Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
September 2010
AGENDA:OFSTHE � r,,�0""`,'°"`�s WSTORIC PRRESERVATION CClMMISSIUN o H SEPTEMBER, 20 Zoo 08 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLUOR ROOM 1308 County -City Building w : C. STAFF REPORTS .. 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals s 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request Nvhen possible. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 7:OOPM t, I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING ' 4 A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS f 1. 559 River COA#2010-0903 Edgewater 2.1231 E. Wayne S COA#2010-0907 E. Wayne Street x" 3.503 Riverside COA#2010-0907A River Bend 4.633 N. Lafayette COA#2010-0907B Chapin Park r: 5.415 La Monte COA42010-0805 Chapin Park J III. HEARING OF VISITORS g IV. REGULAR. BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 16, 2010 August 25, 2010 B. TREASURER'S REPORT ...° : Location Report w : C. STAFF REPORTS .. 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals s 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request Nvhen possible. Application -FOR- Certificate ofAppropriateness Historic PreservationCommission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 45601 Mailing Addt ess: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone -574-235-97% • Fax 574-235-9578 • Ema 1: SBSJCHPC0co.st Joseph in us Website http://wwwstjasephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index html OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COMAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received S'Lt c,W'o Application Number 0Z.0 Past Reviews: [;?'**YES (Mte of Wf Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Commission Review Date: ,� 9 )11A..�.. 14-00 � ❑ NO [� Local Landmark &6cal Historic District (Namr) Ga [] National Landmark ❑ National Register District {Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Title: [� Denied F1 Tabled n Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work. Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s):. A yt ri Contractor(s)Name: fi" 1./('� 1 t' '„ ci t 'Y�> � � 1 C Or, 4 7 Contract Company Name: 7 Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building'1�'Y (Si`h t Family—Multi-Family— Commercial— Cnarrnmeat- Industrial — vocant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: rP, (Wood Fra me —Brick — Stone —Steel — Concrete— Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind ❑ Landscape [] New(Re (�placement (not in-kind) E]Demolition (more than one box my be dwird) t ' l Description of Proposed Work: i" epbc W 'i(�-? n J Owner/Contractor: Fax: TEi-) — (D LO L-0 e-mail ' __ CAC. C4 (M orkeWill lcorrespond lath only one designer) and/or - — APPLICATION RE(21HREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0903 Property Location: 559 River Architectural Style/Date[Architect or Builder: American foursquarelCraftsmen/ 1920/Whitconib & Keller Property Owner: Amy and Matt Dowd Landmark or District Designation. Edgewater Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The home is a two storey house set upon a rectangular plan that includes an enclosed porch and an attached garage. The exterior walls are covered with asbestos shin -les. The cross hip roof has asphalt shingles and a wide over hang with aluminum soffit. The enclosed porch has end piers that extend above its roof. The windows are double hung 511 vertical sash. A1,TERATIONS: Sonic of the windows have aluminum storms. The asbestos shingle siding was installed prior to *1949 and the aluminum soffit was added. The -roof appears to be a replacement. The side steps and landing were replaced with COA 2008-0328. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacing existing shingled roof with new shingles. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This project is a complete tear off of the 3 tab asphalt shingles and re -roofing with architectural shingles. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EDGEWATER B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district vary from hip and gable to gambrel. All are covered with asphalt shingles. Eaves in most cases, have wood facias with gutters and downspouts. Some aluminum sided houses have aluminum covered facias. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the existing or original in composition, size, shape, color, and texture. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof by adding architectural features or roofing materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed. STAFF RECOMNIMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the Edgewater Standards and Guidelines. 559 River, September 9, 2010 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2010-0907 Property Location: 1231 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1929 Property Owner: Neovi Karakatsanis and Jonathan Swarts Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Colonial Revival Home is a two storey frame construction with a rectangular plan and a five bay fagade covered with wood shingles. The gable roof has simple moulded raking trim and asphalt shingles. The windows are 6/1 double hung windows with moulded cornice trim. There is a central entry with a pediment supported by decorative brackets with dentil details along with pilasters and a fanlight over the door. There is a one storey flat roof wing topped by a wood balcony that has been enclosed with jalousie windows. ALTERATIONS: Open Porch enclosed with jalousie windows and matching siding. The wood balcony railing system had a diamond pattern element in 1986. It is now uniform 1x1 balusters. The glass block window is not original to the home. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. Remove glass block on east side. 2. Replace windows and close door in three season room per attached description. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners propose to remove the non -original glass block windows on the eastside of the house and to restore the exterior siding to match the body of the house. The homeowners are re -modeling the interior of the three season room to be more energy efficient. They will replace the non -original jalousie windows with Marvin 6/1 double hung wood windows that will match the original windows of the body of the house. There will be two windows installed on the south, five on the east and two on the north. The two windows on the north are replacing a window and a door. All per product information and submitted project description from Peacock. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes. The homeowners are restoring the siding on the east side of the house by removing the glass block windows. The proposed wood double hung window replacements are more appropriate to the style of the house than the current jalousie windows. The removal of the non —original door on the north side is at the rear of the house and its replacement with a window will contribute to the rhythm of the windows in enclosed porch. Application - FOR - Certi f icate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: Coiuity-City Btu'lding, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9795 • F&Y: 574-2,15-9575 • Enuul• SBSjCHPC<nho.st-psephinus Website: http://w«kcv.sgoseplicountyindiana.com/sjd-q,/intlexhtinl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONMINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received—I eoLo !o Application Number oL D /d _ O g Q 7 Past Reviews: BYES (Dau of Lot Review) Staff Approval authorized by- Historic y Historic Commission Review Date: S �G /9�'J' ❑ NO Title: ow '%4.0Z oeo /'6 ❑ Local Landmark U�focal Historic District (name) — &auk ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) 01 Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: W1AYAC- 'U. A, Street Number arul rcet Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) m e -m KA M il-A ru N i C O�JANA N Address of Property Owner(s): i Z31 6. WAVfJ9- (T. S . Contractor(s) Name: 'ToPA M cm Contract Company Name: k&oCK .40b b C& Contractor Address: 1 4 7 M +S HA WA VA AW. DATE S QAeZS- City: 9 01STt4 Q ENO Phone: L 6q- 4 q9 2 Current Use of Building N% FA M I LSI (Single ,F'amil y —Multi -Family — Commercial — Government —Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: W CSC n FOW, (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New & Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (mare than one box may be checked) �� Des 'ption of Proposed Work: I) /10U6 6W5 9 j ()CK 6IJ LCAST W& L RC(LtCE Wim- Dows AND Cusc- 0&)a Im-nirwc4CA-,�jru juom. tse-t✓ llmciia OgTAPnom) Owner/Contractor- Far. e-mail WOW 1090. C -DU (This office mtli correspond with only one designee) NE011 and/or 7o NATHAN ELu4i2Ts — APPLICATION REQUIREMMS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE - •�.'1M� s .ave,. - . � •i ;k y ••� �� „:•� �. :, � � 'm � '''syr ��� � � ; :� kit .'N _4 .77 1 ai w WaS MR - w�4 �' t w +�' .. •ytitx - :l" .w.�r`I/J ��-�Y_ '1i,� �„ " -- — - - - - - - - - 1231 E. Wayne S. September 9, 2010 West side wrMI-MIJ PRIJIM T 7 FIN, RE M I RN I MErk 1231 E. Wayne S. September 9, 2010 East side w North side Certificate of Appropriateness Application 1231 E Wayne St S Karakatsanis/Swarts' We are requesting a Certificate of Appropriateness for two proposed changes: 1)- To remove two rectangular glass block windows on the east side of the house. These windows are not original to the house, but appear to have been added during a kitchen renovation in the 1950s. We propose to close these windows as part of interior kitchen work. The spaces will be framed in and insulated, with cedar shakes added to match the existing siding. Seepage six of Peacock and Co. estimate and photos of the east side of the house. 2) To replace windows in the three -season room, close door space and insert window. This three -season room is on the west side of the house and was originally an open porch. It was closed in and windows added, presumably in the 1950s or 1960s. We propose to replace the existing aluminum jalousie windows with double hung wood windows. With double hung wood construction and grilles in the upper panes, these windows will closely match the original double hung windows in the rest of the house. We also propose to remove the existing aluminum door on the north side of the room, replacing it with the window as elsewhere in the room. See page eight of Peacock and Co. estimate, window description from Marvin Windows catalog, and photos of the three -season room. AND CK COMPANY DESIGN & BUILD September 3, 2010 Neovi Karaktsanas and John Swarts, 1231 E. Wayne St. - S. South Bend, IN 46615 Dear Neovi and John: KITCHEN& BATH SHOWROOM 1 147 Mishawaka Avenue South Bend, Indiana 46615 Phone (574) 289-4992 Fax (574) 289-4480 www.peacockandco-com Peacock & Co. proposes to address three (3) separate areas of renovation concerning the property listed above; 1) ROOF; 2) KITCHEN; 3) 3 - SEASON ROOM, per the following specifications and terms: Peacock & Company will provide any necessary building permits and finished drawings prior to the start of construction. Why Peacock and Company? - Our Customer First Philosophy is simple — we are satisfied only when YOU are satisfied. From your first contact with our company to the time when you move into your newly renovated space, we want your experience with each person you talk with at Peacock and Company to be pleasant and productive. What sets Peacock and Company apart for the Others? • Peacock and Company has been in business since 1984 • Peacock and Company has been voted 'Remodeler of the Year' in the Tribune's Readers Choice awards seven years in a row. • We are members of the Better Business Bureau and Chamber of Commerce. • Our 10,000 sq. ft. building houses a brilliantly detailed showroom, offices, warehouse and custom cabinet shop conveniently located in South Bend, due north of the historical Farmers Market. Initial I Professional Remodeling: SUNROOMS HOME OFFICES SCREEN ROOMS BASEMENT RPA�DEutia--ReeM ADDITIONS Terms 30% Down 35% Upon completion of House demolition work. 30% Upon completion of Garage demolition work. Balance due upon completion. 2) KITCHEN Demolition and Modification of Existing We will remove existing flooring (including rear entryway) down to the sub -floor; countertops; s ink/faucet/disposal; glass block windows; all of the appliances; all base trim; kitchen door casing; old wainscoating; ceiling scribe. Items that will be removed, reworked and reinstalled: 1) The Oven Cabinet will be made to house a microwave/trim kit on top with drawers filling in the remaining hole. 2) The Soffit Cabinet Doors (18) will be cut to allow glass inserts. 3) The Valances (2) will be cut to eliminate the scalloping. Walls The walls where the glass block has been removed will be framed in, insulated,, drywalled and cedar shake sided on the exterior (to match the existing as closely as possible. Electrical We will supply the following electrical work: • One (1) single pole switch • Two (2) gfci duplex receptacles • One (1) microwave circuit • Install approximatelt 20ft of low voltage led lighting strip for under counter lighting (led low voltage lighting supplied by owner). Unless specifically stated. all herht fixtures and bulbs are to be -purchased separately by the customer. Installation of all light fixtures and bulbs is provided in our proposal. Plumbing We will supply the following plumbing work: Initial Date C1n11., items supplied and installed by Peacock & Companv or work completed by Peacock & Companv will be covered by our two (2) near tivarranty. Terms 30% Down 35% Upon completion of demolition work. 30% Upon completion of Granite top installation. Balance due upon completion. 3) 3 -SEASON ROOM Demolition and Modification of Existing We will remove existing windows; door; knee walls; wall material from house to corner columns (concrete floor to header beam) and corner column to corner column (concrete floor to header beam). Existing ceiling will rernain intact. Walls The walls will be conventionally built using 2x4 studs set 16" on center sandwiched between a single treated base plate and a single top plate, with R-13 insulation installed in all open stud pockets. There will be 7/16" oriented strand board (OSB) applied to the exterior walls along with a layer of Tyvek house wrap. Paint grade trim will fill in the unfinished areas around the new windows while cedar shakes will be installed below the windows to match the existing siding as closely as possible. Interior Walls and Ceiling We will install 1/2" sheetrock (using glue and fasteners) to the walls only and finish them with tape and three (3) coats of joint compound. The ceiling will be sanded and repainted along with the rest of the room. Windows and Doors - Two (2) 79" x 64 7/8" Marvin "Ultimate" Double Hung; Stone White; Upper Grilles Only; Low -E 366 With Argon; Five Wide Unit. - One (1) 181 7/8" x 64 7/8" Marvin "Ultimate" Double Hung; Stone White; Upper Grilles Only; Low -E 366 With Argon; Two Wide Unit. Initial 8 Date 5V " BOTH T RA DO AND MODERN AT THE A Wlido- makers of ar, earlier era got a lot of things right. Sophisticated fines, profiles and proportions never go �i O+ St„le. ;tV;n's titinate rLl�oub€e 'l,iCCOrri?inDS i' tuf,e-ofi1 1Y-a,t yInCJY d7 I:a;n rYiit � CiBSSi; style G t the ;'4St New arjvancr`;ments in engineering make Ultimate Double t --king vvindavvs simpj? to open Marvin:s exclusive int --grated tilt lever lock alk),vs the sash to be titied in or re -roved Fiteasy cleaning. 1,nd with So many options for Sash S;7es: glazing an;,l ;iia patterns, you e.an drearn Lip the urinate window, and Marvin can build it, r; t 5 P=ar, alive- •!' IC?.`;' Eelil lfj class S .' a'.in (%itipe sash lock `AiE tti:.Torj b,,: --k rti .J.dj casing iWu .i LiFlits EX`•4ud 8�!it71;t'r(,Em clad eNter€C� ipad 'tin€tSi . r:G'Iw' f;ici Mm.) jambs, HARDWARE SASH LOCK 1 6Y SASH LIFT;:. 1 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 09.07.2010 Application Number: 20.10-0907A Property Location: 503 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Four Square/1907 Property Owner: Dorothy Scholl -Larry Scholl, .Power of Attorney Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two storey house with square plan on block foundation. There is a full width open front porch. Roof is asphalt shingles. This house is built on a bluff. ALTERATIONS: House has vinyl replacement siding. Most windows on the house have been replaced and aluminum storms have been added. Porch columns are replaced with metal; porch floor, stairs and rails are replacement. Shutters have been applied to front windows. Front door is a replacement. There are two small additions to the rear. APPLICATION ITEMS: Prepare land for new construction. See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The Schohl's are proposing to demolish the house that their family has owned for more than 50 years. The property is currently a multi -family unit that they rent out. The attached note from the owner states that "over the last 40 years there has been constant water problems causing the foundation to settle, mold, mildew, and rusting of metal support beams." Included in the note is a list of what owners have done to try to remedy the ongoing water issue; current quotes from various contractors to remediate the issue along with a quote from a demolition contractor. The owner reported that all three houses to the North of this property have water problems in the basement as well. The owner would like to remove the house from the site so that the vacant property could be developed, During the site visit, staff observed that in the front, the house is settling in both directions, causing the windows to'slope in either direction. There is evidence of the porch settling as well. Staff observed the obvious settling in the basement. The owner showed us the cistern that was installed in the side yard to the North of the house that collects water piped from the rear yard and travels to the street to be released into the City sewer. This was part of the owner's previous efforts to remedy the water problems. Maintenance of the cistern requires periodic climbing down into the cavernous manhole to clean the "pudding -like gunk" out so that the water can proceed to the City sewer. Staff observed the flow of water into the cistern was a fairly good amount, considering there had been no rainfall in nearly one week. The walls in the cistern have a deep red, iron -like build up on them. Upon staff investigation for this report, it was discovered that this property sits on the exact location of where the Kankakee Mill Race, a man-made canal dug in the 1830s, was terminated at the St. Joseph River. A four storey grist mill stood from 1837 until the Race failed in the 1850s. After 1885 the land was the site of the Christian Soen's Brick and Drying Yards. Staff spoke with Carl Littrell, City Engineer to get his perspective on the location of the property in relation to the past use of the site. Carl reported that the soil is clay and was mined for bricks: The brickyard had built a series of canals flowing throughout the yard. In a past job testing soils, Mr. Littrell dug under several basements in this block of -Riverside Drive and discovered trash, debris and water, -all creating differential movements of the houses. In addition to the brickyard, the nearby location of the Water Works in Leeper Park because of the 100 or .0 so artesian springs that have surfaced there, additional springs could be surfacing along Riverside Drive. Mr. Littrell concluded that the water problems at 503 Riverside could be explained by the past uses of site and/or due to the eternal springs in the area. In addition, the City would like to get the cistern disconnected from the City sewers and channeled into a location that would be more efficient for carrying water away from the property. Staff asked Mr. Littrcll his opinion as to if the proposed vacant site would be buildable, in which he concluded that it would more than likely be buildable but that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted and knowledge about the site should be disclosed to prospective buyers. This property begins the district on the South side of Riverside Drive; although it is considered a contributing property to the district, the integrity has been altered by the addition of numerous replacement features. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: V* GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Even though this building does not appear to pose a threat to public safety as the standards and guidelines state for demolition, it is evident that the property the house is situated on has been compromised by water issues since the 1830s. There is currently evidence of mold but no testing has been done. Staff recommends that the owner be in contact with City Engineer, Carl Littrell regarding a disconnect from City sewers and possibly removing water more efficiently from the property. Based on owners discussion with Carl, if this cannot be done, with the ongoing water issues that may not be able to be resolved, staff would be inclined to recommend approval of the proposed project because the structure has been so compromised and its integrity will continue to deteriorate. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Atitirokiv County-CityBuOding, South U—A I-A.ana— Aemi Phone: 574-235-97% - Fax: 574-235-9578 @ EmaiL-SBSJCIiPC@co-st-joseph'ULUS Website: http-//%ww-sqosepl=unq*diana.com/sjchp/index.hbnl OFFICE USE ONLY >>>-D0 NOT CO,,VPLETEANYENTRIESCONRMWnV'nIIS BOX »»» OFFIC USE 01%'L*Y Date Received 7 xCpt Application Number ��6/0 toO 7 Past Reviews: E1YES (Dee VfU$fP_-V,kW) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Commission Review Date: ow V6,44 "/6 E] Local Landmark [gi:ocal Historic District (Name) National Landmark Fj National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: []Denled. n Tabled E] Sent To Committee ] Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work:w -:5 Ame Title: Street Number mut Stmt None Name of Property Owner(s): (Pimse print) 90P,_6 -7-,V L/ 014L_ Address of Property Owner(s): Pa- Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City. Phone: VATF Current Use of Building: 14 " L (Single Fandly - Multi -Family - Commercial - Government - IndusIrw - V4=nt - Cie.) Type of Building Construction: 1/(Single D (Wood Frame - Briek - Stow - Steel - Concrete -Other} Proposed Work: Fj In-kind (] Landscape [ New n Replacement (not in-kind) olition (more than ore &x may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: P&G_. P,41A /_X/vo Owner/Contractor. Fax: I e-mail (M- office Uq5nrSMVf tvit 11Y OneI w) P014 and/or APPLICA77ON REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- 503 Riverside, August 24, 2010 1) tar 1 i� r� � �► �a.7 5 a s i MAI Al-rOVA/ t,v -" ............ �---, _ tom, 44 ....... ...... _. _ . . .i�L 1. .................# `."`.........t .......... _............................. 1 3 3 £ i i F a _ - -/ • e pp eI ✓1 3 k i .y i r,* F , IL r, 3 £ _...- I s ; ii 3 3a i t _.....................__... ......._.... _+ :—.. _ _,._ . .. ........... _..... .... ..._ ...... ...... _.,. �i <i lvom 41 6 9 AA C- PiP tv4C, =HSA. Im A771 A./ :77- -/ /�'F* 4 14. 0 v I-V` A4, 04 I i f i t k L u w � ✓f d J ? p ..,... __,R...,.....r..........`...._...,....„ .., ...........,.. ....... ,... ,_. w...-...I...,...._o fj�^�..._y,-..'.//./..�.J.�.s_s_,..-.j_jjj..�..,�j.........__...TM.__.r...._fsj�.,�...i9'..n((.„.y.,.i.'....Jrj°.', ._ ...__. %'.-w-. .. _.w.. ..._... _....✓ � �� f�f.. L,+6rn.A✓�rir «..•.Y ww F#,.��, • ��f „«.. ,, ,.. .. __. ...«....., .e -+e .- .. ._.... .. ._.... .. ......... . PROPOSAL SUBMITTED To---��--Y-Y STREET. CITY. STATE, ZIP CODE K PROPOSAL Torok Excavating & demolition, Inc. 825 S. Fellows South Bend, IN 46601 232-8981 PHONE n 'e-: 1229 I DATE„ %_ j JOB NAME eh.b 1 4 [ ie ih tr r' JOB UaCAT QN , ARCHITECT 7E OF PLANS JOB PHONE? 3 �P We herby ss two sper.GKWIOns and estbnates for 1.,)14 em, t j ;Y- -11) r p trwt.T M tit. 4— r fifiYt 1�/C'.1liD n :K T -P 4- r f j/W r dollars ($ I rs 4C SX- } aynwts to Fe alme as toibvrs: �/"~"►► Il All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in Authorize a workmanlike manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or Signature, "X-., deviation from above specifications involving extra costs will be executed only upon written orders. and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents or Note: This proposal may be delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado, and other withdrawn by us 9 not accepted within (00 days necessaryinsurance. Will Acceptance of Proposal — The above prices. specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above.. Signature Date of Acceptance Signature 2023 SOUTH BEND AVENUE SOUTH BEND, INDIANA 46637 Mr. Larry Schohl 505 E. Riverside Dr. South Bend, IN. 46601 July 26, 2010 (574) 271-7182 or (574) 271-7197 Fax: (574) 271-7315 1 (800) 525-3452 Page 1 of 2 H (574) 287-9245 Install the following five (5) white interior/white exterior solid vinyl replacement windows with Low E Argon double- gla7ed insulated glass. (Low E blocks the sun's ultraviolet rays and Argon gas increases the window's R -Value to better than 4 panes of glass). Five (5) double hung "tilt -in" style with five (5) half screens. Window installation is to include: Removal of existing aluminum prime awning style windows with nailing fins, installation of new vinyl windows into existing openings, packing of insulation around entire perimeter of windows, seal windows with silicone, trim out exterior of sill and frame of windows with aluminum (color: white), clean up and haul away all debris, Selling Sale prices + tax prices ULTRA ECONOMY GRADE I- Excalibur $2,250 $ ECONOMY GRADE 2 -Star $2,400 $ 3 -Discontinued $ $ 4-Seabrooke $2,500 $ 5 -Discontinued $ $ GOOD GRADE 6-Gorell 5300 $2,600 $ 7-Dicontinued $ $ UInsulator $2100 $ 9 -Discontinued $ $ WHeritage $2,800 $ BE'ffER GRADE 11 -Sheffield $2,900 $ 12 -Tech 11 $3,000 $ 13 -Lifestyle $3,100 $ 14 -Ultra 5500 $3,200 $ 15-Ultramaxx $3,300 $ BEST GRADE 16 -Royal Seal $1400 $ 17 -Primera $3,500 $ 18 -Regency $3,600 $ 19 -Elite 4000 $3,700 $ SUPER GRADE 20 -Discontinued $ $ 21 -Boreal $4,500 $ RoopiNG rrozessionid Contractors PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO STREET CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE -S&W / t-* REPRESENTATIVE Page No- of Pages South Bend/Mishawaka (574) 286-3351 Elkhart (574) 293-2656 Fax (574) 656-8928 P.O. Box 7,89, North Uberty, IN 46554 www.geanrooting.com . PHONE DATE K7, I tys- 7-.f -A> JOB NAME JOS LOCATION JOBPHONE e In�lr�r�C 7.'t,..�S- 3o�.v .Sh:is�j.4 �/� .�i..1f- J�� ,•�,s.;tt�,. �,�lif __in�r�A;t�+n t��+ � ��-,,,,,1�! /i,ri,y ��' ,enc+% c��t..in �' r►�r- 1t _ �* �'% t .s fir_,.&sA* .f G� f l Zeit J)rapolt hereby to furnish material and labor -- complete in a=rdance with above spedfiications, for the sum of: nt to be made as follows: 1- p ` dollars ui Lance Df rD IDgA - The above prices, speedications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authortzed to do the work as apecifled. Payment will be made as outlined above. Signature 24551 Grant Road South Bend Indiana 466 19 Ph # 2334041. Mr. Larry Schoul 5031505 Riverside Drive South Bend Indiana Step Roofing 1. Remove existing roofing down to wood decking. Haul away all debris. 2. Install 7116" OSB sheeting to second story elevations. (Lower roofs have proper substrates) 3. Apply Ice dam membrane to lower 3of eaves and in valleys, apply class a underlayment. Install aluminum drip edging. Replace step and counter flashings on Chimney. Tuck -point chimney. 4. Install Certainteed Landmarks 30yr dimensional shingles over entire pitched roofing. $10,500.0 Structure Facia damage due to House shifting. Repair and straighten sub facia and rafter tails. $4,000.00 Flat roofs 1. Remove existing roofing down to wood sheeting. Install CSB sheeting. Apply Self adheared roofing membrane $900.00 Gutters Install 200 lin ft of gutters and downspouts to the second story eaves $1100.00 Submitted by Scott Mattasits Accepted by RANDALL & SONS PLUMBING, INC. P.O. BOX 1166 GRANGER, IN 46530 574-215-7081 574-875-0337 iNaJfT!4.,J: A", Schohl, larry- Date 7112/2010 Estimate # 140 jai Ds�re�l ption" 503 Riverside. Replacing water lines from water meter 2,100.00 2,100.00 to water heater, kitchen sink, washer, crawl space and to where the water lines go upstairs. Also replacing' drain lines for washer and kitchen sink. parts and labor . . .... ..... THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESSI WE APPRECIATE YOUI Total RANDALL & SONS PLUMBZNG, ZNC. 574-215-7081 $2,100.00 SOUTH BEND CHIMNEY 20195 Whitmer Road South Bend, Indiana 46614 Bill Michalak &* W 231-0834 SOLD By GATE -5r -7 NAME RR >/ / ADDfEss I I PHONE CITY )~]CASH El CHARGE F-IMOSE, RET1 F1 C.O.D. 0 PAID OUT EIM ON ACCT. , DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT F 19 4 RECEIVED BY Thank You 0, South Bend Electric, Inc. Date: 24 June 2010 56436 Strasser Lane South Bend, IN 46619 Tele: 574-234-8989 Larry Schohl Job Location: 527 Riverside Drive 503/505 Riverside Drive South Bend, M 45601 We propose to replace your existing breaker box with a new 100 ampere breaker box and breakers. We will also make correction and additions to your wiring system in the basement to bring it to code. We will also bring the grounding system to current code. We would charge Twelve Hundred Dollars ($1,200.00) to do the above work. Homeowner: South B d Electric, Inc. Date: Hate: 24 June 2010 t 1111iiol 11_2� • r` t IDEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. 411 West Ewing Avenue * Soutli Fiend • Indiana o 46613-2109 Plione: (574) 287-3550 • Fax: (574) 287-3793 a E-mail: gnothandnaragon@sbeglobal.net May 4, 2010 Quotation 4 061810-4 Larry Schohl 527 E Riverside Dr South Bend, IN 46601 Subject Property: 503 E Riverside E01,1IP,NIF NT OPTIONS: (All options include below specifications, unless otherwise noted) To choose an option, please initial for verification: (Price includes tax) GOODINIAN products —1. "GA1N9" up -flow two-stage 95% efficient two -pipe sealed r... W � combustion furnace @ 90,000btu............................................................................. L$3 1500,0( � ADDITIONAL OPTIONS: (All option prices reflect discount for installation with furnace) 2. ADD: Upgrade to HoNEYWELL 7 -day programmable thermostat VisionPRO ......... $ 185.00 . ADD: APRILmRE automatic humidification system .................................................. $ 450.00 4. ADD: HONEYWELL "ENVIRACAIRE" 5" pleated media filtration system .................. $ 400.00 . �5. ADD: New 40 -gallon naturally drafted .STATE water heater .................................... $ . 650.00 ff INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS: All labor and materials necessary to install the units} described above inside the proposed heating/cooling perimeter ✓ Removal and haul of existing unit(s) ✓ New disconnect switch to furnace ✓ New PVC two -pipe sidewall vent ✓ New chimney liner for water heater ✓ New digital thermostat ✓ New condensate drain ✓ New supply plenum ✓ New return airdrop ✓ .Existing supply and return duct system and registers ✓ Existing gas and electrical connections to furnace FREE BENEFIT: GNOTIt & NARAGON HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, INC. will clean and service your newly installed furnace and air conditioning system at the beginning of the second season of use. Please call us at your convenience to schedule this important free service! PLEASE RETURN TIIIS SIGNED COPY WITII YOUR ACCEPTANCE PAYMENT. OFFICE COPY. FOR PROJECT. Toll Free: 888-321-7522 www.3dstructural.com Structural Solutions tiy4?;--',��.Z};1�fi{}iE -'��:�_i:t3?3siit_ _.-.. .:{i{ ._-._...—.tS{< {f �_�_.•«....v_ _.,i-_�....�_�._»__.. °iiiit{.—'j1�j?tt ..—_,_.._,,._...t�:t��j{,tfi.#i .'"-_.�._-;..-.,'.. _ ii i�l}tt# .--_..«-�--..�si.;,'t{}{�� • ^___ iJ. �_�_p�;�{#<:#{:ij>i#.; .r----_.-".�_.;s€+ai#i��ti1moi+—;l'�r- - .�._�.T..•-.•.,.'r��i}-#j}}ilI�,#%_.•.-.�--„--.t.es�omi._�(;fflit}�###!�t”1,.—,.,,t...-,. - w3► *��- _�__-t .._i+�}(t#3,t{#� � �,/-.,Ri__.��_#i,�'#it.1 w���.�..-.»..%._.}i��..� .."w^u_^.•�-.'j.j-,,S��ifd}tI�j .,.� �.`-,,._,!r'_.Q�.�^.fi.�_�+om'�...�..rt )�:?jtj�1(€4fttii� _��{�_w^.�i�_�E:�?11.WV.' _.Si�itit+i}��y' �w�l_i�1��#t�{�_t� _.' ,:`dr_.. # �/W�.,~-..,"r"!„Y:'E}�i='i } ,,l.i.._..��p.•�}Paiti�` # -•-r..�1tj'�ftit ._«___�.''ir�{''3ij,']I%'#?t.+_�r�fT.t$�+i*".-►_+iMe..4Y.�'���i^.iI��r�?'r.�.•.�^"�«'+-��t,-�f}�!"}:f}i,,-r-.'."��-,-«x_•�<"ma�jjLrj-{i># '-�-.-j._+,.�-a�s?#?�iitZ!- -'y."_.„..,•t_$......_._...i,.. + -,��+�et�� �:+.-J'i�:�-�:^ .;�}I11�`#/'''�_iT,+,Atf�—?;.1'+�}'ta�:�t �°._���"."_ --7«!'3�i{"t{C"�?_i r'-.."-i.'�'.((it}�#SSSj�#i la_.7��-7__."j.'.�`a/j{{i,#..-.�;_..•.r.��.,_�,��is«.<a;�Li1}: .i,'_«_..L,'.'.«�=✓~.r.. _-.".., -.es__�„�!_-.- ....j{ :fJ+ft#jji}�i#i�' a,_.--.;.�.�'.1'-...1.nj,;'+l�?<t .._•..-"._..���.__-_m..».-.� .� t1�-ii�'1.+a`+`fi ,�__-4_---"'...".....-{tyiiM 6}{�ij11I7:�4 •�.»,.".�w.^'K'.+`_�-°_.-���. "'._-"•--_...+-�j$�i�i��{iit(i� -•.-y�-.'-!•_�-�.^-��tr%�i'}tl�;li�— '_ _. o'.'-..'4 -- + A. - T' . if . .__ ..""y_-.-....',' ._ _ .- .�._,_ .�_''._..�...�..�..~'...t*7J�1�;}�*1rj�te#}f..-�—�...•..-._-_ __..S�?;iI{`.t,ji�El'}iii#, -�_.,.-�.-.-..__.«--�-T'.4«jt'�ii;ff';� _^, -.}�.....».f.�....'.i+.}�.#{�i#�{;?,F - ?.a It_i4.•_.Iff-I —+-" - Struci ar"}I SolUtIonSJim witme. —1-4-L- Product Manager '..—fi...•._�.».e_.',--�...�_¢}1st-.�'tt- -,-',.-_ -�.....'..,,....{ •t{iji``5't,y`�i#�. . _ .-.......•..�^�-ii'F(tt�1�i'' +."^-__"'..'.«."^�1.�}t}jil�;rj;i;�3j^!'9 .-.�._.w,-•..�"«.- _i 20115 Jackson Rd South Bend IN 46614 8--2 p, 574-291-0771 Fax: 574-291-0773 -i-i ltJ Cell: 574-532-3257 -.- � .- y..•.--_.,i.#f{{�'� .. ,..J .. eiS — jisnw@3dstruduraisatutions.comif if I Si( t -.iuw.�.,laaa irwu.rrsxwm, �i.aS+< <!, s. a4'�,w,°•1 « d �< r v •n.� r� nr Mls � . EVERDRY WATERPROOFING SOLUTIONS Option 1— Excavation Method Outside Treatment (Surface Water) 10 Excavate to footer all accessible areas 'y Repair all wall cracksCLeveft Seal Walls Back FiUInside Treatment (Ground ik'afer) u None (Not Applicable or Warranted)$ Labor & Material Ft Total Sq Ft (Grad inSq , X Lineal Ft ) Warranted $ Per Sq Ft Cost Option 2 — Insidedriternal Drains Method Outside Treatment (Surface Water) None (Not Applicable or Warranted) Inside Treatment (Ground Water) 0 Open floor next to outside walls ARa smlced Drip weep holes at looter level w7liMlean Otlylyt W& Install drain tile surrounded by gravel Connect drain tile to crock with sump pump* Replace concrete floor where opened t j f -' $ Labor & Materials `� Sq Ft Total Sq Ft (Lineal Ft X Area Treated - 3 Ft) Wal ranted $ $ Per Sq Ft Cost * Sump Pump Covered Under Separve Manufacturer's Warranty Whicb Is 12-24 Months 1wit - , Option 3 — Multi -Step Pressure Reiiefr"' Method Outside Treatment (Surface WaterlSaturation PressurelFrost Neave Pressure) Hand excavate inspection trench (where accessible) Excavate and seal any cracks continuing below inspection trench to their ends Apply Fibrated Mastic (waterproofing) to walls Apply heavy-duty industrial plastic to mastic forming "Jr' channel0 Install new sub -soil pressure relief drain the raw IV packed in gravel Areasmkcd Install heavy-duty plastic filter will be watranud: -h Regrade Floor"Walls de i utnp� Cove seal any outside cement Inside Treatment (Ground WaterlHydrostatic Pressure) Open an inspection trench inside ; Filter Wrap where necessary Install Pressure Relief"' Tile ' Ltstatt Pressure Relief^' Cylinder Install Pressure RclieP Lid on top of Cyl' er K? Install Pressure Reliefs" Pump** #t Install Smart Power Backup System*" Install Cove Plate+ l Install EvercrctetD \ Install E -Z Breathe' Ventilation System* « Clean up and haul away debris $ Labor & Materials Outside Sq Ft (Grade Level R X Lineal Ft Inside Sq Ft (Lineal Ft X Lineal Ft �?,Sq Ft Total Sq Ft Warranted $ $ Per Sq Ft Cost *. tLifetime Warranty Offered on Pressure Relief- Pump, Ez-Breathe ventilation System and Smart Power Pump. I have reviewc his documept wit inspector. All Proposals AfayBe WiAdrawn Withfn 30 Days Signal Ix Date 1 1wit - , Option 3 — Multi -Step Pressure Reiiefr"' Method Outside Treatment (Surface WaterlSaturation PressurelFrost Neave Pressure) Hand excavate inspection trench (where accessible) Excavate and seal any cracks continuing below inspection trench to their ends Apply Fibrated Mastic (waterproofing) to walls Apply heavy-duty industrial plastic to mastic forming "Jr' channel0 Install new sub -soil pressure relief drain the raw IV packed in gravel Areasmkcd Install heavy-duty plastic filter will be watranud: -h Regrade Floor"Walls de i utnp� Cove seal any outside cement Inside Treatment (Ground WaterlHydrostatic Pressure) Open an inspection trench inside ; Filter Wrap where necessary Install Pressure Relief"' Tile ' Ltstatt Pressure Relief^' Cylinder Install Pressure RclieP Lid on top of Cyl' er K? Install Pressure Reliefs" Pump** #t Install Smart Power Backup System*" Install Cove Plate+ l Install EvercrctetD \ Install E -Z Breathe' Ventilation System* « Clean up and haul away debris $ Labor & Materials Outside Sq Ft (Grade Level R X Lineal Ft Inside Sq Ft (Lineal Ft X Lineal Ft �?,Sq Ft Total Sq Ft Warranted $ $ Per Sq Ft Cost *. tLifetime Warranty Offered on Pressure Relief- Pump, Ez-Breathe ventilation System and Smart Power Pump. I have reviewc his documept wit inspector. All Proposals AfayBe WiAdrawn Withfn 30 Days Signal Ix Date FOUNDATION INSPECTION REPORT 27 POINT CHECK LIST /} Customer L4 Cr,�O i''i L, Inspector (,{� %* BASIC CAUS ALUATION CHECK LIST Natural Seam Crac Stage 1 Stage 2 NS Stage 3 Stage 4 Settlement t�racktrty I t,.r,r�,r......... F CRACKING CHECK LIST (I OR MORE SIGNS NOTICED) ' ' ' I Nothing On Inside I (moo if lHill 4 TYPES OF MOISTURE/WATER CHECKLIST Surface Water Exposure Ground Water Exposure (Natural) Wow Ground Water Exposure (Man -Made) .00 aft N Condition For Condensation/Humidity 3 TYPES OF PRESSISE CHECK LIST Hydrostatic Pressure Soft Satura#ion Pressurev000,} } Frost Heave Pressure • �s DAMAGES/EFF T CHECK LIST Statm.l Staue 2 Stage 3 Dryrot IF7 ^ ro h J000 Pests 00V Iq Mold Rust Structure Conditio Safety �L' Air Quality 19. Energy Costs Home Value Usable Space Lift Tes :. LAM , I have reviewed this document wi } the i or. Signature Copyrght Kamin Industries M4001 (Rev 10) nray uini Nesting Stage 4 e g nA g Infesting Ruining ° E &nfishab) a—va niCentering ost t Customer Commentsmooncerns wc�� f�, A -2,d- ,�y YVY Date � Time 503 Riverside Drive IJ View showing roof separating from house OWN%- - 00, '1011110 . - Rear showing center of house higher than sloping sides Straight plane view representing appx. 4" settling p Straight plane view representing appx. 4" settling Rusted supports in basement Basement water, mildew, mold 14 j JI; Basement foundation cracking Basement water damage showing iron deposits Window observation showing settling Another window observation showing settling Floors buckling ....,�. ;• • ., :.'ler,; -.: � � � � • ��� � �... �� c � '�.��. g< x« +A ''' t6"a �.;�„� �'''�' �•. �' ,i �.. '� ,dam � , #i 3 IL 11 th St im _.. to j' 18'm �-rw+.#i�+-A'^, b.,>w:,+-.».�.YrE .i r_ r >.. r iii M+• .._ .. ,- . -. � rt ^ � ]� Lafayette BIvd� c }# fres �a `.. }� < ^i -ixaA• A f ^ ,$`: ►? - .i 3 +�► �.. w Main St , rD _ e•m `T A <'f - .. a• „ .Y.. „Ay: � �_. •a. ,d ,:..,a a ,.,., :.. �.y :4-. 3!'p • ':r,u;-� :' 1', , All i} t r 3a.w. � �..�- � ! ,.�, .i,,--; «»- a-i� -:_.. �-,;->r� F„-� � ---� I ... »_.,.> •�3r-,*_..°:�°--^.'. �-s•�:- , .:._..- ;.r;' ...,.. ,:�x-' '� =E;st�..�:I� � �;' � =�� -i '� ~ - Michigan S J. rh, , : s SLJt1S cph�Stx. '.. ” Sycamore St R _ v .S � �,�' .;t,; _:.:2:a: ,�,��':.t;y?';�. Y.Z. '.:f,,'Si', •: :': � - # 3 , r STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 7, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0907B Property Location: 633 N. Lafayette Blvd. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1895 Property Owner: Terri and John Califano Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey wood sided home is set upon a T -plan foundation with bays on the north and south sides of the home. The gabled roof has asphalt shingles. There is an enclosed entry porch. The windows are 3 vertical sash/1 double hung with moulded crown trim. There is an attached garage and wood deck at the rear of the house. ALTERATIONS: The Assessor's Card states the date of this house as 1885, so there have been both modifications and additions to the original structure. The addition of the two bays were noted in the 1949 assessment. There is aluminum siding on the porch at the rear side of the house. The garage and the porch were noted in the 1932 assessment. The wood deck noted on the 2005 survey is a modem addition. The roof on the house is an architectural asphalt shingle replacement of asphalt shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: Tree fell on the house/garage. Work is to demolish/rebuild garage. Repair exterior. Remove aluminum siding on porch and replace with cedar to match. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicants propose to rebuild the attached garage and rear deck. With the siding materials salvaged from the demolished garage they propose to replace the aluminum siding on the porch and use the remainder to do repairs on the body of the house. They have discussed the change in the dimensions with Mark Lyons, Building Department and it meets City Code. They propose to construct an Ultra Deck Fusion wood free standing 11x14 rear deck. The enlarged garage will tie into the original house. It will be a wood frame construction on a new concrete pad with a gable roof re -roofed in asphalt shingles to match the architectural shingles on the main body of the house. The wood siding will also match the siding on the main body of the house. The porch door will be replaced with a steel security door and the garage door will be a solid raised panel overhead door. All per product information, site plan and drawings attached. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have L- or T-shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half -story bungalows. The most prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard/composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The owners' proposal will restore what was lost in the wind storm and up grade the rear elevation considerably. The materials chosen will replicate those on the main body of the house. The re -roofing of the garage with asphalt shingles to match the house will extend across the rear of the house. Staff has no objection to the use of solid steel security doors off the porch and on the garage as they face a dark and overgrown alleyway. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBS)CHPC®co.st-joseph.in.us Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.htinl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX >»»> OFFICE USE ONI-Y Date Received, , 11010 Application Number '10 1 0 - Dq 4'7_05 Past Reviews: E] YES (Date of but Review) Staff' Approval authorized by: 71175191 Title: Historic Commission Review Date: 02�t eOLb /D Local Landmark [ Local Historic District (Name) ~+p i '��rk National Landmark [National Register District (Name) 1 Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied E] Tabled E] Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: W3 N •��� s Street umber and Sheet Nal%l r.• Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) VO/7l7 Address of Property Owner(s): 17b s. /97,55Li �7 - Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building: 6))7-4 7e FGC./72i (SingleFamily—Multi-Family— elommercial—Government— Industrial — Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: �In-kind E] Landscape n New E] Replacement (not in-kind) n Demolition (more than one box may he checked) Description of Proposed Work: V red/ate - y Owner/Contractor: Fax: (This office Mill eorrespid with only ondesignee) 6-12. //11�cG8� J --e riY.[.i l -j C/ 1- ��r�ei)l0u0- A(u m /11 k.h, e-mail 'ea/� r'!U ad00 0,;'l zhoe" v (no --2) v1^i CSC/ /r.l��J and/or hlkn ea, b'an 6, — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 4P4 7'. _ .•'iKK ]�c f yt Y 4Yhsl., r 2.. 1ivYVt ��Lf .*-: ♦.'�rc '��4 �Y z�i '�' y��y' tit � �... �5t; t .3 .�, 3 s COC 'y� • N>,1r. �� r Y. � �ti4 iY.. r < illy_... x xf 4 t 4 ~�G (� G •....tA lry Ali— "n ' � t�_..r+e'A�''.`'S"`i.�����,x��ll,�.•Mw�_,�,,,,yi, :� i .,�, x . „4•- y r �t r#� > r. 'r . r si`3�`. � j•i .x tt: COC 'y� • N>,1r. �� r Y. � �ti4 iY.. r < illy_... x xf 4 t 4 ~�G (� G •....tA lry Ali— "n ' � t�_..r+e'A�''.`'S"`i.�����,x��ll,�.•Mw�_,�,,,,yi, :� i .,�, x . „4•- y r �t r#� > r. Califano 633 N. Lafayette Project — Rebuild garage and deck Written Description - A tree fell down onto the garage, house and deck. The garage and deck were totally destroyed and needs to be rebuilt. • Dimensions/Alterations (Garage) - The old garage was 8'x 16; which is not big enough for cars built today. We would like to increase the size of the car to accommodate a mid-size car. The new dimensions would be 13'x 18'. The Setback on the South side (side) of the house is 4. To make the garage wider, we would not go beyond this, and the setback for the garage would be 5'. The setback on the West side (rear) of the house was 53' from the back of the garage. The setback for the new garage would be 51'. These were verified with Mark at the St. Joseph County Building Department, who told me I could go up to the current setback of 4' on the side of the house, and the rear setback would have to be at least 25. • Dimensions/Alterations (Deck) — The old deck was 9'x 14'. The new deck would be 11' x 14'. • Construction Methods (Garage) — Wood frame construction, new concrete pad, gable roof, asphalt architectural shingles • Construction Methods (Deck) — Wood frame construction, ultra composite decking material • Other — House currently has cedar shake siding. We will remove the current siding from garage and use it to repair areas on the house that need it. We will also remove current aluminum siding from a porch that was added on and use the old cedar siding from the garage to match the rest of the house. Materials to be Used • Lumber • Concrete • Asphalt Architectural Shingles to match current roof • Cedar Shake Siding to match current siding • 8'x 7' white steel raised panel garage door (attachment) • 36" steel entry door (attachment) • Ultra Composite Decking (attachment) Site Plan — Attached Photographs — Attached Drawings - Attached f) ez C. v --- JA,-- e- tq C_, -j 1 I Y. '( I S -T -f "C'. oc e\ Y-16, .. ........ II :N -3 I Y. This cedar siding does not match - we would remove and match with cedar from garage Note - Angle of picture distorts dimensions Note - Angle of picture distorts dimensions Current 4' setback Proposed 5'setback - ` K d YTY, 4 t w.-3iF Ni- � •� 1 ��� ~ * .5 .3�` �C� kms' Z. 1 ze MIMI E- � SLK' h4"4$Zi'�„yy' -'Nut, ig� yrs a? Ml "` C j W G N............. 'K L}T• y -i � f Ll r K g www j s ARM 4,41 oll ME- {" •moi J�'�n,. t ,lp. uq!*+'^'lrtF^: °ys .,.� d "`,. w N 777 laaaa _ \ �Lfl66 41 y O CJ C t YM.,,.CD �- sit - _� v~ C l.f. un un JLJI ej 16 to , srx r M • O O v.. is O 1"^ r'ri •"i '� v .a °���'��.:. • � 1 C MRS. yy� ■il } l Snkw•-..'.. r•. .r. -..C.>... .a, a.'k='r. ...0-. _ ,.p.. y. .:y. sc*"s�xxl... k. . A4, .n.,..4 ^ . k . _ ...i , �PrvE'.. ..,�'...,o�.i-�.v �..sS'.i+'-,...«a`t�..:++a, + r . ;.. . vv: �._ .,�. .+. „a::ea w....:n:x .*5. ?5 �"JY s.�k.kt-.'� '•+'r�.4 '. : , .y,,:.Ni u:.:A». '%.v t'S Design # 11500 4.1=�-7L,,.�Page 1 of Z 91812010 Items Selected: Gable roof w14112 pitch, scissor trusses 2' O.C. Truss Design Location Zip Code: 46617 2x4 Wall Framing Material Wide X 18' Deep X 8' High 8" Cedar Lap Siding 112" OSB Wall Sheathing 12" gable/12" eave overhangs 112" OSB Roof Sheathing 25 yr. Castlebrook, Heatherstone Gray Shingles Pine Soffit & Fascia White Premium Roof Edge 1- Garage Door Opener Pine Overhead Door Jamb Options Selected: The options you have selected are: 30 LB Roof Felt 2 Rows Granular Ice & Water Barrier Today's estimated base price: 51,49$.77 The base price includes: 0" Eave/0" Gable Overhangs, Framing Materials, 7116 OSB Roof Sheathing, 20yr. Fiberglass Classic, - Onyx Black Shingles, Pine Fascia, Galvanized Regular Roof Edge, 8 Textured Vertical Hardboard Siding, No Senrlce Doors, No Overhead Doors, No Windows, or Any Other Options. Front View Back View Today's estimated price: $3,320.04 If purchased today, you save: $452.53 Monthly BIG Card payment: $93.24 *** Take this sheet to the Building Materials counter to purchase your materials, *** All information on this form, other than price. has been Pro, ndeI b; guest and Menards is not responsible for any errors in the information on this estimate. indudin g but not limited to quantity. dimendon and quality Plea- estimate carefully. MENARDS MAKES NO REPRESEI ITATICIIS OR -L ;'RiTTEN OR OTHERWISE. THAT THE MATERIALS LISTED ARE SUITABLE FOR ANY PURPOSE BEING CONSIDERED BY THE GUEST. BE WIDE VARIATIONS IN CODES. THERE ARE NO REPRESS I .f:. I : ; ;S TH�!T THE MATERIALS LISTED HEREIN MEET YOUR CODE REOUIRE10ENTS Design # 11500 Here are the wall configurations for your design. Illustration May Not Depict All Options Selected 3 0 A Gable Front View (1) - 8X7 WHITE NONINSL RAISED PNL EXTSIP MSST 0-U 0 A0•0 Eave Front View (1) - CP1 FLUSH STEEL DOOR PH 36X80 RH SB Building Size: 14 feet wide X 18 feet long X 8 feet high --cimate Peak Height: 10 feet 8 inches (128 inches) U -U ' Pace 2 of 2 9 812010 Gable Back View . EaaaJ.a;:aaaatial#;i8;:;�;;;i,i:2;:2;2:•:�;t{iti#...,,;rzt„„.2;ta:;:�;u;;:<;2' iz3;a xa:aa titi;;ti.;ai'�Zz�i �atia;:>:;?;•>,> Eave Back View 18, ... ... - - Menards provided material estimates are intended as a general construction aid and have been calculated using typical construction methods. Because of the wide variable in cc-- site restrictions, all final plans and material lists must be verified with your local zoning office, architect and/or builder for building design and code compliance. Menards is a sup;}_ construction materials and does not assume liability for design, engineering or the completeness of any material lists provided. Underground electrical, phone and gas lines shot I located and marked before your building plans are finalized. Remember to use safety equipment including dust masks and sight and hearing protection during consiruction'o e.. a positive building experience. 1-li-0 0-0,1-0-0 Sx10M71Uk= 7-0-0 REACTIONS (Ib/size) 2-645/0 3 B, 4-645i0 3 8 MaxI lorz2-31(LC !) Max llplift2- 9n(I C 9). 4- 9)(1 C 10) Mdx Grav2_6,19(LC 2). 4-v-19(LC 2) FORCES (lb) fvlaxin-mm I ensinn IUP( IIORD i ' U;'1tS.G :' 1�iytS3U�, i -I -t )�b.31�,:i-U ib :.it:�,'i• 1 E'c4 :� u. 1-:� G ti3 I'•O I (:I IO1i11 ? (i- ?4?'l SE'i(>. 1 ii= ?4?.'l3�GG WEB, 343--2i7r_s9 NOTES 1) l ribalanred roof live Triads have keen cnnsidered for this desigJn 2) Wind- ASCE 7.05; 90mph; h=25tt; I CUL =4 2pst; BGIA-=6 Opst; C=ategory II; Exp B; enc=losed; MWI-R5 (lour -rise) gable end zone aryl C -C Exterior(2) zone, cantilever left and right exposed , erxi vertical left ar-rJ right exposed, Lumber DOL=0.00 [date grip DOL=O 00 Plate metal D01.=0 00. This truss is designed for G G for members and forces, alai for MW FRS for reactions specified. 3) TOLL: ASCE 7-05, Pi25.0 psf (roof live load: Lumber DOL -0.00 Plate DOL -0.00 Plate metal DOL -0.00), r'y-3b.? psf (ground snow); I's -24.7 pst (root snow: Lumber DOL -0.00 I'late DOL -0.00 Plate metal DOL -0.00); Category 11: Exp B; Fully Exp., Ct-1 .1 4) Hoot design snow load has been reduced to acx:ourlt for slope 5) Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for this design. 6) This truss has been designed for greater of rain roof live load of 16.0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 24.11 psf Uri overhangs non -concurrent with other live loads. CP1r�hincttWr�rAfr><xortietin desiuned for a 10.0 Usf bottom chord live load nonconcuffent with anv other live loads. :1 4 no 12 - --- - - 3 -_ 7 I - - -:. ,- 14-0-0 '-0-0 7-O-0 LOADING (psf) SPACING 2-0.0 CSI DEFL in (roc) Udefl Lid PLATES GRIP ICL l_ tri 0 Plates Increase 1 00 1 (; O 58 Vert(11) O 15 h x-999 240 MI ?O 197/144 TCDL 7.0 LUrnbel Increase 1.00 BC 0.59 VerL(TL) -0.32 2-6 X515 180 PAT 18H 197/1'1'1 13CLL 0.0 Rep Stress In(;r YES WD O.bb I loiz(TL) 0.1 b i n/a n/a ti(:DL 10.0 Code II IC2003/ 11'12002 (Matrix) Weight: 36 lb LUMBER BRACING TO 2 X 4 SPF No.2 TOP CHORD Struclurdl wood sheathing directly applied or 3-5-•1 UC purlins. 13C 2 X 4 SPF 1 boUL- 1.oE DOT CHORD Rigid ceiling directly applied or 1 U -U -U oc bracing. WB 2 X 3 SPF Stud REACTIONS (Ib/size) 2-645/0 3 B, 4-645i0 3 8 MaxI lorz2-31(LC !) Max llplift2- 9n(I C 9). 4- 9)(1 C 10) Mdx Grav2_6,19(LC 2). 4-v-19(LC 2) FORCES (lb) fvlaxin-mm I ensinn IUP( IIORD i ' U;'1tS.G :' 1�iytS3U�, i -I -t )�b.31�,:i-U ib :.it:�,'i• 1 E'c4 :� u. 1-:� G ti3 I'•O I (:I IO1i11 ? (i- ?4?'l SE'i(>. 1 ii= ?4?.'l3�GG WEB, 343--2i7r_s9 NOTES 1) l ribalanred roof live Triads have keen cnnsidered for this desigJn 2) Wind- ASCE 7.05; 90mph; h=25tt; I CUL =4 2pst; BGIA-=6 Opst; C=ategory II; Exp B; enc=losed; MWI-R5 (lour -rise) gable end zone aryl C -C Exterior(2) zone, cantilever left and right exposed , erxi vertical left ar-rJ right exposed, Lumber DOL=0.00 [date grip DOL=O 00 Plate metal D01.=0 00. This truss is designed for G G for members and forces, alai for MW FRS for reactions specified. 3) TOLL: ASCE 7-05, Pi25.0 psf (roof live load: Lumber DOL -0.00 Plate DOL -0.00 Plate metal DOL -0.00), r'y-3b.? psf (ground snow); I's -24.7 pst (root snow: Lumber DOL -0.00 I'late DOL -0.00 Plate metal DOL -0.00); Category 11: Exp B; Fully Exp., Ct-1 .1 4) Hoot design snow load has been reduced to acx:ourlt for slope 5) Unbalanced snow loads have been considered for this design. 6) This truss has been designed for greater of rain roof live load of 16.0 psf or 1.00 times flat roof load of 24.11 psf Uri overhangs non -concurrent with other live loads. CP1r�hincttWr�rAfr><xortietin desiuned for a 10.0 Usf bottom chord live load nonconcuffent with anv other live loads. O � N O N C2> 00 Q'a1A 0— NOTES 8) All plates are MTpt) plates unless othorwiso indicated 9) ' This truss has been designed fur alive load of 20.Opsf un the bolturn chord in all areas where a rectangle 3-5-0 tall by 1-0-0 wide will lit between the bottom chord and any other members. 10) Bearirq at joinl(s) 2, 4 considers parallel to grain value using ANSIITPI 1 angle to grain formula. Building designer should verify capacity of bealit)q surface. 11) Provide mechanical connection (by others) of truss to bearing plate capable of withstanding 95 Ib uplift at joint 2 and 95 Ib uplift at joint 4. 12) This truss is designed in accordance with the 2003 International Residential Code sections R502.11.1 and R602 10.2 and reterenced standard ANSI/TPI 1. LOAD CASE(S) Standard Design # 11500 �•1=�7�-•��� Page 3 of 3 91812010 _ ... T =Qa ..p nr a N Dor, Pu`rch`ases ;Over r$299 , O cn '.GOOD . _ • "�a,,.�u.; . 3 £ M . '.F xr. •10YZ ty =� i=! Iririted Warranty.'.'. .0 .oma � •... I� Sate � .. each ;_ i -` `ii; to III's•Non ;insulated whiteateel r4 " anal extengrCD •Tongue and groove section jointsor tighter weather seal J steer w `, •Includes all track and hardware az5-,ss2. _- " '< , r ,�L,%:';!5i.+». �0 .4--.>,'. <.5 •" ,_ .ice.'✓ ,�a 3. _ " iY '.�vY4 rl:.s',.1: F =J,:`:'.•xb. x7: 4251402 :::..:.::::........:::.:...:..::::.:.:.......:..:....::....:..:.:..W199. -, a�--y '(6'.XT 425-14,5. ................ .......... ........ ..........a3T9. OD j z {- ry t� Special ober at some locations in approximately 3 weeks, �t T 8 x;7,:lnsulated o rs 3� �A � }� ` BETTER=Meta tG d v Insulated R Va/ue is 5 8 USA. $ 3 s ! a *,*. r ^s E i' EZ -,Set Ton; on Spring ,. �+ • y �'§_ 7"-.'+. r1`•; 'p+, -w, `.�"'k k3, r'. Systenlnr ale - cn "'� x i Ltmded lrletime warranty each _ White steel raised panel extenoi with insulated tiack.panel ' Q- i IT— All, , g� xs � �Y , •Tongue and groove•sectton) iihts fora tighter Weather seal � s Includes all;traclt and hardware az5 as,s p ? f rr•5':. S� yMt V#'•6iiifh:Mw.., ......................' $269 _ .moi. Steel8''-425-4535. .299 •`•;-LS+i-lS�"5�#.`i';n4```t14 s-H.'k� IIISUIitI "t. -ey et t ;$CD k 16' x 7 4z5 sag _ 469. -, Y 3 1 _ i+ e F Special order at some locations In approximately 3 weeks... s S,k 8t• x 7`: Premium, Insulated o st.Sy`'�'h" xti '�` k r r BT: F• y 1[ADEAIr R<Value 1565 414!f�r,ees ` t1�'7SetTorsJonSpring ..Sale - a7 .-c* ." each UmRed(detimewarrantjr;. 0-3(8" Insulated Core tL° ,, ! _ %Pre -finished white:steel inside and out 4a- sylk z*{ Fir •Wrable,dent t8sistant construction. ; jf s j,� ; ? ' k 1� T 'p ; �I 'M1.✓% >d @' -includes cinlttrue an gack.and hardroove waret a25 -a 6,tlghter weather seat : steel ti> 9' x 7' ..425-4674. .... ...... $339 -1 -`' .'t - • )nsalati � 9' X 8` 425-4667:8389 . . wig T Steel _ i ,.....................16'x T a2e:asso :589 .. r 16 X 8' 425-4695 .. 669: - - - - B' z 7' s tial ordei at alt locations, other sizes special peUel order of some ` locations. Special orders available in approximately3 Smooth Fiberglass ,1 �. • 4-9/16" wide vinyl clad frame with brickmould applied Textured Fiberglass • 4-9/16" wide vinyl clad frame with brickmould applied 1-660 P ave Sa 8ve ✓ta i S $3 i 4 Pre -Finished! . cern:: a'v.^r.•a �,a.,+tA^...,,+--.. '7 f'. �w 'Tuscany: y:PremwM.m 6 -Panel Sunburst Prairie ie Luminance $. a , $A-Aq, $ 69 98 Sale Sale Sale Sale Sale each each 21 each each4each ,32" or 36". 414-1742-1747 36". White grilles between the insulated 36". White grilles between the insulated . I -Textured woodgrain. Looks like 36". Textured woodgrain. Looks like 6 glass never need cleaning'. 414-2694, 2695 glass never need cleaning. 414-2862, 2863 wood, . tough as steel. Triple pane wood, tough as, steel. Sculpted Primed Frame ata -1800-1805...... 39 insulated beveled lass. 414-6824, 6825 insulated lass. 414.6800, 68o1' Fiberglass doors special order at some locations in approximately t week. g g liI IIIA IIIItl 111 iii 1111 Jlill i'MAW 11"111"Ah, IIII II IY ... — Location Budget as of 08-31-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 08/31/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original Addt9/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 25,118.52 38.03 38.03 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 110.70 22.14 22.14 10000 Totals 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 200.00 1,825.94 2,025.94 23.43 000 General GovT. 2,843.55 13.47 13.47 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 J 000 General GovT. 0.00 0.00 0.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 815.27 77.06 77.06 20000 Totals 925.00 1,825.94 2,750.94 23.43 31070 Other Contractual Services 20,016.00 1,100.00 21,116.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32020 Travel 100.00 700.00 800.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32050 Instruction & Training 0.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32350 Postage 1,000.00 57.90 1,057.90 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 200.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 000 General GovT. Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 09/01/2010 12:16 PM Page 60 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 17,360.30 12,639.70 12,639.70 42.13 42.13 23, 571.18 12,478.82 12,478.82 34.62 34.62 40,931.48 25,118.52 25,118.52 38.03 38.03 1,867.34 135.17 158.60 6.67 ' 7.83 389.30 110.70 110.70 22.14 22.14 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,481.64 245.87 269.30 8.94 9.79 18,272.45 2,843.55 2,843.55 13.47 13.47 699.60 100.40 100.40 12.55 12.55 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 242.63 815.27 815.27 77.06 77.06 49.78 250.22 250.22 83.41 83.41 39.00 161.00 161.00 80.50 80.50 User ID ksobecki 09/01/2010 12:16 PM Page 60 LocatioikLkdget as of 08-31-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 08/31/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Original AddYl/Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 000 General GovT. 30000 Totals t 22,021.00 2,157.90 24,178.90 Location Totals 88,996.00 3,983.84 92,979.84 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 09/01/2010 12:16 PM Page 61 Unencumbered Unexpended Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,848.46 4,330.44 4,330.44 17.91 17.91 23.43 63,261.58 29,694.83 29,718.26 31.94 31.96 0.00 0.00 63,261.58 User ID ksobecki 09/01/2010 12:16 PM Page 61 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE: ADDRESS: DISTRICT: 08.05.2010 HOMEOWNER: 225 SUNNYSIDE EAST WAYNE STREET MARY PAT NUSSBAUM WORK PROPOSED: REMOVE 2 112 SQUARE ROOF TILES AT 2 SEPARATE AREAS; INSTALL ICE AND WATER SHIELD AND 40# FELT; REINSTALL TILES PER ORIGINAL. IN-KIND REPLACEMENT: ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ON TILE ROOF. PER CONTRACTOR, TILE WILL BE REMOVED FOR MAINTENANCE AND SAME (ORIGINAL) TILE REINSTALLED. WHERE TILES ARE BROKEN OR MISSING, AN EXACT MATCH WILL BE INSTALLED. OFFICE VISIT FROM J.C. LAUBER CONTRACTOR, PAUL SCHMITT ON 8.5.2010. ON SITE VISIT BY WAYNE FOR PHOTOGRAPHY. PHOTOGRAPHS INCLUDED. RME APPROVAL: ELICIA DADLOW, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Application . - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 . Mailing Address: County -City DULL ng, SBend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574235-9798 - Fax: 574-235-9578 - Email: SB5JCHPC )mst joseph mus Website: http://wwwstpmph°ountyindiana.e°m/gchp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONIIUNED IN THIS BOX """OFFICE USE ONLY R Date Received I 0 Application Number. X a. Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Ohre of Gut Review) ❑ NO p h Staff Approval authorized by:,��f�� Q {✓A(tlnW Title: f�V Historic Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) E • W a n - ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District ¢varve) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued onTs ..•� n-� Address of Property for proposed work rat Num and Street Name ,O Name of Property Owner(s): (Please print) Address of Property Owner(s): ���4► ``�" Contractor(s) Name:/f��� Contract Company game: Contractor Address: Y* d City: Phone: �! Current Use of Building: 97F` ' /(single FamrTy – Multi -Fa mercial – Government – Industrial –Vacant – etc.) � Type of Building Construction: % �� u%, .i 5�. ape)( ? (Wood Frame – Brick – Sbh –Steel – Connell – Other) Proposed Work ❑ Ln -kind ❑ Landscape E]New Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition Q. �0�a (more than one box may 6e dwdm) Description of Proposed Work) 4eo W 1 Owner/Contractor. Fax: 1-3` 7T e-mail (This o& rraspm�d wilh onlyonedesigmx) and/or CATION RE uTREMENT S ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Tim Musczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNl'Y Phone: (574) 235-9799 FAX: (574)z35-9578 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us Director i CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove 21/2 square roof tiles at 2 separate areas; install ice and water shield and 40# felt; reinstall tiles per original. J.C. LAUBER SHEET METAL, Contractor for the following location: z25 SUNNYSIDE ' South Bend, IN 46615 ± East Wayne Application No. 2010-OSOSA in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Located in a ]Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for ' public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Richard and Mary Patricia Nussbaum DATE PERMIT - 08/06/2010 TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Micia Dadlow(� �C �I Assistant Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. No. 02347 REGISTRATION $100.00 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AND CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA e March 24, 2010 WHEREAS, J.C. LAUBER SHEET METAL CO., INC. having this day paid to the Budding Department the sum of One Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents is hereby REGISTERED to operate in the unincorporated areas of ST. JOSEPH COUNTY and the CITY OF SOUTH BEND, as a tGeneral Contractor THIS REGISTRATION EXPIRES: April 8, 2011 Building Commissioner Charles C. Belot sa e. u sPA= Avenue svurie sera, IN 46617 (574)234.4174 THIS REGISTRATION IS NOT TRANSFERABLE 00-0 . ESTABLISHED 1090 • CONTRACTORS A ENGNVEERS FOR INDUSTRY • HEATING. VENTILATIMG. AIR* CONDITIONING • ARCHITECTURAL A MECHANICAL SHEET METAL • SLATE. ME A METAL ROOFING 0 POLLUTION CONTROL PROPOSAL: Mary' Pat Nussbaum 225 Sunnyside South Bend, IN 46615 504 EAST LA SALLE AVENUE SOUTH SEND, INDIANA 46617-1 Project: PHONE 234.4174 AREA CODE Date July - 16, 2010 Attenlon: Proposal to remove approximately 212 square of tiles at roof We P.P..,0 IPd-=cre,,V: 2 separate areas; install ice and water shield and 40# felt; reinstall tiles per original. 423AH417� As Per Plans-SpecAcation&-instructions of: Por tits Net S=of$ 5,554.00 PLEASE NOTE: Interest at 18% per Sw (1.5% per nxmq will be charged on InV01cft Over thirty (30) dap past due. All costsof collection Including legal fees and court cosb will be added to past due accountr -7bis quatmilm Is subject to acceptance by the buyarwfts 60 days' .x �---�__ Via• �J:3fi' j s�" N „•4,» it _..pq� �a ° +�kr�'Y �`k"T�vr�'�,.y;� � Tqn •ll �' � 16 ,i 9.vu. f a �Bz,-� .y ,� ,+^r •"' � si S; �..rw, ti ��,��.-:^t. �,i iR�' _ �•*f v �-�' ��"'��' +t�+�,_."��+ik�s���t�Y,�er,'3z� �'y.�.'��'�'A .u+hk��'� a• : ��y ,,: � �",�"'PG` ; _::a%S,i,�h,,, .die-; � r. :.. a y{k- ?•�'i'�e, 41rf � � _ a ,Cr4' .r x ws'�t^` +"'�"'"3�i� � � .. -...t+« � :v +��� n :.�, �;�„ �: .. Y, r..?r«•swpwys HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTV ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE: 08.10.201 O RME: 08.10.201 OA ADDRESS: 944 RIVERSIDE DRIVE DISTRICT: RIVERSIDE DRIVE LHDICHAPIN PARK NR HOMEOWNER: DAVID BETSON AND .JENNIFER WARLICK WORK PROPOSED: IN KIND. ON AN AUXILIARY STRUCTURE THAT IS DETACHED AND SETBACK FROM HOUSE, ORIGINAL SECONDARY CARRIAGE HOUSE DOORS ON SETBACK, DESCRIBED AS 3 INDIVIDUAL DOORS WITH RAISED PANELS AND TRUE DIVIDED 4 LIGHT WINDOWS ARE GOING TO BE REPRODUCED IN WOOD, IN-KIND BY AN AMISH CRAFTSMAN AND INSTALLED BY HOUSE DOCTORS OF ELKHART. IN-KIND REPLACEMENT: CARRIAGE HOUSE SECONDARY DOORS OFFICE VISIT FROM HOMEOWNER ON 8.10.201 O PHOTOGRAPHS INCLUDED Application . - FOR - CerH f icate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S6 Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 . Mailing Address: County -City But�ding, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-M • Fex 57405-9578 • F.maR awjuw%.*+m.st josephinus Website httpr//www.slosephCD=VndiamCDM/qdtp/hulexhtml OFFICE USE ONLY »»>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONpIINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received a. �� . b Application Number Q. -LQ- - 06" Past Reviewr. tdYES (aatc o f t„ t ReVQ ❑ NO - Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: , jf ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) AV ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District ovamt) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued IMTs �l'1 ( , Address of Proforproposed work. l 4 4 S ' ' PAY Street Nwn6a and Stmt Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Manprint) �, n Address of Property er(s): 944 (Z •� Prx?;' l� ' nN' o i SIR •��3. Contractor(s) Name: 6',kr .P4> 0 CAga5 Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building- sw FaN '%-\ (SingleFamily-Matti-Pony-Commercial - Gaoeiummi -Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame - Bride - Stone - Steel - Concrete- Other) Proposed Work ❑ In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in4dnd) ❑ Demolition (mat than onebout traybecha*4 jq Description off P posed Work � l � Civ ""� =—� �n-'-1 `� CL&., C r � n cat&rS i`�u�t W".0— w� SLce� J Owner/Contractor. F= e-mail (Tim ofai rnapond toith only one �/or Tim Klusczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574) 235-9578 Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director CERTIFICATE - APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: On an auxiliary structure that is detached and setback from house, original secondary carriage house doors on setback, described as 3 individual doors with raised panels and true divided 4 light windows are going to be reproduced In wood In- kind by an Amish craftsman and Installed by House Doctors of Elkhart. HOUSE DOCTORS HANDYMAN SERVICE, Contractor for the following location: 944 RIVERSIDE South Bend, IN 46616 Riverside Drive LRD/Chapin Park NRD Application No. 2olo-o81oA in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in a Local Historic ` ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the . recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. r THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OFAPPLICANT: David Betson DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 08/10/2010 PERMrr ISSUED BY: Elicia Dadlow Assistanto irect POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK I 944 Riverside, August 11, 2010 ME ''Im . .... ..... . y1i, gi tow ME ''Im . .... ..... . y1i, gi Q vy ass T JA 94 qr. Ion 3 pane is j 6 4 Off, v to Z- vb Hoc�S� Nc-b(S-a►Urt I n Wood E JOOV-,5 SWIVA I - ion q - HISTORIC PRESERVATION i O O SOUTHBEND i ST. JOSEPH COUNTY1 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE FORM DATE AUGUST 20, 2010 ADDRESS 501, 503,527 N. LAFAYETTE DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING NOT APPLICABLE HOMEOWNER TREE LAWNS/UTILITY EASEMENT WORK PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL FOR STREET AND SEWER WORK CITY FORESTER, BRENT THOMPSON, APPROVED THE REMOVAL OF THE FOLLOWING COMPROMISED TREES THAT WOULD BE FURTHER COMPROMISED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW SEWER LINE IN AN AUGUST 20, 2010 E-MAIL: 510: SUGAR MAPLE WITH HIGH SURFACE ROOTS DROPPING GRADE 503: SUGAR MAPLE -TOP DEAD AND GIRDLING 527:2# NORWAY MAPLE* HIGH SURFACE ROOTS DROPPING GRADE AUGUST 24 DISCUSSION WITH TOM ANDERSON -ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THESE TREES WOULD NOT SURVIVE AND WOULD COST THE HOMEOWNERS FOR THEIR REMOVAL AT A LATER DATE IF THEY WERE NOT REMOVED AT THIS TIME. THE TREES WOULD BE REPLACED 2 FOR 1 WITH MAPLES AND/OR HONEY LOCUSTS. t Page I of I Catherine Hostetler - 500 N Lafayette From: "Brent Thompson" To: Date: 8/20/2010 4:09 AM Subject: 500 N Lafayette CC: "Tom Anderson" Tree removals Memorial Hospital improvements 502 N Lafayette Red maple (girdling root & large root under sidewalk) 501 N Lafayette Sugar maple (high surface roots dropping grade) 503 N Lafayette Sugar maple (top dead & girdling) 506 N Lafayette Red maple (rotten & new driveway cutting close to roots) 527 N Lafayette 2# Norway maple (high surface roots dropping grade) Thanks IMPORTANT NOTICE ! This E -Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E -Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E -Mail in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E -Mail address. C, i I . Y 1 11 '. 4')E4597SJC , W20/2010 Tile Klusczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove Sugar Maples at 501 and 503 N. Lafayette; remove 2# Norwary Maple at 527 N. Lafayette located in Chapin Park District perBrent Thompson, City Forester, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF �OI.TT'H BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY TBD, Contractor for the following location: 503:503: 527 N. Lafayette South Bend, IN 466oi Chapin Park Application No. 2020-0820 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter zi (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on rile and open for E-mail: SWCHPC@.co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County,125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227IN"est Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAMEOFAPPLICANT: MetnorialHospital DATE PERMIT TADS FORCE: 08/20/2020 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST INA CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THP PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF AI.I. WORK 503 N. Lafayette, August 24, 2010 6!w ol Y 0; Aim 527 N. Lafayette, August 24, 2010 50I N,Lafayette, August 24, 2010 . 9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE AUGusT 25, 201 O ADDRESS 202 EAST NAVARRE DISTRICT NORTH ST. JOSEPH STREET RATING, CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER SIGRID THANOS WORK PROPOSED REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT OF WOOD FRONT PORCH COLUMN WITH LIKE COLUMN. HAVE HAD A NUMBER OF CONVERSATIONS WITH THE HOMEOWNER OVER THE MONTHS AS TO WHETHER SHE IS REALLY (THIS WAS THE THIRD TIME I HAVE DROPPED OFF A NORTH ST. JOSEPH STREET STANDARDS BOOK TO THIS ADDRESS) IN AN HISTORIC DISTRICT AND WHAT THAT MEANS. . SHE HAS ALSO SPOKEN AT LENGTH IN THE MONTH OF AUGUST NOT ONLY WITH THE DIRECTOR BUT WITH LARRY METEIVER AND WAYNE DOOLITTLE CONCERNING THE SAME ISSUES. SHE HAS A DETERIORATING PORCH COLUMN THAT WAS SECURED TO ITS BASE WITH A CAULK REPAIR THAT IS NOW FAILING MISERABLY AND CAUSING THE PORCH ROOF TO SAG IN THAT LOCATION. IN OUR CONVERSATION I POINTED OUT THAT HAD SHE USED A CONTRACTOR THAT WAS SKILLED IN WOOD REPAIRS THAT THIS FAILURE WOULDN'T HAVE OCCURRED. COSMETICALLY THE QUICK FIXES WORK FOR A SHORT TIME, BUT IN THE END CAUSE MUCH MORE DAMAGE AND EXPENSE. SHE SENT HER CONTRACTOR, D&D HOME MAINTENANCE, IN TO APPLY FOR A COA. HE DECIDED TO APPLY FOR AN IN-KIND REPLACEMENT AFTER LOOKING OVER THE INFORMATION ON THE ABATRON PRODUCT LINE AND NOT WANTING TO DELAY THE PROJECT WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A COMPOSITE COLUMN. Tim Musczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In-kind repair or replacement of wood porch column with like column. David Justice, Contractor for the following location: 202 NAVARRE South Bend, IN 46601 North St. Joseph Application No. 2010-0825 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: ❑ Located in a Local Historic 0 A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Sigrid L. Thanos DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 08/25/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. I id Tim Musczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In-kind repair or replacement of wood porch column with like column. David Justice, Contractor for the following location: 202 NAVARRE South Bend, IN 46601 North St. Joseph Application No. 2010-0825 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: ❑ Located in a Local Historic 0 A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Sigrid L. Thanos DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 08/25/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. Application -FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 MaiBng Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-M8 Fax: 574-235-M • Email SBSJCRPC®ao.st joseph mus Website http://www.sgosephaountyindkmcom/ajchp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY»>>» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONARM IN THIS BOX »»» OFTICE USE ONLY - Date Received Application Number Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Otte o/Gat &view) RNO Staff Approval authorized by. %}� Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark Gjt1 cal Historic District pvame) ` z ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness:. ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee [E"Approved and Issued 4&tl" 2010 WE Address of Property for proposed work: 2 z A(n tint? zr F Stmt Number and Stmt Name Name of Property Ow ner(s): (Pime print) „l►4QA'r-, µeR Address of Property Owner(s): 2 o Z 14 A v!-/ Q 1� Contractor(s) Name: V Avl o J v STi e-6 Contract Company Name: % ` 1� Pc:, P i r bf #1 / Af7X- )A.V d c Contractor Address: 1?6 5 t_ a EP 161¢ S':' City: enc 4b6.56 Phone: 57y- Z73- Z /Zo Current Use of Building- A KG 4c (Single Fandly-Multi-FamOy- Commadd - Covemment -Industria! -Vacant - eta) Type of Building Construction: Gt)oav FlUx-4 6 (Wood From - Brkk - Stone - SW - Concrete- Other) Proposed Work ® In-kind Landscape ❑ New [a Replacement (not in kind) ❑ Demolition (more than we box may bedud-ed) L Pare Description of Proposed Work '5 Q LAe,,V Vol - Fa 1Z tN � I- Q •— 00 W _:r AW Owner/Con ctor. Fax: e-mail (This oris tow MWdesignee) xr 7 ,e.•- and/or r+'-�� tis Zi � @ to••� c�s�. — APPLICATION REQLUREAE S ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE . AUGUST 27, 201 O ADDRESS 1307E. WAYNE NORTH DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER PAMELA AND JEFFERY BICKEL WORK PROPOSED IN-KIND REPLACEMENT OF GUTTERS ON GARAGE. THE BICKELS HAVE BEEN DOING AN EXTENSIVE AMOUNT OF RESTORATION TO THEIR HOME AND YARD FOR SEVEN YEARS. 26 AUGUST PAM CALLED THE OFFICE ABOUT REPLACING THE GUTTERS ON THE GARAGE. SINCE IT WAS IN-KIND STAFF COULD APPROVE. 27 AUGUST PAM SUBMITTED COA APPLICATION WITH CHECK FOR THE GARAGE GUTTERS. COA WAS ISSUED ON 2 SEPTEMBER AFTER IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT THE GUTTERS ON THE GARAGE WOULD BE HALF ROUND BUT NOT COPPER. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPCQcost joseph.in.us Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiana.com/s chp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONRINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ell 12tv- -.LO/d Application Number -10 /,0 - 40,Pa 7 Past Reviews: { 'ES (nate ofWt Review) /G xo�v OW16 n NO Staff Approval authorized by: �f Title: Historic Commission Review Date: , ❑ Local Landmark Egl�oeal Historic District (Name) F] National Landmark E] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied ❑ Tabled E] Sent To Committee ERA"'pproved and Issued 044cW"o DATE Address of Property for proposed work: ;,.a % 6i 7- h A-IA/E -'�WiE' Act -u-71 Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) A FF r- PAIL -i /.3'iC/cEr- Address of Property Owner(s): ,A-iwe Contractor(s) Name: 7-6b Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building, s1NE7 i e f-PsM I L u (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: 7-541 c-fc- (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: In-kind [:] Landscape E] New E] Replacement (not in-kind) ElDemolition (more than one box may be checked) Description of Proposed Work: 'iZ,-ni_AC E C-7A2A&rte' G 077-CYZJ •." 31Cid !Lf (/l.G-111A9A/C-1 c'c).ri t.,is r yrij (I A 10c 1- /,1/1//L,72'7L/K(,- - Owner/Contractor: Fax: 4 l 5 g -7 c% G 8 6 `/ e-mail �U ►Yt t �a a h rc (Gd /�t fit t UP C c) �� (This once unTl correspond with only one designee) and/or - — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Page 1 of 1 Catherine Hostetler - COA for garage gutters From: Catherine Hostetler To: pamela.bickel@mkmv.com Date: 8/31/2010 10:27 AM Subject: COA for garage gutters Pam, Please let me know what type of gutters you are proposing for the garage and if they are replicas of what was there. Your gutter system on the house appears to be half round. Catherine Director, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana 574 235 9798 '\ file://C:\Documents and Settings\chostetl\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C7CD911SJC ... 9/2/2010 Tim Klusczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COAMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574) 235-9578 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.gt-joseph.in.us CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director CERTIFICATE m APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In-kind replacement of half -round gutters on garage. TBD, Contractor for the following location: 1307 WAYNE South Bend, IN 46615 East Wayne Street i Application No. 2010-0827 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Pamela and Jeffery Bickel DATE PERMIT TADS FORCE: 09/02/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM . DATE AUGUST 31, 201 O ADDRESS 721 PARK DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING NOTABLE HOMEOWNER JOVANNA AND BILL SANDUSKY WORK PROPOSED IN-KIND REPLACEMENT OF STUCCO FACED CONCRETE BLOCK CHIMNEY. August 31 2010 Gary Hershberger of Hershberger Masonry discussed this proposed project with Staff. Since Staff was familiar with the house at 721 Park and was aware of the chimney issues the COA was issued for its repair. .r - Application - FOR - Cerci f icate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Send, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -Cary Suncun% South Bend, Indiana 464n1 Phone: 574-235-9798 - Fax 574-235-9578 - Email: SBS avwco st-pephu us website: http://wwws§osepha=4 indima=m/*Ip/in o html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONVIINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY- Date NLYDate Received —d—1c20/6 Application Number61 � p � � . •� / � . Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date ofLast lievkv) Staff Approval authorized by: d�%L�ti.w,.? Title:�'''�eeG✓ Historic Commission Review Date: [] Local Landmark D4 ocal Historic District (Name) [1 National Landmark [t hiational Register District ovame) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied [1 Tabled (� Sent To Committee [<pproved and Issued f 07-6'1'0 "DATE � Address of Property for proposed work: Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) o, �" Address of Property OwnerLtts): �-/ Contractors) Name: J Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: _. City: �ti+c< t Phone• Current Use of Building. ��1==u (Sing't�Family —Multi-Familyl Commercial — Government —industrial —Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: <4' (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete -Other) Proposed Work: 2<.kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New n Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (mm than one boa may be du+rlad) Description of Proposed Work:fL c e�=-W J � .� wl.G )'ttmv�att Owner/Contractor. Fax: t , e-mail (This of f�cr correspond uritf ty designee) _ and/or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- Tim Klusczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574)235-9578 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.sY Joseph in.us CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director CERTIFICATE m The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In-kind repair and replacement of stucco faced block chimney. HERSHBERGER MASONRY, Contractor for the following location: 721 PARK South Bend, IN 46616 ChapinPark Application No. 2010-0831 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of . the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OFAPPLICANT: Giovanna and Bill R. Sandusky DATE PERWr TAKES FORCE: 08/31/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT LWIM COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE AUGUST 31, 201 O ADDRESS 721 PARK DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING NOTABLE HOMEOWNER JOVANNA AND BILL SANDUSKY WORK PROPOSED IN-KIND REPLACEMENT OF STUCCO FACED CONCRETE BLOCK CHIMNEY. August 31 2010 Gary Hershberger of Hershberger Masonry discussed this proposed project with Staff. Since Staff was familiar with the house at 721 Park and was aware of the chimney issues the COA was issued for its repair. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City But�ding, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-798 • Fax 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC®co.stjosephin.us Website: http://wwwsgosephcountyindimmmm/odip/index html OFFICE USE ONLY>>>>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONRPJED IlV THIS BOX .»»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Atpr 010/0 Application Number Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Date of Lot Review) BM Staff Approval authorized by: Title: A"46-4.; Historic Commission Review Date: , ❑ LocalLandmark [gocal Historic District Name) ❑ National Landmark D-Pational Register District pvame) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee [<pproved and Issued 4 "1 7 o7'0/0 'DATE Address of Property for proposed work Ra t+ ` �t i r , f Sheet Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) �1 n 9 .� u r.�.� Q c e Address of Property Owners): S xw r- Contractors) Name: v v Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: &7 City: d 4 Phone• —4 Current Use of Building. x,,.: (SingFamgy —Multi-Fami7Commerciat— Gos�errtment —Industria! —Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: <LCe_<n (Wool Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work219--kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in -End) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be d=b d) Description of Proposed Work: gcx Ca' Owner/Contractor. Fax: / e-mail (This office tf correspondu»t1 ily an designee) _ f and/or — APPLICATION REQUIREMBNYS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — CERTIFICATE m APPROPRIATENESS Tim iKlusczillslzi, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In-kind repair and replacement of stucco faced block chimney. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574) 235-9578 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josephin.us HERSHBERGER MASONRY, Contractor for the following location: 721 PARK South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2010-0831 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OFAPPLICANT: Giovanna and Bill R. Sandusky DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 08/31/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE Director OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. September, 2010 Director's Report 17 August Prepared approved COAs and mailed to homeowners. On -sight visit to Riverview Cemetery Gate House. Meeting with Chuck Bulot about the building permit issues without a COA for 425 La Monte roof. GIS system omitted Chapin Park LHD when it deleted the NR Districts from the HPC permitting system. 18 August Received Bartow Builders e-mailed proposal for light posts at Riverview Cemetery with request for a Special Meeting. Began canvassing Commissioners for a Special Meeting. 19 August Luncheon Meeting with Tamera and Michelle of DTSB about the State Theatre being both for sale and being leased to Opera LaSalle. Arrangements for Special Meeting. Lengthy conversation with Eric of Champion windows and Mrs. Gaul of 1204 E. Wayne concerning the installation of additional vinyl windows and including the COA dated June 15 at the Special Meeting the following week. Office had received the application but no follow up information from Champion on the new proposal; Champion was supposed to meet with sales rep and send info to Office. Prepared Staff report for 617 Park. Three 106 Reviews. 20 August Meeting with James Childs Architect and Dennis Andres about work proposed for Morris Performing Arts Centers windows and doors. On sight visits to Riverview Cemetery, 1204 E. Wayne, 425 La Monte, and 510, 503 and 527 Lafayette (trees) and 617 Park for photographic documentation for Special Meeting to be help on August 25 at noon. Also 530 Riverside and 415 LaMonte for the 20 September meeting and an on -sight visit to 801 Forest where conditions have deteriorated and the new owners have applied for an RMF,/COA. Spoke with Ted Foti of Memorial Hospital about the Singer South Bend Lathe N.R. District; prepared research for him to be hand delivered on Monday. 21 August Posted Agenda for Special Meeting. Special Meeting follow up with Brandon Bartow on the light fixtures. 23 August Vacation Day. Dropped off information to Ted Foti. 24 August Met with Tom Anderson and Nick Rchas on the way to work concerning the removal of Lafayette Blvd. brick street and the asphalting after the sewer work is done. Met with Carl Litterll concerning Lafayette Blvd. Met with Mark Lyons on the GIS system with historic boundries missing and now the issues with Lafayette re -paving with asphalt. Spoke with Champion windows about the COA for 1204 E. Wayne, not necessary that they come since the Commission already approved previous windows at the house. 25 August Special Commission meeting at noon to entertain four COAs. Sent out COAs to homeowners and contractors. Researched a comment by former Director and Commissioner Ed Talley and John Oxian of the existence of an agreement between Public Works and HPC to retain and maintain all brick streets in the City regardless of location. Issued RME for 202 East Navarre column repair/in-kind replacement. 26 August Meeting with Gary Gilot and Carl Littrell along with Larry Meteiver and Tim Klusczinski concerning the MOU or letter between Public Works and HPC on brick streets cited by John Oxian and Ed Talley in phone conversations and e-mails about the sewer and street work on Lafayette Blvd between Navarre and Madison. Larry could not locate anything in legal. Staff could not find it in files. Gary and Carl had no recollection of it, but had a staff researching it. Lafayette Blvd. is outside the Chapin Park LHD boundaries, so their standard to preserve and retain brick streets did not apply. Gary Gilot stated that it his goal to salvage and recycle the bricks. They are to be cleaned and palletized and added to the current inventory of 40,000 brick. His goal is to have 120,000 bricks which the number he estimates it would take to resurface two blocks. He would also use those bricks for smaller repair work in historic districts. His assessment of these bricks is that they would be better used in lower traffic residential streets (less than 5,000 cars a day) on east/west streets without bills or inclines. The current project on Lafayette is part of the CSO project combined with Memorial Hospital's TIF priority to resurface Lafayette with asphalt for a smoother ambulance route. Conducted Architecture Tour for Melani Micozzi's Art Appreciation class from ITT between 6-8 p.m. 27 August Received archived boxes with Minutes and meeting binders from 1996- 1999. Read through to discover any mention of the Brick Streets agreements/polices. Wayne spoke with John and asked him to locate his copy of the agreement. (To date we have not received anything from John 9/13). Issued RME for 1307 E. Wayne N. for in- kind gutter replacement on garage. 30 August Researched minutes for Brick Streets information as well as Office files. 31 August Continued to research brick streets. Could locate only one reference to policy indirectly in the December, 1996 HPC Minutes. Sent copies to Carl Littrell and Gary Gilot. Turned in fees to treasurer's office. Issued RME for 721 Park for in-kind chimney replacement. September 1 Follow up with Brandon Bartow. Patrick Lydon returned call about possible garage. Botanical Society Executive Committee meeting at 5:15. September 2 RME for 845 Park per City Forester September 3 Kevin Hughes. Phone conversation with Leonard Dobosiewicz about land marking St. Casimir's Church; he requested a follow-up letter summarizing our discussion Architecture Tour between 6:00-8:00 September 6 Holiday 2 September 7 Accepted 3 COA applications for September meeting. RME issued for trees on N. Lafayette per City Forester and discussion with Tom Anderson, Public Works Department working on the Lafayette sewer and resurfacing project. September 8 Prepared Staff reports for COAs and RMEs for Commission meeting and Commissioner packets. September 9 St. Casimir Church discussion with Leonard Dobosiewicz about local landmarking to prevent what happened to St. Stephen's. Will follow up with a letter. Discussion concerning "no work from home" policy that doesn't exist. September 10 Payroll. Researched "no work from Home policy" no County ordinance exists. Prepared Commissioner's packets. September 13 NICH Finance Committee meeting. On -sight visit with Alice and Tom at the Oliver Inn; supplied them with formula to remove paint easier with their Speed Heater. Brief discussion with Raphael Morton on the "no work from home" policy. Contacted Larry Meteiver concerning same and other personnel issues. September 14 Began letter to Leonard Dobosiewicz. Began arrangements for meeting with City Officials and BSSB concerning work on Conservatories. Mailed COA to Ken Swank for window replacement on Pine Road, North Liberty land mark. Restore Michiana window workshop attendees listing updated, faxed Spigelmyer attendance guesstimate, event press release and poster/flyer. Spoke with Kerr Roofing on 720 W. Washington re -roof; met with Neil Gilbert concerning re -roof, proposed in-kind work, tree removal and pursuing individual National Register nomination for the house. On-site visit and photographs for COA 2010-0914A&B. September 15 Meeting with Elizabeth and Greg Schoff new owners of 728 Leland who are currently returning the house to single family usage and planning on living there once the renovation is completed. He is a contractor and wants to remove the aluminum siding and aluminum storms and restore clapboards and whatever else he finds underneath as well as build wood storms and restore the wood windows. Gave him the information on Spigelmyer's workshop. The would also like to create a wraparound porch in the front connecting the two side porches and entrances as well as fence the yard in the rear for privacy. Obviously the many entrances to the house will be changed or modified suitable to a single family residence. Met with Chuck Bulot about 720 W. Washington passing Design Review and the delay from the HPC procedures for roof replacement. Completed 10 106 Reviews for Grants and Demolitions. Completed letter to Mr. Dobosiewicz on St. Casimir's. Staff Report for Re -roof of 720 W. Washington for Commission's consideration at 20 September meeting. Follow up e-mail call to Carl Littrell about brick Street MOU. No word from John Oxian to date. September 16 Verified reservations for Saturday workshop. Discovered that Staff omitted a COA for 415 LaMonte and e-mailed information to Commissioners. Calculated the amounts for In -Line transfers and turned in for County Commissioners' hearing, 21 September. Completed 8 106 Reviews for demolitions and grants. Received e-mail from Champion windows that someone will be at the HPC meeting for replacement windows on 1238 E. Wayne. 17 September Verified reservations for Saturday workshop. Made necessary changes to Agenda, posted and e-mailed commissioners. Dropped off information and Wayne's report to 812 Golden and Staff Report on 415 LaMonte. On site 106 visit to vacant lot at 823 Cottage Grove. RMFXOA for 219 221 West North Shore for tree removal per Brent Thompson. Met with Jerry Kline concerning the addition he is proposing to his Local Landmark (113 West North Shore) in the Spring. Attempted to identify grant sources for his project. Toured Chapin and East Wayne Districts. Provided historic photographic information on the Granada Theatre for Jim Monroe from the Morris Performing Arts Center. He is trying to determine the cause of sinking spots in the Plaza. Turned in Reservation listing for workshop at WNIT. 4 Historic Preservation Commhslon SLOW testae Mlchlana 2010 of Indiana Landmarks khigan Sireef LLC ATP deposit dmak'i51'24/10 � Southhdd Bums Rent-ABs, Inc. Equipment rental 3.15.10credit card 216.79 0 246.79 Southhoid Creative Caterkrg Catering processed check from HQ 227.11 0 227.11 Southold Imty, Prints Invitations May-10 check from HQ 52.35 0 52.3S Sovthhold Palace of Flowers Decoratloru 5.17.10 credit cans 42 0 42 # Southhold GFS Utenslh, etc. 5.7.10credit cad 18.26 0 18.26 Southhdd Indom Landmarks reimbursement for table use 5.26.10. check 30.06 _ , 0 -30.06 Oeen Weekend '"'"""°"-WNff— "'""'"""'"" LSporiiaship Green Weekend GFS or groceryCandy giveaways - - 6.24.10 cash from 1enNfer 9.99 0 9.99 - itvrr of onal' (pt #nfng iHf+o i',OOfS7iPC 6ioofiures processed check ban HGf— 31U 0-610 Promotional Budget Signs banner 6.3.10 petty cash 38.5 0 38.S Promotional GoDoddy.com Restore Mkhkm website 6.22.10 Credit cad 14.97 0 14.97 Promotional _ GoDaddy.com Restore Michionowebsite 6.29.10 credit cad 2.66 0 2.66 - RMserles-EA Pon Zmyslo Presentation 7.24.10 check S10 0 SIO RM series-EA Bums Rent-Alts. Inc. Seating for 35 7.19.10 credit cad 42 0 42 Riuiieries"�ifks�"ows Myer S—irpples requesteajUgUst •.:-. Check.. IW - 0- YSU.. ,. RM sesies-Windows , v WNR ... Production ..: ,..... requested Aug'.af check . ,..., . .....1015 0 ..... .. 1015 pm_vgo vinto"Seeer wnrr meering roanronra glr total 3999.57 3999.57 balance spread prepared and managed by Oda Dadlow, HMorlo Preservation Commission 8.30.2010 Assistant Director's Reuort HPC Meetina 9.20.2010 1. City Cemetery National Register Nomination -Perusing through files requested from County Archives. 2. Restore Michiana Series -Promoting calendar. Updating website, always. Revise flyer and distribute in DTSB. 3. RMS Energy Audit Workshop -Correspondence with Ron Zmyslo regarding follow up energy audit. Looks like we will shoot for January to do a raffle for a February audit. 4. RMS EPA Lead Overview -Correspondence with Tammy Moore regarding follow up questions. 5. RMS Vintage Green Lecture -Design flyer and advertise. Correspondence with Roger Chrastil of WNIT regarding invoice for meeting room use. Correspondence with Judith Hizer of SBT IN Michiana magazine, who would like to voice record lecture to formulate an article for next issue of magazine in the "All Things Sustainable" column. Deliver laptop and set up room. 6. Window Restoration lecture/demo/production-Discussion with Spigelmyer regarding quote and invoice. Forward invoice to Indiana Landmarks. Correspondence with Angel Hernandez of WNIT regarding invoice. Correspondence with Brenda Bowyer, producer at WNIT regarding sets and taping. Critically review window videos with Wayne to prepare for post production. Prepare list of talking points for pre -production meeting with WNIT. Add EPA Lead Certified Firm contacts to mass email list-fyi, there are 231 within 50 miles of South Bend. Fax Dick regarding lodging and last minute details. 7. State Theatre -Meeting with Todd Zeiger to discuss grant. Prepare letter to County Commissioners requesting permission to apply for grant. Reviewing terms of HPF grants and requirements by the sponsoring party. Phone call with Tamara Nicholl -Smith of DTSB regarding the bank that owns the building wanting to put up a for sale sign. Correspondence with Ezra of Opera La Salle to update him on our progress regarding obtaining permissions for writing for the grant. 8. Riverview Cemetery Gatehouse -Tour with Wayne and Catherine to observe progress. Spoke with Jeff Schoberg as he removed window sashes. Follow up visit with Catherine to photograph for light fixtures. 9. Prepare 08.16.10 HPC meeting minute draft and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print and forward minutes from August meeting to Catherine for September meeting. Print commissioner mailing labels for the next 3 months. 10. Staff Reports -503 Riverside Drive 2010-0907. Visit to property to photograph and make observations. 11. Routine Maintenance Exclusion -X »»»»»»»»»»»> 12. $4,000 events budget tracking -continue to update. Forward to Jennifer Hren at Indiana Landmarks for review. Finalize report and produce copies for inclusion in Commissioner packets or distribution at September meeting. 13. Prepare 08.25.10 HPC special meeting minute draft and forward to Commissioners. 14. Morris Performing Arts Center Windows -Presentation by Dennis Andres of the Morris and Chris Hartz of James Childs Architects presenting the facts of the deteriorating windows and doors. They were able to collect recommendations from staff and commissioners present as to how they should approach the treatment of the windows. All staff present; Commissioners present included Sandy, Lynn, Linda and Paul Hayden of Indiana Landmarks, representing Todd. Review meeting minutes provided by Chris. 15. Local Landmark Preservation Standards -update last page to reflect the 2010 commission and staff. 16. 66441 Walnut -Discussion with homeowner, Darlene Thornton, regarding legal rights, Preservation Standards, and revoking Landmark status. Emailed links to HPC webpage. Postal mailed Preservation Standards and copy of ordinance. 17. Grants.gov-Register for this site so that in the future, HPC can apply for competitive grants. Also, investigate into a possible grant for digitizing files. Correspondence with County Commissioners office regarding registration. 18. Phone call with Tamara Nicholl -Smith of Downtown South Bend regarding Cedar House restaurant moving into JMS Building. Emailed links to COA, Landmarks Standards, and Design Review contact. Phone call with owner of Cedar House regarding COA for new awnings. 2 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF ENGINEERING TO: Catherine Hostetler, Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & Saint Joseph County FROM: Carl P. Littrell, PE City Engineer SUBJECT: Reaction to "First Local Landmark Designation for Brick Streets" DATE: September 17, 2010 Thank you for sending over a copy of the subject matter. I had not seen that information put together previously. It appears that the Commission staff had gone to some trouble in 1996 to prepare a case for preservation of brick street surfaces. As I remember, it elicited a promise from the then Public Works Director that brick street surfaces would be preserved on local and neighborhood collector streets. • I believe that the City has kept that promise. Brick surfaces have been preserved in the historic districts and in the neighborhoods, except for brick -paved arterials. Bricks have been restored and re-laid on portions of Madison Street and Washington Street. Curbs and brick gutters have been reset on part of Franklin Street. The remainder of the block will be reset soon. Excavations in brick surfaces whether in local historic districts, or elsewhere in the City, are restored with brick. . The City has stockpiled brick pavers to replace units broken or damaged. A large stockpile is being collected to be able to renew streets in preservation districts. As the excerpts from the South Bend Municipal Code and Prevailing Specifications for Public Works included in the landmarking documents require, all pavement repairs in brick require re -setting the bricks. The City's stockpile is available to supplement any attrition from the excavating process or due to the wear on the units. If any further information is needed, please call. cc: Gary Gilot D. Committee Reports 1. Budget & •Finance Mr..Oxian stated there was no business to report 3. Legal : There was no new legal report. 4: Historic Districts' Mrs. 'hoitz stated that there was no new i.'formation to report from Project Access. and yielded to Mr. Talley .to report on. the meeting'with Madison Hospital-. He.stated'that several residents of River Bend Historic District had met with the Director' of Madison Center,. the architect of the new.Children's Center; Dr.- Shore (acoustical. consult ant, IUSB), Ann -Carol Simon. -(Asst:, City Attorney) and Councilman Lueke. He. feltthe meeting had been productive: Dr. Shore is :to " work .with the architect. in further defining the source of., the noise problems. ' 5. Hi.storic Landmarks ' Mr. Oxian, chair of .the Landmarks Committee, .reported that He . and Mr. Duvall had met with Kathleen Dempsey of -Code Enforcement- and that .they had agreed to request the Common Council to .hear the ordinance which has been. there tabled to designate 501 West Colfax as a Local Landmark. Mr. Oxian then -reported on the status of. re Commendations previously made by the commission: A) Leeper Park - Leeper Park.was established by the Common Council. as Local Landmark. B) Brick Streets Local Landmark Ordinance Mr. Oxian reported that a .meeting with the .City Engineer, his "staff, Mr. Talley, Mr. -Duval.i and ;councilman, Lueke had met to discuss this recommendaeion. Since the city has an established policy on the maintenance, and repair of. existing .brick street pavements. which. provided- continuing protection for them, he had agreed to withdraw the proposed ordinance..The- City Engineer is to send a letter to'the commission affirming this policy and, guaranteeing that the commissioner will be notified in the event of any. change to this 'policy in the future. Mrs. Sporleder 'expressed. concern. over spot repairs and Mr. Oxian 'and Mr.. Talley indicated .that such repairs were covered in the existing policy. Mrs. Ghoitz inquired about proactive maintenance policies such as scheduled turning of the. existing' brick. Mr. -Oxian indicated that this was not discussed. Mr, Tal.ley, observed' that he felt the proposal. had' included too many streets'. and that a less ambiti.ous ordinance may have met less -resistance from. engineering..Staff. Mrs. Sporleder noted that. she .had observed very efficient and thorough rehabilitation procedures for 'unit* masonry pavements in. Europe which included taking .up paving units regrading - and compacting base and relaying the'iunits in quite orderly process. Mr. Oxian observed that Engineering Staff had allowed that these pavements were -the easiest to maintain. Mr. Talley added that the necessarily skilled•iaorkmen for such 'repai.rs'-were difficult to find. - He .indicated. that this was -an illustrative case of the benefit of meeting on a -regular basis with the staff of other City departments.. The Sporleders indicated that. -the' Masonry Institute was. prepared to offer assistance in providing specifications, for the proper ,procedures for brick -pavements. Mr: Talley indicated that Larry. Spradlin . in Engi.neer.ing was probably the best contact for ' effectively communicating these ideas'to.the.Department. Mr. Talley indicated that there might be an opportunity for a seminar in this issue. i SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR Print Name MINUTES Address f9ce.ua2 VL'T A '1 1�1-1�1h t ` h+ 5 Signature 44���, Ale;1 !f,14XH it AfqPAUVU rimy �a ,i-vr l lad u!-t/�►.l 1,,SI . Ko4ic- 4�i(lpcq-4 tjC-41 m-vl 121-1 PPL-U)l \ ALL Girths lvt,5 Weis A Fawll �ebecc�, l,tSc.k we Z�z -ravt� � ua t J lJ l� ipa t LJ r /6;� ti vef '71 till 14644 dlv 7r T%'/t.4/07 ,{U cn 0 U(l,q — y f soduA � K`s h Wa M a.* 'D6w & SSi Poet Avt (P.c) 0 ) (a4 211"cA 71J 31,G E'✓--yn e tkk4 4 -re _A . . iA- S G'ec 11 r'a 4 r 7-1U 1-� �s ic:"r�-�1-c.. U-e��,t ti��oa- �iur-I�t� [t�c�e (�• f9ce.ua2 VL'T A '1 1�1-1�1h t ` h+ 5 Signature 44���, Ale;1 !f,14XH it AfqPAUVU rimy �a ,i-vr l lad u!-t/�►.l 1,,SI . Ko4ic- 4�i(lpcq-4 tjC-41 m-vl 121-1 PPL-U)l \ ALL Girths lvt,5 Weis A Fawll �ebecc�, l,tSc.k we Z�z -ravt� � ua t J lJ l� MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST JOSEPH COUNTY September 20, 2010 136' Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, In 46601 President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 MEMBERS PRESENT: Todd Zeiger, Linda Riley, David Steinhauer, Timothy Klusczinski, Sandra Rossow, Lynn Patrick (arrived at 7:05), Jerry Niezgodski (arrived at 7:10) STAFF PRESENT: Larry Meteiver, Attorney and Catherine Hostetler, Director MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Richard and Viola Albright, Kaitlyn Smous, Paige Marijcci, Eric Jurgonski, Elizabeth Fuller, Larissa Esmilla, Matt Dowd, Neovi Karakatsanis, John and Terri Califano, Anne Nguyen, Jackson Bongs, Cecilia Simbana, Katie Veasey, Rogelio Huerta, John Albright, Larry Schohl, Joey Hiben, Neil Gilbert and Marianne Surges, Katie Springstead, Matthew Balkey, Christine Tiffin Rebecca Lischew PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0903 Property Location: 559 River Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American foursquare/Craftsmen/ 1920/Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Amy and Matt Dowd Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The home is a two storey house set upon a rectangular plan that includes an enclosed porch and an attached garage. The exterior walls are covered with asbestos shingles. The cross hip roof has asphalt shingles and a wide over hang with aluminum soffit. The enclosed porch has end piers that extend above its roof. The windows are double hung 5/1 vertical sash. ALTERATIONS: Some of the windows have aluminum storms. The asbestos shingle siding was installed prior to 1949 and the aluminum soffit was added. The roof appears to be a replacement. The side steps and landing were replaced with COA 2008-0328. U APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacing existing shingled roof with new shingles. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This project is a complete tear off of the 3 tab asphalt shingles and re -roofing with architectural shingles. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EDGEWATER B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district vary from hip and gable to gambrel. All are covered with asphalt shingles. Eaves in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. Some aluminum sided houses have aluminum covered fascias. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the existing or original in composition, size, shape, color, and texture. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof by adding architectural features or roofing materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the Edgewater Standards and Guidelines. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by David Steinhauer the Commission unanimously approved COA#2010-0903 6 -0. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2010-0907 Property Location: 1231 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1929 Property Owner: Neovi Karakatsanis and Jonathan Swarts Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Colonial Revival Home is a two storey frame construction with a rectangular plan and a five bay fagade covered with wood shingles. The gable roof has simple moulded raking trim and asphalt shingles. The 2 windows are 6/1 double hung windows with moulded cornice trim. There is a central entry with a pediment supported by decorative brackets with dentil details along with pilasters and a fanlight over the door. There is a one storey flat roof wing topped by a wood balcony that has been enclosed with jalousie windows. ALTERATIONS: Open Porch enclosed with jalousie windows and matching siding. The wood balcony railing system had a diamond pattern element in 1986. It is now uniform lxl balusters. The glass block window is not original to the home. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. Remove glass block on east side. 2. Replace windows and close door in three season room per attached description. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners propose to remove the non -original glass block windows on the east side of the house and to restore the exterior siding to match the body of the house. The homeowners are re -modeling the interior of the three season room to be more energy efficient. They will replace the non -original jalousie windows with Marvin 6/1 double hung wood windows that will match the original windows of the body of the house. There will be two windows installed on the south, five on the east and two on the north. The two windows on the north are replacing a window and a door. All per product information and submitted project description from Peacock. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes. The homeowners are restoring the siding on the east side of the house by removing the glass block windows. The proposed wood double hung window replacements are more appropriate to the style of the house than the current jalousie windows. The removal of the non —original door on the north side is at the rear of the house and its replacement with a window will contribute to the rhythm of the windows in enclosed porch. On a motion by David Steinhauer with a second by Linda Riley COA #2010-0907 was amended to include a complete tear off of the 3 tab asphalt shingles on the roof and the installation of architectural asphalt shingles with a unanimous vote 7-0. On a motion by David Steinhauer with a second by Sandy Rossow COA#2010-0907 as amended was unanimously approved by the Commissioners 7-0. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 09.07.2010 Application Number: 2010-0907A Property Location: 503 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Four Square/1907 Property Owner: Dorothy Schohl-Larry Schohl, Power of Attorney Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two storey house with square plan on block foundation. There is a full width open front porch. Roof is asphalt shingles. This house is built on a bluff. ALTERATIONS: House has vinyl replacement siding. Most windows on the house have been replaced and aluminum storms have been added. Porch columns are replaced with metal; porch floor, stairs and rails are replacement. Shutters have been applied to front windows. Front door is a replacement. There are two small additions to the rear. APPLICATION ITEMS: Prepare land for new construction. See attached. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The Schohl's are proposing to demolish the house that their family has owned for more than 50 years. The property is currently a multi -family unit that they rent out. The attached note from the owner states that "over the last 40 years there has been constant water problems causing the foundation to settle, mold, mildew, and rusting of metal support beams." Included in the note is a list of what owners have done to try to remedy the ongoing waterissue; current quotes from various contractors to remediate the issue along with a quote from a demolition contractor. The 4 owner reported that all three houses to the North of this property have water problems in the basement as well. The owner would like to remove the house from the site so that the vacant property could be developed. During the site visit, staff observed that in the front, the house is settling in both directions, causing the windows to slope in either direction. There is evidence of the porch settling as well. Staff observed the obvious settling in the basement. The owner showed us the cistern that was installed in the side yard to the North of the house that collects water piped from the rear yard and travels to the street to be released into the City sewer. This was part of the owner's previous efforts to remedy the water problems. Maintenance of the cistern requires periodic climbing down into the cavernous manhole to clean the "pudding -like gunk" out so that the water can proceed to the City sewer. Staff observed the flow of water into the cistern was a fairly good amount, considering there had been no rainfall in nearly one week. The walls in the cistern have a deep red, iron -like build up on them. Upon staff investigation for this report, it was discovered that this property sits on the exact location of where the Kankakee Mill Race, a man-made canal dug in the 1830s, was terminated at the St. Joseph River. A four storey grist mill stood from 1837 until the Race failed in the 1850s. After 1885 the land was the site of the Christian Soen's Brick and Drying Yards. Staff spoke with Carl Littrell, City Engineer to get his perspective on the location of the property in relation to the past use of the site. Carl reported that the soil is clay and was mined for bricks. The brickyard had built a series of canals flowing throughout the yard. In a past job testing soils, Mr. Littrell dug under several basements in this block of Riverside Drive and discovered trash, debris and water, all creating differential movements of the houses. In addition to the brickyard, the nearby location of the Water Works in Leeper Park because of the 100 or so artesian springs that have surfaced there, additional springs could be surfacing along Riverside Drive. Mr. Littrell concluded that the water problems at 503 Riverside could be explained by the past uses of site and/or due to the eternal springs in the area. In addition, the City would like to get the cistern disconnected from the City sewers and channeled into a location that would be more efficient for carrying water away from the property. Staff asked Mr. Littrell his opinion as to if the proposed vacant site would be buildable, in which he concluded that it would more than likely be buildable but that a geotechnical engineer should be consulted and knowledge about the site should be disclosed to prospective buyers. This property begins the district on the South side of Riverside Drive; although it is considered a contributing property to the district, the integrity has been altered by the addition of numerous replacement features. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: V. GENERAL A. Buildings in the district should not be demolished except where a building poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative. Documentation of interior and exterior features of the original buildings, especially homes rated as 5 historically significant, is encouraged. Measured drawings and photographs may be submitted to the Historic Preservation Commission for safekeeping and future reference. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Even though this building does not appear to pose a threat to public safety as the standards and guidelines state for demolition, it is evident that the property the house is situated on has been compromised by water issues since the 1830s. There is currently evidence of mold but no testing has been done. Staff recommends that the owner be in contact with City Engineer, Carl Littrell regarding a disconnect from City sewers and possibly removing water more efficiently from the property. Based on owners discussion with Carl, if this cannot be done, with the ongoing water issues that may not be able to be resolved, staff would be inclined to recommend approval of the proposed project because the structure has been so compromised and its integrity will continue to deteriorate. After a lengthy discussion between the homeowner and the Commissioners the Homeowner signed a Waiver of Statutory Limit and on a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Sandy Rossow COA#2010-0907A was Continued with a unanimous vote 7-0. The Commissioners were then encouraged to meet with the property owner and tour the site. 10 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 7, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0907B Property Location: 633 N. Lafayette Blvd. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1895 Property Owner: Terri and John Califano Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey wood sided home is set upon a T -plan foundation with bays on the north and south sides of the home. The gabled roof has asphalt shingles. There is an enclosed entry porch. The windows are 3 vertical sash/1 double hung with moulded crown trim. There is an attached garage and wood deck at the rear of the house. ALTERATIONS: The Assessor's Card states the date of this house as 1885, so there have been both modifications and additions to the original structure. The addition of the two bays were noted in the 1949 assessment. There is aluminum siding on the porch at the rear side of the house. The garage and the porch were noted in the 1932 assessment. The wood deck noted on the 2005 survey is a modern addition. The roof on the house is an architectural asphalt shingle replacement of asphalt shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: Tree fell on the house/garage. Work is to demolish/rebuild garage. Repair exterior. Remove aluminum siding on porch and replace with cedar to match. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The applicants propose to rebuild the attached garage and rear deck. With the siding materials salvaged from the demolished garage they propose to replace the aluminum siding on the porch and use the remainder to do repairs on the body of the house. They have discussed the change in the dimensions with Mark Lyons, Building Department and it meets City Code. They propose to construct an Ultra Deck Fusion wood free standing 11x14 rear deck. The enlarged garage will tie into the original house. It will be a wood frame construction on a new concrete pad with a gable roof re -roofed in asphalt shingles to match the architectural shingles on the main body of the house. The wood siding will also match the siding on the main body of the house. The porch door will be replaced with a steel security door and the garage door will be a solid raised panel overhead door. All per product information, site plan and drawings attached. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION New construction includes any new building or structure built within the boundaries of the historic district, or any new addition to an existing building. New construction should be designed 7 considering the appearance, scale, styles and setbacks of the other buildings in the neighborhood. New work may be contemporary or may suggest motifs from historic buildings in the district. A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of the structures in the district are two stories in height and have square or rectangular plans. There are several houses that have L- or T-shaped or rambling ground plans. There are a few single -story cottages and one- and one -and -a -half -story bungalows. The most prevalent fagade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Fagade proportion shall be established by permitting no structure with a fagade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Design of new construction should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions that would add new height or change the existing fagade of a building, and change its scale and architectural character shall not be constructed. Not Recommended New stories should not be added nor existing stories be removed which would destroy important architectural details, features and spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with the existing should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS Wall materials in the district range from brick, stucco and wood clapboard and shingles, to aluminum, vinyl and fiberboard/composite siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in scale, texture and color (as pertains to masonry) with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. Also, as much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Alternative or composite siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible with the original size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone or artificial brick shall not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than the foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The owners' proposal will restore what was lost in the wind storm and up grade the rear elevation considerably. The materials chosen will replicate those on the main body of the house. The re -roofing N. of the garage with asphalt shingles to match the house will extend across the rear of the house. Staff has no objection to the use of solid steel security doors off the porch and on the garage as they face a dark and overgrown alleyway. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Linda Riley COA#2010-0907B was approved with a unanimous vote 7-0. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 5 August 2010 Application Number: 2010-0805 Property Location: 415 Lamonte Terrace Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled Ell/1885 Property Owner: Dick Allbright Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 2 storey single family irregular plan house set upon a brick foundation. Clapboard walls with corner boards and frieze at rake. Roof is a cross gable with extension of central gable and is finished in asphalt shingles. There is an enclosed corner porch with decorative trellis work over roof and square paneled Doric supports at corner. Porch windows are 8 light casement. Openings consist of 6/1 double hung windows with moulded entablature on front first storey and 1/1 paired double hung with label moulding on second storey front. Elaborate engaged pediment with square Doric supports and entablature surround front door along with a wood decorative arched fanlight. ALTERATIONS: None documented on 1987 survey card. APPLICATION ITEMS: Rubber roof over flat roof and Tamko designer 30 year shingles over 3&1 old shingles. K -style gutters to replace existing K -style gutters. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owners are applying to install rubber on flat front porch roof over the metal roof currently installed. Also applying to install asphalt architectural shingles over the 3 tab shingles currently on the gabled portion of the roof. According to contractor, there is only one roof underneath and they will not be doing a complete tear off. Steel flashings will be reworked and replaced in-kind where needed. Owner also wishes to replace the current K -style gutters with in-kind. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass all the various designs found in residential structures: hipped, gabled, gambrel, flat and combinations of these. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood and slate shingles as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The fascias of some vinyl- and aluminum -sided houses are covered with the same materials. Required The existing shape and type of materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features, which give the roof its essential character, shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended The original shape and materials of the roof should be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, the and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from a street by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffit, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the installation of rubber over the flat roof as it will not be noticeable from the street. Staff recommends approval of replacement asphalt architectural shingles as it is appropriate to the style of the house. Gutters will be replaced in-kind. In discussion with the homeowner, the Commissioners advised that care be taken to identify areas of leakage since this would be a re -roof over the current roof. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by David Steinhauer COA#2010-0$45 was approved with a unanimous vote 7-0. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: September 14, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0914A Property Location: 720 West Washington Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1850 -Federal/ I- House/Jonathan Webb Property Owner: Neil Gilbert and Marianne Surges Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark in West Washington NR District Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE : The Bartlett House is a 2 storey yellow common bond brick residence with an attic set upon a rectangular foundation with a gable roof with cedar shingles, sloping soffits, hanging K -style gutters. The windows are 6/6 wood double hung windows throughout except for the double French doors over the entry porch balcony and the fixed 3/3 and 2/2 windows in the 1929 wood addition. The windows on the main house have iron lintels and pediments with wooden louvered shutters. The front entry is supported by paired square wood classical columns engaged 10 piers with decorated balcony balustrade. The front doorway has glazed sidelights and transom under a shaped wood lintel surrounding a single leaf wood panel door. ALTERATIONS: The original kitchen wing was tarn down by Sara Bartlett in 1899. The new, smaller addition containing a kitchen, dining room and two upstairs bedrooms was built at the rear in1926. The Cedar shake roof was applied in 1985 with COA approved onl9August. The storm windows and doors appear to be modern. APPLICATION ITEMS: Re -roofing; replacement of non –original cedar shingles with architectural asphalt new shingles; complete tear off of 25 year old roof. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT. The homeowner proposes to remove the deteriorating 25 year cedar shake roofing and replace it with Certainteed landmark Architectural Shingles in Burnt Siena approved by Design Review. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, and/or samples where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of he landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. 11 b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the re -roof with the asphalt architectural shingles as they conform to the standards for the local landmarks. There is no mention in our files as to the original fabric of the roofing. We do know that in the 1932 Assessor's records there was an asbestos roof which was replaced by 1949 with asphalt shingles. The 1986 DNR Survey Card notes a composition shingle roof, possibly from a 1975 Case Study cited on the Survey Card, while the Commission approved the application of the Cedar Shakes on 1985. The asphalt architectural shingles in the application will complement the Federal style of the house. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Jerry Niezgodski COA#2010-0914A was approved with a unanimous vote 7-0 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Application Number: 2010-0909 Property Location: 1238 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1963 Property Owner: Donna and Michael Pangbum Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Colonial Revival Home is a two storey frame construction with an L plan that is aluminum sided. It has a three bay facade with 6/6 upper level and 9/9 lower level double hung windows and louvered shutters. The front entrance is recessed with pilasters and broken pediment. The gable roof has asphalt shingles. There is a one storey gable wing on the west side with board and batten siding and 9/9 double hung windows. ALTERATIONS: The windows are replacement windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: 6 Vinyl Replacement Windows DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to replace 6 replacement windows 2 in the living room on the west side, 3 in the master bed room 2 on the south side and 1 one the west and 1 in the upstairs hall on the east side with vinyl double hung windows to match. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required 12 Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement windows to match previously approved replacement windows. On a motion by David Steinhauer with a second by Linda Riley COA#2010-0909 was approved with a unanimous vote 7-0. Catherine Hostetler then read the Preservation Specialist's Report on COA 2010-0802A concerning window replacement at 812 Golden in the Riverside Drive LHD entertained by the Commission on August 16, 2010. Report on 812 Golden: I visited with Kennedy Kafatia at his home at 812 Golden on August 23, 2010. Mr. Kafatia believed he needed to change his windows after being told so by a window salesman. We looked at all of his first floor windows. .The windows at one time had wood storm windows. When the siding was installed the contractor removed all the window hangers and used screws to fasten three wood storms to the front of the house. I am not sure how well those storms work. Several windows had no storms and others had old triple tracks of questionable quality. We then looked at a window of the second floor landing. It is the largest in the home and had no storm window. Mr. Kafatia told me that all of the second floor windows were no different than the first floor. .That indicated to me that they are in good shape. There is one window on the third floor that faces the street. Pieces of the frame are missing that area allowing rain into the home. The home owner showed me a repair that was done to a wall directly below the window. The window is also missing a meeting rail. It is doubtful that the window would survive removal. The room will be a bedroom. IN Recommendations: Most of the windows are tight and the remaining can be tightened. New aluminum double track storm windows should be installed on the first and second floor. The third floor window should be replaced. Wayne Doolittle Preservation Specialist After a discussion the Commissioners voted 7-0 to deny COA#2010-0802A on a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Sandra Rossow. The rationale for the vote to deny are as follows: Todd Zeiger: The windows can be rehabilitated; Sandy Rossow: The windows are repairable; Timothy Klusczinski: The homeowner offered only the replacement option to the Commission and not an option to rehabilitate the windows; Linda Riley: The windows should be rehabilitated; David Steinhauer: The windows can be rehabilitated; Lynn Patrick: The windows are suitable for rehabilitation; Jerry Niesgodski: The homeowner was absent and the guidelines state rehabilitation if not deteriorated beyond repair. On a separate motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Dave Steinhauer the Commissioners voted 7-0 to allow the homeowner to apply for a COA to replace the third storey front window with a double hung window without being charge the $15.00 application fee. The Staff would approve this COA and then bring it to be ratified at the 18 October Commission meeting. Hearing of Visitors: There were no visitors that wished to be heard. REGULAR BUSINESS The Minutes of the August 16, 2010 and August 25, 2010 meeting were accepted by consensus. The August Location Report was accepted. The Staff Reports from the Director and the Assistant Director and her Workshop Budget Spreadsheet were distributed along with the Correspondence File. Catherine also distributed the memo from Carl Littrell responding to the HPC concerns about the Lafayette brick street being re -paved with asphalt. The concern stemmed from the Commission's desire to preserve brick streets and from communications from former Director Ed Talley and past President John Oxian that a MOU between the Public Works Department and HPC to preserve brick streets in lieu of land -marking all of them (1995- 1996). Catherine distributed the minute from December 16, 1996 alluding to a South Bend policy to preserve and repair brick streets. Mr. Oxian nor Mr. Talley could produce a written policy. Neither HPC nor could Public Works locate one in their files or archives;; there is only a statement in the City Code leaving the preservation of brick streets to the City Engineer which has not changed since the 1970s. 14 The bricks removed from Lafayette would be palletized for future use in repairs in historic neighborhoods and on secondary roads. Lafayette would be paved to accommodate Memorial Hospital's ambulance traffic. The Commissioners decided to have a table at the NNN's Arts Cafe on November 7, 2010. There was a report from Legal. Larry stated that the Commission must take official action on Commissioners Steinhauer and Zeiger determination for the window replacement options at 66984 Pine Road, a Local Landmark, in COA# 2010-0802. Therefore President Timothy Klusczinski moved that pursuant to this Commission's delegation of authority granted to Commissioners Zeiger and Steinhauer to review and make a determination of the appropriateness of COA #2010-0802, to adopt, confirm and ratify the unanimous decision made by Commissioners Zeiger and Steinhauer to approve COA 2010-0802. The motion was seconded by Jerry Niesgodski and approved with a unanimous vote. 7-0 There was no President's Report. OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: None The meeting adjourned at 8:35 on motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Linda Riley. Attest: Lynoatrick, Secretary Date ' 15