Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
May 2010
IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES B. C. D. April 19, 2010 TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report OLD BUSINESS 1. Southhold 2010 Awards 2. HPC Logo OVER . y ,# »..1,� ;'•s': �',`-,�.,' .(, ., :F, n w,+r,:«q.eawa.,+ro-.... T Cr.}]j 2 . f,.. SOUTH F \\Ijl�l�/�e/�% �� � dq$;.- '•' j .'- ,. ., •.:::,:;..,s, : - p,,,, ;>.',«yw°.w. MN��� HISTO �QRA i b t t % ( y• 0 a s� - d. !,r l 65 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 T • County -City Building `:x• MONDAY, MAY 17, 2010 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL ° ' . II. PUBLIC HEARING ' A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS is ;i�:",,:;yi•. "n., 9.5 1. 723 Park Avenue COA#2010-0406 Chapin Park LL "' .,_;• 2. 345 S. Sunnyside COA#2010-0412 East Wayne Y ,3` 3. 830 N. Michigan COA#2010-0413 Local Landmark wJ 4. 902 Leland COA#2010-0414 Chapin Park 5. 1715 E. Wayne COA#2010-0427 East Wayne 6. 514 W. LaSalle COA #2010-0428 Local Landmark 7. 803 Forest COA#2010-0428A Chapin Park Vil R 8. 51755 Portage Road COA#2010-0430 Local Landmark 9. 1308 E. Wayne S. COA#2010-0503-1 East Wayne 10. 302 S. Sunnyside COA#2010-0503C East Wayne 11. 712 Forest Avenue COA#2010-0503D Chapin Park ' B. National Register Nominations: ... 1. City Cemetery <= III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES B. C. D. April 19, 2010 TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report OLD BUSINESS 1. Southhold 2010 Awards 2. HPC Logo OVER V. NEW BUSINESS 1. Chapin Park, Inc. July 24 Energy Audit: Restore Michiana Series VI. ADJOURNMENT .f STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 April 2010 Application Number: 20.10-0406 Property Location: 723 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/.1889/ Property Owner: Rita and J. Patrick ..Lyden Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark &Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Hodson's Castle is an elaborate 2 fi storey Queen Anne with an irregular floor plan set on a foundation built from "Notre Dame" yellow brick. The first storey if finished with narrow wood clapboards while the second storey has rounded and diamond shaped shingles. The two storeys are divided by a belt course of vertical siding and elaborately trimmed. The hip roof has gable dormers along with tower and bays with mansard wrapping around the rear corner. There are detailed carvings at roof edges and dormers. There is a corner tower with overhanging chamfered corner supported by two spindle columns. The window openings are simple double hung sashes with pilaster trim and carved corner blocks. The front door way are panel wood double leaf doors with single light and multi -pane over and below with a stained glass transom ' ALTERATIONS: The tower has been shortened. The verandah was been removed and .replaced with two porches leading to the main entrance and the east side entrance. Roof has been replaced. New K -style gutter were installed and the foundation repaired and reinforced (COA#2009-04460) APPLICATION ITEMS: Install a skylight per attached description. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposed to have SlaTile professionally install a Wasco venting skylight on the rear attic roof of the "Queen Anne" section of the home to provide additional lighting and ventilation. Please see attached diagram and copy of product brochure.. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BuiLDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches {visible from the street} as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property• found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a Cof A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The low reveal of skylight will correspond with the slope of the roof line and will not be noticeable from the street. It will not detract from any of the architectural features of the roof or the house. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Addmss: CountyCity Building, South Bend, lndiaik� 466))1 Phone: 574-135-9798 • Fax; 574.235-9578 - Fanail: SBSJCHI'C(C�rn.st-j(y eph.in.i.t~5 I'Vebsite:,,ti,i%•tvstjosephcotuttyiiidiana.com/si lip/indox.html A Certified Local Government OFFICE [ISE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY I:ilTjUEY,S hrAINFD IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ..ZO/O Application Number Past Reviews: ErYES (Lmteof tnstR ictn) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: l % 2X -2010 (+� Local Landmark [B<ocal Historic District (Name) [:] National Landmark [ ational Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: [:) Denied E] Tabled C] Sent To Committee R Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: �>a4e-L 4vp— Name of Property Owner(s): (Plrasc• Print) t,) Address of Property Owner(s): 6a-'rtQ Ax, d ve_- Contractor(s) Name: J / Contract Company Name: g Cx- - AV cel t j7C Contractor Address:ArML Current Use of Building: -S i�vEgle . t'�i'.�wl lq S i d600 Phone: t '. Ta.mitY Alulti- anvil y - Commercial - Government - Industria? - Vacant -etc.) Type of Building Construction: 0 0 -j�iY\4C_ (Word frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete- Other) Proposed Work: In-kind F� Landscape X New F� Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (mare thv: nrte box may Iv ehoded) Description of Proposed Work: OwnerContr CIO' F t e-mail ` U�✓ � .. 9 ;tiro t. O (This off" a will co esP d unit t I one designee) _ and/or Si tf Ht%rre✓�_ 5irtrttttrr of Contractor _ — APPLICAVON REQUIREMrNTS ARE LISMD ON REVERSE SIDE — a 723 Park Ave James & Rita Lyden Description of Proposed Work: A Wasco Venting skylight is to be installed on the rear of the roof facing the alley. The following work will be completed: * Removing the existing shingles in area where skylight is to be placed. • Remove wood decking in area that skylight will be installed. • Provide and Install a new 22 %" x 38 %" standard Skylight in area specified, • Install Manufactures flashing kit with curb. • Install Ice Shield around Skylight flashing. * Install new shingles in area where shingles were removed for skylight installation. • Tie in new shingle to the new skylight per manufactures specifications and National Roofing Contractors Assoc. recommendations and good standard roofing practices. • Remove all debris from site. Location: The skylight will be placed in an area of the roof that is extremely difficult to see from the street level, it will be impossible to see the skylight from in front of the house and nearly impossible to see it from behind the house either. The sketch below is intended to give you a sense of its location as well as the included photographs. MWA INA �A 0 1 vr oft 0 Q Ass A IN Aw-it A Ems 'ZZ'01 ol- INA �A 0 1 vr oft IN Aw-it A Z �j 4F 1 YL, THE:-,:,, MORE S1 �S K TSf", our eneiv, 6re7ig t per ipugh opening�arid insm i s, tin Ch ose ei ve time than an� 6 the leading brand�, o "r n :Z' Or fiyi d styfes, in standard 'or('C'u"Sto M' s"ae OW r M ....... ....... ... V �'s YT4 r:z '?Y % 0Y, U, P �4 WNW rM 44 1K q "Al j Z �j 4F 1 YL, THE:-,:,, MORE S1 �S K TSf", our eneiv, 6re7ig t per ipugh opening�arid insm i s, tin Ch ose ei ve time than an� 6 the leading brand�, o "r n :Z' Or fiyi d styfes, in standard 'or('C'u"Sto M' s"ae OW r M ....... ....... ... V �'s YT4 r:z '?Y % 0Y, U, P �4 WNW rM 44 1K q "Al "All I "N f "With our budget,'.we; 'want to make sure we can put them, in fast and easy, and this is the window that does the job for us. They just drop right in,". Tommy Silva, CC, "This Old House -7 0,ff 3t_ 7` 1-�T-w...",.y � �A� yd• T`°'*.a'r'%n ,v" ,• ,• ,• w^'+;�w.�..,,,eN, RIGHT OUT OF THE BOX Our energy-efficient E -Cass- Skylights are designed to install ';n less time than any of the leading brands. Our one-piece curb-framei flashing design installs far more quickly and easily rhankylirhts requiring step flashing or mastic Finishes Mi:! 1-nish altl"rznurn is 1anclzrc 01) all A5,chi'ecruril Seras ca qp, , + 1Z) d arA 'pr- o df>ignier color our tnos, c(A,Ns are sho"eyrn bQ10"k" allpfoximaf'dl bv Pralt!rv, inks Copper clac<line is ,,++iWNe on ",Tile utllts, A`V,-YLAKF !14 0MGNER COLM5 &I COPPM CIADDINC. ■ 4 719—m—;�s ---7" MORE DAYLIGHT FOR LESS Our E -Class skylights sit on the deck, giving you a larger glass area per rough opening compared to cornpetitws'skylights, See dimensions and daylight area specs below. 10 YEAR WARRANTY E -CLASS OPTIONS AND ACCESSORIES ELECTRONIC REMOTE-CONTROLLED MOTOR for venting modc!s, Includes rain sensor to auron-a-zicatly close the skylight in bad weather. Any number of skylights, may be controlled from one remote. {multiple motors required. Phase call for details) ALUMINIZED PRIVACY PLEATED 5KYSI-fADE- (for venting or fix,,d models) mounts in the skylight opening Wow the glass. Shades have no side rails, maximizing daylight. WIRELESS REMOTE CONTROL for motorized SkyShzc.e- operation, ALUMINUM TELESCOPIC POLE {6'2" to I0`4") for manual operation of venting skylights. ALUMINUM TELESCOPIC POLE {3' to C or Gto 12') for manual SkyShade- operation Wasco skylights' superior design, workmanship, and weathertight p(r(ormance are backed by a non -prorated, 10 year, limited %-arranry covering, materials, CIP11101la1 S;,ysl-de ca,i be motowed insulated glass and workmanship. Ask for details. 1577 7, E -CLASS— STANDARD SIZES I L11"J, Ll 20 g'7 Openin?K 22 k' 30'1 ' 22';>x 38 22 x 30' 'x307,* 46 1'* x 4G 7'" Model No N/A NIA EV2222 EV2230 E�22�8 EV2246 EV3030 EV3046 EV -11646 N til A 201,x 20'1, 231,11,< 26Y. 20'h x;6',", 20';o x 4.5 2SI, x 2F','. x 44'4 4414 x 44'! . .......... .. Day!.&.t Sq It zari NIA 29S 4.10 525 "'39 5159 8s/ 1393 ....... ... ... . . . .................... fix — 7— Model No, EF1430__,,, '._Er'1446 T EF2222 EF2230 EF2233 EF2246 EF3030 EF3046' EF4646 ... . . .... .... ................ ......... ..... - . ........ A,ea ffla5s) 3','- x 207, 13 x 45 21 `1, x 21'b 21 Ax 29'3. 21'1, x 37 i, 21 x 4"'A 29'18 x 29 27';°, x 4S 1> 4S";, x 45, b SQ. Ft. Qja:>) D5 11 IT" 4-27 45 062 58 1) ;.13 34.1 .. . ..... ... - ------ . .. ..... ......... ....... . ........ ........ .. . . . . ...... Modd z3o Ix oderedz3 H -4(3D. the fir,*,mcn,,^nrmral" I to cxh4dy,r 11 3 ' .. AT tj �''�;e,,;�r A �� •� " `fit t�r� " :.. ow 4,Ni y "y r• �� y � d°tp'3 �•/ 3'e:���+ `'d..•,.'."a,{ §'*, 'i :•,.=, iib �'r_}> Oil- ' .s+. » .i.!'W > >-'� v�� .e <.'�'�4. �..vst �"r"e .; ,,.. Z '%'�`'-'t ..<, «. � .•r .,,. . '��JPN''. t.}..:w.: e. .T :..;.:::3. , rw a46 723 Park Ave. April 5, 2010 I 723 Park Ave. April 5, 2010 ✓' STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 12, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0412 Property Location: 345 S. Sunnyside Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neoclassical/1953 Property Owner: Richard Cullar & Sandra Weides Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating:Non-Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 2 storey frame house with rectangular plan. I storey gable wing with window and roof skylight. Attached 2 car, single door garage. Side gable roof with asphalt shingles. Double and triple casement windows, triple casement has central stationary window; wood trim around windows with ornamental louvered shutters. Large wood siding on second storey over vertical wood siding on first. Central pediment entry with concrete stoop, flanked by wood columns. Flat roof canopy rear entry with concrete stoop and metal railing and supports. Simple brick corbelled chimney. ALTERATIONS: Replacement siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: Take down 3 pear trees next to driveway in southeast front yard. These trees were stuck there by prior owner as left over inventory (he was a landscaper), and they dump 100's of pears on the ground each fall and are inconveniently located right next to the driveway, making it awkward to get in the car. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner wishes to remove 3 pear trees on south side of driveway because in the fall the pears litter the area, making it difficult to access the car. Per Brent Thompson, City Forester, "Pear by house is too close and pear by sidewalk planted under maple could be removed. Maybe save the middle pear or replace." STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wayne Street: 1. THE ENVIRONIti1ENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings, sidewalks or streets that arc causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. As much natural vegetation as possible should be preserved. If large shrubs become unsightly to the point of detracting from the historic character of the house or site, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and diseased material should be selectively removed. Trees and major landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. The curb height should be sufficient to maintain adequate drainage of the street. If older light fixtures are taken down in the city, they should be reserved for use in the historic district. Light fixtures on top of the brick pillars at the Eddy Street entryway should be replaced according to these standards. B. BUILDING SITE.,, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing; surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of removal of the 2 pear trees as suggested by City Forester. Middle pear tree may be removed only if replaced with an acceptable tree species from attached listing provided by City Forester. Application -FOR- C'erti'ficate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Buflding, South Bend, Indiana 44601 Phone: 574-235-9M • Fax: 574-235-95713 • Email: SB5JCH1'C@co.st joseph.in.us Website: http://%vwws# osephcountyindianacom/s chp/index,htmI OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received l,? fit' -4k., -Z 4016 /� Application Number �,0f ©- 4,V1 2- Past Reviews: y YES (Date of fast Rrriew)IM5 --U If 111A- [] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: [] Local Landmark cal Historic District (Name) k National Landmark n National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: F] Denied [] Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee [j Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work; 3 ! - .�v.+ny1i�� 14vt ilc J 0Lor-vft _771' W %� % % Street Number and Street, Nam Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) /i t Cfi't rd i cra<d Va rid v -_r Address of Property Owner(s): Y -r - .V .rnrrt-rrtcr vC Contractor(s) Name: IVA- �;����L _ Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: c� City: �~ t Phone:» 7 - Current Use of Building:h�t�� t�Arst�l (SingleFantily— Multi-Farnify — ConmercW— G nmment — Industrial —Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: I*iP$r�" ilk4 C (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind ® Landscape [] New n Replacement (not in-kind) (] Demolition (more than one ins may be drnked) / % De iption of Propos d Work: w m r 7r,,r, 4rx7' cf 1' iVr Wa". !N -0 a7Ji m-r7- �j - 16^7 xAd. Propos 7fr4v Wrrr STdt 7'rhrvr c?w.rr Al lr -CSV*Y I V.- UTAJ Q. F S w Y / h> rjr�t lOt7 'r Id ref VJ d tl rd Jr o d Vol INCdNVrrt;r►A 1 /0 -7,1 .r;,,17 ArXT 7`+o � / if r {(r�;tra} ,� t r� 7 6&6 7� r,-7 rrf M '��-�J �canerr ontractor. Fax: S 7 y". t�r t�..7�c� e-mail lS�c vl hit rP /7.. w. ce'n tuill mrmsp and with only one designee) and/or - — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — fes„ , •}:.......,-�-.. '^., i' 8 9 �..✓p ,c ��'n, - ,a �: : an!: A " 2 .� .. a�,.r x" ,% • fir.-«µ. *al°"�*: - ate ^i4 ,"ec" •'��SAD� �`+. ami ,# :i.,3's�^."F7�'x <,,,✓�'� 4�ax �• � ""• ��'�• Y��"t ;�9 &''� 3 L P" ;�, .-•a}t.'°'� V i f N^"s'.✓ �.t j'•, , C'q.�; � '1 ;+- Y„#( � `*„ � '�O „�� 4da��'°"• 'd:� ;y: -, i � � ..:>s ' i . e`=.' P'(,�ar '-p tf"�S, `}�-�',s'' x �'aa •°/''�:�'Y-/'°_ , ?• .. , v + ::,,+. i.4.� Wi d' <'.•'i �•1• `. ,}-✓ �`,d ^, ..:, -i any: " •".i , ` PAT �» i a�y i .��'6 .•`�r•'`� + � ,k,.,k .:tom.-»•,•.i. +.:.;-., �,>-yWk.� :Aaa •� �'�;,:re,,'„�Kr, �,;.✓Mga,i s S '� y ✓v"r . , [ [aLs i �,;'�... aa�+'%.,, � A F4'r$ ^'i d "�a ,.' N � �n � � � �� �� �� e' .. SO 46 'Aa fj '`5'.+.'•t %°:�„a;, �'. .�.,+",h ... '” ';."s.'. ''; l °r yid —•-• .5�,.g.�.kp �s, � < • ,,,�A`M% "°`'m'.,.,�". a `• y 3 s ten• �,. „ ,, � �:.• „,ate. .�„ 345 Sunnyside, April 15, 2010 ° � �. Nee 1 of I Catherine Hostetler - Re: 345 S. Sunnyside From: "Brent Thompson" <BTHOMPSO@southbenclin.gov> TO: "Catherine Hostetler" <CHOSTETL@co.st-joseph.in.us> Date: 4/13/2010 1:57 PM Subject: Re: 345 S. Sunnyside Attachments: IMG-1062.1pg; IMG-1063.jpg I would say that the Pear by the house is to close to the house and the Pear by the Sidewalk planted under the Maple tree could be removed. Maybe save the middle Pear or make replace the middle Pear tree. See attached pictures. Thanks >>> "Catherine Hostetler" <CHOSTETL@co.st-joseph.in.us> 4/13/2010 11:23 AM >>> Hi, Brent. The homeowner would like to remove 3 pear trees next to his driveway in the southeast front yard. The fruit is becoming a nuisance and the trees close proximity to the drive is making it difficult for the homeowner getting into the car. Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you, Catherine Director, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana 574 235 9798 IMPORTANT NOTICE ! This E -Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E -Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E -Mail in error please immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E -Mail address. The table below fists street trees that can be planted in Souls Bend The table below is for reference only Trees size Mature height less than 35ft appropriate for under power lines, 35ft to 45ft may be compadbie with power lines if wires are high enough Canopy Density Open, Moderate or Dense. Open canopy will allow more sunlight through than a tree with dense canopy Urban Stress Tolerance tolerance to urban stresses such as air pollution, poor drainage, compacted soil & drought Salt Tolerance H -High, M -Moderate, L -Low and S -Sensitive (relative tolemce to aerosol salt spray) Growth Rate S -Slow (12 yrs), M -Moderate (12"-24" yrs) and F -Fast (24"+ yrs) Life Rate Long (+-50yrs) intermediate "Inter" (up to 50yrs) and Short (up to 30yrs) ' Highest recommended trees Revised 4-26-45 Tree Species Minium Height Spread Canopy Fall Urban Stress Salt Growth Rate Sun/Shade Tree Lawn Density Color Tolerance Life Span Requirements Aider Black (Abrus giutlnose) 48" 40'-80' 20'-40' Moderate None High M F/Inter ' Bald Cypress 72" 60'-80' 20'-45' Dense Bronze High • M F/Long BlackgurnOack Tupelo 60" 40'-74' 30'-45' Moderate Orange/ited Intermediate M S/Long ' Birch River (Heritage) 48" 40'-60' 40'-50' Dense Yellow Intermediate L F/Inter Birch (White Banded Himalayan) 48" 35'-50' 25-40' Dense Yellow Intermediate L F/Inter Buckeye Yellow 72" 60'-75' 30'-35 Dense OrglYellow M M/Lang Caroline Silverbell 36' 2a'-40' 15-35 Open Yellow intermediate M h'l•1nter • Cherry (Kwanzan Oriental) 36" 25'-35' 20'25' Moderate OrgJBrwn Low L -M M/Short "Cherry (Canada Red or Shubert Chokecherry) 36" 20'•30' 15'-20' Moderate Mat red purple Low M -H MlShort Cherry (Big Cis Sand) 36" 12'-15' 10'-12' OrgJRed F/Short Cherry (Acoo:ade Flowing) 36" 30'-40' 25'-35' Open None Intermediate F/Short Cherry (Columnar Sargent) 36" 30'-40' 12'-1$' Dense Org/Red/Yeliow Intermediate M Ftinter ' Corktree (Macho Amur) 48" 35'-45 30'-40' Open Yellow High M M/Long Corktree (ShademasterAmur) 48" 35.40' 35'-40' Moderate Yellow High NU • Crabapple (Sugar Tyme) 36" 16'-20' 14'-1f> Moderate Yellow Inter -Nigh H FAnter ' Crabapple (Centurion) 36" 20-25' 15'-20' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H S4WInter • Crabapple (Prairifire) 36" 15'20' 15'-20' Moderate Bronze Inter -High M -H Flinter • Crabapple (Harvest Gold) 36" 20 -25' 15'20' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H S -Minter • Crabapple (Donald Wyman) 36" 18'-22' 15'22' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H "/Inter • Crabapple (Cardinal) 36" 15.20' 18'-22' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H F/Inter • Crabapple (Red Jewel) 36" 14'-16* 10'441 Moderate variable Inter -High M -Ii S-Mftnter • Crabapple (Spring Snow) 36" 25'-30' 15' 20' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H S-Mitnter • Crabapple (Sargent) 36" 10'-15' 10'-15' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H S-41/inter `Crabapple (Lollipop) 36" 10'-12' 10'-12' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H S-M/Inter ' Crabapple (Adams) 36" 20`24' 181-2V Moderate variable Inter -High H F/Inter • Crabapple (Royal Raindrops) 36" 1,7-20* 15-20' Moderate Orange/Red Inter -High H M/Inter ' Crabapple (Redbud Zumi) 36" 20'-25' 25'-30' Moderate variable Inter -High M -H S -Monter ' Crabapple (Winter Gold) 36" 20-25' 15'-20' Moderate Brown Inter -High M -H S-M/tnter `Dogwood (Kousa) 36" 20'-30' 20'-30' Moderate Red Intermediate M F/Inter `Dogwood (Aurora Stellar Series) 36" 2(r-25' 20-25' Moderate Red Intermediate M Fllnter Full/Part Shade Full Full/Pirt Shade FulltPart Shade FuIVPart Shade Full FuWart Shade Full 'Full Full Full Futi Full/Part Shade Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Full Part Shade Part Shade Tree Species Minium Height Spread Growth Rate Tr" Lawn Density Color Dogwood (Ruth Ellen) 36- 201-25 201-25* Dawn Redwood 72" 70'-100' 25'-40' * Elm Hybrid (Homestead) 72- 501-60* 35'-45* * Elm Hybrid (Pioneer) 72" 501-60, 501-60, I Elm (Lacebark) 72- 50* -75 30'-75 Elm (Dynasty Lacebark) 72' 50'-70* 501-W Elm (Ohio Lacebark) 72" 501-60, 40'-50' * Elm (Allee Lacebark) 72" 50* -75' 40* -55' Elm (Prospector) 72" 45* -56 40*.50' Elm (Frontier Hybrid) 60* 40'-5O' 25* -36 Elm (Regal Hybrid) 72" 55* -65! 40'-57 Elm (Sapporo Autumn Gold Hybrid) 72" 55* -70' 50* -60' Elm (Urban Hybrid) 60" 501-60' 35* -45' Elm (Danada. Charm Hybrid) 60' 601-70, 5-01-64' "Elm (American Liberty) 72" 80*400* 60* -817 Gingko (Lakeview fruitless) 60, 451-55, 25-35' Gingko (Autumn fruitless) 60, 45--55' 30'40' * Gingko, (Princeton Sentry fruitless) 60" 551-65* 25-30' Gotdenrain Tree 60* 26-40* 25-49 Hawthorn (Crusader/Cockspurr thornless) 36" 16-20, 20* -25 Hawthorn (Downy) 36" 20* -25' 151-20* Hawthorn (Ohio Pioneer Dotted) 36" 20'.25' 20'-25* Hawthorn (Washington) 313" 20'-30' 20'-30' Hawthorn (Winter King Green) 315" 25* -30* 25'30' Hawthorn (Vaughn) 36* 201-30, 26-35' Hardy Rubber tree W 40* -60' 40* -60' HachberTy (Prairie Pride) 60" 40'-50' 40* -50' Hachberry (Magnifica) 72* 50'-60, 501-60, • Honeylocust (Skyline) 48" 45'.70' 35* -45' • Honeylocust (imperial thornless) 48" 30-40 35!45' Honeyiovust (Moraine) 4z. 69-70' 501-6t}, Honeylocust (Sunburst thornless) 48. 301-36 N!A Honeylocust (Shademaster) 48" 40* -60* 30'-40' • Hornbeam (American) 36" 20'-40* 20* -30' Hcrnbeam (Fastigiate European) 36" 30,40, 20* -30' Horsechestnut Baumann COrnrr= 72' 601-70* 45* -55' * Horsechestnut Ruby Red so, 30* -45' 30* -45' Hickory 727 60'-801 NIA Katsura Tree 60* 40'-60* 201-40, * Kentucky Coffeetree 72' 55* -75' 45* -55* Canopy Fail Urban Stress Salt Growth Rate Sun/Shade Density Color Tolerance Life Sp3n, Requirements Moderate Red Intennediate M FlInter Part Shade Open Ycllow,Org Intermediate 10 F/Long Full!Part Shade Open Yellow High M F/Inter Full/Part Shade Open Yellow High M FtInter FulltPart Shade Moderate Red/Yellow High M F/Long rull[Part Shade Moderate RedNellow High .10 R'Long FullIPart Shade Moderate Red[vellow High M FA-cng Fuil,'Part Shade Moderate RedfYellow High M MI/Long Fult'Part Shade Moderate Yellow High F/ Moderate Burgundy High M FINIA FulliPart Shade Moderate Burgundy High M F/N!A FuILTart Shade Moderate Burgundy HIC"n 10 F/NIA Fullipaft Shade Moderate Burgundy High M FNIA Fu!l.,?art Shade Moderate Yellow High M F/N,1A FullrPart Shade Moderate Yellow High M F/Inter FuIVPart Shade Mode -ate Yella,ri High M Ml-ong Full/Part Shade Moderate Yellow High &I MILong Fu%'Part Shade Moderate Yellow High M F11-ong Full/Part Shade Open Yellow Intermediate M F/Inter Full Dense Org1purple High S,M! Full Moderate None High L Full Moderate CopperlYellow High L fAlinter Full Moderate Red[Gold High L MILong Full Moderate Org/Scarlet High H S1 Full Dense Yellcw!Green High H. NVInter Full/PartShade Moderate Yellow High L4A F/Long FulllPart Shade Moderate Yellow High F/Long Full Ptart Shade Open Yellow Intermediate M MILong Full Open Yellow Intermediate H F/Long Full Open Yellow intermediate M F/Long Full Open Yellow Intermediate M F/Long Full Open Yellow Intermediate M M/Inter FuIVPnrt Shade Moderate OrgMedNellcw High S S,MAnter FulUPart Shade Dense Yellow High NIA $tinter FullJ'Part Shade Dense Yellow Intermediate M Mil-ong Full Dense Yellow Intermediate M S11-ong Full Moderate Yellow S,!Long FuIVPart Shade Moderate Yellow/Orange Intermediate M F/Long Full/Part Shade Open Yellow High M SfLonq Full Tree Species Minium Height Spread Canopy Fall Urban Stress Salt Growth Rate Sun/Shade Tree Lawn Density Color Tolerance Life Span Requirements *Lilac (Ivory Silk Japanese tree) 36" 20'-30' i5'-20' Dense RedlNo Color Intermediate fit Winter Full Lilac (Summer Snow Japanese Tree) 36" 20'-26 24:25' Dense None Intermediate M Winter Full mac (Regent Japanese t^ee) 36" 25-30' 15'-20' Dense None Intermediate M M/Inter Full "Linden American (Greenspire Uttleleaf) 4&" 50'-70' 30'-45' Dense Yellow Intermediate L M/Long . FulitPartShade * Linden (Littleleaf) 48" 60'-80' 35'-55' Dense Yellow intermediate L M/Long FulltPart Shade * Linden (Redmond American) 48" 50'-70' 30'-45' Dense Yellow Intermediate L M/Long FulltPart Shade ` Linden (Glenieven Littleleaf) 48" 50'•70' 35'-50' Dense Yellow intermediate L M/Long FulltPart Shade "Linden (Sterling Silver) 48" 45'-70' 30'-55' Dense Yellow intermediate H M/Long Full/Part Shade Magnolia (Cucumbertree) W. 50'-70' 35'-55' Dense Bnmze/Yetlow High M F/Long FuIVPart Shade Magnolia (Star) M. 10'-20' 10'-15' Moderate Yellow Intermediate H Siinter Fuli/Part Shade Magnolia (Merrill) 36" 25'-40' 25'-40' Open Yellow Intermediate H Writer Full/Part Shade Mamolia(Galaxy) 36" 30'-50' 10'-15' Open Yellow/Brown Intermediate H F/Shod FutliPartShade Maple Amur 36" 15-20' 15'-20' Dense Red intermediate M Monter Both * Maple Hedge 36" 25-40' 25'-40' Dense Yellow High M -H S1lnter Full/Part Shade Maple (Armstrong Freeman) 48' 50'-60' 20=25' Moderate Yellow High L Ffinter FulVPart Shade Maple Paperbark 36' 25'-35 15'-30' Moderate Red.Org,Yel Intermediate S Slinter Bath Maple (Autumn Blaze Freeman) M. 50'-60' 40'-50' Dense Orange, Red High H F/ Full/Part Shade Maple (Celebration Freeman) 60' 45'-65' 25-40' Dense Red/Gold High F/Long Full/Part Shade Maple (Scarlet Sentinel Freeman) 60` 50170' 25135' Moderate Red/Yellow High Ff Full/Part Shade * Maple (Black/Sugar) 60" 60'-80' 40' 70 Dense Org/Red/Y eitow Intermediate L M/ Full/Part Shade * Maple (Greencolumn Black) 60" 50'-80' 20'-30' Apricot intermediate H S1 Full/Part Shade Maple (Norway) W. 40'-75' 30'-60' Yellow/Brown High FuIVPart Shade * Maple (Cleveland Norway) 60" 45'-55' 301-35 Dense Yellow High FullfPart Shade * Maple (Columnar Norway) 48" 501460' 15' 20' Dense Yellow High S/Long FuiVPart Shade * Maple (Crimson #Ong Norway) 60" $545' 25'-35 Dense Brown Intermediate F/Long FulflPart Shade " Maple (Crimson Sentry Norway) 48" 35-40' 25-30 Dense Red/Gold H Maple (Deborah Norway) 60' 55-&5' 45-55' Dense Yellow High FA(Plart Shade Maple (Emerald Lustre Norway) 60" 55'-65' 50'-60' Dense Yellow High F1 Full/PartShade Maple (Emerald Queen Norway) 60` 60'-75' 50'-60' Dense Yellow High F/ Full/Part Shade Maple (Parkway Norway) 60* 40'-50' 26-35 Dense Yellow High F/ Full/Part Shade Maple (Superfomm Norway) 60" 501-W 49-45 Dense Yellow High F/ Full/Part Shade Maple (Red) 60" 57-75! 30-60' Moderate Red/YeHow F/ * Maple Red ( Red Sunset) 60" 45'•50' 35'-40' Moderate OrangelRed High S F/inter FuIVPart Shade * Maple (Armstrong Red) 48- 50'-60' 201-251 Moderate Orange/Red High F/ Maple (Autumn Flame Red) W. 45'-W 35'-45' Red F/ • Maple (Autumn Blaze Red) 60" 50'-60' 30'-40' Red Intermediate H F/ FulWart Shade ` Maple (October Glory Red) 60" 50'-60' 40'-50' Moderate Red Intermediate F/ Full/Part Shade Maple (Bonfire Sugar) 60" 50'-70' 40'-60' Intermediate M/Long FuIVPart Shade • Maple (Commemoration Sugar) 60" 50'-60' 30'35' Dense Org/Pink/Red intermediate S M/Long Full/Part Shade * Maple (Goldspire Sugar) 48" 40'-50' 12'-15' Dense Yellow Low S M/Long FullIPart Shade Tree Species Minium Height Spread Canopy 5211 Urban Stress Salt Growth Rate Sun,'Shade Tree Lawn Density Color Tolerance Life Span Requirements Maple (Malesty Sugar) 60" 45* -50* 30* -40* Dense OrgfRed Intermediate H M/Long Full/Part Shade *Maple (Legacy Sugar) 60" 50'-601 30'�35 Dense Orgillink/Red Intermediate S M/Long FullfPart Shade • Maple (Fairview Sugar) 60- so* -60' 40* -50' Dense Orange Intermediate M/Long Full/Part Shade • Maple (Steeple Sugar) 'a. 40* -45' I5'20' Dense Yellowl0range Intermediate M S[Long Full/Part Shade • Maple (Tatarian) 36" 15* -251 151-25' Dense YellowlRed High M M/Long Full/Part Shade • Oak English (Fastigiate) 48" 501-60, 15' 20' Moderate Bronze High M MlLong Full Oak English (Skyrocket) 46" 45-60' 14'-17' Moderate Bronze High M %I'Long Full Oak English (Attention) 48* 501-60, 14!-17' Moderate Bronze High M tAtLong Full Oak English (Shademaster) 48' 5a-601 36-49 Dense Bronze H:gh ki'l-ong Full Oak (812ck) 72' W-801 NIA Bronze High /Long Full Oak (Sawtooth) 72' 40'-50' 35* -55, Dense None High %1-ong FulVPart Shade `Oak (Northern Red) 771. 60'-80, 45'-65' Dense Red High M F/Long Full * Oak (Our) 72" 70* -90* 60"01 Dense Dull Yellow High ki MX11-ong Full * Oak (Shumard) 72' 60'-80* 45* -65' Open Scarlet High M FtLong Full * Oak (White) 72" 8o'-100' 60* -80' Moderate Red Intermediate M &Mang FuIVPart Shade Oak Pin 72- 55'-75' 40'-55 Moderate Bronze/Red Intermediate S -L 1711.ong Full * Oak (Shingle) 72" 40* -65* 40* -60' Dense Red/Yellow Intermediate M S-MILong FullfPart Shade * Oak (Swampwhlte) 72" 601-80* 50'.70' Moderate Bronze Intermediate L -M M/Long Full/Part Shade Pagodatree (or Scholar tnae) 48* 40'-70' 40'-70' Moderate Yellow High M MILong Fu!I Parrotia Persian 36' 20* -49 15`-30' Yellmy,'Orange M/Short Pear (Cattery Aristocrat) 36" 35-45' 30'-40' Moderate Red High M F/Inter Full Pear (Callery Cleveland Select) 36" 35* -40' 151-20, Dense Red High M FlInter FullfPart Shade Pear (Callery Redspire) 36" 40'-45' 27-30' Dense Red High M Flinter Full/Part Shade Pear (Dancer Omamentnl) 35* 301-35, 20* -25' Dense Flinter Full/Part Shade • Pear (Autumn Blaze Calley) 36- 35* -45 20'-30' Dense Red/Orange Intermediate FAnter FulltPart Shade • Pear (Chanticleer) 36, 35* -40' 17-201 Dense SoldtRedtPurpit High M Ffinter Full • Pear (Capital Gallery) 36- 35'-40' 101-15, Dense Ped/Purple Intermediate Flfnter FuIVPart Shade • Pear (Whitehouse Callery) 36" 35* -40' 15'20' Dense Ped/Purple Intermediate F/Inter Fult/Part Shade • Pear (Korean Sun) 36" I5'-20' 15* -20* Dense RedtPurple Intermediate H F/Inter Fult,?art Shade • Planetree (Liberty London) 72" 70'-80' 57-65, Dense Yellown3rwn High M FiInter Full * Planetree (Boodgood London) 72" 70* -80' 551-65, Dense Yellow High M FlInter Full Planetree (Columbia London) 72' 50'-1801 40'-66 Dense Yeliaw[Brown High H I'AlLong FulVPart Shade * Redbud Eastern 48" 25'-30* 25'-30* Moder-ate Yellow LOW S. F/Short Full/Part Shade Scholartree, (Regent) 37 401-50, 30'-40' Yellow Intermediate H F/ Full Semricebeay (Autumn Brilliance) 3-3- 20* -25' 16-18, Moderate OrangePRed LOW S, FIShort Full.Part Shade * Serviceberry (Tradition) .36. 20'-25' 15'-25* Moderate Org,RedYeI Intermediate /inter FullfPart Shade Serviceberry (Cumulus) 36" 26-30, 12'-18' Moderate Org,Red.Yel Anter Fu%'Part Shade Serviceberry (Robin Hill) 36' 27-25 I2'-16 Moderate Org,Red,Yel Intermed' -ate /inter Full/Part Shade Sourwood =-50, 20'-30' Dense Yellow/Orange Intermediate M S-MJ]nter FuIVPart Shade Sycamore (American) 8ol-100, 60* -70' Dense Yellow M Fil-ong Full loll a Tree Species • Sweetgum Sweetgum (Moraine) Sweetgum (Gold Dust) Tuliptree Turkish Hazel or Filbert Yeliowwood Zelkova Ml lage Green Japanese) Zelkova (Green Vase Japanese) Zelkova (Halka Japanese) Zelkova (Village Green) NOT RECOMMENDED TREES Ash Boxelder Black Locust Black Walnut Bradford Pear Black Cherry Basswood Birch (White) Crabapple (W"Uiout disease resistance) Catalpa Conifers (Any) Cottonwood Elm (American) Elm (Chinese) Elm (Siberian) Ginkgo (Female) Mulberry Mintum Height Spread Canopy Fall Urban Stress Salt Growth Rate Sun/Shade Tree Lawn Density Color Tolerance Life Span Requirements 72" 50'-75' 40'-65' Moderate RedNeliow Intermediate 14 F/inter Full/Part Shade 72" 56-65 40'-50' Moderate RediYellow intermediate M F/Inter Full/Part Shade 72" 551-65 40* -45' Moderate Red/Yellow Intermediate M Fllnter FuiVPartShade 72" 79-¢0' 35'-50' Open Yellow Low S F/Long Full/Part Shade 72" 45=60' 25'-35 Dense Yellow/Purple High S hill-ong Full 72" 35'-50' 40'-55• Moderate Copper/Yeitow intermediate M Minter FuiVPartShade 72" 50'-60' 40'-60' Moderate OrgtRed/Yeilow High M F/Long Full 72" 60'-70' 50'-55' Moderate OrglRed/Yeilow High M MILong Full 72' 60'-70' 35'-45' Moderate Org/Red/Yellow High M M/Long Full 72' 50'-60' 40'-50' Moderate Org/Red/Yeliow High M M/Long Full Pine (Scoter) Pine (White) Poplar (Caroline) Poplar (Lombardy) Poplar (Silver) Poplar (White) Russian -Olive Sprue (Blue) Spruce (Norway) Spruce (Any) Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus) Willows (Any) . Any weeping or pendulous branches Nut -bearing trees Mountain Ash Maple (Sliver) Osage -Orange A transplanted tree draws all of its moisture from the root ball for the first few months. The root ball can dry out in a few days though surrounding soils remain moist. Studies have show that height growth of transplanted trees may triple if a turf free area as small as 2ft by 2ft is left around the base. If the turf free area is approximately 90ft by 20ft, the height growth may increase by as much as six times the height of the same tree with turf growing up to the base of the tree. A transplanted tree takes about one year for every inch of trunk diameter. A smaller tree will establish quickly and grow rapidley enough to catch up to a larger tree, which struggles longer to replace its larger root system and grows slowly. Research has shown that an 811t circle of mulch property applied under young trees can quadruple tree root densities when compared young trees growing with turfgr,ss I' competition and no mulch. Sec. 19-17 Tree and Lawn area regulations a) Standards for planting trees and shrubs. 1. Tree Species- The Board of Park Commissioners, or Superintendent of Parks develops and maintains a list of desirable trees for planting along streets in three size classes; small, medium, and large. All trees planted in such areas shall be of healthy stock, not less than 2 inches in caliper. 2. Spacing – The spacing of tree and lawn area trees and shrubs will be in accordance with the three species size classes listed in the re—commended species of trees list. No tees may be planted closer together than the following: small trees, 20 feet; medium trees, 30 feet; large trees, 35 feet; except in special plantings designed or approved by the Board of Park, Commissioners. .3. Utilities- No tree and lawn area trees other than those species listed there in as small trees may be planted under or within 10 lateral feet of any overhead utility wire or over or within 5 lateral feet,of any underground water line, sewer line, transmission line, or other utility.. 4. .Distance from curb and sidewalk The distance that tree and lawn area trees and shrubs may be planted from curbs 'or curb lines and sidewalks will be in accordance with the three species size classes listed above. (19-17 C-2) No tree or shrub in such areas of street intersections shall be planted less than 15 feet from the intersection of the curbs. No person shall plant trees within 6 feet of a fire hydrant or in ' such manner as to obstruct the view of any street light, traffic sign, signal device or street intersection. (Code 1962,38-17,19) INTO tree and lawn area tree and shrub maybe planted closer to any curb or sidewalk than the following: small. trees, 2 feet; medium trees, 3 feet; large trees, 4 feet 5. Hedge or Shrubbery- No hedge or shrubbery planted in the tree and lawn area shall be permitted to grow more than 3 feet in height. 6. The hole should be twice the diameter of root ball and at the depth of the root flare of the free. The trees should be planted and watered in. The backfill materials should be the soil taken from the hole. The tree should not be stacked when planted unless tree is unstable. The rope and burlap should be removed from the top of the ball and the top rung of the basket should be removed below grade. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 13, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0413 Property Location: 830 N. Michigan Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 20`h century functional/1913 Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark in a Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Utilitarian structure with a cylindrical footprint. Brick construction with limestone trim at top. ALTERATIONS: none APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolition of round suction reservoir in back of North Station. This reservoir has had no useful function for 60 to 70 years. A careful demolition would free bricks for main_ building restoration. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The City of South Bend Water Works would like to remove the suction reservoir that is located in the back of the North Pumping Station. "It has been out of use for over 70 years and has no practical value to the South Bend Water Works", per John Wiltrout, Director of Water Treatment for the City. Within the last six months, the City has made masonry and roof repairs which revealed further building; maintenance issues and they must consider the costs. Therc is deterioration along circumference and the walls are bulging and uneven. The structure has been rc- pointed with N type mortar instead of lime putty and there is efflorescence as a result. Furthermore, the rebar reinforcement of the sunken concrete roof is rusting. During demolition, the City intends to salvage the bark -faced 8" masonry units that are no longer in production, as they arc the same bricks used on the main building. The surplus realized from the deconstruction of the suction reservoir will allow use of the salvaged masonry to restore the main building. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leeper Park 9.0 Landscapes — Standards and Criteria for Leeper Park 9.1 Introduction 3. The standards and criteria acknowledge that there will be changes to the landscape and are intended to make the changes sensitive to the historic character of the landscape. 4. Each property will be separately studied to determine if a later addition(s) and/or alteration(s) can, or should, be removed. 5. Since it is not possible to provide one general guideline, the following factors that will be considered in determining whether a later addition(s) and/or alteration(s) can, or should, be removed include: a. Compatibility with the original property's integrity in scale, materials and character. b. Historic association with the property. c. Quality in design and execution of the addition/alteration. d. Functional usefulness. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Croup B Standards D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of deconstruction of the suction reservoir so that bark -faced 8" masonry units can be salvaged for future use on main building restoration. The building has had no functional usefulness for over 70 years and would be very costly to repair. Per Group B Standards, measured drawings and documentation by the demolition agency is encouraged for future reference and possible reconstruction. V A 2 9: 31n'4�7d2359578 HPC SOUTH BEND No. 2192 pt1': 1 132 7 Application N� j71N1� 3 7 -for- p,sr Cert!flcate of Appropriateness Hutorir Pruervstior. Cemmmion ofSouth Bend ,& St. Jostplt County s: 125 South Lafaycitc Bouict3td tis s Mailing addrs = 227 Wect Jefferson Blvd -South Bcnd IN 46501.1830. 't i'hcac_ 210-231-9798 fiat: 114.233-0171 wftAlt: ktut,enrt M,s�.,.jtiia.•r ' Walw3t�btl�ltwtrtritj,M.}i�tni��lS�l•tSM.•ifi;rjt�}ArJt�tJitn,l A CzrtSfir$ Lout Gwcrnmtnt u xra eeti}aaatt IIO. "m Ct?MFt3?TL ANY, i? MUDS CONTA1NY.a IN T Rt S t3ueRaGet►ed %3�-�'`� . 1i�� ADCtttadoa ttts�ber: �9�-„��%��� .�� D tiU SatIIA(+�txa'ai /UtboriYc6 Ay`__..... TRIC. 1Yjtt¢Necmmhajoni'tctfr,avita; } {yyt Iwrtafiandmcrk�,�`j'�t}' �� � � Kartan.ltnndn+ark � ❑ 7fsti"A Reamer P114 tie. M- T • � Larai Htrtede btstNct �.,�: ��v C ui Elb+*IaQ T4bje! D SastTACnIkMISIe! Aura =cd and ix+ac! _,,, Im. ” IlAddrets of Property fur proposed %serk: 1 1. City: ptv:rtr'elshone NO: 51t'y0 ' t`ittnt of Property OaneT(s}:�,c.�n t ,A Address otPra t Omar: CaWiLeter(s) avatar: Coniraet Company Nit ,N� %/ rt Contrfittor"dretc; 7 �t 1. t'r City: Contrsttar's rhoot No: ctrrrcnl tine ot'Buitdt'ng:; • ���ti'*�{V•HW�t•iMt{r.C�+�..f�lt3. Gi�+nnemFr l.t>1Rr�t. Wce>rr-yr, . Type of Butldlrk Constrvttion:+D'�-' rv.Mntar.b!{,4•J?q+:.ar,.r. p.a..Ot+*ct Procaed Work: � Inkind � LsndsctpE � Ncv- a PApjNcemettto,.rw4o ' L3.} i)Cltltrtilian - •7attcrip60n of PropoxedWotk: �iN" 0� i rcc d ttt� i t �._......a�r'i'�".. -.cl�' itM.. A@AeAJllut 4isw�. _..... fat 10 �UAA,. A y i%t6talea •Kfi -88 = srtotF4 n; v . A &�aY 5t;,matnr4r ., 6i8r!�turant���tr.ctor . AMIMION MQUIRT-M.Vi-f9 AXE Lt3711) ON AtVZXSE SID1✓. John Wiltrout Director of Water Treatment 830 N. Michigan South Bend, IN 46601 574.235.5670 jwiltrotiii',,soutlibendiC,n.(,ov I., Catherine I losteder, Director Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph Co. 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. South Bend. In 46601 Re: North Station Suction Resemoir Demolition Catherine, The City of South Bend Water Works seeks permission to demolish the suction well reservoir located on the property northeast of the North Pumping Station at 8307\. Michigan. In the last six months, the have made masonry anti roof repairs whichrevealed further building maintenance issues. We will continue restoration of the North Pumping Station but must also consider the costs. We would appreciate historic preservation's assistance in the varied aspects of this responsibility. The suction well reservoir has been out of use fior over 70 years and has no practical value to the South Bend Water Works. Because the suction well was constructed with the same historic bark -faced 8" masonry units as the main building, the demolition of the suction well would allow us to use the salvaged masonry to restore the main building. We ask Historic Preservation for a favorable recommendation to abandon the water suction reservoir, Thank you for your consideration. ReT dL I •�X� jollI X Nriltrout �C'Cx� c"Okc M, NO 5085 Z-1 November 20, 2009 ROOFING AND RESTORATION, INC. 1703 South Ironwood • South Bend, IN 46613 Catherine D. Hostetler, Director Historic preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph Co. 125 S Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, In 46601 Phone: 574.235-9798 Fax. 5-74-235-9578 Re: South Bend Historic Water Works Structure Restoration Catherine: Phone 574/233-7485 Fax 574/233-7531 slatileog comcast.net The historic masonry brick work- on the main structure building is in. need of restoration. Many of the historic standard sized 8" bark faced masonry units are fractured and in need of replacement. Tile ornate architecture and ekceptional quality of this structure mandates exact matching of the masonry units that require replacement. These high quality obsolete masonry units, in my professional opinion, would be nearly impossible to obtain. The use of new modular masonry units would be ascetically and structurally detrimental to the adjoining masonry as well. If obtainable, the cost to purchase the rare and historic masonry units would be excessive. The facility has an unused and decommissioned masonry water storage tank that was constructed with the same historic bark faced 8" masonry units as the main building. The unused lank has sustained massive decomposition and water related attrition for a prolonged time frame. Due to the extent of the degradation the cost to restore the unused tank- is considerable, (previously quoted to the owner at +/- $1,80,000.00) It is my professional opinion that the scrviceable existing masonry units in the unused tank should be salvaged and used in the required restoration of the historic main building. - This would provide matching historic masonry units for future maintenance and structural masonry repairs for years in the future. . ESTABLISHED 1924 ROOFING - MASONRY RESTORATION - SHEET METAL Page 2 Re: South Bend Historic Water Works Stnicture Restoration ff you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at 574-233-7485 ext. 3309. Sincerely, Russ Luchies Mason Restoration Manager Slatile Roofing & Shcet Metal Co., Inc. RL/law Leeper Park Pumping Station April 15, 2010 i' Leeper Park Pumping Station April 15, 2010 _'';'";'..-,-..w«..w•, r: «'_ ., s:: ^ :'rvi`'�" "e'er'°°' a,= :"<; >, x z "s.��. -,_ �. -' a°`> -`„'' ` w» -r<• ' r•-^,+- r ".�i4 1,3:;.'x” a•:-.., ».:-':«ar `"`«�✓- .. ,a...a-.w»�b�a= „ M'-,: .,A;k WO r.4- „°.'.` °wAc mw�, run,gp .Re°•."7"'" r� ✓ t, :5 js ,'.. h .€.<%<' -,,-4' ,a� ,•"` �. •F.."+, ;s , «�� .sr„"�'�•�' wt°,a^•�"a,�n 's;,t ;°..�" ;��;': p .t:.°:`i;;, ri � •`-„<a�',,. �r aat s -.�.g:t �,'�m.,a'-?::.a �.;..j>a•�.,-�'''.. :. '�`< ,.�<,a; <,f ,o.;3��.�. „r..' .9.<a".: t,+€.'.ra •"+w.«���:' y�.;j-'',S.'$y- `•,.'�h..:v .:YypP.. _ �- .r�'>�,;.,y;,> ',.��A !r� aq p 4 . ,�+„�x^'''Ra .� 3 _ S' .�' %',' ."• i4! °.,f',�;.. Y' �y_ � � j i �'ww� a t cp } ' p r'{ } ;'kx .ke%�r ! �, w +q z° .J ." <f >�.•�. k,'<'�2 :° "L_.,y .:°« e � w3i^ fir,:• :a «¢R y .�^.'a 5 a...; '9:. °5°re ..°azp. ..�>�..-` .w+,x ` �Y-fro.`�1. i r+�'wF'�sK+a..?-r ebur aert%•aa4C.•-�'c %�;;. '" r �a�d'r{�*' a+wy �q,..mrzN,:ti.,w•.iAMpy<N a,. ,`4,,g n<.. ry,a pwAar �p<a '.'�.•w,, ea(r ...°y tl i;i F;t,?�. •8 3r ��° .t. r%;" .�,,. « r, r' „_�,. , r•&"" �, ��,� �€"dr "a ei-'m-s . -,:.'° **.,,,. "'�_,. ' �> le �< �S' ,��st .a'��::a�� .^.fir'.-c'�f-,�°it�°•.'s; -_< ras 3x F, ,,a 5. •', JkL 1>,,.. 'x,44• rZ.°'•> 'n:s '" .�< v'.." ': r,"r: °;'`o° �* h� r"�Rr"p';d.R »x -s »r-'•'A�.cwa,..r• 'a""�a'S'� pr,..r%4,«r +w".� � ft or `'%��' Y'�A; �'`,�'".. fir, `�". �'- ,`;'< :�,' :�,.a6ss,:< " < «>,�•:g,-.L.a•; �, i* y' �Tz; ' ,.°•i,••,'4 S M. «'.w.;„ > r, < ' "i' ..p �'°>^r''w d'n wa.;i*r�*;•"!-...``'p va��y%''° s .� '$ :,�•ib' tS ", � � '"-w .A' -os o. ..,, ..,�.i y*', "wnm�;u?•:,'.. `' s; �, °.n. ..«. �`•°•ei7,P; s.;rte,:. »N >x` ^>,"`>.s:• "' '9.s& „ �,,°,.'a�,a.,.,N .;°ra,®r>:...;.t,� ^;" <y"�.-.z; y;,w"g°.zAE' w i ask '� ",ffi; '<1? _'xr-<:, Ys.," pia; 4":„a;�,., ;�. ,"'>`q°,t^a ' � j,:;•'--; .., z,. ` ;., ' �s 'a ,b A,;v .r... 9�;*, ::&- 9•-, .1✓"8. ,„i ^,° '°d5S' ;r '� .' mw ""xg..'tl„ q.,>��y€:. ter' � +� ed ,� ..+xY� '' "<-„:"..,<-.' .34Y'_. E, A:M •• <% b ' `wt. � a.n .�'s ®� � .y"'° _ � > t,>t. r+, .$��;, ��'np, -.. d °>f ,''' : � µ..,. ,n �a>��r..>C fi� .. ��a, ami j..".'•i X.✓'�j',,5`g,>e,+• , r -�°,Q� -4 � .w,�,. °�`9, r � a .�� � `'�' y�i•9.:.re...n&n «awry, ..r, r�'„-- �. ��' . :,r- �,Y« �X �r..c %._•' .�,.�._.�,da '"".« y m..�,;av, >we<•.< s4' ,�,°L«� < .. .*„� a ' '`gays: "`4�,i” J `' �°$r3''',*�:;. >�`; �Fa �' >- ,"'a..-: ' � i!'y •,��.¢, '•� ,a .� ''�;` : s ..,� Leeper Park Pumping Station April 15, 2010 rzxKU ° A . ” ,. � ,w.4a�'”"°•., w.x.,. , w' , war }s. 3++ 4 5: 1�p fP�u.,,, °+«5» s�^-..8„✓wr ^a, '„"•; �.,�.,.•;:, °°'•'-tea,<. �,;', >x•� ted- ,,,,. .... ��;:,': ° < 3 .two � �..+ _ _ .e '° ..�F .. -' - ., ..°gyp. �, .,. - .. i' .,. ,.3".-y •a�e,a -- .....r 'fit ''e .,. - . ° . Ow i"+_':.:.'>:�a«,,,.,. F.' 'gym ;., .a`-.""'' rw;—.a�«..,.:> . �';'�?':: �{^,''. ."_�^�. °- „ m• .•`w�%" .„ � :�: Y:"c :%�` �;: :..„w :.. a ,r ../�,�,,,.c?'..rc. ..�['q,;..._„e.,r'`�•S::¢'^•, <p' �° Y '^;Y r"'""p' max' ��a�^"� gr°R~�v.'s:..asu"' ,-�e'Y,'.';t< rt«'x. ur;..:r. �» -'da.K <...n..• j" - -«. � s.,•,.> .. „,a,�,�;: a..a •; ;,� m:,.« .>+”. ,s�''-'''"".�*'�.'N, z _^ .. .�g„'w '�s'.4d< a.•am:^'�<q�r.�<aX:,::SP-Fa•'a Y.-:. •'.>rryff„ �„ <,„`'at "'">t""s.,,";^x.. �£ �,»....w""e`�.-•:;�•,f*�'°'a� r,:'� ,,,•F�>Y+'t,, , _�.„�.�, -�w.>; wY" ir^'"'° 'aro � -¢ Gy+.t4,•«'- $�t`c ,a a. >., a gg��, �•..p.,. ..,.m«.,p�y ag>y Y'+'....Ft"»'1$y.s yq i','''w`''Ii ^`:+.' m:..`tm y" S.'^ �°„yaGw-Y«-^:.°•"may '+°•,x''^rr ,#^`.;^, >f+A'..°sem 4 -?:a +<-'>id (a '^ �,� %x'�'Ya se: V'.'.�-_,�%,.�.w. .'rss.<>^.°' wf K',."'+wwtsp-staa--%•"•,.w'y`.>a ,r�<m� /Y.�M. P�.�'M1 -yg''F .< ��w - ' •, .°Px'. "Y° f, -x-,,: M.,�,� 3^:?e ,i �, e q t,y :. �ey. ..,>". Q'• ¢� ... y,:S <p{ 78«^a°''<✓ Tv"$ ., a � „„" �° r,..w. w!� t•�7v'`" T� :: xY. ^"°yy' $°�?hs`9r, -Y �:s-� .J., ".i w, g'e. -.. "r''` •parse' a a '.'""p.'!°. 8eor„e warP„� Mm,°4 . :aid?- rya',vaeA"^>:W ''1� P"•: r .m ,»YM3,:��.....-�°°-, i�X ..wb.,..°...«wr* :s s#x- •;.. 'g<�:.°�.. `. ..,. ,�'„`«. J, .+`, , r« .." >m y.,t«,< 'v+awa°#y.?".^�" �£.s-''.e^qr,'�-a � '7»v'rt• g° a � ,;: ;;..::-,._ ` » p$€,�€w.<. F.�.»at gg"'°.�rR"•. , . ' "�'-"' ♦' "w.� : «°' w°s<� ..c.: s:". �'^� �`�>.%::"e :• , w�" "'�"" �� F"ryw+..mb f.'.; g°,agv ,.`'•"k'n $e a4r�;Y-'A. ,+.a' °�'„R_ _”' a.N+> e .. +W�«,n* i r'.. F' ' �-.. ra:»<..:�•}^`-»r �ar»;y,�a.r Wag �•.:a'sfr?pg *,;w:;$ :.zA' < f'm+r'°°t°,'"±', w.,;sa�p�;•.�..-., � d a, : � fpm>`--: ',a>f.=;°arSg d.sw^^!, •,�''m°.S' n:.ra<.w`..<..:..G.:..+.••�.°`.l.:a:R��,. .> " . .,.... .... .........• ..s.+rs..aaavnre t rrr � /r r' i ` -'.� _•,. n'v:'" .�a�,i'g=s: �n�aa.'i;"sfp "';� ,. °as�"Rq`p�'',» rg,q �: ;..m- ,.� Z, sA>' 6 'e„�, 'r., ""'kr"`"x, �'y ,,,�,��s, $r �'��. •''' �a�kR,3,�"..�`� � �z - rm',Y; C' k Aea ya ���q�;4ii✓ . :. ,� ,4 'a£ aa+. �y�4'n`•. ..,_:``?'sx; �F^�rw q t 3$$b� / ” �r,:4�..s 'k�,rd. "K.��a,',�a Tf„� a•P ..� ,,$��%�� "�';q.µ« i� , -•Fp n„ � 6 +ge%R "a °� J i. rt«Y 1 :4' 9 � e'ay,e. ` aP`ay'y' .: ” � / _ as � ^' S iV j�� + • ..Y ��q", � F " .�� � �_:w�," 6Y;prM >ra�.��.3 :W s � Q' i' �� � �• AL-� dr fi � �:,/, 5, °"Y ;'7 74: % yb" �,6 `. � xi'• � 3 »�� ,!^' � ..p ��.pp.:�a5q. � i • a.F a z . �.: b, r fwK i ^'^�".. � 5: .r k`...f f°:+.'R °.f• •^ ma .- /C:: ^ P9n .S�':%.i... 9�'�' a , z/yf>, t q,, � . �` . h el,�`��`.M1°�' aF,l .n �af npy "Hp•r 's.%Y �.� ,, 4'7„��.s� _ �. , �.tiiit ✓^ r ..' per, ...riX �$�• : _- ',; .- S,m tb � w 4, ;,.�,$'.; h. `'"q rw,, ff_ a`X •,a rg .a .� ,v .6u 59,' .. _- %,t ^ ._ ab,#sx ..°.�;M�G:,w„v ,, y'.r,.. , r:: °i � � d ... ;�.' ' !'�; ,, ;',r "•��, w�;F+m, .,RY, ,r .. r ra�4G.:�w.+ee_SJ.fW mws.L `nm,✓ -v:4 s- ...:'eS.«e nhi •.�.i�>:a ,.. .."'i4.a.'•:�.r .. _ ..a_.n .a......,�,�y r&.w .. a.°a taw:?�,. 1 n.a. i .w«e w.. Luper Park Pumping Station April 15, 2010 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 30, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0414 Property Location: 902 Leland Architectural Style[Date: Gabled-ell/1900 Property Owner: Santos Fernandez District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 902 is a one and a half storey gabled -ell duplex set on a brick foundation. The walls are covered with Insul-brick the windows are 1/1 double hung with a frontwindow 18/1 with shutters with a cut out design. The porch is enclosed with a full pediment over the door and brick biers. The gabled roof with gable returns has asphalt shingles. . ALTERATIONS: The Insul .Brick was applied to the wood siding in the 1940s. The storm doors and windows are aluminum. The three car wooden garage at the rear of the house has been demolished. The porch had some modifications completed in 1951. APPLICATION ITEMS: Would like to build a post fence around the back yard with a loop chain through each treated post. This will also prevent cars driving through lawn. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner wishes to install a post fence composed of green treated lumber 4"x4" posts set into the ground with concrete around the perimeter of the rear yard along the alleyway and property line. Each 4'-5' post will have a reflector attached. To enclose the yard the posts will have coated metal chain looped through holes drilled into them per drawing attached. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission, Stone damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the. same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This is a very basic, utilitarian solution to resolving the intrusion issue from vehicles backing into yard from the garage and driving through the back yard from the alleyway. The staff recommends approval for a fence in the rear of the house but that the design needs to be refined. Application - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46W1 Mailing AAA—r— Building, South Bend, Indiana 4Gb()1 Phone: 5744-235-97'98 • Fax: 574-235-%78 • Email- SBSJO PMo.st-josephinus Website. littp://www.stjoscphcountyituiiana.com/sjchp/index,htm! OFFICE USE ONLY>»»> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONVIINED IN THIS BOX >>>>>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received /`%/o Application Number - l�IKif� Past Reviews (1 YES (IMteo/Ix,tReu;eQ n NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: % 7 >;(44 f -Wrt� Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) F1 National Landmark E] National Register District Wane) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied n Tabled [) Sent To Committee (❑ Approved and Issued Dnrr. Address of Property for proposed work: V Str, eWumber and Street Naple Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) S C :.��,._; Address of Property Owner(s): 7 �Ltla.. o Ste' Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: I �'?6`�'t (2A— City: Q 4W . Phone: Current Use of Building (Single Family MultiFamiI - Commercial - Cenernment- Industrial - Vacant - etc.) 'Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame - Brick- -Stone -Steel - Concretr -other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind ❑ Landscape (more than one bore nrry be dwded) Ldj Descri tion of Proposed Work: VX- �' k i+\ CA - MNe}w] �}❑ Replacement (not in-kind) F] Demolition K"r�c� ' ) (Aj 1 Owner/ ontractor. Fax: e-mail (M. %, i W171 car tGni bnlyone desigum) and/or t vi1►'- 1�v�.. tJ t r�Ct� y�✓.k13%r✓o� — APPLICATION REQUIRDWEN TS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- ' . ,47100AMSO � / � // �~ ------- | \ \ ' ! / >' / i ��` '. ~//" // � / / . y../ � oil �,. ,» t � :J"•x _ `{�{r; '°' ,�. , " '3 �...: `pea `y,<".' .,�"'�s`z's''� "q`({`. ..` f i .,,,& �@ !!' s =R "�' fv, Po Y � P;g» �� < '" vID _ dn'k a c•� ,� a 3n s <' . A :`"��, , ',, '` � x.5 ," - € jT �a;, � •i..:': t$''`� gig' •' ,, •, .{' s§^ :;t`�• �, zx = a '''k �.<� S'i �.��, %C'�,pr.• erg - � 5 ,.; :' � }g}�, y 's'¢,-c","<s g , S' g _ ; -g° ° ` -; ,y"a. < �%� # . p a ✓ tr" r a`x , a , y rp-.i' " �,°'�',.'i `�'�" .;f ,. � .Yj t, +�FY FR'A"'•°�'�k, •., �d"•$,.a, � a^•r`#.�m,-Kr .k '6 �`,' `iy'' '.,t, q,`°a''6°�« `•^ ;` '<..: �•`j £s,s°•< h01 '�ei✓'1'+.y •., " t`'' ' ../ � f• +�: • .a3„w±.hr m�=s—.�v 51, .*. 4„,�, ',4Rfl;, `g;j�ybr�,�': :, w .¢-,,r @i ,bl. - e" A', f sY '. aw' •,'9' SY �°' � "»'� 1 -.``�" it •,� :[,' �1° a:,q y -se»... :6.s �`.�. #, sd3°"aR9R"'%S ^� ,� .� - �, s ', x �''q °!<� ` k o" � m <k" ;-".` `�' '••„".�m'iar..'4. w':i4 �, `, - <`$ ,''z.. •,, i< ° ,y'` W,i ~y,:a', `,e n,, Fs i'✓tt'''��'a , ,. % •y�.<"g��fii-"�,. >v,•'', is �F. 5 ;,T t �. ^, :.:, ,w,q,S$��"+Y' :,x �.✓' < .. ' r*< • s>"' ,,a n< a la;v*�'.,},% x.Kt "` ;Y£5,6;" i. - ;' °,m; Mom _•��3 � 7`a` ''�$ brei joy, p<,,�y*�"�, o°;'ge?a� ,�� �'�,, a&� * a ..� ° �# k'A t��. �: :�"-AK'' ..t,';.r� ,' h' <us, h* j _� ,{i.• r :."`t £ f i i�. 0�. , °.L;` °`� :,6,.<,;°""'��"�a pr• J ...t,'r.: Aq'a.3`"�`di d s�`>"- „;:.w :. ,'ir �`, " i�„r;�,� i*,s. " t . y $s:® �,. ���, x"t 2 aA,\ � Y"y "Qy �^y ml�iA[,� �4 �� � j•' �`x kR':,.j "�>�aY,..� -'S« g a ^c x. '.s' !� .v3»;�4 s'`yC ,�•p%' ., .�n��E.^^�'f9•�<" a;,e :' � p$ -,..<:-'!s I .Y"L't, a%< °. t; '�`i•. :.T� :ysr ;' „# 1,;}�.;. .z; ;m�•,`:<?3,rr�Fts`.'-'' 4a� -•... "✓" y 'yet lk?» `=e„ .'t., zA�,} a '•t' .; F " `"-'~ `„tit*�i'.: ` «.}::- ' Sei:,;s ,• 'p., 6,"�°, {:." ` `, �.? '„wa 'S'�e.�.•,.,..R ,, A[�; u e�g` e;.f It >'6•':s a;€:gs:,3<�'W,O 4 �` '�-. as�`A',...' � '.�.y �.;• �.F«;}`1�'s'����x :ii,,.'i� a �'�, � �` s'w _ _•, t ”. ate. ^'. `s"'�+"s xArpz Violr} �i .9 > ..A ^3s..s•.:€;. t.i � .qe-, �,r `� � ..� 'r�-;�.,3.• _ _ a>` v: ,Rp, i^�'swwv p'q.' t.?°v �, 3�.•.ia; E"1 p .'•a i` s . i^ Yw••.: ,7�,�e$, e x j • `cd .J �� '.�a�f .j „4 s:,1 A' gnu .a. m;. *, g 's t<"i ', , 'Fg-' TV" , a; d' 1 :• <L 3 t` 9 jy a- %° as••c ,r aa, a w '`'a %•'r, 3�':,' �i . ' 3't >z��4. ��a;,• .�@i'' �,e. °; ... „-S as sP y '�i >i;Vk✓,€°r""•«° .�&„*,,,,i la�':'is°�F fpr° i r'f :f f � "� y q ..-''-r'.>.: •; --.a: ''+ s; ��i?,;,g,;, d,€ i .'i ,'a ;2 �r�s, €. i £ €j.5'' ty:: ,:r.. <�s i,px g t sr' ° ,a < � S. 5,^la"s W a c.:., y? ;$Raz `•^.ate. ° .s r? a T.. 4;ra';-ice; «fig Ono max •9,`k.g'�' �`�{F°=:.;;�.�a'q{i��ys _ <g; "§. T ::•'& ,'�j ° ;£p`�4'z,$` , '^'i:z§.; .€gi" ,,y.., a: ''4•ir-i6' ,7'.', �, et�,i;'.•', �r�k`':s` •zr' :�", t. , - ,gi gl •a`• '; �8p,�;; ,j,p?.. �`` 'i., y"j, q.'I{".:v �< t �''+„ a° t*�, § lit "A"it ., .`� '^,�',� •£ �l tts ; •Y-'�'•z s4 �?: �,:: ,€ (;s '#, Y"e` #t•!....,x x ��•»�.ya ca*,'::$'-_.,«� n y'a a ; m' �,it" ?° Eµ pe'_ a $ � A�•'', "4 fi A� r -.A guy, e •.: , p<o,: ,.,'• • i5 a� �y7s�F ° � 5 �� ",tf, WHO � �R� f' x t •a<>< °A � ;s�s'a.<#.. �..4.';`y�'t:>.x� •�'°`": :�i�£` S%S.i.<'^�F¢%���,'�,rr�3': (S�•:,$� ��;� �,/y, , ..- ' p*9'�rs' ¢ � �� s • � �„���'?`{,le�f$£�""gg �'�,`. �. •i'r�'� �. :, 3.(tt�i.< z•,, i��''.:9 r,�kr�•g,',,:"�$ •.�:? �;x °' ,f �� ew �• ._"� �"�,� 'g4' "b�'�{�'sg lap�-�a. ,: ` `�� j��.,i Y'vy' ;: �' ;9A i,.; � '' 'ffi�• 4 € sE * "� Ykl�* e# ��y}T D w<.•+. +�, jy�5� ¢ ` F rj ¢'^ t, ,n» PS`� ',.p'e � s c � � „E�; �.�., .•i f ;°£ '% a �ee:µA: '.. -,$;5€�`�-�' ,�`"%<�t : g+#`' > _; ,fir -. :,a.' �'•�•_.<, ae.ss,' :� ",`' � _' ;�, ¢¢ �z a `� °'*':.'aha [$p. �? t�'�. �:,, f' < i. �„"3F `A ?".•"' is.' °Y „3i,;; F-' �cl 'L "; r, t*� S i r$♦ i &'<+r "vC 'd;,^ -z „• 2k;' ,Pa�'..{',sg P .y,^ - g .£-arrk'"S ;♦ S %`1.. .� t j'4`�' ,<, �i< �?fTi, >"rB-��¢i?.*.' y�B.d+`, �o 9�',• ''i'• n t'f �' � $F<b,: K :.i: lc �.a�}#o.,3. .i" 5;� $# $". •$' S .s S.�_ i �.�aa"!S,'gi'S ••�}b���;�`�.",�'; f ;rr ;,gd• '.4' aq fid.,: �yrr '.£. �.j �.°; iTtFe. 9,r•, �t„.r # 4, 1 01 '•"Dx "' "iia�s '��"a ���`' 'x:�. .,i;,,�s �. e., y¢ tl�. .�sg ;- �, g;-.5�y7� ''�1♦pn,�iy .-:w,r4� Von 'Jni` f+ ¢,3 - B a2 �,�`ea { 4 'a4 •8`•`v tX•p�` i���+, m ��r+ £ +'�Y""�' .q •''s ggam''. '�,3=��@ °y9°'Y' .'�. x¢'E�A'F`,•{' ', '��v.• .t :>;,• ¢: ,4:, •R � i °y .a�a y.i4_}. �`B ICA ,"a`„�`'„ 4'",sY' }p < ' ._I r, js .g i,m 5'• 'SC €,�;'.'"" &7 .,x.'`'� r '�,�,s.� '?. 0'Ys K:'� � b'��sg�x,l�L 'Amp r�"� � �°" r•c7*M.*a. `-•y.:»` .,,t i tft ,i' s'• 'EY'ror°=fi ts� lot,R s d• stomp ! z q 1 .,r' � :�;a�'< •�'z'I."•;'•'s'``.:=:i- � £ `'� ;f. � i :".g, gf�if Ds^' £'"'mac oil Alto, ta5;«ai,. < i• 902 Leland, April 16, 2010 - ; i x_ 4 ^��3r. .� '1 sr v,n .r', b-."/,. sw�, f L`'s. A•t. .. sr .: i•`• ' ' ✓, ,1� � ;o: ��'�.•` `t"ws. „' �'+. wr ,�"'snw x<,.mf?°; .". � ?';t� ', x ., t 5 •^: .v. < '°c4,,<'t: �' ' '„"AR`;.: y 'Ta;". �� .r'°- �' r ,�.,S!r'"4.a-., . sw.A. o"t•it'..34i ,w'6 S« `;„. ,g.,,^'"• �v n` ,: `a"'"a�''F$".'r' ....r•;Tk ` ^• �, �^`p. 3 ,`°`�s1.- 'tl',;y' a.w h;.y�'c .b�+`al'..`." T' •,".✓... ;+'f;•.�)• g ..-• " ..� ,�'-' �� ',.G" Y-.: ^'e °`.'dna' s+s. �� � '�.: �`*, k'�", - �y'' a-''`�'' z� �'Y�;g.a.,� :`'t�'` ".y�:n.:;'�g»-,>.g ,,..._s`"� q".' �:P .',° 2J`{F���r .x.'°y-A i��.;.;:x�... � Hw°�.,,,� }y. � , •/`; -pAa 4 n¢,�r�tx �,,,s y�,.� "9•� N,. vi; ri»::.x' -,':" � M �d"�.°`d. «C .>K v'y t'`� i.is,+.� " �� � y �'r x*: ��,xn�'�F, �3 '^�i.. ...• �`''''ri�'`:'>�•a..c. '°'� !.r-"�r✓'•;':�::;,-" -'M, �' fi;;,;,�;ra�4''' �• ,- a , Te � -.,,mac .~� t ; �'" "., �5.` y � `.�-+'`�'^ �` � ^a:�•�� � •P+°"�� � f.r: r rt'�.,F.3�®�;'' d �r•p'°: � `' •• '" .:: . ...' ` N• Ari at.�r ^ k.. ,�. ,�.. ' � .,.. } '�-_%n,, .. '. .. LAI 403d J}( ?�: 8r � • �- .i 777 € g A »slll f Y^-�� - Vf ,� >'>: ` ,e>A •+.a.,.....�e, d_ [i �"".,,rv.r'e 4,w 4'k t L� , 7 ".j. ss,»> •a+. `-�-- t5 k'''.'..: `;y,.c;. <,� - ., m �� 't. ,.�' vw"..e['.an, bv" , -: Tc' ,6,x ` J'" �.�, '-A'``-" •n,t eW's 3w+8 r� ° :off"","' "'.,"i.> q.',.+,; .:,s.,,c-,; d :, �'.. " .% s,�✓.: . 'd' . 3"-S 4x. r f-'. .'%�• `s�iT r 6" , : K�.'e .i / Db� .`y:%w.,� "„` w 'D 4'> - _"i' 9 + .#�� �,g„✓ �, :�`�",� .G .>"C�"zs'<t^'_ �$,nx, z :%,..k ;,axe, a;re�Ly., m"aZ`•sr,'�s ��,d r4£.,`� ,s��''.., :. >°h4tl+ ',5,'i'' �e✓; ''•!'*Wf' 'az,`�.'+e.d' c,�rwi., '.'ii'wv-a ' /' �' za %'"4P3 -� s,`�-:✓ .,^, Bs•Y " : +R _ <:+; `: �c`.. ",r .. �d,,-.' ,.,*iw,;%r.,. y °'; r,°,. t` ,-e3�. a"�...- �'",�a�iy dx:; ;•p y�,; '; "8; v,'`{,:, :i;' ,?;�>^', v°l�-y.:.• "t;i „�1: -w r%• s �}�:✓"`"� '9 at", w � ^� '':.a:,:�,e_ r"s': 7;,M t::,'-'. : � '^� tL': ° " ' ��i.:'.i •:"A*,"=�- s'•,° ;^ '•"''`v+ =.--,..r....x `" R ", a..o1:: .'f>at, "'�.�.&:: w+°L-3`arp:x. �^ `•«+..; `w'•i"♦ ik*'<'i�" ,r..r i,• - ,::`4v` '�,:" ""s1:_" >'R` �'�'°-z„> � �.j� :,�A�, 4 p'„� ;��iaAr%'•ny r°, ,`. <"s ` £�°'»''', •e� ':^5,, p:. .� . aC, '�' `£ y, ' '�" °'�; w%�u :,ti a n, * " �•' 'tea" �•`. - '; ° F ,� Y.44'ew �,� - •:J �"w, � a.`b%f ✓<` ''��p,r -" '� `a :` re F' _ a at^°" � r �r ✓•% '3 ,fit; sf&�' ", <' `,-„ a .$''-x'.'. '` �" " n,>. �,�'".° .p�•^<_� .' .' ,�;*.ofa.,,+ `'�„>"� 4,...'.�a.�,..°. s,'' ,.".+,°:..«<.« i,a s^<...., >;:L."``.u,.%�, >..:`�: -..: •%ro= _ °tni r"s", „.:�_... �. v ...,,m,..�.`"x,• t;:�°�r.':r,., ... ,.,:.+.�a�,' :..ilk.: i,,a;.,tia<'..a"`. .: �w.."...,.*hc s'.."r<,,. "se.+.�: »:�«.:d......�«''`.`°"•.: 902 Leland, April 16, 2010. Looking toward house `E' •�Y-B "� r . _. ww.•. �;.: "` "'k_s• <x k,?c'� *'I` ;:WS '�.>"4. .s ='+�t "e,,;°° a"° I',. � T'�+ ea . .s y '� `: ¢> > - _ F'+• ;Fws;'. y`2.` ;�crw�, �`:i. t� W r� "i+�: :'';•±Ap'-" �,n�e.' �`��',. " '7 «1^_w �,y r-� "Ea 4• ®'_ . ; 1'P 4i ,ayt / _ s' 3� r <R,j,' �wu• dS . /, ,s+n+f.+:.e>�'�1" - A+x�"° .R�,n. ,!,r`.Pej,' ° p,r �s, .L ,(„ + �rc "vT i d y.. . � 't•.K �.:µ^ ,l. ^��,.��;....•, �„�,f . �d;n � '..ri,' �'^,. fie, + ?.� `` � t�� > 7' - `• �'p:l;,Y``'""• 4°.rp�,.r�,r,+^���`.,'w`"s'ei'a'a�,<��'<��> t._tr �}t Yam"=,3:^' �•�'-d,° -g'�I. TA • �" �.• ”. +.0 r q y ` v-1 t `»-.:,r&ps- F :d, 4'6 r. i' r °.. ,•. .`<`S' ` " / ° '`t `" -bf"" f'" „�/,t°• '�'v^� ,"se-\ Q' .s � ,'w�.`>.> < g .. `:,„. �xh�'_'.,, 6®*a''�°',,,j„ +"$"^ �".. ", . .. , . F+s� f ; ..'Ni 2" -''� '•� a r z �'.� •' bs< "* . .; e.:, °$ v' �4��' 4� '.�' <..; >..:"; <t.:.3-,� gg ;, �, �y,r � e.,w+w i,'<.✓ iX�' .i�a'. ._ ,. „°,' xf.. "'ten.' .§.a.' J� �O�sE¢]1.;,�kM. °•,�.< °"�_"'+•:: �< ''°t � ,s K� c��,,,. �x:'^'�"°�.�''-�'y", . � z {�.'r• •'�_.,„:;y ';'6=>'�4,;„°, �«, .,uw< '`w:w."" `}�, .g�+- „�:i£Y � , „.:"'°'"'^rt i,•=� •' �-.r R`�':.-;�R':�� , . <-, �� .a r,,� •�ri..✓o,;y�y�,."'°c%;-<„,_-'TM mss,',»„• ', -. r'6'a".';:�.;;; r. �' �,m�v:°'w= g ,:” ,� � z�t •gab ':�°'a •'X� "'"°s'� ,"a*�'M':_1'd .." »«., ,,,--. ..,_ ,,,_•., '._. 4d ,, <jv ap' "€#}, j8. 1SA .�"? �;e 'd'Y'x t,rte , w..'"sr,: ., .em«R.«�.•,rr� " AN '/rte �=-r q,,,,,*, -_....,.a +.w'd;R ` �.w �:°e,,w .� •.� =,�wg m' q°' +.. 1-d,,•� �. ,y.8,?'^ r�1FW �R. ��i: `4°4..:. 4s mow. M� f d' +Y� k'. -t�. !. ds • C`• s3" e y t' - a' IDz. ,e»«we'em..A.: , - .. r�Zw1b:4G ' ww• ..,.e<r a--wG'a/m�n �..+, sszww... ,d. .a r`"bw:<n'��, n „ „ .< ,x ... °✓xs/•a.m;,.dd'Y., n na ^t sw_'dbwn wdve:c�m� Awa �.swLa Looking toward alley Application -FOR - Certi icate o, f Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South fiend & St, Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Knd, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address Cnunty-City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 - Fax: 574-235-9578 - Email: Sl1,SJC11PC@co.st josephiaus Website http://ivww.stjosepheountyindiamcc)m/Ichp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT C »»» OFFICE USE COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COMI?t}TdID IN 7Ti15 BOX E ONLY Date Received 44 Application Number'4 Past Reviews: [94S (N"a 'll.txk.) e .Z -?-0O 7 ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: '17 79&/ lt4 l a n Local Landmark 0 'focal Historic District (Name) G ea n National Landmark [] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: [) Denied [] Tabled Sent Th Committee ❑ Approved and Issued pAT1s Address of Property for proposed work: f 7 _ Stntt � � / Stmt Nu Brand Name,Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) %p f- b`-' z Address of Property Owner(s): % 7 / 44 Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: 9z' City: M j.� i� Phone: Current Use of Building: (Single Family — Multi_Fa milt' — Commercial — Groernment — Industrial — l'arrnt — etc.) Type of Building Construction:1 G' ( Wood frame — Brim — Stone — Stwl— Concrete — Crfher) Proposed Work: �In-kind D Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) [] Demolition (mme tlon one box nay be chr d) Description of Proposed Work: AlE GLIA VT— 70 t 4C,E 72_� W111J00W S 7W7- .A,P2 AW O/L ' /2 c4114 17'� 1 n� 0 t/h'. ,t�MF I,rJi 7�-J /9�A (S'459 M ea7- tA.1I 1-jvo /-j 5 . 'TlZ-j-0 w u.-)5 6 Tem r� 1 , G454F1j7_ 1,1/ Xf,4A- 1,115 ivoVL.tp L)!4( 7D 12<P64C46 W r7N D . Z�- e-mail .J .1 BPA�Y C Z !' !Qty 1. - Cc,ft-A Owner/Contractor: Far. " (IT%s offI unit mr . with o tyonerlesignee} _ and/or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE L1 TED ON REVERSE SIDE — STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 27, 20.10 Application Number: 2010-0427 Property Location: 1715 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Arcliftect or Builder: Tudor Revivial/I 929/1-1.1t, Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: John Brady Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE! SITE.: The two storevTudor of brick with half tirnbcr and stucco wall -features has a rectangular plan and a gable roof with a slight flair at the eaves. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles. There are casement windows throughout the house with brick header course sills on the brick facades. There is a half timber and stucco shed dormer in the front faq-ade and there is an extended front entrance with steep gable roof and stucco walls with a door in the center flanked by lanterns. ALTERATIONS: In 1988 a I Ox 14 foot two storey addition was added to the rear of the liouse(COA 1988-0815); the roof was replaced in 1998 (COA#1 998-0916) and the screened in porch was added in 2007 (COA4'2007-0906). The windows are replacement windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: We want to replace the -replacement windows that are poor quality in our home with Pella casement windows. Two windows (interior) that are casement in the rear we would like to replace with double liun,(,-,, DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED 1IR03ECT: In 1988 the NORCO windows were installed. Currently the windows are failing and deteriorated; one kitchen window's glass has recently disintegrated C> and needed to be replaced. The homeowners wish to replace the NORCO windows with PELLA wood casement windows that will have aluminum exterior cladding located on the second floor. The windows on the second floor will be replaced with casement windows that will match the existing; the front double casements will be replaced with grid patterns to match the originals. The two casement windows that were on the exterior and are now enclosed in the screened in porch are to be replaced with double hung windows so people don't hit their heads on the casements. The exterior aluminurn cladding will match the exterior trim on the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware, When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resemblingthe original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storni doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced, .1 Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOlt1l1 MDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement windows with PELLA casement windows on the second floor and the removal of the casement windows in the rear interior wall of the house and their replacement with double hung PEL LA. windows. 1.715 E. Wayne, April 26, 2010 a .. r 1715 E. Wayne, April 2G, 2410 Window Materials and Styles with Pella I Pella.coin Page I of 1 1% 7120OL17 Casement vvindows are, models of contemporary style and convenience Vinyl Fiberg!ass CorrpcMc Select 2 or 3 windows to compare, ki-,= , I &I � �VL, i I -, :,Ya, t,- 11 1 F S,) T f, k, a.: , . ;t" ,, , ),' V ni C. V), j ,: : .1 " I 1 4.1 _;2'. Ii: :y +'.3 y ,I'y i',;: f 4,'� -. see Y ,� N,:: S i ;,E : :e- . ..-f a is s•3;. i just CLfl your P�-:,j e-pell 1 "0 374 4", :om I Po!0.c,)rn Mr, and Mrs. Brady were called out of town unexpectedly before they could provide the Office with the number of casement windows and which series of Pella windows they had chosen to be installed. - ]web. ella.comliwindows/ex lore-window-st Ies/,%N,-indow-st les.as x?St IeID=l 5/6/2010 Encompass by Pella' lmper%ria' Pella' (Prol-ine) Designer Senes' Architect Series' Pella' 0,, rc; ,v f# Z,e V C r* I - S. isatin J t -t, w v. i e n .a..eo tz-ge of 2- ,j cec-;rz, Olfo,s fr,k, E. r PJiiy t',-, U. D,rza � , - *!:q .•...........,... Z;,tV C f a OW .,sV e nMll a kf. Y�,u sat: ;,,:, "s - ! t,:: Y S F', i", A 8Ss a� rl^x ED I e i js Fn 7v, "a 's a. j -w, Z* a L; ca fC 71 -of njc ta ms V,6 x f V e& V:V, t-,,2 Select 2 or 3 windows to compare, ki-,= , I &I � �VL, i I -, :,Ya, t,- 11 1 F S,) T f, k, a.: , . ;t" ,, , ),' V ni C. V), j ,: : .1 " I 1 4.1 _;2'. Ii: :y +'.3 y ,I'y i',;: f 4,'� -. see Y ,� N,:: S i ;,E : :e- . ..-f a is s•3;. i just CLfl your P�-:,j e-pell 1 "0 374 4", :om I Po!0.c,)rn Mr, and Mrs. Brady were called out of town unexpectedly before they could provide the Office with the number of casement windows and which series of Pella windows they had chosen to be installed. - ]web. ella.comliwindows/ex lore-window-st Ies/,%N,-indow-st les.as x?St IeID=l 5/6/2010 Window Materials and Styles with Pella I Pella.corn Page I of I Double -hung windows have timeless traditional appeal. J ° " aN Vinyl Fiberglass Composite yyy windows nam NrobF . V,Mn2 sW*s T TRC li;wer sash ;I arlaws In a cool bieeze. Tie upper sash PUIS hot a:r. from me Encompass by Pella'' Impervie Pella` {Proline} Designer Series.Mq Architect Series` Pella o Made from pela?, Our fRov. porlliar Ava tatle w in between- The moce of those who Enooqpass Vj Petla" Patented fiberglass Claim, lnc!Wing; wdf the-.2w's R1,nds. lat"Ir defignt in M-vess offsvn prodkicts are comp-osile calved range of standard 2nd snades deoorat,,e eptons. clifers thtl exoeptonal!y easy to IDAM4.Ust t - the clivom sizes. Best of all. panels and removab!'a riatimal teaut.y of ca.,* for Past of apt, Y"YJ slron�ellt. nest du"Able ,You Nv& trie g0e3— P07a'ls belween wanAJany, Alder. aet Me ;160t- Of rrwRutg mate"la! 4o3ifallie, in of awning Pel; -If%.e,-UIass wmidv* Dougias F,r or Pine, Flws uality P(01vcts basked wm�,ws and ,smansni at 13 W'N"n .4 snap in and CIA. VMlzlly unlar-ited sails. RY Pella cli,rio'W't. PrI:I so IW(e easy kr you to sti-INS wVivillie clAtion Mange P-a1ef5% gz"s optiom in wlsde. Im: 91,133 ol'!.(,ns glass options and br"-n Low-ma;n1minle Sim cp-ums tn,;uding glass. virions Ava;lab:e nwhile and Endurallad' e cerors tnp!e-pane Wass th2tLow-4 • nalre en a "tA, al.ril, ond - il�Aila_^ld if, woN asI I for energy Er.d.raCue exteriors • TirwmaStar by Pella' WON ef".oiency ova i"Alule Int cot;33 v3ilatle Low -main -mince P,us C.Istam C011Y3 at Lo"'S e),te�ofs in Z? WInts Plus custom cow's View details ',/ww detaIli de -ails "W dela"Is 10ow details MCI to corl".0 Add to conlpam (]l Add to wrnoare r-) Add to coillp"re Add to compare Select 2 or 3 windows to compare. NOT E qonle leatures, and Lptonq may vary by Product and la, V1n 1 prod'ict a�a dy may V;Yry DY reg:on See your �Oui Pella sales rep(esenta-,;�* N . .9 for avadaNUy. 1 =0�374-4758 1 webtrifogpetka coin i Pella.ctim TO k.TIlLBFSr P Mr. and Mrs. Brady were called out of town unexpectedly before they could provide the Office with which series of Pella double hung windows they had chosen to be installed. http:Hweb. ella.com/uindows/ex lore-window-st les/window-st les.as x?St YlelD=3 . _/6'2 - STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 3,2010 Application Number: 2010-0428 Property Location: 514 West LaSalle Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1904 Property Owner: Connie and Tom Tooley Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey plus attic Free Classic type which was constructed with a wood frame, overhanging second floor and clapboard and shingle siding. The roof has a center gable and a small hipped extension projecting off the back, box -molded cornice and is covered with interlocking asphalt shingles. The chimney is brick and flush to the first floor and interior through the second and third floor with decorative brick chimney work at the top. The windows are all the double hung sash type that are hung from top hinges. The house also contains many decorative windows such as the wood framed stained glass panel in the back wall, the leaded glass design in the transom over the front window and the first floor side lights. One of the main features of the house is its front porch which has a brick base, wood slat floor, wood spindle balustrade and brick pedestals that support short Done columns. It also has a plain entablature and a dentilated frieze pediment over the front entrance. ALTERATIONS: The Ihome has been restored. The gutters have been repaired and replaced, the stucco removed from the brick foundation, the roofing has been replaced; the site has been extensively landscaped in the rear and enclosed with a privacy fence. Windows have been installed in the enclosed back porch. (COA#2002-0520a). Deck mounted skylights were installed to replace the "bubble"type. APPLICATION ITEMS: Complete tear -off of roofing materials, repair/replace decking as necessary, install ice/watershield, Install Certaineed Landmark Series 30 year Dimensional shingles. Repair Chimney as needed, re -point with lime putty mortar. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT; The complete removal of all existing layers of roofing, estimated to be .four layers, and the replacement of the Sherriff-Goslin interlocking shingles with the architectural asphalt dimensional shingles. All decking will be replaced and repaired, installation of iceh,vatcr shield as required by Building Code. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency "'vith the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition. I* Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: L Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material: Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials xvith additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. s,rAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the complete tear off, repair and the re -roof with the dimensional asphalt shingles. The 19312 Assessor's Card notes that the roof had asphalt shingles. Application - FOR - Certi. f irate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SG Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Band, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-M9798 • Fax: 574235-9578 • Email SBSJCHPC@eo.st-0sephinus Website http://ivwsv.sgosephcountyindiana.com/schp/index.litml OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COINPLETE ANYENTRIES COIMINED IN TRIS BOX """OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ofg O 11- c1010 Application Number _2�0 /D - -0 q t Past Reviews: n YES (NLeafustptevirto) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: /7 MIr AP A0 [B.ocal Landmark Local Historic District (Nara:) [� National Landmark National Register District Wow) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied [] Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: .5/4 MS67- .L.4 S4L _,- Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) CONN/E rrrr %_-oAe 10.04eY Address of Property Owner(s): '1.5;z d4/457"__ /_ I's4 4L_,r Contractor(s) Name: r%AS/tfU/i ,c{!LL Contract Company Name: l' . C d S SGT'-/C71t1 -r' , ck3 FJ.Ae G Contractor Address: .'S �. /�', / •� i l 4 %7'V6 DATE es2oi� —e, 7(7 Z. City: 4;6C_C4 L ,l9 4,561 Phone: l 74t - 4122- 6 Current Use of Building: SW4 L�C FWAI'14 y (:1C_ ..: ,oj'So 7 / (Single Family - Multi -Family - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: Fe41Y6 ( Wood Fra me - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - 09ter) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind _[:] Landscape [] New replacement (not in kind) E] Demolition (more th4n one, Itis dray be checked) Description of Proposed Work: COHd9'L,67-e 76A,e". -®FF' e c ,i'ara. 11v, NRrF..e�o�.e. . . Af/.IF7J �,��L�3C E �e�cr�.4,5 �1'et7'��,$.�'d?3"` iN.'i'7",9G� T:•,G-l/,,LtTX'.,r" �,r//��,p,, frtr.�,�l +PE+°!r<A4' CH/•eI�IEY f7S JY EDs.�%. PFYCVJ.VT hllr# 1./MF PU77Y� I-40,e7W-e- Owner/Contractor: Fax: e-mail m{requndi 'th one } Xand/or -- APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Roofing - :Photo Gallery - CertainTeed Idea Center CertainTeed Idea Center: Photo Gallery Commercial: Residential. View By; 9 Roofing ..,..::' e ...... Landmark'M Shingles - Color: Resawn Shake When you choose Landmark shingles, you make the decision that assures the beauty, durability and security of your home for generations. Landmark takes your roofing to a higher level. It- ""'s engineered to outperform ordinary roofing, keeping you comfortable, your home protected; and your peace -of -mind intact for years to come with a transferable warranty that""""s a leader in the industry. To view all of the color offerings available for Landmark shingles, click on the link below. Products Used in This Image Landmi,k rl,' Shn do,,.r Ridgy ll JkY�i(, 7tGyi Page I of I w 514 W. LsSalle, April 28, 201.0 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 3117ay 2010 Application Number: 2010-0428 Property Location: 803 Forest Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1885 Property Owner: Rosalind E. Clark Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two storey wood frame house has a rectangular plan set on a brick .foundation. The walls are horizontal clapboard with vertical bands with diagonal inserts. The gabled dormer and the gable have fish scale shingles. The roof has asphalt shingles. There is a half width front porch has turned posts and balusters. The windows are 1/1 double hung, some with crown moulding; there is a circular window in the front gable ALTERATIONS: The screened in porch was extended over garage in 2004-2005; in- kind roof repair and gutter replacement occured in 2009. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install 2 skylights in attic, one on west, one north (House faces street on east side). Install vent fan on west in attic. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to have Brad Pierson Constriction and Kirkpatrick Carpentry professionally install Velux deck mounted skylight and a Broan Roof Mount Powered Attic Ventilator fan on the rear attic roof of the home to provide additional lighting and ventilation. Please see attached photographs and copy of product brochure and information. She also wishes to install a Velux deck mounted skylight on the north side of the home. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITES LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required - , Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon appro-v-al of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, sliall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions g resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The application of the skylight and the vent fan in the rear attic roof will not be visible from the street. The low reveal of skylight on the North side will correspond with the slope of the roof line and will not detract from the architectural features of the house. Application -FOR-. Certificate of Appropfiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 MM11no Arlrfracs— County-CityBuilding, C__3 14 Bend, T_ Phorv--574-M5-9798 * Fax: 5741235-9,578 * Email: SB5JCHPC@c:ost-j0sephinus "lebsitLt http://Www.stjowphcxnmqindiana,com/*hp/index.htinl OMCE USE ONLY>>>>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONI UNIED INTHIS BOX >>>>>> OMCE USE ONLY Date Received 41 AFkJL- .2010 Application Number _!9_0PL - d 'Afxfi Past Reviews. F 1' S (021tafl-Mmiew) '7-/'3 --Zoo 7 E] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: 7 ?7e -qt d20/ 0 C/? / Local Landmark ['Local Historic District Qvamr) National Landmark - [; fNational Register District ovano Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied n Tabled E] Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: OU St Number and Street MI'l Name of Property Owner(s): (pims, print)kox4jlf Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building. t1k 1'r, (:b " 1'�, 6e (Single Family- Mut-Famity- 6mmerciff -GmPerninent - Industrial - Vacant - efcJ Type of Building Construction: I A i) f(Wwd Frame - Brick - Stone- Steel-Concreir- Other) Proposed Work: 0 In-kind Ej Landscape 0 New F1 Replacement (not in-kind) F1 Demolition (mare than ore ba nvy be dr -W) Description otProposed Work: .9, xk�' /40 e. Ate' as tieifi, e7� t� t.. .. ......... ... Owner/Contractor Fax; e-mail (This qrlm Idth Vnly one designet) ----- - - and/or x 4?q -- APPLICATION REQUIMMEAMS ARE LISMD ON REVERSE SIDE — e 803 Forest, April 28, 2010 803 Forest, April 28, 2010 Why VELUX Leakproof For over 65 years, VELUX has been engineering and manufacturing skylights to withstand the harshest of elements. Each product is subjected to rigorous air, water, and pressure testing before ever being brought to market, Each skylight is then combined with a custom tailored flashing system. That's why VELUX is the world leader and the preferred skylight brand worldwide. (Top left) Before introducing new prod- ucts, VELUX uses wind tunnels during testing to subject them to real worid wind and rain conditions. (Top right.) Massive wind tunnel fans create hurricane force winds used in product tests. Quality When you decide to use VELUX roof windows or skylights, you can be sure that our dedication to providing exemplary prod- ucts and services will not end with the completion of that project. We stand behind our products with a promise of lasting service and quality. • Our warranty covers 20 years on insulated glass seal, 10 years on the skylight, roof window, flashing or SUN TUNNEL"' skylight and 5 years on blinds, controls and electronics. • After more than 60 years, VELUX continues to be the world leader in the roof window and skylight industry. • VELUX is the preferred skylight brand for American contrac- tors according to every national survey of building Industry professionals. • VELUX holds more than 300 patents in roof window and skylight design. Energy efficiency By choosing VELUX skylights, you can promote energy efficiency and save money on utility bills, all while making your home brighter and more comfortable. VELUX insulated low -E tempered (comfort) and Insulated low -E laminated (comfortpius) glazings: • Offer three times more protection against solar heat gain. , • Resist condensation twice as long as clear glass. • Protect Interiors by reflecting the vast majority of the sun's fade -causing rays. The complete system VELUX offers a complete system for bringing daylight into virtually every space in your home. Take advantage of our 60+ years of experience and the solutions we offer for controlling natural light and fresh air. Exterior heat control — Best protection against heat gain. Weathertight flashings — Leak proof flash - Ing area must for every skylight. Skylights and roof windows — VELUX offers a range of skylights and roof windows with features for any need. Blinds and shades — Provide varying degrees of interior light control while saving you money on your energy bill. b. i.,,, r. Convenient controls — Handles, rods and electronic control systems provide easy operation of skylights and blinds. Technology leader At VELUX, innovation is the name of the game. We are constantly exploring new technologies and finding ways to apply them to better meet the needs of our customers. Here are a few of the latest examples of technologies that we have been working with. 7iresotarbalte yl,,ghtb,'ockshade operates hyremofecontroiandcharges outomaticallyusingonly the sun. Asingh chargeoperatestheshodeover 500 times. Electric skylights Our premium electric skylights are packed with features that make them the most convenient skylight option. A sirngle14gauge hard wire connects d'rectly into a stardardjunction box to provide power. An infrared remote control can operate multiple skylightsond sunscreening blinds. it can also he programmed to close skylights a ftera set time period Rain sensors automatically close the skylight when it rains to provide protection from the elements. Product selection VELUX offers a complete range of daylighting products to bring the many benefits of natural light into your home in almost any application. VELUXSUN TUNNEL"" skylights for when a view to the world is not needed such as laundry rooms, hallways, second baths, stairways and closets. Skylights for overhead, out -of - reach applications orwith in -reach applications where egress is not regurced. Roof windows for in -reach appli- cations requiring egress, such as finished attics. Skyi ghtsare ideal for conventionally framed sunrooms. Consider how the skylight will finish out from the inside. You have several possi- bilines to enhance the room with natural N, .• light. Flat ceilings 777 Sloped walls k...t.: L'athc'dral ceilings Flat or low -sloped roofs i General product Information along with frames' ' ted an the following pages. Please see product Instructt0ii—Hihecise measurements Manual venting %lights VS, VCM and QVM • Stainless steel chain operator. • Tempered or laminated low -E Insulated glass. • Opened and closed manually with VEWX control rods when out of reach. (sold separately) • Smooth -turning handle available for when the skylight is installed within reach. (sold separately) VS and QVM (additional features) , • Select wood frame and sash, insect screen (pre-installed), and aluminum cladding. • Pre-installed mounting brackets. • Impact glass available for hurricane prone areas. • Full blind program (page 20). • Manual to electric conversion kit available (WCM 140). F7 -1 � E VS Deck Mounted For roof pitches from 150 to S5° Flashing sold separately VCM Curb Mounted For roof pitches from 00 to 600 Flashing sold separately Available sizes for trusses 24* on center Imidec,-b 2222 2234 2246 dnnsim 22'h*x221h' 2214104W 22%*x46'h' Available sizes for rafters 16' on center Insidecu,6 3030 dimenslarr. M1b*x30`-b* Available sizes for trusses 24' on center 3434 3-*1h*x34Ye 4646 4W% 40' QVM Self -Flashed For roof pitches from 15* to 60° 101 104 106 log Available sizes for trusses 24' on center Framesire: 21'h*x27%' 21lh'X38%' 211b'x4WA' 21vex54W Available sizes for rafters 16' on center 156 7. 711 =_77 Uj 7- 304306 17-7=1 Li 308 601 606 Framsize: 301V 4 38'W 301A-*x46'A* 30'Aex54"Ae 44W x 271h* 44'&'x46'/+' VCM Curb Mounted For roof pitches from 00 to 600 Flashing sold separately Available sizes for trusses 24* on center Imidec,-b 2222 2234 2246 dnnsim 22'h*x221h' 2214104W 22%*x46'h' Available sizes for rafters 16' on center Insidecu,6 3030 dimenslarr. M1b*x30`-b* 3046 3011z*x4Wh' 3434 3-*1h*x34Ye 4646 4W% 40' QVM Self -Flashed For roof pitches from 15* to 60° Flashing integrated (for shingles only) Available sizes for trusses 24' on center L 150152 156 17mmsize: 23W x 23V 2311e ), 301h* 237,'x0lle Available sizes for rafters 16" on center 17-7=1 Li 302 306 656 .... .. .... Attic Fans - groan Roof Mount Powered Attic Ventilator I PureAlrProducts,corn 512110 2:24 PM AbOUt U; Cir;1orr-rr Service ordiir Status 1.877.266.1144 Air Purifiers Humidifiers & Dehumidifiers Air Circulation Fans Ventilation Vacuum Cleaners Free Shipping Every Day for Orders over $too it, It terve shinning for Bro'-n orders Shop By Type crm 701-900(3) 91.X) dnd up (17) Home/Attic Size Brand Altr-lovv (fi,l E! C"'In fc-41 Additional Categories flithronrl F:m'; Ringo Hoods Fins Dehumidifiers Air Ploriflv'rf• Vacuum Cleaners Home r'—s Dryer Booster Fans Utility Fans Other EefaCo Stores KitchenSourcexom. <1 J'c'. r C nlpq �' trtmrvntl ntttr, rt' r.1 -I Nn I ^tr lwy,rri itu roScI,-,rccx,, rn Howe I Wil:i!C, 1 Iijkis' i"io% Roof Mount Powered Attic Ventilator by Broan I'Select a CFM $96 - $169.26 c,ty ? 1 ftw �'Ar Chiafk 5hipring CT rrodu(" Ri-,tifw Click ijr, ITT "I e!'% J:.4 ow 10 YI'?W WfL'-'f ., rexturez: 0 riuraWk' 1`eO'-rPsktont PVC donne 6111 bt- pa;vt(�d 10 mlu:h roof coli)( - Av,43abli- in b -'Ail) or bl;'Ck trrnsolotr- ?-d"jm-d rc"-:if 'Ind Vw,h srm,.n 1,etlps out birland I-o%'Ct to 2 7/W, Cp!�I"'+ —1p, il'.(';Il nu! r.'in 140;ivy g"406f� awl;4; rk'oIiq� Uandti k1f7 to natfin"'; ;and Wrlifle, fe%xd;s of d4rmu o'atOe to, f'o;v .., 1!Grr„? ' ro":-'jr. 14' 63nietcr steel blade Specially &sipnod for mixirurn air rno'vernent ffi jhc7r-.iijjy pr.c,.*cctrd, p,,,rminonvy hitricnttr! rw.'to' HVI Cvr'INuql. UL U'Al it Weleht: 17 - 1S Lbs. Ships vi,) UPS or Fedrx 't Yc..ir W,'urranty :0 -!kin any hor, i+,2 Root !'mount pov/crcd Attic unitS renlovc, ficncj ztAi- air, rn, inn -,C more corn. or� !Q. 'k, '.r !t, of heat pcnCtra1j1,n into Nving 3ri*35, Romoving, attic heat -C&C-os runnin-, tin.e of wr concnti,-,nors%.,hict relu!t in CT�Crl-,Y 'Z :” 'W io 'x ';:t!% i; t-, "incl a51 Ship Method: http://www.purealrproducts.comi'attic(ans-br350.htm Page 1 of 2 ���� �,,,�.�(�,�yfr�yrri '�rr�oy .; .� t'. ;z< '�. .. ,. � . /. 'qv SIT% . . . . . . . . . . . IFI JF I Q A' I All 7 f Nor "T A W-7 we TAOS:, V WMA., 0 QW W,W� 7 F. - My, - Q11 °y.,,; low, too, QY �1 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 30, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0430 Property Location: 20501 Cleveland Road — Cripe-Witter Cemetery Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: c.1850 Property Owner: German Township Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE./ SITE: Small cemetery off Cleveland Road shaded by a canopy of tall trees. Stone markers indicating grave sites are scattered; some are leaning against others, some are leaning against trees, many arc missing entirely or broken and scattered throughout cemetery. AI.,TERATIONS: none. APPLICATION ITEMS: Put in sign depicting cemetery. Put in (grave) markers where needed. Remove (trees) where overgrown. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSEDPROJECT- Owner wishes to put in a sign to be placed near the right of way off the parking lot at the entrance of the cemetery, see attached photo "Monument to be in graphic" for logo on sign. Language on sign to read: "Gripe -Witter Cemetery Circa 1834 German Township Historic Landmark. This cemetery was originally known as "The Cripe Cemetery" in honor of the Cripe family who donated the land for the cemetery. This cemetery became the first in St. Joseph County declared a historic landmark on, 13 August 1991, by the Historic Preservation Commission and County Council." The material or size for the sign has not yet been decided and owners are open to suggestions. Owner is planning on using grant money to erect this sign and must work within that budget. Owner would also like to replace grave markers that have felled or broken. In the case of those that are missing entirely, owner would like to erect markers fashioned as a cross, 36" tall x 30" wide. They arc willing to make the markers out of wood and would like to put the name of the deceased on the marker. Owner would also like to remove trees where overgrown. They have not named any specific trees; however, in general they- ould like to thin out some of the volunteer trees that have grown to be quite tall. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmark Group B Standards A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction, 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material maybe allowed ifit duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should c make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. MovinL, The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Buildini,,r Site and Landscaninp- (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dislics and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed application items pertaining to the grave markers and the tree removal as they are appropriate to the general cleaning and upkeep of the cemetery. Staff has no recommendation regarding the sign as there are not enough details decided at this point. I - APR -30-10 12:47 PM GERMr#Nr'Wp ij4f:.1V/A11j UQ.*52 5 144-3 � �5 , 8 574 2729020 hn 5WTH BENZ) Application -'FOR - Certificate of Approptlateness Histode PreSovid0ft, Cornu 1190M OfSMOh P*nd & St. 101;tPh COWY 1b 6 lafqotto Blvd, Swth tend, b4nw 4i FAS v OMCEUSE O 39107,070DO C0MPLMAVrVM1F.4 WNW= INBOX*"*" VMCI; USE OOZY 1 Doteltimelved 4 •V I ApPlication N=tb#r2Q- LM Q- - P Put Riviews: M (Algif Lo ice.?.. NO StAff Approval authorUed br. Nixtmt Commb5tall Review W..' XCaul I=dtzw& Local Mot,* District ovow) riatfune litister Diswet ovow (31)fted DT*bkd C3Sent UC*=n1t14v; ClApproved udbstod Addrax afpMpwV for pmymd work: CLtVrLAND RD. ACROSS FROM GER. LIR. 11Mf8xM)ff 10 Oftd �401t Nxne of Pmpaty own#r(s)- Cvww;wxt) GrRMNN TOWNSHIP Addr#ss ofPtopgrty O%rw(s), 7 5 5 PORTAGE RD. SOUTH 13ZND_,I.N... 46628 contravww' Contract Company Nwis, Contri" Addi"v City._ (574). 272-4020 (plif Finly-ft'ri'asily- yam( -it) Type of Duildlog Con'strucuore CEMETERY Proposed Work- -RIn-ldrid ERLindseW [)Nvw LIRuplicament(wix-W) Qrkmolldorl L PUT IN SIGN DEPICTING CEMETERY,-T.RY-,TO,-PUT'-ST014ES-TiPC!K--l-N-PLACEi- PuT ru v jwvrm-, WILVP�rj NEEDED -ZRTILI ZE-; --SEED -GR hSS'�,+Uttlr, -S AND' T. TREES WHERr, OVER GROWN","�,)OR REMOVE WHERE NEEDED. 5 7 4 2 7 2 - 9 0 2 0 APP4Lt=ON REQLUPaCNn AFX USTW CW PXWRSE SW — APR -30-10 12:46 PM GERMAN'TWP 574 2729020 513UTH E£'iti South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD SOt3TH BEND, IN 46601.1830 wwA-.O oscphtountyiadiena,conVsjchplindcx. htmI Eno-= 574.235-9798 Fix 514.235-9578 e -rail: SBSJCHPC(co st jWph la.as Timndzy S Klu sczinsid. Presidcat Fox Transmission h' Nancy German Township P. 01 PAr:F- Q_ A Crrtired Uma Gevcrnm>ttt CatSezinc D, FFoat rix. Drrctcr j a ,, Ellcla Dadlow Qatt tent: April 30,1010 Plumber of pages including cover pager Ci Auachcd i,► the Certificate of Appropriateness application for Local Historic Districts and Local Landmarks. Please Citi out to the best of your ability and call our office if you have any questions. Wayne Doolittle, Pres. ervition Speciall'stlinspector will visit the site of the application and take photographs. Deadline for COA's for the May 17 Commission rrtccting is Monday. May 3 at 3 pm. Your check for $15 can be mailed to the ad- dress above. Thank you, Elicia Dadlow RESPECTFULLY, r -i G' NANCY TOWNSi11)? ASSIST;NT 9-30-2U;0 rt?4IMINStti:' PRS SI'ri,F.,F J1rty'ti'iSzFdski Wayne Dfiulit;lc. Pr x"tior specialixt Lynn Patrkk (Secreta�rtyy) Utry Mateiver. t,0141 CtVnscl tMVId Sttith4Utt (Archittcttnl Ht3tvt}Kn} Vicia'Dacilpw. Assiitaat D term Undi XXq (Trt=rtt) nrrd,A Race w NE $4PR-30-18 12:47 Pm GERMANTWP 574 2729n20 Pr , wx- f . CIRCA 1834 P. 03 a4l;ll 0.)1.4 r� at a,,Z, o, t ( 4 1, g4vl�q . n4,4v THE CEMETERY WAS ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS C'THE GRIPE CEMETERY" IN HONOR OF THE CRIPE FAMILY WHO DONATED THE LAND FOR THE CEMETERY. THIS CEMETERY BECAME THE FIRST IN ST, JOSEPH COUNTY DECLARED 'A HISTORIC LANDMARK ON, 13 AUGUST 1991, BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND COUNTY COUNCIL., - MAY -OZ -10 12:10 PM GERMANTWP 574 2729020 P.02 GERMAN TOWNSHIP OFFICE IRVIN STASZEMKICE RO, - TRUSTEE 5 175 5 POR'rA SOUTH BENO, IN 46628 PN. & FAx # (514)277.9020 3 MAY 2010 GERMAN TOWNSHIP IS IN NEED OF MARKERS FOR THE GRIPE-WITTER CEMETERY. I WE ARE WILLING TO MAKE THE NEEDED MARKERS OUT OF WOOD. EACH 36" LONG 'BY 30"'ACROSS. WE WOULD LIKE TO PUT THE NAME OF THE DECEASED ON THE MARKER. NANCY TOWNSHIP ASSIST4NT Lookint towards the NW, May 5, 2010 0 • sc -tL Stone that will be the center piece of sign. I I ............... Stone that will be the center piece of sign. I I STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 5 May 2010 Application Number: 2010-0503-1 Property Location: 1308 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1948/Whitcomb and Keller Property (honer: Louise and Stephen Anella Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The original two storey house was constructed on a L -plan and set upon a brick foundation; the facades are brick on the first storey and wood shingles on the second. There is a gable roof covered with asphalt shingles that has molded raking trim. The windows are paired casements with wood trim and louvered shutters on the second floor and brick header course sills on the first floor. There is a round pediment at the entry with fluted pilasters, concrete and tile stoop, paneled details at entry and a wood sunburst motif fanlight. There is a brick header courses at the second floor line, and new rear addition. ALTERATIONS: The flat roof rear addition to the home was replaced in 1998 with a new addition with a pitched roofing system. The asphalt shingle roof was replaced in 2005 with asphalt dimensional shingles. , APPLICATION ITEMS: Front sidewalk, replace concrete with pavers. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROTECT: The homeowners wish to remove the current sidewalk leading from the front door to the driveway and to reconfigure it so that the two garden areas flanking the entry are symmetrical and then install rectangular brick pavers from the front door to the driveway. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private. yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing; deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's, history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project. The proposed plans are appropriate to the s}mimctry of the Colonial architectural style of the home and conform with the guidelines of the district. Application - FOR - Cedificate of Appraptiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South fiend & SL Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address. County -City nuilding, South need, I_A-"� 46fi(l1 Phots 574-235-97% • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email SBSJCHPC@co.st josCPhin.us Website http://www.sgoscphcounlyindiarkacom/sjchp/index,html OFFICE USE ONLY>>»y> DO NOT COMPLETE ANYEMIES CONMINED IN :CHIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received c>to I0 Application Number 4010 - 4Sor3- 1 Past Reviews: ©°YES (Date oftustReview) f' n44 -t.-! .7-O'.tS [] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: �r.�rG -o �a3-t Historic Commission Review Date: Fj Local Landmark [Local Historic District (Name) [j National Landmark [] National Register District (Namr) Certificate of Appropriateness: Ej Denied [] Tabled [] Sent To Committee Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: - 6 /, ` ", -,� < ffStreet Nurttber an street Na e Name of Property Owner(s): (Pleze Print) �4"er / -e /_-_1 A Address of Property Owner(,): Contractors) Name: C, Contract Company Name: / - PR 0 Contractor Address:� City: 5,0, r>e, nr Phone: Current Use of Building: P (Single Family - Multi -Family- Commercial - C.,o*.wnment - Industrial - Vaunt - rtc.) lrpe of Building Construction: (Woad Frame - tirid - stone - Steel - Conacte - Other) Proposed Work: I J `In-kind [❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) [] Demolition (more than one box may be dwrkrd) J f �} / �e sx YW I' j,C'e- t- r r:.' Description of Proposed th�k: �-l` ,�/ QAJ�jC, C'G:.7rt3lLt . tSL' 7fLl^'T jTd°} A %e F e10/4re*.1 G. C N.C. j- e 1-e t-* f i� bt dT v et -S OwnerlContractor. e-mail (This njj`ue rural ��rnrd ymtedesi n - - and/or _._._....___ __._._..._._. — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE. SIDE -- 1308 E. Wayne, May 5, 2010 � Wayne, Mav -`---- 01 1- £xtS'ttl3G R. NEW AW10N (44S SO, FQ EVSTING SCREEN POR04 14.5! -9,V 13,42* IT Ir F-� 1,75, zmsm-4 IYMEDE RESTRICTIONS NYMEDE RESTRICTIONS 7TOACK IS 40' and- ZTBACK IS 40* and LA I SIDEYARD IS 6 SiDEYARD IS '5 x 65* 8.66'c*_ ® 1 %5 x 6w 8.66' -7o, to SUNNYSME AYE. EASTWAYNE STREET SOUTH SITE PLAN Q� sckf— 1, - 20'-0' NORTH --CIO 20,167- CARAGE/ NEW A00=10N (48 Sy. F'Q MSTING Sall" pu"— IkV T, 75 i ITM 2EXISANG ROUT x sacs EAST WAYNE STREET SOUTH -fllropoae.A SITE PLAN SC"- il - 20.'vl NORTH 70' to SUNNYSIDE AVE. Holland Stone Specifications and Pallet Information Holland Stone - 2 3/8 in. Length: 7 13/16 in. Width: Height: 2 3/8 in. Weight / Stone: 6.00 lbs. Stones / Pallet: 480 stones - Pallet Weight: 2,884 lbs. Sq. Ft. / Pallet: 103 sq. ft. Product Number: 217 Holland Stone - 3,1/8 in. Length: 7 13/16 in. Width: 3 7/8 in. Height: 3 1/8 in. Weight / Stone: 8.10 lbs. Stones / Pallet: 384 stones Pallet Weight: 3,024 lbs. Sq. Ft. / Pallet: 84 sq. fL I Product Number: 219 Applications General Road Construction Parking Lots Gas Stations Holland Stone is available in Standard, Parkway (non -chamfered edges), Provencial (smooth) and Heritage (tumb Driveways Series finishes. Patios Product Images - See More Product Photos Highway Ramps Highway Rest Areas Bridge Underpasses Entrance Areas Industrial Plants Industrial Yards Installation Patterns Storage Depots Tt-rl i -AL r 11,�ii� —J. 1. L Loading Docks . . ...... Flooring in Stables Sidewalks a Terraces Garden Pathways Pool Decks Beach Promenades Pedestrian Malls Roof Gardens Street Medians ROWDO The renowned durability of interlocking pave stones, Holland Stone offers the old world charm of a simple paver shape. The rectangle shape can be installed in a number of fascinating patterns to produce simple or intricate designs. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-05030 Property Location: 302 S. Sunnyside Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1926/H. Russell Stapp, Architect Property Owner: Timothy Curran Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two storey brick house with rectangular plan. Side gabled slate roof with returns. Simple entablature with block modillions. Three hip roof dormers. 6/1 double hung windows with brick soldier course lintels and brick header course sills. Louvered shutters. Central cncloscd brick entry. Full entablature and block modillion detail extends over brick stoop, supported by fluted pilasters and columns. Leaded glass side lights and transoms. Brick quoins and brick header belt course at second floor line. One storcy flat roof enclosed wing with casement windows with stationary transoms. Attached brick two car garage with flat roof with simple entablature and cornice. Rcar flat roof porch. Brick chimney with stone caps. ALTERATIONS: Enclosed wing. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace windows evidencing mold contamination, replace windows that are missing and broken beyond repair with Anderson 400 series. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner wishes to replace 33 original windows in house. 4 of the 33 windows in the house arc missing the lower sashes; the missing windows are located on the 3`d storcy North side bedroom and 2"d storey West side bath. Homeowner has an urgent need to replace those 4 windows, as small children occupy the home. There are about 6-10 storm windows in existence, however, they do not .fit on the windows. The existing kitchen windows on the South side are double hung and the replacement proposal is to install casement windows. Wayne Doolittle, HPC Preservation Specialist/Inspector visited the house to inspect the windows; per Wayne's observation, he cannot make the mold determination, the HPC would recommend the Health Department. Wayne states that the windows are not deteriorated beyond repair. Steve Schoberg of Schoberg Restorations inspected the windows as well and observed that the original windows could be restored. Per homeowner, the dormer windows, sunroom windows, and all of the windows around the front door will be retained, re -glazed, lead remediated, and rc-painted. Big C Remodeling has quoted homeowner for replacement windows. Per Tom Doyle of Bic C, all replacements will be installed from the exterior. Exterior casing will be clad in aluminum and painted to match existing. Contractor will insulate the interior weight pockets. Muntins (referred to as grilles) will likely be between the glass for case of cleaning, however, more dimensional options are available with this replacement series. Richard Spicglmcycr of Replacement Systems International will be inspecting the windows and homeowner will report on his inspection to HPC staff. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended - Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend approval, as the two window inspections have determined the windows can be repaired and the lower sashes of the missing windows can be reproduced. Application - FOR - Cedif . iCate of AppropHateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County: 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing "Arpm* County-CityBuilding, SouthBend, T__1 iarrta 4601 Phot: 574-235-M 9 Fax:57-1-235-%78 I Email:-SBSj01PMD.st-joscphirLuS Website. httly//www.stjoscplicountyindiam,com/., chp/indexhtmI OFFICE USE ONLY>>>>2,> DO NOT COWLM ANY ENTRIES CONMINED IN THIS BOX >>>>» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received')-.') .10 Application Numberz— — — — Past Reviews: % YES E]NO Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Commission Review Date- A�IJ,10 Local Landmark Local Historic District (Name) National Landmark National Register District (Name) Title: Certificate of Appropriateness - Denied [_] Tabled F1 Sent To Committee n Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: Rozlde_ Ave_- Itreet Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s); (Please Print)( -Ttlti'Vt (1virto.01. Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: » S' M_ Ott ICAA/ku City- R. Phone: Current Use of Building: f, a le Family - Mult4a mily - Commerci4l - Government - industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wwd Frame - Brid - Sttme - Steel - Conaefe - other) Proposed Work: [] In-kind ] Landscape E] New E] Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one bor may be chxW) Description of Proposed Work: C e tl,c e %.*t 01 IQ I., r e 4 'C It -t Aa (.L_ ty* t"4441 Arle'rit^ '10D Ourner/Contractor. Fax: e-mail ±G _%j r CkVQ (7mus offi(MV foll cens *rid with only one desiptee) and/or 3—�APPIUICA710N REQLHMWNIS ARE LISTED ON RLITRSE SIDE — 302 Sunnyside, May 5, 2010 North side, May 5, 2010 5 302 Sunnyside, May 5, 2010 South side AND Ty""575 R" f V: oil E --Now Z z 0`4 IR NARY •I A ANSI Th, Iry - ?yrr=7C'_ wrink �'Mf 'Ta A too :a; x; TOM— X' OPT, A :4-" z AM, gig low, Kitchen windows, May 5, 2010 May 6, 2010 I visited the Curran house at 302 Sunnyside on April 19, 201 O.Tim Curran took me on a tour of the home where I was able to look at most of the windows from the inside. Many of the windows were painted shut and missing sash weight ropes. There were four windows that were missing the lower sashes and others with missing or broken glass. Most of the windows suffered by years of neglect and no storm windows. Many of the mullions have pealing paint caused by moister. Some of the window sills were split but repairable with Abatron. The missing sashes can be duplicated and the rest restored. I visited with Steve Schoberg on May 5. 2010. His company has many years of window restoration experience. It was also his opinion that the windows can be brought back to their original appearance. Wayne Doolittle Preservation Specialist South Bend and St. Joseph County historic Preservation Commission Page 1 of 1 SBSJCHPC - 302 S. Sunnyside - Windows From: "Timothy Curran" <TCurran rr LCK-Law.com> To: <SBSJCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us> Date: 5/3/2010 6:16 PM Subject: 302 S. Sunnyside,- Windows Attachments: 044 jpg; 053 Jpg; 046 jpg; 048 Jpg; 050 jpg; 052 jpg; 064 jpg; 074;jpg; 076.jpg; 080.Jpg; 082 jpg; 086 jpg; 088 jpg Attached please find some photos showing the mold (a sampling of random windows from each of the three floors) and some others showing the missing windows (third floor bedroom and second floor bathroom). Also, please note that I have a total of about 6-10 storm windows left. When we took occupancy of the house in February and our painter/plasterer started working on the interior, he couldn't get those storms to fit on any of the windows (thus, the plastic on the outside). My understanding is that the majority of the windows in the house have not had storms on them for the last 6-10 years. Please do note, however, that I'm keeping the dormer windows, sunroom windows, and all of the windows around the front door. Those windows (which, luckily, have been covered by storms for the last 6 years and, as a result, are not beyond repair and are not showing mold) will be reglazed, lead remediated, and re -painted. Please don't hesitate to call me if you have any further questions or thoughts. Thanks, -Tim Timothy M. Curran LaDue Curran & Kuehn LLC 574.968.0760 (office) 574.859.1585 (cell) www.lck-law.com file://C:\Documents and Settings\EDadlow\Local SettingsiTemp\XPgrpwisel4BDF 131 ASJ... 51512010 WWAQ w. stop WMA APT �# 3 f f}•: z F, i- into; 1 r I A VISIT, 'x'«oil Vis. :��� ... •"6:E .. B..�ry,-,�;;;. va 4:`H�'s ''tR' {fz§<.�;t�,z`-y�.� ',�.Q'•ba°<. m?vr• '4''•'zb ,-.r'� c •S'•' � p� P i 11, ''ill 1111�'jlljpm e a i< 14:MY W Any, "Pin 40 6.g rte' k 6.g MRS. , vir, W n ITT" Im• jtl� ly Jim I Ax"Zo, A 04-- 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . "Eli on; v toy W wK T 000 ,.�,L.����.. �Xs• •w%+C.9',pj�+u„S.Ps�Y u'",':a•«rv, y.F® " .iii ,s'dn:^� .; .. - �� n rx •yf°, ••� �Y •'OCG,'-. .. y�i,ref,: °! t..;, -- 2`'-.�`a V .Y. Eq`„ ..,,�,, ,�„�%�".� PP - .. �' ,�.,. t dy�j,-'*A„���"�"� 2 ,+r '" :a�"e�P��-„'�""y,Y � .y w'u° !• '%; A',,!'...�m. $, •.," $:�5 r'p" A'p j s.E,'°�, `�+.kh'�'s - r,K°'U: � �'.ir .�<_ ��'*r�. � r° � �: ' fin. � y '• 1 � Y ° ,� , � s °" S ti Im� f'� "� �jq" .a*'��ys �' palWON WIT If WKCO - 0140717 < r. l�. F H tSw r. ��"A�eae�+a � M •e HiQ k ;L n EPOPS: DRAW WINDOWS COPY Page: I 100316 1641 QUOTATION #547 412912010 0000547/07 Big C remodeling Sim#: 001695 2V8(T) X 42(T), 125 N. Dixieway Emp: South Bend, IN 46637 Ordered: 4/28/2010 Phone: 574-272-6500 800-837-1882 Xmitted: Fax: 574-271-3832 PO #: Customer #: 12725 Job Name: Curren Home Owner: Remodeling Dept Project ID: Location: Lot #: Model: Phone: Contact: Fax: Cust PO#: All drawings are from the OUTSIDE looking In. T = Tip to Tip'Measurement 0 = Rough Opening Measurement 1TF1 ED iul.li El 2 Double Hung 6 Double Hung 0000547102 0000547101 19(T) X 32(T) 26 1/2(T) X 42 1M(T) 2nd Poor bath 4 Double Hung 3rd floor 0000547103 36(T) X 54(T) 2nd, Master OR ........... FFTI 1 Double Hung ....... 0000547104 28(T) X 46(T) 8 Double Hung 0000547/05 10 Double Hung 2nd MBath 36M X 54(T) 0000547106 36M X 58(T) 3 811's, 2nd floor 1st floor I Right Hinge Casement 1 Left Hinge Casement 0000547/07 0000547103 28(T) X 42(1-) 2V8(T) X 42(T), I, "WCVq;v' -oA i� s STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0503D Property Location: 712 Forest Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/ 1903/Ennis Auston, Architect Property Owner: Vittorio Hoslc Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two storcy rectangular plan home set upon a concrete block. foundation. Wood clapboard siding on V storey. 2"" storcy is covered with wood shingles. Asphalt shingled gambrel roof with a curved slope over porch. Two upper dormers projecting from front, one gabled, one hipped. Front porch with grouped Doric wood columns supporting an entablature. Balustrade with spindles and moulded banister. Pent roof with moulded rake and knee brackets over north entrance. Windows are double hung. Projecting bay windows on North side. Hipped dormer windows have a diamond pane transom. Two small recessed windows in the attic. Gabled garage located at rear. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove existing picket fence and replace with privacy of similar material. Extend driveway fence from main house Southwest side to existing location. Add gate to Northwest alley side. Extend fence to include main house side entrance. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner would like to exchange the existing decorative wooden picket fence for a "dog car" wooden privacy fence because neighboring tenants dump litter into their yard. New fence placement will include an existing side entrance on the alley side for security, in which a gate will be installed to access the alley side door. New fence will extend fence on neighbor's driveway side approximately 25' to deter excessive litter; the fence and gate installation will be behind the setback of front porch. Both gates will be softened from street view by existing landscaping. The 6'x 14' alley entrance gate will be a residential sliding gate apparatus faced with the same pressure treated "dog car" style fencing to match the rest of the installation. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park: 1. THE .ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in . It close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commere ia] style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF REXOhiMEitiDATION: Staff recommends approval to exchange existing decorative fence to a functional "dog car" wood privacy fence and extending the perimeter around to the side door and neighbors driveway. i Application - FOR - Certiificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 4(kOl Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana AAAA Prone: 574-235-9758 + Fax: 574-2335-Tj78 • Email• SBSiCHPMo.st josephin.us Website littr//www.stjosephcountyindiaro-com/Ichp/indmbtml OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONIA tNEL) IN THIS BOX »»» OTI"ICE USE ONLY Date Received 3. 1 0 Application Number lu Q_ - X50 4 A Past Reviews: R YES (ewe o f last &view) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Commission Review Date:c(� ! 10 [] Local Landmark] Local Historic District (Name.) nyl�1 [] National Landmark [] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: YNO Title: Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee F1 Approved and Issued 9^ Address of Property for proposed work:. / I--- lbw Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Pique Print) --�4^ P Address of Property Owner(s): 7/ Contractot(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: ') V DATE City: _.- : = �1— A Il777A! _ Phone: i `7 Y _ U - , Current Use of Building: (Sing)s'amily - Mu11i-Fami1y - Co merdai - Government - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction:�+r01 7riz Amp (Wood Frame -Brick - Stam - Stmi - Concrete- Other) Proposed Work: W In-kind E]Landscape [❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more titan one box mazy be chtz9ceai) Description of Proposed Ark:,..... + . �I; t ; .. � ( � � r F Owner/Con . o Fax:_ `-. y q/) e-mail ��� -�, r� � � r, r ApJ jE , ( ' olf,m Yngvn *h only one deaigne) ( � /?jIt lt�) 12 5ft7+trrtl/�sC r Il and/or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- ri ' uv uv NrJ"+ L I b gs, t GC t idsx4 � AIG Solid Dog Ear vnsx. post spacmg 4x4 I xt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 x4 . . <.3• FRONT VIEENN" 36" 1-ifin-1/tAmm, hnnvi>rffnoo Page I of I 171-4x4 /-2 x4 TOP VMNV �. . 1, 1 1 1 1 1 1 "1 1 1 1 1 1 '1 1 1 muvffiw 99,CO1H " 7 (;f4o(If rtw#,. F*M#�d Ca A4 w Looking east down ally Looting east on south property line 712 Forest, May 3, 2010 I Looking W. at gate iv v, I'k 7,1 Still looking W. along fence Back of property -77 ......... ...... Ii P R i All Al L-1, Back of property J Looking W. NW corner back yard Side door by ally Location Budget as of 04-30-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 04%30/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original AddYi/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 46,907.88 71.02 _ 71.02 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 360.63 72.13 72.13 10000 Totals ""'"" 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 200.00 1,825.94 2,025.94 0.00 000 General GovT. 11,007.00 52.13 52.13 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 160.00 100.00 100.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 278.99 93.00 93.00 20000 Totals 925.00 1,825.94 2,750.94 0.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 20,016.00 1,100.00 21,116.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32020 Travel 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32350 Postage 1,000.00 57.90 1,057.90 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 200.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 000 General GovT. Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 05/05/2010 12:05 PM Page 61 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 8,049.80 21,950.20 21,950.20 73.17 73.17 11,092.32 24,957.68 24,957.68 69.23 69.23 19,142.12 46,907.88 46,907.88 71.02 _ 71.02 1,854.14 171.80 171.80 8.48 8.48 139.37 360.63 360.63 72.13 72.13 0.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00 1,993.51 757.43 757.43 27.53 27.53 10,109.00 11,007.00 11,007.00 52.13 52.13 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 98.36 959.54 959.54 90.70 90.70 s 21.01 278.99 278.99 93.00 93.00 0.00 200.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 245.00 245.00 100.00 100.00 User ID ksobecki 05/05/2010 12:05 PM Page 61 Location &u-dget as of 04-30-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 04/30/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Original Add `VAdj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation 30000 Totals '" *" 22,021.00 1,157.90 23,178.90 Location Totals "'*'"*"*"' 88,996.00 2,983.84 91,979.84 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint J I I iii County User ID ksobecki 05/05/2010 12:05 PM Page 62 t Unencumbered Unexpended Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 10,228.37 12,950.53 12, 950.53 55.87 55.87 0.00 31,364.00 60,615.84 60,615.84 65.90 65.90 0.00 0.00 31,364.00 User ID ksobecki 05/05/2010 12:05 PM Page 62 t f HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE: 04.21.2010 ADDRESS: 824 FOREST DISTRICT: CHAPIN PARK HOMEOWNER: VICKY HYLAND WORK PROPOSED: IN KIND. GARAGE ROOF TEAR AND NEW ROOF. 25" FIBERGLASS 3 IN 1 TAB SHINGLE. IDENTICAL MATERIALS TO WHAT IS PRESENTLY THERE. IN-KIND REPLACEMENT: ROOFING OFFICE VISIT FROM RICHARD GUNTLE ON 4.21 .2010 ON SITE VISIT WITH WAYNE, CATHERINE, ELICIA TO 824 FOREST ON 4.21.2010. PHOTOGRAPHS INCLUDED. Tim Musczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In kind garage roof, tear off and reroof with exact same style shingles. RICHARD A. GUNTLE, Contractor for the following location: 824 FOREST South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2010-0421 in the County of St: Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of ; the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. 4 . CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Victoria hyland DATE PERMIT 04/21/2010 TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Elicia Dadlow Assistant Director h L pNn�] POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK A Application FOR - CerH fiCate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46401 Mailing Address- County -City PU;Ielin South Bend Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-215-%78 * ErnaiLSBSjCHFC@cost-josephinuS Websita, httF.//winv.stkmphcountyindiana.cwn/sjchp/index.litml OFFICE USE ONLY>>>>>> DO NOT` COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COIMINED IN THIS BOX >>>>>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Application Number 011/2 J �lf'E Past Reviews: M YES (Date of writevi=) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: tai Title: Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark Local Historic District {Namr) rC ti' National Landmark National Register District Woml Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied [:]Tabled Sent To Committee Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work- q_?_ Ll Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Nnt) a -y /* e4 Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: - (f I c- e -?c Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: Phone: Current Use of Building; (single Family - Multi -Family - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Conistruction: K__)Cke-'k (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind n Landscape 0 New n Replacement (not in-kind) [] Demolition (more than one bar may be chased) Description of Proposed Work- cx Owner/Contractor. Fax: e-mail (This cfficr wM corrtspnd mjth on designee) j Xzf%zle5�y ane 1_11111'�r-. and/or — APPLICATION REQ UIREINIENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — '14 W MAI ma 0. A A 11 1 N 1 kits wASSY TY._ Tllls'"74'1'1"%, A—A TITS; 824 Forest, April 21, 2010 Avon KA Wv,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j4Ojos: 0 At A of .... .. . y f 1 ly , MTV T T ma An 824 Forest, April 21, 2010 Avon KA Wv,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j4Ojos: 0 At A of .... .. . y f 1 ly , MTV SO SAO Sh. - R a rill ga ma A—A SO SAO Sh. - R a rill ga HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & STJOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE April 26,2010 ADDRESS 628 Park Avenue DISTRICT Chapin Park, Local Historic District HOMEOWNER Cornelius Eady WORK PROPOSED. Repair/In kind of brick and lintels that are failing from stress. Remove top coping stones on NE top side. Bricks will be removed some four. feet to remove lintels. New lintels will be installed and the brick re-laid to original look. I spoke to Mr. Behringer, supenisor, about the work that necessary to preserve the look of the brick. We talked about the mortar and sand to be used. I also went over the f6rmulas used in recreating the original look- including coloring the mortar and the proper finishing techniques. Photographs were taken of the damaged areas to be repaired. Application - FOR - Certificate of AppropHateness I listoric PfeservatlOn Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County Ir5 S. Li-dayeve Blvd,, South Bcmd, Indim-ta 46h0l Mn -b Address. County . Wvuj1d=,_>outhbendf indianaqbwl Phone: 571-235-9798 * Fax:.57,1_z35-9578 - Fmail:SB5jCH'I-'CCt)co.st-joskIpiLill.LIS Website: http://wlvw.stjosephcotintyindiina.com/.jclili/index.litnil OFFICE LISE ONLY >>>>>>Iii? NOT COMPLM ANY EMIES CONMINED IN THIS BOX -->OFFICE USE ONLY' Date Received -W111 - 0 �vZ 7 Application Number eAe Past Reviews: 441) n NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark BlAcal Historic District YA4j— National Landmark 2-gational Register District orame) Certificate of Appropriateness: [j Denied (Tabled n Sent To Committee [B'Approved and Issued 417,4I&M 0t_)b,�T �.,' Address of Property for proposed work.---- k" .W"8 Art fiWA btC,, Street Number and Street Mime Nance of Property Owner(s); (Wiese Print) Cornic-Tws E_oLdL� Cf, NA; Address of Property Owner(s): Pct. r V, A v t_ Ao-p, Contractor(s) Name: Mt V-. Tro N r, JGLred RC PtO_ 5 Contract Company Name: jkm(y-,-i� MasNr^, Contractor Address: M_6a_5fTe6J_ City: '24���_-2_J(J 61A 0 Phone: �05 Current Use of Building: s} W, 11, " -ain,4 (Sir Ie ranzl�v - Multi -ramify - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Varant - nO Type of Building Construction: `6,_0L (I,Vxd frame - Brifi- - Stene - Steel - conaefF - other) Proposed Work:In-kind Landscape 0 New E] Replacement (net inQ-kind) Demolition (7,;7e than one box fmyb.- sharked). Description of Proposed Work- 'Revv\nvc, *)p 5i.4-r� '� � C aL�c _)Qicy_� 1i Aft Akso fbAWx_1_q10H im4-1c's �K U�ns&&k\ �)ricycs WCL Al) V , �L n5 t tin cl 4A. Liok�);Nj Ilicy-ro--m- ri rAcA CaS Oxvncr/Contracto. Fax: (<,--Iq e-mail (This offim will airropond with only rde designee) 4 and/or -- APPLICATION REQUIMIEWIS ARE LISIT-D ON REMRSE SIDE — ,k Tim Klusczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Repair/In-kind of brick work: Remove top coping stones on NE top side; Remove bricks downs 4 feet, also remove steel lintels. Install new steel lintels and re -Install bricks back to original height and style along with coping stones. Remove downspout and grind, 4 feet from window to comer; top to bottom 11 feet. Tuck point ground out areas with lime putty mortar to match original. CHIM TECH, Contractor for the following location: 628 PARK South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 20 tO-O427A in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 238-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSjCRPc@coxt-joseph.1n.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OFAPPUCANT: Cornelius Eady DATE PF.R.'t1IT o4/x7/2o10 TAKES FORCE: PEILAIrr ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST INA CONSPICUOUS PLACE ONTHE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT tTN"nL COAIPIZnON OF ALL WORK. 628 Park, April 273 2010 4 1147 _ <�- _. _ ;•�.. %;:tea :�`, „ `".:: .r WAN y I 'e'�; � b.v ` r� e`• « yn, «✓`� $! ':y« 'i•y' r'^t � `x -...Y k"+ • £ r ?„ y�,a' ,.. ,.°�,': " ,fix .b�,,,£ 0�;:�. �° "' �a ....: -s yk ♦ p Y �,a<�° �.� Y 2 V ;,, z .,-•d .. ��� c rolls,g �' . ,' 6 SSS��� nr�' 1Y ; :�. • .,.�. > 'gc� >, , J^`L• >.'. �' �+.wd»^Y d yyy ,'� �« " : - is 9 �P ��' �- s. '•� �gws.� ..;�' -i �tr , , t .. ;fag..'• - L. `�<i . n..�- � , 4 � c, c oA g°'tin c tg.£ ���'> x'a`e Ya a4RV” `*,< _�'�, ~`faw •, ,' %,�` ., i" .,: . ' �.«y 77 owl M�f � '>Y Nw`�' d�<. rte -'3, `4w .+._, y� ^'s^xx^'-o•'" ;�� �S '. . „�°rz�'e `w".'w��o, ' sm An Inn A, � r �; ,': 4 : 2 a g., _ f• toot ,P bi' � e r TVA 4' «p, Y. .,�.uw'-% y•'"mw",'�^ ;«a ``�l �<s r$°,^., �`^, _., b i HI a _ sz it�'v .�i's : „t �, r .✓ r <� ' w f£ 4"`','-6#„. xru. �a 41 A < • �-0qA,�• y� ���<j: �> -','f ''� ':€35� d 628 Park, April 273 2010 ., •t, aw, 'Oa.! .e y{ ��.St, T.@�.��- eyy.m.«,.m. ,'� ��f to ° �gws.� ..;�' -i �tr ,f 4 � oA g°'tin c tg.£ ���'> x'a`e Ya a4RV” `*,< _�'�, ~`faw •, ,' %,�` ., i" .,: u}`R� owl M�f � '>Y Nw`�' d�<. ,'r'•,.q'�» °�'✓ ab'3 -�{.r.<•ay g `w".'w��o, ' sm An at. a _ � e r TVA a HI a a£ a` r <� 41 A IS . n � �: �, v _15. picot. re� ,8 8'ak�w..w,a ..m+rc .. ,w ,. -„ 5 , ,,..a.«-�. .,,a„e., .-.,-w ., , a” s .. «,., ,.....,,<.,. 'a ...., n-uG«n....�`. s,.4 .. .,." .., w n...ro•,,., 4 ,.s ... .n, ,u_<,... .sn,.r.«.<w'a :... d+,��i, .,i.w :.,..ro I&. 628 Park, April 27, 2010 rv� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST, JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION, FORM DATE: 04.28.2010 ADDRESS: 533 RIVERSIDE DRIVE DISTRICT*. RIVER BEND HOMEOWNER: BEVERLY AND BILL LAWSON WORK PROPOSED: IN KIND. FRONT PORCH ROOF TEAR OFF AND NEW ROOF. IDENTICAL MATERIALS TO WHAT IS PRESENTLY THERE. IN-KIND REPLACEMENT: ROOFING OFFICE VISIT FROM JEFF DIERBECK ON 4.28.2010 PHOTOGRAPHS INCLUDED Application - FOR - Certificate of Appro priateiiess I listOric Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South BLmd, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indian Af-,Al Phone- 574-235-9798 - Fax:574-235-T578 # Email:SBSJCIfPC(a)co,st-jt)cA-ph,ifitis Website: littlY//wivw.stjo,%�phcountyindiami.com/.schl�/inth..,X.IitinI OFFICE DISE ONDO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received � - 'tq I 10 Application Number L 0 1 0 - 0 R F.Y,E-: Past Reviews: ] YES (mt, of Last Rmitw) Staff Approval authorized by: E] NO Title: i' D Historic Commission Review Date: 01- ] Local Landmark [� Local Historic District (maw) \v C rBey—)j E) National Landmark f -j National Register District (6vaftw) Certificate of Appropriateness: M Denied [] Tabled Ej Sent To Committee [] Approved and Issued DAfF Address of Property for proposed work: k7+-tt =_K -Sr n;c n Sired Numberand Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Plmsr. Print) Address of Property O-wner(s): r /)01- Contractor(s) Name: 11 F r oa, *in -A :5 Contract Company Name - Contractor Address: e42 jk. 1 City: Phone: Current Use of Building: commercial - Qvernmerf - Indititrial - Vacant - rtc-,) Type of Building Construction: (-)rte o - Flz i, m,F Proposed Work- [gIn-kind[] Landscape E] New n Replacement (net in-kimf) E) Demolition (mare Von one ba may be che.ked) Description of Proposed Work: to— Va",e, q plo J 4 -&J -D 14 I A-1 A4 tO Ov,mer/Contr c or- \ Fax: e-mail we wall ,p ind with only one designee) and/or 1j t J1 APPLICATION REQUIREMEWS ARE LTSTEI) ON REVERSE SIDE -- xAPPROPRIATENESS Tim Rlusczinski, President Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574) 235-9578 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.at joseph.in us The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove existing fiberglass roofing at front porch and replace with same. DIERBECK &ASSOCIATES, LLC, Contractor for the following location: 533 RIVERSIDE South Bend, IN 466oi Riverside Application No. 2010-0428B in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © Located in a Local Historic ❑ ALocal Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICAN T: Beverly Lawson DATE PERMIT 04128/2010TAKES FORCE: PERMIT ISSUED BY: Elicia Dadlow Assistant Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL 1VORK. TV WSW Ww' MITI, OQ— Ji 'JIM 0 r VOW efs ashy 0 533 Riverside, April 29, 2019 Director's Report May, 2010 April 19 Visit Farm on Brick and Mayflower for Area Plan meeting April 20 Area Plan Commission Meeting. Issue approved COAs. April 21 On site visit to 824 Forest for RME on garage roof. 106 Reviews April 22 Letter to Councilman Henry Davis per Commission's direction April 23 Office; Payroll; 106 Reviews April 26 On site visit to 628 Park Avenue for RME on brick repair April 27 On Cell System tutorial with Bill S. On site visit 845 River for in-kind work and restoration of bead board porch ceiling. April 28 On site visit to 533 Riverside Drive for RME on in-kind roof re -placement by Jeff Dierbeck. 514 W. La Salle worked with Connie Tooley and contractor for COA on roof; meeting with 803 Forest homeowner, Rosilind Clark on COA for skylights April 29 MACOG's Partners for Clean Air Awards Luncheon in Elkhart April 30 Turn in fees for month; Economic Luncheon with Indiana Secretary of the Treasury. On site visit to burned out landmarked Firehouse on Thomas May 3 Deadline for COAs: 5 Applications accepted. Staff Reports for COA applications. Issued RME for 545 River, 601 Park (trees per Brent); On site - visit with Doug Gibson at 1025 Hudson concerning proposed addition to rear of house and back yard landscaping and deck. May 4 Office Closed for Primary Election May 5 Prepared Staff Reports for May meeting. May 6 Prepared Staff Reports for May meeting; begin prep of Commissioners' packets; Temple Beth -El fundraiser; conducted Botanical Society membership meeting at 5:15 for Executive Committee nominees May 7 Finished Commissioners' packets and helped prepare for Southhold Awards that evening; participated in Awards ceremony that evening. Worked with Rita Dargis for RME on deck replication at 845 Park. May 10 Participated in the NICH Finance Committee meeting; Attended DTSB Annual Stakeholders luncheon meeting at Wiekamp Auditorium. May 11 Worked with Judy Roschek from Community and Economic Development on 106 audit materials; researched 728-728 1/z Leland zoning with Chuck Bulot, Building Commissioner May 12 Met with Bill Lamie concerning plans for 1223 E. Wayne Street South addition options and plans; sent findings to Judy Roschek. May 13 Prepared letter to interested party on 728 Leland for Chuck Bulot's review; attended Kroc Center ground breaking, discussed Drewry's Brewery with Derek Dieter on site visit and tour of 609 Riverside Drive with potential buyer with Wayne. Assistant Director's Reoort HPC Meetina 5.17.2010 1. City Cemetery National Register Nomination -Phone call with John Carlson of GIS -he provided me with a historic photograph. Discussion with Steve Nemeth of Parks Department -setting up a meeting to go through records in the Gatekeeper house. Reorganizing nomination, using the appropriate form. Correspondence with Holly Tate of DHPA with questions -waiting for her response. Researching at Gatekeeper house, going through all files and maps. Correspondence with Dave Steinhauer regarding setting up an appointment to tour the cemetery and discuss architectural layout and design. 2. Restore Michiana turned Green Weekend -correspondence with INLandmarks and GreenTech regarding 3D recycling statistic & working on design. Work on budget. Design banner and solicit quotes. GW planning committee meeting at DTSB. Correspondence regarding banner. Send banner to print. 3. Southhold Preservation Awards/DTSB Pride of Place Awards -Add to guest list & send invitations. Prepare & send special letter of announcements to nominees. Design program. Prepare Award presentation. Visit Circa Arts to approve the fired tiles. Correspondence with caterer, equipment rentals, and Natalie of American Trust Place on details of event. Prepare winner -certificates. Collecting RSVPs. Prepare table layout for ATP. Flower quotes. Meeting with Jitin Kain and Jennifer Gregar on schedule of events and details for the ceremony. Prepare revolving PowerPoint presentation. Pick up awards and flowers. Set up ceremony. Attend Southhold. Clean up after ceremony. Prepare press release, forward to DTSB. Correspondence with Burns Rental regarding misplaced table cloth. 4. HPC brochure -Soliciting quotes for printing. Update brochure design. Send brochure to print at Lightning Litho. Approve proof. 5. Restore Michiana workshops -Meeting with Jennifer Gregar of IN Landmarks. Discussion with Bill Barnard of Troyer Group/US Green Building Council on partnering for a Lead info session. Research to find our EPA contact, left phone message. Correspondence with EPA regarding lecture. Correspondence with Richard Spigelmyer regarding window lecture and restoration demonstration -getting back to me with a price. Meeting with Jennifer Gregar of IN Landmarks to review calendar. 6. Prepare 03.19.10 HPC meeting minute draft and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print minutes for May meeting. »»»»»»»»»»» 7. HPC Logo -Discussion with Architectural Historian Dave Steinhauer regarding a new design he sent by email. Compile Commissioners preference. Photograph 1855 Courthouse for possible logos and whip up a logo or two played off the photos. 8. Michiana History Group -correspond by email on next meeting and possibly hosting a workshop. 9. Routine Maintenance Exclusion -824 Forest. 533 Riverside. 10. $4,000 events budget tracking -Prepare budget sheet. Fill in the blanks. 11. Indiana Hoosier Heartland Conclave & Theatre Tour -Contact the Theatre Historical Society and offer to be involved and to help promote the June 22-27 tour. 12. Phone conversations with several COA applicants. 13. Staff reports 20501 Cleveland Road. 345 S. Sunnyside Avenue. 302 S. Sunnyside Avenue. 712 Forest. 830 N. Michigan. 14. Research Oliver Park for officer Derek Dieter. 15. Attend groundbreaking ceremony of the Kroc Center. 16. Attend DTSB stakeholder meeting at Center for History. 17. Attend Partners for Clean Air Award Luncheon hosted by MACOG, presentations by NIPSCO clean air activities, EPA on national ambient air quality standards, and IDEM on how P2 works for you. 2 South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD. SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e-mail: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Timothy S. Klusczinski, President A Certified Local Government Catherine D. Hostetler, Director AGENDA OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MONDAY, MAY 24, 2010 9:30 AM SPECIAL MEETING OFFICE OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 12 5 S. LAFAYETTE AGENDA: 712 FOREST AVENUE COA42010-0503D Miscellaneous COMMISSIONERS Linda Riley (Treasurer) Jerry A. Niezgodski (Vice President) Lynn Patrick (Secretary) Sandra L. Rossow Todd Zeiger David Steinhaurer I Ad Number: 4250755, Publication: TFI AGENDA OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MONDAY, MAY 24, 2010 9:30 AM SPECIAL MEETING OFFICE OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 125 S. LAFAYETTE AGENDA: 712 FOREST AVENUE COA#2010-0503D It: 5:20 State of Indiana St. Joseph County ss: Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for said county and state, the undersigned Carol Smith who, being duly sworn says that she is of competent age and is Advertising Director of The South Bend Tribune, a daily newspaper which for at least five (5) consecutive years has been published in the City of South Bend, county of St. Joseph, State of Indiana, and which during that time, has been a newspaper of general circulation, having a bona fide paid circulation, printed in the English language and entered, authorized and accepted by the post office department of the United States of America as mailable matter of the second-class as defined by the act of Congress of the United States of March 3, 1879, and that the printed matter attached hereto is a true copy, which was duly published in said newspaper. 1 time s, the dates of publication being as follows: Mav 20. 2010 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 20th day of May 2010 Leslie Ann Winey Notary Public Resident of St. Joseph County My commission expires December 21, 2016 Charges $4.30 Page 1 of 1 Catherine Hostetler - 712 Forest Special Meeting From: Catherine Hostetler To: HPC&STAFF Date: 5/18/2010 12:19 PM Subject: 712 Forest Special Meeting CC: Larry Meteiver Wayne and I met with Jeff Dierbeck and Mrs. Hosle this morning concerning the 6 foot privacy fence in COA 2010-0503D. On our way to the meeting Wayne and I drove down the alleyway that intersects behind Forest off of Riverside Drive and counted 17 privacy fences; only one of which was painted white. One of the reasons why they go unnoticed is because the wood has weathered and they do blend in and they are along the rear of the property. Jeff Dierbeck drove through the neighborhood as well and from the front of the houses from the street along Park, Navarre, Forest, Riverside, Leland and LaMonte (I have the listing with the addresses) he counted 34 rear/side privacy fences --only one of which was painted (and that one was white). The Hosle Family has gone to Court concerning their problems/issues with these two houses (drugs, pit bulls, profanity, fights not to mention thefts from the Hosle's garage and being under constant observation by these people) and the judge recommended that they erect a privacy fence along the perimeter of their property. The Hosle's have two young boys and are expecting a third child very soon. They are willing to compromise on the design by keeping a 4 foot fence/gate on the street side behind the setback of the porch but they absolutely desire a privacy fence along the alley, rear and side of their home to enclose their back yard. Therefore, I am calling for a Special Meeting for 9:30 on Monday, 24 May 2010 in the Office Conference Room to re -address this COA with Mrs. Hosle and Mr. Dierbeck. We will need at least four Commissioners for a quorum, please let me know ASAP so that I can contact the homeowner and contractor. I am also under the impression that the homeowner would not be adverse to meeting sooner, rather than later; but our by-laws state 5 days notice. Please let me know ASAP. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Catherine Director, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana 574 235 9798 file:HCADocuments and Settings\chostethLocal Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4BF285D3SJC... 5/24/2010 Page 1 of 2 Elicia Dadlow - Fwd: 712 Forest Avenue From: Catherine Hostetler To: Elicia Dadlow; Wayne Doolittle Date: 5/20/2010 9:58 AM Subject: Fwd: 712 Forest Avenue FYI Director, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana 574 235 9798 >>> "Dave Steinhauer"<DSteinhauer@jameschildsarchitects.com> 5/20/2010 9:29 AM >>> Tim, Because I will not be able to attend Monday's meeting with regard to the proposed fence installation at 712 Forest Ave., I would like to enter the following opinion into the minutes for the upcoming meeting. I've reviewed the Chapin Park Local Historic District guidebook with regard to fencing. Paragraph one (1) of the "Required" clause in Section B states, "Fencing—which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained". Additionally, paragraph three (3) of the same clause states, "Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open and consistent with the historic character of the structure enclosed." I would argue that paragraph one (1) implies all fencing on a property, as it is not specific on front, rear, or sides. Where I think the guideline falls short is describing, in more detail, locations, types, materials and height of fencing. Subsequent to our Board meeting, the contractor as well as HPC staff identified multiple locations within the district in which unpainted, wood, privacy fencing has been installed, thereby setting a previously undocumented precedent. Had the Board been provided this information prior to the meeting, I feel that this COA would have been approved without prejudice. file://C:\Documents and Settings\EDadlow\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4BF507CASJ... 5/24/2010 Page 2 of 2 As I stated during the Board meeting, I would like to see this fence design modified slightly by substituting a Gothic picket in lieu of the proposed dog ear, or scalloping at the top of the fence. The gate facing the front yard should be lowered to the existing height and have its pickets spaced as noted in paragraph three (3) of the requirements. I understand that this may cost a little more, but I feel that the homeowners understood the restrictive covenants of this district when they purchased this property. Finally, it is my opinion that some subjectivity could be granted in this COA, given the continuing, court documented, issues that this homeowner is having with the neighboring rental property. I feel that a fence is not a permanent structure and will not forever impact this property. Additionally, I feel that it is more important to this district to have a good stable homeowner remain within the district than to have this possibly become another rental property and potential blight on the neighborhood. I know that this may be contrary to the objectivity of the guidelines, but quality of life should also be considered a precedent in all districts. By continuing to reside at 712 Forest Ave., this homeowner is sacrificing his. Thank you David B. Steinhauer, R.A. file:/IC:\Documents and Settings\EDadlow\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise14BF547CASJ... 5/24/2010 South Bend and St. Joseph County HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 227 WEST JEFFERSON BLVD. SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1830 Timothy S. Klusczinski, President Phone: 574-235-9798 Fax: 574-235-9578 e-mail: SBSJCBPC@co.st-joseph.in.us A Certified Local Government AGENDA OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION THURSDAY, JUNE 10, 2010 10:00 AM SPECIAL MEETING Catherine D. Hostetler, Director OFFICE OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION 125 S. LAFAYETTE AGENDA: 902 LELAND COA#2010-0414 MISCELLANEOUS COMMISSIONERS Linda Riley (Treasurer) Jerry A. Niezgodski (Vice President) Lynn Patrick (Secretary) Sandra L. Rossow Todd Zeiger David Steinhaurer Tim Musczinski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND COUNTY Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574)235-9575 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st joseph.in.us CERTIFICATE OF =. , APPROPRIATENESS'i The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Construct ballards 3-4' tall pressure treated posts with chamfered or finialed tops that can be set in concrete approximately 4'feet apart on the southeast alley and comer of rear yard to prevent vehicular access to back yard. The ballards will not be joined with chains. i i TBA, Contractor i for the following location: gat LEI.AND South Bard, IN 46616 Chapin Park Applicatton No. 2olo-o610 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in a Local Historic' ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards-pertainingAolAw�"istoric4Andmarbmd/or4"zI Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the ° recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of ! the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the i State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file.and open for ' public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE 1 NAME OFAPPLICANT: Santos Fernandez DATE PERMTr 06 io 2010 TARES FORCE: � PERMIT ISSUED BY: ' Catherine D. Hostefler ! Director CATHERINE D. HOS TETI.ER, POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. Director Ro,;dz,s SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMIVIISSION MAY 179 2010 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES Print Name Address Signature bL49 11 LAc,,k-L�x-- �OFi-i 9,n . MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY May 17, 2010 13'b Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Jerry Niezgodski, Timothy S. Klusczinski, Linda Riley, David Steinhauer Members Absent: Lynn Patrick, Todd Zeiger, Sandra Rossow Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia Dadlow, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: John Brady, Abby Hill, Irwin Stanwaki, Rosalind Clark, John Wiltrout, Richard Cullar, Jeffrey Dierbeck, Stephen Anella II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 April 2010 Application Number: 2010-0406 Property Location: 723 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1889/ Property-Ownem-Rita-ander Pa en Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark &Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Hodson's Castle is an elaborate 2 '/z storey Queen Anne with an irregular floor plan set on a foundation built from "Notre Dame" yellow brick. The first storey if finished with narrow wood clapboards while the second storey has rounded and diamond shaped shingles. The two storeys are divided by a belt course of vertical siding and elaborately trimmed. The hip roof has gable dormers along with tower and bays with mansard wrapping around the rear corner. There are detailed carvings at roof edges and dormers. There is a corner tower with overhanging chamfered corner supported by two spindle columns. The window openings are simple double hung sashes with pilaster trim and carved corner blocks. The front door way are panel wood double leaf doors with single light and multi -pane over and below with a stained glass transom ALTERATIONS: The tower has been shortened. The verandah was been removed and replaced with two porches leading to the main entrance and the east side entrance. Roof has been replaced. New K -style gutter were installed and the foundation repaired and reinforced (COA#2009-0406C) APPLICATION ITEMS: Install a skylight per attached description. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposed to have S1aTile professionally install a Wasco venting skylight on the rear attic roof of the "Queen Anne" section of the home to provide additional lighting and ventilation. Please see attached diagram and copy of product brochure. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys -are generally -behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may _ cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The low reveal of skylight will correspond with the slope of the roof line and will not be noticeable from the street. It will not detract from any of the architectural features of the roof or the house. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Dave Steinhauer Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0406 was approved with a unanimous vote STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 12, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0412 Property Location: 345 S. Sunnyside Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Neoclassical/1953 Property Owner: Richard Cullar & Sandra Weides Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 2 storey frame house with rectangular plan. 1 storey gable wing with window and roof skylight. Attached 2 car, single door garage. Side gable roof with asphalt shingles. Double and triple casement windows, triple casement has central stationary window; wood trim around windows with ornamental louvered shutters. Large wood siding on second storey over vertical wood siding on first. Central pediment entry with concrete stoop, flanked by wood columns. Flat roof canopy rear entry with concrete stoop and metal railing and supports. Simple brick corbelled chimney. ALTERATIONS: Replacement siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: Take down 3 pear trees next to driveway in southeast front yard. These trees were stuck there by prior owner as left over inventory (he was a landscaper), and they dump 100's of pears on the ground each fall and are inconveniently located right next to the driveway, making it awkward to get in the car. 2 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner wishes to remove 3 pear trees on south side of driveway because in the fall the pears litter the area, making it difficult to access the car. Per Brent Thompson, City Forester, "Pear by house is too close and pear by sidewalk planted under maple could be removed. Maybe save the middle pear or replace." STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings, sidewalks or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. As much natural vegetation as possible should be preserved. If large shrubs become unsightly to the point of detracting from the historic character of the house or site, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and diseased material should be selectively removed. Trees and major landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. The curb height should be sufficient to maintain adequate drainage of the street. If older light fixtures are taken down in the city, they should be reserved for use in the historic district. Light fixtures on top of the brick pillars at the Eddy Street entryway should be replaced according to these standards. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor L-lackivyycd. Fivin pud punas shall not be fenced and fences snail not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of removal of the 2 pear trees as suggested by City Forester. Middle pear tree may be removed only if replaced with an acceptable tree species from attached listing provided by City Forester. On a motion by Linda Riley for approval of application as amended by applicant to accept staff recommendation to remove only two trees as recommended by city forester with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0412 was approved as amended with a unanimous vote STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 13, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0413 Property Location: 830 N. Michigan Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 20's century functional/1913 Property Owner: City of South Bend Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark in a Local Historic District Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Utilitarian structure with a cylindrical footprint. Brick construction with limestone trim at top. ALTERATIONS: none 3 APPLICATION ITEMS: Demolition of round suction reservoir in back of North Station. This reservoir has had no useful function for 60 to 70 years. A careful demolition would free bricks for main building restoration. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The City of South Bend Water Works would like to remove the suction reservoir that is located in the back of the North Pumping Station. "It has been out of use for over 70 years and has no practical value to the South Bend Water Works", per John Wiltrout, Director of Water Treatment for the City. Within the last six months, the City has made masonry and roof repairs which revealed further building maintenance issues and they must consider the costs. There is deterioration along circumference and the walls are bulging and uneven. The structure has been re -pointed with N type mortar instead of lime putty and there is efflorescence as a result. Furthermore, the rebar reinforcement of the sunken concrete roof is rusting. During demolition, the City intends to salvage the bark -faced 8" masonry units that are no longer in production, as they are the same bricks used on the main building. The surplus realized from the deconstruction of the suction reservoir will allow use of the salvaged masonry to restore the main building. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Leever Park 9.0 Landscapes — Standards and Criteria for Leeper Park 9.1 Introduction 3. The standards and criteria acknowledge that there will be changes to the landscape and are intended to make the changes sensitive to the historic character of the landscape. 4. Each property will be separately studied to determine if a later addition(s) and/or alteration(s) can, or should, be removed. 5. Since it is not possible to provide one general guideline, the following factors that will be considered in determining whether a later addition(s) and/or alteration(s) can, or should, be removed include: a. Compatibility with the original property's integrity in scale, materials and character. b. Historic association with the property. c. Quality in design and execution of the addition/alteration. d. Functional usefulness. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmarks Group B Standards D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of deconstruction of the suction reservoir so that bark -faced 8" masonry units can be salvaged for future use on main building restoration. The building has had no functional usefulness for over 70 years and would be very costly to repair. Per Group B Standards, measured drawings and documentation by the demolition agency is encouraged for future reference and possible reconstruction. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Dave Steinhauer Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0413 was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: Apri130, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0414 Property Location: 902 Leland Architectural Style/Date:Gabled-ell/1900 Property Owner: Santos Fernandez District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 902 is a one and a half storey gabled -ell duplex set on a brick foundation. The walls are covered with Insul-brick the windows are 1/1 double hung with a front 4 window 18/1 with shutters with a cut out design. The porch is enclosed with a full pediment over the door and brick piers. The gabled roof with gable returns has asphalt shingles. ALTERATIONS: The Insul Brick was applied to the wood siding in the 1940s. The storm doors and windows are aluminum. The three car wooden garage at the rear of the house has been demolished. The porch had some modifications completed in 1951. APPLICATION ITEMS: Would like to build a post fence around the back yard with a loop chain through each treated post. This will also prevent cars driving through lawn. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The owner wishes to install a post fence composed of green treated lumber 4"x4" posts set into the ground with concrete around the perimeter of the rear yard along the alleyway and property line. Each 4'-5' post will have a reflector attached. To enclose the yard the posts will have coated metal chain looped through holes drilled into them per drawing attached. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: This is a very basic, utilitarian solution to resolving the intrusion issue from vehicles backing into yard from the garage and driving through the back yard from the alleyway. The staff recommends approval for a fence in the rear of the house but that the design needs to be refined. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski to table application until owner is available to take questions regarding the style with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0414 is tabled with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A R CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: Apri127, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0427 Property Location: 1715 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revivial/1929/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: John Brady Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two storey Tudor of brick with half timber and stucco wall features has a rectangular plan and a gable roof with a slight flair at the eaves. The roof is covered with asphalt shingles. There are casement windows throughout the house with brick header course sills on the brick facades. There is a half timber and stucco shed dormer in the front fagade and there is an extended front entrance with steep gable roof and stucco walls with a door in the center flanked by lanterns. ALTERATIONS: In 1988 a l Ox 14 foot two storey addition was added to the rear of the house(COA1988-0815); the roof was replaced in 1998 (COA#1998-0916) and the screened in porch was added in 2007 (COA#2007-0906). The windows are replacement windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: We want to replace the replacement windows that are poor quality in our home with Pella casement windows. Two windows (interior) that are casement in the rear we would like to replace with double hung. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: In 1988 the NORCO windows were installed. Currently the windows are failing and deteriorated; one kitchen window's glass has recently disintegrated and needed to be replaced. The homeowners wish to replace the NORCO windows with PELLA wood casement windows that will have aluminum exterior cladding located on the second floor. The windows on the second floor will be replaced with casement windows that will match the existing; the front double casements will be replaced with grid patterns to match the originals. The two casement windows that were on the exterior and are now enclosed in the screened in porch are to be replaced with double hung windows so people don't hit their heads on the casements when they are opened. The exterior aluminum cladding will match the exterior trim on the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. where -metal -or vinyl siding -has-been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement windows with PELLA casement windows on the second _ floor and the removal of the casement windows in the rear interior wall of the house and their replacement with double hung PELLA windows. Z On a motion by Linda Riley for approval of application as amended by applicant to include the 1" storey windows with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0427 was approved as amended with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: May 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0428 Property Location: 514 West LaSalle Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1904 Property Owner: Connie and Tom Tooley Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house is a two storey plus attic Free Classic type which was constructed with a wood frame, overhanging second floor and clapboard and shingle siding. The roof has a center gable and a small hipped extension projecting off the back, box molded cornice and is covered with interlocking asphalt shingles. The chimney is brick and flush to the first floor and interior through the second and third floor with decorative brick chimney work at the top. The windows are all the double hung sash type that are hung from top hinges. The house also contains many decorative windows such as the wood framed stained glass panel in the back wall, the leaded glass design in the transom over the front window and the first floor side lights. One of the main features of the house is its front porch which has a brick base, wood slat floor, wood spindle balustrade and brick pedestals that support short Doric columns. It also has a plain entablature and a dentilated frieze pediment over the front entrance. ALTERATIONS: The home has been restored. The gutters have been repaired and replaced, the stucco removed from the brick foundation, the roofing has been replaced; the site has been extensively landscaped in the rear and enclosed with a privacy fence. Windows have been installed in the enclosed back porch. (COA#2002-0520a). Deck mounted skylights were installed to replace the "bubble"type. APPLICATION ITEMS: Complete tear -off of roofing materials, repair/replace decking as necessary, install ice/watershield, Install Certaineed Landmark Series 30 year Dimensional shingles. Repair Chimney as needed. re-noint with lime putty mortar. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The complete removal of all existing layers of roofing, estimated to be four layers, and the replacement of the Sherriff-Goslin interlocking shingles with the architectural asphalt dimensional shingles. All decking will be replaced and repaired; installation of ice/water shield as required by Building Code. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Groua B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 7 2. Material: Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the complete tear off, repair and the re - roof with the dimensional asphalt shingles. The 1932 Assessor's Card notes that the roof had asphalt shingles. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0428 was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 3 May 2010 Application Number: 2010-0428A Property Location: 803 Forest Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1885 Property Owner: Rosalind E. Clark Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The two storey wood frame house has a rectangular plan set on a brick foundation. The walls are horizontal clapboard with vertical bands with diagonal inserts. The gabled dormer and the gable have fish scale shingles. The roof has asphalt shingles. There is a half width front porch has turned posts and balusters. The windows are 1/1 double hung, some with crown moulding; there is a circular window in the front gable ALTERATIONS: The screened in porch was extended over garage in 2004-2005; in-kind roof repair and gutter replacement nccured in 7no9- APPLICATION ITEMS: Install 2 skylights in attic, one on west, one north (House faces street on east side). Install vent fan on west in attic. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner proposes to have Brad Pierson Construction and Kirkpatrick Carpentry professionally install Velux deck mounted skylight and a Broan Roof Mount Powered Attic Ventilator fan on the rear attic roof of the home to provide additional lighting and ventilation. Please see attached photographs and copy of product brochure and information. She also wishes to install a Velux deck mounted skylight on the north side of the home. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. The application of the skylight and the vent fan in the rear attic roof will not be visible from the street. The low reveal of skylight on the North side will correspond with the slope of the roof line and will not detract from the architectural features of the house. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0428A was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: April 30, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0430 Prgpertv__-_� Locatiow ?0501 r'lPveland Road — Urine -Witter CemetPry Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: c.1850 Property Owner: German Township Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Small cemetery off Cleveland Road shaded by a canopy of tall trees. Stone markers indicating grave sites are scattered; some are leaning against others, some are leaning against trees, many are missing entirely or broken and scattered throughout cemetery. ALTERATIONS: none. APPLICATION ITEMS: Put in sign depicting cemetery. Put in (grave) markers where needed. Remove (trees) where overgrown. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner wishes to put in a sign to be placed near the right of way off the parking lot at the entrance of the cemetery, see attached photo "Monument to be in graphic" for logo on sign. Language on sign to read: "Cripe-Witter Cemetery Circa 1834 German Township Historic Landmark. This cemetery was originally known as "The Cripe Cemetery" in honor of the Cripe family who donated the land for the cemetery. This cemetery became the first in St. Joseph County declared a historic landmark on, 13 August 1991, by the Historic Preservation Commission and " County Council." The material or size for the sign has not yet been decided and owners are open to suggestions. Owner is planning on using grant money to erect this sign and must work within that budget. Owner would also like to replace grave markers that have felled or broken. In the case of those that are missing entirely, owner would like to erect markers fashioned as a cross, 36" tall x 30" wide. They are willing to make the markers out of wood and would like to put the name of the deceased on the marker. Owner would also like to remove trees where overgrown. They have not named any specific trees; however, in general they would like to thin out some of the volunteer trees that have grown to be quite tall. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Local Landmark 0j Group B Standards A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structure or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure, which does not alter the general massing while and addition, is a change in mass. A modification, which involves the removal of a part of the landmark, should be considered under demolition (see demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of ht landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure—Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material—Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood—all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials—the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. V. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should a make of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Sins No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super - graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. G. Building Site and Landscaping (These standards apply to both A and B) 1. Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, green houses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public way. 2. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers.. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 10 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed application items pertaining to the grave markers and the tree removal as they are appropriate to the general cleaning and upkeep of the cemetery. Staff has no recommendation regarding the sign as there are not enough details decided at this point. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski to approve application with the condition that the owner provide details of the cemetery marker sign for final commission approval with a second by Dave Steinhauer Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0430 was approved with conditions with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 5 May 2010 Application Number: 2010-0503-1 Property Location: 1308 East Wayne Street South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1948/Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Louise and Stephen Anella Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The original two storey house was constructed on a L -plan and set upon a brick foundation; the facades are brick on the first storey and wood shingles on the second. There is a gable roof covered with asphalt shingles that has molded raking trim. The windows are paired casements with wood trim and louvered shutters on the second floor and brick header course sills on the iliot�ldvi. Tll..rlV �a-round-pedirnent�t-the�ntry--with-fluted-pilasters�oncre�e-and-tile-stoop; paneled details at entry and a wood sunburst motif fanlight. There is a brick header courses at the second floor line, and new rear addition. ALTERATIONS: The flat roof rear addition to the home was replaced in 1998 with a new addition with a pitched roofing system. The asphalt shingle roof was replaced in 2005 with asphalt dimensional shingles. APPLICATION ITEMS: Front sidewalk, replace concrete with pavers. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to remove the current sidewalk leading from the front door to the driveway and to reconfigure it so that the two garden areas flanking the entry are symmetrical and then install rectangular brick pavers from the front door to the driveway. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Major landscaping items, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Dominant land contours shall be retained. Structures such as gazebos, patio decks, fixed barbecue pits, swimming pools, tennis courts, greenhouses, new walls, fountains, fixed garden furniture, trellises and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from a public walkway. Recommended 11 New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. Not Recommended Telephone or utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this project. The proposed plans are appropriate to the symmetry of the Colonial architectural style of the home and conform with the guidelines of the district. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0503-1 was approved with a unanimous vote. COA 2010-0503C was withdrawn by applicant prior to meeting e STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A GL-�R-T4FICATEOF"APP OP LkTENBEE Date: May 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0503D Property Location: 712 Forest Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Free Classic/1903/Ennis Auston, Architect Property Owner: Vittorio Hosle Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Two storey rectangular plan home set upon a concrete block foundation. Wood clapboard siding on I" storey. 2nd storey is covered with wood shingles. Asphalt shingled gambrel roof with a curved slope over porch. Two upper dormers projecting from front, one gabled, one hipped. Front porch with grouped Doric wood columns supporting an entablature. Balustrade with spindles and moulded banister. Pent roof with moulded rake and knee brackets over north entrance. Windows are double hung. Projecting bay windows on North side. Hipped dormer windows have a diamond pane transom. Two small recessed windows in the attic. Gabled garage located at rear. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door. APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove existing picket fence and replace with privacy of similar material. Extend driveway fence from main house Southwest side to existing location. Add gate to Northwest alley side. Extend fence to include main house side entrance. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner would like to exchange the existing decorative wooden picket fence for a "dog ear" wooden privacy fence because neighboring tenants dump litter into their yard. New fence placement will include an existing side entrance on the alley side for security, in which a gate will be installed to access the alley side door. New fence will extend fence on neighbor's driveway side approximately 25' to deter excessive litter; the fence and gate installation will be behind the setback of front porch. Both gates will be softened from street view by existing landscaping. The 6'x14' alley entrance gate will be a residential sliding gate apparatus faced with the same pressure treated "dog ear" style fencing to match the rest of the installation. 12 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Chapin Park: I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to exchange existing decorative fence to a functional "dog ear" wood privacy fence and extending the perimeter around to the side door and neighbors driveway. Commission discussion regarding the appropriateness of replacing a 4' painted Gothic picket style wood decorative fence with a 6' natural finish dog eared style wood privacy fence. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski to continue application so that homeowner may work with staff regarding options of fence styles with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 4-0 COA 2010-0503D was continued with a unanimous vote. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. City Cemetery update -Elicia gave an update on the progress. III. HEARING OF VISITORS No visitors IV. REGULAR BUSINESS 13 A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES April 19, 2010 Approved B. TREASURER'S REPORT - Distributed C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -File Circulated. Larry discussed ADA memo details. We will begin publishing the ADA notice on the Agenda. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals - Distributed. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. Discussion of Derek Dieter research of Oliver Park and breweries, 1223 E. Wayne Street, and Thomas Street Fire station possible demolition. 4. AD Report -Distributed. 5. Legal Counsel -None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -Verbal report of attendance at Southhold/Pride of Place. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Southhold 2010 Awards — Compliments by all the commission members present. B. HPC Logo — Elicia will continue tweaking design so that the commissioners can vote on a logo in the future. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Chapin Park, Inc. July 24 Energy Audit: Restore Michiana Series — Discussion on 2010 tentative calendar. Elicia will email calendar to commission members. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Linda Riley to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Att4ecretary t: Patrick, o ADte 14