The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDecember 2016Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR ROOM 1308 COUNTY—CITY BUILDING MONDAY DECEMBER 19, 2016 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1.2016-1128 504 East LaSalle 2.2016-1128A 511 West Colfax 3.2016-1205 812 Golden 4.2016-1206 1246 East Jefferson III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. November 21, 2016 B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Executive Director 3. Deputy Director 4. Preservation Specialist 5. Legal D., COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President 2. Nominating V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS Local Landmark Local Landmark Riverside Drive East Wayne Street VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS & MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET 19 December 2016 Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White/Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. Hearing of Visitors is limited to three (3) minutes per person. NAME ADDRESS < < U c�; W, B, F, D H, O STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 4ate: 28 November 2016 Application Number: 2016-1128 Property Location: 504 East LaSalle Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate/Neoclassical/1882/1900/1924/J.C. Lauber Company Building Property Owner: Greater Lowell Holdings, LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark; National Register East Bank Multiple Property Listing Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 1900 one-story rectangular -plan commercial building has a concrete foundation, tin clad walls, and a flat roof. Front facade features modillions on ends of dentilled cornice above large plate glass windows with transom lights. In 1924, an addition was built directly behind the 1900 building. The one-story rectangular structure is built of concrete block, with a flat roof, and multi -pane windows with metal frames (probably original). There is no historic survey/description of this portion of the property. ALTERATIONS: COA 2005-1031 approved demolition of portion of building constructed in 1882, known as the Bergan Building. COA 2006-0413 approved reinstallation of JC Lauber Sheet Metal sign, formerly on west side of 1882 portion of building. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1) Demolition of 5,000 sq. ft. building which was not part of original historic structure. Building is not served with utilities other than basic lighting. Building currently used as cold storage. The wooden roof is deteriorated and building is of little to no value. 2) Installation of approx. 1801.f. of commercial grade ornamental aluminum fencing on the northwest corner. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes 1) demolition of 1924 addition to 1900 one-story portion of J. C. Lauber building. The existing structure has a deteriorated roof, no utilities except basic lighting, and is of little current value to the owner. Renovation costs would exceed the resulting value. This portion of the building was a later addition to original 1900 structure facing LaSalle Avenue, and only by virtue of vacating the former alley between the main building and the structure to be razed is it even considered part of the historic structure. Demolition would allow additional parking spaces for building's future use as a Brew Pub and Community Event Center, and improve curb appeal. 2) Installation of 180' of ornamental black aluminum fence at the northwest corner of property, enclosing area where 1882 Bergan Building once stood. This area will be outdoor seating for the future Brew Pub. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: On Wednesday November 30, 2016 I met with Frank Perri the owner of the Local Landmark located at 502 E LaSalle. (Commonly known as the JC Lauber building). He has applied to remove the addition located to the south most of the structure. We walked around inside and outside of the structure. The east, west and south walls were added to the existing building. The north wall of the addition is the south wall of one of the earlier additions and will remain. The floor is not complete and still has about 40% dirt floor. The area was designed for vehicle and equipment storage. The joists are non -dimensional lumber (we believe the addition dates 1946) and steel beams with wood and metal posts. Recent repairs were made and additional posts and supports were added to the north side of the addition. Areas of the ground and floor were still wet from recent rains and the roof deck has water stains and visible holes. Several patches and repairs have made to the concrete block walls where the walls have sunk or shifted. There is a severe slope and the field east of this area which sits uphill does not offer much other than channeling water directly to this building. The shifts to the south wall follow the water flow right to the east bank of the river. The owner intends to use this area for a parking lot. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of apart of the landmark,_ should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of fence installation and demolition of 5,000 sq. ft. 1924 addition to rear of building. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with all city codes. Deb Parcell Deputy Director Elicia Feasel Executive Director Application -FOR- Certificate FOR- Certi icate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLYr»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED fI.N THIS BOX --<<OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: I l ab I III Application Number: Past Reviews: � YES (Date of Last Review) �!� (� I a�0(p ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: - MV Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: _ ❑Denied ❑Tabled ❑Sent To Committee ❑Approved and issued: (Please Print) 57b 4 �S 1 � ✓,, - I � - �O (, � ➢ [ �(F 'j Address of Property for proposed work: � • ui-v� � I J rr-•, +� (Street Number : Street Name—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): 1 �t. LoWp-1 I `gobjA�s L L Phone #: - 1 •O Z Address of Property Owner(s): 3401-7 / e K.-{ V�1 I P - V 400-1 �� D ► + (Q� � (�Street�Ifumber— Street Name—City—Zip Code) ` l' Name of Contractor(s): if 1 � ,.,, `^ I V 1 -D E5 i&AS 6- LI.. � phone #: �7� . 7 3 �• �� 1 Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building:1� (Single Family—Multi-Family--C`oml mercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: Fri b4Cl�t ` SO � P-i(4L W �j% �L�1`k ( /� CA -DE 11 ( (Wood Frannie Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ADemolition (more than one box may be checked) tt-A-n criptionofProposedWork:l'/>1=M.L-01` of �►a0O `5&, f+ �VIt-1D1144 WR(644 L}•S Mol © F e" 1,t NA -L (i s l"0 2i (- 5—IQ-0 L -L) ILE , 130 ( L -D 1 t 15 M6-1 -5&We,0 wink t V, I j+ias ..46A Miz- 1-49ft0� . V0iL,0i;tUf C04�1V BSEP 4S CoSioKA�yE .'i-l+r . Weot)rg XoP i s vET�►o�11�0 AOo 0JI�0;A q s &F W *(P Nd. JA -10E .Cz) AM ��T 11,ftw OF AMP,, ISO I•f of 40AtMC0LIA4» �A408 OWt4E►�4t, ► W&11y.)Af FFa4 Ohl orl/' �5r coR. ek Owner/Contra or Fax #: e-mail: QN r t �° 0-d (` a I i'1 C) Z•D M (Staff will cor es on ►th onl n desi ee) X �/�- and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— earthdesigns bffisd A Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 Attention: Elicia Feasel November 23, 2016 Re: Certificate of Appropriateness for J.C. Lauber Building, South Bend, IN 46617 Dear Elicia, Enclosed please find a completed COA application which I would like the commission to review and approve at its earliest convenience. I am hoping that the demolition as described in the application will be performed in late April or early May 2017 just prior to restoration work on the J.C. Lauber Building itself. The J.C. Lauber Building improvements are being designed over the next few months and bidding is to be conducted in March, 2017 with constrcution commencing in May if all goes according to plan. The architect for the renovation will be Sanford Garner of the firm RG Collaborative. They will be assisting me in all aspects of the plans and application approval process including submission to you as well as Federal and State Preservation officials and State building officials. Earth Designs is excited to begin the transformation which will result in an attractive and successful adaptive reuse in a historically responsive manner. Please let me know if you have any questions or if there is anything you would like to discuss. Thanks for your time and assistance in getting this project off the ground. Sincerely, 96" Frank Perri 0 eaMdesigns 3617 McKinley Avenue, Post Office Box 148, South Bend, Indiana 46624-0148 4 _ i Historic J.C. Lauber Building 504 East LaSalle Avenue South Bend, IN 46617 "A place for people to meet, have fun and be creative" The J.C. Lauber Building was originally constructed in 1880 with additions in 1882, 1900, 1915, 1920, 1924 and 1954. The building was placed on the National Historic Register in 1986 and its "Commercial -Industrial style, common for facades at the end of the 19th Century, is rarely found extant by dawn of the 21St Century. Goal: To create an aesthetically pleasing interior space that maintains the building's historic integrity while also meeting the social and commercial needs of the East Bank Village (EBV) neighborhood in which the building resides. During the Fall and Winter of 2016-17, architectural design of the interior space will be completed for the buildings future use as a Brew Pub and Community Event Center. Historical features of the building will be maintained and remnants of the buildings long tenure as a sheet metal fabricating shop will be incorporated into the interior design. LP&4 oN or- 14AVI. cMaM�TRc. ALV44UM pr. a �IIF I � Ycvla+rt � 1 m00I0'IN..CB J L ---------J I �3 --------- I I 1 FLOOR PLAN SCAM -,/6..T. 1-- Iz �+IIa�NA-L k -11 `p 7-t�U v a T=- S l ooa6E 4 -tNS7-— % O� l� l:f- o� oiUpr�raialds D ,/\,N La5ALLE 5T. 9. �I, ePrs A, a� Gold t �loa r Jq (oAjiqA-L- E sTflrz� SiR�� o.AJLy ) A'PPAbx S,qo o 56Z F+ . PRIVATE 5ERVIOE DRIVE cco+�54Ce �- I.eoo s.F. lU1 RESIOENiW.UNR%IBpJE 6IRIGE � 11 FI SO E AX PRNATP PARKING ING Y LAMER PARK 6H2KaE FCR IFPIr � O� 5 9W Qa d� m r-1 0 m `U Z J NORM V SITE PLAN � 1 / SCALE I- is � 1 PEDE5TRIAN WALK re�{Lr�i W.vJ 60 v�S � ��i d rr\ J�0 � �1t4 A- I r COMH@+G1I1 SPICE ! RESILENLVL UNf15I00ve \\ �,E 6H2KaE FCR IFPIr � O� 5 9W Qa d� m r-1 0 m `U Z J NORM V SITE PLAN � 1 / SCALE I- is � 1 PEDE5TRIAN WALK re�{Lr�i W.vJ 60 v�S � ��i d rr\ J�0 � �1t4 A- I r Checklist -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephJn.us To ensure your application can be processed in a timely matter without delay, include the following documentation when appropriate: Certificate of Appropriateness Application Written description of the project (Scale, dimensions, construction methods, alterations, etc.) L614 eA Materials to be used (Supplemented with manufactures' brochures and specifications) NOAtl Site Plan showing existing buildings & structures and proposed project (for new construction, additions, paths, terraces, patios, fences) a- Photographs N A Blueprints/Drawings - one (1) set Application fee - $20.00 I. Rating 2. County 3. Survey No. 0 Outstanding EO Significant / Notable OContributing S111 S1- Tnql, 3(".3ZO • 15A614 -C - 1 4. Historic Name 5. Township Preliminary No. J.C. Lauber Co. Portage 141-597-56136 6,41', 6. Address 7. City 8. Quad Name 504 E. LaSalle South Bend, IN. 46617 South Bend East 11 INDIANA HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY State of Indiana Department of Natural Resources State Form 168221 Revised 1987 33. Surveyor 34. Revised by E.A. Straw J. Pastor 35. Revised by Affiliation Date H.P.C. 1985 Affiliation Date H.P.C. 1988 Affiliation Date LANDMARK RICT 01 9. Common Name 10. Visible 11. Endangered Explain Lauber Co. 1E Yes C1 No 0 Yes ®No 12. Ownership Owner's Address (it different) C3 Public :0 Private 13. Use Present Past 14. Category 15. Surveys I Legal Protections 16. Location Notes/ Legal Description 17. Cohdition 18. Integrity Residence 0 0 M Building(s) Local Landmark O.P. Lowell Lot 79 El Excellent - 0 Unaltered Commercial 1B 131 0 District (WI So?. F_ w"5Ail,L-1i) P9 Good 0 Altered 0 0 0 Site18-5005-0106 0 Fair 0 Moved El El 13 Structure 0 Deteriorated Date moved 0 Object 0 Ruins 19. Time Period(s) 20. Style(s) 21. Architect I Builder 1882. 1900, 1924 Italianate, Art Deco 22- SPECIFY ALTERATIONS Removals Replacement Additions Other 23. DESCRIPTION 24. SITE PLAN Stories oneA�_ Plan Rectangular Foundation Concrete 00 1 q I 7-q Tin clad wiflarge plate glass winnows. rlud"iiuub on ends ot dentilled walls cornice above openings. Roof Flat with tin cornice Porches (openings Double leaf wood and Large plate glass w/transom plass doors on N. facade m us, winauw on east Waif of bUildiu6 7- divided into (3) horizontal (divided divisions. Addition Features: Tin cladding on structure mfg. by Lauber Co. (Grounds /Outbuildings 1 25. No. of Contributing Resources 2 1 26. No. of Non-contributing Resources 0 27. Environment Commercial 28. Areas of Significance: ❑Agriculture 29. Historic Context(s) / Statement of Significance I Additional Description: Joseph Charles Lauber was born in Hamiltor Architecture 10hi. in February, 1868. He moved to Mishawaka with his family in the ATTACH NEGATIVE 0 Art 0 Commerce (early 1870's. Luaber began his work as a tinsmith at the -age of 12 when ENVELOPE HERE El Communications he was PnDrenticed to Jared Morse of Mishawaka. After working with Morse for four years. 0 Community Planning 11 Conservation T. -h'- t-nnk a nosition'with* the firm of Shriner and Weatherly of Grand Rapids, Mich., there 0 Economics I ha learned drafting and architectural sheet metal work. Lauber also attended the South 11 Education • Engineering Bend Business College for a short time in the late 1880's: • Entertainment/ recreation I In 1890 Lauber began his own sheet metal and slate roofing business. The City 1:1 Ethnic heritage 0 Exploration/settlement Directoires show that Lauber had several different partners in the early years of his C3 Health/medicine I business - probably reflecting a need of capital. The firm is first listed as Titzel and 11 Indian 13 Industry I Lauber. then Lauber and Poeh1man and finally Lauber and Weiss in 1896. C1 Invention Lauber's tin shop still operates in its original location in the 500 block of East 0 Landscape architecture 0 Law I LaSalle. although it was expanded greatly. It began as a small building behind several 11 Literature I store fronts, with access from the alley. The company slowly expanded and acquired other 0 Military El Performing arts buildings until it eventually controlled the entire block. The first expansion took El Philosophy place in 1900 when Lauber built an enlarged shop, 30. FOR STATE OFFICE USE ONLY C3 Politics I government 13 Religion fronting on LaSalle street. The building featured NR C1 Science large plate glass shop windows and an elaborate tin 0 Social history SR cornice.made by Lauber's shop. The tin cornice on Lau - 13 Transportation 0 Vernacular/Construction I bar's shop is an enlarged duplicate of one which tops 13 Other Nr [aSEE CONTINUATION SHEET 31. UTM 116 32. Information Sources City Directories Portage Township Assessors Lauber Family History Written by Howard Schmitt 33. Surveyor 34. Revised by E.A. Straw J. Pastor 35. Revised by Affiliation Date H.P.C. 1985 Affiliation Date H.P.C. 1988 Affiliation Date Page 1 of 2 Debra Parcell - RE: 504 East LaSalle From: "Frank Perri" <fperri@earthdesignsred.com> To: "'Debra Parcell"' <dparcell@co.st joseph.in.us> Date: 11/28/2016 6:11 PM Subject: RE: 504 East LaSalle Hi Debra To answer your question, I offer the following: o Current parking for the new business which will occupy the main historic building per the plan which was submitted is woefully inadequate and razing the cold storage building will allow the addition of between 30-40 parking spaces, as well as additional outdoor green space. The cold storage building is in poor condition and was never intended to be anything more than storage space. As such, its single wythe block construction has never been improved upon, the roof is in need of replacement and the entire structure is in need of a substantial renovation if it were to be utilized for any meaningful purpose. The costs to renovate the building far outweigh the value resulting from such renovation. e Upon the completion of the planned improvements, including the addition of the new parking lot, the site will have a much improved curbside appearance than the existing building. The addition of fencing, landscaping and outdoor seating areas will add to the newly refurbished look of the main JC Lauber building. The structure to be razed was never a part of the historic structure and only by virtue of vacating the former alley between the main buildings and the structure to be razed, is the building even considered a part of the historic structure. The building has little if any relevance as far as historical perspective. Hopefully, this answer will suffice for your needs. I would like to know what the date for the hearing is so I can make sure I am available. Thanks for your help. If there are any other questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. %ake cane, 579444 574.592.5646 file:///C:[Users/DParcell/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/583 C7362InternalPLEXISPO... 11/30/2016 DO tAII DO I'T I II §S j I'T I II 'i z - S.-�:�' 1 'F '-�. - „'�' �r�'-�' . s''u:-`�'l''" - .._`-.�a.;:3:�."a :.af-_• _kp,�,i `G",='_.'..re._'�,c f _�.a L ��yk, _ - TI �': ' -� ��s v _ �"iry �.2 .'� S - -r' �� y T E (f - i ��5��.•� y�,a ew `��'-..'x e�d,:,, S � } �r,� I., STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS tate: 28 November 2016 Application Number: 2016-1128A Property Location: 511 West Colfax Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/l898Birdsell House/Wilson Parker, Archt. Property Owner: Steve Mihaljevic/Anisah Michael Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark/West Washington St. National Register Historic Dist. Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The wood frame house has field stone veneer facade on the first floor, second floor is brick veneer, gable ends of house are Tudor -style Half timbers. The foundation is concrete and stone and the half-timbering in the gables. Wood windows are diamond patterned 4/1. Verandah is supported with stone columns with ornate capitals. The porte cochere has a hipped roof. ALTERATIONS: Original roof has been replaced with asphalt shingles. COA 2000-0316 approved a wrought fence around the property, and a rear yard chain link fence was approved with COA 2001-0129, although neither of these fences were installed. COA 2008-0604A approved reconstruction of chimney. RME 2016-0825A approved repair of five original double hung windows in second story south and third story south. COA 2016-1018 to replace the existing asphalt shingle house roof and metal front porch and porte cochere roofs with standing -seam copper was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacing all roof surfaces with new copper sheeting. 4ESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This is a reapplication for COA 2016-1018. Owner proposes to install new standing -seam copper roof with copper drip edge, copper valley, edge trim and flashings on entire house, including front porch and porte cochere. Historic photos show the original house roof to be flat clay tile, and the Portage Township Assessor's card lists a tile roof in 1935. The original porch and porte cochere roofs, as well as gutters and accents which still exist, are painted metal; the original house roof was replaced with asphalt shingles. Group B Standards say the proposed treatment should be reviewed for "character and style consistency with the original surfaces." The National Park Service's Preservation Brief 4 on roofs says "if the roof is readily visible ... material should match as closely as possible the scale, texture, and coloration of the historic roofing material." Historically, copper roofs were used on important buildings in the early 1800s, then infrequently until the latter 19th century when copper became more accessible. Even then, it was used most frequently for ornamental roofs on public buildings. (National Park Service, Roofing for Historic Buildings, Metals) The owner has selected copper for the roof material in an effort to match the original roof materials that remain, as well as for its durability. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: Upon request made by Deputy Director Deb Parcell, I am writing an analysis of the roof in its current condition. The current roof material is asphalt shingles on the main house and metal raised -seamed roofing on the front porch and porte-cochere. Several patches and alternative coverings are in place in multiple locations where the asphalt roof has begun to roll up and deteriorate. From the interior of the house water damage is evident on the southeast, northeast, and southwest corners. A large area on the northeast has the most significant damage. The exterior patches and correlating interior damage would suggest that an inspection should take place to identify any necessary roof deck repairs or replacement that should take place prior to installation of any new roofing material. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while an addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. StructureNecessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Movini4 The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended 4 New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: While copper roofing was not original to the main house roof, it still exists in other areas of this building. As replacement of all roofing with copper would be a replacement in kind for the porch and porte cochere, but a change of material and profile for the house roof, staff recommends approval of installation of copper roof on porch and porte cochere only. Staff has advised the owner to seek quotes for alternate roofing materials, particularly synthetic slate. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director Application - FOR - Certi ICate of Appropriateness `t `�=5::� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION��x 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ''y1 I *lac 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www. stj osephcountyindiana. com/departments/SJCB P/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 11 1381 a0 i U Application Number: Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date ajLast Review) Staff Approval authorized by: I Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: FO Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark ' Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ DeniedElTabled 10/ IS1301b ❑ NO Title: ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (Nance) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) , �l +� j L! Address of Property for proposed work: S-11 Vr , C 1 � 7'r�`�- -90 v 1�PW96A L-201 l� 1-&60 p (Street Number—Street Name((—City—Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): �31A �.� KkWN .e, k C/ ,Ort iljS�'i h I (✓kar,( Phone 9:7773 � 3c) -o 8,93 Address of Property Owner(s): 1,q_ 'F CV \�� n /e_ L4. O eA4 ' LEG6 6 (Street Number treet Dame—City—Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): 1 +0 9Q � kSCA M(r UPM Phone #: 3 -- Contractor Company Name: Address of Contractor Company: (Street Number— Street Name—Cit y—Zip Code) r Current Use of Building: M 1x�� 0�'L4 CO rnnneri6 /l,( "7o Cl) C i�[^ref��l f9G'C4tZ-f– (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government .fz pstrial—Vacant—etcy. Type of Building Construction: f' iC_�-'_ )_�: +0-n l CJ KU 0 & a I � - Uucco (Voda Frame—Bricy-Stone—Steel-7toncrete—Other) Proposed Work: In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box m be checked) //�� (� '' aa Description of Proposed Work: PQ -P' G.GI nc Q,, ( (-cop S o (-T'G�e [^ Wk A4, me U'_j Coo f)8 Owner/Contractor F #: e-mail: MCn M �(>✓ P r e�(�cc eS (asP'►�l C X e t and/or X Signatu a of ner Signature of Contractor 0 //�G G, R > fid., ✓.,y, ..t`?"" f;4, ti s�s� �.:'. yam! _ ..^ 1r .. • � � '».: .fir-..- A.. ... .. ,....� a u { , R Y s�s� �.:'. yam! _ ..^ 1r .. • � � '».: .fir-..- A.. ... .. ,....� a u { , „ kil '.i 1 •+I :b.,A!!li��tiy4',i0A{Iri�Ri+ . e rr P MIT �:t "x N Nr,ir � rvr f' U 'All rl s �3 r i it Al l P.P'Phi 1 rr P MIT �:t Nr,ir � rvr f' U 'All rl s �3 r i it (4ugTf4t l' �lminimrcmrnnuntmiinmvi 4;ay n IN ...•!!i!t' �. �..._ t 5Y. � � .�• t ��,stl � ,_ fix. , lr ”?+�"7. �- �' �'�`lr ` kj.��Jr✓� +il � � A. il�lr��! ei yo ,` YN ( pv,r1ol"4✓t. iy 1�� i 1 p \W • i `t t-77 ..,: 'i�� f�.+l •'! iii:. f i r � t! 4MG a Lji t r� � � �•'• f �r y i 'at �� .•. R Nr,ir � rvr rl s r it (4ugTf4t ,4 rti ✓< tyM1� ✓ � Aoa` WtirM1r aa :' r: G3 Wittw. P'*7� iLT3' Mougin Roofing LLC 9325 North 850 East New Carlisle, IN 46552 (574)993-1396 mouginroofing@gmaii.com ESTIMATE ADDRESS Steve Mihaljevic Mag Mile Properties LLC 511 West Colfax South Bend, In. ESTIMATE # 1229 DATE 10/13/2016 ACTIVITY QTY' RATE AMOUNT Roofing 1 98,584.00 98,584.00 *This proposal is for the Main house and doesn't include porch and carport -Remove existing roofing -thoroughly clean up/haul off/dispose of debris -inspect decking for damage -if decking needs replaced it will be done at a cost of $28 per 32 ft.2 -Install proper underlayments -high temp ice and water shield on eaves/valleys/around penetrations -install synthetic metal roof underlayment on remainder -Install copper drip edge on eaves -Install "W" style copper valley -Install standing seam copper panels -includes copper flashings/counter flashings/rake edge trim/hip and ridge flashing --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- Mougin Roofing is a family owned company that stands behind TOTAL $98584.00 their work 100%,we guarantee the best quality workmanship available. Mougin Roofing requires half down to start this project and the remaining balance upon completion of all work. RE i� 0tV ..r r• � y 1. r:.' - �i�:✓'= may_ y:��:. �h�; -:�cx.><.s.i-.:.."_. r STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 5, 2016. Application Number: 2016-1205 Property Location: 812 Golden Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/1911 - Property Owner: Tim & Leticia Morris Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 story frame house has a square plan and is set upon a concrete block foundation. It has a high hip roof with a gable projection on the main fagade and it is covered in asphalt shingles. The walls are aluminum sided. Some of the upper floor windows and the front fagade windows appear to be original 1/1 wood double -hung. All the windows have aluminum storms. There is an open porch with concrete block pillars and piers with wood Doric columns. The front door appears to be original. The house is situated on a very small wedge-shaped lot with a narrow front and side yard; the garage completely dominates the rear yard. ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided and all windows have aluminum storms. The steel security door at the rear of the house is a replacement. The garage appears to be original. The storm door is not original. The south kitchen window has been reduced in size and replaced with a modern vinyl replacement window (1985). A south basement window has been replaced with a vinyl replacement window and the other south side basement window has a deteriorating aluminum storm and wood window. A window at the rear of the house has been removed and/or covered with aluminum siding (1985). The roof was replaced with COA 2007-0316. COA 2010-0802A for vinyl replacement windows was denied with the exception of the front third floor window, as it was determined by the Preservation Specialist that existing windows could be repaired and/or rehabilitated. COA 2016-1019 approved tear down of existing garage, and conditional approval of installation of a new wood deck and French doors (replacing windows) at back side of house; removal and replacement of existing wood windows was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS: Windows DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Owner proposes removal of seven existing first floor windows: four in living room to be replaced with Andersen 200 Series exterior vinyl -clad double -hung wood windows with Colonial "Grilles -Between -the Glass", and three in dining room to be replaced with P1yGem Contractor Series 2000 vinyl double -hung replacement windows. Reasons for replacement are to "increase energy efficiency and safety, and because windows are believed to have too many problems to justify the cost of repair." Andersen vinyl -clad wood windows were chosen for the front of the house, visible from the street; P1yGem vinyl windows for the dining room as they are not visible from the street and face the neighboring house, which is situated extremely close to this property. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: I met with Tim Morris the owner of 812 Golden Ave at his address located in the Riverside Drive Local Historic District. I had received an email from Director Feasel in response to a call from Mr. Morris. We walked around the interior and exterior of the house discussing the condition of his existing windows and his plans to remodel the back yard and remove the extremely small garage. We continued around the house going floor to floor as I photographed each window. There are two windows that have enough damage that needs structural repair by means of an epoxy along the bottom of the sashes. The greatest issues with these windows are: 1) the presence of many heavy layers of paint 2) missing ropes and pulley wheels with paint interference 3) misalignment of interior stops (trim) leading to movement of lower sash and a less than tight seal of the upper and lower sashes 4) missing or damaged aluminum storm sashes It is my opinion that the majority of these windows are not deteriorated beyond repair. New sash cords, removal of some paint, and the adjustment of interior stops would greatly improve the performance of the majority of the windows. Granted some additional epoxy work needs to be performed on two sashes. There are aluminum storms already on most of the house and the ones that are missing parts could be replaced with new. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Riverside Drive Local Historic District II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Reauired Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Previous siding replacement, window alterations, and installation of a couple vinyl windows have already altered the original appearance of the house. As inspection of the windows have determined that several windows need significant repair, and the proposed windows will appear very similar to existing, staff recommends approval of replacement windows without grilles, to maintain the original 1/1 appearance. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director G Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCHP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f: 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLYy»»> ' f 'I ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX««< OF „ f j DO NOT COMPLETE ANY < FICE USE ONLY Date Received: CP Z / (7S 10 Application Number: 06 Vo— 1� =� I duo Past Reviews: " YES (nate ojLast Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark 101 Iq I aolb ❑ NO Title: Local Historic District (Name) }� 1 Jn-jad P. ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: Name of Property Owner(s):: t% 1A Address of Property Owner(s): ty,t 2 - Name Name of Contractor(s): Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: C1C1t 1� is �t1-f 5nm u (Street Number— Street Name—City`Zip Code) �-1C til K0lu 1 S Phone #: '-� qC s k7 (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Phone #: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building: (Single Family—Multi-Family—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: (1n'7 [A t ,N " --,'TSj,� (Wood Frame Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape �ew eplacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: t �'"� U.J S Owner/Contractor Fax #: e-mail: -ivxA' (D iA e 4P o o\i w, iL — CcA (Staff will torr pond with oft one27ee)Oand/or X e of Owner / Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— \j IDE— Ej Woodwright full -frame windows offer 400 SERIES I you the ability to select from a simple WOODWRIGHT° WINDOWS rectangular shape or create a distinct, Make new homes look old and architecturally inspired look with old homes like new. Unequal Arch Arch Springline graceful arches. Woodwright windows are a great choice for traditional architecture. With their thick, sloped sills, precision -milled wood interiors and historically accurate grille patterns, REPLACING A WINDOW? these windows bring authentic old-world character to Woodwright insert windows can save you 24 homes of all ages. time and money. (See opposite page.) CUSTOM SIZES REPLACEMENT 400 SERIES '`;: jIV,L.WATCH° Andersen® 400 Series tilt -wash full -frame windows are TILT -WASH WINDOWS available with impact -resistant glass and structural upgrades to Our most popular double -hung window. meet the tough building codes of hurricane -prone coastal areas. Year after year, the Andersen 400 Series tilt -wash See your local code official for specific requirements. window is our best selling double hung window — and for good reason. Extremely energy efficient, it gives . ) you a wide array of decorative and performance options. REPLACING A WINDOW? �f i 400 Series tilt -wash insert windows can save you time and money. (See opposite page.) CUSTOMSIZES REPLACEMENT 00 SERIES ILT-WASH WINDOWS Our 2 0 Series tilt -wash double -hung window comes in our ost popular sizes and gives you our most reque ed options. You still get low -maintenance "ter, rs and real wood interiors, along with our reno ed Owner -2 -Owner® limited warranty* 32 _'`BLit andersenwindows-com/warranty for a copy of the limited warranty. NARROLINE® WINDOW CONVERSION KIT If your home has Andersen Narroline® windows that were made after 1967, our quick conversion kit can turn them into convenient, tilt -wash double -hung windows with high- performance Low -E4® glass. It installs easily with less mess REPLACEMENT than ordinary window replacement. Plus, it matches your existing window inside and out and is backed by our full Owner -2 -Owner limited warranty* Visit andersenwindows.com/narroline, where you can download measuring guides and watch an installation video. ') Outlook Mail SCUfbMA and Fleip*een I O New I Reply I Delete HArcli Pail Junk I Sweep Move to subject) TinfMO s Reply I 0 Today, 5:08 PIv1 You letty I life insurance health incur: Lorraine nesrallah 1 mexico trip moms condos new home portobello I tax,Z009 1 tax 2010 i tax2011 3 taxes 2015 taxes2013 1 I trust https://outlook.live.com/owa/?path=/attachmentlightbox cad Save to OneDrive - Personal from my Ver&on W%reiess4GLTf 0 11/21/2016 Outlook Mail SeFfffAM3Q and ft*een 1 O New I Folders Inbox Junk Email Drafts Sent Items Deleted Iters 4 adt security Aventuras C bantling meti capitalone car insuranc carl meado clientsworkir condo renta4 condos at av, condosale : -5 gary@adventurasclub 1 letty life insurance health incur' Iorraine nesrallah I mexico trip ' moms condos new home portobello Tax 2009 1 tax 2010 1 tax2011 3 taxes 2015 taxes2013 1 trust Reply I Delete Hftfs mil Junk I Sweep Move to (No subject) TM Tinf)Ao s +"` Reply I 0 Today, 5:04 PM You ,(a -Personal Download Save to OneDrive -Personal sw 2017velkagan Jetty 1.4::: s S1997mo. far 36 mos Sl Due at signing. Excludes ta):� :: title, license, registration, Sent from my I/er&cin Wireless 4G 1TEDROI) options, and dealer fees. Fc:: Wireless 4G LTf DROID highly qualified customers through Volkswagen Credit offer ends 11/30/2016 View kev offer details https:Houtlook.live.com/owa/?path=/attachmentlightbox 11/21/2016 Line Item #: 0003 Line Item Qty: Initial: Location: —_O Size =3'4"Wz5' 6"H Unit Size= 3'31/2"W x 5'51/2" H m �. 200Series TUt-VVaoh. Single Units _--_--_ Unit Codo8temSize: 244DH3456' Openabon/HondinA:A\ Frame Depth: 31N" ---- —'--- Exterior Color: White Interior Color. Pre -finished White Glass Type (Top) Low E8nnadSunGlass, F\ne|ightGhUex-Between-th*+G|anw.Colonial, VVhita80h|ta.3/4" Glass Type (Bottom): Low E SmartSun Glass Grille Construction (Top):Finm|ightGd|hmo-Behweon-the-G|aom Insect Screens: Insect Screen, White Extension Jamb: Pna'fin|ohedWhite, 4SV1O".Job Site Applied, Complete Unit Extension Jambs Hardware: Andersen 2U0Series -White Zone: Northern U-Facton O.3U. GHGO: D.1A. ENERGY Sl0\ROCertified: No Comments: Qty Part Num Item Size Descripdno Total Price Extended price 1 0000000 244DH3456 Unit, 31/4"Frame Depth, VVhbe/PiWhite, (Top $ 607.00 * 60708 GGlass, R Gh||en-8ebw»en-thn'Glasa.Colonial, 4VV2H, VVhiteMh\te.3/4"(Bottom Sash) Low EGmodSun Glass 1 0833286 244DH3456 Insect Screen, White $ 53.60 $ 53.60 1 0876686 244DH349BHDSL Extension Jambs. Head and Sill, Pre -finished White, $ 17.00 $ 17^00 4S/1O".Job Site Applied 1 0876730 244OH56PR@D Extension Jambs, Side Member, Pre -finished White, $ 20.80 $ 20.80 4QMG".Job Site Applied $ 698.40 $ 698.40 Line Item#: 0004 Line Item Qty: 1 Initial: Location: RO Size= 8Y0"VVxS/G"H Un!tSbn=3"111/2"Wx575112"B T11| . Part Number: O000O0UU-1 Mulling Location: Factory (Direct) | Mull Priority: '� |N Mulling Matehal'Narrow Mull ' Pedm�ar��ensionJomb:Pro-finishedVVhue.49U6".JobSmaAppUed'CumpleteUnb Unit Code/Item Size: 244OH2 Operation/Handing: AA -AA -AA Comments: _ QUOTE: 353 Print Date 11121/2016 Page 3 Of 6 K]\emion 16.2 Qty Part Num Item Size Description Total Price Extended Price Composite Parts and Labor - Factory (Direct) Mulled 1 0876730 244DH561244FX56 EXT JAMB, WHITE SIDE 4 9/16 WALL PI PR $ 20.80 $ 20.80 2 0876671 244DH96IN EXT JAMB, WHITE 4 9/16 WALL PI $ 67.40 $ 67.40 Total: (includes Mull Charges of $ 176.80) $ 265.00 $ 265.00 Unit 1 of 3 __— 200 Series Tilt -Wash, Single Units Unit Code/Item Size: 244DH2456 Operation/Handing: AA Frame Depth: 3 1/4" Exterior Color: White -- Interior Color: Pre -finished White Glass Type (Top): Low E SmartSun Glass, Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass, Colonial, White/White, 3/4" Glass Type (Bottom): Low E SmartSun Glass Grille Construction (Top): Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass Insect Screens: Insect Screen, White Hardware: Andersen 200 Series - White Zone: Northern U -Factor: 0.30, SHGC: 0.19, ENERGY STAR® Certified: No Comments: Qty Part Num Item Size Description Total Price Extended Price 1 0000000 244DH2456 Unit, 3 1/4" Frame Depth, White/PI White, (Top $ 531.00 $ 531.00 Sash) Low E SmartSun Glass, Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass, Colonial, 3W2H, White/White, 3/4" (Bottom Sash) Low E SmartSun Glass 1 0833317 244DH2456 Insect Screen, White $ 47.40 $ 47.40 $ 578.40 $ 578.40 Unit 2 of 3 200 Series Tilt -Wash, Single Units Unit Code/Item Size: 244DH3456 Operation/Handing: AA Frame Depth: 3 1/4" Exterior Color: White Interior Color: Pre -finished White Glass Type (Top): Low E SmartSun Glass, Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass, Colonial, White/White, 3/4" Glass Type (Bottom): Low E SmartSun Glass Grille Construction (Top): Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass Insect Screens: Insect Screen, White Hardware: Andersen 200 Series - White Zone: Northern U -Factor: 0.30, SHGC: 0.19, ENERGY STAR@ Certified: No QUOTE: 353 Print Date: 11/21/2016 Page 4 Of 6 IQ Version: 16.2 Comments: Qty Part Num Item Size Description Total Price Extended Price 1 0000000 244DH3456 Unit, 31/4" Frame Depth, White/PI White, (Top $ 607.00 $ 607.00 Sash) Low E SmartSun Glass, Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass, Colonial, 4W2H, White/White, 3/4" (Bottom Sash) Low E SmartSun Glass 1 0833286 244DH3456 Insect Screen, White $ 53.60 $ 53.60 $ 660.60 $ 660.60 Unit 3 of 3 200 Series Tilt -Wash, Single Units Unit Code/Item Size: 244DH2456 Operation/Handing: AA Frame Depth: 31/4" Exterior Color: White Interior Color: Pre -finished White Glass Type (fop): Low E SmartSun Glass, Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass, Colonial, White/White, 3/4" Glass Type (Bottom): Low E SmartSun Glass Grille Construction (Top): Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass Insect Screens: Insect Screen, White Hardware: Andersen 200 Series - White Zone: Northern U -Factor: 0.30, SHGC: 0.19, ENERGY STAR® Certified: No Comments: qty Part Num Item Size Description Total Price Extended Price 1 0000000 244DH2456 Unit, 3 1/4" Frame Depth, White/PI White, (Top $ 531.00 $ 531.00 Sash) Low E SmartSun Glass, Finelight Grilles -Between -the -Glass, Colonial, 3W2H, White/White, 3/4" (Bottom Sash) Low E SmartSun Glass 1 0833317 244DH2456 Insect Screen, White $ 47.40 $ 47.40 $ 578.40 $ 578.40 $ 2,082.40 SUBMITTED BY: SUBTOTAL $ 6,077.10 ACCEPTED BY: TAXES( 0.000 %) $ 0.00 DATE: GRAND TOTAL $ 6,077.10 ** All graphics as viewed from the exterior. ** Rough opening dimensions are minimums and may need to be increased to allow for use of building wraps or flashings or sill panning or brackets or fasteners or other items. QUOTE: 353 Print Date: 11/21/2016 Page 5 Of 6 iQ Version: 16.2 I PL Customer Information I kV Y W1 A� •X %,euvw v4vt� Y GEM BILL TO: 00046377 SHIP TO: 00046377 Certified VY I N 0 0 WS Big C Lumber South Bend Big C Lumber South Bend, 30499 Tracy Rd 020830 020830 Walbridge, OH 43465 125 Dixieway North 125 Dixieway North Phone: (800) 666-4343 Fax: South Bend IN 46637 South Bend IN 46637 www.,r)lvaemwindows.com 574-272-6500 574-271-3832(Fax) 574-272-6500 574-271-3832(Fax) T "]Qa 3115527 11/21/2016 None Not Set ^~ matt.fields@bigclumber 0 Ni 410,11-919-W01 'A% TV Toledo Kinch, Nicholas N 'Rough Opening: 281/4 X 66 1/4, Overall Frame Size: 28 X 66 Qty: 3 Product Contractor Series 2000 Replacement Double Hung $333.50 $1000.50 Room Location: Special Product Request Glass Breakage Warranty = No glass breakage None Assigned warranty Note: Dimensions Frame Width = 28, Frame Height = 66, Sash Split = Even Exterior Color/Finish = White, Interior Color/Finish = White Operation / Venting (Viewed from Exterior) = Double Hung Performance Rating = H -RI 5 (DP +151-15), U -Factor = 0.27 (1.53), SHGC =0.27, VLT = 0.5 Glass HP2+, Double Glazed, Annealed, Low -E / Low -E, Argon Gas, Warm Edge Spacer Hardware White, 2 Locks Full Screen, Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh, Center Bar Frame Options Rigid Welded Nail Fin Clear Opening: 23.424 X 26.26, Clear Opening Area: 4.271626 Total Unit Quantity: 3 Order: Delivery: Comment: CUSTOMER SIGNATURE DATE Prices listed are good for acceptance for 30 days after the quote is certified. All material to be delivered within an additional 90 days or pricing may be increased due to material cost increase. Acceptance of the order by Ply Gem will be determined by availability of production time. Product quoted may or may not meet architect's specifications. Please verify adherence to state and local codes. Total does not include applicable taxes. Job total is reflected by the quantities SHOWN ABOVE. In the event of quantity or extension discrepancy, unit price will prevail. Quote #: 3115527 Offil PLY GEM Page I of I Quote Effective Date: 1111I.C1.10-'ri"W Printed: 11/21/2016 1:49:13 PM ITTIO' All, 1 $1,000.5Q Tim Morris Tim Morris n `NO Order: Delivery: Comment: CUSTOMER SIGNATURE DATE Prices listed are good for acceptance for 30 days after the quote is certified. All material to be delivered within an additional 90 days or pricing may be increased due to material cost increase. Acceptance of the order by Ply Gem will be determined by availability of production time. Product quoted may or may not meet architect's specifications. Please verify adherence to state and local codes. Total does not include applicable taxes. Job total is reflected by the quantities SHOWN ABOVE. In the event of quantity or extension discrepancy, unit price will prevail. Quote #: 3115527 Offil PLY GEM Page I of I Quote Effective Date: 1111I.C1.10-'ri"W Printed: 11/21/2016 1:49:13 PM at. -a l"4 � � �Y1 < i � n 11: :ac; .t;:.. .. �'\, i ,x+ qtr —�� C1 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Aate: 6 December 2016 Application Number: 2016-1206 Property Location: 1246 E Jefferson Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neo-Classical/1907/ Austin & Schambleau Property Owner: Patrick and Suzanne Ruszkowski Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a 2 storey frame on a rectangular plan. The gable roof has a bell -cast shape with plain box cornice. A large front shed roof dormer has two inset balconies with wood balustrade. The windows are 6/6 double hung with wood shutters and 11 with hidden metal storm shutters. A three -car garage (1936) and wood and stone lodge (1937) are also on site. ALTERATIONS: The landscaping was changed with COA 2008-0410 to remove half of the tennis court and install in -ground pool. The asphalt shingles were replaced with COA 2011-0701A. COA 2015- 0908A to replace 22 existing windows with Anderson Renewal replacement windows was denied. APPLICATION ITEMS; Replace 22 windows on second floor with wood type windows from Marvin — Ultimate Double Hung windows. All aluminum windows which are not historic will be removed. The new windows will have the design (same) as the original windows including the grills. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to replace 22 existing second floor windows with Marvin Ultimate aluminum -clad wood double hung replacement windows, designed to be used within the existing frame. Windows will be simulated divided lite, with grilles on interior and exterior and spacer bars between glass to create look of authentic divided lite windows; same appearance as existing windows. The existing non -original aluminum storms were improperly sized and have done considerable damage to the sills and window openings. The storms will be removed, restoring the outside appearance to its original look. The owners are looking for a quality replacement window that will maintain the historic character, but allow ease of use, cleaning, ventilation, and reduce sound from busy Jefferson Blvd. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: From 10/5/2015 PS Report: Although 80% of the sashes are not beyond repair, other components of the windows such as the sills are. Eleven windows with the "hidden" storm shutters will need new customized sills, insulation, and additional support added just to achieve functioning windows that can keep elements and sound out. I recall during the last meeting that involved this property, someone had asked the question as to what the condition of the windows in the remainder of the house especially the first -floor windows. Just to clarify, the property owner told me that he had the first -floor windows restored and new wood storms built for the entire level. Steve Szaday-Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street Local Historic District II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re- used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As inspection of these windows has determined many components need replacement, and removal of the existing storms and replacement with the proposed Marvin Ultimate white aluminum -clad windows with grids to match existing will restore a more historically accurate appearance, the Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel Executive Director Deb Parcell Deputy Director i Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http://www.stj osephcountyindiana.com/departments/SJCI iP/index.htm p: 574-235-9798 f. 574-235-9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE \ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX«««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: kZ-� � l %W Application Number: NV I U — 18vu Past Reviews: ® YES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ® Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ NO Title: E04I 5 e ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) �Q\ Address of Property for proposed work: (S�tjreet Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) c� ct Name of Property Owner(s): Phone #: l;)L 2- �p15S Address of Property Owner(s): QH b lfz- , (StreetNumber—Street Name—City--Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): vwvb�_— Phone #: Contract Company Name: �F-t f' `�� Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name—City—Zip Code) Current Use of Building:1� fily (Single amily—Multi-Fan—Commercial—Government—Industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: � '`,� JkV flood Frame Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: + ` P►"L `� �tc��1N5 CvU \��'�M. LJ�1�,..dh`1.ia '�'C��r-��C�A'0.��\N - ��t1v.!�� `�D��-�'\kti_ 1►.1�1�.�_CJ'11a� Nl��nC /� � � • ' V.i �� `c��Vrz �� S�th-.> Ips �1^,i=�'f�l ��i tv a.� �i t n, Qu'1.�..s� `sve.��V�°� Owner/Contractor Fax#:;�7q e-mail: ( or\spn it one signee)Xand/or X Signature of \ �' Signature of Contractor —APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— OMS Ver. 0002.11.00 (Current) Product availability and pricing subject to change. LINE ITEM QUOTES Riskowski Windows Quote Number:7S8FZHD Architectural Project. m6er The following is a schedule of the windows and doors for this project. For additional unit details, please Quotes. Additional charges, tax or Terms and Conditions may apply. Detail pricing is per unit. Line #1 Mark Unit: A Qty: 6 &.1 c� I.dov. ..d D.." Built around You' opo HH 1H FA' As Viewed From The Exterior Entered As -10 FS 415/8" X 49 3/4" 10 42" X 50" Egress Information Width:383/8" Height:197/16" Net Clear Opening: 5.18 SgFt M fG Li 'e Ite AR16� Net Price: 1,260.00 Ext. Net Price: � USD 7,560.00 Stone White Clad Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Interior ...................................... Clad Ultimate Insert Double Hung ...................................................... Inside Opening 42" X 50" 0 Degree Frame Bevel Top Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White- Pine Sash Interior IG Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter and Spacer Bar 7/8" SDL- With Spacer Bar - Stainless ...................................... Rectangular - Special Cut 4W2H Stone White Clad Ext- Painted _Interior Finish - White Pine Int Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile Bottom Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG -1 Lite Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter Bar Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile White Sash Lock 1 /Unit White Sash Lift................................................................... White Jamb Hardware .................................... :.............................. Aluminum Screen Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh Stone White Surround 31/4" Jambs 117.00 920.00 ......197.00 ............................................11.00 ............................................15.00 Line #3 Unit: C Net Price: I 1 893.001 Qty: 1 I)Mark &7# Ext. Net Price: USD 893.00 l IRIVIH ¢a Stone White Clad Exterior wi"d— ..v D.— ........................................ Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Interior .......................................... ........117.00 Built around vou: ..................................................................................................... Clad Ultimate Insert Double Hung......681.00 Inside Opening 181/2" X 46" 0 Degree Frame Bevel GlassAdd ForAll Sash/Panels.................................................................................................................69.00 Top Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG -1 Lite Low E2 Obscure w/Argon Stainless Perimeter Bar Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile Q Bottom Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG -1 Lite Low E2 Obscure w/Argon As Viewed From Stainless Perimeter Bar The Exterior Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile Entered As: 10 White Sash Lock FS181/8" X 45 3/4" 1 /Unit White Sash Lift ..........................................................................................................................11.00 10181/2" X 46" White Jamb Hardware..........................................................................................................................15.00 Egress Information Aluminum Screen OMS Ver. 0002.11.00 (Current) Processed on: 12/1/2016 2:32:29 PM Page 2 of 7 OMS Ver. 0002.11.00 (Current) Product availability and pricing subject to change. Line #7 Mark Unit: E Qty: 3 MARVIPI pE wl.J.r, , D.— Builtamund.au: "M As Viewed From The Exterior Entered As:10 FS 415/8" X 493/4" 10 42" X 50" Iress Information idth: 38 3/8" Height: 19 7/16" —t Clear Opening: 5.18 SgFt Aluminum Screen Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh Stone White Surround 31/4" Jambs ZA VA J/,;, Stone White Clad Exterior Riskowski Windows Quote Number:7S8FZHD Architectural Project Number: Ext. Net Price: I USD 3,780.00 Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Interior.........................................................................................:117.00 Clad Ultimate Insert Double Hung ......................... ».................................. _............................................ 920.00 Inside Opening 42" X 50" 0 Degree Frame Bevel Top Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter and Spacer Bar ._.7/8"SDV-With Spacer Bar-Stainless:.......................:........................................:..........:..............197.00 Rectangular- Special Cut 4W2H Stone White Clad Ext- Painted Interior Finish - White Pine Int Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile Bottom Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG -1 Lite Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter Bar . Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile White Sash Lock 1 /Unit White Sash Lift.....................:.............................:....:.:.....................:.........................................11.00 WhiteJamb Hardware..................................:............................................................... ............15.00 Aluminum Screen Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh Stainless Perimeter Bar Ogee Interior Glazing Profile Standard Bottom Rail White Weather Strip Satin Taupe Folding Handle Satin Taupe Multi : Point Lock Aluminum Screen Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh OMS Ver. 000211.00 (Current) Processed on: 12/1/2016 2:32:29 PM Page 4 of 7 Stone White Surround 31/4" Jambs Line #8 Mark Unit: F� Net Price: 1 N 1,466.00 Qty: 1 4 J � ':� Ext. Net. Price: USD 1,466.00 RUIN ick Stone White Clad Exterior wt.a_ .,....e n.— Painted Interior Finish - White- Pine Interior ....................................... .234.00 2W1H - Rectangle Assembly Ass came Size 66" X 17" X. Assembly Rough Opening bl Aa ViewedFmmThe Estanor Entered As: FS 67" X 171/2" MO 661/2" X 171/4" .......................................................................:...:........:........................... Unit: Al ........................... ......... 609.00 FS 66" X 17" Clad Ultimate Replacement Awning- Roto Operating RO 67" X 171/2" Basic Frame 33" X 17" Egress Information Al, A2 Rough Opening 34" X 171/2" No Egress Information available. 0 Degree Frame Bevel Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG -1 Lite Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter Bar Ogee Interior Glazing Profile Standard Bottom Rail White Weather Strip Satin Taupe Folding Handle Satin Taupe Multi : Point Lock Aluminum Screen Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh OMS Ver. 000211.00 (Current) Processed on: 12/1/2016 2:32:29 PM Page 4 of 7 OMS Ver. 0002.11.00 (Current) Product availability and pricing subject to change. Riskowski Windows Quote Number: 7S8FZHD Architectural Project Number: ine #14 Mark Unit: H k 0 Degree Frame Bevel 1,205.00 Tap Sash o Q Ext. Net Price: USD Stone White Clad Sash Exterior — Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG Painted Interior Finish - White- Pine Interior.......................................................... ................................117.00 Low E2 w/Argon s"ita a""aye : Stainless Perimeter and Spacer Bar 7/8" SDL- With Spacer Bar - Stainless...........................................................................................189.00 Rectangular -Special Cut 3W2H 0 Degree Frame Bevel Stone White Clad Ext - Painted Interior Finish - White Pine Int Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile Bottom Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG -1 Lite As Vievred From The Low E2 w/Argon Exterior Stainless Perimeter Bar Entered As: 10 Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile FS 27 5/8" X 55 3/4" White Sash Lock IO28" X 56" 1 /Unit White Sash Lift..........................................................................................................................11.00 EgressInformation White Jamb Hardware..........................................................................................................................15.00 Width:243/8" Height:227/16" Aluminum Screen Net Clear Opening: 3.80 SgFt Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh Stone White Surround Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile 31/4" Jambs ine #14 Mark Unit: H k Net Price: pe,04Y 1,205.00 2ty: 1 o Q Ext. Net Price: USD 1,205.00 Stone White Clad Exterior w,..d.....+ Dee., Painted Interior Finish - White- Pine Interior.......................................................... ................................117.00 s"ita a""aye : Clad Ultimate Insert Double Hung ........................................................................................................... 873.00 Inside Opening 32" X 56" 0 Degree Frame Bevel Top Sash _ Stone White Clad Sash Exterior Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior IG — — — Low E2 w/Argon Stainless Perimeter and Spacer Bar 7/8" SDL - With Spacer Bar - Stainless...........................................................................................189.00 I� A Rectangular -Special Cut3W2H Stone White Clad Ext- Painted Interior Finish - White Pine Int Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile Bottom Sash Stone White Clad Sash Exterior As Viewed From The Painted Interior Finish - White - Pine Sash Interior Exterior IG -1 Lite Low E2 w/Argon Entered As:IO Stainless Perimeter Bar FS 315/8" X 55 3/4" X Ovolo Interior Glazing Profile 10 32" X White Sash Lock Egress Information Egress Information 1/Unit White Sash Lift ..........................................................................................................................11.00 Height: 227/16" 2 White Jamb Hardware..........................................................................................................................15.00 NetClear Opening: 4.42 S Aluminum Screen Charcoal Fiberglass Mesh Stone White Surround 31/4" Jambs Project Subtotal Net Price: USD 30,821.00 7.000% Sales Tax: USD 2,157.47 Project Total Net Price: USD 32,978.47 OMS Ver. 0002.11.00 (Current) Processed on: 12/1/2016 2:32:29 PM Page 6 of 7 DIVIDED LITES: SIMULATED DIVIDED LITE (SDL) SDL is an energy-efficient way to create the look of divided lites. SDL bars are permanently adhered to both sides of the glass. SIMULATED DIVIDED LITE (WIrHSPACERBAR) SDL bars are combined with spacer bars installed between the glass, creating the essence of Authentic Divided Lites. AUTHENTIC DIVIDED LITE (ADL) Separate panes of glass are glazed between muntin bars — the way windows have been made since the beginning. Now, Marvin® Windows and Doors' state-of-the-art design adds traditional appeal. (Available for wood units only.) GRILLES -BETWEEN -THE -GLASS (GBG) Grilles are permanently installed between the glass panes, This low -maintenance grille is available with a two-tone option. GRILLES Solid wood Grilles on the interior offer the look of classic divided lites, but can be easily removed for cleaning. WOOD SPECIES, FINISHES & DIVIDED LITES 69 /-�! 111e-,�,e �Itla—,Yll A love of old homes shouldn't doom you to a life with old windows. The Ultimate Insert Double Hung Replacement Window is a design to be used within the existing frame, allowing you to enjoy the latest smooth, efficient and convenient tilt -to -clean window engineering. The Ultimate Insert fits perfectly into your existing space, without disturbing the trim or wallpaper. And its beautiful wood interior looks like it's been there from the day the house was built. i � �� ' F�, December 14, 2016 RE: 1246 E Jefferson COA 2016-1206 On December 13, 2016 at approximately 3pm I met with Pat Ruszkowski the owner of 1246 E Jefferson at his home. I had visited the home in 2015 and had taken extensive photographs at the time of his last application, but since so much time had passed, the staff agreed that an updated visit and photographs take place. There was no change in the condition of the windows that the owner wishes to replace on the second floor. However, the aspect of a cold, windy day as opposed to the previous warm weathered visit offered different insight. The windows currently all have aluminum storms in fair but operational condition. Even with the storms in place one could feel the cold air as the wind blew but not rattling. (The storms utilize spring clips.) Especially in those rooms with the built in "hide -away" storm shutters. Most of the lower sashes in these windows are operational, however, some are painted shut and six of the lower sashes needing re -roped. Most of the top sashes are painted shut as well. Although some sashes definitely need some glazing most of the deterioration has taken place to the deep sills between the storms and lower sashes but not the sashes themselves. Peeling paint and buckling can be seen in the photographs submitted. Due to the depth of the sills especially in the south "hidden shutter" rooms, any replacement windows will need to have a transition or wrap to accommodate the space so as to "bridge" the interior and exterior wall. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY November 21, 2016 13`h Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I.. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Tom Gordon, Vice President/Asst. Secretary; Elizabeth Hertel, Secretary; Mike Voll, Treasurer; Kevin Buccellato, Joseph Molnar, Brandon Anderson, Michele Gelfman Members Not in Attendance: Jennifer Parker, Architectural Historian Staff Present: Elicia Feasel, Executive Director; Deb Parcell, Deputy Director; Brett Hummer, Legal Counsel; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist Members of the Public Present: Carl Brunson, Todd Zeiger, Tim Morris, Leticia Morris, Daniel Conaway, Elizabeth Woodard, Taylor Driscoll, Ashley Rinks, Jessica Casamassima, Nicole Zielinski, Niklas Thorsrud, Gordon Reif, Jael Jackson, Tim Janowiak H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 511 West Colfax COA#2016-1018 Local Landmark No representation. Commissioner Molnar moved suspend the agenda, moving COA 2016-1018 to end of public hearing, to allow representation by applicant. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Seven in favor, one opposed (Commissioner Hertel). Vote: 7 — I COA#2016-1018 moved to end of public hearing. 2. 812 Golden COA#2016-1019B Riverside Drive Representation by Tim and Leticia Morris, 812 Golden STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 19, 2016 Application Number: 2016-1019B Property Location: 812 Golden Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/ 1911 Property Owner: Tim & Leticia Morris Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 story frame house has a square plan and is set upon a concrete block foundation. It has a high hip roof with a gable projection on the main fagade and it is covered in asphalt shingles. The walls are aluminum sided. Some of the upper floor windows and the front fagade windows appear to be original 1/1 wood double -hung. All the windows have aluminum storms. There is an open porch with concrete block pillars and piers with wood Doric columns. The front door appears to be original. The house is situated on a very small wedge-shaped lot with a narrow front and side yard; the garage completely dominates the rear yard. ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided and all windows have aluminum storms. COA 2010-0802A for vinyl replacement windows was denied with the exception of the front third floor window, as it was determined by the Preservation Specialist that existing windows could be repaired and/or rehabilitated. The roof was replaced with COA 2007-0316. The storm door is not original and the front porch decking and balustrade are treated wood replacements. The lattice under the porch appears to be a vinyl replacement product. The south kitchen window has been reduced in size and replaced with a modern vinyl replacement window (1985). A south basement window has been replaced with a vinyl replacement window and the other south side basement window has a deteriorating aluminum storm and wood window. A window at the rear of the house has been removed and/or covered with aluminum siding (1985). The steel security door at the rear of the house is a replacement. The garage appears to be original. APPLICATION ITEMS: Garage tear down, windows, new door. See attached plan/notes. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Owner proposes: 1) Tear down garage — area will be grass for now, with plans to install a paver patio in the future (not part of this COA). Current garage is not usable for modern vehicles, and cannot be insured. 2) Remove existing windows on first floor and replace to "increase energy efficiency and safety, and because windows are believed to have too many problems to justify the cost of repair." Owner has not made a decision on type of replacement window, but would prefer aluminum. 3) Installation of French doors on backside of house, replacing windows currently in that location, to allow exiting the home through the dining room. 4) Installation of wood deck outside new French doors. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: At approximately 10:45AM I met with Tim Morris the owner of 812 Golden Ave at his address located in the Riverside Drive Local Historic District. I had received an email from Director Feasel in response to a call from Mr. Morris. We walked around the interior and exterior of the house discussing the condition of his existing windows and his plans to remodel the back yard and remove the extremely small garage. We continued around the house going floor to floor as I photographed each window. There are two windows that have enough damage that needs structural repair by means of an epoxy along the bottom of the sashes. The greatest issues with these windows are: 1) the presence of many heavy layers of paint 2) missing ropes and pulley wheels with paint interference 3) misalignment of interior stops (trim) leading to movement of lower sash and a less than tight seal of the upper and lower sashes 4) missing or damaged aluminum storm sashes It is my opinion that the majority of these windows are not deteriorated beyond repair. New sash cords, removal of some paint, and the adjustment of interior stops would greatly improve the performance of the majority of the windows. Granted some additional epoxy work needs to be performed on two sashes. There are aluminum storms already on most of the house and the ones that are missing parts could be replaced with new. I had not seen the file yet as I literally called him and left the office immediately after arriving. He told me that a COA had been approved under the previous owner to replace 8 windows on the third floor. There is only one window on the third floor and one on the third -floor stairway. There were however 8 windows on the second floor. I informed him that I was surprised that the commission approved the replacement as the windows were not in a condition beyond repair. Upon return to the office I was informed that the COA application by the previous owner to replace the windows at this property was in fact denied. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Riverside Drive Local Historic District 1. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high- intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. N II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Re uq ired Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. III. NEW CONSTRUCTION C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS Required Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features, and open spaces. Proportions and materials shall conform to those required for new construction. Recommended Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood. Prohibited Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used. Not Recommended Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of items 1) tear down garage, 3) installation of French doors, and 4) installation of new wood deck outside French doors. Staff recommends denial of 2) removal and replacement of existing wood windows. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner corrected staff report to reflect that wood porch deck and balustrade, and vinyl lattice under porch were removed in April 2016. Owner disagreed with Preservation Specialist's assessment of window condition. Commissioner Gelfman moved to conditionally approve application for items 1) tear down of existing garage; 3) removal of existing windows and replacement with French doors; and 4) installation of new wood deck outside French doors, remanding authority to staff approve the decking material and French doors; and denial of item 2) removal and replacement of existing wood windows until specific product information is provided. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA#2016-1019B Approved with conditions. 3. 655 River Avenue COA#2016-1103 Edgewater Place Representation by Carl Brunson, 655 River Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: November 3, 2016 3 Application Number: 2016-1103 Property Location: 655 River Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1894 Property Owner: Carl Brunson Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This house is a one storey structure with an attic set upon an irregular brick foundation situated on a double lot at the dead end of River Avenue. There is a tall brick chimney on the west side. The exterior walls are covered with wood shingle siding and the cross gable roof is covered with fiberglass shingles. The 2/2 windows and storms appear to be original to the house. The 4/1 wood windows may be original to the enclosure noted in the 1933 on the Assessor's Card. The entry door may be original to the house. ALTERATIONS: The Assessor Card notes that in 1933 the porch was enclosed and that there was an addition to the front of the house. It also notes that there was wood siding which was covered after 1949 with the current siding application. The roof has been replaced with a COA approved on November 17, 1987 with Owens Corning Fiberglass shingles. The flat roof surface is covered with rolled aluminum roofing. COA 2010-1206B approved 6'x12' addition to northwest corner of home. This COA was extended for one year on September 29, 2014, and is being applied for again with this COA application. COA 2015-0916 allowed tear off and re -roof house and garage with asphalt shingles, replacement of siding to replicate original, and replacement of garage doors. APPLICATION ITEMS: 6' X 12' addition to northwest corner of home per attached illustration and description submitted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to construct an addition to the rear of his house. There will be a new concrete foundation poured (this house does not have a full basement) and new framing. The existing siding will be salvaged and reused to cover the exterior walls. A window will be salvaged from the exterior wall at the site of the new construction and placed in the new exterior wall. The extended flat roof will be covered with rolled aluminum roofing and tie into the current roofing materials. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: I have met with Carl Brunson the owner of 655 River several times over the last 12 months and have even appeared with him at code hearings in the past. Mr. Brunson had quite a repair list from Code and a deadline. I am happy to report that 70% of the cosmetic list and 901/o of the structural concerns have been attended to and have been done so in accordance with the standards and guidelines of the Edgewater Local Historic District. The proposed addition would be located at the southwest corner of the structure. There were foundation issues that were repaired last year as a result of plumbing work that was done in the crawlspace under the west side of the house. Planning ahead Mr. Brunson left a capped stub for an additional drain for this future addition when he performed the repairs. The footer in this area had been reinforced during the time of the repair and should be able to hold the additional weight. This area would connect onto the slightly pitched roof which already exists. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Edgewater Place III. NEW CONSTRUCTION A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories in high and are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few single story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater that that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, -features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Wall materials in the district range from brick, clapboard, shingles and masonry to aluminum siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in type, scale, texture, and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible in size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick may not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the standards and guidelines for Edgewater Place for new construction. The owner is also proposing to re -use current materials on the exterior with the intent that it will not stand out as new construction. The new construction will not be visible from the street as it will be situated in a vacant corner of the house. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Gordon moved to approve application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA#2016-1103 Approved. 4. 512 N. St. Joseph COA#2016-1109 North St. Joseph Street Representation by Gordon Reif, 32815 Pheasant Ridge Lane, New Carlisle STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 November 2016 Application Number: 2016-1109 Property Location: 512 N St. Joseph Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1904/Hicks House Property Owner: Dan Maloney Landmark or District Designation: North St. Joseph Street Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 -story rectangular plan wood frame house has a cement over brick foundation, and cross gable roof with asphalt shingles. A full width porch with hip roof spans the front of the home. Windows are 1/1 double -hung. ALTERATIONS: Wood windows and siding have been replaced with vinyl. APPLICATION ITEMS: 10' x 11' room addition on back corner of house. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to build a 10' x 11' addition at the northeast corner of the house, with vinyl siding to match house as closely as possible. There will be one double -hung window installed in the east wall, matching other existing windows in house. The current exterior door will be moved to the exterior of the addition. Addition will have a shed roof, 4/12 pitch, with asphalt shingles to match rear side of house, if possible, to maintain continuity on that side. (Front of house has brown asphalt shingles, rear has green.) PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: North St. Joseph Street III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district are predominantly wood clapboard and its imitation in aluminum and vinyl. Some walls are brick. Patterned shingles are common in gable ends and dormers. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Commissioner Buccellato moved to conditionally approve application, remanding authority to staff to approve submitted samples of siding and roofing match existing materials. Seconded by Commissioner Molnar. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA#2016-1109 Approved with conditions. 5. 517 River Avenue COA#2016-1109A Edgewater Place Representation by Leah Zimmer, 517 River Avenue STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 November, 2016 Application Number: 2016-1109A Property Location: 517 River Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer Front Bungalow/1921/Schifibauer House Property Owner: Leah Zimmer Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: A two story dormer front bungalow set upon a brick foundation. Walls are wood clapboard on first story and wood shingles on second. Roof has asphalt shingles. There is a full width open front porch with brick piers and walls. Window openings are original wood 4/1 vertical division double hung and an arched attic window in front. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and an aluminum storm door have been installed. COA 1990-0618 approved replacement of front porch floorboards. COA 1997-1016 approved in-kind repair of fire damage. COA 2001-0910 approved tuck pointing foundation and repair of masonry around foundation of house. RME 2013-0402 approved tree removal. RME 2014-1022A approved roof replacement with architectural shingles, repair of mud room, and in-kind repair of front steps, sidewalk, and trim on rear and west side of house. COA 2015-0518 approved existing chimney to be lowered below the roofline, and addition of a 4" vent pipe to extend through the roof deck. RME 2016-0428 allowed replacement of previously removed tree, and replacement of rotted/damaged siding and shingles on house. RME 2016-1OI IA approved installation of new roofing on flat roof, and repairs and siding installation on rear porch; in the process of this project the porch was found to be unsalvageable, resulting in the current COA application APPLICATION ITEMS: In renovating my mudroom it was found to be unsalvageable (termites, rotted wood). I would like to pull down the existing structure and replace with a half porch/half external storage where mudroom used to stand. The cost to rebuild the mudroom "as is" was prohibitive at $25K. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to remove the existing mudroom at rear of house and replace it with an enclosed exterior storage area and open porch. This project will not change the current footprint of the house, as the existing brick foundation will be the foundation for the proposed storage/porch. The east side of the current area will be an enclosed storage space, to be sided with LP Smartside, and will include a door off of the proposed exterior porch for access. The west side will be a wood porch with wood railing. The current interior door to the mudroom will be replaced with an exterior door to the porch, and an exterior light will be installed by the door as well as on the back of the storage area. If the rear second floor door must be removed to accommodate the new porch roofline, it will be replaced with a window. (see attached project description, site plan, and drawings) PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: I have been in contact of the property owner, Lea Zimmer since late September when she had called about how to proceed with the deconstruction and rebuilding of her rear mudroom/entrance. There are issues and the room is pulling away from the rest of the house. She had hired Pat Ashton of Ashton Construction to perform the work. I have dealt with Mr. Ashton on several jobs most recently an intensive remodel on West Northshore. They had received RME 2016-1011 a to complete the task. However, after more investigation, the repairs are more structural in nature and will require footer work as well. Ms. Zimmer and Mr. Ashton were exploring other options beyond just repair of the existing addition, since it would all have to come down. I know that the lot is small and with the alley behind there are limitations as to what can be built according to the building department requirements. Hence, the new COA 2016-1109a. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Edgewater Place III. NEW CONSTRUCTION A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories in high and are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few single -story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Wall materials in the district range from brick, clapboard, shingles and masonry to aluminum siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in type, scale, texture, and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible in size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick may not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the proposed removal of the mudroom and addition of the porch/exterior storage does not change the size, scale, or character of the house, it conforms to the district standards and guidelines. Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director 7 Commissioner Voll moved to approve application as submitted, remanding authority to staff to approve replacement window if second floor door must be removed to accommodate new porch roofline. Seconded by Commissioner Gordon. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0 COA#2016-1109A Approved with minor conditions. 6. 511 West Colfax COA#2016-1018 Local Landmark No representation. Commissioner Molnar moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner Anderson. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when voting. Roll call was ordered. Commissioner Molnar (AYE) - lack of representation. Fee should be waived for reapplication. Commissioner Gelfman (AYE) - materials have not been specifically brought here for the house itself. More information is needed before making a decision. Commissioner Buccellato (NAY) - motion is not in the best interest of the house. Would prefer to propose an alternate proposal in keeping with staff recommendation — separating the porches from the house itself. Not willing to deny the application outright. Commissioner Voll (NAY) - Porte Cochere and porch are probably OK, given some idea of alternative materials. Complete copper roof on the house should not be approved without further exploration. Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) - unsupported stylistic changes. Not in keeping with group B standards for the material evidence present on the structure. Applicant not present. Application fee should be waived for a reapplication. Commissioner Gordon (AYE) - copper not in character with original house roof. Fee should be waived for new application. Commissioner Anderson (AYE) - wants to look at different materials for this important Local Landmark. Commissioner Hertel (AYE) - confusion of verbiage in application vs. quote, inability to question owner about other potential ideas, and the copper roof not being in character with the time frame. Vote: 6 — 2 COA#2016-1018 Denied. M. HEARING OF VISITORS A. Tim Janowiak, Studebaker Driver's Club — presented plan for reassembly and incorporation of Studebaker Guard House, pillars, and gates into Building 84 Complex after being disassembled and spending many years in storage. Plans are to make the site accessible to the public, possibly as a location to start tours. Preliminary plans are to unveil Guard House in May 2017, at the International Studebaker Convention in South Bend. Asked for HPC blessing on project. Discussion. President Klusczinski gave preliminary HPC endorsement, and asked for support of Studebaker Driver's Club for future landmarking of Guard House. IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 17, 2016 — Approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 8 1. Location Report — Distributed. Discussion of budget approval, and time frame for approval of out -of -line transfers. Executive Director Feasel answered inquiries about accident involving HPC car, and related insurance payout and repairs. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Executive Director — In Packet. 3. Deputy Director — In Packet. 4. Preservation Specialist — Distributed. 5. Legal — Eric Boyd appeal of COA application denial. Common Council has put that on their schedule and issued series of deadlines for submittal of materials; appeal will be heard at their meeting on December 12. Commissioner Hertel questioned if Commissioner Molnar's position in the Clerk's office would be a potential conflict of interest in this case, but it was determined not to be. Commissioner Voll asked for update on action being taken regarding window replacement at Tippecanoe Place. President Klusczinski clarified that HPC defers to the Building Department as our enforcement agency to put pressure on the building owners. Also, Indiana Landmarks has had some contact with the owners in an attempt to enforce their interior and exterior facade easement. He is confident that things will eventually be resolved in a satisfactory manner, with our partners, Indiana Landmarks. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President — Distributed. Commissioner Gordon questioned November 15 meeting between County Auditor, Mike Hammond, and County Council President, Rafael Morton, regarding HPC county vs. city activities. Also, inquired about status of letter of findings on Dave Matthews project. Staff findings submitted to HPC for endorsement. Determination made by HPC to refrain from making a public statement at this time. 2. Indiana Bicentennial — As the state Bicentennial year reaches its conclusion, Chairman Hertel applauded work of Executive Director Feasel and the way she represented HPC in coordinating virtually all Bicentennial activities in the past year. 3. Public Relations and Community Education — Executive Director Feasel requested any photos taken at Preservation Awards event be shared with staff so they can be added to the Drop Box file. V. OLD BUSINESS — none A. MLK Street Renaming — Commissioner Gordon questioned status of Martin Luther King, Jr. Street renaming. Commissioner Molnar stated committee recommendations have been made, but it is currently stalled until the City Council or Mayor takes action. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 2017 CONTRACT — Few minor legal language changes made to existing contract. Commissioner Gelfman moved to approve Preservation Specialist Inspector Services contract beginning January 1, 2017. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Vote: 8-0. B. 2017 HPC MEETING AND COA DATES — January and February HPC meetings moved to fourth Monday of month to avoid county -scheduled holidays; deadline days in those months would move to the second Monday. 2017 meetings are scheduled for 7:00 p.m.; if 9 HPC wants to change time, meeting room is available earlier. Discussion. General consent for meeting times and dates as submitted. C. NOMINATING COMMITTEE — Commissioner Klusczinski moved to form a Nominating Committee with Commissioner Anderson as its chair and comprised of all voting commission members, except for its president, to select candidates for executive office positions for 2017 calendar year, and to present its final slate for consideration at the next regular meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Voll. Vote: 8 — 0. D. COA SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION — Commissioner Buccellato suggested creating a better list of required COA documentation to allow decisions to be made at HPC meetings; perhaps create a minimum requirements list for various projects (windows, etc.). Discussion. Commissioner Gelfman proposed staff draft a letter to realtor's association to pass along to their realtors, reminding them to disclose when a house is located in an historic district. VII. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS VIII. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Voll moved to adjourn. Seconded by Commissioner Hertel. Eight in favor, none opposed. Vote: 8 — 0. Meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Attest: Elizabeth Hertel, Secretary Date 10 Location Budget as of 11-30-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2016. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 11/30/2016 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Carry Forward Original Addfl Adj Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent ✓ 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 34,884.00 0.00 (11,016.00) 23,868.00 0.00 20,269.52 3,598.48 3,598.48 15.08 15.08 000 General GovT. ✓ 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 37,000.00 0.00 3,700.00 40,700.00 0.00 36,003.86 4,696.14 4,696.14 11.54 11.54 000 General Gov T. 10000 Totals """"""`«""'+""""":"""""" 0.00 71,884.00 0.00 (7,316.00) 64,568.00 0.00 56,273.38 8,294.62 8,294.62 12.85 12.85 21030 Office Supplies 0.00 297.00 0.00 350.00 647.00 347.91 293.79 5.30 353.21 0.82 54.59 000 General GovT. 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 (561.15) 438.85 0.00 333.01 105.84 105.84 24.12 24.12 000 General GovT. 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 211.15 436.15 0.00 436.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 • 0.00 000 General GovT. 20000 Totals """""':».»...»,......».»:..,.+.+... 0.00 1,522.00 0.00 0.00 1,522.00 347.91 1,062.95 111.14 459.05 7.30 30.16 31070 Other Contractual Services 0.00 18,886.00 0.00 7,338.04 26,224.04 1,000.00 19,920.00 5,304.04 6,304.04 20.23 24.04 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 0.00 57.00 0.00 (7.46) 49.54 6.58 39.67 3.29 9.87 6.64 19.92 000 General Gov T. 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 210.42 305.42 0.00 258.36 47.06 47.06 15.41 15.41 000 General Gov T. 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 (275.00) 625.00 0.00 625.00 0.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 0.00 0.00 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 50.00 450.00 150.00 300.00 0.00 150.00 000 General GovT. 0.00 33.33 30000 Totals "»""""""""""""""""""" 0.00 20,338.00 0.00 7,316.00 27,654.00 1,156.58 21,143.03 5,354.39 6,510.97 19.36 23.54 Financial System 12/02/2016 11 by ksobecki Page 55 V► Location Budget as of 11-30-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2016. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 11130!2016 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Location Totals *""""****************:...:.,.<..,:... 0.00 93,744.00 0.00 0.00 93,744.00 1,504.49 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 78,479.36 13, 760.15 15, 264.64 14.68 16.28 0.00 0.00 78,479.36 Financial System 12/02/2016 11:44 AM by ksobecki Page 56 r Outstanding Purchase Orders as of 11-30-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2016. _ Fund/Location/Account/Object/Purchase Order Sequence —und: 1000 County General mac: 0037 Historic Preservation Financial System Budget Vendor PO Number Vendor Name 135305 031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 135708 031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 135960 067795 Hesburgh Libraries of Notre Da 135306 001538 South Bend Tribune 135560 001213 National Alliance of Financial System Budget Account Code Open Date Amount Age (Days) 1000.21030.000.0037 11/10/2016 238.00 20 1000.21030.000.0037 11/22/2016 109.91 8 1000.31070.000.0037 11/30/2016 1,000.00 0 1000.33010.000.0037 11/10/2016 6.58 20 1000.39010.000.0037 11/16/2016 150.00 14 Location Total 1,504.49 12/02/2016 11:47 AM by ksobecki Page 21 _f* Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 11-30-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 11/30/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.02711.000.0037 Reimbursements General GovT. Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 12,500.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 1,980.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 3,598.48 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 3,598.48 20,269.52 Cash: (20,269.52) Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 4,696.14 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 4,696.14 36,003.86 Cash: (36,003.86) Financial System 12/02/2016 11:53 AM by ksobecki Page 207 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 12,500.00 (12,500.00) 0.00 0.00 1000.06500.000.0037 Non -Identified Revenue General GovT. Historic Preservation 11/02/2016 11/02/2016 Rec/AutoRcpt 340.00 Rec:137138 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE 11/22/2016 11/22/2016 Rec/AutoRcpt 80.00 Rec:137370 BK:007 SJC HISTORIC PRE Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 420.00 0.00 Total 0.00 1,980.00 (1,980.00) 0.00 0.00 1000.11075.000.0037 Deputy Director General GovT. Historic Preservation 11/03/2016 11/03/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:713577 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDstl1103/2016 11/18/2016 11/16/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,199.38 BK:008 CK:714778 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDst11/18/2016 11/30/2016 11/22/2016 Approp/Adjustment (7,316.00) ORD 63-16 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 (7,316.00) Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,868.00 0.00 1000.11309.000.0037 Historic Preservation Admin. General GovT. Historic Preservation 11/03/2016 11/03/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:713578 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDstl1/03/2016 11/18/2016 11/16/2016 Claim/PayDocket 1,565.38 BK:008 CK:714779 Vend:005528 County Payroll PyDstl1/18/2016 Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 40,700.00 0.00 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Office Supplies Historic Preservation 11/07/2016 11/01/2016 Approp/Adjustment 350.00 IN-LINETRANSFER Saint Joseph County Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 12,500.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 0.00 Cash: 1,980.00 Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 3,598.48 2,398.76 Unencumbered: 3,598.48 20,269.52 Cash: (20,269.52) Balances Expenditure Unexpended: 4,696.14 3,130.76 Unencumbered: 4,696.14 36,003.86 Cash: (36,003.86) Financial System 12/02/2016 11:53 AM by ksobecki Page 207 Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 11-30-2016 Saint Joseph County Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 11/30/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.21030.000.0037 Office Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 PO/AutoPO 238.00 PO:135305 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 11/15/2016 11/15/2016 Claim/RegDocket 286.63 PO:134883 BK:008 CK:714259 Inv:740184 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc 11/22/2016 11/22/2016 PO/AutoPO 109.91 PO:135708 Vend:031188 Office Three Sixty Inc Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 353.21 Current 0.00 0.00 350.00 286.63 Unencumbered: 5.30 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 647.00 347.91 293.79 Cash: (293.79) 1000.22010.000.0037 Gas Oil & Lubricants General Gov'f. Historic Preservation 11/07/2016 11/01/2016 Approp/Adjustment (350.00) IN-LINE TRANSFER Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 105.84 U Current 0.00 0.00 (350.00) 0.00 Unencumbered: 105.84 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 438.85 0.00 333.01 Cash: (333.01) 1000.22120.000.0037 Garage & Motor Supplies General GovT. Historic Preservation Garage & Motor Supplies Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 0.00 / Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 436.15 0.00 436.15 Cash: (436.15) 1000.31070.000.0037 Other Contractual Services General GovT. Historic Preservation Other Contractual Services Historic Preservation 11/03/2016 11/03/2016 Claim/RegDocket 360.00 BK:008 CK:713470 Inv:HISTORIC PRESERVATION 18 HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 11/17/2016 11/17/2016 Claim/RegDocket 640.00 BK:008 CK:714688 Inv:PRESERVATION SPECIALIST 32 HR @ 20/HR Vend:061203 Szaday Steve 11/30/2016 11/22/2016 Approp/Adjustment 7,316.00 ORD 63-16 11/30/2016 11/30/2016 PO/AutoPO 1,000.00 PO:135960 Vend:067795 Hesburgh Libraries of Notre Da Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 6,304.04 Current 0.00 0.00 7,316.00 1,000.00 Unencumbered: 5,304.04 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 26,224.04 1,000.00 19,920.00 Cash: (19,920.00) Financial System 12/02/2016 11:- y ksobecki -age 208 Y � Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 11-30-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 1 113 0/2 01 6 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation 1000.33010.000.0037 Publication Of Legal Notices General GovT. Historic Preservation 11/10/2016 11/10/2016 PO/AutoPO 6.58 PO:135306 Vend:001538 South Bend Tribune 11/18/2016 11/15/2016 Approp/Adjustment (7.46) IN-LINE TRANSFER Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 (7.46) 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 49.54 6.58 39.67 Cash: 1000.33100.000.0037 Printing General Gov'T. Historic Preservation Printing Historic Preservation 11/18/2016 11/15/2016 Approp/Adjustment 7.46 IN-LINETRANSFER Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 7.46 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 305.42 0.00 258.36 Cash: 1000.34040.000.0037 Auto Liability General Gov T. Historic Preservation Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 625.00 0.00 625.00 Cash: 1000.39010.000.0037 Dues & Subscription General GovT. Historic Preservation Dues and Subscriptions Historic Preservation 11/01/2016 11/01/2016 Claim/RegDocket 50.00 PO: 134129 BK:008 CK:713129 Inv:MEMBERSHIP #1212 Vend: 003585 Historic Landmarks Foundation 11/16/2016 11/16/2016 PO/AutoPO 150.00 PO:135560 Vend:001213 National Alliance of Estimated Unreceived Revenue Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: Current 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 Unencumbered: Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 450.00 150.00 300.00 Cash: Saint Joseph County Balances 9.87 3.29 (39.67) Balances 47.06 47.06 (258.36) Balances 0.00 0.00 (625.00) Balances 150.00 v 0.00 (300.00) Financial System 12/02/2016 11:53 AM by ksobecki Page 209 w Combined Ledger by Location (Current Month) as of 11-30-2016 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07/01/2016. Fund 1000 County General for 01/01/2016 thru 11/30/2016 Loc 0037 Historic Preservation Normal Current Unreceived Revenue Total Investment Current Balances Total Transfer Current Appropriation Encumbrance Total' Location Totals Current 0.00 Total Saint Joseph County Estimated Unreceived Revenue Balances Revenue Receipts Balance Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Unexpended: 15,264.64 0.00 420.00 0.00 6,866.15 Unencumbered: 13,760.15 0.00 14,480.00 (14,480.00) 93,744.00 1,504.49 78,479.36 Cash: (63,999.36) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cash: 0.00 0.00 420.00 0.00 6,866.15 0.00 14,480.00 (14,480.00) 93,744.00 1,504.49 78,479.36 Cash: (63,999.36) Financial System 12/02/2016 11: y ksobecki age 210 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Executive Director report — Elicia Feasel — 08 November through 05 December 2016 11.08 County Holiday 11.09 Budget reconciliation. Bicentennial: Budget reconciliation. 11.10 11.11 County Holiday 11.14 Work w/ Rachel. Work on City/County budget. Prepare City 2016 2nd half invoice. Prepare 2016 CDBG invoice. Budget reconciliation. Meeting w/ Tim and Todd on miscellaneous matters. 11.15 Work on City/County budget. Prepare City 2016 2nd half invoice. Prepare CDBG invoice. Budget reconciliation. Meet w/ Myles Robertson re: Taylor's Field property. Present Local Historic Districts to AH E PA. 11.16 Work w/ Rachel. Work w/ George. Work w/ Millie. Bicentennial: Meeting w/ Lou Sabo on PowerPoint for lecture tomorrow. Email American Family Mutual Insurance re: car accident. Meeting w/ Liz Dube of ND Preservation and Conservation re: framed photo. Meeting w/ Evie Kirkwood at St. Pat's re: Bicentennial finances. 11.17 Attend Green Ribbon Commission meeting and read letter addressed to Mayor Pete on behalf of Perry of Indiana Bicentennial Commission. Prepare for and attend Lou Sabo's lecture at ND Center for Arts and Culture. 11.18 Meeting w/ Eric Boyd re: anticipated COA application for 1240 W Thomas, follow up report. Phone call w/ American Family Insurance re: car accident and scheduling a field adjuster. Meeting w/ HPC Legal Counsel Brett Hummer re: 1240 W Thomas appeal before the Common Council. Budget reconciliation. Meeting w/ Marsha of ND Preservation and Conservation re: framed photo. Meeting w/ City Planners re: Coal Line Trail and local landmarked Norfolk Southern Bridge. 11.21 Work w/ Rachel. Treasure Hunt meeting. Prepare for and attend HPC meeting. Budget reconciliation. 11.22 Organizing and cleaning at HPC office. 11.23 11.24 County Holiday 11.25 County Holiday 11.28 Work w/ Rachel. Meeting w/ Sue Bybee re: payroll. Meeting w/ Lou Sabo and picking up exhibit. 1240 W Thomas paper processing. Budget reconciliation. Follow up w/ Dave Matthews re: 401 E Colfax study of effect on historic buildings. 11.29 Work w/ Millie. Work w/ George. 1240 W Thomas paper processing. Prepare 2017 Preservation Specialist Contract for County Commissioners. Organizing files. Building South Bend meeting preparation and meeting at ND Architecture Library. Bicentennial: Correspondence w/ Evie; prepare contractor invoices; peddling Playing Cards. 11.30 Budget reconciliation; prepare requisitions. Bicentennial: Grant follow up paperwork processing; budget reconciliation. Meeting w/ Tim, Brett and Katie (Brett's associate). 12.01 Budget reconciliation; prepare requisitions. 12.02 Budget reconciliation; prepare requisitions. 12.05 Work w/ Rachel. Meeting w/ Ben Hoggan. Budget reconciliation; prepare requisitions. Description Who Project | George Root, Volunteer Archive Technician Rachel Arvuy, County Commissioners Intern Millie LatackPreservation Speciakst|ntem Building South Bend: Past, Present, & Future; general office files Indiana's ZO16Bicentennial, Public Relations/Communications Minimum Maintenance Standards surveying, field Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Deputy Director Report — Debra Parcell — November 9, 2016 — December 19, 2016 :.. Daily Highlights.: ; 11/9 COA 2016-1109 and 2016-1109A. Prepared paperwork for commission packets. Made 2017 COA deadline & HPC meeting list. Transcribed barely legible letter in file for Walnut Grove. Attended Restore Michiana 2017 planning meeting. 1635 Linden research. 11/10 Finished COA 2016-1109A. Research for 2119 Portage. Researched copper roofs. Finished commission packets and all related materials. Revised agenda. Returned extra award invitations to Indiana Landmarks. Switched desks with Steve. 11/14 Mail commission packets. Gather information for second half budget inventory. Letter to City Council of potential effects of Dave Matthews project. Continued research on IUSB buildings and Cozi Theater. Prepared minutes and sign -in sheet for HPC meeting. 11/15 Prepared additional materials for HPC meeting. File maintenance. 11/16 File maintenance. Send 1240 Thomas info to Brett Hummer. COA 2016-1116. 11/17 Finish COA 2016-1116. Attend Visit South Bend luncheon. File maintenance. 11/18 File maintenance. Research 1415 & 1502 West Washington. 11/21 106 review. Research potential impact of Dave Matthews project and revise letter. Attend Treasure Hunt meeting. Attend HPC meeting. 11/22 Filed paperwork from commission meeting. Worked on meeting minutes. Printed and mailed COAs. 11/28 Finished meeting minutes and sent out for review. 106 Review. Worked on COA 2016-1128 and 2016- 1128A, and RME 2016-11288. 11/29 Finished COA 2016-1128A and issued RME 2016-1128B. Attended Building South Bend meeting at Notre Dame Architecture Library and had brief tour. Researched historic property notification through realtors. 11/30 Issued denial letter for 511 West Colfax. 106 Review. Revised COA 2016-1128 to include fence. Research historic property notification. 12/1 Planning meeting with Brad for Restore Michiana and Tool Crib. 106 Review. Start RME 2016-1201. 12/2 Finish RME 2016-1201. Restore Michiana schedule—topics, dates, potential instructors. File maintenance. 12/5 106 Review. Finish COAs for meeting. Start preparing commission packets. Went over samples of siding and roofing materials for 512 N. St. Joseph with contractor. COA 2016-1205. Routine Maintenance Exclusions Address RME# Description 330 Navarre 2016-11288 Repair and replace in-kind front porch deck boards and support posts. 745 Leland 2016-1201 Repair and replace retaining concrete retaining wall with stone (original retaining wall material). Research Requests What Date Who 518 South Michigan Street 11/9/2016 2119 Portage 11/10/2016 owner 1825 Northside Blvd. 11/14/2016 Valeria Chamorro Cozi Theater 11/14/2016 Robert Porter 1415 & 1502 West Washington 11/18/16 Church member 227 West Jefferson 11/21/2016 John (HR) Who Date/Time Mary Binney 11/15 15:00 Brian Scott 11/17 2:00 Kathryn 11/30 2:00 Rosenbaum Lynn Patrick 12/1 1:00 Phone Calls What Multiple problems with 427 LaMont Window guidelines for Riverside Historic District Contractor list Contractor list HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT December 19, 2016 Hello Commission! Since last meeting: Code Enforcement hearings - 745 Leland Mostly repaired by owner, repair agreement on the remainder 836 Leland Mostly repaired, paint in spring 2017 709-711 Lincolnway East Windows repaired by end of January, Remaining repairs by July 2017. ' 10 property site visits for environmental reviews. The HPC mobile has been repaired and looks the same with the exception of small scratches at the underside of the front passenger side bumper. I would like to thank Tim K. for all of his assistance in rearranging the storage room and shelf assembly. Between the two of us as well as director Feasel, there was a serious and rewarding purge going on. Not much to report as far as new work being performed, mainly those contactors and owners getting ducks in a row for 2017 projects. I will be talking to the Granger Rotary in January as well as speaking at a workshop for Carla Bruni. She is the contractor who gave us all the tools through the ToolMade program and is the director of the Evanston Rebuilding Center. Steve Szaday Preservation Specialist Historic Preservation Commission President's Report — December 19th, 2016 • 11/21/2016 7P: HPC Monthly Meeting (County -City Building; Room 1308). • 11/30/2016 9A: Assist Steve Szaday in assembling large capacity, modular racks and reorganizing department storage items (HPC Storage Room).; Staff demonstration of the Fein Turbo II HEPA Vac (proposed tool crib equipment item). • 11/30/2016 2P: Meeting with Director Feasel, HPC Attorney Brett Hummer and Associate, Katlyn Foust Hunneshagen (HPC Conference Rm.). Review past events and documents related to the upcoming appeal Bovd v. Historic Preservation Commission, now slated for December 12t', 2016. • 12/09/2016 1P: Conference call with HPC Attorney Hummer (HPC Offices) to review HPC legal defense materials re: Bovd v. Historic Preservation Commission. • 12/12/2016 7P: Arrive at County -City 4`h Floor Chambers to provide testimony at Bovd v. Historic Preservation Commission appeal. Approached by Common Council President Tim Scott before the meeting began, who advised that the Council intends to continue appeal proceeding to January (probably the second time it convenes that month). I contacted Director Feasel by telephone with this update. Met HPC Attorney Brett Hummer as I exited the building. I informed him of this development. He went upstairs to verify and gather additional information. Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County Change in Public Hearing Procedure December 19th, 2016 Timothy S. Klusczinski - President 1. Chair announces application number/property address. 2. Application is read into the record. 3. Applicant or representative provides testimony.* 4. Chair allows for questions from membership.* i�—w..�..�c��iw��[�►��c�t��w��►��w..�.. ►tea i�ri� 6. Chair opens public hearing and invites comments (for and against the project). 7. Chair closes public hearing. Commission discussion and comments.* 8. If there is need, the Chair allows for alternative considerations.* 9. Chair calls for a final motion. 1o.Chair invites debate on the motion. 11. Chair calls for vote (by general consent or roll call). 12. Chair declares the vote and states that the application is approved, conditional, denied, continued or some other determination. (*) Chair may entertain motions to amend the application. . -1 Prescribed by State Board of Accounts Governmental Unit General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) To.................................................................................... Dr. IDEM South Bend Tribune 225 West Colfax Ave ..........:.................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tax IN 35-13-1571 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Ad #: 9933 Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ................................... Head -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ................................... Total number of lines in notice E COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.365 cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $3.29 DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Number of Insertions Size of 8 point 1 $0.00 ................................... Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid. I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size, which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune: 12/12/16. ublisher Cheryl J ne Morey, Notary PuV1c Resident of St. Joseph County My Commission expires December 21, 2016 South Bend Tribune 225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628 ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR $3.29 Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571 ALLOWED IN THE SUM OF $3.29 Attest That it is duly authenticated as required by law. That it is based upon statutory authority. That it is apparently correct incorrect certify that the within claim is true and correct; that the services there in itemized and for which charge is made were ordered by me and were necessary to the public business + �`Ad #: 9933 Historic Preservation Commis- sion of South Bend & St. Joseph County will meet December 19 at 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun- ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN. Agendas available by request at SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us T. Klusczinski, President Hspaxlp it 12:12 Pres't-ibed by State Board of Accounts Governmental Unit General Form No. 99P (Rev. 2009A) To.................................................................................... Dr. IDEM South Bend Tribune 225 West Colfax Ave ............................................County, Indiana South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tax ID# 35-13-1571 PUBLISHER'S CLAIM LINE COUNT Ad #: 9933 Display Master (Must not exceed two actual lines, neither of which shall total more than four solid lines of type in which the body of the advertisement is set) -- number of equivalent ................................... Head -- Number of lines ................................... Body -- Number of lines ...............................•••• Body -- Number of lines ..............................••••• Total number of lines in notice D COMPUTATION OF CHARGES 9 lines, 1 columns wide equals 9 equivalent lines at 0.365 cents per line Additional charges for notices containing rule or tabular work (50 per cent of above amount) Charge for extra proofs of publication ($1.00 for each proof in excess of two) TOTAL AMOUNT OF CLAIM $3.29 DATA FOR COMPUTING COST Width of single column in picas 9.4ems Number of Insertions Size of 8 point 1 $.. .......... 00 ................. Pursuant to the provisions and penalties of IC 5-11-10-1, 1 hereby certify that the foregoing account is just and correct, that the amount claimed is legally due, after allowing all just credits, and that no part of the same has been paid. I also certify that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, of the same column width and type size; which was duly published in said paper 1 time(s). The dates of publication being as follows: South Bend Tribune: 12/12/16. Nv. � IOU Uublisher Cheryl Ju Morey, Notary Publi Resident of St. Joseph County My Commission expires December 21, 2016 South Bend Tribune 225 W. Colfax Ave. South Bend, IN 46628 ON ACCT OF APPROPRIATION FOR $3.29 Appropriation No. Tax ID# 35-138-1571 ALLOWED IN THE SUM OF $3.29 Attest That it is duly authenticated as required by law. That it is based upon statutory authority. That it is apparently correct incorrect certify that the within claim is true and correct; that the services there in itemized and for which charge is made were ordered by me and were necessary to the public business Ad #: 9933 Historic Preservation Commis- sion of South Bend & St. Joseph County will meet December 19 at 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, Coun- ty -City Bldg, South Bend, IN. Agendas available by request at SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us T. Klusczinski, President Hspaxlp 1t 12:12