The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMarch 1996• AGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING of the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular monthly meeting Count,,- Commissioner's 7:30 p.m. Conference Room Monday, March 18, 1996 7th Floor County City Bldg I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Public Hearing A. Certificates of Appropriateness 1. 1215 East Wayne St. N - window replacement & relocate trellis 2. .1332 East Wayne St. S - window replacement & mist. landscaping 3. 3rd County Court House - replacement of dome 4. 14.14 East Wayne Street - rear yard fence 5. 1724 East Wayne Street. - window replacement B. Second reading of recommendations for Local Landmark designations 1. 130 Park Lane IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes 1. .January 15, 1996 2. February 26, 1996 B. Treasurers Report C. Correspondence D. Committee Reports 1. Budget & Finance 2. Legal. 3. Historic Districts a. Liaison system 4. Historic Landmarks a. Status of recommendations to Common Council -- 534 LaPorte Avenue (Starzynski Texaco Gasoline Station) 3418 Mishawaka Avenue b. Leeper Park LL proposal c. request for 30750 Inwood Rd. 5. Standards & Maintenance a. 221 West North Shore Drive 6. Personnel a. interviews b. inLer.n E. Staff Reports 1. C of A Staff Approvals 2. DHPA. Grant: status a. National Register nominations h. Economic Benefits Study 3. Legal a. alternative modes of certific-ition. V. Old Business VI. N(,w Business VII. Hearing of Visitors VIII. Annonncoments & Miscellaneous M;)Lter.s IX. Adjournment 0 C\ce Vi 0- 4 ol • 0 2 dV I0-ta VON N9C7 04 � ; li V"\ i r CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT APPLICATION -- 1996-0224 PROPERTY -- 1215 East Wayne Street North South Bend, IN OWNER -- Bernard & Patricia Diedrich DESIGNATION -- East Wayne Street Local Historic District RATING -- Contributing (C-9) STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HISTORIC CONTEXT This Renaissance Revival style dwelling built in 1927 was designed by notable local Architects, Austin & Shambleau for Frank E. Shambleau and his wife Letta. Frank, an autoworker with Studebaker, was the brother of architect, N. Roy Shambleau. Letta's mother, Lena Klinghammer also lived here until her death in 1932. In 1944 the property was sold to Elbert A. Darnell, owner of Darnell's Drug Store. The building is finished in brick with arch -headed windows at the first floor which feature an unusual mullion pattern and a low -sloped hip roof. Notable features include a stone string course at the sill -line of the second story windows and iron balconies at the second floor windows. Existing second floor • windows are wood double -hung type with 6/1 mullion pattern. PROPOSED CHANGE The owners propose to replace the second story windows with new windows per the documentation provided. Replacement windows are to be exterior aluminum clad wood double hung windows with mullion inserts to imitate the existing. The owners also propose to relocate and rehabilitate the rear yard pergola and plantings. STANDARDS The Preservation Guidelines and Standards for the East Wayne Street Local Historic District state: I.B.(1). Required Major landscaping items, trees, fencing,...which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained.... Structures such as: gazebos, patio decks .... fixed garden furniture, trellises, and other similar structures shall be compatible to the historic character of the site and the neighborhood and inconspicuous when viewed from the public way. II.A.(1) Required Original building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, & painting. The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and material when deteriorated beyond repair.... II.A.(2) Recommended Whenever possible, original building materials should be restored.... Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors,... and other architectural Features. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT • II.C.(1) Required Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units resembling the original. RECOMENDATION The replacement windows proposed for this project are Eagle brand double hung with six/one simulated mull patterns per the documentation provided. These windows reflect the original design. Staff recommends approval of these windows. The rehabilitation of the pergola should probably be viewed as maintenance and would not in and of itself require review. However the relocation of the pergola does require review. Unfortunately, due to the applicant's being away from South Bend, Staff has not been able to ascertain the exact new location proposed, nor the associated landscaping changes which have not been further described. Staff therefore recommends tabling of these items. DBD 3/14/96 U • S our times more airtight than the industry standards, EAGLE Double Hung Windows are engineered with mylar-covered foam insulation behind jamb liners, snap -on mounting fins on all four sides of the frame, bulb weatherstripping and premium -grade butyl glazing tape and silicone caulk on the exterior. 41/2" jambs (extension iambs available) and modular sizing that fits today's construction measurements make installation simple. The easy -lift balance system means smoother operation and the tilt and lock mechanism facilitates cleaning. Removable wood grilles and self -storing storm and screen units are optional. ERGLE WINDOWS • DOORS A MASCO COMPANY 1 EAGLE SPECIFICATIONS wC-a°°°RS FRAME: All exterior frame parts shall be clad with premium grade T-6 aluminum extrusions having a wall thickness of .055. Fitted to the inside of these extrusions shall be clear, kiln dried, select wood components, treated with water repellent preservative, in accordance with NWWDA Industry standard IS4. The wood sill shall be clad with a T-6 aluminum extrusion to a point under the lower sash where it contacts a dual durometer vinyl extrusion to provide a positive thermal break. The basic jamb width is 4 9/16'. Optional jamb extensions are available to accommodate the wall thickness required. Snap -on mounting fins shall be provided on all four sides of the frame to permit positive anchorage to the building. Frames may be easily and efficiently joined together in multiple unit groups. Wood frame parts may be painted or stained. Both side jambs shall be equipped with a rigid vinyl extrusion to having a wall thickness of .060. Full length flexible foam shall be factory installed behind each jamb liner to provide resistance air and water infiltration and permit the sash be factory installed behind each jamb liner to provide resistance to air and water infiltration and permit the sash to be tilted. Installation clips are also available to be used in lieu of the snap -on mounted fins. SASH: All wood sash members shall be clad with T-6 aluminum extrusions, having a wall thickness of .055. Fitted to the inside of these extrusions shall be clear, kiln dried, selected wood components, treated with water repe;lent preservative, in accordance with NWWDA Industry standard IS4. Sash shall be mechanically fastened at the corners and sealed with butyl. EXTERIOR FINISH: A standard exterior finish of Sierra Bronze, Pebble Tan, and colony White tones are offered in a thermal setting acrylic film that fully covers the exterior. • GLAZING: The sash shall be glazed with 5/8' EAGLE Maximizer Low E or clear insulating glass, having a 7/16' inside air space. The insulating glass fabrication shall consist of a dual seal for added longevity and stability. The glass shall be held in place from the i interior with wood stops that are pin -nailed for easy reglazing. The insulated glass is set i in a butyl bed to insure the seal between the sash extrusion and the insulated glass. It is recommended that the glass not be used in altitudes in excess of 5000 feet above sea level. Special high altitude glass is available. HARDWARE: Each pair of sash shall have a check lock and sash lift factory installed. Each sash shall have two specially designed, pivot -lock mechanisms which permit each sash to be pivoted inward, at the bottom of the sash and held in place there while the sash is tilted inward for washing. The pivot -lock mechanism shall be made of zinc die cast components. Each sash shall have two spring balances or block and tackle assembly depending upon the sash weight. Balances shall be factory installed, semi -concealed, in vertical channels of the side jamb liner. SCREENS: Screens shall consist of charcoal fiberglass screen cloth, 18x16 mesh, set in a Sierra Bronze, Pebble Tan, and Colony White aluminum frame. Screens are also available with an aluminum mesh. Screens shall be fastened to the window unit using spring bolts. REMOVABLE WOOD GRILLES: Colonial Lite 5/8" or 7/8' wood grilles of unfinished wood are available as an option. COMBINATION UNITS: An optional, self -storing storm and screen unit shall be available to be mounted on the outside of the window unit. Sierra Bronze, Pebble Tan, and Colony White are offered as color finishes. A thermosetting acrylic film fully covers the exterior. Frame shall have perimeter weatherstripping. PERFORMANCE: The EAGLE Double Hung Window System meets requirements for • ANSI/NWWDA IS 2-87 Grade 20, Grade 40, Grade 60. Japanese JIS 10 and 20 kilograms per square meter. Canadian CMHAC (the application for CMHAC has been filed). Dade County requirements, Dade County Florida, 89-1212-1 (88). EAGLE Products protected by U.S. Patent Number 4207707. I 86 1 • • Standard 41/2" jamb with extension jambs available. • Butyl glazing tape and silicone caulk on interior. • Mylar -covered foam insulation behind jamb liner resists air ant water infiltration. • Modular sizing for easy installations. • Optional wood grilles snap out for simple cleaning. • Positive thermal break in wood sill. • Full screen or self -storing storm/screen combination. • Can be grouped together or with other EAGLE products. • Security lock flush with check rail. • 5/8" double -sealed insulated glass. • Bulb weatherstrip seals like your refrigerator door. • Low -E Maximizer glass available. L� ERGLE WINDOW UNITS wenows-aoa+s AMASL6 COMimMY ■■ ■■■ ENEON 0 NNE won m on ■■■ ■■■ �■�� ■■ ■�� ■■m owns mison ■/t ■■N IasIll son I. �� on ■o■ NNE o■ �� MEMO no mom ■■E on M 0 iso ■■■ �� III �� ■�■ ��t ��/� 111 mom m■■ �■o s■■■ god 1111111 . /� 111 �� ■�■ ■�� ■■■� i/ 111 111 ■■■ ' ■■� 11 111 III ■■■ ■■� - 11 � iil 111 ;o; „ ,,,I 11 111 111 �� iiia ■�■ ..... .�� ■.■ iii ,.■�■ ■ is m■■ ■ X11 son OMNI ■ME 111 moo ■o■ ONE so i11 son ■■■ ■■m NONE ■■1 ■mm �� 111 '� �� ■■■ ■�� ■■�� IN 11on 0 I go ` III on �� III � �� ■■■ ■■� ■■■� IN 111; t 1�� ■■■ ■■�■�� 6 D E -r A I L S ERILE WDXXWSDOORS Im'scocwp— NAILING FIN NAILING FIN 7" L HEAD JAMB n 30 DEGREE DOUBLE -HUNG ANGLE BAY ROUGH OPENING WIDTH Sim EXTENStONJAM8_ INSTALLATION CLIP I 3pJAMil SILL 45 DEGREE DOUBLE HUNG ANGLE BAY ROUGH OPENING WIDTH —j: INSTALLATION CLIP SIDE EXTENSION JAMS INTERIOR MULL COVER INSULATION INSULATION, XINSULA ON INSULATION 45* ANGLE BAY 30' ANGLE 13AY CLOSURE CLOSURE J p, CAULK CAULK 30' ANGLE SAY MULL COVER 45* ANGLE SAY MULL COVER 90 DISCOVEREAGLF-EQUAW CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT APPLICATION -- 1996-0306 PROPERTY -- 1414 East Wayne Street South Bend, IN OWNER -- Jennifer Lackman C; DESIGNATION -- East Wayne Street Local Historic District RATING -- Contributing (C/9) STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT This house was built by Whitcomb & Keller in 1927. The house was designed by H. R. Stapp in a Colonial Revival style reminiscent of French dwellings on the Mississippi Valley. It was purchased by Stapp and his wife Eva, but they never resided there, selling it back to Whitcomb & Keller. It was subsequently sold to Charles Pask, a sales manager with the Industrial Acceptance Corporation located in the Studebaker Administration Building, and his wife Ruth. in 1935, the Prudential Insurance Company foreclosed on the Pask's mortgage and the property was subsequently sold to Prudential in a sheriff'ss tax sale. Prudential sold the property to Richard G. Hudson, manager for the Studebaker Export Company, and his wife Marian. PROPOSED CHANGE The owner requests approval of construction of a rear yard fence per the documentation submitted. S TANDARD S The Preservation Guidelines and Standards for the East Wayne Street Local Historic District state: I.B.2. Recommended - Now site work shall be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type, and appearance. T.B.3. Prohibited - ... front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house.... RECOMMENDATION This application has been submitted following the commission's previous denial of this fence as it was constructed without Certificate of Appropriateness or building permit. The present application requests approval of the fence to enclose the rear yard and extending along the west property llnc to the setback established by the front porch. Though constructed of synthetic material, the fence reflects the character of site elements and buildings in the district. Staff recommends approval of the rear yard fend as proposed in this application. DBD lif 1196 • CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT, APPLICATION -- 1996-0307 PROPERTY -- 1724 East Wayne Street South Bend, IN - OWNER -- Jane Werth DESIGNATION -- East Wayne Street Local Historic District RATING -- Contributing (C) STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HISTORIC CONTEXT This H. R. Stapp designed dwelling was built in 1927 by Whitcomb & Keller. Originally purchased in 1929 by Raymond & Sarah Boner, the house was rented in 1930 to Dr. Cecil M. and Electa Sennett who purchased it in 1931. It was subsequently sold in 1933 and by 1935 had become rental property. in 1937 it was purchased by Clinton Knapp, owner of a feed business and his wife Lena. The original style of the house was Tudor Revival which has been obscured by substantial alterations in 1948, including addition of a wing at the rear, a shed dormer above the front porch, a bay window at the front, and enclosure of the porch. The exterior finish of the building is painted brick. Typical • windows are double hung type with 6/6 mullion patterns although several other types are present as additions or replacements. The second story paired window at the facade is surrounded by fixed shutters with cut-out tracery. PROPOSED CHANGE The owner proposes to replace the twelve existing second story windows with new windows per the documentation provided. Replacement windows are to be exterior aluminum clad double hung windows. STANDARDS The Preservation Guidelines and Standards for the East Wayne Street Local Historic District state: II.A.(1) Required - Original building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, & painting. The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and material when deteriorated beyond repair.... II.A.(2) Recommended - Whenever possible, original building materials should be restored.... Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors,... and other architectural Features. II.C.(1) Required - Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units resembling the original. • RECOMMENDATION The proposed replacement windows are to be Pella brand Designer series windows per the documentation provided. the existing mullion patterns are to be replicated. Staff recommends approval of this application. DBD 3/14/96 , Z. Designer o is Double -nun g Windows "Designer Series" windows have a unique design and profile, particularly the double -burnt. Its more elegant—it just looks like a finer piece of craftsmanship. All the other brands look alike." Wood construction adds beauty and takes advantage of one of natured best insulators: wood's tbernuil resistance is 1,500 times greater than metal Sash corners are jastened three ways—inter- locking wood joints, metal fasteners andglue—to stay true. Corrosion -resistant aluminum cladding with our baked -on EnduraClad" fmish is standard in Wbae, Tan or Broum—nearly every other color is also avail- able. And aluminum won t warp, and or split like vinyl, even in seacoast environments. Higbly effective weather stripping reduces air infiltration to less than one-half the industry stan- dard for residential udndows. 7b make sure, we factory -test =re standard operable double -hung unndow, so homeowners don 7 have to finish the "m - house testing. " Lowell Pratt Pratt (fomes White Bear Lake, Minn. Botb sasb arefully operable, for fledble ventilation that lets home 7tcrs take full advantage of cooling breezes. Both sash pirotfor convenient mashing of eelerior gla<s j•otn inside. I mike olber brain& ther7r balanced.so Ilm- (Ion't brit e to be propl)ed tt/t jrtr 11r1.49in,,l. Innovative SntartSasb " glazing options iuc/trtle hi, hl r e�Lrenl hisidshie/d " instdalingglax Or trdh a restorable inlenor prvtel. trhich (tllotes gt71h',Y or,slhnshade' bltntic betteem llxv juaeti Pella -engineered, sea- coast-mortl�y bardmare prot•iden• prolection front lbc, elements al un tip chat e. 7hrct sl�ntdard f ini, h opltons are to ailable: (bantpq nte. ffi vx or Rbile. A variety of installation acces- sories are at ailtrble to nttrke t our job assimplea povible. Acept4;'ec,N- ,3/ for more in/btntalron. w 1)(18 lgalc Set --1shading options with- [hree, mayor advantages: s: lwafilot� location, location. from dust and damage. That's a real advantage for anyone with kids ... with pets ... or with better things to do than An rune who's ever dusted a blind trill appreciate our erdusire,slirttshelde, bliu(ly, trbich f it neall ), betrreen the ptntes. atrar,vm dust rind damage. 7hel"reavailable in While and ener �)-e(%iriertt Goldtone 71pe 6 (shotrrt). clean mini -blinds. But Pella' between -glass options offer other benefits as well. They don't cover up the window's beautiful lines. They even increase both energy effi- ciency and comfort. For example, our exclusive Slimshade' blinds can cut winter ionable fabrics. Grilles are available in our .Rz For so,lish control over light and shading, we offer fabric pleated shades in (from top left) Almond, Pearl, Winter White, White Eyelet, Vanilla, Parch- ment and Gardenia Hammered Silk. classic pattern or special patterns that you create. It adds up to a whole world of options—all of which fit into the space between the panes. 6 Quality that lives up to the Pella reputation At Pella, we use the same high standards in creating heat loss by as much as 52%, and summer our window and door accessories as in building the products heat gain by up to 42%. Just think of the difference that can make to someone who's sitting next to a window on the coldest day of the year ... or the warmest. A wealth of colors, fabrics, styles and patterns Whatever type of between -glass option your home- owners choose, they'll be able to find the perfect complement to any room. Slimshade blinds x themselves. That's why our grilles are finely crafted real wood rather than flat, featureless plastic. Not only does the wood stand up to close inspection, it can be painted or stained to match the window finish—inside and out. We've also made sure that grilles and shading options can be removed, added or changed if the homeowner wants something different in years to come. Which is even more important when you consider how long these windows are built to last. are available in White or energy-efficient PellaI grilles tire bmuttfully detailed real wood,, not plastic. 1 ver since Pella invented the concept of putting Goldtone Type E; bends, shades or grilles between panes of glass, home- pleated shades owners have loved the idea—and for good reason. are available in Mainly, it's because between -glass options are protected a variety of fash- from dust and damage. That's a real advantage for anyone with kids ... with pets ... or with better things to do than An rune who's ever dusted a blind trill appreciate our erdusire,slirttshelde, bliu(ly, trbich f it neall ), betrreen the ptntes. atrar,vm dust rind damage. 7hel"reavailable in While and ener �)-e(%iriertt Goldtone 71pe 6 (shotrrt). clean mini -blinds. But Pella' between -glass options offer other benefits as well. They don't cover up the window's beautiful lines. They even increase both energy effi- ciency and comfort. For example, our exclusive Slimshade' blinds can cut winter ionable fabrics. Grilles are available in our .Rz For so,lish control over light and shading, we offer fabric pleated shades in (from top left) Almond, Pearl, Winter White, White Eyelet, Vanilla, Parch- ment and Gardenia Hammered Silk. classic pattern or special patterns that you create. It adds up to a whole world of options—all of which fit into the space between the panes. 6 Quality that lives up to the Pella reputation At Pella, we use the same high standards in creating heat loss by as much as 52%, and summer our window and door accessories as in building the products heat gain by up to 42%. Just think of the difference that can make to someone who's sitting next to a window on the coldest day of the year ... or the warmest. A wealth of colors, fabrics, styles and patterns Whatever type of between -glass option your home- owners choose, they'll be able to find the perfect complement to any room. Slimshade blinds x themselves. That's why our grilles are finely crafted real wood rather than flat, featureless plastic. Not only does the wood stand up to close inspection, it can be painted or stained to match the window finish—inside and out. We've also made sure that grilles and shading options can be removed, added or changed if the homeowner wants something different in years to come. Which is even more important when you consider how long these windows are built to last. are available in White or energy-efficient PellaI grilles tire bmuttfully detailed real wood,, not plastic. • r CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT APPLICATION -- 1996-0228 PROPERTY -- 1332 East Wayne Street South South Bend, IN OWNER -- Christopher Craft DESIGNATION -- East Wayne Street Local Historic District RATING -- Non—Contributing STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT This dwelling was built in 1955 combining Contemporary style Colonial Revival massing elements. The building facade is finished in stone at the first story. the house is clad with wide synthetic lap siding. Windows are surrounded by fixed shutters at the facade. features and The remainder of casement type PROPOSED CHANGE The owners propose to replace the existing windows with new windows per the documentation provided. Replacement windows are to be exterior aluminum clad casement windows. They also propose to replace the existing front door with an insulated core metal six panel door with brass latch knocker, and kickplate, to replace the existing full view storm door with a similar door with larger glass area, and to add four low shrubs as foundation planting across the facade. STANDARDS The Preservation Guidelines and Standards for the East Wayne Street Local Historic District state: I.B.(2). Recommended — New site work should be based on actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property. found in photographs, drawings,- and newspapers. New site work should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type, and appearance. II.A.(1) Required — Original building materials shall be retained. Deterioration of wood materials shall be prevented through repair, cleaning, & painting. The existing or original architectural detail around windows, porches, doors, and eaves shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and material when deteriorated beyond repair.... II.A.(2) Recommended — Whenever possible, original building materials should be restored.... Every effort should be made to retain the original trim around windows, doors,... and other architectural Features. II.C.(1) Required — Original windows and doors including sash, lintels, sills, shutters, decorative glass, pediments, hoods, and hardware shall be • retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units resembling the original. RECOMMENDATION The proposed replacement windows are to be Pella brand Proline Series casement windows per the documentation provided. These windows reasonably reflect the CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT design of the original windows. Staff believes the original windows to be Pella. The proposed storm door is to be nearly identical to the existing. The shrub foundation plantings proposed are consistent with typical landscaping of surrounding properties. Staff recommends approval of these items as conforming to the guidelines. _ The existing front entry door is of 1950s contemporary design in keeping with the style of the house. The proposed six panel door does not reflect this character. Staff believes the three panel contemporary design to be available in a modern steel door, and therefore recommends denial of this item. DBD 3/14/96 • 1�1 • r Proline' features that make the difference (✓ , � l F.r _Y --•ate ��,., . is w;.a. Windows and doors are pre - assembled and ready to install. Continuous fold -out aluminum installa- tion fins with corner attachments make your job even quicker. Solid wood construction is wormer, more beautiful—interiors can be painted or stained as your customers prefer. Naturally, we use only select woods that are treated to repel insects and water. Superior weatherstripping systems keep air and water outside where they belong, even in harsh envi- ronmental conditions. For example, casements, fixed windows and sliding doors won't leak even in rain driven by a 50 mph wind. And they handle 155 mph winds like a breeze, earning them a Grade 60 rating when tested against NWWDA performance standards. sR moi• - ^t �`'r `3 . � - srrr�rd . .,*,F t Optional screens and real wood muntins are made with the same attention to quality as our wind- ows and doors. (Muntins are prefinished white; screens are rust -free fiberglass (loth.) And we package them separately, so they won't get in your way. • Convenient packaging reduces boxes that pile up on site. Instead, we use a clear wrap that protects windows and makes it easy for you to check their condition upon delivery. Your choice of clear or high- performance InsulShield'" glass is available. Our state-of-the- art argon -filled InsulShield" insulating glass provides superior energy effiden- cy, reducing heating and cooling bills by as much as 24 percent! And the advanced double low -E coating helps protect furniture, carpets and decor from fading. It's all part of the Pellao Envirometric System" (see page 20 for more information). "Computer simulation average compared to single -pane wood windows. Actual savings may vary. Low -maintenance exterior features sturdy aluminum cladding with our exclusive Enduradad" coating in White or Brown. Homeowners love the way it resists chipping, cracking and peeling for years. Sturdy, seacoast -worthy hard- ware will work smoothly and easily for a very long time. For example, operating hardware is tested up to 10,000 times—equal to daily use for more than 11 years. t; I tib 4� Y J� Superior weatherstripping systems keep air and water outside where they belong, even in harsh envi- ronmental conditions. For example, casements, fixed windows and sliding doors won't leak even in rain driven by a 50 mph wind. And they handle 155 mph winds like a breeze, earning them a Grade 60 rating when tested against NWWDA performance standards. sR moi• - ^t �`'r `3 . � - srrr�rd . .,*,F t Optional screens and real wood muntins are made with the same attention to quality as our wind- ows and doors. (Muntins are prefinished white; screens are rust -free fiberglass (loth.) And we package them separately, so they won't get in your way. • Convenient packaging reduces boxes that pile up on site. Instead, we use a clear wrap that protects windows and makes it easy for you to check their condition upon delivery. Your choice of clear or high- performance InsulShield'" glass is available. Our state-of-the- art argon -filled InsulShield" insulating glass provides superior energy effiden- cy, reducing heating and cooling bills by as much as 24 percent! And the advanced double low -E coating helps protect furniture, carpets and decor from fading. It's all part of the Pellao Envirometric System" (see page 20 for more information). "Computer simulation average compared to single -pane wood windows. Actual savings may vary. Low -maintenance exterior features sturdy aluminum cladding with our exclusive Enduradad" coating in White or Brown. Homeowners love the way it resists chipping, cracking and peeling for years. Sturdy, seacoast -worthy hard- ware will work smoothly and easily for a very long time. For example, operating hardware is tested up to 10,000 times—equal to daily use for more than 11 years. How to get a great window for the price of a good one ow more than e\-cr, your customers demand the most value out of es-er\- dollar the\- InVest in it home. At the same time, they don't want to compromise on duality. That leaves you with a next -to -impossible task: finding; products that combine dualit\,, performance, curb appeal and exceptional value. But when it comes to choosing; windows and doors, \,Our job is far from impossible. Because t Pella(. ProLine" products deliver the brand name \,our customers trust and the features tile\, want most—at a price everyone can appreciate. ProLine products deliver \\,flat you want, too. Front head to sill, they're designe&with \,our needs in mind, with easy -to -handle preattached installation fins, convenient protective packag- These Proline® Double -Hung windows feature a beautiful wood interior that can be pointed or stained, as your customers choose. And there are no visible nail holes, just the warmth of natural wood. ing (fewer boxes to get in your way!) and more. c� They're shipped to meet your schedule, and built with all the care and attention to detail you'd expect in a fella product. We e\-cn factory -test ever;' operable Prol,inc product—so your customers won't have to finish the the "in-house testing" for us. For. all rlTese.reasons, you can count on ProUne wi flows and doors to live up to }our reputation for duality—becaus��\,e build them to live tip to ours. Premulled Proline combinations like this distinctive triple casement help you save time. And with more than 150 sizes and combinations available, you can create a "signature" for every home you build. • CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT, APPLICATION -- 1996-0306 PROPERTY -- 1414 East Wayne Street South Bend, IN OWNER -- Jennifer Lackman DESIGNATION -- East Wayne Street Local Historic District RATING -- Contributing (C/9) STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT This house was built by Whitcomb & Keller in 1927. The house was designed by H. R. Stapp in a Colonial Revival style reminiscent of French dwellings on the Mississippi Valley. It was purchased by Stapp and his wife Eva, but they never resided there, selling it back to Whitcomb & Keller. It was subsequently sold to Charles Pask, a sales manager with the Industrial Acceptance Corporation located in the Studebaker Administration Building, and his wife Ruth. In 1935, the Prudential Insurance Company foreclosed on the Pask's mortgage and the property was subsequently sold to Prudential in a sheriff'ss tax sale. Prudential sold the property to Richard G. Hudson, manager for the Studebaker • Export Company, and his wife Marian. PROPOSED CHANGE The owner requests approval of construction of a rear yard fence per the documentation submitted. STANDARDS The Preservation Guidelines and Standards for the East Wayne Street Local Historic District state: I.B.2. Recommended - New site work shall be based upon actual knowledge of the past appearance of the property found in photographs, drawings, and newspapers. New site wort: should also be appropriate to existing surrounding site elements in scale, type, and appearance. I.B.3. Prohibited - ... front yard areas shall not be fenced and fences shall not extend forward beyond the setback line of the house.... RECOMMENDATION This application has been submitted following the commission's previous denial of this fence as it was constructed without Certificate of Appropriateness or building permit. The present application requests approval of the fence to enclose the rear yard and extending along the west property line to the setback established by the front porch. Though constructed of synthetic material, the fence reflects the character of site elements and buildings in the district. Staff recommends approval of the rear yard fence as proposed in • this application. DBD 3/14/96 CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT 9 APPLICATION -- 1996-0301 PROPERTY -- 105 South Main Street South Bend, IN OWNER -- St. Joseph County DESIGNATION -- Local Landmark RATING -- Outstanding (0/13) STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT Construction on the third county courthouse began on October 31, 1896 and the building was completed in 1898. The building was designed by the Chicago office of Shepley, Rutan , and Coolidge, a Boston firm, and constructed by James Stewart & Company. The supervising architect for the project was George Selby who remained in South Bend and practiced briefly with Ernest Young. The style of the building is Academic Classicism as had been popularized at the Columbian Exposition in Chicago. It is constructed substantially in limestone. The Dome is constructed of iron frame with terre-cotta leaf pattern shingles. PROPOSED CHANGE The owner proposes to replace the existing dome framing and cladding. The replacement material is proposed as precast concrete panels articulated to 40 replicate the shingle pattern, restore the copper cupola elements and flagpole and reconstruct the fineal crown. The owner also proposes to repoint stone masonry as required around the entire edifice and to clean the building with mild chemical agents and low pressure water rinse. STANDARDS The Preservation Guidelines and Standards for Local Landmarks state: Group B C.1. Structure - Necessary structural improvements , where safety demands, should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. C.2. Construction and Style - All work should be done in the architectural style and in a technique compatible with that of the original structure..... C.3. Materials - Additions and improvements involving any new material in the building should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. RECOMMENDATION As of this writing, a meeting of the Landmarks Committee has been held to review this proposal with its designers. It is anticipated that the Landmarks committee will make recommendation following this meeting in consultation with • Staff. Therefore no recommendation is put forward in this report. David B. Duvall 3/14/95 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING of the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Special Monthly Meeting County Commissioner's 7:30 p.m. Conference Room Monday February 18, 1996 7th Floor County -City Building I. Call to Order John Oxian, president of the commission, brought the meeting to order at 7:35 p.m. II. Roll Call Commission members present were: Richard Bullene, Catherine Hostetler, John Oxian, Jerry Wiener, & J. Edward Talley. Janeanne Petrass joined the other commissioners soon after commencement. Commission staff present were: David Duvall, director and Aladean DeRose, counsel. Also attending the meeting were: Anne Bokenkamp and Howard Dukes. III. Public Hearing A. Certificates of Appropriateness 1. 1996-0130; 221 West North Shore Dr. (NSHD) - Request for approval of • general exterior rehabilitation of residence. Mr. Duvall read the Staff comments and circulated photographs and scope of work documentation. After some discussion clarifying the particular specifications which remained insufficiently defined Mr. Wiener moved for approval of the application as recommended subject to review of the size and design of the skylights, material and design of replacement doors, design of window infill at the rear porch, and layout of the rear deck. Mr. Talley seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved. B. National Register Nomination 1. Studebaker Wagon Works - Carpentry Building, 637 South Lafayette. Mr. Oxian informed the commission that he had met the previous Wednesday with Jon Hunt of the Department of Economic Development to discuss this building among other issues. Although the building is in the vicinity of one proposed alternative site for the new county jail, Mr. Hunt is interested in seeing it saved. Mr. Oxian suggested that anyone knowing of a not-for-profit group which might have interest in this building should contact him regarding the possibility of occupancy. The owner has expressed willingness to donate the building for such a purpose. Mr. Oxian indicated that if progress not made on this front in the near future, both this building and the Standard Surplus building may possibly be threatened by jail construction. Mr. Duvall read the staff report on the application which has been submitted by Glory -June Greiff as part of the HPC's activities partially funded by the DNR-DHPA Historic Preservation Fund. Ile also circulated the file including all • required documentation and notification information, and the criteria used in assessing eligibility. He further noted that no correspondence had been received in response to the notifications of these proceedings. Mrs. Hostetler moved that the proposal for the nomination of the Studebaker Wagon Works Building 930-30A be sent to the Mayor with a recommendation for its approval. Mrs. Petrass seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously 0 approved. IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes - January 15, 1996 Mr. Oxian tabled consideration of the minutes until the March meeting to allow sufficient time for their review. B. Treasurers Report The Treasurer made no report. C. Correspondence Mr. Duvall Indicated that due to his accident, he had not had an opportunity to develop the correspondence report for this meeting. D. Committee Reports 1. Budget & Finance Mr. Wiener indicated that there was no report for this month. 3. Legal Mrs. DeRose indicated that she had not yet had an opportunity to study alternative forms of certification. She sought clarification of the desire of the commission for a device to allow after -the -fact approval of work done without COA which conforms to the standards and guidelines. She noted that amendment of the ordinance might be required to accomplish this end. Mr. Oxian observed that a tree had been removed at 1202 Lincolnway East without COA. He requested that Mrs. DeRose send a letter to the owner requiring replacement of the tree. Mrs. DeRose inquired as to whether the owner had probability of sufficient resources for such a replacement. Mr. Oxian indicated that he believed so. Mr. Talley observed that the area around the former Potpourri site was receiving new sidewalks, and that another nearby house had recently removed a tree from the tree -lawn without COA. He noted that the tree removed from the tree -lawn should have required city approval. Mrs. DeRose inquired what was known of these trees regarding description. Mr. Talley indicated that the first tree discussed was of approximately three feet in diameter and was located at the north corner of the lot near the tree lawn. Mrs. DeRose asked about the applicability of evidence the owners might have of necessity from tree horticulturists etc. Mr. Talley responded that the question at hand was whether procedures had been properly followed without regard to the merits of the action. 4. Historic Districts Mr. Oxian observed that there had been an article in the South Bend Tribune about the proposed Lincolnway West Local Historic District and that he had received only positive comments. 5. Historic Landmarks A) Mr. Oxian reported that the status of local landmark proposal for 534 LaPorte remains tabled by the Common Council but has not been withdrawn. He requested that other members should visit the site and give comment as to whether the commission should reactivate this recommendation or drop it in light of the brick veneer which has been added since the proposal was tabled by the Common Council. Mr. Talley inquired about the underground tanks. Mr. Oxian indicated that they were still in place but should probably be required to be removed. • B) Leeper Park Proposal Mr. Oxian reported that the standards and guidelines from Boston have been sent to the Parks Department for their review. Ile indicated that a letter had been received from them requesting a meeting to review the standards. Mr. Talley will establish a meeting for members of the Landmarks Committee to meet with Park Dept. staff. c. 415 Parry Street - Mr. Duvall stated that he had met with Rebecca Shriner, the owner of this Local Landmark regarding her concern that Robert Henry, the owner of a nearby contracting firm had indicated an intention to rezone her property and several adjacent residential lots for light industrial use related to expansion of his business. Ile indicated that he had discussed the position of the commission that unless there was a proposal on record which would effect the landmark status and character, the commission did not yet have standing for the discussion. Ms. Shriner had indicated that she would probably present some such proposal in that case. However no application or proposal had been received to date. He also stated that he has had no direct discussions with Mr. Henry although telephone messages had been exchanged. Mr. Oxian observed that this issue had been discussed when he met with Jon Hunt and that the city was not excited about the prospect of this rezoning. 6. Standards & Maintenance Fr. Bullene reported that the committee had met to discuss the pending request for COA at 1414 East Wayne Street. Having in the interim had the opportunity to visit the site, he stated that it was obvious that the fence was • inappropriate. This judgment was based on his analysis that the neighborhood was constituted by houses which are slightly overscaled to their lots and that the esthetic character was mutually reinforced by the continuity of space from yard to yard. The committee recommended that the fencing be removed from forward of the building set -back. Mr. Duvall observed that the owner had submitted a letter which had duly been distributed for review by the commission and reminded the commission that this application was still pending decision, having been referred to committee and that a denial would be required prior to a request for removal. After some discussion of the technicalities involved with the documentation necessary for purchase of a permit, Fr. Bullene moved that the application for a fence at 1414 East Wayne Street be denied. This motion was seconded'by Mrs. Petrass. The motion passed with a roll -call vote as Follows: Fr. Bullene voted yes because a portion of the fence as constructed is in violation of the standards and guidelines and that the fence is contrary to both the letter and the spirit of the guidelines. Mr. Talley voted yes concurring with the reasons stated by Fr. Bullene. Mr. Wiener voted yes concurring with the reasons stated by Fr. Bullene. Mrs. Petrass voted yes concurring with the reasons stated by Fr. Bullene. Mr. Oxian voted yes noting that individual deviations from standards without Certificates of Appropriateness could not be allowed. Mrs. Hostetler voted yes concurring with the reasons stated by Fr. Bullene and noting that the work constituted a clear violation of the standards. • 6. Personnel Mr. Duvall reported no change in the personnel status. Our notice of the available position has been published in the Southhold Newsletter. Several resumes have been received and Mr. Duvall is to establish interviews. An intern is scheduled for 3 hours of work per week during March. This person has expressed interest in the assistants position. • E. Staff Reports 1. C of A Staff Approvals a. 1007 Hudson Av. (RSD) - in-kind replacement of stockade privacy fence at rear yard. This COA was processed by John Oxian & Ed Talley in Mr. Duvall's absence due to his accident. 2. DHPA Grant status a. Mr. Duvall reported that he had come to agreement with Deputy Auditor, John Lentz that funds which the HPC deposits with the County will be added to the cash balance in the commissions appropriation thereby making them available for our use. b. National Register nominations: Ms. Greiff is proceeding with work on the outstanding nominations. Mr. Duvall reported meeting with her and staff from the State Historic Preservation Office in which it was determined to not proceed with the nomination for the South Bend Brewing Association property, but to submit the research and documentation to the SHPO as a file for future use. The reason for this decision is doubts as to the eligibility of the property due to lack of integrity at the present time. Mr. Talley inquired as to whether the cistern was being included in the North Pump Station nomination as he knows that parking expansion may soon be proposed which could effect this structure. Mr. Duvall responded with a definite maybe noting that he and Ms. Greiff had not conclusively determined the boundary description and noting that the National Register status would not effect such an impact unless federally funded. Mr. Oxian noted that the landmark status includes the site. Mr. Duvall noted that • the site boundary for this landmark was ambiguous as he has found the legal description to be inaccurate. Mr. Talley noted that there was an original condemnation in 1895 for the first pump station and artesian wells. Mr. Oxian stated that his presentation to the Common Council had indicated inclusion of the pump station, the cistern, and the reservoir. Mrs. DeRose indicated it would be helpful to review the minutes of the common council meeting whence this designation was established. Mr. Duvall indicted that the National Register boundary would be either the perimeter of the building itself or the driveway path which circumscribes the area. The latter plan is the more probable choice and would include the cistern. Mr. Oxian observed that the site established in the park for the relocation of the Pharoh Powell house remains a landmark even though the house has burned. b. Economic Benefits Study The Appraisal Group has completed approximately 800 of their work. Receipt of the Draft Report has been delayed but is anticipated in the coming month. V. Old Business VI. New Business Mrs. Petrass cited some of the complaints from Dr Lackman's letter regarding the lack of notification and information about historic districts which often come as a surprise to property owners. This sort of complaint to be too common, especially after insufficient disclosure in the case of new purchases, • and raised the question of how the commission can address this problem. Ms. DeRose stated that she has always maintained the legal position that an owner is on constructive notice that their property is within a historic District (or other development or use description) and that it is the owner's responsibility to inquire about and obtain required information. She noted that this was a legal position but that the commission could possibly avert • the use of such arguments by acting pro -actively to assure better notification. She also noted that there have been insufficient funding in past years to enable direct contact to all property owners. She noted that the commission could contact new owners after purchase if there was some way of becoming aware of such transfers. Mrs. Petrass recalled that Liaison committee members had been directed to track changes in occupancy but that these committees have generally become inactive. Mrs DeRose stated that the commission has no duty to make such contacts. However, she does not like to see letters such as the one presented. Mr. Talley indicated that when the designations are recorded which is our current intent, the disclosure of historic designation will become more efficient as part of title work associated with a sale. Mr. Duvall stated that this recording is in process. Mr. Oxian reminded the commission that the districts are identified by signage at their boundaries and that realtors are generally good about informing potential buyers of Local Landmark status. Ile expressed concern about the selling off of (and subsequent development of) farm acreage which is included in rural Landmark designations. Mr. Duvall noted that the commission receives prior notification of re -plat proposals which we review for impact on historic sites but that this procedure does not prevent the selling -off of small parcels for development. Mr. Oxian indicated that he thought a notification of rural owners should be undertaken to assure their understanding. Fr. Bullene returned to Dr. Lackman's statement that the standards are unavailable. Mr. Duvall clarified that these books are out of print (excepting River Bend) and are not available for distribution but that he had provided her with photocopies of the sections which pertain to her application. Fr. Bullene inquired as to whether the standards were available at the libraries. Mr. Duvall stated that though the IHSSI Summary Reports and City -County Preservation Plan are in the libraries, the district Plans are not. He also noted that the district plans were available for review in our office. It was generally agreed that the placement of these plans in the public libraries would be beneficial. Returning to Dr. Lackman's letter, Mr. Wiener expressed concern that there seems to have been extensive work done over a period of four years, none of which seems to have had benefit of permits. Mrs. Hostetler indicated that this was one of the reasons for referring this COA to committee, as there appeared to have been contractor negligence in this regard. Mr. Talley expressed frustration with a decline in home -owner pride relative to the historic neighborhoods and failure of the commission to assist in supporting such neighborhood spirit. He saw the lapse of the liaison system as endemic to this situation. He stated that the commission often seems to find itself positioned as "the bad guy" when occurrences such as the difficulties at the Lackman home arise. He suggested that major action be taken in a timely way to address this issue such as a white paper or committee action. Mr. Oxian stated that he had difficulty sympathizing with this sort of complaint as it would be nearly impossible to move into or live in a historic district without knowing the area to be so designated and that there are standards associated. He focused on the liability and negligence of contractors in not seeking proper licensing and permits. Ms. Bokenkamp, the liaison from Riverside Drive LHD stated that she sees this • as a public relations problem, having purposefully purchased a home in a historic district and being excited about it. She observed that promotion of benefits would be helpful in alleviating complaints. Mr. Oxian noted that a study of economic benefits was in progress. Mr. Talley re-emphasized the need to address the snowballing effect of owners successfully contracting for or performing wort: without COA. Mr. Talley brought the discussion back to the need for commission action to address this failure of communication. Mr. Oxian stated that he would look to newer members of the commission for ideas as the longer standing members have been unable to find effective solutions, noting the liaison system and spring letters. Mr. Talley suggested surveying residents. Mr. Duvall expressed reservations about the effectiveness of surveys, noting the difficulty of designing, collecting, and analyzing them. Anne Bokenkamp suggested focus groups as an alternative means of sampling public opinions and attitudes. Mr. Talley briefly discussed his recent survey of residents in his district, citing the questions pertaining to truck traffic and speed. He inferred from the responses that people may often be unaware of laws. Mr. Oxian suggested contacting other commissions. Mr. Talley indicated that in his discussions with other commissions no-one else owns up to having this problem. Mr. Duvall suggested that the Historic Districts Committee convene to discuss the issue of neighborhood communications and the liaison system. Mr. Talley expressed frustration with being held at fault for administering regulations developed by neighborhoods themselves. Mr. Oxian observed that commissions are the only government bodies which are administrative, legislative, and judicial. He also recalled that the commission is empowered to appoint liaison representatives in the absence of procedural action by the neighborhoods to identify their own. A. There was a first reading of the proposal to designate 130 Park Lane as a Local Landmark. • VII. Hearing of Visitors none VIII. Announcements & Miscellaneous Matters none IX. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. • • STAFF REPORT PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK 130 Park Lane HISTORICAL CONTEXT This house was designed by Callis Miller and built for Arthur L. May and his wife, Elba in 1929. Mr. May was an attorney with Craybill, Crumpacker, and May the oldest firm in South Bend at that time, established by Andrew Anderson in 1856. ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION The two story brick building is designed in Georgian Colonial Revival style and is finished in brick. It features balanced brick chimneys at either side, a three bay facade with six over six double hung windows with shutters, dentilated cornice, and a transom fan moulding with trellis -like door surround at the main entry centrally located on the front facade. The west facade contains a three sided bay window extension. The roof is hipped. A small garage with a unique arched overhead door opening is connected at the east side by a vestibule. RECOMMENDATION Based on the HPC Local Landmarks Criteria, the building at 130 Park Lane has been recommended by the Landmarks Committee of the Historic Preservation Commission as a Local Historic Landmark. The building meets the criteria in at least two areas. 1.) Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or craftsmanship which represents an architectural characteristic or innovation. 2.) Its suitability for preservation. The building fulfills criteria #1 as a finely articulated architect designed period revival house. The building fulfills criteria #2 by the integrity of its original construction with only minor alterations. DBD 3/13/96 • l J • Introduction PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC LANDMARKS IN 1, . Preservation Standards for historic landmarks are used by the Hip.toric Preservation Commission whenever exterior changes are proposed for officially de;ignated structures. Review is required when proposed plans for building and develor);:,ent indicate the architectural character of the landmark will be changed. These standards are an extension of the present Ordinances #5567-73 and dl54A-1973 already adopted to implement a comprehensive program of historic preservation The present historic preservation ordinances empower the Commission to issue or deny a Certificate of Appropriateness prior to the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any landmark. The ordinances also give the Commission the power to establish reasonable and just standards for the preservation of historic landmarks, including architectural treatment, site development and maintenance provisions, providing that the standards are in keeping with the intent of the ordinance and that the standards apply only to the exterior- features of the historic landmark. These standards guide the Commission in their review of Certi- ficates of -Appropriateness. The two major conditions under which change will occur are maintenance or in:pravement and the demolition of an existing landmark. One Historic Preservation Commission has established two levels of preservation standards - Group A and Group B. Group A Standards are the more comprehensive of the two and require that the original character of a building be maintained or - restored. Group B Standards require that the building be maintained as is and, if possible, returned to the original. One of these levels will be selected at the time of designation. Both require a Certificate of Appropriateness before the construction, reconstruction, alteration, demolition or moving of any I;andmark structure or site. The property owner is responsible for furnishing the Commission with a complete description of the proposed changes. This information may be plans, elevations, specifications, photographs, or other means to accurately describe the project. When an application is being reviewed, it will be the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate that the new work is compatible. Definitions Shall - Defined as an expression of something that is mandatory or gust be done. Should - Defined as an expression of obligation, somethinq that ouUrt to be don; but that is open to compromise. Group A Standards. The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the 0T-xtent of any proposed treatment, renovation or addition to a historic landmark. he Commission will require drawings, plans, specifications, samples and/or color schemes in detail where appropriate. It -2- A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historic structure or site shall in no .jay involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkee, of the landmark The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all structures or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or or.iginal form in any way. Such improvements include painting, reroofing, glazing, resurfacing drives or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission will review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces in material selection, color and scale. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general • massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification i•:hich involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition (See Demolition). Additions to landmarks must not detract from the original fora) and unity of the landmark and must not cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity or overall appearance of the site. The proportions, P.iaterials and ratios of the existing structures should be car-ried through in the addi- tions. Care must be taken not to change or alter the following: I. Structure - Necessary structural improvements, where safety demands, shall be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Construction and Style - All work shall be done in the architectural style and in a technique compatible with that of the original structure. A change that alters, removes or covers existing significant stylistic detail shall not be permitted. A change which adds detail of another style :ill not be per- mitted. 3. Materials - Additions and improvements involving any new material on the landmark shall be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size, color and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates the original. •�. a. ti•:ood - all wood trim shall conform with existing trim in shape and size. b. siding materials - in no case should original materials of landmarks be altered or covered with additional siding. Structures already sided with I • incompatible materials should be returned to a material of original visual character when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When a landmark poses a threat to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods shall be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this docurpientation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply to the Commission for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. Billboards and supergraphics • will also be disallowed. Only one appropriate identifying sign %.till be permitted per business. Group B Standards. The Commission has the authority to determine the architectural merits and the extent of any proposed treatment, renovation, or addition to a historic landmark. The Commission will require drawings, plans, specifications., and/or samples ."where appropriate. A. Maintenance The maintenance of any historical structure or site shall in no way involve any direct physical change except for the general cleaning and upkeep of the landmark. The Commission shall encourage the proper maintenance of all• structures or sites. B. Treatment Treatment shall be defined as any change of surface materials that will not alter the style or original form. Such improvements include reroofing, glazing, or landscaping lawns and may involve a change that can potentially enhance or detract from the character of the landmark. A treatment change of any surface whether on the landmark or in its environment may require a Certificate of Appropriateness if it significantly alters the appearance of • the landmark. Although these kinds of changes may not require a Building Permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be necessary. The Commission should review the proposed treatment for character and style consistency with the original surfaces. C. Renovation and Additions Renovation is the modification of a structure which does not alter the general massing while an addition is a change in mass. A modification which involves the removal of a part of the landmark should be considered under demolition (see Demolition). Additions to landmarks should not detract from the original forri and unity of the landmark and should riot cover singular examples of architectural detail. Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the visible unity or overall appearance of the site. The proportions, materials and ratios of the existing structures should be carried through in the additions. Care should be taken not to change or alter the following: 1. Structure - Necessary structural improvements, :,here safety demands should be accomplished in such a way as to cause minimal visual change to the original style and construction. 2. Construction and Style - All work should be done in the architectural style and in a technique compatible with that of the original structure. Change that alters, removes, or covers existing significant stylistic detail shall not be permitted. A change which adds detail of another stvl e v.,iI1 riot be • permitted. 3. Materials - Additions and improvements involvin;; any new :-raterial in the landmark should be of the same material as the original. It should be the same size and texture. An alternative material may be allowed if it duplicates -the original. a. wood - all wood trim should conform with existing trir, in shape and size. b. siding materials - the Commission discourages the covering or alteration of original materials with additional siding. Structures already sided with incompatible materials should be returned to a sidine, similar to the original when renovation is considered. D. Demolition Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. When: a landmark poses a threat, to the public safety, and demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive methods should be made of both the exterior and interior of the landmark. The person or agency responsible for demolition of the landmark shall be responsible for this documentation. E. Moving The moving of landmarks is discouraged, however, moving is preferred to demolition. When moving is necessary, the owner of the landmark must apply t -o the Commission • for a Certificate of Appropriateness. F. Signs No neon or flashing signs will be permitted unless they are original to the structure. i Bia llboards and supergraphics will also be disallowed. Only one -5 - appropriate identifying sign wi\| be permitted per business. To apply for a Certificate of Appropriateness, or if there are any questions regarding these Standards or about work you wish to do on your landmark building contact: The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St' Joseph County Room 1123 County/City Building South Bend, Indiana 46601 Telephone: 284-9798 5/85