The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMay 2011' d�,� `.J� 4 :^, y� :.?i., _ .• i': <' f �3� w > ,t' � Jr i -z•• C l`Vtl`I'.�tE�S�It��'�',I��T�S�O.A:J4�;7i-F.AJ lJ�011 `'e" o •'�' .: {.;.GAJ ,J.•��d - .. w%t..`��L�F,, ::,: t%a,-;i.S,..T" it; :. �.+. ,�;:�r,'.-_S•Ss,-;'.:�:.�iw:-:-".; �y *� Regular Meeting imxTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY, May 16, 2011 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 53190 Juniper Road COA#2011-0412 2. 1615 E. Wayne Street COA#2011-0421 3. 557 Edgewater COA#2011-0428 4. 13271 Adams Road COA#2011-0429 5. 1043 Riverside COA#2011-0502 6. 914 Leland COA#2011-0502A 7. 1081'Riverside COA#2011-0502B 8. 1130 E. Wayne COA#2011-0502C 9. 229 W. North Shore COA#2011-0502D B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION III. HEARING OF VISITORS {= IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 18, 2011 B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Preservation Specialist Report 6. Legal Counsel D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report Please turn the page..... Local Landmark East Wayne LL/Edgewater Local Landmark Riverside Chapin Park Riverside East Wayne West North Shore NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. 2 V. OLD BUSINESS 1. Restore Michiana Workshops -Windows, May 14 at New Carlisle 2.1414 E. Wayne Street COA#2011-0404 V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Future National Register Nominations VI. ADJOURNMENT PE STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 28 April 2011 Application Number: 2011-0412 Property Location: 53190 Juniper Road Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate Cube/1856 Property Owner: Joan and Kevin O'Connor Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Alfred Maurice Talley house is a red brick two storey Italianate with side wing additions and an addition at the rear. The hipped roof is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are double hung 6/6 with brick segmental arch. The front entrance has a panel door with sidelights and transom. ALTERATIONS: The 1875 Atlas illustration shows a cupola, side chimneys in the roof and a porch all of which have been removed. The north wing and the south greenhouse are later additions. The 1975 survey card indicated that the front door with sidelights was probably not original. The rear addition was added in 2007. The entire house was re -pointed in 2005. APPLICATION ITEMS: Rebuild existing sunroom area using existing brick knee wall as foundation. Replace glass/metal frame structure with flat top hip roof and casement windows similar to north side addition. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Please see attached documentation and drawings. This project will remove an outdated and deteriorating south side one'storey "sunroom/greenhouse" superstructure leaving the brick foundation and knee wall. It will shorten the enclosed room and reveal_an original window obscured by the sunroom. It will be replaced by a wood frame with a flat top hip roof with asphalt dimensional shingles to match north addition and Pella Architect Series casement wood windows with simulated divided lights. The bricks will be re -used to create the planters beneath the northwest windows. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not requirea Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it conforms to the guidelines. It is replacing an awkward addition with one that is more appropriate to the scale and materials of the house. It will give the house a more balanced appearance from the street by matching more closely with the north wing. ,r -Application - FOR - Certificate icate o f Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County City Building, South Bend, Indiana 96601 Phone: 574235-9798 • Fax: 574235-9578 . Email• SBSJCHPC@cost joseph.in.us Website: httfr//,Kwwstjosephcountyindiana.com/sichp/index.bttnl. . OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONED IN THIS BOX--- OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received' / � 1546#- aZ0/1 Application Number ed0_/ I - 4.s(/e7- Past Reviews: �L' J (Date Of IBS+ tZIT 1GIC) Staff Approval authorized by: ❑ NO Title: . Historic Commission Review Date: i cal Landmark Local Historic District (Name) National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied F] Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee [] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: + Street Number and Street Marne Name of Property Owner(s): (Pimse Print),1L __ Address of Property Owner(s): �•3llr�-,%t!n/1 PE,4 �O Contractor(s) Name: iBl> t t et AA-vRAr-rz.r--- Contract Company Name: v/ �o • . Contractor Address: 1-7 _ , City, Phone: Z - Current Use of Building r7/Nl�.L�s►mr� (Single Farm7y - Mniti-Family - Cormrrercial - 0xvnnneni - I,rdustrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: iW60,0 A4 Frtr� D (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind E] Landscape [�'lvew E] Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (naon than one lvx nmy tr cherW) Description of Proposed Work: i 11-6 5K- t h11 e46 �twd Mau A -0 -a -A ' U s t r4& E1F i571rJ� 8 tic. it.+u��wl hS f"ota N+'�-Ttart . 12 �►°[ A�� ley �►h 8:7-A FkA-wa. 4i—au e_raa=E. W{tr(4- FLAr ?-P At P P -v aF IAALD% CA4a-mt nmr-WIP4L ow!r, Ts3 J�to/Z �>sOEif,¢��tr<OJtf. Owner/Contractor: Fax: -7 — Zf9r 5'L'f e-mail % � aPe.,-14 (77d, gTxc tvi11 rnrrrsjwrd r n1y case ,Ime) r and/or __-- — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 1 • Additions • Free Estimates April 4, 2011 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. County -City Building South Bend, IN 46601 CONSTRUCTION & CO., INC. 17330 BATTLES ROAD SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 (574) 299-9422 (574)-299-9424 FAX W WW.HAUPERTCONSTRUCTION.COM RE: Proposed Renovation of Existing Sunroom 53190 Juniper Rd. South Bend, IN • New Construction • Remodeling Dear Members of the Commission: On behalf of Kevin and Joan O'Connor we are submitting application to rebuild an existing sunroom at the above stated property. The O'Connor's have done major renovations to the home at 53190 Juniper Rd. since first acquiring the property from family members in 2007. At that time The Historic Preservation Commission approved a garage addition to the east side of the home. The O'Connor's wish at this time is to renovate a badly deteriorating metal and glass structure that sits on a brick foundation. Our intent is to keep the existing brick foundation, and rebuild the upper portion with wood frame, flat top hip roof and casement windows. The rebuilt south wing would complement the north wing addition, and the main house in both window style and exterior materials. Brick exterior would remain the same, wood overhangs and window trim to match and roofing to match. The hip style flat roof allows for 2"d story windows to stay intact and roof pitch will match upper roof pitch for good appearance. Exterior wood trim will be painted white as all other trim. The brick foundation would be shortened in length to allow for the original 1s' floor double hung window to be visible again; this window to be refurbished to its original state. Casement windows in the new structure will be a true divided light or simulated divided light; not grills or removable grids. Exterior will be clad white with wood interior to be painted as all other interior trim. - Additions Free Estimates CONSTRUCTION & CO., INC. 17330 BATTLES ROAD SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 (574) 299-9422 (574)-299-9424 FAX W W W. HAUPERTCONSTR UCTION.COM New Construction - Remodeling All exterior treatments will conform to existing structures and materials. We believe this rebuilding and/or renovation of the south addition to be in accordance with and conformity to Standards for Renovation and Additions, which states that "necessary improvements should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to original style and construction and using materials to match where at all possible". Materials to be used: Brick foundation to stay as is with adaptation at east end; reusing existing brick Wood overhangs and trim work around windows to match Rooflng'to match - rubber flat top with dimensional shingles Windows— Pella Architect Series; casement style similar to north addition, simulated divided lights, wood clad units Scale and Dimensions: Please refer to drawings Thanking you in advance for your consideration, and your timely approval of this application. Sincerely, Bruce A. Haupert, Presi ent Haupert Construction & Co., Inc. For Kevin and Joan O'Connor !: I" low Fi. :. PJW- iw� u5' poi ISIL•i� : . � .' � �..... . � ..:;..., . s LI T—T t 1 f r � 1 �'L1 ._t?2�c.F^��"'_ �i ..►�L_._�—Dt �T,C r' `I t ...fir_, .- ' _ � �:•_ . �. 1 _t.�L l - - - - - - - - - - - Ya v: -P—ESutl—O yllMQ,,VM • Additions • Free Estimates April 4, 2011 VUN5THUG1rIUN Qc W., ING. 17330 BATTLES ROAD SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 (574)299-9422 (574)-299-9424 FAX W W W. HAUPERTCONSTR UCTION.COM Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S: Lafayette Blvd. County -City Building South Bend, IN 46601 RE: Proposed Renovation of Existing Sunroom 53190 Juniper Rd. South Bend, IN Dear Members of the Commission: • New Construction • Remodeling On behalf of Kevin and Joan O'Connor we are submitting application to rebuild an existing sunroom at the above stated property. The O'Connor's have done major renovations to the home at 53190 Juniper Rd. since first acquiring the property from family members, in 2007. At that time The Historic Preservation Commission approved a garage addition to the east'side of the home. The O'Connor's wish at this time is to renovate a badly deteriorating metal and glass structure that sits on a brick foundation. Our intent is to keep the existing brick foundation, and rebuild the upper portion with wood frame, flat top hip roof and casement windows. The rebuilt south wing would complement the north wing addition, and the main house in both window style and exterior materials. Brick exterior would remain the same, wood overhangs and window trim to match and roofing to match. The hip style flat roof allows for 2"d story windows to stay intact and roof pitch will match upper roof pitch for good appearance. Exterior wood trim will be painted white as all other trim. The brick foundation would be shortened in length to allow for the original 1" floor double hung window to be visible again; this window to be refurbished to its original state. Casement windows in the new structure will be a true divided light or simulated divided light; not grills or removable grids. Exterior will be clad white with wood interior to be painted as all other interior trim. • Additions • Free Estimates CONSTRUCTION & CO., INC. 17330 BATTLES ROAD SOUTH BEND, IN 46614 (574) 299-9422 (574)-299-9424 FAX WWW.HAUPERTCONSTRUCTION.COM • New Construction • Remodeling All exterior treatments will conform to existing structures and materials. We believe this rebuilding and/or renovation of the south addition to be in accordance with and conformity to Standards for Renovation and Additions, which states that "necessary improvements should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to original style and construction and using materials to match where at all possible". Materials to be used: Brick foundation to stay as is with adaptation at east end; reusing existing brick Wood overhangs and trim work around windows to match Roofing to match - rubber flat top with dimensional shingles Windows — Pella Architect Series; casement style similar to north addition, simulated divided lights, wood clad units Scale and Dimensions: Please refer to drawings Thanking you in advance for your consideration, and your timely approval of this application. Sincerely, Bruce A. Haupert, President Haupert Construction & Co., Inc. For Kevin and Joan O'Connor STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: COA#2011-0421 Property Location: 1615 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1929/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: J.C. and Julie Ducom Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The brick house is a 2'/x storeys with a rectangular plan and steep gable roof with thin wood rake trim. The roof is slate and the shed roof dormer is also covered in slate. There is a series of 5 diamond paned lead glass windows across the front. There are 8 light casement windows in the lower and upper levels. There are brick chimneys at each end and half-timbering and stucco on the west side toward the rear and the back gable. ALTERATIONS: Fifteen windows were replaced with Eagle brand casement windows with COA#1997-0825. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove existing deteriorated slate tile roof, water damaged sub straight and install high quality GAF Grand Slate fiberglass asphalt Look -a -like. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Remove the original, but failing slate roofing material. Repair decking as needed, install ice and water shield and install GAF Grand Slate Fiberglass Asphalt roofing material. Haul away all debris. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered ith a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles.. Residences in ost cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascia of some vinyl or metal sided houses are overed with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:. Staff recommends approval of the new roof as it conforms to the East Wayne Street Guidelines. The slate roof has deteriorated considerably and continues to flake and chip off the roof giving it the "rusticated" look it currently has. he GAF product will restore the original look of the slate roof. t Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPCQco.st josephinus Website: h4://www.st osephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.hhnl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONEUNED IN THIS BOX-- OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received o2 / C4 4&e- 010 // Application Number a O / - 0 5CZ / Past Reviews: [✓]'YES (Date of Last Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: / !xrW Zd / / ❑ Local Landmark 2<ocal Historic District (Name) ' _ ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: 0� ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE / I I I I Address of Property for proposed work: LA Z1, ry Stree Number and Street Name/� (rJ , ` /d Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) 'I, C , A N L. A n h �� 0 ja OL n (� 0 40 � r v Address of Property Owner(s): 8,O)g I LA LL /4 e! ti=C7 in � Contractor(s) Name: _�/� I�f �� Contract Company Name: / rt h c � _4 is n_Ao Qom/ g e . i Contractor Address: _.p�� /{ /2 ^ / Q ►� . / City: r .��, l A rrl Phone: (.'S 7 ��,y- ;t 95 Current Use of Building (Single Family` Multi -Family — Commerlial— Government — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: FfIn-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: )wner/Contractor: ax: e-mail Th' will and with nIy ozre designee) I .ice — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 1615 E. Wayne, March 24, 2a 11 1 b 1.5 E. Wayne, March 24, 20 J. I 1615 E. Wayne, March 24, 2011 161.5 E. Wayne, March 24, 20 11 •, 1, �,.'`;';,,�-.,r',. `, • > 3" c Pill Y`k<. =:C.e,.�; '"+.,,,5''.�""L."�'.^w.. •3�,_"..air`'—+w.'.�,,,r*e•s�.::'°,,,,.e•""'W,.,�^;�,,rr '�r., �'': r � ..� '� .. r ..,,^ w'� f,+rr-.u.��.•"•w� ! ��"',""yiMrn.�\r•�S*MxyS"+y. '_�.y^4•"+.•'tir'�+eYs+ C.�•^'^+wy..y4w��.�w,,Y,tie,�ytr .}� �`w � � ,., �..'.._�• ��. .,,'^""�M�_4. ... !� � +�r..'.Y��wr�."~I!IIy4'"i �'*�w.�.q.�w r` ` - T _"'�,wi! '4a"'w�K^y�+a�"�'.w�.•w�. M+�` ` �av� "; �` < .%S ' . 'wLLW� � .,` `..!e��rr+,;.�;�,""�" '• "�:c ' ` ,',...:,^i• ' ' •`�w..... `"':"-.::+:ia ',;;,,.w: 'Y..,,,,,- , dU:'"y,�°'^""E�"""�a!•,.yx;r:,.:�r.:,,,� ,. ..� .w��.'v�;`^;;,..�J �-= - { . • '� . , sem' , . '�.�^�,�. 161.5 E. Wayne, March 24, 20 11 I 0 /4%20?.1} Catherine er, lefter.pdf` . . .. . . ... ... .. ... .. . ...... .. . .......Pa Jean -Christophe and Julie Ducorn 1615 E. Whytic St. South Bend, IN 46615 (574) 514-0318 May 3, 2011 Dear tn=bcrs of the East Wayne SUM Historic District and Historic Preservation Ctmimission, We are writing to request your Approval to replace the roof of our residence at 1615 E. Wayne Street. The house currently has its original Pennsylvania Slate Toof. The roof is in need of replactment by the standards ($0-100yfs)- as well as the professional opinion of a number of inspcadit th-clodiftihatof lite CommissioWs i WairieMbotitle. Unfortunately, asMdOW6dby-the fact that t sli Ififsltittgle zaiils have slowly replaced nearly a] I state roofs on Wayne St: hordes,, the cost of a -StAto is prohibitive. While we find original slate to tic the thdA ddsth6tfeally pleasink choice, We simply cannot handle the financial -hardship dW would.cotzlCwith such a replacement. .(Please we enclosed estimate for genuine slate.) After a.thorough investigation into out options for roof replacement tivc have concluded that the Lifetime W-atntity OAF product Grand Slate, whii;h creates a dramatic visual -impact r6embling:that ofskte the Tnostapprop.riatc choice for our property. We have obtained a bid. tromjefTrey bjqTbe'q*_k a Assoc. to replice.but, rbr.6 . f . with these designer shingles and requested that he itpresent uslxiihaprocess of attempting to obtain your approval to do so. (We are. currently . tesidl 4ontair Our -116use-has -b6en d . i 'intod.4s a wo tbudngO pperty to Historical District, and has a �W _Wn pr the roo-rwith a slope Oiat �&64 It, a. pr6thint mt f6 of the home. We appreciite the need to preserve the historical nature oftli.6 neighborhood, and take 'very seriously the aesthetic quality as well as the integrity of the product that we 'would like to replace the root Willi. Wctee{ that the ultra -dimensional appeampce. ofthe:Grand Slate product, coupled with the workmanship and professionalism of Diem ck.and.hi.s.as.s.ocia.tes,p.rovide.the best solution to our roofing dileffinia. The Grand. Slate. mofrepiacttiietit.i a tpmaiitztatelyiwice as: expensive ,as an asphalt roof replacement, however it is srUL ices "diinhalf the gehuin.e slate And remains within our grasp financially. I We are in the.process of marketing our house for sale, and it has become clear that potential buyers 4r thwarted by the don.&Ioft of the roof As many of you.know the season during which a home is most likely to sell oft R Wayne St. Is undeiway. 11iis, %v kind�ty request that we be granted approval for this product as soon as feasible, so that we may replace the roof' in order put the house on the market once again. We greatly appreciate your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jean -Christophe and Julie Ducom J. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING RNING APPLICAT.ION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 28 April 2011 Application Number. 2011-0428 Property Location: 557 Edgewater Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Pr:briell920/Wltitearnb&Kellcr Property Owner: Tina Assimos 1. andm:tri: or District Designation: Local Land marliEtlgeivater .Rating;: Outstandint, DESCRIPTIO! OF STRUC:'TURE/ SITE.: The house was landmarked in2Ci00. -]']its is -it tWb S101cv stucco home with intersecting hip roofs covered with Art Lock asphalt shingles. It has broad flat soffited overhangs. There is art enclosed front porch surrounded by stucco piers facing the river. Tile windows are lit double hung with divided upper light. There is a parte cochere at the west side main entrance. There is a detached 2 car garage with two sets of double leaf wood doors with 8 light windows. ,* LTERA`I'IONS: Aluminum storms were added {C:'OA1981-11414). Rear and side foundation windows_ replaced with vinyl windows (C'OA i 9114-0813)A two storey rear addition was built in 1989 that replaced a two storey porch and vinyl beaded soffit was installed (COA1989-0110). The roofmaterial is not original to the house {C"OA 1()98- 0617) or the g aragc(COA 1999-1130). APPLICATION ITENTS: Replace 90 year old garage door that rails off track when trying to operate -tried repairing 2 years agcy at cost of 5250.00 but door remains inoperable. Have replaced garage floor. Remove about 5" of sod to straighten drive Nvay and replace with concrete. Huild;'Construct roof over re:ir entry door in style of rear bay window roof, proportional to doorway size, approximately 4'x4'. Construct wood steps with landing=, and banister at 45 degree angle to rear door so that steps face the driveway. DESCRIPTION C.?F.I'I OPIC:)SEI) PROJECT. Replace the oarave doors with custom made 13'01'.9" hemlock wood.doons resembling the original using Model 7412 "IDerby". Remove the 5-6" of sod bordering tapered driveway and pour concrete to ac}neve:t rectangular, straight drive. ,At the rear of the house Oil the 1989 addition: replace demolished concrete steps that deteriorated with wood stairs and landing; and railings. Construct a 4'X4"roof over tilt: dootivay and new steps that will resemble the roof over the: bump -out to p everit deterioration from rain. Construct cedar steps with landing and banister in Prairie style with Prairie style caps on the post at the rear door so that -steps .face the driveway. Ccdar will be stained to match the house. STA\DAR111S AND GUIDELINES: Grout) B The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural trtents and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation. or addition to a historic. landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, speeifications: artd.for samples where appropriate. A. l-laititenanee The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way, involveany direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The C:'ortirnission shall encourage the proper maintenance, of all structure or situs. B, Treatment Treatment shall be defined as anv change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing;, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a chang;c that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landrnark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate cif Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style cemsi aency with the; original surfaces. _ C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, whicli sloes not :alter the ggeneral massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks sht)uld not detract fi-om the original Cairn and unity of tllt landmark and should not cover Singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to lan(inunis should be added ill a manner that does riot ditirupi the visible airlity of overall alppemence of doe sift . 'I'he. proportions, materialsand ratios of the Cximing strirt"t17r'e;+ should be carrier{ through in the additions. (Are shtluld be taken not to change or alter the liallt»r hy: 1. Structures:- w- ccc5sai structural improvements, where sa Piety flatlands should lac aCC011l IliShCd it) ~deli a Was' as to CaUS, Tniilin)a11 visual Change to the. original Style acrid t;onStrttction. ?. and improvements involving any ncxv material in the landmark slutuld be of the ,anie material as the original. It should be the sante: size and textnrc, Ail alternative material may be allo~. cd if it (upliCatcs the original. r aa. wood ....._:ill wood trial should conform whh costing trial in shape and We. C. WINDOW'S AND DOORS Felsrcrts,rtcr !'iacc Local flivoric District Guirfctbool, 51ndmi; and door frames are in nearly all cases w(od. Brick structures have mime sills and brief lintels; rmasowy block structures have masonry sills and lintels, . In some casts where aluminum siding has been applied tvindotr Vim has been covered. About half ol'the structures ill the distrust have aluminum stornr windows, the taller half Nvood storill kvindows. Required Original -windows and doors includOg sash. lintels, sills. shutters, decorative glass, pedrmerit",, hood", and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced will dydicates of the c.ristirlg; or original. Recorninendorrl "Tod hime storm uhWows and Ws. painter.{ to nmWb Me existing or orighmi. should be used Mit should not damage existing hurries and should be removable in the futuro if new sash and doors are used. file existing, or original materials, design, and hardware should he used. When metal storm doors are ailed, they should be painted anodized or coated to hatch Elie existing. Wn awnings art: used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original door::. Winflotivs, tine] hardware shall not be discarded when they call be restored and re' -used in place, :fie« wine{ow and dixar opLtlirlgs which %would alter the Neale and proportion of the lruiWhV shmdd not be introduced. Inappropriate neav Nvindoty and floor li;aturcs such as aluminum insulating glass cornbinathin s that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recominewlerl ficial, Anyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and hilae Mitt ers that would doract born tile cxistrng character or appearance of the building should not be ised. 1). ENTRANCES, PORCIIES, AND STEPS Ilei nWority of the houses tri the district have either an open ora enclosed porch aacwi the: front ter on the We, 1llost porches have cutter gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by, the main roof of the' housm A brick base "!ill woof] columns is common. Required Existing or original porches and steps, including llandraits, balusters, columns, bracket~, tiles and roof decoration,, shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same desi,,,,n and materials Own dewo-Alraied Wyond repair, l'ttn%; and additions reflecOng later architcc;tural styles. sine:] Nvhich are important to Me building`, historical integrity ilalli he rcfiainetl. RecoinrncrrdW % hen crickm ng porches for heat conservation or for ofllcr reasons, it should be done in al nraralTI r thait dolts not atlter the architectural or historical character of the building, Pr•ohUted Porches anti steps that are imlxmrta m to the Imildirlyl stele and development may not be ailtere or r"ell-roved, Not RCcomnrentled Original rxmvin details should riot lle replaced uitll materials i-Mracivrng a drf ierent period or style !roll the OWN). S'I`f�I I I2IrC'C)lI 1I? tiI)�1`1"IC)1; Staft"rceotilrrrerrtis approval al`tlne replacement the oa-iginal ;�.,00d gars;.'e(lr)ors With the custom woof{ garage floors that dykeme Me original Actors in every aspect except the proposed door,, only have % HaWs versus the originals` 8 lights..`,ataff recommends the approval of the straishtcning of fhe driveway. Staff rect>mnlend; approval of the wood r ylacement steps and the roof on the rear 1959 addition of the house as both conform to the guidelines for Fdgewatcr and the Group B Standards fur Landmailks. r� Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 175 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: Couniy-City Building, South Bend, Indiana 1466Q1 Phone: 574235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9:7>8 • Ema SBSJCHPC@co.st josephin.us Website: http://www.sqosephcounqbdLvacom/sjchp/index.hbnl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COAMINED IN 77HS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received "I'PeGl r Application Number � ° 1 f - 4 � Y Past Reviews: S (note of last gmm) Me Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic C rnmissian Review Date: Local Landmark 2focal Historic District (Nano) Q National Landmark Q National Register District wamt) Certificate of Appropriateness: Q Denied [] Tabled , Q Sent To Committee Q Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: �` 7=r�:;i; 1 Street"ober and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Pleam Print) Address of Property Owner(s): --� �'�" � �' ! ,4-1� Contractor(s) Name:It }J''c Contract Company Name:1711 Contractor Address: City. Phone Current Use of Building: ' r I { .... /= r -1t t 51 Z'4" - it (Singh Family - Multi -Family - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Vacant -etc.) ljrpe of Building Construction: (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Suet - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: Q in-kind Q Landscape Q New [Dteplacement (not in-kind) Q Demolition (more bran one )rax may k cwe%i) Description of Proposed Work:fi;�'r'L Owner/Contractor: Fax: . {This o,(Jue w`itl correspond urith onlyonk designer) ; tt 9 A jJ e-mail'7`"tIt` and/or - a` — APPUCA77ON REQIIIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON Ria TR5B SIDE — d I-AHDINC7 ,y • sewer 557 Edgewater, May 2, 2011 r, � i:Y.,,..w✓-y.....—%r--+-'w..,«,,;.,,,.y.: 5 � 3 .� ; ir' , ...:.s � e.,y+? X ��q' ,P - . y.,s w,y»»+w-$ .„"•�.'z xy'w.w .-C.r” "*`�.�*•f+i n - - - ,. .°y��,.r ID ..f 557 Edgewater, May 2, 2011 BOUNDARY SURVEY 1 LOT 17 AND PART OF LOT 16 AND 45 OF EDC uo_ CD �, c:, APART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTIO C)� o tri PORTAGE TOWNSHIP, ST. JOSEPH COUI � ca C'V C7 C7 N . z' �? SURVEYED FOR: _ FOTINE ASSIMOS 557 EDGEWATER DRIVE. SOUTH BEND, IN 46601 -9 -__ EDGEVCATER DR1Vr 56' R/W --i I i S-0523 * STATE O' tib IANC' Ln SUR TITL FOL LINE DES UNr THIS REC JOS OF THE EST, AR Cup DIFF 2) FIEL RE CHORD LENGTH CHORD 57,00' N90'00' 45.31' 1 S89'04' I, TERANCE D. LANG, AM A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF INDIAIA AND HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE LANDS HEREON DESCRIBED AND DELINEATED, AND THAI TRIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER LAY DIRECT SUPEROSION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ,BELIEF THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE W11H THE REOU-REMENTS OF RULE 12 OF MJN: UM STANDARDS FOR COMPETENT PRACTICES OF LAND SURVEYING " AND AS PRESCRIBED BY INDIANA ADWNI ISTRATIVE CODE 565, 1.1-12. SIGNED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL., 2003. LE O IR 05i X D1 P PI Im m a r, 7o.r i y� , TWO STORY i 5 ( p CJ w HOUSE I t 3 I CD - -1 61 0, 7. r 0 1 v^i 1 7 j %a 70.3• f n GARAGE CAVE US a r QUER THE PR+'PEPIN LINE 20-.3' r"r 3.x.00' Pc�IY9 , EAV: � I.fl iv90'00 00 E MER ;! E PROPERTY Esx: N 17'27'41 "1"r'' I CURVE ( RADIUS I A.`RC LENG1H 00' q.,� ; `'` I C1 - 907,13' 15j7,01' P&M � �N89'26'17"IN C2 ; 352.63' ! 45.34' S-0523 * STATE O' tib IANC' Ln SUR TITL FOL LINE DES UNr THIS REC JOS OF THE EST, AR Cup DIFF 2) FIEL RE CHORD LENGTH CHORD 57,00' N90'00' 45.31' 1 S89'04' I, TERANCE D. LANG, AM A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF INDIAIA AND HEREBY CERTIFY: THAT I HAVE SURVEYED THE LANDS HEREON DESCRIBED AND DELINEATED, AND THAI TRIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER LAY DIRECT SUPEROSION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND ,BELIEF THIS SURVEY HAS BEEN PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE W11H THE REOU-REMENTS OF RULE 12 OF MJN: UM STANDARDS FOR COMPETENT PRACTICES OF LAND SURVEYING " AND AS PRESCRIBED BY INDIANA ADWNI ISTRATIVE CODE 565, 1.1-12. SIGNED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL., 2003. LE O IR 05i X D1 P PI Im m SB' pg SJ, G!, L"'n JJ ova is 1:A10 1-1 — A m 70-1-010 AQ Ali V PW Q 110 h 7, 7 'n� TIM 1 anon 2 1. 041. 5 woul, Vol mov, Antos kj oilis For 0 ", 0 Ow "OTT Y! a. G L"'n JJ ova is 1:A10 1-1 — A m 70-1-010 AQ Ali V PW Q 110 h 7, 7 'n� TIM 1 anon 2 1. 041. 5 woul, Vol mov, Antos kj oilis For 0 ", 0 11 (4/28/2011) SBSJCHPC - 1h3AGO032.jp7 Paye ; Fe kZ oA— is "•�. Y }�$'�..F- I.Y , Paye ; Wl— ibis 10 sh, 9 --, , -, OnAl IS 0 L LLl Behnont 004: XW va Olin* 40= MtW 74I UZ: Cvllq°!-1 1412 Efull! izal El C3130 Q! :AUL U 4 F�e . . ......... .. M "K A Von, jAw v • 'Los —y"t, Rf #7420 WWI" No v 1 7410 tloeal 7421 G MRS CO OWN CRATIS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 April 2011 Application Number: 2011-0429 Property Location: 13271 Adams Road Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1871/Italianate style applied to a 3 -bay 1-house/Joseph Singer, builder Property Owner:, Michael Wheeler Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The red brick 2 %Z storey Italianate has a solid stone foundation. The windows have segmental brick arches and segmented window frames, double hung 2/2 and 2/1, with fixed transoms on the second floor. The gable roof has asphalt shingles deep cornices with brackets and dentil moulding. The front porch is open with turned posts and a concrete stoop. The Cherry Road porch has square posts with brackets and a wide dentil frieze with brackets. There is a westside rear one storey ell with French Doors. ALTERATIONS: The roofing materials are not original to the house (COA 2009-0821). The French doors, new siding on the ell were approved with COA#2001-0713-1.5 Pine trees and 2 Walnut trees were removed in the right of way for a utility upgrade with COA 2007-0501. —APPLICATION ITEMS: Please see attached narrative, site plan and figures. The Troyer Group engineer) is submitting this COA Application on behalf of St. Joseph County Engineering, Friends of Granger Paths (project sponsors) and Michael Wheeler (property owner). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. To install a multi use 10 foot concrete path along Adams Road in the right of way 42' from the front of the house as part of the Phase I Granger Paths Project. Remove trees and replant with landscaping and installation of a 1900 wrought iron fence all per diagrams and illustrations provided. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include -re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark.A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has been working with Granger Paths and Mr. Wheeler since 2005 concerning the mixed use trail system and with the Troyer Group for the past two years concerning the location of the trail and its impact on this landmarked home. Mr. Glass, acting SHPO, was at the most recent on-site meeting on April 14 and agreed that the mixed use trail needed to be moved as far away as possible from the house. At his recommendation curbing will be installed along Adams to allow for the path's location closer to the road and the furthest from the house. This will necessitate removal of trees and changes in the non -original landscaping features in front of the house. However, the Troyer Group proposed a landscape screening plan that will buffer the house from the trail while still remaining visible from the trail and road. The homeowner will install the fence. Staff recommends approval of this project as presented. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 4b601 Phone: 574-235-9798 . Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSjC1-1PC@cost-josephin.us Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiana.com/s chp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONwuNED nV THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received °Z? 452164 -LG -70 // Application Number 020 /7 — - 0,542 �, Past Reviews: R,(TS (Date of Last Review) Staff Approval authorized by: of/ Qce,q ao o 9 ❑ NO Historic Commission Review Date: %2•iy a0 R Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark National Register District (Name) Title: Certificate of Appropriateness: R.Denied F] Tabled F] Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: 13271 Adams Road, Granger, IN 46530 Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Michael Wheeler Address of Property Owner(s): 13271 Adams Road, Granger, IN 46530 Contractor(s) Name: N/A Contract Company Name: To be determined through competitive bid process Contractor Address: N/A City: N/A Phone: N/A DATE Current Use of Building: 'Single Family (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: Other - Site Revisions (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: [:] In-kind 2 Landscape New E] Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: See attached narrative, site plan, and figures. The Troyer Group (engineer) is submitting this COA Application on behalf of St. Joseph County Enqineerinq, Friends of Granqer Paths (proiect sponsors) and Michael Wheeler (property owner). Owner/Con actor: Fax: 574-259-9982 e-mail cjc@troyergroup.com (This of�c�eJwil nd ith only one designee) 1� Z • /r'1"'— and/or — APPLTC47ION REQU EMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Page 1 of 1 Catherine Hostetler - Re: Troyer's COA From: <mwh144@aol.com> To: <CHOSTETL@co.st joseph.in.us> Date: 5/2/2011 11:15 AM Subject: Re: Troyer's COA Thank you Catherine. I agree the troyer group will be submitting the COA ON our behalf. I will be installing the fence. Moving the current one closer to the road and adding to it... according to the drawings as it will be 46 feet from the center of the road and approx 26 ft from the home. The lilacs will be relocated by their landscaper and bush in front removed... I acquired the fence from Niles cemetery who indicated it dated around 1910 Again thank you Mike Wheeler 13271 Adams road Granger, IN -----Original Message ----- From: Catherine Hostetler <CHOSTETL@co.st joseph.in.us> To: mwhl44@aol.com Sent: Fri, Apr 29, 20114:00 pm Subject: Troyer's COA Mike, 1 picked up hard copies of the proposal and COA application from Troyer and I think their proposal looks very good and sympathetic to your home. They signed and submitted the COA with the drawings/photos that you have. Please e-mail me a brief note stating that Troyer is submitting the COA on your behalf with your consent. If there is a problem, please let me know as the deadline is Monday. Thank you and have a wonderful week's end Catherine Director, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana 574 235 9798 Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend/St. Joseph County Application of Certificate of Appropriateness Description of Proposed Work: The Friends of Granger Paths, in cooperation with St. Joseph County, is constructing Phase IA of the Adams Road trail project. This is the first phase of a multi -phase trail project. Phase 1A involves the construction of approximately. 0.8 miles pathway along the North Side of Adams Road from Elm Road to Cherry Road. The planned Granger Path system includes 21 miles of pathway. The trail will pass through a property on which a Local Landmark is located -13271 Adams Road (northeast corner of Adams and Cherry). The property is owned by Michael Wheeler, and it includes a c.1871 Italianate house (3 -bay I -floor plan), and a c. 1847 barn with cupola.. The front of the house faces Adams Road, which is separated by a distance of 55 feet. A path alignment through the property,that reduced impacts to the property, while adhering to federal multi -use trail design standards was agreed upon through coordination with the parties listed below: • Barbara Fredman — Friends of Granger Paths • Jessica Clark, Chip Porter— St. Joseph County Engineering • Toni Giffin, Jim Glass — IDNR, DHPA • Mary Kennedy — INDOT Cultural Resources Office • Joyce Newland — FHWA • Dan Corbin — INDOT LaPorte District • Catherine Hostetler— St. Joseph County Historic Preservation Commission • Mike Wheeler—Owner, Historic Property • Chris Waidner, C.J. Cunningham — The Troyer Group (Engineer) The 10 -foot wide path will be located adjacent to Adams Road until 150 feet west of Cherry Road, where it will curve north to preserve a mature tree (tree #6 as identified in the attached photos). To provide a barrier between vehicular traffic and trail users, a 6" curb, and a 2' gutter will be installed between the road and path. The path will remain within the existing right-of-way and will be located 42' from the front of the house. (See attached supplemental figures) Supplemental Figure 1 shows the path overtop an aerial photograph. Five trees near the west property line must be removed to accommodate the path. However, they are in poor condition due to numerous trimmings to remain clear of the overhead power lines. Four small landscape areas must be removed to accommodate the path and landscape improvements. However, per Mr. Wheeler's request, the lilacs from landscape area C will be transplanted. (the attached photos illustrate which trees and landscape areas are remain or be removed) In an effort to mitigate the impacts to Mr. Wheeler's property, landscape improvements will be installed at the time of the path construction (contractor is TBD). These landscape improvements will be arranged along a c.1900 wrought iron fence to be installed by Mr. Wheeler. Some sections of the fence are currently installed approximately 10 feet in front of the house, but these sections will be moved (see attached photo #7 for example fence sections). The fence will be installed outside of the existing right-of-way, approximately 26 feet in front of the house. Mr. Wheeler plans to install the fence yet this summer, while the path and landscape improvements are planned to be installed in spring of 2012. The landscape improvements will be installed immediately south of the fence. Plant materials include 10' (mature height) Junipers spaced 20' apart, pink and red flowering shrubs, day lilies, ornamental grasses, and the transplanted lilacs. A site plan (Supplemental Figure 2) is attached, along with landscape plant material cut -sheets, which describe the plants and provides pictures. The areas underneath the fence and plants will be covered with 3" of mulch. Photo #1 Photo #2 13271 Adams Road, Grariger, _ May 2; 2010 Granger Path, Phase 1A Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Refer to photo key on Supplemental Figure 11 _ Supplemental Information _ Photo #3 Photo #4 13271 Adams Road, Granger, klay2,2010 Granger Patti, Phase IA Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Refer to photo key on 'Supplemental Figure 1' Supplemental Information Photo #5 _ 13271 Adams Road, Granger, May 2, 2010 Granger Path, Phase 1A Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Rafer to photo koy on Supplemental Figure V - Supplemental Information Photo #7 Photo #8 (Examplel 1. 3271 Adams Road, Granger, Granger Path, Phase 1A ReA,.,rw photo koy on 'Suppiernental r-igure I' May 2, 2010 Application for Certificate of Appropriateness Supplementil Information manger paths ,landscape Plant materials tree'/ shrub common name: green columnar juniper botanical name (top photo): juniperus.chinensis 'hetzii columnaris' other notes: size: IO'high, 5.'wide 11intenance: relatively low' maintenance, may need trimming every few years to keep columnar form and height orran ger paths landscape plant materials shrubs common na.me: minuet weigela botanical name: other notes: clump shrub pink/red flowers in late spritig/early summer attracts bUtterflys tij ii a t. granger -paths landscape plant materials perennials common name (top photo): daylily botanical name (to- photo): hemerocallis species common name (bottom photo): dwarf fountain grass botanical name (bottom photo): =nnisetum alopecuroids `Hamelin'. other notes: daylily species vary in size and flower color, range in size from- 2' to 4.5' in height Notes., 00 Wrought Iron Fence is some as shown in Photo 7 (to be installed by owner) CL (D Uacs frorr Landscape AivaC' to be ranispfanled to CMos surrounding grto (2) Pedestrian Crossing Sign will be sir, for to those shown in attached photo 43 0 Utility Poles to be rolocoted 3'ryxth r ------------------- (2) Planfing bed, to Include. 3" pt mulch Proposed Londsccpe -Mot--rials: P.-oposed Poll) (see ortactled cut shce r rean coturnnor jun, er Pink/Rod Sfto FwOhrg P;'ar;f Mrleiicr [R9n-,a,;w.Vj Perienfe4s - Orn. Gross/Day illfes ---------- Ci in N 100.01 53 60.01 Apo. E4stiV P/ ... . ...... 7............ . ........ .. ................ . . 777— . ....... rV (2 AMMMM .. .... .... . Adams Rood ... ... .. ..... . . ... ... .... .. . .... . ... .... .... .. . .. .. .... .. ... ... ... . . . ... .... ... ... 0 20' 40' 60' ........ .. . . .... . . . ........ . Application for Certificate of Appropriateness INTIANA TROM.!t f/lrOtK !FrEPrkRRIENTOFTRANSPORT.A'nON Supplemental Figure 2 mr—RGROUP A-DN"s TRAIL A TW Application for Certificate of Appropriateness � 1 PWM�OVI{ Supplemental F7gure t GROUP :"• ' .fy�� ' "" "�s`e" } 01]UiM. ^Mhos . npeep .ir T.41wiye�on QeA`�' i ---- rwingR(W ' --------- Fdge--4Pawnerf {:.. PmposPd Poth s^iWSNng Ft nt Mate" ' _ �T PeSRQt7(.°SCOF`C to RetP.O2t c UeesAondscope to be Removea Photo 0.6--mlafon �35^ : ft 1'.s.r4�e 0 40' 60' W \ e j INDIANA r n DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION i 0°VP1MFIsrv� ARAM.S MAX �1 WkvE�wat f i la:-a.xa- ilj i tn.� Wrr.• 1.. t n amaw (4/25/2011) Catherine Hostetler- MtgMin,Des09O2236Sec10614apr11.pdf Page 1 . TTG Project # 09110-00 INDOT Des # 0902236 TROM ��. GROTJR ,0ttt Planning • Design . Construction MEETING MINUTES 550 Union St. Alishnivaka, IN 46544 (800) 200-9976 mm.troyergroup.com Project: Adams Road Trail (Des. Nos. 0902236, 1006373) Mtg. Date: April 14, 2011 Issue Date: April 22, 2011 Location: Harris Branch Library - Granger, Indiana - Present: Barbara Fredman — Friends of Granger Paths Jessica Clark, Chip Porter —St. Joseph County Engineering Toni Giffin, Jim Glass — IDNR, DHPA Mary Kennedy — INDOT Cultural Resources Office Joyce Newland — FHWA Dan Corbin — INDOT LaPorte District Catherine Hostetler — St. Joseph County Historic Preservation Commission Mike Wheeler —Owner, Historic Property Chris Waidner, C.J. Cunningham — The Troyer Group (see attached sign -in sheet) Copies To: Attendees, Section 106 Correspondence File 1. The Friends of Granger Paths, in cooperation with St. Joseph County, is constructing Phase IA of the Adams Road trail project. This is the first phase of a multi -phase trails project. Phase IA involves the construction of approximately 0.8 miles pathway from Elm Road to Cherry Road. The planned Granger Path system includes 21 miles of pathway. 2. The preliminary Route Study was introduced to explain why Phase IA is being located on the North Side of Adams Road. a. Phase IA (Elm to Cherry) and subsequent phases along Adams Road were evaluated as part of the Route Study b. It was revealed that the preferred side of Adams Road was the north side due to: C Safety considerations ❑ Cost estimates of resolving design conflicts c. Cultural resources, including a cemetery, would be impacted in future phases with a route on the south side of Adams Road. 3. The original proposed design was discussed. The design standards for multi -use trails were introduced. Unlike a sidewalk, multi -use trails are intended for multi -directional bicycle use; therefore safety considerations require that they be a minimum of 8 feet in width, but 10 -foot wide paths are preferred. 4. Mr. Wheeler restated his project concerns: Page I of3 http://oec.troyergroup.com/project.✓.vyoe/09110-00/design_docs/Mig Min.doc T+-z--r—•,:T"a..••�„p�.—.—..+a._'T^r��—.+,;T._T.^.'�.--.s .T..ne _ (4/25/2011)Catherine Hostetler - MtgMin_Des0902236 'Sec166�14apr11.pdf Page 2 a. The 10 -foot path is too wide. 5'-6' wide would be preferable and more congruent to other sidewalks in the area. b: The path is too close to his front door. (The north side of the path is 32' feet from the south side of Mr. Wheeler's house. The edge of Adams Road is currently 53' from the house). c. Ms. Clark reiterated the design guidelines. Mr. Wheeler stated that if the path were to remain 10 feet wide, then he preferred that it be located closer to Adams road. 5. There was discussion regarding the project's impacts to the characteristics of the property contributing to its eligibility to the National Register of the Historic Places. Mr. Glass asked if any of the trees were identified as character defining features in the Historic Properties Report. No specific trees were identified; however the report does reference a "well -shaded" yard. 6. Ms. Hostetler explained that the Historic Preservation Commission would have to approve any changes to the site through the review of a "Certificate of Appropriateness." The next meeting this project could be placed on the agenda is May 16'', and materials must be submitted by May 2nd Ms. Hostetler's primary concern with the project as initially presented is that there is too much pavement too close to the house. 7. At this time, the meeting relocated to Mr. Wheeler's property, where realignment options were discussed further. 8. Through discussion of the project and a visit to the historic property, the following revisions to the project design were finalized. Please refer to the attached exhibit, which includes notes and dimension describing these changes. a. The path will be realigning immediately adjacent to Adams Road b. Under this alignment: a. The path would be 10 feet wide. Although design guidelines allow an 8 -foot path, the alignment nearer Adams Road forces trail users nearer vehicular travel lanes, and they tend to prefer the center of the path, essentially narrowing the path. 8 feet wide would not be preferable when aligned so close to Adams Road. b. A curb and gutter (2 foot gutter with 6 inch reveal) would be constructed as a barrier between vehicular traffic and trail users. c. Upon performing detail design of this alignment after the meeting, the north side of the path is now 42.4 feet from the south side of the house and 15.4 feet south of the right-of-way line (compared 32 feet from house to path under the original design). c. The utility poles on the southeast comer of the property would need to be relocated to the north. This could impact the mature tree on the corner of the property (tree #7 as identified in prior Section 106 Coordination). It appears as though the tree already has a 15'-20' clear zone from the overhead wires. The redesign shows that utility poles on the southeast corner will have to be moved a minimum of 3 feet. Conditional upon AEP's approval, this shift will not result in the loss of the mature tree nearest the southeast corner of the property. d. The first mature tree to west of the house (Tree #6 as identified in prior Section 106 documentation) can remain. The path will be adjacent to Adams Road until it would curve around the tree and hug the right-of-way line. - Mr. Wheeler stated that he would not oppose the removal of this tree. Page 2 of 3 http://aec.troyergroup.com/proje cts/s joetfl9110-00/design_docs/Mtg Mkdoc {{ (4/25/2011) Catherine Hostetler - MtgMin_be' 0Ob2236_8ec106_14apr11.pdf _ Page e. The curb would continue west along Adam Road and terminate where curb and gutte currently exist east of Cherry Farm Trail. f. Mr. Wheeler has acquired approximately 200 linear feet of c.1900 wrought iron fence from the Niles Cemetery. He is planning to install this on his property along the right- of-way line. In addition to installing this, he asked if it would be possible to salvage the lilacs to be removed from the southeast corner of the property and relocate them between the fence and path. The project plans will call out the relocation of the lilacs along the south edge of the right-of-way line. Other screening plants will also be introduced. Arbor Vitaes were suggested. 9. When asked if the realignment proposed by The Troyer Group would avoid a finding of "Adverse Effect," Mr. Glass stated that the further away from the that the path could be, the more likely it would avoid such a finding. 10. Mrs. Hostetler stated that she would contact AEP (electric provider) to discuss moving the utility poles on the southeast corner of the property, such that it does not necessitate the removal of tree V. We believe these minutes reflect the intent of the events, discussions and decisions made during the meeting. Please notify this office in writing within seven (7) days if participants find any errors, omissions, or discrepancies. Cestop er dner, P.B. Project Manager Attachments: Sign -in sheet Proposed Plan Revisions Page 3 of3 http://0ec.froyergroup.comlproje cts/syoe/09/10-0o/de.rign docs/Mig Min.doc , 4/25/2019 „CatherinebHostetler - MtgMin_Des0902236�Sec106_14apr11`pdf�� BAN W STI Project# 09110.00 1 ITROYER W1 GROUP,INC Leaders in Planning, Design and Management Services for Enduring Built Environments 550 Union Street, Mishawaka, IN 46544 Slern In Sheet Phone: 574-259-9976 Fax: 574-259-9982 Project: Adams Trail, Phase 1 Mtg. Date: Thursday, April 14, 2011 Location: Harris Branch Library, Granger, IN Copies To: Attach to meeting minutes S i en in Sheet: Name Company Email, Signature Phone Toni Giffin INDR, Division of Historic Preservation TGiffin@dnr.IN.gov (317) 233-9638 Mary Kennedy INDOT, Cultural Resources MKENNEDY@indot.IN.gov + Office (317) 232-5215 C fyjJJ�^ Joyce Newland FHWA Joyce.Newland@dot.gov l}� Jessica Clark St. Joseph County Engineer JCLARK@co.st-joseph.in.us (574) 235-9626J✓^i[�.ti(�!• Barbara Freedman Friends of Granger Path grangerpaths@gmail.com / Catherine Hostetler St. Joseph County Historic CHOSTETL@co.st-joseph.in.us Preservation Commission (574) 235.9798 Michael Wheeler Owner, Historic Property mwhl44@aol.com (574) 243-7650 Chris Waldner Project Manager, ctw@troyergroup.com `.. 1� The Troyer Group (574) 277-1375 4;,l ;,...:. ' C.J. Cunningham The Troyer Group cjc@troyergroup.com (574) 259-9976 i I,^ f �IVVI 7 �� ,_ ; ��, � ailf, J`�t 71 z 344 h7t'ri'zfi)Vi� rf/ititi .1 C•�n �cC'�c[" Jl•. �O`�Yk�j...!I'Y'�f C•�cF'�T"�CC�.:� _�.^_�f,�i.�.�,US /��,�.��`---__ I Page 1 of I Page 4 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: . May 2, 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502 Property Location: 1043 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Shingle/1908/Fred W. Keller Property Owner: Michael A. Neises Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE:, The property at 1043 Riverside Drive consists of a 2%s storey frame home set upon a square floor plan with a two stall garage situated at the rear of the property along a north/south alleyway and bounded on the south by an east/west alleyway. The house is set upon a concrete block foundation. The walls of the house are wood shingle with board trim. The roof is a high hip with a right gable projection with gable returns. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles. There is a full width front porch with shingled posts and walls. The windows are 1/1 double hung. There is a nine pane attic window in the gable. The two stall garage has wood flush siding and a low hipped roof, there are 2/2 windows on both the east and west side; a pair of restored original sliding doors on the east stall and an overhead door on the west stall opening. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows have been added on the house. In 2003, the entire garage was repaired and restored (COA 2003-0515-2). The overhead door on the garage is a replacement. A new roof was installed (COA 2005-0623-04). The fencing is not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. Replace existing perimeter fencing (some wood and chain link) with new 6' privacy wood fencing on three sides of the property. 2. Replace existing storm windows on second floor. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Applicant proposes to change the fence from the current mismatched fencing materials to a shadowbox style wood fence on three sides of the property in the same footprint as what currently exists. 2. Applicant proposes to replace existing silver storm windows on second floor with in-kind aluminum triple track storms in a white finish, which will make all storm windows on the house unified in color. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more . building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with_circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required - - - Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. N Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fence as it will unify the fence from several styles and materials to just wood and conforms to the Standards and Guidelines. Staff recommends approval of the In-kind storm window replacement. r Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fay 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Website: http*//www.st osepheountyindiana.com/sjchp/ A Certified Local Government OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ?xj�g 0210// hA/p�plication Number a a 1 Past Reviews: M YES (Date o/ Last Review) 1,� t� x)11"1 Q NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review DaterLoTcaHistoric 'I Local Landmark District (Name) F vpvl _ National Landmark E] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied F] Tabled E] Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: • /Oj<3 11 .5 tD]✓ -�)k to Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) 141CWAE(_ A, N151_5LS Address of Property Owner(s):�- Contractor(s) Name: "Vc' /6 Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: DATE Current Use of Building: (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government — industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone- Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: LTJ n -kind Landscape E] New ED4eplacement (not in-kind) Demolition (more than one box may be checked)] r Description of Proposed Work: wo u � $- Ct�A� „t Lt N (�� c_,J t •-fVr 1�1 �� 6 ` i�Q tt1 PtiC.I/ t�JooL> F'�N Cr rs Cr— oat C� ��u��= �x t 5 ;t.t Cs- �of�t. �rNo�..�S r� 5�<�►��2 Owner/Contractor: Fax: e-mail MI CRAG( -NEC; Si�-S�S'N1,PS I(-. C -OA", (This office will correspo with onll ore designee) . ✓�/%-� and/or Signaturi of Owner - Signature of Contractor — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Z 4-1 .............. ti 1043 Riverside, May 2, 2011 N% 6ft x 8ft Shadowbox Wood Panel • Pressure -treated • Pickets double nailed on each rail • Built with 2x4 back rails • Warranty against rot, decay or termites • Easily painted or stained t 3.. F 3 s f. FA Triple Track 28" x 55" White Storm Window • Three track storm window with top and bottom removable panels • Top or bottom ventilation. glass and screen remove easily to clean • Woolpile weatherstripping reduces air infiltration. stabilizer bar adds strength. f Date: 4 May 2011 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2011-0502A Property Location: 914 Leland Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Arrliitect or Builder: 1911/Prairie/Klapp&Taggert Buildiers Property Owner: Jennifer Dear and James Donahue Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE Two storey rectangular plan home set upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are stucco with a wood course band between the storeys and a frieze board at the eave. The Gable roof has asphalt shingles, there are two dormers both with pediments and wood shingles on the dormer walls with wide eaves. There is a frill %Adth font porch with square brick piers with fascia board and a small pediment above the entrance. The windows arc wood double hung with aluminum storms. The front windows have muntins in the form of geometric squares. The.garage is attached to the rear of the house and has a wood shed dormer above and an attached back porch with pergola. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and doors. The garage was constructed before 1932, the shed dormer and back porch are more recent additions. The roof is not original to the house. APPIACATION ITEMS: Replacement of deteriorating wood privacy fence with wood shadow box style fence -that will closely resemble the newer fence not being replaced), and replacement of (long gone) gate over driveway off of alley. (Fence is behind house, off alley). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT:. The homeowners wish to replace a dilapidated stockade fence with a wood fence resembling the shadow box style fence. The fence will be in the same location as the old along the side and enclosing the rear yard of the house. There will be a three foot wood swing gate at the side of the house. Also, there will be a 10 foot wood swing gate along the alley that will be installed between the brick pillars and additional fencing. All per photographs, diagram and Schuell Fence Proposal submitted. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chanin Park: L TH.E ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITF, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks %i-ith regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. 1,andscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin_ Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, -private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage. disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the stricture shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. 04tecomnended 'Ntew site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity ro a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encoiicaged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacklopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, not, industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes. skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review, Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen frorn a street. The Commission Will CVahlatCall installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval ofthe fence and gates as the project conforms to the Chapin Park Standards and Guidelines. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SL Joseph County 125 S. I-afayette Blvd., South Band, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: rA"rkhf_ritxRuiIdin South I3etirl, Indiana 46(01 Phone- 574-235-9-798 * Fax: 574-235-95-78 # Frnail:Sl1qCHPCVkqSt-J0s4_- . ph.in.us w0y,ite: iitq)://wwwstioselihcoutit},ilidiana.com/s chp/index.hiiiii OFFICT USE ONLY >>»>> DO NOT COMPLETEANYENTRIV; COMMINED INT MIS BOX >>>>>>OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Application Number 4011-- 015,602-Iq Past Reviews: Q YES (Daieq1,:stFevk-w) .. . . . ...... . . . . ..... D<O Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: A011 7X01y .16 f Local Landmark rViefocal Historic District (Name) ....................... e_ 011- n- National Landmark [] National Register District (:tiame) Certificate of Appropriateness: F� Denied E] Tabled n Sent'llo Committee E] Approved and Issued DAI' Address of Property for proposed work: ci 114 idary-A Ne, Street Numtvr and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): Unease Print) ..Jef1V..\4r' IVa r T >r) o 1i ue Address of Property Owner(s): /-0 M 0, Contractur(s) Name. fit Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: Q-V+q kdanrr, City: '�Ikt 41 -, 1 0� d L1 U U 1r � Phone:�J544) aT; - q c� co Current Use of Building: S I /\C)16 (Single Fat.tlilq Alti-Family - Commercial - Goti Type of Building Construction- pri-CA. 4- S-Jqkc(.a (Wo" , I Frame - Vrick - Stone - Steal - Concrete -- Other) Proposed Work: Lr&u� In-kind I Landscape [] New R Replacement (not in-kind) F-1 Demolition (wore than vete bur ma1v tv ckyked) Description of Proposed wor%: (6100'1'elxvnekn-tf&�(Yq MA p(Nelu ' i AU Lf);4) 51vdao-lo* s le, `'iw_ 1114� will .&W61 rl�,04614- Moir be, tn(n irtpllwm on I:: (I of v �we_ r -r. t�' 11 119 C'r-e (ice. I N kiLed" Xult"T ov,tte_ Ner 0 a I C� Owner/Contractor.- Fax: 01W/ e-mail ria.-jmJkur�) t 1, C (7 his LfflLe will cortrslKrW viillh only one tksii1111) and/or — A.11111-ICA772N REQUMEMENUS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — �� d'H, day �t�� F.k��✓A�^�t��'�.t��,�34 of �� .. *{„{�" �, - /. 914 Leland, May 2, 2011 7 914 Leland, May 2, 2011 COED 1 R1r--;,T PROFS FOR THI `- D I R 221-77 ili.3.•FY1'.i: PD.. SCUi :_ ,":tJs ': �`7 •F' E Name - JENNIFER amse:JENNIFER DEAR stye.. 914 LELAND AVENUE otySOUTH BEND IIN e 46616~ Gabe Moore Phones: South Senn! 574-272.-9200 Saler Representative Elkhart 574-$74-9600 Fax 574-271-$156 (S -r- , v G _ �. 22377 ADAMS ROAD SOUTH SEND. INDIANA 46625 sw.v; schueilfence.com T o/rr r t 112 DEPOSIT & TyD• BALANCE ON RECEIPT OF INVOICE Sty Is BOARD ON BOARD H w;;ti t 72tt I 274-7227 CELL INFOLLOW GRADE _ NATURAL �m THIS PROPOSAL COVERS: CIRCLE ALL OPTIONS THAT APPLY, _ OPTION#1: MATERIALS AND LABOR TO REPjOVE AND HAUL 61 FEET OF EXISTING 61000 FE14CE AND INSTALL - 61 FEET NEW 6 FT. HIGH BOARD ON BOARD PRIVACY FENCE IN SAME LINE AS OLD. NEW MATERIALS WILL BE NOMINAL 1 X 6 TREATED PINE PICKETS, NOMINAL 2 X 4 TREATED PINE CROSS STRINGERS AND NOMINAL 4 X 4 TREATED PINE POSTS SET IN 2-112 FT. DEEP CONCRETE FOOTINGS. TOTAL — $1,700.00 OPTION#2: MATERIALS AND LABOR TO INSTALL ONE (1) 10 FT. HIDE DOUBLE SWING GATE IN BETWEEN EXISTIN ILLARS. GATE WILL BE FLANKED ON EITHER SIDE BY A SECTION OF BOARD ON BOARD STYLE FENCE ATTACHED TO THE GATE POSTS AND CONNECTING TO THE PILLAR VIA 2 X 4 NAILER WHICH WILL BE ANCHORED TO PILLARS. GATE POSTS WILL BE FLANGE MOUNTED TO EXISTING CONCRETE. GATE WILL BE MADE USING SAME MATERIALS AS OPTION #1. THE 1 X 6 PICKETS BUTTED EDGE TO EDGE (WESTERN PICKET STYLE) ON ONE SIDE AT THE GATE FRAME WORK. TOTAL — $780.00 OPTION: MATERIALS AND LABOR TO INSTALL ONE (1) 18 FT. WIDE STEEL FRAME WOOD GATE !MOUNTED ON TWO 62 6-5/8" O.D. STEEL POSTS SET IN 3 FT. DEEP CONCRETE FOOTINGS. PICKETS WILL BE TREATED 1 X 6 PINE AND SCREWED TO ONE SIDE OF THE STEEL FRAME WORK. TOTAL — $1,300.00 OPTIONMATERIALS AND LABOR TO INSTALL ONE (1) 3 FT. WIDE SINGLE SITING GATE. MATERIALS ARE l X#4: REATED PICKETS BUTTED EDGE TO EDGE AND NAILED TO ONE SIDE OF TREATED PINE 2 X 4 CROSS STRINGERS. GATE WILL SKIING FROM ONE (1) 4 X 4 POST A14D LATCH TO CORNER OF HOUSE. CUSTOMER TO OBTAIN PERP(IT FROM CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT.` [*3 AS THE GROUND RISES AND FALLS, THE FENCE WILL ALSO RISE AND FALL. APPROXIMATE START DATE FROM RECEIPT OF SIGNED CONTRACT . 1-2-.6.1EEKS...._ .._... NUMBER OF DAYS FOR COMPLETION AFTER STARTING JOB .45...-- - ..CLOSEST CROSS STREET C0NDIT10NS Tn:s voocgaf, whwn a�cVvl Pv by the f U'Cht'5Af, bP^On" n, ... r:tfa": ^ !1te !e'>'15 and fDn 7+: =rC BSD eti:al'y Set *w1h htlr9-P !I may P£" ne fha't^yec of mvcinoac :n b^y '"a,Ilef excmv :?y written agreement of bot^ SC^.uel Pn^P a^C t^8 puff -laser s: 1$ CC"tnye^! vror tlZ=avS ctM Ic Vnkft5. 1"e a=ICAs t$ aw.CrY Mee causes b-yo.0 the con.v't Ot Iht S03tw 2 Th7 Contra.t 'S payatie ,i fv'€ UX, :rtJrl„e Alto! S t S'an' a coq,;,:e':4" V Inas wclK to be oe-lolmec by ,Sz%eit Fence Cc^Daly p;:'S:J3n! to th.s co^:-ae' Th,s IS A C3S'1 safe dr^ Pureh3", has :Ta no !it to deter Daymen• PAM t^e :!set§ tale The ?a'i:es a^;rne IhA' 'n 11N e't n! +t4ri.!'.A42i' C:es f,n, pay I^"0 ba:3.^._P to Set>Cr whor. $De::fleC aoove-the tle-ave^t amoun, shat RCAR NTe FIEST C 1Iez% PEq l -I NTH twn:;:h is Ar? a'^l;a' tH1rC8"'.l A;;Q ta: 0` tII. -i ;5.s•_haser a•;f P.?$ he Sh3': to ltablA for o f c:u.^ CK oSt:. P1VPNy $ fPe :. 3^c!hn:' PYpO'44S toCu'fed t'y st`+ve'z rence co^Da^r n Its the rcifi.crtor of sly a'ount e' 4 >; tof work ?e't?'r^•E'°'1 ^ AlMeft!'eC rvittr• >r, this C ontra;t - 3 Alt propos3!s Ini.iu Inst$' d!10 by the S. :w•. a'P ma;:q cn the r:. ,...1 Ira, !I- ell". -C- Il? co^D`:e?e, wit^.: ', inrnrr ct:pr hY 1'16 PVfff?aSer An'7 rh3^geS tn:t:a:ed i w •rr0 Purt'!a5ef are Su^.t"'Ci to 3cVx13f cha'pes. AP:::' t0 iomr;encen m D, De:i`orf`o^cf by S.!.ier � rt-a'1i 1. fn'S ^"fk:t o,v.hay.r shat c,r- s $im:w -i Suf`1C'Q^: 8.:0£"X:0 3S to hle ex.3'_I krz c, --s i:Oc" ri.'C`•ttSf' S Tea` D'f:o,,i ••y c' al oft'?0") I r+n rakes a'ks ;J'aiY.' YaaK ;S, a: wp: A: A.' v'*Se'^yfCU RO !:«t x a�C c ;,w n^• i.^ ItiI t�, A! SbfeJ's::?^. C:: +, u' c3S ' �'X's I5' y Kl; aFi:uln� '.v onef i�:e �m.x'>n5 a^w S:rC" IDBS C` 1.".!g wttr-ti a'e us8 as mil o` an L=?o^ ;':'a:^C ,.,�nc� „ S' S -e' t -w. , I b^ TAS Do�st}8 or I:3`.y9 to pur„h3'fir fit an,V" ' e`se f„' c-i'^a;^g3 'M,ftti v troy- in ^� $:.;.�Jf?:!' r'y As'6n 'y?'>'P,i .fif>'eF bYJP,t rvlasAr a; to riQ e.a.f vx:at onA; Lt SjC" r.rY and :.v'•S t' v ,;`,a:t+'`S`8'I A':,f f ;Se^s'M'r a-',! say« Se7ef ho—osc !fir ale !.3!,1:'7 c' S--',ef FK.'ri7 :'uy f'd,. -,-mat'3n 1taXr! !t"s r�ai::e��'. �+'L:Yrn2-l.".'t C3!! se -,n( .':%'t rt°aSi,++r S f.13. '.:J"'.? .� WF';: f? 'Y ?P t!r >f rP^t ^1. ..'.'Q Va"Jtl$ : - 'Y C.�''^S3i^:n Cnr'Y;Q" r y" ("9 '� �:'if�*i of :i_'��ir AY;d U$Ja' : ti 1'y ` t a i V l We a$ Dvt*c !L eD w,* Arz ^✓" fly, w nQS ^a$ ' ^a:' a Vii' eP C', e . Na•^.ry any Deem, 1 a ^X h may it 3o i cn e A^'. !'fY.z N 3n. -a—tss for la'I'ure !'v, bva n six h S"?OWC 1t beecmrYt@ wSSa'y dn', •7 Y..^e .'A1II ' a'r nv! $?'f=rC $!i ,o mnoyo e..;$t n-- ! nze o� bukllf1t-- ry .y, t'a)e, to t.'_ tt, }U',.sh erica talce r, 1w D fovt:r[« t^t Dce15, C' 1f ac:!t•ora! taty Is redo° O°) rwt •.,crve .. •+ ., ax'e?> 'ac e =^al;rr a;re<..; ozr ?bf svclt rzr•A ex,•+ sQ + yc3vtr� - S In ::ase a^y cne or rno,e or the h,'�5':I'4:.: S"3I':r aro !edS'on :;Q r.C1,^, to t'.A r^y2::. .ti.?;j33 C' Unel:01-.03:Ie IM any reipeCt. S.1_^ tf.YAI.C'y_ 3>8 ^yA.1} Cr u^8't'.':e i✓!i ly $r'.31t no, AI'P:•. d'1y o"'Q' er<, Y:v^n 1"5'n^! aro :. ..- 3"3st iR ns 1r SU:'e an Yriii•1, i'.Q;a t' :. a.-1r'^IIs^!P a•cYs.cr. ?`a".t nee, hs3gre Tfi$ Contract G>r'acsai slWl tnrml^a'a :I: -�a,s 1,o,M. VII. :`aiII of t"', s5,:n by CCPiIw? rol fye:ulerc by the PUfckas=ar t hevt examfnt'd the ebove Cmt,rct f'm ossf, read Itis .^"o-ditfona and ht^erg w:veOt ttfe a<aromsn:#erw2 tt"ns at an exsc'ut" cdntraot Axcct'pted by ii�tt _.._.__.__ schu Ei Fence co.�`..---.._.�,.�Date 04-12-11 0 �- 1 ; cot (�t owl 33 so. .wfIl 't - TtPl 01 >e t I XU v STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 2, 2011. Application Number:. * 2011-0502B Property Location: 1081 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Prairie/1920 Property Owner: Ed Talley Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: - 1081 Riverside Drive is a two storey square plan with stucco walls. The roof is hip with asphalt shingles. Foundation is brick. There is an enclosed porch. Windows are 1/1 double hung. A garage sits behind the house on the property. ALTERATIONS: none. APPLICATION ITEMS:. See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT; Homeowner proposed to install two separate fences in the backyard of the property. The first fence, nearest to the house will be a 42" tall wood gothic picket fence with two egress points. Gates to be simply constructed as a cut away from the fence and will offer a smooth transition. The picket fence will be mostly shielded by neighboring bushes with only a 6 foot section visible from street. The second, a 6 foot stockade privacy fence is in the rear of the lot along the alley way and west property line. Fence is currently in progress. The west of fence will be completely shielded by 8 foot neighboring bushes and the alley side is visible and ends adjoining the garage. The gate will likely be on the north facing the back of house. A patio floor of square one foot tiles will be installed inside privacy fence footprint and a fire ring grill set in retaining wall stones will be centered in the enclosure. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences -are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There arc also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the picket fence, the privacy fence, and the stonescaping within the privacy fence as it conforms to the Standards and Guidelines for Riverside Drive and is also not very noticeable to the public right of way. Application -FOR- Certificate OR-Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend &, St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: rminhy-r4tv, South Rend, T -A;,— AAAA1 Phone: 574-235-9798 Far. 574-235-95778 * Email: SffijC1l11'C4cc,.st+)scph.in.us V*bsitL- http://%vi"v.s". licountyitidiam,com/sjchp/indc%.htn-d OFFICE USE 04%1'LY>>>>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONlr4lNTD IN THIS BOY -—OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Z Application .Number - eso.ZB Past Reviews:] E] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: to Historic Commission Review Date:l(i F1 Local Landmark Local Historic District ova",r) Di'v e n National Landmark E] National Register District (Sante) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied Tabled n Sent To Committee Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: Street NUMIler and Start Ml"x Name or Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: f��Jz City: Sr'(1.r1l '060,12 Phone: 3 vv - s - Current Use of Building- Sis:1, �K, it .-Multi-Family- Onnwreid -Gou,rnment -IndustrW_ Vacant -etc.) Type of Building Construction:—,7Z.? L,e (44'cvd Frame - Brick - Slott- - Steel - Ce"crete - other) Proposed Work: [] In-kind n Landscape n New Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (mw thin one lux vyq Ir -�hecW) Description of Proposed Work: -U/ Wrz- 1,W15 z,��x Owner/Contractor: Fax, e-mail 6b71 -? A. {This u0i onlY one desj(nee) xand/or 4"L`CAT70J\T.REQUIRCX1EN7S.A RE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — r--4 00 1081 Riverside, May 2, 2011 (5/2/2011) Wayne Doolittle - Fence project description.doc � 1 11- -- � .... .. .. ............ - . ........ Fence Project Description 1081 Riverside Drive, Lot 35 .... . . ...... Seite 1 The fence project for the rear yard at 1081 Riverside Drive, located in the Riverside Local Historic District is intended to accomplish two objectives. First, it will provide an area for the dog to run. This area is enclosed by 42 -inch tall, by 8 -foot panels of French Gothic Pickets. Two gates, one located at the west side of the house one foot forward from the rear of the house. The second gate is two feet west of the rear cast corner of the house. This fence begins where the stockade privacy fence ends and continues north approximately 24 -feet, set 6 -inches east of the west property line, then turns east for approximately 6 -feet, where it meets the house. This 6 -foot section is the only section of the fence visible from the street. On the eastern side of the enclosure, the fence line runs north and outlines a parking area for the Grand Marquis automobile which is one foot longer than the garage., making it unable to fit into the enclosed garage. The second area is intended as an entertainment and relaxation area with a 12 by 12 -foot one foot square tile surface set on a gravel and sand base at ground level. In the center of this patio area is an in ground 27 -inch circular fire ring with barbeque grill cover.. rising 18 -inches from below the surface of the patio and enclosed with RiverToNNn-- retaining wall stones. This area is enclosed by 6 -foot tall by 8 -foot long stockade panels. — A single gate is located on the north side of the enclosure and faces the rear of the house. This fence sets one foot north of the north side of the alleyway and is shielded on the north side by 8 -foot tall Lilac bushes. The fence then runs north along the west side of Lot 35, and is set 6 -inches east of the western property line. A Burning Bush hedge of over 8 -feet in height owned by the owner of Lot 34, shields this fence from that neighbor. The privacy fence ends approximately one half the distance of this hedge,xvhcre the picket fence then begins and runs approximately 24 -feet north of the end of this hedge. A photograph, circa 1965, of the former Mr. Melander, of 1064 Wood,,Nrard Avenue, sets directly across the alleyway from the rear of Lot 35, which is 1081 Riverside Drive. This fence has not existed for over forty years. The privacy fence replaces the pictured picket fence. The owner of 1081 Riverside Drive began construction of the rear of the privacy fence under the impression that no permits, including a CoA was necessary since the fence project was in the rear yard and not visible from the street. Nklien the owner became aware that their assumptions were incorrect, they halted all construction until permits could be obtained. There was no malice of forethought. (5/2/2011) Wayne Doolittle - Site Plan 002. jpg Seite 1 . ,. , _M_.� ..._.... _.. _.... e 1 a � O to �. L LOT 34 / J At �y,,, 11y, _ ■T$`� - i LOT 36 sr -, '� SET PK NAIL (502011) Wayne Doolittle - 8-foot section of 42-inch picket fence ediield.P6 1 , � �� /�v11)Wayne Doolittle ~1S05 - ----�—'-------~--~--------------~~~---�-----~- --� ----'-� ;51212011) Wayne Doolittle - Looking Forth from alli'ywayLCiiteCI.�JPG sei#e 1 P, ........... . . .... ... ...... ... 3/2/2011) Wayne Doolittle - Looking SW from driveway off East corner of house� edited.JPG Seise (5/212011) Wayne D.o.olittie -Backyard #1_edi#ed,JPG Site 1 Wavne Doolittle - Re: Ed Talley From, edtal <edia](�/aol-com> To-. "Wayne Doolittle" <WDO(Axri Date: 5/5/20114:30 PM Subject: Re: Ed Talley Page I of 3 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502C Property Location: 1130 E. Wayne Street - Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1928/Whitcomb&Keller Property Owner: . Kimberly and Matthew Bloom Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey brick Tudor Revival home has the original asbestos tile on the steep gable roof and steel casement windows with six lights and stationary transoms. The windows have brick header course sills and brick soldier course lintels. There is a round arch entry in the front gable with a brick corbelled door surround. There is a diamond brick pattern above the entry door. A gabled wood canopy with brackets is above the side door and the chimney on the west side of the house is brick with a stone cap. There is a one storey enclosed rear porch ALTERATIONS: The enclosed back porch was a noted later addition to the house in the 1986 survey card. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolish attached porch. Construct 2 -story addition in rear of home per attached drawings. MESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This project will remove the rear enclosed porch that is tot original to the house. A 2 storey addition will be constructed per drawings. The windows will be Anderson 400 Series Casement windows to match original window configuration. The GAF Slateline roofing material will compliment the current roofing material on the main house. The masonry materials will match the brick and mortar of the original house; the window sills will be brick. All exterior trims will match existing. A gabled rear entry in the new addition will match the style of the side entry. Please refer to attached product information and drawings. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street Local Historic District III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of anew structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. ecommended ontemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. rohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. - - Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half-timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the removal of the non -original enclosed porch and its replacement with a two storey addition as it conforms to the standards of the East Wayne District for New Construction. A two storey addition to this home was approved by the Commission with COA #1999-0805, but it was never constructed. Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 MailingAddress:County-City Building South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9758 Fax 574-235-M • Emat SBSJCEII'Mco stjoseph3nus Website: httlr//www,s§osephcmmtlhuL mcbm/sjchp/index html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRMS CONEDUD IN 719S BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received a U o20 / f Application Number _4A / /— _ D 50 d- V Past Reviews: ❑ YES (a* o f Gut Awew) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark 2facal Historic District pv.) 6.1th ,► I ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District Qvamal Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent 7b Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work '11.3o e R3T 1rvAY/Va- Shat Number and Stmt Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) M ArrHew Q Ic Mi;c1RA.-{ r3. o a M Address of Property Owner(s): 1159 L--Y}Sr . wAY„r Contractors) Name: C -HAW NOMC5 5 w7r C-4ASE Contract Company Name: CHASE- M o M eS e,« Contractor Address: t t y q q W t c -la t tvS' OLIVE City 0 o Fri. Phone: 5 -71f -M6-15-76 Current Use of Building S t ^+ a La F*m t w (Single Family -Multi -Family -Commercial -Government -Industria! -Vacant -etc.) Type of Building Construction: tn)QpD r�M E . ,`7' age t uc &7>zau02 (Wood From - Brick - Stone -Sled-Concrete -Other) Proposed Work [:]'In-kind ❑ Landscape E'New ❑ Replacement (not in-und) ❑ Demolition (mm than am box maybe dx&4 Description of Proposed Work DF~t-LSH 4rM•&K4;0 OVA444 CAM S MU t1- 2- S1/bIA/ 4401770ti3 IH iWA 2 d4 • ('(Or`tC P� �'tT4GK�r0 (7�ianrG3 Owner/Contractor. I= 5-7y- a-niall C H A SC. Ayor c_ --3 (M offia Will mrspond with ly igna) x C � .�it�--- and/or _ & orr ClUse , c owTxAc7z9. -- APPLICATION REQUME& ENl'S ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 1130 E. Wayne, May 2, 2011 4* � Aw - :1 ti Aw - :1 ti f � .f pi4s gg �'x 3 �J. 1 N 4 Drawing Number Date: 5/1/11 S�26 Scale: 1/16"=1'-0" 55'-0" D X N X C o O --4 1- m� o 20'-0" -v O U O m v D v v 0 z 2 w rn 02 5" .A C.0 rn 60' Drawing Title: Project: CONCEPT #3 Bloom Addtion _ SITE PLAN 1130 East Wayne South Bend, IN An Artisan's Approach 574-286-1576 ru 77 '. An Artisan's Approach . Location: 1130 East Wayne St. South Bend, IN Scopes of Work 1- Planning - 1.2 — Construction Plans/Design o Conceptual renderings o Construction and "for build" drawings Q -Electrical plan. - 1.4 — Site Work (demolition) o Addition Scope of Work Bloom Addition ■ Remove existing 8x16 room • Roof, ceiling, walls, floor (might be concrete), foundation • Attached planter box • Cut door opening in breakfast nook ■ Remove current exterior wall on second floor • Brick, window, plaster and studs o Kitchen ■ Remove countertops ■ Remove cabinets s Remove bulkheads ■ Remove tile backsplash ■ Remove all plaster walls and ceiling. Expose all studs ■ Remove built -in -cabinet in hallway ■ Remove double swing door to living room ■ Pine flooring to stay. Will be covered by new floor. ■ Remove window for replacement ■ Remove both bathroom windows for replacement o Guest Bath ■ Remove countertop ■ Remove built-in vanity cabinet ■ Remove toilet ■ Remove floor tile ■ Remove wall tile ■ Remove plaster that is damaged while removing tile 5 — Foundation and Flatwork - 5.1 — Footers & Foundation o 54 lnft of 4' walls, 8" thick o 541nft of footer, 8" tall, 16" wide o #4 re -bar o No sleeves or window bucks o 1 box bolts - 5.2 — Waterproof o Rub R Wall waterproofing - 5.3 — Foundation Drain Tiles o 4" socked tile to run perimeter of addition and tie into existing system - 5.7 — Concrete Porch Slab o Stairs off mudroom door — 4' wide, 3 steps o Walk to driveway, 3' wide, 8' long 6 — Steel - Structural steel is not required - Angle iron for masonry is in category #14.1 7 — Framing - 7.1 —Materials o 2x4 walls, 8' tall, interior and exterior o I joist for first and second floor of addition o 3/" TBG UL OSB floor decking o 1h" OSB wall sheeting o Tyvek wrap for masonry - 7.2 — Framing Roofing Materials o Stick frame all roofs o Steep slops, 18/12, 12/12 and 10/12 (see prints) o 1/z" OSB decking - 7.3 — Labor o Build addition o Frame in doorway in side door hallway 8 — Exterior Doors, Windows and Screens - 8.1— Entry Doors o 3-0 LH in -swing o S light, 2 panel wood or fiberglass, satin nickel hinges - 8.4 — Windows & Clad Doors o Anderson 400 Series, casement ■ Terratone vinyl clad exterior, white interior ■ Colonial grills between the glass White hardware ■ ■ M :ffif: 0 IIIIIIillllllll I IIIIIIII11111111111111111111111111 IIII111�1 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 11111111 111111111�1�1�11111111 1111 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. ..1.1.1.1. 1.1..1.1 1111 111 1111 1, 1 1 11111 ___ �I�I 1�i �I�I �i 1 1 11111 11 11 11 � 1 11 �1�1. I�1 _ �IJJ 1 i � 1�1 1 al �1�1� I. ■ ■ ■ i 1` aaa.�.a.�.a.a'.ala.a.a.�.a.a.a.a,a.a.a.a.a.a a.a.aaa,a,�.a ■ 11II 11 111 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 111 11 111 IIII 11 1 11, II 11 11 1 11 11 111 1 1 1 1 1 �I�II III' �1 1 �1 1 till 111 1 1 11 II 1 1111 1 1 111' �y��G��llllll 1 11 1 1 1 1111 1•',,/��Ir-j/ 111 11 I �1 1 11111 11 I �� II 1111 1111 1 1 1 11111 X11 111 1 11 �� II il, 1 it 1 �� II 1 1 I 111 1 ■ 1 �i �I I 1 11 1 �i • � �,il�ll 11 1 11. d HIM dalali�l 1 I l 11/Ilea , Drawing Number B-19 Date: Drawing Title: 4/11/11 CONCEPT #3 Scale: WEST ELEVATION NONE Project: Bloom Addtion 1130 East Wayne South Bend, IN ....CMASI fl°MS An Artisan's Approach 574-286-1576 Features FRAME 0 A seamless one-piece, pre -formed rigid vinyl frame cover is secured to the exterior of the frame to maintain an attractive appearance while minimizing maintenance. Q The full perimeter installation flange ±. is seamless and integrated with the eztertor-uf the frame. © Wood frame members are treated with a water- repellent wood preservative for long-lasting* protection and performance. 0' Interior stops are unfinished pine.'tow-maintenance prefinished white interiors are also available. SASH © Rigid vinyl (PVC) encases the entire sash—a vinyl weld protects each sash calmer for superior weathertightness to maintain an attractive appearance and minimize maintenance. LD] 1 © Wood core members provide excellent structural stability and energy efficiency. O Flexible bulb weather- stripping or PVC closed -cell foam weatherstripping is factory -installed on the perimeter of the sash. Exterior Specify a ton rzledm option and interim option_,ta complete your order. White Sandtone Terratone9 crest Green Hardware Sold Separately. Estate- Hardware blade of solid brass. Available with bright brass, antique brass. polished chrome, brushed chrome, satin nickel. oil rubbed bronze, distressed nickel and distressed bronze finishes. GLASS © A rigid vinyl or CPVC glazing bead features a ftexible lip that, combined with silicone glazing, provides increased weathedightness. r,74: xz:1 O High-performance" glass options include: • Law -E4" glass • 1mv-E4" SmartSun' glass • Low -EC Sun glass Tempered glass and other glass options are available, Contact your Andersen supplier. (Gtass option must be specked.) Interior HARDWARE Z' t :l, YQ` ` �IIIIIIWIIZW ..vt`..t?4+a ;'w: � yr Smooth Control" Hardware System The Smooth Control" hardware system employs a worm gear drive for easy operation. The split -arm operator moves the sash awayfrom the frame to provide for easier glass cleaning. (Hardware option and finish must be specified.) CXW15, CXW155, CXW16 and CXW25 units are not available with split -arm hardware. Handle and cover sold separately. *For complete information on our limited warranties, visit andersenwindows.com or contact your Andersen supplier. Naturally occurring variations in grain, color and texture make each window one -of -a -kind. Lite_, pine a. t Folding Hardware Single -Actuation Casement lock A single -actuation lock releases the casement sash easily while the "reacb-out"action-eliminates binding when closing. The lock handle is offered in finishes that coordinate with your specified hardware option. Y nr�µ•' �ks}.K`lcxl�R.yr :;,+;Ay4; Awning Sash Locks Awning sash locks provide an added measure of security and weathertightness. Hardware style and finish options are compatible with Andersen casement windows to ensure consistency in appearance when used in combination designs. witdiwindwtreatmedinferterence Classic Series" Hardware with window treatments. 9 Contemporary Traditional Available in bright brass, satin nickel, Available in bright brass, antique brass, satin nickel, oil rubbed bronze, white or stone finish. oil rubbed bronze, white or stone finish. Available rh'white J or stone finish. Bold names denote finis= — - - - ••i :f-' Ind ';tY':,G.�: - _ _ .� . � •"' ,t ;, . , Printing limitations prevent Hardware .',: 'ry}Ji'}''i " esactfinish replication. y �. r,.:j,' '.i'a [•i•.0 V:,,�{ S•'.� i'�i 'f £•�`p��rki` �� `�a3;�,r^�;rt;'¢_r`xj�r �ar;;n,ft,�s��.s SeayeurAndersensupPlier Finishes _ ,: 4`G "r Y" s%<,r«ac" for actual finish samples. ,. mow... bright antique polished brushed satin oil rubbed distressed Rdistrmessedbite W stone brass brass chrome chrome nickel bronze nickel bronze 16 2 i Table of Basic Casement Unit Sizes Scale Ile - V -O" (1;96) Unit Dimension1'-5' V-81/2' 2'-0tls'. 24 '31x• 2'-7 u2' 2-11 Ju' 2'-931e 3'•43/4" 4'-0' 4'-8 V2' (432) (521) (613) (721) (800) (913) (857) (1035) (121L`9) (1435) i 53/2 :1 "+ 2'tl s�- 2 4 /s 8" 3' 'uz 2'=16 l4• T-5.1/4 . 4-0 /i•._" IYllnim4m 2 0 4': '", :-`RoBgtlOpening 44 .533 625 _ 733 813 :'.(927 ( ', ( ) ( ) (- ). ( ) ). .:r%.''i '.'-(810) : (1048) (1232) (1448) Unobstructed Glass" 125/81 161/8" 19314, 24' 271/x' 31 g/te 12 5/8' 16 Ile 19 3/4' 24" (321) (410) (502) (610) (689) (802)- (321) (410) (502) (610) Unobshucted Glass 12 31t 15 111j 19 51te 23 9/t6* 26 ilhe" 313/8" 28 115/116! 3515/te" 433lie 51 111l Transom UnrtsOnry —(3 1-0) (398) (491) (599) (678) (791) (735) (913) ' (1097) j (1313) ® FM M =0 c— 7 t CST C7R(uansom) M1510$ CTR1810 $ CTR2010 $ CTR2410 $ CTR2810 $ CTR3010 t CTR2910 $ CTR3410 t CTR4010 $ CTR4810 $ units are non -venting, « chi 12 m- Y - -�+'^'' CTR21830 CTR22010 CTR22410 CR12 GN12 C$2 M12 -CN22 C22 frW22 A C4 EM 3 CR125 CN125 C125 CW125 CX125 CN225 C225 CW225 10 MI, ERB DN IM711 W" CR13 CN13 C13 CW13 CX13 CXW13 CR23 CN23 C23 CW23 CR135 CN135 C135 ' CW135t♦ CX135••♦ CXW1354 CR235 CN235 C235 CW235t fRw. E r M CR14 CN14 C14 CW14t ♦ CX14 • WM14 ♦ CR24 CH24 C24 CW24t • M �p r...eff ET, i4 "X J' ''; , "" .♦ r `. CR145 CN145 C145 CW145t♦ CX145 • CXW1451 CR245 CN245 C245 � CW245t♦ 7,L - a � -jj CR15 CN15 C15 CW15t• CX15•j C)n15'•+ CR25 CN25i —�CC25 CW25t• '-)i--Zt_ S): } :.tf •ti ; ,, r CR155 6155 - E155 CW155t♦ CX155 ♦ CXW155•• ♦ CR255 CN255 C255 CW255t • ) --. i N Gti s..Q �•, � v r. i s: r ,•..,2C,r `; .,. R' \ / � rJ '�'�; y4 � ('\. ' CR16 CNifi C16 CW16tf CX16 f CXWi6•• f CR26 CN26 C26 CW26t ♦ • -Unobstructed Glass' measurement is for single sash only. •• These units have straight arin aperarors. sax opening sperificallons. t CW series units (except CW2, CW25 and CW3 height) open to 20' clear opening width using sill hinge control bracket Bracket can be pivoted allowing for cleaning position. CW series units are also ava8able with a 22' clear opening width. 3 Andersen' art glass panels are available for these units by special order only. Contact your Andersen• supplier. Panels are available for a8 other units on this page througli normal ordering process. Yisit anderserhwindows.00rnlartglass for patterns. ♦ These units meet or meed the following dimensions: Clear Openable Area of 5.7 sq• ft, pear Openable Width of 20' and Clear Operable Height of 24; when appropriate hardware (straight atm, or split arm) is specified. + Casement transom rants (CTR) may be rotated to be used as a casement or awning siderot + Ratio opening dimensions may need to be Increased to a0ow for use of bullding wraps, flashing, sill penning, brackets, fasteners or other trema. Sae page 13 for -mom details. • 'Unit Dimension' ahrays refers to outside home to frame dimension. + Dimensions in parentheses are In millimeters. • When ordering, be sure to specify color desired: White, Sandtone, Tenatane' or Forest Green. 20 5'-2 3/4* 5'-116/s" 5'4' S'-11 7/a' 7'-0 5/8' (1594) (1819) (1549) (1826) (2149) 5'-31%4' 6'-0 1/8' 5'-1 1/2' 6'-0 3/8' 7 (1607) -- (1832) shown on size table is standard. (1938) (2162) 271/6" 319/16" 161/8' I 193/4' 24' (689) I (8112) (410) (502) (610) 5715/16" 6613/16" 563/16" 671/16" 7913/16' (1472) I (1697) (1427) i (1703) (2027) ---------- CTR5210t CTR51110t MR5110 t CTR6010t CTR7010t CTR22810 CTR23010 CT.R31810 CM2010 =2410 Eiji CM2 02 CM2 CH325 C325 CW325 iI; I I� - - Eff -IT[[Y �= iI�I , = - �I - 7-I SII CX23 CXW23 CN33 C33 CW33 I , D-11,11 E IJ U235-0 CXW235# CN335 C335 CW335t# CX240 CXW24# CN34 C34 CW34t* �r - Y `.' ."pmt (—tom,: t '� I � , 'F'—FA M r C)(245 • CXW2454 CH345 C345 CW345t • � oj� .4— 4- Hf -T 77 1 CX25• CXW25*-* CN35 C35 CW35t* '.:MM Floor to sill heights are calculated based upon a structural header height of 6'-101/2." Divided Light Patterns In addition to the Colonial grille patterns shown in the table of basic unit sizes, other standard divided light patterns are available. Not all grille patterns are available in all configurations. See page 30, Visit andersenOndows.com/grilles, or contact your Andersen® supplier. El Compatible Specialty Windows To find compatible Circle Top," arch and other shaped windows, see the Specialty Window section beginning on page 101 and the Andersen Architectural section beginning on page 157 or visit andersenwindows.com. #5rlo Product Details See pages 33 and 34. Joining - Casement, Awning and Picture Windows Consult a professional when joining windows. The similarjamb configurations otAndersenO casement, awning and picture windows enables them to be combined in an almost Infinite number of window combinations. To view some of these possibilities, log on to andersenvAndows.com/400casementcombos or andersenwindows.com/400awningeombos. 21 Left Right Stationary .Yenting Conflguration shown on size table is standard. Specify right or stationary, as viewed m the outside. For other hinging of ulde units, contact your local supplier. pi '.:MM Floor to sill heights are calculated based upon a structural header height of 6'-101/2." Divided Light Patterns In addition to the Colonial grille patterns shown in the table of basic unit sizes, other standard divided light patterns are available. Not all grille patterns are available in all configurations. See page 30, Visit andersenOndows.com/grilles, or contact your Andersen® supplier. El Compatible Specialty Windows To find compatible Circle Top," arch and other shaped windows, see the Specialty Window section beginning on page 101 and the Andersen Architectural section beginning on page 157 or visit andersenwindows.com. #5rlo Product Details See pages 33 and 34. Joining - Casement, Awning and Picture Windows Consult a professional when joining windows. The similarjamb configurations otAndersenO casement, awning and picture windows enables them to be combined in an almost Infinite number of window combinations. To view some of these possibilities, log on to andersenvAndows.com/400casementcombos or andersenwindows.com/400awningeombos. 21 John Ozian, . President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION -OF SOUTH BEND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone (219) 235-9798 FAX: (219) 235-9578 e-mail: historic©michiana.org J. Edward Talley, Director CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: DEMOLITION OF REAR ONE STORY ENCLOSED PORCH. CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW TWO STORY 14'16'7016'9"ADDITION ONTO THE REAR OF THE HOUSE WINDOWS ARE TO BE TDL WOOD CASEMENTS WITH TRUE DIVIDED LIGHTS TO MATCH THOSE EXIST- ING ON THE HOUSE, SALVAGE BRICK FROM PORCH AND REUSE ON EXTERIOR OF AD- DITION AS A WAINSCOTTING. THE REMAINING EXPOSED WALLS WELL BE COVERED WITH 3 COAT SYSTEM STUCCO AND HALF TIMBERS. CONSTRUCT A TRUNCATED ROOF WITH COOPER VALLEYS AND SLATELINE ARCHITECTURAL TYPE SHINGLES. INSTALLATION OF HALF -ROUND STEEL GUTTERS ON WEST AND EAST FACADES. EX- POSED RAFTER TAILS WITH CURVED RAFTER TAIL PROFILE TO MATCH THOSE EX- ISTING ON THE HOUSE. INSTALLATION OF FASCIA BOARD ON SOUTH ELEVATION WITH RAFTER TAUS ON EAST ELEVATION IN PLACE OF FASCIA. INSTALLATION OF GREEN RECTANGULAR TIM WOOD THREE PANEL DOOR AND BRICK COURT YARD. INSTALLATION OF 3', L -SHAPED BRICK FOOT PATH. PER DOCUMENTATION SUBMIT- TED TO THE STANDARDS & MAINTENANCE COMMITTEE AND THE COMMISSION. for the following location: 1130 EAST WAYNE STREET SOUTH BEND IN 46615 Application No. 1999-0805 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Located in a Local Historic District F]A Local Historic Landmark and founda j the Standards .4,0,.apertaining .4,0,.a storic Districts. Regulation ,,,ctjaP44 till ..r.N 9 9 % unission are found in C: ode & Chapter LkZ 26 of the S The .neer, release the recipient fr requirements of the zoning A or other re- quirements Joseph, the State of Inc Mt. Thi ' issuance and is effective le and open for public insp m Commission of South Bi i Blvd. RM 1123, Soutl ,___o ____ _.. ..... ,.... _S. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: STEPHAN FREDMAN DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCCE:/� 09/20/99 PERMTT ISSUED BY. T"G"Pf MD:RS J. EDWARD T , iuttLCTOR POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. 40 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502D Property Location: 229 West North Shore Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1910 Property Owner: Dr. Brooks Crofoot District Designation: NVest North Shore Rating:, Outstanding I)ESCRIPTIONOFSTRIJCTtJRE/Sl'.1'.F,.: This is large three storey brick and half tiniberTudor home with an irregular plan set upon a concrete foundation. The roof has multiple gables with overhangs, simple board fascia rake and slate roofing. The main level has several open porches with brick railing and cut stone capping, brick comer biers and heavy timber pointed lintel. The windows are double bung with multi lite upper sashes over single in the lower. There are also multi lited casements on the second floor porch and sonic attics. ALTERATIONS: None noted APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove slate roofing and replace with Grand Manor (asphalt/ fiberglass) Slate Look -a -like. - :DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Complete tear off of original slate roof and replace with CertainTeed GrandManor "Shangle" Luxury Shingles. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: West North Shore 111. STRUCTURES A. ROOFS Preferred: Keep the original shape of the roof. Retain the original roofing material. A special effort should be made to do this ivhen the roof in question -is of tile, slate, or some other unique material not usually found today, Preserve or -replace all architectural features which give the roof its character, such as dormer windows, cupolas. cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting, weathervanes, and special eaves. Permitted: NVhcn necessary to replace roofing material, match the original as closely as possible in size, shape and texture, Prohibited: Do not add, remove, or alter features which will change its character or the architectural character of the house. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff visited and photographed the roof and noted the deterioration of the slates. Staffreconu-nends approval ofthe re -roof with the stipulation that the copper ridge caps be restored at the peak of all of the gables, Application - FOR - Certifreate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 175 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County-Caty Buildin- South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235M • Fax 574-235.9M + Eman: SwCMF0@co sgoseph.inus website: http:l/www4osephCDunq* dia mxbm/sxhp/kO htmi OFFICE USE ONLY >>>>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANYENTRIES CONUMM IN TWS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Z " Lo t / Application Number "j -a // _ 10 - ",b Past Reviews: ERM (Dateof Leatbvi W) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by. Title: Historic Commission Review Date. / ll [] Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) - ! National Landmark 0 National Register District pvame) Certificate of Appropriateness: (� Denied E] Tabled [] Sent To Committee E] Approved and issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: �� s . /11�►-�iLt - Street Number mrd Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): Onn se Print) it K-1 C1 " Address of Property Owner(s): ` lr ! , tt j I- Contractor(s) Name• �1E-E� F `� fA Contract Company Name: _116 2 IJIF-t_ 41all j -5.s.o 6; A I � Contractor Address: �:ua=i �` j KE& A.; k. n �4 n City. ` i n j- k P t: K, n, f Phone: Current Use of Building: ` �,a M bitif mLV—Muni-F4m4—Commmial —Government—Industrial — Vownt —rtc) 'type of Building Construction: tA-.-'JS 0 n rr A M, e - (Woad Frame — Bp_rkk — Stone — Steel—Conrnte —Other) Proposed Work: ❑ in-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ;@ Replacement (not tri nd) ❑ Demolition (more than one bar maybe efiedz4 Description of Proposed Work: _ M t _ &0l3' - A2 * . ^ r,"jou4OA74A JAR k 4,1j. —� —1 4 4 Owner/Contractor: (Tkls o�ccr wr7l , t ,x?/-:. / e-mail and/or �f APPLICATION REQLURFMENIS ARE US= ON REVERSE SIDE — - v► 'I 229 W. North Share, May 5, 2011 229 W. North Shore, May 5, 2011 229 W. North Shore, May 5, 20 11 w HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE: 03.31.201 1 ADDRESS: 317 W. WASHINGTON DISTRICT: LOCAL LANDMARK OWNER: CENTRAL HIGH ASSOCIATES, LLC WORK PROPOSED: REMOVE ORIGINAL EXTERIOR TRIM AND 223 OPERABLE WOOD WINDOW SASHES. REMOVE PAINT FROM ALL TRIM, SASHES, JAMBS, STOPS, AND TROUGHS. REPAIR WINDOWS WITH WOOD AND EPDXY. RE -GLAZE ORIGINAL GLASS. PAINT ALL COMPONENTS. REINSTALL SASHES, MAKING NECESSARY REPAIRS TO CORDS AND WEIGHTS. REINSTALL ORIGINAL TRIM. REPAIR: ALL WORK CONDUCTED SHALL BE CONDUCTED INA MANNER IN WHICH TO MAINTAIN THE HISTORICAL INTEGRITY OF THE STRUCTURE. IN-KIND REPLACEMENT: MINIMAL TRIM REPLACEMENT IS ANTICIPATED, GIVEN THE AGE OF THE BUILDING AND DETERIORATION OF SOME WOOD COMPONENTS. HOWEVER, ALL REPLACEMENT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN -LIKE KIND. CORRESPONDENCE: ZACHARY HEINE, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER AT AMERECO INC. FIRST EMAILED 03.07.2011. SITE VISIT WITH ZACHARY OF AMERECO, JOHN, MANAGER OF CENTRAL APARTMENTS, WAYNE DOOLITTLE, HPC AND ELICIA FEASEL, HPC. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic: Preservation Comnussion of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-979£ • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Website: http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY—-- DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received'U1.2011 Application Number I l L 1- 6;'31 Past Reviews: ❑ YES (DaleofLast Review) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: t.r_Py1111 Title: Atk?c6/ Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Nance) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 317 W. Washington Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Central high Associates LLC Address of Property Owner(s): PO Box 560807, Dallas Texas, 75356 Contractor(s) Name: Amereco Inc. & Accurate Construction Contract Company Name: Amereco Inc. Contractor Address: 204 F. Jefferson Street City: va]oaraiso, Indiana Phone: 219.531.0531 Current Use of Building: Multi. -Family housing (Single Fancily - Multi -Family - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: Concrete, Brick (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Otiter) Proposed Work: ❑x In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more Hum one btu nuty be check -al) Description of Proposed Work: See Attached. Owner/Contractor: Fax: 219.464.0464 e-mail zhei.ne@amerecoeng.com (This office will conespotui with only one designee) and/or - — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Tim Musminski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CERl'1r'1CATE The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove original exterior trim and 223 operable wood window sashes. Remove paint from all trim, sashes,.Jambs, stops, and troughs. Repair windows with wood and epoxy. Re -glaze original glass. Paint all components. Reinstall sashes, making necessary repairs to cords and weights. Reinstall original trim. All work conducted shall be conducted in a manner in which to maintain the historical integrity of the structure. Minimal trim replacement Is anticipated, however, all replacement materials shall be In -like kind. Amereco Inc. & Accurate Construction, Contractor for the following location: . 317 WASHINGTON South Bend, IN 46624 Application No. 2011-0331 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: ❑ Located in a Local Historic Q A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other � . requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 2is-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for e-mail: SBSJCHPC@cost-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Central High Associates LLC DATE PERMIT 04/11/2011 TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Elicla D. Feasel Assistant Director POST INA CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. AMERECO, U CONSULTING °ENGINEERING *PROJECT MANAQEMENTw-02�ws Central High Apartments — Window Maintenance Proposed Work Project Description: The overall goal cfthis projectistoeliminate any health hazards associated with the paint onthe windows. Therefore, the project oha||oonsimtofon|ythosernaaauranhomemedythiaconoonn. The only windows that will be disturbed oho|| bethe windows with interior storm windows that are operable by tenants. Additionally, all work shall becompleted onthe exterior of the building, aseach unit has interior storm windows. Scope ofwork: Removal of trim necessary to remove operable window sashes (-223 windows) Remove window sashes Remove paint from window jambs, stops.troughsondctheroreaaof friction/impact Remove paint from window sashes Re -glaze / repair removed windows asnecessary with like material Paint window sashes Re -install window sashes, making necessary repairs to cords and weights Re -install trim removed toaccess window sashes Paint all exterior window components (using strengthen epoxy where necessary to strengthen existing wood.) Nobe: Contractor shall attempt house heat first boremove paint; however, itisanticipated that oUenlica(sihppersvi||baui|Uzsd. All work conducted shall be conducted in a manner in which to maintain the historical integrity of the structure. Minimal trim replacement is anticipated, given the age of the building and deterioration of some wood components. However, all replacement materials shall bein-like kind. Respectfully Environmental Manager 204 EAST JEFFERSON = YAiPARA|SO. IN 46303 ° OFFICE (219) 531-0531 ° FAX (219) 464'0464 �%� Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SL Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone:,574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSjCI-IPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiana.com/s chp/mdex.hbul OFFICE USE ONLY-- DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COAMUNED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received /.�- apt -020 // Application Number o2 O / / _ e i// V Past Reviews: 9 YES (Date of last Review) NO Staff Approval authorized by: c�G Title: Historic Commission Review Date: E] Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied E] Tabled E] Sent To Committee [13'A"pproved and Issued / i�r•// DATE j Address of Property for proposed work: R & (a G e 1 e. n d 4-1, 13 r 01,11. Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) , oc n 'tz� owws a -,A lar i a % V -r -o s +e.r+ 1zo Address of Property Owner(s): ___S%t Qt Ave. Contractors) Name: bau i ,l Warne. Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: 2915 / 1-" le v Roa d $oxA-v% 1AGnA i" 4 (o IL Phone: 9--7 y— 3 07 99,83 - Current 983 - Current Use of Building: T 1 r. c3 LC .r a" 01 (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: t o r% o d .f r o rr, e ( Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: 5 'In-kind Landscape F� New [] Replacement (not in-kind) 0 Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: Q'eu�, @ rr &06, JUg _c e.e k- g2k e 4j,,,,eSe 4Ar-.r - Atv� ash ron nenv N--woV'k .Cor ..'f'"°rvov6k Qf 6,1L+ Gid �kr h tZew wk'& et. 1%, SO WIAUe , Owner/Contractor: ' Fax: - e-mail - (This office will correspond with only one designee) J o r % d o L.ln f L- / Lt S 6 . Cd ti --A i„_ CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Tim Klusczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In -Kind replacement of missing clapboards on house and garage; repair and inkind replacment of fret work on front porch; replication of porch railing to match existing. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY WARNER CONSTRUCTION, Contractor for the following location: So6LELAND South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2011-0414 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9795 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9575 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCRPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during . normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Joan Downs and Brian Krostenko DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 04/14/2011 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director — POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. 806 Leland, April 15, 2011 Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation"Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 " • Email: SBgCHPC@costjoseph.in.us Website: http://www.st osephcountyindiana.com/s chp/index.hbnl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONRINED W THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received A1.Q,at . oW 11 Application Number O 4r2 / Past Reviews: 5KTS (Date of last Rmiew) is /30/ A-ra 3 r-1 NO Stasi Approval authorized by: W Title: 4cZ11 �_ Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark �ocal Historic District (Name) National Landmark Ej National Register District (Name) U Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied E]Tabled [:] Sent To Committee E?'A"pproved and Issued Of"12$/ZD!_/ DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 1 q 06 E. W Qqae_ St . Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) SQf bar 6L kr rj Address of Property Owner(s): l q O& E. W a J n -e_ 1 Contractor(s) Name: -J OSHUm 41U Contract Company Name: _A, -T Co rJ ST r2v LT io N 4- QCX'1j F i rJG Contractor Address: ;5914 � La. City: CSS ce010- ylnSlo I Phone: 5 7y 'lo7N -N2 Zf� Current Use of Building:S%If- FGm, 11* (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: W (-)ocii VCv 'tee (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind n Landscape r] New [] Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work:cowefe. AY off of rd lyla y-na Cr'tRb RPv j OG,�r �,T u' sulk. A_ k 1qe&e V-10II IVJUtkr kl_(4T 1h. .1) C(rUinfie LAr1dmjrlG Ser -e( Gh'ift ,t Owner/Contractor: Fax: J q -&7q- LIZ L/D e-mai1__ A-1 - fan rqtwatria Sb(41ob4l. net (This offs rTl Po wit rn ly o ignw) and/or CERTIFICATE m Tim Klusczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Complete Tear Off of roofing materials; repair/replace decking as necessary; install ice and water shield, Install Certainteed Landmark Series (30 Year) architectural shingles. Haul all debris from site. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST, JOSEPH COUNTY AJ CONSTRUCTION OF OSCEOLA, LLC, Contractor for the following location: x708 WAYNE South Bend, IN 46615 East Wayne Street Application No. 2011-0421 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file. and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.styoseph.ln.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Barbara A. and Timothy D. Hernly DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 04/25/2011 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. 1 ].mss 1 w t9. i� .j t •� Ytr } n .r r• r � •; °.S� -` �.•ii. _ IThx'A,�� •iC`;ni t,�'7 '.'lrytt�, :#�c .� •.+� �.. ,- �r i� � s sCej, E r,111F��j,�.j��.. � S .. � •• } 3. w - .. .. �'... r !'- _" � _ ' .f'� 4 , � � _ � � t i ! ,� ? y moi. - I_ I ars �>- . _, ,: ,. •_ ' _. . Saint Joseph County Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Location Budget as of 04-30-2011 9,230.80 20,769.20 20,769.20 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2011. 69.23 11,092.32 24,957.68 Fund: 0001 County General for 01/01/2011 thru 04/30/2011 69.23 69.23 20,323.12 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation 45,726.88 69.23 69.23 Account Original Addt'I/Adj Total 66.81 Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 100.00 100.00 390.00 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 13, 804.00 13, 804.00 70.94 10000 Totals' """"" " 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 400.00 134.67 534.67 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 100.00 100.00 97.20 345.51 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 800.00 100.00 900.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 178.24 86.82. 86.82 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General Gov T. 0.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 20000 Totals "'*"' 1,425.00 234.67 1,659.67 0.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 19,216.00 243.84 19,459.84 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32020 Travel 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32350 Postage 400.00 42.71 442.71 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 200.00 5.29 205.29 0.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 34040 Auto Liability 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 05/04/2011 10:26 AM Page 61 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 9,230.80 20,769.20 20,769.20 69.23 69.23 11,092.32 24,957.68 24,957.68 69.23 69.23 20,323.12 45,726.88 45,726.88 69.23 69.23 177.46 357.21 357.21 66.81 66.81 212.54 687.46 687.46 76.38 76.38 0.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00 390.00 1,269.67 1,269.67 76.50 76.50 5,655.84 13, 804.00 13, 804.00 70.94 70.94 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 97.20 345.51 345.51 78.04 78.04 27.05 178.24 178.24 86.82. 86.82 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 100.00 100.00 User ID ksobecki 05/04/2011 10:26 AM Page 61 L`o�ion Budget as of 04-30-2011 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2011. Fund: 0001 County General for 01/01/2011 thru 04/30/2011 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Original AddYl/Adj Total Object Description . Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 000 General GovT. 30000 Totals 21,521.00 . 291.84 21,812.84 Location Totals "" "" 88,996.00 526.51 89,522.51 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint J� County i User ID ksobecki 05/04/2011 10:26 AM Page 62 Unencumbered Unexpended Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 0.00 245.00 245.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 5,880.09 15,932.75 15,932.75 73.04 73.04 0.00 26,593.21 62,929.30 62,929.30 70.29 70.29 0.00 0.00 26,593.21 i User ID ksobecki 05/04/2011 10:26 AM Page 62 Director's Report May 2011 18 April Responded to Cindy Diamond of LL 420 W. Wayne with Custom Steel Design -Shipshewana 260-768 7266 (Kenny Yoder) for repair work on wrought iron railings. Discussed meeting with Brendon Crumlish to review LaSalle Hotel files as lie has an interested client. Followed up with Commissioner Linda Riley on filling the vacancies on the HPC after the History of the Germans in South Bend class. Will provide information on the Standpipe for the next class. Completed 18 106 Reviews for demolition; these were houses that had already been demolished. Received confirmation of Michael Voll's appointment to the Commission from the Mayor. 19 April Participated in 7:30 am Rotary Foundation/Board meeting at the LaSalle Grill. Met witli John Wiltrout at the LL North Pumping Station about work proposed for Leeper Park and ice dam issues on the cupola. Water Works proposes to reroute one of their water mains away from the Reservoir to their building. This would involve some deep trenching which would affect the landscape of the Park until the work was completed. The sod/grass would be restored. The copula was an issue that will need expert advice because of die artisan copper domes and the wood superstructure that is also posing some issues. Wrote up and mailed out all approved COAs to owners. Worked with Commissioners and Staff about 1414 E. Wayne Street. COA that was tabled; and the fallout from tic homeowner. E-mailed thoughts to Larry and Tim. Completed 19 106 Revicws on sites that had already been cleared in the past. 20 April Discussed response to 1414 E. Wayne with Larry and Tim. Wayne is to call for an interior inspection and if she refuses thens documented and the Commission &Fy-1 could address it at die May meeting. Coordinated a t8 meeting with John Wiltrout, Paul Schmidt, Russ Luchies and Staff to meet in the morning to examine the cupolas on the North Pumping Station. On site visit to 612 Portage to see window innovation and its installation. Completed and submitted 24 106 Reviews for demolition. 21 April Completed ten 106 Reviews for demolition for the City. Prepared and submitted payroll. Attended Lunch and Learn on Economic Development, Gary Gilot speaker Brenner of Innovation Park and speaker on Ignition Park. 22 April Great Friday Office Closed 25 April Working with Commissioner Riley on Commission vacancies. Attended final class in the History of the Germans in South Bend. Reviewed minutes from C. J. Cunningham of the Troyer Group on the 14 April meeting at Snyder Farm. Completed thirteen106 Reviews for demolition for the City. 26 April Attended the Clean Air Luncheon in Elkhart. Met with Jessica Clark about the AEP moving the light pole on Adams and Cherry in front of the landmarked Snyder Farm. Followed up with Thia Vawter of Dept. of Public Works on 106 Reviews needed for Commercial Property demolition. Notified Code about holes in gable returns at 805 Leland. Met witli Andrew Schnabel, President of BSSB between 5:00 and 7:30 to prepare Form 990 for the May 15 deadline. 27 April Contacted Jeff Dierbeck about his proposal for a slate roof replacement at 1615 E. Wayne Street; notified him that Staff need more specific information on the proposed replacement materials. Created a Preservation Specialist Intern job description and e-mailed information to Steve Szaday. Completed fourteen 106 Reviews for City demolition. Attended Rotary International District Dinner (6:30-9:30) and emailed report to Rotary Office for Bulletin. 28 April Met with Jeremy Roschyk of DLZ on another proposed location for the lift station. This station will be about 8 feet in diameter and the new proposed location was in the vicinity of the entrance to the Garden of Fragrance created in 1955 by the Garden Club for the enjoyment of the Blind. This lift station could work there if the wrought iron entrance to the Garden was restored and then the path reconfigured as a curvilinear to meet up with the old path and replanted with fragrant bushes and flowers. The lift station would be screened as well. Met with John Wiltrout and Paul Schmidt of'JC Lauber for an on site inspection of die North Pumping Station Roof and South Cupola copper and copper drainage area. Paul made some illustrations and suggestions on how to combat laic ice dam issues and drainage by either removing the copper and /or covering the copper drainage area with a rubber membrane; securing the rubber membrane under the neck of the cupola and the adding new copper pieces to secure the seams. Staff also photographed the chimney that needs to be re -built and new damage to the southwest roof terra cotta tiles. Met with Tina Assimos and worked with her on her COA for landmark 557 Edgewater. Spoke witli Jennifer Born about information needed for appointment to Commission. She will have info to Office by May 6. 29 April Followed up on inquiry from Wednesday evening about cost of Residential demolitions for City Council Candidate Cavanaugh ($3,000-$5,700 to $10,000.00). Followed up on inquiry from Randy Ray on 803 W. Washington's acquisition by City; faxed information. Responded to phone inquiry about fence at 1043 Riverside needing a COA. Completed 12 106 Reviews for Grants. Completed paperwork and submitted COA fees for the month. Meeting with CJ Cunningham at Troyer Group in Mishawaka for COA submission for work proposed at the Snyder Farm for Granger Paths. 2 May COA application deadline for May meeting. Received 5 COA applications throughout the day, bringing die total to 9. Began organizing materials for Staff Reports. Processed the paperwork for Steve Szaday to be die Intern working with Wayne Doolittle for IUSB credits beginning 16 May through the 31 December. Met with Scott Chase on 1130 E. Wayne COA application. 3 May OFFICE CLOSED FOR PRIMARY 4 May Staff Reports. Contacted Julie Ducom in California, homeowner of' 1615 E. Wayne concerning Jeff Dierbeck's application on her behalf for the replacement of the slate roof. Sent Mr. and Mrs. Matt link to COA for the re -roof of 1619 E. Wayne. On site 2 visit to 1619 E. Wayne for photographs. Followed up with Diane Bennett Real Estate rep for 1130 E. Wayne on COA progress and building permits. 5 May On site visit to 229 West North Shore. Completed Staff Reports. Picked up Location Report. New errors. Completed nine 106 Reviews. Started making copies for Commissioners' packets. Follow up with Thia Vawter on Commercial Building demolition process and paper work. 6 May Prepared homeowner/contractor mailings of Agenda and Stall Reports. Delivered or mailed out all Commissioner packets while touring various districts. 9 May On site and RME for new roof at 1352 LWE. Title/Assessor Card/1875Adas and Plat Book research for Donald Cornelis at 57549 Crumstown Hwy, property line dispute; Ed Bennett of Garden Homes for 27751 Osborne Road in Liberty Township and Ron Baker for an old cemetery near new Capital Ave -needed to go back to 1875; couldn't locate a cemetery. Participated in Center for History Finance Committee meeting. City of South Bend is contemplating purchasing 803 W. Washington from John Freidline with TIF money and then improving, selling to the NICH for $1.00 if the building meets the needs of the NICH for either an archives site or offices. Scheduled luncheon with Dina Harris for Friday about land -marking the Nat. Arranged on-site inspection of Local Landmark 61723 Oak Road for RME porch repairs. 10 May On site visit to 61723 Oak to see scope of work needed on porch. All in- kind and repair work proposed and needed. On site visit to 60649 Hickory Road to see completion of re -roof. Photographed other defects to be sent to the management company. Attended a luncheon at the Morris on stage to celebrate the 10 year mark for the refurbishing and re -opening; spoke with Margret King, Joe Kernan, Dr.Marvin Curtis, Ann Puzzello, Mikki Dobski Shidler, Barbara Warner and several board members. 11 May General Office Work. Noted that 803 W. Washington is on the City's Took a Personal Day after Noon. 12 May Meeting with Kathy Sobecki in Auditor's Office to correct errors on Location Report. Collected and copied information for mailing on the historic homes that are B&Bs for Mr. Steve Cira. Submitted Jennifer Born's letter and resume with letter to Dr. Varner to replace Todd Zeiger as the Common Council's Republican Commissioner. Attended BSSB Executive Committee meeting at the Conservatories at 5:30 and submitted the Treasurer's Report. 13 May Luncheon meeting with Dina Harris, Director of Development at IUSB about the Natatorium Civil Rights Center and its landmarking prospects. Prepared for monthly meeting. General Office work. 3 Assistant Director's Report HPC Meetina 05.16.2011 National Register Nomination - a. City Cemetery -Reorganizing content per Commissioner Steinhauer's suggestions. b. LaSalle Ave, Sons of Israel, Marquette School -correspondence with Todd Zeiger and Kurt Garner regarding possible Partners In Preservation funds. Contact PIP regarding funding. Correspondence with Cynthia and Kurt of PIP. Research into West Washington file about the potential of LaSalle Ave joining. Prepare presentation for HPC meeting new business. 2. Attend 04.18.2011 HPC meeting, prepare draft as requested. Print minutes from April meeting mailing labels. Delivering Commissioner packets. of minutes and forward to Commissioners. Revise or May meeting. Print commissioner and liaison 3. Internships - a. Resource Library -Receive and review student resumes. Meeting with Mary Lou at the Office. Begin inventory of library holdings in an Excel spread. Forward inventory to Jennifer Parker for review. Continue working on new floor plan of office furniture. Correspondence with Jennifer Parker on finding a free online cataloging program. Download ResourceMate library cataloging demo. b. Local Landmarks -XXX c. Preservation Specialist -Discussion with Catherine about position. Invite newly hired intern, Steve Szaday to Hands -On ... Windows. Give Steve the office files tour and discussed some projects. 4. RMS 2010-2011 Window Restoration Production -Discussion on script with Andrea of Grass Roots and Wayne. Revising and expanding script. Correspondence with Todd Zeiger to update. Developing supplements, including: Condition Assessment, Tools & Supplies, Estimates -Quantity & Cost. Restore Michiana Series 2011- a. Historic Wood Window Restoration Workshop with HNC -updating PR, flyer, website. Go live With marketing. Meeting with Schoberg's and owner at site. Continue marketing. Organizing registrations. Develop supplies list. Develop workshop handouts. Correspondence with Dana and meeting at site to troubleshoot event setup. Crafting email to registered attendees regarding day - of -event information. Create nametags. Facilitate workshop on Saturday May 14. b. Lincoln Highway -add event to Restore Michiana calendar 6. Staff Reports -1043 Riverside Drive, 1081 Riverside Drive 7. Routine Maintenance Exclusions -None. 8. Energy Audit at 1012 Riverside Drive -Logistics of event. Reminder to Commissioners. Attend and take notes. Met Jonathon Burke, South Bend Energy Director. 9. Studebaker/Bendix Heritage Trail -Follow up with Environmental Data Resources about digital Sanborn Map copyright. 10. City of South Bend Lunch and Learn Series- Innovation Park, Ivy Tech Nanotechnology degree, and Department of Public Works projects. Economic Development. 11. Historic Church Tour -XXX »»»»»»»»»»>over 12. Grants - a. Historic Preservation Education Grants 2011 -follow up with DTSB. 13. Attend Chamber of Commerce Young Professionals Network Mayoral Roundtable. Attend =hamber YPN Power Lunch: Jumping Into Social Media - What Your Company Needs to Know. 14. Researching into the new Michiana Lock and Key site at 621 E. Jefferson for'Jack Seifer who is trying to reproduce the look of a historic locksmith. No photos were found but unveiling the building yielded terra cotta. 15. Attend MACOG Partners for Clean Air Award Luncheon in which 3 awards were presented to: City of South Bend, University of Notre Dame, and TRANSPO. Heard from representatives of NIPSCO- Clean Air Activiites, Indiana Department of Environmental Management -Office of Air Quality, and Indiana Department of Natural Resources -Division of Forestry. 16. Newly Mayoral appointed Commissioner, Mike Voll, visited HPC office. Talked with him about Restore Michiana activities, his occupation as a history educator, City Cemetery, and Local Historic Districts. Invited him to Energy Audit. 17. Assisted homeowners of 916 Riverside Drive with researching their house. Made copies from the file. 18. Forward a picture of City Cemetery gate from our files to Marcia Qualls for Urban Adventure use. 19. Investigation of each Local Historic Districts using social media to communicate. Set up a platform for this experiment in facebook: http://www.facebook.com/hpclocalhistoricdistricts#!/ =10. East Wayne Street -searching for historic photograph of entry. 21. Downtown South Bend EcoFest June 18- Looking into feasibility of exhibiting this year 22. Attend Convention & Visitors Bureau "Be a Tourist in Your Own Town" bus tour. Sites included: Studebaker National Museum, Copashaholm, Tippecanoe Place, South Bend Chocolate Factory, and Notre Dame. Networking with mostly hotel professionals (thatlliew next to nothing about Historic Preservation, but I enlightened them O). 23. Phone call with Lynette Jones, Real Estate Appraiser about Local Landmarks. Followed up with an email directing her to HPC webpage. 24. Forward Sue Solmos, City of South Bend, discussions from the NAPC forum on MLS listings and Realtor education. 2 Historic Preservation Commission President's Report - May V th, 2011 • 04/18/2011 7:00-8:30P: HPC Monthly Meeting (Rm 1308). • 04/30/2011 11:00-2:30P: Attended Energy Audit #2 demonstration by Ron Zmyslo at 1012 Riverside Drive (the Michael & Gabrielle Keen residence). HPC attendees: Elicia Feasel, Wayne Doolittle, and Michael Voll. Test and discuss building science concepts - i.e. convection and the stack effect. Original workshop in 2010 (612 Portage Avenue) did not produce blower test data due to excessively high leaks in the building envelope. Today's test was challenged by occasional, strong wind gust. But with delicate compensation, data points were finally recorded and will be available for review. Findings reinforce the theory that excessive energy loss (heat) does not occur through window and door openings, drafts enter the structure from the lowest level of windows (basement) and what might typically feel like drafts around upper story windows is actually air evacuation. Also "comfort" problems (cold areas around window/door openings) do not necessarily represent energy loss. • 05/16/2011 Repair HPC Micro cassette Transcriber/Dictator Model #BM -850. Install new coupler jack (D -Sub connector), solder patch cord to pc board, add servo boss pins for broken mount. It works! Cl SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 16, 2011 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES Print Name e,l>co-r AWIT i bum 64, G�,v I�rqpN4m (). D v- /I Address W56 C-1 -<T r,- 350 I yl y Z5, W(,kun6 54. LA);LyVo- 6&q - 1 I Signature MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY May 16, 2011 13`h Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Sandra Rossow, Jerry Niezgodski, Lynn Patrick, Todd Zeiger, Mike Voll Members Absent: Linda Riley, David Steinhauer Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: Tina Assimos, Scott Chase, Bruce Haupert, Jennifer Dear, Matt Bloom, Chris Waidner, Jeffrey Dierbeck, C.J. Cunningham, Mike Neises, Mike Wheeler, Jennifer Chuppe, Drew Chuppe, Philip Schatz, Joan O'Connor, Ed Talley II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 28 April 2011 Application Number: 2011-0412 Property Location: 53190 Juniper Road Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate Cube/1856 Property Owner: Joan and Kevin O'Connor Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Alfred Maurice Talley house is a red brick two storey Italianate with side wing additions and an addition at the rear. The hipped roof is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are double hung 6/6 with brick segmental arch. The front entrance has a panel door with sidelights and transom. ALTERATIONS: The 1875 Atlas illustration shows a cupola, side chimneys in the roof and a porch all of which have been removed. The north wing and the south greenhouse are later additions. The 1975 survey card indicated that the front door with sidelights was probably not original. The rear addition was added in 2007. The entire house was re - pointed in 2005. APPLICATION ITEMS: Rebuild existing sunroom area using existing brick knee wall as foundation. Replace glasstmetal frame structure with flat top hip roof and casement windows similar to north side addition. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Please see attached documentation and drawings. This project will remove an outdated and deteriorating south side one storey "sunmom/greenhouse" superstructure leaving the brick foundation and knee wall. It will shorten the enclosed room and reveal an original window obscured by the sunroom. It will be replaced by a wood frame with a flat top hip roof with asphalt dimensional shingles to match north addition and Pella Architect Series casement wood windows with simulated divided lights. The bricks will be re -used to create the planters beneath the northwest windows. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carred through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it conforms to the guidelines. It is replacing an awkward addition with one that is more appropriate to the scale and materials of the house. It will give the house a more balanced appearance from the street by matching more closely with the north wing. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to accept application as submitted. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0412 was approved as submitted. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: COA#2011-0421 Property Location: 1615 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1929/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: J.C. and Julie Ducom Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The brick house is a 2 '/2 storeys with a rectangular plan and steep gable roof with thin wood rake trim. The roof is slate and the shed roof dormer is also covered in slate. There is a series of 5 diamond paned lead glass windows across the front. There are 8 light casement windows in the lower and upper levels. There are brick chimneys at each end and half-timbering and stucco on the west side toward the rear and the back gable. ALTERATIONS: Fifteen windows were replaced with Eagle brand casement windows with COA# 1997-0825. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove existing deteriorated slate the roof, water damaged sub straight and install high quality GAF Grand Slate fiberglass asphalt Look -a -like. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Remove the original, but failing slate roofing material. Repair decking as needed, install ice and water shield and install GAF Grand Slate Fiberglass Asphalt roofing material. Haul away all debris. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles.. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascia of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new roof as it conforms to the East Wayne Street Guidelines. The slate roof has deteriorated considerably and continues to flake and chip off the roof giving it the "rusticated" look it currently has. The GAF product will restore the original look of the slate roof. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to continue application for further investigation to look at alternative materials. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0421 was continued with conditions. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 28 April 2011 Application Number: 2011-0428 Property Location: 557 Edgewater Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Prairie/1920/Whitcomb&Keller Property Owner: Tina Assimos Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark/Edgewater Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house was landmarked in 2000. This is a two storey stucco home with intersecting hip roofs covered with Art Lock asphalt shingles. It has broad flat soffited overhangs. There is an enclosed front porch surrounded by stucco piers facing the river. The windows are 1/1 double hung with divided upper light. There is a pone cochere at the west side main entrance. There is a detached 2 car garage with two sets of double leaf wood doors with 8 light windows. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storms were added (COA1981-0414). Rear and side foundation windows replaced with vinyl windows (COA 1984-0813)A two storey rear addition was built in 1989 that replaced a two storey porch and vinyl beaded soffit was installed (COA 1989-0110). The roof material is not original to the house (COA 1998-0617) or the garage(COA 1999-1130). APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace 90 year old garage door that falls off track when trying to operate -tried repairing 2 years ago at cost of $250.00 but door remains inoperable. Have replaced garage floor. Remove about 5" of sod to straighten driveway and replace with concrete. Build/Construct roof over rear entry door in style of rear bay window roof, proportional to doorway size, approximately 4'x4'. Construct wood steps with landing and banister at 45 degree angle to rear door so that steps face the driveway. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. Replace the garage doors with custom made 13'x7'.9" hemlock wood doors resembling the original using Model 7412 "Derby". Remove the 5-6" of sod bordering tapered driveway and pour concrete to achieve a rectangular, straight drive. At the rear of the house on the 1989 addition: replace demolished concrete steps that deteriorated with wood stairs and landing and railings. Construct a 4'X4"roof over the doorway and new steps that will resemble the roof over the bump -out to prevent deterioration from rain. Construct cedar steps with landing and banister in Prairie style with Prairie style caps on the post at the rear door so that steps face the driveway. Cedar will be stained to match the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions 3 Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Edgewater Place Local Historic District Guidebook Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels.. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials , design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES, AND STEPS The majority of the houses in the district have either an open or a enclosed porch across the front or on the side. Most porches have either gabled or hipped roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. A brick base with wood columns is common. Required Existing or original porches and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations shall be retained or replace with replicas of the same design and materials when deteriorated beyond repair. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles. and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Porches and steps that are important to the building's style and development may not be altered or removed. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement the original wood garage doors with the custom wood garage doors that duplicate the original doors in every aspect except the proposed doors only have 6 lights versus the originals' 8 lights. Staff recommends the approval of the straightening of the driveway. Staff recommends approval of the wood replacement steps and the roof on the rear 1989 addition of the house as both conform to the guidelines for Edgewater and the Group B Standards for Landmarks. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Lynn Patrick to accept application as amended by applicant to note that the door will be an overhead operation. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0428 was approved as amended by applicant. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 April 2011 Application Number: 2011-0429 Property Location: 13271 Adams Road Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1871/Italianate style applied to a 3 -bay I-house/Joseph Singer, builder Property Owner: Michael Wheeler Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The red brick 2 %s storey Italianate has a solid stone foundation. The windows have segmental brick arches and segmented window frames, double hung 2/2 and 2/1, with fixed transoms on the second floor. The gable roof has asphalt shingles deep cornices with brackets and dentil moulding. The front porch is open with turned posts and a concrete stoop. The Cherry Road porch has square posts with brackets and a wide dentil frieze with brackets. There is a westside rear one storey ell with French Doors. ALTERATIONS: The roofing materials are not original to the house (COA 2009-0821). The French doors, new siding on the ell were approved with COA#2001-0713-1.5 Pine trees and 2 Walnut trees were removed in the right of way for a utility upgrade with COA 2007-0501. APPLICATION ITEMS: Please see attached narrative, site plan and figures. The Troyer Group (engineer) is submitting this COA Application on behalf of St. Joseph County Engineering, Friends of Granger Paths (project sponsors) and Michael Wheeler (property owner). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. To install a multi use 10 foot concrete path along Adams Road in the right of way 42' from the front of the house as part of the Phase I Granger Paths Project. Remove trees and replant with landscaping and installation of a 1900 wrought iron fence all per diagrams and illustrations provided. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has been working with Granger Paths and Mr. Wheeler since 2005 concerning the mixed use trail system and with the Troyer Group for the past two years concerning the location of the trail and its impact on this landmarked home. Mr. Glass, acting SHPO, was at the most recent on-site meeting on April 14 and agreed that the mixed use trail needed to be moved as far away as possible from the house. At his recommendation curbing will be installed along Adams to allow for the path's location closer to the road and the furthest from the house. This will necessitate removal of trees and changes in the non -original landscaping features in front of the house. However, the Troyer Group proposed a landscape screening plan that will buffer the house from the trail while still remaining visible from the trail and road. The homeowner will install the fence. Staff recommends approval of this project as presented. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Mike Voll to accept application as submitted. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0429 was approved as submitted. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 2, 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502 Property Location: 1043 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Shingle/1908/Fred W. Keller Property Owner: Michael A. Neises Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The property at 1043 Riverside Drive consists of a 2'/2 storey frame home set upon a square floor plan with a two stall garage situated at the rear of the property along a north/south alleyway and bounded on the south by an east/west alleyway. The house is set upon a concrete block foundation. The walls of the house are wood shingle with board trim. The roof is a high hip with a right gable projection with gable returns. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles. There is a full width front porch with shingled posts and walls. The windows are 1/1 double hung. There is a nine pane attic window in the gable. The two stall garage has wood flush siding and a low hipped roof, there are 2/2 windows on both the east and west side; a pair of restored original sliding doors on the east stall and an overhead door on the west stall opening. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows have been added on the house. In 2003, the entire garage was repaired and restored (COA 2003-0515-2). The overhead door on the garage is a replacement. A new roof was installed (COA 2005-0623-04). The fencing is not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. Replace existing perimeter fencing (some wood and chain link) with new 6' privacy wood fencing on three sides of the property. 2. Replace existing storm windows on second floor. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: 1. Applicant proposes to change the fence from the current mismatched fencing materials to a shadowbox style wood fence on three sides of the property in the same footprint as what currently exists. 2. Applicant proposes to replace existing silver storm windows on second floor with in-kind aluminum triple track storms in a white finish, which will make all storm windows on the house unified in color. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. H. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required Gel Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fence as it will unify the fence from several styles and materials to just wood and conforms to the Standards and Guidelines. Staff recommends approval of the In- kind storm window replacement. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Lynn Patrick to accept application as submitted. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0502 was approved as submitted. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502A Property Location: 914 Leland Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1911/Prairie/Happ&Taggert Buildiers Property Owner: Jennifer Dear and James Donahue Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two storey rectangular plan home set upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are stucco with a wood course band between the storeys and a frieze board at the eave. The Gable roof has asphalt shingles, there are two dormers both with pediments and wood shingles on the dormer walls with wide eaves. There is a full width font porch with square brick piers with fascia board and a small pediment above the entrance. The windows are wood double hung with aluminum storms. The front windows have muntins in the form of geometric squares. The garage is attached to the rear of the house and has a wood shed dormer above and an attached back porch with pergola. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and doors. The garage was constructed before 1932, the shed dormer and back porch are more recent additions. The roof is not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of deteriorating wood privacy fence with wood shadow box style fence (that will closely resemble the newer fence not being replaced), and replacement of (long gone) gate over driveway off of alley. (Fence is behind house, off alley). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to replace a dilapidated stockade fence with a wood fence resembling the shadow box style fence. The fence will be in the same location as the old along the side and enclosing the rear yard of the house. There will be a three foot wood swing gate at the side of the house. Also, there will be a 10 foot wood swing gate along the alley that will be installed between the brick pillars and additional fencing. All per photographs, diagram and Schuell Fence Proposal submitted. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chaoin Park: 1. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission: Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. 7 Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be approp.iate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the fence and gates as the project conforms to the Chapin Park Standards and Guidelines. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Lynn Patrick to accept application as submitted. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0502A was approved as submitted. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 2, 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502B Property Location: 1081 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Prairie/1920 Property Owner: Ed Talley Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1081 Riverside Drive is a two storey square plan with stucco walls. The roof is hip with asphalt shingles. Foundation is brick. There is an enclosed porch. Windows are 1/1 double hung. A garage sits behind the house on the property. ALTERATIONS: none. APPLICATION ITEMS: See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner proposed to install two separate fences in the backyard of the property. The first fence, nearest to the house will be a 42" tall wood gothic picket fence with two egress points. Gates to be simply constructed as a cut away from the fence and will offer a smooth transition. The picket fence will be mostly shielded by neighboring bushes with only a 6 foot section visible from street. The second, a 6 foot stockade privacy fence is in the rear of the lot along the alley way and west property line. Fence is currently in progress. The west of fence will be completely shielded by 8 foot neighboring bushes and the alley side is visible and ends adjoining the garage. The gate will likely be on the north facing the back of house. A patio floor of square one foot tiles will be installed inside privacy fence footprint and a fire ring grill set in retaining wall stones will be centered in the enclosure. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the picket fence, the privacy fence, and the stonescaping within the privacy fence as it conforms to the Standards and Guidelines for Riverside Drive and is also not very noticeable to the public right of way. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Lynn Patrick to accept application as submitted. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0502B was approved as submitted. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502C Property Location: 1130 E. Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1928/Whitcomb&Keller Property Owner: Kimberly and Matthew Bloom Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey brick Tudor Revival home has the original asbestos tile on the steep gable roof and steel casement windows with six lights and stationary transoms. The windows have brick header course sills and brick soldier course lintels. There is a round arch entry in the front gable with a brick corbelled door surround. There is a diamond brick pattern above the entry door. A gabled wood canopy with brackets is above the side door and the chimney on the west side of the house is brick with a stone cap. There is a one storey enclosed rear porch ALTERATIONS: The enclosed back porch was a noted later addition to the house in the 1986 survey card. APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolish attached porch. Construct 2 -story addition in rear of home per attached drawings. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This project will remove the rear enclosed porch that is not original to the house. A 2 storey addition will be constructed per drawings. The windows will be Anderson 400 Series Casement windows to match original window configuration. The GAF Slateline roofing material will compliment the current roofing material on the main house. The masonry materials will match the brick and mortar of the original house; the window sills will be brick. All exterior trims will match existing. A gabled rear entry in the new addition will match the style of the side entry. Please refer to attached product information and drawings. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street Local Historic District III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure constructed within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance of the other buildings in the neighborhood. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories high and are square, rectangular, or irregular in plan. There are a few story -and -a -half residences. The prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and a 1:2 height -to -width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height -to -width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure of the same type in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district include brick, stucco, half-timbering, stone, clapboard, shingle, and metal and vinyl siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Metal or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, molded or artificial stone, or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the removal of the non -original enclosed porch and its replacement with a two storey addition as it conforms to the standards of the East Wayne District for New Construction. A two storey addition to this home was approved by the Commission with COA # 1999-0805, but it was never constructed. On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to accept application as submitted. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0502C was approved as submitted. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: 2011-0502D Property Location: 229 West North Shore Drive Architectural StyWDate/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1910 Property Owner: Dr. Brooks Crofoot District Designation: West North Shore Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a large three storey brick and half timber Tudor home with an irregular plan set upon a concrete foundation. The roof has multiple gables with overhangs, simple board fascia rake and slate roofing. The main level has several open porches with brick railing and cut stone capping, brick comer piers and heavy timber pointed lintel. The windows are double hung with multi lite upper sashes over single in the lower. There are also multi lited casements on the second floor porch and some attics. ALTERATIONS: None noted APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove slate roofing and replace with Grand Manor (asphalt/ fiberglass) Slate Look-a- like. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Complete tear off of original slate roof and replace with CertainTeed GrandManor "Shangle" Luxury Shingles. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: West North Shore III. STRUCTURES A. ROOFS Preferred: Keep the original shape of the roof. Retain the original roofing material. A special effort should be made to do this when the roof in question is of tile, slate, or some other unique material not usually found today. Preserve or replace all architectural features which give the roof its character, such as dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting, weathervanes, and special eaves. Permitted: When necessary to replace roofing material, match the original as closely as possible in size, shape and texture. Prohibited: Do not add, remove, or alter features which will change its character or the architectural character of the house. 10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff visited and photographed the roof and noted the deterioration of the slates. Staff recommends approval of the re -roof with the stipulation that the copper ridge caps be restored at the peak of all of the gables. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Lynn Patrick to approve application as amended by applicant to include copper flashing, valleys and gutter with the condition that the applicant produces the additional documentation of the extraordinary expense involved in replication of this. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0502D was conditionally approved as amended by applicant. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Todd Zeiger to amend agenda to move 1414 E. Wayne Street COA#2011-0404 up from Old Business to Public Hearing, Certificate of Appropriateness, Item # 10. Vote: 6-0 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2011-0404 Property Location: 1414 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1925/H.R. Stapp/Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Jennifer and Drew Chuppe Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey frame designed in the Colonial Revival style reminiscent of French dwellings in the Mississippi Valley. It has a gable roof with a large shed roof front dormer. The porch extends across the entire front of the house supported by large Doric columns over brick porch floor. The porch wraps around to a side gabled roof patio. The roof is asphalt shingles. The windows are double hung, 8/8 on the first floor and 6/6 on the second floor some are also 6/1. ALTERATIONS: The original wood siding was covered with aluminum siding prior to 1986 along with aluminum storm windows and doors. The 1986 survey card notes that the windows were 6/6 double hung. The roof has been replaced. There are replacement windows in the rear of the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: replace upper/lower sashes of 14 double hung windows and replace with architecturally correct Marvin simulated true divided light aluminum clad windows. 14 windows were already replaced years ago during the kitchen/bathroom/attic renovation. 5 of windows being replaced don't match the rest of the house (lack of muntin bars on one sash). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to replace 3 first floor 8/8 windows in the front and 2 second floor 6/6 windows; on the East side 2 8/8 windows on the first floor and 2 6/6 second floor; on the west side 18/8 on the first floor and 16/6 on the second floor; on the south 18/8 window on the first floor and 2 6/6 on the second floor. The replacement option is a full window replacement with Marvin Clad Ultimate Double Hung. The installation will be via the exterior of the home by removing the present sashes, peeling away the aluminum siding, inserting the new window, shim and caulk, return the siding and add trim to simulate what was there -flat casing to butt to the siding. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended 11 Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No one is quite sure if the current windows are original to the house. The survey card indicates a 6/6 double hung pattern, while what is currently on the house is a mix of 6/6 on the second floor and 8/8 on the first floor in addition to other muntin patterns. Staff was unable to do an interior inspection of the windows; however what staff could observe from the exterior was that cosmetically the front first floor windows appeared to be OK. However, Bob Grant of Bob Grant Construction, Inc. performed an interior inspection and concluded that the windows require extensive repairs and that five of the fourteen are of an inferior quality. Staff recommends approval of the replacement windows. From April 18, 2011 meeting: [On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to continue application pending closer inspection of windows by staff. Vote: 6-0 COA 2011-0404 was continued.] From the May 16, 2011 meeting: On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Lynn Patrick to continue application with adequate time for homeowner to provide photos of the interior of the windows only showing condition of the sash, jamb, and sill, keyed to window location photo and an example of the proposed replacement system so we can see exactly what it is that is being proposed and to explore sash packs. Vote: 5-0 Commissioner Rossow absent. COA 2011-0404 was continued with conditions. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION III. HEARING OF VISITORS None IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —April 18, 2011 Approved B. TREASURER'S REPORT —Received. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals - In packets. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. 4. Assistant Director Report -Distributed. 5. Preservation Specialist Report -Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -Distributed. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Restore Michiana Workshops -Windows, May 14 at New Carlisle- Elicia reported. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Future National Register Nomination-Elicia reported opportunity to pursue funding for Marquette School, Sons of Israel Synagogue, and LaSalle Avenue from Partners in Preservation (P.I.P.). 12 On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Lynn Patrick to pursue P.I.P. funding with the Commission providing up to $500 worth of staff time. Vote: 5-0. B. EcoFest DTSB-Elicia announced HPC inclusion as an exhibitor. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Mike Voll to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. r' retary ate 13 SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 249 2011 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT, YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR, MINUTES Print Name "014 e-��„�,�1/�� -swoz- 5-L Address Signature �.. ff�G z D !_�z3 l yl q Haw •.. 0 v� MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY May 24, 2011 Historic Preservation Commission Conference Room 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order just after 4:30 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Sandra Rossow, Jerry Niezgodski, Todd Zeiger, Mike Voll, Linda Riley, David Steinhauer, Lynn Patrick (arriving after COA#2011-0404) Staff Present: Aladean DeRose, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia D.Feasel, Assistant Director, Wayne Doolittle, Preservation Specialist Members of the Public Present: Jennifer Chuppe, Drew Chuppe, Daniel King, Steve Szaday, Jeffrey Dierbeck II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2011-0404 Property Location: 1414 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1925/H.R. Stapp/Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Jennifer and Drew Chuppe Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey frame designed in the Colonial Revival style reminiscent of French dwellings in the Mississippi Valley. It has a gable roof with a large shed roof front dormer. The porch extends across the entire front of the house supported by large Doric columns over brick porch floor. The porch wraps around to a side gabled roof patio. The roof is asphalt shingles. The windows are double hung, 8/8 on the first floor and 6/6 on the second floor some are also 6/1. ALTERATIONS: The original wood siding was covered with aluminum siding prior to 1986 along with aluminum storm windows and doors. The 1986 survey card notes that the windows were 6/6 double hung. The roof has been replaced. There are replacement windows in the rear of the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: replace upper/lower sashes of 14 double hung windows and replace with architecturally correct Marvin simulated true divided light aluminum clad windows. 14 windows were already replaced years ago during the kitchen/bathroom/attic renovation. 5 of windows being replaced don't match the rest of the house (lack of muntin bars on one sash). DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to replace 3 first floor 8/8 windows in the front and 2 second floor 6/6 windows; on the East side 2 8/8 windows on the first floor and 2 6/6 second floor; on the west side 18/8 on the first floor and 16/6 on the second floor; on the south 18/8 window on the first floor and 2 6/6 on the second floor. The replacement option is a full window replacement with Marvin Clad Ultimate Double Hung. The installation will be via the exterior of the home by removing the present sashes, peeling away the aluminum siding, inserting the new window, shim and caulk, return the siding and add trim to simulate what was there -flat casing to butt to the siding. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: No one is quite sure if the current windows are original to the house. The survey card indicates a 6/6 double hung pattern, while what is currently on the house is a mix of 6/6 on the second floor and 8/8 on the first floor in addition to other muntin patterns. Staff was unable to do an interior inspection of the windows; however what staff could observe from the exterior was that cosmetically the front first floor windows appeared to be OK. However, Bob Grant of Bob Grant Construction, Inc. performed an interior inspection and concluded that the windows require extensive repairs and that five of the fourteen are of an inferior quality. Staff recommends approval of the replacement windows. On a motion by Todd Zeiger to amend application by applicant to reflect full frame removal, cutting and reconfiguring aluminum siding, installation of a full width wood trim, similar to the original, inserting a full frame replacement system, and the permanent removal of storm windows with a second by Dave Steinhauer. Vote: 6-0. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Linda Riley to approve application as amended by applicant for the complete removal of 14 windows and exterior sills from the exterior along with storm windows, Install 14 full frame replacement Marvin wood double hung windows with aluminum exterior cladding: "Marvin Clad Ultimate Double Hung" with muntins. Restore original flat casing around the window to make that trim around the window more prevalent, cut aluminum siding to fit and caulk edges. Vote: 6-0. COA 2011-0404 was approved as amended. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 May 2011 Application Number: COA#2011-0421 Property Location: 1615 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1929/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: J.C. and Julie Ducom Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The brick house is a 2 %s storeys with a rectangular plan and steep gable roof with thin wood rake trim. The roof is slate and the shed roof dormer is also covered in slate. There is a series of 5 diamond paned lead glass windows across the front. There are 8 light casement windows in the lower and upper levels. There are brick chimneys at each end and half-timbering and stucco on the west side toward the rear and the back gable. ALTERATIONS: Fifteen windows were replaced with Eagle brand casement windows with COA# 1997-0825. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove existing deteriorated slate tile roof, water damaged sub straight and install high quality GAF Grand Slate fiberglass asphalt Look -a -like. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Remove the original, but failing slate roofing material. Repair decking as needed, install ice and water shield and install GAF Grand Slate Fiberglass Asphalt roofing material. Haul away all debris. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles.. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascia of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. 2 Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new roof as it conforms to the East Wayne Street Guidelines. The slate roof has deteriorated considerably and continues to flake and chip off the roof giving it the "rusticated" look it currently has. The GAF product will restore the original look of the slate roof. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Linda Riley for the conditional approval of Grand Manor from CertainTeed, on the main house, and garage, with an opportunity for the homeowner to substitute a standard dimensional asphalt shingle similar to Grand Manor CertainTeed, for installation on the garage. A second option for the homeowner would be that they could repair the existing garage slate roof utilizing salvaged slate from the main house. The original slate on the front main gable of the house should be retained and repaired in kind Vote: 7-0 COA 2011-0421 was approved with conditions. II. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Linda Riley to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. ate