 1•I(.1'YtIYY�}._I„ .-. ... ............f•.....r. ,.,,, :,. .. .. _. ,.i,......--... ....n...•�.,. ... .. ..... ss• q0' 569/16- 1 '391/4• 26" 18'_ .� I 7uio uwMi oil /lig —.� SIDEVIEW 96• f.. ----- 14" I10" ' PLAN VIEW I 5686 9/1,6" ' t 90 25.00 SO. FT. FABRICATE AND INSTALL2 D/F BLADE SIGNS WN EXPOSED NEON CONSTRUCTED OUT OF ALUMINUM ANGLE AND SKINNED IN ALUMINUM. PAWED PMS.209 SURGUNDYAND WHITE. LETTERS.ARECUT CUT'OF.lir ALUMINUM PAINTED WHITE, RED NEON MOUNTSTO•THE FACE OF ALL LETTERS.• TIUM TOPANO BOTTOM HAS BLUE NEON MOUNTED TO TL SIGN'MOUNTS TO BUILDING WITH BRACKETS AND BOLTS. THERE MAY BEADOITIONALANGLED GUIDEWIRES USED ALSO. !OSignt 1MAOC,SOLUTIONS I 'wwwslgncr3ftind.com 8816CORPORATION DR, INDIANAPOLIS: IN 46256 Of fce 317.842.8664 Fax 317.842.3015 1 PREPARED FOR I REAI.AU R GA SOUTH BEND, INDIANA SKETCH NAME NOiEnENamING;I$'tlASEDAN,ESRMAi� ME SIGNS y, �gDIMiNSIGNS��F1f1AL�511AYEIttAhY1: "."^,-' %+� AITEi:tCLU SiRATEtl AEPRESENiATI ON::,t 177 77 7, ee 8 I e e Lr 27 ' w, ec I r;��•�y " , rra+Asa•r;.rr•r•r.4rrrnr`rr'Lwrl x'.�rm �� J. "^_r' �,\""� :��.\•�^.,::/-`}_.`�';• ;1%,,.I_,��';_ Wil. �;;=. IMIILMtlINLU Tu 1S0 Y0lTUI1LL340111�IWInGfKCi601 r �•- - - 'IM• " .sun•u•anlwro•rowwYuuoln'acwaouvx •Y:4S:'NEEDED ON NORT WESTEIEVATINELOMTTON �w""'Mawl== (A-SURVETO'V,ERIFYbIMENSIONS�,: flie'=-1'•0• v16•=•1.0• ncttmrx woe AIm70R onmlarnlolelr wcu wets. nns meumtsmovtn tmamm�m um wlmma of ius nca COLOR S"ECS COLOR Al PROVAL DRAWING APPROVAL WORK OF DER H0. gem UL,,,, I SCALE jvl�� , �.,��.�I,_`u�._II_..�I_....u...._I,._,_.I_...,�.�L"_,�...�,__.��....,�..�,_,: 11/2•a 1'-,1'. `—: n ' I "'� q"' ,.I`Y '',L�.._ 1 DATE SEPTS 2116 �--li4. Jnr_. .�. S. C. REP iESENTATTVE � 1„ - tyw � j , :,a� � 'r .l In .'i,': '•::�I (wo ��-�'r--,1T rn, ,gra ':;; ,; � o !m ' STEVE WACKER I INDEX Nt VISER 0916-00 1 wp �iil'', vn ar 1 (rli. vw 1 In _� I` "n •� m ri I Iiimoll ' 8 e Q e' DESIGNE SLM Ise tl ;I�e�t r ��,I�,I P,,, :114'{ �I'',}'V.1:rrn.,i(_�:9i��'1 t1w• li-'':i,''�}�i�rrel'��,`.�,�••Sr^:ts{L� REVISIO 1' 4 1 8- 177 77 7, ee 8 I e e Lr 27 ' w, ec I r;��•�y " , rra+Asa•r;.rr•r•r.4rrrnr`rr'Lwrl x'.�rm �� J. "^_r' �,\""� :��.\•�^.,::/-`}_.`�';• ;1%,,.I_,��';_ Wil. �;;=. IMIILMtlINLU Tu 1S0 Y0lTUI1LL340111�IWInGfKCi601 r �•- - - 'IM• " .sun•u•anlwro•rowwYuuoln'acwaouvx •Y:4S:'NEEDED ON NORT WESTEIEVATINELOMTTON �w""'Mawl== (A-SURVETO'V,ERIFYbIMENSIONS�,: flie'=-1'•0• v16•=•1.0• ncttmrx woe AIm70R onmlarnlolelr wcu wets. nns meumtsmovtn tmamm�m um wlmma of ius nca COLOR S"ECS COLOR Al PROVAL DRAWING APPROVAL WORK OF DER H0. gem UL,,,, j% ;, MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY August 15, 2016 13'' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Tom Gordon, Vice President/Asst. Secretary; Mike Voll, Treasurer; Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Michele Gelfman Members Not in Attendance: Elizabeth Hertel, Secretary; Kevin Buccellato, Brandon Anderson Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist Members of the Public Present: Stan Molenda, Keith Shaum, John Conway, Micah Niespodziany, Todd Neuenschwander, Judy Karnes, James Lundberg, Rebecca Lundberg, Joan Downs-Krostenko, Sanford Garner, Sarah Cullinan, Darla Karafa, Paul Worland, Antonio Bajuyo, Abrahm Christianson II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 858 Forest Avenue COA#2016-0711A Chapin Park Representation by Rebecca and James Lundberg, 858 Forest Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 11 July 2016 Application Number: 2016-0711A Property Location: 858 Forest Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabeled-ell; c. 1890 Property Owner: James and Rebecca. Lundberg Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local Historic District/National Register District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Built circa 1890, this 2 -story irregular plan frame house sits on a brick foundation. It has an asphalt -shingled roof, which extends over the half -width front porch. Siding is 4" wood clapboard siding with corner boards, and small frieze board at eaves. 1/1 double hung windows and wood panel front doors. ALTERATIONS: Previous work includes addition of aluminum storm windows and brick porch and columns with metal supports. COA 2015-0921A approved removal and replacement of brick chimney. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1) We would like to remove 13 of our 14 existing windows and replace them with new, vinyl windows (double -hung Pella ThermaStar). The old windows have proved difficult to open and close and are terribly, terribly inefficient. Further, the old storms have posed a danger to our young child as many of the locks that hold the storms in place no longer function. This is not a full -frame tear out; only the storm and wood sash will be removed. No aluminum capping will be used; wooden exterior frames will remain in place. All windows but for the kitchen casement window will be replaced. 2) We would like to install iron handrails on either side of the stairs leading to the house. No handrails are now in place and this has proven dangerous in icy and snowy conditions. We will be working with our contact at Lowes (please see application for his details) on purchasing the pieces to produce a handrail as you see in the attached illustration. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner proposes to 1) remove all storm windows and wood sashes and replace with Pella 250 Series vinyl windows, with the exception of the kitchen casement window. Only the storm and wood sash will be removed; exterior wood trim will remain, and will not be wrapped with aluminum. 2) install Fortin Ironworks iron handrails on either side of front porch steps. Currently there are no handrails. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On August 10, 2016 at approximately 12pm noon I met with the owner at 858 Forest Ave. They had applied to replace 13 original wood windows and aluminum storms with new vinyl windows. The only original that would remain was a double casement in the kitchen. I photographed each window and checked each for structural integrity of the sashes, frames, and sills. I noticed only three sashes that were loose enough to rattle and had missing glazing. I noticed that over half of the windows had top sashes that were painted shut but were not fully closed. Many of the windows were in need of re -roping and some had been re -roped with polyester rope which had stretched over time. There was one broken pane on the original window sashes. The two sills on the second floor front face of the house needed scraping and painting soon but were not rotten yet. I also saw many of the storm windows needed repair. In particular many of the "ear tabs" that keep the screens and glass panes in place were missing or broken. The owner explained that was part of the reason for the desire to replace them was the lack of ability to use the storms and screens properly. She expressed concern since they have a young child and will be renting the property out in September that the storms were not safe. I suggested that she gets a copy of the contractor list to talk about the repairs that are needed on the original windows and get quotes just to get new storms installed in lieu of the ones there that are failing. Deb Parcell emailed a list that day. I did not notice any windows in the house that were deteriorated beyond repair. They need maintenance and soon but not replacement. The storms however because of the lack of locking tabs and ears are most likely dangerous if opened without something present to prop them up. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double - hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. D. ENTRANCES PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of window replacement, and approval of handrail. Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Public Comment Joan Downs-Krostenko, 849 Forest: One point of becoming a Historic District was to preserve original windows, doors and trim. A few vinyl windows have been installed, mostly before the district was formed. Originals windows should be retained. They are efficient, easy to use and maintain, safe, and help to retain property values. Recommends following district guidelines. Commissioner Gelfman moved to conditionally approve in-kind storm window replacements [in lieu of the proposed Pella 250 vinyl replacement windows] and the installation of new [Fortin Ironworks] handrail subject to final approval by staff. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0711A Approved with Conditions. 2. 1069 Riverside Drive COA#2016-0726 Riverside Representation by Darla Karafa, 1069 Riverside STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 26 July 2016 Application Number: 2016-0726 Property Location: 1069 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/Craftsman/1910/Hughes House Property Owner: Andy and Darla Karafa Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a 2'/s story American foursquare house with Craftsman features; walls are stucco with wood trim and wide soffits. The roof has a high hip with hip roof dormers covered in asphalt shingles. The front porch is enclosed on the east and open on the west side. The windows are 1/1 double hung with wood surrounds. ALTERATIONS: The attic windows are replacements with COA 2005-0118B. A mudroom was added to the rear of the home with COA 2006-0627. The roof is a replacement. APPLICATION ITEMS: Back yard: 1) Remove large Ash tree; 2) Install 10x20x4.5 fiberglass swimming pool; 3) Replace existing patio, extend patio around pool w/brick patio pavers; 4) Repair existing garage structure, replace roof & aluminum siding with wood siding or stucco, and paint to match house; 5) Extend roofline of garage to create a 6 ft. awning for a covered patio. Front yard: 1) Install small brick retaining wall similar in size and appearance to 1041 and 1021 Riverside Dr. Brick to match chimney brick as close as possible. House: 1) Install 4 porch lights; 2) Roof DESCRIPTTON OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner proposes to do the following: Back Yard: 1) Remove very large Ash tree from back yard. It is susceptible to disease, and is currently being treated with pesticides, which the homeowners would like to discontinue. It also poses potential hazard to this and the neighboring property if limbs or the entire tree were to come down in a storm. City Forester Brent Thompson says it is the homeowners' decision to have the tree removed. AEP stated the homeowner is responsible for keeping the power lines clear of limbs and branches. The tree will be replaced with an approved species. 2) Install in ground 10'x20'x4.5' fiberglass swimming pool. 3) Replace existing patio and extend around pool with Hollandstone "Rustic Red" patio pavers. 4) Garage — remove aluminum siding, replace with 6" wood clapboard siding painted to match house. Re -roof, same as house. 5) Add 6' "awning", or extend roof of garage to create a covered patio. (see attached photos) Front Yard: 1) Install 2' retaining wall in front yard starting at concrete steps and running across the lawn on both sides of steps. (see attached Unlock spec sheet) House: 1) Install low profile motion -detected security light for driveway. Install 2 period -appropriate Craftsman -style porch lights on each side of front door. 2) Roof -over current shingles with Tamko Heritage Woodgate architectural shingles in "Antique Wood" or "Black Sage." PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior wall materials in the district include limestone, flagstone, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, sandstone and masonry block. In some instances, vinyl or aluminum siding has been applied over the original surface. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry including brick, limestone, flagstone, sandstone and stucco shall be cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains, and shall be done with a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture compatible in composition, color and texture shall be used. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only alternative to maintaining or replacing the original surface material. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when metal or vinyl siding has been installed in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and/or insects. Mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. It is emphasized that, prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort, the property owner should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County which is located in the County/City Building of South Bend. The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material which is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Brick surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. This can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and the differing porosity of the material and the mortar which can result in serious damage to adjacent brick. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces indiscriminately. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints which do not need repointing should not be repointed. B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gable, gambrel, flat, and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood facias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or aluminum sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Over hanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Debra Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Owner corrected application items to include installation of three exterior lights rather than four, and use of landscaping brick rather than masonry for front yard retaining wall. Commissioner Parker moved to approve application to include owner's corrections. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0726 Approved. 3. 609 Rex Street COA#2016-0727 Chapin Park Representation by Stanley J. Molenda, Field Inspector for City of South Bend Code Enforcement STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 27 July 2016 Application Number: 2016-0727 Property Location: 609 Rex Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer -front Bungalow/1909/Stover House Property Owner: Karen Sue Janowiak Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The one and a half -story dormer front bungalow with clapboard at the base and wood shingles above is set upon a concrete foundation. It has a side gable with a large gable front dormer. There is a full width enclosed porch with windows; its roof is an extension of the main roof and covered with asphalt shingles. The house windows are 1/1 double hung; the porch windows are fixed sash with vertical divides forming 3 upper lights and 2 lower lights. ALTERATIONS: The roof is not original to the house; no other alterations appear to the exterior of the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolition DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: City of South Bend Code Enforcement proposes demolition of the house, garage, and fence at 609 Rex after a March 5, 2015 Code Enforcement hearing affirmed demolition of all three structures based on 13 exterior code violations, see list included COA#2015-0504 approved demolition of the garage and fence and called for further evaluation of the house interior. Preservation Specialist inspected the interior along with Code Enforcement Inspectors, see PS report. Highlights from the Code violations that may meet criteria for demolition in Chapin Park include: structural members deteriorated and no longer cabable of safely supporting dead and live loads, foundation walls are no longer plumb and free from cracks and breaks, and there are caving in and holes in roof allowing water to enter and damage interior elements. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On July 151 at 1pm I met with members of Code Enforcement at 609 Rex St. A representative of the bank was also in attendance and had access to the key box and was able to enter the building. The purpose was that code was investigating the presence of asbestos in the HVAC system to compile a scope for demolition. As pictures will indicate, the house is full of trash and absolutely foul. The house had basically been walked away from. The kitchen had food in the cabinets and the refrigerator that animals had gotten into. The amount of flies and smell in the kitchen was overwhelming. The house has several areas on the second floor where water infiltration is evident. The damage on both the interior and exterior where gutters and eaves have failed. The Code Enforcement inspectors were opening walls to search for duct runs and I saw mold in some of the walls. (See picture) The Michigan basement was dry but signs of water marks were evident and some crumbling brick and mortar were present. I was not able to determine if the source of the water damage was interior or exterior. The gas meter had been removed, the electrical lines were cut, (the electrical box was not legal as it sits, no cover, not properly wired, see picture) and the water may still be connected to house but an earlier generation water meter was still present. No markings from SB Water works were present indicating cut water service. The garage is a safety hazard and was previously approved for demolition as well as the fence and jungle gym. I would safely say that there are 2+ dumpster loads of just garbage in the house to remove before an adequate assessment could even begin. There is simply too much garbage to even walk through the entire house. It may be a salvageable, but without serious investment just to remove and clean the house, it is difficult to determine what else would need to be done in the house to see if repairs would more expensive than the value of the house completely repaired. I asked the bank's representative what would they sell it for and he said not less than $25K. Somehow having to pay for a demolition is less of a loss than what the loss would be on the books for selling it for any less than the mortgage amount due. Steve Szaday STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Gordon moved to amend application to include demolition of garage and wooden stockade fence. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0727 Amended. Public Comment: Joan Downs-Krostenko, 849 Forest: Chapin Park, Inc. has been in negotiations with Indiana. Landmarks about restoring a home within Chapin Park. This is one of the homes Todd Zeiger has looked at for this purpose. It is valuable to the neighborhood for the architectural variety it brings with its Craftsman/Shingle style. She recommends the garage and fence be demolished, and a short reprieve on the house while Indiana Landmarks makes a decision. Sanford Garner 456 North Meridian, Indianapolis: Not speaking as a representative of Indiana Landmarks, but is a member of their board. Their Executive Committee meets August 17 and to date he is not aware this case is in front of them. Their annual Board Meeting is on September 11. Potentially Todd could have communication and get this through the real estate committee to go to the board to be approved, but the likelihood of any kind of approval could not come until around September 11. Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as amended, excluding the garage and the fence demolition. Seconded by Commissioner Klusczinski. Discussion held. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Gelfman (NAY): the house has been sitting a long time. The demolition is supposed to occur within the next three days, and to delay this would be a disservice to the long term plan to remove houses in disrepair. Commissioner Parker (NAY): the house is too far gone. Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE): does not see sufficient evidence to warrant structural demolition. Commissioner Gordon (AYE): have not gotten inside the house to view condition. It is an obvious candidate for demolition from the photographs and reports from Preservation Specialist and Code Enforcement. However, if one house can be saved through a couple organizations, let's find that out in the 30 days it takes for another application. Commissioner Voll (NAY): has safety concerns. It has been a problematic property for a while. He hopes there is a rescue attempt. The paperwork process will take a while, which may provide time to save it, but we should stay on the path we are on. Two in favor, three opposed. Vote: 2 — 3 COA#2016-0727 Approved as Amended. 4. 416 Manitou Place COA#2016-0729 Chapin Park Representation by Micah Niespodziany and Todd Neuenschwander, 416 Manitou Place STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 July 2016 0 Application Number: 2016-0729 Property Location: 416 Manitou Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1941 Property Owner: Micah Niespodziany and Todd Nevenschwander Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This house was originally located at 534 North Lafayette, and was moved to the present location in 1980. It is a 2 -story rectangular brick house on a block foundation and chimney on side, 6/6 double -hung windows and front door with sidelights. The gable roof is covered with asphalt shingles. ALTERATIONS: A back addition with a flat roof is non original. APPLICATION ITEMS: 8 -foot addition to rear kitchen wall to make a small mudroom allowing easier, cleaner entry through back door to kitchen. Will use appropriate composite material to match the existing wood siding. New window will be appropriate reproduction of existing windows. New door will be an appropriate reproduction of the doors found on the original blueprints (owner possesses) of the house. New flat roof membrane and repairs to water -damaged areas caused by existing roof and gutter not fitting well. Adding low -height metal fencing of simple design to flat roof area as required by insurance. Low platform deck of cedar planks to make dining room door accessible and provide access to mudroom door to remedy extremely uneven grade of the yard by doors (as .5" drop from door to ground at dining room, 7' drop at kitchen). Deck will be a 6'x25' slightly enlarging existing patio space. No railing, low platform steps surrounding all edges of deck. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner proposes adding an 8' addition to rear kitchen wall creating anew entrance. Addition will have new composite siding to match existing wood siding; new window and door will be reproductions of existing windows and door. A 36" metal railing will be installed around existing flat roof, per insurance requirements, height TBD and encompassing new addition. New flat roof material will be installed on the existing flat roof and new addition. A new cedar plank low -platform deck will be added around the addition, providing access to rear entrances. Overall dimension of the deck will be 16' x 25', which is slightly larger than existing ground level patio space. (see attached site plan) PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park Local Historic District III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have L- or T-shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half -story bungalows. The most prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard/composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. 7 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Owner corrected description to reflect that grade of yard drops from 11.5" to 7", not 0.5" to 7'. Commissioner Voll moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0729 Approved. 5. 304 West Navarre COA#2016-0729A Chapin Park Representation by Keith Shaum, Keith's Lawns, 24306 County Rd 36, Goshen STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 July 2016 Application Number: 2016-0729A Property Location: 304 West Navarre Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/I906/Miller House/Ennis Austin, Architect Property Owner: Sara Davis Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2'/z story house will an irregular plan sits on a brick foundation at the corner of Lafayette and Navarre Streets. Exterior walls are stucco between half-timber trim and band courses above the first and second story windows. There are two entrance porches: the one off of Lafayette Street has brick rail and piers supporting a flat roof with brackets at eaves; the one off of Navarre is similar but has two wood columns supporting a flat roof. The windows are 9/1 double -hung grouped in pairs, threes, and fours with flat wood surrounds. The doors are wood with multiple lights; side light on door on Navarre Street side. ALTERATIONS: COA 2016-0623A approved installation of paver patio in side yard behind fence with a paver side walk around to front porch. COA 2014-0606 approved tear -off and re -roof with architectural asphalt shingles. COA 2012-0910 approved removal of red maple tree. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove old concrete and replace with landscape walls and new steps, replace concrete in front of garage door. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner has contracted with Keith's Lawns to remove old concrete patio area and replace with 6"x6" pavers (Cambridge Cobble) similar to existing pavers on porch, remove existing wrought -iron railing and replace with 36"H black extruded aluminum railing (Riviera IV style C34), remove brick steps and replace with pre -cast concrete slabs (Granika Step), remove and replace concrete drive in-kind, remove face brick surrounding garage door and replace with stone veneer (Brandon wall collection), and install same stone veneer retaining walls (Brandon wall collection) on both sides of drive. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited g No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. D. ENTRANCES PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Debra Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Preservation Specialist Steve Szaday asked if there would be some way to drain water that accumulates at the garage door. Keith Shaum responded a channel drain would be installed on exterior of door to address existing drainage issues, and agreed to amend application to include this. Commissioner Gordon moved to amend application to include channel drain. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 - 0 COA#2016-0729A Amended. Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0729A Approved as Amended. 6. 325 West North Shore COA#2016-0801 West North Shore Representation by Paul Worland, 17914 Buckland Drive, Granger, IN STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0801 Property Location: 325 West North Shore Drive Architectural Style/Date: Neo-Classic/Sears Roebuck's "The Magnolia" /1926 Property Owner: Paul Worland and Deirdre Mylod Landmark or District Designation: West North Shore LHD Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 325 West North Shore is one of six known Sears "Magnolias" in existence. It has two stories set upon a square plan with projecting porches all on brick foundations. There is a Porte-cochere on the west fagade. The exterior walls are recently restored clapboard siding. The windows are 9/1 double hung. There are aluminum railings around various porches and balconies. The roof is a truncated pyramidal with asphalt shingles and a front dormer with a classic pediment; the roof peak has a flat roof. The porch and balcony are distinctive features with the classic portico front entry that has 9 triple ionic columns on both front corners; bracketed entablature with a flat roof enclosed by a wrought iron fence. According to the 1977 survey card, there is a "newer frame garage with apartment of a `style that detracts from the house."' (Brian Crumlish) ALTERATIONS: COA 1991-1202 approved enclosing existing second level balcony to create a laundry room. The "guest house" was revamped with siding and new door configurations in 1995. COA 2015-0601 approved removal of the aluminum siding and restoration of wood details and trim, and restoring/replacing the bead board porch ceiling and soffit. COA 2015-0722 approved demolition, rebuilding, and reinstallation of front porch slab and foundation; rebuilding pillar foundations; remove non - original Porte Cochere and rebuild to historic specifications, and in-kind replacement of asphalt roof shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace flat roof of carriage house with Gambrel roof and two dormers on either side. Install custom-made, historic wood storm windows and storm doors made by Jeff Schoberg. Replace newel posts and rails across the front porch, Juliette porch, above the sun porch, above the porte cochere, and above the front portico. Newel posts will be built to original blueprints and balusters will be replicated in profile using original remaining balusters. Newel posts and railings and balusters will be made of wood. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Carriage House: Owner proposes to replace the flat roof on the carriage house at rear of property with gambrel roof with two dormers on each side. Replace existing siding and add siding to new second story with beveled cedar clapboard in the same style as the house. Windows will be replaced throughout and installed in new second story with new Marvin 6/6 wood double hung. All trim will be consistent with the house. A second garage door that existed originally will be reintroduced with a new overhead garage door with divided lights at top. The existing garage door will be replaced with the same as new. New 9'x12" fluted columns with Scamozzi capitals will be installed to replace existing metal column. Exterior front door will be replaced with new 6 light door. Storm windows: Schoberg will custom construct storm windows and storm doors for house. Railings: Replace any missing or non -original railings, newel posts, and balusters with exact replicas of original using blueprints, salvaged material, and historic photographs as evidence. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: WEST NORTH SHORE DRIVE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT III. STRUCTURES A. ROOFS Preferred: Keep the original shape of the roof. Retain the original roofing material. A special effort should be made to do this when the roof in question is of tile, slate, or some other unique material not usually found today. Preserve or replace all architectural features which give the roof its character, such as dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting, weathervanes, and special eaves. Permitted: When necessary to replace roofing material, match the original as closely as possible in size, shape and texture. Prohibited: Do not add, remove, or alter features which will change its character or the architectural character of the house. B. WINDOWS AND DOORS Preferred: Retain and maintain existing window and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, doors, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. Use canvas awnings, if awnings are used. Install wooden frame storm windows and doors painted to match trim. Install insulating glass in existing sash. As to Lot 12, metal storm windows and doors which have been coated to match trim and which are architecturally in good taste with the structure, are preferred. Permitted: Replace deteriorated doors, windows, sills, shutters, etc. with materials which match the original as closely as possible. A special effort should be made to match the size and style of the window and door openings, so that the overall appearance of the structure is not altered. Install metal storm windows and doors which have been painted, anodized, or coated to match the trim. Prohibited: Do not attach or use metal, vinyl or fiber glass awnings nor hoods. Do not attach exterior shutters to a house that did not have shutters originally unless approved in writing by the Historic Preservation Commission STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel. Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Parker moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0801 Approved. 7. 108 North Main COA#2016-0801A Local Landmark Representation by Sanford Garner, 456 North Meridian, Indianapolis STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 01 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0801A 10 Property Location: 108 N Main Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neo-Classical/1910/Solon Beman and H.G. Christman builder Property Owner: JMS Development, LLC — Ryan C. Rans Landmark or District Designation: Local Historic Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: John Mohler Studebaker built this eight story Neo -Classical style office structure in 1910. The fagade is comprised of six bays to the west and three to the south and is covered with white terra cotta classical detailing. It is also clearly divided into three registers that are separated by strong projecting and intervening cornices. The bottom of each cornice is punctuated by volutes and honeysuckle designs placed between each bay. The middle of the structure is articulated with a three bay system, which continues to the second intervening cornice, once again embellished with classical detailing. The top floor is further distinguished by the use of arched bays, which are topped by elaborate egg and dart molding. The overall decorative detail of the structure tends to reflect the impact of the Colombian Exposition of which the architect, Solon S. Beman, was a major participant. However, the frank expression of the steel frame links the building to the Chicago School of skyscraper construction. The building has a flat roof with robust projecting cornices that have egg and dart molding and decorated voluted brackets. The windows are 1/1 double hung with simple decorated spandrels, except for the eighth floor, which has round even spans and cartouche keystones. ALTERATIONS: The structure has a modern aluminum store front entrance and further modern black stone fronts along the street. COA 2016-0705A approved replacement of the non -original storefronts at ground floor with new aluminum windows and sill flashing and 7 door openings with standard hardware. Vinyl has been added to the arches on the top story windows. Existing vinyl/aluminum windows are currently undergoing replacement to a historically appropriate Quaker style aluminum that will restore all full original window openings, including arched heads. Concrete has been applied over the north side bricks. Further approvals with COA 2016-0705A include: awnings, in-kind; close up windows behind elevator core; masonry restoration, in- kind; remove skylights; install stair tower and trash chute near center of north fagade, all finished in EIFS. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of the JMS Building signage along the northern fagade. Installation of two (2) Centier signs — one (1) on the northern elevation, and one (1) on the southwestern comer of the building; and installation of Studebaker Lofts signage above the main entrance on the western fagade (details of which are still being developed). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Remove existing JMS signage from northern building fagade. 2. Install two signs (for Centier Bank). Proposed for the southwest corner of Main and West Washington Streets is a blade sign, 3' wide x 15'-5" high, internally illuminated LED, reading, "Centier Bank" and "ATM", two brackets in rendering appear to attach to building, unsure of details of how they will attach to masonry. Proposed for the north elevation is a "Centier Bank" and firework design face -light LED sign, 33'-7" wide x T-0" high, mounted on raceway, unsure of details of how raceway will attach to masonry. Exact placement on the fagade has yet to be selected by Centier; Staff has recommended option "D" for consideration. "Studebaker Lofts" appears on sheet A 200. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Groun B: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark A treatment changes of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure - Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material - Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood - all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials - the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition 11 Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of removal of existing JMS sign and installation of blade sign. Staff makes no recommendation on installation of sign for north elevation. Staff recommends approval on Studebaker Lofts sign. Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Parker moved to conditionally approve application as submitted for removal of JMS sign, and installation of signs with the exception of blade sign. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. One in favor, four opposed. Vote: 1— 4 Motion is defeated. Commissioner Parker moved to conditionally approve application as submitted for removal of JMS sign, and installation of sign on north elevation and Studebaker Lofts sign; striking capital design elements of blade sign, and remanding authority to staff for final determination of the scale of blade sign. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 - 0 COA#2016-0801A Approved with Conditions. S. 1313 East Wayne Street COA#2016-0801B East Wayne Street Representation by Sarah Cullinan, 1313 East Wayne Street STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0801B Property Location: 1313 E. Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/ 1926/Whitcomb&Keller Property Owner: Sarah and Shannon Cullinan Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey brick faced Colonial Revival home with the original slate tiles on the gable roof and a large front shed dormer. The windows are 8/1 double hung sashes with brick header course sills and brick 12 soldier course lintels with ornamental louvered shutters. There is a central gable entrance canopy, arched under with entablature, cornice and brackets. The porch steps and walkway are concrete. ALTERATIONS: The original rear Pergola type porch noted in the 1986 survey card was removed in 1991 when the one story rear brick addition was constructed. The 1995 second story clapboard rear addition eliminated the rear shed dormer and also created a second story bay window over the brick bay window of the 1991 addition. COA 2013-0903 approved construction of a mudroom at the rear entry. APPLICATION ITEMS: Renovate existing screen porch into four -season room by framing out and installing windows and heating unit. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owners seek to enclose an existing screened -in porch on the west side of house to create a four -season room. This project would not change the footprint of the house, and will retain the existing foundation, column structure, and roof. A knee -wall will be framed out at the base of the existing screened porch area in a post and panel style and painted white, matching existing trim on the exterior of house. White Pella wood windows will be installed in porch area (3 60"H windows in each section between columns) to match the style of the original windows of the home, with 4/4 grilles. All walls will be insulated. An AC/Heat unit will be install under the window close to the house. The brick foundation will be repaired. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT EXISTING STRUCTURES D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have small open porches at the main entrance. Stoops and small patios also are in evidence. Of those porches that have roofs, many have either hip or gable roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Columned porticos, porches with broken pediments or turrets, and other porch forms characteristic of the Period Revival styles are also found in the district. Required Existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing an earlier period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0801B Approved. 9. 413 Lamonte Terrace COA#2016-0801C Chapin Park Representation by Antonio Bajuyo STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0801C Property Location: 413 Lamont Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1892/the Ware House Property Owner: Sara and Antonio Bajuyo Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local/National Register District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story wood frame house with an irregular plan has an asphalt shingle roof, and 1/1 double -hung windows. A broad stick -style porch stretches along the south entry and the east, with a shed roof supported by wood columns. There is an octagonal corner tower with onion dome. ALTERATIONS: COA 2015-0813A approved removal of a walnut tree in the back yard. COA 2009-0406D approved improvements to rear of house, including addition of a deck, French doors with a small porch canopy over them, and four Pella aluminum-clad/wood interior windows; replacing existing chain link fence with wooden French gothic open picket fence, 13 replacement of garage doors, and replacement of existing cedar shingle and lap siding with HardiePlank Lap siding. Non -original cedar siding has been installed APPLICATION ITEMS: Restoration of the front half of 413 Lamonte. This includes removing non -historic shingles and installing new siding and trim to match the original (see 1905 photo attached). Many windows will be repaired. Seven Marvin windows will be custom made with divided lite to match seven 2nd floor windows that will be replaced. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to remove existing shingle siding and install HardiePlank lap siding to match the original; ornamental diamond and scallop siding will be wood. Spacing of lap siding will match original siding. New wood corner and fascia trim to match 1905 photo. This is a continuation of siding work approved with COA 2009- 0406D for the back of house. Demolish non -historic chimney. Repair many windows, and replace seven double -hung windows on second floor with Marvin wood windows with aluminum -clad exteriors painted Wineberry Red; divided lite to match existing windows. Install new wood trim for all window openings including new crown moldings to match 1905 photo. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On August 4, 2016 I met with the homeowners, Tony and Sara at their home at 413 Lamont Terrace located in the Chapin Park Local Historic District. They have applied to replace seven (7) double hung wood windows with Marvin aluminum clad wood windows. The house had a rear addition added that was approved with a previous COA and utilized the same Marvin windows as this new application. I inspected the outside of the structure and each window has an intact wooden storm window. I was able to inspect the interior of each window and as the photographs provided by the homeowner was able to see that the windows currently in place are not the originals but were wooden replacement sashes with multicolored panes. The sashes are ill-fitting and have been caulked and or painted shut. Even so the owner keeps plastic over the windows to keep the air conditioned air inside the house. Many of the interior stops are missing and some of the panes of glass are broken. These sashes are not deteriorated beyond repair but as stated clearly not original. The owner also indicated that the two side by side windows on the front of the house are 24" across and would like to change those to 30" across as the other windows he are looking to replace are all 30". He believes that this would provide a more uniform look. This would be achieved by reducing the middle framework between the windows and some of the side jambs. He also stated that they would like to remove the eastern chimney. This is a non -original feature that does have a fireplace to it but was done for heating exhaust. There is some bowing and some separation that if not removed would need some repair at the least. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious 14 damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Casement windows adapted the English tradition of using wrought iron casements with leaded cames for residential use. Rolled steel casements (either single, as shown, or paired) were popular in the 1920s for Cottage -style residences and Gothic -style campus architecture. More stream -lined casements were popular in the 1930s for institutional and small industrial buildings. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Owner corrected description of previous alterations to state HardiePlank siding, rather than cedar, has been installed. Also, the four windows installed in 2009 are Marvin, rather than Pella. Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Parker. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0801C Approved. 10. 1109 East Wayne Street COA#2016-0801D East Wayne Street Representation by John Conway, 1109 East Wayne Judy Karnes, Workz Group, 11424 Old U.S. 31, Berrien Springs, MI STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2016 Application Number: 2016-0801D Property Location: 1109 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial RevivaV1925/Laylon House/Freyermuth & Maurer, Architects Property Owner: John Conway Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story wood -frame brick -veneer house with tiled gable roof has 1 -story flat roof wings at east and west sides, and a 1 -story flat roof rear section. Windows are 6/1 double -hung, with stone sills and brick soldier course lintels. There are corbeled brick chimneys at east and west ends of central 2 -story section, and half fanlight attic windows. There is a 1 -car brick veneer garage with gable roof at rear of property. ALTERATIONS: COA 2014-0908A approved removal of two trees. 15 APPLICATION ITEMS: 43' of 4' aluminum fence DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to install 43' of aluminum fence from rear corner of house to front comer of garage that will follow the driveway. At time of application, fence had already been installed with no approved COA or Building Permit. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block Require Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora_ All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Voll moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0801D Approved. B. LOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION 1. Second reading: 806 Leland Avenue, South Bend "The Elbel House" Public support: Joan Downs-Krostenko, 849 Forest Abrahm Christianson, 806 Leland Public opposition: none Commissioner Klusczinski sponsored Resolution #16-02 to recommend to the Common Council, that the building, located at 806 Leland Avenue be established as an historic landmark, pursuant to ordinance #5565-73, as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5-0 16 Resolution #16-02 Approved by unanimous consent. III. HEARING OF VISITORS - none IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. July 18, 2016 — Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Executive Director — In Packet. A. Southhold Awards - Tuesday, October 25, in the lobby of the LaSalle Hotel. The event is still in the planning stages — more information to follow. B. Auto insurance - switching insurance carriers for the HPC car. V. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Parker moved to suspend the agenda, deferring all other regular business and questions about reports until the September meeting and to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Gelfman. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Meeting adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Attest: lizabeifiFle- ertel, Secretary -(0 Date 17 Ldcation Budget as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05-31-2016. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Office Supplies Carry Forward IOriginal Addt'1 Adj Total 7.16 Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 34,884.00 0.00 (3,700.00) 31,184.00 0.00 13,073.24 18,110.76 18,110.76 000 General GovT. 749.99 749.99 000 General GovT. 58.08 58.08 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 3,700.00 40,700.00 0.00 26,611.58 14,088.42 14,088.42 000 General GovT. 0.00 0.00 225.00 225.00 000 General Gov'T. 34.62 34.62 10000 Totals "'«:.:.:...««..«««,«,«..:«...««««««.«.« 0.00 71,884.00 0.00 0.00 71,884.00 0.00 39,684.82 32,199.18 32,199.18 44.79 44.79 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 297.00 0.00 0.00 297.00 7.16 0.00 289.84 297.00 000 General Gov'T. 97.59 100.00 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 250.01 749.99 749.99 000 General GovT. 75.00 75.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 225.00 000 General Gov'T. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals """"""":""""""""""""` 0.00 1,522.00 0.00 0.00 1,522.00 7.16 250.01 1,264.83 1,271.99 83.10 83.57 31070 Other Contractual Services 0.00 18,686.00 0.00 (102.96) 18,783.04 0.00 14,640.00 4,143.04 4,143.04 000 General GovT. 22.06 22.06 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 0.00 57.00 0.00 0.00 57.00 9.87 26.51 20.62 30.49 000 General GovT. 36.18 53.49 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 102.96 197.96 0.00 165.78 32.18 32.18 000 General GovT. r 16.26 16.26 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 250.00 150.00 150.00 000 General GovT. 37.50 37.50 30000 Totals •""«.«..«.«««.«_«_..«.«.«.««««.«..«««. 0.00 20,338.00 0.00 0.00 20,338.00 9.87 15,082.29 5,245.84 5,255.71 25.79 25.84 Financial System 09/02/2016 11:33 AM by ksobecki Page 55 w , r Location Budget as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05-31-2016. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addri Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Location Totals'"`.""""""""""""..... 0.00 93,744.00 0.00 0.00 93,744.00 17.03 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 55,017.12 38,709.85 38,726.88 41.29 41.31 0.00 0.00 55,017.12 Financial System 09/02/2016 11:33 AM by ksobecki Page 56 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 08-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence Fund: 1000 County General Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Vendor Budget PO Number Vendor Name Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 130829 031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 1000.21030.000.0037 06/10/2016 7.16 82 132835 001538 South Bend Tribune 1000.33010.000.0037 08/22/2016 9.87 9 Location Total 17.03 Financial System 09/02/2016 11:34 AM by ksobecki Page 19 - < Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.02711.000.0037 Reimbursements General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/22/2016 08/22/2016 ReGAutoRcpt 12,500.00 Rec:136106 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 12,500.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 12,500.00 (12,500.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 12,500.00 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/22/2016 08/22/2016 ReGAutoRcpt 520.00 Rec:136105 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 520.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 1,200.00 (1,200.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 1,200.00 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/05/2016 08/05/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,199,38 BK:008 CK:707648 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/05/2016 08/19/2016 08/17/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:708682 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/19/2016 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 18,110.76 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 18,110.76 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,184.00 0.00 13,073.24 Cash: (13,073.24) 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/05/2016 08/05/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:707649 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/05/2016 08/19/2016 08/17/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:708683 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst08/19/2016 Estimated Unreceived Revenue . Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 14,088.42 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 14,088.42 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 26,611.58 Cash: (26,611.58) 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation Financial System 09/021201611:46 AM by ksobecki Page 164 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 297.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 289.84 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 297.00 7.16 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/25/2016 08/25/2016 Claim/RegDocket 19.00 BK:008 CK:709207 Inv:REIMB FOR GAS Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 749.99 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.00 Unencumbered: 749.99 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 250.01 Cash: (250.01) 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 225.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 225.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 08/04/2016 08/04/2016 Claim/RegDocket 400.00 BK:008 CK:707547 Inv: PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 20HR @ 20/1-1R Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/18/2016 08/18/2016 Claim/RegDocket 280.00 BK:008 CK:708614 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 14 HR @20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/18/2016 08/18/2016 Claim/RegDocket 380.00 BK:008 CK:708614 Inv: PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 19HR @ 20/1-1R Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 08/25/2016 08/25/2016 Claim/RegDocket 500.00 BK:008 CK:709207 Inv:25 HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 4,143.04 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,560.00 Unencumbered: 4,143.04 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,783.04 0.00 14,640.00 Cash: (14,640.00) 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/22/2016 08/22/2016 PO/AutoPO 9,87 PO:132835 Vend:001538 South Bend Tribune Financial System 09/02/2016 11:46 AM by ksobecki Page 165 Financial System 09/02/2016 11:46 AM by ksobecki Page 166 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 30.49 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 20.62 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.00 9.87 26.51 Cash: (26.51) 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General GovT. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 32.18 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 32.18 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 197.96 0.00 165.78 Cash: (165.78) 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 900.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 900.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 150.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 150.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 250.00 Cash: (250.00) Financial System 09/02/2016 11:46 AM by ksobecki Page 166 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current 0.00 Total Transfer Current 13,700.00 Total Location Totals Current Total Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance 0.00 13,020.00 0.00 13,700.00 (13,700.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,020.00 0.00 13,700.00 (13,700.00) Appropriation 0.00 93,744.00 0.00 93,744.00 Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 7,108.52 Unencumbered: 17.03 55,017.12 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 7,108.52 17.03 55,017.12 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 38,726.88 38,709.85 (41,317.12) 0.00 0.00 (41,317.12) Financial System 09/02/201611:46 AM by ksobecld Page 167 V"', . ; Location Budget as of 08-31-2016 SaintrJosephCounty Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05-31-2016. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016, Director: County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addrl Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 3,273.89 0.00 289.00 0.00 3,562.89 0.00 0.00 3,562.89 3,562.89 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals '="""""""""`""""""""""' 3,273.89 0.00 289.00 0.00 3,562.89 0.00 0.00 3,562.89 3,562.89 100.00 100.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 0.00 0.00 30000 Totals""':.:.:.:....:..=.===k=.:==..«.:... 0.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Location Totals "'"""""""""""""":'"""""` 3,273.89 0.00 319.00 0.00 3,592.89 0.00 30.00 3,562.89 3,562.89 99.17 99.17 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 0.00 30.00 Financial System 09/02/201612:22 PM by ksobecki Page 106 e Location Budget as of 08-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05-31-2016. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016, Director. County Historic Preservation Carry Forward Original Addri Adi Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent Fund Totals """"::...::........:....:.......,.::...:. 3,273.89 0.00 319.00 0.00 3,592.89 0.00 30.00 3,562.89 3,562.89 99.17 99.17 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 0.00 0.00 30.00 Financial System 09/02/2016 12:22 PM by ksobecki r Page 107 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05131/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0000 General GovT. 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen GovT General GovT. General GovT. Current Total Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current 0.00 Total Transfer Current 16,229.45 Total Location Totals Current Unreceived Revenue Total Estimated Encumbrance Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,229.45 (16,229.45) Estimated Encumbrance Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,229.45 (16,229.45) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,229.45 (16,229.45) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 16,229.45 Balances 0.00 0.00 16,229.45 0.00 0.00 16,229.45 Financial System 09/02/2016 02:01 PM by ksobecki Page 258 �t i Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Present for 01/01/2016 thru 08/3112016 Loc 0034 Commissioners 4103.06400.000.0034 GiftsBContributions General GovT. Commissioners 0.00 Unencumbered: 08/29/2016 06/20/2016 RectAdjustment Cash: (40.00) Rec:135323 BK:007 CORRECTION Expenditure Estimated Unreceived Revenue 0.00 Unencumbered: Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation a.0o Current 0.00 (40.00) Cash: 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Estimated 0.00 Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Normal Current 0.00 (40.00) 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Current 0,00 Total 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 Total 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 (40.00) 0.00 Total 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Financial System 09/02/2016 02:01 PM by ksobecki Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: a.0o 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: L Saint Joseph County Balances 0.00 0.00 0.00 Balances 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 259 1 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.02104.000.0037 Sale Of Maps & Publications General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 25.50 (25.50) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 25.50 4103.02707.000.0037 Charges For Services General Gov T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 50.00 (50.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 50.00 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General GovT. Historic Preservation 08/29/2016 06/20/2016 Rec/Adjustment 40.00 Rec:135323 BK:007 CORRECTION Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 269.00 (269.00) 0.00 0.00 0,00 Cash: 269.00 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 3,562.89 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,562.89 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,562.89 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 4103.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT_ Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 30.00 0,00 30.00 Cash: (30.00) Financial System 09/02/2016 02:01 PM by ksobecki Page 260 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total Location Totals Current 0.00 Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 3,562.89 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,562.89 0.00 344.50 (344.50) 3,592.89 0.00 30.00 Cash: 314.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 344.50 (344.50) 3,592.89 0.00 30.00 Cash: 314.50 Financial System 09/02/2016 02:01 PM by ksobecki Page 261 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 08-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 05/31/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 08/31/2016 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 16,573.95 (16,573.95) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Fund Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,573.95 (16,573.95) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,592.89 0.00 30.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 3,592.89 0.00 30.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 3,562.89 3,562.89 16,543.95 0.00 0.00 16,543.95 Financial System 09/02/2016 02:01 PM by ksobecki Page 262 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 02 August through September 06 2016 Daily Highlights 1-08.02 Present at County Commissioner meeting on behalf of 115 S Lafayette Blvd, local landmark. 08.03 Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Marketing meeting at HPC. Attend The History Museum presentation on Leeper Park by Jonathon Geels. 08.04 Work w/ Millie. Building South Bend: Set up model w/ Jennifer at St. Joseph County Public Library; prepare and submit final CFSJC grant narrative. 08.08 Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Building South Bend: Work w/ Jennifer to prepare final CFSJC grant budget and submit. Review car insurance quotes. Review/edit new building permit violation template provided by Legal. Review/edit new Local Landmark template drafted by Deb. Review 2016 CDBG Contract for South Bend Community Investment. Bicentennial: ALL -IN Block Party follow up tasks. 08.09 115 Lafayette correspondence and planning. 1240 Thomas meeting with Eric Boyd for COA application. 202 Bartlett rezoning review and preparation. Bicentennial: ALL -IN Block Party follow up tasks; Geocache issue travel bug press release; pick up completed Playing Cards! Show them off around County City Building and deliver a deck to each Commissioner and other officials. 1408 Elwood forward letter to Code. Meeting w/ Ben Hoggan re: Chapin Park houses he is working to purchase, including: 745 and 805 Leland, 917 Leland, and 417 W Navarre as possibilities. 08.10 202 Bartlett rezoning review. 1240 Thomas local Landmark discussion w/ Chuck Bulot Building Department re: unauthorized work taking place on roof and rear. Bicentennial: Playing Cards deliveries and invoices; looking into vendor payments; Photography Exhibit scheduling correspondence w/ IUSB. Posting HPC meeting notices. 08.11 Work w/ Millie. Site visit at St. Paul's Church to document what records might be applicable for Building South Bend digitization. 08.12 Work w/ Millie. Attend State Board of Accounts webinar at County Commissioners conference room. Work w/ George. Meeting w/ Lou Sabo; digitizing photos and negatives. 115 S Lafayette progress. 08.15 Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel.115 S Lafayette follow ups. Portage Manor Cemetery correspondence w/ Bev in Area Plan. 202 Bartlett correspondence w/ Angela in Area Plan. Bicentennial: Deliver paper and order Birthday Bash flyers w/ John in Area Plan; Photography Exhibit follow up w/ IUSB on Press Release template and other marketing materials. HPC meeting preparation. Follow up w/ Ben Hoggan re: Chapin Park redevelopment properties. JMS meeting w/ Sanford Garner to go over anticipated COA. Attend HPC meeting. 08.16 Bicentennial: Attend Steering Committee meeting at County Commissioners, follow up tasks. 806 Leland Resolution and Ordinance to City Clerk. Southhold: Revision of most recent guest list. 08.17 Bicentennial: Meeting w/ Auditor's Office re: Bicentennial funds; correspondence w/ Evie; Playing Card sales. 417 Navarre correspondence w/ Code, neighbors, property manager. 609 Rex correspondence w/ Code, contractor, investor. Geiger experiment meeting w/ Tim, Elizabeth and Deb. Building South Bend planning. 08.18 Work w/ Millie. Reconcile budget. Edit HPC August meeting minutes. Portage Manor cemetery follow up w/ Bill Shalliol. 609 Rex correspondence w/ Code. 319 N William conversation w/ Jerry Frye re: master plan for house and neighborhood. Southhold: Guest list and award correspondence. Report 1329 East Wayne Street fence w/out COA to Building Department. 08.19 Work w/ Millie. Work w/ George. Meeting w/ Tim. Reconcile budget. Bicentennial: Correspondence w/ John in HR re: bills; deliver Playing Cards to SNM for sale. Southhold: Guest list. Receive 1329 East Wayne Street COA 2016- 0819. Correspondence w/ Greg Aldridge re: Erie Insurance quote for HPC car. 08.22 Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Deliver performing arts event flyers in DTSB. Reconcile budget; correspondence w/ SBT Joe Dits re: Geocache travel bug. Meeting w/ Myles Robertson re: his tax bill and parcel questions. Correspondence w/ Indiana Landmarks and SJC Purchasing Dept. re: membership renewal. 08.23 Work w/ George. INDOT/Rieth-Riley meeting at US 31/Johnson Road to determine new location for restored Indiana/Michigan Territorial Line marker, interview by 57 and WNDU. Staff tour through districts and select county landmarks: Research JMS Building historic photos and meeting with architect Sanford Garner. Site visit to 1855 County Courthouse w/ County Maintenance staff. Issue RME. Lafayette Building correspondence. 08.24 Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Lafayette Building. Treasure Hunt 2017 meeting at NDCAC. Bicentennial: Playing Card sales. Car insurance research. 08.25 Work w/ Millie. Meeting w/ Marlene of 609 Rex to go over Repair Order now in place w/ Code Enforcement, issue RME. Lafayette Building. Issue RME. Bicentennial: Photography Exhibit planning; deliver wholesale for sale items to WNIT for Torch Bearer meeting; Playing Card sales. 08.26 Work w/ Millie. Bicentennial: Meeting w/ Lou Sabo. Lafayette Building. Private Tour scheduling and invoice. 08.29 Staff meeting. Issue RME. Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Install photo exhibit w/ Lou at IU South Bend. Work on CLG report. 08.30 Meeting w/ Pam and Lory in DCI to go over City contracts for next year; follow up w/ Deb and Steve on office procedures for processing paperwork. Work on CLG report. Meeting w/ Troy H of 313-315 Madison re: water disconnection concern; follow up w/ Code. Assignments for Rachel. Meeting at LaSalle Hotel to plan Southhold event. 08.31 Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Facilitate Committee meeting at Studebaker National Museum, follow up tasks. Finalize CLG report. Work on Southold Guest List. 09.01 Work w/ Millie. Meeting w/ Bill Shalliol and Millie. Car insurance follow up. Bicentennial: Follow up on paying bills. 09.02 Personal Day 09.05 Holiday 09.06 COA deadline. Work on Staff Reports. Attend Building Department Design Review Committee meeting for JMS building signage f Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 1426 Wayne 2016-0816 Remove dead/dying American Elm in side yard. Remove Hemlock planted in close proximity to house. All approved per City Forester. Trees and major landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another should be immediately replace by suitable flora. 212 E South 2016-0823A Replacing exterior wood siding as needed, in-kind. Clean exterior of building. Scraping paint off walls, windows, doors. Tuck pointing existing brick foundation and replaced face brick, in-kind. Repaint existing house with two coats. Repair gutters, in-kind. Remove non-original lean-to/carport. Haul all debris off-site. 975 Riverside 2016-0824 Remove dead Norway Maple located in front yard, per City Arborist. Trees and plant Drive materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. 609 Rex 2016-0825 Demolish garage, fence, and jungle gym as approved with COA#2016-0727. All debris to be removed from property. Clean up of vegetation including trimming of trees. No trees to be removed without COA. 511 W Colfax 2016-0825A Repair five original wood double hung windows in second story south and third stor south. All work In-Kind. 817 Leland 2016-0829 Replace deteriorated front porch. New framing. New roof, Owens Corning Berkshire asphalt shingles. Porch deck, pine tongue and groove. Porch ceiling, pine tongue and groove. Replace 5 non-original porch supports with 3 new wood colonial columns with Tuscan Cap and Doric Base. New railing with square balusters to replicate original, low height railing - see survey card. Install 4 new 32"x16" vinyl basement windows, replacing non-original glass block windows on north and south sides. Interns/Volunteers Who Project George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Rachel Arvoy, County Commissioners Intern Indiana's 2016 Bicentennial, Public Relations/Communications Millie Latack, Preservation Specialist Intern Minimum Maintenance Standards surveying, field work, file org. Phone Calls Who Date/Time Regarding Ed Tally 08.08 noon Following up on an email re: unauthorized work taking place at 1071 Riverside Drive. Discussed the street lighting deterioration and possible replacement. Frank Perri 08.12 noon Discussion about his master plan in East Bank and future partnerships and COAs. Marlene Botka 08.18 noon Discussion about 609 Rex and working w/ Code Enforcement re: a repair agreement. Gina, Edgewater 08.19 11 am Metal roof inquiry. Semi parking Lincoln Way East. Notre Dame 08.3011 am Bicentennial donation receipt clarification and update request. Phillip Blaine 09.0112 pm Concerned/frantic neighbor to 803 West Washington re: roof and windows. Research Requests What Date Who Hours Portage Manor Cemetery 08.11 Bill Shalliol .5 I 1422 Miami 08.11 Walk-in .25 Drewry's Brewery 08.22 Margaret Fosmoe .25 Utility disconnection concerns on "affirmed demos" w/out COA 108.25 West North Shore guideline inquiry Hibbered Building 08.26 08.26 Troy H Angie D Kevin .25 .25 .25 V Historic.Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report —Debra Parcell —August 2, 2016— September 6, 2016 Daily Highlights 08/02 Finish all staff reports for August meeting. Worked with homeowners to get more information on COA applications. Attend downtown walking tour planning meeting; attempted to reach building owners to be included in tour. Researched history of towns to be included on Bicentennial Birthday Cake. Section 106 review. 08/03 Research 1137 Woodside. Worked on securing buildings for downtown walking tour. Revised Local Landmark application form. Added final details to COAs. Sent COA/guideline information to 212 E South owner. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. RME for 508'/: West Washington. 08/04 Prepare commissioners' packets. Planning for awards program. Historic file maintenance. Gathered information about NR properties along the river for Riverfront Parks & Trails. 08/05 Complete and mail commissioners' packets. COA for 609 Riverside. Research Oliver School site. Get insurance quotes for HPC car. Review Section 106 notice for proposed cell tower construction near Brick and Elm. Confirm buildings for downtown walking tour. Talked with owner of 1137 Woodside about HPC, potential local landmark status for her house, and possibility of being included in future home tours. 08/08 Talked with homeowner of 1733 East Wayne about potential RME. Worked on Section 106 for SR 23 bridge. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. Secured another quote for HPC car insurance. 08/09 Letter to Code Enforcement regarding demolition of Drewrys Buildings. Prepare minutes outline for August HPC meeting. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. Worked on securing buildings for downtown walking tour. 08/10 Section 106. Worked on alternate venues for awards program. Finished minutes outline for August HPC meeting. COA for 1240 West Thomas. Researched restrictions for National Register listed properties. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. 08/11 Attend meeting with INDOT in Indianapolis regarding advertising on historic byways. 08/12 Planning for awards program. Provide information for JMS developer. File maintenance. Attended Internal Controls webinar. 08/15 Worked on application for IUSB internship fair. Research 1840 Kessler and respond to potential buyer about designation and restrictions. Section 106. Meeting with Sanford Gardner at JMS Building. Prepare for commission meeting. Research Portage Manor Cemetery and organize related files. HPC meeting. 08/16 Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Wrote meeting minutes and sent out for review. Printed and mailed COAs. Section 106. 08/17 Finished rough draft of commission meeting minutes. Printed and mailed remaining COAs. RMEs for 1321 and 1216 East Wayne Street. 08/18 Finish paperwork for RME 2016-0817 & 0817A. RME for 2016-0818. Section 106. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. Historic file maintenance. 08/19 Section 106 for SR 23 Bridge over the St. Joseph River—field inspection to assess impact. Write fall intern job description and posting in IUSB job website. Complete application to exhibit at IUSB Job Fair in September. Research manufacturer of Second County Courthouse bell. Started 2016 Annual CLG Report. 08/22 Worked on 2016 Annual CLG Report. Section 106 reviews. Started RME for 947 Riverside. Downtown walking tour to see JMS progress and Century Center. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. 08/23 Meet with Reith-Riley/INDOT about placement of IN/MI state line marker on U.S. 31. Toured historic districts. RME for 947 Riverside. Section 106. Toured 2nd County Courthouse to see bell tower and clock. Researched manufacturer of bell. 08/24 Section 106. Toured Lafayette building. Attended Treasure Hunt planning meeting. 08/26 Finished research of 2nd County Courthouse Bell. Attended meeting with Public Works, Indiana Landmarks, Historic Michigan Road Association, and Indiana Lincoln Highway Association regarding downtown signage. Wrote letter to Building Dept. confirming HPC permission not necessary for electrical work at 59101 Apple Rd. Section 106. Research 541 North Ironwood. J 08/29 Worked on 2016 CLG Report. Research 541 North Ironwood. Scanned slides at library. 08/30 Section 106. Research 541 North Ironwood. Met Brad Miller and site manager at LaSalle Hotel in preparation for awards program, followed by planning meeting at office. Checked with Health Dept. for food permit requirements. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. 08/31 Section 106. Finish RME 2016-0823 (sent check for wrong $). Planning for awards program — program, guests, menu, press release for nominations. Worked on CLG report. Write up findings of eligibility of 541 North Ironwood for landmark status. 09/01 Planning for awards program. RME for 952 Riverside. Wrote cover letter and mailed CLG report. Worked on historic properties spreadsheet. Section 106 for SR 23 Bridge over the St. Joseph River. Scanned Leeper Park Cultural Landscape Report for file. Created agenda for September commission meeting. 09/02 Researched owners of property surrounding 614 Sherman Avenue. Wrote company description for IUSB intern expo. File maintenance. 09/06 Finalize and email August Commission Meeting minutes. Create Southhold Awards nomination form. Update forms to correct email address. Historic file maintenance. RME for 1204 East Wayne Street. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 508 % W. Washington 2016-0803 Re -roof carriage house, in kind, with architectural shingles. 804 Park Avenue 2016-0812 Prune sugar maple tree off of garage and oak tree off of roof. 1321 East Wayne Street 2016-0817 Tear off and re -roof house, in kind. 1216 East Wayne Street 2016-0817A Tear off and re -roof house, in kind. 841 Park Avenue 2016-0818 Cut down dying tree — confirmed by city forester. Replant approved species. 947 Riverside 2016-0823 Remove tree at street corner. 952 Riverside 2016-0901 Tear off and re -roof house, in kind. 1204 East Wayne Street N 2016-0906 Remove and replace in-kind driveway, front step, and section of service walk. Repair 4 section of city walk. Research Requests What Date 1137 Woodside Street history 8/3/2016 Oliver School Site 8/5/2016 1840 Kessler historic status 8/15/2016 Manufacturer of bell on 2nd County Courthouse 8/18/2016 541 North Ironwood Landmark status 8/26/2016 Blueprints for Howard Park WPA building 9/1/2016 1760 Kessler Blvd. 9/2/2016 Phone Calls Who Heidi Eakins Bill —Alliance Architects Emily Neufeld Kristen Madden - History Museum John and Sheila Redding Parks Department Property owner Who Date/Time What Heidi Eakins 8/2 — 3:00 History of her house, and discussion of Landmark possibilities. Anna McKeever 8/8 — 2:00 Tree trimming at 804 Park Pam DeCola 8/10 — 2:00 Restrictions for Local Landmarks and National Register properties. 1426 E Wayne 8/15 — 2:00 Tree removal and COA process. Stephanie 8/15 — 2:00 Questions about Chapin Park Historic District and guidelines. Weldy Kathy Kehr 8/16 — 3:00 Flooded basement. Sent contractor list and referred to Indiana Landmarks for copy of theirs. Neighbor of 8/18 — 3:00 called to see if permission had been given for fence being installed. They feel it 1329 E Wayne is large, unsightly, and comes too far to the front of property. They believe the 1920's house next-door neighbor will be upset Next-door 8/18 —4:00 just got home and is VERY unhappy! The newly -installed fence is too tall, and Neighbor of only on one side. It feels personal! If this is supposed to be a security fence, 1329 E Wayne why doesn't it encompass the entire back yard?! Owners of 1329 usually don't Edgewater come home until after 7 p.m. Please do something!!! If she needs to do something to help this along, she gladly will. This is why they bought a house in a historic district - to prevent things like this! Coldwell- 8/22 — 2:00 Explain Group B Standards for Local Landmark home for sale, and how to access Banker Realtor them on the website. Potential buyer 8/22 — 2:00 Explain Group B Standards for Local Landmark on Portage Avenue. Potential buyer needed clarification of COA process & fence standards. Anthony 8/26-4:00 Explain historic district guidelines and COA process for potential North St. Joseph Street property buyer. Jay Malone 8/29 —3:00 Questions about roof replacement, COA process, and commission approval for property in Edgewater. Pamela Florey 9/1— 2:00 Needs roof replacement. Sent contractor list and directed them to Indiana Landmarks for their contractor list. Todd Zeiger 9/1-4:00 Discussed call from Phillip Lane concerning roof work. Confirmed that roof replacement was included with RME 2016-0318. Owner of 9/6 — 2:00 Needs wood floors refinished. Sent contractor list and directed them to Indiana 1920's house Landmarks for their contractor list. Cressy -Everett 9/6 — 3:00 Explain historic district guidelines as applicable to 215 West Northshore. Realtor Gina — 9/6 — 5:00 Very frustrated with semi -trailers used for storage at Circa Arts. Property is not Edgewater zoned for this use, visibility at intersection of Bronson is limited, and it detracts from historic neighborhood. She will call Code Enforcement. Prescribed by State Board of Accounts Governmental Unit General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) To.................................................................................... Dr. IDEM South Bend Tribune 225 West Colfax Ave ............................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tax ID# 35-13-1571 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Ad #: 9930 Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ................................... Head --Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ............................... Total number of lines in notice 0 COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.365 cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) ................................... Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) ................................... 00 ................... TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $3.29 DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Size of 8 point Number of Insertions 1 Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid. also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, . which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune: 09/12/16. /, ral Manager Cheryl Ju Morey, Notary Public nResiden 4of St. Joseph County My Commission expires December 21, 2016 South Bend Tribune 225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628 ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR $3.29 Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571 ALLOWED IN THE SUM OF $3.29 Attest That it is duly authenticated as required by law. That it is based upon statutory authority. That it is apparently correct incorrect I certify that the within claim is true and correct; that the services there in itemized and for which charge is made were ordered by me and were necessary to the public business "J., -Ad It: 9930 Historic Preservation Commis- sion of South Bend & St. Joseph County will meet September 19 at 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun- ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN. Agendas available by request at SBSJCHPC®co.st-joseph.in.us T. Klusczinski, President Hspaxlp 1t 9: 12 0 - Prescribed YPrescribed by State Board of Accounts General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) GovernmentalUnit To.................................................................................... Dr. IDEM South Bend Tribune 225 West Colfax Ave ............................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tax ID# 35-13-1571 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Ad #: 9930 Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ................................... Head -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Total number of lines in notice 0 COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.365 cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) ................................... Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) ................................... ................... TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $3.29 DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Size of 8 point Number of Insertions 1 Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid. I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune: 09/12/16. 6 %&l n ral Manager South Bend Tribune 225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628 ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR $3.29 Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571 ALLOWED IN THE SUM OF $3.29 Attest Cheryl Ju a Morey, Notary Public Residen of St. Joseph County My Commission expires December 21, 2016 That it is duly authenticated as required by law. That it is based upon statutory authority. That it is apparently correct incorrect I certify that the within claim is true and correct; that the services there in itemized and for which charge is made were ordered by me and were necessary to the public business Ad #: 9930 Historic Preservation Commis- sion of South Bend & St. Joseph County will meet September 19 at 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun- ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN. Agendas available by request at SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us T. Klusczinski, President Hspaxlp - 1t 9: 12