The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDecember 2010AGENDA.OF THE SpllTIIB a ". •• ". IIISTOR.IC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DECEMBER 20, 2010 7865 w Regular Meeting , uRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2010 7:OOPM x• I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL II. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS s 1. 626 Park Chapin Porta a Avenue COA#2010-1123 Portage 2.537 Edgewater Drive COA#2010-1206A Edgewater Place 3.655 River COA#2010-1206B Edgewater Place 4. Angela -Riverside Drive Intersection, Lighting on Angela Bridge COA#2010-1206C Local Landmark 4 S L C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence c . III. HEARING OF VISITORS 3. Director's Report T . V IV. REGULAR BUSINESS H A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 15, 2010 D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: "� :,• B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report W `a VA1SS$0,VrP' OJ? i o H om o' NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence .:° 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals 3. Director's Report T . V 4. Assistant Director's Report 5. Legal Counsel D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: "� :,• 1. President's Report V. OLD BUSINESS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. ADJOURNMENT `a VA1SS$0,VrP' OJ? i o H om o' NOTICE: FOR HEARING AND SIGHT IMPAIRED PERSONS Auxiliary aid or other services are available upon request at no charge. Please give reasonable advance request when possible. SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION DECEMBER 20, 2010 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES Print Name Address r /11 1i S o 5 o t n s,4 v. gm QITA SV AJ�i- ko Vv ,,+ ✓1 bow n5 - -F:�J rf) - �� ` L--aS/ Q c '3 Signature STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: November 23j2010 Application Number: 2010-1123 Property Location: 626 Portage Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1 part cominercia1f1927 Property Owner: Saint Germain Foundation, c/o Cynthia Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Register District Rating: Non-Contribilting DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE.: Building is a one storey commercial with rectangular plan. Foundation is concrete, exterior walls are brick with vertical siding applied to front. Roof is flat with a stepped parapet in front. There is a projecting cornice that spans the front facadc. ALTERATIONS: Vertical vinyl siding applied to front, solid panel replacement door in front, front windows removed and/or covered over with siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: I -lave a sign put up on the building. See attachment for details. Replace back door and have a gate added to the chain link style* fence. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Tenant is proposing a sign for the building that will represent the business. Neighborhood is zoned mixed use. According to the Building Department guidelines, size cannot exceed 10% of the area of the facade, in this case 33 square feet. The proposed sign is 4' x 6', 24 square feet. Sign will be a digital print on hard vinyl. Sign will attach to structure with screws. South Bend Fire Department Notice of Violation and Order report requests that a new back door be installed because the current wood door is rotted. Staff does not have details at this time as a contractor has not been hired. In addition, the reports requests that a gate be added to back fence. Building owner suggests removing a portion of the gate rather than adding a gate. Project is pending a letter of support from the owner. CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: 1. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Prohibited The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Pending pennission from the owner, staff recommends approval of the proposed sign as it is appropriate to the building, respecting the size, scale and design of the building Nvith the existing alterations, however, staff did not take exact measures at the parapet to ensure this size would fit. Staff recommends removing a portion of the chain link fence. Staff has no recommendation for the replacement door as there are no further details at this time. 01 Application -FOR - ert%fi'Cate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 il±lailing Address: County C ity F3uilding, bouth Bend, hlddiana 4ha n Phone. 574-235- • Fax: 574-235-9575 • Email: SBSJCi-il3C@cost jolt ph1 us Website: http://ivNvu,stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.htzni OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX} >>>>>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received Application Number _94 l L- I� L 3 Past Reviews: E] YES (Do., r f La,,, Rmieao) Staff Approval authorized by: [] NO Title: Historic Commission Review Date: R 120 1 ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District Wamne) ( M �i n 19i i i - E]National Landmark National Register District {iYame�•YIffj nDO,, OL Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied ❑ 'T'abled F1 Sent To Committee [] Approved and Issued oaTF Address of Property for proposed work: Street'Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Tease .Print) , ,' 4f. Address of Property Owner(s): z .> 4 41 Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: t },„r ;3 - i si �f'.h6rxil V, lip; N ” (o Contractor Address: lGl" City: 1, :' .. ,/ Phone: Current Use of Building: (Single Family - Multi-Family(Conurrtreia Gozvminent - Industrial - Vacant -etc.) Type of Building Construction: (Wood FrameBrlc — Stane — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed 'Work: In-kind (� Landscape M New [] Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition (more than one box may be clinked) Description of Proposed Work: / 1 ' .� ^a.� �. f!Fin fi P f? .. ! Owner/Contractor: Fax: e-mail Wis office will correspond with only one &-ignee) 1`.� ', _ ,s and/or -- APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — N lo 04 . . . . . . . . . . . .......... 626 Portage, November 30, 2010 All- 7 1 Idyn Alf 4 A K 411 04 . . . . . . . . . . . .......... 626 Portage, November 30, 2010 NOTICE OFVIOLATION AND ORDER I`A*.C'I10ND)vrE: i'l 10C)i REINSPECTION LOCATION: BUSINESS NAME: DATE: SIGNED: MANAGER!OWNER. RE -INSPECTION: BUSINESS PRONE: RE-INSPECTIONN: You are hereby notified that during the above-tercrenced inspection our inspector found violations of Indiana Administrative Code 675 IAC 22-2*3 and the rules promulgated thereunder. You are hereby ordered to correct kill of the violations huniediately and tins conic. into compliance 't;Ath the statute and rules by the dates indicated above. DATES INDICATE VIOLATION AND COMPLIANCE VIO.CON1. COMMENTS Gencral Means orEgress (Including I.ocks &RIC ct - Irl Latches) See, 10033 IFC 1 Chapter 10 1FC .......... Mainterianw of Means or 1.11gress (Obstructions) Sec. 1011 117c," Chapter 10 IFC, ............... Stairway See. 1003.33 IFC /Chapter 10 IFC, , , , , , , , , Ex it Sign Sec. 1003.2. 10 IF C' / Chapter 10 IFC �i%-4 ari L Means of Egress Illumination (Emergency Lights) See. 1003.2.11 IFC / Chapter 10 IFC ..... ........ Smoke Detector System . . ............. Cit -y- Ordinance & NNFPA 72 ..................... Fire Alarm & Detection Systems . ......... See, 907 IF( ......................... ...... Automatic Spri A let SyAeni Sec. 903 / Chapter 91€`C & NFPA 13 ............ Plesistaricc-Rated Construction Chaplet 7 1 PC . , , ........ I 34c, Portable FirC EXtiTU'Llisher C See. 906 IFC & NFRA 10 & Municipal Code. Commercial Cooking Systems Sec. 904 11 IFC & INIC& M -11A 96 ............... Electrical E.Cluipincrit Wiring I lazar& (Including Ext. Cords) See. (105 If'C' . ........... Combustible Waste Material Sec. 304 IFC ....... ........ ............... Ignition Sources Sm 305 lFC. ......................... Flammable and Combustible Uquids Chapter 34 IFC & NNIA 33 & 34 ................. Flammable Finishes Chapter 15 IFC ..... ...... I ...... Premises Identification (Address) Sec.505A II'C &- Municipal Code ......... I ...... Rematks,10ther Li are hereby reqoested to submit a plan lbw corrective action 'Within ten days of receipt of this notice and report all correctine action taken to the undersigned at the address Nlow. South Rend Fire Dcportment Pmention I Inspection mucau 1222 South Michigan Street South Bcnd; Indiana 466'01-w2921 Phone: 574-2"-;-9,187 Inspector V-1 iL A F- N Iwo- 7ramy 1-i' Now r, I 626 Portage, November 30, 2010 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS :Date: 6 December 2010 Application Number: 2010-1206B Property Location: 655 River Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled -d1111894 Property Owner: ' , Carl Brunson Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Rating: Listed as a non contributing vacant lot in 2005 Survey DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This house is a one storey structure with an attic set upon an :irregular brick foundation situated on a double lot at the dead end of River Avenue. There is a tall brick chimney on the west side. The exterior walls are covered with wood shingle siding and the cross gable roof is covered with fiberglass shingles. The 2/2 windows and storms appear to be original to the house. The 411 wood windows may be original to the enclosure noted in the 1933 on the Assessor's Card. The entry door may be original to the house, ALTERATIONS: The Assessor Card notes that in 1933 the porch was enclosed and that there was an addition to the front of the house. It also notes that there was wood siding which was covered alter 1949 with the current siding application. The roof has been replaced with a COA approved on November 11, 1981 with Owens Corning Fiberglass shingles. The flat roof surface is covered with rolled aluminum roof ng. APPLICATION ITEMS: 6' X 12' addition to northwest corner of home per attached illustration and description submitted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Mr. Brunson proposes to construct an addition to the rear of his house. There will be a new concrete foundation poured (this house does not have a frill basement) and new framing. The existing siding will be salvaged and reused to cover the exterior walls. A window will be salvaged from the exterior wall at the site of the new construction and placed in the new exterior wall. The extended flat roof will be covered with rolled aluminum roofing and tie into the current roofing materials. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Edtewater Place: TII. NEW CONSTRUCTION A. .EIGHT AND .PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories in high and are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few single story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the . district. The building height shall be no greater that that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing; structure in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. -Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and snood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. —Not Recommended W ew stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, .features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING h'IA'ITRIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Wall materials in the district range from brick, clapboard, shingles and masonry to aluminum siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in type, scale, texture, and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of. that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible in size And style and with the materials of other buildings in the district.' Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick may not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF REC{?MMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the standards and guidelines for Edgewater Place for new construction. The owner is also proposing to re -use current materials on the exterior with the intent that it will not stand out as new construction. The new construction will not be visible from the street as it will be situated in a vacant corner of the house. Application - FOR - CerHficate of Approptiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing %. din C—fu n.MA T"Altmn AAM1 Fhmw- 574-235-9798 - Fax 574-235-9578. * Email: SWCHPC0cost-jxep1LirLus Website: httF://www.sqosepheountyindia com/qchp/Wex.hbnl OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES COMMIN THIS BOX »"" OFFICE USE ONLY 0-1C 20/0 1.6. 10M.6 B Date Received Application Number— — — — Past Reviews: [BYES (Did,.I&O ftQ /4 hro14- / 9 NO. Staff Approval authorized by. Title: Historic Commission Review Date: AL. 2010 0 local Landmark G3*(Acal Historic District (maw) 5 D G 6I, , 47-F, t F, E] National Landmark [j National Register District (Hann) Certificate of Appropriateness: (3 Denied F1 Tabled F1 Sent To Committee [I Approved and Issued DATE Properly for proposed work: Address ofProp � stare MM and stiret Na meName of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s): Contractors) Namix cpaq �- Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building. (Single rawly,- Multi-AM17y;-CrMerdal - QWWMt -Industral- Va=t - etc.) Type of Building Construction: fi/eiAlc? Z?v �� (Vftd Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: kin -kind Landscape [ New Replacement (not in-kind) Q Demolition (in= fl= one box may be dWW) f y Description of Proposed Work- � X' 1---7 Owner/Contxactor. Far. e-mail (M office, it *e* dmi;=) and/or Az t,41,7 ov�' /h' L' ema- eye.= t:;P<ea. 7V Iva" ema- eye.= t:;P<ea. 7V Iva" 11 I 655 River, November 17, 2014 "C lTON 0 F -Pka'Pas 62) 4 D P 17 -rani 655 River, November 17, 241.0 s .W STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 12.6.2010 Application Number: 2010-1206A Property Location: 537 Edgewater Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1921/ Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Joseph and Judith Pietrzak Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1 %z storey rectangular plan plus appendages on a brick over concrete foundation. Roof is a side gambrel with major dormer along front, all covered in asphalt shingles. Porch features 4 heavy scaled Doric columns supporting a simple eave of low slope porch roof. Front door is a single leaf glazed wood panel door with multi light side lights. Windows are 6/6 double hung. There is a semicircular headed fan opening in attic gables. Basement windows are glass block. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door. Aluminum siding. Some replacement windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace 2 rear (South) and 1 rear (East) windows with double hung white mutton sashed windows 6/6 Marvin wood double hung, exterior aluminum clad. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The locations of proposed windows are on a back addition to the house that was converted to living space from a garage. The existing windows have been restored 4 times within the last 40 years, are letting in cold air, and are not capable of another restoration, as stated by homeowner. Homeowner proposes to install 3 Marvin window inserts, locations noted in application items. Already replaced on the house are 2 windows at the top of stairs in rear and windows on the left side in front. Replacement windows will have same muntin (grille) pattern as existing windows. Grilles are snap in from the interior and are removable. Materials are clad exterior with wood interior. No wrap will be used on exterior. Existing storm .windows will remain on. Light visibility will decrease by approximately 1 inch on each side. EDGEWATER STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows. _ _ W7 Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends replacement of 3 windows. These windows are not original to the house, only to the addition. Furthermore, windows are in the rear and side of house, not visible from the street and will retain a uniform appearance to the rest of the house as the existing storm windows will remain on. Application - FOR - CerHficate of Appfopfiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 P, sailing Address: County -City Building, S—ab Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574.235-9793 , Fax: 574-235-9578 e Email: SBSjCHPC@co.st-joseph.in.us Website: http://wmv.st osephcouiityindiana.mm/s chp/hidex.html 01-TICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CON14INED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Receivedin. 1 10 Application Number aO / D - A-204109 Past Reviews: [ �S (,nate o/Last Revic,tn)-um -OINI E]NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark [� Local Historic District (Nance) ,u r [] National Landmark E] National, Register District (Natne) Certificate of Appropriateness: ` R Denied F]Tabled R Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and. Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: Street N�urrtm%bi. d qtr f Natne Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) dos e, Address ofProperty Owner(s): i Contractor(s) Name: Pen d "? 4 Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building:�� (Single Family - Multi -Fe utily-Cvaierd7l-Gowrnmeit _'Industrial-114catd - etc.) Type of Building Construction: WLtceW Ir-ai17 -L ("boil Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete -Other) Proposed Work: (] In-kind R Landscape [l New [R replacement (not ithkiutf) n Demolition (more than arse box may Ix, checked) Description of Proposed `Work: __ r% / • i, � J.r.7i YZr. C�r,4�% h t �n � Whi 7�z Jy1s� Dt2 ��'c: ,� t4.! i ►21� .� M r,ev w bo Quo u 3 t.E- E�XU K. n Ow er/Contractor: Fax:- e-mail (ris ict Willco lNlt I r only Otte csiglw) and/or - — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 537 Edgewater, December 7, 2010 537 Edgewater, December 7, 2010 Marvin Ultimate Insert Double Hung Windows • With the Ultimate Insert Double Hung replacement window, there's no need to take out the existing window frame. Exterior casing and interior trim remain undisturbed by the replacement process. • Tilt or remove the sash for easy cleaning. • The Wood Ultimate Insert Double Hung is designed to meet historic design criteria. • The Clad Ultimate Insert Double Hung has a wood interior and low maintenance, extruded aluminum -clad exterior. Standard Features • Bare wood interior • Satin Taupe sash lock One -lite Low E II with argon insulating glass • 3 1/4" (82.5 mm) jambs (clad only) • 4 9/16" (116 mm) jambs (wood only) • 8° sill bevel • All wood exterior (wood only) Extruded aluminum clad exterior (clad only) • Full screen • Prepped for jamb installation • Installation hardware • One -handed tilt -in operation for easy cleaning Interior View Removable Grilles 10 Solid wood Grilles on the interior offer the look of a classic divided lites, but can be easily removed for cleaning. CLAD ULTIMATE INSERT DOUBLE HUNG DAYLIGHT OPENING CONVERSIONS NOT TO SCALE i Frame Size - 3 7/32' _ Daylight 3 7/32' (82) Opernn (82) 7C12i 7(21) 2 13/16' (71) 7/8' (22) c aT 00 1m 7�T 132' ih m lL 0 `x100 CL 7/8' (22) 4 (116) (116) V MARVIN Ilo 01.11.1 Built around you. 2008-06-02 11708324 19.17 Marvin Architectural Detail Manual STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 6, 2010 Application Number: 2010-1206C Property Location: Angela Street Bridge, Angela Boulevard and Riverside Drive Intersection Riverside Trail extension to the crest of Riverside Drive Hill and along the eastern boarder of Brown Field Park. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Angela Bridge: Filled Spandrel Arch Bridge/1940/W.S. Moore &F.J. Miller, Engineer/H.L. Maddocks Builder Property Owner: City of South Bend (Streets) and St. Joseph County (Bridge #211) Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark (Bridge) Riverside Drive LHD (path to crest of hill and reconfiguration of Riverside Drive to the west; addition of sidewalks in Brownfield Park) Rating: Outstanding (Bridge), Local Historic District (Riverside Drive) THE ANGELA BRIDGE: DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Angela Bridge is a three Arch Melan Style Bridge constructed of reinforced concrete, having two central pillars with corbelled string coursecones at pillar bases and plain spandrels. The bridge construction method relied on bands of several metal arch rings aligned evenly with the protection of a concrete shell. Rough faced cut stone comprises the facing of the structure. ALTERATIONS: COA#2003-0616 allowed for the replacement of the original, deteriorated approach railings with railings of identical shape size, dimensions and design as the existing except that for NHTSA standards new rails will be 12" deep (wide) instead of 9", the piers will be 18" wide and the distance between elongated oval openings in the rail will be 18" on center instead of 12" on center. Openings in both the approach and the guard rail shall be elongated ovals as in existing rail. Conduit and wiring for restored historic lighting is permitted. APPLICATION ITEMS: Roadway Improvements adjacent to District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT; The city will be upgrading the lights on the Angela Street Bridge. This work was approved by Historic Preservation in June 2003 under the permit application 2003-0616. The Certificate of Appropriateness has been included in the information Package. (Exhibit A) The City of South Bend proposed to install a total of eight lights on the Bridge: 2 at each end and 4 in the middle where the arches come together on existing pillars. (Photos 1&2) The Main Street -A luminaires will be set upon 12 foot Leesburg straight fluted shafts. (Exhibit B) STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material: Addtions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the restoration of historical lighting to the Bridge recommended and permitted in COA 2003-0616. The selection of the Main Street -A and Leesburg fluted shafts compliment the architecture of the Bridge and the street light styles in the area. RIVERSIDE DRIVE: DESCRIPTION OF SITE: Northwestern and Northeastern edge of the Riverside Drive Local Historic District that includes a narrow eastern strip of Brown Field Park bordering Riverside Drive and the land between Angela Boulevard to the crest of the hill between the St. Joseph River and Riverside Drive. APPLICATION ITEMS: For this PROJECT, The City will be installing a new trunk storm sewer down Diamond Avenue to improve drainage and to remove storm water from the combined sewer system. During the design process we asked the engineers to do some traffic and lighting and pedestrian/bicycle facilities upgrades. The following work will be performed in the Riverside Historic district (Exhibit C&D): 1. Install a roundabout at the intersection of Riverside/Angela. This will reduce pedestrian -auto conflicts. 2. The roundabout will move the Riverside/Angela intersection away from the bridge over the St. Joseph River, improving the sight distance and to create a valuable public park space along the river. Riverside will be shifted to the west to align with the new roundabout. 3. We are planning on installing a multi -path extension up the hill to Shetterly Park in the future. 4. Signage, lighting and pavement markings will be improved. (Drawings 1-3) DESCRIPTION OF PROTECT: The proposed Roundabout will cause for the reconfiguration to the northwest of Riverside Drive on the fringe of Riverside Drives LHD. It will create on the east side of Riverside Drive additional land to construct a 10 foot wide concrete pathway to connect with the current River Walk/Bike Path on the north side of Angela Boulevard. This Pathway will begin at the newly configured intersection and terminate toward the top of the hill near an overgrown grouping of volunteer trees (that are proposed to be removed). The work proposed for the area in Brown Field Park will have an impact the actual district boundaries by moving a short section of Riverside Drive through the Park area on the northwest and with the addition of two street lights on the east side of the Park along Riverside Drive. (Exhibits D&E) I. THE ENVIRONMENT RIVERSIDE DRIVE LHD GUIDELINES A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and by its intimate relationship with the St. Joseph River. The district encompasses the seven blocks of Riverside Drive which follow the river front from Lafayette Street to the east to Angela Boulevard to the west. For a portion of that route, there is a row of houses facing the river from across Riverside Drive, while in another portion, residence are situated on both sides of the 2 M+ street, with some properties abutting the river and others located across the drive. The district also includes homes located on Hudson and Golden Streets, between the drive and the alley defining the southern boundary of the district, as well as three separate park areas which lie adjacent to the river's edge: a portion of Leeper Park to the East; all of Shetterly Park in the middle and a portion of Brownfield Part to the West. Required Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, benches, walkways streets alleys and building setbacks shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society. Light sources must have spectral Distribution in all color ranges. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix) or a suitable replacement which closely duplicates the standard in size, shape, style and appearance, i.e., Herwig Lighting Company standard or similar. Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Tree and landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another shall be immediately replaced by suitable flora. The river front neighborhood character of the district shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings, sidewalks or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. If erosion control efforts become necessary to preserve the riverbank, they should involve processes and materials consistent with the natural beauty of the banks. Large, deep-rooted trees and shrubs as well as fast spreading ground cover should be used when planting for erosion control. As much natural vegetation as possible should be preserved. If large shrubs become unsightly, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and diseased material should be selectively removed. Do not dump leaves and grass clippings on planted slopes as this practice will kill much of.the low ground cover and leave soil more susceptible to erosion. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening existing streets, application of asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, Streetlights, benches, major landscaping items, fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The introduction of heavy trucks or similar vehicles in the District shall be prohibited. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. The reconfiguration of Riverside Drive will impact an area of Brown Field Park that is currently part of a hillock that is not used for pedestrians or recreation. It will not adversely impact any architectural features in the Riverside Drive Local Historic District. The new roundabout and change to Riverside Drive will create additional pathways to the current River Walk and create a safer intersection with more visibility and pedestrian safety. The proposed 10 foot concrete pathway is located in the same area as a footpath and will not involve the removal of any significant trees. (Photot#3) The lighting style of the Main Street -B set on Barrington posts proposed for Brown Field Park attempts to imitate the Cutter lamp style found in the Riverside Drive LHD. All of the project drawings include appropriate landscaping. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPC@co.st joseph.inus Website: http://www.st osephcountyindiana.com/s chp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received /a de- tO/o Application Number —4-0 16 Past Reviews: [RIES (Date of Gast Review) � (O � a0'7� 3 NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: o"w [i] Local Landmark Dreo cal Historic District (Name) National Landmark E] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: E] Denied E] Tabled E] Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: a Historic District - Along Diamond Ave. Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) City of South Bend, Department of Public Works Address of Property Owner(s): Suite 1300 N, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, IN 46601 Contractor(s) Name: Christopher Waidner, P. E. Contract Company Name: The Troyer Group Contractor Address: 550 Union Street City: Mishawaka, IN 46544 Phone: (574) 259-9976 Current Use of Building: Not a building, rather a Residential Historic District (Single Family - Multi -Family - Commercial - Gomrnment - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: No building construction, rather a roadway improvement project (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind [:] Landscape E] New M Replacement (not in-kind) ElDemolition (more than one box may be checked) x Other - Roadway Improvements adjacent to District Description of Proposed Work: (see attached sheet) 11 0 e /Contra or: ax: (574) 259-9982 (This ce will corres and w only one designee) 'l and/or e-mail clw@troyergroup.com — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — City of South Bend Diamond Avenue Trunk Storm Sewer Project Description For this project, the City will be installing a new trunk storm sewer down Diamond Avenue to improve drainage and to remove storm water from the combined sewer system. During the design process we asked the engineers to do some traffic and lighting and pedestrian/bicycle facilities upgrades. The following work will be performed in the Riverside Drive historic district: • Install a roundabout at the intersection of Riverside/Angela. This will reduce pedestrian - auto conflicts. • The roundabout will move the Riverside/Angela intersection away from the bridge over. the St. Joseph River, improving the sight distance and to create a a valuable public park space along the river. Riverside will be shifted to the west to align with the new roundabout. • We are planning on installing a multi -path extension up the hill to Shetterly Park in the future. • Signage, lighting, and pavement markings will be improved The city will also be upgrading the lights on the Angela Street bridge. This work was approved by Historic Preservation in June 2003 under the permit application 2003-0616. The Certificate of Appropriateness has been included in the information package. Materials to be used Please see the Project Drawings t t i t i kj All The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: John H. Oxian, President 1. Remove curving approach railings, too deteriorated to retain, & 2. Replace with approach rails of identical shape, size, dimen- sions, and design as the existing, except that, for NHTSA stan- dards, new rails will be 12" deep (wide) instead of 9", the piers will be 18" wide, and the distance between elongated oval open- ings in the rail will be 18" on center instead of 12" on center. 3. Openings in both the approach and the guard rail shall be elon- gated ovals, as in existing rail. 4. Conduit and wiring for restored historic lighting is recom- mended and permitted. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND. ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone (219) 235-9799 FAX: (219) 235-9578 e-mail: historic@michiana.org, Karen R. Hammond -Nash, Director Julie L. Schutte, Assistant Director for the following location: The Angela Bridge Application No. 2003-0616 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: FILocated in a Local Historic District Fx-x]A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission ar— found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code & Chasm 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana,during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE St. Joseph County Engineering NAME OF APPLICANT: Department, by Laurie Johnson, P.E. DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: June 16, 2003 PERMIT ISSUED BY: f X00 Karen R. Hammond -Nash, r'7%�1 �` �' 1.. Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET ILL OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. J;XHI13 t'I" A Angela bridge looping NW December 7, 2010 Angela bridge looking N. December i, 2010 STER"E"" INTAGE LIGHTING 7401 Oak Park Ave * Niles IL 60714 Scale 16 -inch = 1 -foot LEESBURG 3800 -FP Base Size D - 15" H -. 34" Wall/Floor Thickness - .250%875 Straight Fluted Shaft O.D. - 4" Wall Thickness - .125 Candy Cane available Overall Post Heights 3810 -FP - 10' 3812 -FP - .12' 3814 -FP - 14' 0 r - MAIN STREET -A and A-0 with Glow Top Roof (MS805-A)/(MS805-A-0) 16"(17'k" on diagonal) x 38" Mercury Vapor 100, 175, 250w High Pressure Sodium 70. 100,150. 250w Metal Halide 100, 175, 250w �a- 15X11 cB IT15 e 15X11 cB IT15 a,SN 'F \ ^.; .w•`;" INV' .;:.^t,., sea `"-• .'n_S�'D`';-tom «��. i 2 G «,,.tea,°- •� " :d.: 7,,;�::�-�,l'yx•::.x . ' y>..."`„`-,+;,;,,wss.�w+..�;:�^''*.»• ;y:�.:. � �, .r x_�a,� �k n«•':o- ��F"8',k:,.` _�- ;ta,,':,�.«^'' `'.":• 3,�, ��.5±”=-BSc `> '"' r �'" a$-a..r" < ,�. :� �,» �"�w a a �7•r"`."� W�� '�•<�mis,a..�: ,t` >. BA - s ziw. §., a, ..��. .a. ^�.,,."., . .,a`', a'L,;. _ .>.p..,:: °i � < ..c :'fir•,.:'.'=.: wloLe s` _ yy,,,Yi';•^3`�'.. .,:4e.. ,n�-33r...^ '�c�.^,., ,.,: i �;, {�.;, aa•�.= s;..x1��-. -. .<�.�ec,,``,_ .nz,2 i��.''�P'��'<, °i V< �;.._��`� �y, \a� w Sd"'„ a;«.3:'€:' �-s- t -v °��.aa 33 '�xm�.,n < �5`r. "x,,.xR w W w'tc''•?.cw � "�< � y' :� =��,• �..*:t,<, .ya �.eg2. a_ ': ai' :'J7' .S,a. «:x'a ,,:"w4w �.t"; r ¢�, �•,_' ,�ptva,. .:>- k ... v.: .:':, �.: :< d.,. .'ltv�% <e Ah. ,�`§.•�kti:. ,d S. `.Y'' .>z. ^�rm'";g¢ t ` .;.�,•.i'`,:`,". `�':�' ia.' tea'.., ..s ',ava,.`are.�� ^q. Y < . Y`�. 'y°. 1,-5. _ 51.. �'A' V'd« \�1"`.S'.aik> .{ _,�1i.=.:' C _Sar.•{ .y.,., ..[,:s _.. e '�Rftaa � : A ..�' �� iV:... .td aa't`.t<<•n- .�„ aa,. p ,,.y, > fY r 1st43+. .'� Z'.`t `,3 , e "- �.,. =P,... � ,. > .. � . .:::-.: •. ,.,.,,<.,',,., _,- - _ . he .r rfi. V >_�. _, x.'+,>Yw :.:�,- `\sYiS?ySS+ ?l.. `=F:<`j:§,.,•'�.. .y,";>V• µ g� \ . , `-`.� .: ._. « „ aw:. tee•,,,. ,.. s„ ", . ; a : ...s.. W Nor •,,.., t..;,,,...>A..:^.: .ss -PP a• .�'�„a,a 2>.-: ;:..'..+<',r�• :,,4..., mak"., sc 'd'i,syr .t x��F .�, F�`> ...:•_ .''�-sem=,t i3�'c;:, >v;� "�.::`'r.,,.- i':.v, f'ge',o-,ss.; cl;' +:.,- -ee.?p, �v`,£«a; •t�, < <x"ev, " a. > .,.FY 9 '4y A` ^ o'l `y,• ^'�IvA+' .sv`Sv wn-.'-,a,�,,"•a t. -e_.d.modK'45 �•D G' , a � ' r. < .w .. .. .. � g a:r.:' -:�..a.• a,,,.,.;: ».:..<e.>'�>ze�-,;. S , a:y\�: :Fyks,��^< , �.v.;. . ^.CAK=' .%<e 5�r Y,9" `, ,,:qy,y(• F ay�q �' _> " r gh i- v' R" f+ 4tkM fidi- t• a S , ...�r:>.. ... .:... �" ..amp i= 020 lowt,e', <�. "�P. S. '� ,fS"''", .��.. ,,, Si£`A a.•'�i ,= � in` -aye',: > t'�_._,>..,. q,� +� . 1.t ,V'T.i ",:»?- `�h,.•.: '..\rv`' '<.R�V+JL^<L"'i,:'N^y`a�>nq w 1 _ °d ) iV> St.. .e as , u v '�A+ii> s>•A . iV•' ti .. - .A,. - .. � " ,,�. �$^, '^r.ni ate``. t�:.A:r= x>�": `,i • iS `.;.,H;,a>z. if k! 61 V _ Fe {y. u +n .. >:'>a�. a;"�.t« a•."` _ �: s_`{S5, . .: "'t _ "„ . , ,� _ m t:. 'A, V"" sy ..>�'< -^� '�TS•' - +V 1.V..,�.r.:`.e" ... . `. .. .. .. "''Yt° e' '�RFWR23iFfaYxaei 1CuvJN•wE:,,.., � � - t ffi EX 4 k 0 X D A slow qw, -,oval 1z 3. A&A TOM MM511i Asr. sg iv �010, 0 N Agg Jiro w A All PF VIE. � 0' ..::wy. trR " %F n,�e' °`. ":Y" .: W,. �z<=e^+'°n`yHy' xTll <?Mx �mw+- ,e- .` .Y. i5xHtI3 IT 'j) S / / 0 � / r STR 975 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION lro lo•wsawR � b / RI STR 976l 4 err a Seo- Remme –J ST. JOSEPH RIVER J l nSTR 977 Rr STR 979 SEE SHEET la FOR GEOMEMMK=UT. r KEY NOTES: Q rrccv.cuwwsf pCK Ca Slm„eem ITGwn«,cmcnn. W, f, �`�AO) Mc{Men maeebgf«gm s.e sn�a v s« war wsvry Rl+o• STR 116 Q r �ceayrvaen.r. v«weem eme..n .ro m ]{'°I I�Z�errow'E O rKCI.Ibnm mneclb ZS ITCrvNeeCmrnrorro 3] MIZS,r�{l)q O `KC/bAppeocMlen Cnnnea Cmcnre la. u O; KCI MAppoocn« m rcmn.e cexnra. rro s3 eOl �.r.sro I«rear Ida eM1EC IaRn XRrxe. rrpe I m ^°'"sI—C�Ev.cm oO) Irc'mr.a ce.,c+ele. w u I{s enrerw suarc. rw. n3 enw rwAe«..rw.tmcm Qe).w f uwbe emenle. wn ss rwA xle 1—cm .cm W { Glnnea Cmneb Sl cmcrero. f OS.MMOc Cmcreb f .$)an.REm' STR 117 Q I I?ewro ualrro.Rw'e Il3eM1eWAlwbc. pet `deol mselw lls c.°�`13 8 AeNn ce,l.yroe.we n.lr)M1v-{>{rl O Ay,m v.w. roc..,x `Line'RNO-NE' O STR 119 me w,...rae pran«n 'aRro g R..R..a ao.«a Ye Onx canb,«r CoxrebCW fGar«. ryye elRbwxmlel V emc.»eem.'..re e�Reawl«lea�«I �Re„I,M .{z Rr �Irc Ilµ r Sroilrro:ew'e l _ n /; e«rcel. nRe lemwrl _ E•eo..be «rc e«.,e.r"t,urx, _ -..._ -- c..+-.- --------- TR 503 ALL TOPOGRAPHY ON THIS SHEET DESCRIBED FROM LINER' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL R/W ON THIS SHEET DESCRIBED FROM LINER' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ® rcmw sroel cer.«r..e TRE Qi REcoAwEnoEo WEER P �AIIRorµ II /'��7p (u nne«13f4 rN,011 cE,IGrc Fr+G onrE W__ 1c ./Vl �V ,I.E'(�� IoF,IGE4e wwwea Ipmny. o.w, • cm,v.<.m Q �J Y3 ,.' ce.lq+.emro o``- �crlEcuo c,4csEa fNe.va Gen lee 11NR11r b eNM sl eeznn eena weenew rxe. se. sn.«a rr�� alaroN me wlen lwl 4pnr PoM Nn fovwolgn. SSps 1. See Lxbl )) (jVx<) {pnl lob..en fouml�an irye25er SMal }) CW 4eR+Irpe' • .. SN SMel1r N wro{ WATER MAIN KEY NOTES: ❑I IP.1) rae.«Ae O MA e oIr.rrr..,�e o{ eaA o , sr•IrR.ex« '❑' Ir.rw.w n Qr wol«s..se.nl,.l.vr va.e GENERAL NOTES: I wew o.n.nRmis.erorx.aew w«. rwlw oe.�.ne. : u e.« Irol e�..,ae ro- Re«..asna oc Inbclmnr <mR«I« Rm.omww cwlwor conevclon CITY OF SOUTH BEND gxl)Ory CA3E roAonE INDIANA RIK1l3cAlf eE pNASgn I I s I -1c eoOR SErEErs DIAMOND AVENUE TRUNK STORM SEWER I 11lfcrRp+K I lal I PLAN AND PROFILE• LINER' I c sRAcr :Ro,Ecr x I �9ALO(?4C, I sM. x..r w.J snrwl sM. s srrixrr saaxa.r swe xrr ,n.wr n i9arrer n s+w w.r sr :.x.r Jr snru.r sr..wr sM.wr f e.+w.r ,v sAw.r srwxir u�rwr Iree. Flf tt4fi.yal-N G6 rG cn FI oJ•r n.r - n.r cfn c.a c.n c. /+ o. sz c. n, C. a •f c, .r /u mr..w.r 3 jo f c'• r DIAMOND A% c. _ ,Mrwf p ^IAMOND AVC. 4 4 4 4 4 .` V, 4 4 rl 4 4 4 DIAMOND AVC. I xelN; 3rSr. �., f�w6/ 6— '6x..f6G H..1 xel Cr.f (D' a Tlfhw.r JI.'. x,a Cl. '�•.J f). fJ SM.xal m ! G. rJ CO > FM. w.r •N ,eft HA: xal " fi •i Jl-e w.1 .. ,J it .xwl hr, S.vrw.l � fn4wf rN 00o r�! (5.,] U f/+. V 'hM xal K f. rr Sa+x.`.r 2' .5+, s Nwl .L f. .. � xf.l �L U .1 '. > Shlf r:al Ura l4•.1 iH �4r .r fa EI `wa,o.r UM rM.I O 'JJ ; 1 SERVICE POINT M2 -ONE LINE DIAGRAM SERVICE POINT N 1 - ONE LINE DIAGRAM sM. ra t u.r ~ s , e n snrre : n a.r 6F. DIAMOND AVE.- 4ms,"A n » n IHEETKEYNOTES Qr s.,r:.i..0 rr. erxre se..r Esmrrooeaf (2) — a," typ. 6.II -"A. rC. Qf mese. F•.ttpo.ya F.e c,a rc �. rso.ee F.roaq n.yar..rocxtic Qs we.�.esq ttp. Cr.FV a -•l cxn rc. O n.r.rle Flfttp CY.Aa F.. G.,SC Q Iree. Flf tt4fi.yal-N G6 rG S..Conxwa,en O e�pnEe FrIR typ R. t) t I..Ip .r,Q 1-C. .wa. . Qs wawa F.rotyp a.VaF.rocearc. ,xe rcowfJw r/ae.ea. cm oaroee.rw.rro rep. a I® Ibalrxe leM bpbtLrelNeaSpenalerowam. ��r�.w.l � f�ryww.rl :u ral� uxwr • rM+o.s rw h,rr .ri.•h..r .�U o.f .a�:r�, w.J mr..w.r 3 jo f c'• r DIAMOND A% c. _ ,Mrwf p 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 V, 4 4 rl 4 4 4 4 f;;wr + MFA '«xal f w.l fIJN1f-.Nei lSiwl xelN; 3rSr. �., f�w6/ 6— '6x..f6G H..1 xel Cr.f (D' sM.w! .>o n.. SERVICE POINT N 1 - ONE LINE DIAGRAM sM. ra t u.r ~ s , e n snrre : n a.r 6F. DIAMOND AVE.- 4ms,"A n » n IHEETKEYNOTES Qr s.,r:.i..0 rr. erxre se..r Esmrrooeaf (2) — a," typ. 6.II -"A. rC. Qf mese. F•.ttpo.ya F.e c,a rc �. rso.ee F.roaq n.yar..rocxtic Qs we.�.esq ttp. Cr.FV a -•l cxn rc. O n.r.rle Flfttp CY.Aa F.. G.,SC Q Iree. Flf tt4fi.yal-N G6 rG S..Conxwa,en O e�pnEe FrIR typ R. t) t I..Ip .r,Q 1-C. .wa. . Qs wawa F.rotyp a.VaF.rocearc. ,xe rcowfJw r/ae.ea. cm oaroee.rw.rro rep. a I® Ibalrxe leM bpbtLrelNeaSpenalerowam. FI FGTRIGAL SYMBOLS � fs.nxaswt•rswte�eor C3 Ir.,aafs.r eO o«we..=.rrlouol. •or oa rn.. sarxwl ••� Exe.arJgNler oar..,. ,„rw.! f✓Vnbq CaraileMGce„p •—o srr..rfe rype–•� ies\—r gFxw 4�MbSp.e.=.�ex..m iv lr,m. type MaPor. ryq. TYPICAL LIGHT POLE INFORMATION DETAIL I IInMROMM SCAI! l I1L' J °aerex �P I1COM" "`° ('�pW�� ] mF.IxV^aE�. /��\,p• II CITY OF BEND Tftcw wW»NDWA I II •rKH f� = I a ax aw. I fIME•Fv IOOR LSfrf �'lI1�lJVC V�� IOFnUIFO.OfwwM OEI III FIECEEOnEC QVL DIAMOND AVENUE TRUNK STORM SEWER I so IxJ ^""ro•e"o'•Cane''�fO" sdd¢ I PAVEMENT MARKING. LIGHTING d SIGNAGE DETAIL I coNro^ff .rortcr >. f:.prld+e»ro a<cao- Jc oecllm. fen _ bRAW ruIS, 7 wa�w+icw�cro� � s.awbra rrwRd r>Aq ido.ra.. �Ma �ReM b�� QiaOArat d rII�mM rRecepbcb Aiwa RapueE 4arabsMara OTYPICAL HANDHOLE DETAIL a) - -.— bexmy � Mr � II7{ IN faMCR Mpal y J Iypm, De� r s/n TyV_ Snar i INb _�= SOaa saga '�•–o---�–:. sw.. haow•e Soace �+�_�� Menace Soac'e 1y roµprN �awee Ca JT{ c. loco' hva vA I wn semca oa�nenecr fWn wialnd awr � a,ca COnrROI { nl--� C I—�� rlve Gr o C.rlc.Ma ��^j�ylm Cr ClOnmvvsm9 14r{ hmaeespoc sue roru d nee a sa{ ra roru w.w.raf eros SERVICE POINT #I - 120/208V, 3 Phase, 4 Wire Service Detail va.iaw«nm p• ee sa�.oMN \ avmRd em. ca•. S..awnrwason xRaMa e.r. Aea G�naM NFGper No � t /f Cnonler_ IIAWG COe�•ev Aaiw IOM ti S�..wr RNR I� RpllvC OCONCRETELIGHT BASE DETAIL 71 SUf Mrs. LIGHT POLE, TYPE 1 DETAIL aI --l- w`m.aewrN. rr.a.,r w.n rw.s SO.e Ow CM iivwva IryvcOO rowAioeaef � 5'a S�s�arasrh+aa n An h 0 0of TYPICAL POLE BASE WIRING DIAGRAM scua .brbxr. 4 S •� GaOa ame�r� farm LIGHT POLE, TYPE 2 DETAIL n of Mmbs<aR � ngnfONN SCNf oA� CITY OF SOUTFI BEND I i �R C LL tC if o ; ron TIMM � ISfgn.wn ��Pe¢� I «ARROYN Gnf xa fR INDIANA awva lvM w.or. �M\](�(VIaw,a..aa v a`''� i SURrE.Ioa pO jp J�J[ � �(P ITVEO. SA/RfI DRwww Rff f QQ-sffs I°f � pIAMOND AVENUE TRUNK STORM SEWER I �scr.a+c v�mc froa.y • oMy� • cawnR.ar IP �.,, ELECTRICAL DETAILS I c r A r eon..bnreroro d lueao Rx c ufoseo I I _ ... CRAW/MIG _3 S�s�arasrh+aa n An h 0 0of TYPICAL POLE BASE WIRING DIAGRAM scua .brbxr. 4 S •� GaOa ame�r� farm LIGHT POLE, TYPE 2 DETAIL n of Mmbs<aR � ngnfONN SCNf oA� CITY OF SOUTFI BEND I i �R C LL tC if o ; ron TIMM � ISfgn.wn ��Pe¢� I «ARROYN Gnf xa fR INDIANA awva lvM w.or. �M\](�(VIaw,a..aa v a`''� i SURrE.Ioa pO jp J�J[ � �(P ITVEO. SA/RfI DRwww Rff f QQ-sffs I°f � pIAMOND AVENUE TRUNK STORM SEWER I �scr.a+c v�mc froa.y • oMy� • cawnR.ar IP �.,, ELECTRICAL DETAILS I c r A r eon..bnreroro d lueao Rx c ufoseo I I _ ... CRAW/MIG _3 Angela bridge looking cast up Riverside Drive December 7, 2010 STE"INTAGE LIGHTING 7401 Oak Park Ave * Niles IL 60714 BARRINGTON 5200 -FP Base Size ID - 20" H - 24" Wall Floor Thickness - .250/1.00 Fluted Shaft O.D. - 5" Wall Thickness - .188 Candy Cane Available Overall Pole Heights 5210 -FP - 10' 5212 -FP - 12' 5214 -FP - 14' 5216 -FP - 16' 5218 -FP - 18' r Scale 16 -inch = 1 -foot "r MAIN STREET -B and B -O with Glow Top Roof (MSSOS-BY(MS805-B-0) 15!6"(17" on diagonal) x 38" Mercury Vapor 100, 175, 250w High Pressure Sodium 70,100,150, 250w Metal Halide 100, 175, 250w i E 1 I i_ a Location Budget as of 11-30-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2010 Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 11/30/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original Addt'I/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 (5,550.00) 24,450.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 8,145.78 13.46 .13.46 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 204.54 28.21 28.21 10000 Totals*wwwwwwww..........w.www...w.wwwwwwwwww. 66,050.00 (5,550.00) 60,500.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 200.00 1,825.94 2,025.94 0.00 000 General Gov7. 1,501.88 5.41 5.41 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 500.00 225.00 725.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 0.00 0.00 0.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 225.00 0.00 225.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 14.42 18.01 18.01 20000 Totals ******'" 925.00 2,050.94 2,975.94 0.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 20,016.00 7,766.33 27,782.33 0.00 000 General Gov7. 32020 Travel 100.00 599.60 699.60 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32050 Instruction & Training 0.00 300.00 300.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32350 Postage 1,000.00 (642.10) 357.90 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 300.00 (219.93) 80.07. 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 33100 Printing 200.00 (161.00) 39.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 39010 Dues & Subscription 245.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. Saint Joseph County User ID ksobecki 12/07/2010 10:08 AM Page 60 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 20,463.80 3,986.20 '3,986.20 16.30 16.30 31,890.42 4,159.58 4,159.58 11.54 11.54 52,354.22 8,145.78 8,145.78 13.46 .13.46 1,890.77 135.17 135.17 6.67 6.67 520.46 204.54 204.54 28.21 28.21 225.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,636.23 339.71 339.71 11.42 11.42 26,280.45 1,501.88 1,501.88 5.41 5.41 699.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 302.53 55.37 55.37 15.47 15.47 65.65 14.42 14.42 18.01 18.01 39.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 245.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 User ID ksobecki 12/07/2010 10:08 AM Page 60 Location AWet as of 11-30-2010 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2010. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2010 thru 11/30/2010 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Original AddVI/Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation 30000 Totals **********"**"************************** 22,021.00 7,482.90 29,503.90 Location Totals "***"""'"'**"`"*"**'*'***'"**`""`"*"*** 88,996.00 3,983.84 92,979.84 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts SainSW I I ph County User ID ksobecki 12/07/2010 10:08 AM Page 61 Unencumbered Unexpended Encumbrance Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 27,932.23 1,571.67 1,571.67 5.33 5.33 0.00 82,922.68 10,057.16 10,057.16 10.82 10.82 0.00 0.00 82,922.68 User ID ksobecki 12/07/2010 10:08 AM Page 61 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION "SOUTHBEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY OF IN MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 4 NOVEMBER 2010 ADDRESS 325 S. SUNNYSIDE DISTRICT EAST WAYNE STREET HOMEOWNER LORI AND WILLIAM BROECKER RATING: HOME OMITTED IN 20035 SURVEY; 1985 SURVEY CARD LISTS IT AS CONTRIBUTING 1928 PERIOD REVIVAL; H.R. STAPP, ARCHITECT. WORK PROPOSED RE -ROOF 4 NOVEMBER: 10.00 HOMEOWNER CALLED OFFICE ABOUT PROCEDURE TO RE -ROOF HOUSE. SAID HOME WASN'T LISTED IN E. WAYNE STREET BOOK 13UT KNEW HE NEEDED "SOMETHING". 1 1:1 S HOMEOWNER CAME TO OFFICE DISCUSSED THE COMPLETE TEAR OFF OF THREE TAB ASPHALT SHINGLES AND THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW ROOF WITH ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES. ALSO THE IN-KIND REPLACEMENT OF THE RUBBER MEMBRANE ON THE FLAT ROOF. STAFF PROVIDED HIM WITH CONTRACTOR LISTING AND COA FOR THE RF--ROOF- THE: HOME IS IN THE EAST WAYNE STREET STANDARDS BOOK ON PAGE_ 10; BUT IS MISSING FROM THE 2005 CITY SURVEY. ALSO DISCUSSED WITH HIM ANOTHER PROJECT FOR THE SPRING TO REPLACE SOME WOOD SIDING ON THE GARAGE; LET HIM KNOW THAT A CHANGE OF MATERIAL WOULD NEED COMMISSION APPROVAL. h Application .- FOR - Cer•tifrcate of Appropriateness I umoric' pinesu"tio€) C onr€t)i%sion of' South 1.3c;rici & St.,Jc} r Irit Cas unly 12.5 S. I.:il, yt,"t = Blvd, So,,itl! Ii;,:cl, limli !tF i 46,601 llailinl�Aciclrcus'. C.'(r£i}i411 Itt£il:ti#);;. S.>c£tli l;;=€ut, 1£i tAt,t -lfi 0) llhmu>: 571-235-971918 • 1'a X: 5741-1145-9578 i}' • I'.n},ill: SI.7`3;c„„1'IPC <f cw.'t-j()” ,,pI'IJrl.IIs "OKlt.':I£ttI>:��°}l"11'tl'.Stlz�Si.'IIItC'i?lllls�'#:}aiiiiit<i.Ci?flt; SJi.iil�;%�iFsiil'i..ltttti) 01'E'ICI.: ISE (l,\'I.}'>w—>x IR) :i`t)'1 Cf.);i PLE;I'F ;1 NY1:,1,`TIwIF'S C£11''lAINII3 IN THIS 13O OITICI: t1SF. ONLY Daw Izc=ct•h°c°cl_.._f.l 707-clial 6 11pIiIicRitititi Past .Ruviex s. Stith'A[)I)ro\ral autliorizecl lad" ............................ _..._... _. 1`iilr+. ......._.__....... Ilistoric C:ortrti)issirr€# Revivu, Darr: LAu:al I.,aculnu€rk j1,oral Ilistt)rir District __. _. r.....! atlaoat I<andinark F Natloual Re Wer l.)iwAt t,t'trf•:?......._.._... _ Certificate of:' ppropriawness: F]Denied ! _ bl0cd ( Soo lb C;ominitttsc t% rift : _� �... -t is m _._..__._...._.._..___.._.____.._____...---.._.__....._..__.__..__ Name oI Pro ertl' Owiit=r(s): ..}.., ... xLcldn ms o 1 Prolrtwrq, C: caner{5l:._..3 + -1 t, i :. '_ ._ li_ ........__......_........_. .._ _....._.....__.._...._...__....___..........._._.___...__..._._ Contra€tor(sirrric'. (,cmtract C ump inc' Nkimer .� ` _. _..._.___.__. C outractor Address;-...__._€!�._.._.{�✓�....... ......_._ _.._ _..._.............. _ ._......_..._w. ..... ._ __._.._............._.. C:urrrrtt Use of I,uilcllnl;:....._..._ ,-. w,yq way °( . ... j--. _.........._..__ .................... __..............._........... .._......_.__.... ................_... "Ii,> e crt'1 inkling(_mistritctioti:.__...__'_°.�X�^9� t� _....._......_........... ........__........ _....,..... ....._........_,... _.................... _..............._ ._.... _..........._........_... _._._.._.._...._ Proposed i1`cirl : ±lipkind ; (I,iirtzlsc<il>r E] New r iZeI) wtumu Gnomon L I: onolition I_)cst>ri ptir)ri ciI'I'rtF :47setmcrrk;......._�*,�Ci°e,tf._`�...�`°•' �t �. �". '. `�'�.........., ��....._.�.__....._..... t'�.,''�v!r�........ _.................___._......_........._._................... _..._..............,............ ._.......__..._..__..._..........._.... _.........._ .... _.........._.__..._._... __................. _ t«�c. ai f``r'.�" 1 •.. c<.. { v a . J �P t'4 ; ?�} i `t:" _..b..°'� `"'t- ��.-�" f %.I Owner/C,ontraclor: Fxtr;..........._... ........... allc.i/qtr _._ ,tl'T'I..1C<F177C. N R 'QtEIRFAIEN-1;S ARE, LIS -111.? (7N Ezet'i:EkSESISI: Era- Tim lausezinski, President The Historic Presen ation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Complete tear off of 3 tab asphalt shingles and re -roof with architectural shingles. Remove and replace rubber membrane on flat roof. XT CREATION LLC, Contractor for the following location: 325 S. Sunnyside South Bend, IN 46615 E. Wayne Street Application No. 2010-1104 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: © located in a Local Historic ❑ A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX: (574) 235-9575 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJC11PC@co.st-loseph.tn.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFEMkBLE NATME OF APPLICANT: Witliarn IL Broeeker DATE PE&Mrr TAKES FORCE: 11/04/2010 PER;tt1T ISSUED Bt Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PIACI; ON TIIE 15'I REE r SIDE OF THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPLETION OF ALL WORK. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH REND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY TIM" I DATE 5 NOVEMBER 2010 F.11 01101 N w. DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK RATING OUTSTANDING HOMEOWNER GERI AND KEITH HATHAWAY WORK PROPOSED: IN-KIND EXTENSION OF WROUGHT IRON FENCE. About a month ago Staff was made aware of a break in at this address. In a conversation with Keith lie explained that the police suggested that they secure their property by completely enclosing the property with the wrought iron fence. 5Novernber Keith called the Office, to make an appointment to apply for the COA for the fence. Scliull Fence is custom manufacturing the fence to match the current fence that encloses all but about 14 feet Orthe property that will also include a gate. This will replace a deteriorated non original wooden fence. Application — FOR — Cer0ficate of Appropnfateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 466M Mailing Address: County City Building, q_'tu T1..A T.A.."n AAMI Phone: 574-235-97% * Fax 57'4-235-9578 Errud, SMCHPMwst-josephfttus WebsiL- httpr//www-sqosephc=4*xliammm/*-hp/indmhtaiI OFFICE USE ONLY »»>x DO NOT COMPLETE ANY EWM CONTUNM W THIS Box >">>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 6' Application Number I D . / / ">6 B Past Reviews: []3,fu (Mtequsf &.Vkw) n NO Staff Approval authorized by, Title: Historic Commission Review Date - Local Landmark Historic District (Name) 1414442r� National Landmark [IiNatlonal Register District Waw) Certificate of Appropriateness. Denied []'tabled Sent To Committee CRIApproved and Issued ',3' DATE Address of Property for proposed work. 6 0 f -P,49A.. A Lf'o St&d Number and Stred Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Pimse print) W A y Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name. Iq SH t-, e- L I— F* -9,1V e Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: city, Phone: Current Use of Building: (Single Family -Multi-F4rmity-r-ommm-ial-Commment -Industrial- Vaml -tic.) Type of Building Construction-, E,j ftm_fr_ (WoW Fraena - Stick- Stm -Steel - anade - Other) Proposed Work: 4?_1n-klnd ] Landscape [] New E] Replacement (not in -00 0 Demolition (wti burn me L= may be dWW) F�' Description of Proposed Work: P G. )41C_` )v5 w Its7- t p_41" &V Owner/Contractor: Fax and/or e-mail Titn Klusezinski. President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St, Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work Extending Metal Fence 115 feet of 48" high wrought iron including one gate 48"A8"; custom made to match current fence. COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Schnell Fence. Contractor for the follmNing location: 6o PARK South Bcntl, IN 46616 Chapin Park Application' No. 2010.110511 in the County of St. Toseph; State of Indiana; which is: Z Located in it Local Historic E] A Loc.tl Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic landmarks and/or Local historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph Count), Code. The issuance of this permit does NUF in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying vdth the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAN' (574) 2235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-niaiL-I.c,BSJCIIIIC@c,D-st-iosepli.11,.us , public. inspection at the office of the Ilistoric preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County-, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFEIRAIII.Xi NA31EOFAPPLIC.VVl': Keltb liathaway DXIT PERMIT TAKES rORCL- PERMIT ISSULD Ily: Catherine 1). Hostetler Director 11/05/2010 CATHERINE D. nos'I-EXLER, P0S'17 IN A CON'SpICUO11S PUAWEON TIIE STREET SIDE Director OF"I'llf, PROJECT ITIVITI. CO.NIPLL-nO-% OFALLWORK 601 Park or 407 Navarre; November 1.5, 2010 r ,AA 601 Park or 407 Navarre, November 15, 2010 T�T&14AJ tlp7 +4ppR f x't f R��"xj tmi a a fi«1K a °�`iW.:-'-i f� FOR THE FINEST IN FENCING r l' OI ECT INQUIRIES -T.0 MIKE KRUEGER� coo 28377:1 ?AP�iS Fid„ SE)Ui}i t: rhJi ;Ili .a { '}�h nos: South �F:fTd. 5?d,nc7?,-92C1G. Ellihtlft 5,i.4-574.9Gi}(J Fax:. 574-271-8 t 56 a i . . XEITi rrAT13A1A s _ ,.1 12 aUEP-S_IT 5 BALANCE Off RECEIPT -:Oi arnI-aUV....Oa.I.sr,..6w..'...-,a.«i•.i.. .cwnt � StreetYyRe€;p�{ # I 407 it. UA ARE STEEi � WROUGHROU Fax €qty State Zip Style Contour SOUTH BEHO � iN 46616 ["i"ZESILIENTIAL - NFOLLOW GRADE Height � �tnf alt 4 FT. BLACK THIS PROPOSAL COVERS: 1aATEitIAL ANO EAI3i1 TOI #STACL,.,13�-i/fix FT. AOF Ota #IIG 9 'ROUGHT IRON FENCE INCLUDING GATE 48" X 8" HIGH (APPROXIi- ATE) MADE TO LOOK S11,11LAR TO FENCE STYLE.* .. 11ATER,IALS ARE: TI -10 (2) 2" X 1/2" X 1/8" `CHANNEL CROs RAILS, 3/4" SQUARE BAR POINTED PIC9ETS AMOXIOATELY 4--5/t3" Ute CENTER S5PACIN6. T1110 (2) GATE AND ONE (I.) ENU POSTS 3" X }tf SQUARE WITH UALL CAPS. ATTACH TO EXIST°ING.f.30 POST: THE 04TE TO BE HADE WITH A SLIME LATCH FOR CUSTUMER'S PADLOCK. �..... ALL OATERIALS TO UE PRIPIEU ANU PAINTED BLACK. CUSTt t ER TO:::i WN.-k.ER0IT'S FR90. iIST SOCIETY AND' CITY,4�3t�I'Lt�It�Gu€� PART�iE�13� . ' z UE -'M -,AGE- :.QI" <, EXISiI C� 't> TE `IA1,S At .Oy.I P ".1004. `EtdC',E:: MAY ,fl0T BE -All t1 <;£XACT, MATCH .�T , EXISTIt1t FENCE• { IF ANY "PRIVATE CONTRACTOR" INSTALLED U 0ERGROUIIU LINES ARE DAMAGED, SCHUELL FENCE CAN Nojk. ASSUME THL COST OF REPAIR. 1*.1 AS THE GROUND RISES AND FALLS, THE FENCE WILL ALSO WISE AND FALL. PLEASE' 11101CATE: - COUNTY 6 TOWNSHiP OF JOB SITE. CLVSEST, QROSS ST:SE T. :.. µ .: .... .. .. APPROXIMATE START DATE FRO3 RECEIPT OF SIGNED CONTRACT 3-4 WEEKS WBER OF DAYS FOR CURPLETIOR AFTER ST'ARTIUG JOB 45 C0NDIT10NS I- This proposal, whan accepted by the Purchaser, becomes a contra., upon €nt t@rm5 end conditions especialty set forth hate n. It may not be modified, changed or rescinded in'anv manner except by wmen agreement of both ,S• chunit`Penco am the purchaser. It is contingent upon delays dus to ShIkes, firs, accidents androt Other causes "Yana the control o! the $attef i This contract is payable ,n full upon inv(Mca ah@€ sutastantjal completion of this work to be performed by Schuall Pence Company pursuant t0 this contra -1 This is a Crier Sate and Purchaser has r c right to defer paytnant past the true date. The Dania% agree that in Intl event Pv;ihaw does not (fay the balance ttl "lot when 109.^.:Ntd above, the de?inquant amount shalt SEAn INT€AES` OF I i:reZ PrR MON"; H !which is a annual p@ cantd4s rate of 1844i pwchaser agrees he shall be I,abis for *if coon costs. Artorhiey`s tees, ano other expenses ncvtred by Schue'i Fence Companv V A in the cci!ectrcm of any at'n(sunI due ,t.for work pkrfotmed Or mate!,a€ suevi+rtp Porst:at I. IO this contra _t._ 3- "Ail jtrCVo!wi including I*Iita!tai;om by-Ihe S@I er. are taloa ar, We COro�hon that the entre work be ec+mpieted without mtorruptOn by the Pwcha;er. Any t:I:anges initiated by the f'urrnaser are Subftn'i f;1. a4ditKatfa3 4tklfiJes.. } _ _ _ . . _ ..•' ..7. ; .- .:. Zj t .• 6 P10 40 Commence mF t'f of pe formanpe_by War psr5uanliln,*th,s coniracf. Purcnaier s^Ai hirmish Soler w8hu,!tx:itN+t sint7$rice as to the exact k7ca}iflrsS' upon purctitissr'ii.taat_prdtxtrty'C} alt: GrGpttty Ilse stakes 0-4 W-ade stakes. as'wfa?t as a n tar�€p nr.' tori and zarpos rClu(t.ng bur not tim,ted td RA ttgeKs on caNm }tris: qts tines to gr4tf%4, bmrbectrrtg,gi tither like Ntppc•,es anti such pees or . i hoes wrt d) ate -used as part df an u.Viig€cwntf st;nnk;*rtF,j'systiv^ Safer s.:al'nct be 14%xtnsiti3t lir kable to purct?aw or: anyone slit idr.it,t'na;� resu'#,ng l�pmuracct'sfi'a trrprmat+drig;ven-$nAtu .. by, FUFCftaSar`85 tome tYaet ttaCattprts C} Seen intoe and piton+, Pk mm&w shalt also ir-do n iffy ant: sage $6* ha^PIt,kS3, �€dri ,yrtEj katkiity o} S�st re3i7ttitNj }r"Jm 4VCh`shaCCL'r$!fi t?t?tgRriOt`dn•. zC6CNa(} .'`' • : . . from this rgq�taod intotma!!om due Seller torr+ pv^chwwr. is`tnat 1nf`*--_aeon which is nastily gven by the various ut.tity cdrts,araez COMWrM,xg the 10CX!* s at 0edi"ary and usua} vWcis: ut;tity kr+ev Such as vubhc Itaephono and wipric eteow.. Purctlaw. boa*i ai"i, oe teopcns,Nt- for dbam mg any pt;ba c pertn4S wtueh may to adpt;caLin and hold Seller ha?m1ess for ta4ute t6 ptua,n suet i `s. S!tduld it betome necessary 10 dtilt!(>Ek, convete or. asa!Nv to, the prover sett -g posts to retrieve exist -mg fence or buifalogs. ts, grade, t0 fig, Of to fufntsn extra €arege o! dopy, taanngs for posts. 01 0 aftPonai tabor is requ,rett not covered in the aDdve C;+nt>ac:?, ins Pwchaset agteas 10 pay for Such extra expense m-olved. 6. in cost any Chin or mote or trio Dfovisions cpmta,nd in this contract sha;i tt„r-any reaux+ be haid to tie invalid. dlagal of unsnfdrteable in any ff;50C3, SuO iriv_21,ty, illegal:ty or un"forco Itilirty !;halt flat Affect any (Ifrit' prcv,si" thereof and lms ClOnt£act snail De const€ued a% 0 }urn invalid. liia; 5� HISTORIC PRESERVATION. COMMISSION OF. SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY 0) AOUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 5 NOVEMBER 2010 ADDRESS 611 PORTAGE DISTRICT CHAPIN PARK NR/LHD RATING CONTRIBUTING HOMEOWNER , JOHN FORNASH WORK PROPOSED: REMOVE DYING MAPLE TREE IN TREE LAWN AND REPLACE WITH TREE 3 NOVEMBER ' STAFF RECEIVED E-MAIL FROM BRENT THOMPSON CONCERNING TREE AT 61 1 PORTAGE. 5 NOVEMBER CITY FORESTER FAXED PERMIT #27 AND #252 FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLANTING OF A TREE ON THE TREE LAWN. 5 NOVEMBER HOMEOWNER APPLIED FOR COA AND STAFF ISSUED RMECOA 2010-1105A A11 masms"01 Tirn 10usezinsIi-i, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Pend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: Remove hollow Norway maple tree per Brent Thompson, City Forester Permit #252 and replant with tree of owners choosing per Brent Thompson Permit 927 HISTORIC COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND Cruz "free, Contractor for the following location; 6 11 PORTAGE South Dezid, IN46617 Chapin Park Applir,ation.No. 2010-1105A in the County of St. Joscph; State of Indiana; v4iicli is: R] Located in a Local Historic Ei A Local Historic Landinark I and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 2)6 of the St. Joseph County Code, The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phan(: (5774) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the (late of issuance and is FAXI (r,, 4 9 7 ) 235-37s effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic 1'resmation Commission of South Bend and St, Joseph County, 125 S, Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bond, Indiana, (luring." normal business hours. GVFHERINE 1). HOSTETLER, Direr - THIS PERMIT IS NOT TILNN'SFERABLE I INAME OF APPLICAN-r: John IV. Fonash DATr- PER.*%trr TABES FORCE: PERM IT ISSUED IIY-. Catherine 1), Hostetler Director 11/05/2010 POST IN A CO\SPICIYOU--S PLkCEON THE STREET" BIDE: OrITT E PROJE('I'UV' I -� . ' .1 1 , Applicafion - F 7OR - Certificate of Appropiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 11; S. Lifavette Blvd., F)uth Bond, Indiana 466H Ma1lin-a Address: County -City Buil-li )uth Bond Indiana 4AWl I T114 Phonv.574-235-W798 # Fax: 5'-1.2z-9578 Email: OFFICE USE ONLY>>>>>> DO N07'COMPLE7"E'A1'Y E"WRIFS CON'MYED TN IIIIS BOX >>>>>> OFFICI]JISE ONLY Date Received--', ct-t�`" a Application Number C� 19 a� Past Reviews: E] YE (derf 1a;lRariez-) [79 NO Staff Approval authorized by: I-Itle. jw�— Historic Commission Review Date: Local Landmark E�ocal Historic District (Nattie) National Landmark National Register District (iVattle) Certificate of Appropriateness: M Denied 0 Tabled M Sent To Committee M Approved and Issued DAM Address of Property for proposed work:— ec, ,I. Plot,?, apid:51nIet Nanee Name of Property Owner( s (Ple! rr Pilitt) I Address of Property Ownerr(s):.- f - L) Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name, Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Building: Y14 tr i F -C -L a,- I Lt, (Si)l�"Ie Family d-,,tvn4ir,:ia1 - Covryo,-Cnf - 1r0at ,trial - Vamnf - eh,.) Type of Building Construction: iA-%)0-04 01.',,v: I Franu, - Rrick- Stone - Skel- Cog -rete - Other) Proposed Work: E] In-kind indscape E] New Replacement (m, in-kmJ) 1-1 Demolition (morc thin vne Nw ma.y tv checkd) LAP 1 5� Ct Description of Proposed W 2- s— ork: Q, Is' W 7/1 Lj Owner/Contractor: Fax: 10 (ni and/or — APPLIC.TrION REQ[11REMEM FSARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- Ste-plim J. Luecke, Maym N0vembc,r"5,2010 Pennit 4 #252 FAIX NO:259,47841 Nov. 05 2010 11:23AII P" S TTH'BEND OL PA R -Kc-& RECREATION �5 DEPARITIMIENT Executive Director Phillip L. St. Clair Devarimenrof Tablic Parks South Bend lndiana Jon Fonaslh 611 Portage AvC. South Bend, IN 46616 Penn:ssion is hereby gan-J ,o ibe above to remove (1) hollow Nor,vay maple tree on the property at - Re. 611 Portage Ave. 'Note: Property Owner's Responsibility, D-partment of Public P&rks Brent qTtompson Br,-nt 'rhompsori, Cl''Y.F-oyestcr FRUI :5BPARKSRNDREC St: Plien I. Luecke, m4yor 3 November j , 2010 Permit ".27 FPX NO, :2994704 Nov. 05 2010 11:25AM P1 "W" SC;CJTjH BEND 'PARKS &Z TIO' N DE-RAIRTMENT Executive Dkecto- PbilUp L. St Clair. De.,0,2rUn6nt of Public uric' South Bend Indiana John Fonash 611 portage Ave. Sooth Bend, IN 46616 Permission is hereby gralitcd to the above to plant (1) tree on the pvopely at: 611 Portage Ave. Nov -1- Property OvNnerls Responsibility, Tree List enclosed Dcpxtiment of Public Parks (Brent Thompson' Brent Thonipsoti, City Forester 321 East A-7alw Street,a South Bend, Indiana 46614 e 574-299-4765 IK PaTks Admi-istTation Fax 299-4783 * Recreadon Fax 299-4791 NZZ OF SOUTH REND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY EXCLUSIONA'OUTINE MAINTENANCE FORM DATE 5 NOVEMBER 20310 DISTRICT RIVERSIDE/CHAPIN PARK NR RATING NOTABLE HOMEOWNER JAY TIDMARSH WORK PROPOSED: REMOVE TREE LEANING IN BACK YARD AGAINST MAPLE THAT IS THREATENING BOTH MAPLE AND BACK OF HOUSE IF IT FALLS. ALSO TRIM THE MAPLE TO GET BRANCHES AND LEAVES OFF THE BACK OF THE: ROOF. 13 SEPTEMBER ON SITE STAFF VISIT AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF TREE. PROJECT REQUIRED CUA APPLICATION AND FORESTER'S OR AN ARBORIST'S REPORT ON THE TREES 20 SEPTEMBER OFFICE RECEIVED COA AND CHECK IN THE MAIL. OCTOBER THROUGHOUT THE MONTH STAFF IN CONTACT WITH HOMEOWNER VIA E-MAIL AND PHONE FOR NEEDED REPORT. HOMEOWNER CHANGED ARBORIST TO COMPLETE PROJECT. 4 NOVEMBER MR. TIDMARSH RECEIVED REPORT FROM SAN -MAR AND SENT IT AS A PDF TO OFFICE. 5 NOVEMBER STAFF ISSUED COA FOR REMOVAL. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropilateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing A AA- ng,South Send, T—A.ana— Arrmi Drone: 574 -235 -TM * Pax 574-235.9578, # Emafl.SBSJCHPC@costiosePhin.us Website: htty://www.s"hamqindWmcx)m/s chp/ftidocltnil OFFICE USE ONLY>3.>>>>DONOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONBRVEDRVII1156 BOX >>>>>>OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received %5* Application Number Past Reviews. afis (r)afe of Lgg Revkv) 14'4� A,!Vo a.., E]NO Staff Approval authorized by. Tltle:__414� Historic Commission Review Date: E] Local Landmark cal Historic District Ova#,) National Landmark [] National Register District Ova=) Certificate of Appropriateness: n Denied [] Tabled E) Sent To Committee n Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work:* Name of Property Owner(s): (P1=,PrW) Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: 'Q Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: � N VV r s S a � .',p City: , Phone: Current Use of Building: .1 n cx {Singh iams7y Type of Building Construction: woa� 11CM,"Va (jVood Frame - Brick- SIM - SW - Cmcmte - Other) Proposed Work: n In-kind MLandscape [] New n Replacement (rat ink" [] Demolition (mm than = is inay be d=W) Description of Proposed Work: Q'( -6;%A-41WOOP 4- ot Owner/Contractor. Fax* e-mail r A WcortrslxWWWJvniyrnre -- APPUCA77ON REQUIRUMM ARE USM D ON and/or Thn Klusezinski, President HISTORIC COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND The I listoric preservation Commission of Soutb Bend and St. Joseph County has revicived the proposed Nvork: Remove dying, diseased Gurnwood tree by northwest corner of the house that is threatening the house and a healthy Maple per San -Mar Arborists. Trim Maple away from roof, San -Mar Tree & Maintenance, Contractor for the following location: 938 RIVERSIDE South Bend, IN 46616 Itiverside Drive Application No. 2010-tI05 in the County ofst. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: R] I.,ocated in a 1,ocul Historic E) A Loval historic landniark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend 'Municipal Code and Chal)tcr,-)6 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient frorn the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the, County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Governinent. Phone; (5-4) 235-9798 This, permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FXX(5-14) 235.9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are oil file and open for L-ma11-SW';JCIlPCpublic inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 125 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. 0 LR M CNI11F]UNE D. HOSTETIff"R, Director TIIIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NANILOFAPPI1C_AN`I: JayTidtnarsh 1).1TE Pi-.'R'mrr TA KUS FORCE: 11/051/2010 PEP-Nirr ISSUMD BY. - Catherine D. Hostetter Director* POST INA CONSPICUOUS PIACI' ON 111E,'U'REETSIDE OF THE, PROJECf UVI'll, CONIPITTION OFAII,WOItK. .........sf 938 Riverside, September 13, 2010 PAMlow -rat WK so 0, wy ; 7A, Ault; 11,1"Jo YIN' Af Q 20 "T tot MGM f• Yk f6i V S �t?, ?Vq. oil T -"S4. mi n "'K 'Y 1� psi, ASV AN 021' IVA Q Asia, wK QV a am - v wu "tA V '"I . A , X too, N, R, AWN, A VIVOt;liDAvg all- A 4M N 4 w to tow 1 CAW, A IN 938 Riverside, September 13, 2010 777 p 1577 TO A not "A" loop, oil J A A AT fe Mot ,41 'j A cow -24 TVsOW wA Its, 14 All WA Vgy 670 Page I of 2 Catherine Hostetler - RE: COA for tree removals "Xv= From: Jkv Tidmarsh To: Catherine Hostetler Date: 11,15/201.0 9:13 AM Subject: RE: COA for tree removals Attachments: Catherine, , I am attaching a. PDF cope of the report from our arborist about why the tree needs to be taken down. I might add to his letter that the tree is leaning against as very pretty ni ' aple in. our back yard (indeed, if not for one of the branches of the maple that acts as as support. the tree would have fallen over onto our roof long ago). When this tree does fall over, which it will eventually do because it is growing at an angle rather than straight up, it is likely to take the maple with it. I want to preserve the maple. The tree we are taking down is a scrub tree. The arborist thinks it is a. gumwood: in any event, it is neither a, maple nor an oak like the, other trees in our yard and hei&borbood. I think our COA also asked for permission to trim a few maple branches that have started to reach our roof as well. Horget if asked for that or not, but I wanted you. to .know that the arborist will do some trimming of the inaple, but will cortainly not, take it down. Thanks very much. Please let, me know if you need more information, Jay Jay Tidmarsh 938 Riverside drive 288-71026 (h) 631-6985 ) (w) .. .... . . . ... ... . .... . From: Catherine Hostetler [mailto:CHOSTETL@co.st-joseph.in-us) Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 11:32 AM To: Jay Tidmarsh Subject, COA for tree removals ftle:HCADocuments and Settin \ Page 2 of 2 3ay, we still have not received your arborist's report so that we can Staff Approve the removal of your trees. Our fax number is 235 9578. Please advise. Thank you Catherine Director, Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana 574 235 9798 San -Mar Tree & Maintenance 54555 Pine Road South Bend, Indiana 46628 Tclex574-232-6081 Fax 574-232-3225 Cell 574-28"884 11/04/1011. Jav Tidmarsb 9313 Riverside Dr. - South Bend, In, 46619 To whom it may concern: In regards to the tree that is on the North/west corner of the home. We feet that in our professional opinion that this tree must be taken down. There is (1) large branch that is hanging directly over the home. Taking this branch off would be more than 50% of the tree. This would not live anyway. There is also evidence of carpenter ants, & decay, Respectfully 4grank W. Alartinrz 4q Contractor - SOUTHHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIO OF ! . ST. JOSEPH COUNTY1 ROUTINE MAINTENANCE FORM S DATE 12 NOVEMBER 2010 DISTRICT RATING LOCAL LANDMARK HOMEOWNER CHARLES WILLIAMSON WORK PROPOSED: TO REMOVE AND REPLACE THE ROOF ON THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AND .REPLACE WITH ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES 12 NOVEMBER HOMEOWNER COMPLETES COA APPLICATION FOR IN- KIND RE -ROOF WITH ARCHITECTURAL SHINGLES. HOME OWNER DOING THE WORK WITH HELP FROM RELATIVES. 18 NOVEMBER ONSITE STAFF VISIT AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF WORK CURRENTLY IN PROGRESS AND BEING PROPERLY EXECUTED. 41 701 W. LaSalle, November 18, 2010 Application - FOR - C rtiheats Certificate of Approptiate ness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SC Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 M -011n ArtArmmn county-CityVvjT_4tq CZovflk Ra"A Indiana 46601 Phone: 574 -235 -TM 9 I= 574-23,5-9578. # Email: SBSjCHPC&ost-joscphin.us Website: bttp.//i,a,NNivsqosephcoun4indiana.com/s chp/indexhW OMCE USE ONLY >>>>>> DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENMIES COMAMED IN 77115 BOXOMCE USE O'VLy Date Received /'�I? C;20/" Application Number -Zd / e) . Z Past Reviews: Ej YES (Date cl u4t xr,*-x) Ej NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: PLocal Landmark 0 Local Historic District (Name) [] National Landmark [] National Register District (lvamr) Certificate of Appropriateness; [-I Denied E] Tabled F1 Sent To Committee � Approved and Issued Address of Property for proposed work: z/ 11,1h St tW) =smdStrerf Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Address of Property Owner(s): J U Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address, 1Z 7—A,,ff XO 14 DATE City: Phone: Current Use of Building, S 11'rL_ - (Single ramify -M i -F 'y- corimercial- Government -Industrial -Vacant - tic.) Type of Building Construction: (WWd Frame - Brick - Stone - Sted - Concrete - Wer) Proposed Work: In-kind Landscape New Replacemely (not in-kh,:d) F1 Demolition (mm than one fox may to diccW) r" Description of Froposed Work:C'C. til Owner/Contra Fax: e-mail M;�of Wt - *IM0111y - and/or Tim Musezinski, President COMMISSION 0 IS �10' N OF -TVO7UTH BEND AND S ST OS PH T. JOSEPH C CO W OUNTY 11 iV11,111-fill The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviewed the proposed work: To remove and replace the roof on the existing structure with asphalt architectural shingles. Homeowner, Contractor for the following location: 7ot"SALLE South Bend, IN 466ol Application No. 2010-1112 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: 0 Located in a Local Historic R1 A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government~ Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX; (574) 235-9579 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail- SBSJCHPC@co.st-joscphJn.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, 12$ S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINE D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NAMEOFAPPLICA-Mr- Charles EAVilliamson DATE PEPUAIrr TAM FORCE: 11/12/2010 PFmirr issuFm By. Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON THE STREET SIDE OF THE PROJECr UNTIL COMPLMON OF ALL NVORIL HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISS10111 OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EXCLUSION FORM DATE 15 NOVEMBER 2010 DISTRICT RIVERSIDE DRIVE RATING CONTRIBUTING WORK PROPOSED: REPLACE LEAKING FLAT ROOF AND DAMAGED INSULATION WITH IN-KIND RUBBER MEMBRANE ROOF ON NON -HISTORIC REAR STRUCTURE. ALSO REPLACE ANY MISSING SHINGLES. 14 NOVEMBER PHONE CONVERSATION WITH HOMEOWNER CONCERNING SCOPE OF PROJECT. DETERMINED THAT IT COULD BE STAFF APPROVED SINCE IT WAS ALL IN-KIND WORK. 15 NOVEMBER MR. PRICE ARRIVED AT OFFICE WITH COMPLETED APPLICATION AND CHECK. .ISSUED RMECOA 2010-1115 FOR IN-KIND WORK Application — FOR — Cer0ficate of Appropfiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 17.5 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 AX-2111fift Address: i ounty»City n ng,"xruth Tz,—A Indict, AA4ni Phone. 574-235-9798 - F= 574-235-9578 - Emal- SWCHIMost -joseplLin.us Website: ht[F//wwwstjosepkountN dbmcom/sjchp/index htrrd OFFICE USE ONLY >>>>>> DO NOT COMPU77: ANY ENTRIES COAMINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 16' Xd4Y 0201, Application Number PastReviews: ErWS(Vte0f1M1xer*W) F1 NO Staff Approval authorized by. 4 Title: Historic Commission Review Date: []Local Landmark E31' )cal Historic District (vone) n National Landmark [] National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: C] Denied [] Tabled [] Sent To Conmdttee Q-,Kpproved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work, ShVd VWnber and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) Alin t, 061 Address of Property Owner(s). 60 lhc., Contractor(s) Name: Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City: Current Use of Building: Type of Building Construction: Phone: 133—�4�q q 6 (Wb&F==— Bra — Slow— Sted —Concrete —Other} Proposed Work; q1n-kind [] Landscape 0 New tmi than one box "tay be dedazi) Description of Proposed Work: -- fcvk-1,r1 Owner/Contractor. Fax: 71' ir E] Replacement (not in kind) F1 Demolition -qR�; and/or Tirn latiscAnsId, President MCI I'm COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Phone: (574) 235-9798 FAX: (574) 235-9578 t, I 0 W M V THERINE D. HOSTETIA',R, Director r, Wj 111 "191 The Historic Prcsemation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has ri-Mewed the proposed work: In-kind replacement of rubber membrane roof on non -original rear addition to home. MARRIOTT CONSTRUCTION, Contractor for the follovim,n location: I 1049RIVIAL5I13E South Bend, IN 466W Riverside Drive Application No. 21010-1115 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana,., which is: f7i Located in to 1,ocnI Historic L7 A Local Historic 1.andmarly and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landwarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the I listoric Preserv-ation CommLision are found hi Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Cock( and Chapter 26 of the St, ,Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying Nvith the requirements, of the toning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other 0 requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is effective from the date entered herein. I'lansare on file and open for public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Conimissdon of South Bend and St, Joseph County. 125 & Lafayette Blvd, (mailing address: 227 West Jefferson Blvd), South Bend, Indiana, during nOrlual business hours. THIS PERMIT IS NOT TRANSF ERAIILE NNANIEOI' Ai,Pnmv,r, AnnG.aridnornns Price DAIM PE&MIT TAKES FORCE: 11/15/2010 PERMIT ISSUED BY: POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PIACF os Tin', sntir'r SIDE 01"110 PROJECT UNTIL C0'MPIx,,1I0N OF A"W01M HISTORIC PRESERVATION 7. SOUTHi=_ & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ROUTINE MAINTENANCE FORM DATE 6 DECEMBER 2010 ADDRESS 557 EDGEWATER DRIVE DISTRICT EDGEWATER PLACE DATING LOCAL LANDMARK HOMEOWNER TINA ASSIIvtoS WORK PROPOSED: REPLACE 3 EXISTING WINDOWS ON REAR 2ND FLOOR PORCH -.EXTERIOR TRIM AND SILL. TO BE UNDISTURBED. 30 NOVEMBER SPOKE WITH WAYNE DOOLITTLE CONCERNING THE STAFF PHOTOGRAPHS FOR THIS PROJECT. 1 DECEMBER SPOKE WITH TINA ASSIMOS AND BOB GRANT, CONTRACTOR CONCERNING THIS PROJECT. 3 DECEMBER WAYNE DOCUMENTED ENCLOSED FORMER SLEEP PORCH IN REAR OF HOUSE. 6 DECEMBER SPOKE WITH BOB GRANT AND MARVIN WINDOW REPRESENTATIVE, LANCE CONCERNING THE PROPOSED REPLACEMENTS. CONTRACTOR ARRIVED AT OFFICE WITH DOCUMENTATION AND APPLICATION. RME COA 2010.1206 WAS ISSUED FOR IN-KIND REPLACEMENTS. Application - FOR - Certificate of,Appropriateiiess historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 123 S. Lafayette Blvd, South Bend, Indiana 4(kOl 4 :1, ( A A I ,its, r- 4 0.t v � n , KZ,, if rZ,, A I ... 4; A AJn I ;I rl 1 i oun v- I 1 4 Slr5* I'm'101PO Plv)i w: 57 1-1)5 979S• FxcS)74.2�&9378 aiL, l Wvb�,iV lct luntyi nAl iattail OITICE USE ONLY—- S NOT COMPUTE ANYEWRIES CONTUNED IN THIS BOX >>>>>> OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received !!9„ 47 z . ao 0 Application Number_ . . ...... _......... / _�/ 0 - 10206 Past Reviews: 0 YES NO Stall'Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ;oral Landmark [-; K �jj _scat Historic District wamr) National Landmark i'i National RvgisterDis(rict (Nalml- Certificate of Appropriateness: roved and Issued [7 Denied f Tabled Sent To Commilt(T J�pp Address of Property for proposed worl- Nwnh-r ar-d 5frrc ,., M -me Narne or Property Owner(s): Prml) 7-;,,, �( Address of Property Owner(s)- _6 j" -4- ?P� _5 Contractor(,-,) Name, /3v b (5-,-tr .'-f Contract Company Name: Contractor Address: City:_ Pimp: C�) tt- �j Ci Current Use of Building: Ax Type of 1.31 fitd ing Construction- e C, f Pri, k - - S!4,t-I - O!,"11 -r) Proposed Work: �1n-kind �"ndscallv [_-New F711)pmolifion Description ol'ProposedWork: e_x) lc� h", Owl Fax: tt :D — -5 We andfltar — APPLICA77ON IZEQUIRIAMNIIS A RfLISTED ON REII'RSE SIDE — Quality Window& IX)or Co., Lance Roush 2984527 Assimos: 130b Grant / Assimos Version 8.47 12/02/10 **'PRlCl`SIJSTF'DIN1JSD*#* QUANITFY SURFACl-;A:'R0j)UC'j- Of skies 2 CLAD UUTIMAIT' . CASL-MbM' VENI'lNo PICIVRE ROU0l4OPJNlN(!70"X43" FRAME SIZE 09" X 42 1/2" 1 Q1 Jon- comm 1 DIVIDED I.IIT: 1 118' RECrANGUIAR S1MU1,ATF3j*) I)IVIDFD 1,11,E W111 I SPACER BAR AS VII WI -D FROM THE I-XITMOR Ell sides (TAD UIXIM/01" CAStMiKj'pIU1'URL ROUGH OPENING 77* X 43 3/4" FRAM -81711-76"X431/4' QI1OT-L-'WWM)2 GRILLUSIMULAIED DIVIDED 1,111— 1 M* RIXTANOULAR SMJI,AIT-D DIVIDED Lr1*L- - Wf 111 SPACER BAR AS VIEWID MZOMTJ 11, VXMUOR I DFN(TMS FXCF-,IyrlONS 1*0 111 F SPEC CONTIM JED ON NFA7 PM F I -A(-; E 2 2,371-20 991.75 SM) T(TrAl,- 3.362,45 7,000% SALES TAX: 235,37 PROJEC'I'TOTAL PRIM. 3,597.82 Marvin Wm=vs & Wars, MDS Vorzion 1 f3m, hl:)S RD Tabs Version 18.0, MDS RB Gcdt� Vasion 18.0 jA4 P;l C- t Gczllu: 0/4' - 1'-0, .-ag mato: CUCAPI-CCS-CM C R.O: 70" x 43' M 0- &q Il?' x 42 3/4' Prcjccl Nam,,; Unli[Ld SOME PIC TUP. F W! NDO �,V'S ARE W01�"i'-I-.! il ORE 3IlAt*AT,'-.Ir.'SAtJD -i'll)["DS. N i'D FEATURES I R D kl,,,A R E LOCV "VE P -TAILS HANOU:1 ,;.. 4E�e - 4 i .,, .,..�, .>.i,,,z b ,. �' .-. � �- „ . ,. ,. ,. � r.. �- � „ �- ;. .. ,.,, ., z ... r, .,. s r ` - �,;/y5 � � � v � .. _ - � � � �� - .,. ' � _ f '� I{ .. P a S 3 .. ._ ,.. _ ,.A .,. ...µ, ..�. � € r t s 4 dp., i .. :557 Edgewater December 3, 2010 7'7 V�� 'Z :557 Edgewater December 3, 2010 \ i , `.. � � «f L++ � .�`.i'�K.^ • Y q ye srK,a , ° � , , yn.„° > ». •.......,..�, w w' p'�3 \!i i,�.,' •Y '�-�'��.gg�,j..�»''�`i � i y ca•' rya°.s ��a>} �F �,},-'�'a°'c . —�� Y\ 'YK `d v. ww e ' ,, , t ,1'" -. 4 •Y�'� p�Y `s�� rri'ir`'`�' A a 'S ..... i' i�� 4@ w� aa ?'Kn°�<"%.•m' vel. �.' �"'.e, 3 t•+t 4 <ey. a��r � e V yc•«• S� 3 p}„ •�� — folio ep �•�\,ww5 e � { + _ °� 4 • � mom' owv�.`.^ -. In , : � � � °•°�. \ ; ` :�__ �: •e..=�b. fie" i " •. .`" `.. _., , c ' fes,• • _ � >:�° .(: .Y far �'; �,:" �,,. '3 `�;&`W dff AW jr: Tim Klusezinsld, President The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County has reviLived the proposed work: In kind replacement of 3 picture windows in rear of house on enclosed sleeping porch with Marvin venting picture windows, =-- 11-1*3111164 V IR VOLK WTA LIU 0. COMMISSION OF =FOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY BOB GRANFCONSTRUCTION, Contractor for the folloNiing location: 557 EDGEAVATFAt ,IN46618 Edgmater Place Application No. 2010.1206 in the County of St. Joseph; State of Indiana; which is: Located in a Local Historic A Local Historic Landmark and found this application to be appropriate according to the Standards pertaining to Local Historic Landmarks and/or Local Historic Districts. Regulations pertaining to the Historic Preservation Commission are found in Chapter 21 (Zoning), South Bend Municipal Code and Chapter 26 of the St. Joseph County Code. The issuance of this permit does NOT' in any manner, release the recipient from the responsibility of complying with the requirements of the zoning ordinances, building codes, safety codes, ADA or other requirements of the City of South Bend, the County of St. Joseph, the State of Indiana, or the United States Federal Government. Phone: (574) 235-9798 This permit is good for one year from the date of issuance and is FAX- (574) 235-9578 effective from the date entered herein. Plans are on file and open for E-mail: SBSJCIIPCC"o,st-joseph1n.us public inspection at the office of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, i25 S. Lafayette Blvd. (mailing address: 227 IYCst Jefferson Blvd.), South Bend, Indiana, during normal business hours. CATHERINEi D. HOSTETLER, Director THIS PER HT IS NOT TRANSFERABLE NXIME OF APPLICAINT: Tina Assimos DATE PERMIT TAKES FORCE: 12/o6l2olo PETWIT ISSUED BY. Catherine D. Hostetler Director POST INA CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON T1IESTREKr SIDE Or, THE PROJECT UNTIL COMPIX-flON OP AL1., Director's Report December, 2010 15 November Met with Councilwoman Ann Puzzello at HPC Office about the South Bend Maennerchor Club and its possible connect to St. Joseph Parish. Issued a RME COA to Tom Price for a Roof for 1049 Riverside Drive. Provided research for Desiree Andrew on 527 Lafayette that she is renting to own. Provided Chapin Park information for homeowner of 309 W. Marion. HPC monthly meeting. 16 November Issued and mailed approved COAs. Contacted John Machowiak of the City of South Bend and faxed him the waiver for Fire Station #9. He apologized profusely about the mix up. E-mailed the South Bend Tribune the HPC meeting schedule as well as Helen Witucki and Marsha Qualls for the meeting room and security. E-mailed Libby from Champion the 2011 schedule and deadlines. Contacted St. Anthony's about 22 November presentation to the Third Grade class on local history. Completed and submitted fifteen 106 Reviews. 17 November Met with Carl Brunson owner of 655 River about proposed work on the house. Wayne met with him on -sight to review projects with him. Provided additional information on 527 N. Lafayette from our files on architects. Conversation with Ted Fod of Memorial Hospital on preservation in general and current medical concerns with the building of the Oncology and Children's Hospital. 18 November Began to organize materials for Third Grade presentation. Spoke with Scott Peacock about this work on 1231 East Wayne South and had a copy of the COA in the building department for his window permit. Followed up with Mary Jo Filipek at St. Anthony's. BSSB meeting from 5:30-7:30. 19 November Spoke with property manager, Morgan La Fleur, about the JMS Building signage and 803 W. Washington. Contacted Building Department about sign on 626 Portage. Turned in payroll. Finished prep work for presentation. 22 November Reviewed Area Plan Agenda for historic sights or landmarks Spoke with Mark Lyons about the sign at 626 Portage. Completed nineteen 106 reviews. Organized for absence for surgery. Made presentation to 34 third graders at St. Anthony's. 23 November -3 December Sick Leave for surgery and Thanksgiving Holiday 6 December Met with Patrick Henthorne concerning City COA for lighting on Angela Bridge, Round about at the Angela and Riverside Intersection and pathway from Riverside Drive through Shetterly Park. Prepared Requisitions for encumbering funds for over year's end to pay for 2010 expenses billed in January. Met with Bob Grant for window replacement at local landmark 557 Edgewater and issued RME-COA for in-kind replacement windows. Met with Mr. Pietrzak and Mr. Brunson to accept their COAs for the December meeting. Spoke to John Lox of South Bend Silver and Gold about the facade work he proposed on the storefront of the JMS building and the signage. Advised that his architect will need to apply for a COA for work. Completed three 106 Reviews. 7 December Followed up with Patrick Henthorne on COA specifics on historic lighting options and proposed materials for path way. Reconciled Location Report and faxed Requisitions to encumber funding. Prepared Staff Reports for December HPC meeting. On site visit to River View Cemetery to photograph the installed lighting. On site visit to Riverside Drive and Angela area for photographs. Also passed by House of Squalor on Leland featured in S.B. Tribune. Completed five 106 Reviews. 8 December Staff Reports for the 20 December HPC meeting. Contacted Tim Wall via e-mail with HPC's comments on the Ewing Street Improvements. Completed two 106 Reviews. 9 December Completed Staff Reports and RME-COA Reports for Commissioners' meeting packets. Followed up on various inquiries for information on houses and local districts. 10 December Followed up on e-mail request for John Freidline on information on Easement for 803 W. Washington and JMS Building. Mailed packets and sent agendas and staff reports to applicants. Spoke with Larry concerning John Freidline's easement issues. Arranged to meet with 2 ND students doing some research for class. 13 December Completed research for information and composed letter to John Freidline. Met with building commissioner, Chuck Bulot and gave him copy of letter. Chuck also said that he had an issue pending with him as well concerning the house on 410-412 Williams as a clerical error occurred allowing him to install 3 meters. The Building Department informed him of the error and is requiring him to return it to single family. Office research visit from Caitlin Smous and Joe Hiben. Spoke with the "owner" (problematic deed) of the burned out, land -marked Firehouse #4 on Thomas Street and assured him that HPC will be at the Code hearing requesting demolition to support his case to continue to restore the structure. Followed up via e-mail with Ryan Dvorak and Mary Ellen O'Connell on 219 W. North Shore and other neighborhood concerns. 14 December Office supply inventory to prepare requisition for balance of 2010 Office Supply Funds. Spoke with John Machowiak about the window replacement option for Fire House #9 and arranged to meet with Jesse Starke of BEE Window on 15 December. 15 December On site visit to Fire House #9 met with Chief Andy Petrie, John Machowiak at 1:30 and Jesse Starke (he was an hour late!) at 2:30 to see the proposed replacement window. Since John signed the continuation for COA#2010-1101 and the BEE Window Anderson option appeared to be acceptable we will put it on the Agenda for the 20 December meeting, both Jesse and John will be there. Returned John Freidline's phone call and left a message on his voice mail. 16 December On site visit to Local Land Marked Fire Station #4 1240 Thomas for Code Hearing at 1:30. Attended Code hearing and met David Stevens who holds a problematic deed to the building. 1240 Thomas was boarded up when it was land marked in 1999 and has fallen into disrepair especially after a 2007 fire destroyed all of the wood flooring and most of the roof. Mr. Stevens was given until 13 June 2011 to make repairs, obtain clear tide and perform the continued maintenance on the structure required by Code. Spoke with John Freidline about his concerns with non -conforming use at 410-412 N. William Street in the Chapin Park LHD; he has two options prove that it was continuously occupied as a multi family since May, 2004 or turn it into a single family residence. Freidline did have the same conversation with Building Commissioner Charles Bulot and may turn the issue of to his attorney, Mr. Wertheimer. Composed and mailed out Staff Report to Commissioners for Local Landmark Fire House #9 windows. Participated in a 5:30 BSSB meeting at the Conservatories. 17 December Arranged meeting with Michiana Jewish Historical Society for January 13 at the Jewish Federation with new president, Maggie Goldberg. Contacted Mary Ellen O'Connell about a January meeting concerning West North Shore Triangle area and the possibility of a district. Faxed Jesse Starke of BEE Window the Staff report since all mail goes to Lafayette. Continued to work with Patty Godsey to correct the snafu with Elicia's pay. Assistant Director's ReDort HPC Meetina 12.20.2010 1. City Cemetery National Register Nomination -Once again transferring nomination to the newest form. Revising Sections 1-7, editing Narrative Description. Photograph old maps from Center for History and edit. Going through all files to gather additional research and to complete the bibliography. Recorders Office for maps. Portage Township Assessor office. 2. Re -organizing files/emails/calendar/etc. after returning from 9 week FMLA leave. 3. Restore Michiana Series -Reinstate website and domain name with 2 year renewal to expire November 2012. Update website. Working on developing programming for 2011. 4. RMS 2010 Window Restoration Production -Correspondence with Grass Roots Media regarding pre -production schedule. Fax to Spigelmyer. Critique Kalamazoo window instructional video with Wayne and deliver with comments to Grass Roots. Review 1 It chapter of WNIT Why video. Informal meeting at HPC office with Andrea of Grass Roots. Review YouTube videos of window restoration for examples. Begin outline for narrated script. Working on template for starting a window project. Meeting at WNIT with Brenda Bowyer, Angel Hernandez, Brian (editor), Paul Hoyden, and Todd Zeiger to go over changes to the first chapter of the WHY video. 5. RMS 2011 Energy Audit Raffle -Correspondence with legal council to discuss details of a raffle. Discussion with representative of LangLab at 1302 High Street regarding a possible windows workshop. 6. Preview www.SaveTheWindows.ora by the National Trust. Suggest Schoberg Restorations for inclusion on the contractors map. Print flyer to hang on HPC office door. Share website with Facebook friends of HPC. 7. Research in HPC Resource Center and at SJCPLibrary Mr. George A. Schock for a lady in Massachusetts who phoned the office. 8. Preparing the 2011 newsletter for a January 3 release. 9. Prepare 11.15.10 HPC meeting minute draft and forward to Commissioners. Revise as requested. Print and forward minutes from November meeting to Catherine for December meeting. Print commissioner and liaison mailing labels. 10. Staff Reports - 626 Portage: correspond with Mark Lyons of Building Department. Phone call with Cynthia Ringsberger of St. Germain Foundation. Site visit to meet with Katiki and business partner regarding more appropriate scaled signage, delivered a copy of the district standards and guidelines. Phone call with Ed Bassett of Ed's Sign World regarding dimensions and materials of sign. Meeting with Katiki to discuss Fire Department violation report. Phone calls with Cynthia. 537 Edgewater: phone call with homeowner regarding CoA procedure. Phone call with Quality Window and Door regarding Marvin specs. »»»»»»»»»»>over 11. Site visit to Landmarked Firestation #9 regarding window replacement. Catherine and I met with Chief Andy, John of City Maintenance, and Jesse of Bee Window (who was an hour late). 12. Attended code hearing on 1240 Thomas -burned out firestation. 13. Grants- Grants.gov-Continue to register for this site so that in the future, HPC can apply for competitive grants. Investigate into a possible grant for digitizing files. Historic Preservation Education Grants 2011 -research into possibilities of applying for this grant. Forward packet to Ezra of Opera LaSalle for review. 2 MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY December 20, 2010 13'h Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, Todd Zeiger, Linda Riley, Jerry Niezgodski, , David Steinhauer, Lynn Patrick Members Absent: Sandra Rossow Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Legal Counsel; Catherine Hostetler, Director, Elicia Feasel, Assistant Director Members of the Public Present: John Machowiav, Jesse Starke, Jason Ruiz, Aaron Carizo, Joan Downs-Krostenko, Katiki Lipscomb, Carl Brunson, Patrick Hethon II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Chair announcement of an additional COA 2010-1101 added to agenda, whereas public hearing was held November 15, 2010 during regular HPC meeting and was voted continued. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: November 23, 2010 Application Number: 2010-1123 Property Location: 626 Portage Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1 part commercial/1927 Property Owner: Saint Germain Foundation, c/o Cynthia Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Local and National Register District Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: Building is a one storey commercial with rectangular plan. Foundation is concrete, exterior walls are brick with vertical siding applied to front. Roof is flat with a stepped parapet in front. There is a projecting cornice that spans the front facade. ALTERATIONS: Vertical vinyl siding applied to front, solid panel replacement door in front, front windows removed and/or covered over with siding. APPLICATION ITEMS: Have a sign put up on the building. See attachment for details. Replace back door and have a gate added to the chain link style fence. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Tenant is proposing a sign for the building that will represent the business. Neighborhood is zoned mixed use. According to the Building Department guidelines, size cannot exceed 10% of the area of the facade, in this case 33 square feet. The proposed sign is 4' x 6', 24 square feet. Sign will be a digital print on hard vinyl. Sign will attach to structure with screws. South Bend Fire Department Notice of Violation . and Order report requests that a new back door be installed because the current wood door is rotted. Staff does not have details at this time as a contractor has not been hired. In addition, the reports requests that a gate be added to back fence. Building owner suggests removing a portion of the gate rather than adding a gate. Project is pending a letter of support from the owner. CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: I. THE ENVIRONMENT B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING & ACCESSORIES Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Prohibited Metal, vinyl, or fiberglass awnings, hoods, and fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends replacement of 3 windows. These windows are not original to the house, only to the addition. Furthermore, windows are in the rear and side of house, not visible from the street and will retain a uniform appearance to the rest of the house as the existing storm windows will remain on. On a motion by Linda Riley to approve with a second by Lynn Patrick Vote: 6-0 COA 2010-1206A was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 6 December 2010 Application Number: 2010-1206B Property Location: 655 River Avenue Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Gabled-ell/l894 Property Owner: Carl Brunson Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Rating: Listed as a non contributing vacant lot in 2005 Survey DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: This house is a one storey structure with an attic set upon an irregular brick foundation situated on a double lot at the dead end of River Avenue. There is a tall brick chimney on the west side. The exterior walls are covered with wood shingle siding and the cross gable roof is covered with fiberglass shingles. The 2/2 windows and storms appear to be original to the house. The 4/1 wood windows may be original to the enclosure noted in the 1933 on the Assessor's Card. The entry door may be original to the house. ALTERATIONS: The Assessor Card notes that in 1933 the porch was enclosed and that there was an addition to the front of the house. It also notes that there was wood siding which was covered after 1949 with the current siding application. The roof has been replaced with a COA approved on November 17, 1987 with Owens Coming Fiberglass shingles. The flat roof surface is covered with rolled aluminum roofing. APPLICATION ITEMS: 6' X 12' addition to northwest corner of home per attached illustration and description submitted. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Mr. Brunson proposes to construct an addition to the rear of his house. There will be a new concrete foundation poured (this house does not have a full basement) and new framing. The existing siding will be salvaged and reused to cover the exterior walls. A window will be salvaged from the exterior wall at the site of the new construction and placed in the new exterior wall. The extended flat roof will be covered with rolled aluminum roofing and tie into the current roofing materials. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Edeewater Place: III. NEW CONSTRUCTION A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories in high and are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few single story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater that that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Wall materials in the district range from brick, clapboard, shingles and masonry to aluminum siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in type, scale, texture, and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. 3 visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carred through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material: Addtions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the restoration of historical lighting to the Bridge recommended and permitted in COA 2003-0616. The selection of the Main Street -A and Leesburg fluted shafts compliment the architecture of the Bridge and the street light styles in the area. RIVERSIDE DRIVE: DESCRIPTION OF SITE: Northwestern and Northeastern edge of the Riverside Drive Local Historic District that includes a narrow eastern strip of Brown Field Park bordering Riverside Drive and the land between Angela Boulevard to the crest of the hill between the St. Joseph River and Riverside Drive. APPLICATION ITEMS: For this PROJECT, The City will be installing a new trunk storm sewer down Diamond Avenue to improve drainage and to remove storm water from the combined sewer system. During the design process we asked the engineers to do some traffic and lighting and pedestrian/bicycle facilities upgrades. The following work will be performed in the Riverside Historic district (Exhibit C&D): 1. Install a roundabout at the intersection of Riverside/Angela. This will reduce pedestrian -auto conflicts. 2. The roundabout will move the Riverside/Angela intersection away from the bridge over the St. Joseph River, improving the sight distance and to create a valuable public park space along the river. Riverside will be shifted to the west to align with the new roundabout. 3. We are planning on installing a multi -path extension up the hill to Shetterly Park in the future. 4. Signage, lighting and pavement markings will be improved. (Drawings 1-3) DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The proposed Roundabout will cause for the reconfiguration to the northwest of Riverside Drive on the fringe of Riverside Drives LHD. It will create on the east side of Riverside Drive additional land to construct a 10 foot wide concrete pathway to connect with the current River Walk/Bike Path on the north side of Angela Boulevard. This Pathway will begin at the newly configured intersection and terminate toward the top of the hill near an overgrown grouping of volunteer trees (that are proposed to be removed). The work proposed for the area in Brown Field Park will have an impact the actual district boundaries by moving a short section of Riverside Drive through the Park area on the northwest and with the addition of two street lights on the east side of the Park along Riverside Drive. (Exhibits D&E) 1. THE ENVIRONMENT RIVERSIDE DRIVE LHD GUIDELINES A. THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENT The district is characterized by its proximity to downtown South Bend and by its intimate relationship with the St. Joseph River. The district encompasses the seven blocks of Riverside Drive which follow the river front from Lafayette Street to the east to Angela Boulevard to the west. For a portion of that route, there is a row of houses facing the river from across Riverside Drive, while in another portion, residence are situated on both sides of the street, with some properties abutting the river and others located across the drive. The district also includes homes located on Hudson and Golden Streets, between the drive and the alley defining the southern boundary of the district, as well as three separate park areas which lie adjacent to the river's edge: a portion of Leeper Park to the East; all of Shetterly Park in the middle and a portion of Brownfield Part to the West. Required Distinctive existing features such as parks, gardens, streetlights, fences, signs, benches, walkways streets alleys and building setbacks shall be retained. New plant materials, fencing, walkways, streetlights, signs and benches shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. Street lighting should be maintained at levels recommended by the Illumination Engineering Society. Light sources must have spectral Distribution in all color ranges. Sources and light posts should be uniform throughout the District. Lamp fixtures and supporting posts must be similar in proportion, scale and detail to existing historic lamps (see appendix) or a suitable replacement which closely duplicates the standard in size, shape, style and appearance, i.e., Herwig Lighting Company standard or similar. Streetlights should be placed so that adequate illumination is afforded all sections of the public sidewalks. Tree and landscaping elements that must be removed for one reason or another shall be immediately replaced by suitable flora. The river front neighborhood character of the district shall be retained. Recommended Whenever possible, the original features should be restored. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to buildings, sidewalks or streets that are causing deterioration to those elements should be removed. If erosion control efforts become necessary to preserve the riverbank, they should involve processes and materials consistent with the natural beauty of the banks. Large, deep-rooted trees and shrubs as well as fast spreading ground cover should be used when planting for erosion control. As much natural vegetation as possible should be preserved. If large shrubs become unsightly, they should be cut back and allowed to rejuvenate. Dead and diseased material should be may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 3. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 4. Material: Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the Anderson Renewal window system product to replace and replicate the 21 non -original windows as these inserts will conform with what the Commission has approved in the past, replicate the current window pattern and not alter the structure, i.e. remove original window frames, of this landmark On a motion by Dave Steinhauer to approve with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 6-0 COA 2010-1101Revised was approved with a unanimous vote. III. HEARING OF VISITORS No visitors IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —November 15, 2010 Approved B. TREASURER'S REPORT —Distributed. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals -In packets. Clarification was provided by Catherine Hostetler for 601 Park. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. Discussion of Preservation Specialist report. 4. AD Report -Distributed. Discussion of Restore Michiana 2011 Series 5. Legal Counsel -None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -None. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Nominating committee proposed slate of current Officers to participate in those same capacities. Tim Klusczinski, President; Jerry Niezgodski, Vice President and Assistant Secretary; Linda Riley, Treasurer; Lynn Patrick, Secretary. On a motion by Todd Zeiger to accept the Nominating committee slate of officers as presented with a second by Lynn Patrick. Vote 6-0 VJ The installation of unsightly large devices, such as television satellite dishes, skylights or solar panels, shall not be permitted in areas where they detract from the architecture of a building, are intrusive to the public view of the building or are highly visibly from a public street, or ruled inappropriate after Commission review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Pending permission from the owner, staff recommends approval of the proposed sign as it is appropriate to the building, respecting the size, scale and design of the building with the existing alterations, however, staff did not take exact measures at the parapet to ensure this size would fit. Staff recommends removing a portion of the chain link fence. Staff has no recommendation for the replacement door as there are no further details at this time. On a motion by David Steinhauer with a second by Jerry Niczgodski to approve application as amended by applicant to remove all information regarding rear door replacement. Vote: 4-2 COA 2010-1123 was approved as amended. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: 12.6.2010 Application Number: 2010-1206A Property Location: 537 Edgewater Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1921/ Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Joseph and Judith Pietrzak Landmark or District Designation: Edgewater Place Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1 '/: storey rectangular plan plus appendages on a brick over concrete foundation. Roof is a side gambrel with major dormer along front, all covered in asphalt shingles. Porch features 4 heavy scaled Doric columns supporting a simple cave of low slope porch roof. Front door is a single leaf glazed wood panel door with multi light side lights. Windows are 6/6 double hung. There is a semicircular headed fan opening in attic gables. Basement windows are glass block. ALTERATIONS: Aluminum storm windows and door. Aluminum siding. Some replacement windows. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace 2 rear (South) and 1 rear (East) windows with double hung white mutton sashed windows 6/6 Marvin wood double hung, exterior aluminum clad. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The locations of proposed windows are on a back addition to the house that was converted to living space from a garage. The existing windows have been restored 4 times within the last 40 years, are letting in cold air, and are not capable of another restoration, as stated by homeowner. Homeowner proposes to install 3 Marvin window inserts, locations noted in application items. Already replaced on the house are 2 windows at the top of stairs in rear and windows on the left side in front. Replacement windows will have same muntin (grille) pattern as existing windows. Grilles are snap in from the interior and are removable. Materials are clad exterior with wood interior. No wrap will be used on exterior. Existing storm windows will remain on. Light visibility will decrease by approximately I inch on each side. EDGEWATER STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in nearly all cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels; masonry block structures have masonry sills and lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with duplicates of the existing or original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors, painted to match the existing or original, should be used but should not damage existing frames and should be removable in the future. If new sash and doors are used, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Existing or original doors, windows, and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building should not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require the removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Recommended Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible in size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick may not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval as the project conforms to the standards and guidelines for Edgewater Place for new construction. The owner is also proposing to re -use current materials on the exterior with the intent that it will not stand out as new construction. The new construction will not be visible from the street as it will be situated in a vacant corner of the house. On a motion by Dave Steinhauer to approve with a second by Todd Zeiger Vote: 6-0 COA 2010-1206B was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 6, 2010 Application Number: 2010-1206C Property Location: Angela Street Bridge, Angela Boulevard and Riverside Drive Intersection Riverside Trail extension to the crest of Riverside Drive Hill and along the eastern boarder of Brown Field Park. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Angela Bridge: Filled Spandrel Arch Bridge/1940/W.S. Moore &F.J. Miller, Engineer/H.L. Maddocks Builder Property Owner: City of South Bend (Streets) and St. Joseph County (Bridge #211) Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark (Bridge) Riverside Drive LHD (path to crest of hill and reconfiguration of Riverside Drive to the west; addition of sidewalks in Brownfield Park) Rating: Outstanding (Bridge), Local Historic District (Riverside Drive) THE ANGELA BRIDGE: DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The Angela Bridge is a three Arch Melan Style Bridge constructed of reinforced concrete, having two central pillars with corbelled string coursecones at pillar bases and plain spandrels. The bridge construction method relied on bands of several metal arch rings aligned evenly with the protection of a concrete shell. Rough faced cut stone comprises the facing of the structure. ALTERATIONS: COA#2003-0616 allowed for the replacement of the original, deteriorated approach railings with railings of identical shape size, dimensions and design as the existing except that for NHTSA standards new rails will be 12" deep (wide) instead of 9", the piers will be 18" wide and the distance between elongated oval openings in the rail will be 18" on center instead of 12" on center. Openings in both the approach and the guard rail shall be elongated ovals as in existing rail. Conduit and wiring for restored historic lighting is permitted. APPLICATION ITEMS: Roadway Improvements adjacent to District. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The city will be upgrading the lights on the Angela Street Bridge. This work was approved by Historic Preservation in June 2003 under the permit application 2003-0616. The Certificate of Appropriateness has been included in the information Package. (Exhibit A) The City of South Bend proposed to install a total of eight lights on the Bridge: 2 at each end and 4 in the middle where the arches come together on existing pillars. (Photos 1&2) The Main Street -A luminaires will be set upon 12 foot Leesburg straight fluted shafts. (Exhibit B) STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Grout) B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the selectively removed. Do not dump leaves and grass clippings on planted slopes as this practice will kill much of the low ground cover and leave soil more susceptible to erosion. When replacement of utility poles or power supply lines is necessary, consideration should be given to underground conduits or utility poles erected along rear property lines. Prohibited Existing relationships of buildings and their environments shall not be destroyed through widening existing streets, application of asphalt or other bituminous coverings, or by introducing new streets or parking lots. Signs, Streetlights, benches, major landscaping items, fencing, walkways and paving materials which are out of scale or inappropriate to the neighborhood may not be used. The introduction of heavy trucks or similar vehicles in the District shall be prohibited. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project. The reconfiguration of Riverside Drive will impact an area of Brown Field Park that is currently part of a hillock that is not used for pedestrians or recreation. It will not adversely impact any architectural features in the Riverside Drive Local Historic District. The new roundabout and change to Riverside Drive will create additional pathways to the current River Walk and create a safer intersection with more visibility and pedestrian safety. The proposed 10 foot concrete pathway is located in the same area as a footpath and will not involve the removal of any significant trees. (Photot#3) The lighting style of the Main Street -B set on Barrington posts proposed for Brown Field Park attempts to imitate the Cutter lamp style found in the Riverside Drive LHD. All of the project drawings include appropriate landscaping. On a motion by Todd Zeiger to approve with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 6-0 COA 2010-1206C was approved with a unanimous vote. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: November 4, 2010 Application Number: 2010-1101Revised Property Location: 2025 Mishawaka Firehouse #9 Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer Front Bungalow/1926/Ernest W. Young Property Owner: South Bend Fire Department Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: One and half storey dormer front bungalow on a square plan with an offset brick chimney set on a brick foundation with a stone string course at the base. The walls have aluminum siding at the second storey, the rest of the exterior walls are stretcher bond brick. There is a two storey tower with a flat roof at the rear. The asphalt shingled roof has a side gable with aluminum sided knee braces and large front and rear gable dormers with the same aluminum siding. The front porch extends across the front of the firehouse and has a low brick wall with stone caps and brick pillars. The roof is an extension of the main roof with curved knee brace supports. There is a side shed canopy at the entry with similar bracing. The front entry at the porch is offset with multi -pane side lights. There is a side entry with multi -pane light door. There is a large garage door under the porch. The windows a 1/1 double hung sashes with stone sills. There is a square bay window with shed roof on the west side. ALTERATIONS: The 1979/1990 Survey card notes that the original glazed tile roof has been removed; that aluminum siding, storm windows and doors are replacements. The windows are not original to the structure. The current wood window sashes have insert lights with a composite plastic surround that are set into aluminum tracks. Two windows have been replaced with inserts, one on the first floor east side and the other in the upstairs bathroom on the south side with COA 2009-1214. APPLICATION ITEMS: Install 21 Renewal Anderson double hung, double tilt back, fibrex window systems, white in & white out. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The City wishes to replace the remaining non -original twenty-one windows with 21 fibrex (a composite wood and vinyl product) double hung insert systems that are to be custom built to replicate the current windows and fit inside the existing frames. The insert windows will have screens and storms and will not alter the interior trims or alter the appearance of the exterior trim. The windows will replicate the 1/1 double hung windows. The all wood brickmold will be wrapped with a white vinyl product to match current white aluminum brickmold. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: GrouD B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 3. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 4. Material: Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the Anderson Renewal window system product to replace and replicate the 21 non -original windows as these inserts will conform with what the Commission has approved in the past, replicate the current window pattern and not alter the structure, i.e. remove original window frames, of this landmark On a motion by Dave Steinhauer to approve with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 6-0 COA 2010-1101Revised was approved with a unanimous vote. III. HEARING OF VISITORS No visitors IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 15, 2010 Approved B. TREASURER'S REPORT —Distributed. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -Circulated. 2. Routine Maintenance Exclusion Approvals -In packets. Clarification was provided by Catherine Hostetler for 601 Park. 3. Director's Report -Distributed. Discussion of Preservation Specialist report. 4. AD Report -Distributed. Discussion of Restore Michiana 2011 Series 5. Legal Counsel -None. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Presidents Report -None. V. OLD BUSINESS A. Nominating committee proposed slate of current Officers to participate in those same capacities. Tim Klusczinski, President; Jerry Niezgodski, Vice President and Assistant Secretary; Linda Riley, Treasurer; Lynn Patrick, Secretary. On a motion by Todd Zeiger to accept the Nominating committee slate of officers as presented with a second by Lynn Patrick. Vote 6-0 7 VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Jerry Niezgodski distributed a holiday card from the Sporleders. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Lynn Patrick to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 8:18 p.m. Attest: L Patrick, Date S cretary