The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJune 2010AGENDA OF THE �. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 21,--2010 b 1865 Regular Meeting `tmKTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY, JUNE 21, 2010 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL H. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS ,. 1. 849 Forest COA#2010-0602 Chapin Park 2. 424 Manitou COA#2010-0604 Chapin Park 3. 708 N. Joseph St. COA#2010-0604A River Bend ~ 4. 317 LaMonte COA#2010-0607 Chapin Park COD 5. 853 Forest COA#2010-0607A Local Landmark 6. 814 Arch COA#2010-060711 Edgewater B. National Register Nominations: 1. City Cemetery 2 III. HEARING OF VISITORS C IV. REGULAR BUSINESS ~ A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ' May 17, 2010 " B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report " C. STAFF REPORTS �. 1. Correspondence 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals QI 3. Director's Report 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel ?: D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: 1. President's Report �. IV. OLD BUSINESS 1. Sons of Israel Synagogue } 2. Green Weekend— wrap up V. NEW BUSINESS A " VI. ADJOURNMENT `OM,MISSIOryFry� a H p on r SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMIVIISSION JUNE 219 2010 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR Print Name -� o Q n uc -xmci I< MINUTES Address Is Lf 9 T:76ftz� s6 4f 7 0 �, 0,9N� S�, 406- 0Z Fwlt rc Sf-. 3 17 L.n m,ti�-� Signature kClloollf ooA�x L STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: ,lune 10, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0602 Property Location: 849 Forest Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1898A925 remodel Ernest Young Property Owner: Joan Downs and Brian Krostenko Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house has two storeys and is set on an irregular stone foundation. The exterior walls are wood clapboard with corner boards. The roof has a steeply pitched front gable, asphalt shingles; there are also shed roof dormers that contribute to the varying and projecting roofline. There are two small entry porches at either side of the center wing, the roofs are an extension of the wing roof with wood square piers at the corners. The windows are 4/1 double hung with simple lintels. There is a single leaf wood panel front door. There are brick steps and porch floors. There is a two car garage in the back. ALTERATIONS: The body of the house appears to be unaltered. The roof was replaced with COA42005-0721.-2. A garage door was installed and the flatwork, retaining wall and a fence around the yard were repaired and re -worked with COA#0403-2006. APPLICATION ITEMS: The original fence of wood recently fell down (it had been in poor repair far 8 years). 1. would like to replace it with a 6 foot metal fence which has decorative finials and allows light into the garden and views to the alley. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeo«Hier wishes to replace a wood fence and install a 6 foot black aluminum fence along the rear of the property along the alley on either side of the garage. Please refer to product information and site plan attached. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencirig, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new fencing as it conforms to the standards and compliments the architecture of the house. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46602 Phone: 574-235-W98 + Fax: 574-235-4578 • Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-josep1Lin.us Website: httly//wwwsqxTbcounbdncliana.com/sdip/index.htmI htmi OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 02 bl-0!o Application Number?Za v — Past Reviews: [v_TVES (Dateof totRrriem) /9 s.?oo 4 E] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: "t / 4�C ofd Local Landmark cal Historic District (Name) ❑ National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied Q Tabled [] Sent To Committee Fj Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: 9q'1' Fov-e s 4 Ave. S., G e n -A U (;:� 16 Street Number and Street Naeem. Name of Property Owner(s): (Phase Print) .� V tXr-' 'bo w n S C --%A 1B Y; or% Address of Property Owner(s): ON, CL4-n e_ Contractor(s) Name: S'_ ct^ ^ . n (Re (G r.*. Contract Company Name: 9,e % 1 t ti . Lo r-% A 5 C o P e end Z) e s t `j r, Contractor Address: Phone: Current Use of Building: (Single Family - Multi -Family - Connnerrbi - Gawrnment - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction:* (Wood frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Onrnte - Other) - Proposed Work: n in-kind [] Landscape [] New (� Replacement (not in-kind) [] Demolition �. imnr�.OtSC13(tZlttIIS�i4G1:f tY�'1, Description of Proposed Work: _T�"++l Pr it Araw (..1\- k6,4 rD.a id 1�ict e'e/it c Owner/Contractor: Fax: (TAa's office will mrrffpvnd with only one designee) .--rip \ 0' e , A i.A Is terlk 6 (o AC>0 i- m e -1 ct 1 .� e-mail ^�— and/or - - -- APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS A RE LISTED ON RELTERSE SIDE — 11 iLTERATIONS Aditions u i n s 21. Architect / Builder �i Other 24. SITE PLAN 'ners; charac the roofs rners Trofid' t a ra 27. Environment 4-7 C sa < .I TINA lid .RHARTY, d. n�hv y i` � i •� sd :7 = • � � �.� r. :. Y __ �.. # �_ ,,,,Y .rte � �� ( -_ � y VN F—C NCc- T-0 R. 4eq 9 Fo vzt-SI— C o j A "W" 'A Ai 849 Forest, June 3, 2010 849 Forest, June 2, 2010 Back yard - 6. w„„ry °'gym YSF�• ewe' .red mEVII Back yard - ,I. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: .Tune 8, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0604A Property Location: 424 Manitou Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1891 Property Owner: Molly B. Moon Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: One storey gabled —ell on across plan set upon a brick foundation. The walls are clapboard with beaded band course defining fenestration; fish -scales shingles in front and west gables; diagonal clapboard in east gable. Roof is cross gable with moulded cornice and asphalt shingles. There is a frill width front porch extending around the front and side of the center gable with a flat roof with slender wood square supports. There is lattice work under the porch. The windows are 1/1 double hung with lintels defined by continuous beaded band board. There is a ten light casement in .front and 2 wood panel front doors with wood storms and simple surrounds. There is a one storey hip garage at the rear. ALTERATIONS: There are aluminum storms over most of the windows. The porch flooring, facing board and lattice skirting was repaired in kind with COA#2006-0822; removal of 1 Red Maple and volunteer trees in the rear yard in 2009 per City Forester with COA#2009-0415. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace deck, add pergola on back of house. Re -roof studio and re -glaze windows and paint to match colors of house. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Replacement of deteriorating deck with a studier, slightly larger one composed of pressure treated lumber with concrete footings per diagrams submitted. The deck is not attached to the house but will have two set of stairs on its south and east side. The pergola is designed to reflect the architectural details of the front of the house and is secured to the deck per illustration submitted. It is not attached to the house. The garage has been converted into a studio. The windows are to be rc-glazed and the exterior painted to match the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CIIAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. - Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open, (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The project was already in progress when the homeowner was notified by a neighbor that a COA was required. The homeowner and the contractor promptly came to the Office and made application. Staff recommends approval construction of the deck with the pergola with lattice application in the rear of the house. The new deck is not visible from the street while portions of the pergola re visible from the street it does incorporate fbatures from the main house. It is not attached to the house in any way and will have flowering climbers growing on it which will eventually soften the view from the street. The re -glazing of the windows and the painting of the studio are considered routine maintenance and do not require a CO A; and as stated, any painting on the studio will match the color of the mains house. The roof has been staff approved with R.ME COA#2010-0609 as an in- kind re -roof replacement replicating the former roofing material with three tab Super Glass 25 year shingles in Rainbow Green which also matches the roofing material of the main house. C� It Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: Countj"-City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC@cost joseph.in us Website: http://www.sqosephcauntyindianLcom/schp/index.hW OFFICE USE ONLY »»»>Di O NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONVIINED IN THIS SOXr�»»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received(�une "i t -U1 0 -Application Number' L 1-6 - V U() q Past Reviews: [PrYES (gate of bast Review) [] NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: .21 .90/4 Local Landmark oval Historic District (Name) h_Ah,.k.3 ❑ National Landmark ONational Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied M Tabled E] Sent To Committee M Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: &QW4YAJ /`"_1_ Sirect Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Pratt) Yl l v im, _ M40 YN Address of Property Owner(s):( Contractor(s) Name: C' L� Contract Company Name: !'fir r e C tt-rt r t/r ! Contractor Address: 632 -J��.�-,r_�r.,c .) City: , r L ! Phone: E; 711—:VE 3 o Current Use of Building: A'ZC (bmagle Family —Multi-Family-kxmtmerdal — Government —Industrial — Vacant — efc.) Type of Building Construction:_1*tj,c ( and Fr Brisk — Surae — Steel — Concrete Other) Proposed Work: n In-kind [1 Landscape [ "New replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition {r:ung-#lrsratuae-�ax+mry#eefaerl�t) � �y �} ..,,/,, t � Description of Proposed Work: -�� "�i1} Intf..' (bpk, � � ,L� ? 2 IGL rnIx,,,,,_.._ Ro d Owne ontractor. Fax: e-mailmbfimn 61 ni eL o ,e will mrralvW with only one designnee) /Y 7(! .. and/or - — APPLICA770N REQUIRLMMS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE --- June 7, 2010 To the Historic Preservation Commission: Here is a description of the deck, pergola and studio repair project at 424.Mallitou Place in the Chapin Park neighborhood: Deck: a replacement for one that was failing down, the deck is sturdier, slightly larger and incorporates a pergola. The material is pressure -treated lumber. The dimensions are 12'x12'. There are two stairs on the south and east sides, of 13" treads and 5.5" risers. The pergola incorporates architectural details from the front porch and is in proportion with my small house. It will be covered %vith roses and sweet autumn clematis someday. There is a partial trellis wall on the north side of the porch/pergola that imitates the handmade front porch facing proportions, enlarged to an appropriate scale. Studio: a former garage, it was converted into a studio by former owner, the writer Frances Sherwood, from whom I bought the house in 2000. The contractor is replacing the roof with shingles that match the house. He is reglazing the windows as well. Everything will look the same as it has since I bought it. Contractor: Scott Hires, of HIRES FOR HIRE - who grew up in this neighborhood on Riverside Drive where his mother still lives - is doing the work. lie plans to attend the June 21 C of A board meeting to answer any questions on this project. Hires does excellent work and has a real appreciation for historic houses. lie can be reached at 574- 291-7091. I do apologize for my backwards timing on the approval process. Next time *1 will know the procedure and will follow it. Sincerely, Molly B. Moon Sys`,:.: :.•• ,d'' *�+" '< ' S K $. € # „?`+''"�»o-.a 8 " bye > q....-.. �.-., y';^. • , - s . ; � Vit; • E ...e ��af „rr" , y.� , . x 4�p•. W7- 424 Manitou Place, June 9, 2010 . .......... .......................... ........... ............... .................... . •' r i --Clxr Tapp. 1469S.: T-7 v o1v sr W r—nA G. —4TV f L - I 11 i h,A 5r?4euW (&) V 'o C17 .34 i G ---.__..k � j� � r� � jam. �% STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 June 20.1.0 Application Number: 2010-0604A Property Location: 708 N. St. Joseph Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: American Four Squaret.1903 Property Owner: William & Catherine Hostetler Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Rating: Nan -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: 2 storey square plan on :raised concrete foundation. Fagade is restored clapboard. Steeply pitched hip roof with hipped dormer on North side and gabled dormer on front facade -all covered in asphalt shingles. There is a 1 storey porch with hipped roof, concrete steps and deck, and iron supports and railing. Windows are I A double hung with aluminum storm windows. Front door is paneled with aluminum storm door. There is a center brick chimney. ALTERATIONS: 1977 one storey rear addition; 1983 patio and walls in rear enclosed with brick; 2006 complete re -roof; 2008-2010 non -original insul brick siding removed and clapboard restored and painted. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. (Brick replacement) of cement 8"x16"xI-pavers with bricks on the path around the house from the back patio to front walk. 2. (Replacement) of cement walk from sidewalk to front steps with bricks. Reason: cement is broken - improve the look and safety of walks. 3. Remove two trees in front lawn. Reason: one tree is overhanging house and the roots of both trees are entering the sewer line. Replace with two smaller city approved trees in tree lawn. 4. Remove four trees along the alleyway. Reason: trees are dying and overhanging house and electrical wires. Replace with 4 evergreens. 5. Put up a 2' retaining wall along the alley 63' long to improve the look of the property. Made of cement retaining blocks. *1,2,5 to be done by homeowner. *3,4 to be done by a contractor. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner wishes to 1. Replace cement pavers with brick Paveloc-Antiqued Holland on path around house from back patio to front walk. 2. Replace cement walk from sidewalk to front steps with (same) brick. 3. Remove two trees in front lawn and replace with two smaller city approved trees in tree lawn. Replacement approval granted by City Forester. 4. Remove four trees along rtil.ey-C�ty I'U.c�i�, �wwlude5; "ti es arc 17]aittedin-a Vf'ry`l7ad Spot''': � EreCt a ?' retaining wall along alley using Unilock-Stack Stone. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. IN THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South'Bend and its location adjacent to Leeper Park and along the St. Joseph River. The district encompasses: two blocks of Riverside Drive beginning at Marion Street (from 503 Riverside Drive north) and ending at Bartlett Street; two lots on the north side of Navarre street just west of the alley behind Riverside Drive; the north side of Hammond Place; the cast side of St. Joseph Street between Hammond Place and Bartlett Street; and the south side of Bartlett Street between St. Joseph and Riverside Drive. The District contains 45 residences and their adjacent outbuildings. Required Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets, alleys and building setbacks shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walk -ways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix). Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Removal of shade trees over twelve inches (12") diameter, conifer trees over six inches (6") in diameter or other major plant elements shall be subject to approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, Any subsequent replacement trees of any size required by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be retained. The Riverfront character of the district shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. Do not dump leaves and grass clippings on planted slopes as this practice will kill much of the low _ground cover and leave soil susceptible to erosion. When replacement of utility poles or power lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening or closing of existing streets and alleys or by introducing now streets, alleys or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers which would alter the relationship of the houses and the river is prohibited. The introduction of heavy trucks or similar vehicles in the District shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. B.—BUILDINGSII"E-,",L--i\:NTDSCAPING., &ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in firont and a larger lawn to the rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive generally have sloping front lawns and flat back yards. The majority of structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties include a garage located at the rear of the property accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. L• All houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. The district has a compact layout. Large homes are constructed on small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Place, are constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of the backyard areas or rear first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In recognition of this, greater latitude will be allowed in the application of the adopted standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the individual preferences of the property owners in the treatment of these backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn, shrubs, walkways or semi-permanent surface changes in the rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets; sand -boxes, etc. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas TYPICAL SITE PLAN where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends 1 & 2. Replacing cement pavers with the selected brick treatment as it will improve the look and safety of the path. Staff also recommends 3 & 4. Removal of existing trees and replacement with appropriate city approved trees, per City Foresters recommendation. Staff also recommends 5. Erecting the retaining wall with the selected blocks along the alley to improve the aesthetic of the property. All elements of the new site work are appropriate to existing surrounding site elements iifmle, type and appearance. 0 Application - FOR - Certificate icate o f Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Halling Address: County City Building South t3cn4, Indiana 4&101 Phone: 574-23-1-9798 - Fax: 574-2.35-9578 - Email: SWCHPC@co st josephJn.us Website: http://wwNvstioselihco=nt diana.com/sjchp/indexlitnil OFFICE USE ONLY »�»» E DO NOT COMPLIT ANY F,WMIES CONTAINED IN' 771IS BOX »»» OFFICE USE O1VLY Date Received'y. �� 1 Application Number � � � - 0 to �i A Past Reviews: [] YES (Cate e; Last Review) Stasi Approval authorized by: Historic Commission Review Date: E] Local Landmark 'Local Historic District (.Dame) National Landmark C] National Register District (,varve) so Title: Certificate of Appropriateness: R Denied F_� Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee Fj Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: t7 cs ` 4cte-Ap" Street Numbc7 and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) W'�(i a Af" :' tZ*rlL VWK- Address of Property Owner(s): Cg i'j _ � t � �7 ti7 t4) 7 g � ` Z q ; o Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Plione: Current Use of Building: (Single Family — Wti-Family — Commercial — Gwvernment — Industrial — vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame — Brick — Slmae — Steel — Uncrrte — Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind (21 Landscape E] New ® Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (mor :soars nr,e%x tnay Ike cdu*cl� el) �} _. _._. Description of Proposed Work:�.� Owner/Contractor: Fax: e-mail (MI o(fxe will u€rresrhartd with only one drs �rur) and/or — API'LICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE IJSTED ON REVERSE SIDE — V, 'C4 �_ .....� _'r'i. .�__..._� .. .. ..... .... :. j .. a v% ca .�'-j.{'�7R.�..• y........... 0 1 i ! W : ! s -.y,.,-,-.:-. ........._ ... .... ........... .._:....... .....«.... ... - t ` _ _.. Yom.....:...,.. .�........: _ .... : - . �. «-. ... ., .. .. _ _ ., r i 1110111�. w- Mw�'' U"47,11" F�T' 708 N. St. Joseph, June 9, 2010 708 N. St. Joseph, June 9, 2010 �Yro''i 3 ITS ; • � w��AVy. s *t by ;'':. £, :',• 353 ;."$,<.-•m..Vnv ,£»= L ... n �`""<, .«,....,,m.» " s,...« » ;,.,y;..�si, •,s„aar':s ^y;�' .'.M ' 4:• " �'by;',;,? h• a � .•` Y•« , r<y :sYa�yml,r n f1 i xm`«"`. c *�ty,: "� °`��' � � f ',�b> , z�.�, �x � � £ V ,. Irma ZAK �Yro''i 3 jaug - Lw WON lot un 1-17 4 n COE-% _I41 it 0. OEM 1440 7 wy, man,, $"..:V, oil 41� 'A' 00, 02v "Al sew -TIN, pqlp_wey> FIX POO 1"t, , I OEM y wy, man,, oil 'A' Pennit # 10 Department oj*Puhlic Parks South Bend Indiana Property Owner 708 N St Joseph South Bend, IN 4601 Permission is hereby granted to the above to plant (2) tree 1 trees on the property at: 708 N St Joseph Note: Property Owner's Responsibility, Tree List enclosed Department of Public Parks Brent Thompson Brent 'I'lionipson, City Forester ......... .. . ... . Catherine[.(617/2010)Hostetler- IMG 1519.jpg . ..... 'Page i (6/7/2010) Catherine Hostetler- IMG 1520,jPg ' '.�' .�'� ;, �'�';',��>`�t'' '�° is •1'aap��`� %';`:,;.�< �;1 .. i° >.� 5� ,g°.�s��A<. �.' �y,J� l�•�e�"€L,,i moi. ��3 y ab^� K�. �'�s,,9,z £.�4�� y ,.'":r•'F�p�R�1yy EL �'4 ,. `E+: `aV ` «" ..\a,+R.•.. j}'Ai.. j ,' j„ s ,A 1g. /' " $'{ (S �j, » '� " . e " .^opi" : , ,�,� , N%�k.:9. ., "\ +. Cf �`1, :P`;�Ya KAY � ?r; i •w Y� a y a • 37 'ya•'d:,��.�a�=d`�"`.;.`y'�-:',.,�"�°'?s{a'�=e`.^�r" tai 'S;, �, ,� r _ Y .._ ^1Y.,. _';,••, �. �<<<o'6 "{y, '%. %;•.+$La"ge ,SF. R'.N ., z A•E 9y #> q'�B'�4�yss s: 4"� b ,^ Page 1 Page I of I Catherine Hostetter - 708 M St Jae ,... _._ From: "Brent Thompson" To: Date: 6/7/2010 10:54 AM Subject: 708 M St Joe Attachments: Forgot look at the two dead & hollow corkscrew willow by the alley. Trees planted in a very bad spot. Thanks IMPORTANT NOTICE I This E -Mail transmission and any accompanying attachments may contain confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in reliance on the contents of this E -Mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited and is not intended to, in anyway, waive privilege or confidentiality. If you have received this E -Mail In error please Immediately delete it and notify sender at the above E -Mail address. :a WM _ s • w A r+V.• � �a ::r7 "oF„�$d�,Y,' p �+""�yY^1i.'',g. �,a 1. Y TYi < A�� K mss' w.. kr' " •�'� 4w�. >� ° � � _ > ,.,�..��? a'�\�`� •,�ati.; �";R t' � , a•}.R°L R �'e °"y . s : A� : `?•�,.: � �°' �t .,,�, 'moi' ;F y..�• �. � .o- r •'+k"';�' t � '�"'s-.r�;:. �� '`?r' ` ; ''8.� 4z� "�"::" x v .iJ �°xi.�°�;•' ¢ ' -r ;,�_ Ma, d !+ fir' •• P. \ Ate. �... :, ".`a""',"`•$s.: ,.�'.".'�" ��` � ii"' : �".�« .. � Y�, <: `^^ a`"' .ani,. tr°• �. �aT. # �' •» rx � R,., a� � """`,A'�e.:sr..,,.`.'.at"a °a";,r..;,$:z'. �e_g� ,n 7�„�y �'�^'�,'.° ;':• . tY W` � �rs, ��:�; -a� * ' �` :; a. �. 's ,�,.�..,',�e` �;r', ='z.y -r:' r. .f a :€°�'�':'�,;.�d;�a�'�;•0 � .'a• $ .� •. .�r�,�w.„y'dY °�s'gr`�' z`� r=°^` n. y°y�M, .� ^' # .l" •�R `..te,V` '.,.. "kms 'k, `� e .. Pq-� w� ' S ;0.��°y' r^(k V.'..0 'W�3'i", ,� x,.,,r' /' nA..;•4::...F.tyrC.� =,$; ��. s•>� ,E�' �`1.." r�"�•�^�'bm'"r` �.iX:r'.xre. ^•w' '3. - r�u Y<x. .`�.'a;. A ♦ .3. � mn , y, .,'<'aE'9.,.^�,,&i'n; ^^£ a��4, • Ae a . � e F� -a>;<N .,w�•"'�A -., ,yeF«°.� ,.. a .. - "'�^. ,�r.».y,,.,, a, X,. �� •`:"'.:a^:.r�^;,;.y =;...:s...':j�;;.3;�;-ox"';:° ,•„�:.".:•xq" ,<' �. �.R :, jj 6p spar 8,.. _ _. ?;. 8< ' .`'.<.9.•R,v"•. :,°•'#a ",£"�,r"� . _, - ., ; va"Y'�� >� „°�CEX i ��'��; � ,•�.�... �" a 4 s. °�� ""' �, a �'. s€�rp . ai s �.� Al.. «-•--.:..�+' .r+""".^ ,.: `" y<�°'Aa ..F' � s�4+a>.��'.r'A' 3< �, �„ ag.�vy�3 ` :i': � .. .. $�' �° , �`� � i. 43x' .Y Y, } rl ,M � hf ,a + �� +�az. F kk;�7.w Ar'�� . : -t,. ,�. �.a ,ay,�' .� ♦ 3 [ � �� 'b . irk '. C'4 ED Ar k` rad a linp Pf x x&` �xk a•f; y ;fix es �" <'" '*�„� .'. t 'y�Lk�� c w��, w.v' a *»Mt„+�t £, k � a Y„ � .�' z.4 r . �` _ �, �37+ �t. •*•�'� rot � ?4 ii�J"J'{ s s f �y :� .3 •9 akiiy � t.«W L�6/7/ 2010) Catherine Hostetler- IMC _1523.jpg . . ........ . . ... .... . ... .. .. .......... . jo I Al". , Page 1 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPI.ICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 8, 20.10 Application Number: 2010-0607 Property; Location: 317 La Monte Terrace Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer Front Bungalow/.1907 Property Owner: Abigail and Neal Wozniak Landmark or District .Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey wood shingled home is set upon a square brick foundation. The asphalt shingle roof has side gables with large hip roof dormer in from with pilasters at the corners and in the Huddle. There is a full width front porch with shingle covered square supports and solid rail. The windows are 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures. There is a wood panel front door with single light and a wood storm door with divided light. ALTERATIONS: There are aluminum storms on the second floor. Aluminum siding covers the roof soffits and fascia. The wooden steps do not appear to be original to the house. The front concrete steps and walkway were replaced in kind with COA#2006-0724; there was a complete tear -off and re -roof with architectural shingles under COA#2006-0109A APPLICATION ITEMS: Re -paint exterior of house, replace porch steps with similar design, add black wrought iron hand rail. Add gate to west side of house. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: There are ctiurently only two wood steps leading from the walkway to the front porch. The steps are badly constructed with risers that are very steep and awkward to navigate; the homeowner wishes to replace the two steps with three wood steps. The black wrought iron hand rail or wrought iron style will be attached to the side of the square porch support and to the wood stairs. There is no handrail and one is required by South Bend Code. A wooden gate will be behind the set back of the .house between the west side of the house and the retaining wall (approximately five feet between the house and wall) to secure the backyard play area. It will be obscured by the current landscaping. Repainting the house does not require a COA. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons, Not Recommended - Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new wood steps, the wrought iron railing and the wooden gate. The wood steps would be in the approximate footprint of the current front steps. The railing is required by Code. The wood gate at the side of the house is obscured by landscaping and the setback of the house from the street. The gate can be as solid or as open as the homeowner deems practical i1or his purposes as it will not be seen from the street. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateiiess I listoric Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 1275 S. Uafayetti,, Blvd, South &nid, Indiana 46601 Malibu, Address: County -city Building Slull, Vend Indiana 466(11 Phone; 574215-"7 8 - Fax: 574 -r -)5-957S Website: OITICE USE ONLY DO 1V07'CO3MPIT-11: ANY VVIVIES CONTILYWD IN MIS BOX OF ICEUSI, ONLY Date Received Application Number Past Rei ictus: NO L Staff Approval authorized by. ...... ... .............. ........ .......... I listoric Commission Review Date: . . . . ........ F� Local 1andinark Lq<_ocal Historic District. (Name) National Landmark PkK ational Register District. ("Vame) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied [].Tabled E] Sent'ro Committee Approved and Issued . . . ....... DATF Address of Property for proposed work: _!13. . . ....... ...... S,'?vo .Nun:4,rmud Street Namt' Niinicofl'ropertyOwtier(s):(PI,�i-vi,ti.-it) JIalod . . .. .... ...... Address of Propertner(s): 0_7 L4M y Ow Contractor(,,) Narne: t-t,�, L ........... ....... ..... Contract CompanyName: 0 ------ Contractor Address;_.7,-, _ Y U 4 _x+ Plione: Current Use of Building: . . .. . ......... ...... ------ Co""o?""tia I .... C� r j, � ne? ludwirial - Va, anu' rtt,.) Type of Building Construction: L42 ('W�kO frmuc -• Brick -Stal role -- Oth?r) Proposed Work: E] In-kind F E] I 010re "T.P1,11le hak m". I/ 1'e:""'J % h) ") ] Utidscape ['I New Replacement (nviv;-kiruf) Demolition be Aa4Y —T T _v _n -( OKA . .............. ....... ............................................. . .. . ..... . ............................. . ... ................. ... . ...... ....... ............. . ... ............... ............. ... . . ... . . ... ... ........ _.__ APPLICA770N REQ11IREAIEN'15 ARE LIS71:D ON REVERSE SIDE — F 317 Lamonte, June 9, 2010 317 Lamonte, June 9, 2010 I q! N 1:0 9.---___- %LTERAT�{3 S additions n s to s ep . Other _. Alum. siding cin roof soffits and fascia only, 24. SITE PLAID Y 27. Environment Residential i t Y 27. Environment Residential _,0 1 STAFF "PORT CONCERNING APPLICATIOJN FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 9, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0607A Property Location: 853 Forest Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled ell/1892 Property Owner: Mary and Steven Prince Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark in Chapin Park NR/LHD Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This landmark is a two storey frame house set upon an irregular brick foundation. The walls are generally four inches to the weather painted clapboard siding with narrower boards at the second floor spandrel. The exterior exhibits outstanding carpentry. The roof is 12/12 intersecting gables with broad soffits and a plain frieze board. There is a variety of fish scale shingles in the gable and spandrels. The cut off corners were noted to lend to the distinction of the house. The windows are 1/1 double hung throughout with simple jambs and moulded wood entablature. The front door is single leaf glazed with simple jamb and moulded entablature. The storm windows appear to be original to the house. ALTERATIONS: The side porch was reconstructed after 1987. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install an 18'x 14' brick paver patio in rear of house using Pine Hall Brick in granite green set in a basket weave pattern. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners propose to lay a brick paver 18'X14' patio in a very shady section of their backyard. The 18'X14' area will be excavated to a depth of 8 inches. The area will then be surfaced up to 6" with "53" crushed concrete and compacted; the area will then be resurfaced with 2" of finer crushed concrete and re -compacted. The granite green pavers will be set in the basket weave pattern and a polymer adhesive will be brushed in. This patio will be at a corner of the back yard close to the house. and it will not be visible from the street. 4 STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See %4 above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the patio as it conforms to the standards of the district and will not detract in anyway from the architectural features of this land -marked home. f Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateftess Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend 8t St. Joseph County 125 S. I. -layette Blvd., !36uth Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: CountSY-City Building, South Bend, Indiana AAM1 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 . - Email SBSJCI-IPC@co.st joseph.irLus Website: http://wwwsgo-wphcountyindiana.com/schp/indexbttnl OFFICE USE ON .Y>>>> > DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COMMINED IN THIS SOX >>>>> OFF -ICE USE ONLY Date ReceivedjunC AppIication Numbed{) u t - 04 01A Past Reviews: [TYES (Dat,of last Rtoiew) At t. V r6 0 NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: +21 07-0/4 i C] Local Landmark ] Local Historic District (Name) Y � (] National Landmark Stational Register District (Name) t t Certificate of Appropriateness: E]Denied []Tabled Sent To Committee C] Approved and Issued DATT Address of Property for proposed work: Street Nu and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) 104poe n j ma `V 'III.c,,e. Address of Property Owner(s): 95.E --P'd "e�s� Ivd Contractor(s) Name: CnyIn+,04C (be I Contract Company Name:'belb'T.t, t alx c(srap ,k Gl c1/L• 00" Contractor Address: X49 L; x -col A wo_4 w City: %b re' kowSa..t7 r -L , Phone: 8'.7 `, -= : %f -- q Y cry-' Current Use of Building:i Xw o t .ak.",/,,�i (Single Family — Multi -Family — Commercial — Got ernment — Industrial — Vacant — eteJ Type of Building Construction: ___W D tact ` /it Q i (Wool Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: In-kind D'q"z Landscape F] New F� Replacement (not in-kiml) F] Demolition Mw thatI Otte tx= Inay IV Checked) Description of Proposed Work: =7AA5r,¢L.L #M /8X 14 , 2,elcx P-4VC-P_ tAn6 b 1 N .i'E,Rn or 0q47&,50r 05ltva P /Are A014 L.G. Boer c,< /M <,.fAX t 1L a eee. %l 4'7' lAt R ;I.477_6A!A1 Owner/Contractor: Fax: 6 j V _ a 5S_ 6-43q q e-mail (T11is t }cr gcd�tl rurreslx��r i11t only one designe<) — �� and/or a — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARI: LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — r F V-0 tA r 853 Forest, June 9, 2010 I 853 Forest, June 6, 2010 •f � v ,e'�, e b S, ..,Y, ' $ .' tp . p.'n .a a } �& � �» g' e.3#",SXj sr. � - �# S. mdro s' F .1� �� $��• `zFF ^x'ro,w •'s: '�Y;' a`"y.g,8a"'.. `2` '?p '.�3, €,;.'+ , ;A, ab i', •r i.'°,na s. 'L't,x.• "a;if ;>e t�>'`t�• €�;�_z�at '?'s•;?p: ��., '>-� �`N �Y, +",; N-e'ar€>`�e 3eie�°�'.��,�'P�;?p<?':��•'��''�'';.��`,a;d � 3 •.�. '°'F'.+ p�>{'° ee�`°>se';=„ ... .�' � yid° r II r -k $sx a:.�z wx"° «pT. •.a. a'�°�, ,° �(y.$y�' /PP-'�A�t ;� .,� s�� 5 S y��5 "� 4 .x•:.+ee 4 J•a f Y�{.k 5; L°�"...A e ';°>'.°„ _ C � i; •".t '•5'..• � I rl <,g ,,'36 �.�. �..� ,��• •k fa 4„ d,£! :�.Q 9c'e.a }�� '8:'i, i'.�,. G.�. .a� �.. ,.�+,a�A ,�aak ;+n{�?' 4<g a» � aa'; ,.,5 3 � .i � r �� . 'at,. } `4 � 4 �� . '33'�jg3�� .''» s.,x ti, ••9�..isw.3.avw .A {®,,•t >""timsa.E.wr.......a,.ia:.s�fi,..>sa:ixuxi�.4t,S.r.°...n.e..ts8lian,..,.,,...... s..w..a:,n v»w,.4,',.•..... ..�o:-oie.�s:•°m...r' A D.• :;97 .. •• . a,k At».....»..w e...< mi ,,/�,,., , � ,I.. ... 1 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 10, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0607B Property Location: 81.4 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dutch Colonial/1920 Property Owner: Gerald Kania, Jr. and Hyun-Soon Lee-Kania Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey Dutch Colonial with a rectangular plan set upon a pour concrete foundation with brick veneer. The first storey is brick and the second storey is aluminum sided. There is an asphalt shingle covered roof with a central gable with end walls decorated to appear as a gambrel. There is a bracketed pediment entry roof over the stoop. ALTERATIONS: There are aluminum siding and storms on the second floor. The front door was replaced with COA#2007-0507. The aluminum storm door is not original. The deck and railings over the sun porch were replaced with COA#1997-0714.2. There are aluminum storms on the sun porch and two complete window replacements on the rear east side of the house. The garage door appears to be a replacement. The 12" concrete square front walkway is not original to house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of roof, removal of old asphalt roof, replacing with architectural shingles. Replacement of 3 tab to an arch. Shingle. Complete tear off and replacement.. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This project is a complete tear off of all roofing inaterials and the 3 tab asphalt shingles and re -roofing with architectural. shingles. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EDGENVATER B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district vary from hip and gable to gambrel. All are covered with asphalt shingles. Eaves in most cases, have wood facias with gutters and downspouts. Some aluminum sided houses have aluminum covered facias. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, the and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the existing or original in composition, size, shape, color, and texture. -- _-- Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof by adding architectural features or roofing materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Office was called with a report from a neighbor that work was in progress without a COA or building permit. Staff immediately followed up on the report and the homeo«ner and contractor came in and applied for the COA that day. Work was not stopped on this LO project because of weather considerations. Staff recommends approval of the re -roof with architectural asphalt shingles since these shingles would mimic the original wood shingles which were still in place in the late 1940s as noted on the Assessor's Card. 1 Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Maitittg Address: County City Building, South Bend, Indiana 4E01 Phone: 574-235-W% • Fax: 574 -?35-957$ • Email: S139CH13C&ost josephin.us Website: http://wwwsgosephcountyindiana.corn/ochp/index.htnil OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONMINED IN T711S BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date ReceivedjUnf ,� 12010 Application Numbera l0 - V � l> Past Reviews: (5q YES (Datca/lflst Review) Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: aw. 7,1 � fl,,, [j Local Landmark. Local Historic District (Name) f, 4t � Y.�{ [] National Landmark (] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: [] Denied [] Tabled E] Sent To Committee R Approved and Issued DATF Address of Property for proposed work: %.,'_ ---� St t weber i nd St r N Name of Property Owner(s): (Pimse Print) jV `� _ :i (. , Address of Property Owner(s): 8114 Al2 Avi, r44-4.0 Contractor(s) Name: �Vt J 14 elW ro, ,7 Contract Company Name: 4jC111ro r7 Contractor Address.% /, /"r .rr _. City. A r 11u-crr+ Ix %�lv Phone:S .f = 2 fes' r Current Use of Building: ! . 1-e ) , Ingle icy— Iii-Fami y — Commercial — Gmxrrment — Industrial — Vaunt —etc..) Type of Building Construction: I (t.0 { Dort France — Brick — St — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind n Landscape . E] New Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition :mare«' Descri tion of Prop sed Work: 4j6.(r1iXi`A r IiLc 1�+�'1�u t.viWtp 54, Owner/Contractor: (this0'�4 1 pmpond -- APPLICATION �o —tata,tt. cr)"J, ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 81.4 Arch, June 9, 2010 814 Arch, June 9, 2010 I Location Budget as of 05-31-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 05/31/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original Addt'I/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 42,065.80 63.69 63.69 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 325.60 65.12 65.12 10000 Totals 66,050.00 0.00 66,050.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 200.00 1,825.94 2,025.94 0.00 000 General GovT. 8,730.00 41.34 41.34 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 500.00 0.00 500.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 160.00 100.00 100.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 273.70 91.23 91.23 20000 Totals 925.00 1,825.94 2,750.94 0.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 20,016.00 1,100.00 21,116.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32020 Travel 100.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32350 Postage 1,000.00 57.90 1,057.90 0.00 000 General GovT. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 33100 Printing 200.00 0.00 200.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 06/02/2010 11:21 AM Page 60 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 10,118.80 19, 881.20 19,881.20 66.27 66.27 13, 865.40 22,184.60 22,184.60 61.54 61.54 23,984.20 42,065.80 42,065.80 63.69 63.69 1,854.14 171.80 171.80 8.48 8.48 174.40 325.60 325.60 65.12 65.12 0.00 225.00 225.00 100.00 100.00 2,028.54 722.40 722.40 26.26 26.26 12,386.00 8,730.00 8,730.00 41.34 41.34 0.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 178.42 879.48 879.48 83.13 83.13 26.30 273.70 273.70 91.23 91.23 0.00 200.00 200.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 245.00 245.00 100.00 100.00 User ID ksobecki 06/02/2010 11:21 AM Page 60 LocatiolI kdget as of 05-31-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 01-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 05/31/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account - Original Addt'I/Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 30000 Totals "*"*"""*"****'**'**"'*** 22,021.00 1,157.90 23,178.90 0.00 Location Totals 88,996.00 2,983.84 91,979.84 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Sai,Joseph County 0.00 38,603.46 User ID ksobecki 06/02/2010 11:21 AM Page 61 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 12, 590.72 10,588.18 10, 588.18 45.68 45.68 38,603.46 53,376.38 53,376.38 58.03 58.03 0.00 0.00 38,603.46 User ID ksobecki 06/02/2010 11:21 AM Page 61 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION . FORM DATE 3 MAY 2010 ADDRESS 601 NAVARRE DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING OUTSTANDING HOMEOWNER GERI AND KEITH HATHAWAY WORK PROPOSED: REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF DEAD OR DYING TREE AND SHRUBBERY IN FRONT, REAR AND SIDE YARDS. 3 MAY: MARK TEMPLE OF TEMPLE TREE SERVICE APPLIED FOR THE COA ON BEHALF OF THE HATHAWAYS. BRENT THOMPSON HAD BEEN NOTIFIED OF THE TREES AND CALLED THE OFFICE AND SAID THAT THE TREE WAS DYING AND COULD BE REMOVED. CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS ALLOW FOR LANDSCAPING CHANGES. IN THIS INSTANCE ALL OF THE SHRUBBERY BEING REMOVED WAS BEING REPLACED IN-KIND. Application -TOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St, Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email SBSJC 1PC@co.st josephinus Website http://www.sgosephcoungindian&com/sjchp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY»»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTI NED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 3 %yC,e► 4 401 D Application Number.4! Past Reviews: BYES (mtevf[Mt'RevkW.) ❑ NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark Erfocal Historic District (Name) 64,ae V National Landmark 2 National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied E] Tabled , E] Sent To Committee 2<Pproved and Issued DATE 3 Address of Property for proposed work: tn PA le .tz- J St t Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (please Print) _>e r 1 V e %A -V- v Address of Property Owner(s): i0 O 3 Pa P ow e ontractor(s) Name: - M n f i.[- TCS WI P Le- _Ti2 t✓' G- S e J20 tp Contract Company Name: ' V\A C- k- Tt% m P� � Contractor ,Address: r� 2-� �' lj �C© b A r City: 1 , l_ ► 6 Phone: 5-7 4 2 -73 -L2 -73-L 0 0 Current Use of Building: -trr G W , hi (Single Family - Multi -Family - Commercial -Government - Industrial -Vacant -etc.) ` Type of Building Construction: Q-pvu(>.j14u el ti `t I VVI (Wood Frame- Brick- Stone- Steel- Concrete- Other) A- Q-' O a C4- n pesedWb , I Tn-4ind Q iandsrane r 1 New r-1 Replacement (not in-kind) n Demolition (more than one bar may be checked) , f Description of Proposed Work: t�(.c n 1zoL' P� (u r°'t �'n `�� 4 �.0 v, u -,e [d_4;0 Ct � o � us (+� S + Q-ep 1G c_e ;/U 6 +r"*4f FP.o K T 0- - u-j� l C G ,S'/'j d 'N ety-S 1}- PPLG rL 1I.i tow le �RGK Owner/Contractor: Fax: ,5'7 q-232-27 -5'1 e-mail t",-t�e,.� etc -veac (This once WX correspond roith only one ' nee X `IA 't and/or APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — CERjL'.tjv-tCATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 4 Tim Klusczinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. OF SOUTH BEND AND. ST. -JOSEPH COUNTY . Phone: (574) 2355-9795 FAX: (574) 235-9578 E-mail: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Removal and replacement in kind of 1 dead/dying purple plum In side yard; removal and repiacment of 6 dead/dying burning bushes In front yard and removal and replacement of 10 dying small hews in rear yard: per Brent Thompson, City Forester Mark Temple Tree Service, Contractor for the following location: 6oiNAVARRE South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2o10-o5o3A in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the ' recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of SL Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission ' of South Bend and St Joseph County, 126 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing ! address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OFAPPLICANT: Gerri and Keith Hathaway DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 0$%0$%2010 I PERMIT ISSUED BY: % n Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST INA CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OFTHEP f HISTORIC OF SOUTH BEND ti ST. JOSEPH ROUTINE O MAINTENANCE FORM DATE 7 MAY 2010 ADDRESS 845 PARK DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER RITA DARGIS WORK PROPOSED: REMOVE CURRENT WOODEN DECK IN REAR OF HOME AND REPLICATE DECK WITH STANDARD WOOD DECKING MATERIALS. 8 MAY: MRS. DARGIS CALLED THE OFFICE TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED PROJECT 1N THE REAR OF HER HOME. 7 MAY: WAYNE AND I WENT TO THE SITE TO PHOTOGRAPH IT. MRS. DARGIS CAME LATER IN THE DAY AND FILLED OUT THE COA APPLICATION FOR IN-KIND REPLACEMENT. 0 Application -FOR- Certificate of Appropriateiress Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 123 S. Lafayette Blvd., South BLmd, Indiana 4(a)1 Mailing Address; County -City Building, Sou4,11 A Indiana 4&Ml Phone: 57.42,35-9798 • Fax: 574-2.35-�78 * Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st-joscphin.us Website: littp://w%8,w.sgosephcotintyindiafui.com/sjchp/indc!x.htnil OFFICE USE ONLY»»» UO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COIVIAINED IN THIS BOX >>>>>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 7" of 0/0 Application Number cl b % 0 _ 06'd 7 Past Revlinvs: BYES (Dhte ofU.,f Ree. mut /7 A�c� t td [j NO Staff Approval authorized by: t -/1.fix Title: ..t�.lt,&4, Historic Commission Review Date: [-1 Local Landmark P'Local Historic District (..N'ame) C_t_A ' R National Landmark �ational Register District (Nanta) Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ denied ❑ Tabled [] Sent To Committee [ pproved and Issued 7 DATE Address of Property for proposed work: ZY y=' Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) _.._`_` / J' %; Address of Property Owner(s): Contractors) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: r- Street Number an.i Street Name X/1 Phone: :, ' x '- `l' 10 7 _,;� Current Use of Building: i N (Single. family — Multi -I amily — Commercial — Ccn.t=ernmrnt — Industrial — Vamnt — etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frame— Stink — Slone— Steel — Concrete — Other) nruposed.Work• gln kind __[] Landscape _._.0 Newt/ _E]Yepl4cenient (not in-kind) FI Demolition (mare than one brat tray be choked) Description of Proposed Work-, £ "i' C.. l l fr`_< f' ' y Q %G „ .K" 1 ' i'.✓ 4 - f/.,.fAj j P .tf` /< r t...� k ` 't.. ) �. � i'....FF, . !,'•, ,,,,, � y r - ,� % P�' '', .,� '/-..... Owner/Contractor, Fax: e-mail _ (This ojfix urT� rturrtjxx3d tufth or� one ds�igr:c�t} and/or __...._..__._.__�_._._. _____..._..__...._ __....... _.._. — APPLICATION REQUIRE.&IENTS ARE LISI1D ON REVERSE SIDE, -- i Tim Klusminski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHBEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY m - - - - . __ - i& The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove current wooden deck in rear of home and replicate deck with standard wood decking materials. Homeowner, Contractor for the following location: 846 PARK South Bend, IN 46616 Cahpin Park Application No. 2010-0507 k W 6 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX' (574) 235.9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCIIPC@co.st-josepbJn.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. �i ;YMaataM�i�7f. • Yi t . C THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICAN"r: Rita M. Dargts DATE PERM117 TAKES FORCE: 055/07/2010 PEPLMrr ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler Director *ez POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALLWORK. 845 Park, May 7, 2010 845 Park, May 7, 2010 .vp OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH ROUTINE MAINTENANCE l FORM DATE 18 MAY 2010 ADDRESS 714 FOREST DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING OUTSTANDING HOMEOWNER LENA AND PIERPAOLO POLZONETTI WORK PROPOSED IN-KIND FENCE REPLACEMENT OF SECTION DESTROYED BY FALLEN TREE LIMB. 18 MAY: WHILE WAYNE AND I WERE AT 712 FOREST" CONCERNING THE PRIVACY FENCE WE NOTICED CAL: PRO INSTALLING A FENCE SECTION AT 714 FOREST WITHOUT PERMITS. I ASKED CAL PRO TO COME TO THE OFFICE AND APPLY FOR A COA AND PULL THE NECESSARY BUILDING PERMITS. A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COMPANY CAME TO THE OFFICE WITH THE FEE AND FILLED OUT THE PAPERWORK AND PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION. SPOKE WITH MR. POL.ZONETTI ON THE PHONE AND ASSURED HIM THAT THE WORK ON HIS PROJECT WOULD BE CONTINUED THAT DAY. Application - FOR - Certificate of Approptiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 416601 &I 1 1. Address: County -City T1 OA; South B , IndianaGi)1 Thorn:: 57=1-2..35-9798 * Fax: 574-135-9577 Email: SB5jClTPCtii)co.st.j().Alph.iii.tis Welxiitcr littfr.//wwiv.stiowplic.ounivin(liarvi.com/,,,jclil)//in(f(?x.fitilil OFFICE l.ISEONLY>>>>— DO NOT COMPLETE ANY EIVIRIESCONMINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USEOND' Date Received Application Number gevo - 45 Past Reviews: [],YESvlf Lasl Revic-0 ...... . . . ......... . ...... . XNO Staff Approval authorized by:—.- .. ......... .... . . .. . ...... Title: I listoric Commission Review Date: F*� Local Landinark Bf0cal Historic District (.Nrame) '4i Ej National Landmark [ ational Register District (.\rawr) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied ❑ Tabled El Sent To Committee [pproved and Issued VAIF. Address of Property for proposed work: L/J�� I/ ( - — '-j St t IN .4cand Street Natne Name of Property Owner(s): (Mcve Priw) Address of Property Owner(s); 7/ L/ Contractor(s) Name: P. 'fl Conti -act Company Name: Contractor Address: -7y0 0 14), FOld S� City: Phone: Current Use of Building: Y1 - z - Variant etc ) J Type of Building Construction'.--.- (Wood Frame- Rfiz* -S1w.'e- Start- Concrete - Otho) Proposed Work: aln-kind R Landscape F - New Replacement (not in kind) E] Demolition 111wre 'han oreboy du�"' Description of Proposed Work; -i- OwnerlContr Le,, ,aaor: Fax: ... ...... . . AIII)LICATION REQUIREMEMS ARF LIS -FED ON REW'.-RSE SIVE — c1c,"pl tit) Tit ,, , to t 1866 . Tim Musc2inski, President HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION, OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Exact duplicate of fencing section destroyed by failing tree limb. Seneing located in front side yard of house. CAL PRO FENCE CO., INC., Contractor for the following location: 714 FOREST South Bend, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application No. 2010 -OSIS in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Q Located in u Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21(Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Ckwernment. Phone: (574) 235-9795 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX. (574) 235"9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCIIPC@aco.at joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATIIERINE D. HOSI'ETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Lena and Pierpaolo Polzonetti DATE PEIWIT TAKES FORCE: 05/18/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: Catherine D. Hostetler _ Director d/ POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. c F _k € ,°i'i: ,•♦��,,;. asp _ � °4«:, _ ° ♦• ", r,�"*,"�a.�,r.w. .,..�` � y 'n "M z�,. "°' •" s. :� s,',. � • �, . _ a ; : �y4.:�. `�:� s � { ��y. +., �} �q � ` '' `t's'E � � ;,'mss .n,a,�.� �¢9i:`, ,,?!"¢i., ... � � "..,_a.3, . �•s?y� C ?.SS. �• °'r$ �' �•', r's��y ; : � ? � "� ' �`"� ivl$�"` ` ,tea` sar �`�'.�! `-=�tL' °„z :, ,,' .�t�r 'v $;� •'. »,.. `� ,`<�y � 'i 5"�:' �, ,�, `� fix, �«•-4�;c.,°s "' � , .�: tt t z - �«. ,. sr = ; q it a, � ".^`,�• ' S'7; -.,>�: e.•ti ..fir t z, , 4 ' :y:: �iF, - - - . . '•:�`�,;°�`�,k�� ry.K..£�ri s�� +� ;�r,�t�,w�o :i��g' fig° h £�Ar�; .•. •o=. ..... .". ' °1w Aw; ' � " ., .... %€$� ��'!' �z a,n:"'1 r: ,t«a[t.�. ¢�``6;i��;"t1��:'t'b `.`°"�a��""„ ,�; >';?`t e,r '�'' r, t>p;d"b '�.T�:w :. .. :.�.ar` wsx•` b":' ,.^sR.,.G.' � i.� � � '..� a .` liy'k^;,,�a 7'4�� Yds ., ....x' `'�aL". ��}}� z��s-'�,sd�a4 a "w®°°�+*,.. ,,,.wrr,,.°N.. •. _ 2' `h....b ?'S; ° �$�"•/y:°'...r � a«, ..:amu �" yrs..„ �";. ��i:}'^`'''#'.' _.-" .x ism, «z... •,�,-o 714 Forest, May 18, 2010 ' FENCE Cuvaot LAY OUT SHEET ,4/- 93 -2 DATE LEAD NO. STREET POCrS7e is V -r SALESMAN CITY,00 ST JOB NO. AV - MATERIAL LIST ,fe) r 4-14 c��a oi 60 4 -r -j 7b 0/0 c f rr cc, HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE FORM DATE 26 MAY 2010 ADDRESS 1336 E. WAYNE SOUTH DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING OUTSTANDING HOMEOWNER PAMELA AND RON FLOREY WORK PROPOSED FRONT PORCH REPAIRS WITH PAVERS, RAILING REINSTALLATION, FRONT WALK REPAIRS WITH PAVERS TO MATCH PORCH. 17 MAY: TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH PAMELA FLOREY; MADE ARRANGEMENTS TO MEET WITH THEM AT 10:00 THE FOLLOWING DAY. 1$ MAY: WAYNE DOOLITTLE AND I MET WITH HOMEOWNER RON FLOREY AT HIS HOME TO DISCUSS PROPOSED PROJECT OF REPAIRING THE PORCH AND USING BRICK PAVERS OVER THEIR CONCRETE WALKWAY. ADVISED THAT THE PORCH COULD BE STAFF APPROVED, BUT THAT THE CHANGE IN MATERIALS FOR THE WALKWAY WOULD REQUIRE A COMMISSION HEARING. TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH PAMELA FLOREY, REPEATED THE INFORMATION WE HAD GIVEN TO RON; SHE EXPRESSED HER DISAPPROVAL OF THE ENTIRE PROCESS; MAILED HER TWO COPIES OF THE GOA APPLICATION. ZU MAY: TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH PAMELA FLOREY. THEY HAD MAILED IN THE APPLICATION WITH A $30.010 CHECK THE DAY THAT THEY RECEIVED IT. I TOLD HER THAT I WOULD LET HER KNOW IMMEDIATELY IF THE APPLICATION DID NOT ARRIVE ON FRIDAY AND THAT BOTH ITEMS COULD BE ON THE SAME COA AND ONLY REQUIRED $15.00. I WOULD SEE THAT THEY RECEIVED THEIR $15.00 BACK. 21 MAY TELEPHONED THE FLOREYS THAT THEIR COA APPLICATION HAD ARRIVED AND THAT WE WOULD BE OUT TO TAKE PHOTOGRAPHS. 26 MAY TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH ARCHITECT IN WAYNE STREET DISTRICT WHOSE WIFE HAD A CONVERSATION WITH PAMELA THAT REVEALED THAT THE ORIGINAL WALKWAY WAS BRICK. 27 MAY: ON-SITE VISIT WITH ELICIA DADLOW AND WAYNE DOOLITTLE CONCERNING WORK THAT HAD BEGUN ON THE PORCH AND TO DISCUSS ISSUES WITH THE REPLACEMENT OF THE CONCRETE WALKWAY WITH BRICK PAVERS. IDENTIFIED BY DIGGING UP PART OF THE LAWN THAT BRICK PAVERS WERE UNDER THE CONCRETE -STYLE TILES AND CONCRETE PAD IN FRONT OF THE PORCH. ISSUED A COA FOR THE REPAIRS AND THE WALKWAY. RETURNED THE EXTRA $15.00 AND GAVE RECEIPT TO RONALD FLOREY. 4 .,TUNE: ON-SITE FOLLOW UP VISIT TO PHOTOGRAPH COMPLETED PROJECT. THE WALKWAY WAS BRICKED ONLY TO THE SIDEWALK. THE OWNERS DECIDED NOT TO BRICK THE WALKWAY IN THE TREE LAWN AS REQUESTED IN THE COA APPLICATION. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SL Joseph County 115 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Ma€ling Address: County -City Building, South Bend,.Ind€ana 46601 Phone: 574-235-798 Fax: 574-2-9578 Email:-SBSjCHPC@costjosephin.us Website: http://wwwsgoxThcountyindiana.com/sidip/index.htnil OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received o r OW10 Application Number / 1�_ - d -1-z l Past Reviews: n YES (Date of W1 Rmkw) Staff Approval authorized by: ■ • Title: Historic Commission Review Date: a2/ C'7' 41 Local Landmark 21ocal Historic District (Natnt) __j:5 IZ)4 +P .�.. ufiZ National Landmark n National Register District (Name) U Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied F� Tabled [] Sent To Committee C] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: P p P , V '�- le Stree Nurnhtr trttt Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Pteaw Print) __M- (�J..�V, b /1ju Address of Property Owner(s): 17,`7 'C� t") 11 TIJ J Contractor(s) Name:i Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building: a t n� (ShgleFamily —Mut -Family—tonnercialGowerument—industrial—Vacant—etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood Frante — Brick — Stone — Sart -- Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind [:] Landscape n New replacement (not in-kind) [] Demolition (*nem liar orxr baz. nxy berh=kcd) r >� Description of Proposed Work: 1,45 cA Owner/Contractor: Fax: e-mail Is�P')-- r77 (This cfficn will mrrevend with onry one designee) and/or — APPUCA774N REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- 1i� i t t Jt. Y Tim Musezinski, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: In kind repair and replacement of front brick porch area and front walkway from the porch to the curb with brick to match. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY IIURVAI`H'S MASONRY, Contractor for the following location: 1336 WAYNE South South Bend, IN 46615 East'Wayne Street Application No. 2010-0526 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Ej Located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards portaming to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235.9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCIIPC@cost joseph.in.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. i u THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAME OF APPLICANT: Pamela and Ronald Florey DATE PER.ilrr LAKES FORCE: PERINIrrISSUED BY.- Catherine Y:Catherine D. Hostetler Director 05/27/2010 � !J CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, POST IN A CONSPICUOUS I'LrS.C13 ON TIIF S1"It.EM SIDE Director - OFTHEPROJECT'U'i`MI.CONIPLETION OFALLIIORK. 1338 E. Wayne St. S. May 18, 2010 Looking towards the street as F T� Xd r 4. ,b'; RYA>�« �`, 0 r5''•"."s`;be 1338 E. Wayne St. S. May 18.2010 w.., °'" '�s $ s.�• „'''<'i^aa ,� yr ;,�� ;<a:: :,:.,. z �: �'ar e� «. _ <, _ °"°"' . a`w < �y ' ys ;� .t°.,.�.'."' ':,aa, mr ,3Y.; ••" ',xY"^, .' � s' _'4 T"°" 7 ,g,.A,M,w' � z '"° _, «.,.,� ,° ;6 Wy„� .. r+:. +»..„ 4” aw'.'S ,„„. 'p`p''v 4 ?' "'.a �., �'y'•� w""3 .. .Ydd«7!`';,,,s� r, f�.y .f ' a' . -;.}, •'YD'S 8^ _ er4 i""�`„r w -t; �, ��.�°°rx g,`f�;Y N mdi"• _ `�• ' � .:�F��.. +'. , � ,�,ar�,p";.,-p-= "s n � _ "Y°s'�''�< R1 '1 �<S `: 3'�t c,:�'"sr' "6•� i�,y - ,�,.� x,'�nxw ° '%'� , t� „�. : ,. .s, ;,pr .; . �. Y� rs' :"3; �' �� ,'&i: '-: ..,nsi� *f§ 'm'y+�J4K6M�^>e+r,"k-�ir�d e.ia'�7.,W rysYI'si.�vy'a;.ro"�rro"ts':. .. ,•.'«,�1�t^w++.af A„ Mpg. �' .��'".: r'kr e: �.�R��y".�� a,, Yt^^. $�2°gad p . M ,a •� �_ e j 4 a iii ,� ` A' - `;;. -„ ^;.Ye D''"°'T°�,,a• ;, cr ,j: -�< :'z,•a>^F:;s a<'a.. j�'x; '' y, "....t � •«°s+ 1336 E. Wayne South, June 4, 2010 1336 E. Wayne South, June 4, 2010 Us till R f 110. -13 `0 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SuUT" RENu ST. JuSEPi� Cui1N 1 Y ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSIOJ FORM DATE 28 MAY 2010 ADDRESS 1238 EAST WAYNE STREET SOUTH DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING NON-CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER .JOYCE AND RICHARD FITZGERALD WORK PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL CITY FORESTER, BRENT THOMPSON CONFIRMED THAT THE WHITE BIRCH IN THE FRONT YARD WAS DYING FROM BRONZE BIRCH BORER DAMAGE AND COULD BE REMOVED. MARK FROM TEMPLE TREE WILL REMOVE IT. V .4Vp '�C ,s. s`fa1 <�F r��cµ�i» N y}�t is `"9,`�.A,V Se;� •'�� da x • A 1238 E Wayne dying white Birch with .Bronze Birch Borer damage which will kill the tree slowly. %'; s A 1414• 4 a K • - o ys4Y > 1238 E Wayne dying white Birch with .Bronze Birch Borer damage which will kill the tree slowly. 1238 E Wayne dying white Birch with Bronze Birch Borer damage which will kill the tree slowly. V6 §. 1238 E Wayne dying white Birch with Bronze Birch Borer damage which will kill the tree slowly. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE MAY -28,2010 ADDRESS 1233 E. WAYNE NORTH DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER DENISE AND MICHAEL COLLINS WORK PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL CITY FORESTER, BRENT THOMPSON VERIFIED AND SENT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE ROTTEN CRABAPPLE TREE BY THE HOUSE THAT IS TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A JAPANESE MAPLE TREE. f ole Ills)— se map Sava," aad reply louse, tue rottev, Cr Director's Report June 2010 May 17 Meeting with Chuck Bulot on Shefineyer property on St. Louis and Jefferson. Spoke with Pam Florey and arranged to visit on COA proposal. HPC monthly meeting. May 18 Onsite visit to Ron and Pam Florey's home at 1336 E. Wayne S. about brick porch repair and the brick paver replacement of their concrete walkway. On site visit through Riverside Drive LHD concerning the size of the "Share the Road" signs. On site visit with Jeff Dierbeck, Wayne and homeowner of 712 Forest concerning the privacy fence. Requested that Cal -Pro stop work and get a COA and building permit for fence replacement at 714 Forest. They complied. Arranged for a Special HPC Meeting for Monday, 24 May, to review COA 2010-05031); posted notices and notified SBT for legal publication. Met with Laura Moranand Wayne about proposed acquisition strategies for 609 Riverside Drive and referred to contractors for realistic estimates for work proposed. May 19 Attended the ground breaking for East Bank Townhomes developed by David Matthews on the old Rink site. Prepared and mailed out all approved COAs to homeowners. Research on Oliver Park/Playground May 20 Contacted Mr. Santos Fernandez concerning his tabled COA# 2010-0414 to sign waiver; if he does not sign we must hold a special meeting on or before 11 June since his 60 day falls on Sunday, 13 June. He said that he would make the Office his first stop around 9:00 Friday 21 May. Walking tour of Edgewater Place LHD with Elicia Dadlow noted that house at 521 River needed extensive exterior rehabilitation. May 21 Office Payroll; contacted Patty Godsey concerning lack of accumulated and available personal days and sick days on Elicia's pay stub. Mr. Fernandez was not at the Office Friday morning to sign the waiver. Reviewed St. Joseph County's Family Leave Policy in anticipation of Elicia's maternity leave. May 22 Participated in Rotary's "Done In A Day" project for DTSB by planting flowers and plants in the various planters, boxes and beds in downtown South Bend. May 23 Attended the dedication and grand opening of the Natatorium as a Civil Rights Center. Met with Mayor and various City and IUSB officials. Also met with Chuck Simon and discussed Rose Hill Cemetery and the need for fence repair: met with James Mullins former resident of W. Washington Street and IUSB Librarian and discussed the vast improvements to the neighborhood since he and Kathy moved. May 24 Attended a Special Meeting of the HPC for reconsideration of COA 2010- 0503D for a privacy fence at 712 Forest; a six foot privacy fence with gates was approved. Participated in the annual Rotary Golf Outing fundraiser for the Down Town South Bend Rotary Charitable Foundation because I am the current Director of that Foundation. This Foundation has contributed close to a million dollars for local student scholarships and philanthropic awards to local not for profits. May 25 Presented at the Land Use Planning Committee of the St. Joseph County Council for the re -appropriation of the $1,000.00 grant money awarded to HPC by Keepers Preservation Education Fund to the various line items to reimburse expenses incurred by Elicia Dadlow and myself at the Preservation Conference in New Harmony between April 7-9. May 26 On site visits to Kroc Center site where Gary Cornwell (ccornwell@vahoo.com; 269 687 1379, cell 269 8615465) was digging in the 1880 former neighborhoods' privies and unearthing bottles and dinnerware and Sons of Israel where IUSB Anthropology class was digging at 4 different areas looking for artifacts under the guidance of James M VanderVeen ( imvander@iusb.edu 574 529 4618). Both are willing to make presentations concerning their work. On site 106 documentation for 1134 and 1141 Cleveland Avenue for grants. Met with Tim Wall from Ken Herceg & Associates about work that the County is planning on doing at the 1898 Court House Dome collar and flat roofs. Suggested that Tim contact Sla Tile and Ziolkowski for recommendations for re -pointing the limestone and terra cotta rather than use latex caulk proposed by the company John Embrickson contacted. John also wants to cover the low, flat roofs (not visible from the street) with an energy efficient white plastic material because there are some water issues. I suggested that they do a tear off to determine where the problems were originating (which could also be from the dome's collar not being pointed in 1996) rather than covering over a potential problem. May 27 On site visit with Wayne and Elicia to 1336 E Wayne S. and Horvath Masonry concerning the brickwork repair/replacement on the porch and sidewalk; pictures of original brick for RME for work. Staff toured E. Wayne, Edgewater and parts of Taylor's Field. Documented 521 River for Code inspection request. Contacted Marco Mariani about the disrepair of the awning at the former Ehninger Florists. His response was that the owner wasn't interested in putting any money in the building and was aware of the DTSB facade grant program. The same situation for the building next to WNIT Herman and Goetz are aware of the DTSB facade grant program but refuse to do anything. June 1 On site 803 Forest for RME for an in-kind chimney replacement of a non - original brick chimney. Also viewed landmark on 803 W. Washington St for any progress on exterior landscaping plus windows and screens. Windows and screens are still a mess, there are sheets still handing in windows for curtains; but the front yard has had stones put in where the cars were making a mud pit. More complaints about Share the Road signs in Riverside Drive. Forwarded the info up to Chris Dressel and he will bring it up at the public works meeting with Gary Gilot and Carl Littrell this week to see if double sided signs could be put in Shetterley Park rather than in people's yards. June 2 Contacted Santos Fernandez to remind him to sign the Waiver. He said that he would be in that day; but did not. Staff follow up visit to 1336 E. Wayne South to photograph completed brick work. Homeowner decided not to extend brick work in the tree lawn. Meeting with Jennifer Greger, Indiana Landmark's Intern, Lisa, Elicia and myself concerning events and set up for Green Week End. June 3 Arrangements completed for Green Weekend and began gathering information. Followed up on Sons of Israel synagogue article after learning that it was not going to be moved but turned into a gift shop. Indiana Landmarks has facade easement and has determined that a plaque on the outside and inside describing its former function would be adequate. Contacted Timothy Wall about proposed repair work by Masonry Contractors, Inc. on the 1897 Court House. June 4 Arranged for Special Meeting with Santos Fernandez and HPC. Notified Commissioners. Worked Jitin Kane for RME at 102 N. Main for Main Street Coffee House awnings to replace the Ugly Mugs awnings all in-kind work. Began Staff Reports for June meeting. Spoke with Russ Luchies at Sla Tile concerning proposed application from Masonry Contractor's, Inc. after looking at the roof of the Court House from the 7`s Floor Commissioners' Office. June 7 COA deadline for 21June meeting; accepted COAs and worked on Staff reports. Determined 10 June for Special Meeting and contacted Santos Fernandez and then Tribune for legal notice. Met with Timothy Wall of Herceg in the Office about the scope of work proposed for the 1897 Court House. Russ Luchies recommended DOW- 790, OW790, a silicon based application, for the re -pointing of the drum of the dome. June 8 Staff Reports. Posted notices for Special Meeting. Attended Green Drinks. Presented at the St. Joseph County Council meeting for grant appropriation to budget line items for Elicia and my reimbursement for the April Preservation Conference. June 9 Office continued with preparations for Green Weekend and Staff Reports for Commissioner's packets for timely mailing. Spoke with John Embrickson, St. Joseph County Building Engineer, about proposed repair work on the 1855 Court House. All in- kind repair work that would not require Commission approval. June 10 Commission Special Meeting with Mr. Santos Fernandez. Meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Marcus Miller about the awnings at the Main Street Coffee House; issued an RME for in-kind replacement of awnings. June 11 Assisted with set up for Green Weekend at Century Center. Completed 40 106 Reviews. June 12 Saturday 8:30 am40:30am: Eco Fest at Howard Park with Elicia, Wayne and Paul set up tables for HPC and I.L. and gave information. June 14 Participated in Finance Committee meeting for NICH. June 15 On site visits to 1238 E. Wayne South and 1204 East Wayne concerning Champion window replacements. Dropped off additional Historic District brochures to Champion Windows for distribution to sales reps. On site 106 photos on Corby. On site visit to repair work on Forest. Issued and mailed RME/COA for 1238. Vistied with Steve Kohler about the deterioration, spalling and missing bricks on the south side of the Dean Building. He said that they were having difficulty in finding a suitable match, suggested using a bark faced yellow brick to match previous patch work on the south side. Also, reflected his concerns/complaints about this property being over assessed and taxed to Community and Economic Development. Contacted Morgan La Fleur, John Friedline's assistant, and left voice mail message about his properties on William and West Washington. June 16 Posted meeting notices. Completed 10 106 Reviews. Turned 230 Navarre into Code after neighbor's complained of open back door, debris and raccoons. Office had reported this as a problem property previously in the month. Received voice mail from Morgan La Fleur to contact her after 10;00 on Thursday. June 17 Spoke with Morgan La Fleur about 412 William for work done with building permit but not COA. Sent her a copy of Chapin Park Guidelines. Spoke with Chuck Bulot about the work at 412 and he admitted the oversight; but also that additional work was performed that was not covered under the building permit. Provided Tim Wall information on Walker Field House and Immanuel United Methodist Church for 106 Review of Ewing Avenue Reconstruction. Completed eight 106 Reviews for Real Services "aging in place" grants. June 18 Met with owner Chris Chockley of 803 Ashland concerning proposed work on house. Wayne accompanied the owners for an on-site inspection of proposed work and what could be approved as routine repair and maintenance. Met with three members of the Grossmann family from Chicago and provided them with information on John F. Ullery and the farms in Portage Prairie. Assistant Director's ReDort HPC Meetina 06.21.2010 1. City Cemetery National Register Nomination -Working on it. Reading other cemetery nominations for comparison. Searching for guidelines on how to write a narrative description. Scan in large maps of cemetery additions at Area Plan. Walk through cemetery with Dave Steinhauer, Architectural Historian to determine architectural features. Survey cemetery site and take photographs. Soliciting sources for historic photographs. Formatting historic maps and fitting puzzle pieces together. Sifting through file provided by Mary Prince of South Bend Tribune Archives. 2. Green Weekend -Working on 3-D soda can/demolition statistic. Meeting with Jennifer Gregar to begin booth design and RM series advertising. Meeting with Lisa, IN Landmarks intern to explain GW and get her involved. Prep for the big weekend. Exhibiting on Friday and Saturday of GW. Attend luncheon with Walmart. Picking up the pieces after the weekend -following up with inquiries, etc... 3. Gather research on St. Casimir Parish for Roger Chrastil of WNIT. Meet with him to go over St. Casimir info also discussed HPC involvement at WNIT open house and our future events at there site. 4. HPC brochure -visit Lighting Litho to approve proof. Pick up brochures. 5. Restore Michiana Series -Conversations with EPA regarding RRP Lead Certification lecture. Identify and contact potential partners. Prepare advertising for Green Weekend. Work with Lisa, IN Landmarks intern to create a year'of events calendar and flyer for Energy Audit wksp. Restore the Restore Michiana website and begin design. Planning for advertising for the Energy Audit workshop. 6. Prepare 05.17.10 HPC meeting minute draft and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print minutes for June meeting. 7. Trip with Wayne and Catherine to old Oliver Playground (new Kroc Center site) to talk with the privy digger to see what he has dug up. Also to the Synagogue on William Street to talk with the IUSB archeology class that is doing a site excavation to see what they have dug up. 8. Visited Monroe and Marquette schools with Wayne and Catherine to observe progress on construction projects. 9. Routine Maintenance Exclusion -803 Ashland. OTHER SIDE »»»»»»»> 10. $4,000 events budget tracking -continue to update. Discussions with Jennifer Gregar. 11. Staff reports -708 N. St. Joseph. 12. Trip with Wayne and Catherine to 1336 E. Wayne to review RME. Follow up trip to observe progress. 13. Historic Bike Trail -Dug this project up from last year. Leadership South Bend provided me with the Google Earth of the trail and I designed a brochure. Meeting with Kathy Schuth of James Childs Architects to discuss project. Printed a few copies of the brochure to distribute at Green Weekend. Posted Google Earth map of Historic Bike Trail on HPC webpage. 14. NAPC Forum -Request permission to apply for scholarship. Attend County Board of Commissioners meeting. Prepare scholarship application. Make arrangements to attend Forum. 15. Beefing up our webpage in preparation to link to SELL South Bend site. 16. Assisting new owners of the former St. Andrews Greek Orthodox church with locating sources of funding. Phone discussions and put in contact with David Duvall at DHPA. 17. Theatre Historical Society tour -Preparing PowerPoint presentation of historic South Bend theatre photos. Coordinating with the THS, Palais Royale, and Morris to setup day of tour. 18. Pulling research from Water Works files for someone who called in requesting it. Returned her call inviting her to come to the office to make relevant copies from the files. 2 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY June 21, 2010 13`l' Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Jerry Niezgodski, Timothy S. Klusczinski, Lynn Patrick, Todd Zeiger, Sandra Rossow Members Absent: Linda Riley, David Steinhauer Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia Dadlow, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: Joan Downs, Mary Prince, William Hostetler, Kip Kania, Scot Hires, Neal Wozniak II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 10, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0602 Property Location: 849 Forest Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1898/1925 remodel Ernest Young Property Owner: Joan Downs and Brian Krostenko Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Notable DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house has two storeys and is set on an irregular stone foundation. The exterior walls are wood clapboard with corner boards. The roof has a steeply pitched front gable, asphalt shingles; there are also shed roof dormers that contribute to the varying and projecting roofline. There are two small entry porches at either side of the center wing, the roofs are an extension of the wing roof with wood square piers at the corners. The windows are 4/1 double hung with simple lintels. There is a single leaf wood panel front door. There are brick steps and porch floors. There is a two car garage in the back. ALTERATIONS: The body of the house appears to be unaltered. The roof was replaced with COA#2005-0721-2. A garage door was installed and the flatwork, retaining wall and a fence around the yard were repaired and re -worked with COA#0403-2006. APPLICATION ITEMS: The original fence of wood recently fell down (it had been in poor repair for 8 years). I would like to replace it with a 6 foot metal fence which has decorative finials and allows light into the garden and views to the alley. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner wishes to replace a wood fence and install a 6 foot black aluminum fence along the rear of the property along the alley on either side of the garage. Please refer to product information and site plan attached. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new fencing as it conforms to the standards and compliments the architecture of the house. On a motion by Lynn Patrick to approve application as amended to reflect the inclusion of a gate with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0602 was approved as amended with a unanimous vote STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 8, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0604 Property Location: 424 Manitou Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/1891 Property Owner: Molly B. Moon Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: One storey gabled —ell on a cross plan set upon a brick foundation. The walls are clapboard with beaded band course defining fenestration; fish -scales shingles in front and west gables; diagonal clapboard in east gable. Roof is cross gable with moulded cornice and asphalt shingles. There is a full width front porch extending around the front and side of the center gable with a flat roof with slender wood square supports. There is lattice work under the porch. The windows are 1/1 double hung with lintels defined by continuous beaded band board. There is a ten light casement in front and 2 wood panel front doors with wood storms and simple surrounds. There is a one storey hip garage at the rear. ALTERATIONS: There are aluminum storms over most of the windows. The porch flooring, facing board and lattice skirting was repaired in kind with COA#2006-0822; removal of 1 Red Maple and volunteer trees in the rear yard in 2009 per City Forester with COA#2009-0415. 2 APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace deck, add pergola on back of house. Re -roof studio and re -glaze windows and paint to match colors of house. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Replacement of deteriorating deck with a studier, slightly larger one composed of pressure treated lumber with concrete footings per diagrams submitted. The deck is not attached to the house but will have two set of stairs on its south and east side. The pergola is designed to reflect the architectural details of the front of the house and is secured to the deck per illustration submitted. It is not attached to the house. The garage has been converted into a studio. The windows are to be re -glazed and the exterior painted to match the house. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The project was already in progress when the homeowner was notified by a neighbor that a COA was required. The homeowner and the contractor promptly came to the Office and made application. Staff recommends approval construction of the deck with the pergola with lattice application in the rear of the house. The new deck is not visible from the street while portions of the pergola are visible from the street it does incorporate features from the main house. It is not attached to the house in any way and will have flowering climbers growing on it which will eventually soften the view from the street. The re -glazing of the windows and the painting of the studio are considered routine maintenance and do not require a COA; and as stated, any painting on the studio will match the color of the mains house. The roof has been staff approved with RME COA#2010-0609 as an in- kind re -roof replacement replicating the former roofing material with three tab Super Glass 25 year shingles in Rainbow Green which also matches the roofing material of the main house. On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0604 was approved with a unanimous vote 3 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 4 June 2010 Application Number: 2010-0604A Property Location: 708 N. St. Joseph Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Queen Anne/1903 Property Owner: William & Catherine Hostetler Landmark or District Designation: River Bend Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/SITE: 2 storey square plan on raised concrete foundation. Fagade is restored clapboard. Steeply pitched hip roof with hipped dormer on North side and gabled dormer on front facade -all covered in asphalt shingles. There is a 1 storey porch with hipped roof, concrete steps and deck, and iron supports and railing. Windows are 1/1 double hung with aluminum storm windows. Front door is paneled with aluminum storm door. There is a center brick chimney. ALTERATIONS: 1977 one storey rear addition; 1983 patio and walls in rear enclosed with brick; 2006 complete re -roof; 2008-2010 non -original insul brick siding removed and clapboard restored and painted. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. (Brick replacement) of cement 8"x16"xl" pavers with bricks on the path around the house from the back patio to front walk. 2. (Replacement) of cement walk from sidewalk to front steps with bricks. Reason: cement is broken -improve the look and safety of walks. 3. Remove two trees in front lawn. Reason: one tree is overhanging house and the roots are entering the sewer line. Replace with two smaller city approved trees in tree lawn. 4. Remove four trees along the alleyway. Reason: trees are dying and overhanging house and electrical wires. Replace with 4 evergreens. 5. Put up a 2' retaining wall along the alley 63' long to improve the look of the property. Made of cement retaining blocks. *1,2,5 to be done by homeowner. *3,4 to be done by a contractor. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Homeowner wishes to 1. Replace cement pavers with brick Paveloc-Antiqued Holland on path around house from back patio to front walk. 2. Replace cement walk from sidewalk to front steps with (same) brick. 3. Remove two trees in front lawn and replace with two smaller city approved trees in tree lawn. Replacement approval granted by City Forester. 4. Remove four trees along alley. City Forester concludes, "trees are planted in a very bad spot". 5. Erect a 2' retaining wall along alley using Unilock-Stack Stone. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT A. IN THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and its location adjacent to Leeper Park and along the St. Joseph River. The district encompasses: two blocks of Riverside Drive beginning at Marion Street (from 503 Riverside Drive north) and ending at Bartlett Street; two lots on the north side of Navarre street just west of the alley behind Riverside Drive; the north side of Hammond Place; the east side of St. Joseph Street between Hammond Place and Bartlett Street; and the south side of Bartlett Street between St. Joseph and Riverside Drive. The District contains 45 residences and their adjacent outbuildings. Required Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, walkways, streets, alleys and building setbacks shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix). Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Removal of shade trees over twelve inches (12") diameter, conifer trees over six inches (6") in diameter or other major plant elements shall be subject to approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. Any subsequent replacement trees of any size required by the Historic Preservation Commission shall be retained. The Riverfront character of the district shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. Do not dump leaves and grass clippings on planted slopes as this practice will kill much of the low ground cover and leave soil 0 susceptible to erosion. When replacement of utility poles or power lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening or closing of existing streets and alleys or by introducing new streets, alleys or parking lots. Signs, streetlights, benches, new plant materials, fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The erection of high walls or barriers which would alter the relationship of the houses and the river is prohibited. The introduction of heavy trucks or similar vehicles in the District shall be prohibited. Utility poles with high intensity overhead lights shall not be used on main thoroughfares. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING, & ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located near the front of each lot, with a small lawn in front and a larger lawn to the rear of the property. Those properties facing the river on Riverside Drive generally have sloping front lawns and flat back yards. The majority of structures have been erected on a single lot. Many of the properties include a garage located at the rear of the property accessed from unpaved alleys running behind the property. Most properties have trees, shrubbery and/or hedges. All houses conform to the uniform set -back within each block. The district has a compact layout. Large homes are constructed on small lots while smaller homes, such as those on Hammond Place, are constructed on narrow, deep lots. Little of the backyard areas or rear first stories of these homes is visible from the thoroughfare. In recognition of this, greater latitude will be allowed in the application of the adopted standards in the rear of the properties, in order to accommodate the individual preferences of the property owners in the treatment of these backyard areas. No approval will be necessary for changes in lawn, shrubs, walkways or semi-permanent surface changes in the rear of houses. Staff approval would be required for semi-permanent structures such as gazebos, but not for play equipment such as swing sets, sand -boxes, etc. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the properties' history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Accessory structures such as decks, gazebos, fountains, or small outbuildings should be appropriate to surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials in close proximity to the buildings and which are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed and replaced by more suitable flora as approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other site elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced, or fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the property. Telephone or utility poles with high intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from the thoroughfare. The installation of unsightly, large devices such as television satellite dishes shall not be permitted in areas TYPICAL SITE PLAN where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends 1 & 2. Replacing cement pavers with the selected brick treatment as it will improve the look and safety of the path. Staff also recommends 3 & 4. Removal of existing trees and replacement with appropriate city approved trees, per City Foresters recommendation. Staff also recommends 5. Erecting the retaining wall with the selected blocks along the alley to improve the aesthetic of the property. All elements of the new site work are appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. On a motion by Todd Zeiger to approve application as amended that retaining wall (Item 5) will terminate at the house corner with a second by Lynn Patrick Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0604A was approved as amended with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A 5 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 8, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0607 Property Location: 317 La Monte Terrace Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer Front Bungalow/1907 Property Owner: Abigail and Neal Wozniak Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This two storey wood shingled home is set upon a square brick foundation. The asphalt shingle roof has side gables with large hip roof dormer in from with pilasters at the corners and in the middle. There is a full width front porch with shingle covered square supports and solid rail. The windows are 1/1 double hung with moulded entablatures. There is a wood panel front door with single light and a wood storm door with divided light. ALTERATIONS: There are aluminum storms on the second floor. Aluminum siding covers the roof soffits and fascia. The wooden steps do not appear to be original to the house. The front concrete steps and walkway were replaced in kind with COA#2006-0724; there was a complete tear -off and re -roof with architectural shingles under COA#2006-0109A APPLICATION ITEMS: Re -paint exterior of house, replace porch steps with similar design, add black wrought iron hand rail. Add gate to west side of house. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: There are currently only two wood steps leading from the walkway to the front porch. The steps are badly constructed with risers that are very steep and awkward to navigate; the homeowner wishes to replace the two steps with three wood steps. The black wrought iron hand rail or wrought iron style will be attached to the side of the square porch support and to the wood stairs. There is no handrail and one is required by South Fiend Code. A wooden gate will be behind the set back of the house between the west side of the house and the retaining wall (approximately five feet between the house and wall) to secure the backyard play area. It will be obscured by the current landscaping. Repainting the house does not require a COA. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK D. ENTRANCES, PORCHES AND STEPS Most houses in the district have either an open or enclosed porch across the front. Most porches have either hip or gabled roofs or are covered by the main roof of the house. Required When deteriorated beyond repair, existing or original porches, stoops, patios and steps, including handrails, balusters, columns, brackets, tiles and roof decorations, shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design or by a design more in keeping with the historic period of the structure. Porches and additions reflecting later architectural styles and which are important to the building's historical integrity shall be retained. Recommended When enclosing porches for heat conservation or for other reasons, it should be done in a manner that does not alter the architectural or historical character of the building. Prohibited Front porches, stoops, patios and steps that are important to the building's style and development shall not be altered or removed; if in need of replacement, see above Required section. See also Section IV B. Access for Handicapped or Disabled Persons. Not Recommended Original porch details should not be replaced with materizls representing a different period or style from the original. B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the 6 Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard areas should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the new wood steps, the wrought iron railing and the wooden gate. The wood steps would be in the approximate footprint of the current front steps. The railing is required by Code. The wood gate at the side of the house is obscured by landscaping and the setback of the house from the street. The gate can be as solid or as open as the homeowner deems practical for his purposes as it will not be seen from the street. On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0607 was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 9, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0607A Property Location: 853 Forest Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled ell/1892 Property Owner: Mary and Steven Prince Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark in Chapin Park NR/LHD Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This landmark is a two storey frame house set upon an irregular brick foundation. The walls are generally four inches to the weather painted clapboard siding with narrower boards at the second floor spandrel. The exterior exhibits outstanding carpentry. The roof is 12/12 intersecting gables with broad soffits and a plain frieze board. There is a variety of fish scale shingles in the gable and spandrels. The cut off corners were noted to lend to the distinction of the house. The windows are 1/1 double hung throughout with simple jambs and moulded wood entablature. The front door is single leaf glazed with simple jamb and moulded entablature. The storm windows appear to be original to the house. ALTERATIONS: The side porch was reconstructed after 1987. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install an 18'x14' brick paver patio in rear of house using Pine Hall Brick in granite green set in a basket weave pattern. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowners propose to lay a brick paver 18'X14' patio in a very shady section of their backyard. The 18'X14' area will be excavated to a depth of 8 inches. The area will then be surfaced up to 6" with "53" crushed concrete and compacted; the area will then be resurfaced with 2" of finer crushed concrete and re -compacted. The granite green pavers will be set in the 7 basket weave pattern and a polymer adhesive will be brushed in. This patio will be at a corner of the back yard close to the house and it will not be visible from the street. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: CHAPIN PARK B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES This section focuses on individual properties and amenities. Building sites tend to be irregularly shaped, of varying topography and with different setbacks with regard to plots. Alleys are generally behind houses. Landscape accessories like fences are unique to each structure. Chapin Place presents a unique situation within the district. Applications from properties that have property lines on Chapin Place will be considered on a case-by-case basis. Required Fencing, walkways, outbuildings, private yard lights, signs (i.e. house numbers) and benches (visible from the street) as well as trees located in a yard or tree lawn which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. A tree located in such areas shall only be removed if the removal is required due to storm damage, disease, threatened damage to a structure or for such other reason acceptable to the Historic Preservation Commission. Storm damaged or diseased trees should then be replaced with an approved species at the same or approximate location wherever possible. Fencing visible from the street in front of the structure shall be open (meaning spaces between the pickets) and consistent with the historic character of a structure enclosed. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Front yard arf.as should remain open. (See above for information regarding fences.) Trees in close proximity to a building may cause structural damage. Owners are encouraged to remove these trees and replace (or replant) them at a more appropriate location as soon as planting season permits and upon approval of a C of A. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped, nor enclosed by solid fences, chain link, nor industrial/commercial style fences. The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. Utility poles with high-intensity overhead lights should be installed so that they cannot be seen from a street. The Commission will evaluate all installations as well as any potential exceptions resulting from special circumstances, before granting a C of A. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the patio as it conforms to the standards of the district and will not detract in anyway from the architectural features of this land -marked home. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Sandy Rossow Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0607A was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: June 10, 2010 Application Number: 2010-0607B Property Location: 814 Arch Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dutch Colonial/1920 Property Owner: Gerald Kania, Jr. and Hyun-Soon Lee-Kania Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This is a two storey Dutch Colonial with a rectangular plan set upon a pour concrete foundation with brick veneer. The first storey is brick and the second storey is aluminum sided. There is an asphalt shingle covered roof with a central gable with end walls decorated to appear as a gambrel. There is a bracketed pediment entry roof over the stoop. ALTERATIONS: There are aluminum siding and storms on the second floor. The front door was replaced with COA#2007-0507. The aluminum storm door is not original. The deck and railings over the sun porch were replaced with COA#1997-0714.2. There are aluminum storms on the sun porch and two complete window replacements on the rear east side of the house. The garage door appears to be a replacement. The 12" concrete square front walkway is not original to house. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of roof, removal of old asphalt roof, replacing with architectural shingles. Replacement of 3 tab to an arch. Shingle. Complete tear off and replacement.. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: This project is a complete tear off of all roofing materials and the 3 tab asphalt shingles and re -roofing with architectural shingles. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: EDGEWATER B. ROOFS AND ROOFING Roof shapes in the district vary from hip and gable to gambrel. All are covered with asphalt shingles. Eaves in most cases, have wood facias with gutters and downspouts. Some aluminum sided houses have aluminum covered facias. Required The existing shape and materials of the roof shall be retained. All architectural features which give the roof its essential character, such as dormer windows, cornices, brackets and weather vanes, shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original shape and materials of the roof shall be restored. Particular effort should be made to retain materials such as slate, tile and other unique materials not commonly found in new construction. Roof covering which is deteriorated beyond repair should be replaced with new material that matches as closely as possible the existing or original in composition, size, shape, color, and texture. Prohibited Nothing shall be done to change the essential character of the roof by adding architectural features or roofing materials inappropriate to the style of the house. The roof shall not be stripped of architectural features important to its character. Not Recommended If aluminum or vinyl siding is added to a building, overhanging eaves and gables should not be covered or enclosed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Office was called with a report from a neighbor that work was in progress without a COA or building permit. Staff immediately followed up on the report and the homeowner and contractor came in and applied for the COA that day. Work was not stopped on this project because of weather considerations. Staff recommends approval of the re -roof with architectural asphalt shingles since these shingles would mimic the original wood shingles which were still in place in the late 1940s as noted on the Assessor's Card. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Lynn Patrick Vote: 5-0 COA 2010-0607B was approved with a unanimous vote. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. City Cemetery update -Elicia gave an update on the progress. III. HEARING OF VISITORS No visitors IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —May 17, 2010 Approved B. TREASURER'S REPORT - Distributcd X C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -File Circulated. Discussion of East Wayne party invitation and Cindy Bodle notifying staff of the estimated fee revenue deadline. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals - Submitted in packets. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. 4. AD Report -Distributed. Announcement of DHPA scholarship awarded to attend the NAPC Forum 2010. 5. Legal Counsel -None. Discussion of what could be done when an applicant doesn't appear for a meeting. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -Will be rolled into July's report. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Sons of Israel Synagogue — Todd Zeiger reported that he has been working with City staff on a re -use for the building to be used in conjunction with Coveleski Stadium. B. Green Weekend wrap up — Elicia reported on the event, thanking Commissioner Zeiger for his participation as a workshop speaker and President Klusczinski for attending and assisting with breakdown on Friday. VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Sandy Rossow to adjourn Meeting adjourned at 8:07 p.m. Attest: Patric *11 ecretary 10