Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 08-20-76August 0, 1976 10:00 A M. Presidi g Officer: 1. ROU CALL SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President 1200 County -City Building 217 West Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, Indiana 46601 issioners Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President ent: Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, Vice President Mr. A. Peter Donaldson, Secretary Mr. Robert J. Cira, Assistant Secretary Mr. Lloyd E. Robinson, Sr., Member Leg4l Counsel: Mr. George T. Patton N 0th Co uni Dev to Sta f: ia: Ms. Jeanne Derbeck, South Bend Tribune Reporter Mr. Dave Anderson, WNDU -TV Reporter Mr. Jim Holloway, WNDU -TV Photographer Mr. Dan Caesar, WSBT -TV Reporter Mr. Dale Lamb, WSBT -TV Photographer Mr. Larry Ford, WSJV -TV Reporter Present: Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Interested Citizen Mr. Gene Evans, Executive Secretary, Civic Planning Assn. Mr. John Fisher, Lawson - Fisher Associates Mr. Gerald C. Kinyon, Lawson - Fisher Associates Mr. Rozell Newbill, Jr., Newbill Construction Co. Mr. Bill E. Slabaugh, Dept. of Public Works LPAIStaff: Mr. John E. Davis Mr. James L. Johnson, Jr. Mr. C. Wayne Brownell Ms. Helen S. King Mr. Edwin R. Bauer 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES T Mr. Richard E. Pfeifer Mr. Kenneth J. Schaller Miss Pat Joers Mr. James J. Rowan On otion by Mr. Robinson, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and carried, MINUTES the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 6, 1976, were approved APPROVED as ailed. -1- 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, CLAIMS that the claims be approved, as submitted, and be allowed and APPROVED ordered to be paid -- totalling $11,282.53. The authorized claims are PRO ECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT, INDIANA R -57 Abstract & Title Corporation $ 50.00 Cole Associates, Inc. 1,465.25 Cur ey's Mower Service 21.50 Mrs George Pope 435.00 Total $ 1,971.75 PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT, INDIANA R -66 S. M. Dix & Associates, Inc. $ 2,498.20 S. M. Dix & Associates, Inc. 619.50 South Bend Supply Co. 4.54 Total 3,122.24 PROJECT TEMPORARY LOAN R -57 Arthur Dye $ 15.00 Total 2 15.00 URBA14 REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL FUND Herrman & Goetz, Inc. 24.20 Total 24.20 REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND Payroll: July 10 to July 23, 1976 $ 5,603.37 Amocc Oil Company The Bond Buyer 74.07 Community Development Program (Telephone Costs) 26.37 140.77 Downtown Idea Exchange James R. Meehan & Associates 14.60 Musz nski Insurance Agency 40.89 South Bend Tribune (Advertisement) 189.00 South Bend Tribune (Subscription) 28.47 46.80 Total $+6,164.34 GRAND TOTAL $ 11,282.53 REIMBURSEMENT TO REVOLVING FUND Indiana Indiana R -57 - Month of July, 1976 R -66 - Month of July, 1976 $ 2,258.41 8,364.71 Total $- 10,623.12 -2- 4. CORRESPONDENCE a. HUD Regional Office letter dated August 2, 1976: This letter is REQUISITION from Mr. Richard A. Kaiser, Assistant Regional Administrator for NO. 10 Community Development, advising Requisition No. 10 for Project APPROVED, Capital Grant Progress Payment, Contract No. Indiana R- 66(LG), PROJECT has been approved in the amount of $2,500,000. The approved CAPITAL amount represents payment of Urgent Needs Funds as approved in GRANT our Loan and Grant Contract. PROGRESS PAYMENT, The check, drawn on the Treasurer of the United States, will be R -66 mailed directly to the depository designated and authorized by our Agency, and is to be recorded as a receipt in the Project Temporary Loan Repayment Fund. Mr. C. Wayne Brownell, Executive Director, Department of Re- development, advised this check has been received and we have purchased Treasury Bills with it. President Nimtz added, "The Chair might say, as he has said be- fore, this was the combined effort of many, many people on this, including the former Mayor Jerry J. Miller and the present Mayor Peter J. Nemeth; the late Dr. Oliver C. Carmichael had a great deal to do with this; Don Newman, the Indiana Liaison Officer in Washington; Congressman Brademas; and many, many others. This is a combined effort and a successful one. We now have the money." b. HUD Area Office letter dated August 2, 1976: This letter is CLOSE -OUT from Mr. Stephen J. Havens, Director, Community Planning and DATE OF Development Division, advising in accordance with our telephone R -66 EX- conversation with Jeanne Meggs of his staff concerning the re TENDED TO financing of Project Indiana R -66, the close -out date has been 3 -25 -77 extended to March 25, 1977. C. HUD Area Office letter dated August 11, 1976:- This letter is PROJECT from Mr. Stephen J. Havens, Director, Community Planning and CLOSE -OUT Development Division, confirming agreements reached during our R -57 recent discussion of close -out of the LaSalle Urban Renewal Project, Indiana R -57, on or before December 31, 1976. The activities that remain to be completed and the indicated actions were listed for acquisition parcels, condemnation actions, disposition, final audit to be scheduled for the Project, and the estimated costs to project completion were requested. Prompt close -out of this project is critical to continued favor- able consideration of proposed expansion of Project Indiana R -66. Mr. Brownell advised that we are currently negotiating to acquire the parcels remaining on the acquisition list. The letters have been mailed, via certified mail with return receipt requested, to the people on the disposition parcels giving them 15 days to get in touch with us. We have sent requests to three (3) national audit firms for a quotation on a final audit. On the financial status of the Project, the form is currently being filled out. - 3 - 4. CORREISPONDENCE (Cont'd d. HUD Area Office'letter'dated August 19; 1976: This letter is FINAL from Mr. Stephen J. Havens, Director, Community Planning and INSPECTION Development Division, acknowledging receipt of the Contractor's SCHEDULED, Certificate and Completion Affidavit for Contract 2, Phase III, 9 -1 -76, Pedestrian Way, that we submitted with our letter dated August CONTRACT 2, , 1976. PHASE III, & DREDGING Final inspection of this Contract and the Colfax Pier /Park CONTRACT, Dredging Contract is tentatively scheduled for September 1, R -66 1976. Motio was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, that he above communications be received and placed on file. 5. OLD BUSINESS a. Change Order No. 6 to Rehabilitation Contract No. SECD /HR /CS- CHANGE ORDER 1/07: This item was tabled from the last Commission meeting NO. 6 TO in which the change order request was for an increase in CONTRACT ontract amount of $1,796.00, with the Slatile Roofing & SECD /HR /CS- heet Metal Company, at 502 Sherman Avenue, for an amended 1/07 APPROVED, ontract total of $5,812.00 for Contract No. 7, and original SECD HOUSING ontract set total of $40,246.00 to be amended to: $42,042.00, PROGRAM in the Southeast Community Development Housing Program. he new Change Order No. 6, submitted for this Commission meet - ng along with the memorandum from Mr. Ken Schaller, Project irector, is for an increase in contract amount of $1,066.00, Contract $4,016.00 to amended amount of: $5,082.0.0, for Con - ract No. 7), with original contract set total of $40,246.00 o be amended to: $41,312.00, with an extension of contract ime for this portion of the work. r. Schaller was requested to explain the reduction, and he tated that, basically, the difference in price was the result f a different type of roofing to be installed on the rear of he structure. The contract had originally called for a 4 -ply tandard built -up roof. However, after re- visiting the struc- ure and discussing the situation with the contractor, we ound that we can have a 90# rolled roofing installed at a avings of $730.00 and not sacrifice a quality roof installa- ion. Mr. Schaller had photographs of the structure which he istributed to the Commissioners. n reference to the questions asked by Commissioner Wiggins n the roof, Mr. Schaller advised the rear portion of the tructure would be reroofed with the 90# rolled roofing, and hat the main roof would be 3 -in -1 asphalt shingles. They pre - ently have T -lock shingles and they are starting to deteriorate n the house. r. Wiggins moved for the approval of Change Order No. 6, for n increase in contract amount of $1,066.00, with Slatile Roofing 5. OLD BUSINESS (Cont'd b. & Sheet Metal Company, for an amended contract total of $5,082.00 and amended contract set total of $41,312.00, with an extension of contract time for the reroofing work. Motion was seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried. Change Order'No. 7 to Rehabilitation Contract No: SECD /HR /CS- 1/14: This item was also tabled from the last Commission meet- ing in which the change order request was for an increase in contract amount of $675.00, with Slatile Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, for rehabilitation work at 1525 Swygart Avenue, for Contract No. 14, (Contract: $4,316.00 to amended amount of $4,991.00). Extension in contract time was also requested. With the $730.00 total savings, on Item 5a above, the original contract set amount is changed from $41;312.00 to amended total of $41,987.00, in the Southeast Community Development Housing Program. Mr. Brownell said this again was on the matter of the reroof- ing that was discussed in the last meeting. Mr. Schaller ad- vised the request for the extension in time by the contractor is only for the roof completion in above Item 5a, and 5b; all the other work has been completed on these two jobs. Mr. Wiggins moved for the approval of Change Order No. 7 to Rehabilitation Contract No. SECD /HR /CS- 1/14, 'for an increase in contract amount of $675.00, with Slatile Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, for an amended contract total of $4,991.00 and amended contract set total of $41,987.00, with an exten- sion of contract time. Motion was seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried. 6. NEW NUSINESS a. Report on recommended guard rails at the Pedestrian Bridge Site, P1a2a Park, Project Indiana R-66: Mr. Brownell displayed blueprint drawings on the proposed guard rails that were sub- mitted by Mr. Edwin. R. Bauer, Assistant Director, Department.of Redevelopment. The design is a continuation of the design.on he bridge, and is recommended by Lawson- Fisher Associates, our ngineering consultants on the project. Mr. John Fisher and r. Gerald C. Kinyon of the firm were present for the meeting. he apparent need for additional guard rail protection at the est end of the pedestrian bridge has been discussed in length. he concrete abutment at the west end has been fitted with seat alls without backs and could be considered of some danger for hildren use. Approximately 45 lineal feet of railing would be equired for this extra work. r. Brownell explained that, on the areas adjacent to the ridge, there is a wooden bench along the edge of the river nd the drop -off is straight down 22 feet onto concrete abut - ent. We recommend a railing along there, with a design similar - 5 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 TO CONTRACT SECD /HR /CS- 1/14 APPROVED, SECD HOUSING PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSED GUARD RAILS APPROVED, R -66 6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd a to the sides of the bridge, with square openings one foot square, and then run it across the concrete abutment on the north side of this seating area and one section on the west side to frame the corner. The real concern on the part of the Commissioners is that somebody -- possibly a child- -may fall off and get in- jured. Mr. Dan Caesar, WSBT -TV reporter, raised questions for the con- cern of the other side that we do not own, and Commissioner Wiggins advised the other side is down hill from the end of the bridge, whereas our area being discussed has the depressed area. He also stated the continuation of the same design as the sides of the bridge will tie right in, look good, and it will serve our purpose. As the railing is necessary and the cost factor worthwhile, Mr. Brownell requested Commission permission to invite quotations and bids to get this work done. Motion for the approval was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, and the staff was authorized to request bids for the proposed guard rails. John G. Pence Associates, Inc.: Commissioner authorization was requested to enter into a contract with John G. Pence Associates, Inc., for the preparation of a Letter of Opinion as to the value of land in Block 6 for certain specific uses, in fee amount of $200.00, Project Indiana R -66. Mr. Brownell explained there were two appraisers who did the reuse appraisals on what we call Block 6, or Disposition Parcels 6 -1 and 6 -2. The one appraiser is now deceased, and Mr. John G. Pence was the other appraiser. We have now changed the land uses Dn this particular Disposition Parcel 6 -1 by permitting additional residential units up to 350, which permits the elderly housing to go from 192 to 211 units, and we have also taken away the prohibi- tion against the hotel or motel. The question then presents itself if this has made a significant change in the value or price of the ) roperty, so we are going back to the appraisers who recently ap- )raised the land for reuse purposes and are asking them to give us i letter on the value. Since the other appraiser is deceased, we lave to go to John G. Pence Associates, Inc. JOHN G. PENCE ASSOCIATES, INC. AUTHOR- IZED FOR LAND VALUE APPRAISAL, BLOCK 6, R -66 Ir. Dan Caesar raised questions if it would be possible the appraisal light be higher since it is commercial land; not lower but higher? Ir. Brownell advised it could be higher, or it could be lower. If t would be lower, it wouldn't make any difference; if it is higher, hen it would make a difference. Personally, he felt that the and use changes we made would tend to decrease the value of the roperty rather than increase it. Ir. Dave Anderson, WNDU -TV reporter, asked, "Exactly what is this roposal for ?" when he received a negative answer to his question hether this appraisal is for the preparation of the possibility f a motel in the development of Block 6. Mr. Brownell advised it Q c. BUSINESS (Cont'd is simply to determine whether under the land uses we made- - permissive land uses -- whether the value of the land would have to be increased, the minimum bid price. Mrs. Janet S. Allen, interested citizen, asked various questions on the parcel, "Wasn't the land already bid on and purchased? How can you change the price of that land after they have already bought it? You could negotiate the price they offered you for that land lower than that which they offered, as you said it might come down? Mr. Brownell answered the questions individually as asked, and advised that the land has been purchased; however, they have asked for the changes in land use, so that when one part of the contract is changed, the other part is subject to revision. The price that was bid could not be made lower as they bid that, but if the value was higher it might have to be raised. Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried, for the authorization to enter into a contract with John G. Pence Associates, Inc., for the preparation of a Letter of Opinion as to the value of land in Block 6, in fee amount of $200.00, in Project Indiana R -66. Second Series 1976 Project Notes: Bids were received for these SECOND Project Notes, in amount of 4,221,000, in the office of the De- SERIES 1976 partment of Redevelopment. Bid opening was on August 17, 1976, PROJECT at 1:00 o'clock, Eastern Daylight Savings Time. The low and NOTES, R -66 successful bidder was: Bankers Trust Company Bank of America N.T. & S.A. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith By: Bankers Trust Company 16 Wall Street New York, N.Y. 10015 t an interest rate of 2.94 %, with a premium of $143.00, and iaturity date of"March 25, 1977. ur Resolution No. 281 authorizes the sale, issuance and delivery f Project Notes, and the execution of requisition agreements, in roject Indiana R -66. T e Notice of Sale of the Project Notes appeared in The Daily Bond B yer on August 3, 1976; and also in The South Bend Tribune on A gust 3. other bids received in bid amount of $4,221,000 were as follows: Bidder's Name and Address Morgan Guaranty Trust SE lomon Brothers 213 Wall Street NEW York, N.Y. 10015 Interest Rate Premium Company of New York 2.95% $202.00 - 7 - 6. NEW $USINESS (Cont'd Bidder's Name and Address Interest Rate Premium Erlich -Bober & Company, Inc. 2.96% $143.00 New York, N.Y. By: American Fletcher National Bank, Agent Chemical Bank 2.97% 84.00 In Association with: A. G. Becker & Co. Municipal Securities, Inc. By: Chemical Bank, Municipal Bond Dept. 20 Pine St., N.Y., N.Y. The Indiana National Bank 2.97% * 5.00 One Indiana Square 3.01% ** 9.00 Indianapolis, IN 46266 Citibank, N.A. & Associates 2.98% 195.00 95 Wall Street New York, N.Y. 10015 Pittsburgh National Bank 3.0% 193.00 Pittsburgh, PA. 15230 Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. 3.0% * ** -0- In Association with: 3.03% * ** -0- Lehman Commercial Paper 3.05% * * ** -0- National Bank of North America Denominations bid: * $ 500,000 ** 3,721,000 * ** 1,500,000 * * ** 1,221,000 4r. Brownell advised there will be 123 Project Notes in varying denomi- iations making up the total of $4,221,000 for the successful bidder. Ir. Brownell explained the effect of the Notes and advised the First eries 1976 Project Notes are due on September 14, 1976, in the amount f $6,951,000. The interest on those is $54,287.13 for a total of 7,005,287.31. The new Notes, in the amount of $4,221,000.00, leaves total due from the Local Public Agency of $2,784,287.31. The cash or this purpose is the Capital Grant received of $2 -112 Million, read arlier under Communications, 4a. The following funds received, rom Community Development $240,763.00, from land sales $44,427.00, r a total of $2,785,190.00 with the grant. This amount will have to e paid to the paying agent of the Bankers Trust Company on September 4, 1976. They will then subtract this amount, with a difference of 902.69, plus the premium of $143.00 from the bid will total $1,045.69 hich they will send to us. HUD dictates this procedure. he Chair added, the point is that if we hadn't received the $2,500,000 rant, we would have been issuing Notes for that amount also, and it ould still be up in the $7 Million amount. Instead of that, we are 6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd 0 e. in the $4 -1/2 Million and this saves considerable interest on daily, weekly and monthly basis. Mr. Brownell stated that in the last two years, we have reduced these Notes approximately $6 Million; they were $10,381,000 last year. The Chair asked the Commissioners if they had any questions on the Notes; then asked the public if they had any questions they may want to ask on this financing; there being none, he requested a motion to confirm the bid award to the low bidder as tabulated above. Mr. Wiggins made the motion the bid award is accepted and confirmed to the low bidder, Bankers Trust Company, in bid amount of $4,221,000 with interest rate of 2.94% and premium of $143.00. Addendum No. 6 to the A reement for Engineering Services with Cole ADDENDUM Associates, R -57: Mr. Brownell explained that under Addendum No. 5 6 TO to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Cole Associates, AGREEMENT the Addendum provided for the payment to the engineer for the pro- WITH COLE perty surveys to be increased from $35.00 to $50.00 per plotted lot. ASSOCIATES Last May, Mr. William J. Parrish requested 124 legal descriptions APPROVED, be forwarded to our office. Since Addendum No. 5 does not cover a R -57 price for the preparation of descriptions only, the cost of $50.00 per parcel is too high for this service. Therefore, the request is made that the Agreement be amended once again to provide for payment to the Engineer for property surveys on the basis of the actual hours required to make the survey and prepare the plat of survey. Mr. Brownell explained that under the $50.00 price, it would cost $6,200 for these, and under this proposed Addendum No. 6, it will :ost around $1,600 which is their actual time - -their time being 2-1/2 multiplier that is used. So we thoroughly recommend the iddendum for Commission consideration. . Wiggins made the motion for the approval of Addendum No. 6, conded by Mr. Cira. he Chair asked if there were any further questions or further iscussions on this item, and Commissioner Wiggins asked Mr. rownell if this will wind it up in the LaSalle Park Project? r. Brownell said that it will pretty much; of course, we have o have these on all the parcels that we have acquired and have of sold, but if we acquire some more, we would have to have a ew more but not very many. he question on the adoption of the motion was unanimous in avor of the adoption and the motion was carried. tesolution No. 529: This Resolution authorizes the execution RESOLUTION )f the Redevelopment Agreement for the disposition of land and NO. 529 ;he execution of Quit -Claim Deed for the transfer of title thereto ADOPTED, n connection with land to be disposed of in the LaSalle Park R -57 6. NEW 3USINESS (Cont'd f. am Urban Renewal Project, Indiana R -57, for Parcel No. 34 -9B, to Will Roy James, in amount of $200.00. Mr. Wiggins moved for the adoption of Resolution No. 529, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and carried. Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation Contract No. 53, in Southeast Code Enforcement Project E -7: Approval was requested for this Change Order with Barany Sheet Metal & Heating Company, for an increase in contract amount of $55.00, (Contract: $4,721.00), to amended contract amount of: $4,776.00, with no change in contract time,.for rehabilitation work at: 622 East Broadway Street. The change order is to replace the lavatory faucets and to repair the bathtub drain. The lavatory faucets are not repairable and if the tub drain were allowed to continue to leak, it would ruin the ceiling below. This work is at a cost of $85.00, and the $30.00 cost for reseating the fixtures is deleted, leaving a cost of $55.00 additional to the contract. The Chair asked Mr. Schaller if he had any further comment to make on this item, and Mr. Schaller advised this is one of the three contracts left to be completed in the E -7 Program. Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried, for the approval of Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation Contract No. 53, for an increase in contract amount of $55.00, with Barany Sheet Metal & Heating Company, and amended contract total of $4,776.001, with no change in contract time. ram: Approval was requested ders, Inc., for an increase in contract amount of $619.00, (Contract: $2,156.00), to amended contract amount of: $2,775.00, with no change in contract time, for rehabilitation work at: 537 North Euclid Avenue. The Chair asked Mr. Richard E. Pfeifer, Chief Inspector, on this Project, to comment. Mr. Pfeifer advised that the homeowner had a plumbing problem, and everytime the bathtub was used, water was leaking and running to the downstairs bedroom around the light . fixtures and the ceiling was about to collapse. A proceed order was issued immediately as the problem was creating a health and safety hazard for the occupants of the structure. The problem consisted of leaks from the bathtub drain line to the soil stack, leak from the water closet that is cracked at the base, leaks from the waste pipe that connects to the soil stack, and a leaking P -trap and drain line on the lavatory. A major portion of these pipes are concealed either in the floor or wall. The water closet, lavatory, lead waste and drain lines, sub floor were replaced, vinyl tile with waterproof adhesive installed, and eight square feet of drywall replaced under lavatory, and painting, were done in amount of $619.00. mm CHANGE ORDER 2 TO REHAB. CONTRACT 53 AP- PROVED, SE CODE ENFORCE- MENT PRO- JECT E -7 CHANGE ORDER 1 TO REHAB. CONTRACT NWCD /PR/ CS -1/05 APPROVED, NWCD PROGRAM 6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried, for the approval of Change Order No. 1 to Rehabilita- tion Contract No. NWCD /PR /CS -1/05, for an increase in contract amount of $619.00, with Madison Builders, Inc., and amended contract total of $2,775.00, with no change in contract time. 7. TRIB�TE TO THE LATE DR. OLIVER C.- CARMICHAEL - RESOLUTION 'NO . 530 The hair called cern ng the late the esolution in W H W W H T H on Commissioner Wiggins to read the Resolution con- TRIBUTE TO Dr. Oliver C. Carmichael. Commissioner Wiggins read LATE OLIVER C. its entirety: CARMICHAEL, JR R E S O L U T I O N N O. 5 3 — 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — E R E A S; One o6 the guiding pt.ine.i.p.2ez o6 this nation 6&om its bounding has been that a2.2 men 'a/Le eteated equal, yet there has aZways coexisted the paradox that the imptementation of .indiv.idua2 oppottunitieA and tatents has demonst&ated such wide vat.iance as to occazionatty ptoduee giants among men, and E R E A S; The Redevetopment Commission o4 the City o4 South Bend has had the &ate good 4ottune to have had the 4tiendsh.ip and whoteheaAted cooperation o4 such a man in the pe&zon of the .late O. C. Catm.iehaet.. Jt., whose genetouz eont&ibutionts o6 time, talent and coneetn de- voted to zotv.ing the ptob.lem of uAban change have made out present estate o6 ptogtess pozz ibte and out 6utute pto,s pectz bA,ig ht, and E R E A S; Being m.indjut that a meazute o4 Mike',6 gteatnezz was his devotion to his wi4e and 4am,ity who ptov.ided his .inzp.itation and zuppoAt in 4u.12 measute. E R E F O R E, B E I T R E S O L V E D: That the South Bend Redevelopment Commission, in meeting azz embled, publicly exptezz ens to the community at latcge, and to the Catm.ichael 4am.ily in pa&tieulaA, its pto found sense o 4 loss at the untimely death o f OtiveA C. CaAmichae.2, Jt., and at the same time acknow- ledge its thanks 4ot the unique and warm zuppott Mike always gave and in token pledges to catty on and keep his zp.itit alive in the zuccersjul completion o4 out mutual goal. CITY OF SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERS /z/ E. Jay N,imtz /z/ A. PeteA Donaldson /z/ Donald A. Wiggins /z/ Robett J. Cita 11 - /z/ Lloyd E. Robinson, St. 7. TR TO THE LATE DR. OLIVER C. CARMICHAEL - RESOLUTION NO. 530 Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and unani- mously carried, for the adoption of Resolution No. 530. President Nimtz thanked Commissioner Wiggins for the above Resolution that he drafted, and for an excellent job. 8. NEX COMMISSION MEETING The next regularly - scheduled meeting of the Redevelopment Commission wil be Friday, September 3, 1976, at 10:00 a.m., E.S.T., in the Off ces of the Department of Redevelopment 9. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Commission, motion was duly made for adjournment, at 10:35 a.m., by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Robinson and carried. (SEAM) , txecutive Direc - 12 - ident A NEXT COMMISSION MEETING, 9 -3 -76 ADJOURNMENT