Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 10-26-90October 26, 10:00 a.m. Presiding O Because of Board of Put 1. ROLL CA] • : �I WN N ' I2 •• 1 • %V DA I UGN V 1 1990 1200 County -City Building 227 W. Jefferson Boulevard ficer: Ms. Paula Auburn South Bend, Indiana 46601 Vice President large number of people attending the meeting, the meeting was moved to the lic Works Meeting Room on the 13th Floor of the County -City Building. Members Tresent: Members Absent: Legal Counsel: Redevelopment Staff: Bureau f Housing Staff: News M 'a: Others: Ms. Paula Auburn, Vice President Mr. Raman J. Piasecki, Secretary Mr. Sandy Combs, Assistant Secretary Mr. Michael Donoho Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President Ms. Sandra Boyd Mrs. Ann Kolata, Director Mrs. Esther Deak Ms. Hedy Robinson, Economic Dev. Specialist Mr. K.C. Pocius, Economic Dev. Specialist Mr., Ted Leverman, Assistant Director Mr. Don Porter, South Bend Tribune Mr. Thom Howell, U93 Mr. David Scott, Ch. 28 Mr. Bill Ruminski, Michiana Business Journal Mr. Robert Gorny Mr. Homer J. Baird Ms. Leslie J. Daniel Mr. Clayton Lang Mr. William Jenkins Mr. Phillip Hunter Ms. Diane Ernsberger Mr. Hobert Shelton Ms. Early Shelton Mr. Bernie Thomas Ms. Ruth Lewis *sir. Ed Richardson Mr. J. Pallatin -1- South Bend Regular Me 1. Ms. Auburn continued f< 2. 3. ,relopment Cannission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) Ms. Rebecca Neiswender Mr. Mitchell Heppenheimer Mr. Harold Morgan Mr. Bill Furry Mr. Paul White Mr. Ben Ziolkowski Mr. R. F. McGinty Mr. James Carr Mr. B. Doshi Mr. S. Blenki Mr. Howard Goodhew Mr. Ralph Ran wl Mr. Jim Eckenberger Mr. Calvin Murdock Mr. Jerry Neff Mrs. Debbie Neff Mr. Otto Szucs Ms. Helen Sutton Mr. F. Fuller .that the Executive Session held prior to the meeting would be adjourrmient of the Regular Meeting. Upon a notion made by Mr. Piasecki, seconded by Mr. rondho and unanimously carried, the minutes of the Regular Meeting of Friday, October 26, 1990, were approved. •• I Rf tj Kel A N =411VEN 1 Ion z 101 MAN • i • �r ICI 1 • - • Ccuputea s Assoc. $ 84.00 MACOG 15.00 P.D.H. 5.73 South Bend Drafting Supply 15.00 South Bend Tribune 74.88 St. JOSEph County Surveyor 4.00 Tri Cour ty News 62.62 Equipmert Services 278.05 Abstract and Title 130.00 Petty Ca sh Reimbursement 8.00 OTAL $ 632.28 -2- South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 0 Abstract & Title Corporation Baker & Daniels Booher, Gussie Cole Associates Fuller, Charlene Horka, Thomas Lauver, Ralph McClosl<ey & Associates Moore, ene Powell, Carol Shelton Hobert & Early St. Joseph Treasurer St. Joseph Title Baker & Daniels Forrest Peggy Grove, iri & Linda Horka, omas Petty Cash Reimbursement R. McClcskey & Assoc. Powell, Carol & 1st Source Powell, Carol St. Jos 1oh. Treasurer Upon a Mr. Col ordered 26, 199 Dtion made by Mr. Donoho, seconded by s and unanimously carried, the :)n formally approved the claims d October 15 and October 22, 1990 and Necks dated October 19 and October to be released. -3- $ 270.00 5,169.28 7,681.87 10,729.78 30,506.35 7,650.00 3,850.00 7,700.00 850.00 9,496.44 950.00 840.34 50.00 1,734.93 1,070.00 5,648.64 3,500.00 69.00 15,000.00 22,500.00 950.00 351.36 $136,567.99 $137,200.27 South Bend Fedevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 4. CONMUNICATIONS 5. 6. Ms. Kol to said the communications we have received. are related to the public hearing and we'll introduce them at that point. Mrs. Kol ata stated there was an item to be added tc i the agenda concerning a proposal from Walker Parking Consultants for preparation of a maintenance manual for the Wayne/St . Joseph garage. Hearing no objections, Ms. Auburn added this to the agenda Is item 6h. There wa[s no old business. a. MCM 1. An 2. An Marl the ►uburn stated that Substitute .ution #962 amends the Studebaker dor Development Plan and adds some :ional properties to be acquired to was originally in our Studebaker .dor Development Plan. :e beginning the Public Hearing Mrs. :a introduced the following docLmients the record: :iginal of the "Notice of Hearing on hment to the Studebaker Corridor .opment Plan". 'fidavit of Carol Smith, Classified Fer of the South Bend Tribune, that notice of Hearing was published in daily newspaper on October 12, 1990. -4- NO OLD BUSINESS South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS S (Con't) a. con lnuea... 3. An ffidavit of Cherie Jolly, managing edi or of the Tri- County News, that the Not ce of Hearing was published in that weekly newspaper on October 12, 1990. 4. Projerty owners listed on Substitute Res. No. 962 were sent a copy of the Notice of Hearing on October 12, 1990. 5. A list of neighborhood associations who previously registered with the Redevelopment Conmlission concerning the Studebaker Corridor Development Area. Thesse neighborhood associations were sent a copy of the Notice of Hearing on October 12, 1990. 6. A capy of Substitute Resolution No. 962 which is the subject of the public hearing. 7. As of 10:00 a.m. on October 26, 1990, 5 written remonstrances were received. Ms. Kolata introduced the following letters into the record: October 25, 1990 Redevelopment Commission of the City of South Bend Department of Redevelopment 1200 County -City Bldg. 227 W. Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 RE: Substitution Resolution No. 962 Studebaker Corridor Development Plan Ben Ziolkowski - Block 3 - Parcels 15,16,17,18,21,22,23,24 and 25 Ziolkowski Construction Company - Block 3, Parcel 20 -5- South Bend Regular Me elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUMMSS (Cont.) a. conitznuea... Gentlemen: On behalf of Ben Ziolkowski and Ziolkowski Construction Company, we hereby file a written remonstrance to the proposed amendment to the Studebaker Corridor Development Plan, which proposed ame dment will be heard at 10:00 a.m., Fri ay, October 26, 1990. Ziolkowski Construction Company is an Indiana Corporation which was formed in 1974, and since the date of incorporation has been continually engaged in the construction business. Ziolkowski Construction Company has undertaken numerous contracts in the South Bend area for construction purposes, and continues do so. During 1978, the Company purchased the property at 1005 South Lafayette Boulevard, South Bend, for the purpose of constructing its Company buildings to house its operations. This was undertaken at considerable cost to the Company, but was done to promote the use of the land in a manner to best serve the interests of the City of South Bend, as well as the Company. Since that time, the Company has continued to upgrade the area, including its parking area. Subsequently, the Company decided to expand its operations and proceeded with the purchase of several parcels during 1982 and 1983. At that time, these parcels were in a blighted condition and, agai ' at Company expense, the parcels were upgraded and became an integral part of t e overall Company operations. In particular, these parcels were used for South Bend Regular Meg elopment commission - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSMS (Cont.) a. conitinuect... yard and equipment storage, and a building also was constructed on Block 3, Parcel 17, for vehicle, equipment and inventory storage. Substitute Resolution No. 962 amends the Studebaker Corridor Dev lopment Plan by adding these parcels use by the Company for yard and equipment storage, as well as vehicles and inventory storage. This letter is being written on behalf of Ben V oLkowski and 2iolkowski Construction Company as their written objection to the adding of the above numbered parcels to the Studebaker Corridor Development Plan. The objections are as follows. l) Since the early 1980's, the Company has purchased the parcels involved in the Substitute Resolution, many parcels of which were in a blighted condition, and has spent considerable monies to upgrade these parcels. The incorporation of these parcels in the Development Plan would have a severe economic impact on the existing construction business. 2) The Company presently employs approximately 250 people, with an estimated weekly payroll of $125,000. The incorporation of these parcels, which are an integral part of the Company operation, could result in a loss of employment, and even have a direct impact on the future of the Company's construction operation. 3) The parcels of land sought to be adde to the Development Plan are not blig ted areas within the meaning of 36- 7.14 -1, et. seq. I.C. -7- South Bend ] Regular Meei 6. NEW BUS- a. coni elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) 4) The Company will continue to promote the use of the land sought to be added to the Development Plan in the best interest of the City of South Bend and its citizens, at no expense to the City or its taxpayers. 5) The inherent costs involved in adding these parcels to the Development Plan and subsequent acquisition would exceed the benefits and goals of the Department of Redevelopment and the City of South Bend. 6) The decision to add these parcels to the Development Plan is unreasonable and is an unnecessary action. Resplectfully submitted Kenneth P. Fedder Suite 300, First Bank Bldg. 205 W. Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 Telephone: (2l9) 234 -6061 Attorney for Ben Ziolkowski and Ziolkowski Construction Co. Ben Ziolkowski, Individually and as President of Ziolkowski Construction Co. October 16, 1990 City of South Bend Department of Redevelopment 1200 County -City Building Sout Bend, IN 46601 Attn: Ann olata Dear Mrs. Kolata: South Bend I Regular Meet 6. NEW BUS] a. cons elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) 4) The Company will continue to promote the use of the land sought to be added to the Development Plan in the best interest of the City of South Bend and its citizens, at no expense to the City or its taxpayers. 5) The inherent costs involved in adding these parcels to the Development Pla and subsequent acquisition would exc ed the benefits and goals of the Department of Redevelopment and the City of South Bend. 6) The decision to add these parcels to the Development Plan is unreasonable and is an unnecessary action. Respectfully submitted Kenneth P. Fedder Suite 300, First Bank Bldg. 205 W. Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 Telephone: (2l9) 234 -6061 Att rney for Ben Ziolkowski and Ziolkowski Construction Co. Ben Ziolkowski, Individually and as President of Ziolkowski Construction Co. October 16, 1990 City of South Bend Department of Redevelopment 1200 County -City Building South Bend, IN 46601 Attn: Ann Kolata Dear Mrs. Kolata: �Z South Bend Regular Mee 6. NEW BUS elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) a. conttinuect... I arr the owner of parcels 12 and 13 that Redevelopment has listed in resolution 962 to be acquired. I also own two lots immediately north and two lots east on Michigan Street. This property is all used by my business, Edward J. White, Inc.. We are a plumbing, heating and air conditioning contractor and have been at this South Michigan address since 1927. The parcels in question on Main Street are part of our storage yard and are an essential part of our business. I am therefore requesting that parcels 12 and 13 be deleted from resolution 962. Sincerely, Edward J. White, Inc. Paul J. White October 26, 1990 City of So th Bend, Indiana Redevelopm nt Commission County -Cit Building South Bend, Indiana 46601 ATTN: Ms. Ann E. Kolata SUBJECT: Substitute Resolution No. 962 Amending the Studebaker Corridor Development Plan Gentry: Please accept this as our official remonstrance to the above action. our -10- South Bend I Regular Meei 6. NEW BUST a. cons elopment Ccm ission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) specific objections are the inclusion of parcel number 13 -Block 4, parcel numbers 5,7,8,14,15,16, 18 -26 of Block 5. As stated it is our present intention to expand our existing operation, therefore req iring assistance in the acquisition of those parcels required for the successful completion of our project per the attached master plan marked Exhibit "A ". Thank you for your consideration of this request. Respectfully, Murdock & Sons Construction, Inc. Ome a Properties W.H. Calvin Murdock W.H. Calvin Murdock President October 23, 1990 Redevelopment Commission of the City of South Bend Department of Redevelopment County -City Building 227 W. Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, IN 46601 RE: Substitute Resolution No. 962 Gentlemen: I wish to object to the acquisition of parcels 3,4, and 25 on block number 10. -11- I South Bend ] Regular Meet elopment Connission - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSS (Cont.) a. con,�inuea... This land is used for employee parking and is also the only access to our truck Loading dock. Acquisition of this land will result in severe damage to the operations of the Ridge Company. Sincerely, Howard R. Goodhew Chairman of the Board October 25, 1990 Ann E. Kol to Director Department of Redevelopment City of South Bend Stu ebaker Corridor Development P an Dearl Ann: I received your notice of the hearing to be held on Friday October 26 concerning the parcels within the Studebaker Corridor that the city would like to acquire. As you are aware, I am the owner of a building within the Corridor. Parcels #1, 2, 3,5, 6, 7, 8, 10 of Block #12 that are listed for acquisition are of concern to me. Some of these parcels make up the paved parking area for my building. The remaining parcels were purchased with the idea of expanding the parking, they are now unpaved and are used as employee parking. Since the construction of my -12- South Bend Regular Me elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSn ESS (Cont.) a. conitinuect... building in 1982, my business, Joe's Liquor has doubled its retail sales. The other retail businesses have also increased sales. I was advised in early 198S not to pave the remaining area until fin l decisions were made regarding acq isitions. Therefore I would request tha ownership of these parcels remain the same. Sincerely, Jos ph A. Gorny Joe's Liquor Store 111 South Main St. South Bend, IN 46618 Ms. Kolata said these are the reannstxances that have been received at this point. Ms. Kolata asked Mr. Pocius to briefly outline those areas that are being suggested to add to the acquisition list. The Commission earlier this year added a nuiter of parcels to their acquisition list. With this resolution we would add the remainder of the property that we intend to acquire in the Studebaker Corridor Development Area. Mr. Pocius outlined the Studebaker Co idor Area on the map. The purpose of all this is to assemble land in the Studebaker Corridor area. Specifically, we are adding properties south of Sample St. for assemblage and ultimate di ition in order to redevelop the are4 as a light industrial park. This is -13- South Bend edevelcpment Commission Regular Meeting - October 25, 1990 6. NEW BUSINESS Cont.) a. conttinuect... the first step in the process in adding several properties to the acquisition list and these are the properties that are contained in the yellow areas. Ms. Auburn asked if there was any objection to any of the information being entxxed into the record. There being no objection the information will be entered into the record of the public hearing. Mr. F asked if the objections are for the people or the staff. Ms. Kolata stated that this is to see if theie are objections to submitting the information I've mentioned so far. Then we'll get to the public hearing where the public will have the right to object to the resolution. Ms. Auburn asked if there were any obj ions to the letters that have been submLitted from those parties or any obj ions to the fact that the legal notices have been appropriately run within the newspapers. Hearing no objections, the items were entered into the record. We will now open it up to the public for the public hearing portion to hear what the public has to say about our plan and the resolution. Ms. say. uburn stated that this is now the c portion of this hearing and this e time when it's appropriate for e that have come to this meeting to some kind of statement about the sition of the property or the opment of the Studebaker Corridor. is the appropriate time to make statements, so that the ssioners can hear what you have to -14- South Bend gedevelopient Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSUIESS (Cont.) a. conttinuea... Mr. Kenneth Fedder, practicing attorney at 300 First Bank Bldg, in South Bend stated that I'm hear on behalf of Ben Zidkowski individually and Ziolkowski Construction Co. since you are proposing to take property that belongs to either Ben individually or the Corporation I'm go' to leave with you a series of photographs that I've taken that could be attached to my letter. I think what you are attempting to do might have good neri t insofar as the City and the 'ssion's goals are and I will tell you the Ziolkowski Construction company has undertaken the same project back in the areas of 1978 to 1983. That was, we tho ght a depressed area somewhat blighted and we moved in there with kn ledge of the City and developed the You have now chosen to take one half of my property. I own about a block of land and you are choosing to take one half of the block and are leaving me the other hal . On the half you are going to leave me have already constructed my new ccq any buildings, new parking area and havo t upgraded at a considerable expense. As i n integral part that you're leaving me s that we purchased all of the dilapidated old homes on the areas on Block 3 that you might call parcels 16, 7,18,20, 21 and demolished those at the expense of my client and we built our stomage garage there for our vehicles, for our inventory and for our equipment. We think that it would be like you chocsing to condemn or take a lumber saying you may keep the company office but you can't keep your yard. Th e's no way that the company can -15- South Bend evelcpment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSTCMSS (Cont.) a. conuinuea... o to without our yard, our inventory and our storage area. You would have an economic adverse affect, devastating financial affects to the company. We Employ approximately 230 people, many of those would have to be laid off if this was done. We have a payroll of abo t $125,000 a week which would be materially affected. I suppose you could take the entire block and move us and give, us a block of land in an industrial park and build a similar building for us, and give us a yard for the equipment. But you're not doing that. You're taking half' of my operation and leaving me with the remaining half which is completely unfeasible. I think it's an unreasonable request. I think those portions of the landthat you are proposing to take shoild be exempted and taken out of this red velopment amendment plan. We have ked, and continue to do so, on a proc ram to do what we think promotes the best, interest in the city and neicibborhood. and we continue to upgrade it. You should not do that or propose to do that because it is not only to the detaiment of my client but at the expense of the citizens of South Bend and the tzoZeyers- Why should the taxpayers do and pay for what we are willing to do and are doing ourselves. So at this t think that you should amend the plan. I'm making a request that the pro ies that are involved with Mr. Ziolkowski and Ziolkowski Construction Co. be removed from the amended Ms. uburn asked if there was anyone else tho would like to speak. -16- South Bend edevelcpment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSVESS (Cont.) a. continued... Mr. Paul White, Edward J. White Plumbing and Heating. I own property on Main Street. My father started the business in that location in 1927 on Michigan St. and over the years we have acquired adjoining property across the alley on Main St. I own a total of 4 lots on Main St. for storage. You want to buy half of that. If you buy half of my yard in effe,at you put me out of business. I don t think it's fair Iand I'm not going to sit still and see it be done. I would like my property removed fram, the list of acchisitions. Calvin Murdock with Murdock & Sons Construction as well as Calvin Murdock personally and Omega Properties. I have had numerous hearings with Economic Development with regards to our own proposed development on Lafayette and F!rwiklin St. I am confused as to why those properties that we have acquired at scmn cost are on the list. We have been told that what we are proposing is consistent with Economic Development's aim to develop the area. We are indeed anx ous to see those efforts continue, particularly with those parcels we have sated that we need some assistance in acciairing in order that we can control enot gh of the property. I think there are 3 or 4 parcels that we do need in order to J ulfill the master plan of our pro ect. We can see that we have an extianeous tract of land dawn in the 1100 block that is not contiguous with any of the other properties that I certainly see will, be consistent to relinquish that. But I don't see the merit particularly wi the effort and considerable dollars the we've already invested in our -17- South Bend euelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSVESS (Cont.) a. cominuea... pro ect in seeing our properties listed on 1he list of acquisitions so I certainly would not like the Can ission to pontinue with those properties that we have possession and ownership of listed as Ootential acquisitions on the list. Mr. Rid are lis 25 thi rig] rev at by bui to whe S. ] wer bec sem the the Bec peq new bui: thr 15' is , dam wit an i Howard Goodhew, representing the e Company at 1535 S. Main St. You interested in purchasing properties ed as block No. 10, parcels 3,4, and ind I've spoken to the staff about . The parcels were formerly the t-of- -way for the railroad and to us under easement reversion he time the railroad tracks were oned. The parcels no. 3 & 25 are for employee parking. We have 60 oyees at this location and without ing we have no place to park those le. Parcel no. 4 is a triangular ed piece of property which was owned as long as we've owned our ding. That is being used as access ur truck loading docks. Formerly, we purchased our building at 1535 in St., we had loading docks that entered from Main St. This then me a state highway. And these larger s, in order to get into our docks, would have to go up on the curb of UAW hall and caused damage there. use of the complaints of these le, which were justified, we built loading docks on the west side of our ding which are accessible only ugh this parcel no. 4. We have about o 20 trucks a day. If this property cquired it will result in substantial ges to our property. I verified this appraisers that you would be paying xtremely high price for a rather 1 parcel of land. -18- South Bend edevelopment Coamission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSANESS (Cont.) a. continues ... Mr. Bill Furry asked what the procedure wou. d be to obj eat to our property being tak . Is this it? Ms. Kolata said this would be the best time. ' After the public hearing we have scheduled action, whatever action the 'ssion desires to take on the lution. The resolution says that all of these properties that were in the leg&l notice are to be added to the accitLisition list. The Commission can approve the resolution they can modify it or they could disapprove it whatever action they care to take. That is scheduled following this public hearing. If iL property is added to the acquisition list the next step is for the staff to come forward to the Commission, probably, in this case, on a piecemeal basis with the authorization to send purchase offers. So your best opportunity to speak would be today.. MY rame is Bill Furry, Universal Paint at 131S S.ILafayette. We have property there which is not marked for development. This piece of property is a 30 foot lot adj Z cent to our parking lot that we use for storage. We have a corner piece of pro , basically it's a square piece of property. I see no reason why they wo d want 30 feet in the middle of the lock adjacent to ours. Basically I obj to it, its expenditure of the city whidh is unnecessary. We were relocated abot it 4 years ago from where the ball park. is and spent a considerable amount of i tonev. -19- South Bend edevelcpment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS= S (Cont.) a. con-¢inuea... Mr. Greg Walz with J.E. Walz at 1202 S. Laf yette. I have a question as to the tinu.ng of this acquisition. When do we hav to vacate and when would this take pla ? I have a 40,000 sq. ft warehouse and a lot of merchandise. Ms. olata said that we are having appmaisals done and we are also looking at scme of the errviromental conditions in the area. As we get that work caq)leted we would came back to the 'Commission and say we are now ready to p with this component of aczILLisition. We've already sent out a n of purchase offers to property owners in the corridor but those are pr' ily the residential units. As the bacl.ground work is completed we will came fonrard to the Commission. The timetable for that would be over the next few months. Once we send an offer there is certainly time to negotiate and time to discuss how long it would take to vacate the property. We usually give at least 90 clays to move and that can be extended if there are extenuating circumstances. James Carr represents South Bend Lathe. South Bend Lathe has two lots on Franklin St. which are improved. They're paved, we put in storm sewers, and fencing to create parking space. This parking space is essential to Corridor properties continued renting of the parking spaces. South Bend. Lathe further owns lots 22 - 25 an the corner of Lafayette and Sample and I object to the acquisition of those projerties without reason. I have a copy of the Studebaker Corridor Project as it was originally conceived and want to know why it has been changed and what is the rationale for the checkerboard acq4isition of properties. -20- South Bend ]Redevelopment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSMFSS (Cont.) a. continued... Ms. Kolata said that our concept for the arat has not changed. When we adopted the official redevelopment plan no properties were scheduled for acquisition in the official plan as it was originally adopted. That was back several years ago. Them we came fon4ar. in July and approved a resolution that added approximately 30 p ies to the acquisition list. What this resolution is doing is amending the pl by adding additional properties to the list. The concept of the plan has never changed. The concept of the plan has always been to clear out the bli ting and unrelated use properties. For example, the residential properties and the vacant lots. A lot of the discmssion today is focused around the parlang lots and storage yards. We are proposing to clean out and remove the properties that have not been utilized to their fullest. Whether or not a construction yawl is a utilization to the fullest is something that the Commission is croirxj to discuss. There are merits to the arguments presented both today and in the past. We are not trying to do harm to any existing business in the co idor. What we are trying to do is rexKve those properties that are not coiqatible or not in good condition and then to make that land available for new ial and light industrial I J nk the Commission and the staff I be very willing to discuss, on an Idual basis, each of the instances that are being brought up Generally our purpose is to create and provide land for development. -21- South Bend edevelcpment Cormnission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) a. continuect... We inly know that parking is important for a business, but parking is not always the highest and best use for a particular piece of land. We are looking at ways of consolidating land and maybe prmriding a different form of access to the back of that property so that we can the bigger blocks of land for devcdcpment and at the same time protect those businesses that are there. No single property was targeted for acquisition. The next step is to sit down wit1i each of you on an individual basis. jub Auburn stated that the puipose of the i s hearing and the meeting is to get t ly that kind of input. Mr. Goodiew wanted to add that Block 10 parcel no. 4, because it's a triangular piece of land, what we wish to retain is direct access to loading docks. He has no objection to squaring off the property but needs more than just a narrow alley. Mr. Ed Richardson, American Medical, 228 Broadway wanted to know the time frame for these acquisitions and whether the offexs would be to us by the end of the veax. MS. Kolata said it could be about the end of a year or the beginning of next Mr. is YOU .chardson asked that if everything eeable then we are relocated, do ve any assistance in relocation. -22- South Bend edevelcpment Conmtission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSnTESS Cont.) a. continued... Ms. Kolata said we follow the rules of the Uniform Act which is the relocation policy for any projects using federal money. We are not using federal money but we choose to follow that same policy. We give relocation benefits for those who are tenants of property we buy, and we have business relocation benefits. They are based either on what it actually costs to move or are based on the income for the business over the last 2 years. Th e's a formula for calculating what th benefits would be. Ms. Kolata stated that we have a staff pea-son who works with anyone being relocated and would work with you as Mr. Buzz Daily, owner of 1107 Lafayette, stat ed that the board has made an offer on the property which I rejected. I came in z nd gave the board what I felt I n ed to go out and reinvest the money that,I asked for the property. If I understand correctly, that was rejected. I sl ould be entitled to have equal rights of leing able to go out and purchase another property of equal value that I'm having to give up. All I'm asking is to maintain the same earning. It is an inccme property for me. The first offer and second one were both low. At their las offer I reject it. Mrs.1 Kolata said that the staff would disduss his offer with him. Mr. "lip Hunter. I own the property at Garst and Franklin Street and for 17 years had a business there. Law and -23- South Bend edevelopment Comunission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSnTESS (Cont.) a. cominuea... ord broke down in that neighborhood. I have been robbed 5 or 6 times. Tools were stolen out of the shop. I tried to sell the place and couldn't. I had it loc ed up and barred and braced, to the po' t where they couldn't break in the ou ide walls. Then they went up on the roo and cut holes to get in. Then the wa came in on the floor, then the env PO officer said I'd have to dawn the building or repair it. So I t re it dawn. That's why it's a vacant There must be 8 -10 cars parked on my lot I had a steel fence built around it and they tore the concrete posts out, and still park there. The Enviromiental people come out and say they can't do anything about it and they don't. Then the police come out and they won't even get the cars off. It went on for about 18 out of the 25 years I was there. Ms. Auburn stated that time is running short and asked if there are other parties to be heard. Diarte ErnsbeYger, 822 S. Lafayette. I own the Dew Drop Inn. You stated that you are going to take Block No. 17, parcels 19 - 31. At this time my rest,aurant isn't included but I will need of these lots for parking. I will not need all of them but I will need same of them. If you take all this property away from me I won't have a restaurant, because there won't be any place for my cus omers to park. -24- South Bend evelopment Commnission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSDMS (Cont.) ailiCC7N � Ms. Auburn asked if there was anyone else who wants to speak. Ro bert Gorny with Gorny Plaza. You are considering taking 8 parcels of Block 12. Half of them make up our parking lot the other half are for employee parlanq and we don't want them taken. Ms. IAuburn asked Mr. White if he had another comment. MrrWhite asked when we would know the r is of the executive meeting. Ms. Kolata said the executive meeting is not discussing this particular issue and the executive session was dealing with some other items. There are limited items that: you can discuss in executive session and it wasn't this. Ms. Auburn stated that when the public heaiing portion is cmplete the Ccmdssion will take action on the Resolution which is what everyone here is tallang about. You will know shortly what the Commission is going to do, following the public hearing. Mr. Fedder suggested that the Commission pone or delay any action on the lution until you meet with the parcel rs. What I fear is that once you the resolution and -25- South Bend evelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSANESS (Cont.) a. continueca... add all of these properties in, it seems more difficult to deal with these. I thilik you are a little premature. I think you should postpone the hearing and talk to the individual people and if no one has serious objections, put that in. You should postpone and talk to these people. Take 15 minutes on a scheduled basis and then be in a more informed pos tion as to whether to adopt the resolution to add all these in. Ms. Auburn stated that she was going to close the public hearing portion of the men ing unless there is someone else that wou d like to be heard. Seeing no ind cation I will close the public hea. ing portion and open it up for que4tions and discussion among the Ms. Auburn stated that it might be helpful to say that we have looked at the Studebaker Corridor from the perspective of is been accomplished in the Monroe Park area. That was the acquisition and assemblage of property, what were smaller pieces of property into larger more devedcpable pieces of property and that the Monroe Park Area has been very successful. We have no more land to devc lop there and yet we still have inqL.iries as to whether there are other areas within the city where that kind of lark. is available for development. There is riot a lot of that kind of land within the confines of the City of South Bend for that kind of development. There is prorerty outside the limits of South and while it helps our geographic am4 develop, it does not help put a 'tional businesses on the tax rolls -26- South Bend evelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS$NESS (Cont.) a. continuea... for the City of South Bend per se. From the Cc mission's perspective we've been looldng at following the success of Monroe Park and asking if there was some way that we could begin to carry that sua3ess, forward and to help the Studebaker Corridor Area further develop in that particular area. The Coim.ussioner really appreciate everyone's tine and input. That's why we have a pub is hearing, so that we can hear from you and get your input into the decision making process. Mr.]Piasecki asked Mr. Fedder how many enm ovees are affected? Mr. Fedder said that we don't really know. We have 230 employees and if we can't use the remaining portions of our properties Mr. Ziolkowski will have to make some tough decisions. He cannot operate Ziolkawski Construction Company wit1iout, the yarns and the equipment stomage. The company would have to totally relocate somewhere else at a tremendous cost. You could go into Chapter 11 bankruptcy. You will have ho endows problems in taking part of the o tion, it's hard to really diagnose and digest the impact. But it will be economically devastating in effect if you cl him down. Mr. Piasecki asked Mr. Gorny how much lar4 is being used for your an personal Mr. the Gorny said approximately 30 feet of existing parking lot that's paved. -27- South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS�NESS (Cont.) a. con tinuect.. . Mr. Piasecki asked Mr. Gorny if he had any idea of developing the remainder of that on your own. Mr. Gorney said that about a year ago they were going to pave it and were told to it. Mr. Piasecki asked how lame of a parcel is 3femainincr. Mr. Gorey said that it would be parcels 1, ,3,5,6,7,8 and 10 of Block 12. Ms. Kolata said that currently 30 feet is paved and being used and the other 60 fee# is unpaved. Mr. JGorrry said that their plans were to mako additional parking which they really Ms. Kolata stated that she had met with Mr. Gorny's father and he represented that. they had thought of expanding the actual building area as well, not just the parking area. But he didn't have an imT4diate timetable and that's something we pursue. Mr. Donoho stated that he had no cc ments but when you need a motion I would like to make it. Mr. ICombs had no questions. Ms. Auburn said that another issue for that. area is some of the aesthetics, just what kind of look will some of the prarerty have. You might want to get back and talk to Mr. Ziolkowski about that. CME South Bend evelopment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) a. continued.... 0 Mr. Fedder said that he had recently spoken with Mr. Ziolkowski and he will continue to upgrade the areas and he miglit build some additional buildings to house some inventory or to put some pment. Mr. Ziolkowski is spending a lot of time and money to do something 1' Monroe Sample at his cost and why should the taxpayers do it. Ms.I Auburn asked if there were any other queotions or discussion from the Ms. Auburn stated that we are closing the public hearing portion that's item a. and move! to Item 6b. on the agenda which is our action on the Resolution. Mr. Donoho stated that from the insight and input that's here today I don't feel comfortable with Substitute Resolution No. 962. I think our prime motive here should be continuation of business that exi is already, with that business undExstanding that one of the things we are after is to improve the aesthetics of all the business in the area. So that any investment made from this point on is done in cooperation with existing business. We don't intend to put anyone out of business and it appears as though this resolution may not do that but it could sure help. With that in mind I would like to table the matter until the next, regular scheduled meeting and that notice be given to all participating parties that might be concerned with it. Whether we're legally bound by it or not -29- South Bend evelopment Commssion Rregular M ting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSPNESS (Cont.) a. cont=uea... I'm moving that we do that, so that everyone that participated today has the saup ability to participate in any other futtwe action we have. I would like to look at amending this list. With that in I move that we do not pass titute Resolution No. 962 today, that it be tabled to the next scheduled meeting and we take a look at res cturim it. Mr. Coombs stated that he is supporting Mr. DonohoIs motion because I'm concerned too I think we need to be involved in the business of trying to enhance business in that area and not necessarily doing that may be hasty that may cause some problems for our businesses. I'd like to see us move forward and not shoot ourselves in the foot, and I'll second the motion to table. Ms. and the 9th It I we'- Auburn said there has been a motion a second to table this item so that Conmission can reconsider the 'sition list and that at our arly scheduled meeting on November we would acme back and take action. on't be another public hearing but it be our action as a result of the is input from today. We would cam as a Conmission and take action on mioer 9th on re- looking at Substitute lution No. 962 given the input that e heard today. -30- South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSANESS (Cont.) t-IFEELG--re) 1110 1 0' L== R Mr. Piasecki agreed with the rest of the Camiission to table Substitute Resolution No. 962. Ms. Eblata stated that the staff will mee with basically everyone here today and sit down and go over the list again and come back with some suggested is to that resolution. What those amoximents will be, I assume are reductions from the acquisition list. We can't legally add anything that isn't on there already. All we can do is subtract from the resolution. As the people leave tocLty, if we have not talked to you before, we need to sit down with you and get your name and address and schedule a meeting within the next couple of weeks. Ms. Auburn stated that we have the relevant input and relevant information from the public hearing. That's the purpose of the public hearing. The 'ssion's job now is to take the inp t, weigh that input and come up with a final decision on what we will do. Mr. RO a motion by Mr. Donoho, seconded by Combs and unanimously carried, the Fission tabled Substitute Resolution 962 until the next regularly duled meeting on November 9th. -31- CONM ISSION TABLED SUBSTITUTE RESOLUTION NO. 962 UNTIL THE NEXT REGUTARLY SCHEDULED MEETING ON NOVEMBER 9, 1990. South Bend edevelopment Ccumission Regular Mee ing -October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS S (Cont.) C. South Bend Heritage SBH $42,972.00 Fouxidation 416 E. South St. * includes $4,072.00 contingency Kern H. and Kenneth H. Miller $36,730.00 Janice R. Miller 717 N. Blaine St. * #cludes $2,733.38 conting Ho ing Development Corporation HDC $69,810.00 422 College St. * includes $5,270 contingency Ms. Kolata stated that we have three rental rehab loans. Ms. Kolata stated that. there is a mistake on the address, the loan applicant for South Bend Heritage Foundation is for property at 416 E. South St. This property currently has 3 units but will be converted into 2 units. The entire project cost is approximately $42,000.00. It includes re-roofing, electrical, gutters, plimbing, new furnaces, bathrooms and kitchens. The application is for $14,000.00 of rental rehab loan. South Heritage intends to use Community -32- $14,000.00 (Public) $14,472.00 (CDBG) $14,500.00 (Private) $16,000.00 (Public) $20,730.00 (Private) $26,000.00 (Public) $43,810.00 (CDBG) South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSUMS (Cont.) c. continues... Development Block Grant and private fimncing to make up the balance of the pro eat. Your action is to approve the $14,000 loan and to approve South Bend Her tage being the contractor for $42 972.00. The next rehab loan is for Kenneth H. and Janice R. Miller at 717 N. Blaine. It is a 2 unit house. It includes exterior painting, new furnaces, water heaters, batImooms, kitchens and re wiring. The remal rehab loan would be $16,000.00 The - have private financing in the amount of 20,730.00. You also need to approve Ken ieth H. Miller as the contractor for $36 730.00. The final application is from the Housing Deveacpment Corporation for property located at 422 College St. The house has 2 urlits and will be converted to 4 one units. The project includes re-roofing, window replacement, addition of vinyl siding, and then extensive remdeling of the inside of the property. The rental rehab loan would be in the amount of $26,000.00 and you would be approving the Housing Development Co ration as the contractor for $69,810.00. -33- South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS124ESS (Cont.) c. conzinuea... Mr. Donoho stated that he didn't understand why 422 College is $69,810.00. That's approximately $18,000 a unit for a one bedroom unit to rehab. Mr. I Ted Leverman said they are going to be duttim the whole unit. Ms. Kolata stated that it will be 4 one units. The rental that will be Charged on them will be $125.00 a month for a one bedroom unit. Ms. Kolata stated that using the Conuu.mity Development funds and using the rental rehab funds which are forgiveable cuts down what has to be repaid through the private financing. This is ad essing a segment of the market that really is not well addressed. The HDC will. have 4 one bedroom units very much up to code, available at a very minimal Mr. Piasecki said that we are going to redevelop these and then move people in. Are they going to be a Section 8 1PrO ? . Mr. Leverman said that they don't have to be. Mr. Piasecki said to try and get some earned dollars into the property rather thanhaving government money like Section 8. Ms. Kolata stated that at $125.00 a lot of people probably wouldn't need the Section 8 subsidy. -34- South Bend Regular Me 6. NEW BU, C. col elopment Cmmiission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) Ms. Kolata stated that we can't turn down son body who comes in as a Section 8 applicant. We can't say no to them. Ms. Kolata said that you can't diR,.riminate against someone because of where their money comes from, but it makes it much more affordable. Somebody who is earning a wage can carne in and aff rd it. Ms. Helen Sutton asked how does an area que4ify for the forgiveable loan. Ms. Kolata said that the Rental Rehab progrm is for rental property so that larrilords or property owners apply for the funds. There is a geographic botudary and Mr. Leverman can show you what: the boundary is. Basically within that: boundary, to the extent that we have rental rehab money available, it can go up to 50% of the cost or $8,500 for a 3 unit. The landlord must bring the entire property up to code and supply 50% of the cost from other financing. Upon a motion made by Mr. Piasecki, seconded by Mr. Combs and unanimously can-ied, the Commission approved the Rental Rehab Loan of $14,000 and awarded the contract to South Bend Heritage in the amount of $42,972. for property loc4ted at 416 E. South St. Upon a motion made by Mr. Donoho seconded by Dr. Combs and unanimously carried, the Ccxmission approved the Rental Rehab Loan of 4,16,000 and awarded the contract to Kenneth H. Miller in the amount of $36,730 for property located at 717 N. Blaine St. -35- COMMISSION APPROVED THE RENTAL REHAB IRAN OF $14,000 AND AWARDED THE CONTRACT TO SOUTH BEND HERITAGE IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,972 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 416 E. SOUTH ST. COWUSSION APPROVED THE RENTAL REHAB LOAN OF $16,000 AND AWARDED THE CONTRACT TO FENNETH H. MIIIIR IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,730 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 717 N. BIAINE ST. J South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSMS (Cont.) 1�6-r•) -1114 i ilk L= e. Upon a motion made by Mr. Combs, seconded by Mr. Doncho and carried, with Mr. Piasecki abstaining, the Commission approved the Rental Rehab Loan of $26,000 and awarded the contract to the Housing Dev ( ion in the amount of $69,810 for property located at 422 Col ecfe St. Ms. Kolata said we have three properties in the Studebaker Corridor Area where we would like to accept a counter-offer. 1) arcel 5 -6 at 1214 S. Franklin and the c o ter-offer is $9,000. 21 5 -2 at 1206 S. Franklin and the C ter -offer is $10,000. 3) 1 4 -23 which is 315 -317 W. Stull and the counter-offer is $30,000. The sta f would recommend that the Commission a pt all these counter-offers. Upon a motion made by Mr. Carobs, seconded by Mr. Donoho and unanimously carried, the Commission approved the counter-offers of Parcel 5 -6 for $9,000; Parcel 5 -2 for $10,000; and Parcel 4 -23 for $30,000 in the Studebaker Corridor Devidlorment Area. Ms.IKolata stated that there is a -36- COMMISSION APPROVED THE RENTAL REHAB LOAN OF $26,000 AND AWARDED THE CONTRACT TO THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $69,810 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 422 COLLEGE ST. COMMISSION APPROVED THE COUNTER- OFFERS OF PARCEL 5 -6 FOR $9,000; PARCEL 5 -2 FOR $10,000; AND PARCEL 4 -23 for $30,000 IN THE STUDEBAKER CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT AREA. South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) d. continued... property at 512 S. Rush. The property awncx has indicated they intend to r ilitate the property and move into it. The staff has looked at the properties that this owner has previously renovated and has inspected this property and would like to recoYmmnd that we witIldraw our purchase offer and allow the property owner to redevelop the property, Pazzel M10 -3. The property owner's name is Perda and it is listed on our accr4isition list as the Reiso Ms. Kolata stated that we sent the p offer and the owner came back and said they intended to move into the house and rehabilitate it and it would be their residence. They had previously r ilitated a house in the 900 block of W. LaSalle. Ms. Robinson and Ms. Hickey met with Mr. & Mrs. Derda and went through the house on LaSalle as well as the house on Rush and it's their reccmye.ndation that we withdraw the offer at this time. They intend to start some of the work imBdiately, and not complete it before next spring. We intend to monitor that. They need to do a good rehobil itation otherwise we would come ba and ask you to reissue your purchase off 6r. wi a motion made by Mr. Donoho, ded by Mr. Combs and unanimously ed, the Commission approved the rawal of the purchase offer for rty at 512 S. Rush in the South Bend al Development Parcel M10 -3. -37- CrW4rSSION APPROVED THE WITHDRANAL OF PURCHASE r` OFFER FOR PROPERTY AT 512 S. RUSH IN THE SOUTH :arD CENTRAL DEVELOPMENT AREA. PARCEL M-10-3. South Bend evelcpment Commission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUSANESS (Cont.) Eip Ms. Kolata stated that the Commission is considering, and stated in its lease with the Redevelopment Authority, that we would like to acquire 10 pieces of land in the Airport Economic Development Area. Nine parcels are in the area of Old Cleveland Road and one is on Bendix just: north of Viridian Dr. By law we mist. have two appraisals of each piece of prolexty. We have gone to four appraisers and asked each of them to do five appraisals. Mr. lauver had a conflict on one of them and so we took one from Mr. Lauver and gave it to Mr. Horka. We ended up with McCloskey and Associates having five appraisals, Jerry Michaels having five, Ralph Lauver having four and Tom Horka having six. This will provide us wit2L information regarding the value of the property in the area. Their pro s range for the type of projerty. Mr. McCloskey said he will do the appraisals for $1,500 per improved pardel and $1,000 per vacant parcel, that totals $7,000. Mr. Lauver gives specific n for each parcel and it comes out to $5,350. Mr. Horka has a range from $11,650 to $12,100. Mr. Michael's prorasal adds up to $10,000. Mr. Donoho stated that at one time we tallied about the Airport Authority using our staff for relocation and asked if this was related. -38- South Bend evelopment Cmimission Regular Mee ing - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS4NESS (Copt.) f. continued... Ms. Kolata stated the we did same relocations for the Airport Authority Those properties were south and west of the airport. Ms. Robinson has nearly ccupleted those relocations. Almost all of this is northwest of the airport. Nine properties are northwest of the a' rt and one is on Bendix Dr. just no of Viridian. This is approximately 240 acres. Some of this is vacant land, is farm land and some is property wh a people are living. Ms. Kolata said that Mr. PendlIs and Mr. Bradford I s property is here. I've met with the appraisers and relayed the concerns that the property owners have expressed to us. Mr. Hunt and I went out and toured Mr. Pendl's property, went through his house, across his property and we relayed those conversations to the appraisers. We asked them to consider all of the things that were brought to our attention. The property owners indicated to us that if we are going to buy them they want to get some sense of what the values are going to be and they want us to move forward on the appraisals. They have asked we have all notifications sent to them by certified mail. I've relayed that to the appiaisers and I think that the owners are not happy that we're looking at their prqerty, but if we are looking, they want us to do it. Mr. Pendl has about 15 Ms. Kolata said the appraisals are used to Establish what the value is and we would use it for the budget for the bond -39- South Bend Regular Me 6. NEW BU f. Co a elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 (Cont.) iss ie. Mr. Pendl said he wants no road thr)ugh his property just to take it all if you are going to take it. This is for tot Ll acquisition. Nothing is being done sou of the airport. Ms. Kolata stated that the appraisers want to get started now that the weather is still nice because it is quite beautiful out there now. Upon a motion made by Mr. Combs, seconded by Mr. Donoho and unanimously carried, the Commission approved the proposals submitted by McCloskey & Associates, Tom Horka, Jerry Michaels and Ralph Lauver for appraisals in the Airport Econa is Dev lolpment Area. Ms. Kolata stated that Catering by Billie is a tenant in our retail space in the parldng garage at Wayne and St. Joseph. She has gone to lst Source Bank for a loan related to some equipment she has put into the building, and 1st Source has asked that we approve an ass grmnent of the lease. Ms. Jenny Pitts 'er had suggested that it's appropriate that we sign it. Ms. Kolata said that it's basically subordinating our lease to their loan for the eauini ent. a motion made by Mr. Donoho, ded by Mr. Combs and unanimously ed, the Commission approved the rm ent of the lease with Catering by e, Inc. -40- CCRAISSION APPROVED THE POSI = BY MC CLOSKEY ASSOCIATES, • • . C JERRY MICBAELS AND RALPH APPRAISALS i AIRPORT COMMISSION APPROVED THE ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE FOR CATERING BY BILT , INC. South Bend edevelopment Ccomission Regular Meeting - October 26, 1990 6. NEW BUS4,ESS (Cont.) 1147 Ms. Kolata stated Walker has outlined the scope of services as to what would be inc uded in the maintenance manual. It wou. d include procedures to take care of all of the physical features of the garage, what the maintenance requirements will be and putting together an estimated budget for annual maintenance costs for the next 10 years. Walker would do this for a lump sum fee of $6,000 plus re' le expenses that will not go aver $1,300. They will provide multiple cop es of this manual so that we can have one at the garage, one in the City Eng meer 's office and one in our de t. We highly reo mnend it. There is no similar booklet for the other two garages and that has caused problems in the past. Ms. Kolata stated that this will outline what maintenance should be done and when so that you don't end up with major deterioration or problems. Mr. Donoho asked if that wasn't included in Walker's earlier contract. Mrsl Kolata said it wasn't. Mr. Donoho said it should have been and suggested we go back to them and see if they can delete the $1300 reimbursable a motion made by Mr. Donoho, COMMISSION TABLED TBE PROPOSAL ded by Mr. Combs and unanimously FROM WALTER ENGINEERING ed, the Commission tabled the CONCERNING TB E PARING GARAGE ng Garage Maintenance Manual pending MAINTENANCE MANUAL. er negotiations with Walker. -41- South Bend Regular Meg 7. PROGRE 8. 9. There elopment Commission - October 26, 1990 no progress reports. The nex# Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Conmiss on is scheduled for November 9, 1990 at 10:0 a.m. There beirxj no further business to cane before the Redevelopment Camnission, Mr. Combs iuLde a motion that the meeting be adjourned. Mr. Piasecki seconded the motion and the meeting was adjourned at 11:45 a.m. �iJ, A), N. Auburn, Vice President -42- NEXT OOrM4ISSION MEE= G NOVEMBER 9, 1990. F 1: Uu��I�Uy E. Kolata, Director