The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAugust 1993AGENDA OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Regular Monthly Meeting County Commissioners' 7:30 p.m. Conference Room 7th Floor, County/City Building August 16, 1993 I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Public Hearing A. Certificates of Appropriateness 1. 615/617 Riverside Drive -- Riverbend LHD 2. Shetterley Park Fountain -- Riverside Drive LHD 3. 1228 East Wayne Street (N) -- East Wayne LHD IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes -- July 1993 B. Treasurer's Report -- July 1993 C. Correspondence D. Committee Reports 1. C of A (Staff Approvals) A. 629 Riverside Drive B. 1077 Riverside Drive C. 12657 State Road 23 D. 1717 East Wayne 2. Budget and Finance . 3. Legal 4. Historic Districts 5. Historic Landmarks 6. Standards and Maintenance 7. Personnel 8. Staff Reports V. Old Business VI. New Business VII. Hearing of Visitors VIII. Announcements and Miscellaneous Matters IX. Adjournment C CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT PROPERTY -- 615/617 Riverside Drive South Bend, IN 46616 OWNER -- Dennis J. Laskowski DESIGNATION -- Riverbend LHD STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT The house at 615/617 Riverside Drive is an American Foursquare. It is rated C/10, contributing, on the Indiana Historic Sites and Structures Inventory. The house was built in 1914 by Seth Hammond and Leslie Whitcomb, of Whitcomb and Keller, as a real estate venture. William H. and Sarah J. Kryder bought the property in 1915. Between 1941 and 1947 the house was converted to a double residence. PROPOSED CHANGE The applicant's proposal calls for the removal of all stucco from the second story exterior surfaces. Those areas will be covered with vinyl siding. In addition, All fasciae and soffits will be sided. The applicant also wishes to fully side the garage. Concerning the front porch; the applicant intends to install four (4) sections of wooden railing. He intends to remove one front door and replace it with a window, the installation of which would use brick that matches the existing brick in both dimensions and color. The applicant intends to replace the existing porch columns with those of a "similar type" and to cover the porch ceiling with aluminum bead board. The applicant intends to "build out" the gables and install a half -round louver. Concerning the windows; the applicant plans to install thirty-one (31) vinyl replacement windows, all of which will be wrapped in vinyl. Concerning the doors; the applicant intends to install three (3) 24 gauge, wood textured, steel entry doors. The applicant proposes the replacement of the garage pad and the installation of 31 inch sidewalks leading from and around the house. He also intends to remove and replace the street sidewalk and install new front steps. The applicant plans to install a six (6) foot privacy fence. STANDARDS Concerning the removal of stucco and the application of siding the standards state: "Masonry including... stucco shall be maintained." page 3 II.A.1. and "The existing architectural detail around windows, porches, doors and eaves should be retained..." page 3 II.A.1. Concerning the front porch the standards state: 2Existing or original porches... shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials..." page 5 II.D191. and "Original porch details should not be replaced with materials representing a different period or style from the original." page 5 II.D.4. Concerning the gables the standards state: "The existing or original architectural detail around windows... shall be retained or replaced by replicas of the same design and materials..." page 3 II.A.1. STANDARDS; continued Concerning windows the standards state; "Original windows... shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the original." page 4 II.C.1. and "Original doors, windows and hardware shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place. New window or; door openings that would alter the scale and proportion of the building may not be introduced." page 5 II.C.3. Concerning doors the standards state: "Original...doors... shall be retained or when deteriorated beyond repair, replaced with units and trim resembling the original." page 4 II.C.1. and "Original doors ... shall not be discarded when they can be restored and reused in place." page 5 II.C.3. Concerning sidewalks the standards state: "Distinctive existing features such as ... walkways ... shall be retained." page 1 I.A.1. and "...walkways ... which reflect the property's history and development shall be retained." page 2 I.B.I. RECOMMENDATION The HPC staff recommends against this proposal. As offered it clearly conflicts with the standards of the Riverbend LHD. Chip Frederick HPC staff • 8-6-93 • RENOVATION OF 615/617 E. RIVERSIDE DR. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT — HOUSE/GARAGEtREMOVAL OF STUCCO FROM UPPER PORTION OF HOUSE AND SIDE HOUSE AND GARAGE -INCLUDING FASCIAS, AND SOFFITS WITH VINYL SIDING. WORK CONTRACTED ON' MAY 12, BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED MAY 25, #965659 ON HOLD. LAP BOARD SIDING ORIGINALLY, MR. HOLYCROSS VERIFIED. — FRONT PORCH!INSTALL FOUR SECTIONS OF WOODEN RAILING, REMOVE DOOR AND REPLACE WITH WINDOW, INSTALLATION TO USE ORIGINAL/MATCHING BRICK, REMOVE AND REPLACE THREE WOODEN COLUMNS WITH NEW OF A SIMILAR TYPE, COVER PORCH CEILING WITH ALUMINUM BEAD BOARD. WORK. CONTRACTED ON 14AY 5, ON HOLD. --GAEL)ES:BUILD OUT AND INSTALL HALF ROUND LOUVER, CONTRACTED ON APRIL 26/27, ON HOLD. _BAgyr pPRgH Fj He ST_ -I fiAV A;B SNSTATT Ge B!! T ATA T 99..7AV4TT.a\e i7 SS•'• WINDOWS:INSTALL THIRTY ONE VINYL REPLACEMENT WINDOWS, WINDOWS wRAPPED IN'VINYL. ::ORK CONTIRACTED A�:Y 10, ON ?CLD —;)00RSs INSTALL THREE STEEL E'1T3Y DOORS, WOOD TEXTURED, 24 GUAGE. WORK CONTRACTED ON APRIL 26/27, ON HOLD. CONCRETE;REPLACE GARAGE PAD; INSTALL 31 INCH SIDE 4ALr:S, 3 EJ'OVE A`.zD REPLACE ST3EET SIDE AALKS, I-NI73TALL FRO dT STEPS, WORK CCNTRA CTED Oli AP3ii, 30, GT3 nu.Li D. r E<dCE' INSTALL A 6 FOOT PRIVACY FENCE. T/1 11T "]T T'1 /1 /1T TT/'1T TST ' TTA T "�T)TT)T AlTT? !T'TT ..IwT TtI "e1T n'- VL V 11 \LJl J111 ee?;T A GTBB f1TT T'TTuGN . �T�� MASGNRY isHED • CNS •-�aAR:ft'' � � � i� ` r � � t: „fir► , � �. _ �n""� <�" +' »,y .• F±'` a x�f/ ..X.+MNt ,I t: x�f/ ..X.+MNt ,I t •n +. • 615/617 Riverside Drive garage north elevation south elevation \ A�! WIN t��GjiL\ )WE Q/'� eez r`��. Rall 1 _�- M7r 3 s �1 • RENOVATION OF 615/617 E. RIVERSIDE DR. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT HOUSE/GARAGE:REMOVAL OF STUCCO FROM UPPER PORTION OF HOUSE AND SIDE HOUSE AND GARAGS INCLUDING FASCIAS, AND SOFFITS WITH VINYL SIDING, WORK CONTRACTED ON MAY 12, BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED MAY 25, #965659 ON HOLD. LAP BOARD SIDING ORIGINALLY, MR. HOLYCROSS VERIFIED. FRONT PORCH:INSTALL FOUR SECTIONS OF WOODEN RAILING, REMOVE DOOR AND REPLACE WITH WINDOW, INSTALLATION TO USE ORIGINAL/MATCHING BRICK, REMOVE AND REPLACE THREE WOODEN COLUMNS WITH NEW OF A SIMILAR TYPE, COVER PORCH CEILING WITH ALUMINUM BEAD BOARD. WORK CONTRACTED ON KAY 5, ON HOLD. --GABLES.BUILD OUT AND INSTALL HALF ROUND LOUVER, CONTRACTED ON APRIL 26/27, ON HOLD. WINDOWS.INSTALL THIRTY ONE VINYL REPLACEMENT WINDOWS, WINDOWS *RAPPED IN VINYL. -.ORK CONTRACTED X --%.Y 10, ON -?CLD - DOORSj INSTALL THREE STEEL E71TRY DOORS, WOOD TEXTURED, • 24 GUAGE. WORK CONTRACTED ON APRIL 26/27, ON HOLD. -- CONCRETE ! REPLACE GARAGE PAD, INSTALL 31 INCH SIDE 4A; -or S, REI,'OVE A:1D 3EPLACE STREET SIDE �vAl,riS, INSTALL FRONT STEPS, WORK CONTRACTED 011 AP2I1-, 30, Olv HOLD. - FENCE , INSTALL A 6 FOOT PRIVACY FENCE. `'LReeiz HeT48B, v^iilieii�BirrGjr, TN9r. r r [SVT_ NEE* T.r A49HiNG iNs T T GTSTLRA g* GAP, L eRi R BE WASHRP - 0 • RENOVATION OF 615/617 E.. RIVERSIDE DR. MATERIALS SECURITY FENCE: 1 X 6 X:.72" FENCE BOARDS(TREATED), 4 X 4 X 9, POSTS (TREATED), 7 D GALVANIZED NAI -L --S: SIDEWALKS; 34" SIDEWALKS AROUND HOUSE, NEW SIDEWALKS IN FRONT OF HOUSE. ROOF: 20 YEAR FIBERGLASS 2KO SHINGLE, 36" ICE SHIELA 30 LB. FELT PAPER, PLYWOOD SHEETING 1/2 CDX 3 ply, CHIMNEY FLASHING(ALUMINUM), CHIMNEY CAP. • SIDING: HOUSE/GARAGE MASTIC TLOCK SOLID VINYL, DOUBLE FOUR/WHITE, SOLID VINYL SOFFIT, ALUMINUM COIL STOCK FASCIA, AMOCOR BOARD, HALF ROUND LOUVERED VENT(ALUM). FRONT PORCH. ALCOA PRO BEAD SOFFIT/PORCH CEILING, RAILING (TREATED), 2 X 2 BALUSTERS, STEEL ENTRY DOOR • 24 GUAGE WOOD TEXTURED, 3-6' TURNCt?AFT KILN DRIED PONDEROSA PINE COLUMNS, 36" REPLACEMENT WINDOW/BRISTOL OUTSIDE TRIM MATCHED, CONCRETE FRONT STEPS. BACK PORCH: PRESSURE TREATED WOOD DECK, 2 X 6 DECKING TREADS, 2 X 10 JOISTS/LEDGER BOARDS, 2 X 12 STRINGERS, 4 X 4 POSTS, CONCRETE FOOTINGS, JOIST HANGERS, STEEL ENTRY DOOR 24 GUAGE WOOD TEXTURED. WINDOW REPLACEMENTS t HOUSE/GARAGE 31 HI EFFICI-3NCY BRISTOL VINYL REPLACEMENT WINDOWS, TRIPLE PANED, R•VALVE 5.2 BASEMENT DOOR: NINE PANEL STEEL ENTRY DOOR, 24 _,GUAGE, WOOD TEXTURED. GARAGE1 CONCRETE (PAD) THE ULTIMO Bristol's Technology ADDS up to EQUAL Performan Triple Insulating Glass + Soft Coat Low -E + Argon Insulation (,U WCC k + Non -Conductive BR 50 Insulating System 0 A K C, �C 1 e �V 'r✓ Equals Bristol's Superior Energy Efficient BR 50 Insulating Glass! • Adds Security • Improves Insulation • Retards Condensation • Reduces Noise Contamination • Retains Beauty/Color of Fabrics *Compare performance and see why Bristol's BR 50 is the BEST with a U -Value of AT TRIPLE E_..is better than Bristol's BR 50 .19 U -Value means higher energy savings and performance. No Other Glass System Measures Up � . .TE HIGH PERFORMANCE GLASS 1. Triple Insulating Glass Bristol creates two insulating air spaces by using three lites of top quality float glass, resulting in dramatic energy savings. • Added glass strength... triple the protection. • Noise level reduction... quiet and comfort. • Retards convective activity within the sealed unit ... reduces costly energy expenses. • ENERGY 2. Soft Coat Low Emissivity Glass Atomic thin layer ofmetallic des bonded into the surface of the middle pane of glpa si • Detects radiant heat and restricts its passage... keeps unwanted heat out in the summer, and cold out in the winter • Reduces ultra -violet penetration and prolongs fabric life. • Comfortable, energy-efficient heatt�' gand lower fuel costs. • Transparent protection without bloc�ng your view. RESULTS COMBINATION! Triple E - A Plus with BR 50 replaces traditional 'air-fil insulating glass with innovative argon gas insulation. conducts far less heat than air It also aids in noise red because it helps stop sound speed. • Greater insulating power. • Resistance to condensaton and icing. • "Inert" and totally safe. • Gives an effect of inches of fibreglas. Insulating Furnishings ROUND Thermoplastic 'ThTW&— advancement in improving glass performance eliminates conventional methods of sealing the glass. No more metal spacers and high conductivity rates. BR 50 is a sealant that creates a chemical bond to the glass and combines the sealant, desiccant and metallic spacer into one continuous extruded thermoplastic tape. • Outstanding thermal performance. • Increased shock absorption. • Drastically reduces perimeter glass condensation. • Incorporates 2201/6 of the industry standard for sealant and desiccant. Bristol's 4 Step Process Works Together to Maximize Performance! WITH BR 50 17rere's no greater investment than a segue, energy-efficient home. And ther6 no greater place to find a superior pro dUc, at an exceptional value than from your kcal Bristol distributor. THE ULTIMATE REPLACEMENT WINDOW 11iroughout the country, only the most reliable, customer- orienteci companies arc sek; cttxl to market the Bristol line of windows and doors. AR l because of that, }'ou can ex ed professional]\• trained workmen, courteous service and warranties that are among the lest in the business. Bristol Triple f: A -flus with BR So Replacement windows are custom -fit to meet your individeal requirements. Installation is fast and efficient with no troublesome cleanup. Start now to enjoy an investment that lasts a lifetime. Bristol Triple 1:,A -Plus with BR all Replacement Windows and Doors. The ultimate in s(:Writ\, cum, ctficienc and total year-round round comfort. f ACCENT PANELSTM y x. k I i�u fl - P X I WITH A FRESH, NEW LOOK.M a - - - kzz k I i�u fl - P X I WITH A FRESH, NEW LOOK.M ALC OA PUTS IT ALL TOGETHER FOR YOU • Alcoa Pro -Bead` Soffit/Wainscot As versatile as it is appealing, the beaded profile of this soffit offers the classic look of old-fashioned porch ceilings. It can also be used as vertical wainscoting for added architectural interest. Available in a vari- ety of colors and in perforated styles for proper ventilation. Alcoa Vintage'" Shutters • Choose from two styles of shutters to complement your windows: classic raised - panel or popular open -louvered. Available in seven popular colors with a realistic woodgrain, these shutters won't Warp, crack, split or rot — and they'll never need painting. Lifetime limited warranty. Alcoa Rain Removal Systems" Replacing your gutters and downspouts? Choose the only system with a lifetime limited warranty. Alcoa free-floating hanger systems are load -tested in excess of 50 lb. per foot and designed to complement almost any roof style. Available in five colors, they offer a superior two -coat finish, inside and out. to • 'A IA AMERICA's AT HO\IE WITH ALCOA QUALM Alcoa Building Products P.O. Box i 16, Sidncy, Ohio 45305 \..r�: All al.,u •hi�cn .gym n'irchxnrallr rrpn•.3ucc.i. Tho o ill from rhe accu.il pr—li a. Alcoa Louvered Vents Dress up gable ends and roof peaks while improving your attic ventilation, with Alcoa's attractive louvered vents. Available in four shapes —half -round, square, octago- nal and rectangle — an=several popular colors to blend with any color scheme. Life- time limited warranty. ALCOA PRO-BEADT11SOFFIT/WAINSCOT TRADITIONAL LOOKS THAT ARE MADE TO LAST. New from Alcoa, a classic profile that adds traditional appeal to your soffit, porch ceiling and sidewall applications. Timeless beauty and charm combine with freedom from maintenance to deliver the value and performance you and your home deserve. COLORS TO ENHANCE ANY DECOR Pro -Bead Soffit/Wainscot is available in six beautiful colors with a soft matte finish to give a freshly painted look. Its distinctive profile and beaded accent match perfectly with Pro -Bead's decora- tive J -mold for the finishing touch. TIMELESS LOOKS THAT LAST A LONG TIME Available in both solid and vented panels, Pro -Bead eliminates many of the maintenance problems of a traditional wood soffit. No more scraping and painting, in those hard -to -reach places. And Pro -Bead is designed for sidewall or wainscot applications. A perfect opportunity to coordinate }'our entire home design. White Beige 13 ALCOA A WARRANTY YOU CAN DEPEND ON Pro -Bead Soffit/Wainscot is covered by Alcoa's Registered XledallionWarranty. A Lifetime 50 -Year Transferable, Non - prorated Limited Warranty that covers both materials and labor. ALGA -THE NAME YOU TRUST Alcoa is the name in home building products that's known and trusted by more homeowners than any other. When you choose Alcoa, you're getting value and performance. But even more, you're uettim, the best you can buy. Desert Sand Sandtone Victorian GreN Cameo A\IERIC.-\' c AT Ho\IE WITH ALC0.A QUALITY Alcoa Build11_11- Pnnlucts P.O. Biu , 16, `idlwv, Ohio 453h� \,�r.-. :�.li .,L,i.- .h,^ar vc nir. h.r m:.SII'. rr��r•,Jii�,..i. The Castlegate Entry System offers an outstanding combination of energy savings, security and low maintenance beauty. The entire line of Castlegate doors carries the strongest warranty available in the industry. Our warranty is good for 20 years from the date of purchase and can be transferred to the new owner if the home is sold. Energy Efficiency: Our construction features keep the weather outside three ways: a solid polyurethane core for high insulation value; exclusive thermal break edge to keep out cold in winter and heat in summer; and perimeter weatherstripping plus a bottom sweep with drip fin for tight seal against temperature and moisture penetration. The solid polyurethane core ensure a R-15 insulating value which gives up to five times the energy efficiency of wood doors and approximately 30% better than steel doors with polystyrene insulation. The triple contact bottom sweep utilizes twin compression tubes and extruded vinyl sweep, blade mate with threshold to seal the door bottom, ensuring no leaks, drafts or ice buildup. Our True Thermal Break tightly locks the outer skins together while separating interior and exterior surfaces. This feature successfully prevents thermal bowing, heat loss, condensation, and frost or ice buildup on the inner skin. A fully continuous strip of foam compression weatherstrip combines with the bottom sweep and threshold to tightly seal door and frame. This superb combination eliminates air and water leakage. Our magnetic weatherstripping "follows" the steel door as it opens and closes. The composite magnetic/TPE extrusions eliminate air gaps in the weatherstrip channel, so there is a stronger magnetic seal than you get with most magnetic systems. Security and Durability: A 24 -gauge galvanized steel door with reinforced lock and hinge preparations, the exclusive interlocking steel edge, and vinyl thermal break gives extra strength and security. 12 gauge hinge reinforcement provides rigid and positive attachment to the frame system. The special plate riveted within the door eliminates costly callbacks resulting from sag and misalignment. By reinforcing the lock preparation, a rigid base is provided for locksets. No steel cutting is required for installation of hardware. The rigid steel skins are strong and secure, discouraging would-be intruders. This superior surface won't warp, sag, shrink or swell like wood doors. The result is a door with low maintenance and long life. s,. _ ,�-:� .. .. c::� ''s _ _. ��'` e .� ,�� 4� s r. �' a; 111111111 (� : - R - ��_� _ 3 ��i �I III ��" I'II'I NI 1 - � 011 K.ST•:' �Xr z-� z-� � ��` '°a ^� � at � ° �^��?�� fit. .. � ' "� � ,�,.r. �y �-•" ,�, C7 Steel Entry System Standard Specifications Backset I• 23/C or 23/4" backset • Oak textured Door surface • Mahogany textured 2923/32' • Smooth Door System • 24 -gauge steel Door construction • Galvanized inner and outer surfaces 33'-3/32" • Thermal break edge Insulation • Foamed -in-place polyurethane core 383/16" • 1 1/2 -hour Class B label for doors Fire Rating without lites Face bore • 21/8" diameter lockset Independent • Optional deadbolt bore testing certification • Two 1" x 21/4' mortised lock and Edge preparation deadbolt cutouts, 5 1/2' on center 653/16' • Cover provided for deadbolt cutout 607/16" • 44/ih' standard wood frame Frame • Optional steel or other wood frames 633/16' available Weatherstrip • Compression or magnetic Sidelite Nominal 80" height Brickmold • Optional Astragal • Wood 1 693/16' • Aluminum 1 647/16' • Three 4" x 4" pin -type Hinges • Other types available 1 • Fixed aluminum 1 • Fixed aluminum with thermal break Threshold • Aluminum adjustable • Oak adjustable • Bumper type • Installed in all doors except those Sweep having a bumper threshold • Availability shown in door and Glass door lites lite selection page Backset I• 23/C or 23/4" backset Door Opening Dimensions Single Door Widths • Textured surface: prime coat plus Factory finish stainable coat 2923/32' • Smooth surface: prime coat Door System • Assembled 343/16' • Installation instructions included 33'-3/32" • Thermal performance test 3'0" • Structural (,wind) test 383/16" • Air -infiltration test Rough Opening Widths • FHA materials release No. 1011b 633/16' • HUD federal mobile construction and Independent safety standards testing certification 6'0" 1 • 150 -hour salt spray test on primer 653/16' • 250 -hour salt spray test on finish coat 607/16" • Mechanical performance test 363/16" • Water leakage test 633/16' • Sound transmission test 673/16' • 12" and 14" width Sidelite Nominal 80" height Panel size 13/4' thickness Warranty 20 years on door panel Door Opening Dimensions Single Door Widths Actual Door Widths Rough Opening Widths * 2,6„ 2923/32' 323/16' 2'8" 3123/32' 343/16' 210" 33'-3/32" 363/16" 3'0" 3523/32' 383/16" Double Door Widths Rough Opening Widths 50„ 633/16' 62-Y4" 54„ 2'8" 663/4" 6'0" 1 743/4 All doors have a nominal height of 68" and require a rough opening 610" high. All doors are 13/4" thick. * Available only in flush style 510, M10, or K10 and six panel style S30, M30 or K30. gfPPI ,Sidelite Standard Specifications If you can't find what you need, be sure to ask about other options available from Castlegate. Call 1-800-835-0364. In Kansas 1-800-362-1179 CSG 352 5/92 CASTLEGATEG ENTRY SYSTEMS A ® COMPANY P.O. Box 76 • 911 East Jefferson Street • Pittsburg, Kansas 66762 1-800-835-0--%4 Rough Opening Widths With Sidelites Double Door Widths Single Door Widths Door Only One 12" Two 12" One 14" Two 14" One SSL300-12" Two SSL300-12" 2,6., 323/16' 4511/16' 593/16' 4711/16" 633/16' 455/16' 587/16' 2'8" 343/16' 4711/16" 613/16' 4911/i6" 653/16' 475/16' 607/16" 210" 363/16" 4911/16' 633/16' 5111/t6' 673/16' 495/16' 627/26' 3'0"1 383/16" 5111/16' 1 653/16" 1 5311/16' 1 693/16' 515/16' 1 647/16' , _,-.- .L,-. 1 3 d" 1 1 16" 1 1 135/8" If you can't find what you need, be sure to ask about other options available from Castlegate. Call 1-800-835-0364. In Kansas 1-800-362-1179 CSG 352 5/92 CASTLEGATEG ENTRY SYSTEMS A ® COMPANY P.O. Box 76 • 911 East Jefferson Street • Pittsburg, Kansas 66762 1-800-835-0--%4 Rough Opening Widths With Sidelites Double Door Widths Door Only One 12" Two 12" 1 One 14" Two 14" One SSL300-12" Two SSL300-12" 5,0" 623/4„ 761/4' 893/4' 781/4' 933/4' 757/$' 89,. 5,4„ 663/4,. 801/4" 933/}, 821/4, 973/4, 797/8, 93„ 6.0„ 743/4., 881/4" 1013/4' 901/4" 1053/4„ 877/8' 101„ Width Sidelite Only 14" 16" 135/8 If you can't find what you need, be sure to ask about other options available from Castlegate. Call 1-800-835-0364. In Kansas 1-800-362-1179 CSG 352 5/92 CASTLEGATEG ENTRY SYSTEMS A ® COMPANY P.O. Box 76 • 911 East Jefferson Street • Pittsburg, Kansas 66762 1-800-835-0--%4 y' JOHN _ StocklHouse 1 !ll3 ; f � Designs '10 TmoTr 15"', ucraft manufactures a full selection of StocklHouse Design Columns which rangefrom 6" 30" in diameter and from 8' to 30' in length. (Please call for information on columns with M.diameters larger than 20" and lengths greater than 2(y.) These practically priced columns include matching caps and House -Design Attic Bases and may be ordered by Design No. through distributors in all 50 states for immediate shipment from Tumcraft's East and West Coast Warehouses. They are manufactured to the same exacting standards as Custom and Classic Columns and may be ordered with or without Ionic fluting. Columns through 12" include wooden caps and bases. Cap and base sets for the larger columns are high-density polyurethane. Optional polyurethane caps and bases available for 6 to 12 columns. Stock/House-Design Columns -Round z d Stnd. Shaft Base Cap Cap d Base Design Bottom— Min. Height(A)Width Total Abacus Total Total Sets No' inside Plinth (B) Ht. (C) Wid. (D) Ht. (E) Col. Included 1068 5" 21/4" TT' 8'e" 3" 63/4 21/2 8' 2006• R 1088 8" 33/4" T7" 10" 3" 83/8" 2'/z" 8' 2008• 34,• 1810 B" 33/41, 9' 7" 10" 3" 83/8" 2'/2" 10' 2008 °t 1108 10" 5?4' T 7' 12' 3" 103/8" 3„ 8' 2010• 7770 10" 534" 97" 12" 3" 103/8" 3" 70' 2010• 1112 10" 53/4 117'12" 3" 103/8" 3" 12' 2010• '•�"` "' 1128 12" 73/4„ TT' 14"3" 12" 3" 8' 2012• 1210 12" 734" 97' 14 3" 12" 3" 10' 2012• 7212 12" 734' 11'P' 14" 3" 12" 3" 12' 2072• j 1216 12" 734 157" 14" 3" 12" 3" 16' 2012• # l • 1, - . 1408 14" 9., T5" 16'h•, 43h" 14" 43/8„ 8'- 2514 ' f - - 1 . 1410 14" , 9" 9'S" t6h" 43/8" 14" 43/8" 10' 2514 1412 14" 9" 11'5" 161h" 43/8" 14" 43/8" 12' 2514 az a 7 +,, I I ag i i 1416 14" 9" 1515" 161/2" 43/8" 14" 43/8" 16' 2514 r t�� 1418 14" 9" 17'5" 16'/2" 43/8" 14" 4% 18' 2514 7612 16" 10'/4" 11'5" 183/4" 41/2" 76" 41/2" 12' 2516 1616 16" 101/." 15'5" 183/4" 41/2" 16" 41/2" 16' 2516 } '�! 1618 16" 1014" 17'5" 183/4" 41/2" 16" 41h" 18' 2516 iii 1620 16" 101/4" 19'5" 183/4• 41/2 16" 41/2 20' 2516 1812 18" 12'/8" 11'5" 22" 51/4 ^ 183/4 61/4" 12' 2518 1816 18" 12'/a 15'5" 22" 614" 183/8" 614" 16' 2518 11 1� i 181818" 12'/8" 17'5" 22" 61/i" 183/4 614" 18' 2518 1820 16" 121/8„ 19'5" 22" 6'/4" 183/4" 6/." 20' 2518 1916 20" 141/4" 15'5" 24" 61/e" 203/4' 61/8" 16' 2520 i1 y f 1918 20" 141/4" 17'5" 24" 61/8" 203/4" 61/8" 18' 2520 i ',� +I 1920 20" 141/4" 19' S" 24" 6'/8" 2034" 61/e" 20' 2520 U ;UUU11J U Custom —Please call for information on columns with diameters larger than 20" and lengths greater than 20'. 1 _� "' See page 5 for typical load-bearing capacities Matching wooden cap and base sets, to order optional high-density polyurethane sets simply drop the "20" prefix and add a "25" prefix. 'Add "F"to Design No. to order columns with fluting. Actual dimensions are approximately Ne" less. Square Columns Shaft cap a ease Cap b Base Design �» � Totai � h" r •" Nw, (Al BI (CI Coi. Included 6001 6" 7' 1011/16" 14'76" 81/4" 8' 6506 6003 8" T 1011/48" iri6" 1114" 8' 6508 4 6004 8" 9' 1011/16" 14'46" 111/4" 10' 6508 Add "F" to Design No. to order columns with fluting. t —Actual dimensions are approximately ?,' less. 1-800423-3311 Fax: 1-503-826-1393 cn 600 C 2 3 m O 0 o O O 7v � -or C/) 3 < O X C y D CD N = � CL N4 � m & Z v cn ' �• ' �. j V� i.Zi _ � v O m C -0 ic •a<i a m m z C O 7v � -or rN � N into ' �• ' �. fA r =. _ A C M T C fl O'I o 0.0 W C n. s. C -w c 3.1. (A *to COQ Ap 0 212 fD� a.= � K 30� 'a o-• N y A vo * S* 3 y to %A, 3'..O> o W = aft� A Oil > .F .F (An = o A IL O O � n�� M Mt H.O. S. rt = - 3 �; o 3 1 m a Q. O (o O A '* O -0C� m3 0 . C p � � s • H O � c to V� 3 < �• A • May 4, 1993 Donald Coleman P.O. Box 3663 South Bend, Indiana 46619 Dear Mr. Coleman, As you are aware, your property located at 617 Riverside Drive is in the River Bend Local Historic District. The purpose of local historic designation is to protect and enhance the historic integrity of the properties included within it. This is done on the basis of a set of standards created through the cooperation of district residents and the Historic Preservation Commission. In order to create these standards for our district, property owners have been meeting with the Historic Preservation Commission and its staff for the last several months. As a result of these meetings, a draft of standards has been completed (see attached). The next step is for these standards to be discussed at a public meeting. This meeting will be held on Monday, June 14, at 5:30 p.m. on the 7th floor of the County/City Building • in downtown South Bend. We strongly encourage you to attend this important meeting and raise any questions or make any comments you might have concerning the draft of standards you have received. Sincerely, River Bend Coordinating Committee 0 v �. p p 0 rt ("a w e � tj) Lrl � a.v�-�'�4 d, v �C INDIANA HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY CONTINUATION SHEET 3. Survey No. Preliminary No. 6. Address 615-617 Riverside HISTORIC CONTEXT(s)/STATMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION RELSURVEYED (July 6, 1993) Major alterations: Stucco removed from 2nd story, porch steps removed and r replaced with wood steps. Two windows on 2nd story are boarded up. Flagstone terrace removed. HPC—S2 • CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT PROPERTY -- Shetterley Park 1000 block Riverside Drive, South Bend, IN OWNER -- Park Department City of South Bend DESIGNATION -- Riverside Drive LHD STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT The city of South Bend purchased the land which became Shetterley Park from two families, the Millers and the Shetterleys in 1911 for the sum total of twenty dollars. Development of the park began in 1913 and was completed in 1917. Two rogue (form of croquet) courts occupied the southern part of the park from 1917 until 1923. There was a drinking fountain in close proximity to those recreational areas. PROPOSED CHANGE The Park Department intends to install a drinking fountain in Shetterley Park. The precise location is in the 1000 block of Riverside Drive across the street from the residence at 1035 Riverside Drive. The fountain's dimensions are as follows; 3' high, 10" deep and 8" wide. The design is produced in house by the department and the construction is done in house as well. This project is also • undertaken in conjunction with neighborhood advocacy. STANDARDS The standards for the Riverside Drive LHD do not specifically mention fountains of any kind. However they do make reference to site amenities such as streetlights, fences, signs and benches; regarding these the standards state: "New ... shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color." page 16 I.A.I. RECOMMENDATION The HPC staff supports the proposal to place a drinking fountain in Shetterley Park. However it is the opinion of the staff that the city's choice of this particular fountain is inappropriate.While cognizant of complicating factors ie. availability and cost etc.; HPC staff believes that the residents of the Riverside Drive LHD who have aggressively and responsively pursued the installation of historic streetlights and park benches are justified in their desire for an appropriate drinking fountain. Chip Frederick • HPC staff 8-9-93 I-] • i Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission Regular Monthly Meeting 7:30 p.m. August 16, 1993 I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. 7th Floor, County Commissioner's Conference Room, County -City Bldg. II. Roll Call Members present: Mrs. Martha Choitz; Mrs. Catherine Hostetler; Mr. John Oxian; Mrs. Janeanne Petrass; Ms. Lora Spaulding; Ms. Jewel Van Dalsen; Mr. Jerry Wiener Members absent: Mr. Jed Eide; Mrs. Joann Sporleder Staff present: Chip Frederick- Administrative Assistant Also present: Aladean DeRose- Deputy City Attorney; Dennis J. Laskowski -615/617 Riverside Drive; Kevin Boughal-South Bend Tribune; Mike Bruno -1228 East Wayne; Marsha Stevenson -1093 Riverside Drive; Ed Talley -1081 Riverside Drive; Anne Graham Price -1049 Riverside Drive III. Public Hearing A. Certificates of Appropriateness Mrs. Petrass moved to reposition 615/617 Riverside Drive as the last C of A on the agenda. Mrs. Choitz seconded the motion. There was no discussion. Motion approved unanimously. 1. Shetterley Park Fountain -Riverside Drive-LHD Mr. Frederick read the staff report. Mr. Oxian introduced several other photographs of the proposed fountain. Mr. Talley spoke against the proposal. He detailed the effort to bring water back to the park and the general history of drinking fountains in Shetterley Park. He then requested that the HPC deny the proposal. Mrs. Choitz asked about Health Dept. restrictions concerning fountain design. Mr. Talley replied that he had not considered the matter. Mr. Oxian then asked about the originality of the Leeper Park fountains. Mr. Talley replied that they were original to the park but had been moved several times previously. Mr. Oxian stated that part of Leeper Park was in a LHD. Mr. Talley responded that the fountains in question were not in a LHD. Mrs. Choitz asked that the HPC be in compliance with other City departments. Discussion ensued about vandalism. Mr. Oxian then asked counsel about approving the COA but requesting a different fountain. Ms. DeRose stated that was not possible. Mrs. Choitz asked whether the COA could be tabled. Ms. DeRose indicated that a signed waiver must accompany a motion to table and that the city was unrepresented at the meeting. Further she stated that as a practical matter the HPC had all of the information necessary to decide the issue. Mr. Wiener moved to reject the COA. Mrs. Hostetler seconded the motion. No further discussion. The motion to reject the COA application on the grounds of inappropriateness to the Riverside Drive-LHD was approved unanimously. 2. 1228 East Wayne St.—East Wayne-LHD Mr. Frederick read the staff report. Mr. Bruno stated that he may leave the fence unpainted. Mrs. Choitz replied that the HPC " does not deal with paint". Mr. Oxian questioned Mr. Bruno about the relocation of a portion of the 42" high fence to behind the garage. Mr. Oxian stated that the COA application should reflect the moving of that fence as well as the installation of the new privacy fence. Mrs. Choitz moved that the COA reflecting the move of the fence and the installation of a new privacy fence be approved. Mrs. Hostetler seconded the moti..(m� No further discussion. The motion to approve the COA application for a new privacy fence and the possible relocation of a portion of the existing fence was approve unanimously. 3. 615/617 Riverside Drive-Riverbend-LHD Mr. Frederick read the staff approval COA dated July 27, 1993. He then read the staff report and the report of the Historic Districts Committee dated August 11, 1993. Mr. Laskowski presented his proposal calling his plan a "sincere res- torration." He indicated that he had " contracted all work before the standards were in place." He stated that he had a letter dated May 4 stating that the stan- dards are not yet in place and that he did not receive the letter until May 12. Mr. Laskowski also showed . -a photocopy of a building permit issued on May 25_..for work including siding, fasciae and soffits. He explained that on Ma 12 then HPC Director Fred Holycross verified that the house in question had clapboard siding originally. Mr. Oxian pointed out that Mr. Laskowski was neither returning to original construction nor willing to maintain the house as it stood on the date of LHD designation. Mr. Oxian then read "Preservation of Original Landmarks and Buildings" into the record. This document was adopted by the HPC April 20, 1992. Mr. Laskowski asked where he stood concerning the porch. Mrs. Choitz replied that the HDC had recommended the complete restoration of the porch. To which Mr. Laskowski responded; "I'm not going to put that porch back the way it was." Mr. Oxian asked Mr. Laskowski if he objected to any proposal which the HPC had approved. Mr. Laskowski indicated no objection. Mr. Oxian then asked staff to read those items. Mr. Frederick read the list. Mr. Oxian stated that the HPC had also approved window changes oh the side and rear facades. Mr. Frederick pointed out that those proposals are neither in Mr. Laskowski's proposal nor in his COA application. They appear only in his drawings. Mrs. Choitz then moved that the HPC approve the siding of the garage, the switchout of the front door for a window, changes in the side and rear door pending HPC'desi n approval, installation of a 6' privacy fence, window changes, as in drawings, to the west and north elevations only, replacement of the garage pad, seconded the motion. No further discussion. The motion passed unanimously. Mrs. Hostet er Mr. Oxian asked the staff for a brief report on the stucco. Mr. Frederick replied that there appeared to be lath underneath the stucco, not finished clapboard. Mrs. Choitz indicated that there were numerous examples of houses of this type in the area and reported that the stucco on three facades appeared in "very good condition". She then rei.terated the HDC's position concerning the stucco. Discussion ensued concerning the issuance of the building permit and the next step in the HPC's deliberations. Mrs. Choitz suggested that the HDC including Mrs. Sporleder meet with Mr. Laskowski to work through the remaining areas of difficulty. Mr. Oxian asked counsel if that was appropriate. Ms. DeRose replied in the affirmative but that Mr. Laskowski would have to sign the waiver. Mr. Laskowski then asked for a review of his proposal. Mr. Oxian cited the following areas of dispute: stucco, fasciae and soffits, porch ceiling, porch columns... Mr. Laskowski then asked about the doors. Mr. Oxian stated that replacement of storm doors should be part of Mr. Laskowski's COA application. Mr. Oxian continued the list of disputed items. Also included were building out of gable and installation of a half -round louver, treatment of the center window • in the front facade second story and changes in the dimensions of the sidewalks. Ms. DeRose stated that the primary resWsibility of the HPC was to the historic nature of the homes in each district and not an overriding concern for safety. Mr. Oxian began a discussion of the front porch. Mr. Laskowski maintained his safety concerns as well as matters of liability. Discussion ensued concerning the front porch. Mr. Oxian offered the applicant a hearing before the HDC. Ms. DeRose stated that the HPC could also deny the petition. Mr. Oxian said he preferred for the HDC to hear the remaining proposals. Mrs. Hostetler requested original photographs. Mr. Frederick replied that the photos in question were Mr. Laskowski's. Mr. Laskowski then said he would provide the HPC with the original photos if that were possible. Mr. Oxian cited remaining areas of disagreement and asked Mr. Laskowski if he desired a hearing with the HDC or an up/down vote tonight. Mr. Oxian made clear the HDC meeting would depend on the applicant signing a waiver. Mr. Laskowski responded that if the HPC did not approve his plan in total he wished to register his disapproval. Mrs. Choitz detailed the HPC's committment to saving the house from unwarranted damage and referred each area of disagreement to the HDC. Mr. Oxian continued with the rest of the agenda. IV. Regular Business A. Approval of Minutes -July 19, 1993 Mr. Oxian discussed the minutes with Mr. Frederick prior to the meeting. Mrs. Choitz moved to approve the minutes as submitted. No discussion. • The motion passed unanimously. B. Treasurer's Report; no report C. Correspondence; no report D. Committee Reports 1. Certificates of Appropriateness (Staff Approvals) A. 629 Riverside Drive -tree removal B. 1077 Riverside Drive -renewal, tree removal C. 12670 State Road 23 -renewal, in-kind siding replacement, doors and windows D. 1717 East Wayne-reroof and new gutters and downspouts No discussion. 2. Budget and Finance; no report 3. Legal Mr. Oxian asked about the code enforcement situation within LHDs. Ms. DeRose then asked about the specific nature of the request from the Dept. of Code Enforcement. Mrs. Choitz asked about the singling out of a substandard property among a group of the same. Discussion ensued. Mr. Oxian read a letter from Kathy Dempsey concerning a property on Arch Avenue in the Edgewater Place LHD. Ms. DeRose said that properly the HPC should target substandard houses within a LHD and send reports to Code Enforcement for further action. Ms. DeRose and Mrs. Choitz agreed that the HPC and Code Enforcement should act in concert. Ms. DeRose asked that the HPC upon receipt of an itemized list of repairs for a property send Code Enforcement a separate report from our Standards and Maintenance Committee. 4. Historic Districts Committee; report read in 615/617 Riverside Drive public hearing. • 5. Landmarks; no report 6. Standards and Maintenance; report read in Legal IV. D. 3. 7. Personel; Mr. Oxian has passed resumes for the directorship among the HPC members. 8. Staff; no report 9. Old Business; no report 10. New Business; Lora Spaulding was appointed to the Standards and Maintenance Committee. Mr. Oxian directed the commission back to the matter of 615/617 Riverside Drive. Mr. Laskowski exhibits letter from Jerry Gray of Wickes (Lumber) saying that replacement windows will not effect the existing window trim. Discussion ensued. Mrs. Petrass moved to allow replacement windows provided that all trim remain intact painted wood. Mr. Wiener seconded the motion. Mrs. Hostetler asked about the HPC's right to impose a time limit on the project. Ms. DeRose responded in the negative. The motion was passed unanimously. Discussion ensued concerning remaining areas of disagreement. Mrs. Choitz indicated that the piers and steps of the porch should be of a piece. Mr. Laskowski stated the porch columns would be an in-kind replacement of wood for wood. Mr. Wiener moved to allow the replacement of the porch columns provided it was an in-kind replacement, wood for wood. Mrs. Petrass seconded the motion. No discussion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Laskowski repeated his concerns about the front porch. Mr. Oxian responded that the porch would be referred to the HDC. Mr. Oxian asked Mr. Laskowski to sign the waiver. Mr. Laskowski stated that he was tired and asked if he "could come in tommorrow and take care of this?" Mr. Oxian responded in the affirmative. Mr. Frederick repeated the approvals granted during the meeting and stated the remaining areas of disagreement to be heard by the HDC. These included: stucco, fasciae and soffits, center window second story front facade, porch railing, porch piers and steps, bead board in porch ceiling, gable build out and half -round louver, metal front door and any change in sidewalk dimensions. Mry.Wihncr: then moved that the HDC would hear Mr. Laskowski's final proposal and that the HDC would make a final ruling on the matter. Mrs.,;Hos.tetler-,seednded the motion. No further discussion. The motion passed unanimously. V. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 9:40 p.m. 0 • MEMORANDUM: Riverbend LHD Standards September 13, 1993 To all members of the Historic Preservation Commission The Riverbend LHD Standards Committee mailed out Standards ballots to forty-two (42) homeowners in the district. On September 9, 1993 Commissioners Choitz and Petrass counted the ballots that had been received by the due date of August 13, 1993. The results were as follows: fourteen (14) in favor; four (4) opposed. Twenty-four ballots were not returned, as stated non receipt of ballot constituted approval. The Riverbend LHD Standards were approved. C. Frederick HPC staff • • .7 . .. v &po CJ,4 r(-- 1093 7 c� it • > i 7 I _. �-1-S'� r • • • Shetterley Park Drinking Fountain photo of proposed fountain type site of proposed fountain 1000 block Riverside Drive CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS STAFF REPORT • PROPERTY -- 1228 East Wayne St. (N) South Bend, IN 46615 OWNER -- Michael N. Bruno DESIGNATION -- East Wayne LHD STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE/HISTORIC CONTEXT The house at 1228 E. Wayne St. (N) is a Colonial Revival residence built in 1927. The house received a contributing rating of C/9 on the Indiana Historic Sites and Structures Inventory. The home was in good condition at the time of the survey and alterations were considered minor, they included the installation of aluminum storm doors and windows. PROPOSED CHANGE The applicant proposes the replacement of a 42" high French Gothic Picket fence which runs along the west lot line with a privacy fence (French Gothic Panel) that is 6' high. The new fence will be painted white as was it's predecessor. Each of the fences referred to are wooden. STANDARDS Concerning fences the standards state: ... fencing ... shall be compatible with the character of the neighborhood in size, scale, material and color. page 18-19 I.A.I. RECOMMENDATION The HPC staff recommends for this proposal. The applicant's proposal calls for the replacement of a fence with another that maintains the same stylistic elements. The applicant wishes to provide additional privacy and security for his family as well as their dog. The applicant's neighbor to the east has previously installed a 6' privacy fence. Chip Frederick HPC staff 8-9-93 • // P 1 0 C'ta Q ,vr t;RII4. do VI % em#-rf^4r VI p►ck4r F4Afec I �� nl,�►9if dor fo sr�tf 6 dl VIVA ft veF ' Ut fy% r Af •✓c'� 71/P NSF A6 tr 1416r ra SbOK f k y _ Ra asF� X - - - P,.Owu aldkir 4� 'trf, Alf 1.9# % 1/GT ro I I Na 7r lu pay VA, , . APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY G -93 �V�"�� S}:I Date: ��"� Owner's s Name : 6ddress of Mailing Address Property of Owner Designation: Telephone: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Stb kWkAAAS0 [] Continuation Sheet [] Addendum to Certificate The following information as applicable to the particular situation and the standards designated shall also be submitted as part of this application: Structural drawings and specifications, or site plan, floor plans, elevations, cross section plans, renderings, diagrams, or other such plans. Landscaping plans. Contractor specifications. Photographs. Where the proposed project includes a sign, a scale drawing showing the location of the sign on the structure or property, the type of lettering, and the method of V lumination. Other- such information as the�Historic Preservation Commission may require under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of South Bend or the St. Joseph County Zoning Ordinance, as applicable. The filing of this application shall be accompanied by a fee of three dollars ($3.00), payabl to the Historic Preservation Commission to cover the costs i urred in- a iewing and processing this application. [] Ap licant's s nature Applicant's Printed Name FOR OFFICE USE ONLY COMPLETEQ AP'PL I CATION RECEIVED (date): Z7 93 CASE # : lRg3-07"Z?- REVIEW AND DECISION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION •REVIEW: [] In-kind Replacement [] Appropriate [] Inappropriate Comments: [] Continuation Sheet [] Addendum DECISION: [] Approve.d [] Denied [] Partial Approval Date: Comments: Historic Preservation Commission •Notice to Applicant: Approval of your application and issuance of a Certificate of"'Appropriateness in no way signifies compliance with health, safety or general building/zoning standards. Neither does it release or relieve you from compliance with all codes and regulations of the City of South Bend, St. Joseph County, or the State of Indiana. The commission ex- pressly disclaims any liability resulting from safety or health defects in any structure for which a Certificate of Appropriateness has been issued. Approval of your application expires six months from the DECISION date. For projects not substantially completed, contact HPC for renewals. Y� 1. Rating 2. County 3. Survey No. [I Outstanding ❑ Significant l Notable ❑(Contributing C/10 St. Joseph 141-598-46351-597 4. Historic Name 5. Township Preliminary No. William H. & Sarah J. Kryder Portage _ Address 7. City 8. Quad Name 615717 Riverside South Bend, IN. 46601 INDIANA HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY State of Indiana Department of Natural Resources State Form 16822/Revised 1986 I r - LOCAL DISTRICT 9. Common Name 10. Visible 11. Endangered Explain Donald Coleman, Whitcomb -Keller Yes ❑No ❑vee No 12. Ownership Owner's Address (if different) ❑ Public C$Private 13. Use Present Past 14. Category 15. Surveys / Legal Protections 16. Location Notns /_ Legal Description Residence [� n [? Bui lding(s) Proposed Near Lot 19 Hammond & Whitcomb 17. Condition 18. Building Integrity — ❑ Excellent ❑ Unaltered C.mmertial ❑ ❑ ❑ District Northwest District CkGood ®Altered Minor ❑ ❑ ❑ Site 18-1007-0281 ❑ Fair ❑ Moved ❑ ❑ ❑ Structure r Deteriorated Date Building was moved ❑ Object ❑ Ruins --___ i-,. i ime Periods) (Dates) 20. Style(s) , 21. Architect I Builder 1914 merican 4 -Squame_ 22. SPECIFY ALTERATIONS Replacement Additions Other I I'ainovals Alum. St. windows & St. door 23. DESCRIPTION 24. SITE PLAN Stories 2 ------- — -- — ----- -- _.. -- — -- —� f - ?Ian S uare ----- --- ---------- — -- --- - --------------- t r 1 N Foundation concrete Chim: offset corbelled brick chimney Wells Brick st story to stone stringcourse, stucco above not Medium pitch hip roof w/gable dormer in front Continous eave I -- ----------- - _ - sc i a . As h. shingle �.__ 91 Porches Full width porch w/wood columns set on cast conc. block piers. Concrete block rail. Gable above entrance bay. Openings 1/1 & 6/1 d -H. w/simple wood trim.3Iwood panel doors all wj! ,v I ,Grounds/ Outbci:o:ngs_ _El evate�.si to .wl_fl a sg tone terrace. Hip cl apboad garage ------- ---- --- --- t - --- - ------------------- ------._—.—_.._ - - --- - .-_v 25. No. of Contrirut�ng Resources 126. No. of Non-contributing Resources 0 i27. Environment 2 ——...._..._ ... _ Residential !8. Areas of Signi`icance: - Agriculture j(Architecture Art Commerca Comrnunicatio•s Community Planning Conservation Economics Education .." Engineering Entertainment I recreation u Ethnic heritage Exploration I settlement `- Health / medicine ❑ Indian Industry Invention ❑' Landscape architecture I❑ Law ❑ Literature ❑ Military ❑ Performing arts ❑ Philosophy ❑ Politics / government ❑ Religion ❑ Science C Social history ❑ Transportation ❑ Vernacular I Construction ❑ Other summer 1979 Chris Nagy Fall 87 temeniof Significance /Additional Description: William H. & Sarah J. Kryder bought 615 Riverside _1915. Seth Hammond _&_Leslie Whitcombprobabl-y built the house ATTACH NEGATIVE )etween 1908 and 1914 as a real estate venture. The Kryder's lived inELOPE HERE the residence which was converted to a double residence (615-617) sometime etween 1941 and 1947. William Kryder was an engn. for the south Bend Water or s. 9 SEE CONTINUATION SHEET n ation 29. FOR STATE OFFICE USE ONLY NR—_—.. ---.__.-- SR E------- ------------....._--...._------ 2 -- Date 4— Da-_ - ------ APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS .; HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Q Date: �- � '7� Owner's Name: d6-� •Address of 0 c <6Ik- 1 Mailing Address _Q1 �y S_L Property of Owner r� r yo Designation: � ) DTelephone: iZ34E c7 L- 0 DESCR I P„T ION QF PR IFCT �^`b lJwT,-� a-4— [] Continuation Sheet [] Addendum to Certificate The following information as applicable to the particular situation and the standards designated shall also be submitted as part of this application: Structural drawings and specifications, or site plan, floor plans, elevations, cross section plans, renderings, diagrams, or other such plans. Landscaping plans. Contractor specifications.. Photographs. — "U- � Where the proposed project includes a sign, a scale drawing showing the location of the sign on the structure or property, the type of lettering, and the method of W umination. Other such information as the.!Historic Preservation Commission may require under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of South Bend or the St. Joseph County Zoning Ordinance, as applicable. The filing of this application shall be accompanied by a fee of three dollars ($3.00), payable to the Historic Preservation Commission to cover the costs incurred ir7 reviewing and processing this application. Applica signature Applican 's Printed Name FOR OFFICE USE ONLY COMPLETED APPLICATION RECEIVED (date): 7/2-q 3 CASE REVIEW AND DECISION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REVIEW: [] In-kind Replacement [] Appropriate [] Inappropriate Comments: [] Continuation Sheet [] Addendum DECISION: [] Approved [] Denied [] Partial Approval Date: Comments: Historic Preservation Commission Notice to Applicant: Approval of your application and issuance of a Certificate of'I'Appropriateness in no way signifies compliance with health, safety or general building/zoning standards. Neither does it release or •relieve you from compliance with all codes and regulations of the City of South Bend, St. Joseph County, or the State of Indiana. The commission ex- pressly disclaims any liability resulting from safety or health defects in any structure for which a Certificate of Appropriateness has been issued. Approval of.your application expires six months from the DECISION date. For projects not substantially completed, contact HPC for renewals. APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY Date: August 5, 1993 •Address of 1228 E. Wayne St. N. Property South Bend, IN 46615 Designation: ._DESCR.IPTION ith DESCRIPTION fens .eplacement fence w ,1 an to level ani—r treas..7Fe pr -_r Owner's Name: Michael N. Bruno Mailing Address 1228 E. Wayne N. of Owner outh bend,IN Te 1 ephone : 219-288-8400 OF PROJECT: Replace current picket fence in harkyard Alnnn wast Iotlina [] Continuation Sheet [] Addendum to Certificate The following information as applicable to the particular situation and the standards designated shall also be submitted as part of this application: X Structural drawings and specifications, or site plan, floor plans, elevations, cross section plans, renderings, diagrams, or other such plans. (SEE ATTACHED) X Landscaping plans. (SEE ABOVE) X Contractor specifications. Standard fence available at any lumber yard. X Photographs. (SEE ATTACHED PHOTOS OF CURRENT FENCE.) • N/A Where the proposed project includes a sign, a scale drawing showing the location of the sign on the structure or property, the type of lettering, and the method of illumination, Other such information as the'Historic Preservation Commission may require under the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of South Bend or the St. Joseph.County Zoning Ordinance, as applicable. The filing of this application shall be accompanied by a fee of three dollars ($3.00), payable to the Historic Preservation Commission to cover the costs incurred in reviewing and processing this application. [] / MICHAEL N. BRUNO Ap icant's gnature Applicant's Printed Name U is . FOR OFFICE USE ONLY COMPLETED AP I CAT I ON RECE I VED ( date) : M. 11 ?3 CASE # ----�- — REVIEW AND DECISION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REVIEW: [] In-kind Replacement [] Appropriate [] Inappropriate Cominents : [] Continuation Sheet [] Addendum t 1 A royal Date: DECISION: [] Approved [] Denied L Par is pp Comments: Historic Preservation Commission Notice to Applicant: Approval of your application and issuance of a Certificate of"'Appropriateness in no way signifies compliance with health, safety or general building/zoning standards. Neither does it release or relieve you from compliance with all codes and regulations of the City of South Bend, St. Joseph County, or the State of Indiana. The commission ex- pressly disclaims any liability resulting from safety or health defects in any structure for which a Certificate of Appropriateness has been issued. Approval of your application expires six months from the DECISION date. For projects not substantially completed, contact HPC for renewals. I A. HISTORIC NAME Roy W & Luella Kilmer _ B. COUNTY St. Joseph C. NUMBER 141-57186.3-597 O. ADDRESS 1228 East Wayne North E. TWP/CITY Portage/South Bend F. QUAD NAME RATING OOutstanding OSIgnllkenl/NotableA'Contrlbuting/Reli ONon-Contributing UTM REFERENCES 1 8 U i i i 1 1 STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES INDIANA HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY REVISED stet 1. COMMON NAME 2. OWNERSHIP Public X Private 3. VISIBLE X Yes No 4. PROPERTY'S MAILING ADDRESS Kestermeier, William J & Marlene T. 1228 East Wayne North South Bend, IN 46615 10. CONDITION 11. BUILDING INTEGRITY — Excellent — Unaltered —�L Good —J(_ Altered minor Fair 6. USE PRESENT PAST _ Ruins PRESENT PAST 7.ENDANGERED Residence IN IIx Military ❑ ❑ _ _ Vacant Govt./Pol. ❑ ❑ Entertainment ❑ ❑ ___ Neglected Commerce ❑ ❑ Scientific ❑ ❑ __ Encroachment Industrial ❑ O Religious ❑ ❑ Other Agriculture ❑ ❑ Park ❑ ❑ Transportation ❑ ❑ Museum ❑ ❑ SURVEYS Organization O ❑ Educational ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NR NHL — 10. CONDITION 11. BUILDING INTEGRITY — Excellent — Unaltered —�L Good —J(_ Altered minor Fair Moved _ Deteriorated Date _ Ruins __- 11a. Specify Alterations Removals Structural._ Replacement alum. storm doors/windows Additions 1Oadentil E 192813. STYLE Colonial Reyiyall4. ARCHITECT/BUILDER 1CRIPTION 2 story frame, rectangular plan, gable roof with simple cornice row, gable returns, slate roofing; 6/6 double hung windows, brick _header course sills, wood shutters with clover leaf cut-out over louvers; central Inscriptions _ Facade Material brick 16. OUTBUILD@NGS 2 car, 2 door brick, gable roof garage, slate roofing 5. LOCATION NOTES 4th building west of southwest corner of South Sunnyside and East Wayne _North. B. CATEGORY Sa. LOCAL LEGAL PROTECTIONS — District _— Historic District _ Building(s) _— Landmaik — Structure _— Deed Restriction — Site Other — Object __- _ HABS HAER 17. I bl" SITE PLAN tJ i 18. ENVIRONMENT_— Res i dent i al _^ 19. AREAS OF .SIGNIFICANCE: Specify the significance for each area checke i. Aboriginal This Colonial Revival residence was built in 1927 for Roy W. & Luella ATTACH ArttNEGATIVE Kilmer. Roy W. Kilmer was a paneler at Studebaker. By 1935, the City _ _ ArchitectureDirectories list Roy W. Kiler's wife's name as Martha A and his occupation ENVELOPE — Commerce HERE Communications as a dentist with offices at 9071, S. Michigan. It is unclear whether this — Community Planning is•the same Roy W. Kilmer as in 1927. _ Education Engineering Environs/Neighborhoods — Exploration/Settlement _ Humanities Indian — _ Landscape Architecture - Military _ Politics/Government Religion — Science/Technology _ Social/Ethnicity Transportation -- vernacular/Construction thar DesC Cont • entry, simple entablature and cornice with X pattern balustrade, supported by brick pilasters con -rate stogp; 1 story flat roof Side wing with simple entablature and cornice details, X pattern balustrade: rear simple brick chimney: 1 story flat roof rear wing; Legal Desc.: L103 Sunnymede 1st Key # 18 6107 3804 _ 0. INFORMATION SOURCES South Bend City Directories• Portage Township AccPscorc; an 1. SURVEYOR • 22. DATE Sept., 1986