The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRM 08-03-79SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING August 3, 1 79 1200 County -City Building 10 :00 A.M. 227 W. Jefferson Boulevard Presiding 0 ficer: Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, South Bend, IN. 46601 President 1. ROLL CAUL Members Present: Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President Mr. Lloyd E. Robinson, Sr., Vice President Mr. Robert J. Cira, Assistant Secretary Ms. Paula N. Auburn, Member Members (Absent: Legal Counsel: Redevelc Communii Staff News Med Guests: Mr. A. Peter Donaldson, Secretary Mr. Kevin J. Butler nt Staff: Mr. Mr. Mr. Ms. Mrs Ms. f Development Carl Ellison, Director Timothy K. Eckerle, Assistant Director Kevin C. Horton, Real Estate Officer Ann Bathon, Research Associate Jane Zimmerman, Executive Secretary Denise Fleming, Secretary Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau of Housing Ms. Kathy Baumgartner, Project Director, Bureau of Housing Mr. C. Thane Wilson, Assistant Project Director, Bureau of Housing Ms. Shirley F. McCoy, Labor Standards Officer Mrs. Theresa Ellett, Labor Standards Monitor ia: Ms. Deborah Domine, Reporter, WSBT -TV Mr. Steve Neher, Photographer, WSBT -TV Mr. Dave Anderson, Reporter, WNDU -TV Mr. Les Howard, Photographer, WNDU -TV Mr. Larry Ford, Reporter, WSJV -TV Mr. Bill Hentsch, Photographer, WSJV -TV Ms. Jeanne Derbeck, Reporter, South Bend Tribune Mr. John E. Leszczynski, Manager, Public Construction Mr. James H. Lahey, Concerned Citizen Mr. Marc A. Brammer, St. Joseph Bank & Trust Mr. Thomas Gibson, St. Joseph Bank & Trust Mrs. Janet Allen, Concerned Citizen Ms. Glenda Rae Hernandez, President, S.E. Side PAC South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - August 3, 1979 2. APPROVALI OF MINUTES On motio by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Cira and unan- mously carried, the Minutes of the Regular Meeting f July 20, 1979 were approved. 3. APPROVALIOF CLAI On motio by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Ms. Auburn and unan mously carried, the claims -- totalling $42,748. 7, were allowed and ordered to be paid. The auth rized claims are: REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND Payroll: 7 -14 -79 to 7 -27 -79 $ 4,730.62 Business Systems, Inc. 20.11 Carl Ellison St. Joseph 163.13 Indiana Bell Telephone Co. (May) 331.62 Indiana Bell Telephone Co. (June) 596.01 Patrick McMahon 77.68 Public D cuments Distribution Center 4.50 Travelmo a 360.00 Coffee T me Service 1 25.22 TOTAL $ 6,308.89 REDEVELO MENT DISTRICT CAPITAL Abstract Company of St. Joseph County $ .57.50 Abstract Company of St. Joseph County 60.00 James E. Childs and Associates, Inc. 875.00 James E. Childs and Associates, Inc. 170.00 Thomas P illips Water Works 95.48 200.00 Rodolfo rejo Michiana Moving & Storage, Inc. 48.00 Michiana Moving & Storage, Inc. 25.00 TOTAL $ 1,410.50 P. E. A. IIND. R -66 Kevin J. Butler $ 3,813.84 Kevin J. Butler 1,285.25 Orra S. Frame and Son, Inc. 39.00 Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. 447.43 Otis Elevator Company 110.58 Ritschard Brothers, Inc. 3,963.50 Seifer Safe and Lock Service 65.50 South Bend Water Works 95.48 Ronald E. Gettel 500.00 Michiana Moving & Storage, Inc. 25.00 Michiana Moving & Storage, Inc. 25.00 Walter J. Filipek, M.D. 4,018.00 Walter J. Filipek, M.D. 10,000.00 Robert Sh rk 1,718.67 -2- MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 20, 1979 APPROVED APPROVAL OF CLAIMS South Bend R development Commission Regular Meeting - August 3, 1979 3. APPROVALIOF CLAIMS (continued) P. E. A.1 IND. R -66 (continued).... Odd Fell ws Maintenance Contract $ 1,774.50 7-14-79 to 7 -27 -79 Ann Bath 3n (Contract) 7 -14 -79 to 7 -27 -79 316.00 Paul Fal uto (Contract) 7 -14 -79 to 7 -27 -79 176.00 TOTAL $28,373.75 312 L Edward J rzak, Jr. & Anna Nemeth Wayne Ga bard & Georgia Kourlas R. A. Stickler Plumbing & Mattie Valentine Ridgedal Construction Co. & Dominic Parisi C.E. Lee Co. & Mattie Valentine Area Carpet Experts & Joni Ladewski I & M E1 ctric Heating & Joni Ladewski Wayne Columbia & Joni Ladewski 4. COMMUNICATI $ 345.90 3,061.00 120.00 500.00 127.73 32.50 1,903.00 565.00 TOTAL $ 6,655.13 GRAND TOTAL $42,748.27 There were no communications to present to the Commission. 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Commission approval reg ment between the City o Redevelopment, and the the sale of land for re ested to modi South Bend, ouch Bend Pub evelopment. an agree- partment of C Library for Mr. llison: The staff prepared and legal counsel revi wed a modification of our original Sale Contract with the library for a parcel of land to the South of the library on which the library will eventually con - stru t improvements. The modification essentially exte ds the time to begin and complete construction by one year, and allows them on an interim basis to use the land for surface parking. It is necessary that the ommission formally approve this agreement so that the 3ales Contract can be modified. The original contract gave them five years to begin construction and even years to complete it. In June 1978 we appr ved the first modification, which gave them a two ear extension. At our last commission meeting we app r ved a one year extension. So, the second modifi- cati n reads eight years to start and ten years to -3- NO COMMUNICATIONS PRESENTED MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN SOUTH BEND PUBLIC LIBRARY AND DEPT. OF REDEVELOPMENT APPROVED South Bend edevelopment Commission Regular Mee ling - August 3, 1979 5. OLD BUSINESS (continued) 5a. (continued).... com lete, and it contains a provision regarding sur ace parking. The ye were no further questions raised concerning the above modification contract, therefore, Ms. Auburn made a motion to approve the second modification contract ext nding construction for one year, and a provision regarding general use of surface parking, for the South Bend Public Lib ary, seconded by Mr.' Cira, and the motion was una imously carried. b. Com ission approval requested to undertake certain action, COMMISSION APPROVAL Re: The Disposition of the Odd Fellows Building. GRANTED TO DEPT. OF REDEVELOPMENT Mr. Ellison read a memorandum regarding the Odd Fellows TO ADVERTISE Building. Authorization was asked for the following: FOR SALE OR DEMO - LITION OF ODD To adveAtize the sate of the buitdi.ng on an about August FELLOWS BUILDING 10, 1979, in the Watt Street 7owcnat Chi e�6TTAsibune, Washington Post, an South Ben" t� d4.�ona1 ` , be neq e e�ads woutd p ace .cn ocai' pubticatiows. A s "xty day peA od wou.Cd be allowed to neeet.ve devetop- me pnoposaP�s. uthotuzati.on to concwvicentty adveAti�se 4on demotiti.on bids 4on the b uitding . us is consistent with the Rowse &epotct jum the stand- point o$ the time that shoul?d be neee6,satcy to detenmdne whetheA there is seAious intetcest in tcenovating the buitding. The sta44 be-P,f evets this approach is neeessatcy to impte- ment the Rouse Repoxt with nes pee t to the Odd Fe Uow.s P&o tasty. Thehe4otce, we tceeommend the Commission authotuze the actions the memotcandum dens cA bed. Mr. Robinson made a motion authorizing the staff to advertise for the sale of the Odd Fellows Building and concurrently advertise for demolition bids for the Odd Fellows Building, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the motion was unanimously carried. 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Commission approval requested for the following 312 loan 312 LOAN APPLI- a lications: CATIONS APPROVED Name Amount Loan No. Charles & Movita Stewart $5,000.00 18 /SOU - 1/60/1 1241 California Street South Bend, Indiana 46628 -4- South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meetling - August 3,' '1979 6. NEW BUSIINESS (continued) 6a. 312 loan applications...... Name Amount Loan No. Leona McCoy $7,000.00 18 /SOU -1 /61/1 801 Sout Falcon South Bend, Indiana 46628 Frederick S. & Aravni Sheets $10,000.00 18 /SOU= 1/62/1 526 North Allen Street South Bend, Indiana 46628 Jeanne A. Welsh $10,000.00 18 /SOU -1 /63/1 722 Cott ge Grove South Be d, Indiana 46628 Richard 4., Sr. & Mary A. $11,350:00 18 /SOU- 2/65/1 Dob zykowski 606 Souti Liberty Street South Be d, Indiana 46619 Art J. Kbil $4,000.00 .18 /SOU - 1/66/1 730 SoMd, Dundee Street South Indiana 46628 Phillias L. & Bertha M. Gour $2,400.00 18 /SOU- 2/67/1 1124 Wes Indiana Avenue South Be d, Indiana 46613 Nellie Mae Clark $4,400.00 18 /SOU- 2/68/1 1711 South Dale Street South Be d, Indiana 46613 Herbert . & Lucy A. Harris $9,650.00 18 /SOU - 2/64/1 448 Sout Kenmore Street South Be d, Indiana 46628 Mr. Ellison asked the Commission to subsequently consider Leona McCoy of 801 S. Falcon, for a 312 loan approval in the amount of $7,000.00 subject to a written receipt from HUD of a waiver, as Ms. McCoy is a city employee, and the waiver is necessar . Ms. Aubu n made a motion to approve 312 loans to Charles & Movita Stewart, 1241 California Street, for $5,000.00, Frederic S & Aravni Sheets, 526 N. Allen Street for $10,000, Jeanne A. Welsh, 722 Cottage Grove for $10,000.00, Richard W. Sr. & Ma -y A. Dobrzykowski, 606 S. Liberty St for $11,350.00, Art J. K il, 730 S. Dundee Street for $4,000.00, Phillias L. & Bertha M. Gour, 1124 W. Indiana Avenue for $2,400.00, Nellie Mae Clark, 1711 S. Dale Street for $4,400.00, Herbert L. & Lucy A. Harris, 448 South Kenmore Street for $9,650.00, seconded by Mr. Robinson, and the motion was unanimously carried. -5- South Regula 6. NE 6a fx c. Bend Redevelopment Commission r Meeting - August 3, 1979 W B USI ESS (continued) loan applications....... '312 Ms. Auburn then made a motion to approve a 312 loan for Leona McCoy of 801 S. Falcon for $7,000,00, subject to a written waiver from HUD, since Ms,,McCoy is a city employee, seconded by Mr. Robinson, and the motion was unanimously carried. Commission approval requested for Change Order #1, with Area Services, Inc. for a decrease in contract pri ce of $10-0-.00, for an amended contract total of 1,350.00, at the address of 911 Sherman Street, as set forth in letter from Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau of'Housin . Mr. arcus: According to rehabilitation contract for 911 Sherman Street specifications require replacement of oil furnace. The Commission is requested to approve Change Order No. l stipulating that furnace replacement to be a gas fired unit. Homeowner is now in agreement and a cost saving of $100.00 will occur. Mr. Robinson made a motion to approve Change Order #1, wi- Area Services, Inc., authorizing the replacement of an oi' furnace at a decrease in contract price of $100.00, seconc by Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carried. Commi Sion approval requested for Change Order #1, with B & B Plumbing, for an increase in contract price of 1226 0, for an amended contract total of $207.00, at the addre s of 1220 East Cedar, as set forth in letter from Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau of Housin . The home under contract at 1220 East Cedar Mr. Harcus: sudde tly developed a water leak from defective piping judge to be under the second story flooring. To prevent furth r damage to property, Bureau Director authorized an em rgency repair at a cost of $122.00. Be advised that his service has been rendered. The Commission's cooperation is requested for the approval of Change Order No. 1. Mr. Cira made a motion to approve Change Order #1, with B & B Plumbing, authorizing the repair of a water leak, for ar increase in contract price of $122.00, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the motion was unanimously carried. Commission approval requested for execution of Certificate Of C0 letion to Ritschard Brothers Construction Company-, Re: Demolition Contract 40,`Office'En ineer's Buildin Site clearance. -6- led CHANGE ORDER #1 WITH AREA SERVICES, INC. APPROVED CHANGE ORDER #1 WITH B & B PLUMBING APPROVED APPROVAL GRANTED FOR A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION: RE: DEMOLITION CONTRACT 40 - OFFICE ENGINEER'S BUILDING South Bend R development Commission Regular Meet.ng - August 3, 1979 6. NEW BUSI ESS (continued) d. con;tinued...... Mr. Ellison: The City, through the Department of Engi eering has conducted a final inspection and Bete ined all work completed in 'accordance with the plan;, specifications and all applicable city standards, asst forth in letter from Mr. John Leszczynski, Manager, Bure u of Public Construction. Ms. Auburn made a motion to approve a Certificate of Comp etion to Ritschard Brothers Construction Company for Demolition of Office Engineer's Building, Contract #40, seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carr ed. e. Commission approval requested for "Amendement to Contract for Professional and Technical Services ", between the = of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment,, and S.M. Dix & Associates, Inc., Re: Central Downtown, Ind. R -66. Mr. Ellison: There is a need because of the time that has Leen involved in the property acquisition and relo- cation process in the Century Mall Project, to extend the peri d of the S.M. Dix contract to the end of the year.. This amendment would essentially do that, and would tie additional compensation to the contract. This reflects the staff estimate of additional services which will be necessary to complete our task in that particular project. Ther fore, we hope the Commission will approve the amend- ment. Mr. aira: How long is the contract to be extended? Mr. Ellison: It extends until the end of the year. It is the staff's presumption that by the end of the year we will have completed all the relocation activities in the Century Mall Project Area. If it would in fact turn out that that could not be the case, we would likely reco end to the Commission an additional extension of time, as S.M. Dix services are essential to assuring that we do the relocation process properly, Mr. Cira: Is this his first extension? Mr. B tier: This is the first extension relative to the C ntury Mall Project. Mr. Ellison: Had we not been delayed somewhat by problems in th2 project, particularly the legal ones, we would likely have ended with their services within the period of th2 original contract. -7- APPROVAL OF AMEND- MENT TO CONTRACT FOR S.M. DIX & ASSOCIATES South Bend R development Commission Regular Meeting - August 3, 1979 6. NEW BUSINESS (continued) e. continued...... Mr. Pira: What are they providing now? Mr. llison: They essentially function as a relocation cons ltant. The HUD rules relative to business relocation are very difficult. It is my view that it is less expe sive to hire a consultant to provide counseling, and the 'fixture appraisal services, etc. that are critical to tie relocation process than to train a staff of sufficient size to handle the same process. S.M. Dix was retained sometime ago to provide those kinds of services only in the business area. I don't expect that we would want to utilize S.M. Dix to assist us if-we get involved in a residential relocation program, °as may be the case if t e Commission enters into projects in the Monroe /Sample area for instance. I'think that 'is'something that can be hand ed by trained staff.' We think professional consultants are ecessary to handle business relocations properly. Mr. ira: By law we are not required to have professional cons ltants. Mr. Ellison: No we are not. I think in the long run for cost efficiency we are better 'off in this very Jiff cult business area to have professionals involved. I th nk our potential for error is substantially reduced by v rtue of S.M. Dix's work. Ms. Auburn made a motion to approve the "Amendment to Contract for Professional and Technical Services" between the City of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment, and S.M. Dix & Associates, Inc., extending the contract until the end of the year, seconded by Mr. Robinson, and the motion was unanimously carried. f. Commission approval requested for "Amendment to Contract for Professional.and Technical Services ", between the Cit of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment, and James E. Childs & Associates, Inc.; Re: Monroe/Sample Area. Mr. Ellison: This somewhat similar to the previous item before the Commission. In this particular instance it is n cessary to extend the contract by a few days and also to a just the compensation, as Mr. Childs was called upon to m ke many more presentations than was anticipated by the original contract. Because of those additional presen- tati ns, and additional time he put into this particular prof ct, the staff believes it necessary to extend the contract by 41 days and increase the compensation by $430.00, to pay for the zdditional services he provided. Mr. gira: What did the original contract call for? APPROVAL OF AMEND- MENT FOR JAMES E. CHILDS & ASSOCI- ATES South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meetng - August 3, 1979 6. NEW BUSI qESS (continued) f. continued.. ... RE Mr. llison: The original contract essentially call for presentation to the Commission. We did not cont mplate the presentation`to the Executive Session, invo ving'the Mayor and the Common Council. Mr. lira: Isn't that all part of it, really? Mr. Ellison: Well I suppose it could be. If the Commission were to say to Mr. Childs.. -. "you shouldn't be paid for those services ", Mr. Childs would accept that. When the staff negotiated the contract, we did not con - temp ate Mr. Childs being required at our request to do the humber of presentations that ultimately occurred. It is a judgement call. Normally, a consultant of Child's reputation, and certainly of his past association with the Commission, would be more than willing to make as many presentations as we asked, but I think the Commission has a responsibility to be reasonable; particularly when we are rece ving services that were not originally negotiated and understood. In this situation, I felt it was reasonable to a'low some adjustment in the contract to pay in part for iome of the additional services we received. Mr. imtz: I did ask Mr. Childs to make a number of presentations that were not contemplated, and he did very well in fact, the one with the Historic Preservation Com- miss on was very well done; I think he satisfied some of their questions. Mr. Robinson made a motion to approve "Amendment to Cont act for Professional and Technical Services ", between the City of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment, and James E. Childs &'Associates, Inc., for an extension of Mr. Child's contract by 44 days and increase the compensation by $430.00, seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion was carried. (Ms. Auburn was abstained from voting because of a possible conf ict of interest). Commission a comm ncement Indiana R -66 proval requested for Resolution #590, authorizin of condemnation action on Acquisition Parcel #8- Mr.utler: This parcel is the South half of the Oscols Drug site Ms. fluburn made a motion to approve Resolution #590, authori- zing commencement of condemnation action on Acquisition Parcel #8-12, Indiana R-�66, seconded by Mr. Ctra, and the motion was unanimously carried, W RESOLUTION #590 AUTHORIZING COMMENCEMENT OF CONDEMNATION ACTION ON PARCEL #8 -12, IND. R -66 APPROVED South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - August 3, 1979 FLOOR DISCUSISI The Chair recognized Mr. James Lahey, a representative of the Faith - Hope - Charity Chapel. Mr. James Lahey: Thank you Mr. President, and members of the Commission. My purpose for being here today is to simply reacquaint COMMENTS MADE the Commission with the problem that we have on our hands. We are BY MR. LAHEY located presently in the redevelopment area between Washington and CONCERNING Jefferson on Michigan. We hear that shot ball falling on all sides RELOCATION OF of us here and we know that certainly in an immediate period of FAITH -HOPE time it is going to hit us; and we don't want to cause any problems. CHARITY CHAPEL The Commission has tried to be fair with us, and we have made efforts to acquire other locations in South Bend. I would just like to en- courage the Commission to attempt`to locate'us downtown as expeditiously as they an, so that we are not out of business. We have 300 people or Bette per day coming into the shopping area. That is all I have to preset to the Commission °at the present time. Mr. Nimt Thank you, Mr. Lahey. As you well know, the Commission is appri ed of the situation, and I think all of us are firmly con - vinced tat the Chapel is a drawing card and needs to remain downtown. Particularly, after the news report several weeks ago in the Tribune of the C apel located out East, and the amount of traffic that it generates. As you know, I have met with Bishop Manis on this matter. I think the immediate problem right now, Mr. Lahey, is to relocate you temp rarity, so that you are happy, the Commission is happy, and it is convenient to the people who use the facility. I think that is the immediate problem. I hope that we can possibly meet with you and Mr. Dick Rosenthall, who is also on the committee, and with Mr. Kevin Butler and Mr. Carl Ellison to see if we can solve this problem at everybody's satisfaction. We are certainly pleased to have you here this morning and we want you to know that this problem has been mentioned to the Rouse people and to Gruen & Associates who are working on this whole project. Mr. Cira: Was there discussion of 'a possible site? Mr. Nimt : There has been discussion of several possible sites. Mr. Cira: The one that they did like, what became of that? Mr. Nimt : It is still available. It is a question of whether the Chapel should go there, or should we reserve it for a possible national installation. Ms. Derb ck: What location are you speaking of? Mr. Nimt : A location close to Baers. -10- South Bend qedevelopment Commission Regular Mee ling August 3, 1979 FLOOR DISCUSSIONS (continued) The Chair recognized Mr. Marc Brammer of St. Joseph Bank & Trust. Mr. Bra mer: In the 90 day period, before you accept the demolition bid, are you going to require a firm financial commitment to the potential rehabilitation investor, or are you really going to be concerned about a serious proposal as to the feasibility of rehabilitating the Odd Fellows Building, and the financial commitment that generally comes with it? You know how hard it is to put together that end of the project. Mr. Ellison: It is my feeling that evidence of the firm's financial commitment is necessary to assure that the building can be done in whole, whether the scheme to do it is to be phased or whatever. Mr. Bram er: I think it is difficult in a 90 day period to give a financial commitment on the most stable development in downtown. I mean a commitment that would be stable without any questions. I am just wondering how much leeway you will give with that kind of development as I am almost sure that is what the result w uld be. If a person was seriously interested in obtaining the building then obtained approval, he would rehabilitate it then search f r a financial commitment, it would require at least 30 days to obtain that commitment. Mr. Ellison: I agree. If say, this person has a financial capacity to do it himself and be willing to guarantee it personally, I don't think the Commission can afford to be in a speculative position. It is one thing to be a serious prospect, another to be a serious prospect with the financial capability to deal with the project. Mr. Bram er: Certainly, retail stores on the Century Mall are going to come down far later than the Odd Fellows. I am wondering how much the Odd Fellows would play in hampering the overall project. If someone made a serious offer and could ve y well bring in tenants, and was able to obtain financin but was delayed until December, say in getting that kin of commitment, will the building then be sold? Mr. Ellison: There is no presumption that every detail has to be packaged, but there must be evidence that it can be packaged There might be some sort of interim kind of commit- ment letter from a lender saying "if XYZ" happens, we will finance this project at a certain rate, and then we will look at the rate, so we can then determine if the amount to be charged appears to be reasonable. In those instances we have ro ascertain whether or not the commitment appears to be substantial. If, in fact, there appears to be some- thing su stanttal, we will work with it. There is nothing in the -11- DISCUSSION FROM MR. BRAMMER CON- CERNING DISPO'- SITION OF THE ODD FELLOWS BLDG. South Bend Redevelopment Commission Regular Meeting - August 3, 1979 FLOOR DISCUSSIONS (continued) staff report which suggests that the building is to be demolished. It is probably the worst alternative, but by the same token it is necessary th.at we settle this issue once and for all. The Chair recognized Mrs. Janet Allen. Mrs. All n: Have you placed a price on the Odd Fellows Building? Mr. Elli on: We presumed the cost would be the acquisition of the b ilding. It was appraised at a price of $296,000. Mrs. Allan: I feel you should offer to sell the building for less because of purchases made in obtaining other parcels of land. MV point is if you are going to sell the building, and someone Aiants to buy it, I don't see why your department has to know what exactly that owner plans to do with the building. Mr. Ell% on: I agree under a normal situation, but we cannot afford t sell the building and have a deal that ultimately fails. 7. PROGRESSIREPORTS There were no progress reports to present to the Commission. 8. NEXT COMMISSION MEETIN The next regularly scheduled Redevelopment Commission Meeting Will be �eld Friday, August 17, 1979, at 10:00 A.M. 9. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Commission, Mr. Robinson made a motion that the meeting be adjourned, seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10:43 A.M. tz, President -12- NO PROGRESS REPORTS TO PRE- SENT AT THIS TIME NEXT SCHEDULED REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MTNG. ADJOURNMENT dc m4e �� Carl Ellison, Executive Director