Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
April 2015
SPECIAL, MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY LEGAL, AFFAIRS COMMITTEE 17- APRIL, 20 15 2:00 PM THE HISTORY MUSEUM 808 WEST WASHINGTON STREET SOUTH BEND, INDIANA AGENDA: 1. HPC STAFF JOB DESCRIPTIONS 2. HPC [MAINTENANCEISTANDARDS] ENFORCEMENT POLICY AGENDA OF THE °MMISS1°Nfg - HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION �r o APRIL 20 2015 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY April 20, 2015 7:00 PM Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. VII. ADJOURNMENT Please give reasonable advance request when possible. 1. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. LaSalle 237 N. Michigan COA #2015 -0326B Local Landmark 2. 531 S. St. Joseph COA #2015 -0331 Taylor's Field Q, 3. 527 Riverside Dr. COA #2015 -0401 River Bend ~ 4. Central High 330 W.Colfax COA #2015 -0401A Local Landmark B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES March 16, 2015 ^ Z 4 L H B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS W 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Preservation Specialist Report 6. Legal Counsel �{ D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Q , 1. President's Report I� V. OLD BUSINESS 1. Country Bake Shop 2. Tool Crib NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS VI. NEW BUSINESS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. VII. ADJOURNMENT Please give reasonable advance request when possible. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0326B Property Location: 237 N. Michigan Street Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival /Chicago School blend /1921 / Nicol, Schuler and Hoffman Property Owner: The LaSalle Apt. LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark and Multiple Resource National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The LaSalle Hotel is located on the southwest corner of LaSalle and Michigan Streets; it is a nine storey hotel constructed of stretcher bond laid brick with decorative and plain -cut stone string course. The first and second floors on the east and north facades are treated as one floor. The windows and doorways are flanked by spiral columns and surmounted by round - arched windows with tracery, voussoirs and keystones. A projecting string course separates the second floor from the third floor which has limestone window surrounds, as do the single end bay windows and the ninth floor windows. A projecting string course separates the eighth and ninth floors and the building is sunnounted by a wide overhanging cornice. The windows on the first floor are large, fixed sash plates with multi -light side lights. Other windows are double hung sash in pairs. ALTERATIONS: All of the single light double hung windows on all of the facades are vinyl replacement windows from the 1980s -1990s when the Charismatic Renewal Services owned the building. The aluminum doors and frames do not appear to be original to the building. There are blocked up windows on the ground level. The southside entrance awning and canvas enclosure are not original. APPLICATION ITEMS: Please see attached. The main items are the window replacements, door and frame replacements, exterior lighting replacements and south door and awning replacement. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: OVERALL BUILDING FACADES: Real American proposes to repair damaged brick and masonry and re -point deteriorated masonry joints with mortar replicating original; restore exterior concrete beam and column; remove, restore and reinstall metal balconette railings; repair /restore metal scallops and cornice and up -grade roofing termination at sheet metal coping; restore the existing wood storefront windows; restore existing wood divided light double hung windows and install new aluminum triple track storm /screen units. Replace vinyl replacement windows with new aluminum clad wood replacement windows replicating original 6/6 and 8/8 double hung. SOUTH ELEVATION: Replace the two metal doors and awnings on south elevation with new metal doors and awnings, reopen three windows on south elevation on the "penthouse bump up" over the second floor ball room and install new aluminum framed windows as well as new gutters. EAST /NORTH ELEVATION: Restore existing wood storefront windows, install new entry canopy roof membranes and lighting fixtures; install new wall mounted entry light fixtures; repair sidewalk at East elevation. NEST: The windows and doors under the bridge will be restored if extant or replaced if missing. It is currently boarded and not accessible to view. All per drawings, diagrams, repair guidelines and product information submitted. Please reference morn• e-mail accounts for the wif t<les for this project. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical stricture or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all stricture or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency xvith the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal ofa part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original forms and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of'architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure— Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material— Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood - -all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOI\ NIENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it conforms to the Local Landmark Standards. Staff requests to be involved with the selection of the alLimin rn clad wood replacement windows. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director Application - FOR - Certificate icate of Approp iateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http:/h vww. stjosephcountyindiana. com/departments /SJCHP /index.htm p: 574 - 235 -9798 f. 574 -235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josepl1An.us OFFICE USEOVL)5»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS nOx« ««OFFICE USE O,VLI' Date Received: Application Number: <w h Past Reviews: ❑ YES (DateoffastReiiek) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Rcvicw Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ Local historic District (game) ❑ National Landmark El National Register District (name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please print) t � _7 �i, M l L R 1& A Address of Property for proposed work: � ^ (Street Number— Street Nante —Cifj —Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): ! 14� [AZ;A (,n A rr LLL Phone #: �j 11- 9 1 rj - Sq Z Address of Property Owner(s): 107 AM6M (.A `,It/AY ISIJ I - 'C - 6- 100 �J (Street Number— Street Nanie --City —Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): 640ir I L�- Phone #• �J«�• 1�' �7 52� Contract Company Name: tzt* L_ Amona_l tom& ! O 1`l L' -C� Address of Contract Company: W111 AMC Soo �(-� �� ?1 460 / (Street Number— Street Name —City —Zip Code) Current Use of Building: ` �/� 1, ( Family -- Alit! ti- Faniil y— Conintercial— Goti •ernntetti— htdustrial— l'acant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: 4P SAM 9- Of Frcnne— Brick-- Stoite— Steel — Concrete— Othei) Proposed Work: Oln-Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New %.Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box stay be checked) Description of Proposed Work: 1,2 ece, A A c,,H f Owner /Contractor Fax #: �Jt"1' IhIC7 ` "l�� e -mail: yJ"'M 'C-CAIIt Y I E.ti.C. ' , (1011 (Staff will correspond tirith only one designee) X and /or Signature of Owner Signature of Cont ?actor — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— 77 iil 77 , '1174 el 1 s� I lk IY 11 Tl 1. C' �r� l 1 , � , . ....... T,,I.y,'.4 q..� in r 4 T Z, V4 I ` � 41 � IA I III �Y P i , � � , .i N 1 �,� I I I I ' I , t. Oi liq N'. II I III 11 1N II llji 4f ' �N � s a � �s � •' d Ti� \�� o. The LaSalle Apartments — Description of Proposed Work. 10711 America Way Suite 200 Fishers, IN 46038 317.8155929 Fax 3178155930 The project intends to utilize Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit for a Certified Historic structure so all work shall comply with Secretary of Interior Standards for Rehabilitation as reviewed and approved by the National Park Service. Work on the exterior of the building shall include: • Masonry restoration of damaged brick and masonry and tuck- pointing deteriorated masonry joints • Exterior concrete beam and column restoration and repainting — color to be determined • Restoration of existing wood storefront windows including painting — color to be determined • Replacement of existing Aluminum Storefront Entries with new Aluminum Storefront Entry systems — color to be determined • Restoration of existing wood double hung divided -light windows and installation of new storm window units — color to be determined • Replacement of existing vinyl windows with new clad wood replacement simulated divided light windows with profiles to mimic historic wood windows. These windows will have clear glass and window screens. Exact manufacturer will be determined through a public bidding process administered by the City of South Bend. The City is funding the replacement of these windows. • Two new hollow metal door openings at south elevation — painted — color to be determined • New awnings at south elevation over new doors - fabric color to be determined • Paint historic sheet -metal cornice — Colors to be determined. • Paint metal balconette railings at east and north facade — railing will be removed for abrasive cleaning and reinstalled. • New gutter at south elevation • Reopen three windows at south elevation and install new aluminum framed windows. • Repair concrete sidewalk at east elevation dub to water infiltrations problems in lower level space. • New entry canopy roof membrane • Paint existing exposed surfaces at entry canopies — color to be determined • New exterior light fixtures • Wall Sconce and entry doors: Manning DE 205 -3N60 • Ceiling mount at canopy: Prescolite #LBSQLEDAlOL- 30K -9 -WH • Installation of new mechanical equipment on roof wwwRealAmericaUC.com We are attaching the following for your reference o Drawing Sheet A101— North Elevation o Drawing Sheet A102 — East/West Elevations o Drawing Sheet A103 — South Elevation o Drawing Sheet A502 — Stair Sections — Sidewalk Section Details o Drawing Sheet A603 — Window Types, Details and Notes o Drawing Sheet E301 - First Floor Lighting Plan o Project Specification Section 030130 MAINTENANCE OF CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE o Project Specification Section 040120 MAINTENANCE OF UNIT MASONRY o Project Specification Section 040140 MAINTENANCE 9E STONE ASSEMBLIES o Project Specification Section 080152.93 HISTORIC TREATMENTOF WOOD WINDOWS O Project Specification Section 084113 ALUMINUM FRAMED ENTRANCES AND STOREFRONTS o Project Specification Section 084120 HISTORIC STOREFRONT RESTORATION o Project Specification Section 085200 WOOD WINDOWS o Product Cut Sheet Light Fixture: Manning DE 205 -3N60 o Product Cut Sheet Light Fixture: Prescolite #LBSQLEDAIOL- 30K -9 -WH yr; i 1 : Inj�I "�' """'fi °•IIi:IP " /•C+� y / � �, '^� I I J4_ Wy^�, "INb,,n _ T f � yw. •Y �i f wo '�iar ,�o• l'• w k P I� /�Ij ,"�, :^ "- 'l:i- „'i"u Mph llllll � ,:II {I hI IIIIII �p IgI ' l J I d ii:' ul ull l il l il l li l 'il �I I'y f n�= I' II P F �! e. � p 1 I I Illy I'I 11' 11 M I �I '� I J I' � ry fir'" .'d . � '♦! }g' kk � ,^ T 4 `m ' Irvl; +,., 'nr,��, .;Ir.,r7 v"c, ^T k - r� I j I „ IVI "!!i, ll' ; I; , ..,,•+'. -:..�, _ - ;,iil• - pyr : s , y,:� r ?' r''i% l !� Y. ^pV '� � n �^ 6 - - )� •' / n q Yi // a !� �. r , n'J' p1 s '*w ti" I;i �I l p I I I p II'I'IIIIIIII1IIII f11, },P. $wl f Jv �. - II I I hall II '' I I I I Iill I I 11�( I I r 4';P, � • L / � .r N u // „ I I ' �,II „I' r 4 "• ,� 'll' SI� „ryN�I 1 r !i. f" µ'' II IIILI�6 b •u I, ,,,IIII ,Ill I� I,� N II' II' !, II ! IIIIuu7 ,,, ^''''j j II� ' 'I,� ', „Its' II'� Ir.6'' :: :w."•�I�al, ",II � , Iyy II, Ipp r II I II ry I, I ,�,I� Ir�'I IIPi II! NI pI :� '' '„ I ;i.l"� "I � I,I ' I" rNl'Ik { ufll bJi, 'I u T 1J a '?9N I IIII IIII III I '.'F '. I, v I,pII•I ', ._ - � } Ii I I '� •NNJI� uI,'.I I III 6�I I�I�Jn I I,InNNNNNN',I I:I 1 �IN „ ' i, I Ili p „741' 1 .:�'l�� I I y 1 d f,8 r n Y'. I : I a'. " ry 1 9 I,I II I III pI I IIv Il i 1 .' +ti'. II11'I IIII I,I Nh��,IN'IN,III IIIhIIIIJ 6' - * ' -.i ” pll i' '�° 'ri � ul�ll II l pll r II q . I� IIII II I i •IIII II I, � iv: I ',I, T ' __ �� A M I �I .n;uII, II. uI fIl I�hll" I:NII u I ' II' I III d''� � II�I 1 1,'1,116�I ryll'I II4 I "I,r�el., l,�' I'I,', u �����A t'�. .�•+^"* �, �Y Y "';I'I yyl, ;. 111!I�II,a II�,i 1 ro ,, I I IhI �,I ,gilli� I I 14II•II'IVI', "r ,r ��,! •�j l I �, i, II IIIIIII ,L'o�, Nlll�if� '� PTk"; 16 F n "„�o" . I IIII Rhl 4 u III III 4' � I N k 1 fl Ip �, k'k 'l k9 P,, II I! � ! « � ,I I • I I'I' iYw"' �Si >w !p, :I, n Iti b�Itl off' + YII i ie sTMp r �, '11 ""en' m!IrRr'¢^prrlcT"'� II ..`.i,l 1 d li „ ,I IIIIIII III I f'I YI IIII I I li I,I II II �: . r ,.Mai I � N'' '„ Ir >r ^' ti kw r ���7�,M1 + WW; , 'I I, 1 1 1 I iI l.''ryryII'lIi9�IIl VIII ji 1 � III'III, IIII '�pl - 'rrn•"M +,. LaA h:�, ,�;III ° N P:II ! 6iI k� I ", ' \ .n�;�' I j,, I 'jI I' III, ll III'�III 111111j 1jillllllNl II! I II IVIII Illh 'I',lp II. � 1 "7 I I norx+J I JYYeTWAA wwNN I I d giji �'JW��' _.� 1, Ill (IIIIIII II I � IIh „,i IIII II � IIII IIIIIII IIII VIII Ill,. ",mi "i'�� - .= o . � �� r ,I- nxxaq '; I IIII p „IVIII VIII' 1 1 1l q I I I I 14 I j I I I I I IIII II II I (IIII' IIII �ulr'IYWI�: k i .�w 1 I '' N I a' I Ilmr, I j u'IIIP �I I ' � _ w J.o„ �I:� `ns>i,y �� r Y , k�� ' 1 Y Ir � I I a I 9 116 Y;riu�Jl�II11 Iqw I I :4 II l a,'i d ,I 6 t'j; l l'4 , "i � 4• •ws t ,3 +� "Y ',I"„ �i” -. m*^r �^ ., p I , I , I llll i'ii l� I I, `'• r, F., �, �F� E 'I' I � ,11, I i•I I l ...N I. rl:ll'�p I I I I �� �� � ' • I I 1, .._,�" .'�uWw:I .,� y. b , � I ' I 'I II �Y � b �I �' p b ,„ „ +'� ,• t , II IIIIIIIi.I II Ilir�l� F e I:� r I I :� ” ., x 'e y i I ro +IJ I f "'�t. II'1�1 iI I 11111 IIII ,(IIII VIII 1NN I IIIIImI LidF r dl I I! III a r ir"'�a, PI '' IIIN V wl'ppp � III' 'I'wy I I II .: I I M 6 I I I Iii lll L ' ( ;!III I III 8 I'IIlllpdilll 4 11" IyIIIIh1,,h IIII IIII II VI k. Iu IIII, Ni ry+n*pr4 �u I I JJ ` 1 II �flNli nk �Po 1 1 11 'u11 4 i 1 i� I "IIII I I 'IIII,, 'IIII = r'4+, k I " I I .r IPN'IIII b'ww"8 'l 4 �Nr ' w w I 6 Wl,gk II :' 164, ' I I I i II' kL • �Qr�� t F�` �'- X"3C�Li �� Cirl_Ll �� \a- 1��t��� "��`''>''� �'�pl-r'� f �� p� 1 �A �� P�� fib. G� � �'' I I t4,� � � � f � ce � I I � � � _�� I t. . "��µ 4 Y1"' QI I �, � L. u .�L,' ... I I � I I I Y"� ,I,�I I � .\" J , � 11, - . - • • 7 7 VO I I � PI, I ya 7 T wllkl' 17- I , 1 : ' TIrl- -1 li At- 'J, IN C44 7 7, POE - Kv I Js -Y A 4. T I -A A IN , � A 111111 J) _ - F4M I - L Eli WU V 4 Fu - MM� p r mr X I i) rR �7 � J � '�� p r mr I i) rR �7 � J � '�� i,ht� ;' _ � yl�+. j m ,.r�,�,'};_�'��f�rl�i- fl'�,`" �', �l + 4 ' °• +� ,R; .-.,', �..�.Inlw ` � w� ^ �,' InJ "Iww+�wWC," ,.,,,, A All, 17 E ' ST "Icy VNI 11 14 It ........ . .. . tz el l l� 777 P,`p I �; 6�.:,, I�'�1 .i FYI ���I� 4�� 1 J 1 "L ��!' lir�^I '� y, 1 �''� .. ,,' e .m , 1 ��,. I'' , 'yrW.. ' I.J ........ . .. . 4`' %0a.9 ' II' I�i1�, fi�4W� ,I � I � � h�,w� X'\) o o t;;�O C el l l� f L IY" � +�t � I I i ' + w r ,,�� I P i I 'I � I, , I i i F � �,� 4 C I'�II I ul I III � I I 1 �,� W b " I I I I % I ,, , ,,I I I I II I f �l I I @� � "'i � W �" �I I' ' ' . hi� V . ' � 1 o w 4`' %0a.9 ' II' I�i1�, fi�4W� ,I � I � � h�,w� X'\) o o t;;�O C L IY" � +�t � I I i ' + 4`' %0a.9 ' II' I�i1�, fi�4W� ,I � I � � h�,w� X'\) o o t;;�O C t %l she :,�.^ R � � loll It 41 iR rIO Jl T l j j�� v ft " rc iM j"r i �'l 1 ��.4�,�� i �,� � 1 15 �, Iu „l u..l,'ili�at H I i t s firs 1 I t 5 � 4Z v �,, W, —et PA I O .......... A-, IV, !.fI L I �IJB I' I I r” I I J - t,14,�.,'� � f u 1, • ", ill 11 �, a ' � �� . �' �w! m,�,a'����u111J�.�V' I I 6w�o.... �.��y l �;' �li�tilr..4txl.�'��I:,�:��,J.d. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 7 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0331 Property Location: 531 S. St. Joseph Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Free Classic /1910 Property Owner: Mary Ann and Ben Wilson Landmark or District Designation: Taylor's Field Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a 2 storey plus attic situated on a corner double lot. It has an irregular plan and vinyl clapboard siding. The hipped roof has two hipped dormer covered in asphalt shingles. There is a hooded wood panel with dentilled frieze front porch entrance supported by brick columns with a low brick wall in between. The second floor front windows are 16/1 double hung; there are 1/1 double hung windows in the first floor boxed bay and three part bay on the second floor on the south side. ALTERATIONS: The vinyl siding and asphalt roofing are not original to the house. Some of the windows appear to be replacement windows. The spindles in the porch and upper floor balconies are replacements. APPLICATION ITEMS: Wood privacy fence -dog eared 6' wood pressure treated and 4' picket fence with two gates per diagram and product information submitted . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners propose to enclose their rear and side yards with fencing. Along the front east and side north yard there will be a 4 foot cedar wood picket gothic style fence with a gate at the north. The 6' wood pressure treated dog ear privacy fence will be installed along the alley side of the back yard at the west and sidewalk side of the yard at the south. There will be a gate at the west alley side. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Taylor's Field Local Historic District Guidebook B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot with a small to medium lawn in front and little to no lawn at the rear of the property. Often the back yard is used as a parking lot for tenants. About half of the properties include a garage which is either located at the rear of the property and accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property or located directly next to the structure and accessed by small drives. Nearly all of the garage structures are out of date, single -stall frame buildings. One large carriage house still stands in the district. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. Most houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains and/or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building and causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television satellite dishes, solar panels and skylights shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the guidelines for Taylor's Field. C.D. Hostetler, Director S ouT.R Application - FOR - \\ PFACB / �' Certificate of Appropriateness 'tx m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST, JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http: / /www. stj osephcountyindiana .com/departments /SJCHP /index.htm p: 574- 235 -9798 f: 574- 235 -9578 e: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY»»»DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX «« «OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: 131 7/z ``�' `�� � Application Number: a / S — OS 3 / Past Reviews: DYES (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: FEM Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: AC/ f. / S ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) �G't ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: �� S -,..- (Street Number— Street Name — City —Zip Code) Name of Property Owner(s): Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): S 3 t 5��� ��.,� 3r- S �. �E 5_b- t—ct t L CG (Street Number— Street Name —City —Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): S e--( `l — L , z _ �; - Phone #: Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: ' (Street Number— Street Name — City —Zip Code) Current Use of Building: L A-� — S r- (Single Family— Multi - Family — Commercial — Government Industrial— Vacant —etc) Type of Building Construction: _�111. ✓ I (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone—Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ® New ❑ Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) � ^ P•GkC � 7— Description of Proposed Work: :o '- DY C w r Oc -�a rte) r - rN 7`wVO C- 9:65 Pt =- e. /7G r 4,,w 6018 At 17 - 7,�= 6 Owner /Contractor Fax #: - e -mail: L.L_ —j U'A (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X and /or X Signature of O� r Signature of Contractor — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— r7 7 • PTWMJI . V p Amami nil. ! I 0 (2013) r top- "ROW is �N ja, 41 . AW Me .w;" IL s Ail I oI I Z -tw_ - P fe W iep VY o x , -n n - NIN , .J. I YY Art " 41. cz Ak j6 11 ,1,% JqtgJA x J -ii go It -W w" im INN Av " OLM - l e - N. '�} •{.r u t It • y t ? V' �1?r .5" +, 1. I 4 131 MOIC) R NO. Y,i A Mor 'k A I lo 'A no ,yF L-W - � I - Al W A i . t . %, Ppf, r . . "'Aw I s va 5i.. 'u Mew0g..4 N ON ME - I f MA I ? at. -elper- MUM- OR kr. �1 !t .. J� jr ill 11j. 4 • -17 e, z i l ; g iNlojj•'.iy' w35r� 4 {• ,ix' QH. S l� Aie, L 4/6/2015 Shop Spruce Dog -Ear Pressure Treated Wood Fence Panel (Common: 6-ft x 8-ft; Actual: 6-ft x 8 -ft) at Lowes.com Your Store: South Bend, IN Spruce Dog -Ear Pressure Treated Wood Fence Panel (Common: 64t x 84t; Actual: 6 -ft x 8 -ft) Item #: 156656 1 Ntodel # 160275 $42.84 Buy 25 or more, Get 9% off 4 ?;n:: Tweet .61 , ; c72 Fq email Description Spruce Dog -Ear Pressure Treated Wood Fence Panel ( Common :6- ftx8 -ft: Actual: 6-ft x 8-ft) • Preassem bled for easy installation • Paintable and stainable to match your ebsting decor • Double- nailed pickets Specifications Type Panel Pressure Treated Species Spruce Pre - stained Dog- Post and Accessories Included Style ear Retention in Pounds per Cubic Foot Actual Length (Feet) 8 Warranty Actual Height (Feet) 6 Actual Picket Thickness (Inches) 0.625 Number of Pickets Backer Rails 3 Common Picket Thickness (Inches) Double Nailed Yes Common Height (Feet) Rough Yes Common Length (Feet) © 2015 Lowe's. All rights reserved. Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC Yes No No 0 Limited lifetime 17 1 6 8 i Store Pickup Your order can be available for pickup in Lowe's Of South Bend, IN today Lowe's Truck Delivery Your order will be ready for delivery to you from your selected store. s Parcel Shipping f Unavailable for This Order Sent by carriers like UPS, FedEx, USPS, etc. Spruce Dog -Ear $42.84 Pressure Treated Wood Fence Panel (Common: 6 -ft x 8 -ft; Actual: 6 -ft x 8 -ft) http:Uwww.lowes.comlpd_156656- 199 - 160275_0_ 1/1 i'416t2015 Shop Mite Cedar Gothic Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-ft x 8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x 8-ft) at LokAes.com 'roe.- -£,Crc� Soutn Bond, IN Your Store: South Bond, IN White Cedar Gothic Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-ft x 8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x 8-ft) ........ . .. ...... . ... ........ . .......... FREE 'Store Pickup Your order can be available for pickup 'in Lowe's Or South Be nd, IN today. :Lowe's Truck Delivery .y our order will be ready for delivery to .you from your selected store. Parcel Shipping Unavailable for This Order Sent by carriers like UPS, FedEx, USPS. etc. White Cedar Gothic $23.44 Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-ft x 8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x 8-ft) a Tweet 61' +1 ', 672 P email description White Cedar Gothic Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-ftx8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x8-ft) • Preassembled for easy installation • Naturally resistant to rot and decay • Double-nailed pickets Specifications Typ Species Style Actual Length (Feet) Actual Height (Feet) Actual Picket Thickness (inches) Backer Rails Double Nailed Rough . ....... . ... .. Panel Pressure Treated White Pre-stained Cedar Post and Accessories Included Gothic Retention in Pounds per Cubic Foot 8 Warranty 3.5 Number of Pickets 0.625 2 Common Picket Thickness (Inches) Yes Common Height (Feet) No Common Length (Feet) 0 2015 Lowe's. All rights reser Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC No No No 0 None 13 1 4 8 http:/Amwv.loms.corrVpd_156541-199-160274-4294612396— ftem#: 1565411 Model #:160274 Be the first to $23.44 ........ . .. ...... . ... ........ . .......... FREE 'Store Pickup Your order can be available for pickup 'in Lowe's Or South Be nd, IN today. :Lowe's Truck Delivery .y our order will be ready for delivery to .you from your selected store. Parcel Shipping Unavailable for This Order Sent by carriers like UPS, FedEx, USPS. etc. White Cedar Gothic $23.44 Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-ft x 8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x 8-ft) a Tweet 61' +1 ', 672 P email description White Cedar Gothic Wood Fence Panel (Common: 4-ftx8-ft; Actual: 3.5-ft x8-ft) • Preassembled for easy installation • Naturally resistant to rot and decay • Double-nailed pickets Specifications Typ Species Style Actual Length (Feet) Actual Height (Feet) Actual Picket Thickness (inches) Backer Rails Double Nailed Rough . ....... . ... .. Panel Pressure Treated White Pre-stained Cedar Post and Accessories Included Gothic Retention in Pounds per Cubic Foot 8 Warranty 3.5 Number of Pickets 0.625 2 Common Picket Thickness (Inches) Yes Common Height (Feet) No Common Length (Feet) 0 2015 Lowe's. All rights reser Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC No No No 0 None 13 1 4 8 http:/Amwv.loms.corrVpd_156541-199-160274-4294612396— STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 7 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0401 Property Location: 527 Riverside Drive Architectural Style /Date /Architect or Builder: American Foursquare /1904 Property Owner: Larry Schohl Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE,: The two storey house has a square plan with a later L addition. The foundation is rusticated concrete lock. The walls are vinyl side. The hipped roof and dormers are cover with asphalt interlocking shingles. There is a frill length front screened in porch with a concrete foundation, wood support posts and railings. The windows are 6/6 vinyl replacements with some 1/1 double hung. There are 6/6 and 8/8 double hung windows on the addition. ALTERATIONS: The vinyl siding, roofing and some windows are not original to the house. The shutters appear to be vinyl There one storey addition and a rear deck are not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace Sheriff Goslin roofing, total tear off with new green roof to match same as small rear house. Repair soffits and overhands as suggested by historical normal inspection. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to completely tear off the existing Sheriff Goslin roof down to the decking, repair decking as needed and completely install a new roofing systemusing architectural shingles. Soffit vents and gutters will be replaced in kind as needed. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES; B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential strictures: hipped, gable, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt and asbestos. Residences in most cases have wood facial with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or aluminum sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material which matches the original as closely as possible in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure. When necessary, gutters and downspouts shall be maintained or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare such as adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the re -roof with architectural shingles. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, M 46601 http: /hvww.stj osephcountyindiana .comfdepartments /SJCHP /index.htm p: 574- 235 -9798 f. 574- 235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE O,VLY» OT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX « «< ., . `l 1 » >DO 1S < <O USE ONLY Date Received: I I� \ � I 1 1 L_1_)j-D Application Number: L ") 1�_) — �n` -t 1 Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date oJLast Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled FMM Title: d Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Register District (,Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) n _ Address of Property for proposed work: S 7 /V /G wiz S 10/2 )D2— c v) (Street Number— Street Name— City —Zip Code) S 7 } Name of Property Owner(s): Lp /22 i^ /-1 ,t / L Phone #: Address of Property Owner(s): /-?')-, > 1 //,S i2 S J 9i , 2 1 — / � � J�I� 1i14 I (Street Number— Street Name — City — Code) Name of Contractor(s): C 7 y-- Phone #• Contract Company Name: lq U (2 N Address of Contract Company: 6 fz n ! % /'� %� �- I✓ 7GL ^�� ` (Street Number— Street Name —Cit) —Zip Code) Current Use of Building: ..J % ', "; � 1 " /L ( r (Single Family— Mztlti- Family— Commercial— Government— Inditstrial— Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: �/f'lL% 12 () o .C- (G4'ood Fran:e— Brick — Stone -- Steel— Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New -Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: _ p)- 4- r i / l- x ,Q CCSL_ //I t 2C e- F= t /V 7 7 r7 R- 2 K) 7 JLt �1 �� �HN�y �� j�S SC1if IAIS, C- 7 6_4QI Owner /Contractor Fax #: e-mail: (Staff tivill correspond with only one st nee) X �l.!1.��1 /_ i� �L - ��! l and /or X � Sr* fu' to of O�v r 1 Si ature of Contractor — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— TII� Mw IT � 'II "'fL::l:f V .•. • . ' � W',:Mw:N V �'+rr W'NI1wi " �Ik�, � alalzuX d M, �r. �nw�'.^ e�" �'�� "MTh�ldl"m "rer 'I'�'""r'n�l"�I�cjl�lnr q'apudl tTr" �mm1 f,"'7^''•m���k"N "`•N.r �Ilm��, I.Ir 1 G^ I iP�, I �'Ij'�I�' I� rw Ww r i' rxr+�n I I U � , Idl � 1 1�I�d I I q � II I I" � ", I " 1 111 I K I' I � �' I �II 51 lljllll' III I !7 1 „�aiiilp illllu'�'. I lal r II n 1�6 I d II "I'f rr I NI I I � I II I II I I IIII N� � III I�h 1 �I If�lll I I I i�ul I III � 1 I�I I' rT I�u I II,Iy,1��1�11�111',I IJI ". � la I ,I ' '�'' I k 1 ',141 1 1 a, IiQ�P ° +1. Ide I , h „1 d,l �4,, '111 11 i II ��J I III , II :�� 1 , ill i !; I �G I II I�I III IIII IIIII ° ' I I, Iri!�IINI!4i'IIIf llljy l�i �IN IIII��I, ijh, I�INiI IIeIP�I lI���II'N11;Ili li'illh Nlull���li lili �„,�, Il I„ I��JI �IUPJI,lyllll��,' y IIII I�� :� I ,i l i 7,,,, ; e I IIII� e1 ,l l I ,il I, t �, '.»,.�. � d , p �, e ! „ . �n9u 'l �,II' N,11 I , I ; I Ird6 1 �N,' „Ili pl I�GhI '� I IhI y N I!,r1 °"+S'""Y:�: I p III rj';Ir� -,1, : I� �I I I'i � INI Ilh I I I IJIIIIh� h'h IIIIPI II III 1 1 1 111,. 1 7 ld, hI 1 .. .. :«.'p�lp'9C�+rw�wi+ur.T':"'°'°F wr?w� '�IM,g I q�llla4i 1i�1:, !IP' 1, h . I�III�If!a�� �lil gull y �y 1 11 1 111 1uII �I I IIIII I I FU,: 4 i� 1 VII I�I� �2 x1 �fr g I�w�I ,L,}' II I I IIII I f a 4 ....- •., nrw�InlY..._. .. I .. I III IIaI ku I � II I'il 1pll III IMN �e !ql. w.l,l�tl. I'll,llh Pa�11 tI, IN III,.II:'.�ie .. d”. -tea :"'�fi , �i` ,� � e ra''. � y' �,.;, •' r'�e;'1'r: r':.C•. -"'� sr,, ,rY.' J 4 :t fi 4 /' �. n '.x • may �y -tea Acorn Construction Comb Renzi indiana 46619 Ph. 233 -4041 a 527 Riverside Drive South Bend Indiana MM-1 1.Obtain Building Permit 2. Remove existing roofing down to wood deck. Install 45 sheets dcicki ry tn mqin jlnnar ronf _ =- 3. Haul away all debris. 4. Install Ice Dam membrane to lower 3 ft. of eaves and in valleys as per code. Install Class A underlayment to the rest of the elevations. 5. Replace existing drip edging on rakes 6. Inspect and replace any needed flashings. Replace boots 7. i , ,islaf4 f c5 �ti. �`rsu �tyl �� yi 1�atilf, 8. Apply Certainteed Landmarks. Dimensional shingles over 7 entire roof. Aprox. 3,000 sq ft / ai3 li L ! T {{��hAng11 !u Z /. 11 �trt �7rCi }rt'f �Tti• ���]�QY'ttf7 t i ll<111111. J11Ai i �_/ 11 JILl �)4i1i 1 11 4S LLl -4S L1 i Terms- Balance upon completion with signed contract 4 For the sum Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Dollars $11.400 Submitted by Accepted by - f STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0401A Property Location: 330 West Colfax Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Collegiate Gothic /Art Deco/1911-1913/1918- 1928/William B. Ittner, Architect Property Owner: Forum Real Estate Group Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark and Multiple Resource National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The main entrance, located on St. James Court, is located in a center projecting pavilion and is three storeys tall. The raised doorway is surrounded by limestone trim that extends to include the large, stained glass stairwell window located over the door. Secondary entrances located in the northeast and southeast quadrant also have limestone surrounds with the entablatures containing panels illustrating the sciences. The multi -panel windows of the building are clustered together in groups of threes and fours and divided by pilasters with limestone capitals. Limestone spandrels separate the first and second floor windows. The roofline features a parapet, stone lined crenellations and cut stone cornice line. The foundation is dressed stone. ALTERATIONS: In 1993 the Historic Preservation approved the changes that allowed the Alexander Company to adaptively reuse the school to create loft apartments. The Courtyard elevations had aluminum replacement windows proposed and approved (1993). The chimney and power plant were demolished (1994). All doors appear to be replacements. APPLICATION ITEMS: Window repair /replacement due to wood corrosion creating water intrusion. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The Business Manager, Tina Bobbitt met with Preservation Specialist, Steve Szaday on 30 March to evaluate the window system in the west facing "penthouse ". It was discovered that the original wood storm windows, the wood windows and sills had deteriorated significantly and cannot be repaired. The Management of Forum Real Estate is proposing to replace the current deteriorated wood window and storm system with aluminum frame windows similar to ones previously approved for this courtyard (see photographs). Action Glass Company proposes to install in the 96 x 120 opening 2 fixed bronze anodized aluminum framework windows divided once vertically and twice horizontally (see diagram) to resemble the original. The framework will have a 2" face and 4.5" depth. All glazing to be clear, insulated, tempered where required. The brick and mortar opening for the new installation will be repaired in kind, if necessary. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure — Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material— Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood —all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it conforms to the Local Landmark Standards. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director Y4i:ti .._., ..� r-';t', �"it t '' 'f.41' .,'w£',£'S^'„' i' �1��.- i��' i• �'' •..'•,"£""'_�'�'."''-ir".1k.�i. ;�'``F -';,. : • , "pr -1. =, . -r*! - ... .- ,;'p.`i;ar%s .'l %iFt F <<, ..:x rc r,,, .,. .,� •.n ,.;.,a, i;.i :.:��.;r° "'i.�{e�.9 ".rein.;::.,..'' .. <. \,_4 ..?i✓rw.�_�t.:,s {e rr,,e.q.:.� �pe:e.aw >. .�., :. o:. yvt .._...< "r•ka'; ....::- ,�,.,. ...t q:ti` l�,. �, � f t p 6 NI LS � - t - cr n."..>•w- ,.A..Yrt�.. s #. K i5i `�;. . �3,, i• -A� $ .ny C"1p y ""i.�„E mr. 2 r 'y a - Kxx - r si�zx -:.,.y _ �. �,,.K > 't #t'� �'� t i ia• l �,,,� st m , 6 r l 4�iP -r s a. �" � F`'3 4tw� 'S'•pnna 1 3 '.a N' 9, Y MC � � '41r'✓IP Fy' '++K�Kp �jd},Sp Gwv...0 e...•.H C ` )� h 4 hJ ] 1Y It »P""0F�'��k�4f ;�:vda 'f� °•� PM at "�.. `{'` �1 a,:...:� tw•xaww. a �'¢ Y 0. •rq� #� ! �?ta a.�,.'a =l F,� #� �.��� 5'" ... rl'«+.y US hy, 4 d�w.'�"��l j� .;��ylhs ti�;"tfnr� tw^$.. r �a'•, �n,a�✓�aww ,k�or k S ! t,�, yyL t,S f it 'A 1 IIII •�'. �`,,`c. __r�,:r - �T �'t� }'' ���' w,C �e'',,TT�i�� P ��,•�''f .f: .?i - , «K s ;�v'�iuY, »` �e nt. V ;, `C +, ;: < •4i ;,•�.,..: ! Y t�' /' i•. e' if .V „ Qi , �,tF °.lw';2 ° ,k`'�fi ^;F':. f « ".:S�.t.' �'e ^t :yr „ f' +. E q i�4iq. " �i,;"bi,�llf'4yij','�d`y e w` _ i� t r r ! s, i, r y<{ i - bi' Y . Xr t,Y7iN " tit NA t t k r: s': A .s� - ,i=. 1 "�;1 ?;:�. + ". " r - z>+ ';' �r�t,-!„`•` j' fti" S{.��yY.-- rA'= o�;a``i�•�,:d;��� 9u;. .i�YL' f.A %`�� 'i,qi.: ^a_ e•.fk'i,� S �� - 017 = Y,' ` }�_iJ {'i7aL -T, i� •HkAr• ^.�.)� of '" '3:,�':' •ra "' ; 0 non t A Two r _ u ''4 , d 1U � e �., � en.Fi'�o-3�`%:L?�$� �n�� r - �k a ry�r •,. -, r7 4'$t+T+a `.ti'7y�•`?iyV''vk i a; r. 4� - 9:�.� '� ,� � ! 1;�iD'a. lr'.:"..',...... *1�,:`�J ,. ��l' 1 a•.,+7�. f,� ,"„�:' `�. t�• -Y;,a, Vf,,.F�'k'a:,'A ^i �.....�:.iau" _ �',`�,�.;.�3'e;F�� :.., - ^ � .f. .. r �� �`i- ;+:' �7t �f�A��_w; +°'sti �;yM .:. �r P .i;'�?v "! ":�; ^:,l..`•F'k:�"f�i: . - k�' A l f � �i ,x,1'",1 n: �`: " � ���"C7'a �"x„�"''��g}' l �r a la' � .(� iF7n4y "N'r"N"�'"v � °�r��aa"Zy , � %��........p+,..t� ! i'9 ,, y„ '�y +�ti.r'� �� ,.. - �'>��. s"'�Be:R��ai "' +M "wq°.'1�"�m ��','�•w•1.'I,. , ..s - .1' , : "s „e,'t u`h Z,va"SFw. �, .,» Kk"n � .>'+'t� �,:1`..s i';: ..,.��,• - ; ,���ai.�`' 4:3:.. -. i,' .!'Sw”; ^a si:y ;r .i :�!'_ w a�A �'�,..- •_ r f �i, 3 y,�l Y, 4 t 3 �f •� � ': y { .' ✓ti 4 i J March 30, 2015 Re: 330 W Colfax - Central High Apartments I met with Tina Whitaker - Bobbitt, the property manager and Hardy, the head of maintenance at the site at 10:30am. We looked at the fourth floor window that they wish to replace. The two part window faces west overlooking the enclosed courtyard. It is part of the fourth floor "penthouse" area at the staircase. I found the condition of the window to be as follows: -The original exterior storm is still in place but is done in three horizontal panes across both windows. The lower two panes are gone. This has allowed the elements to enter the window area and settle on the sill. The sill is completed rotted away with entire sections missing. The glass from the bottom sashes is gone. The jambs are deteriorated as well especially on the south side. There are interior storms that were added during the renovation. These are the only barrier from the elements. - Across the courtyard where the main staircase is located, there are two storey tall extruded aluminum frame windows with non moveable glass. The managers stated that they would like to have the same style as in place on that west side duplicated in place of the current original windows. - I explained what steps needed to be done in order to complete a COA application and our deadline and meeting schedule. I photographed the current windows and place the electronic copies under the Central High School folder in the shared drive m �� I i is ,L.� J van � 7! 46 y 4-5 y 31 3 i a1 37 L. . __..- 1 / Cl ear tf- � tos s Action Glass Co. 54978 Mayflower Rd. South Bend, IN 46628 (ph) 574- 232 -7500 (fx) 574- 232 -9129 Name /Address Forum Real Estate 4500 Cherry Creek South Drive Suite 550 Glendale, CO 80246 303 - 501 -8860 invoices @forumre.com Mike Krisch Reg. Mgr. (c) 630 - 330 -0034 t Estimate I Date Estimate # 3/13/2015 Ship To Central High Apartments 4th Floor Harvey Williams 315 -8515 2422 Description In a 96 x 120 opening furnish and install 2 x 4 -1/2 bronze anodized aluminum framework divided once 3728.02 vertically and twice horizontally, all glazing to be clear insulated, tempered where required We look forward to working with you. All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specificatons involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents, or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, torando, and other necessary insurance. Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensaton Insurance. If payment in not rendered within 30 days of completion of work, we will file a lein against the property. This serves as intent to file. This bid accepted by: Subtotal Amount Sales Tax (7.0 %) Total $3,728.02 $126.21 $3,854.23 a Location Budget as of 03-31 -2015 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 -01 -2015. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2015 thru 03/31/2015 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Saint Joseph County Account Carry Forward, Original Addrl AdJ Total Unencumbered Unexpended Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent 11075 Deputy Director 0.00 34,884.00 0.00 0.00 34,884.00 0.00 8,050.14 26,833.86 26,833.86 000 General GovT. 76.92 76.92 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 0.00 35,841.00 0.00 0.00 35,841.00 0.00 9,022.86 26,818.14 26,818.14 000 General GovT. 74.83 74.83 10000 Totals *' ** 0.00 70,725.00 0.00 0.00 70,725.00 0.00 17,073.00 53,652.00 53,652.00 75.86 .75.86 21030 Office Supplies 119.96 297.00 0.00 0.00 416.96 0.00 119.96 297.00 297.00 000 General GovT. 71.23 71.23 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 106.88 893.12 893.12 000 General Gov'f. 89.31 89.31 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 0.00 225.00 225.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 20000 Totals * * * * *" * "" "" "`*" *'*' * * * " *'"""" " 119.96 1,522.00 0.00 0.00 1,641.96 0.00 226.84 1,415.12 1,415.12 86.18 86.18 31070 Other Contractual Services 0.00 20,045.00 0.00 0.00 20,045.00 0.00 3,701.07 16,343.93 16,343.93 000 General GovT. 81.54 81.54 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 0.00 57.00 0.00 0.00 57.00 0.00 17.80 39.20 39.20 000 General GovT. 68.77 68.77 33100 Printing 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 0.00 0.00 95.00 95.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 34040 Auto Liability 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 0.00 0.00 900.00 900.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 39010 Dues & Subscription 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 0.00 400.00 400.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 30000 Totals *' 0.00 21,497,00 0.00 0.00 21,497.00 0.00 3,718.87 17,778.13 17,776.13 82.70 82.70 Financial System 04/02/2015 09:10 AM by ksobecki Page 54 Location Budget as of 03 -31 -2015 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01 -01 -2015. Fund: 1000 County General for 01/01/2015 thru 03/31/2015 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Carry Forward Original Addt'I Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance Location Totals =_«`___«_ « « ............ 119.96 93,744.00 0.00 0.00 93,863.96 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent 21,018.71 72,845.25 72,845.25 77.61 77.61 0.00 0.00 21,018.71 Financial System 04102/2015 09:10 AM by ksobecki Page 55 Director's Report April 2015 16 March HPC monthly prep and meeting. Responded to inquiries from Greg Kil of hil Architects. Researched for Adam Heet at NDU Architecture school about the Oliver Opera House. 17 March Prepared approved COAs and inquiries pertaining to them. Emailed information to Gary Gilot. Emailed COA information to Phil St. Clarie and John Martinez on Leeper Park West. 18 March Discussion with Aaron Perri concerning SB150 and acknowledging families that have lived here for 150 years, like was done at the bi- centennial for residents of 100 years. Responded to inquiries about pool and garage addition at 1069 Riverside Drive; sent links, attachments of meeting dates and requested Contractor's list to homeowner. Signs posted for Special Meeting at 3:00 Friday and notification sent to Tribune. 19 March Follow up with Larry Magliozzi on maps for die Green Ribbon Commission. Prepared information for the Botanical Society Board Meeting at 4:30 and presented Treasurer's Report. 202 Bartlett on site tour with Justin Bergonia die new owner. Currently restoring the apartment house as a three apartment dwelling which it was originally. Discussion with Randy Wilkerson on future demolition issues. 20 March General Office work. Responded to potential buyer of 341 West North Shore with information requested on adding a second storey to the ranch. 539 Riverside Drive is currently being brought up to standards by Safeguard. Contacted Steve Szaday to meet with Bill Allen about the porch issues and Safeguards proposal for installing grates on both side of die front porch. 23 March Followed up on Realtor inquiry on 341 West North Shore for a new purchaser who may wish to add an addition to the ranch house. Followed up with Steve on 539 Riverside and agreed witli the solution to the issue of installing pvc lattice to resolve die ventilation issues and to prevent rotting. 24 -25 March Sick Days 26 March Met with Scott Pannicke of Real American and accepted application for LaSalle Hotel. Processed two RME for tree removals per Brent Thompson. Research for Michael Snyder on 1117 W. Western -sent information. 27 March Meeting with all partners on Building South Bend Past Present and Future fka Architecture and Urbanism of South Bend at Bond Hall. Reviewed the progress and the needed work at hand. Needed funding sources. I am to contact Chris Murphy of 1° Source as a funding source either outright or through their Foundation and Mark Tamer at South Bend Chocolate to make chocolate store fronts from our 3D moulds. Attended at BSSB 4:30 meeting on the By- Laws revision options. 30 March Coordinated times and dates with Jennifer Parker and Brandon Anderson for presentation to Chris Murphy. Received file from Adam Heet on the information needed for their app for the Building South Bend. Also gave Adam the link for COA application for the Cub Scout work in Leeper Park restoring the limestone retaining wall around the "stage" in Leeper Park East. He is also working with Jolm Martinez of South Bend Parks. Began the data search for Adam's app project. 31 March Accepted COA applications for April meeting. General Office work. Called David Duval concerning an e -mail that he needed (last year, it seems -but too many people involved and Lungs "fall through tie cracks ") for the Studebaker Railroad NR District. DHPA needed assurances that HPC did not locally designate the district with the NR nomination was in progress and the application for Tax Credits. Continued data research for Adam and gave to Elicia for input on the various spread sheets. E- mailed Chris Murphy about meeting on the Building South Bend project. Dropped off COA applications to Larry Schohl for re -roof of house; not in -kind. 1 April Interview with Rosie Wood from ABC 57 on Sons of Israel/ Cubs' Team Store. Met with Norrie Emmons of HG Christman who is working with a developer for the JD Lauber Building. He is "Christman.2 ". We will be looping him into the Building South Bend project since Christman's blue prints started die ball rolling on that! Began to seriously work on the La Salle Hotel proposal. 2 April Staff report for the LaSalle Hotel. Emails to American Structures for additional details. 3 April OFFICE CLOSED Good Friday 6 April COA deadline day and Dyngus Day. Routine Office Work. Beginning other Staff Reports for early mailing. 7 -8 April Dedicated solely to Staff reports and Commissioners' packets and e -mail details of the LaSalle Hotel Project. 9 -14 April Vacation Days 15 April David Duval and tax credits state and fed for Queen Anne and Morey House for Eric Horvath. Provided research on Carriage House Restaurant in German Township. Reviewed work and 106 Reviews for balance of week. 16 April 106 Reviews for Boland Trail, Roundabout at Brick and Fir, and a cell tower at 26801 Jackson Road. The Roundabout is near SJC landmark at 14912 Brick Road - Harris Township District Nol School, but shouldn't have a negative impact on the structure. The Boland Trail will be a feat of engineering to create an 8 -10 foot wide pathway between the Portage Roundabout and Riverside Drive. There is nothing by fields near the location of the cell tower. Reviewed contact with City for the additional $5,000.00. Will bring to Commission to review. BSSB meeting from 4:30 -6:30. 17 April Arranging meeting witli NNN Director Kathy Schuth HPC and Randy Wilkerson of Code on deteriorating housing stock in Chapin Park. Environmental Reviews of 1146 W. Washington, 1046 Lawndale,529 S. Illinois for federally funded YWCA Domestic Violence relocation program MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY April 20, 2015 13 Floor Conference Room County — City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Thomas Gordon, Mike Voll, Brandon Anderson Members not in attendance: Kevin Buccellato, Elizabeth Hertel Staff Present: Catherine Hostetler, Director; Elicia Feasel, Deputy Director; Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist/Inspector; Jamie Woods, St. Joseph County Attorney Members of the Public Present: Larry Schohl, Benjamin John Wilson, Scott Pannicke H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Motion by Tom Gordon with a second by Mike Voll to amend agenda to rearrange COA order to result with #I on the agenda becoming #3. Vote: 4 — 0 1. 531 South St. Joseph COA 42015 -0331 Taylor's Field Representation by Benjamin John Wilson, owner STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 7 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0331 Property Location: 531 S. St. Joseph Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Free Classic /1910 Property Owner: Mary Ann and Ben Wilson Landmark or District Designation: Taylor's Field Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a 2 storey plus attic situated on a corner double lot. It has an irregular plan and vinyl clapboard siding. The hipped roof has two hipped dormer covered in asphalt shingles. There is a hooded wood panel with dentilled frieze front porch entrance supported by brick columns with a low brick wall in between. The second floor front windows are 16/1 double hung; there are 1/1 double hung windows in the first floor boxed bay and three part bay on the second floor on the south side. ALTERATIONS: The vinyl siding and asphalt roofing are not original to the house. Some of the windows appear to be replacement windows. The spindles in the porch and upper floor balconies are replacements. APPLICATION ITEMS: Wood privacy fence -dog eared 6' wood pressure treated and 4' picket fence with two gates per diagram and product information submitted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners propose to enclose their rear and side yards with fencing. Along the front east and side north yard there will be a 4 foot cedar wood picket gothic style fence with a gate at the north. The 6' wood pressure treated dog ear privacy fence will be installed along the alley side of the back yard at the west and sidewalk side of the yard at the south. There will be a gate at the west alley side. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Taylor's Field Local Historic District Guidebook B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot with a small to medium lawn in front and little to no lawn at the rear of the property. Often the back yard is used as a parking lot for tenants. About half of the properties include a garage which is either located at the rear of the property and accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property or located directly next to the structure and accessed by small drives. Nearly all of the garage structures are out of date, single -stall frame buildings. One large carriage house still stands in the district. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. Most houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains and/or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building and causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor black Front yard areas shall not be fenced or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television satellite dishes, solar panels and skylights shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the guidelines for Taylor's Field. C.D. Hostetler, Director On a motion by Brandon Anderson with a second by Tom Gordon to approve as presented. Vote: 4 — 0 unanimous. COA #2015 -0331 Approved. 2. 527 Riverside Drive COA #2015 -0401 River Bend Representation by Larry Schohl, owner STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 7 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0401 Property Location: 527 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: American Foursquare/ 1904 Property Owner: Larry Schohl Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two storey house has a square plan with a later L addition. The foundation is rusticated concrete lock. The walls are vinyl side. The hipped roof and dormers are cover with asphalt interlocking shingles. There is a full length front screened in porch with a concrete foundation, wood support posts and railings. The windows are 6/6 vinyl replacements with some 1/1 double hung. There are 6/6 and 8/8 double hung windows on the addition. ALTERATIONS: The vinyl siding, roofing and some windows are not original to the house. The shutters appear to be vinyl There one storey addition and a rear deck are not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace Sheriff Goslin roofing, total tear off with new green roof to match same as small rear house. Repair soffits and overhands as suggested by historical normal inspection. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to completely tear off the existing Sheriff Goslin roof down to the decking, repair decking as needed and completely install a new roofing system using architectural shingles. Soffit vents and gutters will be replaced in kind as needed. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gable, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt and asbestos. Residences in most cases have wood facias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or aluminum sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material which matches the original as closely as possible in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure. When necessary, gutters and downspouts shall be maintained or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited 2 Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare such as adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the re -roof with architectural shingles. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Brandon Anderson to approve application as presented. Vote: 4 — 0 unanimous. COA #2015 -0401 Approved. 3. LaSalle 237 North Michigan COA #2015 -0326B Local Landmark Representation by Scott Pannicke, Director of Design & Construction for Real America STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0326B Property Location: 237 N. Michigan Street Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival/Chicago School blend/1921/ Nicol, Schuler and Hoffman Property Owner: The LaSalle Apt. LLC Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark and Multiple Resource National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The LaSalle Hotel is located on the southwest corner of LaSalle and Michigan Streets; it is a nine storey hotel constructed of stretcher bond laid brick with decorative and plain -cut stone string course. The first and second floors on the east and north facades are treated as one floor. The windows and doorways are flanked by spiral columns and surmounted by round - arched windows with tracery, voussoirs and keystones. A projecting string course separates the second floor from the third floor which has limestone window surrounds, as do the single end bay windows and the ninth floor windows. A projecting string course separates the eighth and ninth floors and the building is surmounted by a wide overhanging cornice. The windows on the first floor are large, fixed sash plates with multi -light side lights. Other windows are double hung sash in pairs. ALTERATIONS: All of the single light double hung windows on all of the facades are vinyl replacement windows from the 1980s -1990s when the Charismatic Renewal Services owned the building. The aluminum doors and frames do not appear to be original to the building. There are blocked up windows on the ground level. The southside entrance awning and canvas enclosure are not original. APPLICATION ITEMS: Please see attached. The main items are the window replacements, door and frame replacements, exterior lighting replacements and south door and awning replacement. <� DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: OVERALL BUILDING FACADES: Real American proposes to repair damaged brick and masonry and re -point deteriorated masonry joints with mortar replicating original; restore exterior concrete beam and column; remove, restore and reinstall metal balconette railings; repair /restore metal scallops and cornice and up -grade roofing termination at sheet metal coping; restore the existing wood storefront windows; restore existing wood divided light double hung windows and install new aluminum triple track storm/screen units. Replace vinyl replacement windows with new aluminum clad wood replacement windows replicating original 6/6 and 8/8 double hung. SOUTH ELEVATION: Replace the two metal doors and awnings on south elevation with new metal doors and awnings, reopen three windows on south elevation on the "penthouse bump up" over the second floor ball room and install new aluminum framed windows as well as new gutters. EAST/NORTH ELEVATION: Restore existing wood storefront windows, install new entry canopy roof membranes and lighting fixtures; install new wall mounted entry light fixtures; repair sidewalk at East elevation. WEST: The windows and doors under the bridge will be restored if extant or replaced if missing. It is currently boarded and not accessible to view. All per drawings, diagrams, repair guidelines and product information submitted. Please reference vour e-mail accounts for the Ddffiles for this Droiect. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure— Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material — Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood —all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it conforms to the Local Landmark Standards. Staff requests to be involved with the selection of the aluminum clad wood replacement windows. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Brandon Anderson to approve application as presented conditionally to include Staff recommendation regarding windows. Vote: 4 — 0 unanimous. COA #2015 -0326B Approved Conditionally. 4. Central High 330 West Colfax COA #2015 -0401A Local Landmark No representation STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 April 2015 Application Number: 2015 -0401A Property Location: 330 West Colfax Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Collegiate Gothic /Art Deco /1911- 1913/1918- 1928/William B. Ittner, Architect Property Owner: Forum Real Estate Group Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark and Multiple Resource National Register Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The main entrance, located on St. James Court, is located in a center projecting pavilion and is three storeys tall. The raised doorway is surrounded by limestone trim that extends to include the large, stained glass stairwell window located over the door. Secondary entrances located in the northeast and southeast quadrant also have limestone surrounds with the entablatures containing panels illustrating the sciences. The multi -panel windows of the building are clustered together in groups of threes and fours and divided by pilasters with limestone capitals. Limestone spandrels separate the first and second floor windows. The roofline features a parapet, stone lined crenellations and cut stone cornice line. The foundation is dressed stone. ALTERATIONS: In 1993 the Historic Preservation approved the changes that allowed the Alexander Company to adaptively reuse the school to create loft apartments. The Courtyard elevations had aluminum replacement windows proposed and approved (1993). The chimney and power plant were demolished (1994). All doors appear to be replacements. APPLICATION ITEMS: Window repair /replacement due to wood corrosion creating water intrusion. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The Business Manager, Tina Bobbitt met with Preservation Specialist, Steve Szaday on 30 March to evaluate the window system in the west facing "penthouse ". It was discovered that the original wood storm windows, the wood windows and sills had deteriorated significantly and cannot be repaired. The Management of Forum Real Estate is proposing to replace the current deteriorated wood window and storm system with aluminum frame windows similar to ones previously approved for this courtyard (see photographs). Action Glass Company proposes to install in the 96 x 120 opening 2 fixed bronze anodized aluminum framework windows divided once vertically and twice horizontally (see diagram) to resemble the original. The framework will have a 2" face and 4.5" depth. All glazing to be clear, insulated, tempered where required. The brick and mortar opening for the new installation will be repaired in kind, if necessary. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re- roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not 11 require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 3. Structure — Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 4. Material — Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood —all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it conforms to the Local Landmark Standards. Catherine D. Hostetler, Director On a motion by Tom Gordon with a second by Brandon Anderson to approve application as presented. Vote: 4 — 0 unanimous. COA #2015 -0401A Approved. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION — None. III. HEARING OF VISITORS — None. IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — March 16, 2015 approved by general consent. B. TREASURER'S REPORT 1. Location Report — Mailed. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals — Circulated. 3. Director's Report — Distributed. 4. Assistant Director Report — Distributed. 5. Preservation Specialist Report — Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel — Discussion. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report —Distributed. 2. Legal Affairs — Update on job description for Director. Also, moving into trying to improve our enforcement ability. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Country Bake Shop — Enforcement discussion. B. Tool Crib — On a motion by Tom Gordon with a second by Brandon Anderson that a budget not to exceed $2,000 be appropriated for initiating the Tool Crib to be prioritized by Staff. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Upcoming events — Seeking volunteers for May 9 and May 23 -24. B. Leeper Park — Follow up from March meeting. W VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Brandon Anderson to adjourn. Vote: 4 — 0 Unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Attest: CF::Z Elizabeth Hertel, Secretary Date G'! HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 20 April 2015 PUBLIC SIGN IN SHEET Because distribution of federal funds may be involved, the City of South Bend is required to maintain a record of whether members of the public attending this hearing or event are minorities. Please designate your status using the following letters: W (White /Caucasian), B (Black), H (Hispanic), O (Other). If you are female, include F, and if you are disabled, include D. NAME: PRINT T.�NO l & C{ ADDRESS W, B, H or O I o v , Amem w 1�J 6 D l�(J S4-. F or D