HomeMy WebLinkAboutSeptember 1983historic preservation commission
lb.. Announcements & Miscellaneous Matters
a. Donation of Sanborn Maps by Mr. B.H. Walton
11. Adjournment
historicpreservatib n commission
of south bend and st. joseph county
ROOM 1123 COUNTY CITY BUILDING
south bend, indiana 46601 (219 284-9798)
M I N U T E S
Regular Meeting Third Floor Conference Room
September 19; 1983 County City Building
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m..
2. Roll. Call
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. John Oxian, Mr. Odell Newburn, Mrs. Martha Choitz
Mr. Ted'Wasielewski, Mrs. Janeanne Petrass, Mrs. Joann
Sporleder, Mr. F. Jay-Nimtz
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Charlie Hayes, Mrs. Gina DeLaruelle
ALSO PRESENT: Karen Kiemnec, Preservation Planner; Liz Straw, Research Assistant;
Jeanne Derbeck, South Bend Tribune Reporter
3. Approval of Minutes
Mr. Oxian noted that page two under Landmarks, sentence two should read "tear down
his porch" not "tear down his house." Mr. Nimtz made a motion to approve the minutes
of August 15, 1983..as corrected. Mr. Oxian seconded; motion carried.
4. Treasurer's Report
Mr. Nimtz made a motion.that,the report be accepted; Mrs. Sporleder seconded; motion
carried.
5. Correspondence
a. The Old House Journal for August/September, 1983
b, a memo and attachments from Paul Falduto regarding the release of Community
Development Block Grant funds for the Northeast Neighborhood Basketball Courts
Project.
c. a brochure on the Bartholomew County Historic Homes Tour on October 1 and 2.
d. an HLFI letter on memorial contributions and gift memberships
e. a letter from Joseph Fragomeni of Cole Associates, Inc.
f. The Indiana Preservationist for July/August, 1983
g. a brochure on the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra for 66'--1983/84 schedule
Page 2
September 19, 1983
h.. Historic Preservation for September/October, 1983
i. Practising Law.lnstitute News for August 10, 1983
j. Preservation Progress for Summer, 1983
6. Committee Reports
a. Budget & Finance
1) County Budget
Ms. Kiemnec reported that the proposed County Budget for 1984 with no
increases was passed.
2) Community Development Funding
Ms. Kiemnec reported that although the Commission had directed her to seek
funds for a secretary, such efforts were unsuccessful with the city budget
so she attended the August 17th meeting to obtain informat_ion'on possible
Communi-ty Development Funding. The H.U.D. guidelines seem to preclude using
the funds for a secretary so Ms. Kiemnec prepared a proposal for an adminis-
trative assistant to.the Preservation Planner (see Appendix A). Mr. Nimtz
made a motion that the HPC request of'Community Development an allocation
of funds to hire an administrative assistant to complete the projects the
Commission is currently working on or to work on projects planned for the
future. Mrs. Sporleder seconded; motion passed. Mrs. Choitz voted nay.
3) Appropr i at ion. of =Funds
Ms. Kiemnec announced that in order to pay the'Research Assistant, Ms. Straw,
out of the Small Town Survey Account, -the County Council must appropriate
the funds. When the grant funds are received, the Small Town Survey Account
will be reimbursed. First and Second Reading will be held on the matter
on September 21 at the Council's Meeting.
b., Historic Districts
1) Report on Seebert Court
Ms. Kiemnec reported that she and Mrs.- Sporleder met with Craig Hartzer,
the Mayor's Administrative Assistant; Neil Shanahan from the City Engineer's
office; Mr. Frickson, and Mr. Levy, Seebert Court residents. The City will
replace a 6" sewer pipe with a 12" one. They will take out the 72' parkway
and streetlamp to put in the sewer but will replace the streetlight and a
parkway that is 312'to 4' and 13 bushes. Neil also agreed to put in place the
electrical facilities for a streetlight at the other end.
c. Historic Districts
1) 52228 Gumwood
Ms. Kiemnec reported that the rescission of landmark status for the house
at 52228 Gumwood Road will be up for First Reading on September 21. The
Commission agreed that Mr. Oxian and Mrs. Sporleder.will make a presenta-
tion for the Council's Committee Meeting and the Public Hearing.
d. Legal
l) Report on the County Ordinance Amendment
Ms. Kiemnec reported that -the Amendment will be up for First Reading with the
County Council on September 21.
e.. Public Relations & Community Education - no report
f. Environmental Impact Statement
Page 3
September 19, 1983
I) Baugo Creek Park Site
Ms. Kiemnec reported, in response to the Commission's-inquiry,that there
are no historic buildings in the proposed Baugo Creek Park area. The
farmhouse.and barn have been extremely remodeled and the corncrib is in
poor condition.
2) 615 Edgewater
The owners are replacing the overhang on the north side of the house and
the pent eaves in the rear. Ms. Kiemnec approved the application. Mr.
Oxian made a motion that the repair work be closely watched by the Commission.
Mrs. Choitz seconded; motion passed.
3) 534 Edgewater
The porch, which was damaged by fire, will be repaired. All elements will
be exactly the same with the exception of the gutters. An exterior rather
than an interior system will be.used. Ms. Kiemnec approved the application.
g. Staff Report
1) Small Town Survey
The Small Town Survey Committee met to discuss recommendations to be made
to the Small Towns in the upcoming Summary. Report. The Committee agreed
and Mr. Oxian motioned that for New Carlisle and Walkerton, we would recom-
mend that they establish their own commission, for Roseland, Osceola, North
Liberty and Lakeville, that they come under our jurisdiction and the remain-
ing areas, no recommendation. Mrs. S ofleder seconded; motion passed. The
Committee also -agreed to assign to/co m�ttee the issue of what kind of
ordinance would be needed by the towns which come under our jurisdiction.
Mrs. Petrass seconded; motion passed.
2) Multiple Resource Area
Ms. Straw recommended that the building at 117 W. Colfax be added to the
Multiple Resource Area with an 11 rating because it seems to be the oldest,
extant commercial building in downtown South Bend. Mrs. Sporleder made a
motion to that effect; Mrs. Choitz seconded; motion passed.
11s. -Straw then.requested that the rating on 221 N'. Michigan be changed from
9 to 12 because of the architectural significance of the building.. Mrs.
Sporleder moved that the rating be changed from 9 to 11; Mrs. Choitz
seconded; motion passed.
3) Industrial Buildings Project
Ms. Kiemnec reported that because Department of Interior funds are available
through the state and because the project is needed, she has put together a
grant proposal on an in-depth study of industrial buildings in_South Bend to
determine their eligibility for the National Register. The project would also
include funds to do a National Register nomination for the Studebaker Clubhouse
& Trees in Bendix Woods County Park (see Appendix B). She brought the pro-
posal up before the Executive Committee on August 26. Mr. Newburn made a
motion that the Commission submit the proposal for a grant to do an in-depth
study of Industrial Buildings in South Bend; Mr. Nimtz seconded; motion
passed.
4) Statewide Alliance Committee Meeting
Ms. Kiemnec will write up a report on the meeting for October's Commission
meeting.
5) Computer Course
Ms. Kiemnec reported that the Computer Program developed by Mrs. Delores
Page 4
September 19, 1983
Davison's class at Notre Dame has been put on tape. She also indicated
that we might be able -to use MACOG's computer touse the information. She
asked permission to attend a Seminar at I.U.S.B. on October 14 called
"Using Microcomputers in Management" for $89. Mr. Newburn made a motion to
r send Ms. Kiemnec,to the seminar; Mrs. Sporleder seconded; motion carried.
7. Old Business - no report
8. New Business - no report
9. Hearing of Visitors - no report
10. Announcements & Miscellaneous Matters
a. Donation of Sanborn Maps by Mr. B.H. Walton
Ms. Kiemnec reported that Mr. Walton donated two volumes of Sanborn Maps to
the HPC. He gave several to the Indianapolis Commission who with Historic
Landmark's help, dispersed them to the various cities.
11. Adjournment
Mr. Newburn made a motion to adjourn; the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
APPENDIX A
Funding For an administrative Assistant Position
»nmitteo Dy
Organization: Historic Preservation Commission
Contact, Person: Karen L. Kiemnec
Phone #: (219) 284-9798
I 1 . PROJFCI' SUMItoRY:
tA► Project Goals (Identify the goal(s) and/or
objectives of the project): The main goal of the project is to
enable the Historic Preservation Commission to expand its activities with neighborhoods
as well as commercial areas. At the present time, the Commission works with residential
and business owners but on a limited basis because the staff includes only one full time
person and a part time secretary (eight hours per week). With another full time person,
services could be greatly expanded to the benefit of neighborhoods and commercial areas
throughout the city.
r! Location of Project (Identify the specific site or i
areas to be served within the city. Be as precise
as possible.): The Historic Preservation Commission, with its
Summary Report, identified twelve potential National Register and/or local historic dis-
tricts and ten potential local districts. . Of those, two are currently National Register
and two are local districts. Citizens in the following areas 'have expressed specific
interest in local designation: LaSalle St., Near East, and Lincolnway East so that those
would be priority areas with the Commission. If however, other neighborhoods requested
designation, the Commission would work with them as time Allowed (see Appendix A for
complete list of potential districts).
The Historic Preservation Commission also intends to continue its
commitment to the Central Business District of South Bend. By the end of 1983, we will
have completed a National Register designation for a section of downtown bordered by
LaSalle, St. Joseph, Wayne, and William Streets. The National Register status will enable
building owners to take advantage of several_ tax credit and matching grant benefits. In
order to offer building owners advice on these
benefits and (Attach extra sheets if needed) help them with the certification process
for tax credits and applications for grants, the Commission must have more than one staff
person.
Page 2
III. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
(A) Identify the activities involved in the project or
type of work to be performed. (Indicate how these
will achieve your goals): see attached sheet
(B) Timetable (Indicate generally the chronological order of
your major activities keeping in mind project completion
on within a 12 month period): The activities mentioned above would
be carried/throughout the year with the exception of the comprehensive plan which would
be completed by the end of 1984.
(Attach extra sheets if needed)
Page 2A
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (III A)
Neighborhoods - to help the three potential historic districts to be designated locally;
which would involve helping neighborhoods to organize, determining boundaries and stan-
dards that citizens agree to, taking a vote and making a recommendation to the Common
Counc i l .
Goals: Would fulfill the Historic Preservation Commission, neighborhood, community -wide,
and city goals of making our neighborhoods better places to live by maintaining the
unique qualities of each area, uniting the neighbors in working toward a common objective,
and generating pride among the residents. In addition, attractive, well-maintained
historic neighborhoods would make South Bend attractive to new residents.
Central Business District - following up on the National Register designation by offering
help to commercial building owners. With an additional staff person, the Commission
could give technical advice and information on all benefits of the designation, help
owners with certification for the Investment -Tax Credit, explain the facade easement
program and the tax breaks it includes, and counsel owners on applications for preser-
vation matching grants.
Goals: To attract developers into underutilized downtown buildings, to encourage revita-
lization of buildings in the area and with the.accomplishments of these, to make
downtown South Bend a more viable office and retail center.
Technical Advice and Infbrmation - to.offer advice and technical help on a much broader
scale. The Commission keeps a library.and resource file of practical advice on res-
toration techniques that are available'.'as well as information on the Investment Tax
Credit, facade easement_ program, and :tmatching grants -mentioned earl ler.- additional
staff person would mean disseminating=,this information to a largee segment of the
commun ity,.;bxy indtgdual,.Acontadj;:, i > :ge�eratr communI ty; educat iom programs : or:_conferences
such as. the:.lg83 Annual "Mayo.c'.sf Confevenee..on Tax Incentives for`: Reha0l ltatlon of
�::; ..::... :::::-
In 1983,: 'tfie Jobs Bi 11 includeif:;'25. mtiiion 'for Historic Preservation. A- simiiar b 11
is proposed.for Fiscal. 1984,with- an even larger allocation to Historic Preservation.
With the two National Register neighborhood districts plus the downtown designation,
over 400 buildings will be eligible for the grants in the South Bend area alone.
Goals: To disseminate information. about the economic benefits of preservation and.serve
as a sourceof -information-,on:preservation technology to as wide'an:audieate as possible.::
Comprehensive Plan - to devise a comprehensive plan for ways to best preserve the historic
resources identified in.the city survey. Such a plan would involve, coordinating, with
other:city.departments such as .the. code enforcement office to come', up with ways to -:deal
with problems -such as otder;=homes'which are allowed_ to deteriorate t6 the point that
demolition is necessary (demolition by neglect).
Goals: To devise a comprehensive plan to most effectively and efficiently use the material
gathered by the survey.
Review of Federally Funded Projects - to expedite the review of such projects. In the near
future, it i.s expected that a Memorandum of Agreement will be reached with the State
Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation to enable
a review of federally -funded projects at the local level. The Historic Preservation
Commission, with its architectural historian/preservation planner on staff, -.would play
a major role in this review process. The addition of a staff person with similar exper-
..tise would enable this reviewprocess,:.to be..expedited for both the Historic. Preservation:;:
Commission other city agencies and"building owners.
Goal: To expedite the review process.
Page 3
IV. PROJECTED ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
(A) Projected levels of service: Identify the level of
service to be performed through each of the activities
and the location of the service. Example, the number
of housing units to be inspected and location, the
number of clients/people counseled in each geographic
area to be served.
NA
(B) Primary Beneficiaries (Define the characteristics -of those:. to be served, e.g. racial mix, income., sex, etc.): A large portion
of the community could benefit from these programs, generally those who owned- historic-'
commercial or residential buildings.
Many of the potential historic districts are in mixed racial and
socio-economic neighborhoods such as West Washington, Near Northwest, St. Joseph Street,
Near East, St. Adalbert's, St. Casimir's, Notre Dame Avenue, Rum Village, Haney/Indiana,
etc. 'in:;addition,'commercial owners would include the range from small business owners
to large developers as potential recipients of the Commission's services and Historic
Preservation benefits.
(Attach extra sheets if needed)
Page 4
V. PROPOSED BUDGET: The budget should be appropriate to the
conduct of the project and be as detailed as possible.
(A) Requested Community Development monies for the
project: $14,000 - one year's salary for an administrative
assistant hired on a consulting basis, no fringe benefits.
(B) Non -CD Monies used for the project: (Identify source and amount)
County funds for space and equipment.
Interns (who work for college credit) as research assistants.
(C) Listing of all sources of funds available to the
organization/agency:
County funds - Preservation -Planner's salary & General operation of
Comni'ss ion:
Depalrtmenf of the Interior funds allocated through the Department
of Natural Resources of Indiana - specific projects such as the
South -Bend and St:Joseph:County Survey,'.the Multiple Resource Area
nomination, r d9n o%M .South. Bend, and:�xhe:: Industrial Butl.dings , ln-
depth' Study'. (grah pending) _..
Historic Landmarks=Foundation of Indiana'- grant for Small Town Survey
Southhold Restorations, Inc. - grant for Small Town Survey
(D) Future funding requirements and source(s):
In the future, it may be possible to fund such a position, at least
partially, through the Department of the Interior grants allocated
by the Indiana DNR as other states do currently.
(Attach extra sheets if needed)
APPENDIX A
POTENTIAL NATIONAL REGISTER AND/OR LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS:
West Washington Street
Near Northwest
North Shore Triangle
Harter Heights
Lincolnway East
Edgewater Place
St. Joseph Street
Wood|awn/Kess|er
Near East
East Jefferson Boulevard
Coquil)ard Woods
Miami/Ridgedale
POTENTIAL LOCAL HISTORIC DISTRICTS:
3t. Adalbert^s Parish
St. Casimir^s Parish
Notre Dame Avenue
Rum Village
Haney/ IndVana
River Park
AlLgeld/VYctoria
Erskine Park
Sunmynede
APPENDIX B
PART I
Pre -Application
Survey & Planning
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
AND ARCHAEOLOGY
HISTORIC PRESERVATION GRANTS-IN-AID PROGRAM
PRE -APPLICATION FOR
SURVEY & PLANNING PROJECTS
DATE OF APPLICATION Sept.2, 1983AMOUNT REQUESTED (FEDERAL SHARE) 3480.00
PROJECT: PART I - An intense survev of South Bend industrial hi,ildingc to
determine elioibiliry for the Narinnal Repicrer
PART 11 - A National Reoister aoolication for the Studehaker rliihhniicP and Trees
(nine trees which spell out Studehaker) rurrPntly Rend;y Wnnric Parti
PROJECT SPONSOR:
Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend b St. Joseph County
CONTACT PERSON:
Name Karen L. Kiemnec Address 1123 County/City Ri,ilding
City/Town South Bend' Zip code 4AAn1
Phone plq 284-979R
Bendix Woods County'Parks owned by the
OWNER: St dnspph rpunty Par c r Addressg_R_ 112 Bn, 77-A
(If individual property Board
City/Town NP. rarIicIP Zip Code ,N h 9
Home Phone Work Phone219 6543155
ENCLOSE WITH THIS APPLICATION:
Part II: Statement of Understanding (Attached)
Part III: Project Description
Part IV: Itemized Project Budget
Part V: Letter stating source of matching funds
MAIL TO:
Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology
202 North Alabama Street
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204
PART II
Pre -Application
Survey & Planning
STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING
FOR SURVEY & PLANNING PROJECTS
National Park Service Historic Preservation Matching Grants-in-aid Program
Administered by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources,
Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology
In order that a project consisting of PART I - An intense survey of South Bend
industrial buildinqs to determine eligibility for the National Reqister
PART II - A National Register application for the Studebaker Clubhouse and Trees
may be considered for a National Park Service (NPS) Historic Preservation Plan-
ning•Grant, the owner and/or sponsor (or his authorized representatives) in-
dicate by their signatures that they have read and understand that:
1. This is a request for consideration for a grant and not a promise for funa-
i^n through the NPS Program by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).
2. The applicant has the necessary authority to request consideration of this
project by the Department of Natural Resources.
3. This is a matching program in which no more than fifty percent of the funds
can be supplied through the NPS program. The sponsor's share (at least
one-half) can be supplied by:
a. Cash funds - supplied or acquired by the sponsor
b. Donated time during the project period
C. Donated materials.
4. No work covered in this application is to begin until the owner or sponsor
has been notified in writing that funds have been awarded, and has accepted
in writing the terms and conditions of the grant.
5. If a grant is received, the owner or sponsor will be responsible for supplying
all necessary documentation for DNR approval.
6. If a grant is received, all obligations for material or work are to be
paid by the owner or sponsor who will then receive reimbursement from the
NPS through the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, based on prior
agreement and approval.
1. If a grant is received, the project will be carried out in accordance with
the "Guidelines for Historic Preservation Survey and Planning Project,"
as provided by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Historic Preservation and Archaeology.
3.. If a grant is received, the owner or sponsor will keep accurate and com-
plete records of all expenditures, transactions, and time or m4terial to
be used as donated match.
9. In accordance with Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (P.L. 88-325),
the Department of Natural Resources requires that grant recipients not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment or an his-
toric preservation project because of race, color, sex, national origin,
or ancestry. All employees must be advised of equal opportunity and bene-
fits. Any complaint of discrimination must be reported to the State His-
toric Preservation Officer.
10, Upon completion of the project, the applicant will submit a Project Comple-
tion Report as required by the NPS, documenting the work and results.
11. The sponsors or owners will cooperate with the staff of the Department
of Natural Resources in meeting all the above requirements, as well as
other federal requirements that may apply.
12.' This is not stated as a complete list of project conditions; it only provides
guidelines to give applicants an idea of the requirements.
13. Any breaking of the conditions set forth in this Statement of Understanding
may mean concellation of the grant.
SPONSOR. Ted Wasielewski President Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend
Name & Title (pease print) Organization s St. Joseph County
9- 83
ignature Date
OWNER: Robert Fisch qrund. President St. 40
Xerribn Board
Name & Title (please print) Organization applicable)
( - �;,[ �\., , f I
(04e4 . sf4 -7— 1 8 3
ignature Date
(The term, "Owner," is d when thelplanning project is limited to a single
property, or when there is a project sponsor other than the owner of an individual
property.)
REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Part I
The Historic Preservation Commission proposes to hire a qualified Research Assistant
to do an in-depth study of South Bend industrial buildings to determine their eligibility
for the National Register of Historic Places. The buildings considered till be those
rated ll, 12, and 13 on the Indiana Historic Sites and Structures Inventory and generally'
structures which would be eligible for the National Register on their historical engi-
neering, or technological merits rather than their architectural significance.
The study will include a general narrative, individual information on the companies
selected, and updated photographs of the buildings. The narrative will discuss South
Bend's industrial history, compare the buildings to be studied and describe the meth-
odology used to select the companies for the project.
A checklist of about eighteen criteria will be applied to each company which will in-
clude the following items:
national name and sales
innovative product
first product of its kind
influence on other manufacturers in the area
major employer
building construction techniques, etc.
In addition, a narrative on each company will supplement the information on the existing
survey cards. When a company consists of more that one building as in the case of
Studebaker o Bendix, a physical description and explanation of use will be given for
each structure.
The project will be coordinated by Karen. L. Kiemnec, the Director of the Historic
Preservation Commission with input and editing by Richard Carey, Senior Planner for
the Department of Economic Development, who works with the marketing of industrial
buildings in South Bend and Marsha Mullin, the Curator for Discovery Hall, a museum
on the area's industrial history.
Part i)
The Commission proposes to have the same Research Assistant do a National Register
nomination for the Studebaker Clubhouse and trees. The clubhouse was built in 1926
for a clubhouse and residence for the engineers and employees of the Studebaker Proving
Ground located adjacent to the building. The pine trees were planted in 1931 and
spell out the word "Studebaker." The project will be coordinated by Karen Kiemnec.
REVISED PROJECT BUDGET
PART
Grant Request
Research Assistant - Thirteen, forty hour weeks plus 12.days
at $7.00/hour...............................S3,724.00
PART I TOTAL REQUEST $3,724.00
Local Match
Project Direction, Staff Time ...................................$ 960.00
Historic Preservation Commission Volunteers ..................... 200.00
Equipment - Space, Phone, Typewriter, Zerox, etc ................ 745.00
Marsha Mullin - donated time .................................... 785.00
Richard Carey - donated time .................................... 473.00
Typing - donated by Redevelopment Staff............ .. 306.00
Photography - Redevelopment ..................................... 50.00
Mileage- Redevelopment ......................................... 30.00
Cash Match - Redevelopment - 2.5 days of R.A._'s time............ 140.00
Cash Match - HPC - One day of R.A.'s time ....................... 56.00
PART I TOTAL LOCAL MATCH $3,745.00
PART II
Grant Request
Research Assistant - Forty hours at $7.00/hour..................$ 280.00
PART II TOTAL REQUEST $ 280.00
Local Match
Project Direction, Staff Time .................................. $ 64.00
Park Department, Staff Time... 89.00
Photography.................................................... 75.00
Mileage........................................................ 30.00
Typing......................................................... 80.00
PART II TOTAL LOCAL MATCH $ 338.00
TOTAL REQUEST $4,004.00
TOTAL MATCH $4,083.00
SOURCE OF MATCHING FUNDS
Part I
For the Industrial Buildings Project, the match will come from three sources: the
Historic Preservation Commission, Discovery Hall Museum, and the Redevelopment Commission.
All three agencies will donate in-kind services but in addition the Redevelopment
Commission will donate typing services and the funds for mileage and photography.
Part II
For the National Register application, the Historic Preservation Commission and the
St. Joseph County Parks Department will donate in-kind services. The Park Department
will also donate cash for the typist's services as well as for photography and mileage.
HISTORIC PRESERVATION C ISSION BUDGET.$18,900.
Treasurer's Report a- September 27, 1983
Line Item Budgeted for 1983 Current Bills -
Ill Historic Preservation Planner $15,400.00 $1,283.33
212 Postage 225.00 11.97 (-$3.40 to
#243)
213 Travel Expense
214 Mileage Allowance
215 Books
220 Conference Expenses
241 Printing, Other than Office Supplies
243 Photography
244 Stationery &'Printing
245 Blueprinting
246 Photocopying
252 Equipment
261 Legal Services
263 Technical Assistance .
265 Publication of Legal Notices
360 Office Supplies
570 Dues
571 Subscriptions
TOTAL
Project Small
Town Survey
200.00 -0-
150.00 -0-
100.00 -0-
89.00 (+$89.00 from
#244 & 245)
Balance
$3,850.03
81.92
55.00
-0-
71.54
-0-
300.00
4.76
168.47
.250.00
10.00
(+$3.40 from
-0-
#212)
150.00
-0-
(-$75.00 to
-0-
#220)
50.00
-0-
(-$14.00 to
6.00
#220)-
220)"100.00
100.00
-0-
50.00
75.00
-0-
-0-
850-00
-0-
773.00
500.00
31.00
-0-
50.00
-0-
50.00
400.00
104.08
40.56
50.00
-0-
50-00-
0.0050.00
50-00
-0-
34.00
$18,900.00
X1,534.14
$5,230.52
$ 7,000.00
$1,425.00
$1,784.33