Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutJuly 1975HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TOTAL BUDGET $11,425.00 Treasurer's Report July 14, 1975 Balance - 0 - 246.10 475.22 150.00 375.52 50.00 366.00 109.75 50.00 294.6o 99.84 135.00 - 0 - $11,425.00 $2,352.03 1975 Line Item Budgeted 119.1 Admin. Sec'y/Research Asst. $3,600.00 212 Postage 300.00 213 Travel Expenses 500.00 215 Books 150.00 241 Printing, other than office supplies 400.00 242 Publication of Legal Notices 50.00 243 Photography and Blue Prints 400.00 244 Stationery and Printing 125.00 252 Equipment 50.00 261 Legal Services 600.00 371 General Office Supplies 100.00 570 Dues and Subscriptions 150.00 263 Technical Assistance (Survey) 5,000.00 Balance - 0 - 246.10 475.22 150.00 375.52 50.00 366.00 109.75 50.00 294.6o 99.84 135.00 - 0 - $11,425.00 $2,352.03 July 14, 1 7 _? August 11. 1 Sen_ t.15 2 1975 Qct.13 . ! 7 _Nov. 10, Dec.. 8 1975 ^_; Jan. 12 ELECTIONS :: prepare report fnr nPXt meetina HUMANITIES accept final report • ;review with review with final review..of _ BUDGET 1 commission council j funds--remaininq preparation of action by �- refer --landmark list refer to LANDMARKS action on -.;dossiers of commission to Area Plan legislative --resolution 'established landmarks on landmarks j Commission body 4 Preparation of j refer -to Area f DISTRICTS action•on resolution for report of report ofj Plan refer to resolution Washington -Colfax committee committee Commission ; legislative body report from refer to Area Plan i ORDINANCE legal council Commission ? ; REVIEW and possible'' ? petition COUNTY SURVEY report completion and .. ,.. acceptance COMMUIITY contract awarding of_contract report report report report i ' report Dr:VELOPMENT approval by to consultant by by by - by j by REQUEST FOR commission for consultant consultant consultant, consultant . consultant CITY SURVEY city survey _ final approval' appointment of report by report of report of ANNUAL REPORT of layout ;distribution committee committee; committee committee': STATE FUNDING report on acceptance of ! f r.Pauest •,.,,_. fundi-ncr -• "• -- -L ---- -- - _ ------- __�._....... _. .,... action on refer to refer to HISTORIC appointment of report of report of !resolutior Area Plan legislative PRESERVATION chairman and committee committee to accept Commission body; PLAN committee plan completion of EDUCATION assignment to' report of committee program °and PROGRAM committee ! distribution jjj, July 3, 1975 Department of Human Resources and Economic Development William Hojnacki, Director County -City Building South Bend, Indiana Gentlemen: On the basis of previous discussions concerning the Survey of Historical Places in South Bend, Indiana, 'we submit this proposal as an outline of purpose, scope, and proposed services to be accomplished under a grant from the Department of Human Resources and Economic Development by the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County. PURPOSE The general purpose of the study is to assist in the preservation of valuable historic architecture and sites in the city of South Bend, Indiana. The study will inventory all structures approximately 50 years old and older and generally evaluate those of architectural significance. SCOPE OF SERVICES The work is primarily ar-survey of the physical conditions of the historical sites and existing architecture of South Bend excluding the West Washington Street proposed Historic District. In order to accomplish this, base and survey data will be collected. Maps and recommendations then will be made, based on the results of the data collection. Base Information Gather and review existing data concerning general descrip- tion and historical development of the city. Outline the historical styles common to the community, pro- pose criteria of evaluation, and propose a method for ranking ' s Department of Human Resources and Economic Development July 3, 1975 Page 2 i buildings and sites. Survey Develop a simple inventory form in cooperation with other local, state, and national agencies concerned with historic preservation. YftL� CI) �, (o cw "XZ, &UAtw 0_.("o, 0" "un? - Review all existing, pertinent and previously collected date available from other sources. Survey all structures of the city; evaluate those of general significance and enter data on survey forms. The information included on the survey forms is that neces- sary to identify the structure (name, ownership, location, date, etc.), to describe the structure (style, condition, mate- rials, etc.), and evaluate the structure (superior, average_, etc.). When the structure is rated highly or has particularly interesting detail, appropriate description will be added which f will support the nomination of the structure for registration. The survey form will include space for further research infor- mation and will serve as the basic data file which can be expan- ded as other information is contributed. Mapping The results of the survey will be mapped on base maps as avai- lable by the Area Plan Commission. Recommendations The findings will be evaluated and future action recommended; such as the establishment of districts or single sites, whether of local, state, or national significance. STUDY RESULTS The results of the survey will be entered on 3% x 14 file cards. Each significant structure will have a separate card which will include the information previously mentioned, a black and white photograph if merited, and if exceptional, a color slide. Material will be referenced to small district maps and superior structures will additionally be plot- s� The information included on the survey forms is that neces- sary to identify the structure (name, ownership, location, date, etc.), to describe the structure (style, condition, mate- rials, etc.), and evaluate the structure (superior, average_, etc.). When the structure is rated highly or has particularly interesting detail, appropriate description will be added which f will support the nomination of the structure for registration. The survey form will include space for further research infor- mation and will serve as the basic data file which can be expan- ded as other information is contributed. Mapping The results of the survey will be mapped on base maps as avai- lable by the Area Plan Commission. Recommendations The findings will be evaluated and future action recommended; such as the establishment of districts or single sites, whether of local, state, or national significance. STUDY RESULTS The results of the survey will be entered on 3% x 14 file cards. Each significant structure will have a separate card which will include the information previously mentioned, a black and white photograph if merited, and if exceptional, a color slide. Material will be referenced to small district maps and superior structures will additionally be plot- Department of Human Resources and Economic Development July 3, 1975 Page 3 ted on a city wide map. MEETINGS The commission will be represented at regular or special meetings with the department, the community, and the local governing agen- cies to insure satisfactory development and understanding of the work. PERSONNEL TIME All work will be under direct supervision of qualified architects. Survey teams will be architects in training and will be trained in survey techniques. The work can be begun on August 1, 1975, or upon acceptance of this proposal; and the work will be substantially complete within 400 calen- dar days. COMPENSATION The Basic Work as described above will be completed for the sum of Twenty -Six Thousand Dollars ($26,000). ADDITIONAL WORK This proposal is limited to the above work items. The following work items are not part of the base work but are logical subsequent projects which the commission will undertake separately if funds are available. Brochure Prepare a black and white, "camera ready" brochure to illu- strate the results of the survey and to serve as an educational booklet on the architectural heritage of the community, for the citizens, useful as a guide and reference. Preparation of Application In the event either single sites or districts are selected for nomination for registry, the commission will assist in the - preparation of the application forms with the necessary accom- payning illustrative work. Department of Human Resources and Economic Development July 3, 1975 Page 4 F We trust this proposal is in keeping with your wishes and the consultant will begin work upon written notice to proceed. Sincerely, Jack L. Smith, President Historic Preservation Commission kl d 4historicpreservation commission ,_:. -; _:•;"-;•� : -:-_..:>-,.. ;: •.,_-.._,:_., .. ,_ ._; ,..:, : of _ - ,, •south bend and st. Joseph county ROOM 1123 --COUNTY CITY BUILDING _ south bend, indiana 46601 (219 284 9768) A ; - - Regular. Meeting -`Conference Room"C - Monday,:. July- 1 ' 1975; -Room 610 _-_ __ - - - County -Cit Building--- y 1. Call'ta.Order 2. .=Roll _ Call- all 3. :. Approval - of Minutes-:---- 3_ __ .1 4.: • Treasurer's Report _.. z ti _ 5. .` Correspondence: - :.: •y_ _31 Committee..Reports - ICH Evaluator's Report ; Consultant's._Report V z,Legal'. - - _ survey . Consultant', s 'Report - ,- - - -, _ Budget" and Finance Historic., Districts. _ . _. - - - _ : - . e ._, _ Historic Landmarks - -- - Legal' - - Public Relations and:Education _ __..._ Presidential`Report. _ - Consultant's Report_ - - Research.Assistant's_Report . _ 7. -Old:-Business - .-Revision of Ordinance_. •. Resolutions:'#3 _and:#4`_ .:.= _ Plaques._: _ Annual Report- - - - New, Business' ` ." _..:: Historic•Plana :- -- - -• Resolution Hearin _." 9. _ g' of Visitors_,. --10.='Announcemen'ts'- -=and Miscellaneous Matters - 11.' "'.-�Idj ourninent _ RESOLUTION NO. 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA, TO CO-OPERATE WITH THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION.OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN- DIANA WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, wishes to promote the efforts for historic preservation, and realizes. that such an effort involves the co-operation of several agencies; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission recognizes the invaluable assistance and counsel that the Area Plan Commission has provided; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission believes that its work to further the preservation of local heritage would be facilitated by its close co-operation with the Area Plan Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana, that the Historic Preserva- tion Commission extends its thanks to the Area Plan Commission for all past assistance and pledges to co-operate with said Commission in�the future and looks forward to the establishment of a reciprocal resolution by the Area Plan Commission. PASSED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF SOUTH BEND AND ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, INDIANA, this day of , 1975. Russell W. Rothermel, Secretary BY: Jack L. Smith, President Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph County, Indiana historic preservation commission PUBLIC RELATIONS AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION COMM ETTEE MEETING ; :-,August: 8- 8; 1975 7:30 P.M. In'Attendance: John Oxian,.Lois McMahan and Deloris Davisson = .°I. Recommend a letter be.sent to all participants.in the special hearing of residents of Park Avenue and West Washington areas ; on July_ -31; 1975. <: !",ai=' _ Reading of letter by Lois McMahan. Discussion. m 7j;. 2. Procedure for public relations:- all views wh i chrep resent ;.o,: the Historic Preservation Commission must be cleared through >' the Public Relations Committee as established under its ,,.: '' s.`.. procedure,. When speaking as an individual a commission ., member= must make it clear that he•or she is not s eakin P 9 --as-an'official spokesman or woman.,for the Commission. ` fior eRecommend program ducation• and edification ofthe Comm i ss I on : ; } - - Iy L U►i -. Q A. In order that the commission may be more familiar- "":° with zoning and zoning proded.ures, as well as to acquaint the members with preparation of . a` master ``' ::• ;plan for Historic Preservation Zoning • the Committee___.. _ recommends a two art training ro ram: P 9 P g, �r. k3; I. An evening meeting devoted solely to zoning` ` discussion with Dick Johnson and Judy, Studer. OK -�, 2. - An evening meeting with Jack Dunfee in which •"- ` �.; -' ®�..to „ we would go over the ordinance, line by Iine, , discussing not only the words .but ;their mean i ng cf ;tP` �i and intent. L -8. In order that;the commission may work more closely, k • -with area residents, the' Committee recommends that two or three commissioners trained in the above ° ;,program, meet with small groups of residents. Discussion ¢; - profitable to the cause is very difficult if 6; 1. We are not tolling people the'same things .2.: We -are ta.i king to large numbers of persons. ° -aA A' Residents and Commissioners should be matched as to o . expertise, and interest. i . '•.'4 .. -The Committee recommends scheduling a. bus trip to Grand Rapids 0 to' acquaint the Commissioners and ,interested public in a sample of HPZ. `O 5. The Committee urges the Commission to study the Marshall Plan: the writing of our Master Plan top priority. I tr is •not _.making until we„have the information written down can we speak from authority when meeting the public or media. Respectfully submitted Deloris J Davisson f _ y - - - •-- - .4 t+.'. -$SFA' ,Line Item 119.1 212 213 215 241 242 243' 244 252 261 371 570 263 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION TOTAL BUDGET $11,425.00 Treasurer's Report August 11, 1975 Admin.Sec'y?Research Asst. Postage Travel Expenses Books Printing, other than office supplies Publication of Legal Notices Photography and Blue Prints Stationery and Printing Equipment Legal Services General Office Supplies Dues and Subscriptions Technical Assistance (Survey) 1975 Budgeted Balance $3,600.00 - 0 - 300.00 228.84 500.00 475.22 150.00 150.00 400.00 375.52 50.00 50.00 400.00 366.00 125.00 102.75 50.00 50.00 600.00 294.6o 100.00 99.84 150.00 135.00 5,000.00 - 0 - $11.425.00 $22327.77 12 July 14, 1975 Page 2 5. Correspondence Lois McMahon mentioned a letter the Commission received from — William Hojnacki in answer to our letter to him of June 19,.re- garding homesteading. He says, in part, the city has provisions in our community development ordinances to allow for homestead- ing when the=program becomes, "in our judgment, feasible and practicable." She next presented a brochure from the Historic Landmarks Foun- dation of Indiana giving a Guide to Historic Preservation Pro- grams and Services. It was duly noted by the Commission. She presented a letter from the National Trust for Historic Preservation stating, among other things, the preparation of a handbook on establishing and administering a preservation com- — mission and a bi-monthly newsletter. Also included was a reser- vation card for their forthcoming October 8 -11th annual meeting which is goig"g to be held in Boston. Lois McMahon next reported that she had contacted Sully Lowe, WSBT, Dan Caesar, also WSBT, and Harry Kavorkian, WNDU, suggesting the possibility of a round table discussion or an interview with Crumlish/Sporleder on their newscasts. Mr. Kevorkian responded. in a telephone call on the 8th that he was interested and suggested a possibility of having 2 or 3 persons in on August 6th for a dis- cussion and possible slide presentation on the progress of the County Survey. Mr. Rothermel suggested someone from Crumlish/Spor- leder should participate. Mr. Smith suggested that someone from the community - a home owner - should also participate. It was further suggested that perhaps Ms. Davisson, as head of the Public Relations Committee would be a good candidate. 6. Committee Reports ICH Evaluator's Report At the suggestion of Ms. Davisson, the ICH meetings evaluator, Dr. Thomas Fern, will give his report and presentation at the next monthly meeting. A written evaluation will then also be available to Commission members. The prepared evaluation would be in four parts: the evaluator's report; John Oxian's report; participants' evaluation; and newspaper clippings. Legal Consultant's Report Mr. Nimtz, chairman of the Legal Committee, introduced Mr. Dunfee and stressed the great deal of work the legal consultant, Mr. Jack Dunfee, has done for the Commission. He also mentioned that Mr. Dunfee had participated in a number of the neighborhood policy meetings. Mr. Dunfee then took the floor and advised that rather than press for lengthy and extensive revision of the ordinance at this time, he would suggest a minimal immediate revision which would make the July 14, 1975 Page 3 present ordinance -more workable. Extensive revision of the ordin- ance should be co-ordinated with the comprehensive revision of the City and County Zoning Ordinance now underway by the Area Plan Commission. The immediate and minimal changes proposed by Mr. Dunfee covered three main points: 1. The deletion of the part of Section II concerning the ac- ceptance by the Commission of "real estate, personal -- property, or monies for the purpose of historical preser- vation." Mr. Dunfee pointed out that this clause gave us illegal powers, since the Commission cannot own property. 2. The insertion of the words. "Historic Preservation District" into Section II, 2,e of the Ordinance concerning the estab- lishment of reasonable and just standards. This addition merely clarified the jurisdiction of the Commission. 3. The third change involved the zoning of Historic Preser- vation Districts. Mr. Dunfee advised the adoption of an overlay zoning which would merely superimpose an historic district over the present zoning. In such a case, the zoning classification of -specific buildings would not be affected. For example, A-1 residential would remain A-1 as such, with Historic Preservation ordinance provisions applicable in addition to A-1 standards. Whereever a - conflict would occur between Historic Preservation pro- visions and zoning ordinance provisions, the Historic Preservation provisions would prevail. Mr. Dunfee said that the three changes should be incorporated into the ordinance and the ordinance then would be free from challenge. The Area Plan Commission and staff had reviewed and approved this revision. After some discussion, Mr. Rothermel moved that the Commission accept the recommendations for the ordinance and that they be turned over to the Area Plan Commission. Mr. Nimtz se- conded the motion and it was passed unanimously. Mr. Jack Smith thanked Mr. Dunfee again and repeated how in- debted the Commission is to him and his work in the Commission's behalf. Presidential Report Mr. Smith remarked that the Commission should do something about the Studebaker Mausoleum which is in bad shape. It was suggested that the Landmarks Committee pursue this matter. Ms. Price spoke about its history and said it was no longer considered the Stude- baker Mausoleum and that the name "Studebaker" had, as a matter of fact, been removed from the tomb. It was decided the Commission should take no action. July 14, 1975 Page 4 Survey Consultant's Report Mr. Brian Crumlish gave a progress report on the County Survey;- He urvey:He stated that his firm had completed about �+(pfo of the work in- volved. He displayed an overlay map of the county. He also stated that they had now drawn up a survey form which will be used to inventory the homes. Since the last progress report of June 9th, they had looked at or driven by 15,000 buildings. They -- had filled out forms for about 320 structures and taken 300 photo- graphs. Mr. Crumlish showed a copy of the survey form used, and suggested that the Commission Zerox them. Thirty of these structures were considered of a "superior" quality and recommended for further research. He also showed a small map with various designations. Mr. Smith mentioned that it might be well to have the newspaper run a notice designating where the survey team will be at a given time so that home owners could be notified in advance. Ms. Price suggested that the Commission prepare a display about the County Survey for the National Trust meeting in Boston. Mr. Nimtz suggested that one or two of Mr. Crumlish's assistants might work with Ruth Price on the display. Next, Mr. Smith brought up the proposal for an architectural survey of South Bend. He passed out to Commission members copies of a letter which Mr. Smith wrote to Mr. William Hojnacki out= - lining the nature and scope of the City Survey. After some dis- cussion, Mr. Rothermel moved that the Commission approve the letter and send it to Mr. Hojnacki. Ms. Davisson seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. At this point, Mr. Oxian said he was not in favor of the Commission acting upon proposals and other matters without first consulting - the proper committees. Mr. Nimtz remarked that much basic spade- work had been done on these matters before they were submitted to the Commission for approval. Mr. Oxian then acknowledged that it was expedient to approve and pass upon these matters that had been tabled for so long. Budget and Finance Committee Two budgets - one to the city and one to the county - have been submitted. President Smith said they must now be reviewed by the County Commissioners and the City Council. Historic Districts Committee Mr. Nimtz reported that at the St. Paul's Church meeting, Ms. Ruth Price suggested to the attending people that they form a West Washington District. However, he suggested that the title "West Washington" be changed to "Washington -Colfax -LaSalle." Mrs. Dill, one of the home owners in that district, reminded the Commission that some home owners are opposed to the idea of an historic district and would like to be considered be- fore any district is established. July 14, 1975 Page 5 Historic Landmarks Committee There was no report since the committee had not met. Ms. Marsha Mullin, however, would give her report later in the evening. Legal Committee The aspects of the ordinance revision were covered by Mr. Dunfee earlier in the meeting. —Public -Relations-and-Community- Education_ - -- The chairman reported that she hasn't been able to get her committee members to attend meetings. She, therefore, had - nothing to report. A discussion -ensued concerning the non- attendance of Mr. Al Stivers and Mrs. Christyne Woolridge at committee and/or Commission meetings. President Smith suggested that the Consultant prepare an attendance chart showing the at- tendance record of all members at meetings. It might then be sent to the respective appointive bodies. Mr. Oxian suggested that since Ms. Davisson is the Treasurer, it might be wise to appoint her to the Budget and Finance Committee, and him to the Public Relations and Community Education Committee. Pres- ident Smith duly noted these suggestions and made the appoint- ments. Historic Plan The Consultant discussed the idea of an Historic Plan and :mentioned that she had been in touch with J. Reid Williamson. He recommended using, as a guide, the plan formulated in Marshall, Michigan. Education Plan The Consultant mentioned the advisability of inaugurating an education plan, complete with slides and lecture which could be used in the school system, as well as women's clubs. This - should have high priority for the Commission should have some- thing by September. A discussion ensued with Ms. Ruth Price who felt such efforts - would duplicate works.already in progress by Southhold. Pres- ident Smith acknowledged this concern and assigned Deloris Davisson to the project and asked her to report at the next meeting. Consultant's Report The Consultant reported that she had -several projects which she would like to bring before the Commission. One concerned'the establishment of a clipping file of newspaper articles about the Commission or related matters. The Commission has nothing of this sort and it would be advisable to start such a file or scrapbook. Ms. Davisson remarked that she had several clippings July 14, 1975 Page 6 which she would donate to the Commission. Mr. Oxiin also stated that he had a complete clipping file which he would allow the Commission to copy. Lois McMahon next reported that a flat file was needed to --- store the many mounted and matted photographs which, at pre- sent, were lying on the floor of the office. She also mentioned that a slide cabinet or file should be purchased for the slides which had been taken for the Neighborhood Policy meetings and - the County Survey. Mr. Oxian stated that the Area Plan Commis- sion has some upright filing cabinets which it would donate to the Commission. The Consultant said she would check on this, but for blueprints, maps, and photographs, a flat storage case was still necessary. Mr. Oxian made a motion that the Commis- sion approve the purchase of whatever storage units are needed. Mr. Nimtz seconded the motion. After some further discussion, the motion was carried and unanimously passed. Research Assistant's Report Ms. Marsha Mullin reported that she had researched seven buildings within city limits. They are: 405 West Wayne, 220 West LaSalle, 319 North Williams, 1104 North Notre Dame, 113 West North Shore, 1234 East Jefferson, and the Odd Fellows Building. She is currently working on 601 Park or 407 West Navarre, commonly known as the "Chapin House", and she has started to research some buildings submitted to her from the County Survey. Mr. Oxian reported that he has had almost 10010 success in answers to his letters about designating homes for historic landmarks. 7. Old Business Revision of the Ordinance This matter was covered at the beginning of the meeting under the Legal Consultant's report. Resolution # 3 A copy of the Resolution was shown to the members of the Commission with the recommendation that it be approved and passed. Mr. Rothermel made a motion that this Resolution be passed as submitted. Mr. Oxian seconded this motion. There was no discussion. A vote was taken and the motion passed unanimously. Resolution # 4 A copy of Resolution # 4 was likewise shown to Commission members. A question was raised by Mr. Oxian regarding a point in the resolution. It was resolved satisfactorily and Mr. Nimtz made a mfltion that the resolution be accepted. Mr.-'Oxian seconded this motion and it was passed unanimously. July 14, 1975 Page 7 Plaques Mr. Oxian reported that he does not have any further in- formation about plaques for designated homes. A discussion ensued as to just what sort of plaques were in question. Ms. Ruth Price stated that the plaques around town are state markers. She suggested that perhaps one could check with the State Historical Bureau. Mr. Rothermel remarked that the town of Salem, Massachusetts had some very nice plaques on their homes and one could check these out. -It was suggested that Mr. Oxian look into the problem. Mr. Smith, likewise, promised to look into the matter. Annual Report A prototype of the Annual Report was submitted to the Com- mission members. Mr. Nimtz referred this annual report to the President, Vice -President, Treasurer, and Secretary for decision and promulgation. Resolution # 5 A copy of Resolution # 5 was submitted Jo the Commission members. Ms. Davisson made a motion that the resolution be accepted. Mr. Nimtz seconded this motion. Mr. Rothermel then questioned why this particular resolution was submitted. Mr. Smith informed him.that the Area Plan Commission had done much work for the Commission and the Commission was very much in its debt. The motion was put to a vote and it was passed unanimously. 8. New Business Historic Preservation Plan The President appointed Juanne Sporleder to direct a formu- lation of a plan for our Commission and to use, as an out- line, the historic plan of Marshall, Michigan. She is to report back to the Commission on this matter at the next meeting. According to our zoning ordinance, the Commission must have an historic plan. State Request Jack Smith reported that he had been in contact with Eric Gilbertson and had sent a letter to Joseph Cloud requesting $5,000 in matching funds to be used on the County Survey. He had not yet received a definite answer, but he would talk - with Governor Otis Bowen this week. A discussion ensued con- cerning the exact use of the money and Ms. Price reminded the Commission that the money had been set aside by the state for use -in architectural surveys. 9. Hearing of Visitors Both Mrs.-Riedle and Mrs. Doyle were very concerned about. the ramifications of the new ordinance, and still had questions July 14, 1975 Page 8 ----, which were not answered by Jack Danfee's explanation or the succeeding discussion. They said they had attended each of the four Neighborhood Policy meetings and were under the impression they would be consulted before such a revision was passed. 10. Adjournment' Mr.'Smith made a motion that the meeting be adjourned. Mr. F. Jay Nimtz seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. SUBMITTED BY: Russell Rothermel, Secretary DRAFT PREPARED BY: G. Gilbert, Administrative Assistant NEXT REGULAR MEETING Monday, August 11, 1975 Conference Room -C, Room 610 6th Floor, County -City Building 7:30 p.m.