Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApril 2013AGENDA THE HISTORIC' PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 15 2013 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY April 15, 2013 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 1201 E. Wayne N COA #2013 0314 Q 2.548 River COA #2013 0325B 3. 113 W. North Shore COA #2013 -0403A E. Wayne - Edgewater Local Landmark `p MM155 1 0/yE g9 J 'r. H a T NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION �j III. HEARING OF VISITORS O-- V IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES III III O March 18, 2013 ~ B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report rte/ C. STAFF REPORTS ^ W 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Preservation Specialist Report l 6. Legal Counsel �{ D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: O 1. President's Report �{ 2. Strategic Planning H V. OLD BUSINESS " VI. NEW BUSINESS J_ VII. ADJOURNMENT `p MM155 1 0/yE g9 J 'r. H a T NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 15, 2013 MEETING ALL COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER PERSON GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES int Name Address Sjgrlatyre - Do 0 Czr lV m PLbC.t--- STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0314 Property Location: 1201 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Modern/1966 Property Owner: Alexander and Laurie Martin Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non - Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This residence was built in 1966 for Emil and Virginia Havel. It is a two storey frame construction with a flat rusticated stone fagade on an irregular plan with a low gable roof covered with asphalt shingles. There is a flat rusticated stone chimney. A one storey front flat roof section extends out to cover open porch supported by simple wood box columns over a concrete slab. The windows are large single pane. There is a two car garage with board and batten siding and asphalt shingled roof attached to the rear of house by a one storey gable roof connector. ALTERATIONS: The gable connector to the garage was noted.as an addition on the 1986 survey card. The roof on the house and garage was replaced in 2006 (COA#20061214A); the storm doors on the front of the house are replacements COA #2007 -0517; the roof on the porch and breeze way were replaced along with repairs to the moulding, soffit, gutters and fascia board COA# 2008 -0917. The side entry door was replaced with a metal clad 6 panel solid door along with the storm door with a self - storing Courtyard aluminum storm door. There was also the installation of the aluminum soffit vents and the capping of the porch beam (COA #2009 - 0618). APPLICATION ITEMS: On the east side of the house there is an area -open on three sides - between the dining room (to south) and garage (to north); we plan to screen and roof this area. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners have engaged Ashton Construction to create a 10'x16' an enclosed porch in the patio area located between the dining room and the garage. The enclosure will have cedar 6" cove siding on the exterior wall, three 32 "x48" triple track double hung storm windows (see brochure) and a storm door (see brochure). The Roof will be framed to match existing flat roof and a 3'x3' skylight will be installed in the center of the roof. All per proposal , diagrams and brochures submitted. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the, other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story- and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half - timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the enclosed porch as it conforms to the guidelines for the East Wayne District. 1 Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http:// www. stjosephcountyindiana .com/departments /SJCHP /l*ndex.htm p: 574- 235 -9798 f: 574- 235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE ONLY> » » >DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX « « «O / FFICE USE ONLY Date Received: l x tlLet A e- ` o2D /j Application Number: <1 i Past Reviews: ©�S (Date of Last Review) a o�dC� p ❑ NO v Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: j ❑ Local Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled A-5 A a t,-- ,7-4 !3 Local Historic District (Naive) � (,!'Lzry,u ❑ National Register District (Name) f / ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: (Please Print) • Address of Property for proposed work: 1 0 G W Q {1 P 1 v J 1i L16 6 (5 (� (Street Number treetName ip — City— ZCode) Name of Property Owner(s): R 0li (c r o t I _ o u ( (C M Q R1 n Phone #: 5 - 7 1 0 Address of Property Owner(s): �U (moo y /� 1 5t A) Q n ( (Street Number Street Name — City — Zip Code) Name of Contractor(s): r G t /" 1 yVl n✓J Phone #: Contract Company Name: 41 u Address of Contract Company: �y O n B OLP h 0 yC�a� u S IJ 16 (Street Number— Street Name — City —Zip Code) Current Use of Building: 511 16M 11 y �n MP (Single Family— AViulti- Family — Commercial— Government Industrial — Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: p a ud ri ive (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel— Concrete— Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: On I M ltd e at 1 N l k , 3,AtC- I� ,et P i 6 A n o (P(x — o/ffrn o n A�(re Nr 0 -- 6efWer. -AI e lb rot lY) (1a o,,J �aleqe (7c) (..) e Ae i fi ge f ee, o,,J r -d A f "'ea Owner /Contractor Fax #: e-mail: Q f h tNl d a t n e J ,!Y1 d t t. ('3 M (Staff will correspond with only one designee) X r" J17 /� and/or X Signature of Owner Signature of Contractor — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE— .C tf z (U Ct� W T-- C) N V -- � _-��-___'__'-_-�__-_-�__-'_�_-_.__'-_____-____'~----'-^�'--'�-----'---'-----�------------------------------'�------�------------ � --'~--� ----^---------�--��------�-------------''----�-------�--~- -`�--------'--'--------'---'-- ----- . i.. ... ..... _ ..... ........... _ ...... ..... .... .... '-_.'_^--._'..--''-.--~_-_'_�-^�'___.-_'-----'.~-'-----'-' - '-~'------�--'---�--~---~~�-' - � .... ......... ... .... ......... ..... ..... .......... __-^-_�__'' � ...... ....... .. ........ _.-.-�,' --.-^`-'��-�~'___�_-''--_- '-_~-'-_' ~_'^`_-'`-~ �_- --, ..-.~--.�- .- _ � -~_-.-...'-`' . . .-- -~�~-�--`--~----�~---'---^-^-^---~-' � ..... � � Page 1 of 3 Proposal ASHTON CONSTRUCTION LLC 55790 Apple Road Osceola, IN 46561 Phone: (574) 674 -9300 FAX: (574) 674 -9308 Date: September 27, 2012 Proposal Submitted To: Laurie Martin Street: 1201 E. Wayne Street North City, State: South Bend, IN 46615 Phone: 233 -2280 We would like to thank you for giving us this opportunity to submit this proposal to you. 10' x 16' Screened In Porch: A<A '5ivGLosc-D "PoRcrr o 2 B ec-czcu>4 y' 1. Remove enough concrete to allow for placement of posts on outside wall to support deck of screened in porch. 2. Remove cedar board and batten from 3 exterior walls of home. 3. Install R -30 faced insulation to floor. 4. Frame floor using 2x8's, 16" on center. Install 5/4" x 6" cedar deck boa rds to entire floor of screened in room. 5. Frame walls using 2x4's, 16" on center, framing in for 1 -3'0 "x6'8" storm door and -3 /-32"x48" triple track storm windows. Install 1 /2" O.S.B. sheeting to both sides of wall. 6. Install 1 exterior light by storm door, 1 outside G.F.I. outlet, and 1 ceiling fan with light kit. Homeowner to supply light fixtures. 7. Frame roof flat matching existing. Rafters to be 2x8's, 16" on center with W decking. Match 3" ISO board insulation and TPO roofing membrane. All overhangs to match existing. 8. Insulate wall using R -11 faced insulation. Insulate ceiling using R -19 faced insulation while leaving room for air flow. 9. Install aluminum soffit to ceiling. 10. Install %" plywood paneling to all interior walls. Homeowner to pick out paneling. Allowance per sheet to be $25.00. 11. Install 1 -3'0 "x6'8" Larson storm door. Homeowner to choose color, style, and handle. 12. Instalk triple track storm windows, approximate size to be 32 "W x 48" tall. Homeowner to choose color of track on windows. 13. Clean up and remove all debris from site. 14. Secure all necessary permits. Total For 10'x 16' Screened In Porch - $16,067.44 1 ASHTON CONSTRUCTION LLC 55790 Apple Road Osceola, IN 46561 Phone: (574) 674 -9300 FAX: (574) 674 -9308 C I -IANGE ORDER JOB NO: Proposal Dated 9/27/12 DATE: March 4, 2013 Customer: Alexander & Laurie Martin Address: 1201 E. Wayne Street North City, State and Zip Code: South Bend, IN 46615 Type Of Work: Screened In Porch You are hereby authorized to make the following change in your work on the above captioned project, it being understood that this change is to be executed under the terms of and conditions embodied in our contract. AV aNcw5d:_: ;vtcrt oe a.��zsrn�.4V Total Screened In Porch Proposal Dated 9/27/12 $16,067.00 Deletions From Proposal As Follows: 1. Installation of /4" paneling to interior of addition. (725.00) 2. Installation of cedar deck boards to floor of addition. (1,150.00) 3. Installation of 5/8" T -111 to exterior of addition. (968.00) Total Deletions From Proposal Per This Change Order (2,843.00) Additions To Proposal As Follows: 1. 12% increase in rooting material cost. 102.00 2. Installation of l - 3'x3' skylight to center of addition roof. 1.,117.00 3. Install cedar 8" V- Groove smooth finish. Product to be installed raw, homeowner to decide on finish. This cost does not include finishing of this product. 3,345.00 4. Installation of 5/4" wolmanized deck boards to floor of addition. 950.00 6. Installation of cedar 6" cove siding to exterior of addition. This cedar to be ordered pre - finished. 2.348.00 Total Additions To Proposal Per This Change Order 7.862.00 'Dotal Amended Screened In Porch Pro er This Change Order $21,086.00 Authorized C'ontractor's Signature ,' Customer's Signature Customer's Signature Date Of Acceptance ONE -STEP HANGING with pro- drilled placement holes ADJUSTABLE HEIGHT for an exact fit WARRANTY PROTECTION LARSOW storm doors offer unbeatable warranty protection. it's just what you'd expect from (ARSON , ". EASY - TO - FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS keep it simple CUSTOMER SUPPORT With the LARSON Homeowner Helpiine, installation answers are as close as your phone or computer. Call 1 -888- 48.'3 -3768 or visit our web site at www.LARSONdoors.com. Install It yourself! L,,: airy'" �xsruunow ramamnrXa )N 4 GOLD SERIES our best window The [ARSON Low-E Gold Series Storm Windows offer you exceptional features for ultimate performance on your home Our Gold Series Window Low -E Glass Double weatherstripping on both sides of sash Pocketed head, iamb and sill Improves c:rer efficiency up to >' , { �iQ YC�tr tc/ 54'r(r'y �.. per window annualiy Proyides meAim±;nh proteuior= ago rlo air infuirotion An exccphonoily ' 61 iii; eliminates lb e reed; /r vobilizel W- I and bow Guides Interlocking top and bottom Adas stabilitY and provents sash bowirrg Buttioint corners and tubular Reinforces faints, and adds frame design stoinnrh anci durobihiy Operating window sash locks in place Provides add ':t security Meets AAMA Certification Amures quality constnx_lion and Standards performance. Available Models color Selection • T*,:,'T(ork Lxubk; Hwx4 Ir surmn) 1213E/ 1.213 b`dhiw • T.vo , Trock Cx uble Hung L203E1 / L203 • T;-r- -Tack Slider Winclow i`u€ wreent 1613E / L613 l.Imorcl • Twcr•Taxk Silder 1603E 11403 Eoriirtone • Two4fack Slding /Picture Win&D -w 162311 / L623 • Skurn P,cn/re WirkLw L50311 / L503 �aihdstxe t Also available in flush Mount All models also available with dear glass It energy toss by up to 60 Save up to $35 per window per year on your energy bill Home stays warmer in the winter, cooler in the summer irotect floors and furniture from iormfui W rays Gold Series storm windows feature energy-saving Low-E Glass. You will feel more comfortable in your home and lower your energy usage, Gold Series Storm Windows are built to withstand winds up to 95 mph and cut air infiltration by over four times the rote of our Silver Series. Styles to Fit Your Home Two-Trock Double Hung At, , TwaTradc Double Hung Picture Window st h uh h :d#riin Two•Trock Slider Two-Track Slider HIiAfA :�i1 AI j Two-Track Slider /Picture , STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0325B Property Location: 548 River Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Dutch Colonial Revival/1924/Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Doug Turnock Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey Dutch Colonial Revival home has a rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are wide wood clapboard and the gambrel roof with full shed dormer is covered with asphalt shingles. There is side brick chimney. The front porch is open with square posts. The windows are double hung 6/1. The front door and storm door are modern replacements. ALTERATIONS: Several basement windows have been replaced. The Aluminum storm windows and the roof are replacements. There have been replacements of the sidewalks around the house. Wood decking has been added to the rear yard (COA 2001- 0510) APPLICATION ITEMS: Add 6' "Dog -Ear" fence on deck; southwest side with gate from house to just shy of tree. Add wood railing to front porch eventually with a wooden handrail along new front steps (see 605 Edgewater). Replace basement window with vinyl replacement window to match other basement windows. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner wishes to place a privacy fence along the deck at the rear side of the house; it would also have a gate. The style of fence was previously approved by the Commission'in 2001 for the previous owners (COA #2001 -0510) but it was not installed. The current applicant changed his mind on the wooden steps on 1 April since the sidewalk was in such bad repair he is now proposing an in -kind replacement on the concrete walkway and steps rather than the = wood covering for the steps. The wood railing and balustrade system would resemble the one he installed at 605 Edgewater but without the two side steps and railings. The owner also wishes to replace the inoperable and deteriorated basement window with a sliding vinyl window which will match the replacement basement windows. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE. LANDSCAPING, AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Many properties have a straight driveway along one edge of the lot leading to a garage at the rear of the house. This driveway often has a sidewalk along one side leading to the front entrance either in the center or at the side of the house. Driveway and sidewalk materials include asphalt or concrete. All of the properties have trees; many have trimmed shrubbery and hedges. All of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Existing plants, trees, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs, and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the buildings that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing old plants, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings and other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, with the exception of properties along Lincolnway, which may be fenced, but not with enclosed stockade -type fencing. Not Recommended Telephone poles with high intensity overhead lights should not be used, with the exception of along Lincolnway. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Metal,.vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fence and the proposed railing system as they conform to the guidelines for Edgewater Place. The proposed vinyl window will match what has been currently installed and will not alter the size of the opening. 4 sO UT11 - Application ytQMIAISS10ryEq� -FOR- o �. Vol r o . :: \FACT %1 Ce6 �r{r� LvILCt� lei 0 App op bW�v fVt his& s :; �� �t.�r;b `t .a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION m o' x Is65 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http:// www. stjosephcountyindiana .com/departments /SJCHP /index.htin p: 574- 235 -9798 f: 574- 235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC(@,co.st-joseph.in.us OFFICE USE + ONLY» » »DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX «««OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: ��z� r3 Application Number: .1? Past Reviews: [g S (Date of tart R-iew) �I see 6 L, ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: /�.J 13 ❑Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) </I r(. (I, e ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: i ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: = iud. 0a,i..i511oio.Wd�rsLi4lilY.lif Ildli it i i i i i i i i ii II li i i— :- Print) r �. ddress of Property for proposed work: Z Ve_r - -- -- Street Number — Street Name—Ci Zi Code Name of Property Owner(s): � �a :� �..n r> e* ,�� Phone #: 2 — c f C1 L� Address of Property Owner(s): 5143 �.+-; — 1(4 i N (Street Number— Street Name — City —Zip Code) Name - of Contractor(s): n wr j Contract Company Name: Address of Contract Company: Phone #: - Street Number— Street Name —Ci ' Zi Code Current Use of Building: —�—frt v)%�(� AJ y Single Fami ly— Mul! - Family — Commercial -- Government — Industrial — Vacant —etc.) :Type of Building Construction;. (Wood Frame Brick— Stone — Steel — Concrete —Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Find andscape ❑ New ❑Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) = - - •- ' " -'' Description of Proposed Work: ""JZL 1 t q rl �ecv' -KAT 9 r A r� (il1Q.t ': k 4a oo I — 0S 1 ( � 0 a `� p� /�/� anti, ivl � (�tYYL�r.Ai 0 61S - c \'`4 1'�l �Valy 1 1 N � r _ - ' `..-_ 11', 56A *X1 +-- tom... 6' 4,0 t&U ` Yin - �v S ova $e�eo�.l Owner /Contractor Fax # J� e -mail: (Sta(f 'll correspond vith only one designee) _ X _ .,i/./r✓��i�'�� and /or X S gnature o ner ` / Signature of Contractor ij ii iS I. is fl I I ii IV O- j. IV IAA -JAI - 7lfJV1,A C - 34 MUIrly 0 v X�.Irv) Wrofvo ' — Ta - vec� roam R 548 River Ave Basement windows are damaged and nnil,=A chi if . - replacement installed by previous owner 548 River Ave 04012013 I II 7, r tv o Cf , i� ` �� 700491060001g jpg (JPEG Image, 276 X 276 pixels) http: / /mobileimages. lowes .com /product/converted/770049 /77004910... ' hop,6 -ft x 8 -ft Pine Dog -Ear Wood Fence Panel at Lowes.com http://www.lowes.com/pL50520-199-102561 Your store: South Bend, IN 6 -ft x 8-ft Pine Dog -Ear Wood Fence Panel You're shopping a store in: South Bend, IN • 7 1 FRED i 250 West Ireland Road ; Store Pickup We use your store location to provide ' Your order can be available for pickup i current pricing and inventory. It'll also • Double- nailed for strength in Lowe's Of South Bend, IN today. be the location for in -store pickups. Specifications Lowe's Truck Delivery Type Panel Your order will be ready for delivery to 1.0 Species you from your selected store. Actual Picket Thickness (Inches) 6 -ft x 8 -ft Pine Dog -Ear Wood Fence j Dog -ear Panel - Nominal Length (Feet) item # 0520 5 I Model #: 102561 1 Parcel Shipping I { Nominal Height (Feet) Unavailable for This Order AN Be the first to Sent by carriers like UPS, 1 a. «�•< ' =.f ': '. ;i, . ° ^ �*`, $37.97 I FedFA LISPS, etc. I X'; z.? k' i:$.'+: t� ^4.;�.- ^.'.:�::^yf•yy \n 6.0 I_ _.. . - �_-__�__.____ - ;f#c'�t 6 -ft x 8 -ft Pine 537.97 •..�- , "tiY'fr >;. �r' =.�� No g -Ear Wood Fence Panel Description 6 -ft x 8-ft Pine Dog -Ear Wood Fence Panel • Pressure - treated for long life • Pre - assembled for faster installation • Double- nailed for strength Specifications Type Panel Nominal Picket Thickness (Inches) 1.0 Species Pine Actual Picket Thickness (Inches) 1.0 Style Dog -ear Backer Rails 20 Nominal Length (Feet) 8.0 Double Nailed Yes Nominal Height (Feet) 6.0 Rough No Actual Length (Feet) 8.0 Pressure Treated Yes _ Actual Height (Feet) 6.0 Pre - stained No Post and Accessories Included No ® 2013 Lowe's. All rights reserved. Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC -f 1 I 3 ^ 3 99 . 3 5 4 Estimate From �...,,�� 4 if 0 STORE # 3525 PHONE: 574 - 299 -8950 902 ERSKINE PLAZA FAX: 574 - 299 -8960 SOUTH BEND,IN 46614 -3244 PRODUCTIMAGE SKU DESCRIPTION 400 - 0336 Northvi.ew Window and Door Special Order Vendor Part #:NVS SPECIAL Color:White Vinyl - Rough Opening,Sizes White Vinyl Horiz. Dbl. Gliding Window with 3/4" Insul. Glass, RO Size Rough Opening height: 14 1/2" Rough Opening Width: 27" Available for shipment in approximately 21 days. PAGE 1 OF 1 4/3/2013 400 -0336 Northview Window and Door Special Order Vendor Part #:NOFINS Size:Optional Removal Upgrade Color:Existing Construction Style Remove Installation Fin on Custom Hemlock or Aspen Window Available for shipment in approximately 21 days. QTY ADDITIONAL INFO. 1 1 1 - 001t= estimate. It is given only for general price information. This is not an offer and there can be no legally binding SUB - TOTAL: $97.50 coetween the parties based upon this estimate. The prices stated herein are subject to change depending upon t conditions. The prices stated on this estimate are not firm for any time period unless specifically written otherwise on this form. The availability of materials is subject to inventory conditions. MENARDS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS INCURRED BY THE GUEST WHO RELIES ON PRICES SET FORTH HEREIN OR ON THE AVAILABILITY OF ANY OF THE MATERIALS STATED HEREIN. All information on this form, other than price, has been provided by guest and Menards is not responsible for any errors In the information on this estimate, including but not _ limited to quantity, dimension and quality. Please examine this estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO GUEST COPY REPRESENTATIONS, ORAL, WRITTEN OR OTHERWISE THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE: BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUEST. BECAUSE- OF WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES, THERE. ARE NO PAGE 1 OF 1 Rf;l ?R[SISNTATIONS THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REQUIREMENTS. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 3 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0403A Property Location: 113 West North Shore Drive Architectural Style/Date/ Gabled Front/1888 Property Owner: Martha and Gerald Mine Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark/National Register/West North Shore LHD Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Samuel Leeper, Jr. home is a two storey painted brick home set upon a rectangular brick foundation with rear additions. The gable roof is pitched and shingled. The South & East continuous porch with wood dentils, bead board ceiling and nine wooden round Doric columns may be an addition. The windows are 1/1 double hung with brick arch and fancy wood infill panel at head and cut stone sills. The single simple entrance is in an opening that matches the window rhythm and shutters. There is an ornate wooden gable fan with fancy scribing. ALTERATIONS: The rear porch was enclosed before 1949. The chimneys were removed with various COAs. The house was re- roofed with a COA in 1995 with fiberglass shingles, turbine vents and a metal - chimney were removed and replaced with three pod vents on the west side. The porch floor was replaced--_ in -kind with COA 2007- 0605A. A privacy fence was installed along the west side with COA 2009 -0521. The rear porch was replaced with COA #2011 -1201. _ _ = APPLICATION- ITEMS wall; remove concreteblock footing io , .r.—,-. _ 4v - attach new ioub le g r Ed ° ence: Newnfencing will match cu' w 'C6 ul ider�� iCti - . DESCRIPTION OF _ PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes't move a brick wall _ with concrete block foundation system that is currently being kept from falling into the alley by three anchors on the wall which terminate around two trees and at a stake in the middle of the back yard. The- wall was erected- fourty.years ago. Please see assessment from J&J_ Ma nay andStaff photographs:- The -,- proposal is to completely remove the brick wall. The concrete foundation/retami g wall will also be removed down to the first course and then rebuilt and re- enforced with metal rods. The homeowner has decided not to replace the brick but have Schuell Fence install a dog eared privacy fence along the alley on top of the re- installed concrete block foundation/retaining wall to match and meet up with current side yard fence. f,=s.; STANDARDS ANDGLlIDE1INES = sx ,- Local Landr ark Buildinu Site and Landscanin : 1. Required = - Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and = benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Structures such as - - gazebos, patio decks,_ fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, ­green.houses, new. walls,` - - fountains, -fixed garden . furniture, trellises, - and other_ similar_ stru shall be_ compatibletaithehistonc-- _- -. 'character_of tie�sife and- neighborhood an� inconspicuous whewAUt x tfie - - - WEST NORTH SHORE STANDARDS: Are silent on modifications at the back of the house and at the rear of the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. The removal of the deteriorating non original brick along the alley and the erection of a wood fence will conform with the other fences along the alleyway in the West North Shore District and will not be visible from the public way. r. Application -FOR - v iy Certificate ofAppropriateness HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1865 of SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 http:// www .stjosephcountyindiana.com/depm tments /SJCHP /index.htm p: 574- 235 -9798 f: 574- 235 -9578 e: SBSJCHPC@,co.st-josephJn.us iJii I. ui iii I i i i i ■ OFFICE USE ONL ri » » >p0 NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX «« «OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received: Application Number: Post Reviews: EYES (Dde of LW Rewew) f ­1V - / c,2 / f ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: / Title: Historic Preservation Commission Review Date: cal Landmark ❑ National Landmark Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled (Please Print) Address of Property for proposed work: Name of Property Owner(s): Local Historic District (Name) -tj- L I r wLe ❑ National Register District (Name) ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and issued: ■ 11.3 7 (Street Number Street Name —City —Zip Code);_"_" Phone #: d _ Address of Property Owner(s): Street Number— Street Name - Ci ' Zi Code - Name of Contractor(s): y6Zta& !) Phone #: Contract Company Name:, Address of Contract Company: (Street Number— Street Name — City —Zip Code) - - rf -.� -__ .x.4.5`` _• - - = T�3. _ - _ -.`<: _ • Current Use of Building- _ -: _ - gle F ily —Mul - Family— Commercial — Government — Industrial Vacant —etc.) >. - Type of Building Construction: yi (Wood Frame—Brick—Stone--Steel—Concrete—Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -Kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ,Replacement (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: �� �i»GR.tJ,Fi .fl�etfJ y6 Ar .c��x�f11�l.�EaL2 , d = .%y./ !i`fid`� Owner /Cont Fax #: e -mail: (Staff will cond with nly one des' ee),_ - r X and/or X Signature o Owner Signature of Contractor A DDT T9 -A1T V nTTTVrUr.NTC ARF T.TCTY.1101412F. .RCF. CTT)F J &J MASONRY RENEWAL, & GENERAL CONTRAC71NG PoMBIV, C1 W49, CouNng and R aaHng 8Hck Wd Nod Lo FREE ESTIMATES (574) 784 -2048 Cell (574) 250 -1876 15.x, ' Luc. jk -as &, tz- XLCU obw h- 113 W Northshore New fence to match existing Wall leaning outward, Notice the 6-7 space on top. The March Location Report was not distributed at the time of this mailing. The Office Copier had broken down and needed parts replaced. When making copies after it was repaired on Friday afternoon, some copies had smears. We are calling the repair people back in to remedy that problem. Director's Report April 2013 18 March Sent Letter to Parks Board on the HPC's priorities for the City Cemetery. MeetingCirculated National Register nominations letter for SOI and Marquette School. Attended HPC meeting and Strategic Planning Committee meeting that followed. 19 March 7:30 am Rotary Board Meeting. 8:30 Meeting with Pam Myers, Liz Maradik, Lory Timmer of Community Investment with Brian Haygood of Code and Shubhada Kambli new Director of Code along with attorney, Ann Carol Nash to discuss HPC's role in the 1000 houses in 1000 days. Brian Haygood indicated that deconstruction would be an option in the next batch on the demolition list; and that he had been in contact with Habitat for Humanity and their crews of volunteers to do just that. New forms were to be developed and HPC would note on listings structures rated Contributing and higher from the 2005 survey. City still operates within the confines of the Unsafe Building Act. HPC Meeting follow up with address to send letters of support for Marquette's NR nomination. Elicia and I met with Marilyn Thompson, Northern Indiana Center for History to discuss the $2,500.00 grant for the Heritage Tours. Researched files for our copies of Community Investment's missing 106 Reviews. 20 March Signed and submitted HPC & City contract to County Commissioners with memo denoting Public Works' deadline. - City landmark mailing to Mail Room. Someone from Ashton Construction came in about 1201 E. Wayne and the enclosure to the rear of the house that the homeowner submitted on 14 March. Inconvenienced because of the meeting and some corrections to the change order that Staff pointed out. Sent out e-mail to people interested in Marquette school with the support letter information and hearing date. Worked out a route for Legends of Notre Dame tour. Cynthia from I AM called; she is selling the commercial building on Portage and wanted to make the new owner restore the front of the building. Reminded her that he would still need a COA. Steve called in about a casual meeting with Michael Weathers of Habitat who would like to set up a meeting after Dyngus Day. 21 March Letter to Ashton Construction reminding Contractor of deadline for meeting and the need for the information and clarifications to be on the 15 April Agenda. Met with Interns. Participated in Code I"* g for Portage Apartments with Steve from Mag Mile; supported the request for renovation rather than demolition. 22 March Sick Day for Medical Test 25 March Luncheon with Shubhada Kambli, the new Director of Code for South Bend. Very interested in preservation and appears to be willing to work with us. 26 March Meeting with John Wiltrout at North Pumping Station about scope of Community Volunteer work in Leeper Park around the Station. Meeting with Chris Murphy, Greg Kil and Andrew Schnabel about the 50" Anniversary of the Ella Morris Conservatory. Attended the Notre Dame Center for Latino Arts and Culture dedication and reception at 5:00. 27 March Photographed the turret of the Remedy Building for Urban Adventure this summer. General Office work 28 March Personal Day 29 March Good Friday. Office Closed 1 April COA deadline. General Office work. 2 April Scott Sneff from IT met with Staff to illustrate the HPC icon and info and the input needed for the tax system. He will return after meeting with programmers to fine turn the process. Steve, Elicia and I, along with Micro Venture Capital students Ming and Luke, met with Jim Williams and Michael Weathers of Habitat for Humanity about a possible partnership with them to re -hab houses using materials from demolished houses. They are meeting with Chris Fielding and Shubhada Kambli tomorrow. 3 April Staff reports and revisions for COAs. Facade of State theatre on the mezzanine level was spray painted with black graffiti. Contacted John Martinez to help DTSB remove it. Spoke with Anne Montgomery about a grant that she is trying to put together; she would like HPC Office to supply some "in- kind" manpower to help with the match for the NRC "Inspire" Grant. 4 April 106 Review for Olive /Sample overpass. Meeting with Parks about the conditions and challenges with City Cemetery: Rick, Alan from Parks, Steve Nemeth and Derek Dieter met with Staff. Derek will investigate the $41,000.00 Trust Fund for City Cemetery and contact Don Inks to see if TIF dollars are be used to secure the place. Steve is concerned with the awful condition of three houses at the entrance gates: 211 N. Elm, 1119 W. Colfax and 1201 W. Colfax ... and 1241 W. Colfax is in very bad shape. Thinks that these should be demolished and the area landscaped for a more inviting entrance to the cemetery. Vandalism is still the #1 issue: last year 150 stones were defaced and Parks could only restore 40. Copier malfunction. Informal meeting with Kathy Cekanski- Ferrand about the Cemetery; also Shubhada Kambli about our problem child neighborhoods. She would like a tour. 5 April Attended the Zimmerman Volk presentation on its assessment of "Who Wants to Live Downtown." At the Northern Indiana Center for History. Basically a demographic study for the revitalization of the core downtown area. Lori Volk was the speaker and -_ _someone gave her a tour - of- the _Historic Districts... again HPC n ot _included. - Met wit Cherri Peate the new Director of Community Outreach in the Administration and explained to her what HPC does. Copier fixed and the Staff reports for the Commissioner packets were ready for mailing. 8 April Mailings for meeting to homeowners and contractors. General Office work. Contacted Landmarks about concerns expressed at the Landscaping Seminar about Ziolkowski's use of a product on the Barker Mansion in Michigan City that is killing plants and loosening mortar. Studied Anne Montgomery's proposal for use of HPC time for a grant opportunity. Participated in the NICH Finance Committee meeting. Gave Anne Montgomery HPC promotional info for her neighborhood meeting on Sunday 14 April. Rotary After Hours at Club LaSalle —Dave Matthews said that in addition to the residential development in the old Transpo lot on Northside that there is some talk about developing retail, etc in Howard Park since the site is under utilized. He didn't mention any discussion with Phil St. Claire. Long time Animal Control Officer was fired. 9 April Rotary Charitable Foundation Board Meeting at 7:30 am at Indiana Trust. Code issues again in Taylor's Field. Steve was at 523 S. St. Joseph with Police; house had been broken into, fires in pots and pans on second and third floor. I notified Dismis House next door to be on the alert and the Fire Marshall/Inspection and Prevention Federico Rodriguez; of course Code was contacted as well. Steve met with Brian Haygood and Code is considering giving HPC boarding directives for their Contractors. 11 April Followed up with Mr. Wheeler, Jessica Clark and Chris Waidner about the tree that was removed in error on Mr. Wheeler's landmarked farm. Meeting with John Pinter and Todd Zeiger about strategic planning for the Northern Indiana Center for History. 12 April Last minute COA for 433 W. North Shore and Staff Report. Research for Karen Hickey on Fr. Sorin. Took pictures for Marcia Qualls for the Urban Adventure. Abbreviated "Then and Now" Tour of Downtown South Bend for Lisle Park Illinois Group. Assistant Director's Report HPC Meetina 04.15.2013 1. Local Landmarks - Fielding phone calls regarding Minimum Maintenance Standards Surveys that were mailed to South Bend Landmarks 3.20.13. a. LaSalle Hotel -phone call with Jason Holderread who may be submitting an RFP to the city. b. 1013 East Jefferson - Meeting with and receiving COA #2013 -0328 for storm doors. 2. Local Historic Districts -none. 3. Staff Reports -none. 4. Routine Maintenance Exclusions- , a. East Wayne Street - Received COA from Karen Hickey 5. National Register -none. 6. Attend 03.18.2013 meeting. Prepare draft of March meeting minutes and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print minutes from March meeting for April meeting. Attend 2nd strategic planning committee meeting. 7. Restore Michiana Series 2010 -2011 Window Restoration Production - Working on broad marketing plan. 8. Restore Michiana Series 2013 - Updating calendar on www.RestoreMichiona.com. Sending out Press Release and flyer marketing Homeowner Workshop Series at Kizer house. Correspondence with Studebaker Museum regarding borrowing folding chairs. 9. Internships- Prepare Summer 2013 job descriptions. Update listsery to include Holy Cross, Bethel, and owe others. Receiving and processing several Internship applications. Oversee and offer guidance for — _following projects: _ —___ a. Michelle: Postcards - Working on updates to series. Uploading files to Rink Printing! - b. Fabian: Minimum Maintenance Standards - Working on updating mailing lists. c. Bethany: Kizer Carriage House and marketing collateral for series - Preparing two Letters of Support for graduate schools. d. Amanda: Kizer elevations e. Grace: Kizer elevations f. Sarah #1: Cemetery DIG - Correspondence with supervisor, Heather. Follow up regarding paperwork. g. Sarah #2: Cemetery DIG - Correspondence with supervisor, Heather. Follow up regarding paperwork. h. Meredith: Labels and office plans - Working on framing the prints. 10. Grants - a. Historic Preservation Education Grant 2013- Meeting with Kellirae and Earl to revise the - - -- Prospectus. Preparing Letter of- Support for application.__ - b. Hotel - Motel Tax Grant - Center for History was awarded $2,500 to develop a Heritage Tours repository in partnership with HPC!!! Correspondence with Marilyn Thompson to begin planning. Meeting with Marilyn and Catherine to set priorities and begin working. Creating a temporary website to use as a visual aide. Meeting with Evie Kirkwood. 11. Redevelopment Commission - Preview agendas. 12. Notre Dame /Mendoza College of Business /Gigot Center for Entrepreneurship MicroVenture Consulting- Meeting with Luke to discuss Ivy Tech partnership possibilities. Meeting with Kathy Kent and Cheryl King from Ivy Tech to discuss partnership possibilities. South Bend Cemeteries DIGitazation- Working with Heather and her - team of volunteers /Interns. 1 wing general inquiries about the project. Prepare an update statement on HPCs involvement thus far. Forwarding update to Parks Department and Common Council. Organize a meeting with Parks Foundation, HPC Staff, and Derek Dieter, Common Council President. Meeting with Parks, Derek, Catherine and Steve to discuss needs at the cemetery and fundraising efforts. Preparing all digital maps for Travis at Center for History. Meeting with Heather regarding possibly extending her contract. 14. Downtown South Bend, Inc. First Friday's- Correspondence with Purple Porch Coop and Bicycle Gallery, in which I serve as liaison for. Visit to Bicycle Gallery to observe their progress of the interior remodel of their space located in JMS Building, a Local Landmark (they are restoring marble floor that was uncovered under vinyl). 15. Preservation Advocates Love St. Joseph County - Talked with Mik Perry on the phone. 16. Local Historic Districts Heritage Tour - Working on setting dates. Correspondence with Tim of Tim's Tours regarding dates, quote and ticket prices. Working with graphic designer to finalize poster. Developing Eventbrite registration page. Placing print order for 200 posters. Working to deliver posters. Forwarding images to WNIT for inclusion in Experience Michiana. 17. Vacant and Abandoned Housing- Meeting with Jim and Michael of Habitat for Humanity with Steve, Catherine, (Luke and Ming from MicroVenture) to discuss partnership potential. 18. Ivy Tech Environmental and Sustainable Design- Meeting with Kathy Kent, Dean of Fine Arts and —eryl King, Environmental Design instructor regarding partnership opportunities. Sent follow up email. 19. Ignite Michiana- Preparing two Power Points to revolve on screen at event, including: Historic Theatres and Historic South Bend Views. Attended Ignite. 20. Meeting with a team from a Notre Dame Sustainability class regarding developing a waste management plan for State Theatre. 21. Developing Commission Courier. Making updates. Emailing. 22. Touring new Notre Dame Center for Arts and Culture at former Hansel Center on West Washington. 23. Assisting the Hickey family with research on their family's construction business. Also, accepted a donation from the family of a brick (in a case) that came from 113 N. Main Street, RECO sporting goods building when it was demolished in 1968 - yah !!! 24.- - Then - &- Now downtown- tours- Meeting _ with_Dena- _Woods,_Catherine_ and Steve to_ set_ dates for upcoming season. Discussed sustaining the tour and the reprinting of the brochures. Discussed OnCell account that Center for History maintains. 25. Meeting with Catherine and Cherri Peate, Director of Community Outreach for City of South Bend to explain HPC. — Studebaker Bendix Heritage Trail- Meeting of the whole to touch base on tour. 2 27. Holy Cross Senior Capstone- Invited and served as an evaluator to a history graduate candidate. Met Katie Cressy, Internship coordinator. 28. Sherwin Williams trade show - Attended with Catherine, Steve and Wayne to learn about products, �-hniques and to network. Sending out Commission Courier to over 2,000 emails. Post of Facebook page and to County website. 3 State of Indiana St. Joseph County ss: Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state, the undersigned Iiim Wilson who, being duly sworn says that she is of competent age and is President & Publisher of the South Bend Tribune, a daily newspaper which for at least five (5) consecutive years has been published in the City of South Bend, county of St. Joseph, State of Indiana, and which during the time, has -been. a newspaper of general circulation, having a bona fide paid circulation, printed in the English Language and entered, authorized and accepted by the post office department of the United States of America as mailable matter of the second -class as defined by the act of Congress of the United States of March 3, 1879, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said newpaper. 1 time(s), the dates of publication being as follows: April 1, 2013 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of April 2013 �n W uv Leslie Ann Winey Notary Public Resident of St. Joseph County My com mission expires Decetnber'21; 2016 Charges: $5.74 Ad # 4393314 Ad Number: 4393314, Publication: TRIB, Magnification: 1X A meeting of the Historic Preser- vation Commission (HPC) of South Bend and St. Joseph will be held on April 15, 7:00 p.m. 13th floor, 308 of the County -City South Bend, Indiana. are available in the HPC Office or may be obtained via email at SBSJCHPC@co.stjoseph.in.us Additional matters not requiring a Public Hearing may be added to this agenda prior to the Meeting. Timothy Klusczinski, President 1t: 4: 1 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY April 15, 2013 13` Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Mike Voll, Jerry Niezgodski, Kevin Buccellato, David Steinhauer, Lynn Patrick Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director; Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director Staff Absent: Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist Members of the Public Present: Pat Ashton, Gerald Kline, Patrick Wilson, Doug Turnock On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski to amend agenda to include COA #2013 -0412 433 W. North Shore Drive and COA #2013 -0415 629 Portage Avenue with a second by Lynn Patrick. Vote: 6 — 0 unanimous. II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 1201 E. Wayne St. N COA #2013 -0314 East Wayne Representation by Patrick Ashton of Ashton Construction, Contractor. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0314 Property Location: 1201 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Modern/1966 Property Owner: Alexander and Laurie Martin Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non - Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This residence was built in 1966 for Emil and Virginia Havel. It is a two storey frame construction with a flat rusticated stone fagade on an irregular plan with a low gable roof covered with asphalt shingles. There is a flat rusticated stone chimney. A one storey front flat roof section extends out to cover open porch supported by simple wood box columns over a concrete slab. The windows are large single pane. There is a two car garage with board and batten siding and asphalt shingled roof attached to the rear of house by a one storey gable roof connector. ALTERATIONS: The gable connector to the garage was noted as an addition on the 1986 survey card. The roof on the house and garage was replaced in 2006 (COA #2006 1214A); the storm doors on the front of the house are replacements COA #2007- 0517; the roof on the porch and breeze way were replaced along with repairs to the moulding, soffit, gutters and fascia board - -COA# 2008 -0917. The side entry door was replaced with a metal clad 6 panel solid door along with the storm door -with a -self- -- -- storing Courtyard aluminum storm door. There was also the installation of the aluminum soffit vents and the capping of the porch beam (COA #2009 - 0618). APPLICATION ITEMS: On the east side of the house there is an area -open on three sides - between the dining room (to south) and garage (to north); we plan to screen and roof this area. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners have engaged Ashton Construction to create a 10'x16' an enclosed porch in the patio area located between the dining room and the garage. The enclosure will have cedar 6" cove siding on the exterior wall, three 32 "x48" triple track double hung storm windows (see brochure) and a storm door (see brochure). The Roof will be framed to match existing flat roof and a 3'x3' skylight will be installed in the center of the roof. All per proposal, diagrams and brochures submitted. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story- and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half - timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the enclosed porch as it conforms to the guidelines for the East Wayne District. Catherine Hostetler, Director On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Lynn Patrick to approve application as written. Vote: 6 - 0 Unanimous. COA #2013 -0314 Approved. 2.548 River I COA #2013 -0325B Edgewater Representation by Douglas Turnock, Owner STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: - -1 -April 2013 -- Application Number: 2013 -0325B Property Location: 548 River Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Dutch Colonial Revival/1924/Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Doug Turnock Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey Dutch Colonial Revival home has a rectangular plan set upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are wide wood clapboard and the gambrel roof with full shed dormer is covered with asphalt shingles. There is side brick chimney. The front porch is open with square posts. The windows are double hung 6/1. The front door and storm door are modern replacements. ALTERATIONS: Several basement windows have been replaced. The Aluminum storm windows and the roof are replacements. There have been replacements of the sidewalks around the house. Wood decking has been added to the rear yard (COA 2001- 0510) APPLICATION ITEMS: Add 6' "Dog -Ear" fence on deck; southwest side with gate from house to just shy of tree. Add wood railing to front porch eventually with a wooden handrail along new front steps (see 605 Edgewater). Replace basement window with vinyl replacement window to match other basement windows. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner wishes to place a privacy fence along the deck at the rear side of the house; it would also have a gate. The style of fence was previously approved by the Commission in 2001 for the previous owners (COA#200 1 -05 10) but it was not installed. The current applicant changed his mind on the wooden steps on 1 April since the sidewalk was in such bad repair he is now proposing an in -kind replacement on the concrete walkway and steps rather than the wood covering for the steps. The wood railing and balustrade system would resemble the one he installed at 605 Edgewater but without the two side steps and railings. The owner also wishes to replace the inoperable and deteriorated basement window with a sliding vinyl window which will match the replacement basement windows. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE. LANDSCAPING. AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Many properties have a straight driveway along one edge of the lot leading to a garage at the rear of the house. This driveway often has a sidewalk along one side leading to the front entrance either in the center or at the side of the house. Driveway and sidewalk materials include asphalt or concrete. All of the properties have trees; many have trimmed shrubbery and hedges. All of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Existing plants, trees, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs, and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the buildings that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing old plants, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings and other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, with the exception of properties along Lincolnway, which may be fenced, but not with enclosed stockade -type fencing. Not Recommended Telephone poles with high intensity overhead lights should not be used, with the exception of along Lincolnway. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and do s hall not be installed. Not Recommended Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fence and the proposed railing system as they conform to the guidelines for Edgewater Place. The proposed vinyl window will match what has been currently installed and will not alter the size of the opening. Catherine Hostetler On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Dave Steinhauer to amended and approve application to include all basement windows, to be matching. Vote: 6 — 0 Unanimous. COA #2013 -0325B Approved. 3.113 W. North Shore COA #2013 -0403A Local Landmark Representation by Gerald Kline, Owner STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 3 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0403A Property Location: 113 West North Shore Drive Architectural Style/Date/ Gabled Front/1888 Property Owner: Martha and Gerald Kline Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark/National Register/West North Shore LHD Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Samuel Leeper, Jr. home is a two storey painted brick home set upon a rectangular brick foundation with rear additions. The gable roof is pitched and shingled. The South & East continuous porch with wood dentils, bead board ceiling and nine wooden round Doric columns may be an addition. The windows are 1/1 double hung with brick arch and fancy wood infill panel at head and cut stone sills. The single simple entrance is in an opening that matches the window rhythm and shutters. There is an ornate wooden gable fan with fancy scribing. ALTERATIONS: The rear porch was enclosed before 1949. The chimneys were removed with various COAs. The house was re- roofed with a COA in 1995 with fiberglass shingles, turbine vents and a metal chimney were removed and replaced with three pod vents on the west side. The porch floor was replaced in -kind with COA 2007- 0605A. A privacy fence was installed along the west side with COA 2009 -0521. The rear porch was replaced with COA#2011 -1201. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove rear brick wall; remove concrete block footing down to last course; attach new wood double dog -eared fence. New fencing will match current wood fencing in side yard. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to remove a failing brick wall with concrete block foundation system that is currently being kept from falling into the alley by three anchors on the wall which terminate around two trees and at a stake in the middle of the back yard. The wall was erected fourty years ago. Please see assessment from J &J Masonry and Stall' photographs. The proposal is to completely remove the brick wall. The concrete foundation/retaining wall will also be removed down to the first course and then rebuilt and re- enforced with metal rods. The homeowner has decided not to replace the brick but have Schuell Fence install a dog eared privacy fence along the alley on top of the re- installed concrete block foundation/retaining wall to match and meet up with current side yard fence. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmark Grout) B: Buildine Site and Landscaoine: 1. Reauired Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from the public way. WEST NORTH SHORE STANDARDS: Are silent on modifications at the back of the house and at the rear of the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. The removal of the deteriorating non original brick wall along the alley and the erection of a wood fence will conform with the other fences along the alleyway in the West North Shore District and will not be visible from the public way. Catherine Hostetler On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Kevin Buccellato to approve application as submitted. Vote: 6 — 0 Unanimous. COA #2013 -0403A Approved. 4.433 W. North Shore COA #2013 -0412 West North Shore No representation STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 12 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0412 Property Location: 433 West North Shore Drive Architectural Style/Date: Traditional Ranch/1975 Property Owner: Patti Starck Landmark or District Designation: West North Shore LHD Rating: Non - Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This Ranch is L shaped and is situated on a corner lot with a very deep set back from the corner of Iroquois and W. North Shore Drive. It is one storey wood frame with regular bond brick veneer alternating with vertical wood siding. The roof has extended gables with hip attachment and is covered with asphalt shingles. The front entrance doors are double leaf with decorative wood panels. The windows are tri partite synthetic composite casements aside a center fixed glass. ALTERATIONS: The roof was re- roofed with Sherriff Goslin Interlocking shingles with COA #2006 - 0501 -1. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace windows with vinyl windows and rear patio doors with vinyl patio doors. All per brochure and specifications submitted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner has purchased vinyl replacement casement windows and patio doors from Lowe's to replace all of the casement windows in the house and the rear patio doors. The replacement casement windows replicate the current windows and the patio doors. There are two sets of three of these windows that are visible from the street; the rest of the windows and the patio doors are not visible from the street as they are located in the rear and at the side of the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: WEST NORTH SHORE STANDARDS: B. Windows and Doors Preferred: Retain and maintain existing window and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, doors, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. Use canvas awnings, if awnings are used. Install wooden frame storm windows and doors painted to match trim. Install insulating glass in existing sash. As to Lot 12 metal storm windows and doors which have been coated to match trim and which are architecturally in good taste with the structure are preferred. Permitted: Replace deteriorated doors, windows, sills, shutters, etc with materials which match the original as closely as possible. A special effort should be made to match the size and style of the window and door openings, so that the overall appearance of the structure is not altered. Install metal storm windows and doors which have been painted, anodized or coated to match the trim. Prohibited: Do not attach or use metal, vinyl or fiber glass awnings nor hoods. Do not attach exterior shutters to a house that did not have shutters originally unless approved in wiring by the Historic Preservation Commission. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval because the replacements conform to the guidelines for West North Shore District. Catherine Hostetler On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Dave Steinhauer to approve application as submitted. Vote: 5 —1. Dissenting Vote from Tim Klusczinski: "The reason is that the only indication from Staff is that the failing could be the seal and that could set a bad precedent." COA #2013 -0412 Approved. 5.629 Portage COA #2013 -0415 Chapin Park Representation by Patrick Wilson of Eagle Scouts, Contractor STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 15 April 2013 Application Number: 2013 -0415 Property Location: 629 Portage Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Empty Lot being transformed into a pocket park Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Empty Lot DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The site of a former multi -use building that burned and was demolished that is currently being landscaped into a pocket park as an Eagle Scout Project. ALTERATIONS: Original Building demolished; site in the process of being re- claimed as a small landscape park. APPLICATION ITEMS: Installing 2 (two) 18 inch by 30 inch pads approximately 6 feet apart and bolting a bench to pads. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Patrick Wilson is proposing to install a wood bench in the park upon two concrete pads. Please see attached photographs. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high- intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. Catherine Hostetler On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Kevin Buccellato to approve application as submitted. Chair clarified that bench will face North on Lamonte with a tree behind it about six feet away. Vote: 6 — 0 Unanimous. COA #2013 -0415 Approved. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION - none III. HEARING OF VISITORS - none IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — March 18, 2013 approved by consensus. B. TREASURER'S REPORT — Distributed. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence — Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals Two deferred until next month. 3. Director's Report — Distributed. Discussion. 4. Assistant Director Report — Distributed. 5 Preservation Specialist Report — Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report —Distributed. 2. Strategic Planning Report — Distributed. Lynn will circulate electronically. V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS A. St. Joseph County Postcard project — Discussion. B. Tippecanoe Place — Discussion. R Commissioner Niezgodski departed the meeting at 8:00 p.m. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Dave Steinhauer to adjourn. Vote: 5 — 0 Unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:03 p.m. zoaba *ecary tat6 7