Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 12-15-72Dece ber 15, 1972 10:3 A.M. Presiding Officer: 1. ROLL CALL SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING Mr. Fred J. Helmen, President 1200 County -City Bldg. 227 W. Jefferson Blvd. South Bend, Indiana 46601 resent: Mr. Fred J. Helmen, President Mr. John E. Chenney, Vice President Rev. Willie V. Williams, Secretary Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, Member bsent: Mr. B. L. Wade, Asst. Secretary thers Present: Mayor Jerry J. Miller, City of South Bend Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President, Board of Trustees Mr. Dan Caesar, WSBT -TV Reporter Mr. Frank Vellner, WSBT -TV Photographer Mr. James L. Marchelewicz, WNDU -TV Reporter & Photographer Mr. Bill Stoner, The South Bend Tribune Reporter Mr. Louis Chapleau, Attorney representing Office Engineers Mr. Karl G. King, President, Office Engineers, Inc., & General Chairman, Downtown S.B. Council Mr. H. Edward Glaser, A.G.A. Realty Co. Mrs. Jane Hill, Roemer, Sweeney, Roemer, Butler & Siemeri Mr. Edgar Seybold, South Bend Civic Planning Association Legal Counsel: Mr. Kevin J. Butler PA Staff: Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor Mr. William C. Ellison Mr. L. Glenn Barbe Mrs. Dorothy N. Howell Mr. Harrison Miller Rev. Billy W. Kirk Mrs. Helen S. King Mr. John A. Kotzenmacher Mr. C. Wayne Brownell Mr. William Parrish Mrs. Dorothy Z. Deane Mr. William E. Slabaugh 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, the MINUTES APPROVED Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 1, 1972 were ap- prov d and unanimously carried. 3. PPPROVAL OF CLAIMS n motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, the CLAIMS APPROVED clai s-- totalling $184,463.41 - -were approved for payment and nanimously carried. -1- 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd) P.E.A. CODE ENFORCEMENT E -3 Rehabilitation Grants Mary Alexander & Jeffie McCauley, #23 -19 - Paid to Sanfaye, Inc. $ Arlene Fields, #19 -4 - Paid to Ardmore Home Improvement Mary Pierce, #14 -6 - Paid to Ardmore Home Improvement A dessia Howell, #4 -6 - Paid to Builders United Enterprises, Inc. Abstract & Title Corporation Office Engineers, Inc. John q. Reese Rieth -Riley Construction Co. John W. Simpson South Bend Tribune Lucille Ferrell — Paid to Indiana Truck Rental John Whitaker Total P.E.A. CODE ENFORCEMENT E -5 Rehabilitation Grant Deal & Perkins, #30 -42 - Ionia Newman Abstract & Title Corporation Abstract Co. of St. Joseph Co. Dennis J. Dillman William C. & Maxine Ellison Riet -Riley Construction Co. Huberlt M. Weaver PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -57 Real Estate Purchase Lulu Wahlen Estate, #5 -8 Abstract & Title Corporation B. & J. Demolition Abstract Co. of St. Jospeh Co. Total Total CT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -66 Estate Purchase ruce C. Hammerschmidt, Atty. for Martin & Carol P. Feferman, #30 -10A - 2 - 3,500.00 2,556.00 2,773.00 1,148.00 85.00 392.00 244.90 78,601.59 1,564.01 18.00 27.30 265.00 91,174.80 $ 3,500.00 210.00 140.00 70.00 16.50 18,935.96 25.00 22,897.46 $ 4,775.00 350.00 616.86 225.00 5,966.86 $ 12,550.00 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd Relocation Claims One Hour Martinizing, #20 -10 - Paid to U.S. Van of Ind. Amy-Navy Discount Center, #20 -6 - Paid to U.S. Van of Ind. B. & J. Demolition Albert Bond Calho Fence Co., Inc. Craven's Hardware. Indiana Glass Co. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. Y. C. Magee Ralp C. Michaels Julius O'Neal Trucking Co. Soutl Bend Tribune Sout Bend Water Works Sout Bend Water Works Loretta Daly Ora . Keel Ora C. Keel Jay I. Miller Total MERRY AVENUE PROJECT ReallEstate Purchase s W. & Willie Lee Blackwell, #1 -3 Relodation Payments ashington Barber Shop, #1 -18 eatrice Gilliam, #1 -31 ernice McBride, #1 -13 - Paid to Goodwill Industries hirley Smith, #1 -20 hirley Smith, #1 -20 hirley Smith, #1 -20 - Paid to Goodwill Industries rnest & Naomi Lark, #1 -23 rnest & Naomi Lark, #1 -23 Total REDEgELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND ayroll: December 1, 1972 to December 15, 1972 A. B Dick Products L. Glenn Barbe Business Systems Continental Assurance Co. Dorothy Z. Deane (Petty Cash.)_ GateE Chevrolet Corp. Hi -S eed Auto Wash Home Tech Publication - 3 - $ 750.00 1,560.00 1,399.00 80.00 451.94 20.51 102.36 142.01 30.50 1,500.00 2,400.00 72.80 1,230.00 21.15 6,565.50 480.00 200.00 200.00 29,755.77 $ 4,075.00 2,500.00 1,070.00 121.75 200.00 90.00 125.00 200.00 300.00 8,681.75 $ 17,407.48 33.70 36.07 20.88 1,593.00 60.86 15.30 13.75 92.51 3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd) I & N Electric Co. $ 60.93 I.B.N. 127.00 Vern it Lewis 3.40 Mort Linder & Associates 521.82 Manpower 458.38 James R. Meehan & Associates 657.83 Office Engineers 185.13 Penc /Dickens & Heeter 188.90 Roemer, Sweeney & Roemer 200.00 Schillings Printing Co., Inc. 6.00 Eldor Schlemmer 4.00 Singer General Tire 4.50 Sout Bend Parking Co., Inc. 100.00 Sout Bend Water Works 3.26 Lloy S. Taylor 37.49 U.S. Government Printing Office 3.00 Veld an's Service Center 2.00 Wagg ner's Fuel Co. 88.96 Lawrence E. Wartha 44.73 Weis erger Bros. 43.80 Caro yn M. Kimbrough 200.00 Caro yn M. Kimbrough 265.00 Shrl y Smith, #1 -20 - Paid to LaSalle Park Homes 96.00 Caro yn M. Kimbrough - Paid to LaSalle Park Homes 104.00 Caro yn M. Kimbrough - Paid to Goodwill Industries 125.00 Total $ 5,,397.E URBAN REDEVELOPMENT FUND Wilson $ 2,500.00 Donald Donald Wilson 200.00 Total 2,700.00 URBAN REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL FUND URBAN-REDEVELOPMENT -- The Ocnd Buyer REIM$URSEMENT TO REVOLVING FUND :ode Enforcement E -3 .ode Enforcement E -5 I.E.A. R -57 I.E.A. R -66 ferry Avenue Project lrban Redevelopment Fund - 4 - Total GRAND TOTAL Total $ 482.09 482.09 $ 184.463.41 $ 10,383.48 9,584.73 1,880.21 19,527.19 3,332.09 1,965.22 $46,672.92 4. PRESENTATION TO MAYOR JERRY J. MILLER: Mr. Lloyd S. Taylor at this point made a presentation of an enlarged, framed and very attractive, aerial photo- graph of the present Downtown South Bend and outlying areas to the Honorable Jerry J. Miller, Mayor of the City of South Bend, on behalf of the Department of Re- development Commission and staff. The Mayor commended this Commission, Mr. Fred J. Helmen, Chairman, and others, and Lloyd S. Taylor, for the work they iave done -- especially this past year -- having people in co petition for urban renewal land is a happy type of probl m. Mayor Miller said: "I will place this in,my offic and everyone in the community can see the picture. Thank so much." 5. R - APPOINTMENT OF SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERS: M-. F. Jay Nimtz, President of the Board of Trustees, advis d in conformity with Indiana Statutes, the South Bend Redev lopment Trustees met on the first Monday in December- - the 4;h--in their Annual Meeting. Mr. Nimtz, President of the R development Trustees, presented a letter dated Decem- ber 1 , 1972, from the Board of Trustees to the Redevelop- ment �ommission, which he read: "Thin iz to o j jic ,ally adviz e you that the Redevelopment Tturteez have te- appointed all of you, namely: Mt. Erred J. Helmen Mt. John E. Chenney Rev. Willie V. Wilt .amz Mt. B. L. Glade Mt. Donald A. Wigginz ass Redevelopment Commizzionexz Got the yeah 1973. It iz out hope that all o� you wall accept thin community taponzibiZity. On behal6 of the eitizenz o4 South Bend, the Redevelopment Tturtees want to thank you Got the many yea&z of devotion and woAk you have given to thin civic duty o4 tebuitding South Bend. All of you have leit an indeZible stamp on Downtown South Bend, which w,%ll be teeognized and will lave jot many, many yeatz to come. There iz no way the citizenz can repay you Got your ditigenee and devotion to thin ptoj ect. It hays been a gteat pteazute dot the Tturteez to woAk with you through the yeatz AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH PRESENTED TO: MAYOR JERRY J. MILLER COMMISSIONERS RE- APPOINTED BY TRUSTEES d.th every good wish, I am Vex yt�s E. lay tu N1mtzyou, PtLzidenx Redevelopment Tturteez' - 5 - 5. OF SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONERS �E-APPOINTMENT Cont'd) Also, in the South Bend Redevelopment Trustees Annual Meet- ing, Mr. F. Jay Nimtz was elected to again serve as Presi- dent of the Board of Trustees; Mr. William A. Welsheimer, elected as Vice President; and Mrs. Guy P. Curtis, elected as Secretary. The Redevelopment Commissioners all consented to serve another term and the Annual Organizational Meeting of the Redevelopment Commission will be January 2, 1973, at 10:00 A.M., at which time the Commissioners will be sworn in by City Clerk and the election of Officers will take place. 6. aOMMENDATION FOR SERVICES PRESENTED TO LLOYD S. TAYLOR, XECUTIVE DIRECTOR Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, offering a special privilege SCROLL COMMENDING resolution, presented a commendation for services to Mr. EXCEPTIONAL SERVICES Lloyd S. Taylor, on behalf of the Rdevelopment Commissioners PRESENTED TO EXECUTIVE which he read for the presentation: DIRECTOR: Mr. 'WHEREAS: The Commizz i.onetz of the South LLOYD S. TAYLOR Bend c-epaattment o6 Redevetopment ate ever mindjut of the vitat weed jot exceptionat petiotmance in the ditection of the pioneet- ing wo&k that we ate .in, and WHEREAS: The demonsttated ptogtezz in every facet o6 the downtown ptoject ztandz ass evi- dence o4 unuzuat competence. Now, thete6ote, be it RESOLVED: That LLOYD TAYLOR iz hereby com- mended jot outztanding metit by the Commiz- zionetz, in meeting azzembted thin 15th day of Decembet, 1972 ass attested by theit hand and seat." /.6/ Fted J. Hetmen PRESIDENT /z/ Rev. WiZZie V. Wittiam�s SECRETARY /z/ John E. Chenney VICE PRESIDENT B. L. Wade ASSISTANT SECRETARY /,s/ Donatd A. Wiggin.5 MEMBER or accepted the presentation with appreciation. The Commission requested the resolution be spread on the minutes. This had been prepared by Mr. Wiggins personally and the scroll is attractively mounted and the work exceptionally well done. For the record, the Resolution is No. 433. -6- 7. COMMUNICATIONS . HUD letter dated November 29, 1972: This letter HUD CONCURRENCE, rk over the signature of Mr. Ma Griffin, Chief, Architectural DEMOLITION CONTRACT & Engineering, concurs in awarding Demolition Contract No. NO. 31, R -66 31 to Miller Construction Company of Marion, Indiana, in bid amount of $19,750.00, R -66 Project. Mr. Che ney moved this letter be received and placed on file, seconde by Mr. Wiggins, and unanimously carried. b. HUD letter dated over tha signature of Mr. & Engin ering, concurs in Clearan a Contract No. 1 South B nd, in bid amount Project. November 29, 1972: This letter Mark Griffin, Chief, Architectural awarding Demolition and Site to B. & J. Demolition Company, of $20,305.00, Merry Avenue Rev. Williams moved this letter be received and placed on file, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unanimously carried. c HUD letter dated December 11, 1972: This letter over th signature of Mr. Stephen Havens, Director, Opera- tions D vision, with attachments for the approved and re- vised b dgets for the Code Enforcement Projects, E -3 and E -5, wa received covering Budget No. 4. Close -out date with al activities completed, is anticipated to be no later t an June 1, 1973. Mr. Wiggins moved this letter be received and placed on file, seconded by Rev. Williams, and unanimously carried. d Warren E. McGill letter dated December 8, 1972: Mr. Taylor read this letter in its entirety, directed to the Department of Redevelopment. Mr. McGill represents an inve for or investor group that is willing to submit a bid tc purchase Block 6 of approximately 976,875 square feet (2 ( acres) in the Downtown Urban Renewal Area subject to observations set forth in the letter. The one stipula- tion is the investor group would submit such bid on the basis o a mutually satisfactory purchase price if Block 6 could be purchased in its entirety, and not merely a part thereof. The proposed uses were outlined. Block 6 was sta ed to be used for office, parking and residential purpose and commencement of construction would occur within our years after the purchase of the real estate. Mr. Taylor said this is another extremely important land- mark and is the largest block the Commission has to offer, approximately 20 acres, in the Downtown Renewal Program. In the original application, the North area was appraised for office use and the South area for housing. Now it would be for mixed use and the boundary cannot be defined. On the basis of their interest, the first step is to have 7 HUD CONCURRENCE, DEMOLITION CONTRACT NO. 1, MERRY AVENUE PROJECT APPROVED AND REVISED BUDGETS, E -3 & E -5 LETTER OF INTENT TO PURCHASE BLOCK 6 R -66 7. 40MMUNICATIONS (Cont'd) reuse zppraisals on this land before it is offered for sale, which vill take from 30 to 45 days. Commission authoriza- tion tc advertise and the establishment of a minimum bid price would be requested after that date. Mr. Wiggins moved this letter be received and placed on file, and the Executive Director instructed to secure re- use ap risals on property designated at Block 6. Said motion was seconded by Rev. Williams, and unanimously carrie . E. HUD telegram dated December 12, 1972: This tele- CONFIRMATION OF gram is over the signature of Mr. Steven J. Hans, Area PART II LOAN & GRANT Director, stating Part II Loan and Grant Amendatory ap- AMENDATORY APPROVAL, proved for LaSalle Park Urban Renewal Project Indiana R -57, R -57 approves Federal Grant allocation of $4,433,738. Mr. Ta for said this is final confirmation of the notice we relived in June from HUD that this amount was alloca- ted. Mr. ChInney moved this telegram be received and placed on file, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and unanimously carried. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS a. Disposition Parcel Nos. 2 -13, 4 -30, 4 -31, 4 -32 and 4 -4 :Commission authorization was requested to advertise these parcels for sale, with bid opening date of February 2, 1973, at 10:30 A.M., E.S.T., and establish minimum bid price, R -66. Parcel No. Square Feet Minimum Price -13 40,215 @ $ 3.985 $ 160,257.00 -30 21,597 @ 18.00 388,746.00 -31 14,508 @ 14.00 203,112.00 1-32 53,246 @ 8.785 467,766.00 -42 21,950 @ 18.00 395,100.00 Mr. Tayl above pa Inc., on Counsel Total $1,614,981.00 r said we are asking for approval to advertise the cels. We have received a bid from Office Engineers, Disposition Parcel 4 -30A and referred it to Legal or review and recommendation. We are suggesting ADVERTISING APPROVED FOR DESIGNATED PARCELS, R -66 9. NSW BUSINESS (Co_nt'd) that this bid be held in abeyance until we receive the bids for the total parcels; then the Commission, at that time, con- sider tie highest and best use for that parcel. The Chair asked if the parcels specified include Dan Clark's property and Mr. Taylor said it does. Mr. Louis Chapleau, Attorney representing Office Engineers, ad- dressed himself to the Commission. Mr. Chapleau stated that, because of property lost by his client due to Urban Renewal, it was imperative that his client obtain additional space. Mr. Chapleaj stated further that in his opinion Parcel 4 -30A should not be included in the offering proposed at this meeting be- cause C mmission action on his client's bid proposal in Decem- ber 1, 1972 went further than simply receiving the bid and de- ferring action. Mr. Tay or said that the Commission cannot legally award a bid proposal until it has been reviewed and approved by the Com- mission's Legal Counsel, the Commission has declared it the highest and best bid, and HUD concurs in the redeveloper as capable of undertaking the proposed redevelopment. Mr. Chapleau then stated that Office Engineers is prepared to go ahead with the contractor. Office Engineers is prepared to let contract to proceed with the construction, if it would be permitted to do so. The Board should consider this and if they do advertise, they should except Parcel 4 -30A from this offerin He asked the Board to let his client know when the Commiss on is ready to proceed and close the transaction. Mr. Wig ins made the motion to authorize the advertising for sale of the designated parcels and approval of the minimum bid prices specified. The Commission discussed whether Parcel 4 -30A should be in- cluded in the offering. Mr. Butler, Legal Counsel, suggested that after the bids are received on February 2, 1973, at that time the Commission may make its determination concerning Parcel -30A based on a number of factors, including any ac- commoda ion which might be reached among interested parties. Mr. Wig ins amended his motion to authorize advertising of the des gnated parcels, but separating Parcel 4 -30 into the redesig ated Parcels 4 -30A and 4 -30B with corresponding land areas a d minimum bid prices. Mr. Chenney seconded the mo- tion an it was passed unanimously. b Acquisition Parcel No. 4 -13: Commission approval was requested for settlement on Acquisition Parcel No. 4 -13, with Julius L. Tucker, per letter from his attorney dated November 27, 1972, R -66 Project. Motion �or approval, as shown above, was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconde by Mr. Chenney, and unanimously carried. ACQUISITION PARCEL NO. 4 -13 SETTLEMENT APPROVED, R -66 9. JEW BUSINESS (Cont'd Acquisition Parcel Nos. 1 -4 and 1 -6: Commission approv 1 was requested for settlement on Acquisition Parcel Nos. 1 -4 and 1 -6, as recommended by William J. Hammes Commission Legal Counsel, per his letter dated December 8, 1972, R -66 Project. Motion for approval, as shown above, was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, and unanimously carrie . c. Acquisition Appraisal Contract: Authorization to enter into an Acquisition Appraisal Contract with Richarc A. Muessel, Jr. for reuse appraisals, on Parcel Nos. 4-14 and 4 -15, in amount not to exceed $1,500.00, R -66 Project, was requested. On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unanim usly carried, the President and Secretary were authorized to enter into a Contract with Richard A. Muessel, Jr. e. Assignment of Contract with Cole Associates, Inc. Authorization to enter into this Assignment with Cole Associates, Inc. was requested. As of January 2, 1973, Chas. W. Cole & Son, Incorporated will be succeeded by Cole Associates, Inc., a new Indiana corporation formed by four of their key executives, who will assume ownership and operation of the company. The Assignment will cover our R -57, E -3 and E -5 Projects for Site Improvement Con- tracts. On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and unanimously carried, the President and Secretary were authorized to enter into an Assignment of Contract cover- ing the above three Projects. f. Contract No. 1: Authorization was requested to advertise, by invitation, for Contract No. 1, tree removal, at following addresses, in the Northeast Code Enforcement Project E -3: 16 St. Vincent 1 13 St. Peter 17 Stanfield 124 South Bend Avenue On moti authori tion, w 922 South Bend Avenue 728 North Frances 1109 Foster 811 St. Peter in by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, :ation to advertise Contract No. 1, by invita- �s approved and unanimously carried. - 10 - ACQUISITION PARCEL NOS. 1 -4 & 1 -6, SETTLEMENT APPROVED, R -66 ACQUISITION APPRAISAL CONTRACT WITH RICHARD A. MUESSEL, JR. APPROVED R -66 ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT WITH COLE ASSOCIATES, INC. APPROVED, R -57, E -3 & E -5 PROJECTS CONTRACT NO. 1 APPROVED FOR ADVERTISING BY INVITATION, E -3 a questei No: 2, substai of the locates BUSINESS (Cont'd 1. Demolition Contract No. 2: Authorization was re- DEMOLITION NO. 2 l to advertise, by invitation, for Demolition Contract APPROVED FOR ADVER- for demolition of two houses which have been declared TISING BY INVITATION, idard and unfit for human habitation at regular meeting E -3 Board of Works and Public Safety on December 4, 1972, l in the Northeast Code Enforcement Project E -3: Parcel No. Address 31 -8 742 North Notre Dame Avenue 12 -14 615 East Howard Street On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and unani- mously carried, the above advertising was approved. Christman Construction Company Contract: Authori- CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS zation was requested to negotiate a Contract for construc- APPROVED FOR CHRISTMAN tion ol a retaining wall around vaults at the Sherland CONSTRUCTION CO., Builds g, with Christman Construction Company, compensa- PARCEL NO. 8 -13, R -66 tion n t to exceed $9,500.00, for Parcel No. 8 -13, R -66. The reason for negotiating this contract with Christman Construction Company is due to the liability involved in workinc in the basement of this structure. Christman Construction Compay is the contractor for the building owners and the principals of the construction company have an int rest in the building. This makes them imminently famili r with the problems of separating the basement area from t e underwalk vault areas. Mr. Taylor said we had agreed if the people would abandon their vaults under the sidewalks, we would backfill them and install new sidewalks, the reason being to encourage abandonment of the vaults. The other solution would be to replace the vault deck, which would be extremely expensive. Mr. Ta for said we are deviating from the normal bidding procedure and need Commission authorization to submit to HUD fo approval. On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and unanimously carried, Commission approved request to negotiate a Contract with Christman Construction Company, compensation not to exceed $9,500.00, for Parcel No. 8 -13, and the President and Secretary authorized to execute, subject to Legal Counsel and HUD concurrence. i. H. F. Glaser Construction Company Contract: CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS Authorization was requested to negotiate a Contract for APPROVED FOR H. F. construction of a divider wall around vaults at 111 West GLASER CONSTRUCTION CO., Washington Building, Parcel No. 3 -18, with H. F. Glaser PARCEL 3 -18, R -66 Construction Company, compensation not to exceed $6,590.00, R -66. 11 9. 14EW BUSINESS Cont'd) The reasons are the same as in Item 6h above. On mot on by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, and unanim usly carried, Commission approved request to negoti to a Contract with H. F. Glaser Construction Compan , compensation not to exceed $6,590.00, for Parcel No. 3-U, and the President and Secretary authorized to execut , subject to Legal Counsel and HUD concurrence. Option Agreements: Approval and authorization was re uested for the President to sign three (3) Option Agreem nts, for the following: Project Parcel No. R -57 5 -8 R -66 3-1 Oa Merry ve. 1 -3 Address OPTION AGREEMENTS APPROVED: PARCEL 5 -8: Total Sum 3 -10a 1 -3 2641 W. Holland Street $ 4,775.00 Rear 118 N. Main Street 12,550.00 2110 W. Washington Street 4,075.00 On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unani- mously carried ' the above - stated Option Agreements were ac- cepted and the President authorized to sign. k. Rehabilitation Grants, E -3: Commission approval was req ested to cancel Rehabilitation Grant approved by Commission on July 21, 1972, for Parcel No. 23 -19, lo- cated at 717 N. Hill Street, in amount of $2,787.00, and in lieu th reof approve Rehabilitation Grant for maximum sum of $3,5)0.00. Also request approval for Rehabilitation Grant for Par el No. 36 -27, located at 609 N. Hill Street, in amount f $3,454.00 - -both in the Northeast Code Enforcement Project E -3. The on final grant amount for Parcel No. 23 -19 was not sufu �nt to bring the house up to standard - -the full grant amount as needed. On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney, and unani- mously arried, the above - listed grants, as stated were ap- proved. 10. PROGRESS REPORT a, as of ti two par( remainir complicz to be nc R -57 R -66 MERRY AVE. REHABILITATION GRANTS APPROVED, PARCEL NOS. 23 -19 & 36 -27, E -3 Merry Avenue Project: The status of acquisition MERRY AVENUE PROJECT is date is 26 parcels closed, have signed options for els, nine parcels are in condemnation and five parcels g are in various stages of negotiation -- mostly legal tions concerning tax sale property, multiple heirs tified, etc. - 12 - 11. NEXT MEETING he next meeting will be the South Bend Redevelopment Commission Annual Organizational Meeting, on Tuesday, January 2, 1973, at 10:00 A.M., with a Special Meeting immediately following the Annual Organizational Meeting. The Regular Meeting, which normally would have been scheduled for the first Friday of the month in accordance with the By- Laws, " lanuary 5, 1973, is being cancelled, and in lieu there- of the Special Meeting will be held on January 2, as noted above. 12. /ADJOURNMENT n motion duly made and passed by Mr. Wiggins, the meeti4 adjourned at 11:50 A.M. V. (SEAL) NEXT MEETING: ANNUAL ORGANIZATIONAL & SPECIAL COMMISSION MEETING, 1 -2 -73 ADJOURNMENT e V. Williams, Secretary Fred men, rest ent - 13 -