HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 12-15-72Dece ber 15, 1972
10:3 A.M.
Presiding Officer:
1. ROLL CALL
SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
Mr. Fred J. Helmen,
President
1200 County -City Bldg.
227 W. Jefferson Blvd.
South Bend, Indiana 46601
resent: Mr. Fred J. Helmen, President
Mr. John E. Chenney, Vice President
Rev. Willie V. Williams, Secretary
Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, Member
bsent: Mr. B. L. Wade, Asst. Secretary
thers Present: Mayor Jerry J. Miller, City of South Bend
Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President, Board of Trustees
Mr. Dan Caesar, WSBT -TV Reporter
Mr. Frank Vellner, WSBT -TV Photographer
Mr. James L. Marchelewicz, WNDU -TV Reporter & Photographer
Mr. Bill Stoner, The South Bend Tribune Reporter
Mr. Louis Chapleau, Attorney representing Office Engineers
Mr. Karl G. King, President, Office Engineers, Inc.,
& General Chairman, Downtown S.B. Council
Mr. H. Edward Glaser, A.G.A. Realty Co.
Mrs. Jane Hill, Roemer, Sweeney, Roemer, Butler & Siemeri
Mr. Edgar Seybold, South Bend Civic Planning Association
Legal Counsel: Mr. Kevin J. Butler
PA Staff: Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor Mr. William C. Ellison
Mr. L. Glenn Barbe Mrs. Dorothy N. Howell
Mr. Harrison Miller Rev. Billy W. Kirk
Mrs. Helen S. King Mr. John A. Kotzenmacher
Mr. C. Wayne Brownell Mr. William Parrish
Mrs. Dorothy Z. Deane Mr. William E. Slabaugh
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, the MINUTES APPROVED
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 1, 1972 were ap-
prov d and unanimously carried.
3. PPPROVAL OF CLAIMS
n motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, the CLAIMS APPROVED
clai s-- totalling $184,463.41 - -were approved for payment
and nanimously carried.
-1-
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd)
P.E.A. CODE ENFORCEMENT E -3
Rehabilitation Grants
Mary Alexander & Jeffie McCauley, #23 -19 - Paid to Sanfaye,
Inc. $
Arlene Fields, #19 -4 - Paid to Ardmore Home Improvement
Mary Pierce, #14 -6 - Paid to Ardmore Home Improvement
A dessia Howell, #4 -6 - Paid to Builders United Enterprises,
Inc.
Abstract & Title Corporation
Office Engineers, Inc.
John q. Reese
Rieth -Riley Construction Co.
John W. Simpson
South Bend Tribune
Lucille Ferrell — Paid to Indiana Truck Rental
John Whitaker
Total
P.E.A. CODE ENFORCEMENT E -5
Rehabilitation Grant
Deal & Perkins, #30 -42 - Ionia Newman
Abstract & Title Corporation
Abstract Co. of St. Joseph Co.
Dennis J. Dillman
William C. & Maxine Ellison
Riet -Riley Construction Co.
Huberlt M. Weaver
PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -57
Real Estate Purchase
Lulu Wahlen Estate, #5 -8
Abstract & Title Corporation
B. & J. Demolition
Abstract Co. of St. Jospeh Co.
Total
Total
CT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -66
Estate Purchase
ruce C. Hammerschmidt, Atty. for Martin & Carol P.
Feferman, #30 -10A
- 2 -
3,500.00
2,556.00
2,773.00
1,148.00
85.00
392.00
244.90
78,601.59
1,564.01
18.00
27.30
265.00
91,174.80
$ 3,500.00
210.00
140.00
70.00
16.50
18,935.96
25.00
22,897.46
$ 4,775.00
350.00
616.86
225.00
5,966.86
$ 12,550.00
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd
Relocation Claims
One Hour Martinizing, #20 -10 - Paid to U.S. Van of Ind.
Amy-Navy Discount Center, #20 -6 - Paid to U.S. Van of Ind.
B. & J. Demolition
Albert Bond
Calho Fence Co., Inc.
Craven's Hardware.
Indiana Glass Co.
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.
Y. C. Magee
Ralp C. Michaels
Julius O'Neal Trucking Co.
Soutl Bend Tribune
Sout Bend Water Works
Sout Bend Water Works
Loretta Daly
Ora . Keel
Ora C. Keel
Jay I. Miller
Total
MERRY AVENUE PROJECT
ReallEstate Purchase
s W. & Willie Lee Blackwell, #1 -3
Relodation Payments
ashington Barber Shop, #1 -18
eatrice Gilliam, #1 -31
ernice McBride, #1 -13 - Paid to Goodwill Industries
hirley Smith, #1 -20
hirley Smith, #1 -20
hirley Smith, #1 -20 - Paid to Goodwill Industries
rnest & Naomi Lark, #1 -23
rnest & Naomi Lark, #1 -23
Total
REDEgELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND
ayroll: December 1, 1972 to December 15, 1972
A. B Dick Products
L. Glenn Barbe
Business Systems
Continental Assurance Co.
Dorothy Z. Deane (Petty Cash.)_
GateE Chevrolet Corp.
Hi -S eed Auto Wash
Home Tech Publication
- 3 -
$ 750.00
1,560.00
1,399.00
80.00
451.94
20.51
102.36
142.01
30.50
1,500.00
2,400.00
72.80
1,230.00
21.15
6,565.50
480.00
200.00
200.00
29,755.77
$ 4,075.00
2,500.00
1,070.00
121.75
200.00
90.00
125.00
200.00
300.00
8,681.75
$ 17,407.48
33.70
36.07
20.88
1,593.00
60.86
15.30
13.75
92.51
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd)
I & N
Electric Co.
$ 60.93
I.B.N.
127.00
Vern
it Lewis
3.40
Mort
Linder & Associates
521.82
Manpower
458.38
James
R. Meehan & Associates
657.83
Office
Engineers
185.13
Penc
/Dickens & Heeter
188.90
Roemer,
Sweeney & Roemer
200.00
Schillings
Printing Co., Inc.
6.00
Eldor
Schlemmer
4.00
Singer
General Tire
4.50
Sout
Bend Parking Co., Inc.
100.00
Sout
Bend Water Works
3.26
Lloy
S. Taylor
37.49
U.S.
Government Printing Office
3.00
Veld
an's Service Center
2.00
Wagg
ner's Fuel Co.
88.96
Lawrence
E. Wartha
44.73
Weis
erger Bros.
43.80
Caro
yn M. Kimbrough
200.00
Caro
yn M. Kimbrough
265.00
Shrl
y Smith, #1 -20 - Paid to LaSalle Park
Homes
96.00
Caro
yn M. Kimbrough - Paid to LaSalle
Park Homes
104.00
Caro
yn M. Kimbrough - Paid to Goodwill
Industries
125.00
Total
$ 5,,397.E
URBAN
REDEVELOPMENT FUND
Wilson
$ 2,500.00
Donald
Donald
Wilson
200.00
Total
2,700.00
URBAN REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL FUND
URBAN-REDEVELOPMENT
--
The Ocnd Buyer
REIM$URSEMENT TO REVOLVING FUND
:ode Enforcement E -3
.ode Enforcement E -5
I.E.A. R -57
I.E.A. R -66
ferry Avenue Project
lrban Redevelopment Fund
- 4 -
Total
GRAND TOTAL
Total
$ 482.09
482.09
$ 184.463.41
$ 10,383.48
9,584.73
1,880.21
19,527.19
3,332.09
1,965.22
$46,672.92
4. PRESENTATION TO MAYOR JERRY J. MILLER:
Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor at this point made a presentation
of an enlarged, framed and very attractive, aerial photo-
graph of the present Downtown South Bend and outlying
areas to the Honorable Jerry J. Miller, Mayor of the
City of South Bend, on behalf of the Department of Re-
development Commission and staff.
The Mayor commended this Commission, Mr. Fred J. Helmen,
Chairman, and others, and Lloyd S. Taylor, for the work
they iave done -- especially this past year -- having people
in co petition for urban renewal land is a happy type of
probl m. Mayor Miller said: "I will place this in,my
offic and everyone in the community can see the picture.
Thank so much."
5. R - APPOINTMENT OF SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERS:
M-. F. Jay Nimtz, President of the Board of Trustees,
advis d in conformity with Indiana Statutes, the South Bend
Redev lopment Trustees met on the first Monday in December- -
the 4;h--in their Annual Meeting. Mr. Nimtz, President of
the R development Trustees, presented a letter dated Decem-
ber 1 , 1972, from the Board of Trustees to the Redevelop-
ment �ommission, which he read:
"Thin iz to o j jic ,ally adviz e you that the
Redevelopment Tturteez have te- appointed all
of you, namely:
Mt. Erred J. Helmen
Mt. John E. Chenney
Rev. Willie V. Wilt .amz
Mt. B. L. Glade
Mt. Donald A. Wigginz
ass Redevelopment Commizzionexz Got the yeah
1973. It iz out hope that all o� you wall
accept thin community taponzibiZity.
On behal6 of the eitizenz o4 South Bend, the
Redevelopment Tturtees want to thank you Got
the many yea&z of devotion and woAk you have
given to thin civic duty o4 tebuitding South
Bend. All of you have leit an indeZible
stamp on Downtown South Bend, which w,%ll be
teeognized and will lave jot many, many yeatz
to come. There iz no way the citizenz can
repay you Got your ditigenee and devotion to
thin ptoj ect.
It hays been a gteat pteazute dot the Tturteez
to woAk with you through the yeatz
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
PRESENTED TO:
MAYOR JERRY J. MILLER
COMMISSIONERS RE-
APPOINTED BY TRUSTEES
d.th every good wish, I am
Vex yt�s
E. lay tu N1mtzyou, PtLzidenx
Redevelopment Tturteez' - 5 -
5. OF SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERS
�E-APPOINTMENT
Cont'd)
Also, in the South Bend Redevelopment Trustees Annual Meet-
ing, Mr. F. Jay Nimtz was elected to again serve as Presi-
dent of the Board of Trustees; Mr. William A. Welsheimer,
elected as Vice President; and Mrs. Guy P. Curtis, elected
as Secretary.
The Redevelopment Commissioners all consented to serve
another term and the Annual Organizational Meeting of the
Redevelopment Commission will be January 2, 1973, at 10:00
A.M., at which time the Commissioners will be sworn in by
City Clerk and the election of Officers will take place.
6. aOMMENDATION FOR SERVICES PRESENTED TO LLOYD S. TAYLOR,
XECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, offering a special privilege SCROLL COMMENDING
resolution, presented a commendation for services to Mr. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES
Lloyd S. Taylor, on behalf of the Rdevelopment Commissioners PRESENTED TO EXECUTIVE
which he read for the presentation: DIRECTOR:
Mr.
'WHEREAS: The Commizz i.onetz of the South LLOYD S. TAYLOR
Bend c-epaattment o6 Redevetopment ate ever
mindjut of the vitat weed jot exceptionat
petiotmance in the ditection of the pioneet-
ing wo&k that we ate .in, and
WHEREAS: The demonsttated ptogtezz in every
facet o6 the downtown ptoject ztandz ass evi-
dence o4 unuzuat competence. Now, thete6ote,
be it
RESOLVED: That LLOYD TAYLOR iz hereby com-
mended jot outztanding metit by the Commiz-
zionetz, in meeting azzembted thin 15th day
of Decembet, 1972 ass attested by theit hand
and seat."
/.6/ Fted J. Hetmen
PRESIDENT
/z/ Rev. WiZZie V. Wittiam�s
SECRETARY
/z/ John E. Chenney
VICE PRESIDENT
B. L. Wade
ASSISTANT SECRETARY
/,s/ Donatd A. Wiggin.5
MEMBER
or accepted the presentation with appreciation.
The Commission requested the resolution be spread on the minutes.
This had been prepared by Mr. Wiggins personally and the scroll
is attractively mounted and the work exceptionally well done. For
the record, the Resolution is No. 433.
-6-
7. COMMUNICATIONS
. HUD letter dated November 29, 1972: This letter HUD CONCURRENCE,
rk
over the signature of Mr. Ma Griffin, Chief, Architectural DEMOLITION CONTRACT
& Engineering, concurs in awarding Demolition Contract No. NO. 31, R -66
31 to Miller Construction Company of Marion, Indiana, in bid
amount of $19,750.00, R -66 Project.
Mr. Che ney moved this letter be received and placed on file,
seconde by Mr. Wiggins, and unanimously carried.
b. HUD letter dated
over tha signature of Mr.
& Engin ering, concurs in
Clearan a Contract No. 1
South B nd, in bid amount
Project.
November 29, 1972: This letter
Mark Griffin, Chief, Architectural
awarding Demolition and Site
to B. & J. Demolition Company,
of $20,305.00, Merry Avenue
Rev. Williams moved this letter be received and placed on
file, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unanimously carried.
c HUD letter dated December 11, 1972: This letter
over th signature of Mr. Stephen Havens, Director, Opera-
tions D vision, with attachments for the approved and re-
vised b dgets for the Code Enforcement Projects, E -3 and
E -5, wa received covering Budget No. 4. Close -out date
with al activities completed, is anticipated to be no
later t an June 1, 1973.
Mr. Wiggins moved this letter be received and placed on
file, seconded by Rev. Williams, and unanimously carried.
d Warren E. McGill letter dated December 8, 1972:
Mr. Taylor read this letter in its entirety, directed to
the Department of Redevelopment. Mr. McGill represents
an inve for or investor group that is willing to submit
a bid tc purchase Block 6 of approximately 976,875 square
feet (2 ( acres) in the Downtown Urban Renewal Area subject
to observations set forth in the letter. The one stipula-
tion is the investor group would submit such bid on the
basis o a mutually satisfactory purchase price if Block
6 could be purchased in its entirety, and not merely a
part thereof. The proposed uses were outlined. Block 6
was sta ed to be used for office, parking and residential
purpose and commencement of construction would occur
within our years after the purchase of the real estate.
Mr. Taylor said this is another extremely important land-
mark and is the largest block the Commission has to offer,
approximately 20 acres, in the Downtown Renewal Program.
In the original application, the North area was appraised
for office use and the South area for housing. Now it
would be for mixed use and the boundary cannot be defined.
On the basis of their interest, the first step is to have
7
HUD CONCURRENCE,
DEMOLITION CONTRACT
NO. 1, MERRY AVENUE
PROJECT
APPROVED AND REVISED
BUDGETS, E -3 & E -5
LETTER OF INTENT
TO PURCHASE BLOCK 6
R -66
7. 40MMUNICATIONS (Cont'd)
reuse zppraisals on this land before it is offered for sale,
which vill take from 30 to 45 days. Commission authoriza-
tion tc advertise and the establishment of a minimum bid
price would be requested after that date.
Mr. Wiggins moved this letter be received and placed on
file, and the Executive Director instructed to secure re-
use ap risals on property designated at Block 6. Said
motion was seconded by Rev. Williams, and unanimously
carrie .
E. HUD telegram dated December 12, 1972: This tele- CONFIRMATION OF
gram is over the signature of Mr. Steven J. Hans, Area PART II LOAN & GRANT
Director, stating Part II Loan and Grant Amendatory ap- AMENDATORY APPROVAL,
proved for LaSalle Park Urban Renewal Project Indiana R -57, R -57
approves Federal Grant allocation of $4,433,738.
Mr. Ta for said this is final confirmation of the notice
we relived in June from HUD that this amount was alloca-
ted.
Mr. ChInney moved this telegram be received and placed on
file, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and unanimously carried.
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
a. Disposition Parcel Nos. 2 -13, 4 -30, 4 -31, 4 -32
and 4 -4 :Commission authorization was requested to advertise
these parcels for sale, with bid opening date of February 2,
1973, at 10:30 A.M., E.S.T., and establish minimum bid price,
R -66.
Parcel
No.
Square
Feet
Minimum Price
-13
40,215
@
$ 3.985
$ 160,257.00
-30
21,597
@
18.00
388,746.00
-31
14,508
@
14.00
203,112.00
1-32
53,246
@
8.785
467,766.00
-42
21,950
@
18.00
395,100.00
Mr. Tayl
above pa
Inc., on
Counsel
Total $1,614,981.00
r said we are asking for approval to advertise the
cels. We have received a bid from Office Engineers,
Disposition Parcel 4 -30A and referred it to Legal
or review and recommendation. We are suggesting
ADVERTISING APPROVED
FOR DESIGNATED PARCELS,
R -66
9. NSW BUSINESS (Co_nt'd)
that this bid be held in abeyance until we receive the bids
for the total parcels; then the Commission, at that time, con-
sider tie highest and best use for that parcel. The Chair
asked if the parcels specified include Dan Clark's property
and Mr. Taylor said it does.
Mr. Louis Chapleau, Attorney representing Office Engineers, ad-
dressed himself to the Commission. Mr. Chapleau stated that,
because of property lost by his client due to Urban Renewal,
it was imperative that his client obtain additional space. Mr.
Chapleaj stated further that in his opinion Parcel 4 -30A should
not be included in the offering proposed at this meeting be-
cause C mmission action on his client's bid proposal in Decem-
ber 1, 1972 went further than simply receiving the bid and de-
ferring action.
Mr. Tay or said that the Commission cannot legally award a bid
proposal until it has been reviewed and approved by the Com-
mission's Legal Counsel, the Commission has declared it the
highest and best bid, and HUD concurs in the redeveloper as
capable of undertaking the proposed redevelopment.
Mr. Chapleau then stated that Office Engineers is prepared to
go ahead with the contractor. Office Engineers is prepared
to let contract to proceed with the construction, if it would
be permitted to do so. The Board should consider this and if
they do advertise, they should except Parcel 4 -30A from this
offerin He asked the Board to let his client know when the
Commiss on is ready to proceed and close the transaction.
Mr. Wig ins made the motion to authorize the advertising for
sale of the designated parcels and approval of the minimum
bid prices specified.
The Commission discussed whether Parcel 4 -30A should be in-
cluded in the offering. Mr. Butler, Legal Counsel, suggested
that after the bids are received on February 2, 1973, at that
time the Commission may make its determination concerning
Parcel -30A based on a number of factors, including any ac-
commoda ion which might be reached among interested parties.
Mr. Wig ins amended his motion to authorize advertising of
the des gnated parcels, but separating Parcel 4 -30 into the
redesig ated Parcels 4 -30A and 4 -30B with corresponding land
areas a d minimum bid prices. Mr. Chenney seconded the mo-
tion an it was passed unanimously.
b Acquisition Parcel No. 4 -13: Commission approval
was requested for settlement on Acquisition Parcel No. 4 -13,
with Julius L. Tucker, per letter from his attorney dated
November 27, 1972, R -66 Project.
Motion �or approval, as shown above, was made by Mr. Wiggins,
seconde by Mr. Chenney, and unanimously carried.
ACQUISITION PARCEL
NO. 4 -13 SETTLEMENT
APPROVED, R -66
9. JEW BUSINESS (Cont'd
Acquisition Parcel Nos. 1 -4 and 1 -6: Commission
approv 1 was requested for settlement on Acquisition
Parcel Nos. 1 -4 and 1 -6, as recommended by William J.
Hammes Commission Legal Counsel, per his letter dated
December 8, 1972, R -66 Project.
Motion for approval, as shown above, was made by Mr.
Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, and unanimously
carrie .
c. Acquisition Appraisal Contract: Authorization
to enter into an Acquisition Appraisal Contract with
Richarc A. Muessel, Jr. for reuse appraisals, on Parcel
Nos. 4-14 and 4 -15, in amount not to exceed $1,500.00,
R -66 Project, was requested.
On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and
unanim usly carried, the President and Secretary were
authorized to enter into a Contract with Richard A. Muessel,
Jr.
e. Assignment of Contract with Cole Associates, Inc.
Authorization to enter into this Assignment with Cole
Associates, Inc. was requested. As of January 2, 1973,
Chas. W. Cole & Son, Incorporated will be succeeded by
Cole Associates, Inc., a new Indiana corporation formed
by four of their key executives, who will assume ownership
and operation of the company. The Assignment will cover
our R -57, E -3 and E -5 Projects for Site Improvement Con-
tracts.
On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and
unanimously carried, the President and Secretary were
authorized to enter into an Assignment of Contract cover-
ing the above three Projects.
f. Contract No. 1: Authorization was requested to
advertise, by invitation, for Contract No. 1, tree removal,
at following addresses, in the Northeast Code Enforcement
Project E -3:
16 St. Vincent
1 13 St. Peter
17 Stanfield
124 South Bend Avenue
On moti
authori
tion, w
922 South Bend Avenue
728 North Frances
1109 Foster
811 St. Peter
in by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams,
:ation to advertise Contract No. 1, by invita-
�s approved and unanimously carried.
- 10 -
ACQUISITION PARCEL
NOS. 1 -4 & 1 -6,
SETTLEMENT APPROVED,
R -66
ACQUISITION APPRAISAL
CONTRACT WITH RICHARD
A. MUESSEL, JR. APPROVED
R -66
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
WITH COLE ASSOCIATES,
INC. APPROVED, R -57,
E -3 & E -5 PROJECTS
CONTRACT NO. 1 APPROVED
FOR ADVERTISING BY
INVITATION, E -3
a
questei
No: 2,
substai
of the
locates
BUSINESS (Cont'd
1. Demolition Contract No. 2: Authorization was re- DEMOLITION NO. 2
l to advertise, by invitation, for Demolition Contract APPROVED FOR ADVER-
for demolition of two houses which have been declared TISING BY INVITATION,
idard and unfit for human habitation at regular meeting E -3
Board of Works and Public Safety on December 4, 1972,
l in the Northeast Code Enforcement Project E -3:
Parcel No. Address
31 -8 742 North Notre Dame Avenue
12 -14 615 East Howard Street
On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and unani-
mously carried, the above advertising was approved.
Christman Construction Company Contract: Authori- CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
zation was requested to negotiate a Contract for construc- APPROVED FOR CHRISTMAN
tion ol a retaining wall around vaults at the Sherland CONSTRUCTION CO.,
Builds g, with Christman Construction Company, compensa- PARCEL NO. 8 -13, R -66
tion n t to exceed $9,500.00, for Parcel No. 8 -13, R -66.
The reason for negotiating this contract with Christman
Construction Company is due to the liability involved in
workinc in the basement of this structure. Christman
Construction Compay is the contractor for the building
owners and the principals of the construction company have
an int rest in the building. This makes them imminently
famili r with the problems of separating the basement area
from t e underwalk vault areas.
Mr. Taylor said we had agreed if the people would abandon
their vaults under the sidewalks, we would backfill them
and install new sidewalks, the reason being to encourage
abandonment of the vaults. The other solution would be to
replace the vault deck, which would be extremely expensive.
Mr. Ta for said we are deviating from the normal bidding
procedure and need Commission authorization to submit to
HUD fo approval.
On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and
unanimously carried, Commission approved request to
negotiate a Contract with Christman Construction Company,
compensation not to exceed $9,500.00, for Parcel No. 8 -13,
and the President and Secretary authorized to execute,
subject to Legal Counsel and HUD concurrence.
i.
H. F. Glaser Construction Company
Contract:
CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS
Authorization
was requested to negotiate a
Contract for
APPROVED FOR H. F.
construction
of a divider wall around vaults
at 111 West
GLASER CONSTRUCTION CO.,
Washington
Building, Parcel No. 3 -18, with
H. F. Glaser
PARCEL 3 -18, R -66
Construction
Company, compensation not to
exceed $6,590.00,
R -66.
11
9. 14EW BUSINESS Cont'd)
The reasons are the same as in Item 6h above.
On mot on by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and
unanim usly carried, Commission approved request to
negoti to a Contract with H. F. Glaser Construction
Compan , compensation not to exceed $6,590.00, for Parcel
No. 3-U, and the President and Secretary authorized to
execut , subject to Legal Counsel and HUD concurrence.
Option Agreements: Approval and authorization
was re uested for the President to sign three (3) Option
Agreem nts, for the following:
Project Parcel No.
R -57 5 -8
R -66 3-1 Oa
Merry ve. 1 -3
Address
OPTION AGREEMENTS
APPROVED:
PARCEL 5 -8:
Total Sum 3 -10a
1 -3
2641 W. Holland Street $ 4,775.00
Rear 118 N. Main Street 12,550.00
2110 W. Washington Street 4,075.00
On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unani-
mously carried ' the above - stated Option Agreements were ac-
cepted and the President authorized to sign.
k. Rehabilitation Grants, E -3: Commission approval
was req ested to cancel Rehabilitation Grant approved by
Commission on July 21, 1972, for Parcel No. 23 -19, lo-
cated at 717 N. Hill Street, in amount of $2,787.00, and in
lieu th reof approve Rehabilitation Grant for maximum sum
of $3,5)0.00. Also request approval for Rehabilitation Grant
for Par el No. 36 -27, located at 609 N. Hill Street, in
amount f $3,454.00 - -both in the Northeast Code Enforcement
Project E -3.
The on final grant amount for Parcel No. 23 -19 was not
sufu �nt to bring the house up to standard - -the full grant
amount as needed.
On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unani-
mously arried, the above - listed grants, as stated were ap-
proved.
10. PROGRESS REPORT
a,
as of ti
two par(
remainir
complicz
to be nc
R -57
R -66
MERRY AVE.
REHABILITATION GRANTS
APPROVED, PARCEL NOS.
23 -19 & 36 -27, E -3
Merry Avenue Project: The status of acquisition MERRY AVENUE PROJECT
is date is 26 parcels closed, have signed options for
els, nine parcels are in condemnation and five parcels
g are in various stages of negotiation -- mostly legal
tions concerning tax sale property, multiple heirs
tified, etc.
- 12 -
11. NEXT MEETING
he next meeting will be the South Bend Redevelopment
Commission Annual Organizational Meeting, on Tuesday,
January 2, 1973, at 10:00 A.M., with a Special Meeting
immediately following the Annual Organizational Meeting.
The Regular Meeting, which normally would have been scheduled
for the first Friday of the month in accordance with the By-
Laws, " lanuary 5, 1973, is being cancelled, and in lieu there-
of the Special Meeting will be held on January 2, as noted
above.
12. /ADJOURNMENT
n motion duly made and passed by Mr. Wiggins, the
meeti4 adjourned at 11:50 A.M.
V.
(SEAL)
NEXT MEETING:
ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL
& SPECIAL COMMISSION
MEETING, 1 -2 -73
ADJOURNMENT
e V. Williams, Secretary Fred men, rest ent
- 13 -