Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
December 2009
Regular Meeting THIRTEENTH FLOOR- ROOM 1308 County -City Building MONDAY, December 21, 2009 7:OOPM I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL Il. PUBLIC HEARING A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 1. 1126 E. Wayne COA#2009-1026 E. Wayne LHD 2. 1016 Hudson COA #2009-1204 Riverside Dr. LHD Q 3. 1055 Riverside COA#2009-1207 " Riverside Dr. LHD " 4. 802 Portage COA#2009-1207A Chapin Park 5. 1704 E. Wayne COA#2009-1207B E. Wayne LHD H B. National Register Nominations: 1. City Cemetery—update OC. Landmarks r 1 1. St. Paul's Cemetery -update 2. Rushton Apartments -new local landmark O III. HEARING OF VISITORS H IV. REGULAR BUSINESS E-� A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Fil November 16, 2009 W B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report C. STAFF REPORTS 1Correspondence V 2. C of A Approvals 3. Directors Report o: 4. Assistant Director Report 5. Legal Counsel D. COMMITTEE REPORTS: F~ 1. President's Report wI 2. Nominating Committee III IV. OLD BUSINESS V. NEW BUSINESS VI. ADJOURNMENT ill STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 30, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1026 Property Location: 1126 E. Wayne Street S. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1927/H. Russell Stapp, Architect/Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Berry, Daniel and Deborah Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The home at 1126 E. Wayne Street is a two storey structure with an irregular plan set upon a concrete foundation. The exterior walls are brick. It has a slate gable roof with simple entablature and gable returns. One storey side wing with pent roof at 2nd floor line carried around house. Gable canopy entry with arch under and gable returns with brackets, brick stoop. The windows are double hung 6 over 1, brick soldier course lintels and cast concrete.sills. One storey rear enclosed porch; enclosed by vertical wood siding with flat roof, concrete slab on brick. Two car brick garage with double swinging doors with windows, slate gable roof with cornice and trim returns. ALTERATIONS: None known APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace (2) garage doors (carriage style) with (1) carriage door. No windows. Have not used for cars in 30 years (doors small). Want (1) door so is more able to be utilized for cars. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner has engaged Raybuck Construction to replace the existing garage doors with a single, insulated overhead door in a style sympathetic to the existing carriage doors, trim and hardware, see style P2C. The proposed garage door will not have the windows as in existing for safety precautions. Homeowner states -that -the new -garage door-will-be,"more conducive to -being used -for our autos and more accessible by me." Discussion with Wayne Raybuck concludes that they will shore up to remove center post and trim. A new laminated beam (LVL) and framing will be installed. Framing and door will be installed;finished with trim to match original. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement of the garage door, supported by the auxiliary nature of the structure and its placement toward the rear of the house. Furthermore, the carriage style of the garage door is comparable in style to that of the two original garage doors and will not detract in appearance from the surrounding structures. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSjCHPC@co.st-josephdn.us Website: http://www.stjosephcountyindiana.com/sjchp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received /8 OC -7 200'% Application Number g'o 09 - Past Reviews: El YES (Date of Last Review) ERNO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: 16 / o v 200,9 R Local Landmark IRtoeal Historic District (Name) 'e5-10,9AmE ❑ National Landmark F� National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied E] Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued DATE Address of Propert for proposed work: 11c* le WA y `%Street Number and S eet Naml Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) QVipd Address of Property Owner(s): Contractor(s) Name: UA y AP_ RA,1 ik o eA ' " Contract Company Name: ' J 10 Contractor Adyj�1ress. / a //r City: f /�S Ii'GJA1.11A oU/1� �5I` T Phone: , Current Use of Building: lSingte Family — Multi -Family Commercial — Goz err rneht — Industrial — Vacant — etc.) Type of Building Construction: Proposed Work: � In-kind (more than one box may be checked)/'� (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete - Other) ❑ Landscape Fj New Replacement (not in-kind) E] Demolition Owner/Contractor: Fax: (This office will correspond with only one designee) 67 1213 RD LE'3 09 and/or e-mail 2 n_ (Z� -Ad 1(m — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — It From the Desk of Debora( R Berry 1126 E. Wayne St. So., South Bend, IN46615 October 18, 2009 Historic Preservation Commissions of South Bend County City Bldg South Bend, IN 46601 Re: Property at 1126 E. Wayne. St. S. I'o Whom It .May Concern: Enclosed is our check and application for the above property. We are requesting permission to replace the carriage garage doors that are 8o yrs. Olcl They have been repaired on several occasions over the past 30 yrs of living here and are now in need of replacing. We are wanting to replace with a single carriage house, insulated door so the garage is more conducive to being used for our autos and. more accessible by me. (I have hit the old ones a few times) I am enclosing a picture and the manufacturer of the requested new doors. They will be insulated with the carriage trim and hardware. I did not send a picture of existing ones as -Mr. Doolittle said he would have to take a picture again anyway. We would like to start this project as soon as possible due to winter approaching sooner than expected. Thank you for your help and assistance with this matter. Sincerely, Deborah R. Berry Enclosures -,� '�' t S ; aP��,�` b t r.;h Y bNA !,..Yti ��'!j. • Sr' yX4 µ[, ,,�c+,wJ .t�.; ,7 • ��Y ,�/�r7 t XJS'�fi ry,r"� ".Hf�iC{1' � �+Sw S.�'!t ♦ 7 � { �, '�� f ti { -v ,+aH; I � lS w. C�1f.�7 y vr 1114'.— Ae - i ye - f jtx54cx Wt'"h"rtz .s3^�.T+e",v 3s K�X� f if , £ Y� I•.. A � i 4 '. �'*r=Jcsw!Md+�U,xk+i.'✓�i�1. ),`"1i: 'Mk�F„l3w"�.r'StsL` 4k �4.Ea. - '3�bs�a�h� R ,.vi..J�v„as .+L>A' §•• > ` - ��� � � T....—�..-.u.rrwl�ll78%�,.ri.�irr•��R++�it^£.'Mi,M uCa4.vey� 't`i' �� � �' �� H� � Y �A' VfF e�i 3 it (77, ��� '` 36411Ff LI W EMMIMMIMMiki.- v �n Presidential Premium Option Shown Above F: -7 OU E7 PlA P2A P3A MA M=== P5A M-7 ==EID P1B* P2B P3B* P4B* P5B e7�� T7�77 r r 7r7N ri 77s�� 7--n r77!�-� r7�� 7771 F771S,r7771 r777S� xi F-7 Pic* P2C P3C* P4C P5C = =1 V U Optional Hardware Placement 17 M = 7N -A For 16'-18' Doors 1999 Ogg "W, W"Iffixg W� Www9w; IORNIM9.91" IDA R9 RR PR Wi W2 W3 W4 W5 *No Window onAva!1a61e show�t may Patpease see your local deal.or for details.-, C, BT, LI W EMMIMMIMMiki.- v �n Presidential Premium Option Shown Above F: -7 OU E7 PlA P2A P3A MA M=== P5A M-7 ==EID P1B* P2B P3B* P4B* P5B e7�� T7�77 r r 7r7N ri 77s�� 7--n r77!�-� r7�� 7771 F771S,r7771 r777S� xi F-7 Pic* P2C P3C* P4C P5C = =1 V U Optional Hardware Placement 17 M = 7N -A For 16'-18' Doors 1999 Ogg "W, W"Iffixg W� Www9w; IORNIM9.91" IDA R9 RR PR Wi W2 W3 W4 W5 *No Window onAva!1a61e show�t may Patpease see your local deal.or for details.-, C, ��.��¢iq � " �. `'li-4� �`�' ���w•�^� off - �� _ : . , i_ � vii �� _, �;,,.-�,i. , � e , � r..� � %` �, �, '`F q P,�' �' '�..'', W r t .s,A'' l � �`l��f _ �Pt 'P{a• .r°'�' d;s' ^~y .n".} J'y ``J ji a � d• S ✓ :: Ff" � " •5,. ,1�, ,��b',*'�, f a,��,f .a�%,€/ � ,',z°,.. t��+fr'!� � /"' / . . _.:.:�'t � a/t/ '� ..Milt/�..... i`j �>� '�..._.% �• - 's._�_..% �� ��N K/ Gw ��' "� L'z:' ���'.F�i�. .1✓''' . � i..-' Base Door Colorserlay. Color or al t Presiden i Premium'Option, ^"_ • Presidential Premium p� 3 provides a completely vinyl 1 . covered surface. ** r < .. • Vertical tongue and groove White Almond Sandtone Desert Tan White vinyl boards are applied * Window frames and designs come in white.on almond and aover the steel Surface. sandtone doors unless otherwise specified. •Design trim boards are ** Desert tan not available in 18'section heights,.- applied over the vertical •< asp = boards in any of the designs ' Yew * described in this brochure, Year Presidential Presidential Premium is , v, palat system ei . s?OrsMr WSunN atlas - - s p'dwkne•R ,�.:: v, available in white only, ANJY ""-:y'°..^('MIRANYY,.t ti•C). - - -•--.+asn>^»+...�--.�„-.....�....�,.-.n.- . _ - �� ..A *Above door is painted gray to highlight the vertical: boards, Actual product is only available in white. Details • Base door and overlay material are Handles ... woodgraintextured. . .15 designs available • .Overlay color is available in white only: • Presidential Series doors are available Carriage Knocker Kit Hammered Iron Carriage Hand *?iv up to 10' -.in height. Windows are -_ Handle available inmost heights; however,doors overs' may be more Hinges Decora. aesthetically pleasing without windows.Please consult your dealer Steel Heritage Hinge ' for_details. " *Steel Strap Hinge III 5 window designs available. Iron Stud with Screw • The Presidential Series base and �,.� Plastic Strap Hinge overlays can be painted. Safe -Way �. s'ecifies Sherwin-Williams .' Hammered Iron Hinge VinylSafeT"' paint colors only (available i Hammered Iron Stud An' Sherwin-Williams Duration"Exterior. -Plastic Heritage Hinge Coating. or SuperPaint� Exterior Paint). *4s teel strap hinges and 2 steel handles provided on single doors. 8 steel strap hinges and 4 steel Failure CO use this palm will VOId the :. handles provided on double doors, Additional items are optional product Warranty. Steel Breakout Door Construction . C�� 'fi A i.,., z . A. Finish Painted Coat A. Nylon rollers provide quiet B B. Primer Coat : operation and long lasting A e ;, durability. t C.' Galvanized Layer s C B. Heavy duty galvanized 14 gauge D Steel hardware _C. Tongue and groove design j3 provides weathertight section "< IDIntS L=ate . D :2"expanded polystyrene rip s insulation provides an R Value of a °� " " � � ' + w 1:+� Steol skins mslde and oyt provide �. 4fx �:,# ��-� �.�.� �'�.< �,� r: ' F �:.Bottomiiveathetst[in'fo)lows �'.�� �. ,_�c .��v •� •� .�� � _ f �� �.-� .Distributedby.TT1 A SAFE -WAY Lnk if61I�4 �. �_. .-� As Safe -Way Door constantly strives to improve GARAGE DOORS a our product, all specifications listed in this ' informative brochure are subject to change without notice or obligation Printed color may - - - - 3814 East U.S. 30 • Warsaw, IN 46580 vary from actual color, please check with your - - - ' local dealer for color swatches. - 574267-4861 ' Fax: 574-267-2871 .' i 2008 &20-086` www safe-waydoor.com — Y STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 9, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1204 Property Location: 1016 Hudson Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1914/Gable-Front Property Owner: Tabitha Shultz District Designation: Riverside Drive Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1016 Hudson is one storey wood shingle house with an attic set upon a brick foundation. It has a rectangular plan. The low hip roof with hipped gables on each side is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows on the body of the house are double hung in various styles and include a jalousie window on the west side; the windows in the attic appear to be original with six panes horizontal in each dormer; the windows in the basement are replacement Wenco single pane. There is a full front porch with brick walls and piers with concrete flooring and steps. ALTERATIONS: The original wood shingle roof has been replaced with asphalt shingles. The screened in front porch noted on the May, 1985 survey card has been opened. The May, 1985 noted that the windows were double hung 1/1. The current windows in the house are not all 1/1; but some do appear to be original with a 6/1/2/1 configuration. COA#2000-0428 allowed for the windows in the basement to be replaced, along with a rear storm door and repairs to the front and rear porches. The trim around the basement windows was not replaced. The jalousie window is a replacement as well. The storm windows appear to be replacements. APPLICATION ITEMS: To replace old windows with new high efficiency vinyl windows. Windows to match window pattern to existing windows. Please see attached sketches and brochure. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner wishes to replace all of the windows with vinyl, thermo pane American Windows. American Sunspace can replicate all of the windows that are in the house. The windows would be inserted within the casing and trim work and reduce the light byl Yz inches all the way around the opening. The six pane dormer windows would be sliding windows to allow for ventilation. The four 12 pane "swing -in" wood casements would be replaced with four 12 pane "swing -out' vinyl casements. - The single pane wood "swing -in" casement in the back porch would be replaced with a single pane "swing -out" vinyl casement. The basement windows would be "hopper" windows to allow for ventilation as well. The jalousie window would be a 1/1 double hung window. The homeowner would] ike all of the windows in the rnairi body of the house to be 6/L—The non -original -storm windows would be removed. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, linteIs, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum Insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION. Preservation Specialist, Wayne Doolittle met on-site with the homeowner and Scott Kopinski of American Window. Wayne could only observe the windows from the exterior of the home and is of the opinion that the windows could be fixed and with the addition of better storm windows(Wayne's estimate was about $100.00 per storm window), be energy efficient. Scott Kopinski asserts that the cost of restoration would be almost the same as the cost for replacement windows. The 1985 survey card notes that the windows on the house were double hung 1l1. Currently there are several different styles and muntin patterns of wood windows in this house and perhaps the surveyor was looking at storm windows rather than the windows themselves. When the survey card was written the front porch was screened in so it is highly probable that the current windows on the front are the original one-third 313 lights over two-thirds 2 single lights. The four 12 pane windows also appear to be original to the house. The rest of the 1l1 double hung windows are probably original and the dormer windows certainly are original. The basement windows are replacement windows approved by the Commission in 2000. Staff recommends approval of replacing the replacement basement windows and the jalousie window with a double hung 111 window. The standards for Riverside Drive state that the windows can not be discarded if they can be restored in place. Application FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St. Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County-Ci#y Building, South Bend, Indiana 46b01 Phone. 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 = Email: SBSjCHPCCko.st josephinus Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiaro-com/Ichp/indmhtml OFFICE USE ONLY »»,/»A DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTAINED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 4 A44 � ooq Application Number e d !� ? Past Reviews: ❑ YES (Darr of Inst Review) Staff Approval authorized by: ■ • Title: Historic Commission Review Date: 02l Z&. omo 9 Local Landmark 12"focal Historic District (Name) [� National Landmark n National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied [D Tabled n Sent To Committee E] Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work / o/ 6 Street Number and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print)3rr,� i c;�ea4-7Z Address of Property O r(s):cTiGELc7- Contractor(s) Name: 1 iY ,Cr Q* -W >- - T eotr Contract Company Name: A"V ETC! a'iW 'clan r',i Contractor Address: Vi> e Roc, - 772- -- C/C Z -Po City: Phone: 45-7 y-- 2 7 C. -'}LG / et.&ALr- Current Use of Building: - y(�Siingle Family -Multi-Family - Commercial - Government - Industrial - Vacant - etc.) Type of Building Construction: K&4WC (Wood Frame - Brick - Stone - Steel - Concrete - Other) Proposed Work: In-kind Landscape n New placement (not in-kind) n Demolition (more than one box may be checked) _ Description of Proposed Work:% 7.sF l�X-�t7 L.e� t�/Tl/ ACc Z3 Owner/Contractor. Fare: ,5_7�4-Z8 �_ 7� �3 e-mail (This office=71 correspond with only one designee) � (y p 1 r�++ ,3 a�,�i - and/or — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Dec 10 09 12:31 p I X 4. 41 0 I� GJ/17f' NsF�'�t,�-/115 Gr�iDS z4 /€3 �� cyl i ore/UJS- C C/i2.' eA17^ i bS /--riT-� p.2 �GPcA�.G cts/ C�liG2�A7'� �'�TT€� Z574 I'. 03-'P/,4 ec, as cvIele4g r -ry wb GAIAJ .�oclrlrce 64V, c-. P.1 Dec 10 09 12:30p 4` 410 �s�s �a Frir✓.3zs . mwvl;- a•SF w - v,/ 3y-- J T."11 -h" sa.5hes rn ike operatiot; <aff and easy from (I'..s,de your homc. The American Witidow Collectioti is crafted xvith care & quality. Distinctive features offer superior performance, freedom of maintenance and a variety of style options. SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE To ensure: I sstincl duality, all American Windows are built with thermally fused, wclded franx_s that assure maxiaauana strength and prevent the infiltration of air, water and noise. The rigid vinyl construction combined with thew natural inSuLating properties of vinyl, reduce heat and cold transfer providing energy, efticicncy.+ FREEDOM OI' MAINTENANCE En oy Simplified living with virtually maintenance -free vinyl which is guaranteed not to rust, peel or chip. The color is fully integrated throughout the frame and will never need painting.The Double Hung i"dindows feature tilt -in sashes that make operation safe and easy from inside, your home.♦ VARIETY OF OPTIONS Choose from a variety of popular styles includling elegant double-ltcmg windo vs, SpaciOUS bay/bow,/picture wincio .° combinations. expansive sliders and spccl ai shapes. 'rhe Americana Window Colk ction fcGatures a"beautifully beveled master frame and a simple one-piece system for vertical and horizontal mulling, Decorative grills and transoms can further enhance the classic ,appeal,+ The American WinG Collection haC�'� a•FINANCING AVAILABLE From AMERISTAR 11.�.do for YOU. X1f ALL CREDITTYPES • Double -Hung CONSIDERED • taayfFotc, Home Improvement • > Lite &3 Lite Sliders Refinancing • • Windou. New Purchases ��Pic:ture t,.ornbinattvri Consolidation . CUStOM Shapes ` No Equity Loans - i • �it(:17112C� • 1000% Financing . caserrient t NO OUT OF POCKET • Garden EXPENSES • Patio ,doors S Im i j t� rA.�q'.. {c �. r t'"tf� �'''9 ca is .�► w �,- .+'� 7" sr ! -ir ' ��}?�4` .✓ i 7.�.�yi' a i rf ��� .t. :.. l; �a'i tij . 6i.� j. . ,ni• ���11%/vr ,W�M+".«��J'�i�Yr' �������f��!'�'7.. :�w.`iw�4�� ;..;�it�'.M� y #, ry it +SY f i r kf �•ry{iiF' ��" Y'�e�� b'� .t�yY� �. YN•y�`�<��.:4:fyi��,?�' S'�1Gu;��N�����!'�. e;.SY�i�' `...��� .+��"i`ei W'A�-'e".a° '��..,r`..+' _.'f � � .r3 �9_.c _,'_ . ��.. _ ...�.., tea. -Aw "UH xis "1 all - MMal AP 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 west side 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 west side 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 west side 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 South Side 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 -South Side 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 east side 1016 Hudson. December 4, 2009 north side 1016 Hudson, December 9, 2009 STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 8, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1207 Property Location: 1055 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Prairie/1926/Gerber & Haley Property Owner: Charles Leone Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive LHD Rating: I Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house at 1055 Riverside Drive is a two and a half storey brick square structure set upon a brick foundation. The walls are brick in stretcher bond with herring bone brick panels in the main fagade. The hip roof is 12/12 with large stuccoed, hipped dormers on each side all with asphalt shingles. The gutters and downspouts are, copper. There is a sunroom on the east end and a French door entry on the main fagade. The large French door style windows flank the entrance. The door is a single leaf wood frame, flanked by sidelights and a segmental transom in a recessed wood enclosure. The first floor windows are wood frame casements, the second floor has 6/1 double hung windows. There is a three car detached concrete block garage at the rear of the house. ALTERATIONS: The wooden exterior storms were installed over the leaded glass sidelights of the front entrance in 1986. The aluminum storm doors noted on the 1977 survey card were replaced in 2000 with COA 2000-0627-2. The surface of the driveway was replaced with concrete brick with.COA#2006-0726. There have been various, approved changes to the landscaping over the course of the decades; dying front yard trees were removed in 1988. APPLICATION ITEMS: Placement of a new tree, a black gum (Nyssa Sylvatica) in the front yard of the property at the tree line, per the attached site plan. DISCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner wishes to plant a black gum -tree -in the corner of the -front -yard -by the drive way -and -sidewalk. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties .in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Brent Thompson, City Forester, said that the Black Gum is a beautiful tree appropriate for front yards. The tree will be near the location of a tree that was removed in 1988. x12/0212009 15:10 5742359578 HPC SOUTH BEND Application -FOR- Certificate of Appr©ptiateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana, 46601 Mailing Address: County City Badding, South L3end, Inda�,na 466ttI Phone: 574-23:-9M - • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSJCHPCQko.st josi.Tt0n.us Website htV://www.stjosephcountyindiam.com/Ichp/index-.htrni PAGE 01 OFFICE USE ONLY »>r DO NOT COMPLM ANY EMIES CONTAINED IN THIS ,BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received % 20c? Application Number iao— °1 - 11,01 Q1 Past Reviews:S (ruo/Lot Review) G% J 0 NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: ❑ Local Landmark Local Historic District {Name)Yc.�_. [� NationaI Landmark (� National Register District pVame' CerWcate of Appropriateness: rj Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee rj Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work- /� fStrut Nbcrand Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (FreAn Print) 4 t l Address of Property Owner(s): /e,7 5" It +r'r's:rCi %z?c , ��� r ,- jr-7 41alz Contractor(s) Name: t7 r r r l W 0'& rfV $ r Contract Company Name: A, Contractor Address: le)!Yo E. F,,a/�rf<, City: %�i t/�tK� Ti" '�i'S h� f'i=aG I'lzozle: Current Use of Building: t t <. (Single Iamiry - Muni-Famiry- Commercial - Government -• Industriar -Vacant - do Type of Building Construction: t/r't J"k - (Wbad Frame - rt rick - Stam. - Sher - Cancrele -tither) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind XLandscape ,rNew ❑ Replacement (mat in-kind) n Demolition 6rtorr than ane hoz may be ) Description of Proposed Work: �Gt A4 . c) T u. j/� +%+� ^' � �/ �7lc� F1'A"' /V' Aee- i#1 �hi 7/ro � �//t t's� Q f" 124 lt�r t T i"j'�,✓ A e -e le, A y� V / OwnerlCo�trI6or. Fax: a'�/-?r�Us a -mail /��/�r Ill�j �j-A; (17ti< office tor71 ccrri%TAT' h pity one darg ' r - - - APPUCA77ON REQF,J.TP,EMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE -- 1455 Riverside, December 21 2409 ow,cai.a„n.u.n X1868=2008-: 'RaC' y V `!y q m 0 N a U < N 9 E m u ESQ 1 t N a � Y 8' brick downspout I �P� inlet Leone f PS�S Driveway nC oA ti ti moo` ti' RW— D,. , Sour 8a,41N lypy 1sT r 1 �, 5" curb 1 b" brick j planting area 33' wood fence rw.a s« ar • o'a`r 1 Site Plan 1/4 1 �_0 ,�,..�.. C1 1102 Riverside Dr - Google Maps http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&11=41.689306,-86.260236&spn=0... /Ds� Google maps Address 14M Riverside Dr Address is approximate Save trees. Go green! Download Google Maps on your phone at google.com/gmm oma, 1 of 1 12/3/2009 5:19 PM /� STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE- OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 9, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1207A Property Location: 802 Portage Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Craftsman Bungalow/1915 Property Owner: Miller, Jason Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The single family home at 802 Portage is a 1 % storey structure with and irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are aluminum sided. It has a side gabled roof with a front gabled bracketed dormer with bellcast. Roof is of asphalt shingles. The windows are double hung 1 over 1 vinyl replacement windows. There is a metal awning over the dormer windows. A brick chimney is on southeast side. Full width integrated porch, enclosed with screens, flared brick piers. ALTERATIONS: Vinyl replacement windows (in which are being requested with this COA), attached 2 storey garage, aluminum siding, COA#2007-0827A re -roof and replacement of gutters (note: presently there are no gutters on the house other that above the front porch entry steps). APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove/replace current windows and two doors windows to be vinyl replacement style. Doors will be steel insulated doors. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: An oversight on the South Bend Housing Authority's October list that was sent by email to the HPC failed to include 802 Portage. The Lead Abatement Program project to remove the current windows and 2 doors and install vinyl replacement windows and steel insulated doors was discovered in process by Wayne Doolittle, HPC Inspector. Because building permits were not pulled the project was red tagged by the Building Department while in progress. At that point 20 windows had been replaced, including 4 on the front of the house. The project is one window shy of completion and the two doors have not been exchanged. Solid 6 panel insulated steel doors are proposed for north door and south rear door, which will eliminate the window in present south rear door for security measures. CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half have wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation for the replacement windows as the project is nearly complete and we have no documentation as to what existed prior to the beginning of the project for lead abatement. Staff recommends approval of the two deteriorating doors that are probably not original to the house. p: 1'2/02/2009 11:12 Ip 5742359578 HPC SOUTH BEND Application - FOR - Certificate icate o f Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & SL Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend., lndi=.A 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46007 . Phone: 574-235-9793 • Pax: 574-235-9578 Ema 56SJCHPCco.st-)osc ph.in.t�s Website: http://wuw.sqascphcounryindiana.com/schp/index.html PAGE 01 OFFICE USE ONLY >>> DO NOT COMPLE-M- ANY ENT.RrES CONMJNT.D INTHIS BOX >"> OkFICE tISE O.i.LY. Date Received "% 7EG Zo a % Application Number Past Reviews: �S (np�/tA F����Yi7 . 0 0 7 NO Staff Approval authorized by: Title: Historic Commission Review Date: 21 DEG Z-009 ❑ Local Landmark Qj Local. Historic District (Name)�'!��- . -tr ❑ National Landmark ❑ National Register District Wamd Certificate of Appropriateness: ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee ❑ Approved and Issued i - DATE I . Address of Property for proposed work: StrcctNwnberand Strccr Marne Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) �-z= d Address of Property Owner(s): U� ► ��G' 3't (jl V . //" !ff T- Contractor(s) Name: V".�:f�:�.� /� Contract Company Name: d Q��-s�M-�+ Contractor Address: City: Phone: Current Use of Btdl.ding: ��-�� '•<�? -=� (Sindflc 9 mil Multi-F?ini i - Commrdal-(;nvvrnnrene - lndrutrlal - vaertnt - etc.) Type of Building Constntction: � l(ti,,• r (wood Framo - l:rl& - Stone - Steel - Concrete -()Flier) Proposed Work: ❑ In-kind ❑ Landscape ❑ New W Replacement (not in-kind) ❑ Demolition (more than one box my be lurked) f /f Description of Proposed Work:�.�- �.%--h 14- �jte_ Owmer/Contractor. Fax: e-mail (This -R carmpond with c�rlytnte dtsign) -- V. . _ and/or — APPLICATION REQUIRENI.ENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — 802 Portage. December 8, 2009 1 802 Portage East Rear. All windows in dormer are replaced. The door with lead paint will be replaced with solid steel door with 6 panels. The two windows on the first floor addition will not be replaced since they do not have lead and were replaced by the previous owners. I :13 802 Portage South Side All lead painted windows are replaced on main body of the house. No replacements for the windows on the addition since they do not have lead based paint and are newer windows. T `\ I :13 802 Portage South Side All lead painted windows are replaced on main body of the house. No replacements for the windows on the addition since they do not have lead based paint and are newer windows. a North side of house with door to be replaced. The two double hung windows are already replaced. The further two windows will not be replaced. 802 Portage North Door. Lead painted door to be replaced with solid, no windows, steel six panel door. This south side rear door is to be replaced with a solid six panel steel insulated door. There will be no window. North Side Second Floor window. Older, possibly not original, window but with lead paint to be replaced. This is the last window #21 at 802 Portage along with the two doors remaining in the lead abatement project. The other 20 windows have already been installed. Styles - - Whether you prefer Double Hung, 2 -lite Slider, 3 -lite Slider, I- { or Picture, Simonton Reflections® S300 windows come in L g - multiple designs, giving you the flexibility to express your unique taste and style. Standard Features Fusion -welded Frame and Sash Arced Exterior Design Triple -stepped Sloped Sill (Double Hung only) Lap -Lok® Meeting Rail Fin Seal Weatherstripping Denny Clip' Pivot System Stainless Steel Constant Force 3/4" Coil Spring Balance System (Double Hung only) Optional Upgrades Double -strength Glass Tempered, Obscure, or Tinted Glass Dual Air Loksn' (Double Hung only) Extruded Screen Frame Aluminum Screen Mesh Dual Cam Locks (windows 21% 28" wide) Celcon® Rollers (Slider only) Extruded Lift Rails and Pull Stiles Flush -mount Tilt Latches .: Tilt-in/lift-out Sash Dual Cam Locks (windows 28" wide or greater) Single Cam Locks (windows. less than 28") ProSolae Soft Coat Low E Glass with an Argon Gas Fill Tan Interior/Exterior Flat Colonial, -Diamond, Prairie, and Perimeter Grids in White or Tan ::. Sculptured Colonial, Diamond, Prairie, and Perimeter Grids in White or Tan All grids come in standard 5/8" width. Sculptured White and Tan also available in 1" width. All this and a Simonton dealer nearby to help you, too. .: Air Lok'" , Single -strength Glass 3/4" Insulating Glass Unit 3/4" Glass Penetration Intercepter Spacer System Rollformed Screen Frame Fiberglass Screen Mesh White Interior/Exterior Lifetime Limited Warranty Grid and Color Options Sculptured White Sculptured Tan SI MON TON. Corporate Headquarters • 53oo Briscoe Road • PO Box x646 • Parkersburg, WV 261o2 -x646 Ilrr W I N D O W S- -wwW.sitnonton.com - I-Soo-sIMONTON We make lasting impressions! The information contained is current at the time of printing. Changes to the product(s) may have been made since publication. Not all features available on all products in -91 areas of the country. Please consult your sales representative prior to purchasing. Due to the limitations of the printing proms, actual colors may vary from printed materials. Please see a sample of the product before maldng your final color selection. Simonton Windows" Reflections! Lap•Lok,- Simonton Sill! We make lasting impressions.* and the stylized -S" are registered trademarks and Air Lok,' Denny Clip,- and ProSolar' are trademarks of Simonton Building Products, Inc I,ap-Lok- is manufactured under U.S. Patent 5,446,997. Super Spacer' is a registered trade -mark of Edgetech I.G., Inc. Intercept- is a registered trademark of PPG Industries, Inc. Celcon- is a registered trademark of Celanese. 02008 Simonton Building Products, - Inc. Printed in USA. Enhanced strength Fusion -welded Frame and Sash ProSolae Soft Coat Low E Glass Argon Gas Fill Air Lok'" Dual Cam Lock Flusb-mount Tilt Latcbes Lap-'Loke Meeting Rail Tilt-in/1i-out Sasb 3/4" Insulating GZw Unit Contoured Extruded Lift Rails Stainless Steel Constant Force 3/4" Cod Spring Balance System Triple -stepped Sloped Sill Advanced thermal protection Every Simonton Reflections® 5300 window is manufactured under the most stringent quality -control system and advanced technology in North America. We know this because we created those systems and technologies. Fusion -welded frame and sash construction provides rigidity for increased strength and weather resistance Denny Clip'" pivot system maintains perfect alignment of the sash for smooth operation Stainless steel coil spring balance system never needs adjusting Chambered vinyl profiles increase strength and rigidity You may not know how Low E/Argon-filled glass works or why our Intercepter spacer system is superior. But every time you pay your energy bills, you'll be thankful that your Simonton Reflections® S3oo windows incorporate every thermal component possible. Intercepter spacer system reduces conduction to keep interior glass warmer Lap -Lok® meeting rail overlaps and interlocks the top and bottom sash to create a tight sealti Argon -filled glass unit adds insulation to enhance thermal protection (%5 :: ProSolar" soft coat Low E glass with an Argon gas fill meets ENERGY STAR® guidelines and works to reduce heat loss in winter and maintain air-conditioned (Mil M4"tlE7.V air during the summer As you stand in front of your window, take solace in knowing we're standing behind it. We know buying windows is a big investment. An investment you want protected. That's why we back all Simonton Reflections® windows and doors with a comprehensive warranty covering vinyl, hardware, screens, and insulating glass units. And, since all warranties are transferable, your windows add yet another great selling feature for any prospective home buyer. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 8, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1207B Property Location: 1704 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Split Level/1953 Property Owner: Brenda and David Bickel Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1704 E. Wayne is a two storey frame home with a brick faeade on the first storey and vinyl "clapboard" siding on the second storey and the remaining three sides of the house.. The house has a rectangular plan. The gable roof is covered with asphalt shingles and simple raking trim. The first storey has a large front picture window with double 4 light casements in wood frames with limestone sills. There are -paired 4 light casements on the 2nd floor. There is a side brick chimney. The entry has a shed canopy supported by turned wood columns and railings set upon a concrete stoop. There is one storey gable roof side wing. There is a detached garage with siding and a gable roof with asphalt shingles. ALTERATIONS: The wrought iron posts and railings have been replaced with wood. The vinyl siding on the three sides of the house and second storey on the front of the house as well as the vinyl wrapping —f all of the windows have been added. All of the windows, except the picture window, have been emplaced with COA#2009-0706C. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. Replace front entry door with wood exterior door. 2. Replace in-kind back west entry door with wood exterior door. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The goal of the project is to: 1) Replace the front door with a wood raised panel exterior door with a center window (see attached picture) In place currently is an interior hollow wood core door with center window. This is an interior door that was made -to -fit to the opening prior to 1987.2) Replace back west exterior wood door with an exterior raised vertical panel wood door on the bottom half and a double pane insulated glass, mini blinds or shade inside the glass on the top half (see attached picture),In place currently is an exterior wood door with raised horizontal panels in the bottom half and a single pane glass in the top half. Both doors and 36 inches wide but shorter than a standard 80 inch door. Depending upon the pricing the wood used in the doors, they will be either primed for painting or have a natural wood finish. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: East Wavne Street: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of -- wood or aluminum Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, roods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the =riginal. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement of the non -original front door with the Madawaska Design #2791 wood door. Staff recommends approval of the replacement rear entry door with the single pane window over the double raised panel in the Madawaska Design #2749 Solid Wood 2000 Series with the choice of finish at the homeowner's option. Application - FOR - Certificate of Appropriateness Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend & St Joseph County 125 S. Lafayette Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601 Mailing Address: County -City Building, South Bend, Indiana 46601 Phone: 574-235-9798 • Fax: 574-235-9578 • Email: SBSjCHPC@co.st joseph.in us Website: http://www.sgosephcountyindiana.com/s chp/index.html OFFICE USE ONLY »»» DO NOT COMPLETE ANY ENTRIES CONTUNED IN THIS BOX »»» OFFICE USE ONLY Date Received 72>05-5c, 2-001 Application Number 4 O O ? - /.Z6 7/6 Past Reviews: Z"YES (Date of imt Reoiero) Staff Approval authorized by: Historic Commission Review Date: lu LY, .2o09 E] NO cZ/ 2>EG 2-11-0'? Title: rj Local Landmark[✓]Local Historic District (Name) G• �i�`` �i n National Landmark National Register District (Name) Certificate of Appropriateness: Denied n Tabled ❑ Sent To Committee n Approved and Issued DATE Address of Property for proposed work: I % o q E. Streea tWumber and Street Name Name of Property Owner(s): (Please Print) t � _PoCc'2NAA T�lGke_l Address of Property Owner(s): M4 Va h p �. 070 i� tG� imcQ ..iV y(o1Q / 5 Contractor(s) Name: )?/ .ASoo-If c - Contract Company Name: . 70 H = c50Y, (?0-), e& f, -U C_ -f frn Contractor Address: ckq rj & L&u Se, L4,-jE City: Phone: S74t-,R9/ , 771,3" Current Use of Building:---Am"Oks�.r1"J Sing Fily Mu amlti-Flmily — Commercial —Government —Industrial — Vacant —etc.) Type of Building Construction: 0("d (Wood Frame — Brick — Stone — Steel — Concrete — Other) Proposed Work: (' In-kind [:] Landscape ❑ New [Replacement (not in-kind) [] Demolition (more than one box may be checked) (` _Description of Proposed Work: 0&,a o e_ Trt)n4 �_7j c.� _Nnr CUL W00dj4*ju r door � I ' r l� back use.- rz rL Wod .eco r- r�o r Owner/Co or: F • e-mail (This offt' ! �thoyne ) and/or - — APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED ON REVERSE SIDE — Bickel 1704 E Wayne St. The goal of the project is to: 1) Replace the front door with a wood raised panel exterior door with a center window (picture attached). In place currently is an interior hollow wood core door with center window. (This is an interior door that was made -to -fit to the opening prior to 1987) 2) Replace the back west exterior wood door with an exterior raised vertical panel wood door bottom half and a double pane insulated glass, no mullions, mini blinds inside the glass on the top half (picture attached). In place currently is an exterior wood door with raised horizontal panels bottom half and a single pain glass top half. 3) Both doors are 36" wide but shorter than a standard 80" door. yY �r w < rx UN °%y.' �ap• �a�sr'+��•,Y�,����..'�"��<�5�-��i�7,.� x, ,tea. .. �, ..� ,�+r� . �rr <?/.. .-•�"�.2"(„`� rd� ' r`.����8,".���st+`t- 9 Ejy �4-- )odr Photo Gallery I= X70'/ E U)", SY/ nt 'Back to 2000 series Previous NcXt Design #2791 Stile Rail Design 3 or 9 Full Thickness Raised Panels Number of panels varies with width of door 1 Clear Float Lite m. Shawn X 79 " Shown as 32" x 80" 1-3/4" Red Click to view Wood Options Oak Glass Options Products tviff not appear exactly as shown -due to colour and grain variations inherent in all natural woods. 176 4 F-, wa-Ar� si- JDo Y- / 6a-cAMR. Door Photo Gallery Page 1 of 1 Back to 2000 Series Previous Next Design #2749 Stile & Rail Design . 1 or 2 Full Thickness Raised Panels o Number of panels varies with width of door . 1 Clear Float Lite 34 X 7g3V 64A"+ ) Shown.as 32" x 80" 1-3/4" Click to view wood options Cedar Glass Options Products will not appear exactly as shown due to colour and grain variations inherent in all natural woods. http://www.madawaska-doors.com/2749.php 12/11/2009 Madawaska Doors - 2000 Series Doors NO, 1'Ces Page I of 2 - Sol I NR* ■ 227 Fr 4 4191, Home About us Craftsmanship Door Gallery Wood Options Glass Options Prehang Options Contact Us Download Vender Locator 3oin our team «- Previous Ne.xt..>> TZA kM1.7 2005 2130 2131 2135 2140 4 2230 2240 2250 2300 2311 f L 77 TJ 2744 2748 2749 3Ar-K- 2750 2751 Z -- F 2751 Dutch 2752 2791 -4 M Y I:'- t,4 -1-P-4' Door Our passion is wood, our beauty is your imagination I1tAi dkarleS`dti ,t3£wrS» Cf�� hi(� ;#dual ..:�... :t...Xi'::^'.TR"f��4xti✓l�l�ii`YI"7},:�}.���M`ti ]+. r 1Y&T;x`•x,"^ , z:+" ��7Y7.�j'j' i"%.''.:: -����:�� �iXe <.<,+� , wi, ra r ,=e,.xl'�x }t f�rrt'>�Qd`�+..,#�,-,3N.5?atiY g>';�1; .,•tJl� a. as1�a`�Yc}or�`ai��cr�tter�'iiarnt�i�iai� Y�r 1�t;alvsffet:�itsa±iri[dsapealtyi grid greet iib�i #� r;arl'►� a, �eu�t �3u�°�tc+rr�� [ •-��.:' Q _i_ Y) ISA AYI �i Y � Lyy tare i px: ,.. ,�r. <«;Y•"•».a,+u+-: sa �:`,..u''^°n+a'42ifM3':. ..•.> x:r;.A.:: v�.��d ;a;r,<<,:.t :?... a�:'«,d��::�:'iv _;.'; """ - �, ,,_,xy��y,'�n ,r,.; ',x,rt >��::.;.ti:i,�';✓.t'�:r: *`srr:�::;•"vw ...:;f:'::. >�� M• '4:" - ..�''<ta'<'Y.� � �:nl»� r•..i::.^ia.a> "-�.rl'ng - ..y.P vw1xY._r.:i: r:'�.: ice' (-'�'D�4.�'4, ,.r.,,;,t. y«g,..+y„»��aii �`i`.'.:. ,.s r:,e::= :.` n;:, : � F't • '.A�':`. `. �'' i,'; ['s.'f;."""`t°','yw.,;"x.1`'s'i+`++wa��„+.y„�`':{x ✓' wq•�.,A}%''.,^q�f,:�Y".Y'Y.,.o:a,.dr�:::t �. �:;,;.. Y✓.:A*ti.. +'k��TW� � fie. v! at ��� -•`:c: »"' •�' r d m� � ..::.: 3';'"na' �"°t�`'�. #.. �.�3�', ,rr"✓i,.;�.'s' " , L .f:,v%�.'..:;>r., �P: r:-.' r., '^'S.:✓P,, iii :1 ,s;BS�sztitiflRS;�U Y:i'rti._;%_< x'.:j•.TY�l:, .::K�Y'.:': 5r' N:?;:; ';; ::::.': {rr ^� PP ':•::.,: n #x> 1. 55 z;i .x.......x�x �•a�_.ag<-s:.kx- .. _xx .... .. .: xx..#.Y,f. _ __ .�j;!,i:da;jlu .......... IX <ytZed f., D':�'.. ,,...::�.•q ,r .r.:.,. ?� , r✓.. .. :,y..: .x ..., ., .. 3 �,4„yi•� �'k> 'R'r: jY}(: <, Y, `4 'N°i S x £ WOO�x,%:••asaa L...�. .>:J": m:: ':.1:. .::...>:.:.::� �yr�}yea• r.. IIK I , l - • 3uR.1 -- - „ ♦".,.A( h :�P"=:•.n l: I1tAi dkarleS`dti ,t3£wrS» Cf�� hi(� ;#dual ..:�... :t...Xi'::^'.TR"f��4xti✓l�l�ii`YI"7},:�}.���M`ti ]+. r 1Y&T;x`•x,"^ , z:+" ��7Y7.�j'j' i"%.''.:: -����:�� �iXe <.<,+� , wi, ra r ,=e,.xl'�x }t f�rrt'>�Qd`�+..,#�,-,3N.5?atiY g>';�1; .,•tJl� a. as1�a`�Yc}or�`ai��cr�tter�'iiarnt�i�iai� Y�r 1�t;alvsffet:�itsa±iri[dsapealtyi grid greet iib�i #� r;arl'►� a, �eu�t �3u�°�tc+rr�� [ •-��.:' Q _i_ Y) ISA AYI �i Y � Lyy tare i px: ,.. ,�r. <«;Y•"•».a,+u+-: sa �:`,..u''^°n+a'42ifM3':. ..•.> x:r;.A.:: v�.��d ;a;r,<<,:.t :?... a�:'«,d��::�:'iv _;.'; """ - �, ,,_,xy��y,'�n ,r,.; ',x,rt >��::.;.ti:i,�';✓.t'�:r: *`srr:�::;•"vw ...:;f:'::. >�� M• '4:" - ..�''<ta'<'Y.� � �:nl»� r•..i::.^ia.a> "-�.rl'ng - ..y.P vw1xY._r.:i: r:'�.: ice' (-'�'D�4.�'4, ,.r.,,;,t. y«g,..+y„»��aii �`i`.'.:. ,.s r:,e::= :.` n;:, : � F't • '.A�':`. `. �'' i,'; ['s.'f;."""`t°','yw.,;"x.1`'s'i+`++wa��„+.y„�`':{x ✓' wq•�.,A}%''.,^q�f,:�Y".Y'Y.,.o:a,.dr�:::t �. �:;,;.. Y✓.:A*ti.. +'k��TW� � fie. v! at ��� -•`:c: »"' •�' r d m� � ..::.: 3';'"na' �"°t�`'�. #.. �.�3�', ,rr"✓i,.;�.'s' " , L .f:,v%�.'..:;>r., �P: r:-.' r., '^'S.:✓P,, iii :1 ,s;BS�sztitiflRS;�U Y:i'rti._;%_< x'.:j•.TY�l:, .::K�Y'.:': 5r' N:?;:; ';; ::::.': {rr ^� PP ':•::.,: n #x> 1. 55 z;i .x.......x�x �•a�_.ag<-s:.kx- .. _xx .... .. .: xx..#.Y,f. _ __ .�j;!,i:da;jlu .......... IX <ytZed f., D':�'.. ,,...::�.•q ,r .r.:.,. ?� , r✓.. .. :,y..: .x ..., ., .. 3 �,4„yi•� �'k> 'R'r: jY}(: <, Y, `4 'N°i S x £ WOO�x,%:••asaa L...�. .>:J": m:: ':.1:. .::...>:.:.::� �yr�}yea• r.. IIK I , l - • 3uR.1 -- - „ Location Budget as of 11-30-2009 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2009. 1,268.96 0.04 0.04 Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2009 thru 11/30/2009 0.00 0.00 31,890.42 4,159.58 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation 11.54 11.54 18,419.24 Account Original Addt'UAdj Total 38.60 Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 11075 Deputy Director 30,000.00 (28,731.00) 1,269.00 0.00 000 General Gov T. 0.16 369.33 210.67 210.67 11309 Historic Preservation Admin. 36,050.00 0.00 36,050.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 18.33 18.33 1,240.24 11428 Part Time (Hrly) 0.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 1,338.00 1,338.00 5.05 10000 Totals * """" 66,050.00 1,269.00 67,319.00 0.00 21030 Office Supplies 500.00 126.90 626.90 0.00 000 General GovT. 100.00 100.00 55.83 264.17 22010 Gas Oil & Lubricants 880.00 (300.00) 580.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 160.00 100.00 100.00 22120 Garage & Motor Supplies 700.00 (400.00) 300.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 20000 Totals 2,080.00 (573.10) 1,506.90 0.00 31070 Other Contractual Services 24,500.00 2,000.00 26,500.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32020 Travel 500.00 (400.00) 100.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32050 Instruction & Training 900.00 (400.00) 500.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32053 Public Relations 1,320.00 (1,000.00) 320.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 32200 Telephone 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 32350 Postage 1,594.00 (450.00) 1,144.00 0.00 000' General GovT. Saint Joseph County v User ID ksgl ki 12/01/2pO9 11:02 AM Page 55 I Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 1,268.96 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 31,890.42 4,159.58 4,159.58 11.54 11.54 18,419.24 11,580.76 11,580.76 38.60 38.60 51, 578.62 15, 740.38 15, 740.38 23.38 23.38 625.89 1.01 1 1.01 0.16 0.16 369.33 210.67 210.67 36.32 36.32 245.02 54.98 54.98 18.33 18.33 1,240.24 266.66 266.66 17.70 17.70 25,162.00 1,338.00 1,338.00 5.05 5.05 71.55 28.45 28.45 28.45 28.45 0.00 500.00 500.00 100.00 100.00 55.83 264.17 264.17 82.55 82.55 0.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 100.00 586.93 557.07 557.07 48.69 48.69 v User ID ksgl ki 12/01/2pO9 11:02 AM Page 55 I Location Budget as of 11-30-2009 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2009. Fund: 001 County General for 01/01/2009 thru 11/30/2009 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation Account Unencumbered Original Addt'I/Adj Total Balance/Percent Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 33010 Publication Of Legal Notices 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 0.00 0.00 0.00 33100 Printing 700.00 0.00 700.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 400.00 100.00 100.00 37100 Auto Lease 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 19, 791.47 19.88 19.88 39010 Dues & Subscription 300.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 39750 Data Processing 400.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 000 General Gov'T. 30000 Totals *********************'*'* 30,974.00 (250.00) 30,724.00 0.00 Location Totals ************* *""*"'*'**** 99,104.00 445.90 99,549.90 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County 0.00 79,758.43 User ID ksobecki 12/01/2009 11:02 AM Page 56 Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 72.26 227.74 227.74 75.91 75.91 435.80 264.20 264.20 37.74 37.74 300.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 255.20 44.80 44.80 14.93 14.93 0.00 400.00 400.00 100.00 100.00 26,939.57 3,784.43 3,784.43 12.32 12.32 79, 758.43. 19, 791.47 19, 791.47 19.88 19.88 0.00 0.00 79,758.43 User ID ksobecki 12/01/2009 11:02 AM Page 56 Location Budget as of 11-30-2009 Note: Includes transactions after the last posted date of 07-01-2009.. Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Fund: 013 County Special Gifts for 01/01/2009 thru 11/30/2009 Balance/Percent 0.00 9,368.25 Loc: 037 Historic Preservation 100.00 100.00 Account Original Addt'1/Adj Total Object Description Appropriation Appropriation Appropriation Encumbrance 00000 Gen Gov't 0.00 9,368.25 9,368.25 0.00 000 General Gov'T. .2,478.00 2,478.00 00000 Totals0.00 9,368.25 9,368.25 0.00 23240 Other Supplies 0.00 2,478.00 2,478.00 0.00 000 General GovT. 0.00 20000 Totals ****'*"*********' 0.00 2,478.00 2,478.00 0.00 Location Totals ******** 0.00 11,846.25 11,846.25 0.00 Investment Accounts Transfer Accounts Saint Joseph County ` User ID ksp�gpkl 12/01/ 1:52 AM Page 13 I II III II Unencumbered Unexpended Expenditure Balance/Percent Balance/Percent 0.00 9,368.25 9,368.25 100.00 100.00 0.00 9,368.25 9,368.25 100.00 100.00 0.00 2,478.00 2,478.00 100.00 140.00 0.00 .2,478.00 2,478.00 100.00 100.00 0.00 11, 846.25 11, 846.25 100.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ` User ID ksp�gpkl 12/01/ 1:52 AM Page 13 I II III II EDGEWATER, PLACE LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICT LIAISONS The results of the election are: DOREEN MESECAR. One year term beginning'11/1/2009-10/31/2010 HEIDI ARMSTRONG-INGRAHAM: Two year term beginning 11/1/2009-10/31/2011 SANDY WIISON: Three year term beginning 11%1/2009-10/31/2012 6AISONS.•..... 1. Work and communicate with the residents'of the district and the Historic Preservation Commission.; 2. Inform and give recommendations to area residents pertaining to the District's standards: a. Meet with new property owners and distribute the standards book along with other pertinent information. b. Notify the Commission of the names and addresses of new owners. 3. Advise'Commission of any possible infractions of the historic district standards that may occur with the property owners and work'with them toward a solution to the problem. 4. Hold liaison committee meetings once every four months or as situations arise. a. Keep records of all business conducted during these. meetings and all other meetings called by the historic district liaison committee. b. Disseminate pertinent information to the district property owners through whatever means available, such as a neighborhood newsletter, flyer, etc. 5. At least one representative of the committee attend the monthly Historic Preservation ' Commission meeting. 6. Participate in the scheduled revisions and updating of the historic district standards. 7. Make an annual report to the Commission at one of the regularly scheduled meetings. 1 Citv of South Bend Lunch & Learn Series Noon-1pm Humphrey' s Room S]CPL Free, register with Sue Solmos 574-235-5879 by January 4, 2010 January 7th, Early History of South Bend, Center for History folks January 14th - The Oliver & Studebaker Families - their impact on the City, Center for History folks January 21st - The Neighborhoods that they built, Historic Preservation & City of SB January 28th - Historic Districts - 9 Local Historic Districts and 9 National Register Districts, HLFI February 4th - Economic Development - Current & Long Range Projects February 11th - Updates on East Bank & Eddy Commons February 18th - Schools - New Programs - Successes! February 25th - Theater & Arts - We Do Have Culture!! March 4th - Parks & Recreation & Downtown South Bend. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE. OF APPROPRIATENESS Datei - December 14, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1214 Property Location: 2025 Mishawaka Firehouse #9 Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer Front Bungalow/1926/Ernest W. Young Property Owner: South Bend Fire Department Landmark or.Distriet Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: One -and half storey dormer front bungalow on a square plan with an offset brick chimney set on a brick foundation with a stone string course at the base. The walls have aluminum siding at the second storey, the rest of the exterior walls are stretcher bond 'brick. There is a two storey tower with a flat roof at the rear. The asphalt shingled roof has a side gable with aluminum sided knee braces and large front and rear gable dormers with the same aluminum siding. The front porch extends across the front of the firehouse and has a low brick wall with stone caps and brick pillars. The roof is an extension of the main roof with curved knee brace supports. There is a side shed canopy at the entry with similar bracing. The front entry at the porch is offset with multi -pane side lights. There is a side entry with multi -pane light door. There is 'a large garage door under the porch. The windows a 1/1 double hung sashes with stone sills. There is a square bay window With shed roof on the west side. ALTERATIONS: The 1979/1990 Survey card notes that the original glazed tile roof has been removed; that aluminum siding, storm windows and doors are replacements. The windows are not original to the structure. The current wood window sashes have insert lights with a composite plastic surround that are set into aluminum tracks. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of two windows. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT; The City wishes to replace two windows and replace them with solid vinyl 1/1 double hung ComfortWorld 6000 windows. The first window is located on the east side of the building and has a diagonal cracked pane in the upper sash. The sashes themselves still operate but are not in stable condition. The second window is located at the south of the building in the upstairs bathroom. It has deteriorated due to poor ventilation and heavy condensation. STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance, of any historical structure or site shall in, no way involve any direct physical change except for the general'tleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all truc'ures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defin as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the =proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change -in mass. A modification which involves the removal ofa part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material: Addtions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend the installation of the vinyl replacement windows. It recommends the installation of wood sash packs or inserts. DEC/15/2009/TUE 08:10 AM P. 002/002 Applimflo �l dtil t.! . FOR - Ccm im* of Approptiatmcss Hbtmk Preaemation Commission of. Soutf* Bond & St. Joselrh Googly - . . 1Z� � Lafayatfe B,1vd.�SoutltP$e:u�indEatat!�66Q1 ,,} . Mailing Ad&m Ccuntpat)' n& Souk r •46601. ' 'Phon�S?4,�35.97�96 • I�c674=�f�55'18 • Snteil;9>il?i�oo�it�fouephin•ue. • • . OFFICE USE ONLY»»>y'UO XVbT COAiP=ANY i $ GONHMW !N ISI'B a0R ssrai> OFFICW MW ONLY^ ate DReceived' /�De•C. ZOO'• AppXtcatiun Numtiar 2Dv�;L. " '/2 Put Reviews: L ] YBS (ibis eltatx lw) [Nth Staff Appoval mthoftd by: HfgWrk CummialonReviewD4tes 21 2>Ec ZOO ., ---- ---- .;. ..i•�y�,,�srYi�• `K!,",'; ;.� fir.•` �5 � �.;�;. � :. � _ '� � • r fl id Taridmk � OV '`f'1 1' �•. ��E`j �; �a��` to'� ih%. NatiortFl Laiidm rk`l""'� Ns1io 'QIDLMaf Ceetli to of Apprapriatoneaa: Varied FZktvleii;s`j']Sent�aCo iitZee_;�fApproved'a!il;Iasiied.' , t�+ra'�•'r . Adbm of Propariy Bsr.pro poseB:gran&::�^�'��.����,t:(,�)�!s'�R�•';�C/a.�t3,i•�P�>... ' 8tnsl.Nta�er•mi8lratlVeau �, ., ;.• :�s::,.x ' Nam of_Piapeq Pmer(a: (i�ia�� iii ` � � ��'� vr.X .�.v��v� ye_-��nM�.9 yq AddressA7L Pr� 4/�I�w►�a): •elf i i : -INN m_ pHa•S�r 2CA05Y y%'t :J Q Yii d� $i d+y t^Qntractor(s) None; G! i .�I� t;.� ' �i.� oar l.c� '. �.�at�,,,. ��"� ` ; �•< .' 9.:" .._ ' . . CantmocampmyName: Ws,vjltg.a> (A)rrlrl._...._ '. CantractorAddress: • i����l.S,a�+�,:�•rz�1�,�:�a:� , � p.;•r��»: .� . , ..- 3� ' Cur=t tJss of Building: t,'V n> ,-- -w . • • S.•(9tngraAatdty�•�Msj�f;'Rndiy�.Qxnnavd�vJ-,fps-i�phW��.�VaO�r�+eta) i . TM _9 :s: a^. rd'-' va•xy{y�.i.. Via.?ave _ .): .. :�4 • ,�.•a?•' :l^1Yti�5dt4r.'i r��y f's i;=i of Building Construction - Pop and onstruction:P opand mbild in-kind LudS¢ag+� [] New [� Replmuent W1 ie'ktnA. 0 Demolition (pumlllimcopebmrltpybcd,� 'i'. .. .. 'r.'�e, :'&}x�iQ.��,�.•:°isi:�.a� i,��i .31f,.�•=' . Desalption of tmposed tbrk: „ 1� l �t t : A • t�WaerlContr'actor: 3�sac .S"�W •�7-�--'3.� �1�„-,_ e•mail • (Thies,�a+dtco-rrmpo�mithmtfyyotudm�raa) � _ -0104h1RG►{GW / A K. anti/or . Cou1 fortW,f) lel 6000 hat7dfi°F.t' dBenefus • Fusion welded m}hes and rmiiriframe structure a(.Id srreri"I'li and rigidity. Tom -h, extra thick c°m-union walls provide the tiltimalc in wchling; strength. • Bev(,Icci exterior tnainfranie and s;ish and hidden scleetl track far added.bea ltv • FAtruded lilt r,iils provide strem.;th and stabilicy fiir easy alteration. • Quad -1 weatherstripping; at the header fiir added protection fE"oln the elements, • Triple barrier provides sul-criar protection against dirt and air infthrarion. • Sloped sill enhances lir(itectiorl from tli(' c'Ic'Ittettt.. 7be i llrwhT featu es are standifrr rl an all C;0n ji;7-A ba lW Mnekw, ifs. • Villl'l frollics alit} sashes trade toligll and solid s=Yrt) mid I'B`C, l ow,ivi that" -will ncvcr chip, heel, c:rad'. or warp. • Multi-c'harnbovd ,ash and rnainfranic frtr superior thernial ef# iciLnc.s°. • lntcrcelit" 'farm F.Ag;e Spacer System nuaimiles perfurrtialice and longevity. • Interlock at sash rticcull- rails crcatc,, a super -tight seal against air infillt:llion and adds to your sense of scCilrio.. • Drop-in glaring fit), extra l71,01cerion fi'ortt tic° clenments. • Dully extruded lift rails providc strength and Stability for easy' operation. 1111rs tbese "IdWitiarral erreIn res. • I)ual ventilator locks provide safe, secure ventilation. • } tell balance covers }tele protect :tg;aiiasr .til iniiltr:ittctrt S4`liile adding; a finished look to t'lu; window frainc. • Constant fitl'c:e balawx s}stem eliminates sash cords, weights elle( pulle,v". You'll brnefit fiom smooth, comfortable fingertip c penition. • Tilt -ill top and bonorn sasht's mala deanin" safe and easti' from ttl.si(L the home. trhanre} �rrrrcjirrrll rrJs rrtitl then- tti0jf • `�tll.trlxinc"frt:uf.tt(•d �;I.tsa lt;lck<t�.;r ii�.truring, l.t>�c=-[; � :, C Jass and V,irm f <clg;e Spam, cyst( m, for cnhamcd irmil.itins; ltcrfitrinallce. • full lir Iill f ftivrghs; scrcenti provide: ventilation 11'liilc' keeping, tn5eCtN (1111. • Standard, Canrc7l11' or Brass g;ridS -- l)laLed b(°M c11 tbC (nines for c.tsy c:k%ming;. • specialty gY,l'C)(wcd g l.t,s }laticl. fiir a tr(ilr cu lonl look. §71707 77 7:77-77 77= 77 I San v 1 WIN 12 to7, 7, MA z 2, W 8. MW IOU Z f6,i, Mar MIA X7 ilp a N A lot c IBM 0 N .j 11 Kl 11 yyuvK 0 v its zi -too." 1 -%mg-1 0 IBM "rot wfe 114 tie IN_ P 40 WYN tt 1 F, -3 ZU09 I Fire house #9, December 15, 2009 Broken window east side Upstairs bathroom. Photo is sideways I 0, *,' Fire house #9, December 15, 2009 Metal track on window to be replaced Typical window. This one is on the west side i V iA Typical window. This one is on the west side i V _ Director's Report December,2009 November 17 Participated in the Green Ribbon Commission's Land Use and Green Building Committee tour and presentation at the Good Shepherd Montessori School. Presented at the Area Plan Commission's meeting concerning the land -marked Bauer property and the moving of the buildings and that the COA necessitated HPC approval of the new site plan prior to any move. November 18 Contacted Marti Orr, Forester at I&M concerning the tree work in the West North Shore District to set up meeting with her and Jeremy Young of Asplundh about procedures for work in historic districts and the locations of the districts and the Iandmaxks. November 19 Met with Dina Harris, Director of Development; Professor Alfred Guillaume, Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, and Kevin James of IUSB at the Natatorium about the possibility of land -marking the building. Under criteria #1 for its role in racial segregation/desegregation as well as the health movement in Indiana that promoted swimming and #2 as an excellent example of Neo -Classical designed public building and its adapted re -use as a Civil Right Museum. Toured 307 La Monte with prospective buyers and Wayne Doolittle. Provided Kessler information for the Bowman Creek Project to Geri Hathaway. November 23 Personal Day. Spoke will Jeremy Young on cell phone from Ann Arbor and agreed to meet with him and Marti after the Thanksgiving Holiday. November 24 Meeting with Phil St. Claire, Mike Dyszkiewicz, Martha Lewis and myself about the Botanical Conservatories at Potawatomi.Park in 2010. There will be some City funding available to support the work of the all Volunteer work force and the Notre Dame heating project. Completed the final details for the CLG Reports of South Bend and St. Joseph County for DHPA. Presented at the County Council Committee meeting for HPC Office's Out -of -line transfer requests. They were sent to the County Council with a favorable recommendation. November 25 Finalized the drafts of the CLG Reports and e-mailed reports to Steve Kennedy and Malia Varnerman. Mailed hard copies with non electronic information to arrive by November 30 deadline. November 26 and 27 Office closed for Thanksgiving Holiday Weekend November 30 Met with Jeremy Young and Marti Orr'and provided them with reaps of local historic, districts, addresses of city and county landmarks and copies of all district standards. They agreed to continue to work -with Brent Thompson and HPC when it came to "trimming" electrical lines using as the model the procedures used for Chapin Park in the summer 2009. Met with Geri Hathaway concerning Innovation Park, IvyTech and the possibility of instituting preservation trades in the high schools or at one of the - vocational/tech schools. December 1 Presented at the County Council for the Out -of Line transfers. All passed unanimously. December 2 Prepared 2009 Purchase Orders for Postage, Preservation Specialist and 2 lateral file cabinets funded with the Out of Line transfers. Prepared copies of the office information on the Natatorium for IUSB faculty. Tabulated the Edgewater Liaison election results. December 3 Prepared end of year In -Line transfers and submitted. Mailed out results of Edgewater Liaison election to all homeowners in Edgewater. December 7 Deadline for December COAs. December 8 Participated in County Commissioners meeting for In -Line Transfers. All passed unanimously. Prepared Requisitions for Office supplies. Prepared Staff Reports. Attended Green Drinks after hours networking at Trio's. December 9 Prepared Staff Reports December 10 On site visits to 1016 Hudson and 802 Portage with Elicia. Worked on Completing Staff Reports. December 11 Finished Staff Reports, prepared packets for mailing to Commissioners and Staff Reports to homeowners. Turned in Accounts Payable for 2010 Historic Preservation Workshop Event. Attended University of Notre Dame Analysis of Zion United Church of Christ that evening. December' 14 On sight visit with Wayne Doolittle to local landmark at 2520 Mishawaka with John Machowiak from City of South Bend Central Services concerning replacing two current windows with solid vinyl replacement. Met with Common Council members: David Varner, Tom LaFountain and Ann Puzzello along with Martha Lewis to announce the awarding of a $60,000.00 grant from Wells Fargo for the upgrading of the electrical outlets at the Conservatories. Prepared Staff Report for 2520 Mishawaka after adding to Agenda per President Klusczinski's instruction. December 15 Met with Dina Harris, Director of Development of IUSB concerning the land -marking for the Natatorium and the language needed to put the proposal in front of the HPC. Gave St. Paul's Cemetery Land -marking presentation to the Land Use Planning Committee of the St. Joseph County Council. It was sent to the full Council with a unanimous favorable recommendation. December 16 Presentation on Historic Preservation as guest speaker to Sunrise Rotary Club at Honker's Restaurant. Provided information to Erin Blasko of the South Bend Tribune concerning the moving of the land -mark at 16021 Cleveland Road. December 17 Provided information to Dustin Grove of WSBT concerning the proposed move of the Daniel Ward House and out buildings from 16021 Cleveland Road. Assistant Director's Report HPC Meeting 12.21.2009 1. Green Ribbon Commission —Meeting to review the Energy Efficiency & Conservation Strategy draft Walk through of Good Shepherd Montessori School's USGreen Building Council LEED for Existing Building registered project 2. City Cemetery National Register Nomination Continuing transferring data from previously submitted document. 3. Fall/ Winter Newsletter Continued building email listsery from multiple sources Almost finished with the newsletter -will be finalized after next HPC meeting to include any upcoming events in early 2010. 4. Attend Chamber of Commerce Young Professionals Business Etiquette lecture over my lunch hour 5. Landmarks Assessment Looking through several disks that have photographs of Landmarks. Begin PowerPoint compilation of Landmark photographs. 6. Prepared 4 COA Staff Reports and mailed to homeowners. Made revisions. 7. Worked with a homeowner in the West Washington neighborhood regarding replacement clapboard and rotting window sills. 8. Attend USGreen Building Council monthly meeting in which we toured the late Playland Park as the new IUSB student housing, which is registered for LEED status. 9. Talked with homeowner in_ Taylor's Field about Grants. Consulted with Wayne and Sue Solmos to confirm that there are no grants available at this time. Contacted Monroe Park Messenger author Mike Cowan to confirm that there are no grants for that area at this time. 10. Attend Common Council meeting in support of proposed Local Landmark - Rushton Apartments. 11. Prepared HPC meeting minutes of 11.16.2009, emailed to Commission, delivered to City Clerk and Mayor. Revised minutes per President Klusczinski s suggestions. 12. Bowman Creek -We have received several inquiries on this. Investigation to determine the route and where it fed into the river. Compiled historic maps into digital document and forwarded to all interested parties. 13. Attend America Recycles Day at Green Tech Park. We toured the facility and learned that they recycle many demolished home components including lath, foundation materials and asphalt roof shingles. 14. Larry Shead of Donation Station met with me briefly at the HPC conference room to discuss potential partnerships 15. Weekly meetings with Sue Solmos of the City to discuss and assemble presentation for Lunch & Learn series coming up in January. Meeting with Center for History folks. 16. Attend Michiana History Group monthly gathering at the Elkhart Co. Historical Museum in Bristol. A steering committee was formed in which I volunteered to take notes and forward to the group. Behind the scenes tour of the museum storage area. 17. Attend Mayor's Luecke and Rea speech over my lunch hour on how the cities are using the ARRA money 18. Attend the Conservatories Christmas with santa event and sell Preservation Nuts 19. Meet with Paul of South Bend Tribune to select photographs for L&L lecture 0a --7: 54 1 �tit') S, G C RESOLUTION N0.09-02 Ecaply A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA ESTABLISHING STAFF PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana (the "Commission") exists and operates under the provisions of ordinances enacted by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, and the County Council of St. Joseph County, Indiana (the "Enabling Ordinances"); and WHEREAS, the Commission is empowered, pursuant to the Enabling Ordinances, to adopt and has adopted By -Laws for carrying out the powers and duties of the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Enabling Ordinances provide that the Commission shall issue a certificate of appropriateness before any one of the following actions is taken: the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any exterior feature of any building, structure or use; and WHEREAS, a certificate of appropriateness is not required for the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building, structure or use which will not involve a change in any exterior features; and WHEREAS, the Commission desires to establish procedures governing the conduct of the Staff of the Commission in order to avoid the Staff exercising powers or duties reserved to the Commission and to provide clear guidelines for the Staff to follow; and WHEREAS, Article 10 of the By -Laws provides the appropriate procedure for amending the By -Laws which requires that approval must be made by a vote of a majority of the Commissioners voting at a regular or special meeting of the Commissioners attended by all of them, provided that no such action shall be taken at a meeting of the Commission attended by less than all of the members unless the members are given at least ten (10) days notice of the substance of the proposed action to betaken at the meeting. The proposed amendment shall be introduced at one meeting and shall be acted upon at the next regular meeting or a special meeting called within at least ten (10) days notice; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the By -'Laws be amended to establish staff procedures for the conduct of the Staff of the Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new article, Article 9.5, is adopted as the guideline for the conduct of the Staff of the Commission and shall be added to read as follows: ARTICLE 9.5. STAFF PROCEDURES Section 1. Certificates of Appropriateness (COA). Staff should, under no circumstances, approve a COA for any property. The Commission has the sole authority for considering a request for a COA. Staff shall have the authority to make a determination that a COA is not necessary in the case of work that is the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building, structure or use which will not involve a change in any exterior features of the property. Work undertaken on a property owned by a staff person, a consultant to the Commission or a Commissioner that falls under the routine maintenance categorical exclusion of the Ordinance should be reported, in advance, to the Commission president for his/her approval that a COA is not required. Section 2. Non -Historic Siding. Removal of non -historic siding shall require a certificate of appropriateness. Section 3. Temporary Structures or Chances. Staff shall not have the authority to approve "temporary" structures or changes. Section 4. Monthlv Staff Reports. Staff approved routine maintenance exclusions shall be reported monthly. The monthly report shall list all site visits, phonecalls or e-mails by all staff with owners of historic properties where it was determined that a COA was not required because it was routine maintenance. Section 5. Presentations by Staff at Commission Meetinas. Staff presentations at a Commission meeting shall include the following images (at a minimum) a) an overall front exterior; b) specific images pertaining to the impacted area of the building or site; c) architectural drawings and images depicting the proposed alterations and d) photos of mock-ups and/or samples. This rule shall not be construed to limit the presentations made by the Staff nor by the applicant. 2 Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the Commission. PROPOSED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on July 20, 2009, and AMENDED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on November 16, 2009, in the Conference Room, 1308 County -City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Timothy S. Klusczinski, President Lynn Patrick, Vice President Linda Riley, Secretary Jerry Niezgodski, Treasurer Todd Zeiger, Member Sandra Rossow, Member Vacant, Member Vacant, Member Vacant, Architectural Historian 3 RESOLUTION NO. 09-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA ESTABLISHING STAFF PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana (the "Commission") exists and operates under the provisions of ordinances enacted by the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana, and the County Council of St. Joseph County, Indiana (the "Enabling Ordinances"); and WHEREAS, the Commission is empowered, pursuant to the Enabling Ordinances, to adopt and has adopted By -Laws for carrying out the powers and duties.of the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Enabling Ordinances provide that the Commission shall issue a certificate of appropriateness before any one of the following actions is taken: the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any exterior feature of any building, structure or use; and WHEREAS, a -certificate of appropriateness is not required for the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building, structure or use which'will not involve a change in any exterior features; and WHEREAS, the Commission desires to establish procedures governing the conduct of the Staff of the Commission in order to avoid the Staff exercising powers or duties reserved to the Commission and to provide clear guidelines for the Staff to follow; and WHEREAS, Article 10 of the By -Laws provides the appropriate procedure for amending the By -Laws which requires that approval must be made by a vote of a majority of the Commissioners voting at a regular or special meeting of the Commissioners attended by all of them, provided that no such action shall be taken at a meeting of the Commission attended by less than all of the members unless the members are given at least ten (10) days notice of the substance of the proposed action to be taken at the meeting. The proposed amendment shall be introduced at one meeting and shall be acted upon at the next regular meeting or a special meeting called within at least ten (10) days notice; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the By -Laws be amended to establish staff procedures forthe conduct of the Staff of the Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A new article, Article 9.5, is adopted as the guideline for the conduct of the Staff of the Commission and shall be added to read as follows: ARTICLE 9.5 STAFF PROCEDURES Section 1. Certificates of Appropriateness (COA). Staff should, under no circumstances, approve a COA for any property; The Commission has the sole authority for considering a request for a COA. Staff shall have the authority to make a determination that a COA is not necessary in the case of work that is the ordinary maintenance and repair of any building, structure or use which will not involve a change in any exterior features of the property: Work undertaken on a property owned by a staff person, a consultant to the Commission or a Commissioner that falls under the routine maintenance categorical exclusion of the Ordinance should be reported, in advance, to the Commission president for his/her approval that a COA is not required. Section 2. Non -Historic Siding. Removal of non -historic siding shall require a certificate of appropriateness. Section 3. Temporary Structures or Changes. Staff shall not have the authority to approve "temporary" structures or changes. Section 4. Monthlv Staff Reports. Staff approved routine maintenance exclusions shall be reported monthly. The monthly report shall list all site visits, phone calls or e-mails by all'staff with owners of historic properties where it was determined that a COA was not required because it was routine maintenance. Section 5. Presentations by Staff at Commission Meetings. Staff presentations at a Commission meeting shall include Dowel• oiiit Slides of other digitally pi-Eq1 in+age:; Burin,'-iHe. pf-e'-s,Cintcmiri-i r'! flie GE)RIffliSSiEffi meeting. PFEgeeii ng f' rho s„h;e..t p r4, ,- and !liePFEIP91Wd ella ,ge'1-t'lll I!IO .• thy, /-•onin,;s_•;on meiiiber-s and the ge ,•.,1 •;t. f l t ,•, eets ofthe rt, ,d the proposed P �i�;ta.+3�g and elate,-n���i-.;,crc ��.,p� _ . eha*ge ;—Tliir, niann�2,I ,tat; I, gives 0i F,:ov,"nei*sainething lee+�-t-4od«::n 2 M their- pfesentationi sii - by th , 11'0 , `'I)n This man nei- of p ntntian also . s that al C—'c��} �i i a1�� arcs lcic31�i33gL at li ;aawTie4He-i+H-h same-+HHenr-ing ian ep lanaiion-a d Tthe following images (at a minimum) shall be presented a) an overall front exterior; b) specific images pertaining to the impacted area of the building or site; c) architectural drawings and images depicting the proposed alterations and d) photos of mock-ups and/or samples. The . equi.-ed shallbeiaken (luring-die--requaifed.,it, TRZitT7tllet. tl, siaffmember- d the ,ill -C71. ' ' nThis rule shall not be construed to limit the presentations made by the Staff nor by the applicant. Section 2. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the Commission. PROPOSED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on July 20, 2009, and AMENDED AND ADOPTED at a meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, held on November 16, 2009, in the Conference Room, 1308 County -City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana 46601. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Timothy S. Klusczinski, President Lynn Patrick, Vice President Linda Riley, Secretary Jerry Niezgodski, Treasurer Todd Zeiger, Member Sandra Rossow, Member 3 Vacant, Member Vacant, Member Vacant, Architectural Historian SOUTH BEND & SAINT JOSEPH COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION December 21, 2009 MEETING GUESTS: PLEASE SIGN THIS LIST SO THAT YOUR PRESENCE CAN BE NOTED FOR OUR MINUTES Print Name Address �C'�7r tai �r S -,C, �- ,�/c TZ /�/ � �.>�,c.► �rJZA �,`f �,,.� /may t �,v�,� s •?� �. (� c t rl`o-✓L 37yrd'i S 3 ro l s. Lo�vs7� ��✓ S./ MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND & ST. JOSEPH COUNTY December 21, 2009 13`t' Floor Conference Room County City Building South Bend, IN 46601 I. CALL TO ORDER: President Klusczinski called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Members Present: Timothy S. Klusczinski, President; Linda Riley, Secretary; Lynn Patrick, Vice. President; Jerry Niezgodski, Treasurer; Sandra Rossow Staff Present: Larry Meteiver, Attorney; Catherine Hostetler, Director; Elicia Dadlow, Assistant Director; Wayne Doolittle, Historic Preservation Specialist Members Absent: Todd Zeiger Staff Absent: None Members of the Public Present: David and Brenda Bickel, Scott Kopinski, T. Schultz, Peter G. Payne, John Machowiak, Charles S. Leone, Charles McMannis, Brian Burris II. PUBLIC HEARING: A. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: October 30, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1026 Property Location: 1126 E. Wayne Street S. Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Colonial Revival/1927/H. Russell Stapp, Architect/Whitcomb & Keller Property Owner: Berry, Daniel and Deborah Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The home at 1126 E. Wayne Street is a two storey structure with an irregular plan set upon a concrete foundation. The exterior walls are brick. It has a slate gable roof with simple entablature and gable returns. One storey side wing with pent roof at 2"d floor line carried around house. Gable canopy entry with arch under and gable returns with brackets, brick stoop. The windows are double hung 6 over 1, brick soldier course lintels and cast concrete sills. One storey rear enclosed porch, enclosed by vertical wood siding with flat roof, concrete slab on brick. Two car brick garage with double swinging doors with windows, slate gable roof with cornice and trim returns. ALTERATIONS: None known APPLICATION ITEMS: Replace (2) garage doors (carriage style) with (1) carriage door. No windows. Have not used for cars in 30 years (doors small). Want (1) door so is more able to be utilized for cars. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner has engaged Raybuck Construction to replace the existing garage doors with a single, insulated overhead door in a style sympathetic to the existing carriage doors, trim and hardware, see style P2C. The proposed garage door will not have the windows as in existing for safety precautions. Homeowner states that the new garage door will be, "more conducive to being used for our autos and more accessible by me." Discussion with Wayne Raybuck concludes that they will shore up to remove center post and trim. A new laminated beam (LVL) and framing will be installed. Framing and door will be installed finished with trim to match original. EAST WAYNE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: II. EXISTING STRUCTURES C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement of the garage door, supported by the auxiliary nature of the structure and its placement toward the rear of the house. Furthermore, the carriage style of the garage door is comparable in style to that of the two original garage doors and will not detract in appearance from the surrounding structures. Applicant was not present and was not represented otherwise. COA 2009-1026 Continued until January Agenda at the verbal request of applicant STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 9, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1204 Property Location: 1016 Hudson Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: 1914/Gable-Front Property Owner: Tabitha Shultz District Designation: Riverside Drive Rating: Contributing 2 DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1016 Hudson is one storey wood shingle house with an attic set upon a brick foundation. It has a rectangular plan. The low hip roof with hipped gables on each side is covered with asphalt shingles. The windows on the body of the house are double hung in various styles and include a jalousie window on the west side; the windows in the attic appear to be original with six panes horizontal in each dormer; the windows in the basement are replacement Wenco single pane. There is a full front porch with brick walls and piers with concrete flooring and steps. ALTERATIONS: The original wood shingle roof has been replaced with asphalt shingles. The screened in front porch noted on the May, 1985 survey card has been opened. The May, 1985 noted that the windows were double hung 1/1. The current windows in the house are not all 1/1; but some do appear to be original with a 6/1/2/1 configuration. COA#2000-0428 allowed for the windows in the basement to be replaced, along with a rear storm door and repairs to the front and rear porches. The trim around the basement windows was not replaced. The jalousie window is a replacement as well. The storm windows appear to be replacements. APPLICATION ITEMS: To replace old windows with new high efficiency vinyl windows. Windows to match window pattern to existing windows. Please see attached sketches and brochure. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner wishes to replace all of the windows with vinyl, thermo pane American Windows. American Sunspace can replicate all of the windows that are in the house. The windows would be inserted within the casing and trim work and reduce the light byl '/z inches all the way around the opening. The six pane dormer windows would be sliding windows to allow for ventilation. The four 12 pane "swing -in" wood casements would be replaced with four 12 pane "swing -out' vinyl casements. The single pane wood "swing -in" casement in the back porch would be replaced with a single pane "swing -out' vinyl casement. The basement windows would be "hopper" windows to allow for ventilation as well. The jalousie window would be a 1/1 double hung window. The homeowner would like all of the windows in the main body of the house to be 6/1. The non -original storm windows would be removed. RIVERSIDE DRIVE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied window trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows, the other half wood windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features, such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Preservation Specialist, Wayne Doolittle met on-site with the homeowner and Scott Kopinski of American Window. Wayne could only observe the windows from the exterior of the home and is of the opinion that the windows could be fixed and with the addition of better M storm windows(Wayne's estimate was about $100.00 per storm window), be energy efficient. Scott Kopinski asserts that the cost of restoration would be almost the same as the cost for replacement windows. The 1985 survey card notes that the windows on the house were double hung 1/1. Currently there are several different styles and muntin patterns of wood windows in this house and perhaps the surveyor was looking at storm windows rather than the windows themselves. When the survey card was written the front porch was screened in so it is highly probable that the current windows on the front are the original one- third 3/3 lights over two-thirds 2 single lights. The four 12 pane windows also appear to be original to the house. The rest of the 1/1 double hung windows are probably original and the dormer windows certainly are original. The basement windows are replacement windows approved by the Commission in 2000. Staff recommends approval of replacing the replacement basement windows and the jalousie window with a double hung 1/1 window. The standards for Riverside Drive state that the windows can not be discarded if they can be restored in place. COA 2009-1204 was withdrawn by homeowner. Homeowner signed waiver to be heard on January's Agenda. STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 8, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1207 Property Location: 1055 Riverside Drive Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Prairie/1926/Gerber & Haley Property Owner: Charles Leone Landmark or District Designation: Riverside Drive Rating: Outstanding DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The house at 1055 Riverside Drive is a two and a half storey brick square structure set upon a brick foundation. The walls are brick in stretcher bond with herring bone brick panels in the main fagade. The hip roof is 12/12 with large stuccoed, hipped dormers on each side all with asphalt shingles. The gutters and downspouts are copper. There is a sunroom on the east end and a French door entry on the main fagade. The large French door style windows flank the entrance. The door is a single leaf wood frame, flanked by sidelights and a segmental transom in a recessed wood enclosure. The first floor windows are wood frame casements, the second floor has 6/1 double hung windows. There is a three car detached concrete block garage at the rear of the house. ALTERATIONS: The wooden exterior storms were installed over the leaded glass sidelights of the front entrance in 1986. The aluminum storm doors noted on the 1977 survey card were replaced in 2000 with COA 2000-0627-2. The surface of the driveway was replaced with concrete brick with COA#2006-0726. There have been various, approved changes to the landscaping over the course of the decades; dying front yard trees were removed in 1988. APPLICATION ITEMS: Placement of a new tree, a black gum (Nyssa Sylvatica) in the front yard of the property at the tree line, per the attached site plan. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The homeowner wishes to plant a black gum tree in the corner of the front yard by the drive way and sidewalk. RIVERSIDE DRIVE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: B. BUILDING SITE, LANDSCAPING AND ACCESSORIES Individual properties in the district are characterized by a house located in the center of a flat lawn, often divided by a walk leading to the front entrance. Several of the residences are sited on two or more building lots; however, the preponderance of the homes have been erected on a single lot. Most of the properties 4 include a double garage, usually located at the rear of the property. The majority of garages are accessed from straight driveways leading from the main thoroughfare, while a few are accessed from the alley. There are also a few homes with a covered carport located at the rear of the property, as well as a few with circular driveways. Driveway and sidewalk materials include concrete, asphalt and brick. All of the properties have trees and most have trimmed shrubbery and/or hedges. Most of the houses conform to a uniform setback line within each block. Required Plants, trees, fencing, walkways, private yard lights, signs (house numbers) and benches which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained. Recommended New site work should be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings and newspapers. New site work should be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type and appearance. Plant materials and trees in close proximity to the building that are causing deterioration to the building's historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. All high-intensity security lights should be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings or other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. Front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house. The installation of unsightly devices such as television reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from the public thoroughfare. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval. Brent Thompson, City Forester, said that the Black Gum is a beautiful tree appropriate for front yards. The tree will be near the location of a tree that was removed in 1988. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Lynn Patrick Vote: 5-0 COA 2009-1207 was approved with a unanimous vote STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 9, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1207A Property Location: 802 Portage Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Craftsman Bungalow/1915 Property Owner: Miller, Jason Landmark or District Designation: Chapin Park Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: The single family home at 802 Portage is a 1 '/z storey structure with and irregular plan set upon a brick foundation. The exterior walls are aluminum sided. It has a side gabled roof with a front gabled bracketed dormer with bellcast. Roof is of asphalt shingles. The windows are double hung 1 over 1 vinyl replacement windows. There is a metal awning over the dormer windows. A brick chimney is on southeast side. Full width integrated porch, enclosed with screens, flared brick piers. ALTERATIONS: Vinyl replacement windows (in which are being requested with this COA), attached 2 storey garage, aluminum siding, COA#2007-0827A re -roof and replacement of gutters (note: presently there are no gutters on the house other that above the front porch entry steps). �1 APPLICATION ITEMS: Remove/replace current windows and two doors windows to be vinyl replacement style. Doors will be steel insulated doors. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: An oversight on the South Bend Housing Authority's October list that was sent by email to the HPC failed to include 802 Portage. The Lead Abatement Program project to remove the current windows and 2 doors and install vinyl replacement windows and steel insulated doors was discovered in process by Wayne Doolittle, HPC Inspector. Because building permits were not pulled the project was red tagged by the Building Department while in progress. At that point 20 windows had been replaced, including 4 on the front of the house. The project is one window shy of completion and the two doors have not been exchanged. Solid 6 panel insulated steel doors are proposed for north door and south rear door, which will eliminate the window in present south rear door for security measures. CHAPIN PARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are in most cases wood and vary depending upon the style of the home. Many are double hung windows with wood trim and sills. Brick structures have stone sills and brick lintels. In some cases where aluminum siding has been applied, the window and door trim has been covered. About half of the structures in the district have aluminum storm windows; the other half has wood storm windows. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood storm windows and doors painted or finished to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used, they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window and door openings, which would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as metal, vinyl or fiberglass awnings, hoods or aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of original windows and doors, shall not be installed. Not Recommended Fake shutters that would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building should not be used. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff has no recommendation for the replacement windows as the project is nearly complete and we have no documentation as to what existed prior to the beginning of the project for lead abatement. Staff recommends approval of the two deteriorating doors that are probably not original to the house. On a motion by Linda Riley with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 COA 2009-1207A was approved by condition: Replacement only of the two doors with Commission taking no action on replacement of the windows STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 2 Date: December 8, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1207B Property Location: 1704 East Wayne Street Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Split Level/1953 Property Owner: Brenda and David Bickel Landmark or District Designation: East Wayne Street Rating: Non -Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: 1704 E. Wayne is a two storey frame home with a brick fagade on the first storey and vinyl "clapboard" siding on the second storey and the remaining three sides of the house. The house has a rectangular plan. The gable roof is covered with asphalt shingles and simple raking trim. The first storey has a large front picture window with double 4 light casements in wood frames with limestone sills. There are paired 4 light casements on the 2nd floor. There is a side brick chimney. The entry has a shed canopy supported by turned wood columns and railings set upon a concrete stoop. There is one storey gable roof side wing. There is a detached garage with siding and a gable roof with asphalt shingles. ALTERATIONS: The wrought iron posts and railings have been replaced with wood. The vinyl siding on the three sides of the house and second storey on the front of the house as well as the vinyl wrapping of all of the windows have been added. All of the windows, except the picture window, have been replaced with COA#2009-0706C. APPLICATION ITEMS: 1. Replace front entry door with wood exterior door. 2. Replace in-kind back west entry door with wood exterior door. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The goal of the project is to: 1) Replace the front door with a wood raised panel exterior door with a center window (see attached picture) In place currently is an interior hollow wood core door with center window. This is an interior door that was made -to -fit to the opening prior to 1987.2) Replace back west exterior wood door with an exterior raised vertical panel wood door on the bottom half and a double pane insulated glass, no mullions, mini blinds inside the glass on the top half (see attached picture),In place currently is an exterior wood door with raised horizontal panels in the bottom half and a single pane glass in the top half. Both doors and 36 inches wide but shorter than a standard 80 inch door. EAST WAYNE STREET STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: C. WINDOWS AND DOORS Window and door frames are of wood or steel (some casements) or in the case of brick structures, stone sills and brick lintels. Where metal or vinyl siding has been applied, window trim has been covered. Storm windows are of wood or aluminum. Required Original windows and doors shall be retained including sashes, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware. When deteriorated beyond repair, they shall be replaced with units and trim resembling the original. Recommended Wood frame storm windows and doors painted to match the original should be used but should not damage existing frames. If new sashes or doors are installed, the existing or original materials, design, and hardware should be used. When metal storm doors are used, they should be painted, anodized or coated to match the existing. When awnings are used they should be of canvas material. Prohibited Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and re -used in place. New window and door openings which would alter the scale and proportion of the building shall not be introduced. Inappropriate new window and door features such as aluminum insulating glass combinations that require removal of the original windows and doors shall not be installed. Not Recommended 7 Awnings, hoods, and fake shutters made of metal, vinyl, or fiberglass should not be used if they would detract from the existing character or appearance of the building. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the replacement of the non -original front door with the Madawaska Design #2791 wood door. Staff recommends approval of the replacement rear entry door with the single pane window over the double raised panel in the Madawaska Design Solid Wood 2000 Series. On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 5-0 COA 2009-1207B was approved with a unanimous vote STAFF REPORT CONCERNING APPLICATION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS Date: December 14, 2009 Application Number: 2009-1214 Property Location: 2025 Mishawaka Firehouse #9 Architectural Style/Date/Architect or Builder: Dormer Front Bungalow/1926/Ernest W. Young Property Owner: South Bend Fire Department Landmark or District Designation: Local Landmark Rating: Contributing DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE/ SITE: One and half storey dormer front bungalow on a square plan with an offset brick chimney set on a brick foundation with a stone string course at the base. The walls have aluminum siding at the second storey, the rest of the exterior walls are stretcher bond brick. There is a two storey tower with a flat roof at the rear. The asphalt shingled roof has a side gable with aluminum sided knee braces and large front and rear gable dormers with the same aluminum siding. The front porch extends across the front of the firehouse and has a low brick wall with stone caps and brick pillars. The roof is an extension of the main roof with curved knee brace supports. There is a side shed canopy at the entry with similar bracing. The front entry at the porch is offset with multi -pane side lights. There is a side entry with multi -pane light door. There is a large garage door under the porch. The windows a 1/1 double hung sashes with stone sills. There is a square bay window with shed roof on the west side. ALTERATIONS: The 1979/1990 Survey card notes that the original glazed tile roof has been removed; that aluminum siding, storm windows and doors are replacements. The windows are not original to the structure. The current wood window sashes have insert lights with a composite plastic surround that are set into aluminum tracks. APPLICATION ITEMS: Replacement of two windows. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: The City wishes to replace two windows and replace them with solid vinyl 1/1 double hung ComfortWorld 6000 windows. The first window is located on the east side of the building and has a diagonal cracked pane in the upper sash. The sashes themselves still operate but are not in stable condition. The second window is located at the south of the building in the upstairs bathroom. It has deteriorated due to poor ventilation and heavy condensation. LOCAL LANDMARK STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Group B Standards: A. Maintenance: The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment: Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include re -roofing, glazing or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions: Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original form and unity of the landmark and should not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity of overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure: Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Material: Additions and improvements involving any new material in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. a. Wood: all wood trim should conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. Siding materials: the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a siding similar to the original when renovation is considered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend the installation of the vinyl replacement windows. It recommends the installation of wood sash packs or inserts. Petitioner amended COA 2009-1214, substituting wood sash packs or inserts in place of the proposed vinyl replacement window. On a motion by Jerry Niezgodski with a second by Linda Riley Vote: 5-0 COA 2009-1214 was approved as amended: Substituting wood sash packs or inserts in place of the proposed vinyl replacement window. B. NATIONAL REGISTER NOMINATION 1. City Cemetery update Elicia Dadlow-Nomination has been set aside for December and will proceed in January. C. LOCAL LANDMARKS 1. St. Paul's Lutheran Church Cemetery — Madison Twp. Update Catherine Hostetler -Presented at the Land Use Committee of St. Joseph County Council and the proposed Landmark was sent forward to full Council with unanimous favorable recommendation. It is on 1.12.2010 County Council agenda. 2. Rushton Apartments Created a Local Landmark by the City of South Bend on 11.23.2009 III. HEARING OF VISITORS No visitors 0 IV. REGULAR BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — November 16, 2009 Second draft of Minutes was approved by consensus. No changes were proposed. B. TREASURER'S REPORT Location Report -Catherine Hostetler -The office was able to encumber $6,000 to pay the Preservation Specialist in December and to send $4,000 to HLFI for future restoration event. She also reported that less than $600 of the 2009 budget will revert to the County General Fund. C. STAFF REPORTS 1. Correspondence -File Circulated 2. C of A Approvals -Only one this month -will add it to next month 3. Director's Report -Distributed. Catherine discussed NSB Natatorium potential designation as Local Landmark given its position in South Bend history and Civil Rights Movement and that the fagade is in remarkable condition. Also, location of HPC 2010 meetings to be in County -City Building 13`" floor conference room. Also, recommended establishing a committee for Restore Michiana/Southold event. Requested committee begin work the first of the year. 4. AD Report -Distributed. Elicia discussed Lunch & Learn lecture and the upcoming online newsletter 5. Legal Counsel -Distributed Resolution 09-02 which has final version with and without edit in line with what was done at last meeting pursuant to Todd's motion. A signed copy will be added to the record book. One other point of order pertaining to President asking what representative capacity was of two individuals representing COA 2009-1207A is that when we have the COA filled out, there is a place for owner/contractor signature and generally owner signs; We can have situations where contractor signs on behalf of owner allowing authority to represent owner at Commission meetings. Tim responded that he found a listing a while back in and older municipal code. D. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. President's Report -None 2. Nominating Committee -Lynn Patrick reports that the committee met on 12.16.2009 at "Peaberry's Cafe', a.k.a. Chicory Cafe, at 7:03a.m. Slate of candidates as follows: Tim Klusczinski as President, Jerry Niezgodski as Vice President, Linda Riley as Treasurer and Lynn Patrick as Secretary. On a motion by Sandra Rossow with a second by Jerry Niezgodski Vote: 5-0 Motion approved with a unanimous vote to accept the nominations as presented V. OLD BUSINESS A. Architectural Historian Two potential candidates -one submitted resume and other has not. Tim will try and contact other individual to prompt him to send resume B. Update on Marquette 10 Jerry Niezgodski mentioned that it was in the newspaper to tear it down. We can make the case that instead of tearing it down, use that money they have set aside for demolition to be used for rehab. Catherine Hostetler proposed that after they make LaSalle High School back into a high school, move LaSalle Academy to Marquette so it would feed from the age group coming out of the Montessori school. Jerry agreed. Linda Riley mentioned that teachers have complained that the new Lincoln School is falling apart just like the new Riley High School. VI. NEW BUSINESS A. Linda Riley recommends that Staff send an email of Staff Approvals of In -Kind replacement as they come up. Discussion of tree trimmings in Districts. Staff will submit emails as Staff Approvals and In -Kind Determinations comes up. Discussion of Routine Maintenance Exclusions. VII. ADJOURNMENT On a motion by Lynn Patrick with a second by Sandra Rossow the meeting adjourned at 9:03 p.m. Vote: 5-0 Attest: Linda Riley, Date Secretary .�E•PRy it/rEZ�opFk2 D.�.T�' 11