The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJune 2016SpU T11 g�, VE rte?% w 1865 Regular Meeting 'THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 COUNTY—CITY BUILDING MONDAY JUNE 20, 2016 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS B. 1.2016-0506 1322 Lincoln Way East Lincoln Way East 2.2016-0527 1520 East Wayne Street East Wayne Street 3.2016-0527B 820 Park Avenue Chapin Park 4.2016-0531 838 Park Avenue Chapin Park 5.2016-0602 1102 East Wayne Street East Wayne Street 6.2016-0606 1732 East Wayne East Wayne Street 7.2016-0606B 307 LaMonte Chapin Park 8.2016-0608 127 Franklin Local Landmark III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 16,2016 B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President 2. Indiana's 2016 Bicentennial V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 806 Leland, South Bend — NOTICE: Request for Local Landmark Designation FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS & MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. VIII. ADJOURNMENT Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET 20 June 2016 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include A Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME 6) ADDRESS W, B, F, D H, O 36-1 L-.'& „- VA- .'W,V'w W M 2222 L �� w sao �` W A ytii= nn STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 May 2016 Application Number: 2016-0506 Property Location: 1322 Lincoln Way East Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1905/Austin House Property Owner: Youth Services Bureau Landmark or District Designation: Lincoln Way East Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 -story Free Classic wood frame house on concrete block foundation has an asphalt shingle hip roof with reverse gable embellishment, wood shingle siding, and contrasting wood frieze board trim. First and second floor windows are 1/1 double -hung; attic windows are fixed, arch -top windows with sunburst grid. ALTERATIONS: Outside stairs were added in 1942 to convert structure from single family to 2 -family residence. Front porch has been enclosed. 1960 remodeling added a one-story family room and breezeway to attach house to existing garage. COA 2013-0815 allowed replacement of the front yard sign. COA 1992-0916 approved replacement windows on the garage, and installation of air conditioner on south side of garage. Some aluminum storm windows have been installed. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacing 40 windows — please see attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner has received a quote from Window World to replace existing windows with vinyl replacement windows with half screens. Although the quote includes two frosted picture windows and grids to match old windows (there are no grids in existing windows), further communication from the window supplier states "none of the windows will have grids and there will be no frosted glass." Multi -pane windows in enclosed front porch will be replaced by picture windows installed over double -hung windows. Existing exterior wood window trim and crowns will be covered with PVC -coated aluminum coil stock. Over half of the existing windows are already replacement. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On June 2, 2016 at approximately 11:30 am, I (along with HPC intern, Millie) met with the facility supervisor at 1322 Lincoln Way East to discuss the COA application that was completed to replace forty (40) windows at this property. I took photographs of the outside and inside of the structure and windows trying to determine the condition of each window. There have been several improper repairs made to, I would estimate about half of the windows. Most have been damaged, newer glass replacement and almost all have had been caulked instead of glazed. I counted 12 that were actually screwed shut and most of those without weight ropes. I found 8 that were in decent condition that were not operable but not attached to sash cords or painted shut. There were 4 that are beyond repair, these were the ones in the bathrooms and had been soft to the touch with pane joints that would require extensive epoxy or suggested replacement wood. The four rectangular windows in the kitchen area had only one that still had a functioning opening mechanism. The large picture windows that were in the TV room faces the rear addition and is covered with a stick type texture plastic to obscure view. The remaining 10 windows facing LWE are part of the enclosed porch. These windows are three high, two banks of three across and two banks two across. These are non- functioning horizontal casement windows due to storm windows being added to the outside. I talked to the director and she explained that several of the past residents had broken the windows from the inside out. This is a Safe Place for runaways and troubled children. She had explained that screws in the windows were in place to help keep the windows in place and weather tight. She also expressed concerns with the remaining original glass and the nature of it to chard when broken as several past tenants had hurt themselves while trying to leave the building and breaking glass in the process. I would also like to point out that the additional enclosed walkway between the house and the rear office (adapted garage) have 14 replacement windows and the rear office has 6 additional vinyl replacement windows as well. Please refer to the photographs in the digital file. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: LINCOLN WAY EAST LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames, in nearly all cases, are wood. Brick structures often have stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Windows are typically wood double -hung or metal casements. Required Existing or original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original or existing. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm windows and doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of replacement windows pending exact determination of window style/location, and denial of covering exterior wood trim and crowns with PVC - coated aluminum coil stock. Deb Parcell Deputy Director 45013T8� Application - FOR - ;:, C'ertificate ofApproprzateness �`e m� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION xass 7j of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLFS»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN TATS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: _ Mail Application Number: W6 - Past Reviews: ©'YES (oau of Lost Review) 3013-01W ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled Title: 9uon @0, ;Poll, Local Historic District pvame) Uncal nu►ai1 � Gapj� ❑ National Register District {Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) ,t Address of Property for proposed work: (Street Number—Street Name ity— ip Code)'�� t Name of PropertyQwner(s): i`'A^�( C} - ��'�( Phone#: Address of Property Owner(s): o��nf��.��.J (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s):ir-An �iC.� Phone #: Contract Company Name: / Address of Contract Company: - (t{`C;Y �✓ `-1Go'C� N (Street Num — Streei Name—Ci ip Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Family—M(uIll Family—i ommercial--Uavernnrent Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: — -kctn.Sl. (Woad Frame—Brick— Stonn"teel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked ;eReplacement _ ,( Description of Proposed Work - C' % � j ork:Cj *C"!,. Owner/Contractor Fax #: Q5. -S '" S e-mail: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) rv' and/or X Signa a of er =a Signature of Contractor APPLICATIO UIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— Start Date: Approx. Completion: "Simply the Best for Less" Window World of Michlana 12748 Sandy Drive * Unit 109 * Granger, IN 46530 (574) 277-3280 - (574) 277-3296 Fax r'—forner. Youth Service Bureau Phone (h) Install Address: 1322 Lincolnway East Phone(w) 235-9396 Bill Address: South Bend, Indiana 46613 E-mail Fax 235-5576 All windows will be series snrPPns.,qrjdq in frnnh to matab 01-d Some Will ha_Pj_CtUrP Wirdn-,7q:trap -sn--S,s1 jdare -,lrn 1p-+ na�� and frosted in some - All Window World windows will have a 100% labor and also material warrantv. All narts and class- Scrppnq Fn '— P repair and must be taken into Window World fnr vpnpi— Total amount and stvle are : (17) double hums (101 transoms (9) nicture wirdowg (91 f..—ted picture windmu: (1) slider (.1) f-prnpered picture wjpdoW ( Total Win C 10) All windows will have exterior trim in w1hitA--inq111;1+---1 nn interior.caulked and sealed. * Total cost for this prnipoi- i- 17.rnn nn Add 4% for Financing or Credit You the buyer may cancel this transaction at any time prior to midnight of the third business day after the date of this transaction. Notice of cancellation must be in writing postmarked no later than midnight of the following third business day. THIS IS A CUSTOM ORDER NOT FOR RESALEI This Window World' Franchise is Independently owned and operated by MichianaWlindowWorld, Inc. d/WaWindow World of Michlana under license from Window World, Inc. Customer shall pay all of Window World's expenses incurred to enforce or collect, any and all indebtedness and other obligations under this contract, including, without limitation, all attorney fees. Owner Date W Attn: Angelica Borvsiak Date Owner Date X� n Granger EW SP 10-14 White Copy - Original Yellow Copy - File Pink Copy - Customer L? Page 1 of 2 SBSJCHPC - FW: FW: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness From: "Jennifer Pickering" <jennifer.pickering@ysbsjc.org> To: "'SBSJCHPCI" <SBSJCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us> Date: 5/20/2016 12:32 PM Subject: FW: FW: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Hi Deb, Please see below from Window World. Thank you, Jennifer From: michiana@windowworid.com fmichiana(@windowworld.comj Sent: Friday, May 20, 201612:15 PM To: jennifer.pickering@ysbsjc.org Subject: Re: FW: Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Hi Jennifer, We included language in the quote regarding grid options in case the Commission required grids in certain windows. You can let them know that none of the windows will have grids and there will be no frosted glass. Then ask them how to proceed. Thanks, Randy On May 20, 2016 09:46:43 am EDT, "Jennifer Pickering" <iennifer.r)ickerinae-vsbsic.ora> wrote: Randy, Please see below. I talked with Angelica and we are fine if they are not frosted. I'm not sure how to answer the grid question. Please let me know what you think. Thank you, Jennifer From: SBSJCHPC fmailto:SBSJCHPC@co.st-ioser)h.in.usj Sent: Thursday, May 19, 201612:21 PM file:///C:/Users/DParcelIlAppData/LocallTemplXPgrpwise/573F03D5InternalPLEXISPO 1... 5/24/2016 Interior Woodgrains and Exterior Colors. Window World Windows are available in a variety of rich hues and natural -looking wood finishes that are remarkably strong and fade -resistant. Transform the appearance of your home both inside and out With Visually exciting colors and warm spices of wood. Homeowners can achieve the appealing beauty of custom -crafted wood windows, without the time-consuming maintenance, with our architecturally coordinated exterior window colors in high-performance finishes. Interior Grids. Window grids are available in classic colors to complement your d6cor, in the standard configurations of Colonial, Diamond, Prairie and Double Prairie patterns. Contoured Colonial grids are available in complementary colors and matching woodgrains. Cut Glass. Looking for a touch of elegance that won't obstruct the View? A selection of V -grooved glass patterns Is available in the Window World Collection. 5 Extruded solid color. 6 White woodgrain is available with a beige base only. Exterior Palette Interior Palette _(U Architectural English Desert White Soft Maple Rich Maple Bronze Red Clay Woodgraiinfi Woodgrain Woodgrain Hudson Forest American Light Oak Dark Oak Foxwood Khaki Green Terra Woodgrain Woodgrain Woodgrain ----------- 04?" Castle Beige' White' Cherry Beige' Whites Gray Woodgrain Colonial Diamond Prairie * 6 1kckw North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 4'u E1 1-800 NEXT WINDOW 11-800-639-8946 "Simply the Best for Less" vvww.WindovvWorld.corn ME - s®• Double StarCrest StarCrest II StarCrest III Prairie N�a„� 0 0 2015 Window World, Inc. Specifications subject to change without notice. tinsulated glass 00) units that require capillary tubes may experience some argon gas depletion. *See printed warranty for complete details. A copy of the written product warranty is available by writing to: AM Window Warranty Department, PO Box 2010. Akron, OH 44309. ENERGY STAR name and symbol are registered U.S. marks and are owned by the U.S. government. 6/15 75M/OP WW -003.1 Featuring a beautifully refined silhouette and advanced energy-saving technology, our 4000 Series delivers exceptional style, strength, energy efficiency and value — everything today's homeowners are looking for in a quality replacement window, and more. Both sashes of Window World Double -Hung Windows tilt in for easier, safer cleaning from inside your home. This next -generation 4000 Series is precision -engineered to meet or exceed stringent ENERGY STAR® requirements, providing triple -pane energy-saving performance in a dual -pane unit. The dual -pane, double -strength insulated glass, thermally optimized frame and sash and non-conductive composite reinforcements are just part of the advanced energy engineering that puts 4000 Series Windows in a class all their own — premium window performance with everyday affordability. With Window World Windows your home will have a fresh, energy-efficient, low -maintenance solution backed by a lifetime limited warranty.* Best -in -Class Performance Features: • Reinforced narrow silhouette frame and sash profiles make a statement of style with their low -profile design. The result is a beautiful and expanded glass area. At the same time, internal chambers increase structural integrity, rigidity and energy efficiency. • Composite meeting -rail reinforcement allows for secure mounting of hardware; the non-conductive material helps reduce the transfer of energy.' • End -of -throw cam shift locking delivers increased strength and protection to the recessed lock. It also includes an "Unlocked" indicator. • The smooth and uniform true sloped sill quickly directs water runoff without the use of weep holes, keeping the exterior of the window clean and attractive .2 • Our telescoping sill dam delivers a triple payoff: protection from air and water infiltration, increased structural stability and enhanced beauty. • When extreme wind and weather hit, our proprietary sill interlock stands strong. Traditional sloped sill designs can allow the sash to bow during powerful winds, but with our interlocking sash -to -sill technology, the sash is channeled firmly into the window frame for a unified wall of strength. • Our innovative screen bulb seal creates a snug fit that eliminates light and insect penetration between the screen and frame. It also aids in easy screen installation and removal 3 siditional Sliding Window Features: • Sashes glide horizontally for easy opening and closing. • Both sashes lift out for convenient cleaning. • Nylon -encased dual brass roller system for smooth gliding performance. Insulated Glass Packages to Meet Your Needs. Maximize your energy savings by choosing a high-performance SolarZone Insulated glass' package to meet your specific climate challenges. The lower the U -Value, the less energy you'll need to heat your home. The lower the Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC), the more you'll conserve on air-conditioning. - - - Clear. Douue f4,ne d ( lea,'Pass nxxt SolarZone: Double patar! wnr; •lath o.•tg Double -Hung Sliding III;r,, In:orrepow ES` ama ran a!s anU meta U -Factor SHGC U -Factor SHGC SolarZone IF. Double pard suet vans long laane of Luvr-E Mass. a•go n gas and nnetal Clear Glass 0.46 0.59 0.45 0.59 :darn Incn:r:pt spacer along voth rs<daaon- SotarZone 0.29 0.30. 0.28 0.30 ntillnlr:Do SolarZoneW SotarZone Plus: Duuhe p:m'<: unit:•rtn SolarZone M028 0.30 0.28 0.30 cite peen of La , E gitss. aeon g: sen:: fa.an space, SolarZone Plus 0.28 0.30 0.27 0.30 SolarZone Elite: Dm,ne jxmi! win •v mh SolarZone Elite 028 0.21 0.28 021 one pane of Lar. E SHGC; g:ss. yg7t gas iinnd metal ak)., Innercefit sr. -a_ -c4 SolarZone Plus Elite 0.27 0.21 0.26 0.21 SolarZone Plus Elite: D:ntk• :lined tuv! Prth one liar of Love E Si -,C g'ss, i rgrin SolarZone TherrnD 0.28 0.30 0.27 0.30 yHs and roam spacer SolarZone Thermo iE 0.27 0.30 0.27 0.30 ert to pined ncvt SolarZone Thmo: Dan vi 111one 11_1,)e of Lo:, E g4Lcs, argon. gas SolarZone ThermD Elite _ 0.27 0.21 0.27 0.21 and stainless steel Intercept spacer SolarZone ThermD 1E: Do tni>paned unit 4 Whore window values are ss, based on double -strength glastandard 4000 Series offering with w Ilione patio of Lo:: E gf<cs, argon gas composite reinforcements ST and FIPpedorinanee values are also available. and staniless steel Inte,cepe sp.,ce:. along w Ih msulahrxn entranced nirhnf am _ SolarZone Thermo Elite: Double -paned unit vmh one pane of U : -E SHGG glass. Air Water Structural ar<g,x: gaff and r r,ass „• _+ Intercept cfm/f2 psf space, =endow World 4000 Base .04 6.0 DP40 Window World 4000 ST .08 7.5 DP50 Percmian erequien,wns meet or exceed Air. water and Suuclural Loads as determirod prmgh ASTM (American Society for Testing and huierialsI test melhods. I Double•hurg base model will automatically be convened to ST (steel reinlorcemena for an Nuts ordered in excess d 46' wide or 840 high 2 For larger sae windows or to meet specific DP/PG ratings. optional weeWpedormame package must be ordered 3 Avetable only with the AID screen opti0h a STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 27 May 2016 Application Number: 2016-0527 Property Location: 1520 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: English Cottage/1928/Harrer House Property Owner: James and Linda Laskowski Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Whitcomb & Keller built this English Cottage style house, designed by H. R. Stapp in 1928. It is a 2 -story frame house with wood shingle exterior, 6/1 double hung and round arch -top windows with diamond panes, round arch -top wood front door, side brick chimney, and a gabled slate roof. ALTERATIONS: In 1945 an enclosed front porch was added. In 1985, a 1 -story addition was added to the rear attaching to a 2 -car garage. COA 1992-0507 and 2008-0611 allowed replacement and addition to the wood fence. APPLICATION ITEMS: Plug holes on porch — lay sand bed — lay 18" inch slate -like tiles — remove sidewalk — keep same shape — lay sand bed & slate -like 18" tiles, cut to the curve (steps will be covered). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to remove existing brick -edged concrete sidewalk, lay sand bed, and install new sidewalk (without brick edging) following original footprint using 18" square slate -look pavers from Unilock. Also, plug holes on porch, lay sand bed and cover porch and steps with same synthetic slate. Proposed gray slate -like material to appear similar to gray slate in existing slate roof. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: June 1, 2016: I visited the house this morning at approximately 8:30 am to take photographs of the front sidewalk and front patio flat surfaces. The front walk has an elongated "s" curve with 21" x 21" square stamping and 9" brick borders. There are broken squares which are a trip hazard. The steps approaching the house have some holes as well. The flat surface is 12" x 12" stamped squares with two different pours and some patchwork. The house itself has original multi -colored slate tile on the roof which is a noticeable and unique feature. Please see photographs located in the file. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET EXISTING STRUCTURES D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have small open porches at the main entrance. Stoops and small patios also are in evidence. Of those porches that have roofs, many have either hip or gable roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Columned porticos, porches with broken pediments or turrets, and other porch forms characteristic of the Period Revival styles are also found in the district. Required Existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing an earlier period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- Certificate FOR-Certi icate of :Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm f: 574-235-9578 e: ,IYI.I,...IL I II„ 111 hd „, II p. 5 ,1 1 . gA 11 .11 P '.. HENTRIES CON AINED> TiiI�BOX«<«p llll 1, IY IYII Y, "i OFFICE USE O(NLY> O E USE ONLY Date Received: 9/37( 2016 Application Number: 30JU — 0937 Past Reviews: YES (hare ofLast Review) 3 009 - O b i i ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: �r ❑ Local LandmarkLocal Historic District (Name) E-04WOAP iltt eP ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled F1Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: 'IIY.iI..d.unJll.u.II...Id, Y Iii I., ,I Y "AY I- H. nYl.1 III'.IIIlYil.I...;I Milli I.IJII.unJiIIld.IY "k, 111 i.. ".I 1.11IIIli111. I.,,I"I'll.iulnu illuYIIIIIiiJaodl, lnlleY inlnli. nliiIIIII.iIInI ISI Ilin.illli•.inl �I .II�.il11.ul.�ii.ulllll.J (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: (, ? n t5 j_(.t 1 ikYt\.1 6 r, (Street Number Street Name—City—Zip Code) Hume of Property Owner(s): i-Lf:�G` J-- L IN( h A %_ NaLt`s LOS Lj Phone #: 5Z' { -S12 Udress of Property Owner(s): 15 ZO 61 t l o IvYNt_� PiC= qp> C? (Street Number Street Name--City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): P—qc t x i I_.A 0 M Phone #: -i.�/ - �-i"1 ' 0 %zq Contract Company Name: �.1 A5T73M t� l l-t"�4CS#� I _ t 11 / 1�.� INC ' Address of Contract Company; (��c�C?(,.,� (Street Number Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 153 f 1,Q1 C I A, M i I (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant--etc.) Type of Building Construction: I x -) C-1 c) it S A R k�?"., / '� I Ar T;E� Fn 0 F (Wood Frame Bri,(k--Stone--,Steel--Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: -fit 1 ;oS j /'.1)1-r TD T-�f T:�> r ,I A 211 T"f=� -P 5 11.L iiiiiivner/Contractor Fax #: aff will correspond with only one designee) Sign re of Owner 1 ..• e-mail: r,(.AS t�M'O(,t_T"bOO12 1-1 V / t`...t & and/or X Signature of Contractor B T:r_b — �6 coI)Fw 5 k t - Molf"Zoe DESIGN & BUILD OUTDOOR LIVING SPACE -- Residential Service Agreement THIS AGREEMENT made this 17 day of May, 2016, by and between Custom Outdoor Living, here in after called the Contractor, Jim and Linda Laskowski here in after called the Owner. With this contract, the Contractor and the Owner for the considerations, named agrees as follows: Front porch, steps and walkway. SCOPE OF WORK The Contractor shall furnish all of the materials and perform all of the work shown on the drawing and/or described in the specifications entitled proposal A, as annexed hereto as it pertains to performed on property located at: 1520 E. Wayne St. South Bend, IN. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. All work shall be completed in a workmanship like manner. 2. Contractor may at its discretion engage subcontractors to perform work, which warranties for one year of all work that was contracted and performed by a subcontractor. 3. All change orders shall be in writing and signed both by Owner and Contractor. An additional fee based on an hourly rate per change order will accrue upon Contractor discursion. 4. In the event Owner shall fail to pay any periodic or installment payment due hereunder, Contractor may cease work without breach pending payment, resolution of any dispute, and may put a contractors lean on the property of the owners house or commercial property until payment is received in full. 5. Contractor shall not be liable for any delay due to circumstances beyond its control including strikes, casualty, weather, and general unavailability of materials. 6. Contractor warrants all installation workmanship for period of 1 year following completion. If contractor is not hired to prepare complete application warranty is void. 7. Contractor is not liable for damage or defect of materials and causes by an act of god, damages beyond our control, or subcontractors not contracted by contractor. 8. Contractor cannot guarantee that concrete, brick, sand work will not chip, crack, harden, discolor/haze, match color, or salt damage. 9. Formal Notice of defects in writing to Custom Outdoor Living, 19766 County Rd.20, Goshen, IN. 46528, must be given prior to expiration of 12 month completion date. 10. Contractor will be given access to roadways and driveways at and around job site, which also includes verbal and or written permission to use neighbor access areas. Contractor will do his best to prevent damage in these areas. Contractor will do his best not to disturb, damage, or destroy any trees, grass, bushes, or plant material. However, if damage occurs, the contractor is not responsible. 11. Contractor is not responsible for any damage to Septic Systems. 574-993-0629 CUSTOMOUTD OORLMNG@AOL.COM 4 1 General Provisions Continued DESIGN & BUILD OUTDOOR LIVING SPACES 12. Any material or leftover items are property of Custom Outdoor Living. However, we will leave replacement materials for damage control in the future, I.e. 12 to 24 units of each items, if so desires. 13. Custom Outdoor Living will not be held responsible for any damage to trees or root damage when Installing pavers near a tree. 14. Cleaning and sealing pavers are not required but is recommended by some manufactures. Since products may very there is only a manufacturer warranty with the application. 15. Contractor agrees to remove all debris and leave the premises in broom clean condition. 16. Estimates only means that this is a good faith estimate on how much a particular item or service may run. Therefore, owner will pay any additional amounts if the bid runs over and that the owner will be refunded if the bid is less than estimate. 17. The contractor is not responsible for any underground damage. It is the responsibility of the owner to mark all underground lines in the working area by calling 1-800-382-5544 three working days before we start. (Including underground sprinkler systems.) 18. When landscaping plants or trees are not warranted but may be replaced if needed under certain circumstances 19. The contractor will provide a copy of liability insurance upon owner request. 20. All check payments must be from a local bank. 21. When choosing a tumbled product, as your contractor, anything over a 2 inch hole will not be installed as a rule of thumb. 22. We will fill in our machine tracks with dirt, anything over and above the tracks are not included in the price. THE CONTRACT PRICE The owner shall pay the Contractor for the material and labor to be performed under the contract the sum of, $13,574.00, subject to additions and deductions pursuant to authorized change orders. PROGRESS PAYMENTS Payments of the contract price shall be paid in the manner following: 25% down for materials, $3,400.00, 25% when we start Job $3,400.00, 50% due upon substantial completion, $6,774.00. I hereby acknowledge that I have read and agree to the terms of this agreement for work contracted and completed and other stipulationssby Custom Outdoor Living. A finance charge will be added to # unpaid balance if not paid upon completion. Date 1 (Owner) By Bruce Wilson/ Custom Outdoor Living 574-993-0629 CusTO 4oLrrD00RLMNG tgAOL.00M �vciiawuc-••- � vuuucx d + RivenstoneTM Timeless beauty of flagstone. nup:// unuocx.coiwprouucEs/ sionemarK/nvensione/ : regions L Available in two nature inspired shades, Rivenstone combines the durability of concrete with the character and flexibility of natural stone. It's an ideal choice for those looking to add enduring quality and timeless appeal to walkways, courtyards, pool surrounds, terraces and patios. Colors K Bluestone Shapes & Sizes 24 x 24 60 cm x 60 cm x 4.5 cm 23.5" x 23.5" x 1.75" P W{ Canyon 18x24 18x18 60 cm x 45 cm x 4.5 cm 45 cm x 45 cm x 4.5 cm 23.5" x 17.5" x 1.75" 17.5" x 17.5" x 1.75" 12x24 60 cm x 30 cm x 4.5 cm 23.5" x 11.75" x 1.75" 1 of 4 5/27/2016 11:25 AM xtvenstonelm I umlock Patterns 9 .. `t 777-T Rivenstone A 24" x 24" (45%) 18" x 24" (33%) 12" x 24" (22%) Eli l � � IFe 1 Rivenstone G 12" x 12" (28%) 12" x 24" (28%) 18" x 24" (44%) Packaging 12" x 12" 12" x 24" 18" x 18" 18" x 24" 24" x 24" x�P Rivenstone D 12" x 12" (19%) 12" x 24" (38%) 18"x18"(43%) http://unilock.com/products/stonemark/rivenstone/?region=2 -W:2 _ `2 i�F+• i'�^i% d � Rivenstone H 12" x 12" (13%) 12" x 24" (13%) 18" x 18" (29%) 18"x24"(19%) -- 24" 8"x24"(19%)— 24" x 24" (26%) Sq. Ft. Bndl. 36 36 81 54 72 Rivenstone E 12" x 12" (12%) 12" x 24" (24%) 18" x 18" (27%) 18" x 24" (37%) Lbs Bndl. 700 700 1526 1038 1353 e 13 Rivenstone F 12" x 12" (17%) 12" x 24" (33%) 18" x 24" (50%) Units Bndl. 36 18 36 18 18 Sold as full bundles only on a refundable skid. All measurements are nominal. Important: Textured surfaces require a buffer between the plate compactor and the paver surface to prevent scuffing. 3 of 4 5/27/2016 11:25 AM Available in two nature Inspired shades. Rivenstone combines the durability of concrete with the character and flexibility of natural stone. BLUEST 24 x24 x IS x24 x In" 60 x 60 x 4.5cm 45 x 60 x 4.5cm - 11! 7 k CANYON Ifl, '6' N - 13% 12 x 12". 13%12 x 24", 29% 18 x 18, 19% IS x 24", 26% 24 x 24' NOTE: Rivenstore Is not suitable for vehicular applications. Patterns may not reflect bundle configurations. More laying patterns avai)Xe at Untlock coin 88 STONEMARK' REALA'" TECHNOLOGY Ultra realistic textures are cast from natural stone, brick and historic cobblestones. ll� 18 x 18 x 1W, 12 x 24 x ly." 12 x 12 x1%" 45 x 45 x 4.5crn 30 x 60 x 4.Scm 30 x 30 x 4.5cm NOTE: Rivenstore Is not suitable for vehicular applications. Patterns may not reflect bundle configurations. More laying patterns avai)Xe at Untlock coin 88 STONEMARK' REALA'" TECHNOLOGY Ultra realistic textures are cast from natural stone, brick and historic cobblestones. ll� STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 27 May 2016 Application Number: 2016-0527B Property Location: 820 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Craftsman/l895/Anderson House Property Owner: Cale Nelson Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Register Districts Rating: Non-contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE:, This 2 -story wood frame Craftsman -style house was built in 1895. The concrete block foundation has glass block windows. There is an interior brick chimney. The gable roof with wide overhang and two gabled side dormers have asphalt shingles. The full -width front screen porch has a shed roof. First -floor windows are 1/1, second floor are 4/1, and there are divided light fixed -sash windows in the dormers and attic gables. Driveway on the south side leads to 1 -story gabled garage in rear. ALTERATIONS: Wood clapboards on house and wood shingles in gable have been covered with vinyl siding, with contrasting window trim, frieze board and band board in gable ends. Wood storms have been replaced with aluminum; brackets under cornice and band boards between first and second floors have been removed. Back yard has been enclosed with a chain-link fence. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacing chain link fence with oak fence. Replace both damaged garage doors. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to replace existing chain link fence with privacy fence he will make from reclaimed oak, the same height as existing (40"), with the exception of fence directly adjacent to rear patio, which will be 6' for privacy. The new fence will enclose the back yard, starting at the rear of the house and following the footprint of the existing fence, except eliminating the current inside corner of the fence line at the area where the fence attaches to the house. Gates of the same style will be included in the same place as existing gates. Additionally, the owner would like to replace both damaged, non -original garage doors with carriage -style doors. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On June 1, 2016 at approximately 11:45 am I met with Cale Nelson at 820 Park Ave. Mr. Nelson is the homeowner and has applied to change his 40" tall chain- link fence to a solid wood fence that he is building himself. The fence as it stands is rusted and has a few dings in it. The fence runs along the north side of his property and encompasses a square area directly behind his house. This square area has three openings, two of which have gates present, the opening on the south face adjacent to his driveway, no longer has a gate. He is proposing a handmade fencing system made of 40" tall solid wood planks to replace in the same foot print of the north property line fence. He is also looking to run new fence on only the north and south sides of the existing square but to have those at 72" (6ft) for some more privacy. There is a small section of 6' privacy fence that his southern neighbor had installed some time ago. Please see photographs in the digital file including the example of a section of fence he built. Mr. Nelson also mentioned he was going to add to his COA application a part `B" that would be for the replacement of his dented metal garage doors to a more carriage house style. He will be bringing to the office the product brochure and amending his application this week. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches .(visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Casement windows adapted the English tradition of using wrought iron casements with leaded cames for residential use. Rolled steel casements (either single, as shown, or paired) were popular in the 1920s for Cottage -style residences and Gothic -style campus architecture. More streamlined casements were popular in the 1930s for institutional and small industrial buildings. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of.original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- R . �� ,,, c o ��\ ''� d Certificate of Appropriateness � �R/� /� ti HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Hyl *tiac -- 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm 1 p: 574-235-9798 " „ f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BO OFFICE USE ON OFFICE USE ON7—h/20 L�Y»»» X««« ONLY _ Date Received: S '2 ! — //Application Number: 2016 — 09370 Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Last Review) a NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark © /� Local Historic District (Name) t ��uffl &at+ Poty ❑ National Landmark ® National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print)...,,,,.....__,,,.•..._��...,,...',,.,.o��,,...�... ,•.,. „„....•..,...,,, „.,..,„,.., ,.....,,,,,..•.,,•..,..,......, ,.,,. •,„ ..,.,....,.,„.,,_ Address of Property for proposed work: l�/A v,,4 tt, �n(Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): ( l G_' V/! cr7G�� Phone #: 3//,, 933 Address of Property Owner(s): L�v 'ate! 62 V�' !rt 5C7c21'41 16 e;,7 (Street Number—Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): Dwc� �� Phone #: Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: f (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 1 �Gt i�rl (Single milt'—Multi-Famil� mercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame—Brick--Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: 19\' 4#4l; moa `� d ;,� ; 4 A, V v Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: C._..4/e n �5/1 /�01; �_ �o�► (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— w,w UN I A, Si Cl RA: 7 7 - "It it _11 �Wl 2 ^i _!sOR-. i5[+ l 'f �fhH f 3A ; i. .. FOR 2 ^i _!sOR-. mclo&-oydoor.col"In 'Door Blogl, Boston Flo, e Gets )pay Im %t ) oric Garage Appeal ?es 1"Itay be subject to copyright. Visit page Save 21" - V 21" 7' 21" 21" r• N 8C STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF DEMOLITION Date: 31 May 2016 Application Number: 2016-0531 Property Location: 838 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1904/Dundee House Property Owner: Maurice and Kristin Shrader-Frechette Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Register Historic District Rating: Non-contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two and one-half story house has an irregular plan. The foundation is stone, and the hip roof is covered with asphalt shingles. A hexagonal tower is located on the northwest corner. The entry porch, on the southwest corner, has wooden columns and a stone railing. Brick and stone are combined on the walls; randomly coursed stone is found on the first level, and brick in a stretcher bond on the second. Brick and stone are separated by a band of cut limestone. Windows are 1/1 with segmented arches capping the second floor windows. Brick driveway on south side leads to one- story hip -roof garage/carriage house in rear. ALTERATIONS: COA 2009-1007 allowed replacement/repair of small chimney in rear of house. COA 2008-0421 allowed in-kind replacement of concrete front steps and black wrought -iron handrail. APPLICATION ITEMS: Jerry Reed Excavating will tear down garage/carriage house by hand, as alleys site are too close to neighbors for large equipment that could damage something. Slab will remain & owners will later apply for wooden fence around slab. See attached for full description of work. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owners propose demolition of the deteriorated garage/carriage house at the rear of property. Although their original intent was restoration, five building contractors have inspected the site and believe demolition is necessary; all agree the 110 -year-old structure is "a serious liability and safety threat, given its unstable condition, collapsing roof, and crumbling, bowed brick/stone walls." The building will be taken down by hand as there is insufficient room for large excavating equipment. Debris will be hauled from site, and the slab will remain, with plans for a COA application to install a wooden privacy fence enclosure in the future. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: December 14, 2015. The garage is a whopping 18 x 48 feet (approximately), 5 door structure constructed of wood frame atop of sculpted concrete block. The door at the driveway is a segmented lift door where the other 4 are sliding horizontal doors. The roof is collapsing in spots as well more than half of the trusses as well. The wall on the SW corner is bowed and leaning approximately 3 inches outward from top to bottom. There are structural splits in the mortar and in between many of the blocks as well as a split in the rear (east) wall that is large enough for my hand to fit into. The garage appears to have been enlarged at one point as a 2" cement curb is evident about 10 feet from the south wall or just outside the driveway lift door. The Portage township assessor's card dated 1949 details lists the garage whereas the 1930s version detail does not. The roof is no longer structurally stable. New trusses, decking, and of course shingles will need to be replaced. The wall comprised of doors is bowing outward and should have additional vertical supports added as well. Steve Szaday; Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visible from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. V. GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell Deputy Director t Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness T t �'7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 0 1865 ` of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.c om/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-jose ph.irll.us OFFICE USE ONjLY» r»>»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFti;E USE ONLY - Date Received: I 1 aO i LP Application Number: A� — 0921 Past Reviews-. fRI YES (Dare of Last Rndew) Staff Approval authorized by: 10/07/300q ❑ NO Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) l /� �^ api fi -pQ (c . ❑ National Landmark ® National Register District(Naa,e) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print)`.,. ti t Address of Property for proposed work: _838 ` A K K AYE SQ{vV 6 146 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip co Name of Property Owner(s): Ma 1Z IM 4--KRIMN / %KDER hone 'p#: b� Address of�Property Owner(s):.958 PhRK 46 sri j,J�rb#�ir�,iS r�� j1�(yj�7 �, �� Q& 7V Pmw �s` t A�L[JQeet4�Numr'Sry�Ve Irl •SmF� li�/ +`JjA 77 Z 'W Name of Contractor(s): ---,W t2 y M �_t+��- Phone #: Contract Company Name: S*4V A -S #" 6V V „ Address of Contract Company: 16q-bl n6 RD, M 16144whm w ,46 5-�Z6 J ,»/� (Street Ni— Street Name—City'—Zip Cod Y e) Current Use of Building: ICON% Sj/vt�E WE hrt1a(5. #r M ; fir k p l/,, I 1,9,W (Sing(e$ami� a {;�atnily—Camtn�� oa ��1"s tci�Tftl �<�t✓/Y��"' Type of Building Construction: S!!�/ll''YYOOvS1�N fC�GLQ7� W(�'ry�' {�f©j �t•- " i�Bu�'f` (JVood Frame—Brick Stone—Sieet--Concrete=Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) WiDiemolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: 966D eXCA a WILL 7-f { PO K t'ARG E A,(=14E)V-r -WAT C,O U G E 9014 11 ;�/Contractor Fax M e-mail: iG.'ih coder o rt j. - i taff will co espoad Ivith onl one designee) X /or X Signature of caner Signature of Contractor U4 00 May 27, 2016 2 SBN Historic Preservation Commission ` City Government Office, 125 S Lafayette Blvd South Bend, IN 46601 J Dear Commission Director Elicia Feasel and Commissioners, V v ° Enclosed is the check for the application fee of $20.00, to accompany the Certificate of Appropriateness and supporting documentation for the requested tear -down of the 110 -year-old carriage house at 838 Park Avenue, South Bend, IN 46616. Please let us know when to send the additional $20.00. All photos, contracts, and supporting documentation will be emailed to the commission by next Tuesday May 31, since Monday May 30 is Memorial Day. Originally we wanted to rebuild the 110 -year-old carriage house, but every single licensed, bonded, insured contractor, whom we contacted, said that the carriage house (1) is completely unstable, (2) has 3 of its 4 block/brick walls crumbling and bowed, (3) has completely rotted wooden roof structure and substructure, and (4) has caved in, sagging roof. They all said carriage house has "nothing to work with" and should be torn down. They all said they are afraid to have men working near/in it, as it is so unstable, including 3 unstable brick/stone walls of 4 walls. Steve, the Historical Commission field director, to whom I spoke, also said he had inspected the carriage house. He said that it is unstable and likely unsafe. Thank you for your consideration, J � f WV& Maurice and Kristin Shrader-Frechette 838 Park Avenue, South Bend, IN 46616 PS: We are teachers, and thus out of town for the summer, babysitting our grandchildren in California. As soon as we get approval, we will return to South Bend, to supervise tear -down of the carriage house on our property. Maurice and Kristin Shrader-Frechette 838 Park Avenue, South Bend, IN 46616 Phone: 574.514-8092 Day after Memorial Day, Tuesday May 31, 2016 South Bend Historic Preservation Commission City Government Office, 125 S Lafayette Blvd South Bend, IN 46601 Dear Commissioners, Enclosed in this file is full documentation and COA application for Jerry Reed Excavators to tear down & haul away our 110 -year-old, unstable, detached garage/carriage house behind our home at 838 Park Avenue, South Bend. All 15 building contractors and excavators who inspected the site say the garagelcarriage house is now a serious liability and safety threat, given its unstable condi- tion, collapsing roof, and crumbling, bowed brick/stone walls. Steve, the commission's field evalu- ator, who spoke with us, also said he had inspected it and believes it is unstable and likely unsafe. We sent our check for the COA application fee of $20.00 by overnight "express mail," last Friday, so you should already have it. It requires a signature for delivery. Many thanks to commission members, especially Director Elicia Feasel, field -evaluator Steve, and others who consulted with us, by phone, throughout last week. We are grateful. Thank you all, and bless you for your volunteering to help our town remain beautiful and historic. Contact Info: Please don't mail us at South Bend address. We are teachers, on summer vacation in California to babysit our grandkids. We'll return to SBN briefly to supervise the garage tear -down, then immediately will return to California, to babysit until SBN school starts. CA address: Shrader- Frechette, c/o 330 Cordova St, Unit 312, Pasadena, CA 91101. Cell phone is 574-514-8092. Contents of this file 1. Cover Letter, Including Contents and Contact Information page 1 2. Certificate of Appropriateness Form, Filled Out and Signed 2 3. Why Tear Down of 110 -Year -Old Garage/Carriage House Is Needed 3 4. Description of Project: Tear -Down -Haul -Away of Garage/Carriage House 3 5. Materials to Be Used 3 6. Contractor Job Quotation, Jerry Reed Excavation 4 7. Certificate of Liability for Jerry Reed Excavation 5 8. Site -Plan Drawing 6 9. Google -Earth Photo of Block 7 10. Garage Photographs (Four) 8.9 11. Why Applicants Cannot Be at Commission Meeting but Will Be on Phone Stand-by 10 12. Fee for COA Application 10 Thanks you for any consideration you can give us. Maurice & Kristin Shrader-Frechette, 838 Park Ave, South Bend 46616 574.514-8092 3. Why Tear Down of 110 -Year -Old Garage/Carriage House Is Needed We originally intended to restore the lovely, 110 -year-old, detached, garagelcarriage house that comprises the entire Eastern end of our property. The garagelcarriage house [18'x 48' (the width of our property) x 18] is bounded by our property lines on 3 of its sides. However the fourth side, the garage front, faces our slate -paved courtyard. However, after we brought 5 different building contractors ---all with A+ ratings from the Better Business Bureau of SBN--- to inspect the garage/carriage house, we had to drastically change our plans. We had wanted bids for restoration, but they all said the garage's 3 exterior brick and block walls, as well as the 1 exterior wood wall (the front, with sliding doors) are crumbling, severely bowed, unsafe, and a liability. The building contractors all said they would not want to work on it, as it is so dangerous. Two contractors said they are surprised that the city had not made us tear it down. They likewise said that city has approved tear -down of other old garages/carriage houses that are unstable liabilities and safety threats, as this one is. Once it is torn down, we shall apply again to commission, to put a tall wooden privacy fence around the back area, where the unstable garage/carriage house now stands. 4. Description of Project: Tear -Down -Haul -Away of Garage/Carriage House Garage/carriage house is 18'x48'xl8', has 3 exterior brick/stone walls,1 exterior wood wall ---all of which are crumbling, bowed, and unstable. The garage also has 3 interior wooded walls ---like separate stalls. You can see these wooden interior walls in the photographs. They are in not -too -bad shape. All work will have to be done by hand, as heavy equipment will not fit in 2 alleys, without risking damage to neighbors' homes and property. Contractor plans (1) to take off the bowed wooden front of garage, to allow access to its interior, next (2) to take out/off remaining roof, now caved in and sagging, as photo shows. Once (1) and (2) are done, and site is cleaner, excavator proposes (3) to work from inside garage, with rope/chains/cords, pulling walls inward, so as not to harm neighbors or their property, and so as not to harm any passers-by or cars. When all block/brick walls are down, the excavator plans (4) to haul away all remaining debris and make site clean, but (5) the keep the concrete slab, so that we can extend our courtyard patio .... and later apply for permit to build wooden privacy fence around slab. The job must be done by hand, more expensively, because excavators cannot get their large equipment onto the site without threatening the neighbors, passers-by, and neighboring property and people. Hence, without large equipment, the tear -down will take nearly a week. 5. Materials to Be Used Contractor will use truck to haul materials ---and perhaps several dumpsters, to keep site clean during the excavation. The largest equipment possible to be used is a small bobcat, as ropes, chains, and hand tools will be used for excavation ----not any typical excavation equipment. Many well-known contractors ---such as the main excavator for the University of Notre Dame, saw our site, but refused to give us a bid because he said (1) he could not bring his large equipment on site, and (2) he did not want his men to have to do this hand work. Hence we feel fortunate to have a good contractor, willing the do the tedious hand work. 3 6. Bid/Contract from Jerry Reed's Excavation page 4 JERRY REED'$ EXCAMING 0,110talloll, 1*01 Nif RIM . DATE gjyN,2016 - 11h uvk�IN, 44 d Quaftilnn# 450 CPIDMilD SU TP. OUQt &ND K% SHODER - FRECREM 9 U. PAR K AY E S 0 0 11 i 6 D'I 0 . I N Map I'H,. 5 74 -5 14 -N" 4 E6 K5IWDEqtPE0U betyrq - Wand hse, f 1(11A d�vls 1,104. 5,40,0, TOTAL I kboo If pi We affy jueS11,01. MUM, hgoft, Walt Nav", Me t THANK KYOVf0RYQUREUSW8V 7. Certificate of Liability for Jerry Reed Excavation aco orr ' CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOTAFFIRMATIYELY,OR NEGAMMY AEXRID MEND, TOR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFFORDED BY THE POLICIES - BELCW.. THIS CERHFlCATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING OISURER(SL AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER. AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER -- IMPORTANT: U Um raRUivto holdor is aD AODMONAL RISUHED, VA poUOT(l._I must DE Endured- U SUBROGATION 95WANW. s ti d fo ME farms and tondltlam Ortho peUcy, CMaln pOUcles may rogLdn En end—L. A ELitnrtrent on,tlfL certilkrta does trot colder flgMa to Oro cortm,w linldxin Bou orsoeh EndanenvmfsL - - - - - �° ° `EB Baherd Comps ry L surance Ine I T 'BeO Baku " " 121 W P *UM 5t I e y s.,; (574) sc6-SES I rui (STI) $46-3527. PO SOs1O e_rcmen.M455.Oo I --,eta,�rcsuw.nOn rvs - -i -wse - EdUPD) -..ny Reed E=,atsrV li. c .15401 NCM Rd Moha-a .. IN 46W efsaeBe: - Ie��.E. I ' COVERAGES - CERTIFICATE NUM BER: - - . - "' - .. .. REVISION HUMBETB` TNIS IS TO CERDFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE "TED Ra""HAV, BEE^t ISSUED TO rdE INSURED NALR11 ASWE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD I INREO INDICATED-- NOTY"iSTANDING ANY IRR�. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER OOCW,IFNT VM RESPECT TO-YaaCH THIS CERTIRCATE VAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCFaF>_=D HEREIN IS SLmr.CT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLLJSONSAND CONDrWk'S OF SUCH PC.U�Q•E&LUDSSHOY/NUAYHAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAWS, awl "-1TPEaf W7RAEeCt Ikn: Tv�l�r. - EMR'vlrtnfefa -' IPwil�il�_,pyli� - lnlR- A—i?—�'+,IlenwLOEnOtaweun! s 09MIS78 - 1=112015 T=LWIs IEAO:anpuE� -Is T.�.� cwLl4wc= oauR - - .Es.G+r^^v� i s _ ..300.000 is - - '10.000 '1.ODO,D00 OSIL:cOREa12L.wR4rPccas - icOtu/LAmFc.r_ IE - '2.DDO,DDO :.� -2,000.000 PpLyy DELT Lac comets.-[tmsslta � s - nbo-�+ JA MlfauOeaE u.mRY "[5513,17100 - tOJ07R01s TON12016 I i° �10°s 1.o00.00a7ANY is s I A 7301 4.00.000aHSI I 5Ii LubA ffl�— - - 09033Bfi4 - - '10,972015 ["0' 2018 I ciryr_i Jl ia" II%A.- oEYMtgraraFEMTKKnI1DCrnortllvL 1ISI.CpC+�LaesemxrtamAo5m�4MMomaaamiewR*blatrfEl CERTIFICATE HOLDER - CANCEUATON MaurlCaKrfsShre—F—mu" 038 PS*A". St101ILD A" OF THE ABOVE DOOMED PRIOIE99E CANOFIIELNEFOME - Saulh Bend, IN 4602E . - - THE EXPIRATION OATH THEREOF. NOTICE Vml Be Dv.IVENBD IN ACCOROANCEIVDH THE POLICY PROVLSICNS - Auns:ac4n�PPEeDRAurE - . - -- .O1&2014ACORDCORPORAT01.,A4 m riOMs StImd. ACORD 25 (2014101) TIie ACORD Rama a Nd logo am rooMmd marks ofACORD - ' page 5 B. Site -Plan Drawing 0 g 64 i^ C: page 6 Aep.Z 4o PT 1 40 SR FT IS FLOOR - R C: page 6 Page 7 9. Gooqle-Earth Photo of Our Block: Our house is immediately south of East-West portion of Dushane Ct. House is mostly obscured by trees, and to right of (behind) house is slate courtyard, about 30'x48'(the width of property). To right of courtyard is detached garage/carriage house, with charcoal -gray roof. I- 1 9 NJe . me io ihz OE_ S . , X SfJoseph. Indiana, Assess, X \ _D Standard Property Reco rd_� X / gj Google Maps �- C I 8 https://wvAvgoGgle.com/maps/@41.6864033 86.2557135,125m/data='.3m1?tea ,;;Apps 4 Boobnarks - C The New York Times-. -G google=Goo gle Seas - M inbox(34)-maurkea- ❑Paid Posi Mdo's Hand - - 7 3 �t s pY. 10. Garage Photographs (four), Continued page 9 11. Why Applicants Cannot Be at Commission Meeting but Will Be on Phone Stand-by page 10 We are two teachers, and summers are our vacation times. We are usually babysitting our tiny grandchildren in California, during the summer, while their parents work. Hence, we cannot return to South Bend without leaving the babies and their parents in a tough spot. However, we will be on standby phone (at cell phone 574.514.8092), during the entire time of the Historic Commission meeting, in case anyone there wants to easily reach us. Also, we will return to South Bend during the time of the excavation, to supervise things, as our children/grandchildren have already made plans for that period in July. Once the excavation is done, we'll return to babysit in CA until the South Bend school year begins again. Contact Info: Please don't mail us at our South Bend address. We are teachers, on summer vacation in California to babysit our grandkids. We'll return to SBN briefly to supervise the garage tear -down, then immediately will return to California, to babysit until SBN school starts. If you wish to contact us by mail, use our CA address: Shrader-Frechette, c/o 330 Cordova St, Unit 312, Pasadena, CA 91101. Cell phone is 574-514-8092. 12. Fee for COA Application On 5.27-16, we, the owners of the house and the detached garagelcarriage house, sent a letter and a personal check # 608, for $20.00, from Notre Dame Federal Credit Union, to cover the COA application fee. It was sent overnight, "express mail," with signature required, so you should already have received it. Many Thanks! Let us know if you want anything else. Our phone is 574.514.8092, and our email is kshrader@nd.edu i[t, 0 r t� 4 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 2 June 2016 Application Number: 2016-0602 Property Location: 1102 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1925/Johnston House Property Owner: Brian & Ashley Pawlowski Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Johnston House is a 2 -story frame house with brick veneer in a rectangular plan. The main structure has a gable roof with asphalt shingles. One-story wing on south end has flat roof and one -car garage. One-story north porch wing is screened, with flat roof and pilasters. Windows are 6/6 double -hung with metal ornamental louvered shutters. There is a security fence around the south yard, and wrought iron fence along west and north yards incorporated into the concrete block retaining wall, with Sunnymede entrance pillars incorporated into the fence at northwest corner. A one-story storage shed with shed roof is incorporated into security fence along the south side of house. The property sits on the southeast corner of East Wayne and South Eddy streets, with drive access to both streets. ALTERATIONS: Garage has been converted to living space. COA 2015-0529 approved removal and replacement of a tree. COA 2007-0518 approved re -roof and replacement of gutters and downspouts. COA 2001-0630 allowed removal of screens in north porch and replacement with 6/1 double -hung r windows, and wood siding along bottom portion of opening. COA 1996-0503 approved in-kind replacement of privacy fence. COA 1989-0911 approved replacement of roofing material on flat roof. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove concrete drive & walkway on property facing Eddy St. Garage was converted to living space many years ago. Driveway & short walkway connecting it to main door serve no purpose. Cracks in concrete are deep & a danger to our kids. Grass will be planted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner has received a quote from JW Concrete and Excavation to remove most of concrete drive to Eddy Street on west side of property. Originally this drive led to an attached garage; however, the garage has been converted to living space. The unused drive will be removed between sidewalk and curb and replaced with grass. Additionally, the concrete will be cut at face of brick fence to match existing sidewalk, as well as even with the west end of storage shed, leaving a small concrete area by the former garage area for a small patio. The concrete drive between the brick fence and west side of storage shed will be removed and replaced with grass. Of the concrete drive that extends to Eddy outside of the gate, the section in between the fence will be replaced with groundcover and the section in the tree lawn will be replaced with grass. The main sidewalk from front \ door to Eddy Street will remain. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On June 3, 2016, at approximately 10:30 am I went to the property at 1102.E Wayne. I had visited the property in 2013 in regards to the same scope of work. There is a driveway with a curb cut off of Eddy Street that goes to a portion of the house that was once a garage but has since been converted to living space. A garage and driveway facing Wayne St. was constructed at a later time. An ornate and unique fence surrounds the yard and crosses where the drive off Eddy plateaus. It is not really a usable drive and is dangerous to back up onto Eddy. Not sure if the plan is to remove just the plateau or the ramp as well. A block retaining wall forms curbs at the north and south of the drive: Please see photos in the digital file. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Reauired Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMSSION °m o° of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY "'yf I ,.tic 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us i 1111 OFFICE USE ONL Y>>>—>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS fBOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: O un e a. D 0l G Past Reviews: ® YES (DateofL-Rev&-) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled Application Number. a 0 1 (D - 0 6 0 a M4 R A19 NO Title: Local Historic District (Name) Caq� ❑ National Register District.(ivame) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) �� Q Address of Property for proposed work: I �� 'e �-"'1 (Street Number- Street Name -City --Zip Code) Name ofPro a Owner(s): �GJh�er �'J3i^iz�laC��Cli-t-ll� Property y Phone #: off- 5y Co3 Address of Property Owner(s): w6w rit 0'+✓ (Street Number- Street Name -City -Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): J "" ary-reVc `"- excAoaba1 Phone #: 5 (V77 y - l A Q 0 j Contract Company Name: -3-W Gy�cne }- + F,)qrAkXA- -b YY) Address of Contract Company: I LP 11 Yd Si- (!) Lj-;d 0. 1&j L40,5w (Street Number- Street Name--City-Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 51r)gLQ t'an')11L4 Hors -u (Single Family -Multi -Family -Commercial -Government -Industrial -Vacant -etc.) Type of Building Construction: &-.:i (Wood Frame -Brick -Stone -Steel -Concrete -Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind VLandscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) Q Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: RP -r oje- coYY_ ynJe. Ent )P- -i' u61" 61on P"") -CSU GZr2oe_ Cow) Coy-urr,4a i -b U%A �'IGc cQ tYw - gr i � rv�an r- 5e r1�_ nq f a . ;cv 5 i rrro-c rel -e- G� til l I lb -2 Owner/Contractor Fag #: rJ-1'� " 5�PGi -rj� t�7' e-mail: J -W MZ9c.01\..1 UZtTE L' no l • cl1 (Staff will co espond with only one designee) ONS W Li= y M A 12-r e- 5%9 !G�)vI A I L. � � n� (_� (,c..c,4.� ) and/or X Signature f Owner Signature of Contractor APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE- 40. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 June 2016 Application Number: 2016-0606 Property Location: 1732 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1929/Keller House/H. Russell Stapp, Architect Property Owner: Chris and Jen Cronin Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story wood -frame irregular plan Tudor Revival house has a gabled roof with asphalt shingles. It has clapboard siding, stucco and half-timbering detail in the side gable end, and front brick corbelled chimney. Windows are 6/6 double hung. There is a detached 2 -car, 2 door garage with gabled roof, and chain-link fence in rear. ALTERATIONS: COA 2012-0517 approved installation of vinyl siding to match existing siding, and new soffit and fascia. COA 2000-0331 approved tear -off and reroof of house and garage. COA 1993- 0524 approved in-kind replacement of two garage doors. APPLICATION ITEMS: Removal of chain-link fence and installation of black aluminum fence. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner has contracted Mike's Fencing to remove existing chain-link fence and install new aluminum fence from rear of house north 21' to garage, and extending east from rear of house 37', then south 45', and west 34'. The owners have selected residential grade Hamilton "Pressed Spear" style black aluminum fencing with two matching gates, one in the current location by the garage, and another added just east of the house. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: n/a STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend. It encompasses several blocks of East Wayne Street, North and South, from Eddy Street east to Greenlawn and the south side of Jefferson Boulevard from Eddy Street east to Sunnyside Avenue. The district is bounded on the north by Jefferson Boulevard from Eddy Street to Sunnyside Avenue and then by the north property lines of the Wayne Street properties to Greenlawn. The south boundary is the southern right of way of the alley or the southern property lines of East Wayne Street, South. Unique features of the neighborhood include the island of homes between East Wayne Street North and East Wayne Street South, the parks at each end of the island, and the brick pillars at the entrance way (Eddy Street) to the subdivision with signage reading "Whitcomb and Keller's Sunnymede." Reauired Distinctive existing features such as brick entry pillars, parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets and building setbacks shall be retained. Major landscaping items, fencing, walk- ways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illuminating Engineering Society. Light sources must have spectral distribution in all color ranges. Older light fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale, size, shape, style, and appearance to the existing historic lamps. Streetlights shall be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of public sidewalks (refer to Appendix A). Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close prox- imity to buildings, sidewalks or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. As much natural vegetation as possible should be preserved. If large shrubs become unsightly to the point of detracting from the historic character of the house or site, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and diseased material should be selectively removed. Trees and major landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. The curb height should be sufficient to maintain adequate drainage of the street. If older light fixtures are taken down in the city, they should be reserved for use in the historic district. Light fixtures on top of the brick pillars at the Eddy Street entryway should be replaced according to these standards. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening existing streets, application of asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, major landscaping items, fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighbor hood may not be used. The introduction of heavy trucks or similar vehicles in the District shall be prohibited. Not Recommended High-intensity overhead streetlights should not be used. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application _ FOR- PLACE OR- • �/% • • 0 - o �\LA, Certificate o ppropraateness 6 z eel. a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COADUSSION °m co" x 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY syr }La 125 S: Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.st osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE iiUSE ' ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: lD t7iOI�t Application Number: 3016— 0606 Past Reviews:. YES (Date of Last Review) lYl�� I7. �00� ❑ NO 1 Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: 11,. rr ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) CGtOT VV GU,n e(Qe-f i ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) 'a 3 Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ DeniedE]Tabled ElSent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: a (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: 17;'92- E- OaU11, u— S-twj -' 3 Sd�ntk -R[s-iA (StreetlNumber-StreetName—City—Zip Code Name of Property Owner(s): 14 Ck vt A ('vd\n.� to Phone #:( — - Address'ofProperty Owner(s): IVtVVV4 .1 (StreetNumber—StreetName—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): CIow (L. Phone #: ��-3-`�� o &Z. — 2 ©p} , Contractor Company Name: (M 16 p- �.Un c -I rn_ Address of Contractor Company: VD -021 S�"f't' L�o/u� I q 1�r L, 1�Gc r�A t Lt �t� .t I "- IP5�(7 3 pp (Street Number Street Name—�'ity--Zip Code) Current Use of Building: St �•..' T"11' _trV� > 1, Single Family—M Family —Commercial—Govermnent Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: wfao I .-kM P_ (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone--Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ®Replacement (not in-kind ❑Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: ' /' - an �._ . _ Un Ztf- (I i V Owner/Contractor Fax #:( e-mail: LXn fc�o n'1 I/, "'p-, v ► / . (ri�1i� J X andl/nr X June 3, 2016 Historic Preservation Commission 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 We have selected the residential grade "Hamilton Pressed Spear" style, in black alumnium with matching gates. There will be two gates, one located in the current location (by the garage) and another added to the back left of our home. We hope you agree that this project will greatly improve the appearance of our home. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jennifer and Christopher Cronin Dear Committee, Enclosedou will find our application lication for a certificate Y of appropriateness, requesting approval for the Jennifer L. Cronin, PhD installation of a new fence in our backyard. More specifically, we wish to remove the existing chain-link 1732 E. Wayne Street fence and replace it with a black aluminum fence. South Bend, IN 46615 jennilynnecronin@gmail.com 770-401-1742 We have drawn up a contract agreement with Mike's Fencing (Contractor: Chuck Fewell), who will be completing the project from removal to installation. Enclosed you will find a drawing of our property that depicts where the current fence is located (i.e., dotted lines) and where the new fence will be installed (i.e., solid lines). Fence dimensions are as follows: UX 45'X 37X 21'. We have selected the residential grade "Hamilton Pressed Spear" style, in black alumnium with matching gates. There will be two gates, one located in the current location (by the garage) and another added to the back left of our home. We hope you agree that this project will greatly improve the appearance of our home. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Jennifer and Christopher Cronin Quote Quote 15598 Date 5/ 1?Pr- u16 uill;ng Address Site A idress Chris Cronin* ` .. Chris Cronin 1732 LE.Mayne 1732 E Wayne St South Bend, IN 4561- �� „it $Mnd, IN 46615 Of Al D t NU q a vv - IV_.. - X -4 X 21 "ELEGANCE VrERSk-rl- ITY SiSIEDSPEAR �.BEUALON'T- 14-A-M-1171ON . . . . . . ---- DUP-ABI LITY-1. fU R! TY ---oPEAC-; OF MIND :... n;..-«_.-:.>•..y.. .z •=��•.i;n_fi',;, .r,-,-...- .. -='S`:.?i..r.^ - - - s.Y'ry - _ - . .. - • _ _ _' - _ ...1,.. _'!fin^.. a'-15.,:`-- -.i.. ]�-r _ .at. -_.>. a �v.rr. n,,v.:va.-^ee,-y.�,N..�_:• STYLES ' l"-`-._�__�<,_-......-iy-,�-•_...+m-�..__.v..._^- v-T.'_^^.-.^.-.-.^`—^?!_.�r'�.'4-rT-T.�.'^S-_.S...W�.�,^_Sy^_.-...-.--^-n...^'^-mn•1,.,.^^...v-+-_•_,^cY--:._..-...-..__..._.-.__...,___..._."_._...--•-•-_•--.._....____.-..._.............. ..-..4-..__.`___ FLAT TOP ': PRESSED S PREMIER F � AS ... 3-CHANNEt•...,. COT CANTERBURY': BELh40M jHAMIITON j VICTORII VICTORL-STAGGERED li _ GE .� k ASCOT'ROYALE . CANTERBURY ROYALE BEwoNT ROYALE HAMILTON ROYALE VICTORIA ROYALE STAGGERED ROYALE ''•��, - .... I«„)�f1J �1! - i it i i � i„ i i i i i i a JMw S' ASCOT PUPPY-PICKET CMTERBURYPUFP PICKET BELMONTPUPPY-PICKET HA. WON PUPPY PICKET VI CLORL4 PUPPY PtCKEi . STAGGERED PUPPY PtCf�T a - g - �llill�llll!IIIIIl�` �Ilf{Iffllllf{IIIII I I• h • I STANDARD BOTTONt . : ' FLUSH BOTTOM v ASCOT 2=Cfw,'R EL FAMIOUNf YOUR CHOICE OF STANDARD OR FLUSH BOTTOM NEIVCkME I`- NEWCASTLE II` . rs . .. 'RES' TIALGHABE ONLY. w it C®LORS. ADORNMENTS �.. a _. - ,._ -_ .s.... •, ..,.,--.-_...__-.___..,. ......-,._..-_,..-- '-- - ---------___.�.__.__ '_ •Blkc% Wkite C1Y r. � ' 'Bait pp"ciacG: Tridil ;=uukG FiriiaG .Fleur be-Zis . - . — - 3 z - ,, FL[IYCG�l ' L SGYDiL POSt SLYD Itcutdard 1 ALL COLORS MEET OR EXCEED HAMA 2604-10 SPECIFICATIONS ' y`.. ._ . C� tS, PIC T`S.&pPOSTS -.... --_ - - .:i� i rSideA' VlalP05t .' . � � - - - +^�j, -' _ "..� to-•+w7. �.-i RPfLdCFCtCLiG GI!iLLFL . ' COGLLLLL?l LZGIG �� ilitA I�2dacsEyiaG j6yl�?BylGil, POST MEASUREMENTS.. ILStEGL2Y 2 x2 X GK7” 3-x3 2.115' s n aso s1 asr ' /a /a A.S. . sin r 2'/z 1C2Yz JcA7.5" 6`X6`X_72S" r. fir.... r�1 2YzX2%z-725" 6'°x6"'x.Zm',.,"t .. �FA , Alum!-Guaira is 2 Proud Member of the American Fence Association Your Local Authorized Alumi-Guard Dealer MI- PLATIIQUM - #-- CERTIFIED oueooruan as• x.,docwrns..pnrcamr-' MANUFACTURER OF 9 m QgALIZYFENC'E & R4uiNG PRDDucrs � s WWW.ALUMI-GU, RD.COM COPYRIGHT 2014 © ALUMI-GUARD • ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • ALL ALUMI-GUARD PRODUCTS ARE MANUFACTURED IN THE USA �. {1 �� - i� 7I �ts'•iMM Sa 1� ' •.- . _ r.:��ie49 _ , -.. -^,aka �_� i �-�-cam'---. ikf`-• - -,.�•: �__.�_'� _ �� s`s,�dFivk�tt- Mi..' w ia1 t - f ' r �� rllSrl` }'A r I N/ � S r �h �I r. I M , (• I I � �K Mn' ,1r,.. r • yr"}4 ( {til• 2 `;� l �' -�. I.Y' -. ! If *F{{��tl �r 1itS'l Pr / Y r `r - li 1 {"� •f is'tyT ya 1 I t'+� 2 !"'S, i=l � � ;D�•;��r C N45�� s� � .i /q`�' �y' i r 4 � i `S?#'�`,?` s' VS�iT� t 4"'. $tl, r 7i�i�}� �i'y 6r�, v,Ql {rt, � !F Y!',. ',^` �. Jt,ti.�`'��/'��G+' "�`'� xCx ` aG '•1 � 1! � r �'. �4ti%}�t ;',;.�,• . +„'�ij ,^b/rJr ..yT t?I�i �jr�r.y::;�r�'�xf��.4Y'��t`'�r jl �s ��'. irr wl� 15dLE~'>'(tf � �f,};� ' a ��'f�%` tiv, a 1rl'L 1 r 5y P ,:! �� *,It , , { bt ,>aaT, Y1. '� J{�f.!(/If ,Y�,+•y��;'fY �' ��1�i�) Ih r H ,�tc> .. t ;,s, ; �,W:�, + wn,?? HI I(j11�f li}' ,(r �i+r oti :✓p �. I `ri i r..,} ',� , t 31 X �� lfk',�ir Y a^lirlly"h`)�4�vM t; t •T(1+'�p 1 t ��... ..rr� q 9q , 7 r �y, , ry�, ! JJ�k ' 11,1".nr p1. 4 1;� ~ .:R�� _I A�,� . � � ��'i`- yifF 1: i9' 11f ��•` �� I � 1 } i?' 1 ( .+7 � IN i. '� � b. !iv \'�•� I>.,!j, � i \:7. e. n 7, lr" x :�� it a.. ,.,ti ,.�• 'r a�. Ore u ,r, 'SY F �i \ih 1, s:``;W aP MR 0,W + f0,,,i ;,X, t '�s..,' � `>4" v.: �•N .��l�llc .-a; ' Iry z �•k!•li.• l n/ .��. 1 I I•I ��..•�.. I 1 i I '�� t F,. SfJ f ,?�ry{'r,. .,5 ,�`y T��PPP ,• ;il. ,.I: S � tY Z 3"�' t �� Fe,�u% ^•" qs� r•j'�xd.'K., 1�. Ii, u.-,11:I(il 1'IIIII� I I v ' J'x ra � '. r • . •? a - 1 P,?w 4 + .Y � , t+ � ,�,��f1. S� .'y"S�i..�Y�rnC �i�.{'�"�s .dI�I1�0��il I i{ . 'I `I Ii �t�� I I � ?i� }7 :ni: 'i 7r r. >,� h n � t �.,, � r�rl ,� a�/\�� „rd \I�', ��'+^�� "� I I � 'j'w,'6�1� �1••�. I; ;- I, 111 7 > ��n xF �'r�.�l �J�J I -�, � .. 5a,�. �+vo� i.�,yia I I I, I.i tr• i _I 4 II ' ) , � - l'1 r /'., r-' h � C, r 1✓ fie%✓;, -C �, ''"hy �! . , v,,,,r{ \ t i I , I , /'!'• r� ,i i��l�.�t I j��`'1 `�I"ri.�'�/r ja t jai � ( � I � tl,.... I'. I ^ 4h c�t�Ih yCi1 tr �l+ `r ,Flr If' f1{1 F is F l .a l,t\ 1t I I i j�,IYI3l l tai1�1 N',t r'G.� e� i•� ;?fir h Al �•r•��ii�IC..Ii 4,`c ait ��'i�ttl'� % {ilt r '�-e��1��5! R• a�ry�i,�' l7 Illi` 7,1 ��'(ItE;; s �V:• try vi., t I Qty � a• i a 1^ 1 yTl�t�',�,+•a tti .N 4'� Sl'kt n/It! � r_;.t '�i r w /! 1� J. ��+a \1,, �r�� ,s�_ .`a.l ` I � ^ a• �h � �41i I r �'r`� ` i y t��R, 2, t � . r tar MP '�.' Cyt �I4 � 7✓� y��l. )' a r ! � .'2 t, rF YVi, t�- •< ji .]r S tl.�, ��.4`"�a ��wi u �•i � rl u:.`j t ^ ��:�.3y ttt"'333,,,t�,, m � � r' r 4 ` ,I 'I '� r i � �\jy \,'� t, �I �/�.1 r \�I i,, 1 A h `�• - � ��,,.tt , ,, r j � 'x c ,�v: ht4 i.,)11�t SIh fid{ ,< 1� 15•CL I.�, I „a 't! t ytal ,) I ,�. 1 � I }� " c .�� . �;,�+• I � r 17" I '- t\ � 1 �%sl�� ,4 S� � 111 �j •,,�'aIJ i �RI`� '�',�. `y�y�,,h�e. � ,� t �V t��"V ,'� i `(t 4 , 'i`� r i a / `� d \ 17 1 9 > � .',l�al l`t i. �5't l �'' 3 � l.'"'sem �C �' � •N 'S t � i; � 1 :.��`'�; 1�, 1�r �`_'�...?��.�{s�.Pd.� � ` `1t`•_'��i� 1 �Ilr',� � C.: �y rT � �l � _i• a , I i c t I . l - `� `�:li�l. 1f R ii h Elk+ u3iYri:r" w%i+` i't". c.S:w1a�}R. tS.r uil 't t y9 ��ly� tt `�wV�'i V•I '� I �Y 1f R ii h Elk+ u3iYri:r" w%i+` i't". c.S:w1a�}R. tS.r uil 't t y9 ��ly� tt g}i ii y '.1 3 3S 1�' �5.•L > y .Yf! � � �a �c �� L � _ a �` �', ° �r + I � � ✓ � .��- r •� i p ��, FFyo''�� y, a�-V, AF tit � � -..r •t �Ik`t <Z' ...ice ��Y� •��~. � - �� STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 June 2016 Application Number: 2016-0606B Property Location: 307 Lamont Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1921/Tohulka House Property Owner: Bradly Management Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Register District Rating: Non-contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two story Colonial Revival is set upon a concrete, rectangular foundation. There are two symmetrical brick chimneys intersecting the gable ends. The first story is brick while the second story is stucco with moulded wood band course between the stories. The side gable roof has asphalt shingles. There is a small segmental entrance roof with moulded entablatures and Doric pilasters at the corners. The windows are 8 -light casement windows grouped in fours on the first story with soldier lintels. There are 3 -unit casements in the second story with a pair of 3 -light casements over the entrance. There are fan lights in the gables. ALTERATIONS: A new front door, vinyl -clad windows, and architectural shingles were added with COA 2015-1208. A wood frame, vinyl sided garage was added with COA 2014-1201. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace stuco on house, with LP siding. Replace garage (siding) with LP siding. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner proposes to removed deteriorating existing stucco and replace with LP Smooth Lap engineered wood siding. Existing stucco was installed incorrectly, and would be costly and labor-intensive to replicate. (More information on proposed project to follow from Russ Luchies of Midwest Masonry.) PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On June 1, 2015 at approximately 12pm I met with Masonry Superintendent Russ Luchies of Midwest Masonry to look at the stucco at 307 Lamont. I had observed previously that the INTERIOR lath that was used was not spaced properly to leave "key" spaces for stucco to attach to the structure. The stucco had areas of repair that was done improperly, but was holding nonetheless. The existing stucco is coming down in sections and has created pockets where elements have been allowed to collect and rot through. Mr. Luchies confirmed that the installation was incorrect and that the entire stucco apparatus as is in place would need to be removed. The only way to replicate original structure stucco would be to attach stainless steel expanded metal sheets to the entire surface with furring strips to allow key spacing. The entire surface would need to be surfaced with a sub mortar layer, then an aggregated base layer, then a top surface aggregated layer on top. This would be removing the entire stucco and starting from scratch. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power -washed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us " 1OFFICE USE ONLYy»»>DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX<<< O 111 I'I 1 jj�. «< FFICE USE ONLY Date Received: & 1It�" 120 lb Application Number: @M — OCAOU H Past Reviews: 0 YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled c�JLCPIYIbP1 Sd�0�� ❑ NO Title: ® Local Historic District (Name) l hap ?nrk National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: ....,..,,, ... ,... (Please Print) �� Address of Property for proposed work: 3,07 ,)A),� pa (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): j� A 1. �% i� it/�94�,£ri! C.�%~ Phone #: -3&IZ i Address of Property Owner(s): �0cs CJ7> ��.✓ �a � 1�/ �� 13 (Street Xumber— Street Name—City—Zip Code Name of Contractor(s): �2 A� Phone #: %L) - 9,K 6 Contract Company Name: ; 717,4c1 - ��1/ � �1�. ✓� Q Address of Contract Company: (Street Numb r— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (SingffFamily—Multi-FFa �ommercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant--etc) Type of Building Construction: t<"90,09�j1,9.� taco (tn n a e, r (Wood Frame Brick—Stone—Steel—ConWete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) > / Description of Proposed Work: /as p � 2q_0 Ir ��t�n_v a,.,,i`�t✓S ; 7G� �: a1 �.•� �,n ani Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X a--� r ,�,�� and/or X Sigrfaiture of,6wner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— D A Tradit ional, Subt le Look • Traditional lookthat aooentuatesthe architectural features of any home • Smooth finish for a dean appearance • Pre -primed for exceptional paint adhesion • 9B' length can result in faster installation and fewer seams • Treated engineered wood fiber substrate 76 Series Smooth Lap (I_ber) �teX �. 1'�k� t at yvi'mini 4, h "�r,a�� i�� Elm. 76 Series Smooth. Up (Eber) ONCIli 15ft. (192 in.)(4877 mm) 15ft. (192 in.)(4877 mm) 15ft. (192 in.)(4877 mm) ACrUALWIDTH ACrUALTHICKNESS PIDNUMBER 5.84 in. (148 mm) 0.375 in. (10 mm) 25919 7.84 in. (199 mm) 0.375 in. (10 mm) 25920 1184 in. (301 mm) 0.375 in. (10 mm) 25921 Smooth finish t �flp'�.rlI � tt y -- Smooth Lap ttt -Simply Beautiful � Y J r • Traditional look that accentuates the architectural features of any home Smooth texture for a dean finish - - l Y[. 'fid±:a}K I }. Ei: ,E _ .,.. �i, •,4\'t:: �i ,�. `` •Pre -primed for exceptional paint adhesion - • Free of knots and common defects, for less waste and no culling ... ': •16'lengthfor faster installation M: ` r` -- and fewer seams _y piieta-_ ry_"-_ -- �•Manufacturedwith.ourpro SmaitGuard�:"roSess.t4.i�e1':'reveiti:fun8el.� c-= tleca anda'ermite:da -�•:Silica=freeiibbersnbstrateavorks _ j: _ ra,:;;„..:,:,��; ,. andcuts.lik_e:_�- traditiotial;wood no epactal fools or protective : ; i£' etl ''Y., }, 'iy �C;•„.:;,.,.::�.,—,:r°.. .;: . gear required .��}ii�IIIIII��1i1 Mata FINOWWWA 004,44.Q 're ............ • 74� it :ttl- we '-'--.L� `^^`2� ,. }.• .'! yny; •?""^ ,: ice. in PULE JLO STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 08 June 2016 Application Number: 2016-0608 Property Location: 127 Franklin Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1895/Glover House Property Owner: William Fewell Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This 2 -story wood frame Free Classic has a brick foundation and architectural shingle roof. The wrap-around porch has Doric columns set on brick piers with wood balustrade. Windows are double hung, 1/1 and 12/12, with crowns. ALTERATIONS: A 2 -story addition was added to the house in 1947, and it was converted to 2 apartments at that time. There is a 1 -story "laundry" addition in the rear. Front porch has been enclosed with screen. RME 2016-0524 renewed COA 2014-0522B, installation of "lap width cement siding to match original over asbestos siding." APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace as many wood as poss_with vinal low E windows DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to replace all remaining original windows with Jeld-Wen replacement windows, preserving exterior wood trim and crowns, and install windows in two openings on rear addition room which have never been filled. Our understanding is that any existing replacement windows will remain. First choice is for Jeld-Wen vinyl although the owner provided a Jeld-Wen wood alternative. The majority of the windows are 1/1; there is one 2/2 in the rear and a 12/12 divided lite pattern in the front. The owner would like to install a decorative glass wood window in replacement of the 12/12. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: At' approximately 10 am I met with the owner Bill Fewell of the property located at 127 Franklin Place. I was requested to assess the condition of the existing windows as Mr. Fewell has submitted a COA application to replace those windows. The results are as follows: South side - 8 -original 1/1 double hung windows 4 -have dry -rotted sills and compromised jambs (non-functioning and soft to touch) as a result of several years of window unit air conditioners being left in place year round. East side (Front) - 2 -original 1/1 double hung windows 1 -has broken sash with rotted sill and jamb 1 -needs sill repair 1 -original 12/12 double hung window Broken muntins in two spots, missing glass in two spots, sill is dry rotted, and Jamb has failed under weight of window A/C and exposure to elements 2 -original 1/1 double hung as part of bay in porch painted shut but structurally sound 1 -original IA double hung as center of bay in porch, sound with wood storm in place North side - 1 -vinyl replacement 1/1 2-block/vinyl replacements 6 -original 1/1 double hung windows 1 has frame failure -due to air window unit 2 are missing the crown moulding West Side - 1 -original 2/2 double hung window -painted and nailed shut 1 -vinyl replacement 1/1 single hung, Jeld-Wen 2 -openings on rear addition room built openings but never filled 9 windows are in need of replacement or serious repair. The damage done by elements and air conditioners have left these beyond repair, especially the jambs, sills, and lower sashes. Please refer to photographs in digital file. Steve Szaday-Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GROUP B STANDARDS The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. 'Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend approval of replacing original wood windows with vinyl; the wood material would be more appropriate. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness � m o HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMUSSION I0 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osepheountyindiana. com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-josephJn.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 30 l - Past Reviews: ® YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Application Number: -do I b — o L00 8 300U - NA ❑ NO Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: = ❑ Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ TabledElSent To Committee ElApproved and issued: ..,.;..,..,.. ...,..... .,o.:. .� .,,,.... ..:�...,.. ....a. ........ ..A (Please Print) /� / Address of Property for proposed work: 7 /'fc 410 K ! (0 J �� yy�� (Street Number— Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): lr�� %! IJ Y-�t� Phone #• s7`�' ✓�o� f! �2 Address of Property Owner(s): A3 % Z-- (; 56 :z7 --,,j (Street Number Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): —T� G Bef— "e 2 Phone #: s7f/ ✓'.�o M's-il Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: lis -9 Z7- </j Tv �/ (Street Number Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: `% /%/d/ /-,, -- (Single Family—Madti-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc) Type of Building Construction: D Y-f�AEu (Wood Frame—Brick--Stone-Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New [K Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: A 65' 5 �M Ftp✓ y CcJr �n �s _1&�D Owner/Contractor Fax #: (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X 14rr/a Signature of Owner e-mail: and/or X Signature of Contractor I I � O O �f 0YR Guaranteed Protection . AuraLast is Safe ' Against Wood Rot ® Aural_ t Wood is made by using a JELD-WEN Wood Windows and patio ° water-based solution to deliver the .. .. doors made with exclusive AuraLast Wood are guaranteed effective ingredients to the core of the wood. Traditional not to rot for 20 years. Wood components made from dip=treatments use a solvent-based chemical bath, Durinn AuraLast wood maintain their structural integrity even prod udion "our Aura Last process releases 96% fewer I I in the toughest climates. volatile organic compounds than the traditional dip- treatment method. ®/ Surface To Core Protection �RUN Because of our vacuum/pressure process, ° 'MAuraLast Wood provides virtually I 100% penetration of the protective ingredients. otherrAt manufacturers use submersion/dip-treatment methods, which only protect the outer surface of the wood. Traditional treatments only protect the outer surface Working With . AuraLast Wood is Easy NIMMME AuraLast offers the strength and beauty' of real wood because it is real wood, not a composite. Aural-ast Wood is colorless, stainable, and odorless. Virtually 100% Surface to Core Protection A JELD-WEN Exclusive s: Only JELD-WEN makes window and door products with natural pine AuraLast® Wood. Protects Against Water Saturation, AuraLast Wood offers superior* resistance to watu saturation, which protects against swelling that causes windows and doors to stick. Protects Against Termites Harmful termites will eat through unprotected wood—not so with AuraLast Wood. Visit jeld-wen.com/aura/6st for more -information JELoIVEl\T. 13 ' [�[/—��C��T|�� yy�� . ��|v��/|�� .�.» Decorative Glass Featuring five popular standard glass collections. Note: Glass patterns will change based onsize anc style of window. ° �u|enmono CollectionCollection Styles & Patterns — Canning Selections:. Choose one of our five caming selections to determine how your glass will appear. 04 35 M ------�,��. 5atinNicke| Copper Patina Bras Zinc | U 13 ��N��& ��. � � .. ...., �,....... � .......:.. . o ............ to I Designed With no nail fin for easy installation in your home There are plenty of reasons to replace old windows with 1ELD-WEN® Vinyl Collection replacement windows.'The pocket replacement frame includes a head expander and sill adaptor to fit into existing frame. The block frame design does not include head expander or sill adaptor. We use only high-quality extruded vinyl. The color isn't applied to the surface alone—instead it goes all the way through the vinyl. This feature ensures it will resist fading and will not chip or peel. Custom Sizes Available • 1/8° increments on all windows Lifetime Warranty • Glass/Vinyl/Parts (2 year labor warranty) • Non -Prorated • Transferable • 3/4" Insulating glass • Weatherstrip • Fusion -welded frame LoE & LoE3-366® Glass A -11=' - Vinyl Replacement Frame Our standard high-performance LoE insulating glass lowers energy costs, helps homes stay cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter, prevents fading of interior furnishings, and reduces condensation. It also delivers greater visible light transmittance than tinted glass. We also offer optional LoE3-366® glass which provides more protection against heat loss and fading, and which allows our windows to achieve ENERGY STAR® qualifications. Why LoE Glass? • Savings on energy costs • Blocks harmful UV rays, helping to reduce fading on carpet, furniture, etc. • Reduces interior condensation • Year-round comfort for cooler summers and warmer winters Neat® Glass LoE glass keeps homes cooler' in the summer and warmer in the winter. A little help from the sun. The titanium dioxide layer of Neat Glass reacts chemically with Y =- the sun's UV rays and causes organic materials that are on the glass to decompose. It AMR works even on cloudy days, as 80% of UV radiation gets through cloud cover. Thus when it rains, the decomposed dirt no longer clings to the glass, easily rinsing away. 2 1 JELD-WEN.COM Va u. -t+' J) y t IS `�f'✓'� .f. � � �I „ � " x`71 ��ti�,;,�^ � kr� ?�; 'k' ) 1 .tw<q � i ��! :) • t ' b✓l!y• c ��r fh w+ " f, MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY May 16, 2016 13' Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Tom Gordon, Vice President/Asst. Secretary; Mike Voll, Treasurer; Elizabeth Hertel, Secretary; Kevin Buccellato Members Not in Attendance: Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian; Brandon Anderson, Michele Gelfman Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist Members of the Public Present: Renee LaReau, Randy Hopkins, Cole Hay (plus one unidentified person), Todd Zeiger, Joan Downs, Clinton and Shundra Gilke H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 841 Park Avenue COA#2016-040113 Chapin Park Representation by Cole Hay, 841 Park Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May rev., 21 April rev., 18 April 2016 Application Number: 2016-0401B Property Location: 841 Park Avenue Architectural Sty]e/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/1890Berger House Property Owner: Cole Hay Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 story frame house with a south bay has an irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. It has a cross gable roof with moulded rake and 3 -tab asphalt shingles. There is a small shed dormer on the central gable. The windows are nine -light casements in the front with 3 light transoms. The bay has 9/1 double hung wood windows. The front door is a wood panel door from the 1916 re -model with round light and arched lintel and decorative metalwork and hinges. There are some original wood storm windows and aluminum storm windows. ALTERATIONS: The fagade of the house was remodeled into a cottage style from a T plan with curved side wraparound porch and Doric columns above the knee wall. The 1/1 double hung windows were replaced with casements in the front and 6/1 in the rest of the house. The bay area was added in 1916 with 9/1 windows. The original wood roofing shingles have been replaced with asphalt shingles. The metal awning over the front entrance noted in the 1987 survey card has been removed and a new porch overhang is under construction with COA 2010-1001A. The aluminum storm windows are modern additions. The roof was replaced with COA 2010-1001A APPLICATION ITEMS: Pf!opesed (A)! eempletion of front porch per- all original approved specifications (see drawing). Currently: emearier ton; in. ^�a:* ^^ i�ee photos) Proposed (B): replace with new Plygem trim, a superior wood substitute, matching the original (see brochure). Currently: exterior siding in poor condition (see photos). Proposed (C): replace with new 6" beveled cedar lap siding, same material & size as original. Currently: windows in very poor condition (see photos). Proposed (D): replace with Pella Proline 450 Series double -hung, casement and fixed transom windows with 7/8" simulated divided -light (SDL) grilles (see brochure). Guuffe tl 'F ^^t a^ .,a,er a^ ed beyond use (see- photos) W ed (E) r-eplaee with an eak door matehing the origma!, hanj crafted by Deve�ail Jehit-, who do Hiany of the ex4erier doers at Netr-e Dame, and using the Driginal hards,,.,.,.e Prop construct.. sed (F): 2 . post eal'umns 'ilial' f ., ,ed end ..:.... defining tl,e Appl: nt has PFOVid@d examples of"p iDusii apppr^`�.e6prre^ ee@tom" in thz neighborhood that relate to the t,.., ofn ets l d. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The evinr proposes oses Jn` tea mplate the f-ent nereh by installing br:ev nereh and ,t ,7 steps, behalf column to ed with halfpost eolunin, new-deapivith-edgin-! ha.-d-i.&re, and$etten The do ntl., bein built rl.- and stainer] and n tab F eff':'Si:ii'b and t_i.T-1 ay. e been completed. The original rn n 7010 1 nal A , .e.7 in 7012 and 2014. The everhang has been eenstructed but the proposed br-iek steep and step with eomposite Dor-ie Column. The replic-a frontde8r ha^, n9t been installed B: replacing all wood trim on the house with Plygem, a cellular PVC product; the front gable trim is already complete and now matches the rear and sides of the house, which those were determined to be original. New corner boards have been installed around the entire house. There is no photo on file that shows corner boards existing originally. Proposed D: replace all existing wood windows with Pella Proline 450 Series aluminum exterior-clad wood windows. Window replacement in the front is complete. For condition of remaining existing windows, see Preservation Specialist report below. The jambs, sills and muntins are showing signs of deterioration and are likely beyond repair. The sashes have been damaged beyond repair, split when screwed shut; the parting stops have all been broken out. Additionally, pulleys are missing, nearly all weights and ropes have been removed and the weight pockets have been filled with insulation. Weposed F.: Cens fuctZ riason—j Yast eolumns to mateh the masonry post column on front perch, to be used as part of a COFfIeF fence to define and- P,;;hRn0,L- thp. 4 eemers of the propefty. An aEch an eithef! side of the pas4s are to be 3'14?,21021141. Thesiding (Proposed G), and ffont doe r-eplaeement (Dr ed E) a uld be considered a Routine Maintenance Exel 'IIE; 3S tcl:cyi:3--fit ir: l::j:-ii€e attaehed �� , and brocksres for f6fthe inf4mation PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Mareh 10,-2416 rt was WOUght tee attention en 02/00/7016 that &11 Pa`k Aved ..nes! wir dews being installer] and that a new uael enial" h.teetural-& uil vJµ�-�,:-, e b a 7dcd. The_house has be ^f.. .. for the last t.,r had b ..ears. Tl'� II'aa.:v.-,a,- ed fenew poreh eveiha".b a:-.d had be dd nd r pai:i-- the weed -slap-b3Aing..Js :-p-recently the -4ontwindews had be-on ee,, wedup tli'.-:r:Eiin% viae - had been on going it is ..era, evident that these are nen wifi 7e..,s and not the original . ad double hung that a still u. place in otherareas of the house. T reviewed the file confirming that the GOA was vnlTfor the =vreh ehad tii:g n'rT ealled the et 7esenh County Building DepaFtment to see what peEmits had been issued on this property. The), eonfkmed the last permit was for the perch o --nta g x 2014. The enhy ether nefmit pulled , an electrieal n rfnit dated 2013. Th 1? •1d:..b the).would be sending out n eter- to «..ed tag!' the property a sable • The windows that have bean issta:iea look.- to be a pat:ble with the 1eld Wens Aad wood windowswith iter:or- and 04er:er grids. Tai: same wind s-w--x irstalled at 207 r a ent .i. an I-.. ap y event, they are t the same as the wooa windows that were there. Please see attached file photegfaphs from March ' 2016 and- Obese -frenn 2014 to eompar-o what was there to m4iat has been installed. Update 1 met with Cole 14a), on 3/16/16.14o indicated that he would be eofning in to apply for the windows and getting renewed RIM& F ..the sidin^ and nisei ✓-X.-. Bldg Dept. as to why there was no Stop Wer4 or-der on the propeFty. The inspeetor iflfMned the om,ner that he Was doing Wof4� without permits and would need to get peafmits. He never stated "stop wer4&1'. The other- ar wil!-be gaing out tedayto post a "Step We.v» Mr. Hay saii:c it z--id l is ap-licetiE)n a area] awe to tact. of« pro info of what he uain ue : 7 rhe 41 windows were beyond Fepairh-ut imadde. no "ent this or to contact us to doeument the eendition prior to work. Gu s I performing the A%at7 New we hav� t Wick p,;l:ars arJ4-.b the prepe.-ty 1: st inside the municipal side This :s leas than 44 hours old Thea ent : of entirely curer] Pietures attaehe.7 Update 4/25/16 On April 22, 2016 at approximately Ipm I arrived at the property located at 841 Park Ave. This property is part of the Chapin Park Local Historic District. I photographed all four sides of the house and made notes as to number each window of the structure and detailing which had been replaced or were still original by way of a diagram that I hand drawn on site. The numbers that I refer to in this report correspond to those numbers which can be found on the printed photographs and my original drawings. I was asked per the Commission's request to inspect the remaining windows at the house to determine if they were deteriorated beyond repair. I photographed as many of the windows as I could get to close enough to show detail. Those that I found to have significant deterioration, I photographed and noted. For the sake of simplicity, I have tried to detail the windows according to their respective numbers. 1-14 Have already been switched out to new windows 15-16 There are no windows present to inspect, just openings with rigid insulation 17-26 Details in photographs will show that the sashes have sustained significant damage due to attempts to secure property. The sashes themselves have had screws driven through them to secure the sashes to the frames. None of these windows had ropes, weights, or parting stops. The interior photographs will show the weight pockets are empty and filled with insulation. Most have had the parting stops ripped broken out with sections of those stops still located in the jambs. There are areas of dry rot in the muntins especially in #'s 22-24. The lower sashes of the first floor on that side have some separation on the frame joints but have been damaged due to the screws. If not for this damage and the missing pieces these would not have been beyond repair. 27-28 These two windows are loose to the touch, dry rot and weather have left the glass barely in the frames. The muntins on these two are the worst in the structure and are soft to the touch. The lower sashes on these two are beyond repair. 29-30 These two have been painted and caulked to improve appearance. The wood is not soft, but once again these have been secured with numerous screws that have split the sash frames. 2 31-33 These three small casement windows are showing dry rot despite having storm windows in place. The opening mechanisms are painted shut. When I attempted to move the cranks even a little, the screws were pulling out of the sashes. 34-35 No windows present, but new windows are poised to go in. 36 Already replaced 37 Replaced with casement window no muntin pattern and odd trim work ill -sized for the window 38-40 I was unable to get close enough to get detailed photographs of #'s 38 and 39. There is a detailed shot of #40 on file Neither 38 or 40 had storm windows and were secured in place without weights and cords. On #40 the upper sash had dry rot and was soft to touch. 41-42 Were both painted and caulked for appearance. Both were secured with screws and are off square. #41 has a % to 3/< inch drop from left to right on the bottom sash and sill. The photo of the meeting rail shows highlights this. I could not determine the condition of the sashes due to the paint, caulk, and lack of movement. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK THE ENVIRONMENT B BUI T PIG SITE T AA DSCADTATG P. ACCESSORIES This section focuses a individual properties and a «:ties. D;Y!6li^.g si:�se«.i to he inregularly shaped ofvarying topography .,.1 with diff- r .,t sethaeks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind hou-sas. Lariseape accessories like fences to each stpaeture. haym P.1 --so Place will be earisidered on a case by aacc-!-asp ,. Peneing, wall.?JJ&js, outbuildings, private , aFd lights signs (i.e. hDu&c r:-unbers) and benches (visible f.era the street) ?F -well acs trees located in a yard or tree laAm which refleet the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such an -as shah , disease, et#i r reaso" ac an approved species at the sarne or apprwiim--afe. leeation iyhereyer -T. i a FE££r: g -iii liC «.,m tl.e street :., front ..f the strueturZ shay l 1��open ( s between the pickets) and a stent with the histerie eha ete of a st et.. enclosed. New site wo.-1.- should he based upon astral ime„ ledge of the past apr,£„r nze of the property found in photographs drawings damage.and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate existing- sufFetmdiag site ele-raents in scale, type and appearan Frontyard areas should r-efflain apen. (See above for iaf0Ffflati0F1 regarding fenees.) Trees in elose proximity to a building may Ovir'ors a.., encouraged to remove these tree e«laee (of «e«land them at a niore appropriat-e lee tien-a=-as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of -A-. Pref; ih- ited No changes may be made to the appeafarice of the site by removing trees, feneing, walkways, outbuildings or other elerne before evaluating their importance to the property's histafy and -gas l all rat he t.a.,afn...,,e,l ince par -king lots ner paved nor blaelae e.l ner els ed by elid fences, chair link, r3r industriaYeeraraereial slyle fenees. The installation of unsightly large deviees, suoh as television satellite dishes, skylights or snear Yanei , sh,l fiat he « ,.mimed : ,.he a the . detr et from the eh:teetur f a h 7 nt.a e t 1 of the buil e h: A ...,:3c dinb, tllc f;.rhac . �': „l,h .Jir.b'.y f~"3nr-a lightpublie street, er ruled inappfOpFiate after C= w. Utility poles with high intensity everhead sh--,PA ba instal 1 e d s 0 that they e annet b e se e n fre Fn a e et. U__e Gn_ rami ss i on wil 1 evaluate al 1 i a stal 1 i sens as viell I a s a exe__eptions resulting F.3irr, 3p_ --c1.,! ziravumstances before grantingA a C of II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low-pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size 3 and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power-washed. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double-hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. Iz l ITP nwrn> c nnnnucc PID 5Tu-.13£ Most houses in the distFie4 have either an open or enclosed perch aeress the ffefi4. Most porches ' ave either hip , gabled roofs are ed by the main ofof the ha an,e late ate l l e 1 -o-wiF a::is: a, . aha stoops, patios and n.ops, including 1 bc-lusters, columns, 14 h.- eketn the and roof de.,.:any, slizl'. 'e retained a ..la ed by repVl as o fthe same design r b a de mere-., keeping porphy-_'; And Additions refleefing later- arehitectuFal styles and which are impol4afitte building' it., shall he feta:..e.7 Aeeo nine"d e.l \l Tvv_ " .-hen f F heat a at:o .. r f- thereasons, :t should be do..e i :-c F!:;......" that doe of alter the ma "b Ye. «ah:teetul h:nte.:eal ohar-aatof the building Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that a ifnpef4ant to tha buildirg's-;t"le and development shall not he alta ed OFreffIE)—vedl- if in of Feplaeefne-R4, see above Required seetion. See _Ahse Seetion P" B. Access for 14andieapp d or D:sw1,'zd Persons. Not Deea.. mended n.:a:nal perch details should fiat he ..enlaeed with ..,a di rent ..e.:od or style F om the origi .al ST-412F Staff does not reeommend g' i ;ith new af4ifieial pf:eduet and does not reeemm the el.ange : style that deviates.. 4'1_ Cita ff d t .h.^. tIi�01'1�1F;�... c.:mr�ocTvrFcccn.ni �, �J replacement El:a:a Feanel Emeeutiye D reato.. 4 MAY REV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend replacing trim with new artificial product. Regrettably, Staff recommends replacement windows. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director M Commissioner Gordon moved to conditionally approve application as submitted for items C (siding) and D (windows), with exception of item B (Plygem trim), which was denied. Seconded by Commissioner Buccellato. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0401B Approved with conditions. 2. 815 Ashland Avenue COA#2016-0502 Chapin Park Representation by Randy Hopkins, 815 Ashland Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 02 May 2016 Application Number: 2016-0502 Property Location: 815 Ashland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: T-Plan/1894 Property Owner: Randy and Diana Hopkins Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two story house with exterior walls clad in aluminum and perma-stone. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles. There is an enclosed front porch with siding to match to house and metal railings. There is a fence across the drive way. ALTERATIONS: In 1945 there was a 5' x 6' addition to the porch. The house is aluminum sided, the perma-stone is not original and there are replacement windows. The fence was added with COA 2009-0922. There is a rear addition with a wooden deck and ramp that was added after the fence was installed, without a COA. COA 2012-0420 approved tear -off and replacement of asphalt shingles. COA 2015-1005A approved removal of the garage, but it has not yet been demolished. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolition of existing concrete front porch and steps and replace with wood front porch and steps. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owners propose to remove the non -original, deteriorated concrete front porch and steps, as well as the existing metal railing, and replace with wood porch, steps, and railing, see Front Porch Plans diagram. The footprint of the proposed deck will be the same as the existing porch. The owner stated that "the use of wood allows the owners to do the work themselves, resulting in significant cost savings". The proposal for the front is designed to look similar in style to the deck that was added to the rear. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On May 3, 2016, I returned to the address on request of the Deputy Director to photograph the steps for application COA 2016-0502. The problem is the limestone fagade ends on the right side of the steps on the house but continues to the end of the steps on the left side of the house when viewing the front. If he removes the steps, there will need to be some way to end the veneer. There is a jagged crack but that cannot be the end or more will come off. Also when the stairs are removed, there may not be any veneer behind the existing steps. The condition of the current steps is poor with just as may cracks as patches. The veneer on the face of the steps has also failed. This is partially due to the patches not covering the entire veneer squarely. The railing is solid and solidly attached to the house, however the contact points to the steps have been compromised by the steps' condition and patches. The railing is attached to the house by bolts and covered with mortar. Please see pictures attached. I did not see any approved COAs in the file for the deck that was added to the rear of the house that the owner plans to match the front steps to. I do see pictures dated 4/21/2010 depicting construction at the rear of the house but I do see further correspondence to the matter. I was not able to meet with the owner in person. I knocked when I was on site, but got no answer. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK EXISTING STRUCTURES D. ENTRANCES PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends replacement of the front porch but suggests a redesign of the proposed to a "design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure" as required by the Chapin Park Standards and Guidelines. Staff also recommends that garage demolition approved with COA 2015-1005A take priority. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Public comment Joan Downs, 849 Forest: Do not put a nice porch on a house with inappropriate siding. Remove the siding, then replace the porch. Steve Szaday 548 River Avenue: Has talked with contractor who prepared quote for homeowner, and shares his concerns regarding railing replacement, and how to deal with stone veneer that extends onto concrete steps. Application withdrawn by owner. Commissioner Voll moved to delegate the withdrawn COA to staff for further disposition. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0502 Withdrawn. 3. 1611 East Wayne Street COA#2016-0504 East Wayne Street Representation by Renee LaReau, 1611 East Wayne STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2016 Application Number: 2016-0504 Property Location: 1611 E Wayne Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival/1929/H. Russell Stapp, Architect/Osborne House Property Owner: Jim Schmiedeler Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Local Historic District Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Renaissance Revival house is 2 story frame with brick veneer in a rectangular plan. The tile hip roof has molded trim at eave ends. Triple arched window at front with brick header, course sill and tracery, and terra cotta spiral Corinthian column between windows. Second floor windows are 6/6 double -hung with railings in front. The front door has a limestone surround with scroll pattern in transom area, flanked by narrow fixed windows with iron grating. The front stoop and steps are slate and concrete. There is a detached 2 -car, 1 -door garage at the rear with matching roof and brick. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storms have been added to windows. A single -story wing was added in 1952, with a flat roof with iron railing above, large single pane windows, and brick chimney at the side. COA 2012-0507A approved replacement of original failed stucco with Dryvit. COA 2009-0731 approved demolition of in -ground swimming pool and portion of fence between garage and rear of house. COA 2008-0904 allowed replacement of 15 windows and front storm door. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace soffit, fascia and gutter. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner has contracted with Millwood Roofing to replace existing deteriorated wood soffit and fascia with fiber cement, and install new half -round gutters to the house, with downspouts located as indicated on site plan. Existing crown moldings to be removed to allow proper installation of gutter. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On May 5, 2016 I visited the property at 1611 E Wayne St, in the East Wayne Local Historic District. The scope of work for the proposed COA included gutters, fascia, and soffit. Upon inspection, I noticed the only part of the house that currently had a gutter was above the door near the driveway on the east side of the house. There is a gutter system on the garage, but I do believe this is part of the application. There is a crown molding transition at the top of the fascia board that continues around the entire house. It appears as though the gutter that exists in that single east location is attached over that crown molding. The application does not specify if that crown molding will be replaced when the fascia is replaced or will it be omitted in lieu of a flat surface to attach gutters to. Round gutters will allow the crown to remain, "K" style gutters are best installed flat against the fascia board. In regards to the soffit, there are multiple locations where evidence of water infiltration has occurred, there are two locations where someone has wrapped plastic around the soffit. I can only assume this was done to keep elements or pests out. The soffit is currently made of wood as evident by the splintering and visible wood grain. So is the fascia board. There is no doubt that sections of the soffit as well as the fascia are in need of replacing. It is also of my opinion, that additional vents be added along the soffit. The large overhang may be better served with additional airflow to allow heat and moisture to move more freely through the space. 2 The material proposed is a fiber cement board which has had successful applications in other LHDs in South Bend when vented properly. I do not recall any such replacement in East Wayne, but do recall examples in Edgewater Place and Chapin Park. The change in material does require HPC approval not just a Routine Maintenance Exclusion. Please refer to photographs in the electronic and paper file. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EAST WAYNE STREET LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Addendum to follow containing additional project information and staff recommendation. Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner corrected description to reflect that soffit is stucco. Commissioner Buccellato suggested that it would be desirable to retain the existing crown moulding, if an alternative gutter bracket could be used in place of the proposed style. Owner was amenable to explore that possibility. Commissioner Buccellato volunteered to search for a substitute. Commissioner Voll moved to amend application to allow Commissioner Buccellato to meet with contractor to explore second type of gutter bracket that would allow crown molding to exist with use of half -round gutters. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA92016-0504 Amended. Commissioner Buccellato moved to approve application as amended. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 COA#2016-0504 Approved as amended. B. LOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION 1. Second reading: 803 West Washington Street Public support Todd Zeiger, 402 West Washington, representing Indiana Landmarks, owner - thanked Historic Preservation Commission and staff for their assistance in moving landmark designation forward. This designation provides significantly more protection for the site than the easement that was on it before because it protects the entire site, and not just the house. Zoning is moving forward, including rezoning and variances. Indiana Landmarks have received several letters of support, and no letters of protest. Area Plan staff has recommended approval of zoning and needed variances. 7 Public opposition: none Commissioner Klusczinski sponsored a resolution to recommend the building located at 803 West Washington Street for establishment as an historic landmark, pursuant to ordinance #5565-73, as amended; this resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the commission. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5-0 Resolution #16-01 Approved by unanimous consent. III. HEARING OF VISITORS None. IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 18, 2016 — Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Distributed. Executive Director Elicia Feasel noted the 2017 HPC budget guidance worksheet (received from the County), mirrors the current year. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusions 3. Executive Director — In Packet. Discussion. A. 806 Leland, South Bend — Joan Downs Qualifications for Local Landmark Designation B. 614 Sherman Avenue, South Bend — Clinton and Shundra Gilke Support for preservation of neighborhood character — they would like something to this effect sent to the city, so the city will take the neighborhood character into consideration when/if the city builds on the adjacent property. Shundra and Clinton spoke to the importance of maintaining the neighborhood, avoiding building that was out of character — rentals, small homes, poor quality, etc., and what the long-term effect could be on the neighborhood. Public Comment: Joan Downs, 849 Forest — commented on Mutual Homes development; feels they lack integrity and character; low quality buildings will not last. 4. Deputy Director — In Packet. 5. Preservation Specialist — Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel —None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President — Distributed 2. Indiana Bicentennial — Chairman Hertel: Geocache launched in April; about to launch 2 travel bugs. Going to do several press releases to spark public interest. Well received — people are enjoying it, and learning about places in the county they did not know existed. Executive Director Feasel: Playing cards are nearly ready, with a target date of June. 3. Historic Landmarks—None V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS A. INTERNNOLUNTEER RESOLUTIONS 1. Ty Pellow 2. George Root Commissioner Klusczinski sponsored both resolutions by formal motion. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5-0 B. Commissioner Klusczinski moved to empower the HPC staff with discretionary authority to extend any valid Certificate of Appropriateness for a period of 45 days from its established expiration date — unless there is evidence that site improvements, subject to review by the Historic Preservation Commission, have occurred without its consent. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5-0 VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Hertel moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Five in favor, none opposed. Vote: 5 — 0 Meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Attest: Elizabet P ertel, Secretary V P adtit Date W + Location Budget as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2016. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation i Saint Joseph County Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 34,884.00 0.00 (3,700.00) 31,184.00 0.00 5,876.96 25,307.04 25,307.04 000 General GovT. 81.15 81.15 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 3,700.00 40,700.00 0.00 17,219.30 23,480.70 23,480.70 57.69 57.69 000 General GovT. 10000 Totals """""*""`""`""'"'"""""`"" 0.00 71,884.00 0.00 0.00 71,884.00 0.00 23,096.26 48,787.74 48,787.74 67.87 67.87 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 297.00 0.00 0.00 297.00 0.00 0.00 297.00 297.00 100.00 100.00 000 General GovT. 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 154.01 845.99 845.99 84.60 84.60 000 General GovT. 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00 000 General GovT. 20000 Totals" ... 0.00 1,522.00 0.00 0.00 1,522.00 0.00 154.01 1,367.99 1,367.99 89.88 89.88 31070 Other Contractual Services 0.00 18,886.00 0.00 (102.96) 18,783.04 0.00 9,920.00 8,863.04 8,863.04 47.19 47.19 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 0.00 57.00 0.00 0.00 57.00 11.69 14.82 30.49 42.18 53.49 74.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 102.96 197.96 99.82 65.96 32.18 132.00 16.26 66.68 000 General GovT. 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 250.00 150.00 150.00 000 General GovT. 37.50 37.50 30000 Totals """`"""""*"""""""`""":'"""' 0.00 20,338.00 0.00 0.00 • 20,338.00 111.51 10,250.78 9,975.71 10,087.22 49.05 49.60 Financial System 06/01/2016 03:59 PM by ksobecki Page 54 Location Budget as of 05-31-2016 Note: includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2016. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01!2016 thru 05/3112016 Lac: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original AddVI Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Location Totals ******"************'********************* 0.00 93,744.00 0.00 0.00 93,744.00 111.51 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 33,501,05 60,131.44 60,242.95 64.14 64.26 0.00 0.00 33,501.05 Financlamr--n 06/01/nrf$:59 PM by ksobecki page 55 Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2016. Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence Fund: 1000 County General Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Financial System 06/01/2016 03:59 PM by ksobecki Page 19 Vendor Budget PO Number Vendor Name Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 129984 001538 South Bend Tribune 1000.33010.000.0037 05/12/2016 11.69 19 129982 000070 Adams Remco, INC 1000.33100.000.0037 05/12/2016 11.82 19 129983 000917 Insty-Prints 1000.33100.000.0037 05/12/2016 88.00 19 Location Total 111.51 Financial System 06/01/2016 03:59 PM by ksobecki Page 19 ^ ~ Combined Ledger by Location (Current as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date mu1m1um1a Fund 1mmCounty General for n1m`ommmmuam1um1n Loc mmrHistoric Preservation 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue Genora|GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated oomoovaomevenue Revenue Receipts Balance Apvmnnanvn Encumbrance ounnm 0.00 000 0.00 Total 0.00 000.00 (320.00) o.uo 0.00 1000.11075000003oenutyoonvm, General mnvT Historic pomenmonn Expenditure unexpended: mm Unencumbered: 0.00 Cash: 05/13/206 05/13/2016 olaim/P;yDwcket 1,199.38 anOo ox:70126 Vend:005528 County Payroll pvoum5n3/20o 05127/2016 05/25/20 16 okum/PayDonket 1.1e9.38 ox:00cu:70325Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDstO5/27/2m Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts aa|mnmo Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: ounrm 0.00 uuo uoo 2,398.76 Unencumbered: Total uoo 0.00 0.00 31.184.00 OM 5.876.96 Cash: 100011309,000.003eistnricPreservation Admin. Genwra/Gnmc Historic Preservation 05/1312016 05/1312016 o|eim/Puyoocke 1.565o8 amouuox:7n11crvenu:ouoouxCounty Payroll prostoon000m omunuo/a 05o5m016 ulaim/Pa 000ket 1.565.38 an:000cmnmoso ven :oossuxcovmypuvmopyoumuoroom Esmmoted onmoxmunevenva Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 uon 0.00 3.130.76 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 uou w\r0000 0.00 17.219.30 Cash: 1000.21030000.003Office Supplies men,ralmovT. Historic Preservation Office oun»mw Historic Preservation Estimated onreco*euRevnmm novanms Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: cvnnm 0.00 ouo 0.00 uoo Unencumbered: Total 0.00 000 000 297.00 0,00 0.00 onu: 1000.22010o00o037 Gas Oil aLubricants ovnera/evvT. Historic Preservation 05/12o0e 05/12/2016 olaim/R0000cket 26.03 aKmoncn:roue*o/mxns/MmFOR FUEL ven :061203Szadavmoae 05/26m016 05o6o016 ola/nxmeoomckm 10oo amuooummx17o/m^nEnwmGAS ven :061203Szmuarateve Saint Joseph County Balances 25,307.04 25,307.04 Balances 23,480.70 23,480.70 Financial 06/01/2 w 00 PIVI by ksobeck! Page 207 4Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General GovT. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 845.99 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.03 Unencumbered: 845.99 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 154.01 Cash: (154.01) 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 225.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 225.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation BK008 CK-700145 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 29HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 05/05/2016 05/05/2016 Claim/RegDocket 580.00 BK:008 CK:700646 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 27HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 05/12/2016 05/12/2016 Claim/RegDocket 540.00 BKO08 CK:702430 Inv: PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 22HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 05/19/2016 05/19/2016 Claim/RegDocket 440.00 BK:008 CK:703178 Inv: PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 28HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 05/26/2016 05/26/2016 Claim/RegDocket 560.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 8,863.04 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,120.00 Unencumbered: 8,863.04 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 18,783.04 0.00 9,920.00 Cash: (9,920.00) 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation 05/12/2016 05/12/2016 PO/AutoPO 11,69 PO:129984 Vend:001538 South Bend Tribune Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 42.18 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 30.49 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.00 11.69 14.82 Cash: (14.82) 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General GovT. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation 05/12/2016 05/12/2016 PO/AutoPO 11.82 PO:129982 Vend:000070 Adams Remco, INC 05/12/2016 05/12/2016 PO/Aut0PO 88.00 PO:129983 Vend:000917 Insty-Prints Financial System 06/01/2016 04:00 PM by ksobecki Page 208 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016 Encumbrance Expenditure Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 0.00 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Appropriation Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 OM 0.00 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General Gov'T. Historic Preservation 93,744.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Cash: Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 1000.39010.000,0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 320.00 (320,00) Investment Current 0.00 Total OM Transfer Current 0.00 Total 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 320.00 (320.00) Financial -i Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 197.96 99.82 65.96 Cash: Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 900.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 06/01/ Iffl 100 PIVI by ksobeck! Saint Joseph County Balances 132.00 32.18 (65.96) Balances 900.00 900.00 0.00 Balances 150.00 150.00 (250.00) Balances 60,242.95 60,131.44 (33,181.05) 0.00 (33,181.05) Page 209 Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 400.00 0.00 250.00 Cash: Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 7,685,55 Unencumbered: 93,744.00 111.51 33,501 .05 Cash: 0.00 a00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 7.685.55 93,744.00 111.51 33,501.05 Cash: 06/01/ Iffl 100 PIVI by ksobeck! Saint Joseph County Balances 132.00 32.18 (65.96) Balances 900.00 900.00 0.00 Balances 150.00 150.00 (250.00) Balances 60,242.95 60,131.44 (33,181.05) 0.00 (33,181.05) Page 209 r Location Budget as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2016. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016, Director. County Historic Preservation Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 23240 Other Supplies 3.273.89 0.00 209.00 0.00 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 3,482.89 3,482.89 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals """""""*'.. 3,273.89 0.00 209.00 0.00 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 3,482.89 3,482.89 Location Totals ' Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 100.00 100.00 *�:�•�*�*•*•�•� 3,273.89 0.00 209.00 0.00 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 3,482.89 3,482.89 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Financial System 06/02/2016 10:59 AM by ksobecki Page 94 - Location Budget as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2016. Fund: 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016, Director. County Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Carry Forward Original Addri Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent Fund Totals """..... """""...... """ 3,273.89 0.00 209.00 0.00 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 3,482.89 3,482.89 100.00 100.00 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Financia iiiiiiiiiri 06/02/x:59 AM by ksobecki 0.00 0.00 Page 95 O Financial System 06/02/201611:04 AM by ksobecki Page 205 l -Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016 Loc 0000 General GovT. 4103.00000.000.0000 Gen GovT General GovT. General GovT. Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 16,229.45 (16,229.45) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 16,229.45 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 16,229.45 (16,229.45) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 16,229.45 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 16,229.45 (16,229.45) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 16,229.45 Financial System 06/02/201611:04 AM by ksobecki Page 205 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 4103.06400.000.0037 Gifts&Contributions General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 209.00 (209.00) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 209.00 4103.23240.000.0037 Other Supplies General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 3,462.89 Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,482.89 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 3,482.89 Normal Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,482.89 Total 0.00 209.00 (209.00) 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 Cash: 209.00 Investment Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Transfer Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 Location Totals Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 209.00 (209.00) 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 Cash: 209.00 Financial 06/02/2- 04 AM by ksobecki Page 206 4 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 05-31-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01/01/2016. Fund 4103 Special Gifts -Historic Presery for 01/01/2016 thru 05/31/2016 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Normal Current 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 16,438.45 (16,438.45) Investment Current Total Transfer Current Total Fund Totals Current Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16,438.45 (16,438.45) Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 3,482.89 0.00 0.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 3,482.89 3,482.89 16,438.45 0.00 0.00 16,438.45 Financial System 06/02/201611:04 AM by ksobecki Page 207 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 03 May through 06 June 2016 Daily, High lights.. 05.03 County Holiday. Respond to Steve re: Studebaker Gate House. Photo exhibit correspondence. Playing Card correspondence. Correspondence with Joan Downs re: local landmarks. Scheduling appointment with Ryan of Orbis Environmental. Area Plan LOS for 831 Colfax for new carriage house/garage. 05.04 Bereavement. Bicentennial correspondence re: County Seal for Playing Cards and edits; Geocache correspondence w/ volunteer consultant and monitoring activity logs. Correspondence with Joan Downs re: local landmarks. 115 S Lafayette correspondence. Correspondence with Deb re: staff reports. 05.05 Bereavement. Correspondence re: Studebaker Gate House. Correspondence re: Downtown Then & Now tour. 05.06 Work w/ George. Reconcile budget. Indiana's 2016: Transfer Photography Exhibit with Lou Sabo to New Carlisle; follow up tasks. Finalize May 16 HPC meeting agenda and staff reports, prepare packets. _ 05.09_ Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Geocache cacheport prizes follow up; working w/ - - - Hannah on playing cards edits. Phone call with Millie Latack re: summer Internship. 05.10 Attend mandatory County budget meeting. Correspondence with Brett Hummer and Tim re: local landmark documents. Review Redevelopment Commission agenda. Follow up w/ Grants Director re: Lakeville projects. Bicentennial: ALL -IN marketing; correspondence w/ Pastor Tom at St. Paul's UMC and St. Joseph County Archives Vicki. 523 S St. Joseph re: possible cistern in back yard. 614 Sherman follow up and correspondence w/ DCI Pam Meyer and Debrah Jennings; correspondence with Gilkes. 05.11 Work w/ George. Post meeting notices. Reconcile budget. Prepare direct claim purchase orders. 05.12 Work w/ George. Attend Regional Cities ground breaking at Studebaker National Museum. Working w/ Deb and CJ Cunningham of Troyer Group re: National Register boundary for Kessl er-Wood lawn proposed district for Section 106 review for tree removals and sidewalk repair. Bicentennial: Correspondence re: cacheport donations. 05.13 Work w/ George. Bicentennial: Work w/ Deb on writing an abbreviated SJC history for Playing Cards. Work w/ IT Dave on new wireless. Correspondence with Brett Hummer and Tim re: local landmark documents. 05.16 Staff meeting. Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Thank you letters sent to cacheport prize donors. Prep for/set up/attend HPC meeting. Attend HPC meeting. Prep for Studebaker Then & Now presentation. Correspondence w/ potential tour guide Terry Belanger re: training. Prepare travel request to NAPC Forum conference to present Building South Bend project. 211 Hammond correspondence w/ Steve re: Code violations. Correspondence w/ ND Architecture Library re: Building South Bend website and data harvesting; follow up w/ George. Meeting w/ Deputy Auditor Teresa Shuter re: 4103 Special Gifts Fund and general budget clarifications. 05.17 Process COAs. Attend IN 2016 Bicentennial steering committee meeting at County Commissioners office; follow up tasks. Prep for Deb's participation at Area Plan Commission meeting re: 803 W Washington rezoning. Prep for Studebaker Then & Now presentation. Correspondence w/ CJ Cunningham of Troyer Group re: Kessler-Woodlawn Section 106 review. 05.18 Prep for Studebaker Then & Now presentation. Attend and deliver Then & Now presentation with Andy Beckman, Todd Zeiger, and Travis Childs. Correspondence with Brett Hummer re: local landmark documents. Bicentennial: Work w/ Deb on editing an abbreviated SJC history for Playing Cards; correspondence w/ Playing Cards Illustrator Alison re: invoice. Phone tag w/ Kareemah Fowler re: presentation to Common Council and 803 W Washington inclusion on Council agenda. 05.19 325 W Northshore meeting with Paul Worland re: upcoming projects; follow up research. Meeting w/ IT department Ian and Brian re: new permit software development. Bicentennial: Prep for and attend ALL - IN Block Party meeting at The History Museum; follow up tasks; prepare email to Committee re: invite to River Park parade this Saturday. J.C. Lauber Building correspondence w/ Frank Perri re: proposed changes and scheduling meeting. 05.20 Staff meeting w/ Steve to go over 325 W Northshore and other pending projects. Potential Lakeville Historic District correspondence w/ Shirley Rynearson and Grants Director Kelly. Bicentennial: ALL -IN Block Party correspondence w/ Pastor Tom of St. Paul's UMC and Vicki of SJC Archives. Schedule NAPC Forum travel. 05.23 Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Playing Cards edits; ALL -IN Block Party marketing and tasks. Scheduling Memorial Walking Club presentation at City Cemetery. Review/edit May HPC meeting minutes. 05.24 Bicentennial: Geocache prize solicitation and receiving; ALL -IN Block Party tasks. Correspondence with Kate Lee of SJC Chamber re: Intern program. Budget reconciliation. Meeting with Mike and Tim re: 2017 budget format. Meeting w/ Kahl!I Smylie, principle at LangLab re: local landmark 713 W LaSalle future restoration projects; follow up with David Neitzel and John Timmons re: their interest in the house. 05.25 Working w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Facilitate Committee meeting at Studebaker National Museum, follow up task; ALL -IN Block Party planning tasks and correspondence w/ Jenni at The History Museum re: marketing. Phone call w/ John Timmons. Attend Visit South Bend Mishawaka Tourism Awards Ceremony where SJC Parks, SB and Mishawaka Parks were awarded! 05.26 Meeting w/ Millie Latack, new Preservation Specialist intern. Attend % day mandatory County department head training re: anti -harassment law and new overtime law. Bicentennial: Playing cards edits. 05.27 Working w/ Millie. Follow up tasks floating around my desk O Researching State Board of Accounts webinar that all SJC employees are now required to attend. Follow up w/ Pekin Insurance re: HPC mobile. 05.30 County Holiday 05.31 Work w/ George. Bicentennial: Playing Card edits and begin printing final proofs. Lakeville trip w/ SJC Grants Director Kelly Sanford to meet with Shirley and Carol re: downtown district eligibility in the National Register of Historic Places; guided tour of town; follow up emails to Shirley and Paul Diebold of State Preservation Office. Register for NAPC Forum. Miscellaneous filing. Follow up with City Clerk on 803 West Washington inclusion in June 6 meeting. Leeper Park West garden inquiry; review file; follow up email with Gary Gilot. 06.01 Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Meeting w/ Ryan Duddleson of Orbis Environmental re: idea for partnership. 06.02 Work w/ Millie. 502-508 E LaSalle: meeting at J.C. Lauber Building w/ owner Frank Perri, Steve, Deb, and Millie to discuss future developments, follow up tasks and email. Bicentennial: ALL -IN Block Party planning tasks and correspondence; Playing Cards history of SJC in 125 words; Photo Exhibit correspondence. 803 W Washington follow up tasks re: Local Landmark. Correspondence with grants director Kelly re: Lakeville, National Register nominations and grant funding. 06.03 Work w/ George. Work w/ Millie. Meeting w/ Lou Sabo. Meeting w/ Tim and Elizabeth. Bicentennial: Photo Exhibit correspondence w/ The History Museum; reviewing overall budget and donations received to date; Playing Cards edits; ALL -IN Block Party tasks. 502-508 E LaSalle follow up tasks. 06.06 COA deadline. Work w/ George. Work w/ Rachel. Bicentennial: Scheduling volunteers for events; review overall budget and donations to date; ALL -IN Block Party flyer editing and printing, scheduling challenge partners meeting at St. Paul's Church, review site plan and make edits; Playing Cards edits. Assist Deb w/ Staff Reports, edits. Begin meeting preparation. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 528 Eddy Street 2016-0606C Remove existing 3 -tab shingles on roof areas #16 and #13. Repair deck, install new CertainTeed Landmark Plus Designer shingle — pewter; felt, ice shield, new drip edge. Interns/Volunteers Who Project George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Rachel Arvoy, County Commissioners Intern Indiana's 2016 Bicentennial, Public Relations/Communications Millie Latack, Preservation Specialist Intern Minimum Maintenance Standards surveying, field work, file org. Phone Calls Who Date/Time Regarding Jeff Gofney, TCU 05.18 807 East Jefferson, verify historic status of property. Deb to email survey card. Gwen, New 05.23 Bicentennial, Geocache St. Joseph County partnership and prizes. Possibly Kitchen Store noon interested in selling Playing Cards. John Martinez 06.06 Walker Field. Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — May 3, 2016 —June 6, 2016 Daily Highlights " 05.04 106 Reviews. Kessler Plan/Leeper Park research request. COA application. Organized historic district files. Research request. 05.05 106 Reviews. RME. COA applications —this month and next. Organized historic district files. Started meeting agenda. 05.06 COA applications. May meeting agenda. Help prepare commissioner packets. Organized historic district files. 05.09 Finish and mail commissioner packets. COA applications. Organized historic district files. 05.10 Commission meeting prep. Attend budget meeting. 106 Review. Letter/guideline information to 609 Riverside. Organized historic district files. - - - - 05.11 South Bend history research. RME. 05.12 Studebaker building tours. 05.13 1 Organized historic district files. Wood lawn -Kessler historic district research. St. Joseph County research. 05.16 1 Organized historic district files. 106 Review. Commission meeting. 05.17 ( Worked on minutes and filed paperwork from commission meeting. Attended Area Plan Commission meeting and spoke in support of 803 West Washington rezoning. 106 Review. 05.18 I Commission meeting minutes. Issued COAs. Letter to 815 Ashland (withdrawn COA). Attended South Bend "Then & Now" presentation at History Museum. RME. Organized historic district files. 05.19 Permitting system meeting. File Maintenance. Staff reports for June COAs. Corrections to May meeting minutes. Reprinted COA for 729 Cottage Grove (originally approved 11/2015). 05.20 1101 Riverside RME —site visit, photographs, delivered COA. File Maintenance. 05.23 11314 East Wayne N RME and site visit. Went out with Steve on site visits. 106 Review. File Maintenance. 05.24 Responded to request for historic district guideline clarification. File maintenance. 127 Franklin RME. COA application. 05.25 Site visit — 201 West Northshore. Leeper Park file maintenance. 05.26 Diversity and Anti -Harassment Training. Leeper Park file maintenance. 05.27 COA for 1520 East Wayne Street. Leeper Park file maintenance. COA application for 820 Park Avenue. 05.31 COA application for 838 Park Avenue. Staff report for 820 Park and 838 Park. Leeper Park file maintenance. 06.01 838 Park and 1520 East Wayne COA applications. Historic file maintenance. 06.02 Tour JC Lauber Building. Leeper Park file maintenance. 106 Reviews. Edited and sent out May Commission Meeting minutes. 1102 East Wayne COA staff report. 06.03 Work on COAs. Historic file maintenance. 06.06 COAs. Historic file maintenance. 106 Reviews. Leeper Park file maintenance. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 540 River Avenue 2016-0511 Owner plans to replace existing shingles with 3 -tab asphalt shingles to match shingles currently on porch roof, and replace gutters. 835 Ashland 2016-0518 Owner plans to replace 54 linear feet of sidewalk, 52 linear feet of curb, and preapproved ADA ramp. Project has been approved by Public Works. 1101 Riverside 2016-0505 Owner plans in-kind rebuild of front steps and walk, and side steps and walk, using new brick and reclaimed flagstone. In-kind Repair/rebuild of back patio. Tuckpoint compromised joints. 1314 East Wayne N 2016-0523 Contractor applied to replace existing 4' picket fence with 6' dog-eared privacy fence. As the style and profile of the existing fence were unknown, a site visit was necessary to determine qualification as an RME. Within the hour, HPC Preservation Specialist visited property, finding fence contractor had already removed the existing fence and set posts for new fence in concrete. Although this is a change in style and profile, the fence is not visible from the street, and there are similar fences in the back of this and a neighboring property. RME was issued with warning to be certain future projects are approved prior to commencing work. 127 Franklin Street 2016-0524 Continuance of expired COA #2014-0522B to install in-kind lap width cement siding to match original over asbestos siding. Research Requests What Date Who Historic designation of 520 East LaSalle 05/13/2016 Connie Ackles Boundaries of Wood lawn -Kessler Historic District 05/13/2016 CJ Cunningham History/photos of I & M Power Plant 05/31/2016 Charity White Who Owner 1113 E Wayne John Fyrquist Jo Broden Phone Calls Date/Time What 5/5 — 3:00 Questions about fence — RME/COA, staff approval or commission approval 5/10 — 2:00 5/10 — 2:00 Barbara Names 5/12 — 2:00 Cheryl 5/16 —1:30 Susan St.Ville Jason Fischer Kevin Sigg Matt Payne Faith Fleming Lloyd Ketcham Charity White Pat Piasecki 5/19 — 2:00 5/20 —1:00 5/25 — 2:00 5/25 — 5:00 5/27 — 3:00 5/27 — 2:00 5/31-1:00 6/6 —1:00 Question about "pit" in back yard of 523 S. St. Joseph. Cistern? Call back if we find answer—(574) 307-0105 Concerns about 201 W. North Shore. Needs someone to come out and assess condition, determine needed repairs. Also forwarded contractor list. Can 221 Hammond PI be removed from Riverbend Historic District? Wants new sign for Preservation Month. Mishawaka resident. Gave contact info for Mishawaka HPC. COA application — does it qualify as RME? Preservation Contractor List Landscape changes for 828 Park Avenue (2 calls) Considering purchase of home in East Wayne Street district. Questions about COA process, garage demolition/rebuilding, fence installation. Needs contractor list and preservation architect lists. Needs contractor list and information on RME process for in-kind repairs Questions about soffit repair. Needs contractor list. Information about former I & M Power Plant Needs contractor list for plaster repair. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT June 20, 2016 Hello Commission! Code Hearings since last meeting: 621 Rex 721 LWE 805 Leland 127 Franklin Place 417 Navarre 917 Leland Still coming in June 319 N William -LL work in progress 939 E Johnson -Forest G Hay barn off Miami LL 1311 Prinz Ct-LWE LHD Research Requests 5105 Ironwood Lakeville Various Sites 610 California 2000 E Jefferson PS visits: Besides this month's RME/COAs 1105 E Wayne 2000 E Jefferson -home of part of the Studebaker Fountain 210 W Northshore 325 W Northshore JC Lauber Bldg -LL on Lasalle More often than not I am stopping at worksites that are doing work without the proper permits that are well underway. Any word on enforcement or at least a charge for asking forgiveness rather than permission? Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist Historic Preservation Commission President's Report —'June 20th 2016 • 05/23/2016 7P: HPC Monthly Meeting (County -City Building; Room 1308). 05/24/2016 12N: Budget Review Meeting. Sat in on a budget reporting session between Mike Voll — Treasurer, Elicia Feasel — Exec. Director and Debra Parcell — Deputy Director. Discussion on the annual budget process and 2016 submission deadlines. Elicia will make improvements on requisition to better reflect standard accounting practices. • 06/03/2016 1:30P: Staff meeting (HPC Offices). Topics discussed: local landmark request for Elbel House, upcoming Agenda items, COA site inspection and miscellaneous. My Show and Tell: Schuyler Colfax memorabilia and stereoscopic views. Visit by Commissioner Hertel. • 06/07/2016 4:30P: (Common Council Conference Room; County -City Bldg.). Meeting with Tim Scott — President, South Bend Common Council. Others in attendance: Raphael Morton — President St. Joseph County Council, Todd Zeiger — Director Northern Regional Office; Indiana Landmarks, Elicia Feasel — Exec. Director HPC. Update on HPC recommendation for Local Landmark designation of 803 W. Washington Street. Heard suggestions for upcoming HPC presentations at each Council meeting. • 06/13/2016 12:30P: (Common Council Conference Room; County -City Bldg.). Meeting with Tim Scott — President, South Bend Common Council. Others in attendance: Raphael Morton — President St. Joseph County Council, Todd Zeiger — Director Northern Regional Office; Indiana Landmarks, Elicia Feasel — Exec. Director HPC, Jim Bognar. Discussion over aspects of Kizer Facade -Easement, current landmark initiative and requests for providing monthly agendas to each respective Council. Returned to HPC Offices for repair of intercom/access controller. Staff discussion over various activities. 06/15/2016 1:30P: "Proving the Product; Studebaker's Proving Ground" (Sudebaker National Museum). Presentation by Evie Kirkwood — Exec. Director St. Joseph County Parks & Andrew Beckman — Archivist, Studebaker Museum. A look back at the history of the proving grounds; now celebrating its ninety -year birthday. 2016 also marks the 50th Anniversary of the County Parks system. In 1966, Bendix Woods (our smallest County park land at 195 acres) was the first to be obtained by the newly installed Park Board under its President, Robert J. Fischgrund. My Great -Grandfather, Levan Van Paris was also a member of that board and was instrumental in negotiations behind -the -scenes to make Bendix Woods County Park, a reality. The Van Paris Shelter, on the premises, honors his contribution. F� p PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK ELBEL HOUSE 8o6 LELAND AVENUE SOUTH BEND, INDIANA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY JUNE 2016 I 3 8o6 Leland Avenue Based on the HPC's Local Landmarks Criteria as adopted by the Common Council, the site at 8o6 Leland Avenue can be recommended to the Common Council for designation as a Local Historic Landmark by the Historic Preservation Commission. The building meets the criteria in at least three areas: 1. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent an architectural characteristic or innovation. 2. Its suitability for preservation. 3. Its identification with the life of a person or persons of historical significance. The building fulfills criteria #1 as an excellent example of Queen Anne Victorian architecture. Built in 1894, it exemplifies the architectural style through extensive exterior decoration, including original spindle and fretwork, a mixture of siding materials, ornate and columned porches, irregular rooflines and gables. The building fulfills criteria #2 by the integrity of the original construction, being completely intact architecturally on the exterior, including siding, ornate trim, original front and back doors, and all but one of the original first and second floor windows. The building fulfills criteria #3 by its association with Richard Elbel, president of Elbel Brothers Music Store, and director of the South Bend Orchestra. Richard also served on the South Bend Parks Commission, being the only charter member to serve continuously until his retirement in 1939• He was instrumental in obtaining grants of land from property owners from Leeper Park northward, providing for the beginnings of what would become the Riverside Drive Parkway. In 1963, the golf course under development on the extreme northwest edge of South Bend was named in his honor. .d Elbel House 806 Leland Historical Context: The Elbel name was of great importance in South Bend from 1848 when Johann Friedrick Elbel, a 50 -year-old musician and tile maker, along with his wife, Anna Susanna, came to South Bend from Arzberg, Germany. In 1854, Johann Elbel built a house at 300 West Marion Street in South Bend, which became the center of the Elbel family's musical tradition. The Elbel family founded the first choral society in South Bend in 1855. By 1867, nine Elbel families were living in the neighborhood around Marion and Lafayette Streets, which_ had attracted other immigrants from Arzberg, thus garnering the name Little Arzberg. The Elbel Concert Band and Orchestra, featuring Johann and Anna's sons John, Lorenz, Henry and Wolfgang, performed classical music at South Bend venues from 1858-1918. Lorenz Elbel married Johanna Mainer in 1856, and they had six sons: Henry, Herman, Richard, Robert, Fred, and Louis. All were musically gifted like their father, especially Louis, who composed the University of Michigan fight song, The Victors, which was first performed by John Philip Sousa's Band in 1899. Richard Elbel (1867-1949), opened a music store in South Bend at 114 North Michigan Street in 1880. His brothers soon joined the venture, naming it Elbel Brothers Music Store. The store remained in business for ninety years. Richard served as president of the business. Richard Elbel, the builder of 8o6 Leland, also served as director of the South Bend Orchestra, and a South Bend Parks Commissioner. Richard Elbel served on the Parks Commission with George M. Platner, W.W. Ridenour and Otis Romine. Elbel was known as the "Dean of South Bend Parks." He was the only charter member of the South Bend Parks Commission to serve continuously until his retirement in 1939• Richard Elbel displayed a love for the development and preservation of green space from early adulthood. He served the city without salary and always insisted on paying his own traveling expenses. He was reappointed by four different mayors from different political parties. In 192o Richard Elbel was elected President of the State Park Association. He was adamant of the need for city planning and in particular for parks and streets. He believed streets should include landscaping and a sensitivity to appearance, thus attaching himself to the landscape and urban parks movements which produced such wonders as Central Park in New York City and Golden Gate Park in San Francisco. He was instrumental in obtaining grants of land 100-200 feet wide from property owners from Leeper Park northward, providing for the beginnings of what would become the Riverside Drive Parkway. In 1963, South Bend Parks opened Elbel Golf Course, on the extreme northwest edge of South Bend, named in his honor. Richard and his wife, Maude, had two children, Verniece and Donald. The house at 8o6 Leland was built in 1894, and the family lived there from 1895-1903, when the Elbels moved to 605 Portage Avenue in South Bend, staying in the Little Arzberg Neighborhood, some of which is now incorporated in the Chapin Park Neighborhood. 4 Description of Building: The Elbel House is part of the Chapin Park Local Historic District, as well as Chapin Park National Register Historic District. The house is in the Queen Anne style with two full stories, as well as a basement, and finished attic with windows. The frame house with brick foundation has an irregular plan. Wood siding covers the first floor, while the second floor and attic gables are covered in wood shingle siding. The roof is pyramidal in design with cross gables, asphalt shingles, and molded cornices below the eaves. The windows are one -over -one double hung with molded entablatures. The corner windows on the south fagade have pendills and the front and back doors are wood with dentils and light. The porch has a coffered front pediment, balustrade, wooden columns resting on the original masonry supports, and concrete porch floor and steps. Location Notes/Legal Description: The land referred to in this Commitment, situated in the County of St Joseph, State of Indiana, is described as follows: Landmarks Criteria: The life of Richard Elbel and his impact on South Bend makes his home an ideal candidate for local landmark status. The Elbel family's musical legacy to the city of South Bend through formation of the first choral society and the Elbel Concert Band and Orchestra, and establishment of Elbel Brothers Music Store had a major impact on the city's life and culture from its early days. Richard Elbel's service to the city through the Park Board, his passion for preservation of green space, and his vision for city planning, especially streets and parks, resulted in improvements that survive to present day. The Elbel house is a fine example of Queen Anne architecture, typical of the Victorian period. Both the interior and exterior remain largely intact, with interior alterations made during a 1950's conversion to apartments being reversed as of 2o16. The interior features 12 foot ceilings, hard wood floors, solid wood pocket doors, and the original fireplace which preserves its carved wooden mantel with columns, tile work and metal built-in surround. The house retains many of its original solid wood coffered doors and Orientalized hardware. Additionally, an elaborate foyer with a stairwell featuring delicately carved spindles and paneling, as well as two built-in wooden seats, with lids which lift for storage, mark the house as architecturally significant. �'t� •P I'YS' �;� A _ � r A� w[ A r . y . zpR' `yrAYGh,.� 5•"�. /7 /•. l/ »�r 'Y -s sT 'ij'!t it J, > , tivawi. tiU r 7ll P'resc'ribed by State Board of Accounts Governmental Unit General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) To.................................................................................... Dr. IDEM South Bend Tribune 225 West Colfax Ave ............................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tax ID# 35-13-1571 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Ad #: 9927 Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ................................... Head --Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Total number of lines in notice 0 COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.365 cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) ................................... Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two)................................... 0 00 TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $3.29 DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Size of 8 point Number of Insertions 1 Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid. I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune: '%. 06/20/16. r AU6G4n1,raI Manager Cheryl JLffie Morey, Notary Public F Resident of St. Joseph County My Commission expires December 21, 2016 South Bend Tribune 225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628 ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR $3.29 Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571 ALLOWED IN THE SUM OF $3.29 Attest That it is duly authenticated as required by law. That it is based upon statutory authority. That it is apparently correct incorrect I certify that the within claim is true and correct; that the services there in itemized and for which charge is made were ordered by me and were necessary to the public business " ' Ad #: 9927 Historic Preservation Commis- sion of South Bend & St. Jo- seph County will meet June 20 at 7.00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun- ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN. Agendas available by request at SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us T. Klusczinski, President Hspaxlp 1t 6: 20 Prescribed by State Board of Accounts Governmental Unit General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) To.................................................................................... Dr. IDEM South Bend Tribune 225 West Colfax Ave ............................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tax ID# 35-13-1571 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Ad #: 9927 Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ................................... Head --Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Total number of lines in notice 9 COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.365 cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) ................................... Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) .......... $0:00 ............... TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $3.29 DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Size of 8 point Number of Insertions 1 Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid. I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune:' " 06/20/16. l , AU6�kwW-7.1i 4r�ral Manager . South Bend Tribune 225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628 ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR $3.29 Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571 ALLOWED IN THE SUM OF $3.29 Attest Cheryl une Morey, Notary Publi Resident of St. Joseph County My Commission expires December 21, 2016 That it is duly authenticated as required by law. That it is based upon statutory authority. That it is apparently correct incorrect I certify that the within claim is true and correct; that the services there in itemized and for which charge is made were ordered by me and were necessary to the public business Ad #: 9927 Historic Preservation Commis- sion of South Bend & St. Jo- seph County will meet June 20 at 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun- ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN. Agendas available by request at SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us T. Klusczinski, President Hspaxlp 1t 6: 20