HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 07-20-79JuVt,_20, 19;
10:00 A.M.
Presiding 01
1. ROLL CAL
SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
cer: F. Jay Nimtz,
President
Members Present: Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Mr.
Ms.
Legal Counsel Mr.
1200 County -City Building
227 W. Jefferson Boulevard
South Bend, Indiana 46601
F. Jay Nimtz, President
Lloyd E. Robinson, Sr., Vice President
A. Peter Donaldson, Secretary
Robert J. Cira, Assistant Secretary
Paula N. Auburn, Member
Kevin J. Butler
Redevelopment Staff: Mr. Carl Ellison, Director
Mr. Timothy K. Eckerle, Assistant Director
Ms. Ann Bathon, Research Associate
Mrs. Jane Zimmerman, Executive Secretary
Ms. Denise Fleming, Secretary
Communit Development
Sta f:
News Med-
Guests :
2. APPROVAL
On motior
and unani
Meeting c
Mr. Thane Wilson, Asst. Project Director,
Bureau of Housing
Mr. James Johnson, Project Director, Bureau
of Housing
Ms. Kathryn Baumgartner, Project Director,
Bureau of Housing
Ms. Shirley McCoy, Labor Standards Officer
Ms. Barbara Radican, Performance Standards Monitor
a: Mr. James Strauss, Reporter, WNDU -TV
Mr. Scott Brink, Photographer, WNDU -TV
Ms. Deborah Domine, Reporter, WSBT -TV
Mr. Tim McClure, Photographer, WSBT -TV
Mr. Larry Ford, Reporter, WSJV -TV
Mr. Bill Hentch, Photographer, WSJV -TV
Ms. Jeanne Derbeck, Reporter, South Bend Tribune
Ms. Glenda Rae Hernandez, South East PAC
OF MINUTES
MINUTES OF
by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Donaldson REGULAR MEETING
mously carried, the Minutes of the Regular OF JULY 6, 1979
f July 6, 1979, were approved. APPROVED
South Bend gedevelopment Commission
Regular Mee ing - July 20, 1979
3. APPROVAU OF CLAIMS
On moti n by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Donaldson, APPROVAL OF
and una imously carried, the claims totalling CLAIMS
$290,965.20, were allowed and ordered to be paid.
The authorized claims are:
REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND
Payroll:
6 -30 -79 to 7 -13 -79
$ 4,682.62
Business
Systems, Inc.
12.08
Dorothy
Deane - Petty Cash
88.17
Timothy
K. Eckerle
25.00
Nat -Lea,
Inc.
164.00
Nat --Lea,
Inc.
82.49
Postmas t
r
46.72
Postmast
r
15.00
White Ra
iator Co., Inc.
101.00
Amoco Oil
Company
30.10
TOTAL $ 5,247.18
REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL
Abstract Co. of St. Joseph County, Inc. $ 57.50
Abstract Co. of St. Joseph County, Inc. 100.00
Community Development Program (Transfer of
Funds) 8,401.00
Marvin C ayton 121; nn
TOTAL $ 8,798.50
P. E. A. IND. R -66
Communit
Development Program (Transfer of
Funds)
$163,148.00
Economic
Development Corp.,(Transfer of Funds
from E6 to E.D.C.)
19,543.60
Forest Sign
& Display Inc.
385.00
Orra S. Frame
& Son, Inc.
25.00
Northern
Indiana Public Service Co.
278.59
Redevelopment
Revolving Fund
11,369.81
South Bend
Tribune
103.20
Urban Redevelopment
Fund (Transfer of
Closed Accounts)
2,965.97
South Bend
Water Works
24.75
S. M. Dix
Associates, Inc.
338.95
S. M. Dix
Associates, Inc.
1,837.50
Ray Brede
35.90
Michiana
oving & Storage, Inc.
25.00
James Sco
t Hauling
6.00
-2-
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting - July 20, 1979
3. APPROVALS OF CLAIMS (continued)
P. E. A.1 IND. R -66 (continued)
Mean's Service Center $ 9.36
Mean's Service Center 9.36
Edwin Voss 35.00
Newman's Department Store 20,732.00
Newman's Department Store 17,346.00
Paul Jams Newman 377.27
Hilda Sa vari 35.00
Odd Fell ws Maintenance Contract
(6-30-79 to 7- 13 -79) 1,850.90
Ann Bath 3n (contract) 6 -30 -79 to 7 -13 -79 288.00
Paul J. Falduto (contract) 6 -30 -79 to 7 -13 -79 224.00
TOTAL $240,994.16
312 LOA
Abstract Company of St. Joseph County, Inc.
Big "C" umber
Big "C" umber
Factory rile Inc.
Indiana 31ass Company
Bruner C ssady Neeser Insurance Agency
Campbell Electric Company
Southhold Heritage Foundation, Inc.
Southhold Heritage Foundation, Inc.
Edward J White
Ace Alum num Home Improvement Co.
Dan Hori e
Lawrence Dwyer
The Old Building Recycling Co.
Bob Grant Construction
Fidencio Bueno, Sr.
Joni Lad wski
Hamilton Distributing Co.
P & R Ca pet
All Stat Builders
Jerry Wa son
T. Brook Brademas
4. COMMUNICI
There wei
$ 102.50
140.46
421 .88
186.32
46.24
130.00
1,820.00
72.54
545.75
669.85
5,790.00
94.38
234.24
436.00
3,607.84
1,860.00
30.00
345.00
322.36
7,420.00
1,720.00
9,930.00
TOTAL $ 35,925.36
GRAND TOTAL $290,965.20.
no communications to present to the Commission.
-3-
NO COMMUNICATIONS
PRESENTED
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meet ng - July 20, 1979
5. OLD BUSINESS
There wa4 no old business to present to the Commission.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Commission approval requested for the following 312
loan applications:
Name Amount Loan No.
Clarz T. Gapinski $ 3,750.00 18 /SOU- 2/58/1
714 S. Brookfield St.
South Bend, IN. 46619
Bish p & Armenter Miller $ 3,300.00 18 /SOU- 2/59/1
1622 W. Sibley Avenue
Soutt Bend, IN. 46628
Lindz L. Mason $15,000.00 18 /SOU- 1/57/1
1305 Woodward Street
Sout Bend, IN. 46616
Douglas W. Way $13,000.00 18/SOU- 1/56/1
503 est Ewing
Sout Bend, IN. 46613
Olet4 Hayes $ 9,450.00 18 /8MC- 0011/59/1
828 . Wellington Street
Sout Bend, IN. 46619
Glor a Gray $12,050.00 18 /8MC- 0011/64/1
137 . Olive Street
Sout Bend, IN. 46628
Doro by Ivy $12,450.00 18 /8MC- 0011/62/1
1413 E. Miner Street
Sout Bend, IN. 46617
TherE were no questions raised concerning the above 312 loan
applications, therefore, Mr. Donaldson made a motion to
approve 312 loans to Clara T. Gapinski, 714 S. Brookfield St.
for 3,750.00, Bishop & Armenter Miller, 1622 Sibley Avenue
for 3,300.00, Linda L. Mason, 1305 Woodward Street for
$15,(00.00, Douglas W. Way, 503 West Ewing, for $13,000.00,
OletE Hayes, 828 S. Wellington Street for $9,450.00, Gloria Gray,
137 P. Olive Street for $12,050.00, and Dorothy Ivy, 1413 E. Miner
Stre t for $12,450.00, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the motion
was Onanimously carried.
-4
NO OLD BUSINESS
PRESENTED
312 LOAN APPLI-
CATIONS APPROVED
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meeting - July 20, 1979
6. NEW BUSI$ESS (continued)
b. Commission
approval requested for
Change Order #4,
CHANGE ORDER
with
Jurtin's Construction Company
for an increase in
#4 WITH
cont
act price of 250.00 'for an
amended contract
JURTIN'S CON -
tota
of 3,923:00, at the address
of '1502 Virginia,
STRUCTION CO.
as set
forth in °letter from Mr. James Harcus, Director,
APPROVED
Bure
u of Housing.
Mr. Johnson: While servicing home located at 1502
Virginia, contractor observed that basement door suffered
dry rot. Bureau Inspector verified observation and
judged that replacement of door was necessary. The
Commission is requested to approve Change No. 4
auth rizing' installation of a new exterior basement door
at a cost of $250.00.
Mr. Robinson made a motion to approve Change Order #4
with Jurtin's Construction Company authorizing installation
of a new exterior basement door at a cost of $250.00,
seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carried.
c. Commission approval requested for Change Order #1, with CHANGE ORDER #1
Rive bend Remodeling, Inc., for an increase in contract WITH RIVERBEND
ri I ce I of $300.00, for an amended contract total of REMODELING, INC.
$5,80.80, at the address of 541 Cleveland, as set forth APPROVED
in 10tter from Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau of
Hous nq.
Mr. ohnson: In preparation to service an Emergency
Repair roofing order, General Construction contractor,
Rive bend, Inc. removed gutters and observed loose fascia
and soffit boards. Such was not discernable when old
gutters were in place. Observation was confirmed by
Bureau Inspector. The Commission is requested to approve
Change Order #1 for 541 Cleveland, authorizing replacement
of c own molding to remedy above condition. Cost increase
is $K0.00.
Mr. Cira made a motion to approve Change Order #1 with
Rive bend Remodeling, Inc. authorizing replacement of
crowr molding at a cost increase of $300.00, seconded
by Ms. Auburn, and the motion was unanimously carried.
d. Commission approval re uested for Change Order #7, with CHANGE ORDER #7
Plai Construction Company, for an 'increase in contract WITH PLAIA CON -
ric of $575.00, for an amended contract total of STRUCTION CO.,
3,9 2.00, at the address of 420 South Arnold, as set REJECTED
forts in letter from Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau
of H using.
-5-
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meet.ng - July 20, 1979
6. NEW BUSI ESS (continued)
d. continued...
Mr. Johnson: Upon installation of new water closet
at 4 0 S. Arnold Street it was determined that
sloping bathroom floor resulted in excessive tilt of
said unit. Participating plumber and bureau staff
founi it impossible to safely shim- balance unit as
was pparently'accomplished for the replaced defective
water closet. The Commission is requested to approve
Chan ]e Order #7 authorizing correction to bathroom
floor so that key fixture may afford residents use
with safety. Cost of remedy is $575.00.
This is a complicated situation and it seems that the
floo was unlevel to begin with and it went unnoticed
by everyone involved. A new floor was put down (under -
laym nt tile) then the plumber set in the water closet,
and found it to be at an angle. Now the contractor is
prop sing to tear up the floor at his own cost; replace
the inderlayment, and tile; but he wants the change
order for something he should have noted in the first
plac which is the sub - floor. There was about 4 square
feet of sub -floor replaced on the inspection but it
wasp t included on the bid packet.
Ms. uburn: What you are saying is that the contractor
went in, refloored it, and missed the tilt on the
entire floor? How can you miss a tilt on the entire floor?
Mr. Johnson: It was beyond my comprehension also. What
will happen is that the plumber will be held responsible
beca se he made a bad installation without making the
Bure u of Housing aware of it, and Mr. Plaia must also
repl ice the underlayment tile.
Mr. lobinson made a motion to reject Change Order #7
with Plaia Construction Company, which was for an increase
of $ 75.00, seconded by Mr. Donaldson, and the motion was
unanimously carried.
e. Comm ssion a
F & F Electr
of �
at t
in 1
Hous
proval requested for Change Order #1, with
c, Inc. for an increase in contract price
or an amended contract 'total of $1,115.00
e address of 1014 East Dayton Street, as set f
tter from Mr. James Harcus, Director, Bureau o
nq.
Mr. ohnson: While servicing 1014 East Dayton Street,
F & 7 Electrical contractor discovered extensive knob
and ube wiring in the basement and attic. Bureau
Insp ctor verified finding. The Commission is requested
to a prove Change Order #1 with F &F Electric, authorizing
the eplacement of said old wiring at a cost of $450.00.
CHANGE ORDER #1
WITH F & F ELEC-
TRIC, INC.
REJECTED
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meet ng - July 20, 1979
5. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
e. continued...
Ms. uburn: Do you know for a fact that the wiring
is n t frayed, and that they simply want to replace it?
Mr. Robinson: If the tube wiring was put in properly, I
am sure that it was at that time, in my estimation it is
better than what it is today, but it is cost prohibited.
In other words, whenever wiring is run through rafters,
there is a protection put around the wiring with a
porcelain knob and this was protection enough. The wires
are separated enough that it is almost impossible for a
rodent or something else to knaw at both of them at the
same time, etc.
Mr. Ellison: Mr. Johnson, could the Bureau check the
condition of the wiring so that we can determine if
indeed there is something wrong with it so that we may
re -i itiate another change order if the commission
should reject this change order?
Mr. Oohnson: Yes, we could.
Mr. Robinson made a motion to reject Change Order #1,
with F & F Electric, Inc., which was for an increase in
contract price of $450.00, seconded by Mr. Donaldson, and
the motion was unanimously carried.
f. Commission approval requested for Chanqe Order #2, with
Jurt n's Construction Company for a decrease in contract
price of $450.00, for an amended contract total of
$95198.00, at the address of 741 South Kaley Street, as
set orth in letter from Mr. James Harcus, Director,
Bureau of Housinq.
Mr. Johnson: The commission is requested to approve
Change Order #2 deleting from grant rehabilitation
specifications, service to roof trim and porch ceiling.
These items will be serviced under a separate 312 loan
contract specifying the installation of aluminum siding
of p operty at 741 S. Kaley.
Mr. ira: I don't understand why there is a total price
of s ffit and ceiling price of $575.00, and yet he is
only asking for $450.00, why is that?
Mr. 4ohnson: Evidently, this contractor has the grant
port on of the contract and a loan; but, I am not sure.
-7-
CHANGE ORDER #2
WITH JURTIN'S
CONSTRUCTION CO.,
TABLED
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meeting July 20, 1979
6. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
f. contfinued...
Mr. ira made a motion to table Change Order #1
with Jurtin's Construction Company, for a decrease in
contact price of $450.00, pending further report by
the Bureau of Housing, seconded by Mr. Robinson, and
the inotion ' was unanimously carried.
g. Commission approval requested for Resolution #584,
authorizing commencement of condemnation action on
Acquisition Parcel #9 =22, Indiana R -66.
Mr. utter: This is 'a resolution pertaining to the
Raitt Corporation property which was tentative by
Lane Bryant. I am hopeful that this will be the last
of tie condemnation requests, as it looks like every-
one Ise is ready for closing, or about to be settled.
Mr. Robinson made 'a motion to approve Resolution #584,
authorizing commencement of condemnation action on
Acqu sition Parcel #9 -22, Ind. R -66, seconded by
Mr. Cira, and the motion was unanimously carried.
h. Comm ssion approval requested for Resolution #585, #586,
#587 #588, and #589, authOrilin the execution of
Rede-elopment Agreement for disposition of land and
the execution of quit-claim deed" s for the transfer
of t tle thereto in connection with land to be disposed
of i the LaSalle Park Project, Indiana R -57.
Reso ution Parcel # Name Amount
58 11 -2 Shelby Little $172.80
58 1 -21 Rosie L. Miller $ 96.00
58 36 -14 Paula Ramirez $261.60
588 22 -42 James Gunn $300.00
589 18 -15 &
18 -16 Jonathan Davis $120.00
Mr. Donaldson made a motion to approve Resolution #585,
#5862 #587, #588, and #589, authorizing the execution of
Redevelopment Agreement for disposition of land and the
execution of quit - claim deed(s) for the transfer of title
thereto in connection with land to be disposed of in the
LaSalle Park Project, Indiana R -57, parcel number 11 -2 to
Shelby Little in the amount of $172.80, parcel number
1 -21 to Rosie L. Miller in the amount of $96.00, parcel
number 36 -14 to Paula Ramirez in the amount of $261.60,
parcel number 22 -42 to James Gunn in the amount of $300.00,
and arcel numbers 18 -15 & 18 -16 to Jonathan Davis in the
amou t of $120.00, seconded by Mr. Cira, and the motion
was Qnanimously carried.
RESOLUTION #584
AUTHORIZING CON-
DEMNATION ACTION
ON PARCEL #9 -22
IND. R -66 APPROVED
RESOLUTIONS #585,
#586, #587, #588,
AND #589 FOR DIS-
POSITION OF LAND
IN IND. R -57,
LASALLE PARK PROJECT
APPROVED
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meet'ng July 20, 1979
6. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
i. Commission approval requested to 'authorize staff
to a are and enter into "an agreement for ro-
fess'onal services 'with "Gruen Associates, Inc. in
conn ction with land disposition activities in
Ind. R -66 Centur Y Mall).
_
Mr. �llison read the following memorandum:
Comm- zzione.As :
M yon Pettit J. Nemeth has asked the Department
to MteA into an agteement with Gruen Aszoai.ates
a4 Nm Yo&k City to ptepate a basic concept plan
and ielsign ittustAated by apptopAia>te gtaphics and
a mo e.2 4ot the CentuAg MaU P&o ee t. Gruen' s
,sety "cets w.Ut cast $95,000 - $112,000. By this
memo andum, then, the ta44 tequest6 Commis zion
authoAization to ptepate and execute an agteemenvt
4ot the above dens etr ib ed z etvicels . As ups uat, the
ag,teement would be 'subject to the ptiot teview o4
the omm- zzion',s tegat eouwse.C. 14 apptoved, Gruen
w,iU eomptete wo&k by OctobeA 1979. The sta44
&ecoinmen6 youA 4avotabte cawsidetati>on o4 this matter.
S/
CaAt F.?.P,us on
Mr. imtz: I believe a number of the Commissioner's
were polled about this subject. Mr. Wiggins (who
used to serve on the Commission), and Mr. Robinson,
served on an architect's committee which met a number
of times concerning this matter. I was unable to reach
Mr. Zobinson last week, so I contacted Mr. Wiggins, and
it i now my understanding that there were two firms
whici were rated high by your committee, and Gruen was
one f them.
Mr. Robinson: That is correct.
Ms. Auburn: May I assume that Gruen Associates will be'
work ng with Rouse Corporation, so that there is some
carr over from the Rouse study, which would go into
the lesign work of Gruen?
Mr.
betw
St.
Comm
rel a
So f
with
:llison: The arrangement with Rouse involved a contract
)en the Commission and a private institution, namely the
Joseph Bank. The contract with Gruen is only between the
ission, and Gruen; thus, there is no client consultant
-ionship between Gruen and anybody except the Commission.
)r practical purposes, we cannot compel them to cooperate
Gruen, but we expect that to happen.
COMMISSION APPROVAL
GRANTED TO STAFF TO
PREPARE AND ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITH GRUEN ASSOCIATES,
INC. (Ind. R -66)
South Bend Redevelopment Commission
Regular Meeting - July 20, 1979
6. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
i. continued...
Ms. uburn: Was Rouse competing with Gruen for the
development and design of Century Mall? Why was
Gruei chosen over Rouse?
Mr. Alison: Rouse's reputation for doing shopping
cent rs is not so much from the design standpoint,
but rom the market standpoint. They know how to get
peop a into the stores, and how to have the merchants
make money. Part of the concern at this point, in
putting the project together, is to assure that it
func ions as a component within a larger downtown.
At 1 ast initially it requires more of an architect's
kind of services. What will likely happen is that
Grue will take off on Rouse's concept plan, and will
refl ct much of that, but they will also look at the
mall project from a physical development standpoint,
and o a degree, utilize Rouse's market information
to d termine what site uses.
Ms. uburn: I have had the opportunity to read the
market feasibility study completed by the Rouse
Corporation, and from what I have said in Redevelop-
ment Commission meetings before, I support what they
developed, in that there has to be some kind of
Jiff rent, local, specialty shops in this project. I
thin the cost configuration is very important.
Mr. imtz: This question was directed to Mr. Molinaro,
President of the Rouse Corporation, at our last meeting
and ie mentioned that whoever has it will rent it as
chew as they possibly can, but the rental figure today
is b sed on "how much do you have in it ", and he admitted
that someone starting out on a shoestring may not be able
to a ford the rent.
Ms. uburn: If they are not going to be able to allow
peop a to rent the space starting out with limited
budg ts, can we determine some alternative financing
mech nism that will not automatically shut out local
peop e, who do not have a lot of capital consignments
behi d them?
Mr. 711 ison: What Rouse Corporation has done before is
set ip a merchant on a cart, in what would be a public area
of a mall. What their experience has been is that some
mere ants who have new products, and have a chance to test
them out, gain confidence, and eventually move into a store.
-10-
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meeting — July 20, 1979
6. NEW BUSINESS (continued)
i. continued...
Ms. uburn: I think that it would be appropriate
for 3ome products, but I don't think it would be
appr priate for everything that might seem to meet
local needs. I am suggesting that Gruen be aware of
our oncerns as a Commission that the rental space
not a so exhorbitant`so that it would price out
local people. Also, we should look at some alternatives
for financing mechanisms or some alternative methods to
allo# local people to meet the rental costs.
Mr. imtz: We all agree with you. What we are saying
is t at the guy who puts up the money has to pay his
inte est, etc.
Mr. ira: He is going to want a return on his money.
You are going to have people moving in and out of the
mall. As far as independence goes it is good, but
unless the person is established and has a good line of
credit, it will be hard for him to get money from the bank
to len up a business, unless he has some collateral to
put P_
Ms. uburn: I think if we use a traditional approach
it will open us up to some problems, because I don't
feel there are an overwhelming number of local businesses
that have been termed "successful ". I think we really do
deal with a lot of out -of -town business structures.
Mr. llison: Gruen is aware of our desire for the mall
to be something unique. But remember that the mall project
is n t just a "mall project." There is more involved here.
So m ch of Gruen's attention will go beyond how the retail
portion should be done, but also how "from a design stand-
point" this site can be related to everything else down-
town so that it will function as a unit. Gruen's work is
necessary to put together a project of this nature. I
believe they will have some preliminary concepts that may
be a ailable to the Commission sometime in early August.
Mr.
ente
Grue
acti
to b
revi
carr
,obinson made a motion that the staff prepare and
into an agreement for professional services with
i Associates, Inc. in connection with land disposition
Fities in Ind. R -66 (Century Mall) with estimated cost
from $95,000 $11.2,000, subject to legal counsel
�w, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the motion was unanimously
led.
-11-
South Bend R development Commission
Regular Meeting July 20, 1979
7. PROGRESS REPORTS
There were no progress reports to present to the
Commission.
8. NEXT COW ISSION MEETING
The next regularly scheduled South Bend Redevelopment
Commission Meeting will be held on August 3, 1979, at
10:00 A.4.
9 . ADJOURNM NT
There being no further business to come before the
Commission, Mr. Donaldson made a motion that the
meeting a adjourned, seconded by Ms. Auburn, and the
motion w s unanimously carried. The meeting was
adjourne at 10:49 A.M.
mtz, President
-12-
NO PROGRESS
REPORTS PRE-
SENTED
NEXT COMMISSION
MEETING
ADJOURNMENT
/� 166 1
Carl Ellison, Executive Director