Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSM 06-27-75 (2)June 2 10:00 Presid SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING 7, 1975 �. M. ing Officer: Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President. 1200 County -City Building 217 West Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, Indiana 46601 1. The South Bend Redevelopment Commission, Governing Body of the City of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment, met in a Special Meeting, in Room 1200, County -City Building, 227 West Jefferson Boulevard, in the City of South Bend,,at 10:OC, a.m., E.S.T., on the 27th day of J ne, 1975 - -the place, hour, and date, duly established for the hold - i q of such meeting. e President called thE: meeting to order and the Commissioners were esent for the roll call: Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President Mr. John E. Chenney, Vice President Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, Secretary Mr. A. Peter Donaldson, Member Ole vacancy exists on the Board of Commissioners with the resignation o Mr. B. L. Wade. Ldaal Counsel: Ndws Media: Oj�hers Present: Mr. Kevin J. Butler Ms. Nancy Sulok, South Bend Tribune Reporter Mr. Dave Anderson, WNDU -TV Reporter Mr. James L. Marchelewicz, WNDU -TV Photographer Mr. Dan Caesar, WSBT -TV Reporter Mr. C. R. Wallace, WSBT -TV Photographer Mr. Larry Ford, WSJV -TV Reporter Mr. Les Howard, WSJV -TV Photographer Mr. Roland A. Kelly, Secretary, Board of Trustees Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Interested Citizen Mr. Allan C. Bloomquist, First Bank & Trust Co. Mr. D. Joe Dickman, Interested Citizen Mr. Joseph G. Donlon, Architect Mr. Gene Evans, South Bend Civic Planning Assn. Mr. Hubert Getzinger, Chairman, Downtown South Bend Council Mr. Thomas Gibson, St. Joseph River Bend Develop- ment Corporation Mr. John R. Kagel, Executive Director, Downtown South Bend Council Mr. Leon C. Maenhout, Architect Mr. Gordon E. Medlock, International Constructors Co. 1. Others Present ( (ont'd) Mr. Eli D. Miller, Governmental Affairs, South Bend- Mishawaka Area Chamber of Commerce Mr. Harrison Miller, Interested Citizen Mr. Allen E. Schrager, Interested Citizen Mr. Douglas Simpson, River Bend Plaza Office Miss "Ralph" Carol Snyder, American Freedom Train, Washington, D. C. Mr. Edward F. Soltesz, Chairman, Governmental Coordina- tion Committee of River Bend Plaza Advisory Committee Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor, St. Joseph River Bend Development Corporation L A Staff: Mr. C. Wayne Brownell Mr. Keith P. Crighton Ms. Helen S. King Mr. William J. Parrish 2. AHPROVAL OF MINUTES M tion was made by Mr. Wiggins to approve the Minutes of the Regular MINUTES M eting of June 20, 1975, as distributed, seconded by Mr. Donaldson APPROVED a d carried. 3. EASEMENTS RELATIVE TO BLOCK 6 AREA, CENTRAL DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT, INDIANA R -66: Mr. C. Wayne Brownell, Executive Director, Department of RE.,develop- m nt, read the letter from Indiana & Michigan Electric Company, in its entirety, which is dated June 25, 1975, to Mr. Thomas A. 0 sterling, Clyde E. Williams & Associates, Inc., engineering con- sultant, regarding thE. above subject. He showed the designated areas on the map. The followinc easements located within the area known as Block 6 are not being used by Indiana & Michigan Electric Company and will be released of record upon the written request from the South Bend Department of Redevelopment or its assigns: 1) Easement granted by Bertha Irvin Sellers, December 9, 1937, and recorded in Book 301, page 87, St. Joseph County Recorder's office. 2) Easement granted by Herbert A. Goltz, et al., April 9, 1964, and recorded in Book 651, page 145. 3) Vacation Resolution 2696, dated December 31, 1951, for a portion of Columbia Street and granted subject to public utilities. 4) Easements granted to I &M Electric Company by George and Anna C. Whiteman on February 18, 1905, recorded in Misc. Record "K ", page 184, and September 27, 1905, recorded in Misc. Record "K ", page 331, and an easement granted by David Bentz and Lawrence E. Daly, December 30, 1954, recorded in Book 544, page 107, were granted to accommo- date facilities being used for thE! St. Joseph River cress- ing to the area. -2- EASEMENTS, BLOCK 6 AREA, R -66 3. aSEMENTS RELATIVE TO BLOCK 6 AREA (Cont'd Mr. Brownell advised the above easements, noted as 1), 2), and 3), are not.in use and I &M has agreed to release them of record upon r quest from us. On easement, noted as 4), the facilities cculd b relocated to Monroe Street and Edgewater Drive in the public road right -of -way if agreeable with governmental agencies. Relo- c tion could be completed by June, 1976, at the latest. If timE! i of importance, relocation could be completed six months from t is date and the easements released of record. Ir letter to the Indiana & Michigan Electric Company, dated June 2f, 1975, Mr. Brownell requested the release of record the ease - m nts noted as 1), 2), and 3); and the easement noted as 4), which I M is usinc, for the St. Joseph River crossing, we will investi- gate and advise. The 4th easement has been discussed with Mr. Jim Seitz, Superintendent of the Park Department, as to whether t is will create any difficulty for the Park Department in operating the Plaza Park if left there, or desire to have them relocated if it will cause any difficulty. Mr. Seitz didn't think it will cause any difficulty. Mr. Brownell advised after he receives this inforrra- tion from Mr. Seitz he will relay it to the Commission. The 4th is an overhead tower with lines goinc across the river that is in the c rner of the Plaza Park plan with a small fence around it. Commissioner Wiggins asked if there are any other utilities in the area, and Mr. Brownell advised therE is none that he knew of; the o ly one that was in the area was relocated onto Jefferson Street. Indiana Bell and American Telephone & Telegraph have given up any easements they had. P esident Nimtz felt it would be apprcpriate that we dirEct a letter to the Indiana & Michigan Electric Company thanking them for their cooperation in this matter with the Commission. Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Donaldson and carried, that the Executive Director write the letter to Indiana & Michigan Electric Company thanking them for their continuE -d cooperation in re- leasing these easements. th to 6- as ea he di to th we co no Brownell had said that this information on the easements being ?re and are being vacated was brought: out this morning to explain the bidders, if any. We do not have any bids, as yet, on Block I. The bid opening is in this meeting, and set for 10:30 a.m., advertised. Mr. Dan Caesar, reporter for WSBT -TV, asked if the ;ements will in any way invalide the bids as they are received ,e this morning, as apparently the bidders, if there are bidders, i not know about them, and the question was referred by the Chair Commission Legal Counsel to answer. Mr. Butler said he didn't 'nk it would automatically invalidate the bids. If the bidders •en't aware of it and feel it is adverse to their bid, they could 1ceivably ask that their bid be withdrawn. The easements, as :ed, are a matter of public record. - 3 - 4. AhERICAN FREEDOM TRAIN: Mr. John R. Kagel, Executive Director, Downtown South Bend Council, s id at one of the previous meetings, this Commission had placed ar action on the table in reference to the American Freedom Train, as it relates to the City's Bicentennial Commission and provided o fice space for their use. Miss "Ralph" Carol Snyder is here from t E: American Freedom Train, Washington, D.C., and was introduced- - p eferring "Ralph ", as part of the Women's Lib. Miss Snyder said, "Actually, I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone for the office space, and the town has been just absolutely fantastic working with me the whole way. ThE: unbelievable cooperation of the River Bend Plaza area is something I have not seer: before in any other City I have been in, and I think that you are d ing a fantastic job here in South Bend and I would just like to thank you now." Mr. Kagel advised the Freedom Train is going to be parked at its nearest point to the downtown South Bend's River Bend Plaza, at thE! corner of Angela and Michigan Street. There are some 24 cars. It is quite a historic occasion for oar community. Miss Snyder said the tickets are being sold at the Montgomery Ward Stores in South Bend, Niles, Elkhart, Plymouth and LaPorte; all the Burger Dairy Stores; all branches of the American National Bank & Trust Company; and our River Bend Plaza office. The tickets are $2.00 for adults; $1.00 for persons 18 and under, and all adults 65 and over; and children under three will be admitted free. The tickets must be purchased for a particular day. If there is a weather problem or anything like that, the tickets will be accepted for another day. They have 52,620 tickets for three days. The Freedom Train will be open from 8: 0 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., July 14 through 16, on the tracks behind St. Jo eph's High School. Mr. Kagel added the citizens of OUr community of South Bend and Misha- waka that are served by the South Bend Public Transporation Corporation are going to be urged, if at all possible, to ride buses to the Freedom Train. They will be providing bLiS service, as the parking: situation there will be critical to a point. The public will be able to ride the South Bend Public Transporation Corporation's buses right to the site with very little walking and there will be frequent service back anJ forth. The buses can be boarded on the main arteries and transfer on regular express buses. The details are being worked out and are al ;o trying to get an overflow parking facility at Notre Dame -- hoping to have shuttle buses. NE M BUSINESS Receipt of sealed offers for purchase of parcel designated as Disposition Parcel No. 6 -1, situated in the Central Downtown Project, R -66: The hour of 10:30 a.m. arrived- -the time set for the receipt of sealed offers for the purchase of said parcel of land, and legally advertised in The South Bend Tribune and Tri- County News, on May 30 and June 6, 1975. The advertisements and certifications were duly noted. - 4 - 5. N.W BUSINESS (Cont'd) President Nimtz asked if anyone else had any bids to turn in. There were no further bids and the Chair asked Mr. Brownell to check at the Receptionist's desk to see whether any sealed offers may have been left there. There being none, President Nimtz requested Mr. Brownell to open the sealed envelopes he has received. Those being: 1) The bid is from the St. Joseph River Bend Development. Corpo- ration, in the amount of $651,111.00. Attached to the bid is an Irrevocable Letter of Credit from the St. Joseph Bank & Trust Company, in the amount of $65,111.00. The proposal is enclosed and signed; the narrative description is enclosed; the Affidavit of Non - Collusion by the Developer is signed and notarized; Part I of the Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure is filled out and signed, attached to that is the Statement of Public Disclosure; background informztion is at- tached; and Part II is filled out which is not for public dis- closure; and attached to the bid are two aerial photographs of the Block 6 area. The principal's signature is Donald S. Esmont, Secretary. 2) This bid is in response to our public offering of Disposition Parcel 6 -1, by International Constructors Company, signed by Mr. Gordon E. Medlock, Sr. Mr. Medlock requested Mr. Brownell to read the letter for the public to understand its contents. Mr. Brownell read the three -page letter, in its entirety. The letter stated they are publicly reconfirming their inter- est in submitting a fully responsive bid when their proposed development: can be approved. They have prepared additionE.l details in their prcposed development, plans for financing, ownership and completion dates for our confidential review. Public disclosure at this time could jeopardize their com- petitive position if the3 were given the bidding opportunity they requested. The letter further states, "We again urge you to proceed with the requested change in land use immediately, rejecting any and all bids received at this time, for reasons most important to the future and economic welfare of downtown South Bend." No other bids were received. Motion was made by Mr. Wiggins that the bid from St. Joseph River Bend Development Corporation, in the amount of $651,111.00, and the communication with the accompanying documents from International Constructors Company, be received by the Commission and be submitted to the Commissioners' attorney and staff to review necessary process- ing and report back to the Commission. Mr. Donaldson seconded the motion and carried unanimously. A copy of said communication is at- tached to the official minutes. - 5 - 5. NSW BUSINESS (Cont'd Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor handed out a short Press Release and gave the following presentation outlining the development areas on the schematic. He identified 'himself as being v.;ith the St. Joseph Bank and Trust Company, but that he is here as a spokesman for the St. Joseph River Bend Development Corporation: This is a group of eleven (11) men from the business and industrial sectors of the community, who submitted this bid for Block 6 -1, the downtown redevelopment project. The plans of this Corporation call for the construction- - on the northern -most part of this site - -of a restaurant, [a first -class dining facility with adequate parking], with the possibility of having some rather small meeting rooms and banquet -type facilities. The dining facility would be constructed on 2.11 acres at the north end of the site. The restaurant would be designed to fit in architecturally with the Century Center and the proposed Plaza Park along the River. Immediately south of the restaurant site to the easement; where the pedestrians have access to the bridge, this group would propose to develop what we would term as an 'office park.' This would be relatively small office buildings- - one to two stories in heighth - -with prestigious -type offices of accountants, attorneys, mortgage banking firms - -that type of professional offices and they would have their own parking facilities, with the interior screened from the street. Some of the offices would face on the Plaza Park and some would face the street. These would be, in general, single- tenant occupancies, giving all of those ingredients of the downtown offices that are not presently available in the single office, which is the identity and also a very nice view of the river and have parking. This 'office park' would be built on 7.17 acres of the site. They propose the development of the drive -in banking facility at the northeast corner of Monroe and Columbia -- planned for one acre of land. The major office building would be constructed on 3.5 acres of land along Columbia Street and would be reserved for bringing into South Bend SOME- type of a major paper - processing operation. We are talking about a regional insurance process- ing center; something of this type. Their group would go out and actively recruit that type of businesses coming into South Bend. They are a major employer and a lot of these facilities are being moved out at the present time - -out of the major metropolitan areas; e.g., Prudential moving their paper processing out of downtown Chicago. They are thinking more in the neighborhood of 75,000 to 80,000 square feet for that facility. - 6 - 5. NW BUSINESS (Coni.'d) They would propose the development of Section 8 elderly housing .facility on two acres on the far southeast corner of the parcel. They have an option agreement with two firms -- Oxford Develop- ment Company being one of those -- whereby if the St. Joseph River Bend Development Corporation is the successful bidder on this site and they are the successful,bidder of the development of the 200 units of Section 8 housing, they then have an agreement whereby they would use that site. Mr. Taylor said this now puts them in a little "bit of a crunch," and "I know you, gentlemen, understand the reason for taking bids, I think, today is so that these bids could be taken prior to the taking of bids on the elderly Section 8 housing. So it is very essential that the Redevelopment Department give prompt attention to these bids and make some kind of a decision, at least the kind of a decision where we can notify our optionees that they can go ahead and submit a bid, possibly subject to HUD approval, since. I am fully aware that this - -any proposal we make - -has to be approved by HUD, but since HUD would be approving both proposals, I don't see that that 'subject to' would discredit their bid. We do suggest, and I say suggest here, because I am not fully certain it is in con- formance with the land use, and in our proposal we state that- - we suggest a little convenience center lying in between the major office facility and the housing facility. This would be primarily to service the offices and the apartments in this facility, although, of course, we would have some drive -in trade undoubtedly, and this would be just a small convenience -type center - -with a delicatessen, possibly a drug store, laundromat possibly, a dry cleaning shop- - those types of facilities to service this area. Now, if the Com- mission feels that is a violation of land use, we are perfectly willing to convert that to additional office space; although we think in the best interest for the whole development that is neces- sary." Among the principals of the St. Joseph River Bend Development Corpo- ration are South Bend businessman Jerry Hammes, contractor Eugene Muia, and Richard A. Rosenthal, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the St. Joseph Bank. and Trust Company. The St. Joseph Bank would manage and develop the property as Trustee for the Corporation. Mr. Taylor informed the Commission, "Our bid was made contingent on only one thing, and you have heard a lot about contingencies of bid. The only contengency that we state in our bid is that the Department of Redevelopment proceed with the development of Block 6 -2, and that it be turned over to some governmental agency for perpetual maintenance and care. The reason being rather natural that this is what you said you were going to do, but we certainly want to be sure that it is carried out. It will be a large con- tingency for the success of our project." Mr. Taylor said he would be happy to answer any questions anyone has. - 7 - 5. NSW BUSINESS (Cont'd Commissioner Wiggins asked, "What total amount of building footage are you talking about here ?" Mr. Taylor answered, "We are talking about total development, and stated in our bid, of about $14 Million. There would be 80,000 square feet of office space [designating the area on the schematic] basically limited by the availability of park- ing. There would be a restaurant: facility of somewhere probably about 10,000 to 12,000 square feet; the major office facility from 70,000 to 80,000 square feet; 200 units of housing - -about $14 Million total." e Chair opened the questions to the public: Mr. Schrager asked, "If you were awarded the bid, what would be the projected starting date? When you would be ready to build one of the buildings ?" Mr. Taylor advised, "Undoubtedly, that would be between six months to a year before a I.uilding can be started. The reason I state that is that plans first have to be developed -- detailed plans - -and be submitted to the Department of Redevelopment for approval, and then after approval is given, we bid on stage take -down. That is in conformance with the bid documents. We have our schedule all out- lined in those bid documents when we would start each project." In addition, Mr. Schrager asked, "When would you estimate the total project would be completed? How many years ?" Mr. Taylor answered, "Five (5) years." Mrs. Allen's question, "I an by the post office where the plan were reversed and have office and the housing nearE some life at night along the Taylor designated thE. area I edge equals a hundred feet, or 800 feet from the trucks. questioning why the housing would be down trucks are bound to be annoying. If the the office buildinc, down toward the post r the restaurant where it would bring riverbank, rather than tre office ?" Mr. or parking for the post office, and the so there would be at least two blocks, Mr. Bloomquist asked, "I was wondering, do you have reasonable, firm commitments from the restaurant or other potential office, small office type ?" Mr. Taylor responded their commitments are confidential, and as to the question Mr. Bloomquist raised if they are speculative, Mr. Taylor advised certainly with 16.3 acres, there is some speculation involved. T�e Chair called on Mr. Medlock if he had any remarks he may wish to make a this time - -in rebuttal: Mr. Medlock responded: "Thank you very much. The only thing I would say, in confidence, we hope we will be given an opportunity to bid as we have requested in our letter. We have provided you with the information now in great detail, as though we were submitting a bid that will enable you to evaluate - -our timetable, stage take -down, specific tenants - -in our projects, and we hope we will be given consideration for that." - 8 - 6. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING Tie next Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Commission will be at COMMISSION I :00 a.m., Thursday, July 3, 1975, in lieu of the Regular Meeting MEETING, s heduled for Friday, July 4th (holiday). [Motion for the change THUF.SDAY, ii date was made and duly passed in Commission Meeting of May 23, 7 -3 -75 1 75]. 7. ADJOURNMENT T ere being no further business to discuss, motion was duly made ADJOURNMENT f r adjournment by Mr. Donaldson, seconded by Mr. Chenney and c rried, at 10:55 a.m. . Wane B� ell, Executive (SEAL - 9 - mtz , Pres i'den Copies to: Redevelopment Commissioners Kevin J. Butler I ERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTORS COMPANY June 27, 1975 The Redevelopment Commission County - City Building South Bend, Indiana Gentlemen: This will confirm some of the comments made to Mr. Brownell and me bers of your commission after the bid opening this morning, and lo add some observations and information that may be helpful. We are most concerned to see Block 6 developed in the best interests of the South Bend business community as a whole and to see this ac- complished as quickly as possible with specific plans and a realistic time able that minimizes speculation on future developments. We lave advised Mr. Taylor that should you reject the bid of the St. Jose :)h River Bend Development Corporation, we would be happy to incl de their investors in the joint venture development of office buil ing requirements. We are, therefore, sending copies of this to Messrs. Rosenthal, Hammes, and Muia to advise them fully of this ffer. Since we already have potential joint venture partners with some specific interests, we will negotiate participating in good faith based on the firm space requirements and the amount of equity inve tment they plan. In any event, we feel a drive -up banking facility would easily be provided, as well as the previously discussed Chamber of Commerce space requirements. Since their announced development plan calls for approximately 12 1/4 acres of office development, we are disappointed that some of these requirements were not made known in response to our public announce- ments, indicating our interest in accommodating the South Bend business com unity's needs. If firm space needs are not currently known, it appe rs unwise to speculate with over 75% of Block 6 as to how much offic space may be needed and when. We 1002 26 East re not trying to say that only our plan or our group should develop (R(j (TD 0.3 F, a-flia l_! JU�J 4 q 1. .7 1g 75 )Inway, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 219/362 -4577 / P.O. Box 1957, South Bend, Indiana 46634, 219/289 -7192 Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202, 513/421 -3363 / P. 0. Box 1752, Parkersburg, W. Virginia 26101, 304/485 -6561 Th Redevelopment Commission Pao,e Two June 27, 1975 Block 6. We are, however, saying that South Bend should not be asked to invest their future in a program that will not be publically discussed and that depends on future events that may or may not occur. If the development does not occur, the bidder loses a $65, 000 deposit, while So th Bend loses more time and up to $18 million in construction. We recognize your tremendous responsibility. What is decided for Block 6 now - - South Bend will live with for a lifetime. We know you will consider the future use of Century Center, the immediate pros- perity of downtown South Bend, and the total investment in new business in Ihis area, fully weighing the viability of the two alternate plans. Ve i y truly yours, "1 2 Cyb n E. Medlock, Sr. GEM: nw cc: Mr. Lloyd Taylor Mr. Richard Rosenthal Mr. Jerry Hammes Mr. Eugene Muia Chamber of Commerce Century Center Convention Bureau r INTERNATIONAL ERNATIONAL CONSTRUCTORS COMPANY June 25, 1975 CitV of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment 1200 County - City Building 227 W. Jefferson. Blvd. South Bend, Indiana 46601 Ge tlemen: This will respond to your public offering of Parcel: 6 -1 advertised Ma 27, 1975. We were surprised and disappointed to see this offering without any cha ge in land use designation, particularly in view of: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Our letter of April 10, 1975 ( copy attached) to Mayor Miller with a copy to Mr. Brownell, offering to purchase the land immediately, subject to a later change in land use and re- questing this change. Our letter, of April 14, 1975 ( copy attached) soliciting your cooperation in redesigna'ting the land use. Your reply of April 16, 1975 ( copy attached) outlining the procedure necessary to change the land use. Our letter of May 8, 1975 ( copy attached) reiterating our previous requests and including a site plan. The absence of any request for you to ask for bids ( at least not publicly known) without land use change. In a meeting on June 4, 1975 we confirmed with your attorney that any bid from the designated land use would be "non- responsive" and �eviating ould not be accepted. In view of the above we are not submitting a bid. We are, however, publicly. reconfirming our interest in submitting a fully responsive bid when our proposed development can be approved. We have prepared additional details on our proposed development, plans for fina cing, ownership and completion dates for your confidential revi w.. We feel public disclosure at this time could jeopardize our com etitive position if we are given the bidding opportunity we have requested. 1002 UncoInway, LaPorte, Indiana 46350 219/362 -4577 / P.O. Box 1957, South Bend, Indiana 46634, 219/289 -7192 26 East 6th Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 4520?, 513/421 -3363 / P. 0 Box 1752, Parkersburg, W. Virginia 26101, 304/485 -6561 Citir of South Bend, Department of Redevelopment Page Two June 25, 1975 We again urge you to proceed with the requested change in land use immediately, rejecting any and all bids received at this time, for reasons most important to the future and economic welfare of downtown South Bend. These include: (1) ` (2) (3) Limiting the housing to 200 units may prevent our ob- taining all of the 225 HUD Elderly Housing Units now being advertised for South Bend. Certainly it restricts the development of this site for additional luxury apartments at some future time. Full utilization of the Century Center will require .added motel rooms and a prestigous restaurant and entertain- ment bar of the size and quality we propose. Information on the Midway Motor Lodge and Hoffman House Restaurant is attached. If this is in doubt, we urge a review of the future requirements with the Convention Bureau, the Chamber of Commerce, the directors of the Century Center , the motel tax board and interested business men in the downtown area. The added revenue and attraction of visitors provided by the Midway Motor Lodge and Hoffman House Restaurant will greatly stimulate the River Bend business area and will contribute to better business for existing motor inns and restaurants. In similar size communities they have demonstrated ability to attract several hundred patrons each night for cocktails , dinner and dancing. The restrictions prohibiting a motel and more than 200 residential units on Block 6 seem most inappropriate. Motels are permitted in the land use plans for Areas A, G, and Hand further motel development would be permitted in Area F. The 200 unit residential limitation seenis arbitrary and is in conflict with the recommendation contained in The Master Plan for The St. Joseph River Corridor prepared for The Redevelopment Commission by Lawson Associates. Specific references relating to this proposal are: (a) Policies and Objectives III, Paragraph 8, Page 46 "The one major objective is to attract people to the river's edge. , Recreation is one way of achieving his objective. Another consideration is to develop i • City of South, Bend, Department of Redevelopment Pag Three Jun 25, 1975 shops, offices hotels, restaurants and nightclubs along the river. Designed and constructed in harmony with the overall character of the riverscape, these types of uses can add another .dimension to the life and vitality of the riverscape. ( b) Master Plan IV, Paragraph 3, Page 47 "The ability to attract people to the river is based not only on the qualities of the river, but also, on. the variety of activities and uses that can occur.along the river. It is, desirable and, to a point, essential that a variety of uses and activities be developed along the river, including active and passive. recreational uses and facilities, cultural 'facilities and events, controlled commercial establishments and residential uses. The plan identifies a variety of uses long and near the river. These uses are arranged with consideration for achieving. a harmonious relationship between uses and between each use and the riverscape. " (c) Block 6 Development- Paragraph 6, Page 69 'Connect a path to the Civic Center area by way of an nderpass under Jefferson Bridge to minimize pedestrian- car conflicts. " We Lelieve the time required for the change in land use willnot delay the start or the completion of these or any comparable de- velopment project. We would be pleased to meet with the commission to answer any questions or to further discuss the development we propose.. Very truly yours, I Gor o J E. Medlock, Sr.. GE : nw Encl sures r r r The following narrative descriptions and enclosures are "Confidential" and are provided for your use in evaluating the potential of the development we propose for Block 6. We ask that this information and all of the enclosures, with the exception of enclosures ##7 and #8, be kept confiden- tial until such time as a fully conforming public bid can be made. CITY OF sou ,m BEND South Bend, Indiana 46601 Jerry J Miller Mayor Indiana & Michigan Electric Company 220 West olfax Avenue South Beni, Indiana 46634 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DEPT. OF REDEVELOPMENT 1200 County -City Bldg., Phone 284 -9371 Redevelopment Commission F. Jay Nimtz President John E. Chenney Vice President Donald A. Wiggins Secretary B. L. Wade Assistant Secretary A. Peter Donaldson Member C. Wayne Brownell Executive Director Sweeney, Butler & Simeri Legal Counsel June 26, 1975. Attention Mr, Thomas R. Manak Gentlemen With refe ence to your letter directed to Mr. Thomas A. Oesterling dated June 25, 975, please be advised we request your release of record the easements you are no longer using set forth as follows: Easement granted by Bertha Irvin Sellers, December 9, 1937 and recorded in Book,30.1, page 87, St. Joseph County Re- corder's office. Easement granted by Herbert A. Goltz, et al, April 9, 1964 and recorded in Book 651, page 145_. Also, Vacation Resolution 2696, dated December 31, 1951, for a portion of Columbia Street and granted subject to public utilities. As to the fourth easement which you are using for the St. Joseph River crossing we will investigate and advise you of our desires in the matter. Sincerely, C. E BROWNELL Executive Director CWB:dc fnnricnn �'� { li INDIANA & MICHIGAN ELECTRIC commr 220 West Colfax A%enue, P.O. Box 17:31, South Bend, Lndiana 46634 June 25-,-1975 Mr. Thom Clyde E. 18 �3 Con, South Be as A. Oes terli.ng Williams & Associates, Inc. nerce Drive ad, Indiana Re: Easements in Block 6 Area, Downtown Urban Renewal, Project R -66 Dear Mr.dOesterling: The following easements located within the area known as Block 6, Downtown Urban Renewal are not being used by Indiana & Michigan Electric Company and will be released of record upon the written request from the South Bend Department of Redevelopment or its assigns: Easement granted by Bertha Irvin Sellers, December 91 1937 and recorde in book 3011 page 87, St. Joseph County Recorder's office. Easenlen granted by Herbert A. Goltz, et all April 9, 1964, and; recorde in Book 6517 page 145. Also, Vacation Resolution 2696, dated Jecemher 31, 1951, for a portion of Columbia Street and granted subject to public utilities. Laseme n s granted to I&tvi Electric Coinpany by George and Anna C. Whiternaii on February 18, 1905, recorded in Hisc. Record "K", page 184, and Septetiiber 27, 1905, recorded in Misc. Record "K117 page 331, and an easement granted by David Bentz and L,.wrence E. Daly, December 30, 1954, recorded in book 544, page 107, were granted to accommodate facilit'es being used for the St. Joseph River crossing to the area. These f cilities could be relocated to Monroe Street and'Edgewater Drive i the public road right of way if agreeable with govern- mental gencies. Relocation could be completed by June, 1976 at June 2j, 1y75 Maseme is in Block 6 Area, Project R -66 the la est . If time is of importance, retsmrcleaseduof be recorTd�,leted six months from this date and the easen- n lease contact me at Shoul additional information be required, p your convenience- Sincerely yours, INDIANA & MICHIGAN L',LECTRIC COMPANY A Thomas R. 14anak Real ;state and Right of Way r Y