Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
November 2011
SPECIAL MEETIN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 7 NOVEMBER 201 1 AT 5:SO HPG CONFERENCE ROOM 1 2S S. LAFAYETTE AGENDA: BUDGETS MISCELLANEOUS MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY November 7, 2011 HPC Conference Room 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 5:53 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Mike Voll, Alice McLane, Lynn Patrick, Kevin Buccellato Members Absent: Sandra Rossow, David Steinhauer, Jerry Niezgodski Staff Present: Catherine Hostetler, Director Staff Absent: Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: Olaf Wiest " II. PUBLIC HEARING: �s A. Budgets - Chair motioned for a $1,500 bonus given to the Executive Director and the Deputy Director, each and any overage from the available balance go into the gift fund with a second by Lynn Patrick. Vote: 5-0 APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY B. 2011-1101A 725 Park Avenue Carport Motion by Lynn Patrick to approve application°with a second by Mike Voll. Vote: 5-0 APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY C. Miscellaneous Discussion of the Leeper Park Bridge. III. ADJOURNMENT: On a motion by Alice McLane with a second by Mike Voll to adjourn. Vote: 5-0 Meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Attest: Lynn Patrick, Secretary ,TM'a� Date J Y'fgJY ` Ad Number: 4329663, Publication: TI A meeting of the Historic Preser- _ Jvation Commission (HPC) of South Bend and St. Joseph County will be held on November I 7, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. in the con- ference room located at 125 South Lafayette Boulevard, South Bend, IN 46601. Agenda items: Budgets and Miscellane- ous. I Additional matters not requiring a Public Hearing may be added to this agenda prior to the Meeting. I Timothy Klusczinski, President 1t: 11:3 State of Indiana St. Joseph County ss: Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state, the undersigned Jffcki Krolczvk who, being duly sworn says that she is of competent age and is Adv r i in Director of the South Bend Tribune, a daily newspaper which for at least five (5) consecutive years has been published in the City of South Bend, county of St. Joseph, State of Indiana, and which during.the time, -has been a newspaper of general circulation, having a bona fide paid circulation, printed in the English Language and entered, authorized and accepted by the post office department of the United States of America as mailable matter of the second-class as defined by the act of Congress of the United States of March 3, 1879, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said newpaper. 1 time(s), the dates of publication being as follows: November 3, 2011 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 3rd day of November 2011 TJl -b Uj.' Wv" \_O uVAj-_1_Z Leslie Ann Winey Notary Public Resident of St. Joseph County My commission expires December 21, 2016 Charges: $ 5.10 MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY November 7, 2011 HPC Conference Room 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 5:53 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Mike Voll, Alice McLane, Lynn Patrick, Kevin Buccellato Members Absent: Sandra Rossow, David Steinhauer, Jerry Niezgodski Staff Present: Catherine Hostetler, Director Staff Absent: Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: Olaf Wiest II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Budgets Chair motioned for a $1,500 bonus given to the Executive Director and the Deputy Director, each and any overage from the available balance to go into the gift fund with a second by Lynn Patrick. Vote: 5-0 APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY B. 2011-1101A 725 Park Avenue Carport Motion by Lynn Patrick to approve application with a second by Mike Voll. Vote: 5-0 APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY C. Miscellaneous Discussion of the Leeper Park Bridge. III. ADJOURNMENT: On a motion by Alice McLane with a second by Mike Voll to adjourn. Vote: 5-0 Meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. Attest: Lynn Patrick, Secretary Date ✓e4ie y 11146-.2 �0�kr /�t��- ��c �Pe T��Y D�-n STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: November 01, 2011 Application Number: 2011-1101A Property Location: 725 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dutch Colonial Revival/1903/W.W. Schneider Property Owner: Olaf Wiest Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: O DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey with an irregular plan on a brick foundation. The roof is an intersecting gambrel form with dormers. The siding is wood clapboard on the first storey with cedar shingles in the second storey. A friezeboard continues around the house with egg and dart molds. The front porch wraps east and north with a distinctive round comer. A pedimented entry is supported by ionic columns on brick piers. Window openings are 1/1 double hung on first storey and 4 pane divided lite/1 on the second storey. The entry door is a glazed single leaf wood panel door with cut glass glazed sidelites. ALTERATIONS: none on record. APPLICATION ITEMS: Broadening of existing brick path, connection to brick path on adjacent property, building of carport on back side of the house. 'DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: With the neighboring property owner, Kevin Hughes, consent, the owner proposed to broaden the existing brick path at the rear of the house, connecting seamlessly to the brick drive at 406 Manitou Place. To allow access, a portion of the existing chain link fence will be removed. See RME#2011-1101. In addition, owner proposes installing a carport in the rear over the newly expanded brick parking pad. An elevation has been included with the application to further detail this proposal. A clear corrugated roof is proposed to minimize the solidity of the roof and to allow sunlight to continue to penetrate the existing stained glass window. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have L- or T-shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half -story bungalows. The most prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. v e........,,.,,, %A a.V 1111L�.11V VLL - Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard/composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate. to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. C. SHEDS AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS Required Sheds and accessory structures (gazebos, decks, doghouses, playhouses, fountains and small reflecting pools, outdoor sculpture, children's play equipment, etc.) shall be located at the rear of the property and as unobtrusively as possible while preserving historical relationships between the buildings, landscape features and open spaces. Proportions and materials shall conform to those required for new construction. Recommended Accessory building designs should be compatible in character and mood to the residence and the neighborhood. Prohibited Prefabricated metal sheds shall not be used. Not Recommended Prefabricated wood composition sheds should not be used unless they conform to all other guidelines and standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project. Considered an accessory structure, the carport conforms to the standards and guidelines as it is located at the rear of the property and is as unobtrusive as possible. The contemporary design and material choices of the accessory structure is sensitively designed to consider the adjacent historic structure. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Benxi & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette iflvd., South Bend, indiuut 4UM l9iru1, Address; County City Building, South Dcnd, 4644y1 Mont 5742`1,5-979$ • Fax 574-235-9578 • i?mail: S8SjC111'C@co.st josephin.us . Website: http://www.st ok-plu:ountAidiana.com/oip/indoxJitn-a O FICC• Mr VO NUT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED r�IN THIS BOX ssa»s OFFICE E15E ONLY Date Receiverdh_M 1 _ Application Number 1r2> > -- ?011 CIA Nast Reviews: YES (vwu qua NO Six Approval authorizedhy: -(" j��1C01-W�: S,e-k Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark Ef Local Historic District (Na)n,,) 1 IQ� ✓1 �a r� [� National Landmark (National Register District (Nine) Certificate of Appropriateness: Q Denied U Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee Approved anti Issued _. t',nt'a Address „l' Pr(,pe. y for proposed work: f,a 14 AV/ StrFr.! Nunrhrrand Start Nnmr. Name of Property Owncr(s): Uwaaserrinr) Address orProperty_Owner(s): �} %T[y�.. �i�� f S0,11h few Contractors) Name: TR CaryUnacl Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phan:: Current, Use of Bitildin• ./'v(f(g,4e)F01r1l1 wi ll -I V (510y JMUlti hitinly Cunnm maul Cuenrrnmcnt lndustnrd Vuntnt dr.) Type of Building Construction: _ fla -P (Wand t Yarm. — brie, — Shitft — SMS l — Cosietr S — 1.111fvr) Proposed Work:. In -kine) Lawid.%adpe ® New ❑ Replacement (nor in-kind) Demolition (more doers wtv Loa may it elrc ird) Desai tioti of Proposed Work:���/w Owner/Goxbeetvr: 'Fax: ��f ��f Z email (1411.111-I1vlfAlelV (This office will evrep and Tran nniy op 0 d+;;igrrer) and/or — AP'PLICA71ON REQ'LlT1ZG1Vi1.'VI S Af& L1S1IiD ON la -VERSE SIDE — ,. � l>• wi ♦' ,s ��s� bit,-; IT .,� G O Y^' i L ci S+' ` ✓ it+Grv`si� �, a r "sr T� �• fi 1 '°Mrµs.�� te°,ar en x `+� i„ :; �''' ' d AR« It kilt- 17 i � -xr � f �h J�� .i�r 7Rt"hq 1�,3o��5t a'i�}f a•"' 1l rp�'k, Y3'ye��Kt..=a �, ''3�.{ ..._ � fr �,;���yy4���,15'"��t^' r� .»x• ��1 ,. �33� }=r ' ",'.i�v��,�ri` � iYi�'fF_rr'� ,.�'" ,�,.� t ta. 'T• moo+ i a`"'` 't".+'Y"y�y"M� .+ `��` fig' F � "����u {',�•'-••�,�""'^`:.� �' - . � L. fir! ✓��, :. ��,, `+� V ,r-�ir��t�r��.....�-'-::.: ,t� IMMA fe.71,_ *i4 A. ,► ,. ; •S '• iib ��< �s""z"' it'c tit + s� J• w,a+:,•. •, s.'�t '•t}7 ::�3 4 � �' z!F � .. •S±c *�'^`.rf ,� Win'"•k ..'""' } • t } _ t(� .. ' n:+k�,"t��*S :, .r lY f � � �� - � :c, �. ✓r � err;' .'i� � '2 �z �r ..._ ��i-�`g����^"�•.,..:� vJ c � r X, 'ka y" .'/� w`:'�"i l Oe r x t,: � � �"�+.'`". e �'i-c c' .,� •z: au aka:: f. s»u s 3: _ r x, t } .. �.r� fit} %a�?".�'=f"' d T,n' a..N .�✓:1' f,. � A0, '� awe,•t`r�w,. �•.!`�"t"i".fi ..� �+4,��",• x:11 �`.'�r, v �w�}r �' ,:%:�+v�r�ai�. •�i it . � :} - ='fir.,, e�"� �� '�j ��k= � •"' '� � 4 Jr � M"t h ,,� 'c�3'��� P 'ls}i t � {-a � , fa �..�_ - _ ��. r�•'�r�C+MY.f<t+7 ,� ' �'�' - '•ice ,..: .'- s'�• "fir t t q ,.s •. '� - �X ,' ._.. j. -. I y¢f O"ll -Aivs-17. F.. -+- t tk' •� 3 wTt4� • t { 1• -J -. 1 1 �u 4 Y rml,51t-l" 4 F.. -+- t tk' f� t r. e `r Y 4 4 [x" .t METALLIC SILVER Solar Control Panels ...A Revolutionary NEW Product Providing Outstanding Ambient Heat Reduction Let Light in and Reflect Heat Away! Polycarbonate S. u Skylight and Side -lite Panels Profile Match High performance glazing that stands up to punishing exterior applications, SunSky® bMetal Corrugated Polycarbonate Panels offer multiple advantages over traditional fiberglass y corrugated panels: up to 20 times greater impact resistance, the highest light transmission Manufacturers rates, the lowest yellowing index, the highest load rating, and the highest resistance to wind uplift—outstanding properties confirmed in accredited laboratory testing and in 9" on Center installations worldwide since 1984. • Panel Lok Plus - Central Sales • Imperial Rib - ABC • Grand Rib III - Fabral • Vic West Best Panel - Vic West • Classic Rib - Metal Sales • CS Roof - Chief Industrial • Max Rib - Stockade Buildings • Max Rib - McElroy Metal • Century Drain - Wheeling • SM -Rib - Southeastern Metals • Stormshield - Niff-Corr 12" on Center • Vic West Hi -Rib - Vic West • Span Line 36 - Metal Sales • Multi -Rib - Stockade Buildings • Type R - Alliance Steel • Amerib 90 - American Steel • "R" Panel - ASC Pacific • "R" Panel - Corrugated Industries • "R" Panel - Ludwig Steel • Type "R" Jannock Steel • "R" Panel - Kenrod Steel • Kirby Rib - Kirby Building Systems • Multi -Rib II - Mesco Buildings • R-or-PBR Panel - MBCI • R -Panel - Norcor Corp. • R-or-PBR Panel - Ruffin Buildings • SR -Panel - Southern Structures • U.S.A.-R - United Structures • Superspan - Whirlwind Steel Bldgs • SM -Rib - Southeastern Metals • Stormshield - Niff-Corr • Virtually Unbreakable • Self Extinguishing •Will Not Yellow • Retains Optical Clarity Far Better than other Glazing Material • Wide Temperature Range (270OF to -40°F) • Easily and Safely Installed • 10 Year Warranty • Hail and Wind Resistant • 100% UV Protection SunSky retains its impact properties over a wide temperature range while meeting building code requirements. SunSky panels form a complete shield against harmful UV rays while admitting most of the visible light and preventing heat loss at night. Sizes (Special lengths and custom profiles also available, minimums apply) Width Length Thiclmess (iNmm) SunSky 7.211, 911, 911CR and 12" 38" 8',10',10'-6",11',12',16', 24' 0.032/0.80 SunSky Ridge Cap 24" 10'6" 0.039/1.00 Colors • Clear 90% Light Transmission • Soft White - Low Glare 85% Light Transmission Providing 100% Light Diffusion • Solar Control Silver 20% Light Transmission • Other Colors Available Minimums Apply Warranty SunSky panels are backed by a 10 -year limited warranty. Ridge. ancn+ Cap i ; K_ .... z,-,Mr)i SunSky 7.2" Panel SunSky 12" Panel .._._..__--------- --- ._._._.- Made in 36• covcRAct raorN USA nw• . � 36- BB ERS -fta ptpav 1 800 ����� We'll be happy to answer your questions and i supply product samples. SunSky 9" Panel 36• COVERAGE Wer.: SunSky 9" CR Panel 36•COVERAM W@TN-... .._.,--. _.___. _. _.... 38 SunSky 12" Panel .._._..__--------- --- ._._._.- Made in 36• covcRAct raorN USA nw• . � 36- BB ERS -fta ptpav 1 800 ����� We'll be happy to answer your questions and i supply product samples. a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE: 1 1.01.201 1 RME#: 2011 -11O1 ADDRESS: 725 PARK AVENUE, SOUTH BEND, IN 46616 DISTRICT: CHAPIN PARK HOMEOWNER: OLAF WIEST WORK PROPOSED: BROADENING OF EXISTING BRICK PATH, CONNECTION TO BRICK PATH ON ADJACENT PROPERTY, BUILDING OF CARPORT ON BACK SIDE OF THE HOUSE. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED: OLAF WIEST AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNER CAME TO THE HPC OFFICE TO APPLY FOR CoA. RMF- ISSUED FOR BRICK PATH COMPONENT OF PROPOSED WORK. CARPORT COMPONENT OF PROPOSED WORK FILED AS 2011 -1'IO 1 A. AGENDA OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION, COMMISSION .NOVEMBER 21, 2011 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building Monday November 21, 2011 5:30PM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 813 Ashland COA#2011-1013 Chapin Park .2. Leeper Park East COA#2011-1103A Leeper Park 3. 1216 E. Wayne N COA#2011-1107A East Wayne Street B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. Sons of Israel 2. West LaSalle Street NR District C. LANDMARKS 1. 1922 Portage Avenue First Reading III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 18, 2011 November 7, 2011 B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Preservation Specialist Report 6. Legal Counsel D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. 846 Forest/Liaisons/Procedures VII. ADJOURNMENT NOTICE: . FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 21, 2011 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT, YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES Print Name Address Signature I V. R -i � I c /W c) .Q✓e 4WO44SI24� 4,6: o rl Do"k - V"0'slen+e-- 9`i°Z ��� e�� �_ r`a� - ��tc�c)� Lo STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 13, 2011 Application Number: 2011-1013 Property Location: 813 Ashland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1896 Property Owner: San Song and Yein Yet Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LIID/NRD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 storey frame house has an irregular plan and is set upon a brick and poured concrete foundation. It has a hip roof with gables featuring box returns and is covered in asphalt shingles. The walls are aluminum sided. According the 2005 survey, windows are original wood 1/1 double hung with wood surrounds. The front first storey window has leaded glass in the top. The side bay window is original wood 1/1 double hung. Most windows have aluminum storms installed. There is a concrete stoop with a metal awning overhead, supported by metal supports. ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided. The roof was replaced in 2008 with COA 2008-0618. The storm door is not original and the front porch is a replacement. At the time of the current Application, most of the original windows had been removed and vinyl replacement installed without a COA. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace with Jeld-Wen vinyl windows to match original windows. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner removed original windows and installed vinyl replacement windows without a COA. HPC Preservation Specialist made a site visit after being alerted of the unapproved project and the photographs provided reflect the project status at the time of inspection. Staff was not able to make a determination as to if the original windows were deteriorated beyond repair as they had already been discarded. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half has wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canyas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Vinyl replacement windows have already been installed in this house and the original windows have been discarded. Staff recommends that the original front first storey windows remain in place as they are a distinct original feature of the otherwise altered structure. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 MA41irm A County—City Building, South __3 Indiana Lana 4660 1 Phone. 574-235-9798 * Fax: 574-235-9578 * Email: SBSjCTIPC@costjosephmus Website htipr//www.stjosephcountyindiimcom/Ichp/indexhtmI OFFICE USE ONLY >>>>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX >>>>>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ifLI "') -I 1 Application Number7'j:)_j_L_ - 1111-A Past Reviews: * N�YES (Date of Last Reukw) 4 -1 � . )( s 9Y � ] n- — .0 Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark 1 I Local Historic District (Name) V) National Landniuk dNational Register District (Name) rx � i h Y9h Certificate of Appropriateness: Ej Denied [] Tabled [-] Sent To Committee E] Approved'and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work:_-91,::� �' MOJld 11e47U 0 yy Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s): ?)/A%c�Caw'Plu"o 5'74 - 233-3533 Contractor(s) Name: r) I.XJ POIR Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building: (Single Family - Multi -Family - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind R Landscape R New [O (more than one box mqy be choked} .,p (not in-kind) Demolition E] Description of Proposed Work: izRp[a( �e wifh j C 0 — wen vinyl m) Indouis -6 hqn'-Fr'.h Omathaj Nndoud Owner/Cqntractor,r F *e-mail (TVs oce oorr�etspq, with dyo)ndesignee) 0- and/or Z #.A4 Z>4 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — APPLICATION FEE The following schedule of fees shall apply to any Application For A Certificate Of Appropriateness: Staff Approval $ 15.00 Commission Review $ 15.00 Payment must accompany the application at the time of submission. For electronically submitted application, payment must reach the HPC office within 48 -hours following transmission. Applications for demolition are 2 -part and are considered a separate application. REQUIRED DOCUMENTATION AND SITE PLANS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County cannot render judgment nor process an Application without specific documentation. Comprehensive documentation protects both the owner of the property submitting the Application as well as providing a complete understanding of the project for the commissioners and staff when rendering a decision. Problems often occur during a project review or during the execution of the project when one or both parties are unclear as to the specifics. Applications will NOT be processed without all required fees and documentation. When an Application has been scheduled for any meeting where a review and decision are to be rendered, the owner and any architect or contractor(s) retained for the project must attend such meetings. Failure by the owner, architect, or contractor to attend such meetings may result in denial of the Application due to insufficient presentation. Documentation shall include: materials to be used, detailed written description of the project including scale, dimensions, construction methods, finished, manufacturers' brochures and specifications and photographs of the area(s) which the project will affect. Demolition Applications are a separate issue and require an Application for Demolition. Photographs may be submitted in digital format compatible with the Commission's operating software, or in any glossy photographic print. Any documentation submitted to this office cannot be returned to the applicant. When a project involves blueprints and/or site plans, four sets shall be submitted with the Application. Each set will be reviewed page by page and carry a stamped date with changes and/or comments indicated on each page. Two sets shall be returned to the owner, architect or contractor following the processing of the Application. This office shall use the other sets when reviewing the project during and following its execution. All projects will be inspected during and following execution, for compliance with the decision(s) rendered by the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County. INSPECTION AUTHORITY Any work performed on a historic landmark or in an historic district which does not conform to the Certificate of Appropriateness permit, shall be immediately halted by the Historic Preservation Commission and the Building Department of South bend and St. Joseph County. INTERGOVERNMENTAL DISCLOSURE Certificates of Appropriateness will be forwarded to the building Department of South Bend and St. Joseph County when the applicant also is required to obtain a building permit or other such permit issued by that department. (The applicant will pick up their permit at that location). In all other cases, only a copy of the Certificate will be sent to that department. In some instances, a copy of the Certificate may also be sent to the Department of Code Enforcement and the Indiana Department of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. When no building or other permits are required from the Building Department, the Certificate permit will be mailed directly to the applicant. 813Ashland, October 13, 2011 .! Y' STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 November 2011 Application Number: 2011-1103A Property Location: Leeper Park.East Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: J Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating: ' Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park East is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. Joseph River, the River Bartlett Street to the South and Michigan Street to the West. It is part of the 1911-1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed for South Bend by George Kessler. Its function as a recreational Park is secondary to its practical function as a drinking water well field dominated by the North Pumping Station which is a local landmark, the Reservoir and numerous wells located through out the area. The sunken garden at the northern end of the Park was rehabilitated in 2009 with new rose plants and gravel walkways. The recreational area of the Park behind the North Pumping Station include the Zeigler performing center with fixed bench seating, signage for the Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre Cabin, Comfort Station, Swing set and slide. ALTERATIONS: The water feature, fountain and statuary of the Sunken Garden were removed in the 1960s. The wading pool has been filled in and the pergola removed around the 1970s. The more formal ardens of lilies, roses, gladiolas and peony beds no longer exist. The Garden of Fragrance (originated n1954 and expanded over the years) that meandered from Michigan Street to the Herb Garden by the Navarre Cabin no longer exists, only the signage remains. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace the existing lift station on the south side of the North Pumping Station driveway and relocate it to the north side of the driveway. Screen the new location with landscaping and plantings. Rehabilitate the Garden of Fragrance Braille marker and boulder monument and install new sidewalks and decorative paving. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Please see project narrative, diagrams and landscape plan. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park Standards and Criteria 9.4 Vegetation: 4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced with materials that match the original in size shape, color form and texture. 5. - When replacement of vegetation materials and features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be considered if the convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom characteristics as the historic plant. 9.5 Circulation 8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9.7 Furnishings and Obiects 1. All items listed herein shall be preserved s. All Plaques, Monuments, Sculptures, Memorials, Planters, Urns, Curbing, Roadways, Marker Stones, Sundials, Well -Head Covers, Fences, Trellises, Pergolas, Pathways and Trees. - STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it is in keeping with the Landscape Guidelines for Leeper Park. Staff researched this area of Leeper Park and there is no existing documentation in the Parks Department Archives for the design, the flora and the trees planted in Garden of Fragrance. What DLZ is proposing will convey the same intention as the 1954 Garden while preserving its markers and monuments and utilizing the wrought iron fencing fragments as objects of interest in the landscaping scheme. There was no formal pathway though the Garden of Fragrance and the addition of a permanent, paved path from the sidewalk along Michigan to the monument and markers will not detract from the overall landscaping plan of the Park. The curvilinear design of the sidewalk echoes the 1915 Kessler design.These improvements will effectively screen the relocated lift station from the Park and the proposed perennials will add variety and color. ,/ PROJECT NARRATIVE Michigan Street Lift Station Replacement City of South Bend, Indiana City Project No.: 111-008 DLZ Project No.: 1161-5064-50 The Michigan Street Lift Station Replacement project will include the construction of a new combined sewer pumping station to replace the existing station currently located in front of the North Water Treatment Plant, along Michigan Street in South Bend, Indiana. The new pumping station will be located approximately 85 feet north of its current location, within Leeper Park. The new pumping station will be installed as a below grade structure and will include a concrete drive to allow access to the station by City maintenance crews. The only element to the pumping station that will be above grade is the control panel, which will be approximately 4 feet wide,1 foot deep and approximately_ 5 feet high. The location of the new pumping station currently consists of an ornamental fence that is in a state of significant degradation and has been overtaken by vegetative overgrowth. It is understood that the ornamental fence used to be an entry way to a historical "fragrance garden" located within Leeper Park. Confirmation of this is an existing monument near the area of the fence and the proposed new pumping station. To revive this portion of Leeper Park and screen the new pumping station, the project will. include the construction of a landscaped area around the new pumping station that will be populated by a variety of plantings (shrubs, perennials, bulbs and ground cover). In addition to the new landscaping, the project will also include the construction of a new concrete and paver walkway to the restored fragrance garden monument. The project will also include an alternate for the restoration and relocation of the existing ornamental fence. .f Ilk, S� a y AZI v, 5T .4 x MCKBAN STREET LFT STATIM PRELIANARY LANDSCAPE PLAN MICHIGAN STREET LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA JUMPER CHIYENSIS 'SEA CREEN* (5* -6') (EVERGREEN SCREENING) SHRUBS HOSTA 'ROYAL STANDARD' (FRAGRANT) DAFFODIL ICE FOLLIES' (EARLY MARCH/APRIL) DAFFODIL 'C"ELOr (LATE - APRIL/MAY) ALLIUM 'PURPLE SENSATION' (LATE SPRLNG/EARLY SUMMER) BULB & GgouNp OvEz? MASSING PLANT PALETTE SYRINGA UEYERI 'MISS KIM' (5--6-) (FRAGRANT) ASTILBE MSIONS- (FRAGRANT) DAFFODIL 'MOUNT HOOD' (MID - APRIL) TUUPA 'APRICOT BEAUTY (EARLY - APRIL/MAY) CONVALLARIA MAJAUS (ULY OF THE VALLEY. FRAGRAN' GROUKOI.:W.R) WDLZ. ;r :' n d ! ! ! ! MKHG+W STREET -^� "''--.,......, ,:.,, �::.; ..:,; :,:., .. �.5.:: ...,: -:. • ;},:f•'. €€,, S'a,i :;iia SN.}.ty.. ' 4,r.}5':? ' • ... .. 1 ,, - wig .s= '.•... :�„,. �,. ham. _ _. .. .... �:.;IA:.:..y r >✓.�'r'i�5 r r r'r r r r r r r r- ' BROOM FNSNI AS SPECOIED COMPACT SUBGRADE NEC—CALLY TO A NOWMAW OF 9 STANDARD 1/2' PS TRANSVERSE JOljT-\ PROCTOR. PLACE AND COMPACT 1, C—RACTOR I NAGE FORM WON- ACGREGE B�X TO A — OF On STANDART) PROCTOR. DEPOSa CON wo FORMS. LEVEL -0 TAM SUFFKNENTLY TO BRING MORTAR TO SURFACL OVORE FN&NNG NN SEE wom ouvw A Nm FLOAT. PI Au Z MEDIUM BROOM TOMSK EDGES ROUNDED M APPROVED EDGER.TO BE SEEK (So CUT) CoNTRACnom CONCRETE SCEWALX. 4- JWFS 1/4 THICKNESS OF PAVEMENT HOOT 053 COMPACTED AT INTERVALS AS 110 ON PLANS, AGGREGATE BASE PR. PRE— EXP. JON(F FILLER 1/2- THICK. BETWEEN CONC. AND W FIXED SYR - OR ELF PAVCWDa AS WELL AS BETWEEN PCONM SEPARATE P011.11S. AND RAOM WHERE &WAR 5 DO OR MORE. 5 SHALL BE 1 300. HOWASOTE. OR OTHER COMFORNING TO AkSHTO M-33 SUBOR;DE OR COMPACTED 213. RECESS JOLT AND emu SEALANT. SDEWALK, CONCRETE, 4' iWD JOMS TO K HAND TRUFT (—)6-), Burr �s SWEPT INTH FOLYNCRIC 1- $AIM IEVDWNG COURSE /r 1' CONCRETE STAB ///� ORAWYDE MDIf%RE .�DPANSON JOINT, M. ADJVYENf CONCRETE _Q 3 r SOLAME HOLE TO BE FORMED lk CONCRETE AT REGULAR INTMALS FOR DRAINAGE. MAX 4' *"T p COMPACTED TFUNIGULAR SPACING. FILL AGGREGATE SAM NIH PEAZRAVEL AND COAX COMPACTED SUDGRADE W/GE0TE)FTd VIE! 1. PAVERS TO BE SET IN PATTERN AS SHOWN ON PLANS, 2. SEE SPECAL PRDV&ONS FOR PARER COLOR AND MANUFACOUREA. PAVERS, BRICK QAC NO, 5" LEAVE 3" OPENNG IN MULCH -7- AROUND BASE OF PLANT FINISH GRADE 37 SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH 1. PLANTS UOL. BE SOAKED IMMEDIATELY FLwt*c RE. FENCE PMEl FOLLOWING L ALL PLANTING BEDS SIOLL BE MACHED INTH Jr SHREDDED HARDoccl aw MULCH, zI ",,—FHSH CRAM MOVING. CONTRA= TO CONFIRM SURFACE OR D90M MOUNT Wo SALVAGED. • CONCRETE 10' OA X 1. SA&NNCE AND STORE EXISTING ORNAMENTAL rENCOC AS BASE Ba 36* MOL DEPTH. RESTORE PER SPECKL PROMSOM I INSTALL ORAX SHOWN ON PLAN& ORNAMENTAL FENCE, RESTORATION (ALTERNATE) PERENNIAL PLANTING N- . MICHIGAN STREET LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 2* X X' METAL FRAME TWTW MITERED CORNERS SRAUE SIGN SMgGED PANEL 1 METAL CROSS MEMBER MOUNTED IN WAKLE NEW MILE. FOR SUPPORT POST 2' 50 WBE P057 ATTACHMENT SGN IME -FROM "��-FOMSH GRADE 2' SO TUM POST - BACK 1. SALYAGE EXISTING CAREFULLY REMOVE BRAILEio m CONCRETE FOOTING PANEL FROM POST AND F`MNE- 2. ALL WELDS TO BE CROKOOD SMOOTH, S. NEW FRAMEWORK AND P09 F"SH M RE 4. BRAVE PANEL TO BE ATTACHED NTN COMPACTED SuBGRADE BRAILLE SIGN, RESTORATION TIRO r9 EXtSONG MONA" WON PLADUE CONCRETE BASE - W TO MTCH DOSTM MOMAKNT PRDAM— DftMSK* JOINT BETWEEN FOOTING COMPACTED SUBGRADE MONUMENT FOOTING Y SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARM FAM BANK MULCH "" *10 F*m GRADE PLANr AS REOUNCMW NOR. 1. SET PLAM 50 THAT TOP OF RMT BALL 15 APPROMMAIELY 2' ABOVE F94H GRADE. 2. PLANTS &oLL BE SWDID INNAEDAtELY FMUOwwG KAWFWKL I ALL SHIKAI PLANTWBEDS SMALL BE MuLflo NNr SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. SHRUB PLANTING (NAE o M711M LEAVE 3" OPENNG IN MULCH -7- AROUND BASE OF PLANT FINISH GRADE 37 SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH 1. PLANTS UOL. BE SOAKED IMMEDIATELY FLwt*c FOLLOWING L ALL PLANTING BEDS SIOLL BE MACHED INTH Jr SHREDDED HARDoccl aw MULCH, PERENNIAL PLANTING N- . MICHIGAN STREET LIFT STATION REPLACEMENT CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 2* X X' METAL FRAME TWTW MITERED CORNERS SRAUE SIGN SMgGED PANEL 1 METAL CROSS MEMBER MOUNTED IN WAKLE NEW MILE. FOR SUPPORT POST 2' 50 WBE P057 ATTACHMENT SGN IME -FROM "��-FOMSH GRADE 2' SO TUM POST - BACK 1. SALYAGE EXISTING CAREFULLY REMOVE BRAILEio m CONCRETE FOOTING PANEL FROM POST AND F`MNE- 2. ALL WELDS TO BE CROKOOD SMOOTH, S. NEW FRAMEWORK AND P09 F"SH M RE 4. BRAVE PANEL TO BE ATTACHED NTN COMPACTED SuBGRADE BRAILLE SIGN, RESTORATION TIRO r9 EXtSONG MONA" WON PLADUE CONCRETE BASE - W TO MTCH DOSTM MOMAKNT PRDAM— DftMSK* JOINT BETWEEN FOOTING COMPACTED SUBGRADE MONUMENT FOOTING Y SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARM FAM BANK MULCH "" *10 F*m GRADE PLANr AS REOUNCMW NOR. 1. SET PLAM 50 THAT TOP OF RMT BALL 15 APPROMMAIELY 2' ABOVE F94H GRADE. 2. PLANTS &oLL BE SWDID INNAEDAtELY FMUOwwG KAWFWKL I ALL SHIKAI PLANTWBEDS SMALL BE MuLflo NNr SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH. SHRUB PLANTING (NAE o M711M .Exhibit 5 19,10+E . EEELpE ' P\V Extow commONS lmao '��f, POWER POLE R STREET LAW MW SLEr 4 SV WT FLOW 0 Mwalou AMME SRMW unirr LSE emomm SRN A POW TARE Tom a - TREE Nam e.... Sam MW M SIM SPOT EL�EM pOOp°°°p OpOOppaO,.nw.000,,„aOCL O o n as Op°aon-- ______--r. nna0a°°0000O WARD sTarET �. Da w • w aaaOpaOOpOOaooaOOo . ^tee• o °1111 •. I I J..0 { l -- - T - { ` r I, i S i 'B, o - 8. �� � " L' i � , \\ wry .Y• •'M• .3.. 1r �,y�'Lr 00 13 •r L.� • • a`'•� t y ice• r C.. \ �� �. ,r�r• % O 7 ��F•• iwiwr`.`i ° Y .i« `w'- i�. .'•{.-.�,. ,,, r. '!3•��" . n 7f C I i. .' 1 y �.• a ... r.•4 LJ r •( ;• �.{ ,,;ar '. °O 9t- •E,•• M M (• I Si^!-M••�i "T .NYiP -�� .'Awf �i i• • Lfn.•r .'�.• r 4` r! r �i 1 ° a , �• I '� it J .r.\7� t) — r �f � �� ' •y„'�� L �"' r S. � a•' � pT � +{' � po . ° L, LJ L-1 u L -J ! �� L� .y r•I Ms•' •,Y'i •`� : - r • ow o_ 13 IV r O � rccr„ rrrr � s...'00 .}+• • 1•a4`.. .•, x. . • . w..ura� �. �i "• 4v �J O r 000e— moa PARK} LAKE aai7 Gooa000ao MOTE STREET) aaooaooaao0 rrw •7�r o Orlr! I 1 arena o yV •r ,w 1Y '�'/' o L LJ ! .3 Li_iLi 'J • o a L SOUTH BEND DEPARTMENT OF iDSTORIC PRESERVATION a ° 13 o SOUTH BEND, ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA o Mai d ``3L •• ..✓ • O ° r..,, of ewwce o I 13 o o VV I o u o �o /,�� o e " T 's � T ✓1 r• r "" {, o nenNe` teran/ee �' -oi 0/I�/� •1v�QG/tVQ cyK�Ol�/i • G xr 0 • . w 0 FOR 0 ° MMS& O •we snna •f•, i 13 ° South Bend Park Department o thy... r ❑ o a°o OF EXISTING CONDITIONS A. ` F, -,PLN ._ qq L o 04 9 00 O °aoa3l3%o oaoo0o0 °000aa°a0a sARTLerT STREET O°°oaa I oo V<61 000000 EARTLETT rRSPA1IED BY aFARNaMSBEIRGeUGMANA eon Exhibit 3 \ � 4 011- - tSION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMS VW%NA SOUTH BEND & 5T• JOSEPH COUNTY�� FOR g"4, SKETCH OF LEEPFR PARK .1m� atl"pD yt: 'es ...� �y b�4-itrT7 3p FRVARED By j,ARvajtsiwRG, INDIANA STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 November 2011 Application Number: 2011-1107A Property Location: 1216 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1925/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Elizabeth and Mark Adey Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1216 E. Wayne North is a two storey frame home with a brick fagade and an irregular floor plan set on a matching brick foundation. There is a gable roof with gable returns with cornice molding and an eyebrow dormer. The roofing is asphalt shingle. There is a multi -pane half -round attic window. The windows are 8/1 and 6/1 double hung windows that have brick soldier course lintels and brick header course sills; some with paneled wood shutters with a tree motif. The front entry has gable roof with round arch under supported by brackets and smooth Doric columns; the front door is rounded with simple wood trim. There is a one storey side open porch with a flat roof supported by smooth Doric columns. ALTERATIONS: There appears to be some window openings that were re -configured and bricked in. The survey card noted aluminum storm windows and some replacement windows. The side porch is open and no longer has screens noted in the August, 1986 survey card and were removed sometime after 1995. There are COAs (2004-9) in file for in kind replacement and repair work to porch, in-kind window replacement, garage roof and rear fencing. Removal of 1955 addition and replaced with new one storey addition 12'8"x 30'8" in materials to match the original house. Replaced replacement casement windows from 1955 re -model to match windows in the addition per COA 2009-0601D. Replacement and restoration of the doors leading to the side porch from the living room; replacement of second floor door leading to porch with COA #2010-0301 APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of Windows: Dining Room window is missing and has been bricked over, return to original style -stationary six light windows; replace eleven windows that have combo aluminum storms with double hung 6/1 or 8/1 divided light; replace one replacement window with more historically correct window. All windows will match rear window that was installed during addition in 2009. Marvin brand windows will be used and the entire house will have the same windows. The current combination storms were installed in the 1950s and are in horrible shape. The windows will return the house to a closer approximation of the house as it was built. Photos included. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Restore bricked opening of dining room window with side by side (2) fixed 6 pane windows. Replace 11 windows that are over painted, over caulked some with broken storm windows: 3 windows located in the front upstairs 2 8/1 and 16/1; 4 downstairs front windows replace 2 double sets 6/1; West upper floor 16/1; rear 2 upper floor 6/1 and upper East 1 original window 6/1; and replace one replacement window 6/1. All windows are Marvin Ultimate Double Hung wood windows with true divided lights and replicate what is there. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and prick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of _Vood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Wayne Doolittle, Preservation Specialist and Steve Szaday, Intern visited the site on 9 November and are of the opinion that from the exterior the windows appear to be able to be repaired. They will perform an interior inspection with the homeowner prior to the 21 November meeting and report their findings. This house has had extensive repair, replacement and remodeling documented since 2004; and all of it has been quality work with quality materials. The Staff makes no recommendation at this time pending the Preservation Specialist report. Application - FOR - Certi ficate o f Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Emat7: SWCHPCQco st joseph in.us Website: hV://wwwsgosephcoungindiana.com/gchp/index.hbnl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received% x�c.tcZO Application Number Past Reviews:ES (Date ofWtReview) NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark I Local Historic District (Name) National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) U Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied E] Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee [] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 12 -lb (i W�1 5&AQ ' ,l ✓ // Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please PP in.,t) MA` I _ /s�/ Address of Property Owner(s): �7i/1 me Contractor(s) Name: ! f M1 11,ov _ Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City.—Mil �I Phone: 77 �piJ - (Yl(Z d Current Use of Building: (Sin5e Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government.— Industrial — Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind F] Landscape E] NewReplacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one box may be dtecked) n - 0 Description of Proposed Work: w Owner/Contractor- Fax: e-mail rba arj^j a m3 vi coo W uss office IunTl correspond wrt�h only one designee) and/or 7/ owe :a- / CC — +r_F.LWT70N REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — LAL) -7p i jjpdov wl oloyc, w&icauy cwted- imy7dw. All wiodfts mil mmirh 'eavWindWv dUV704 oddifitp m 2-06q, NOW �+►� w�naow� w►u �x US(O 01yo. 4k otie Han will haVe�.e ern.¢ WIv�GI ows. /Nj vffe vvqsI4IudM � I q 5D'S �� A q�e � v� VIO,'{�i hla pe. �t.Q IMn� GnR WI I ( (�'Mrn il�e NIX ag)�- AM r 19 Marvin Double Hung Windows for New Construction & Remodeling MARVIN I-:-1 9uillaroundpu' Homeowner I Windows I Double Hung I Ultimate Double Hung I Features And Benefits Page 1 of 2 FIND DEALER SEARCHSITE Zip(Postal Code I I Keyword I INTERNATIONAL REQUEST INFORMATION DOUBLE HUNG aEr UEt;Itt:Ic2�tA,r!oN fNE14SS!17NU? OPTIONS SIZES, PERFORMANCE AND SPECS FEATURES AND BENEFITS PHt'>'.t'?GAttFVr h Ultimate Double Hung Window Marvin's Ultimate Double Hung combines state-of-the-art window design with a classic style of the past to offer unparalleled value and timeless beauty. Advanced engineering and the highest quality construction make our Ultimate Double Hung windows incredibly durable, versatile and easy to use. • Engineering advancements make Ultimate Double Hung easy to open and close • Exclusive integrated tilt lever lock allows sash to be Lifted in or removed for effortless cleaning • Choose from rectangular or round Double Hung windows shapes Standard Features • One lite LoE'-272 with argon insulating glass • Satin Taupe sash lock • Bare wood interior • All -wood brick mould casing (wood units) • B° sill bevel • DP50 performance rating Ultimate Double Hung Round Top Window Our Ultimate Double Hung Round Top windows feature a half round or an elliptical upper sash. Choose from the following variations: Standard double hung window with a half round or elliptical transom. Available as a wood or clad -wood window. ((This product is CE certified. Double hung window with a true radius upper sash and frame. Both the interior and exterior have a radius top. Available as a wood or clad -wood window. �;f (}Ili'i/rta^k?'1 AFit�Fl - t.';Jc L'r\SIGN U;+ INTERIOR FINISH OPTIONS ..t Standard double hung window on the interior with arched exterior casing. This variation is the most economical method of achieving a round top appearance. Available as a wood window. FINDA DEALER I ZiP/Postal Code r 6 �Y 67, ,V Nil http://www.marvin.comlwindowslwood-double-hung-windowslfeatures-and-benefits/ 11/10/2011 N Name: Mark & Elizabeth Adey Date: November 9, 2011 Address: 1216 E. Wayne St., South Bend, IN RE: Restoration of 1 window Millwood Roofing and Construction Inc. propose to complete the following: Scope of Work: • Remove window • Repair damaged frame • Remove all paint • 1 coat primer paint • 2 coats exterior paint • Make storm window to fit window Respectfully Submitted Marlin Miller Millwood Roofing and Construction Inc. Accepted By: Labor and Material Total $ 2,475.00 Date: Millwood Roofing and Construction Inc. is pleased to submit a bid on this project and appreciates the opportunity. We are fully insured and can provide an Insurance certificate upon being awarded the job. We provide a 10yr. Workmanship warranty on our roof work. Estimate price is good for 30 days. After this time period, please contact our office to verify pricing. A cancellation fee of 12% will be charged if contract is released/cancelled. t t k > is y aa F.�. +ix 1216 E. Wayne St. N. November 9, 2011 prr azz Al Existing old windows Yi RRA a. 1216 E. Wayne St. N. November 9, 2011 prr azz Al Existing old windows Mark and Elizabeth Adey 1216 E Wayne St N South Bend 46615 Certificate of Appropriateness (Documentation for Application) Window Replacement 1) Reinstall Dining Room window that was removed and, bricked over in the 1950's. 2) Replace 11 windows that have Aluminum Combination Storms, windows are six or eight over one. Aluminum storms are broken and inefficient. 3) RepiaGe One Replacement Window All Windows will match the window installed during the addition in 2009 (COA granted) m� . —r, .:..J"'"' ...�-_.�•c.._..�....<.--.- '. �,+ivaa� a, � _ �`�`"""=--.�.,. ,*mss." � �::^ , Center Window has been replaced and is the same window that will be used in the remainder of the house. Marvin Brand French doors were installed in 2010 (COA approved) 1922 Portage Avenue Based on the HPC's Local Landmarks Criteria as adopted by the Common Council, the site at 1922 Portage Avenue can be recommended to the Common Council for designation as a Local Historic Landmark by the Historic Preservation Commission. The building meets the criteria in at least three areas: 1. Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials or craftsmanship which represent an architectural characteristic or innovation. 2. Its suitability for preservation. 3. Its identification with the life of a person or persons of historical significance. The building. fulfills criteria #1 as an excellent example of an unusual blend of architectural elements from the English Arts and Craft movement and the Tudor Revival style interpreted in the American Craftsman/Bungalow style. The house is rated Notable in the 2005 Survey as an English Cottage built in 1928 and is unique in South Bend. The building fulfills criteria #2 by the integrity of its original construction with only minor alterations. Alterations are limited to the addition of terraces flanking the modified entry and the removal or enclosure of the south bay window. The building fulfills criteria #3 by its association with George E. and Ruby J. Keogan and Aaron Huguenard. George Keogan was named Notre Dames basketball and baseball coach and assistant football coach in 1923. In 20 seasons as the basket ball coach he won 327 games, the second most in Irish History, a.771 winning percentage. He never had a losing season at Notre Dame. He was succeeded by his protege, Edward "Moose" Krause after his death at age 53. Mrs. Keogan inherited the house and later married Aaron Huguenard in 1950. Mr. Huguenard was the Secretary of the South Bend Tribune and the former President of the Indiana Bar Association. He was active in civic, legal, social, political and business circles: in 1951 he founded the United Fund of St. Joseph County, in 1952 St. Joseph County Hospital Development, Inc. He was appointed in 1955 as a Charter member of the University of Notre Dame Law School Advisory Council. 44%-. 4. q- ~ 'h � ay,.- � - '� ., .. �. ♦ -' 'APd - i,. .. ... ,r.�{s � - JY�,.�,�,�1?e�•� }^^,�i:.:'f:� .x 'tge+..�.tj�d. N. '�'Nee'�'�1S` �U �,�t 21• � k ��S • .,�, � � _�,._� ,r.�1N' �'..... �a .. ,r �.,.. >. ,�`n''ti R ..:�s.zsr4ri:,,.a��' � �rc'�`'�"���P'�i '� �tw , 4s�;,rt. _� "i ''f rYYYr!i, _ .. ,. ,. . F .tr. .K ,wv.ry" Sys: r, ci pp -14 ^.� "'t., :Ff.•[?k ..in.-n?i:, ,. � ""*' •; Dr'">�.,;, .. ,td,g.'-'f p�i;�:'r•, � �-7'�''•'�' ��'�i'f'V'nAtR^'T%sib-;�sJ .. •M1:yetrW..{'. .. .•M: {'.".x y � � .?b:. .�',.,y •,. !�'i ✓': �;,. '. V�J: �e� '=N^' -';k y^tx"v �'i. �p.{� •�, - ,� n;t i.'b%'.. .,..r "°at' "iYr.'f, r' •t^•t��. _..- -'N ,-z'.'zt5 `�.r, �`Yi L"�3.. n _ r r f�"$' ti } Page 1 of 1 Catherine Hostetler - OCTOBER BUDGET REPORTS From: Kathleen Sobecki To: Alice Langel; - Beth Kerns; Beverly Shelton; Carrie Stipp; Catherine H... Date: 10/26/201111:23 AM Subject: OCTOBER BUDGET REPORTS GOOD MORNING. I KNOW THAT October IS NOT YET ENDED, HOWEVER, I NEED TO LET YOU KNOW THAT THEY WILL BE LATE. I WILL BE ON VACATION FROM October 29TH THROUGH November 6TH. I WILL RETURN TO WORK ON November 7TH. AT THAT TIME I WILL BEGIN T0. MAKE ENTRIES FOR ALL OF THE WORK DONE WHILE I AM GONE. THIS MAY TAKE A FEW DAYS. SO, AS SOON AS I CAN, I WILL RUN YOUR October REPORTS. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE, HAVE A GOOD WEEKEND. KATHLEEN CPttinuc\chnstetl\Local Settings\Tempewise\4EA7EDBBS... 10/26/2011 Location Budget as of 10-31-2011 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2011. Fund: 0001 County General for 01/01/2011 thru 10/31/2011 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account I Original Addrl/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation' Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 12,701.81 19.23 19.23 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 322.90 35.88 35.88 10000 Totals 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 400.00 134.67 534.67 0.00 000 General GovT. 6,487.27 33.34 33.34 22010. Gas Oil & Lubricants 800.00 100.00 900.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 160.00 100.00 100.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 94.86 46.21 46.21 20000 Totals 1,425.00 234.67 1,659.67 0.00 31070- Other Contractual Services 19,216.00 243.84 19,459.84 0.00 000 General GovT. 32020 Travel 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32350 Postage 400.00 42.71 442.71 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 200.00 5.29 205.29 0.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 34040 Auto Liability 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 11/10/2011 11:07 AM Page 62 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 24,230.85 5,769.15 5,769.15 19.23. 19.23 29,117.34 6,932.66 6,932.66 19.23 1 19.23 53,348.19 12,701.81 12,701.81 19.23 19.23 352.86 181.81 181.81 34.00 34.00 577.10 322.90 322.90 35.88 35.88 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,154.96 504.71 504.71 30.41 30.41 12,972.57 6,487.27 6,487.27 33.34 33.34 160.00 0.00 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 235.81 206.90 206.90 46.73 146.73 110.43 94.86 94.86 46.21 46.21 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 100.00 100.00 User ID ksobecki 11/10/2011 11:07 AM Page 62 Location Liget as of 10-31-2011 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2011. Fund: 0001 County General for 01/01/2011 thru 10/31/2011 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Original AddYI/Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 000 General GovT. 30000 Totals 21,521.00 291.84 21,812.84 Location Totals 88,996.00 526.51 89,522.51 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 11/102011 11:07 AM Page 63 Unencumbered Unexpended Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,663.81 8,149.03 8,149.03 37.36 37.36 0.00 68,166.96 21,355.55 21,355.55 23.85 23.85 0.00 0.00 68,166.96 User ID ksobecki 11/102011 11:07 AM Page 63 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTV ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE - 4 OCTOBER 2011 ADDRESS 1215 RIVERSIDE DRIVE DISTRICT RIVERSIDE DRIVE RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER BRAIN T. KANE WORK: TREE REMOVAL 4 OCTOBER RECEIVED E-MAIL FROM BRENT THOMPSON, CITY FORESTER, WITH ATTACHMENTS OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ROTTEN NORWAY MAPLE TREE. ISSUED RME-COA AND MAILED TO HOMEOWNER. CERTIFICATE m ,, � � r M M W >! VVIA Q - Tim Musczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove rotten Norway Maple in front yard per Brent Thompson, City Forrester The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 2359575 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Brian T Kane DATE PERMIT io/a4/xoii TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE Director OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. TBD, Contractor for the following location: ixis RIVERSIDE South Bend, IN 46616 PRESERVATION Riverside Drive COMMISSION Application No. 2031-1004 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: OF © Located in a Local Historic SOUTH BEND ❑ A Local Historic Landmark AND and found this application to be appropriate according to the ST. JOSEPH Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local COUNTY Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 2359575 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Brian T Kane DATE PERMIT io/a4/xoii TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE Director OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. ����� Ey�•���,r��>� �t• �> Fr � w y��� ' It! Y� ' T�, � i< ,' �K� �" � � � �� - i �p lM s '1 etk � �" h' i t yt l,t'fif,'�` :S� ,� it}�+ t �r r 33ib 'f� • �_ ...t .. F �.,�^ � ,r'�- •.i� � � �a �, � ��'.�� �r � .. � ai'' 'jib r cif RL Y i s ' �„e ' � �{ �� .� • 4 t � Y . •, �L �.��'^ . � �i�, ...�� `.VY' f� �J t 4` � Y c .2 a ?•i a:... � w k'� i\fit `rss a t y :r. • .- 1;> �, X„JQ k - CYI:'•4 �j'.�rj.�a w � 7 !'stS -. i ,,�y. ..� �ii .3 �f; ti f fad �`:. � ? ,*,,,�' v � � < a �. �-"t ��f{ �+�w,.4: � f o.�i t,pa��•�� .,,t,�i � ... .,,r ':ro ._ _` �4 - yy�� r �o�. �g�`+� � � '�'�t�„! �'`��� 3 .�"� �• ��� ;fit �v.; � � 3� t�,f �: s . `'fit' »* t! - " < a-� ,Y•,,�,.+� a� �KiS z � s � 4 '#' r ye x +e }� �'e f �.'.' ♦ � t .E Sa `6�AM .S . ax,�xg} i[ .. : #: s' 43 ' o •`� Fr'' aFttki"I/.'!rI tri!, y AM MW < .j. .,.�. ,> "'" `;^ „'S-',^•. °, 3�, , i> :.s ;e 'Y' at�>i."��"''_�: .r"�. '�a.'4k ?J="�� ..;(r, #�i�}(:d -, 1' �r E„t $t :� .�j.�f; it �, .I.� h S,�^” ,�: ..r. ��4.4, ". 7" tI R• �y� 3 ,� �'f ri },'i, t =)I .._ ,.>.) _ i,.. �lil_ 1V1.� i>�;.,j°`eil a�+ri. •`•tie .':i"L'.Y,-'^,�':.,t** .�t° -J .,^�w°� '.d t� «.:^e.:.:=�':, «.. . �5�t�; i}:: , _, 1 � �... er °' „� l.s� `}Jtl`Y��EE<��K°��r �I. i'•- «� � , r ^ 1 .' d d d 'z,.k•':i, ,�a� '�£'=ei'' �:� =`a m._; 'f d',•���:�5-�`% eggd( .� ;; ,}��} p:�'i�� .syr •'ia . -,: ''£S•- :4-�, #!.: •rg Sr13!''PT ,r . Y- .>� v ewF F`. A �... Na _ } r.w ��++;Y •> , ,t"'r ah. x 4 «,er�[r 4",,.1,� "'?;�'s�a.we67f14. ' _kr k"°Tgt:.t� Pr A�,. M.' �'iG tel`. i=•.F' •�°y',• `"` �"'.r;" "✓✓. .i3':::,'e..YYI�� y%� „'✓a»� d';�►' _' ''r y' ;i�ye'"i � �;.+,Fr c.v a �K^`a,a �al�i� xpT' �"°' �, , p"• ,fix F'4 � *ryifl' .w;'. �; :`` _ kx,.'.+s'.,,' a.. ..» .+ =d, •a ,r°.v; �' <,. ar y ;.' ;{ i .'!, 0 '` #-. 'f;' 1+.Ti�!,3+J a i,t�. ; f"K,Al '„$ ;`='.•'4 V, I,, �, js• b--., � a:a ahill ;s= t`. t f.„, _ F� , ;:fir,,.,,>� _ E , yy r`,� 'f ,r w - e - 'sr;. __>e: �� 1.” � � � �'- zr 4'°�t - "'.'`` � �; ':¢aw"ri:;-�ir^F<.''[=. _•1 'i .G'y-•y�: '°J/,. �"-,:° .�WW[[ ..'wz. [�`tj_�_ its;:., ipw# ra�wY�}rs;,k.,.�wwr�,' -a - .",•y{.-�#�/, - "fi`''r'.. a �i.st. . �' ?::."':'ir.#:- }�_ - ,,., a-... �. a ' Y' 3 i is .,« �>«'t. s •,3= ,. •>,�: t� °' -`�.'. �`� '�E^�, s �' .5' '.''t>,:^-a'y"!<:'. iti sS..,tyi;sii`•,ox:��"+eeF=:;, a .¢--, :x'z.�:-::'aP N - :4-.'ryata=xs p.f�w,arf "�i� y• e;'Srarf y +"?=aTM -� ^y' • .:p.:w_a"3.. 3"h :s "-�?°. 'L-.: ^.ro«. i•.Fn.e - •-,w...,�„ t:` b RIO! 3 L • : y: ;`^ .£.. '7a�sF i1+4 -a . p r ,. y R ,{y'��x ='` ! ��' Olt .+Y" a* '�i �' •'f,. ,, p%' ,..:`t'"�' �:.rrs+!. ,,. "=+:,t,..,•�:, a.'.+au `•:• ":3-`a L.'.'£.d-,..'«u: `"'.a> _..yam. ia�vfl� +.:<1. s.,; i i 'r P; tw;`,>.�,bra�;• ..+-.aar"' }��ts.>,��. .,., Y3'-. .Fs x f-'.. .. ,I A• K.e� a 4, a°e-fig w•'•W:rYa. " •,.'^w "T, s ��..tr' ) 4.x � 3 s �� F .; "„ { K; f�f�.� �Y .. �6"�w:;:iki;,`':i�•`: ny"' >e: .a.y„,:¢z+fit. <k�a-^e.«.� z �� .d:.� ..,.o 't' � ''�� ;�.�3�.:,� si„=:aw'�i` a' �"'az"' s �,k 'v,:' .. �"'-m`-.i.":--se'�4+-a7,�.` . "°�::" �:,'.i�«.. `^ .'a-.>< :ui .. ( j �..� � .'�E ,.s y$ ':`tr•' 3'` �.. .1. :.r ` .,;-.+=".. � � 'F.'�g:� �'s`�'".e,,, :.Y+,.y '�Y•a-> � .s.cza>ia>.-:',<r.-�.7.. „s- °' V.�, i >I,s;�, s ,.'J '"- :�,'�+� _ ' r=+::F.>. ;v.-: e,.: ;wrt.�i .,. «� ;:'-` +e-.: � `a: ;.:e.t.,'; i'"' -,...`:x; :,w gats- ,'�,': , fS.,.:. �`~ >zx•'9 w`;+',`�:1rk`,t< n' ,, w .- '> � '-i'-, e'�"t�s� , t d�'' ,3”; * '`y.'"g'SF� •:y>:L:'.:��«.ji-:'Y ;:-v K'' .ae `it!•, `.:.r=`�" '�'. :1ts> ��;:yL� :; ai x-. _„�»..- �'' n.+`�,,"�a':'�.-^.re;:is^__ -.h'.+' '`k;"'ye".'c =a,i '�4t�-�'J. e,� ,H«-'a^� `.:''r>. _.,� ,t- a.i.<', '���_. «. •;.st :�'E`�y..a •-:�,-acy..., r� �+-.'. ..'Gt :.;.:,fir;,,, .:,-.. :'�C,;•'" ,<:.'-' .� '?�.r'i'•,.+a'°ye'.':' .�p^,a+.,. ,ua.. '�-y., :j,�,,,, >-..:' a�- _ .z'.i.:t:%,i.:..,.. "•y w-^>,.:"e`n"`._ wc. ,. ;. y. c"n ,.�:.� Aw "?vw'-..:sn.'!8'S'..y >^ ,,. J ' y .r3er. ':'�. 'fe.:° - iX« >.+^. � waa�'" '�s;.' "..r. i "'�w �; . !;b'�','y,,,,.+...�:,, :.-rt .e�,��,+a.>f>.. ,.�:.a.•��m... �, ' �4.L.: .` m�>i"a:%�.. ��;u° r 3�,�}'..e•.,yF,„...-`!R�-:J r >..: x-:��'`u�:s' ,1'a. �,?s`:i?:9:..s+c'•:�:`: ;':="'t';--;s`-;SS':,;.A e.._,. �E•;a>.': r'�'•, ��+{a-�'' .-:i; " a`q .s .'.".wwlr >�,,�.�.,�r�-. ,fin � °w.e"^ "T:;3`::� 7^ 4.Y` '\: �R'R°i:1WR,, '^� _ +U, � "',� .! i,�.. -. c. ...>a `Y r�i r s„ . .�'ai"x• �;"�,» Y't» "-4'i','a... ,>i. 1:-..8�=r•'.,�.?"-Fes'!%= >„�,"a>.'+•:>:'�lY ;->,r -� :f. } p.,,'�'. .1" �,�..' .T: '; �i:.y''.'•_' ,�-'�`f'"' �.- '.y°'."w.x'ai�M1'',�" >y' S. p. `::: d. S�,S��„�jyre...,�..x. Sf ...�Fq'%' }..g, � .�. , .S� ,: � ._ ..azo; . �xR:>::, •Y' -'i ._'�1.. .«;.�' �' n:.; o -l: `s•." . ' r' •r! .w = ... .>'�T°c' ' S:" � .•{-^ : w „+e"„_”. +e, '•"""br .r+it'g"` �.. sii,-__,,n,,,y>,, Rq_ '3':>:e: ;�",��;>;-`.` a" `"�i•'.i« 5.:t3 .a'4 `�it `:.> +g,..� .�.c „a,':". z-�..�,, ro;'v" .ra � =c .e...r+;:..a,'v,+' m:•'t � "'s.. :. a.iap ...kke4.a �+eyz.yr;`; �..,�,.._:,+�.="s°r!• , �:;?.-`S :, • ��Sa a�,q <'�.`'r, � :.Y�„`.�;<..rt m i'w"s; :-��a,,,/,s!'"', i,` r�;�. •'e•'+,Aa�w r': s.,,z'�”' r+6r�� �kr+, . a•...r >-ey r,, ..•.;-�j?�.; h?":�a°'+�: `.'�'x'� „ar�. s:.• -Y„""4: is dL "'�.I�"`a�'�"�.II�,�'?F,^""`.„=w-a.-as'R�_.,`'�„+.i e.` ".f •ntzip .e�",.>w,.,,`.<:....•.. .-..�. ..o.y�- !M�- �>Or"la..�.' `k„":b�e• ,�""`!+'-rejl')b _ .1' :T'-j.u- i A.T ^.w>.-`�'T>.:. •,a;y 3"iT t: +7 2'_ �',7„�..re"'",*: ." ': .."",.,�`3`.ek:.,?`�•"E•.'�i�?;.r <..�"'?w';y>':> ,;..'^ : - "� -`•. '� «..:�4°" x%3, �iL:..t^a'•�`,+,,'b":, �°°i'v>3n`: �e..:, ,rte '••` as: � � i...�-, «'tiw�,�.yr '•'m.w's'ti.,�. ., +aw-, .....i.�i ._r°r: - ...r ka> ,: ".,p,,, . I �� "j,�y*ry, f�°'+,9@y,.! y, �wsrm .STs •iu ..eyp>., a,¢7�^«� ;'. �''` �'.ta' .P�,:!5<,fs'.=i. i . b, •� w. 'T.�._d ..j ,� .a n,.o'M• s.e"�.�+,ys.� �•' vr,<SYw'^,v`,«t,,;tr..q,s`R.',,,E»•.; '�'e :” +.�'; ���-tsr;:.� >. '''s,�+"'.i'`y«`^i;sz :.:-'�'`,�=v^ra.�,r>_,.�. ,� �r., ;. r.,,�,� ' est ,,�f -T y�'ga„'�,r �' •- "I.•^i �. ,"-�}y�., �:.� .•..yr,-•+ Je ._ �, •}, 1 t�� � ��",. »,�, � ti".: ` y:3,,?.'!, Ja��- ..s' t h ; i Y �5.:.aJ.• s �ewx�, ,�e+k �!k6:. �,�r�'' �sa'� .) •. _"'°�,�,!. ':r ,t c_�'„%�.r''-s-. ".�z` amu: .:�a*,y..:•.., -tisk^.:.+.,`. r„'w',..:.�; �'!,•....° '•. �+eeY'+T", a. Jw.�"".":='-=.-•e»."•' ' `.t' > y: * �a, _.'_'"p, `,;"`"•r::�'a. -«?_:.,:. ..'.:vs',:�®+,.:i 'i7^' a A, 'U ,r <, •<. <aS•� ti.�:.. .. .,f`. �::. `~ -s .r, s'{.r 4,;,}a`y .east'`• p¢,'i.� :r;= :!G ,��• :w`?. . �a-d-'. -a:' � 'f ;tYy \•.� '' . } � ,' -,�a> -ani r;r r-: ,:'.' .-�'`.'•�..`, .'. ^'s= ...-"r<.:...=a :` y "�.xi�w"x�• .i��..�;� ,'"p'..`.'�, -mb,M1 ""4 ytXT',� M✓I�Ym^`F. ,"`.,e,, « '�•�'-e.""s°�y.,�,.. �$ .'' ,;�,�;yy�'� ;�•"£`l..?, vy,.'4 . wvi s.'' `J w> K r -'i•„ :, i,,. .- / ',�,,''S.,, >,Y ='^.tlwiwnl-s. +•war .: •"'^-!,.o.'Y,Mr i<�. i`>:r. "�'°':. .M?�,�v¢vR .,�<�;'�4. aAi• `` '.`yr '+� '._l >^`"t. .�� � `ry ..,4 ,+w. ,+w' iw �} ' z' 'iii.wl�f'6. "`.t> `' ,��y��'wr'� „M'Y,-, •$'t ` Y i�✓,{�'�'.•... _ k` !'x ---.'=Y st'': �' a- `', e - :.f,., t} "'Sat'i'' .,Lw9.-,•s�" . �^,.� "•`L�"'+.-..,'. `',"`,.�^.,�? �t�e� �. al`>g3-�,�,`•'.•i—• •' ^'''�`�'° �". ." ��.. ,�fP' �. .°!sf„3.•+ir• ..n " 'ry1id1 :h�::9'ww+3', .+r! .:F .. r°'•,'1q' .,dw' '�„`*4`�-°si' ..;a^ri .�,��':'`' ,r.ia' +>.: „�:'�°` �<.5� --f t. -'1:.'>-R',” � . ��'"�-'�:,Q`��'kywv..`y�,Y' >.•+�'„;�::-,�''!5 .�u ..y..,,,lyiµ7iwY. , ..$?.•6 � _ _ ..>:yr�',._ »� �.�3''�-+:. �P' `r>ta^.',�:.,'..':"'^_.S.V,"^a,.'E� .s�... .'ta,` !i��-=*'V•'.>. _ •6a�'':�5'a">+wY'„"y.,.y.."t. �Sw.•i ;^��^,4.",'•'�: '%"': rrw_ c. xB�.�, :- `.,.w.,,:.:+.«�,w,`•*,`'*.�_`w'sR-ir.; ^.,. ' °`"mow.„z �a-a„ .,.k ".'°F i•�.. �n,,� ''w� 6,,I u*i: ” �,^HMv,. „S �+��-ay',�,•�,..'.s§F� """�y.�� �a`�,.« •4nat���,�.'-3!°- .r T'>u+'"a,'r:7vxs. ..s. q-'>�•y.:mv t'„'�, R#,?°,'•".k' ^"` '.,^e' evw.:>! £ .: "! . 'gyp :` ^ faEy, _� a'A.�.^"t�'W. !�y- :. . , -L.':'"a-. `?' ^ ' aate�,,,� a,r' .-'>+. ^R4 w».�F,,_•> g Hve� � 'mayp�.i.-.,y..��--.£w�!!�S ^w.�w�a.�,..�q�,� r�� �".~..4 `� .Y �.`d, 5,�_ l.ew. 3 .,,y. �" i,T°r'aMtm "`>�444`h'. °^'M^ee%',�x+?' �F+,.°',- Ip`,d!„-°- +•b.£r"�;or .��' >e.'j4, "iT'�'", �li��w.i�'�,,` i11`:-.:"` 9'`,�' t� '�>' ""'Y+ ew�'� ��"'�« ':, '.,r. � -�' �;��, � \<�.«' S �t_,,•k:`4- . �.�< ,.s 'td'. -;§"yam "4%�x�`•-M;-T>„Y °�'�!+”-c,• ''' F.' a �•^S d:''A 'Z;+.1 •':P. .'�'d. � � r~ -� e ���t�`a.,r�e''.�'`-�a'k"",se P.'�Y,r.:.;�y.�,w � r'... ,.«e �+•g,� "- .�<�.'>C•,:'b,�•�� �v7`i {�,.�>r �# ..k�'�7.��;>r� t: r .s a'... 'a' - ^..yo ii•�+'yr-�:;, e, "°v:�;+Ai° - "�° yr"3';i 'qs�+;., howF+ 'a7,'"+rg, C . 1, ya,ar'4S' , µ Iry =. _ .�'r 's'» .., +..." �+.•. �- ai r` :'V 'r.• •}.�� a 4 •��, ie - "rb,., /�' •') .. '£i..w.; v.. x id. >�A ^' ,«tf`� �, � � ,-e"�,.�^Y„��`�.f� � .,�,y. eE ��- .ya..�?^'- �4. ...: ,: ;,.a..xs. ,•:.�'�"sx-#�... ,�y^mu��^. • a °° _7. '7� ;�', .,� _ y.?;�'9sw,r• •,Y e.,ad ���- T- �' p, ....,,,„, i.,ae <. � r � ^\ ti��.�r�.; _.'�' J*:>;,,. ..''�`:� .�fi• �`w :« `sit ``rao3i:'a ''c+`�`�'`'aE�s-;t z,e �op„s'"„".++'W""°" r } �;,�"' +'i.. �> R m,..t".a 'S:• ..,�,� 'ap` ;.:�.- ' 7Cyp��„ Y:� ;;''r'" . v, .� •+..,d, xy„ .. ', t• <i; <:,::"; �-a ' ryGi +`. `.�.-y)ca+8"�� s. ..aw., �.^:,. ,,,, :�7:s•e. .1.$'.t. i, :i. �' '" , h- ,,..s».!`>;'«'m?- .k..: �,-`°•3ti...'' ` ^+�.. `:.„'.r"""",yt 'r"`^�°;" :^:�•.,c>�.,: ��r'�*�"a '�.>^,::,<.tii-`.3,,:, «�,.1'i �• s,>.=:,>;., ..'l�•� d ..: it�. . e+.. � �4,*, �i'r '`"�,+'�"� "'":.•��-�.".'�'a.`�'�:�', i�„�.�.,....""'.«""!"""��..:.; n°'yw.P`'+>-:: r1i::� «w>:{tea. ".1L' .<: •.as.s«-�miu'�',�� �+'; j�tt��,,���� . '4":• >�p .sT'�`{. �.'�»' �` -,� ``'..2?W 'rS L„_ '-�nr-`,`'-'`fo �'!& 4}'i' 1. ��' •w.^,",..",a.i«,q>. v4^. ,.. _•.�.-,a. •'i'"" -t`.>-�- °s.'"`sw�...`«?'�-. s,'>"°-'�s"'t,�iz?1'a's'«-�'�.;,,Y•r�^e �,,��` t6� �,5;.< .y, •? a^'w:, �. ',, �'..m; i!�'i' l,t. Eb� "'�""'-`,'-v`.•aw.r;:4~��� ,i�i�„'zr!Re:^"„i.A•-=p«r, ty'. ,a, y,•w.,,,,»+!„y+w: .:`,►a"'TY: ,i,,:�vs^k...�F s.. ;. 'ate':° �<,•+a.. Z A..'".. ,s ;.. ;� <t++.�'-_ - �x _ ..;p : aw .'.?,�,v` ,,:*":r . ' i,'a..e ^ "r � =sir:: ,;�:> si_s,=�= vi . �. '�.._� ��"E�1..."`,'a.�,�-...:. :..�., �- . :.w: �' "n a!+sE'""�^•..:",eC"-'>r� �" ,�^'Yis�isi,$-' ��.+4+,ias..;•�:�'=`. ,•�°�.�`��+"''„-^�,;,, >, ' :�`s..= > i:.=, -.a ba> .- :"-r• .-.>.a•"i'"�;,: �:, 'i.`v�'> . ..'i - \'�" �.'�a.' �—,,.-' . . �` ++„iG :'^ -.-'' .sz`.r: '�p�'te!'?':.,1,,,,.•^K„•>. ..`,�`?-;:�; "`1..�a`.>=.7t' �",'7.».. ,„=a '<,;.;,,•;s,. ';i' ,'i�s�,jt'�`.;.,,: ��►�.:gs.K;�"; f�s..:5rr.-+^J+..' ,�..r '`+fcia.•'rw:.t-..,, ih. -�.P, a; "r^ ,w.•,.•.., p. -A ,N,,, .. •',':=,.:'' r 5;. xa-r.--„,..+ 'e;`"F.,w ``.,°.'":'^5 e;'S^a "�'aT '.y�±r!<:"•'.� •�"... =?, ,"ri'•;, :-�„�s,.�`�L^„�:;3�i.- .r'.`-:.• ..3. �.u� w� s•,-'.: '' <..3 t �s” �4 a«<,.:--� i'�”'"'.ri"'a„'i .'�:,y..., ' �"�>=^:��„n�. ?��a°`K` ^- ,r".:f ;;1..-•;3ki.<.::«';a�,�,+��> � •a....a..` y ;c�;=�'--..<`�:: ";,pw.a ,.awe•': '«,. :+-br", "�" - .•::£i;.:.�13 .'�'i;„^.>^y.,t.^a,.Y�'r'�r' _,''�'r,. ett y,a`a..m. , yra- ?"'�..< `s W� :_;.:«a.•.*.::��q'i. `°":.�","``S°a�: ,.a «'`','; ,h..v .._.p '!' "{"w w.`:'�ea8. �•-� T•• .�5. _•�`°��� �}-.°Y'^e •,,^,A°�"n`Yigy-+6t Yxw '">r �..,. 't;efi `ham".:: .. �r�°' ,r"✓".L ]'i,e .a^.. �"' -�t'cr: ,�„ ,e.�..rx�wat, ^';'•` •.-'=r'- .``^,�, �?�;Y�'-w_`."'� fin..;>,: ,....b, �• .,::«";.. """'.r.";.r;� ...��„:t,:, -az, k.""' .x* �t._"F>xa., -L.."""•'+^tk',.- WAS >�`°* :A'.",?,%; '. •,a.. gg:: i>r`+ ;r+Sa ••�� x$Y>'¢". - �J :&'e.°::.., w:'^°'Yk; "£.> +t>- 4m., :,a"YA1B^i''n'".i w. '•� :,'-4a.;.t J: L'. 3* '} '-e+•.. `'.; ' d.�;,.. "r' :.h4. "ei-'t> a5., >-"w'•*',.x;;)'e 47t- .a .»"f -t' "';�: �;•a. ,! a -r.`a.!'r. "et ., ns:°- .R v_ a;T"'" �L;`. "fit..«i, -•w.. .r,� 1}, +%„ .'.a`••,•. _i'_ a«: •ru••rnit....=,wiY tom_•' y' T.. .-�,,; a�':,°,-;_ ., ,"�.;. _ w7�„ <•.,;�•.�K .Re VIP' � "�"" ..�'..s`a , �:'' >an., yy. �,. *'',�_,+�'<7.''- .t' :,� '"i•' „,,,��`.+''-'`',�aC ., a ..,;z^",.:s.=.^4,�v je°.s�..>r��,0" 4.._;K�`�T'X"'�''' c�i.�^'�,'� i . �„' '?Po �,°`�c:.``; -.v.o-+w; , r:'e'_ 3 .3" � �\,r`A!'.r^ ..a•4'"f�'�r '»;'�A�ee = :.Riai '...'ew.r".yj-e-,.i`..Y'F'.='y_�»'°'^'y. >aP«',.. 'C,e,«; �rrs�.<^.;,t-. �%.� ��,"?".•`,r�w' o''^. 2'., -.r >�:. ., Tt�s. ilf!^.',��, ,r;. .aa`: s!.« 'i'5.�,`>e>::?�', .o-=:m+*,""�'m.`.�'w -.>'-_ r-;_`•. .3-_-. ,�. +:.ir, sE,, "v. '4.:-<e,.h,p,.,.,.'"�;`2,"�+,�xt';:.:,., a�.--sak .'.��rp-�:....,..: ,..; :;>.'�<.,iN^��sc. .:-►'}*,. ,++*i^:"" +�'„""v=- ="`" t - "_, i.%,t ..a v._-:-�• �`R _ „�' y.. �, � 'R.� k'.i .i;� °� i `�5::..v5�r«�..,:=-s.., s. i�• \�„' se' -r`. -. ,r _ �,�r. .a:a fi"”: _ -.r'?, �' r�"c. .�:,°:`.ti`x�.' �..'`'"-",^-�.'-•. p*ii''��,:�yr~«'�"�^'',. _ ,,-����;f:>,^ ,�.. L.r�-� 'amity •..,,..,, _,�,�. .:� 'E'��;!t _w �'S.A: as><u. '.;; - '.:;i. ..-rr�r`+s-..^K�,:rr'�r F"�•�=,' «.»,c)-a"�^^~;,_: �- '�a, .;. ,��.+��ir.".�r,e :�c,.a"; •-s',+�-�rT a�.�'�,�r"''^..;:.-+r�::.��pr�. �*;•`;: .. �sr�;,�..,,••,- :�; a-'w:�;.+k""`7; ;t �^iR;.. `r.. •?�.+�„w�Fys'''��js?�g""a�e _�..tw' '-W,".T,v>�: �,'.ry `�: ...o�,,,.. w"">�'�`:�.j�•ar.e'tvt�r... eq r•-..r^q,-`''»«"; r"'.;.' ..� : e �1 � R T *�"! ,.war°"��A� _.:ae:i-� 'i:•` f' � •.;�5':.--. �`'"a'"Si _ .Y?="` F' ....«x� w,s p»+^=+=•�... ;4 ..... �s>�„�rrp•�bc.>...+ i�'„�}^(,.,I�JS�I��., r�";��„ `-Y���'=-ar `yLa��= r�;��, '� "..•L '-y�:r .tet4L- R.,_...;,,,..r- <.r.wS 'Y::'•�"�"„a^^"oa M ?�.-� "i',e..�'�si39.,,.£r .•�"` .fy u4t">' Pte;`''::, nD'*; jE'n :'`: «s{'y^.,'_. '^+":"�+:'�'1.s:<:.,s> ,-:'° �: -.-.: •'^-,*,i a-zlot .` ° -?i ` >•1' ' ,^� ,t . rm ' a `>• S.",.` w..r s+. ,-..r aX aaw.` 7[, �} •�'.r�,-„' ��'^' w;,�',Ts. ��w.`''".,';i.�+.+,a-«-»�a'�.y `-�,wi>-"s:�;a ..,.s-• �,i.�...,,;:,`�s•^.: •v�:.e„ ,;�,.d�P'k +'a;a"� 'd�`:�'�':'anA� �.,M.t»<.>`"".'""'-f'„"'^en"s''°!+�% i �"^ �`�''!,/ � �:° + `4"a,t"ew„••ra -z:�,;,,° "t.,: :'�'YY” tS,':. �,,,, w� wv,).';"ip x � ra ,�:',.,,;.., ��S t }'�e•t !� x�.*�.�r,.-.as .�, ' F�'"$<,;aa.� �+".�"' '-�^'�, 's..'.�.s""�y,«�,�c" _ '��„ ,4`+ a�;-�:.'+ ;_.+.,>.y,� •� � � �� ^ � �',f�s't � v« S' ,,r�^"'�„ �•yb��'ro�y�.. "% '°� LNy�.��y �°'%;�h.-.., ;.:,,,,,,,. -, p' -r ♦ a �,�� ',�.,.,,,�,.�r' �, 411e°'!yz�♦M�i'4:.. ✓-�. 1, •�:�2:w.. � ^!a.- w- �i•A, ,as'..:,�.. �,�+�, ,r "'lr"" _ -;3.zm'..:.�.��^.^..if�.,'..,'•�,-w�,,,*�e„��.... -°�`J U✓ ,P -':>fa�dt . ��y°t'Y� 'r,<'tly' � ..'SS'.'g.%•3.a°"` �'"! �' ,, i > h �X,,` ,�1R`,;” `t� .mow ; f�°+x- r;o., '•�Y•�ky ..<:,,,,- _.:” e�->�;a�: ..sg,^s-t�=•�ag !rf 6S.pw::.-•' 'e'.",-`�,':t-.', a.;,. �'a�� �t�.`°'r4.''$�-��ar"'� a3t '�• .t rU. y ¢�'� '?` s.:«'.,'', z '�,y►,"`C"i � 4. %6>,, � `.+�.� , a� � C tl.+ke.a 'r�+� �-�r„ „F''Tii' . :p'?�j!iwt.'"":>?^��.r:a .4 �, m� i:'x.:.. � x };r•> �.E „yt .#! f � ^•'.<:-.e..:,:^'• ', h= ^� � •.s'� "t+#, 't''F`^9 '�.7r'.t � � .a �e:�" "a: ��'�iri Vow �+'€`•+�'" ' e`i^'.'. ':;�,;;%,•�,:,'"'':�„" w ;� -tjf� 4 A,• °R �!}--' - �t i��`', N!'!tl'esas3?''�r Q._3. •ate s �T•' '� �� i��'! ^�' '►i 1 ,Anty r�.:`!�`..a'#� � ':� � a,-. j �r: -,•_ :,cs,n`^-s »:� .s:'"- .:`4r":z-°"� "�'<T a 7, ► :e a '\L >&` 1'1. %:' x✓%'"" >.�a' <'f _'`". - i. „ * .g, x! of -•^.. ..,y.; ��,1a,"al! 3 M I ry R ' tf},., E>.,''ii4`". "cs,- .�y . ,;f',e> a=.a1$�sFrpr �'9•.tire,✓i:.'•,�-.✓X/''''g."�.-.`:ei,>yt ,, -,M}... °,"»:>r.��=:r.R'-,.�a«.,4"^$k"�yttxrr,�'! M+„="p�p.',y� ���Ttil.yl.Es��{Y.,4YyIo,t'--f'-,J....z:«�'.r,.<*�a°"',•� ;., ♦�..,a,.�i.''r""s=.P Y >,• ' q ft.g' 1`,� 74111 '�.vOr� "er:�ys, �,:�"•.;•'•f a• xy�, i-.,+,,', ;' ,.,a', a, V,r, r e'- i" a f:, ��,�. • I:� � w. 4s+. �i�fra�`#r- `�°�r ., '''scy' � �..� .,�y,ixi ••�,.'� " ,,i.,�'. $.�, t�` ;•i.;e �°� °`�s�:�^^Y!!fY`c= <t` t "'pi's.°. .. �''' .a^te'a'sµ � � �+wa {f "$ `rt'., F., sd � r' t{ �" "`>s � ♦. Ms�i - •�l,.a„'�>' °,x `< ;' ''C�`"'•a'.-.....- t > a>:rk � < �o.'° •�: .... •,r ,..''". .,a:.: '' `� � 1...rne.,..L�L�r„'^air .. } HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTV ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 11 OCTOBER 2011 ADDRESS 1238 E. WAYNE STREET DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER DONNA PANGBURN WORK: COMPLETE TEAR OFF AND RE -ROOF 1 1 OCTOBER RECEIVED COA APPLICATION IN THE MAIL. SENT WAYNE OUT TO PHOTOGRAPH HOUSE. VERIFIED THAT ROOFING MATERIALS WERE ASPHALT SHINGLES. ISSUED RME-COA AND SENT IN MAIL. CERTIFICATE = OF APPROPRIATENESS Tim Musczinsid, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Complete tear off of roofing materials._ Repair/replace decking as necessary. "Install ice and water shield and felt paper, Install Certainteed Landmark (30year) architectural shingles. " HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF . - SOUTH BEND I AND JOSEPH COUNTY AJ CONSTRUCTION OF OSCEOLA, LLC, Contractor for the following location: 1238 East WAYNE Street South South Bend, IN 46615 East Wayne Street Application No. 2011-1011 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: . Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours.' CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Donna J. and Michael Pangburn DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 10/11/2011 - PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler 66" Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County - City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSjCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.htn-d OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received // t1e# ,b_.20// Application Number -.9-0 Past Reviews: � (Date of Inst Review) /j [j NO Staff Approval authorized by: (� Title: /v Historic Commission Review Date: E] Local Landmark Eil'foeal Historic District (Name) to • [U� Ej National Landmark 0 National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied E] Tabled [_j Sent To Committee 5Kpproved and Issued Lf&,'A � DATE Address of Property for proposed work: Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) 1 0 n nCA_ P_ ('i r- 5ghu r n Address of Property Owner(s): X2.-3 6 C t/,)t.�n e Af . J Contractor(s)Name: 'A--4'" Josi-lu r\ N- i t ,l - Contract Company Name: A-V C ONST e_l i u lit 1s c> t- C)5(. E O L R, t- L. L Contractor Address: r29 -LAR City: D'. C.e 00� -- /nnI � U(U�IP ( Phone:..5-74 - &1 4 -NZZ& Current Use of Building: .`moi nI)) e- # G rni l �o �J (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial —Government —Industrial —Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: w o U A -Fr L•i rrc (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one box may be checked) 7 Description of Proposed Work:' t • ��+toor of ro�`f lY2GfD{'1�15� / ✓ t et At'1�j �l/,s tiu ltCg-jut,7' i (.Selye', -1 9'_1('- f 'Peel I f L LG9/JGIIY) i C ) r. Y h fel /ti wl ✓f t) f"T Owner/Contractor: Fax: 5 7H - to 1 q " Ci Lt I O e-mail vt s1rIA ( YN Cc, S h We a 1 • to e f (This will-corres�rnt rth g•n of ^des' ) f and/or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — HISTORIC PRESERVATION O SOUTH BEND ♦ JOSEPH COUNTV ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 13 OCTOBER 2011 ADDRESS 802 LELAND DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER FEC LLC WORK: COMPLETE TEAR OFF AND RE -ROOF 12 OCTOBER WORKED STOPPED ON ROOF WITHOUT PERMIT OR COA. PHOTOGRAPHED PROJECT IN PROGRESS. RYNO MANAGEMENT APPLIED FOR IN-KIND COA FOR RE -ROOF. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic. Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC®co.st josephinus Website httpr//www.sqosephcountyindfimcom/s chp/indmhtml OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COMMINID IN TINS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received X02 Application Number 2LO AV Z Past Reviews: []YES (Date e f tact ReuLQ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District pvame) National Landmark . E] National Register District pvame) Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied ❑ Tabled E] Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 'go n treet and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (please print) l / Address of Property Owner, cKS Contractor(s) Name: _jrt?E 04712— Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: r C} LSP f �- S� City: Phone: Current Use of Building: (Single Famil Multi -Family — Commeraal —Government — Industrial —Vacant -etc.) Type of Building Constructio (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone - Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New. [] Replacement (not in-kind) Demolition (more than one box Wray be checW) L Description of Proposed Work: _CO A Pt- 6T� '7'�A � F� 4 �� /2A�F Lt1 /Tff ��S�iFi¢L? r4�C�• ,591,-tq cr-.5 - z/csf�r_,e_ kW 77-e- ! AGE Owner/Con F e-mail (This of 1a wiil d only one ) and/or — APPLICATION REQIIIRF.MMS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — CERTIFICATE OF 'j , Tim Klusczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Install New Roof. Complete Tear Off and Re -Roof with Asphalt Achitectural shingles; install water and Ice Shield. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ORTIZ CONSTRUCTION, Contractor for the following location: 802LELAND South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2011-1012 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9575 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours.' CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: RYNO Management on behlaf of FEC LLC DATE PERMIT 10/12/2011 TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTV ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 19 OCTOBER 2011 ADDRESS 225 HAMMOND DISTRICT RIVER BEND LHD RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER PENNY AND .TAMES HUGHES WORK PROPOSED: REMOVE DYING MAPLE TREE IN TREE LAWN AND REPLACE WITH TREE 18 OCTOBER STAFF RECEIVED FAX FROM BRENT THOMPSON CONCERNING TREE AT 225 HAMMOND 19 OCTOBER WAYNE PHOTOGRAPHED TREE AND STAFF ISSUED COA#201 1.1019 PER PERMIT #229 FROM :SBPARKSANDREC FAX NO. :2994784 Stephen L Lueeke, Mayor October 18, 2011 ? W.W22229 Oct. 18 2011 10:47AM P3 Ak,A, - A., >,7O R 37ENO -........... PARKS A'T'IC�l'� DEPARTWNNtwdri 1rMi�wwwiit t�ta nV6iV+iJ IinNilOWlidnulu+ue, lIL.!Ii111WliJllw.uilunm h Executive Director Philip L. St. Ci* ,Department of Public Parks South Bend Indiana Property Owner 225 Hammond St. South Bend, IN 46601 Permission is hereby granted. 'to the above to remove (t) dend/dying Norway maple tree in the tree lawn of the properly at: ' 225 Hammond St. Note: Property Owner's Responsibility. Department of Public Parks omni 2fiom, psora Brent Thompson, City Forester Sec. 19-19. Removal of hazardous trees by property owner, order, notice, 4sncrgcucy removal. (a) Every owner of real estate within the City shall xcmove or trim any tree or shrub or any part thereof located on suoh teal estate or in tho tree and lawn areaa in front of sueb teal estate which maybe dead, d: seased, tinsightly, in a condition which is injurious or detrimental to the public health and safety or the growth of u jaecnt trees or which may project over the public strect on which such real estate abuts in such manner as to obstruct the free passage of pedestrians and vehicular traffic on such public streets. (b) The Board of Park Commissioners shall have the power and the authority to order and r:quire such owner to remove any such tree or shrub by first causing notice to be served on such owner in the maattcr provided in section 19- 21 not less than ten (10) days prior to the time desigdatcd in such notice for the removal or trimming of such tree or shrub. (e) In case of an immediate necessity for any such removal or trititming by reason of storm sr other emergency, such removal or trimming may be done by the Board of park Commissioners or its Superintend=: of Parks, and no notice whatever nocd be given thereof. Sec 19-15. The Board of Park Commissioners shall have the right, power and authority to: (1) require the owners ofparcels of land bordering on any public street of the City to grade, sod, plant and maintain in proper condition the tree lawn area and the sweet centers in front of the parcels of land and (2) Require such owners to plant and maintain shade or ornamental trees in such areas. 321 East Walter Street • South Bend, Indiana 46614.574-299-4765 Parks Adtnittistration Fax 249-4783 9 Recreation Fax 299-4?84 FROM :SBPARKSANDREC FAX NO. :2994784 Oct. 18 2011 10:47AM P2 Stephen J. Lueeke, Mayor October 18, 2011 James P. & Penny D. Hughes 1918 Southern View South Bend, IN 46614 Re: 225 Hammond St Dear Property Owner: Certificate of Approval from Historic Preservation (River -Bend Historic District) is required before work can begin. We wish to notify you that you have tree/trees on your real estate, wldch is/are violating Chapter 19 of the Municipal Code of South Bend. The existing situation is this: There is/are (1) dead/dying/hollow Norway maple tree in the tree lawn of your real estate, on said property, at 225 Hammond St. This condition could pose a potentially dangerous situation. This tree must be removed. We certainly hope that you will help us now by complying with th.- City Ordinance for trimming/removal of the said tree under Chapter 19 of the Muni,,ipal Code of South Bend. We wish to avoid any possible damage to persons and/or property. It is necessary that you give this situation your immediate attention. If you should. have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 299-4768, ext. 249 Thank You, BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA Brent �iompson Brent Thompson City Forester Ref: 163 321 East Walter Strnot • South Bend, Indiana 46614. 574-295-4765 Parks Administration Fax 299-4783 • Recreation Fax 299-4784 5 1. FROM :SBPARKSANDREC FAX NO. :2994784 Oct. 18 2011 10:46AM P1 J'{��fai� F�l~,�i17 �•' a ~��! ��,,�,orfor.. � • PARKS � �M .l . . ' ��i'.�.RT�vl��fii' ,. , , ... • ,., , � . 4 HE a • 329 East Walter Sireet South-Bend,JN. 46614 Phone: 574-2994768 Fax: 574299.4784' ax, To: f� /}/ /� �\J From: Parc Pages: Phon`7 •" , - . ! Date: e: i Re: r1 urgent. lik)'rReview ❑ Please Cotta lent Pple"e'Reply ] plexi a "Cie e comments: CERTIFICATE OF Tim Musezinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove one dead/dying maple tree in tree lawn per Brent Thompson, City Forester with Parks Permit #229. Tree could pose a potentially dangerous situation. Replant with an appropriate tree per River Bend LHD Guidelines. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST, JOSEPH COUNTY TBD, Contractor for the following location: 225 HAMMOND South Bend„ IN 466oi River Bend APPlication No. 2011-1019 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (5?4) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours.' CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Penny and James Hughes DATE PERMIT io/i9/2011 TAIM FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 26 OCTOBER 2011 ADDRESS 424 LAMONTE DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER M. SHEREE LAPORTE- WORK: COMPLETE TEAR OFF AND RE -ROOF; RE -BUILD CHIMNEYS. I 1 JULY 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR SBHIP GRANT FOR 424 LA MONTE COMPLETED BY HPC AND RETURNED TO COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 26 OCTOBER BID SPECIFICATIONS AND COPY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FAXED TO HPC. PHOTOGRAPHS TAKEN AND COA ISSUED. `t. 4 CERTIFICATE OF - APPROPRIATENESS. Tim Musminski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Complete tear off to bare wood decking, re -roof with ashpait shingles; new gutters and downspouts. Rebuild west side and rear brick chimneys to match existing. HISTORIC . PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND 4T. nxn JOSEPH COUNTY TRI -M CONSTRUCTION, INC., Contractor for the following location: 424 LAMONTE South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2011-1026 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: 0 Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. the issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the . State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9575 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. ' CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT. M. Sheree La Porte DATE PERMIT ' io 26 2011 TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director — POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. -'r".w b`'Ft�k y'� S, 3skjj7qp��y ��u�, d ✓� , E.� �td �.ax^'��,��'� ,'~ } '+�',+rt+M�r,{tlu�• r!.'� !^.., y <. tj `��.r{y.-1'•a r( It�rt� ,r I' �'�� `�-ry�' �"... �}fpt�� � �y"��e1 � °�'F`i'��t�i+.' -•� ♦� ; 4 � ' 7r k, y+5, Fy )� 4r�'rY�. +'�3t' ��ja F�� -:� � r .�,i_ +�J���, 5 '� ' '^�``A�'" 1-c . e � •� cj "�•;� er. 1 � .'., < t1 �i 1 � r ���"�i {..a rte" °��� �,� � ir; :� ��� �r�M Vt ��. . t �� �4r. 5 . .a '"` �.1��p���,t "� � vk• �F.;' � fit• ,}c �"�3gfr ...� "kms' , Y;.; i- t '• �,�.i��^.- € .; 'fix p'. 3 i ,7,,tf��}�..R �•Y - f "' Ea�� ?` .rr *�� � ��rf* .:, najy,� � rr�TM•��r �*r � 1,3��x• � �� �,-� 's« ,2�� ��"`' ..y. \ :tom .}i•" �'' l.yr• th�tYlt� .r Y7',,� t ,�„r,.•,r r,�� v. t �' a��^�j �", �� , ��"�� y,F v�°�_s�J'•. ;��' �� ,'ate �• � 'fit s , r rr r .,: :. } t,�. ,:•. � ;:1 �F - s '.�-''kk s, � : 7 . F„, + 2... - ,r,,�',.qt �, � f • � r �..7Fh1� Froc City of South Bend To:82359578 10/26/2011 11:52 #478 P.0041004 1200 CouNrr-CnY BLUDING 227 W JF rvwN BouLwAm Souni Ev o, INDIANA 46601-1830 No4 574/ 235-9371 FAX 574/235-9021 TDD 5741235-5567 CITY of SOUTH BEND STEPHEN J. LUE.CKE, MAYOR COMMUNITY & EcONOMIc DEW-LOPMENT ,JEFFREY V. GIBNEY LxEctrrtvE DiREEcroR Property Address: 424 LaMpute Tcnm Property Owners: Porte 234-2095(h) 344-92400 Date: BugW 1, 2011 Inspector: Tag otrne Program: JL.,ttt a Revak& 1Mvrovement Logr Bid Specifications Roof 1 Tear -off all roof coverings down to bare wood deck on all surfaces. Replace or repair all deteriorated framing members and sheeting. On all areas install 7/16" OSB sheathing over decking to provide level and adequate nailing surface for new roofing, then with new " NIUM-UDL" Sv_ nthetic Roof Undedayment or approved equal, premium (1-1/2") metal drip edge along all roof edges, appropriate pipe boots and Owens Corning or Cora -Vent brand corrugated vinyl roof ridge vent for proper attic ventilation, needed transition flashing, step and counter flashing at vertical transitions. Install Ice & Water shield along roof eaves and in valleys. Install 235-240 lb. Oakridge dimensional, or GAF Timberline dimensional or approved equal on all pitched roof surfaces a one ply EPDM rubberized roof system or,an approved equal on low slope areas. Cap shingles are to be an exact color match and are to be manufactured by the same company as shingles. NOTE: This home has a side bay window area on west side of building. Roof replacement is to include the replacement of the metal roofed surface with a new matching metal roofing product manufactured to match existing material, size, style and design. Replacement is to include needed new flashings, seam, and walls sealants to prevent moisture infiltration. Gutters: 2 Furnish and install new white or brown .027 ga. aluminum seamless gutters and downspouts on home matching existing style and design. Gutters and downspouts shall be hung and secured in a manner that effectively carries away storm water. Down spouts shall be installed so all gutters are serviced by at least one. Install minimum 60" downs;wut extension with elbows at terminal ends of each downspout, all are to extend at least to lawn areas. 3 Rebuild west side and rear brick chimneys by replacing all spalled or deteriorated brick then re -pointing of all loose or deteriorated mortar joints. New brick shall match existing as close as possible. Mortar joints shall be tooled and the color of mortar shall match existing as close as possible. If needed repair or replace beveled concrete cap on both. Protect adjacent roof areas from tuck -pointing debris. $ 1 TOTAL Company Name: Date: CommuNiTy DEvLWrMEAT Ecoxohuc DEvELOPMEw FWA1.IciAL & PROGRAM PAM -%C. MEYER DONALD E. INKS MANAGEMW $741235-9660 $741235.9371 EUYA6E?N LEONARD FAX- $741235-9697 5741235.9371 From:City of South Bend To:82359578 10/26/2011 11:50 #478 P.001/004 1200 CoLINrr-Crnr BLUDING 227W.JEFFERSON BOULEVARD Soum BEND, INDIANA 46601-1830 PRONE 574/ 235-9371 FAX 574/235-9021 CITY OF So= BEND STEPHEN J. LUEC.KE, MAYOR COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ,JEFFREY V. GIBNEY Fax EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Organization: Historic Preservation FAX #574-235-9578 Attn: Catherine Hostetler From: Kaye Trowbridge Fax: 235-9469 Phone: 235-5880 Date: October 26, 2011 Subject: Order titlework - Junior Loan Policy Pages: 4, Including Cover Page Comments: With this fax, we are submitting an Application for Certificate of Appropriateness for the home owned by Marilyn Sheree LaPorte at 424 Lamonte Terrace, South Bend, IN 46616. The South Bend Home Improvement Program (SBHIP) will be doing the following exterior repairs on the home: New Roof & Gutters Rebuild West Side and Rear brick chimneys Attached, also, is a copy of the Bid Specifications and the signed Environment Review Form. Your consideration toward our application will be very much appreciated. Kaye T. 235-5880 ktrowbri@southbendin.gov COMMUNrIY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL & PROGRAM PAMELA C. MEVER DONALD E. INKS MANAGEMENT 574/235-9660 574/235-9371 ELIZABETH LEONARD FAX. 574/235.9469 5741235-9371 From:City of South Bend To:82359578 10/2612011 11:51 #478 P.0031004 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST JUL 13 2011 SUBGRANTEE COMPLETES: ,� -n J0 1. Project Name: s2 Olt - 2. Project Description: 3. Address:__ � /Z&/ 4. Is project located near obvious source of noise, i.e.., railroa industry, main arterial, or state highway? Yes_ No_!::�_ (Circle the one(s)-which apply?) 5. Does the project involve AM of the following: (a) Increase in dwelling units? Yes_ K0_2�� (from units to _ units) (b) Changes in zoning? Yes_ Nq_X_f (c) Rehab costs will be over 75% of estimated replacement value alter rehabilitation? Yes_No ' completed by: Date: - C U HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMPLETES! 1. The property is listed on or eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic Place;: Yes No ✓ 2. The property is a contributing structure in an historic district: Yes v, No 3. Comments:� /d'9y •tltl.urtr�c. �ffDL' A Completed by: Date: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPLETE: 1. Environmental Determination: (Jw-[� A, Q, 2. Is project in HUD identified floodplain: Yes_ No—& Panel#AS1!AAC1* D TIN 3. Comments: Completed by: Date :2 If YES is checked for any of the above, appropriate measures will be taken to insure project is in compliance with federal requirements. Copies: White to Sub Yellow to H.P. Pink to E.D. From:City of South Bend To:82359578 Application -FOR- 10/26/2011 11:51 Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 466501 Mailing Address: County -City Bui)dingI South t3end, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 - Email: SBSjCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us Website: 1-ittp://,Aw-A,.sqosephcounqindianacom/sichp/index.html #478 P.0021004 a OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONMINEV IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received a6 L16t a0!/ Application Number jg.0 //— _ JQ,Z G Past Reviews: [PfhrJ (Wafr of L0 Review) [] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: _&ze1W1 Historic Commission Review Date: [_j Local Landmark cal Historic District (.Dante) ,RIF K:gl / - [_ National Landmark EKI�atlonal Register District (tvan,e) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied [] Tabled [ Sent To Committee (Approved and Issued'��� DATE Address of Property for proposed work:_� �{ -�A) t S- J i reit Nunrbrr and Sf ert No Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print`) Address of Property Owner(s): --y ;LH Contractor(s) Name: ` TJV�k Contract Company Name: 1�-t! l— I6AI Contractor Address: 5 `9 4 5' o LL tn� �� City: sn�`,V S� Phone:�� Current Use of Building:_51-A}le Fl�lt l � em- 1-DObC%e I �ithyle Family -Multi -Amity - Commercial- Governmeat - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building; Construction: WOOD F:9-ftYy\G (WA)d Frame - Brick - Stonr - Sted - Concrete - Ofhet ) Proposed Work: Ain -kind [] Landscape C1 New Replacement (int in-kind) [ Demolition (mom fhan one bay may be rhWI-cd) Description of Prod�'q sed Work: J � 16W. .. �- � �� WiOO AIt:--.7i) (S-Il.,tkk �--I)OW lt)S06 LOM. KJ'5- 9'.p' -p— bKxcy Chi rn,� Owner/Contractor: ('fhc� t+{in r' trill tronxsjxirui tnith nnty nur d+MiS rtrc) yy�pAt)N CE�i-isfi car 1' a: ,- is l; {n c�trP P 1,,r- P, Gf 77, -0 and/or... ._.. ........... ......._ _ — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — HISTORIC ! COMMISSION or SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 28 SepFEma ;R 2011 ADDRESS 231 EDDY DISTRICT LOCAL LANDMARK RATING OUTSTANDING HOMEOWNER PHILIP H. SCHATZ WORK PROPOSED REMOVAL OF STORM DAMAGED PEAR TREE; INSTALL ELECTRIC WARMING WIRES AND OUTLET IN REAR GUTTERS 28 OCTOBER RECEIVED COA APPLICATION AND TWO CHECKS FOR $15.00 IN MAIL. CONTACTED BILL STOREY AT ERASMUS BOOKS TO HAVE PHIL CALL ME. PHONE CONVERSATION WITH PHIL, RELATED THAT ONLY ONE CHECK WAS NEEDED. SPOKE WITH CUSTOM AND MOORE ABOUT TREE AND CONFIRMED THAT IT NEEDED TO COME DOWN. VISITED SITE AND SPOKE WITH PHIL AND RETURNED EXTRA CHECK. TRIM WORK WAS BEING DONE ON ELM TREES. THE PEAR WAS HALF DEAD AND DETERIORATING CLOSE TO FENCE AND OVER SIDEWALK. GAVE COA TO PHIL FOR REMOVAL OF TREE AND ELECTRICAL WORK. CERTIFICATE OF 'tea �� : a ► /'' ,� APPROPRIATENESS Tim Klusczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove ornamental pear tree in rear yard that is dying from storm damage per Custom & Moore, Arborists. Install electric warming wires in gutters at rear of house and outlet by Steve Weber Electric. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY STEVE'S ELECTRIC, INC., Contractor for the following location: 231 EDDY South Bend, IN 46617 Application No. 2011-1028 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: ❑ Located in a Local Historic © A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Philip H. Sdhatz DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 10/28/2011 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catheirne D. Hostetler POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 - Fax 574-235-9578 - Email: S%jCHPC®co.st josephin us Website: hV://www.s§oseplicountyindiana.com/sjchp/indexhtml OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COArA[NED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received eta 066 oW -1 j Application Number PZ42_/ �— - /0 0? 09 Past Reviews: L s (D„teoflast Review) F1 NO StafFApproval authorized by- TI{)e: Historic Commission Review Date: ' [cal Landmark 0 Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark [] National Register District Mame) Cettiflcate of Appropriateness: F] Denied E] Tabled E] Sent To Committee [�'�pproved and Issued Wt? DATE Address of Property for proposed work: DL'3 - 11 1 y Street Nnn�and Strt Nar Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) ee Address of Property Owner(s): oz'+ G�- Contractor(s) Name: W Contract Company Name: r=Ftvtil �p Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building: C+ (Single Fami7u - Mrdti-Family - Commercial - Governmen - Ind nstrinl - Vacant - et ) Type of Building Construction: ! °tt.rtt 4 Cf+ (Wood Fraine - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind E] Landscape 21"Rew [:] Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one box may be checker!) _ Description of Proposed Work:►- C' M ®'v %-.® C ` ..sa Owner/Contractor. Fax: (This office Wl correspond with only/ one designee) and/or e-mail — APPLICA770N REQLUREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE - m Director's Report November, 2011 19 October Researched Howard Park Fountain donated by Studebaker Family for Gary Gilot and sent pictures for his reference. Volunteered to do a "virtual tour" of South Bend for German Exchange students at the Library. Created PoNver Point presentation for that event with Elicia. 20 October Finished Power Point Presentation and presented at Library to 50 students, host families and teachers. General Oflice work and 2011 Budget wrap up. Compiled the Marquette National Register Nomination and mailed to DHPA. 21 October General Office work. Payroll. Continued work on Budget. Participated in a reception at the Conservatories thanking the contributors for die new floor in the Muessel-Ellison between 5:00-7:00. 24 October Morning tour of East Wayne Street District on fi>ot with Elicia. Afternoon tour on foot with Elicia of Chapin Park. Coordinated meeting on 27 October with Dana Groves in New Carlisle to review transportation grant for the 106 process. Issued RME for re -roof at 418 LaMonte. 25 October General Office work. Turned in Code Violation at 209 E. Navarre for a roof without a permit. Attended Lunch and Learn. Met with Phil St. Claire and Mike Dyszkiewicz who requested letter verifying BSSB grant of 060,000.00. Attended Redevelopment Commission meeting about the properties HPC has an interest in: 803 W. Washington (fagade Easement) and the Rushton (LL). The City will purchase 803 W. Washington from John Freidline for 0441,000.00; John will then donate 030,000.00 plus two years in taxes for Indiana Landmarks to take control of the building and do the repairs and position it with investors or tenants. The City will also invest TIF funds in the Rushton which will then be converted by South Bend Heritage in to low -moderate housing for 55 year old residents; federal tax credits will be applied for this project. Todd mentioned windowreplacement. I will meet with Marco Mariani to discuss this and get David Duval's take on this. 26 October Prepared and delivered letters requested by Phil St. Claire for BSSB concerning 2009 Grant. Received request from ND School of Architecture visiting assistant professor, Selena Anders concerning the design for an archives building for the SJC Library and joining her class for a walking tour on 7 November. Phone call from Yavonne Corbet current owner of LL Yesterdays about the affect of the Granger sewer wort: on her landmarked property; notably the installation of "grinder pumps". SHPO said no historic properties affected. This happened last time with the highway expansion on US23 because the SHPO thinks that the context and the interior of the house have been altered too much. 27 October Contacted Jessica Clark, County Engineer and was referred to Bret at Whiteman -Petri who sent me the file with the photographs. He referred me to Max Henschen, Senior Environmental Mgr. for Indiana Finance Authority/SRF Programs who sent me the diagrams and other information The funding for the project is coming from die State Revolving Loan Fund Qack Fisher). Basically these grinder pumps are to be placed in the utility easements; but if there is no easement then eminent domain will be invoked. Other than Yavonne Corbet being vehemently opposed to the Granger Sewer Project, along with 70% of the other residents, the affect on her property would be like that of having a street light post or a utility control box installed. Since the property is located on a heavily developed, commercial highway, I agreed with the SHPO that there would be no adverse affect. Met with Intern prospect Hannah Blad. Elicia and I went to New Carlisle and met with Dana Groves of Historic New Carlisle to review the 106 transportation improvement project on site with her. There is some objection to the project by business owners to the west of downtown because of hampering their snow removal. Inside tour of 815 Arch with Elicia at the invitation of Jason Pfledderer. He also said that the house on Lafayette is for sale until Spring; if it is unsold then the owner will remove the current siding and reside it. 28 October Gina from Edgewater called twice concerning 557 Edgewater work approved by the Commission and claiming that the homeowner was turning her front yard into a parking lot. Completed 6 106 Reviews for Grants. Prepared RME for 231 Eddy for pear tree removal in rear of house along with the installation of heat wire in the gutters with an outlet in the rear; delivered the COA along with the extra $15.00 check Philip Schatz sent. Notified Yvonne that presently the HPC could find no adverse affect for this project; sent her the link that she requested for the HPC website. On site visit at 557 Edgewater with Elicia to determine the extent of the project with the neighbor's complaint. The project is more extensive that the 6" of sod removal requested and granted in the COA 2011-0428. The driveway tapers so the area of new concrete poured started out at about 8 inches at the top and then flared out to about three feet at the sidewalk. The front yard was not converted into a parking lot. Toured the West North Shore neighborhood and noted that the vacant house was now being worked on. Verified an address for a project at 908 Leland; converting a second storey door to a window in the rear of the house. Dropped off Forum information on Community Redevelopment to Pete's campaign headquarters. 31 October Researched 1855 Court Room Jury Box configuration for Jerry Werntz 277 9664. The County is considering returning die Court Room to Jury trials and moving the Traffic and Misdemeanor Courts to the County City Building. Contacted Christeeter concerning assistance on historic signage by providing research on the WPA projects in the area. Reviewed latest version of the Sons of Israel Nomination by Kurt Garner and sent back recommendations. Turned in fees for October. Prepared for November 7 Special Meeting. 1 November Began Preparations for 7 November Special meeting; contacted Tribune for legal announcement. Contacted Jeremy Roschyk of DLZ about project description for work proposed in Leeper Park East. Confirmed scheduling of' tour for 40 Notre Damc Students of' Selena Anders at 1:30 on 7 November. 2 2 November Meeting with Colleen of the CVB at Office. Worked on National Register nominations. 3 November Attended meeting in Room 1308 with Greg Kil and BSSB with the Redevelopment Commission and affirmed the availability of the $60,000.00 in grant money for the Conservatories. 4 November Prepared for the 7 November Tour with DTSB. Attended meeting with Greg Kil at the Conservatories about the proposed design changes. Attended Miclikma History Group meeting in Plymouth and toured Marshall County Museum. Met with Kurt Garner about terminology in the SOI NR. 7 November Met with Steve Szaday about accepting the Preservation Specialist position in 2012 after Wayne retires in November. Reviewed COA for carport at 725 Park. Gave Now & Then tour of South Bend to Notre Dame students for Selena Anders. Prepared for Special Meeting at 5:30 and made presentations. 8 November Office Closed for Election Day 9 November Reviewed changed on SOI nomination. Prepared COAs for 21 November meeting. 10 November Prepared meeting packets and mailed. 11 November Office Closed for Veterans Day 14 November Attended the Finance Committee meeting for the Northern Indiana Center for History. Worked with new homeowners, Sophie White and Charles Barber, of 219 W. North Shore for RME-COA to remove dead/dying junipers in front yard per Arborcare. Sent Local Contractor Listing in e-mail. Photographed house and dropped off brochures and COA along with Guidelines. Photographed the demolition of Larry Schohl's Riverside rental property. 15 November Attended 7:30 Rotary Board meeting- NR Howard Park is scheduled to be Rotary's Centennial project. Followed up on Howard Park fountain with Mike and Phil St.. Claire about die Studebaker Fountain. Attended CVB luncheon with St. ,Joseph County Parks and Studebaker Museum staff. Researched Studebaker signage; prepared RME for meeting and complied information for Director's Report. 16 November Posted Agendas and Closing notices. Met with Brian Haygood, Chief Inspector for Code concerning the Carriage House at 710 Park; Code has determined that it should be demolished. Contacted Larry Meteiver on the issue, he suggested that Code apply for the COA on behalf of die homeowner to get the process in motion. Staff prepared Report after receiving the application and letter from Code and Wayne's pictures of the Carriage House. Wayne and I met with Sidney Blanclhett about her dispute with Sheriff-Goslin and die botched roofing job and subsequent damage to her roof and ceilings. Gave her a copy of the Contractors Listing and Wayne made recommendations for interior plaster craftsmen. 17 November Created Meeting dates and COA deadlines for 2012. General 011ice work and evaluation of' 2011 106 Reviews to date for City and County. Created a Project flow chart for Office projects to date, including National Register nominations. Follow up meeting with Sidney Blancliett concerning roof and contractors. Spoke with Semi Fimbel of Union Station and at his request set tip meeting at Union Station for 10:00 am on 22 November to discuss some work that they propose for a wall behind, but not attached,to the building. 18 November On-site meeting at request of homeowner of 728 Leland to replace rear doors with one double unit containing an operable door and a fixed pane. Took photographs, wrote staff report and e-mailed to Commissioners for their consideration to add to Monday's Agenda. Followed up on some issues with the Sons of Israel and mailed draft of National Register Nomination to DHPA. E I' ` Assistant Director's Reoort HPC Meetina 11.21.2011 1. Local Landmarks -Developing a list of a few Staff identified potential Landmarks. a. Correspondence with John Hendershot regarding window restoration at Central High --)artments and five storey zoning concerns at the former Wharf site next to Stephenson Mills Apartments impeding the views. Follow up with Building Department. b. Rushton -Attend Redevelopment Commission 10.25 meeting on account of "Memorandum of Understanding with South Bend Heritage Foundation for development of the Rushton Building". c. Leeper Park -Conversation with Martha Kline discussion her concerns and to talk about volunteers. Meeting with Martha, Diana Mendelson, and Catherine to discuss the present condition of the park and volunteer efforts. Reviewing 1995-1997 HPC meeting minutes to determine the Leeper Landmark Ordinance #. d. Fire station #4 1240 Thomas -Correspondence with Eric Boyd, an interested buyer of the building. Attend Code hearing that ended up cancelled due to owner's absence. 2. Local Historic -Districts -Exploring the concept of Neighborhood Development Committees and the Liaison program. Review HPC Ordinance and consider enforcement improvements. Conversation with Chuck Bulot of the Building Department on how HPC Pres Specialist might work more efficiently with Building to place "Stop Work Orders" on unapproved projects. Touring East Wayne Street and Chapin Park with Catherine. Reporting a concrete repair to Wayne for inspection. Visit property at 815 Arch in Edgewater to preview interior improvements. Tour West North Shore with Catherine. Inspection at 908 Leland regarding 2nd door removal. Inspection at 557 Edgewater regarding previous flatwork COA. Correspondence with Chapin Park Liaison regarding a property at 846 Forest replacing a front porch balustrade and rail without a COA, prepare memo to Gary Goddard of the Building Department and follow up with Wayne. Inspection at 728 Leland for rear door COA. Staff Reports - a. 725 Park -carport. Tour Chapin Park and other districts for examples. b. 813 Ashland -window replacement (no COA). 4. Routine Maintenance Exclusions - a. 725 Park -brick pavers, expansion. b. 557 Edgewater -rear storm door. 5. National Register of Historic Places - a. Sons of Israel Synagogue -Reviewing nomination submitted by Kurt Garner. Working with Catherine to send it to the SHPO. b. West LaSalle Street District -Correspondence with Kurt. — - 6. Attend 10.18.2011 HPC meeting, prepare draft of minutes and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print minutes from October meeting for November meeting. Print commissioner and liaison mailing labels. Prepare minutes from Special Meeting 11.07.2011 and print for November meeting. Update Commissioner contact info and forward. 7. Restore Michiana Series (RMS) 2011- a. Updating www.RestoreMichiana.com website. b. House Detectives -Follow up with attendee inquiries. »»»»»»»»»»»»»over 8. RMS 2010-2011 Window Restoration Production -Follow up with WNIT regarding expected completion date. Begin dissecting HOW Script down to match the footage and correspondence with Grass Roots Media. 9. RMS 2012-Correspondance with potential partners regarding next years programming, including Olde Century Colors and Historic New Carlisle. Meeting at Olde Century Colors to discuss potential partnership. - 10. Internships -Filing miscellaneous stuff and condensing future filing. Expanding Intern projects to choose from. Registering for Indianalntern.net. a. Resource Library Books -Working with Rachel on labeling and categorizing. Devising a re - shelving plan. b. Resource Library Flat Files -Review spreadsheet. c. Local Landmarks -Review spreadsheet. d. Preservation Specialist -Discussion with Wayne and Steve about HPC enforcement improvements. e. Files by Subject -Correspondence and interview a prospective Intern. Meeting with Hannah Blad to go over the potential projects and discuss her resume. Working with Hannah to start her project. Further research on subjects to be expanded, as identified by Hannah. 11. Then & Now: A Downtown South Bend Architecture Walking Tour -Organize notes taken over the course of the planning process and create a tour guide manual for personal use (that can later be used to create a docent training manual). 12. Studebaker/Bendix Heritage Trail -Committee meeting at Studebaker. Full group meeting at Studebaker. Downloading Dropbox. 13. City Cemetery records digitizing project -Phone call with Steve Nemeth catching up. Invite South Bend Area Genealogical Society to participate in this effort. 14. Downtown South Bend, Inc. First Fridays planning -Attend full group meeting to brainstorm on themes for each month next year. Correspondence with Marketing team to set a meeting. 15. HPC Marketing - a. WSBT Deals -Monitoring and promoting the sale and distributing surveys to buyers. Quantity of 25 maximum (24 sold to date). b. Magnet -Designing a magnet for owners in LHD and LL to be ordered at the end of the year. Obtaining bids for approximately 1000 quantity. Offering DTSB to include promotional material in the mailing in exchange for a portion of the postage charge. c. Meeting with Colleen Bormann of the Convention and Visitors Bureau regarding HPC marketing and future collaborations. Review CVB tourism grant. 16. St. Joseph County Archives -Presentation to the South Bend Area Genealogical Society about HPC. Invited *to present at a future SBAGS meeting. 17. Bowman Cemetery headstones repair -Correspondence with DHPA, Jeannie. Correspondence with Steve Nemeth at Parks regarding headstone procedures. Date set for Jeannie to visit South Bend. 18. Researching history of Hepler Street as requested by Jane Thompson. 19. Researching a property at 523 LaSalle as requested by Anthony Panepinto. 2 ;# 20. Greening a vintage building project -Discussion with Todd Zeiger on this project that he has secured grant money for. Correspondence with Jon and Jonathon at the City Office of Municipal fiergy regarding a possible partnership. 21. Section 106 Review -Michigan Street (US 20 in New Carlisle) Enhancement .and Beautification Project -Review disk, discussion with Catherine. Trip with Catherine to New Carlisle to inspect the proposed project and meet with Dana Groves on various topics including Main Street and 2012 RMS partnership. 22. Researching two addresses on the digital Sanborn Maps for a lady in Michigan. , 23. Attend a community input meeting at Monroe Street Studios, the old Inwoods Building to discuss how creating a school of music at ,this site could generate economic development downtown. A presentation was given by the Old Town School of Music. 24. City of South Bend Lunch and Learn Series -Attend 10.18 presentation by Center for History and Studebaker Museum, _ 10.25 presentation by Notre Dame Department of Music, 11.1 presentation by South Bend Museum of Art. 25. Redevelopment Commission -Attend the 10.25 meeting on account of "Resolution No. 2947 related to acquisition of property in the West Washington -Chapin Development Area (803 W. Washington) and Resolution No. 2948 approving an accepting a counter offer for the acquisition of property in the West Washington -Chapin Development Area (803 W. Washington)". Previewing 11.22 agenda which includes Union Station Master Plan including street vacation and 635 S. Lafayette (6 - storey Studebaker Building) that is being considered for "acquisition by the City for redevelopment". 1U. Researching Centennial Farms for a property on Pear Road that would like to apply for the recognition. Searching our records and correspondence with owner. 27. State Theatre -Correspondence with Ezra of Opera LaSalle. Working to track down a floor plan of the building, including correspondence with Ken Herceg of Ken Herceg and Ann Kolata of City. 28. CVB Holiday Luncheon -Attend luncheon, networking with Evie Kirkwood and Steve Slauson of St. Joseph Co. Parks. Discussion of the Studebaker Tree Sign professional evaluation afforded by an Indiana Landmarks Endangered Places Grant and the red barn at St. Patrick's Park potential for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 29. Attend St. Joseph County employee benefits meeting in the Council Chambers. Attend Benefits Fair. 30. Research on an inquiry from John Charles Bryant on the Fredricksons Candy Store Building on West LaSalle. Conversation regarding James Lewis Casaday and Sydney Pollack scholarship he is working on. 31. Pop up shops -Attend Grand Un -Wrapping and shop the shops with Intern Hannah. 32. Michiana History Group -Attend meeting in Plymouth with Catherine at the Marshall Co. Historical Wiety. They have a great display on transportation crossroads. k3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION INSPECTION INVOICE November 15, 2011 DATE ACTIVITY HOURS Oct. 31, 2011 visit 846 Forest Nov. 1, 2011 HPC office. Tour districts. Photo of 846 Forest hand rail. Photos 1 846 Forest to code. 6 Nov. 2, 2011 HPC office. Lynn Joyce home for paint. Search internet for photos. Visit 509 Edgewater. 6 Nov. 3, 2011 HPC office. Tour districts. Visit 626 Portage for brick damage. 6 Nov. 9,.2011 HPC office. Visit 1216 E. Wayne N. windows and 557 Edgewater For door. Tour districts. 6 Nov. 10, 2011 HPC office. 106 photos. Attend code hearing on fire station 4. 6 TOTAL 31 SIGNED DATE NO V ayne R. Dooluittle APPROVED DATE Catherigoostetler, Director HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION INSPECTION INVOICE November 2, 2011 DATE ACTIVITY HOURS Oct.18,2011 HPC office. 825 Park on parking pad. Meet with painters, 823 Oct. 27,2011 HPC office. 106 photos. 4 TOTAL 34 SIGNED oz- DATE 2- -J- "e R. Dooli le APPROVED DATE c? Cather*vo tetter, Director Park, Hodson Castle. Marquette School photos. 6 Oct 19, 2011 HPC office. 225 Hammond Ct. on trees. 166 grants. Print. 6 Oct. 20, 2011 HPC office. 106 photos and grants. Print. Meeting NNN. 6 Oct. 25, 2011 HPC office. Tour districts. Visit and photo 424 Lamonte roof. Photo of garage on Rex to code. Visit former market 626 Portage. .6 Oct. 26, 2011 HPC office. Deliver mail to parks dept. tour districts. Work with slate Contractor in E. Wayne. 1071 Riverside for new concrete work. 6 Oct. 27,2011 HPC office. 106 photos. 4 TOTAL 34 SIGNED oz- DATE 2- -J- "e R. Dooli le APPROVED DATE c? Cather*vo tetter, Director 2012 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Schedule COA APPLICATIONS DUE January 23 January 9 February 27 February 6 March 19 March 5 April 16 April 2 May 21 May 7 June 18 June 4 July 16 July 2 August 20 August 6, September 17 September 4 October 15 October 1 November 19 November 5 December 17 December 3 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY November 21, 2011 13`' Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Mike Voll, Jerry Niezgodski, David Steinhauer, Kevin Buccellato Members Absent: Sandra Rossow, Alice McLane, Lynn Patrick Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director, Wayne Doolittle, Preservation Specialist/Inspector Members of the Public Present: Mark Nie, Sara Rhodes, Elizabeth Adey, Brian Haygood, Greg Schoff, Ken Smith, Joan Down-Krostenko, Susan Youens Chair moves to amend the agenda to include to two additional COAs 2011-1116 710 Park Avenue and 2011-1118 728 Park Avenue with a second by Dave Steinhauer. Vote: 5-0. Approved unanimously. II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 13, 2011 Application Number: 2011-1013 Property Location: 813 Ashland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1896 Property Owner: San Song and Yein Yet Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD/NRD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 2 storey frame house has an irregular plan and is set upon a brick and poured concrete foundation. It has a hip roof with gables featuring box returns and is covered in asphalt shingles. The walls are aluminum sided. According the 2005 survey, windows are original wood 1/1 double hung with wood surrounds. The front first storey window has leaded glass in the top. The side bay window is original wood 1/1 double hung. Most windows have aluminum storms installed. There is a concrete stoop with a metal awning overhead, supported by metal supports. ALTERATIONS: The house is aluminum sided. The roof was replaced in 2008 with COA 2008-0618. The storm door is not original and the front porch is a replacement. At the time of the current Application, most of the original windows had been removed and vinyl replacement installed without a COA. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace with Jeld-Wen vinyl windows to match original windows. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner removed original windows and installed vinyl replacement windows without a COA. HPC Preservation Specialist made a site visit after being alerted of the unapproved project and the photographs provided reflect the project status at the time of inspection. Staff was not able to make a determination as to if the original windows were deteriorated beyond repair as they had already been discarded. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double -hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half has wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Vinyl replacement windows have already been installed in this house and the original windows have been discarded. Staff recommends that the original front first storey windows remain in place as they are a distinct original feature of the otherwise altered structure. No representation for application. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Dave Steinhauer to deny application as presented on the grounds that the COA was not submitted prior to the work being completed and to make the homeowner aware that further alterations cannot be done without a COA. Vote: Mike Voll -aye, the applicant derailed the proper procedure; Dave Steinhauer -aye, sets a poor precedent for allowing people to do work without the opportunity for HPC to review it first and if the windows originally had 1/1, the materials and style differ; Tim Klusczinski-aye, the work was not approved by the HPC prior to the installation and there was no way to investigate the original windows to determine if they were deteriorated beyond repair which is a Standards and Guidelines item and the windows that were chosen are not a match to what may have been there before; Jerry Niezgodski-aye, the applicant did not seek a COA prior to starting work and concerned whether the windows are suitable architecturally for the structure; Kevin Buccellato- aye, no COA was granted or applied for and the architectural details do not match what was existing. Vote: 5-0. COA 2011-1013 motion to deny application was approved unanimously. _i Per Counselor, the HPC recommendation to deny is a recommendation to the Building Department to apply a monetary fine; Larry will follow up with Building Department. 2. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 November 2011 Application Number: 2011-1103A Property Location: Leeper Park East Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: National Register Historic Designed Landscape Landmark Rating: Local Landmark DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Leeper Park is a designed landscape located north of the commercial and medical district of South Bend and divided by Michigan Street (US 33). Leeper Park East is bordered by Riverside Drive along the St. Joseph River, the River Bartlett Street to the South and Michigan Street to the West. It is part of the 1911-1915 Parks and Boulevard system designed for South Bend by George Kessler. Its function as a recreational Park is secondary to its practical function as a drinking water well field dominated by the North Pumping Station which is a local landmark, the Reservoir and numerous wells located through out the area. The sunken garden at the northern end of the Park was rehabilitated in 2009 with new rose plants and gravel walkways. The recreational area of the Park behind the North Pumping Station include the Zeigler performing center with fixed bench seating, signage for the Garden of Fragrance, the Navarre Cabin, Comfort Station, Swing set and slide. ALTERATIONS: The water feature, fountain and statuary of the Sunken Garden were removed in the 1960s. The wading pool has been filled in and the pergola removed around the 1970s. The more formal gardens of lilies, roses, gladiolas and peony beds no longer exist. The Garden of Fragrance (originated inl954 and expanded over the years) that meandered from Michigan Street to the Herb Garden by the Navarre Cabin no longer exists, only the signage remains. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace the existing lift station on the south side of the North Pumping Station driveway and relocate it to the north side of the driveway. Screen the new location with landscaping and plantings. Rehabilitate the Garden of Fragrance Braille marker and boulder monument and install new sidewalks and decorative paving. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Please see project narrative, diagrams and landscape plan. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park Standards and Criteria 9.4 Vetretation: 4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced with materials that match the original in size shape, color form and texture. 5. When replacement of vegetation materials and features is necessary, it should be based on physical or documentary evidence. 6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be considered if the convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom characteristics as the historic plant. 9.5 Circulation 8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape design. 9.7 Furnishings and Obiects 1. All items listed herein shall be preserved s. All Plaques, Monuments, Sculptures, Memorials, Planters, Urns, Curbing, Roadways, Marker Stones, Sundials, Well -Head Covers, Fences, Trellises, Pergolas, Pathways and Trees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it is in keeping with the Landscape Guidelines for Leeper Park. Staff researched this area of Leeper Park and there is no existing documentation in the Parks Department Archives for the design, the flora and the trees planted in Garden of Fragrance. What DLZ is proposing will convey the same intention as the 1954 Garden while preserving its markers and monuments and utilizing the wrought iron fencing fragments as objects of interest in the landscaping scheme. There was no formal pathway though the Garden of Fragrance and the addition of a permanent, paved path from the sidewalk along Michigan to the monument and markers will not detract from the overall landscaping plan of the Park. The curvilinear design of the sidewalk echoes the 1915 Kessler design.These improvements will effectively screen the relocated lift station from the Park and the proposed perennials will add variety and color. Project represented by Mark Nie and Sara Rhodes of DLZ. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Mike Voll to approve application as submitted. Vote: 5-0. COA 2011-1103A was approved unanimously. 3. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 9 November 2011 Application Number: 2011-1107A Property Location: 1216 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1925/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Elizabeth and Mark Adey Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1216 E. Wayne North is a two storey frame home with a brick fagade and an irregular floor plan set on a matching brick foundation. There is a gable roof with gable returns with cornice molding and an eyebrow dormer. The roofing is asphalt shingle. There is a multi -pane half -round attic window. The windows are 8/1 and 6/1 double hung windows that have brick soldier course lintels and brick header course sills; some with paneled wood shutters with a tree motif. The front entry has gable roof with round arch under supported by brackets and smooth Doric columns; the front door is rounded with simple wood trim. There is a one storey side open porch with a flat roof supported by smooth Doric columns. ALTERATIONS: There appears to be some window openings that were re -configured and bricked in. The survey card noted aluminum storm windows and some replacement windows. The side porch is open and no longer has screens noted in the August, 1986 survey card and were removed sometime after 1995. There are COAs (2004-9) in file for in kind replacement and repair work to porch, in-kind window replacement, garage roof and rear fencing. Removal of 1955 addition and replaced with new one storey addition 12'8"x 30'8" in materials to match the original house. Replaced replacement casement windows from 1955 re- model to match windows in the addition per COA 2009-0601D. Replacement and restoration of the doors leading to the side porch from the living room; replacement of second floor door leading to porch with COA #2010-0301. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of Windows: Dining Room window is missing and has been bricked over, return to original style -stationary six light windows; replace eleven windows that have combo aluminum storms with double hung 611 or 8/1 divided light; replace one replacement window with more historically correct window. All windows will match rear window that was installed during addition in 2009. Marvin brand windows will be used and the entire house will have the same windows. The current combination storms were installed in the 1950s and are in horrible shape. The windows will return the house to a closer approximation of the house as it was built. Photos included. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Restore bricked opening of dining room window with side by side (2) fixed 6 pane windows. Replace 11 windows that are over painted, over caulked some with broken storm windows: 3 windows located in the front upstairs 2 8/1 and 16/1; 4 downstairs front windows replace 2 double sets 6/1; West upper floor 16/1; rear 2 upper floor 6/1 and upper East 1 original window 6/1; and replace one replacement window 6/1. All windows are Marvin Ultimate Double Hung wood windows with true divided lights and replicate what is there. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Wayne Doolittle, Preservation Specialist and Steve Szaday, Intern visited the site on 9 November and are of the opinion that from the exterior the windows appear to be able to be repaired. They will perform an interior inspection with the homeowner prior to the 21 November meeting and report their findings. This house has had extensive repair, replacement and remodeling documented since 2004; and all of it has been quality work with quality materials. The Staff makes no recommendation at this time pending the Preservation Specialist report. Project represented by applicant, Elizabeth Adey. Wayne Doolittle, Preservation Specialist provided his assessment from the on site investigation that the windows are not deteriorated beyond repair. Member of the public, Joan Downs-Krostenko offered her perspective to the applicant, speaking against the application. Chair clarified that rehabilitation for the existing windows may be done with an administrative approval, not requiring another Board meeting but the applicant chooses to have the disposition for the project as submitted for the replacement option. . On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Tim Klusczinski to deny application as submitted. Vote: Mike Voll -aye, this is an opportunity to preserve what we can, when we can; Dave Steinhauer -nay; Tim Klusczinski-aye, I do not believe that a reasonable quotation to assess the differences between rehabilitation has been provided. We are lacking in sufficient documentation of the replacement options to be able to make a decision. I applaud homeowner for trying to do the very best possible but given the parameters and the small window of decision that we have to make tonight based strictly on this application as it was presented. I cannot in good conscience vote in favor of replacements before I have been assured that rehabilitation is not feasible in this case which also is more in keeping with the Standards and Guidelines for the East Wayne district and for all of our historic districts; Jerry Niezgodski-aye, primarily lack of information to move forward and if we are looking specifically at what is proposed here we would prefer to see included with this some kind of information about costs in rehabbing of this windows. You have been a great steward of this property and have done some great work and moving forward to do something top notch; Kevin Buccellato-nay. Vote: 3-2. COA 2011-1107A motion to deny application was approved. 11 4. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 16 November 2011 Application Number: 2011-1116 Property Location: 710 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Second Empire/1875 Property Owner: Georges Enderle Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark &Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Mary Chapin Anderson and Andrew Anderson house is a three storey Second Empire home with an irregular plan. It has a stone foundation with walls of shiplap clapboard siding with corner boards; the entablature has paired brackets. The house has an asphalt shingle hip roof with gable dormers while the tower in front has a mansard roof with wood shingles. There is a full width wrap around front porch with pared Doric columns on stone piers supporting an entablature with dentils and balustrade. The porch has a flat rood. The windows are 1/1 double hung and most have segmental arch molded entablatures. The front door is wood with a single leaded light' sidelights are leaded and there is a stained glass transom. (See photo #1) ALTERATIONS: The porch was added in 1901 to reflect the classical revival style in vogue after the Colombian Exposition in Chicago. The metal finials at the corners of the tower have been removed. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolition -see letter. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Brian Haygood, Chief Inspector, Department of Code Enforcement applied for the COA on behalf of Dr. Enderle with the following letter on Official Stationary: After receiving information and personally inspecting the property along with our licensed framing inspector we have determined that the free standing garage (carriage house) must be demolished. It is in imminent condition of collapse and due to the proximity of numerous utilities the likelihood of disruption is very high. Therefore, I ask that the Historic Preservation Commission give it permission for the owner to demolish the structure. The owner has been apprised of the condition of the structure and wishes to correct it by demolition. Thank you in advance for your timely response in this matter. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: V. GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Staff has been concerned about the deteriorating condition of this structure and have discussed remediation with Dr. Enderle for several years. This summer Dr. Enderle engaged Jeff Dierbeck to perform an assessment of the Carriage House. Jeff reported informally to the Staff that the Carriage House was in very bad shape, had experienced a fire that further weakened the structure and that it would be very costly to fix, much less rehabilitate. Demolition, because of its location and proximity to utility lines, would also be expensive. I spoke with Dr. Enderle and informed him of what he would need to present to the Commission and urged him to apply for a COA at the December meeting after Dr. Enderle said that he could not prepare the needed information in time for the November meeting. On 9 November, 710 Park appeared on the Code Department's Tentative Hearing Docket for 1 December for the repair of the bam. On 16 November, Mr. Brian Haygood came to the HPC Office requesting HPC to address this as soon as possible because of the precarious condition of this building. I spoke with HPC legal counsel, Lawrence Meteiver, and he advised that the Chief Inspector could apply for the COA on behalf of the homeowner so that the Commission could take action. Wayne Doolittle then photographed the Carriage House in detail. Project represented by Brian Haygood of City of South Bend Code Enforcement. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Mike Voll to approve application as submitted. Vote: 5-0. COA 2011-1116 was approved unanimously. 5. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 18 November 2011 Application Number: 2011-1118 Property Location: 728 Leland Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled ell/1899 Property Owner: Gary Schoff Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park NRD/LHD 5 Rating: Non Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two storey gabled ell is situated on an open site on a busy urban comer. It has asphalt shingles on the cross gable roof and narrow aluminum or vinyl siding on the walls. There is a central brick chimney and 2 small comer porches on both side of the central gable with turned wood columns. There is one entrance on the south porch and one entrance and one boarded up entrance on the north porch. The windows are 1/1 vinyl replacement windows; the doors are replacement doors. ALTERATIONS: The original rear porch was removed and a 12 x 24 addition was built in 1940. The house originally may have been a duplex, became a tri-plex and is now being converted to a single family. The only original fabric remaining of the house is the foundation, chimney and the turned wood porch columns. The two car wood garage noted on the assessor card was demolished sometime after 1949. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of two rear doors. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner proposes to remove the two older rear entrance doors to the former apartments (refer to photograph 1) and replace in that opening a unit that is composed one fixed and one functioning door. The proposed unit is wood with full view glass panels (refer to photograph 2). STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home: Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Casement windows adapted the English tradition of using wrought iron casements with leaded cames for residential use. Rolled steel casements (either single, as shown, or paired) were popular in the 1920s for Cottage -style residences and Gothic -style campus architecture. More streamlined casements were popular in the 1930s for institutional and small industrial buildings. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the two non -original replacement doors in the 1940 addition with the unit proposed by the owner. Project represented by applicant, Greg Schoff. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Kevin Buccellato to approve application as submitted. Vote: 5-0. COA 2011-1118 was approved unanimously. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to suspend to agenda to move forward Hearing of Visitors. Vote: 5-0 approved unanimously. III. HEARING OF VISITORS A. Susan Youens 850 Forest Avenue and Joan Downs-Krostenko 849 Forest Avenue - Chapin Park property owners spoke in regards to safety concerns, code violations, and enforcement procedure for the property at 846 Forest. Specific issues relate to deteriorating roof, gutters and downspouts, brick foundation, exterior paint failure, front porch floor unevenness, and stair railing. The property is in violation of the Minimum Maintenance Standards. Counselor suggests that best course of action will be working with the Building Department or Code Enforcement; Counselor will follow up with Code. Meeting to resume as scheduled. 0 II. PUBLIC HEARING B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. Sons of Israel -Discussion. 2. West LaSalle Street NR District -Discussion. C. LANDMARKS 1. 1922 Portage Avenue First Reading -First reading. A more detailed report will be included in the December packet. IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — October 18, 2011 Chair moves for the following amendment under Item 4, Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes [for Meetings on September 19 & October 4 to include the vote September 19, 2011 'All in Favor 6-0' and October 4, 2011 'All in Favor 5-0' to adjourn. Chair moves to amend minutes Second by Dave Steinhauer. Vote: 5-0, Approved unanimously.] with a second by Jerry Niezgodski. Vote: 5-0. Approved unanimously. November 7, 2011 approved by consensus. B. TREASURER'S REPORT — Distributed. Discussion of grant money reallocation. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals -Distributed. Discussion of RME reporting related to City Foresters order to remove trees. Replanting of approved removed trees to be discussed further at the December meeting. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. Discussion of Preservation Specialists position and a contract for Steve Szaday. 4. Assistant Director Report -Distributed. 5. Preservation Specialist Report -Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel —Discussion of Steve Szaday's contract as Preservation Specialist. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Kevin Buccellato to approve the contract for Steve Szaday. Vote: 5-0. Approved unanimously. Update on 803 West Washington Kiser House. Redevelopment Commission has purchased the property and transferred to Board of Public Works to be transferred to HLFI (Indiana Landmarks). Edgewater request: on 509 and 557 Edgewater Drive. Review of records indicated a COA granted for 557 Edgewater for a COA applied for in April, which was granted in May by a 6-0 vote. It concerned an extension of the driveway allowing it to be enlarged up to the edge of the sidewalk. Neighboring owner has a problem with the car parked in the location. There is no other interpretation of the decision according to the COA and that has been upheld by Code and the Building Department. Did not find a COA for the other address at 509 Edgewater because it was an in-kind repair of a roof. Working on access language to the COA application to adequately assess windows from the interior because we have the obligation to either grant or deny a COA based upon the condition of the material. It is necessary for us to go inside the house to make that assessment. If we do not have that information, we cannot grant a COA. We do have the 7 option of denying a COA because we do not have enough information to perform our duty, if interior access is not allowed. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -No report. V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS A. 846 Forest/Liaisons/Procedures-Elicia suggested maintaining active Neighborhood Development Committees and Liaisons with each neighborhood. President Klusczinski recommends Staff creating a multiple copy form that Code and Building get in addition to HPC Staff and Commissioners so that we can track reporting. B. Nominating Committee for the 2012 Slate of Officers -Committee consisting of all members but the President to have a report ready to present to the Commission at the December meeting. Motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Kevin Buccellato for Jerry Niezgodski to chair a meeting on Tuesday November 29 at Doc Pierces at noon. Vote: 4-0-1 abstention by Tim Klusczinski. C. 2012 meeting schedule -Dates and time set. Prefer to use the same conference room. D. Intern Resolutions -President Klusczinski moves to adopt the Resolutions for Rachel Mezzei and Steve Szaday offered by the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County at this November 21, 2011 meeting of the HPC here in South Bend with a second by Jerry Niezgodski. Vote: 5-0. Approved unanimously. E. South Bend/Mishawaka Hotel Motel Tax Grant Application-Elicia requested permission to apply for the grant to put a tour in place for the nine Local Historic Districts. Chair moves to adopt the South Bend/Mishawaka Hotel Motel Tax Grant application for the fiscal year 2012 allowing our Staff to apply with a second by Dave Steinhauer. Vote: 5-0. Approved unanimously. F. District maintenance mailing -Elicia reported on the magnet and one page district update letter that will be sent out before the next meeting. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to adjourn. Vote: 5-0. Unanimous. Meeting giourned at 10:01 p.m. f ti�Patrik, Secretary D�fe