The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAugust 2011N ENO W V H AGENDA T OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST .15, 2011 e Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY, August 15, 2011 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 501 N. Lafayette COA #2011 -0701 2. 834 Park COA #2011 -0715 3. 424 LaMonte COA #2011 -0727B 4. 420 LaMonte COA #2011 -0727A 5. 1232 LW E COA #2011 -0729 6. 824 Forest COA #2011 -0729A 7. 1340 E. Wayne S. COA #2011 -0803 B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. Haven Hubbard 2. Marquette School III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF July 18, 2011 B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Preservation Specialist Report 6. Legal Counsel D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report V. OLD BUSINESS A. Intern Resolutions VI. NEW BUSINESS `O M,Mlssloy fR � o: o a s o co n �til *fit Chapin Park Chapin Park Chapin Park Chapin Park Lincoln Way E. Chapin Park East Wayne NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. 2 A. Historic Preservation Funds DHPA grant B. Restore Michiana: House Histories VII. ADJOURNMENT 2 SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AUGUST 15, 2011 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES Print Name X r Wt Z Address Signa e / f L �Z- ,P- `/ psi Poe - 76 C, s STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0711 Property Location: 501 N. Lafayette Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: 1892/Free Classic Property Owner: Pat McCoy -- Landmark or District Designation: Chapin - Park LHD - Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey home with an irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. The walls have deteriorating insul -brick siding with second storey bays on south and front facades. The hip roof with gables and wall dormers that are gabled in the front. The gables have box cornice returns with random rubble between decorative half timbering and asphalt shingle roofing. There is a full width front porch with wood Doric columns supporting a shed roof with dentils at cornice. There was a wood balustrade and flooring. The windows are 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures; diamond pane wood casements in front gable. There is an exterior brick chimney on the south side. ALTERATIONS: There was a roof repair in March, 2011. The concrete steps are not original. The aluminum storm doors and windows are not original. The green insul -brick siding is not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: If original siding can be salvaged then we'll restore it, if not then replace it with a similar product. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The green insul -brick siding will be removed. If the wood clapboards are salvageable and able to be repaired then they will be. If they can not then a similar product, like the cement board used on the NNN houses on Lindsey and Leland will be applied to resemble the look and reveal of the original clapboards. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park Local Historic District Guidebook II. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low - pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power- washed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval and will work with Jason, Pat McCoy's contractor, to determine the best method to economically employ after the insul -brick siding is removed. Also any architectural features that are uncovered must be replicated. Application - FOR - CerHficate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St, Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd.; South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building; South Bend, Indiana 46601 . _ . _ Phone: 574235 -9798 Fax 574235%578 • . Eva A- SBSJCHPC ®cost josephinus . Website: http: / /www.stjosephcounVmdm &corn /sjchp /mdex htn l OFFICE USE ONLY » »» DO NOT COMPLETE ANYENTRIES CONTjngED IN THIS BOX » »» O FFICE USE ONLY Date Received Application Application Number �/— - 4 711 Past Reviews: ES (Date oftAst Raier•) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ' •�(f i // Local Landmark cal Historic District (Name)�� National Landmark E] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: (] Denied Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: ("Z St reelSVumber and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (please print) I� / a t ree Address of Property Owner(s): t / 5 - 92 - 5. _ 300 Contractor(s) Name: .xav Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: al ;'O-e-4 �-f City: �� _ / 4/ Current Use of Building:' 'type of Building Construction: Phone: ,S7f/ �O.3 °� 13 3 mgleFami Multi- Family — Commercial— Government— Industrial— Vacant —etc.) (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: R In -kind (more than one box may be ehedW) r Description of Proposed Work: - Owner /Contractor. Faic (This office u x aornespon with only am designee) ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in -kind) [] Demolii _ D v ��it1 il,�fKrLG2 cx LW% � ,R,L2s� e -mail and /or - APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — � , � J � r' '�II�IA'! � br��r tx�'�5��►Trrr�.ec�t!!D. �w;E^.atbnr Ji �a�'' 1 "�►' , mow ,y � �!'� ', j Jf J� .: { rs.•ca�rier L+.a::as iK'��M1tia , +I�Ac t . M.ti �X ��! `t � sy. '. � 5 ++ �. � ,� C � '�^� t wsrrs ax waa•r»cay.:�urpya s.e>�r'.Cyy�z. x '�� 'j ?�" � Y Y n �' ' L •,.,.,� :a 3 T K ➢: , - "'� w i�SA'�`i5 l" ,��+�.�"�� . ' �'rwrsr.. :• �'�y�"'ji � �rn�.� � . ,t'J �`' ...rea+..r. 4 `�.wa•sae aan -. eTra S � 'L "� eJra A � .`�' �, k�[' :s. � � � �i � '° a�:aw 'r � � tiar�sw�i.. • ? �O. �j �,. rt;_:� � . -. �.:[ C. E �A► xxw��y�0':l Fcacu..t�'ta+.warw�Fri'+ttt7eAi? ;3RGFC�'�l4lttyiWE, . r `�.,' y r - .i y ? � L!yt"r,,��',,��,s. rS •� s [ai+wautr� +.xu�,•wts' ,�;'w,>.+tia-raKas�v r. . J �! � ;�` Tvm.a+[n✓s+,a.nwcaus xr < �; 1C1 .u...aw"'"�..',+w,-'�n • �� . � �� .�,,: { �' } � � t , r uTimaeacT�a.an �.. �w+w+t �»TU .�7wY11sah,43tS7a3sS�ayi a: '�. ,, ..: 5 < op. } � :� - �., 5.': 3i {i J. L+nwr�•�nn.7En'aa�twW' ` �•� � • � � � J i' .+Fhr� • '�c: � �. n a� *�4 J✓cuwr.sm.. >.w...,,rw ' t '�?: � �4� r '� � K� 1nMJC2itSO1tf1. . ��+ � ;S� ?.�t�c • + ', �5 � y. ' M i • 3KYiNi" � Fil li21 �QP CTYI�!Y:hY1N22 >TY7'ilrAyi lT'�A{{7�{l' .,5, ., u - Cr1i.' (� w. �. ! . �i-. N. �iM�i� 'w`` °"'s''xrelm €,r►*1,'S 3:j},. , x � .f3k # Kiwrwr: �yJ� �� T`, �'�� '�aa..NN1tLr��ll..lYaW � !. �} - �'�� f " . . • �� •,', �( w � �1Ti1 A RIR H,W Y. ..� u ,e � Y.Y.Iilrllw �t':X wrw4• Y.4' i ' y„ -' � .:� i „ ORI,'M1y2Y7:' a �y�'i;�'SS:LSSI • ,Y. �� y3 !, ).t _ ��, s4.11'.3 aw•Ae y 'tip "�WM � � '� � rae nzr wr •i•n -vTw. i p 1 t '�+r �} 4I n ��t FK+ ' ri[u`ami:t�ttaeat>trY .J i, .� �' � -f� i+, HJ�7iAH�L�ptl�tisbNU�w'a'1YYIdiWC ... JJJ......�ili �5t1�`E`ISY.IG1E �I[IL7A'li"Q N�Nc . - i , I , �` �l tiAESFF�i�4� ibS14e `IY3tL^.:A8C371Y.'6it . _ A . n i' ! i4�at�fralFi4� +i4+u�F:l�le�1U..'+�LtlARt?i• �,• � a�lAil e[. v�sriva�tikaeaer�t 'rt+ar.sa��'3� °sM 4 f •oaaviiay.+e+v.�a .. , .'.'�` . �� ''�x. ;r(,711.11G1 .1�±S�Y+YtK►i ms --- - -- . Iry STAFF .REPORT CONCERNIIING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 293uly2011 Application Number: 20110715 Property Location: 834 Park Avenue Architectural Style /Date /Architect or Builder: Front dornierBungalow/1895 Property Owner: David Mesecar Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating,: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF simucrtTREI SITE: The house is a two storey frame set upon a rectangular birck ----------- foundation. It has wood clapboard on the first storey, decorative shingles at the second and decorative half- timbering in the gables. It has 1/1 double hung windows with simple lintels. The roof is steeply pitched with a shed front dormer with decorative shingles. The porch roof is an extension of the main roof. The 1 /4 width porch has a concrete floor with Nwought iron railing's and posts. There is 1955 13'x16' one storey addition to the rear of the house with casement windows. 'I'licre is a deck also in the rear of the house across the back. ALTERATIONS: `Fhe roof, concrete porch and wrought iron railings are not original to the home. The addition was added in 1955 and the deck is also a recent addition. The windows and doors have aluminum stories. APPLICATION ITEINIS- Replace standard window with bay window. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The home owner wished to remove the casement windows in the 1955 addition and replace it with a salvaged bay window that will be about 12 inches long than the current opening. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are doublehung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place: New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended - Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMINIENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it follows the guidelines for the Chapin Park District. The bay window will also be partially shielded from view from the street by shrubbery. r► Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 175 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Maiiing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 466()1 Phone: 574 - 235 -1798 • Fax 574 -2Z-M - Email: SBSJCHPC@cost josephin.us Website: httg: / /www.sgosTh ountyindkmcom /4d p/i idex.hb3d OFFICE USE ONLY » »» DO NOT COMPUTE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX » »» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 16- P-1 `. Application Number 0 1 0 _ //_ - 0 715 Past Reviews: D YES (Date of Last Review) BNO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: k5_ OW// [] Local Landmark E3 Historic District (Namr) ( ado r n National Landmark- [National Register District (Namr) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied E] Tabled [] Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: '(�' :3 4 1 f (; Stmt Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Pkase Prin O N vi r) m • Address of Property Owner(s): n q P�7 < k OCC L1 4 G t C Contractor(s) Name: AT 0- <Ter t,'Vr ! Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City Phone: Current Use of Building:___, 5 wA ;d : F- 40y;1 -r (Single Family — Multi - Family — Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: Lr rare� F'-nme ( Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — SteeI — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -kind [_] Landscape [] New @ (not in -kind) ❑ Demolition (more Om one bas may be chedzd) Description of Proposed Work: I 'I "I "We �� . r % i el(a� " ix+ tT/ a"Y I el'; Ir'4v Owner /C tractor. Fax: a -mail (This of= eorresmnd rh ly mu desipa) and /or — APPUCA77ON REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — I 11 R� f� �sz�frr) a'1 -G-4A f9 s .a. vA �\ o3 00 0 \� � ! / \� »§ � �� / *� \� / C.1 t� d' N 00 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPI.,ICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: I August 2011 Application Number: 2011-0727B Property Location: 424 LaMonte Terrace Architectural Style /Date /Architect or .Builder: Gabled- ell/1899/ Property Oivner: Marilyn Slieree I.,aPorte landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park —_ Rating:_ _ _ __ _Contributing; DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house has two storeys and is set oil an irregular brick foundation. The exterior walls are covered with asphalt shingles the gabled is covered with asphalt shingles. There is a bay oil the west side with wood pilasters and decorative mouldings and pendills. The windows are 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures. There is a small corner porch oil the west side of the central gable with stone .floor laid over concrete block foundation. There is a central chimney. AILTERATIONS: The siding and roofing are not original to the house. The concrete and stone porch materials are later additions. The landscaping is recent. APPLICATION ITEMS; Fence back side and .front yard with 4' French Gothic picket and two (2) S' privacy sections (in back) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposed to enclose her yard with a four foot French Gothic fence to match the fencing that is already installed. She also proposes to install 16 feet of dog car privacy fence between her back yard and 420 Lalvlonte to match the current privacy fence. Per diagram and photographs provided. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain opens (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. S'I'Al RECO MINI E�N`IWH ON: Staff recommends approval of the tie" fencing as it conforms to the standards and compliments the architecture of the house. There are several houses Situated very closely together can small, irregular lots. Application - FOR - Certi, Cate of f Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 ltihtiting Address— —j.ty -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 4(111 Phone: 574- 23s -M • Fax 574-MM • Email:- SBSJCHP'C6co st jc ah inus Website: http: / / www.s"hani ntyindiana.com /sxhp /index html - OFFICE USE ONLY > » »> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONFINED IN TKIS BOX > > > »> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 1 / Application Number Past Reviews: [] YES (rwe of Last ) F1 NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: f 0jZe"_ C ,2 011 ❑ Local Landmark Cgl l Historic &strict (Neme) [] National Landmark glational Register District (rvame) Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied [] Tabled [] Sent To Committee [] Approved and Issued nare Address of Property for proposed work: .►�.''� c� M p,� �" � L.0- - Street Number and Street Nam Name of Property Owner(s): (Pkase Print)t Address of Property Owner(s): Y re Contractor(s) Name: t"a f. 7 „ t n 11 j%'. o r. 1 C-- P r,-r f Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City. Phone: Current Use of Building- _,_„__.F .-^/_ /,p (Single Family- Multi - Family - Cbmmerciat - Government - _industrial - Vazant -etc.) Type of Building Construction: 6 c� c r { (Wood frame - Bark - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -kind ❑ Landscape New [] Replacement toot in -kind) ❑ Demolition {inure that one bm may be dre&4 q,, 3 i,& Q Description of Proposed Work: - rat h c` 4 � tea �•- �.7 t rr c A 1< 1 Owner /Contractor: Fax: e-mail S' A- 77 - C7. { l3t rs will mrrrttpond with atfymte designee} "0 �� and /or - -- APPUCATTDN REQWRi:MMMEE M ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — -TERATI 5 Jditions Other Asphalt shingle siding. 24. SITE PLAN Jqe �Aecora-tiv-e j f ad co rn i ce E Zi yd, L nn door -IYI8 27. Environment' Residential 420 -424 Lamonte Terrace, August 1, 2011 0 � \ \�# `` \ \�� | f O Back yards between 420 - 424 Lamonte, August I, 2011 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: I August 2011 Application Number: 201.1-0727A Property Location: 420 LaMonte Teri-ace Architectural Style[Date/Architect or Builder: Center Gable /.Remodeled 1907 Property Owner: Alvin Wile)• Landmark or District. esignation: Chapin Park Rating: Not included in survey- DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house. is a two storey rectangular structure with aluminum siding. The foundation is brick. There are metal awnings, aluminum storm windows. and doors. The windows are 111 double hung. Asphalt singles are on the roof. Noted that it was part of the Chapin/Fassnaclit Estate, perhaps part of the estate's Agricultural Buildings. There is a long, narrow brick pathway to the front door. AI,TERATjONS: Possibly repurposed as a residence. May have been moved to current location in 1907. All exterior treatments are not original. APPLICATION ITEMS; Two decorative sections ofFrench Gothic Picket fence 4' high in front of property. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to install a four foot French Gothic fence in front of his home. This will replace a decorative metal garden fence at that location. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: ;CIIAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. SJ'AFF RECOINENIENDMION: Staff recommends approval of the new fencing as it confonris to the standards and compliments the architecture of the house. There arc several IIOUSCS situated very closely together on small, irregular lots; 420 LaMonte is set further back .front the street and is situated behind 418 and 424 LaMonte. T I F C atsh Application FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing AdArote- riurnfu South Ben Indi 4 5 e 01 Phone: 574 - 235 18 - F= 574-215WB • Erna. sgcHPc@cost-josePhjn Websit-- bttP.//Www.st der httd OFFICE USE ON4Yz DO NOT COWLMANY EN7FM CONTAINED IN THIS BOX ;-:,,)*>�,- OFFICE USE ONLY Date RecelvedJAIL, Application NumberIALL - 0 Past Reviews. ❑ YES (DX, ;[]NO Staff Approval authorized by. 31de. Historic Commission Review Date: 7 n Local Landmark Local Historic District Qv--4 ( API 11' VA ( L [3 National Landmark National Register District ovaml Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied [] Tabled ❑ Sent lb Committee [] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: o T'C' To rev-c- StMiNumbffad Simi NOM Nam of Property Owner(s): (Ftmer hint) At %;t to In Address of Property Owner(s): Z 0 1-14 p 7 t-Ine c- e Contractor(s) Name: /1 f, 3 14 ) V. Contract Company Name. Contractor Address: City! Phone: Current Use of Building- A> 4 It r- I (Single — FM17Y - MaItiamqiv - I-GftMMMf -Indotrial - Vq=t -fto Type of Building Construction: 1/ &A P Proposed Work: In-kind ❑ Landscape R New ❑ Replacement Wt hojn4 ❑ Demolition (=a than cm box maybe diedad) Description of Proposed Work: i e3 d o r) CT1 e^j T r Owner/�:=q(br I= e-mail mid/or APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE US7ED ON REVERSE SIDE -TERATIC 5 iditions Other Asphalt shingle siding. . . .......... .. 24. SITE PLAN n""'. d co rn 1* c - fj 0 -or 1 -P-P- 0 - rt door VA-an-tern— 172 Environment dent i 1* 420-424 Lamonte Terrace, August 1, 2011 s I L I I t I I i N .Q G3 N s G N Q3 v C13 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 July 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0729A Property Location: 824 Forest Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Side- gabled/Free Classic /1895/Fred Keller, Builder Property Owner: Victoria Hyland Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating:Notable - DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: - The 21/2 storey frame house has an irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. It has a gable roof with dormers covered with three tab asphalt shingles. The dormers have wood shingles in the gables. The walls are wood clapboard with corner - boards, base trim and moulded cornice. There is a full -width front porch with wood Doric columns. The porch has a wooden porch floor and ceiling. The windows are 1/1 double hung on the first floor; small 4/1 casement windows on the southwest corner and 16/1 on the second floor. The windows have aluminum storms. ALTERATIONS: The aluminum storm windows and the asphalt roof are not original to the house. New Roof was approved with COA 2010 -0929. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove and replace porch flooring. Install 2 "x8" floor joist. Add joist hangers as needed. Replace Apron. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Home Service proposes to remove porch flooring from the entire porch. Support beam to ground with temporary 4 "x4' posts. Install new 2 "x8" floor joist on southwest corner. Install 2"x8" joist hangers to existing floor joists. Remove and replace 7' apron on end and 8' apron on front. Provide new % tongue and groove fir porch flooring, pre- stained on all sides. Install, prime and paint surface. Build and install 6 pillar wood bases with weep holes, matching existing bases. Bases will be pre- stained, installed primed and painted. Re- install pillars, caulk and paint. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the repairs to the porch deck and replacement of the wood floor boards with tongue and groove fir. The deteriorating floor boards have been nailed to the joists and the nail heads are popping up; there have been repairs with patches of wolmanized wood nailed to the joists. The southwest corner is deteriorated to the point that it is no longer weight bearing. The replacement of the deteriorated column bases with wood is in -kind but Staff recommends that the bases have weep holes to prevent wood rot. Application -FOR - CeW f icate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County_ity Building; South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574 - 7359798 • Fax 574 - 2369578 • EmaM SBSJCHPC®co.st joseph.in us Website: http:// wwwatjas ephcountyindiana.00m /sjchp /index html OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETEANYE)VTRIES CONRRVED INTHIS BOX » »» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Receive o2 1 O W/ Application Number A O f J - O Past Reviews: BffES (Dare of t.,t W.) 02 020 / O ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: /,au¢ .W/ / C� ❑ Local Landmark ❑v'Cacal Historic District (Name) �T� -r-� -• ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ lkbled ❑ Sent 7b Committee ❑ Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: a q Street Nu = ,"d Stmt Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) ( G k_f ate/ 1 •.tea!' Address of Property Owner(s): C 4 Contractor {s) Name: q 1 rke;a '4. "r•=� r!' S` � S O � v i +tom Contract Company Name: go ^.P _ T.Q1 C J r C Q Contractor Address: jgi ::� 6-Z / V r (7c� City cnQ ✓,TT Current Use of Building. Type of Building Construction: DATE Phone: -q'7 IeFamil Multi - Family- Commercial - Government- Industrial - Vacant -etc.) Fram<>- Brick - Stone -Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In - kind ❑ Landscape ® New ❑ Replacement (not in4dnd) ❑ Demolition (more than one box my 6r &dm / Description of Proposed Work- - t7 Owner /Contractor: Fax: e-mail Rf (This office will wmVm d with n y one designee ) and /or - APPLICATION REQUnU% E Vn ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — I ro Page No. of NOME SERVICE 55621 Nubour Road • Dowagiac, MI 49047 (269) 782 -4361 or (574) 220 -4475 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO i PHONE STREET 108 NAME 11" 440S `I 1 F of d '7 CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE ; JOB LOCATION - -- ARCHITECT— - - -- — -— DATE OF PUNS -- I DATE Pages - - - - - I JO8 PHONE -- We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: ron� Forc.h ' 1YeMDV -t POro� �f i96i'i N -�1'Jw1 �h�f -i r� porcA , Siyoporf 16fa-mf 4-o r ound iu[ 41 i -epip r e L v - y it x y f 6sf j�fvy4cjj New �C �lodr jofs.� on tSoLtq4i W�q #OrIver. INS k �U isf tv "o eils f© � Xisf � �r , -�100ir tOi' -k m 4 v 7'ayo� °�' "� �' 6' �-p ro a f rcmi- PreWdr e Nett 3,/iv T-t G- f; r- Pc rc-ti f 1wr Pre - .sfa-i oYl a ! I s r'd.es. DNS LLr �a ce . U d d + 1. N eve bets-es yvloJ �2�C is fr lU �a s es, &Sd 6 LO X 6 INsfal /•e priv„d ¢ pa.i vfa, 1? , // p' ll ar s d au/� pizi,v-f. \ t i I OP f ropost hereby to furnish material and labor — complet / e in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of: 1C __A i X dollars ($ ) Payment to be made as follows: All material Is guaranteed to be specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alternation or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above stlmate. Will hold Interest on property until paid in full. All agree - S contingent upon strikes, accidents or delays beyond our control. r to carry fire, tornado and other necessary Insurance. Our workers +\ Ily covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. k aptanrr of f rOJI0981 —The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date of Acceptance: Authorized Signature��' . Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within days. Signature Signature 824 Forest, August 1, 2011 824 Forest, Augustl, 2011 r-4 O N bA N O w d' N 00 .--4 O N taA N O w N 00 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 3, 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0803 Property Location: 1340 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival/1929 - Property Owner: - -John and -Ellen Stolte - — - Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The structure is a two- storey frame construction with an irregular plan and brick fagade. The hip roof has a wide overhang, supported by large brackets and is covered in asbestos shingles. The first storey has grouped casement windows with concrete sills. The second storey has 6/1 double hung windows with brick header course sills and soldier brick. The entryway is a central brick arch with stone keystones and irregularly located quoins. ALTERATIONS: None recorded. APPLICATION ITEMS: Tear off and re -roof. Going from asbestos shingle to 25 year 3 -tab. Maple red. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The roof appears to be the original asbestos shingles and is currently covered in a green moss. The owner reports that the roof is leaking. Contractor for the owner has proposed a tear off and re -roof from the existing asbestos to 3 -tab asphalt of a similar reddish color. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street Local Historic District II. EXISTING STRUCTURES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not. commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project to replace the roof as to prevent further water damage to the interior of the structure. In addition, it will match as closely as possible the color of the existing asbestos roof. ,3.11 n b� You 1 d Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building; South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone. 574 - 235 -9798 • Fax 574 - 235-9578 • Email:: SBSjaiPC®co st josephin.us Website: httF://www.sqosepha)unq*Oiana.cbm/ochp/indexhtird OFFICE USE ONLY » >>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONnINED IN THIS BOX » »» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received B. I I - Application Number 2Q 11_ - O 10 0 3 Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of las Rwiem) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name)T rl National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: (] Denied E] Tabled [] Sent To Committee Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work t y I tea•^ 0 ; 7� . S � _ p Str umber Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: y � r^ ca. C_P ( Contractor Addre (A (.f C1 02 City: Phone: 7 M i Current Use of Building- ,410",(SingleFamt7y— tt Family-Com ' 1— Government— Industrial— Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction. ( C , 7 (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone —Sted — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In -kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New 4ep lacement (not in -kind) E] Demolition (more than one box mtybe cheda4 Descrjption of Proposed Work: �(a "`�` �- -- Q t Owner /Contractor. Fax \ 7 `� I �- 8 e -mail ( This o ffia unll corraspond urith onlyone es _) •' _Y, �p—,_ and /or - APPLICATION REQIUREMENIS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — �� r � a r { S � „a n 5c ow r la aT�• - -Joa` . t a . � .� ,. � ✓ Y 1p 'f Y 4 w • ..'.. �� 3i .&, � , � � r ✓ t ,. I ! I .1 I�' � Y ' ��.N � '� ;nom • 4t STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 10 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0809 Property Location: 624 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Side gabled /1916 Property Owner: Mary and Ted Benchik Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: —This is a one storey house with wood clapboard walls set upon an - -- - irregular concrete foundation. The low gable roof with a triangular eyebrow dormer is covered with three tab asphalt shingles. There are purlin brackets at the eave. The porch is screened with square wood support with capitals and purlin at the eaves. The windows are 4/1 and 6/1 double hung. ALTERATIONS: The asphalt roof is not original to the house. There are aluminum storm windows and doors. The porch was probably screened in at a later date.. APPLICATION ITEMS: Tear off existing shingles. Install new shingles -art lock. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Sherriff - Goslin proposes to remove the 3 tab asphalt shingles and re -roof with the art lock shingle of their product line. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum -sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required 1 The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the complete tear off and re -roof with the Sherriff Goslin art lock shingles as the project follows the Chapin Park guidelines and the new roofing will compliment the design of the house.. Application - FOR - CeW f i'cate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574 - 235-9798 - Fax 574 -235 -9578 - Email: SBSJC ipmco.st josephinus Website. http:// www. sgosephcouniyindiana .com /ochp /index.hbA OFFICE USE ONLY » »» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONruNED IN THIS BOX » »» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received t5. - I I Application Number 2-0 1 1- 0 6 D q Past Reviews: F1 YES (Date of Last Pmew) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by. Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) Chia I11 1 'Qr� National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee 11 Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: (0 2 DATE Street Number and Street Name l Name of Property Owner(s): (Please print) Ot A -1- `'/ Address of Property Owner(s): 1 Contractor(s) Name: r � Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: %a ' City- l� Current Use of Building:- - - (Single Family - Multi - Commercial - Government - Industrial - V int - etc.) Type of Building Construction: / 2 2N. (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: n [_1 Landscape E] New ❑ Replacement (not in - kind) ❑ Demolition (nun than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work:_ 3+qb Owner /Co actor: Fax:`� �-�_ �� 7 `�`7 e -mail (77ruo/fiac to pon�� ly°"e and /or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — `. ; � .�., 1 : ��,�y 4 ` '',,; ge r � � � :;� • - x A rt ♦ "E` ,, �`� uw �vw+�ww�T�k�r� t r ray;' '� ' b �•:r, _ � ; 5 �. •. 'f.T� an��' i l d�'K � �; a t` �f� ••Y AYI 9� AM It IN oi l i q lYl of �'�+ c,,'( • F w r� 2 1 .r.a '"` %y ? t x � 4 . �i.. /i i' f• � l A y � • �.• �•YSM.'i HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOUTH OF BEND 1 ST. JOSEPH • i # i FORM DATE 1 JULY 2011 AND 22 JULY 2011 ADDRESS 1 402 E. WAYNE DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING NON CONTRIBUTING -'1956 MODERN ■ell a ,_ l _ -. WORK PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL AND PATIO REPLACEMENT 1 JULY RECEIVED COA APPLICATION IN THE MAIL WITH CHECK. ON- SITE VISIT AND PHOTOGRAPHED TREE, CLEARLY DYING AND PARTIALLY DEAD. CALLED NICK LIZZI OF NICK'S LAWN SERVICE AND VERIFIED CONDITION OF TREE. ISSUED RME. 19 JULY RECEIVED COA APPLICATION IN THE MAIL WITH CHECK. 20 JULY SPOKE WITH ROBERT DEANS JR. TO VERIFY PROPOSAL AND THAT WORK WAS IN -KIND. CONTACTED BARBARA FOR PERMISSION TO ENTER BACKYARD WHEN SHE WAS AT WORK. 22 JULY ON -SITE VISIT TO 1 402 AND PHOTOGRAPHED CONCRETE PATIO THAT HAD CRACKED AND HEAVED IN A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS. ISSUED RME. Application - FOR .- Certificate of Appropriateness Historic: Preservation Commission of South I3erid K St. Joseph County 1?,- S. Lifati`ett€• Blvd., 1x)uth Bend, Indiana • 60 ia'Iailinf; Aciclress: Culltli4 C ity I3€cild'rict„ 5€iutll l ellCi, lildiMli' �(ir. >(j1 Phone: 574- '_3::7 -€f798 • Fax : 8 Em ail: <al�ll.iil,u >, lvcbsite :llttl / `wwiv.stjosepllc €> lint' iticiilnii .cumJsjl:ilp,limle.\.htilll OFFICE USE ONLY » » >> DO NOT U) f I LETE A.'1, Y I:1: IMS CCJWA VI :I`) IN TIIFS 13t;}Y » »» ()[TICE ITSI: ()Nf 1' Date Received _ 1/ Application Number Past Reviews: (_, ES 1 ONO Staff Approval authorized IT W Title: . ___... I listorir C'onililission Review Date: i� local Landmark Lie mcal Historic District C'Ya»2ir} National Landmark [_1 National R egister District (Nivnr) Certificate of .'appropriateness: f .N) )roved find Issued Denied _; Tabled D Sent Ti> Conunitter. } } __.__...._._.. _ MI Addre of Property for proposed 'o rosecl work: �� '!•.• -. �. �L'`�, -l�l. �. `' '" Marne of' Property Owticr (s): (T'irasc f'rira) Address of Property Chvrier(s): 't--• - - -- Coritractor(s) Name: ,.... Contract Company Narne: Contractor Address:.,, ___ (Atv: Current Use of Building: q ''�. > �i7tttii:('— :t'}1fii2'F :s... `i Ij �i 2:i. —(ai`•, )�2 i3!.;ie i?Id r,. .. .. L.. . Building Coilstrtrrticfrl: _._.. _.._ . . Tvpe of I t �M�`��... _._..._ j�� .�.--- .._.........._._..___.. _._ --__ ...... ('rV''•i'.i fr; F . ;1 , i..,;A - !!'2:t - t,•,•i .. C: ^, t? :.. ='s Proposed Work: _ ] In -kind Landscape (� New �] Replacement {2:::r.t:_n:i;:;) 7 Derriolitioir t s.r +v. >�:::< - Vi:i . '�n:ss ,t ns :'i 3;'Jt / ♦ � � 1 � ,, Description of Proposed Work: C)�snr ontractor: lax:._.... — APPLICATION RFQUIREJNI1:NTS ARI-* I.ISI'EI) ON R111YSE SIIDE — 1402 Wayne Street (dogwood) ��it fir •ir�ti CERTIFICATE OF X j APPROPRIATENESS N " 1865 s Tim KInsczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Removal of dead and dying dogwood tree on west side of house per Nick Lizzi of Nick's Lawn Service, Replacement of tree at homeowners option at a location away from the house. THIS PEI?—NIIT IS NOT TR- 101-11 001 TO N.-I CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director Barbara A. Broo" DATE PERINITT TAKES FORCE- 07/01,12011 PERMIT ISSUED IM Catherine D. Hostetler Director &� POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PIACF ON Till: STREET SIDE OFTIIE, PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF AIA,XVORK. Nick's Lawn Service, Contractor for the following location: HISTORIC 1 WAYNE South Bend, IN 46615 PRESERVATION East Wa)ne Street COMMISSION Application No. 2011-07 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: OF Located in a Local Historic SOUTH BEND A Local Historic Landmark AND and found this application to be appropriate according to the ST. JOSEPH Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation COUNTY Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in an) manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, APIA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 23$ -9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX. (574) 235-957 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCIIPC @cO.!tt Joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address. 22 7 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PEI?—NIIT IS NOT TR- 101-11 001 TO N.-I CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director Barbara A. Broo" DATE PERINITT TAKES FORCE- 07/01,12011 PERMIT ISSUED IM Catherine D. Hostetler Director &� POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PIACF ON Till: STREET SIDE OFTIIE, PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF AIA,XVORK. Application Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiama 46601 1�1allincr Address: County -GlyRij; C-1h Bend T-Aj— 4A6A1 Phone: 574-235-9795 • F-=574-235JM • Email:Sl3SjCI-lPC4kwt+-mpWnus Websih-- hUrr//wwws*)sephcminqindianaaoam/S OM CE USE ONLY s » > DO NOT COMILLTE ANY ENTMES CON RINED IN 7711S BOX ---OMCF USE ONLY Date Received - - --- V� Application Number —G- O Past Reviews: ' 1.4 E] NO Staff Approval authorized by. r Iltle: Historic Commission Review Date.- E] Local Landmark [Rll:o'ml Historic District {Name) <:5 [_ ] National Landmark [] National Register District (maw) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied [] Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee [Approved and Issued fYA Address of Property for proposed work: Simt Numba and Sinxt Now Name of Property Owner(s): (Fiaw prini) Address of Property Owner(s): 5wi IF Contractor(s) Name: Kebc-d Contract Company Name. /JeA &�L A b t'P Contractor Address: P-e /) Fx gir ti city: Phone: a (0 Current Use of Building: Ilype of Building Construction: (wed rnmw - Brki - stme - 5W - (:(*:wme - Otha) Pmpo".d Work: In -kind FlLandscape [ _ toot inkinfi DDemolition (morn - dwn tare hm rwy be dwtW) D iption of Proptised )'cork: ,0 IA- Lf-, C -X(t u ee W,, 1AAe-k--, Owner /Contractor: Fax e-mail 6 Mreer— A9 ya lte-e, ct / (77m, vffirw Ung mmixtO u7th m�y twx dmNpmr) and/or — A1 REQUIREAMOIS ARE US= ON SIDL — RC). Box 884 Granger, IN 46530 PROPOSAL (574) 247-1961 • Fax (574) 247-1962 T'n You Can Count On -)%NFR r CON DATE HOME rtio% VNIN110N FAX NUMBER WORK PHONE il'RITT JOB rd WE CELL /Moull-F PHONE -9 WAI-1 4 E 5714- 850 - 703( - ,) :l'lY,STATE - 71P JOB LOCAVON EMAIL 513 Pq e 1 � A e WE HEREBY SUBMIT SPECIRCATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR 2,5 ' 5 X 1S) TrA Cl 14 7 7 OF -2 f 11V - '7 7 IV& 7Z b J61,,V.775 Co,-,44 Ze VVIL- L, 73CE VJ IT H- V/1aFMFS4 CvN4ze W!L,— &F 6 Linie-s-rvAic- MIX CW : WU-L r-!,;E v\)4c-EFiIFj> T pp , Ec 7- 4 PPLlE 7 c> AFTSP- F) a I Si4 1 A(6 i;DD 7 6 PPr>� ON t tA)� ?t3P-lAP, XA-rT-) I p L9 9 9 Pop .- Lit o DRAJIq A -7s 2 j)UT !T; We Propose hereby to fumish material and labor - Complete ill accordance with above specifications for the sum of- Note: Tbi'q proposal 111.11' b Authoriz'cd c � � Withdrawn bv us if not accepted witbin 30 day,, Cell. 5- 7 53� - 2-- �,, 1 - ,)4- — Signature: The above prices, fqvcificnrions and conditions ate satisfac wry and -art. heteby accepted. Yoij area uth,iri7cd w do the work as sjvcified above, Date of Acceptance. t ° r RONIN-4) AM INNI IPP11 r" N 1 V r•f h N C) Itt V-4 1 =. i�M M 11 MA Tim Klusezinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In -kind replacement of concrete patio in rear of house per specifications submitted. MWIRV W, • • • � ' II Me C O S 1 ROBERT GEA.tiS CORPORATION, Contractor for the following location: 1402 1 4AYtiE South Bend, IN '4 Last Wagne Street Application ',No. 2011 - 0722 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landntark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local historic I andznarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying writh the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 23; -9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAx: (574) 235 -9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E -mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Fiend and St. Joseph County, I25 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address; 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERVBLE ZO * I " tors t� O S . OUR" 1\A'NIE OFAPPIJCAN"T: Barbara A. Brooks DATF. PLR'11rr TAKES FORCE: 07122/2031 PERl1rT ISS LT. U BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director CATIIERINE D. IIQSTETLEIZ, POST IN A CO:+«sPICt7OUS PLACE 0 TIIE STREET SI OF TIIE PROJECT UTN'11L CONIPLETIO:t 0 F ALL WORK. AIST P # OF ! ! S �. MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE I JULY 2011 ADDRESS 1245 E. JEFFERSON DISTRICT EAST W AYNE STREET RATING NOTABLE AUSTIN &SHAMBLEAU 1907 NEO- CL.ASStC HOMEOWNER SUZANNE AND PATRICK RUSZKOWSKI WORK PROPOSED COMPLETE TEAR OFF AND RI =-ROOF 1 JULY RHETT JONES, THE PAINT GUY APPLIED FOR THE COA TO TEAR OFF CURRENT ASPHALT ROOF AND RE -ROOF WITH LIFETIME DIMENSIONAL ASPHALT SHINGLES. PHOTOGRAPHED HOUSE AND VERIFIED THAT SHINGLES WERE ASPHALT. ISSUED RME -COA 2011 - 070 1 A i x E Application Z�evwz - FOR - Certfflcate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address'County -Cty Building, South Bend, Indiana 456tH Phone: 574 - 2359'7 8 • Fax 574235 -9M • Email: WCHF'C@cost josephin.us Website: httlr//wwwAosephcountyindiana .com/sFhp/=IexhtnI OFFICE USE ONLY» » >> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONVIINED IN THIS BOX >> »> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received / 4 .W f/ Application Number L,* fl _ 0 7 o , ,4 Past Revlews: 9 (rat .-Of Lost M*W) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: [] Local Landmark 2fAocal Historic District (Name) e; - National Landmark [] National Register District pvamt) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied n Tabled [] Sent To Committee [A Approved and Issued f° DATE Address of Property for proposed work: t '� ' ' 0- S mbn and Srctt Name Name of Property Owner (Please Print) CiC_� to Sct i Address of Property Owner(s): +m' Contractor(s) Name-' � ' S Contract Company Name: „ "* Contra r Address: 1 ` t C41 c tc C A -0 � City ��t�c��,- .-tCS' Phone:�� Current Use of Building (Single Family — M ulti- F amily — Commercial — Cmrnmrnt — Industrial — Vacant —ttc.) Type of Building Construction: k3 � '�`"'� r-- (Wand Frame — Thick — Stone — SW — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: In -kind Fl Landscape F] New [] Replacement (not in -kind) [] Demolition (more than one box may be drr C ,_,.,,,._ Description of Proposed Work- � �' � �` D- i 4' � - ” � � r` - c- O o ctor ar a -mall (T.�is'�ra r ontyo igrut)� and /or -- APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 1246 Jefferson 71512011 y� Tim Klusezinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Complete tear off of asphalt architectural shingle roof and re- roof with asphalt architectural shingles.All per code with water and ice sheild and haul away all debris from site. THE PAINT GUY, Contractor for the following location: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: (574) 2 35 . 979 8 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235 -9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E - mail: SBSJCILPC@ ca.st•josepli.in.us public inspection at the office of the historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 Nest Jefferson BIvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. �A 1, 1246 JEFFERSON South Rend, IN 46617 East Wayne street Application No. 2011 -070 to in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Z Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and /or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TILA SFEIL8BLE z; O �d , t 7 � 0 I m .T NAME OF APPLICANT: Suzanne and Patrick Ruszkowski 2 CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director DATE PERMIT MUZE,S FORCE: 07/01 /2011 PERMIT ISS IJE.D IM Catherine 1). Hostetler Dlrector POST IN A CONSPICLTOLTS PLACE ON THE SFRE1717 SIDE OF TILE PROJECT UN-1711, COMPLETION OF ALL IVOI K. AISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIO OF SOUTH REND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTVI ----RO-UTINE--MAINTENA-NC-E - EXCLUSION -- FORM DATE 1 1 JULY 2011 ADDRESS 830 N. MICHIGAN DISTRICT LOCAL LANDMARK IN LEEPER PARK N.R. DISTRICT RATING OUTSTANDING FREYERMUTH &MAURER 1912 BEAUX ARTS HOMEOWNER SOUTH BEND WATER WORKS WORK PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF 700' OF 20" WATER PIPE IN LEEPER PARK FROM DRIVEWAY TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND ALONG THE ROAD. 17 FEBRUARY MEETING WITH JEREMY ROSCHYK OF DLZ ABOUT PROPOSED EXCAVATIONF FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE PROJECTS IN LEEPER PARK. 1 1 APRIL GIVEN A NEW DIAGRAM OF THE PROPOSED LIFT STATION PROJECT WITH A 24" PIPE COMEING FROM THE NORTH PUMPING STATION. 3 JUNE SPOKE WITH JOHN WILTROUT CONCERNING THIS PROJECT. O JUNE NEW PROJECT WITH 20" PIPE COMING FROM NORTH PUMPING STATION. 11 JULY RECEIVED FAX COA FROM ,JOHN WILTROUT FOR THE EXCAVATION OF THE NEW 20" UNDERGROUND PIPE. ISSUED RME- COA #201 1.071 1 FOR WORK WITH ALL LANDSCAPING AND GRASS TO BE RESTORED. L '> V e� -� A -I 6 - jV Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Pref:crvatlon Commission of South Bend F2 St, lo-seph County I255 S. Lafayette Blvd•, South Bend, Indiana 466 Mailki Address: County -City >3uiltli ( — , tf, n—A i n c '� A e. 1 I Phone. 574-235-9793 - Fix: 574-2M • Email: 5BSJCHK1ro.st-josephin.us Website. http://i�, *k�,/index.him Orr] CE t ISE ONLY > > > > > > D N 0 T C aVTP L ETE ANY ENMES CON - MINTED rN Tills B » »» OM Cr USE ONtLj( Date Received ll . // Application Nwriber. d I/ fast Reviews: ffylls (oil t: Los! piiew) NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: [Local Landmark .oral Historic District wa,%w n National Landmark ry_j National Register District Certificate of Appropriateness: F] Denied [] Tabled n Sent To Committee R`Approved and Issued f; Address of Property for proposed work: T'S6 tj Y t C, 1 " stred Mbg�r, lwr 2 Name of Property Owner(s): (Frew prijo) i-k e -.A d 0o `f` r r- Address of Property Owner(s): 1p,10 ' IV r"t I c, k 13 41 Cojitractor(s) Name:_ Sodi- t - - - .— i -LL Ajz.+ t r Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building: ly Type of Building Construction: Proposed Work: kind E?'fandscape [2'�Tew ❑ Replacement Otot ❑ Demolition t it Description of Proposed kk I Unt-, t P 7 0 0 �Jf flc f C tj P, j d1 S, C( C. e E—tj o —�� ..�� ° � 'ail i��t 9 t'ctr ( e :_._��s3!e._.'��*�n �,tonc (��_�'d 4 C fr J Se l 0 d f e?_Cj 7-A Owner/Contractor: Fax: )IS e - mail tj I Art'.1 R) 5 0 j e td ) A C V (rk-- Cffi romspomildth 01; by ene ---) and/or APPLICATTON ARE LISTED ON AMRSF SIDE -- 1--Y 47 Nr' K. L,> CXY ;f , N Tint Klusezinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County tins reviewed the proposed work: Installation of a 700' of 20" underground water pipe in Leeper Park from the driveway on the north side of the North Pumping Station to Riverside Drive then along the road to water piping west of fire hydrant near reservoir. Restore grass and any landscaping. South Bend Water, Contractor for the folloNving location: 83o North Michigan South Bend, IN 466ol Leeper Park East Application No. 2011 -071 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: ❑ Located in a. Local Historic Q A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and /or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Presenation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend :Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying iNith the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235 -9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX-' (574) 235`957 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for r,niail: SBSJCHPC@.co.st-joseph,in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NCIT TRANSFERABLE r PY a NAME OF APPLIC.kNT: South Bcnd %Vater NVorks DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 07111/2011 PEILIIIT ISSUED BY; Catherine D. Hostetler Director CATHERINE D. nosS 'ETLER, POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OFTHI PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL N ORK. AISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND t ST. JOSEPH COUNTV .. A • DATE 27 JULY 2011 ADDRESS 1 100 E. WAYNE DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING CONTRIBUTING SUNNYMEDE ENTRY GATES 1925 HOMEOWNER SOUTH BEND WORK PROPOSED RESTORATION OF THE E. WAYNE ENTRY POSTS 1 1 APRIL THE SOUTHEAST ENTRY POSTS WERE DEMOLISHED BY A CAR FOR THE SECOND TIME SINCE 2004. STAFF PHOTOGRAPHED THE REMAINING PILES OF MASONRY AND BRICKS. THE RESTORATION OF THE GATES WAS TURNED OVER TO MARCIA QUA IN THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR INSURANCE CLAIMS AND BIDDING THE PROJECT. THROUGHOUT THE MONTHS OF MAY AND JUNE THE STAFF PROVIDED INFORMATION, SOURCES FOR REPLACEMENT MATERIALS AND PICTURES FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE POSTS. STAFF RECEIVED WORD THAT MC LAUGHLIN MASONRY WON THE BID AND THAT WORK WOULD BEGIN AFTER 4 JULY 2011. 27 JULY CHERYL ,A:NDRIES FROM THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT BROUGHT OVER THE PAPERWORK FROM THE CONTRACTOR AND THE CITY FOR THE RME -COA 2011 0727. 9 z s 2729 JULY THE RESTORATION WORK BEGAN ON THE ENTRY POSTS AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT A LIMESTONE CAPITAL FOR ONE OF THE PILASTERS WAS MISSING. MARCIA QUALLS WAS NOTIFIED AND THE DIMENSIONS WERE THEN TAKEN TO ROSE FUEL FOR AN ESTIMATE. E. Wayne damage April *11, 201.1 t 4 J. Of um red^ g � '� ., �. a,W „, w£ � � ..< E uns A A ql ZAMA! fly 1 J q 1"nj Vic p W' A , N , g is t risu a , $ ° f z 015 tip toy SIN ITS East Wayne Pillars jT br Olivy/ I Application FOR - CerHficate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SL Joseph County 12 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: Cotutty -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 4ff01 Phone 574 -235 • Fax 574 - 2;x'78 • E nab: SWCHPC@wst pseplLmus Website: http divu.rnm /4chp /indexlhrd OFFICE USE ONLY> » »> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONI7 MM IN THIS B » » >> OX OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received -,? 7 "YA4 °Zo // AppIication Number _ d / / - 0 7o2 7 Past Reviews: Er ES (Ddeo /Last Review) [] NO Staff Approval authorized by, tf� Title: " Historic Commission Review Date: [] Local Landmark QfOcal Historic District (Nara,) [] National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Nam,) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied ❑'fabled n Sent To Committee � Approved and Issued .17j44-Z611 DATE Address of Property for proposed work: j Y- c S t'..6 e,c Street gumber and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City Phone: Current Use of Building- (Single family— Multi,Famity Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Woad frame — Brick —Stone — Steel— Concrete— Other) Proposed Work: In -kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in - kind) Q Demolition (more than one box may che*d) Description of Proposed Work: Owner /Contractor: Far e-mail (This ojfia will 'pond k ontya� d,signu) � and/or -- APPUCA77ON REQUIRUEMS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- i Crry CAF Sovrx B&N.'D STEr11EN J. LLTF -ci~T, MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 5, 20I 1 Y Mr. Todd McLaughlin McLaughlin Masonry, LLC 55110 Timothy road New Carlisle, Indiana 45552 RE: Repairs to Brick Entry Walls at the Southeast Comer of Eddy Street and East Wayne Street Dear Mr. McLaughlin: The City of South Bend, .Department of Public Works, Division of Engineering, is accepting your bid for the above referenced repair in the amount of $7,153.00. Please advise hour soon work can be started. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me at (574) 235 -9251. Sincerely, Marcia Qualls Customer Service Coordinator Department of Public Works Engineering water Uarls Central Services Streets Environmental Services Gary A_ Gilot, Director Carl P. t.ittrell, P.E. David Tungate Matt Clilebowski Sam llensley John I, Dillon, Ph.D. 5741235 -9251 574`235 -9251 574'235 -9322 57'235 -9316 574 574,'277 -6515 Fax 574! 235 -9171 Fax 5 74 %235 -91 71 Fax 574/ 235 -5595 rxx 574.' 235 -9007 Fax 574t235-9272 Fax 5741277-8980 �l Tina Kltisezinskf, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed vvork: Restoration and rebuild of brick and limestone entry posts on the southeast corner of Eddy and East Wayne HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH REND .j 1 ST. JOSEPH C OT- _ Phone: (574) 2 35 . 9 -98 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235 -9,578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E -mail: SBSJC1IPC,z cost joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. lip N £� N A 111 Me Laughlin Masonry, Contractor for the following location: Southeast corner of Eddy and E. Wayne , IN East Wayne Application No. 2031 -0727 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: 21 Located in a Local historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. ,Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NO'r in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government, THIS PERAUT IS NOT TRANSFERA11LE rs u . O a 0 M NXNIE OI-' APPI1CAA"r: City of South Bend DATE PERNIrl' TA X-S FORCE: 07/ 7/2011 S e l a PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director CATHERINE D. HOSTETI.ER, POST Iti A COtiSPICL'OLS PI ACE Oti 1 "III' S't'Itf ET SIDE OF THE PROJECT LT,TII, Cp- -TIO:ti OF AI.L AA'ORR. II Location udget as of 07-31 -2011 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07 -01 -2011. Fund: 0001 County General for 01/01/2011 thru 07/31/2011 Loc. 0037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original Addt'1 /Adj Total Balance /Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 27,944.15 42.31 42.31 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 500.53 55.61 55.61 10000 Totals 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 400.00 134.67 534.67 0.00 000 General GovT. 11,164.00 57.37 57.37 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 800.00 100.00 900.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 160.00 100.00 100.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 152.40 74.24 74.24 20000 Totals 1,425.00 234.67 1,659.67 0.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 19,216.00 243.84 19,459.84 0.00 000 General GovT. 32020 Travel 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32350 Postage 400.00 42.71 442.71 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 200.00 5.29 205.29 0.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 34040 Auto Liability 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. User ID ksobecki 08/04/2011 02:53 PM Saint Joseph County Page 59 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance /Percent 17,307.75 12,692.25 12,692.25 42.31 42.31 20,798.10' 15,251.90 15,251.90 42.31 42.31 38,105.85 27,944.15 27,944.15 42.31 42.31 265.47 269.20 269.20 50.35 50.35 399.47 500.53 500.53 55.61 55.61 0.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00 664.94 994.73 994.73 59.94 59.94 8,295.84 11,164.00 11,164.00 57.37 57.37 100.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 152.31 290.40 290.40 65.60 65.60 52.89 152.40 152.40 74.24 74.24 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 100.00 100.00 Page 59 Location Budget as of 07 -31 -2011 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07 -01 -2011. Fund: 0001 County General for 01/01/2011 thru 07/31/2011 Loc: 0037 Historic Preservation Account Original AddVI /Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 30000 Totals 21,521.00 291.84 21,812.84 0.00 Location Totals 88,996.00 526.51 89,522.51 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint WMI County 0.00 47,501.83 User ID ksobecki 08/04/2011 02:53 PM Page 60 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance /Percent Balance /Percent 130.00 115.00 115.00 46.94 46.94 8,731.04 13,081.80 13,081.80 59.97 59.97 47,501.83 42,020.68 42,020.68 46.94 46.94 0.00 0.00 47,501.83 User ID ksobecki 08/04/2011 02:53 PM Page 60 Director's Report August 2011 18 July Participated in the Finance Committee meeting at the Northern Indiana Center for History. Discussed the Kizer House situation. Prepared for the HPC meeting. Sent website information to Pam De Cola a resident on East Wayne Street for possible -- A application. -- Reviewed Hubbard Haven House National Register nomination. Researched Coquillard Park and sent info to Matt Moyers in the Parks Department. 19 July Created and mailed out all approved COAs. Called Jason Springs (617 233 2765) Chapin Park resident that Stall can approve in -kind asphalt roof replacement. Spoke with Gary Stafford of Conor Company who offered his services on window and door restoration. Conor did the work on the Indiana Landmarks Building and the US Court House. 20 July Spoke with Susan Toumey (235 9396) of Teen Shelter, Sale Station located at 1322 Lincolnway East. Emailed her die link for the Lincolnway Standards ( susaiitouriiev @sl)c- ) because the State has money for the Shelter to repair a flat roof and wants to side the house. Will arnuige an on site inspection with Preservation Specialists and Assistant Director at her convenience. Her contact person in Indy for this project is Eric Curtis (317 234 7559). 21 July Contacted Barbara Brook (232 8334 BZBrook @valioo.com) about the in- kind patio work she is proposing. Spoke with Bob Geans, Jr. and he did verify that it was in kind. Trying to arrange backyard photos for RME. Met with Davc Mesecar, 834 Park concerning his Coa application. Staff will need to go out and document house and proposed bay window. Followed up with Susan Tourney left message to make sure she received my e mail. No follow up. Submitted 2012 Budget to Teresa Shuter. E mailed Glory June Greif about upcoming 106 Review for Northside Trail in River Park with SHPO on Tuesday for Carl Littrell. 22 July Met with John Charles at Office, he is concerned about the state of City Cemetery and wanted to know if HPC could contact the Boy Scouts about keeping the Cemetery neat and tidy as a Service Project. Gave him Pat Bridges' contact information at the LaSalle Council and sent Pat and c -mail. On sight visit to 1402 E. Wayne for COA in- kind replacement of concrete patio. Drove to 1605 E. Wayne and observed that die new roof was in place and looked good. Drove by 304 Twyckenham to see if work had started on the two approved projects, but it had not. E- mailed responses to Glory June Greif and sent tier information to Carl wide more information to come after she visits the area this weekend. 25 July Personal Day. Presented BSSB's support for the $1.2 million project at the Potawatomi Conservatories. Also provided financial and grant information for Council members for questions to Mayor and Phil St. Clairc. The Ordinance passed unanimously! 26 July Took HPC vehicle in for repairs. On site visits with Steve Szaday to 1322 LWE and 824 Forest. 1322 LWE is going to replace a flat roof; repair soffits and replace gutters. They are not going to side the house, but replace rotting material, remove peeling paint and re -paint as needed to match. Needs Lead Abatement procedures and practises sent to her. 824 Forest met with Richard Guntel about the scope of work for the porch deck replacement. Wants to replace original wood porch with tongue and grove pine and - - - rebuild the support. We suggested weep holes for the bases of the columns. Meeting and - - on site inspection of the WPA wall for the proposed Nordiside Boulevard trail completion with James Glass SHPO, Chris Jeter, Lawson Fisher et al. Gary Gilot and Rob Nelson MOU forthcoming. HPC will help with WPA brochure and historic signage information. Met with Steve Kollar about the Dean Building south wall. Thanked me for helping with the graffiti removal from his building. Hopefully lie will get die south wall repaired. 27 July Sent out legal notices for the public hearing in September for Hebard Haven House District and also the letters to the public Officials, County Commissioners, and the owners. The South Bend Tribune notice will run on 1 August and the New Carlisle News will run on 19 August.. On going discussion with Randy Ray on 803 W. Washington. Contacted Marcia Qualls and Linda Riley about the missing limestone capital to the pilaster. Sidney Blanchet came to the Office and requested that her home at 1922 Portage be landmarked. 28 July Continued to work on NR Hubbard Haven and began to work on Staff Reports for the August meeting. Ordered 2012 Calendars. L mailed Barry Visel at AEP for 1'iin Johnson who is working on the 307 LaMonte Terrace house and can not get AEP to remove trees so that the restoration work can begin. Received Ismail follow up from Toni Gifin with examples of interpretative signage for the WPA projects. Another discussion with Randy Ray, suggested Indiana Landmarks as a possibility, Randy suggested Community Foundation. 1322 LWE does not have lead exterior paint, so volunteers are proceeding with removing the loose paint and repainting the body of the house. 29 July John Frledline came to die Office for assistance In placing 803 W. Washington In a NPO hands. Stated lie was willing to put money Into the project to help match and get the process moving. Turned in July fees. Worked on National Register for Hubbard Haven House and Staff Reports. Contacted David Relos and updated him on the Friedline visit and my discussions with Randy Ray. 1 August On site visits to 1233 LWE for photographs for roof COA, photographed new rool' on 1615 L. Wayne (owner is now living there, house is for sale) 420 and 424 La Monte for the lcncilig COAs and photographs and photograph of' 821 Forest , toured through Chapin Par and Riverside Drive. On going e -mail and phone conversations with John Freidline, David Relos and Randy Ray about 803 W. Washington. John Freidline also stopped by the Office again. Compiled Staff Reports and organized RME for Commissioners' packets. Dr. Georges Lnderle phoned about die Code Letter putting him P) on notice about the deteriorating barn. Gave him the names and numbers of four contractors stating that the Commission would need to know the costs of stabilizing, restoring and demolishing. 2 August Completed all Stafl' Reports and RME -COA for Commissioners' packets, set Agenda for 15 August meeting. Contacted all parties on 2012 budget matters and July Location Report to contact Elicia in my absence. Sent Ann Thornton support letter language for NR from Commissioners to HPC. Phone conversations with David Relos and John Freidlinc. Staff took Interns to Lunch at Tippecanoe Place. Responded to Erin Blasko's email on Preservation Saves. 3 -8 August Vacation 9 August 802 Forest RME -COA for roof repair work; 1425 E. Wayne REM -COA for asphalt re -roof. Review 3 -8 August activities with Staff members. Prepared for 2012 budget hearings. Contacted Jason Pfledderer new owner of 815 Arch that work on the river would need a permit from the DNR and that any tree/brush removal along riverbank would need to be cleared by City Forester, Brent Thompson. 10 August Review Area Plan Commission Agenda of items affecting Historic Properties. Met with Dave Lillich of Sherriff Goslin concerning roof at 924 Park advised him that the re -roof would have to come before die Commission on Monday. Contacted homeowners as well. 11 August On site visit to Dave Mesecar's, 834 Park, to get better picture of proposed window. Toured Chapin Park and River Bend and NNN projects. Presented and successfully defended HPC 2012 Budget with County Commissioner Kovach and Councilmen Catanzarite, Root, Nolan along with new Deputy Auditor, Teresa Shuter. Elicia should get the raise that the Commission approved. Researched information for Paul Diebold, Team Leader at DNR for the Survey, on the I &M site. Will photograph and send to him on Friday. 12 August. On site visit to Chapin Park for 624 Park Staff Report and inclusion on Agenda to verify windows on survey card as original. On site visit. to 305 W. Navarre for Gene Forsythe's inquiry about replacement storm windows; verified that current storm xvindows arc aluminum replacement windows and that an RME COA can be issued for the white finished metal triple track storm windows. Went to the I &M site and photographed the Commerce Center, the Transformer House. The garage is gone. Attended Michiana History Group luncheon at the NIGH. Issued REM -COAs for tree removals per Brent Thompson. Picked up brochures for Now and Then tour for Saturday's tour. 15 August Due to rain the Now & Then tour was postponed to 9 September; returned the portable microphone and speaker to DTSB. Participated in the Finance Committee meeting at the NICH. Also Communicated with David Relos about the LaSalle Hotel, the Kalamazoo Group is still working on tax credits and should have an answer next month, and on 803 W. Washington, which lie feels is dead in the water since the City will not buy it from John Freidline until there is a confirmed end user for the site. Assistant Director's Report HPC Meetina 08.15.2011 1. National Register Nomination - a. City Cemetery- b. Marquette School -Begin to organize the extremely large file so that Kurt Garner will find it to _�e efficient (and not think we are crazy). Correspondence with Kurt to set a day /time to review the file. c. Haven Hubbard Home - Review CLG procedures as provided by SHPO. Review template, letters, etc. prepared by Catherine. 2. Attend 07.18.2011 HPC meeting, prepare draft of minutes and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print minutes from July meeting for August meeting. Print commissioner and liaison mailing labels. Assemble Commissioner packets and mail. 3. Internships -Draft Resolutions for Internships and forward to Staff, President and Council for review. Print off pretty Resolutions on certificate paper. Celebrate the Interns with a farewell lunch at Tippecanoe Place. Shopping at County Surplus warehouse to select more office furniture, filing, etc. Prepare job descriptions for fall 2011 internships. a. Resource Library Books - Collecting more stuff to be cataloged. Begin re- shelving after rearranging shelves. Working with Mary Lou to re- shelve random books, fine tune the categories, and finalize her work. b. Resource Library Flat Files- Collecting more stuff to be cataloged. Working with Rachel to finalize her work. c. Local Landmarks - Working with Megan to cross reference the digital file with the physical folders. Made a disturbing discovery *ask for details, if interested. Working to get said disturbing discovery resolved. Working with Megan to finalize her work. d. Preservation Specialist- Continue organizing office. Assisting Steve and Mary Lou with the fainting and reorganizing of the Resource Center. 4. RMS 2010 -2011 Window Restoration Production - Continue working on SCRIPT. Reading, Workina. Windows: A Guide to the Rer)air and Restoration of Wood Windows. Forward SCRIPT for review to Tim K, Todd Z., Paul Hayden, Wayne D., and Steve Szaday. Correspondence with Richard Spigelmyer regarding a second and final editing session. Correspondence with Andrea of Grass Roots Media regarding production schedule. Revising SCRIPT based on review comments. Trip to Dowagiac with Wayne to meet with Richard and John for a final editing session. Meeting with Andrea of Grass Roots Media regarding the SCRIPT. Scheduling a time for Wayne to begin the voice over recording. Finalizing SCRIPT. 5. Restore Michiana Series 2011 - a. Updating www.RestoreMichiana.com website. b. Research Your Building's History- Follow up with Cliff Zenor of Mishawaka HPC. A date is set, October 15. Correspondence with Todd and Cliff regarding specifics. 6. Staff Reports - a. 1340 E. Wayne S. -Faxed COA application to homeowner, Ellen Stolte regarding roof replacement. Received COA application from contractor. Phone call with homeowner regarding roof leaking concerns. Correspondence with Commission Pres regarding homeowners concern. Prepare Staff Report. =. Routine Maintenance Exclusions -831 Park Avenue, sidewalk in -kind repair. » » » » » » » » » » » >over 8. Then & Now: A Downtown South Bend Architecture Walking Tour - Continue to promote the tours. 9. Studebaker /Bendix Heritage Trail- Correspondence with Steve Nemeth of Parks Department wegarding adding an interpretive panel & /or signage at the site of the demolished Studebaker mausoleum. 10. 317 W Washington, Central High Apartments RME #2011 -0331- Prepare field observation report for Accurate Construction. Forward to Staff and Commissioners for comment. Revising report, forward to Legal Council for comment. Receive Accurate Construction RRP Certification via email. Correspondence with Faith Slaughter and Mike of Accurate regarding pickup of the approved Field Observations copy. -- - - 11. Identify -a few potential Local Landmarks and prepare letters. 12. Accompany Roger Chrastil of WNIT to research the topic of prohibition at the SJCPL Local Family History department. Introduce him to Heather Yarborough, owner of Chicory Caf6 who studied this topic as a History student at IUSB. 13. Neighbors Against Bad Bugs - forward an invitation to attend a tree tagging event to North Shore Triangle contacts and larger listsery on behalf of Ericka Popovich of the Purdue Extension Service. 14. Grants - a. Historic Preservation Funds - Review procedures, requirements, etc. Meeting with Tamara Nicoll -Smith of DTSB regarding potential projects. Correspondence with Todd Zeiger regarding potential projects. Correspondence with Malia of DHPA regarding grant applications and specifics. iscussion with John Freidline regarding potential grant funds for the Kaiser House at 803 West ashington. Studying Acquisition and Development Grant Application Packet. Preparing a letter to Mr. Freidline regarding HPC procedure. Correspondence with Commission Pres regarding Letter of Support procedure. 15. Assisting the Notre Dame Architecture Department with locating a unique and uncommon place in a vintage building to have a catered dinner for the speakers of "Seaside at 30 ", a conference on New Urbanism, on a request by Samantha Salden. Touring the potential locations with Samantha and Jennifer Parker, conference planners. Potential locations included: Center for History, LangLab 1302 High Street, Potowatomi Conservatories, South Bend Civic Theatre, Museum of Art permanent gallery, Summit Club, Palais Royale, Double Tree /First Source atrium, IUSB Civil Rights Heritage Center at the Engman Natatorium, Woodward Room. 16. 1322 Lincolnway East - Discuss siding project with homeowner. Correspondence with HPC Architectural Historian, Dave Steinhauer regarding siding and energy efficiency. 17. 1232 Lincolnway East, Muessel House - Discuss roof project with homeowner. 18. Receive two COA applications for the 400 block of Lamonte Terrace in Chapin Park. 19. Research for Jeff Dierbeck to determine if Indiana has a law regarding tearing down vintage barns. Correspondence with DHPA Paul Diebold. t 0. Research Callix E. Miller, a former Architect of Notre Dame c.1920 as I came across three original enderings by him. Donated renderings to ND Architecture Library and the Dean loves them! ON 21. Correspondence with Erin Blasko of South Bend Tribune regarding a piece he is collaborating on with other reporters. —22. Assist a Fort Wayne couple visiting the Office with their research of the County Courthouses. 4 3. Correspondence with Lori Horvath, Highland - Riverview Cemeteries Family Counselor Manager, regarding the Riverview Cemetery Gatehouse. Assist Lori with her research in the files at the HPC Office. 24. Assist Lynette Jones, Historic Appraiser, with obtaining information regarding 219 West North Shore. 25. Assist Heidi Prescott, South Bend Tribune, with obtaining information regarding Citizens Bank, 112 West Jefferson.-- - -- 26. Best Places to Buy an Old House - Meeting with Sue Solmos at her office to go over details, begin compiling data, and delegating tasks for nomination. Preparing nomination. On tour of the District with Sue Solmos to get the photos for the nomination. Continue editing. Correspondence with Mike Downs to get pictures of the John Auten celebration in City Cemetery. 27. Trip to 1105 Sherman to discuss exterior siding painting with owner. 28. Field work with Catherine to document the former I & M powerhouse, currently the Commerce Building at 301 East LaSalle /401 Colfax, photograph 305 West Navarre. 29. Michiana History Group- Meeting at the Center for History. Presentation by Jeff Harris of the n�ndiana Historical Society Local History Services Department about the countless free and low cost services /resources that they offer. 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION INSPECTION INVOICE August 9, 2011 DATE ACTIVITY J uly 12, 2011 HPC office. _ -- July 13, 2011 HPC office July 18, 2011 HPC office. Download photos and post cards. July 19, 2011 HPC office. Work on scans. July 20, 2011 HPC office. HOURS 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Aug. 1, 2011 HPC office. C of A photos. Print photos. Aug. 2, 2011 HPC office. Pick up Steve. Work on window script. Photo of 501 N. Lafayette. Capture old photos. Aug. 3, 2011 HPC office. Tour district. 1340 E. Wayne roof photos. Aug. 4, 2011 HPC office. Dowagaic window meeting. TOTAL 42.5 C SIGNED '✓ .- DA �I Z4 a e R. Do ittle �v y° APPROVED DATE 9 - � 2011 Catheri4 stetler, Director 6.5 5.5 5.5 7.5 Historic Preservation Commission President's Report — August 15 2011 • 07/18/2011 7:OOP: HPC Monthly Meeting (Rm 1308). • 08/01/2011 Complete editorial review and commentary on "Preservation and Maintenance of Wood Windows: How ", by Elicia Feasel (script component to the Grass Roots Media video project presented by Richard Spigelmyer). Met with Elicia to provide an explanation of my suggestions. Follow up with Wayne Doolittle for a summary on the "Windows Preservation Standards Collaborative Summit" (WPSC) sponsored in part by Bob Yapp and held at the Pine Mountain Settlement School,. Kentucky. Wayne shared some new techniques for efficient restoration, described new products /sources for materials and had the opportunity to meet pioneers and celebrities in the windows' preservation trade. • 08/10/2011: Repair shorted power cord for the Sony BM -850 Dictator/Transcriber machine (used to record public meetings). Deliver to the HPC offices. MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY August 15, 2011 13` Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Jerry Niezgodski, Mike Voll, Alice McLane Members Absent: Sandra Rossow, Lynn Patrick, David Steinhauer Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, -Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler,- Director, Elicia -- Feasel, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: Charles Ferrell, Sheree LaPorte, Dave Mesecar, Ellen Stolte, Bruce Craven, Dave Lillich On a motion to amend the agenda by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Alice McLane to include COA# 2011 -0809, address 624 Park Avenue. Vote: 4 -0 motion carries unanimously. II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0711 Property Location: 501 N. Lafayette Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: 1892/Free Classic Property Owner: Pat McCoy Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey home with an irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. The walls have deteriorating insul -brick siding with second storey bays on south and front facades. The hip roof with gables and wall dormers that are gabled in the front. The gables have box cornice returns with random rubble between decorative half timbering and asphalt shingle roofing. There is a full width front porch with wood Doric columns supporting a shed roof with dentils at cornice. There was a wood balustrade and flooring. The windows are 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures; diamond pane wood casements in front gable, There is an exterior brick chimney on the south side. ALTERATIONS: There was a roof repair in March, 2011. The concrete steps are not original. The aluminum storm doors and windows are not original. The green insul -brick siding is not original to the house. APPLICATION ITEMS: If original siding can be salvaged then we'll restore it, if not then replace it with a similar product. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The green insul -brick siding will be removed. If the wood clapboards are salvageable and able to be repaired then they will be. If they can not then a similar product, like the cement board used on the NNN houses on Lindsey and Leland will be applied to resemble the look and reveal of the original clapboards. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park Local Historic District Guidebook H. EXISTING STRUCTURES A. BUILDING MATERIALS Original exterior building materials in the district include brick, stucco, clapboard, wood shingles, and brick or stone masonry. In some instances, vinyl, composite and aluminum siding have been applied over the original material. Required Original exterior building materials shall be retained when possible. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning and painting. The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design when deteriorated beyond repair. Masonry, including brick and stucco structures, shall be maintained, and properly cleaned only when necessary to halt deterioration or to remove stains and shall be done in a method acceptable for the preservation of the surface: i.e. low- pressure water and soft natural bristle brushes. Brick or masonry mortar joints should be repointed only when there is evidence of moisture problems, or when sufficient mortar is missing to allow water to stand in the mortar joint. Existing mortar shall be duplicated in composition, color, texture, joint size, method of application and joint profile. When repairing stucco, stucco mixture shall be used. A professional shall make a study of the old stucco, to determine the exact mixture and underlayment used in the original work. Some repair methods are not compatible with the original techniques and may cause early disintegration of the repair work and the original work. Ample ventilation must be afforded the structure when siding is installed, in order to prevent increased deterioration of the structure from moisture and insects. Recommended Whenever possible, the original building materials should be restored. When maintaining or repairing original siding is not feasible, aluminum, vinyl or composite siding may be used. When used over wood surfaces, this siding should be the same size and style as the original wood. Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors, cornices, gables, eaves and other architectural features. Property owners should contact the Historic - _Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County prior to initiating any restoration or rehabilitation effort. [Address and contact information is listed in the front of the Guidebook.] The Commission is an invaluable -- source of information about all facets of rehabilitation and restoration — materials, methods, contractors and the like. Prohibited Wood siding shall not be resurfaced with new material that is inappropriate or was unavailable when the building was constructed, such as artificial stone, brick veneer, asbestos or asphalt shingles. Sandblasting or the use of harsh detergents shall not be used on masonry including brick, stucco, limestone, flagstone and sandstone. This method of cleaning erodes the surface material and accelerates deterioration. Repointing shall not be done with a mortar of high Portland cement content which can often create a bond that is stronger than the building material. Usage of Portland cement can cause deterioration as a result of the differing coefficient of expansion and porosity of the historic masonry unit and the mortar. This most often results in serious damage to adjacent brick. Unpainted masonry surfaces shall not be painted unless they had been painted originally. Paint shall not be removed from masonry surfaces by any means that damage the surface. Not Recommended Waterproof or water repellent coatings or surface consolidation treatments should not be used on masonry surfaces unless required to solve a specific problem that has been studied and identified. Coatings are frequently unnecessary and expensive, and can accelerate deterioration of the masonry. Mortar joints, which do not need repointing, should not be repointed. Wood siding should not be power- washed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval and will work with Jason, Pat McCoy's contractor, to determine the best method to economically employ after the insul -brick siding is removed. Also any architectural features that are uncovered must be replicated. On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to approve application as submitted with the condition that the staff makes a conditional assessment at the time to determine full or partial replacement. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0711 was approved unanimously with conditions. 2. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 July 2011 Application Number: 20110715 Property Location: 834 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Front dormer Bungalow /1895 Property Owner: David Mesecar Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey frame set upon a rectangular birck foundation. It has wood clapboard on the first storey, decorative shingles at the second and decorative half - timbering in the gables. It has 1/1 double hung windows with simple lintels. The roof is steeply pitched with a shed front dormer with decorative shingles. The porch roof is an extension of the main roof. The 3 /, width porch has a concrete floor with wrought iron railings and posts. There is a 1955 13'x16' one storey addition to the rear of the house with casement windows. There is a deck also in the rear of the house across the back. ALTERATIONS: The roof, concrete porch and wrought iron railings are not original to the home. The addition was added in 1955 and the deck is also a recent addition. The windows and doors have aluminum storms. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace standard window with bay window. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The home owner wished to remove the casement windows in the 1955 addition and replace it with a salvaged bay window that will be about 12 inches long than the current opening. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are doublehung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project as it follows the guidelines for the Chapin Park District. The bay window will also be partially shielded from view from the street by shrubbery. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Mike Voll to approve application as submitted. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0715 was approved unanimously. 3. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0727B Property Location: 424 LaMonte Terrace Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Gabled- ell/1899/ Property Owner: Marilyn Sheree LaPorte Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house has two storeys and is set on an irregular brick foundation. The exterior walls are covered with asphalt shingles the gabled is covered with asphalt shingles. There is a bay on the west side with wood pilasters and decorative mouldings and pendills. The windows are 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures. There is a small corner porch on the west side of the central gable with stone floor laid over concrete block foundation. There is a central chimney. ALTERATIONS: The siding and roofing are not original to the house. The concrete and stone porch materials are later additions. The landscaping is recent. APPLICATION ITEMS: Fence back side and front yard with 4' French Gothic picket and two (2) 8' privacy sections (in back) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposed to enclose her yard with a four foot French Gothic fence to match the fencing that is already installed. She also proposes to install 16 feet of dog ear privacy fence between her back yard and 420 LaMonte to match the current privacy fence. Per diagram and photographs provided. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high- intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new fencing as it conforms to the standards and compliments the architecture of the house. There are several houses situated very closely together on small, irregular lots. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Alice McLane to approve application as submitted. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0727B was approved unanimously. 4. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0727A Property Location: 420 LaMonte Terrace Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Center Gable/Remodeled 1907 Property Owner: Alvin Wiley Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Not included in survey DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey rectangular structure with aluminum siding. The foundation is brick. There are metal awnings, aluminum storm windows and doors. The windows are 1/1 double hung. Asphalt singles are on the roof. Noted that it was part of the Chapin/Fassnacht Estate, perhaps part of the estate's Agricultural Buildings. There is a long, narrow brick pathway to the front door. ALTERATIONS: Possibly repurposed as a residence. May have been moved to current location in 1907. All exterior treatments are not original. APPLICATION ITEMS: Two decorative sections of French Gothic Picket fence 4' high in front of property. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to install a four foot French Gothic fence in front of his home. This will replace a decorative metal garden fence at that location. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high- intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new fencing as it conforms to the standards and compliments the architecture of the house. There are several houses situated very closely together on small, irregular lots; 420 LaMonte is set further back front the street and is situated behind 418 and 424 LaMonte. On a motion by Mike Voll with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to approve application as submitted. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0727A was approved unanimously. 5. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 1 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0729 Property Location: 1232 Lincoln Way East Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Shingle /1909/Freyermuth& Maurer Architects Property Owner: Annette and Charles Feirrell Landmark or District Designation: Lincoln Way East LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Freyermuth and Maurer designed this one and a half storey Shingle style house. It has wood shingle siding with an intermediate belt course with wall flare. The roof is a bell cast gable with art lock asphalt shingles that flares over the porch. There are two large hip dormers in the front with 1/3/ -2/3 window and multi pane sidelights. There is a full length front porch with shingled pier supports and arched openings. There are 1/1 double hung windows on the body of the front with multi -pane side lights. There are tall multi -pane fixed sashes in the gable ends near the peaks. 16/1.20/1 double hung sashes with multi pane casements paired and in series; some lead camel, some wood. There is a flush brick chimney at the east side with decorative brickwork. ALTERATIONS: The porch steps were replaced in 1985. Some storm windows may not be original. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace roof with either common shingle which matches current roof or metal roof (old fashioned metal roof similar to what was common in the period the home was built) See Attachments. Please. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The Owners proposed work indicates an either /or description. At the time of the Staff Report completion, proposal has been narrowed to common shingle, specifically, an architectural shingle, brand TBD. Roof work will be a two layer tear off. Gutters will be replaced in -kind. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Lincolnway East B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district include hip and gable types. All are covered with asphalt shingles. Eaves, in most cases, have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. Some aluminum sided Houses have aluminum covered fascias. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the existing or original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof by adding architectural features or roofing materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed work as it is in agreement with the Standards and Guidelines for Lincolnway East. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Mike Voll to approve the application with the condition that the roof to be used will be a standard architectural shingle. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0729 was approved unanimously with conditions. 6. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 29 July 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0729A Property Location: 824 Forest Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Side- gabled/Free Classic /1895/Fred Keller, Builder Property Owner: Victoria Hyland Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The 21/2 storey frame house has an irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. It has a gable roof with dormers covered with three tab asphalt shingles. The dormers have wood shingles in the gables. The walls are wood clapboard with corner - boards, base trim and moulded cornice. There is a full -width front porch with wood Doric columns. The porch has a wooden porch floor and ceiling. The windows are 1/1 double hung on the first floor; small 4/1 casement windows on the southwest comer and 16/1 on the second floor. The windows have aluminum storms. ALTERATIONS: The aluminum storm windows and the asphalt roof are not original to the house. New Roof was approved with COA 2010 -0929. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove and replace porch flooring. Install 2 "x8" floor joist. Add joist hangers as needed. Replace Apron. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Home Service proposes to remove porch flooring from the entire porch. Support beam to ground with temporary 4 "x4' posts. Install new 2 "x8" floor joist on southwest comer. Install 2 "x8" joist hangers to existing floor joists. Remove and replace 7' apron on end and 8' apron on front. Provide new' /a tongue and groove fir porch flooring, pre - stained on all sides. Install, prime and paint surface. Build and install 6 pillar wood bases with weep holes, matching existing bases. Bases will be pre - stained, installed primed and painted. Re- install pillars, caulk and paint. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the repairs to the porch deck and replacement of the wood floorboards with tongue and groove fir. The deteriorating floorboards have been nailed to the joists and the nail heads are popping up; there have been repairs with patches of wolmanized wood nailed to the joists. The southwest comer is deteriorated to the point that it is no longer weight bearing. The replacement of the deteriorated column bases with wood is in -kind but Staff recommends that the bases have weep holes to prevent wood rot. Z On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Alice McLane to approve application as submitted. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0729A was approved unanimously. 7. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: August 3, 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0803 Property Location: 1340 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Renaissance Revival/1929 Property Owner: John and Ellen Stolte Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street LHD Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The structure is a two- storey frame construction with an irregular plan and brick fagade. The hip roof has a wide overhang, supported by large brackets and is covered in asbestos shingles. The first storey has grouped casement windows with concrete sills. The second storey has 6/1 double hung windows with brick header course sills and soldier brick. The entryway is a central brick arch with stone keystones and irregularly located quoins. ALTERATIONS: None recorded. APPLICATION ITEMS: Tear off and re -roof. Going from asbestos shingle to 25 year 3 -tab. Maple red. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The roof appears to be the original asbestos shingles and is currently covered in a green moss. The owner reports that the roof is leaking. Contractor for the owner has proposed a tear off and re -roof from the existing asbestos to 3 -tab asphalt of a similar reddish color. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street Local Historic District II. EXISTING STRUCTURES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed project to replace the roof as to prevent further water damage to the interior of the structure. In addition, it will match as closely as possible the color of the existing asbestos roof. Homeowner amends application to substitute architectural shingle where it had been previously designated as three -tab. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Mike Voll to approve application as amended by applicant to substitute architectural shingle where it had been previously designated as three -tab. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0803 was approved unanimously as amended. 8. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 10 August 2011 Application Number: 2011 -0809 Property Location: 624 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date /Architect or Builder: Side gabled /1916 Property Owner: Mary and Ted Benchik Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a one storey house with wood clapboard walls set upon an irregular concrete foundation. The low gable roof with a triangular eyebrow dormer is covered with three tab asphalt shingles. There are purlin brackets at the eave. The porch is screened with square wood support with capitals and purlin at the eaves. The windows are 4/1 and 6/1 double hung. ALTERATIONS: The asphalt roof is not original to the house. There are aluminum storm windows and doors. The porch was probably screened in at a later date. APPLICATION ITEMS: Tear off existing shingles. Install new shingles -art lock. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Sherriff- Goslin proposes to remove the 3 tab asphalt shingles and re- roof with the art lock shingle of their product line. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum -sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the complete tear off and re -roof with the Sherriff Goslin art lock shingles as the project follows the Chapin Park guidelines and the new roofing will compliment the design of the house. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Alice McLane to approve application as submitted. Vote: 4 -0 COA 2011 -0809 was approved unanimously. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. Haven Hubbard - Nomination in progress. 2. Marquette School- Nomination in progress. III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —July 18, 2011 Approved. B. TREASURER'S REPORT — Discussion of budget meeting. Discussion of fees for copies. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence - Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals - Distributed: 3. Director's Report - Distributed. Discussion of a property consent signature as part of the COA application. 4. Assistant Director Report - Distributed. 5. Preservation Specialist Report - Distributed. 6. Legal Counsel -None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report - Distributed. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Intern Resolutions - Circulated for signatures. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Historic Preservation Funds DHPA- Nothing to report. B. Restore Michiana House Histories -Brief discussion. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Alice McLane to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. 4 Atfttest* rick, D to 0