Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMarch 2010AGENDA OF THE m ..HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION A- MARCH 159 2010 Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY, March 15, 2010 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 1216 E/ Wayne St. N. COA#2010-0301 2. 1716 E. Wayne Street COA#2010-0303 Q 3. 61191 US 31 South COA#2010-0304 ~ B. National Register Nominations: 1. City Cemetery—update III. HEARING OF VISITORS IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES e O February 22, 2010 B. TREASURER'S REPORT ' Location Report East Wayne East Wayne Local Landmark C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report O IV. OLD BUSINESS 1. Architectural Historian 2. Preservation/Southhold 2010 Events V. NEW BUSINESS 1. HPC logo VI. ADJOURNMENT III�IIIIIIII,:_:-� . .., `OV,1/,ISSIOV . or 0 0 c STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 3, 2010 Application Number: - 2010-0301 Property Location: 1216 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1925/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Elizabeth and Mark Adey Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: - Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1216 E. Wayne North is a two storey frame home with a brick fagade and an irregular floor plan set on a matching brick. foundation. There is a gable roof with gable returns with cornice molding and an eyebrow dormer. The roofing is asphalt shingle. There is a multi -pane half -round attic window. The windows are 8/1 and 6/1 double hung windows that have brick soldier course lintels and brick header course sills; some with paneled wood shutters with a tree motif. The front entry has gable roof with round arch under supported by brackets and smooth Doric columns; the front door is rounded with simple wood trim. There is a one storey side open porch with a flat roof supported by smooth Doric columns. ALTERATIONS: There is a rear one storey 8'x12' addition with a shed roof that was built in 1955. The brick is slightly different than that of the house. There appears to be some window openings that were re- configured and bricked in. The survey card noted aluminum storm windows and some replacement windows. The side porch is open and no longer has screens noted in the August, 1986 survey card and —were removed sometime after 1995. There are COAs (2004-9) in file for in kind replacement and repair work to porch, in-kind window replacement, garage roof and rear fencing. Removal of 1955 addition and replaced with new one storey addition 12'8"x 30'8" in materials to match the original house. Replaced replacement casement windows from 1955 re -model to match windows in the addition per COA 2009- 0601D. APPLICATION ITEMS: Living Room: Originally the house had two doors exiting the living room to the side porch, one on each side of the fireplace. One of the doors has been bricked over on the exterior and made into a shelf area on the interior. (Probably one during the 1950's remodel.) The remaining door is in poor shape and needs to be replaced. Work to be done: Replacement of existing door and return of "missing" door. New doors will match rear entry door. Second Floor Bedroom: Work to be done, replacement of entry door and storm. Exterior door leads to covered porch roof and is in really poor shape. Currently the door is held together with a metal plate on the lower portion. The storm door has been sealed shut from the exterior due to the `Breeze" it allowed into the bedroom. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to restore the south doorway leading to the porch from the living room and install a fifteen light, wood frame door. They also wish to remove the `Dutch Door" on the north side and replace it with a fifteen light, wood frame door. The framing on the current door would remain and be duplicated on the south exterior doorway. There will be no storm doors. .The deteriorated second storey door would be replaced with a fifteen light, wood frame replica and the storm door would be a full view storm door with muntins to match interior door. (Please see photographs provided by the homeowner and Staff.) STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the living room doors. The homeowners are returning an original feature, the bricked -in south door to the west facade of the house. There is no documentation that the current Dutch Door is original to this house. The proposed 15 light, wood frame door is in a style that is sympathetic to Colonial Rival architecture and will match the door that the Commission approved for the addition in COA#2009- 0601D. The second storey doors are deteriorated and ill fitting. The storm door is permanently screwed into the jamb; a metal plate is securing the base of the interior door to keep it stable. The proposed replacement interior door in an in-kind replacement; the proposed storm door replacement will match the muntin pattern of the interior door and improve the aesthetics of the west fagade by eliminating the mismatched muntin patterns of the interior door and the storm door. Application FOR - Ceiti f icate of Appropriateness . . Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County • . 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Addt+ess: Countj►-City Bwlding, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phony 574-2354M • Fac 57425.9M • Emaib cwwj�'=%_.bbp:st-jO®eph3aus Webaite: h*//wwws wThmuntyindiarw=/*bp/indexhbrJ . OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONnn= IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE. USE ONLY Date Received. 'i�=�-� Application Number Pest Reviews: [R4'M (Oeta•ffaettr kw) !/- .%9 =e1" 9 [].NO Staff Approval authorized by: TItle: Historic Commission Review Date: M) F1 Local landmark [ fAcal Historic District (vane) ip•���y e� A ❑ National Landmark ' ❑ National Register District (vane) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ lhbled '❑ Sent lb Committee ❑ Approved and Issued Dors Address of Property for proposed work I lX t:::- VJA1 'V S� ianberand Stmt Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Fkm Print) A 11 �T/I n % dry Address of Property Owner(s): _EAW 2 _ Contractor(s) Name: nn t'M Contract Company Name: WAY) l i/� AY) r1 % l �✓ Contractord i I� 11► Phone: Current Use of Building- 1 ngle roily -Multi -Family- nteraal-Covernntent-Industrial-Vacant-edc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Franre— Brid<— Stone— Steel—CO U7de— Other) Proposed Work' O In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in kfnd) ❑ Demolition (more than are boa: mry be d�edbell Descrintion of Pronosed Work _ . Owner/Contnictor. Fax e-mail (Thio Wor=71 mmqwd with adyon*dV=). and/or APPLICATION REQWRE11MM ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Mark and Elizabeth Adey 1216 E Wayne St North South Bend 574-289-5512 Architect: Bill Lamie Contractor: Millwood Construction, Milford Indiana Living Room: Originally the house had two doors exiting the living room to the side porch, one on each side of the fireplace. One of the doors has been bricked over on the exterior and made into a shelf area on the interior. (Probably done during the 1950's remodel). The remaining door is in poor shape and needs to be replaced. Work to be done: Replacement of existing door and return of "missing" door. New doors will match rear entry door. Second Floor bedroom: Work to be done, replacement of entry door and storm. Exterior door leads to covered porch roof and is in really poor shape. Currently the door is held together with a metal plate on the lower portion. The storm door has been sealed shut from the exterior due to the "breeze" it allowed into the bedroom. I 1216 E. Wayne*,'Marcli 3, 2010 7� 1216 E. Wayne*,'Marcli 3, 2010 OWN tsup"- 0 AliA' pany w WWI M Dow T'" �0141110_ �wtw 1t11rw11_ I'T, Y, M- � -1 M .24""s 04 wo X It, v; Ab VIVO WA NIMBI :411�1311whv"@ saux- ma r I M twl 4 4 7� e. Wit pk "Kay "'TA I Z� Ro NO - 2 nf YQW; "OFT j �W ,M . ",e 1 7 in W, I M Ask", 101.0 V F , IRA Of. jr j"" Sol 1; 4- to e" ¢f AN Ott a cn Paw ",/ Nt! 1216 E. Wayne, March 3, 2010 Location of orginal door. U 'ARK 0110, W WAY Is pY 1 5, "'alp '011r* All 11"MR9 AN 4 ;;;w_ MUM. still g.A -who' A: R1 mn Au .0 r '71N "Ilk I X J-"�J Up Stairs door. -who' A: "won Tund NY, 0:1 `4 00 Up Stairs door. 1216 E. Wayne, March 3,2010* current door 'View of West side. r.. '-v .'4 „.s ,; L : �A�,�„�-°�2.��a'��F`.,.,m';w;�:,x �, ::�i�'.ui�'"�tiax ��y T=��e'\.°: •'''<. \��.i S:s�.`.. '�s:�'s;:.�,„ams .�w. •a i V'�, x x.% rx.'m S,Z ' , 3: ':. €�..":.2°es:.. ' S'+.,�•� �, ` ..0 .,.�t,:^, vi io 3'F-..' �• <a y'SF', 4 a' 1 .Y,� a".�".�✓�a'F�.f�'.:.w..�' .. ^. 0�, a •r�i..,'�x"."s ...'3•S.0 ��e�y�e= y�; .'r. gin• �. ` � . �'Q�....- r o �eA , ��£ •"a' �, � :''ice '` ^':� '?" A."^�; ar ax?,y=. �; �•�wi'". �\��: • '� 4aae'S�'�= 4 tam. .y �\ S .a. -i � d 'A R '>F'.•� �'.i �*,. rti} f i �A0 0 a e�2va "^�•"j?%4i�+�-F,o.��-,;: .. ... �, x:\�� 'e``ia�.=,•N-°�+.4 x.,v\.rSc,Y�;� I° " � :>�s..:"?";� a°.>'e"c. :'•`fib' ��� g,.,�, :. 1=t°�j �x�x�'ax h -a Wasyt° �x�>a�•. ..3 .�:�•'•` °v+A�. A�:x Sa s\.� } �tF, •3, Tr'ryF Y6•.° �.i �"y;��: A` �• �.ty Y�'"�," - • Vii" :�. ;b,f°.�. a.. Bl`i � `. .py .. _.', ... _.a ::� '...`+�•<x. _.•.a:�zc as •' r�,°a=dr�Arl�'�a`v� � \ �....... ... r.. '-v .'4 „.s ,; L : �A�,�„�-°�2.��a'��F`.,.,m';w;�:,x �, ::�i�'.ui�'"�tiax ��y T=��e'\.°: •'''<. \��.i S:s�.`.. '�s:�'s;:.�,„ams .�w. •a i V'�, x x.% rx.'m S,Z ' , 3: ':. €�..":.2°es:.. ' S'+.,�•� �, ` ..0 .,.�t,:^, vi io 3'F-..' �• <a y'SF', 4 a' r gin• �. ` � . �'Q�....- ;�: �eA , ��£ •"a' �, � :''ice 3 " �_ i ��A C ' • � STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date.- March 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0303 Property Location: 1716 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor RevivaV1928/IIR Stapp, Property Owner: Kathy Vetter Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE,: 1716 E. Wayne is a 2 Yz storey frame construction with rusticated, yellow brick veneer set upon a concrete foundation. The gable roof has a steep slope with moulded raking trim and returns; it covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are casement style replacement windows with storms. The wood clapboard infill under the windows of the enclosed side porch are covered with vinyl siding. There is a multi -paned picture window flanked by four side -lights with a brick header sill. There are paired six -light casement windows with wrought iron below directly above the bellcast gable roof over the entry. The entry has timber columns, brick corbelled brackets and a brick stoop with turned balustrades. There is a'shed dormer at the west side over the enclosed side porch with replacement casement style windows. There is a two car brick gara ge with gable roof and asphalt shingles at the side of the house toward the rear. ALTERATIONS: The 1987 survey card notes that the house has had major alterations. The brick fagades, porches features and roofs over the front and side entrances and the wood front door appear to be original to the structure. The original roof was asphalt shingle and has been replaced. The side porch was constructed an open porch and enclosed before 1949. All of the windows have been replaced with vinyl windows with storm windows. All of the wood clapboard has been covered with vinyl of the same width as the original - clapboard. Staff has not been able to located COAs for the windows or the siding. The garage may not be original to the house as the location is not the same as the -1932 Assessor's Card APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace roof with GAF Timberline 30 yr. Architectural style shingles. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT.: '111is is a complete tear off and re -roof of the asphalt shingles and application of architectural style shingles to the roof. There is a dumpster on site to contain debris and haul it away. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. RoOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles.. Residences in most cases have wood fascias )V1tfi gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replacedwith new material that matches as closely as possible the original. in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period, Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement asphalt shingle roofing material as it is appropriate to the architectural style of the house. Staff would also recommend that the Commission re-evaluate the rating. Application FOR - Certificate a, f Appropnateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lrdayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Band, Indiama 46601 Phony.: 571-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 + Email: SBSJCHPC@7co.st joseph inus Websitt- http //�vww.stjoR!pluountyindiana.coni/sjchp/in(ic.x.htmi OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY EAURIL'S COAMINED IN THIS BOX. »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ?x&t' Z aZ'0/0 - Application Number!�� Id - t7.30 Past Reviews: [ YES (Nie of test )Zmew) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Corrnnission Review Date: (� Local Landmark g': cal Historic District (Nunn) 5 w� ❑ National Landmark E) National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied n Tabled n Sent To Committee 0 Approved and Issued t3nrr. J Address of Property for proposed work: Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print)_— Address of Property Owner(s): : ) -7 { lc V . t i ' ' 55,i Contractor(s) Name: .--Aso( 0"4xP_I C_o Contract Company Name: _jv ho u'l) {- Contractor Address: x-7`71 j, C --rte- t t�� J-2- -rt- Z. City: VA'i , < V4-%4. -,A) %Or 14 %d.. _. Phone: Current Use of Building: ` t taJ t.rk=LAA t t (Sirrglr. Family - Aluiti-Family - Commercial - Gmernment - tndustriai - vacant- etc.) Type of Building Construction: A) 13 of> (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: � In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one box troy he chmtrci) Description of Proposed k%brk: ?__=j2L-W I-- r= AA ±( �- �.c-t +2_1ii� kw Owner/Contractor. Fax: e-mail (This (flim u171 curresrm"hd with only one �".-........... ...... and/or _.:......._ ....... _.......... ........ __......_.....__..._._._..._.__...__.._.... _.._...._,._...__...:..........._ __._............._ -- API-ILICA77ON REQUIRF.AIENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- 1.716 E. Wayne, March 4, 2010 wodii 'Tmn I bedo.- hEr:w1fiou e" rop arancol. and:.,.:, Tb a' nce'J.".' "Brst MBERL INEft 77FRI can help yott choose the tiglit ingle for your rooll , GAF-Llks Virtual I lone Remodeler v'VN'%V.gafx6m, Visualize GAI -Elk illgles on mse like 331(l. �Elrffr VOUr 11 botisn. ciiflcretzr h1g. t Ors. It's rim! All 0 'hd Cut— Gr�nule Ofamn s Spit refect asn' "Olt so Ashlfi IVIRCcor6' MW6 A S k 7_4 ...SpecU160-Asphot t 'Qrlp� Mot "Ad e A STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 4, 2010 Application Number: . 2010-0304 Property Location: 61191 US 31 South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate Cube/1866 Property Owner: . Paula Elliott Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey Italianate has a rectangular floor plan with bearing wall construction set upon a stone foundation with a brick fagade that is painted white. There is a flat or very slightly pitched roof with cornice board and double brackets. All windows are round arch; there are six pane windows on the second storey and 1/3x2/3 on the first, all with shutters. The central entrance has double wood raised panel doors with a fanlight and an arched brick surround. There is a brick chimney centered on the south side of the house. The house is set back from US 31 and has a central circular, paved drive that is landscaped with shrubbery and trees. There are older out buildings of undetermined date on the site: a milk house and animal shelter and well house towards the rear as well as modern buildings: a house and garage at the rear of the property and a garage on the west side of the Italianate house. ALTERATIONS: The 1975 survey card notes that a small porch was removed. The location was not noted. The bank barn burned in 1985. . APPLICATION ITEMS: Place monument sign list tenants. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Per illustration provided, the painted aluminum sign would be placed between brick pillars positioned east and west and situated at the north of the circular drive entrance near US 31 South. The finish on brick pillars would mimic the main fagade of the house. The sign would not be illuminated. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group.B Standards: B. Treatment: treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing. Glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, A Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. F. Signs: No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as it falls within the Class B Standards for local landmarks. The sign will be situated east and west on the north side of the site close to US31 South and will not negatively impact the front fagade of the landmark. The finish on the sign's pillars reflect the front fagade. A Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st josephin.us Website http://www.sgosephcountyindianarnm/sjchp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN 77ffS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received ago / O Application Number 4 0 Past Reviews: Eq-fES (D.,,gLast-R.ew) o-4 Ae, Z07 7 ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: 16- 22CA t t 4 OW /O ® Local Landmark ❑ Local Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee, ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 61' I ! 0,5'31 S. -SO u A�A _No — � JE� n ��I, 'llS��treet Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (please Print) Gain �t 6 4P Address of Property Owner(s): ' C11 91 US .731 _S r� Contractor(s) Name: _& t`«x Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: r) City: M ►s hvL✓ c 11N'Ci' .1N V�.f-q i Phone: Current Use of Building:_DFC-4L' SQn ce- (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Government — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: & iC k (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind ❑ Landscape [(]/New ❑ Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box may be checked) Q Description of Proposed Work: 1 ��i - MOAO O?K_ - '<k1 r, Owner/Contractof Fax:) 571- S .S- 11 e-mail brill N in '�'�it'nson, r) C t 1_/S fjoj (This office will correspond��vitaakerrly one designee) X�Y1A ice.^u_ and/or - — APPLICATION REQIHREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 61191 US 31 South, March 4, 2010 la i j_ 1 0 �µ� ytyhg:S "Y 1 #h } { Y# 1 Approved by Non -Illuminated Monument as Illustrated 0 4 inch deep Aluminum Construction • Colonial Brick .Columns o Raised panel and letters on Main Plaque © Urethane finish © Meets City Standards T. } ® Exterior Si- t {'Y .1"1',.{'Y'.•"' ams 31h W Art Works Requires 50% Deposit and Balance upon Completion CM12-09-09 Paula Elliott Bolan A. Estimate does not Cover Ta: or Permits Estimate Only-yus Ate' FROM: Payment 50% down ,,,y,, a M Ifis drawing n fhe grope+ty 01 M Works $19r, Corrpar,y No reprodudlon or behdiitichs we permired Whout expressed Estimate good for 30 day past lits gkem 11 written permss�on of M Works Son p,,—. h ... , . � .._...a j. ? of up 10 2.500 was be charged for any amuse of thls drawrlp 4 � * 44 pS� '�V �.✓� � � ( 1 � �F 'axewi^^ A"�." ., � :Sb✓wsatt'�Y 1'�{,�S Y �� R 7't'�! ,' � rS'+ � . - mrsiiiimr s Y 1 Y t �i=�dY i i0i fs'.taai0min+i �ai0� 11 55581 Currant Rd Ph(574) 255-9111 Mishawaka, IN 46545 fax(574) 255-9112 0 �µ� ytyhg:S "Y 1 #h } Approved by Non -Illuminated Monument as Illustrated 0 4 inch deep Aluminum Construction • Colonial Brick .Columns o Raised panel and letters on Main Plaque © Urethane finish © Meets City Standards T. } ® Exterior Si- t {'Y .1"1',.{'Y'.•"' ams 31h W Art Works Requires 50% Deposit and Balance upon Completion CM12-09-09 Paula Elliott Bolan A. Estimate does not Cover Ta: or Permits Estimate Only-yus Ate' FROM: Payment 50% down ,,,y,, a M Ifis drawing n fhe grope+ty 01 M Works $19r, Corrpar,y No reprodudlon or behdiitichs we permired Whout expressed Estimate good for 30 day past lits gkem 11 written permss�on of M Works Son p,,—. h ... , . � .._...a j. ? of up 10 2.500 was be charged for any amuse of thls drawrlp 4 � * 44 pS� '�V �.✓� � � ( 1 � �F 'axewi^^ A"�." ., � :Sb✓wsatt'�Y 1'�{,�S Y �� R 7't'�! ,' � rS'+ � . - mrsiiiimr s Y 1 Y t �i=�dY i i0i fs'.taai0min+i �ai0� 11 55581 Currant Rd Ph(574) 255-9111 Mishawaka, IN 46545 fax(574) 255-9112 Locat- Budget as of 02-28-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 02/28/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original Addrl/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 56,592.04 85.68 85.68 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 464.60 92.92 92.92 10000 Totals "•"""""""" 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 200.00 1,825.94 2,025.94 28.20 000 General Gov'T. 16, 870.00 79.89 79.89 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants - 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 160.00 100.00 100.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 289.57 96.52 96.52 20000 Totals 925.00 1,825.94 2,750.94 28.20 31070 Other Contractual Services 20,016.00 1,100.00 21,116.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32020 Travel 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32350 Postage 1,000.00 57.90 1,057.90 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 300.00 0.00. 300.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 33100 Printing 200.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 000 General GovT. Samt Joseph County User ID ksobecki 03/09/201010:27 AM Page 54 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 3,911.80 26,088.20 26,088.20 86.96 86.96 5,546.16 30,503.84 30,503.84 84.62 84.62 9,457.96 56,592.04 56,592.04 85.68 85.68 1,825.94 171.80 200.00 1 8.48 9.87 35.40 464.60 464.60 92.92 92.92 0.00 225.00 .225.00 100.00 100.00 1,861.34 861.40 889.60 31.31 32.34 4,246.00 16, 870.00 16, 870.00 79.89 79.89 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 67.24 990.66 990.66 93.64 93.64 10.43 289.57 289.57 96.52 96.52 0.00 200.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 245.00 245.00 100.00 100.00 User ID ksobecki 03/09/201010:27 AM Page 54 Location Budget as of 02-28-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 02/28/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Original Object Description Appropriation 30000 Totals 22,021.00 Location Totals ' Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts 88,996.00 Addt'I/Adj Appropriation 1,157.90 2,983.84 Total Appropriation 23,178.90 91,979.84 Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 03/09/2010 10:27 AM Page 55 Unencumbered Unexpended Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 4,323.67 18,855.23 18,855.23 81.35 81.35 28.20 15,642.97 76,308.67 76,336.87 82.96 82.99 0.00 0.00 15,642.97 User ID ksobecki 03/09/2010 10:27 AM Page 55 Historic Preservation Commission Phone 574 235 9798 HISTORIC 125 S. Lafayette South Bend, IN 46601-1830 Fax 574 235 9578 PRESERVATION COMMISSION ROUNTINE MATINENANCE EXCLUSION ADDRESS: 834 Forest DISTRICT: Chapin Park RATING: Contributing Hannan House Gable -front 1899 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Re -Roof DATE: 5 March 2010 COMMUNICATION METHOD: In Office visit from Mike Ramey, Contractor: what needed to be done for a staff approval. STAFF ON-SITE VISIT AND/ OR DOCUMENTATION: Staff explained process, roof must be in-kind for Staff approval; must be 3 -tab asphalt shingle in this case and Staff must visit sight. DATE: 9 March 2010 COMMUNICATION METHOD: In person Office visit with Mike Ramey followed by on -sight inspection by Wayne Doolittle and Catherine Hostetler with Mike Ramey and his personnel. STAFF ON-SITE VISIT AND/OR DOCUMENTATION: Staff photographed site. Roof in a very bad state of disrepair with rotting in some spots, along with some wood trim pieces, due to age, wear from over head tree limbs, and lack of guttering. New roof would be Owens Coming 20 year Classic 3 Tab asphalt shingles which duplicates the current roof. Sample of material provided. Staff cautioned Contractor about the condition of the moulding and that any replacement pieces would need to be evaluated by staff to determine if a Commission hearing would be necessary. Mike Ramey said he would renew his bond and apply for the Staff Approved COA. Date: 10 March 2010 Mike Ramey of Ramey Construction left an application fora COA for only the work`on the. roof. The Staff approved the COA because it would not change an exterior feature of the property. The permit system had the Contractor as current on his bond. 2 Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City nuilding, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574235-9798 • Fax: 574235-9578 Email: SBSJCHPC@co.stjoseph.in.us Website htiV://www.sqosephcounqindiana.'com/s chp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANYENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received /D 27f&t 94 Application Number Past Reviews: E] YES (Date of Lot Review) Staff Approval authorized by: ['i • Title: xa... z. - + Historic Commission Review Date; [] Local Landmark lJ' Low Historic District (Name) [National Landmark F1 National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied ❑ Tabled n Sent To Committee [ pproved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 'D I` "t" P (S (a_ ,�_ _R Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owners}; (Please Print) i A 1 Address of Property Owne,r,(s): (` f. S Contractor(s) Name: !t' L iFl c Contract Company Name: r I Contractor Address: 76 -3 .4-l" o t1 S� t�`� 40 if, , City: Q7 , Phone: -y�C .. �L� -Ocs-L Current Use of Building: <�!t. � f -`4-941x` IV (Single FF•amily — M lti-Family — Commerda! — Government —industrial — Vacant— etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame Bridc — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: n -kind Landscape ❑ New [, Replacement (notin-kind) E] Demolition (more than onebox may be checked) Description of Proposed Work ej Owner/Contractor. Fax: e-mail `J (This oIce wal c orreyond will my one designee) ��1Z and/or — APPLICATION REQU%REMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — IR -A W 7' -F Director's Report March, 2010 24 February Sent Ann Puzzello, Common Council, letter on the brick/concrete segment of E. Colfax; sent Theron Roberts website information on Murco of Chicago; Registered for the Preservation Conference in New Harmony April 7-9. 25 February Submitted office payroll. Attended Lunch and Learn Series. Began incorporating the archived information into the Office files by address... 26 February Submitted Fees for February to Treasurer's Office. Continued the reorganization of the Office files. 1 March Accepted COA for 1216 East Wayne Street and began to prepare Commissioner's packet information. 3 March Met with Brandon Bartow of Bartow Builders (32 Albert Drive, Manitowoc WI 54220). Stonemor Indiana, LLC (155 Rittenhouse Circle, Bristol, PA 19007) hired his company to renovate the Gatehouse into an Office at Riverview Cemetery. This would also include exterior work on the roof, windows, masonry wall and foundation. Advised Mr. Bartow of the COA requirements and gave copy of Landmark Standards. Onsite visits to 1216 E. Wayne for photographs and to 1716 E. Wayne for roof application without COA or building permit. Attended and participated in meeting with Phil St. Claire, Mike Dyszkiewicz, Greg Kil and Jennifer, Tom Cook, Andrew Schnabel and Heidi Gray about the expenditures out of the City's Capital Budget for the Conservatories, estimated at between $250,000-$400,000. for Level I improvements: new heating system alternatives and the demolition of the obsolete growing houses construction of new side entrance with parking. Discussion with Jay Vendervene of IUSB concerning working with him to provide resources for an Archeological Program for his students. 4 March On site visit with Butch Bender concerning the position for the utility box at the intersection of Lafayette and West North Shore approved by the Commission. On site visit with Wayne Doolittle of 1716 E. Wayne to photograph house for COA. Attended Lunch and Learn series at the St. Joseph County Library. On site visit to 61191 US 31 South to photograph site for COA. 5 March Prepared packets for Commissioners and mailings to applicants and liaisons. 8 March On sight inspection with Wayne for roofing replacement that would fall under routine maintenance exclusions at 834 Forest with Mike. Identical roof replacement materials are proposed: charcoal Dow Corning 20 year three tab asphalt shingles. Also discussed the replacement of the crown moulding which we advised him that it would need to be replaced in-kind or repaired; any thing else would require the Commission's approval. Photographed 410-412 N. William Street after the early morning fire; provided Corky Towne of Towne fire and water damage restoration with owner John Freidline's contact information. 9 March On -sight inspection with Preservation Specialist for photos to document 803 W. Washington for letter to owner concerning neglect with copies to Code, Building and Community and Econ. Development. On -sight visit to Riverview Cemetery Gate house to photograph structure for anticipated repairs and re -use as an Office. Toured all local historic districts and the Marquette School building site. Sent via Fax information on windows approved by Commission to John Machowiak in Central Services for Land - marked firehouse. Reconciled Location Report to Office Account. 10 March Office file reorganization project, complied and e-mailed notes from South Bend Park's meeting with BSSB. 11 March Arrangements for Preservation Conference attendance after Keepers Preservation Education Fund grant secured funding, followed up with Frank Hurdis (we still had his old e-mail address); archived g -mail per IT instructions; attended Lunch and Learn on TIF Districts. 15 March Morgan La Fleur (286-1685), Office Manager, from John Freidline's Office (288-460 1) responded to HPC letter concerning 803 W. Washington. The problem tenet will be moved out by April; police have staked out house and have not been able to observe any drug activity. John Freidline will be back from Mexico on March 25 and will be having work done on the exterior of the house -storms, windows, etc. She said that John was upset about the condition of the house and that his property manager of seven years just quite without notice, so Morgan is doing double duty and not familiar with all the properties. Landscaping issues will be addressed as well as roof. Morgan said that 7 Roofers have declined to work on that rood as either being too steep or too dangerous; but she appreciated our Contractor's List and will let us know if she needs additional names. Assistant Director's Report HPC Meetina 03.15.2010 1. City Cemetery National Register Nomination Gathering research pertaining to Architecture and Social History. Searching for historic photos and maps -having a tough time tracking these down. Left message for John Palmer of the Arcadia Publishing books seeking info and emailed Michiana History Group. Correspondence with Holly Tate, new in the NR role at the DHPA. She is becoming familiar with City Cemetery and is gathering examples of other cemeteries to provide me. Discussion about the training at the Preserving Historic Places conference in April ... setting a goal for myself to have City Cemetery delivered for 2nd review by the May HPC meeting. 2. Lunch and Learn Lecture —2.25 presentation by SJCPLibrary on the Past, Present, and Future of the library; presentation by Laura Moran Walton of the Community Foundation on Arts in SB. 3.4 presentation by Marco Mariani of DTSB, Parks Department, and Chris Dressel, City of SB on Bike routes. 3.11 presentation by Don Inks, City of SB on TIF. 3. Attend "Sell South Bend" class for realtors at the Near Northwest Neighborhood office. Presentations by NNN: Catherine Toppel and Ann Carol Nash of Code Enforcement, and SB Bicycle Network, Chris Dressel and Mike Divita. Tour of select NNN properties for sale. 4. Restore Michiana turned Green Weekend Green Weekend committee meeting at DTSB with WNIT and many others. Solicit estimates for brochures. Preliminary design for possible "Sustainable Preservation" brochure. Review sponsorship opportunities. Invited to present a workshop at GW in partnership with Bill Barnard of the Troyer Group -working on topics. Meeting with Lynn Patrick to discuss signage, banners, brochures. Begin design of Sustainable HP brochure. Preliminary design for "Sustainable Preservation Technical Guide" brochure. 5. Southhold Preservation Awards/ DTSB Pride of Place Awards Meeting with Natalie Mast of CBRE at the American Trust Place to discuss needs for the event. Tour of the renovated building and condo development. SH Committee meeting in HPC conference room to finalize nomination form and budget. Prepare SurveyMonkey nomination form. E -blast nomination form, reaching appx. 500 + people. Securing details of caterer, venue, equipment rental, etc... Soliciting local artist for Award production - forwarding information to Committee for review. Design 2 styles of postcard invitation. Meeting with Gene Stowe of SB Tribune, Jitin Kain, and Jennifer Gregar in HPC conference room to discuss inclusion in the Tribune Business Weekly, also went over Press Release and other issues. »»»»»»»» 6. Prepare 2.22.10 HPC meeting minute draft and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Update Commissioner contact information sheet and letterhead templates. 7. Correspondence with Jitin Kain of DTSB to discuss what historic properties in the downtown area are available for sale. Meeting with Becky Reimbold of Just Goods to discuss possible retail relocation and what money might be available to assist with a building rehab. 8. North Liberty National Register nomination inquiry. Respond to Sue Solmos inquiry, providing her with further information about possible grant $ to hire a researcher. Discussion with Malia Vanaman at DHPA about Historic Preservation Funds grant $ to write NRNominations. Pass information on to Sue Solmos. Verified that North Liberty is identified as a district. 9. HPC Logo -Reviewed the logo as provided last year by Notre Dame student. Design other options for HPC logo. 10. Organizing office and HPC Resource Center .... What a task!!! 11. Meeting with Paul and Megan of the St. Joseph Co. Health Department regarding the RRP training for lead safe practices. Notifying contractors on our list and other colleagues of the training. Discussion with Megan about the price of the class increasing and the waiting list to take the class. 12. Attend Green Drinks at the Studebaker Museum. Lecture 'Black and Green is beautiful, Images of African-Americans in the Environment" given by IUSB Center for a Sustainable Future fellow. 13. Attend Young Professionals roundtable with the Mayor. 2 Historic Preservation Commission President's Report — March 15th, 2010 • 02/24/2010 12:OON: Architectural Historian applicant — Alex Regnery. Attendance: Tim Klusczinski, Linda Riley and Mr. Regnery. Interview candidate for the open Commission seat. • 02/26/2010 12:OON: Architectural Historian applicant — Dave Steinhauer. Attendance: Tim Klusczinski, Sandy Rossow, Linda Riley and Mr. Steinhauer. Interview candidate for the open Commission seat. • 02/26/2010 12:30PM: Restore Michiana/Southhold Awards Planning Session. Present: Tim Klusczinski, Sandy Rossow, Linda Riley, Elicia Dadlow, Jennifer Gregar — HLFI. SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION March 15, 2010 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT, YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR, MINUTES Print Name Address . Signature till LAIVII-e JW� (?��i�• fl � iso 1/01 10f acv - MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY March 15, 2010 13`k' Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Jerry Niezgodski, Timothy S. Klusczinski, Linda Riley, Todd Zeiger, Sandra Rossow Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia Dadlow, Assistant Director Members Absent: Lynn Patrick Members of the Public Present: Elizabeth Adey, Bill Lamie, Brian Atkinson H. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0301 Property Location: 1216 East Wayne Street North Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/I925/H.R. Stapp for Whitcomb and Keller Property Owner: Elizabeth and Mark Adey Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1216 E. Wayne North is a two storey frame home with a brick fagade and an irregular floor plan set on a matching brick foundation. There is a gable roof with gable returns with cornice molding and an eyebrow dormer. The roofing is asphalt shingle. There is a multi -pane half -round attic window. The windows are 8/1 and 6/1 double hung windows that have. brick soldier course lintels and brick header course sills; some with paneled wood shutters with a tree motif. The front entry has gable roof with round arch under supported by brackets and smooth Doric columns; the front door is rounded with simple wood trim. There is a one storey side open porch with a flat roof supported by smooth Doric columns. ALTERATIONS: There is a rear one storey 8'x12' addition with a shed roof that was built in 1955. The brick is slightly different than that of the house. There appears to be some window openings that were re- configured and bricked in. The survey card noted aluminum storm windows and some replacement windows. The side porch is open and no longer has screens noted in the August, 1986 survey card and were removed sometime after 1995. There are COAs (2004-9) in file for in kind replacement and repair work to porch, in-kind window replacement, garage roof and rear fencing. Removal of 1955 addition and replaced with new one storey addition 12'8"x 30'8" in materials to match the original house. Replaced replacement casement windows from 1955 re -model to match windows in the addition per COA 2009-0601D. APPLICATION ITEMS: Living Room: Originally the house had two doors exiting the living room to the side porch, one on each side of the fireplace. One of the doors has been bricked over on the exterior and made into a shelf area on the interior. (Probably one during the 1950's remodel.) The remaining door is in poor shape and needs to be replaced. Work to be done: Replacement of existing door and return of "missing" door. New doors will match rear entry door. Second Floor Bedroom: Work to be done, replacement of entry door and storm. Exterior door leads to covered porch roof and is in really poor shape. Currently the door is held together with a metal plate on the lower portion. The storm door has been sealed shut from the exterior due to the "Breeze" it allowed into the bedroom. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners wish to restore the south doorway leading to the porch from the living room and install a fifteen light, wood frame door. They also wish to remove the `Dutch Door" on the north side and replace it with a fifteen light, wood frame door. The framing on the current door would remain and be duplicated on the south exterior doorway. There will be no storm doors. The deteriorated second storey door would be replaced with a fifteen light, wood frame replica and the storm door would be a full view storm door with muntins to match interior door. (Please see photographs provided by the homeowner and Staff.) STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the living room doors. The homeowners are returning an original feature, the bricked -in south door to the west facade of the house. There is no documentation that the current Dutch Door is original to this house. The proposed 15 light, wood frame door is in a style that is sympathetic to Colonial Rival architecture and will match the door that the Commission approved for the addition in COA#2009-0601D. The second storey doors are deteriorated and ill fitting. The storm door is permanently screwed into the jamb; a metal plate is securing the base of the interior door to keep it stable. The proposed replacement interior door in an in-kind replacement; the proposed storm door replacement will match the muntin pattern of the interior door and improve the aesthetics of the west fagade by eliminating the mismatched muntin patterns of the interior door and the storm door. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0301 was approved with a unanimous vote STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 3, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0303 Property Location: 1716 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/1928/HR Stapp 2 Property Owner: Kathy Vetter Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1716 E. Wayne is a 2 %2 storey frame construction with rusticated, yellow brick -veneer, set upon a concrete foundation. The gable roof has a steep slope with moulded raking trim and returns; it covered with asphalt shingles. The windows are casement style replacement windows with storms. The wood clapboard infill under the windows of the enclosed side porch are covered with vinyl siding. There is a multi -paned picture window flanked by four side -lights with a brick header sill. There are paired six -light casement windows with wrought iron below directly above the bellcast gable roof over the entry. The entry has timber columns, brick corbelled brackets and a brick stoop with turned balustrades. There is a shed dormer at the west side over the enclosed side porch with replacement casement style windows. There is a two car brick garage with gable roof and asphalt shingles at the side of the house toward the rear. ALTERATIONS: The 1987 survey card notes that the house has had major alterations. The brick fagades, porches features and roofs over the front and side entrances and the wood front door appear to be original to the structure. The original roof was asphalt shingle and has been replaced. The side porch was constructed an open porch and enclosed before 1949. All of the windows have been replaced with vinyl windows with storm windows. All of the wood clapboard has been covered with vinyl of the same width as the original clapboard. Staff has not been able to located COAs for the windows or the siding. The garage may not be original to the house as the location is not the same as the 1932 Assessor's Card APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace roof with GAF Timberline 30 yr. Architectural style shingles. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This is a complete tear off and re -roof of the asphalt shingles and application of architectural style shingles to the roof. There is a dumpster on site to contain debris and haul it away. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district encompass most of the various designs found in residential structures. Roofs are covered with a variety of materials such as asphalt, asbestos, wood, and slate shingles, as well as clay tiles. Residences in most cases have wood fascias with gutters and downspouts. The facias of some vinyl or metal sided houses are covered with the same material. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character shall be retained, including dormer windows, cupolas, cornices, brackets, chimneys, cresting and weather vanes. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile, and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the original in composition, size, shape, color and texture. Gutters and downspouts are often a necessary adjunct in order to prevent deterioration of the structure; they should be maintained whenever possible or replaced with a style comparable and suitable to the architectural period. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof as viewed from the thoroughfare by adding architectural features or large unsightly fixtures, or by using materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended Overhanging eaves, soffits, brackets and gables should not be covered or enclosed when adding metal or vinyl siding to a building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement asphalt shingle roofing material as it is appropriate to the architectural style of the house. Staff would also recommend that the Commission re-evaluate the rating. No Motion COA 2010-0303 No action was taken. The COA was neither approved nor denied. The Director was instructed to write to the contractor about the necessity of applying for a COA and the necessary permits before commencing any project in a Local District. Copies of this letter were to be sent to Code and the Building Department. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: March 4, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0304 Property Location: 61191 US 31 South Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Italianate Cube/1866 Property Owner: Paula Elliott Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey Italianate has a rectangular floor plan with bearing wall construction set upon a stone foundation with a brick fagade that is painted white. There is a flat or very slightly pitched roof with cornice board and double brackets. All windows are round arch; there are six pane windows on the second storey and 1/3x2/3 on the first, all with shutters. The central entrance has double wood raised panel doors with a fanlight and an arched brick surround. There is a brick chimney centered on the south side of the house. The house is set back from US 31 and has a central circular, paved drive that is landscaped with shrubbery and trees. There are older out buildings of undetermined date on the site: a milk house and animal shelter and well house towards the rear as well as modern buildings: a house and garage at the rear of the property and a garage on the west side of the Italianate house. ALTERATIONS: The 1975 survey card notes that a small porch was removed. The location was not noted. The bank barn burned in 1985. APPLICATION ITEMS: Place monument sign list tenants. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Per illustration provided, the painted aluminum sign would be placed between brick pillars positioned east and west and situated at the north of the circular drive entrance near US 31 South. The finish on brick pillars would mimic the main fagade of the house. The sign would not be illuminated. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B Standards: B. Treatment: treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing. Glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, A Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. F. Signs: No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Billboards and super -graphics will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign will be permitted per business. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as it falls within the Class B Standards for local landmarks. The sign will be situated east and west on the north side of the site close to US31 South and will not negatively impact the front fagade of the landmark. The finish on the sign's pillars reflect the front fagade. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0304 was approved with a unanimous vote 4 Director introduced COA 2010-0315 with the option to review the project on tonight's agenda. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 To accept COA 2010-0315 on the agenda STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 15 March 2010 Application Number: 2010-0315 Property Location: 835 Park Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Tudor Revival/ 1916 Property Owner: P. David Faulkner Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park LHD/NR Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey Tudor Revival has a rectangular plan with appendages on the side and the rear of the house. It is set upon a concrete foundation with red brick common bond and decorative brickwork and half timber and stucco exterior walls. The roof has a central hip with gable ended front, box gutters, narrow overhand with molded cornice and slate shingles. There are casement windows with head sill and jambs of the second floor as part of the timber decoration, the lower level windows have plain jambs with soldier course heads. There are brick chimneys on either side with chimney pots. The front entrance is a partially enclosed porch with a 3/4 stucco wall and turned wood baluster columns; a boxed bay window is positioned above porch. There is a cut stone balustrade around the side terrace. ALTERATIONS: 2003-2005 The current owners replaced the slate roof, installed copper gutters and finials. The original French doors leading to the terrace have been removed and replaced by a fixed picture window. APPLICATION ITEMS:: Removal of old, original(?) screen door front and back door and replace with energy efficient storm door. Full view glass storm door on front. Will store old, original (?) door in basement. Back door is replacing aluminum replacement door. 3/o divided light storm. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Mr. Faulkner wishes to replace the front screen door with an Anderson full view storm door with insulating glass, custom sized to fit the 42"x80" opening. It will also have a full screen insert for summer. See attached documentation. The current wooden screen door is, according to Preservation Specialist, very rickety. It does not have storm window inserts. He also wishes to replace the non -original rear door aluminum door with a % divided light EMCO 300 Series storm per attached documentation. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited 5 Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement doors in the front and the rear of the home. The current screened door may or may not be original to the house and the homeowner will store it in the basement. A storm door for the front does not exist. The proposed replacement storm door is a full view design that the Commission has approved in the past because it is unobtrusive and allows the original wood door to be seen and appreciated. The rear door replacement of a replacement aluminum door is a more appropriate alternative to what is there and it will not be visible from any street or thoroughfare. On a motion by Todd Zeiger with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 4-0-1 abstention COA 2010-0315 was approved. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. City Cemetery update Elicia Dadlow reported that she was gathering research and is still looking for historic photos and maps. Staff has changed in the Architectural Historian role at DHPA and is now working with Holly Tate. Elicia will be attending the New National Register Nomination form training at the Preserving Historic Places Conference in April and has set a goal to resubmit City Cemetery by the May Commission meeting. III. HEARING OF VISITORS No visitors IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — February 22, 2010 Approved B. TREASURER'S REPORT Concern by Linda Riley on the expenditure of office supplies. Catherine Hostetler explained that it was for the purchase of new filing cabinets from last years budget surplus dollars being reallocated and carrying over into 2010. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -File - Circulated. Clarification on John Freidline's "Castle" property. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals -834 Forest, roof. Discussion on the distribution of RME-Staff will provide each Commissioner with own copy to be included in COA packet or distributed at meeting. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. 4. AD Report -Distributed. 5. Legal Counsel -None 31 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -Distributed. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Architectural Historian Chair opened general discussion for the Architectural Historian position based on the slate of two candidates that were interviewed by Commission members in February. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Sandy Rossow Vote: 5-0 David Steinhauer was appointed Architectural Historian with a unanimous vote. B. Preservation/Southhold 2010 Events Discussion of Southhold Preservation Awards -award, nominations jury, guest list, budget, Service Award for Martha Choitz. Discussion of Restore Michiana turned Green Weekend -Sustainable Historic Preservation brochure, Sustainable Historic Preservation technical guide, HPC brochure, Banner/backdrop for exhibitor booth, Sponsorship levels. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. HPC logo Discussion of logo by Mary Jesse, logo by Elicia Dadlow. Logo needs tweaking, Sandy Rossow was recommended to assist with this. Sandy accepted request to assist with logo design. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Jerry Niezgodski to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m. Attest: L�4iin Pa rick, ecretary Date fd