Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 12-07-79December 7, 10:00 A.M. Presiding C 1. ROLL Members SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING 979 1200 County -City Building 227 W. Jefferson Boulevard 'icer: Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, South Bend, Indiana 46601 President ent: Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President Mr. Lloyd E. Robinson, Sr., Vice President Mr. A. Peter Donaldson, Secretary Mr. Robert J. Cira, Assistant Secretary Ms. Paula N. Auburn, Member Legal Co�msel: Redeve Communi News Guests: 2. APPROVAL Commis s that se 1979 me minutes the Com Mr. Kevin J. Butler t Staff: Mr. Carl Ellison, Director Mrs. Ann Kolata, Deputy Director Mr. Kevin C. Horton, Real Estate Officer Ms. Ann Bathon, Acquisition Specialist Mr. Bill Fox, Relocation Specialist Mrs. Jane A. Zimmerman, Executive Secretary Ms. Denise Fleming, Secretary Development OF MINUTES Ms. Shirley F. McCoy, Contract Compliance Officer Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau of Housing Mr. Norm Stangland, Reporter, WSBT -TV Mr. Isaiah Cook, Photographer, WSBT -TV Mr. Wayne Falda, Reporter, South Bend Tribune Mr. Larry Ford, Reporter, WSJV -TV Mr. Bill Hentsch, Photographer, WSJV -TV Mr. Dave Anderson, Reporter, WNDU -TV Mr. Dick Nemeth, Photographer, WNDU -TV Mr. Morris L. Morrison, President, Redevelopment Trustees Mr. T. Brooks Brademas, Architect Ms. Glenda Rae Hernandez, President, S.E. PAC Mr. Donald Rohan, Trane Air Conditioning Mr. Ernest Szarwark, Attorney -at -Law in Attorney, Kevin J. Butler, advised the Commission ,ral corrections to the minutes of the November 21, ;ing were necessary. The Chair directed that the >e tabled until the December 21, 1979 meeting of Lssion. DELAYED DECISION ON APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 1979 South Bend R development Commission Regular Meet ng December 7, 1979 3. APPROVALI OF CLAM Mr. Ellison: I'd like to bring to the attention of the Commission the claims from Michiana Title Corporation totallin $376.00. These were related to 312 loans and are for work previously done. The Bureau of Housing has been instructed not to use Michiana Title Corporation in the futu e. Mr. Nimt : The Commission indicated on November 21 that all outstand'ng work with Michiana Title should be completed and paid for Mr. Butl r: I'd like to state for the record that John Newman of Afichi ma Title has been told not to accept any more business from the Bureau of Housing. On motion by Ms. Auburn, seconded by Mr. Robinson, and unanimously carried, the claims totalling $136,392.46 were allowed d ordered to be paid. The authorized claims are: REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND Payroll: 11 -03 -79 to 11 -16 -79 $ 5,363.43 Kevin J. Butler 200.00 Business Systems 60.61 Carl Ell son 194.22 Kevin C. Horton 62.00 I.B.M. C rporation 240.00 Indiana Bell Telephone Company 439.92 Jordan tors, Inc. 9,174.14 St. Jose )h Bank Travel Agency 103.00 The Wall Street Journal 99.00 Downtown Idea Exchange 54.00 Litho-Plate 37.00 Coffee T'me Service 26.65 Devon Phelps 60.00 TOTAL $ 16,113.97 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL OF 1972 Gruen As ociates, Inc. $ 21,476.71 TOTAL $ 21,476.71 P. E. A. R -57 Benjamin Stroud $ 625.00 TOTAL $ 625.00 -2- APPROVAL OF CLAIMS South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meetng - December 7, 1979 3. APPROVALIOF CLAIMS (continued) P. E. A.I- R -66 Allied nstruction Co. Community Development Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. South Bend Tribune Tri -Coup y News Ray Bred en Otis Elevator Company Leo J. Lamberson, Attorney -at -Law Evelyn E Holland TOTAL P. E. A.1- Monroe Sample Area The Abst act and Title Corp Lang, Fe ney $ Associates, Inc. TOTAL 312 Bureau of Housing St. Joseph County Recorder Dan Hori e Southold Heritage Foundation, Inc. Kissell Company Michiana Title Corporation Abstract Company of St. Joseph County, Inc. Douglas W. Way Tower, Insurance Agency of South Bend, Inc. State Farm Insurance R. A. Stickler & Joyce Sarvari Jurtin's Construction & Carlean Parker Center Services Co. & T. Brooks Brademas American Insulation & Lawrence & Valerie Day Shimp Roofing $ Insulation $ Jeff Gibney Old Building Recycling & Jeff Gibney R.A. Stickler & Wilma Logan Donald Wilson Tri-State Home Improvement, Inc. & Jeff Gibney Tri-State Home Improvement, Inc. & John & Carolyn Bonk F & F Ho e Improvements & Edwin & Alice Janowiak Statewid Construction F Aphrodite, Pappas -3- $ 157.56 4,589.75 11.14 16.32 17.96 173.44 15.00 138.00 16.00 $ 5,135.17 $ 2,900.00 1,862.00 $ 4,762.00 $ 2.50 110.00 12.32 75.89 62.00 376.00 255.00 114.24 113.75 135.00 635.00 570.00 16,160.00 880.00 1,647.00 595.20 1,600.00 62.40 2,100.00 5,330.00 4,736.00 828.94 South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meeting December 7, 1979 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS 4. 312 LOAN$ (continued) L.L. Geans & Sons, John Jamison Frank Banicki Liberty Ellectric & Dominic Parisi Barnes Electric & Dorothy Ivy Plaia Construction & Dorothy Pope Kowalski Siding & Frank Banicki Thomas N wrot Weather-Seal of South Bend, Inc. & Dan Horine Area SerTices & Joyce Sarvari F & F Electric & Della White The Old Building Recycling $ Vincent Klees Stephen Elddy & Vincent K1ees Midwest jkluminum. & Jessie Graves Plaia Construction $ Jessie Graves Bryant Enterprises & Hattie Jenkins Roscoe Bailey $ Gladys Clarke Sandra Desits Belleville Electric & Heating & Aphrodite Pappas Ray Bock j & Hilda Boney Tri-State Home Improvement & Mary Hankins Leone McCoy Wickes Lqnber F Richard or Brenda Ferguson The Ridge Co., Inc. (Whole Sale Div.) & Richard & Brenda Ferguson Art Keil South Bend Electric & Charles Stewart K -Mart & Art Keil F & F Electric F Leona McCoy Area Se ices & Lenoa McCoy McKinley Lumber & Hardware Co. & Linda Mason Paul Hayden Charles Brown Maintenance & Leona McCoy Big "C" Lumber & Jeanne Welsh Dan Horine House of Andala & Dan Horine Charles Brown Maintenance & Willa Logan Tri-State Home Improvement & Mr. & Mrs. Don Wilson I WO GRAND TOTAL IONS $ 175.00 234.27 427.60 1,069.28 303.50 880.00 1,440.02 559.00 1,491.00 1,735.00 2,360.64 1,880.00 3,460.00 180.00 1,052.80 1,500.00 205.91 1,428.00 920.00 4,240.00 42.43 263.96 435.47 176.91 799.00 61.65 690.00 1,100.00 830.40 155.00 4,518.00 194.91 115.00 123.10 7,960.52 8,870.00 $ 88,279.61 $136,392.46 The Cha4 recognized Mr. Morris L. Morrison, President of Redevelotment Trustees. -4- PRESENTATION MADE BY MR. MORRIS L. MORRISON PRESIDENT, REDEVELOPMENT TRUSTEES South Bend R Regular Meet 4. Mr. Morr Commissi Trustees felt tha communit to Conti elopment Commission - December 7, 1979 IONS on: Mr. President, Members of the Redevelopment I would like to announce the decision of the made on December 3, 1979. The trustees and.I you have all done an outstanding job for the and we wish to congratulate you for being chosen le as Commissioners for the year 1980. Mr. Nimt : Mr. Morrison, we thank you and I would like to say that we will continue to support our fine community. a. Letter, from Joseph D. Cloud, State I Historic Preser LETTER FROM STATE vati H- Officer; date November 21, 1979, relative to HISTORIC PRESERVATION rece' t of a National Register application for the OFFICER, RE: ADDING Odd Fellows Building as an I addition to t e West ODD FELLOWS BLDG. TO Wash ton Historic District. WEST WASHINGTON HIS - TORIC DISTRICT Mr. llison: Mr. President, the letter I will read late results from the effort of the Historic Pres rvation Commission to add the Odd Fellows Buil injz to the West Washington Historic District. Mr. Ellison read the following letter to the Commission and averyone present: Dec beA 21, 1979 Rede eeopment Commc6zion o� South Bend County/City Bu itding 227 West JeAAmon Bou2evaAd SouA Bend, Indiana we have Aece i.ved a National RegiAteA appt cation Jo& the Odd Fettows Bu itding as an addition to the west Washington Hi.stotic Distni.et in South Bend. It is o uh pot i.c y to contact to cat autho&it e6 and is of i.e i t tha,t views on et gibte pnopmti.e3 ptr-i-on to con6 ideAation by the State Review BoaAd. East t, shed by the Nati.onae H.ustotr i.c P&e�s envation Act o4 1966, the Na#.i.onat Reg.usteA o4 H-ustoxic Places is the o46ici.a2 Zisting a4 distxicts, sites, bui edings, and bttuctukes signi ji.cant in Am "can h.ustoty, attch i teetu&e, anehaeotogy, and cuttuhe. In IncUana this ptogAam tz adm%vwsteAed by the Depatrtment o� NatuwZ Reis ouAees . TheAe aAe oven 160 Indiana z ite3 .e Lsted on Ae Reg"teA. -5- South Bend R development Commission Regular Meet' g - December 7, 1979 4. CO"MICATIONS a. continued..... Beikq Listed on the Reg ztetc ptovides a measutce o4 put ction 4AOm 4edeAWy 4unded of tLcensed ptojeets; it places no t i mitat.ion6 on what an owneA may do with the AopeAty. Section 2124 o4 the 1976 FedeActt Tax Re4o Act allows owneu o4 Regt6teA pAOpett.ivs that ate used 4oA commaci.at puAposes tax bene4its 4oA ee 4 ied tehabititation costs. The tax code a2.6 o Aes ets the c &cum6tanees unde& which owneu can c2aim dedu "ows joA demot ti.on o% h.ustoAi,c stnuetutres. Nomin- ation to the Reg-usteA wiU maize the ptoperrty e igibte 4oA the hfationat Pa&k Sehv.ice pugtam o4 matching gtants 4oA hi,stc Aic pies eAvati.on. A4t a Nationa2 RegisteA appe ication is tece sved by outs o 4 jff e, it is pto ces s ed and eo ns.ideAed by the State Review Boa&d which wiU eith eA Aej eet oA ap pto v e nomination o4 the pupaty to Washington. The State Review Board wiU study any Aitten comments that you care to submit on this prop y, which is s cheduted to be Aeviewed 4oA the 4.ur st time on DeeembeA 11, 1979. P.inat Aev.iew wilt be at the Review BoaAd's next subsequent meeting, p&obabty sometime in Januaky oA PebtuoAy. We s aU be happy to awsweA any questions that you may have about the National' Reg.usteA, the nomination ptcoeess, oA t e e44eet o4 Register V st ing on the pto pets ty. very lttay youtLs, S/ Jose h D. Uoud Stati HistoA is PAe�s eAvation 04 j iceA The air directed that the letter be received and nlac d on file. • � a. Commission I approval requested of additional gran e'— ...4— T44-+-T.. ..,. ilod Vn� -r-ril Tl -i Mr. Butler: Ms. Genevie Little is the wife of Shelby Little, and has decided to have her name included on the Quit -Claim Deed. The Deed was originally approved (Parcel #11 -•2, Ind. R -57) at the Regular Meeting of Augu t 17, 1979. The only thing we need to do here is have a mo ion adding Ms. Little to the deed. GENEVIE LITTLE ADDED TO QUIT -CLAIM DEED, PARCEL #11 -2, INDIANA R -57 South Bend R Regular Meet 5. OLD BUS I a. cont 6. NEW elopment Commission December 7, 1979 Mr. Zobinsonmade a motion to include Genevie Little, of 2 2 S. Bendix Drive, South Bend, on a Quit -Clain deed alon with her husband Shelby Little, for Parcel #11 -2 in Ind. R -57, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the motion was animously carried. a. Commission a roval requested for Change Order No. 1, with R. A. Stickler Plum in or.a decrease in APPROVAL OF cont act price o 1 .00; or an "amen e 'coritract CHANGE ORDER #1 tot of 445.00; at t e address o 1126'Chdlfdnt R.A. STICKLER Stre t, as per "letter rom Mr. James Harcus; Director PLUMBING FOR A Bure u (if Housing. DECREASE IN CONTRACT PRICE AT THE ADDRESS Mr. arcus: The homeowner of 1126 Chalfant Street OF 1126 CHALFANT ST. appe led to the Bureau requesting that her kitchen sink be r placed in place of her bathroom tub. Upon investi- gation the Inspector concurred. The commissioners are requested to approve Change Order No. 1, which reduces cost by $198.00 Mr. Robinson made a motion to approve Change Order No. 1, with R. A. Stickler Plumbing.for a decrease in contract price of $198.00, at the address of 1126 Chalfant Street, seconded by Mr. Donaldson, and the motion was unanimously carried. b. Commission approval requested for Change Order No. 1; with APPROVAL OF Charles Brown Maintenance Company, Inc. for no change in CHANGE ORDER #1 The—contract price, at "the dddress'of 236 East Haney Street CHARLES BROWN MAIN - as set torth in letter-from Mr. James Harcus; Director, TENANCE CO., INC. Bureau o Housln . (NO CHANGE IN CONTRACT PRICE) Mr. reus: Just as rehabilitation service was beginning at 236 Haney, Bureau Inspector visited property and observed that; 1) homeowner had repaired some items himself, and; ) additional items had deteriorated since time of initial inspection. The Bureau accommodated the above by changing the porch specification to concrete from deck board replacement and thereby balanced costs. The Commissioners are r quested to approve Change Order No. 1. Mr. binson: Mr. Harcus, can you tell me if work done by a hom owner is subject to Bureau inspection? Mr. H4rcus: Yes, it is. All work is inspected to see that it me is the Bureau's standards. -7- South Bend R development Commission Regular Meet ng - December 7, 1979 6. NEW BUS b. continued... Mr , Robinson made a motion to approve Change Order No. 1, with Charles Brown Maintenance Co., Inc. for no change in the contract price, at the address of 236 East Haney Street, seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carried. c. Tax Oatement RequeSt'relative to An area cOITmohly referred to a 1007 East'Sample Street. DELAYED DECISION Mr. Ellison: The staff would appreciate it if the Chair ON TAX ABATEMENT would recognize Mr. Ernest Szarwark, an Attorney who is REQUEST FOR AN here recognizing the petitioners. AREA REFERRED TO AS 1007 E. SAMPLE Mr. imtz: The Chair will recognize Mr. Ernest Szarwark. Mr. zarwark: I am here today to seek your support for a requ st for a tax abatement for a parcel of land at the orner of Lincolnway East and Sample Street. I am sure you re familiar with this piece of property. Currently, ther is a burned out structure on the property and it is an e esore to the area a. (Mr. Szarwark distributed pictures of the site). The land in question is located within the Sou east neighborhoods which is a troubled area, an area refe red to as blighted in the Southeast Planning Profile. My c Tents want to build a new facility on that parcel to expand their business. They plan to provide five new jobs, with an increase in the payroll of approximately $100,000 over the next few years. Mr. Robinson: Could you tell us the name of your client? Mr. Szarwark: Certainly, I am representing the Trane Comp y, a company concerned with heating and air cond tioning. Mr. ira: I have some questions about abatement being necessary for that property. It seems to me that's a pretty desirable location, it is near Miami Street and across from Ro 's and Shoemaker's company. I think somebody would even ually build there without a tax abatement. Mr. Szarwark: All I can say is that no one has wanted that property to date. I'd like to repeat that it is in a troubled neighborhood and people might be afraid of fires--like what happened at South Bend Toy and the building on the property now. Mr. obinson: Aren't you going to need permission from the State for urb cuts? Don't you think that will be a problem? South Bend R development Commission Regular Meet g December 7, 1979 6. NEW BUS ME SS c. continued... Mr. Donald Rohan from Trane Aix Conditioning was recognized by the Chair. Mr. han: We have not yet obtained permission for the curb cuts but we do not feel this will be a problem. We won't have a lot of traffic in and out, it is not that type of business. Ms. uburn: I too have some questions concerning that property. It seems like a good location for a business, I don' know if abatement is necessary. Also, when do you plan to start construction? Mr. zarwark: Construction is scheduled to begin in the Spring. With construction costs continuing to rise, abatement could be the difference between building there or going elsewhere, outside the City. Mr. : I'd like to mention that our plan includes cle 4ohan ing up the property along the river and landscaping it it will be very attractive. Mr. �obinson: I'd like to suggest that we not make a deci ion on this matter at this time. Mr. �imtz: Mrs. Hernandez, as a resident of the neighbor - hood what are your views on this request? Mrs. Hernandez (President of S.E. PAC): I'm tired of hearing quotations from the S.E. Planning Profile, and I wish neighbor- hood residents would be consulted ahead of time and not just hear of proposals at meetings like this. Mr. imtz: I think we are all concerned about the lack of advance notice regarding these requests. That is why we are going to vote on a resolution later in this meeting stating our ntention not to consider tax abatement requests until local procedures are set up. Mr. zarwark: With all due respect, I'd like to ask you to sup rt our request before our resolution is considered by the ommon Council. Mr. imtz: I think it might be appropriate to have a motion dela ing any decision on this tax abatement request until local nroc dures and standards are established. M South Bend R development Commission Regular Meeting - December 7, 1979 6. NEW c. continued... Mr. zarwark: Perhaps the Redevelopment Commission would consider getting a committee together immediately to establish local procedures and standards, so that future tax abatement requ sts could be approved without further delay. Mr. imtz: I do not think you need to tell this Commission how to proceed. I think it would be appropriate to wait until the new administration takes office in January before approving any more tax abatement requests. Mr, Robinson made a motion to delay consideration of the tax abatEment request, relative to an area commonly referred to as 1007 East Sample Street, pending establishment of local procedures and standards to go before the South Bend Common Council, seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carried. d. Commission approval requested for Resolution No. 598 —1 T. .....r..... s RESOLUTION NO. 598 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, DEPARTMENT OF REDEVELOPMENT, EXPRESSING ITS DESIRE TO REFRAIN FROM THE CONSIDERATION OF REQUESTS FOR SUPPORT OF TAX ABATEMENT PETITIONS PENDING THE ESTABLISH- MENT OF LOCAL PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS. WHEREAS, the .taws of the State of Indiana permit the nation ob curtain atceas as UAban Devetopment Anez jot sets o6 I.C. 9 6 -1.1- 12.1 -1 thtcough I.C. § 6 -1.1- 12.1 -6 save; and, WHEREAS, it has become .to cat pnact c:ce jot the Redevelopment Comm,is,sion to cowsidetc and recommend such designations to the Common Councit o4 the City o f South Bend; and, RESOLUTION #598 APPROVED FOR THE COMMISSION TO REFRAIN FROM THE REQUESTING OF TAX ABATEMENT PETITIONS WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Commizzion now 4ind6 that petiti_ows 40n nban Devetopment Area Dezignati.ons can be beaten considetced th o gh the estabti6hment o4 tocat ztandut &s and procedu&e6. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Redevelopment CommZszion, City o4 South Send, Indiana expnessets it6 deli e to te4uin 4nom the co w idenation and necommendati.on o4 UAban Develop- ment AAea De ignati"ons 4ok punpoz ens o4 I.C. § 6-1.1-12.1-1 through I.C. 9 6- 1.1- 12.1 -6 inctcus.i"ve untie such time as appnopAiate tocat -10- South. Bend development Commission Regular Meet'ng - December 7, 1979 6. NEW BUS d. cony ued.... .stan a d3 and pnoceduxez have been e6tabtizhed. Adopted at the Regu2an Meeting of the South Bend Rede topment Comnazzion herd on the 7th Day o f DecembeA 1979 in the 044ice o f the Commi szion, 1200 County -City Bui e "ng, 227 We3t Je4 jeruson BoutevaAd, South Bend, Indiana. CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REDEVELOPMENT S/ F. JAY NIMTZ, Pnezident ATTEM S A. P �TER DONALDSON, SeeAetaAy Mr. imtz: I feel this subject has just been discussed thoroughly with our previous agenda item, therefore, I su_a st a motion be made in favor of this resolution. Mr. Zobinson made a motion to approve Resolution No. 598, whiti supports-the Redevelopment Commission to refrain from the consideration of requests for support of tax abat ent petitions pending the establishment of local proc lures and standards, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the moti n was unanimously carried. e. Commission approval requested for Resolution No. 599, -A to RESOLUTION #599 RESOLUTION OF THE SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, DEPARTMENT OF REDEVELOPMENT, REGARDING THE PROPOSED ADDITION OF THE ODD FELLOWS BUILDING TO THE WEST (WASHINGTON HISTORIC DISTRICT WHEREAS, the H.cstakic Pne/senvation Commi6.6ion o4 South and St. HoAeph County hays zubmitted to the State tc.i.e Pnesenvati.on 044icen (SHPO) a Nat onat RegisteA ,cation Jo& the addition o4 the Odd Fettow6 Buitd i,ng .e Jest Washington H.ustot c D.vstn ict; and -11- APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION #599 OBJECTING TO THE ADDITION OF THE ODD FELLOWS BLDG. TO WEST WASHINGTON HISTORIC DISTRICT South Bend R Regular Meet. 6. NEW BUSII e. cone city thus Comm FeU hercei Fett 4oA elopment Commission - December 7, 1979 WHEREAS, the SHPO has Requested the comments of the o4 South Bend Depahtment o f Redevetopment AegaAd ing matteA. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevetopment �zzion of the City o4 South Bend, that: The Deparctment o4 Redevetopment, cos owneA of the Odd w,s Building on behat6 o� the City of South Bend, does y expuzz .its objection to the addition o4 the Odd w,s Bu,i -ding to the West Washington Hi6tonie Di,5t ict :he Jottowing newsows: a) he Nat-ionat Reg.usteA appt is tion does not ptov.ide u4 jicient evidence that the Odd Fettom Building eets the Nationat Regizten cA tenia 4ound at 36 CPR ant 6 0. b) the juAti4.ieation Jo& Nat.i,onat RegizteA boundary changes utrsuant to 36 CFR Pant 60.16 (a) (2) ho not been met. c) The fact that the Odd FeUowz Buy tding .us Ji4ty (50 ) ew&s otd is not suiJieient Reason 6oA .cts nomination oA .inctus,ion in the West Washington H.ustonic D-c�stniet. Adopted at the Regular Meeting o4 the South Bend Rede et-opment Commission he.2d on the 7th Day o4 DeeembeA 1979 in the 04jice of the Comm zz ion, Room 1200, County- City Building, 227 We,6t JejJenson Boueevatd, South Bend, I ATT T: S/ A. P 1 ---TE CITY OF SOLITH BEND, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REDEVELOPMENT S/ F. Jay N.imtz, PAe�s.ident DONALDSON, SecAetaxy Mr. llison: As you know from earlier in the meeting, we have been notified by the State Historic Preservation Officer (S ) that they have received an application for the incliision of the Odd Fellows Building in the West Washington Historic District. -12- South Bend R development Commission Regular Meet ng December 7, 1979 6. NEW e. contmuea... Mr. llison continues... As owners of the building the SHPO must notify us of the application and ask for our omments. They will be reviewing the application at t eir meeting on December 11, and I plan to attend that meeting. I am not going to read the entire resolution as you have copies before you:. I would just like to state that the resolution expresses Commission objection to the addition of the Odd Fellows Building to tfie West Washington Historic District for the foll winiz reasons: a) e National Register application does not provide sufficient evidence that the Odd Fellows' Building meets the ational Register criteria found at 36 CFR Part 60. b) The justification for National Register District boon ary changes pursuant to 36 CFR Part 60.16 (a) (2) has �ot been met. c) Me fact that the Odd Fellows Building is fifty (50) years old is not sufficient reason for its nomination for inclusion in the West Washington Historic District. Mr. Rob inson made a motion to approve Resolution No. 599, supp rting the objection of the addition of the Odd Fell ws Building to the West Washington Historic District, seco ded by Mr. Donaldson, and the motion was unanimously Mr. llison: I might mention that I expect to meet with the eeper of the Register on or about January 7, 1980, in Washington, D. C. to discuss the Odd Fellows Building. Mr. imtz: I'm also planning on accompanying Mr. Ellison on s meeting with the Keeper. Mr. imtz: Mr. Brademas, I understand that you would like to ke a few comments at this time. The Chair recognized Mr. T. Brooks Brademas: Mr. Brademas: Thank you Mr. Nimtz. I would like to comment on the reporting of the November 16, 1979 Redevelopment Commission meeting. -13- DISCUSSION PER MR. T. BROOKS BRADEMAS South Bend R Regular Meet 6. NEW BUS e. Mr. elopment Commission December 7, 1979 continues.... Out of all the things I said at that meeting the only item reported in the Tribune was that I had zero equity in the Odd Fellows rehabilitation proposal. That is not the case as developer's fees are to be put back into the project. This type of reporting is what happens when you have .a controlled press.. In his report, Mr. Jerry Miller of Jannotta & Associates stated that there were problems with all the proposals related to lack of firm financing taxes and soft costs not being included, lack of detailed costs and lack of equity. I can assure you that these are not problems with our proposal. We have a firm a commitment from Stephens, Inc. as any developer can have at this stage of a proposal. Also, we have included taxes and soft costs in the proposal, we have extensive detailing of rehab costs and, as I mentioned before, considerable equity in the project since developers fees are to be put back into the project. In their announcement to the media recommending demolition, the Redevelopment staff stated that additional public investment would be necessary to save the building. I would like the staff to identify the nature of the public investment they think is necessary. I'd also like to add that our proposal will work without additional public invest- mentl In fact, it will save the City the cost of demolition. The Rouse report indicates a need of 54,550 sq. feet of additional office space in the period 1979 -1982. This did not take into account the new River Glen Office Building on Block 6 that will provide 35,000 square feet. Thus, the addition of a 100,000 square foot GSA building will provide space than can be digested. I have a major restaurant chain who will rent the first floor of the Odd Fellows Building and another restaurant for the 9th and 10th floors. That leaves the 2nd through 8th floors available for use by the SA. I have talked to Mr. Sochowski with the GSA in Chic go and he told me that we could have the GSA in the Odd �ellows Building. I would like to comment on the designs of the Gruen Company. I would like to show you a picture of Faneuil Hall in Boston. What Gruen has done is design a Faneuil Hall for South Bend. I think a much better arrangement for the mall area would be to build a parking garage on the corner of Jefferson and Main with walkways between the garage, the Odd Fellows, and the Federal Building. The garage could be built in the manner of the National Bank Garage with offices, etc. on the first floc--. -14- South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meeting December 7, 1979 6. NEW BUSI Mr. Brademas continues... In conclusion, I think it is buil ing that we don't need buil ing that could provide c "11111 ty. insanity to build a new GSA and tear down an existing many years of service to the Mr. llison: Mr. Chairman, I would like to respond to Mr. rademas' remarks. First, I would like to state that the work of the Jannotta firm was done during a short period of time--a time period considerably shorter than the six (6) mont s Rouse took to do its market study. Therefore, Jer Miller's work on behalf of the Jannotta firm could not nave been as extensive as that of Rouse. I think the Jann tta firm did a credible job given the time available to t em and I believe their analysis was accurate. With respect to the quality of financing aspects of Tom's proposal, I will only note that a firm written commitment to buy EDC bonds may be sufficient for bond authorization but is not sufficient to assure that development will take place. Ult:Lnately, we need evidence of an irrevocable financing commitment to be confident that the rehab of the Odd Fell ws Building will fly. My p rsonal feeling and that of the staff is that.since subs natial rehabilitation is by its nature an inexact science, developers need cushion within their finances to assure that the unexpected can be overcome. Jannotta described all of the proposals as marginal, in part, because of o r inability to find cushion in the numbers. The staff believes that writing down the disposition cost of the building to $1.00 will not be sufficient. We believe additional public sector investment in the form of interest subsidies or loan guarantees or both will be necessary to supply cushion to any of the deals. Rela ive to what the Rouse report indicates regarding the market for additional office space, I note that the report was speaking of new office space. Even with the unexpected addi ion of 35,000 square feet in 1980 as the result of the prof ct on Block 6, the market can still bear additional space in the new GSA building since that space won't be avai able until 1981. Besides, GSA needs cannot, in my opinion, be met'in the Odd Fellows Building. For example, GSA as indicated that the Social Security Administration, because of its clientele needs first floor space. Obviously, this need could not be serviced under Mr. Brademas' proposal sinc he indicated a restaurant use for that floor. We've spent long difficult hours working on the federal building. It is my info tion that GSA has settled on building on a portion of the 45 bus lot. South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meet ng - December 7, 1979 6. NEW BUS Mr. Elli$on continues... In fact, GSA is currently reviewing a site option agree- ment for that site right now. I think Tom Brademas' efforts are too little and too late. We should not turn down an economic opportunity of a new federal building containing additional marketable office space in an effort to save the Odd ellows Building. The fate of the Odd Fellows Building and he new GSA Building are separate and distinct issues. We s ould keep them that way. 7. PROGRESSIREPORTS Mr. Ellison: Mr. Chairman, and members of the Commission, DISCUSSION CON - the Redevelopment Department owns 130 remaining parcels of CERNING THE land in Ind. R -57, of which 30 parcels are being disposed DISPOSAL OF RE- of on an installment type basis. The remaining 100 parcels MAINING PARCELS IN have not generated much buyer interest. This lack of interest IND. R -57 AREA apparently results from the fact that most remaining land is much land. Given the lengthy period during which this land has been available, the department finds good cause in believing that this land inventory could remain in public ownership indefinitely. Since public ownership of the land produces no tax income for the City, and since departmental interest dictate that it be relieved of the burden of managing and disposing of this land as soon as possible, the department intends to request HUD concurrence to dispose of remaining parcels for $1.00 per parcel. The department is confident that HUD will concur in this disposition plan. Mr. Ellison: I'd like to present to the Commission a collage PRESENTATION TO of newspaper articles related to the "Hole" groundbreaking. COMMISSION OF A The coll ge was done by Bill Screes, a local insurance PICTURE FROM man, and given to the department. We had it framed and MR. BILL SCREES would lie to show it to the Commission today. Mr. Nimt : On behalf of the Commission I'd like to publicly thank Mr. Screes for this fine picture' 8. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING The next regularly scheduled South Bend Redevelopment Commissi n meeting will b held on December 21, 1979, at 10:00 A e A.M. -16- NEXT COMMISSION MEETING South Bend Regular Me Q There be Mr. Dona seconded carried. elopnent Commission - Decenber 7, 1979 in.g no further business to come before the Commission, Ldson made a motion that the meeting be adjourned, by Mr. Robinson, and the motion was unanimously The meeting was adjourned at 11°40 a.m. z+,`�"�..] President -17- Carl Ellison, Executive Director