HomeMy WebLinkAboutEstablishing an Historic Landmark Leeper Park - -
ORDINANCE No. 8734-96
Passed by the Common Council of the City of South Bend,Indiana
November 25, 19 96
Attest: ( City Clerk
LO' A J. i UDA
Attest: / C9 /Zee? President of Common Council
Presented by me to the Mayor of the City of South Bend,Indiana
November 26, 19 96
City Clerk
LORETT .DUDA
Approved and signed by me 714e-02i-44 ,,e7" 19 _�_
YA.(00.4. Mayor
ORDINANCE NO. 51:W46
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ESTABLISHING AN HISTORIC
LANDMARK FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LEEPER PARK, IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND,
INDIANA
Whereas, The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph
County has petitioned for the designation of the following described real
estate as an Historic Landmark under the Ordinance No. 5565-73, as amended to
wit:
Beginning at the northeast corner of lot #9 in Mary E.
Anderson's Sub. being at the south bank of the St. Joseph
River, proceed southwesterly 200' along the east
property-line of said lot to the north line of Riverside
Drive, thence southwesterly across Riverside Drive to the
northeast corner of lot #8 in Mary E. Anderson's Sub. , thence
southerly along said line 508.7' , thence south by
southeasterly 61' , thence southeasterly to the north line of
lot #3 of Anderson, Dushane & Putnam's Sub. , thence easterly
along said line to the northeast corner of lot # 6 of
Anderson, Dushane & Putnam Sub. at the west line of Lafayette
Boulevard, thence northerly along said line 453.4' to the
south line of Park Lane, thence easterly along said line to
the east line of Michigan Street, thence southerly along said
line to the north line of Bartlett Street, thence easterly
along said line 247.5' , thence southerly 66' to the south
line of said street, thence easterly along said line to a
point due east of said line at the west bank of the St.
Joseph River, thence following the meandering downstream
along the bank of the main channel of said river to the place
of beginning.
Whereas, The Historic Preservation Commission of South Bend and St. Joseph
County has recommended the designation of the PROPERTY as an historic
landmark.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA:
SECTION 1. That the above described PROPERTY be, and it is here designated and
established as an Historic Landmark under Ordinance No. 5565-73, as amended.
SECTION 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage by the Common Council, approval by the Mayor and its
publication.
COMITTEE REPORT
TO THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND:
Your Committee
to whom was referred
BILL NO.
62-96 A BILL AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ESTABLISHING AN
HISTORIC LANDMARK FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT LEEPER PARK,
IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA
Respectfully report that they have examined the matter and that in their opinion this bill
has been recommended to the Council favorably.
Sean Coleman
Chairman
•
historic p reservation commission
of south bend and st. joseph county
ROOM 1123 COUNTY CITY BUILDING
south bend,indiana 46601(219)235-9798
Common Council of the City of South Bend
C/0 Ms. Loretta Duda, Clerk of the City of South Bend
4th Floor County-City Building
South Bend, Indiana 46601
July 29, 1996
Honorable Council Members,
Attached please find the proposed amendment to the City of South Bend's Zoning
Ordinance. The purpose of the amendment is to designate the property located
at Leeper Park as a Local Historic Landmark.
At its June 17, 1996 meeting, the Historic Preservation Commission of South
Bend and St. Joseph County moved to send to the Common Council a favorable
recommendation to designate the above mentioned property, commonly known as
Leeper Park, as a Local Historic Landmark.
Also attached is a statement of Architectural and Historical Significance
prepared by commission staff. Mr. Talley of the HPC has prepared a lengthy
document tracing the development of the park to supplement this
recommendation. This document will be provided to council members on the
occasion of the public hearing on this matter. We would appreciate your
favorable consideration of this matter.
Yours truly,
(/ ‘,1/
David B. Duvall, Director
cc: John Oxian - President, HPC
Phil St.Clair - Dept. of Parks & Recreation
Filed in Clerk's Office
JUL 3 0 1996
LORETTA J. DUDA
CITY CLERK,SO.BEND,IN.
Report to the Common Council
Including
Historical and Architectural Significance
PROPOSED LOCAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION
LEEPER PARK
Historic Preservation. Commission
of
South Bend, Indiana
July, 1996
Filed In Clerk's Office
JUL 3 0 1996
LORETTA J. DUDA
CITY CLERK,SO.BEND,IN.
. .
\ , .. , ,,, .,, I 71"7 7:!?, J 7 F. I
\' R I7,1 1,.1 1171 19 in 4w1 NI:1 i'll 12PI J 1 '' Li 1 1
IN
TONT) AVENUE
la li NAPOLEON
cryinimnit JILL NO '4,6,7 I ',N.Y. i. j.,. , rill i'lNci,010 MI III I
49/490:
1
i 4w1,41"1 4 OOP =' •.-Iri.
ill ... , .... ... .... .. .... .,.
- . . -,k -- Pci" . ---
,,-, ... - . _
woo ;7 I 7.... 1,-,::: ---I ;
3 au .._. • .... „,...
..., L7 0. —
A E.W.F4p1.4. S. ,
,, • ,E3 - -7.14:.:": :id ...s ""
, 8 ?A, w4q.„4„,,,EwA
... MI,
5 /fi41* 41.4,J 1 3 ls.,..461.-„a;
.N.N......_
e VINCENT
...., _
.V l'itt V:p LZP, rettlick t' - -AVENUE rI E., ,,t_,,,- ' I.°. ii] il •..,. :2 1 maliEE
"Pcbe tila
• '''.f./ / '. t." co 1300 a ..II IQ ---t.lri . -4-4, ts .,..,,, — .., ....
'4Z:44/// f/. ? " ■, VIC : . --- = E:
R,...
'+ .4 W'qi...... •// ill T 1 :, ak. IA
. / ; t ra....14'''t 1.a-
III ,ii■ • osilve 411
• HOWARD
Ib . I ev,i;7„
-mph
I = • 51 1,110 ---
st4011E ...111 'L I ■ j
n
+ -I- ---....4,..t.
779 iiit ,. .
.L_Igilig'ILl'a sh■ • prt -• ' Riveli
Il
. ...
cti.- , io' .- " .,
.....Em■-i re.. ,1' 47,614)\'' 4, sz- dose,
., ,,..
,,....-->=-.1•Ira.k2- -‘.., . --..._miliiiiiiiiiiiiiii...... /./
'ET - "' let'rairil 101 MINDRIVE RIVERSIDE it-
<IN
k ... . .-..-,,,. __.•,-a ga's.;j IS
11
Jim '''' 2in. E;:it 6 wil
ii-dEl 00, ;El iir•ta.1a.a kat5 LEEPER PARK El .:1- .
cn n CORBY
I'.
' 1-.N., 7: ,7: tia 171 • I
•*.
)
,.. ..• si •;-7.3'
El aims' , PARK
...
• ••• D. Mpg 17ral KVA
•,•. 7/4 i I.5 k_.'I..."...tE I 10/,
v.,
-,,
.4.31 ÷
'''''
— s--,..
....
--17:
... ---11 PARK
-M=1:
-II
--ii
•--il + \ 9'...
9 +
. KALERAMA
.....
11 kJ'.
-0 BARTLETT . STET
14 1 iliiiliOV 4.0re s"`
21IS 111E '''. 11 I ."' 5:■1-1 41.4- f-;.",4 a .. ---., 1\1. p
la ri" 3, ; •\:‘, ,_
I, 1 1,,.,, LAMONTE TERRACE ....
DINPN ,4r
7 :: iiiinb Itin a EZti' W:Y MU
HOSPITAL
=--- CPqRr MO MI,WEn
• .- 01 .46)....., 11,...,7.i...,, i,w,..„,1,... ‘,,,,,,,,,...,
Me.a
SORIN STREET -
STREET
• '".11114.'
ARE
.. Ell Etti. gin 1 ! A e!_. L.11PI 1W.,
- _ •Mii-
sr
=Ma
7M9, NAVARRE STNEEP la iff 1111Mr.4 MI m . -_-_ -_7••• _
Cf
kb -
-TrlgT Ri atii mi F.:13 ...' — 1'.4V- MGR
4..
1,*9
el-
-. ''' o i 1 Ifl IBIsi
---;:b7.-ib----- sle0 tiii k .z-
,
,,.,‘
STREET N N I mei-
'C'' CEDAR
4,•,,,,:f4.. limn, ii t im 44 . :=1'ilk mi.. :t..,]
7 WA/0.444.74.* 91 IlEillm.T--f:Z . ' — .— '-`'i" :: r_r---.. .--- _,
h Wif4p4, 'Ilig 41° :1' ,
. ,..:,
___ ... . _._ ilb
.„ \ \NADI S ON
O I* 7
I W4WItt.t4114-4, t par.,
TRE...ET al .. 51
.7451
! olti
= ra
$ .
- --- ------ - ■.,,
= ----i
r 1
—11—I
•
LOCATION MAP
LEEPER PARK
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
As early as 1889, Alexis Coquillard proposed to conditionally donate land at
the bend of the St. Joseph River to the City of South Bend for the purpose of
establishing a public park. The parcel proposed later became Howard Park. At
the time of the Common Council consideration of this donation, the South Bend
Tribune editorialized that the best and most appropriate park land in the city
was at its north end near Chapin Park. In 1895, the city purchased a large
parcel on the east side of Michigan Street for the establishment of the Water
Works, capping artesian wells there located and rendering the land usable for
recreation. By 1900 the area around the Water Works had become referred to as
Leeper Park, The following year, extensive plans and site development were
undertaken. The zoo and lily pond were constructed in 1902. In 1904 the log
cabin was moved into the park from 123 West Northshore Drive. This building
was rehabilitated and established as the "Pierre Navarre Cabin" (a designated
Local Landmark) although this attribution is questionable. The cabin was
relocated again within the park in 1916.
In 1905 additional lands were acquired between Michigan Lafayette Streets and
tennis courts there developed, and the following year acreage was added
completing the west end of the park. The following year, the wooden bridge
connecting to the island in the St. Joseph River was washed away in flooding
and replaced with a new structure of iron and. concrete. By this time the zoo
located at the east end of the park boasted 132 animals of 50 varieties and
the pond in the middle section of the park was stocked with ducks and geese.
In 1911, the Park Board engaged George Kessler of St. Louis for the
development of masterplanning for the City's park-boulevard system. Mr.
Kessler continued to provide design services for many years thereafter. The
present North Pumping Station (a designated Local Landmark) and its reservoir
were constructed in 1912. The present Michigan Street Bridge was constructed
in 1915 as part of the Park-Boulevard plan proposed by George Kessler. During
the Great Depression extensive work was done in the park funded by the Works
Progress Administration (WPA) including the reconstruction of the retaining
walls around the island which- utilized salvage material from the earlier
bridge.
ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION
The area encompasses approximately five city blocks at the bend of the St.
Joseph River which established the northern geographical edge of the 19th
century urban area and includes two established ,Local Landmarks within its
boundaries, the Navarre Cabin and the North Pumping Station. Additional
structures of historical interest include the remote Colonial Revival style
pump houses, the reservoir at the east end, the island in the St Joseph River
with its foot bridge and retaining walls, and the duck, pond. Other historical
features include the formal flower gardens in the eastern section of the park
which were established in 1922.
. F
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the HPC Local Landmarks Criteria, the site at Leeper Park has been
recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission as a Local Historic
Landmark. The site meets the criteria in at least four areas.
1.) Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or
culture of the City of South Bend, St. Joseph County, the State if
Indiana, or the United States of America.
2.) Its embodiment of elements of architectural design, detail, materials, or
craftsmanship which represents an architectural characteristic or
innovation.
3. ) Its educational value.
4.) Its suitability for preservation.
The site fulfills criteria #1 as material evidence of South Bend's development
of civic institutions and infrastructure developed for use and enjoyment by
the general public with the purpose of improving the general health and well
being of the rapidly growing community.
The site fulfills criteria #2 as an example of trends in late 19th century
and early 20th century park and boulevard planning. The several historical
sites and structures in the park such as the reservoir, the duck pond, and the
foot bridge are not rated at this time in the Indiana Historic Sites and
Structures Survey as the survey has not yet addressed man-made landscape
features of this type. Miscellaneous buildings in the park which are not
individually landmarked and which are rated as contributing include the
Colonial Revival pumping stations.
The site fulfills criteria #3 as an example of turn of the century suburban
park planning. The area also represents the integration of recreational space
with utilitarian development and the development of modern notions of public
health and hygiene.
The site meets criteria #4 by the integrity and profuse archaeological
evidence of its features, development and construction with limited
alterations and deterioration.
DBD
7/29/96
Note: Statements written in this style of text are notes to used in completing the
Standards and Criteria. This text has been set up so that it can be typed over while still
remaining in the document. In order to keep the text from not printing, please do the
following: Co into the File menu; select Print command;press Options button; in the
Options dialog box under Include with Document find the option Hidden text, click the
box to clear the option.
9.0 LANDSCAPES - SPECIFIC STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
(Landscape Name)
(Landscape Address)
9.1 Introduction
1. In these guidelines the verb Should indicates a recommended course of
action; the verb Shall indicates those actions which are specifically
required to preserve and protect significant architectural elements.
2. The intent of these standards and criteria is to preserve the overall
character and appearance of the (Landscape name) including its spatial
organization,topography,vegetation,circulation and features.
,
3. The standards and criteria acknowledge that there will be changes to the
landscape and are intended to make the changes sensitive to the historic
character of the landscape.
4. Each property will be separately studied to determine if a later addition(s)
and/or alteration(s)can,or should, be removed.
5. Since it is not possible to provide one general guideline, the following
factors that will be considered in determining whether a later addition(s)
and/or alteration(s)can, or should, be removed include:
a. Compatibility with the original property's integrity in scale, materials
and character.
b. Historic association with the property.
c. Quality in the design and execution of the addition/alteration.
d. Functional usefulness.
6. Recreational facilities which exist should be allowed to remain as long as
they serve substantial community functions. In some cases these features
can be redesigned to be more compatible with the overall landscape.
7. Additions to existing recreational facilities shall not be allowed unless
such additions make the facilities more compatible with the overall
landscape.
8. The development of additional facilities for active recreation or single
purpose uses for limited user groups shall not be allowed.
9. Proposals for special activities and events which cause significant impacts
or require permanent or even semi-permanent (seasonal) structures or
facilities shall not be permitted.
10. The Boston Landmarks Commission recommends that the work proposed
to the landscape be executed with the guidance of a landscape professional
with expertise with historic landscapes.
11. The (list what is under review.) are subject to the terms of the landscape
guidelines herein stated.
12. Items under Commission review include but are not limited to the
following:
9.2 Spatial Organization
•
(includes Views,Vistas,Landscape Spaces, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7 and 9.8 for additional Standards
and Criteria that may apply.
1. Views and vistas are among the most important aspects of a landscape,
therefore,they should be maintained and preserved.
2. All (List the Spatial Organizational features of the landscape that need
to be preserved, such as: views, vistas, landscape spaces, etc.) shall be
preserved.
3. Original or later contributing spatial organizational features shall be
retained in their existing configuration and shall be maintained through
proper drainage, access and erosion control, pruning and removal of
invasive vegetation or otherwise using recognized horticultural and soil
management practices.
4. Alteration of existing or addition of new spatial organizational features
will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic
landscape design.
5. Deteriorated or missing spatial organizational features shall be replaced
with features that match the original in form, shape,color and texture.
6. When replacement of f atures is necessary, it should he based on physical
or documentary evidence.
7. If using the same mater al is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may he considered.
8. Important visual connections between spaces within the landscape shall be
retained by maintaining vegetation. circulation and topography features
which contribute to these visual relationships.
9. The historic spatial and functional relationship of circulation systems,
water features and structures shall be preserved by maintaining the
massing of adjacent vegetation, vistas, or other associated features.
10. Maintenance of. removal of, and additions of vegetation materials and
features should consider maintaining existing or intended vistas and
spaces, screening intrusions, creating new spaces where appropriate and
maintaining defined areas of shade and sun.
11. The form and shape of individual spaces and their associated vertical
elements shall be retained in order to preserve the historic relationships of
the landscape. Examples include the relationship between open fields and
hedgerows or the width and length of an allee.
12. Moving or demolishing historic structures that would alter spatial and
visual relationships in the landscape shall not be allowed.
13. Construction of new structures that would alter historic spatial and visual
relationships in the landscape shall not be allowed.
14. Intrusive views or new construction may be screened with compatible
fencing or plant material so long as the screening would detract from the
historic character of the landscape.
(List any additional items such as:New construction in the Young Meadow
shall not be allowed)
9.3 Topography
(includes the Shape, Slope, Elevation, Contour of Landforms and Ground
Plane, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.2, 9.4. 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9 and 9.10 for additional
Standards and Criteria that may apply.
•
1. All (List the Topographical features of the landscape that need to be
preserved,such as:shape, slope, elevation, landform contours, etc.) shall
he preserved.
2. Original or later contributing topographical features shall be retained in
their existing configuration and shall be maintained through proper
drainage, access and erosion control. and recognized soil management
practices.
3. Alteration of existing or addition of new topographical features will be
considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape
design.
4. Natural features (e.g. rock outcroppings) which are integrated into the
landscape shall be treated as part of the overall design and shall be
retained.
5. Deteriorated or missing topographical features shall be replaced with
materials that match the original in form, shape.color and texture.
6. When replacement of materials or features is necessary, it should be based
on physical or documentary evidence.
7. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
8. Wherever appropriate, plant materials rather than structural materials
should be used to solve erosion problems.
(List any additional items such as:Repair of the Dray Cliffs is encouraged.)
9.4 Vegetation
(includes Trees, Shrubs, Ground Covers, Hedges, Allees, Fields, Forests,
Planting Beds, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.2, 9.3, 9.5, 9.7, 9.8, 9.9 and 9.10 for additional
Standards and Criteria that may apply.
1. All (List the Vegetation materials and features of the landscape that
need to be preserved, such as: trees, shrubs, ground cover, hedges,
altees,fields,forests, etc.) shall be preserved.
2. Original or later contributing vegetation materials and features shall be
retained in their existing configuration and shall be maintained through
proper horticultural management practices.
3. Alteration of existing or addition of new vegetation materials and features
will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic
landscape design.
4. Deteriorated or missing vegetation materials and features shall be replaced
with materials that match the original in size, shape, color, form and
texture.
5. When replacement of vegetation materials or features is necessary, it
should be based on physical or documentary evidence.
6. If using the same vegetation material is not technically or economically
feasible, then compatible substitute vegetation materials may be
considered if they convey the same growth habit, form, foliage and bloom
characteristics as the historic plant.
7. Existing healthy vegetation material shall be retained unless it is part of a
later non-compatible design or is volunteer vegetation inconsistent with
the original design.
8. Consideration for removal of existing healthy vegetation materials and
features will be given when it is in conflict with the original design intent
of the landscape, such as when an important vista has become overgrown
or when plants have grown out of scale with their intended purpose.
9. Maintenance of, removal of, and additions of vegetation materials and
features should consider maintaining existing or intended vistas and
spaces, screening intrusions, creating new spaces where appropriate and
maintaining defined areas of shade and sun.
10. Invasive vegetation shall be removed whenever technically feasible and
shall be replaced with appropriate vegetation consistent with the original
design of the park and with current factors such as security, ecological
conditions and wildlife management practices.
11. Hazardous plants or portions of plants should be removed promptly.
12. Plants with diseases that are difficult or not practical to control or cure
should be removed promptly to prevent their infection of other plants.
13. Mutilated or distorted plants should be removed.
14 Plant replacements should be added on a schedule that will assure a
continuity in the landscape design.
15. Existing vegetation shall be protected adjacent construction activities by
fencing the root system prior to the start of construction.
(List any additional items such as: Future plantings shall be guided by the
original design for the mall, as modified by Shurtleff)
9.5 Circulation
(includes Roads, Paths,Parkways, Drives, Trails, Walks, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.6, 9.8, 9.9 and 9.10 for additional
Standards and Criteria that may apply.
1. All (List the Circulation layout, materials and features of the landscape
that need to be preserved, such as: roads,paths,parkways, drives, trails,
walks, brick sidewalks, granite curbing, stone dust paths, etc.) shall be
preserved.
2. Original or later contributing layouts of walks, roads and paved areas shall
be retained and maintained.
3. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation layouts will be
considered if it can be shown that better site circulation is necessary and
that the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape
design.
4. When replacement of circulation layouts is necessary, it should be based
on physical or documentary evidence.
5. Original or later contributing circulation materials and features shall be
retained and, if necessary, repaired by patching, piecing-in or reinforcing
the material or feature using recognized preservation methods.
6. Deteriorated or missing circulation materials and features shall be replaced
with materials that match the original in size, shape, color, profile, form,
texture and detail of installation.
7. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
8. Alteration of existing or addition of new circulation materials and features
will be considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic
landscape design.
•
9. Consideration will be given to an alternate paving material if it can he
shown that its properties will improve the original or later contributing
design concept.
10. When replacement of circulation materials or features is necessary, it
should be based on physical or documentary evidence.
11. Consideration for removal of existing circulation systems and features will
be given when it is in conflict with the original design intent of the
landscape or when they are no longer appropriate to their intended
purpose.
(List any additional items such as: No motor vehicles of any kind, except
maintenance vehicles approved by the Department of Parks and Recreation,
shall be permitted on any part of the Mall at any time.)
9.6 Water Features
(includes Fountains,Pools,Irrigation Systems, Ponds,Rivers, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.11 B, C and D regarding treatment of materials and
features; and Sections 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.7, 9.8 and 9.10 for additional
Standards and Criteria that may apply.
1. All (List the Water Features of the landscape that need to be preserved,
such as:fountains,pools, irrigation systems,ponds, rivers, etc.) shall be
preserved.
2. Original or later contributing water features shall be retained and
maintained.
3. Existing water courses or bodies should not be altered. Consideration will
be given to proposals that improve site drainage, improve water quality,
enhance the landscape design or improve wildlife habitat.
4. Alteration of existing or addition of new water features will be considered
if the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape
design.
5. When replacement of water features and their materials are necessary. it
should be based on physical or documentary evidence.
6. Original or later contributing water feature materials shall be retained and,
if necessary, repaired by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or reinforcing
the material using recognized preservation methods.
7. Deteriorated or missing water feature materials shall be replaced with
materials that match the original in size, shape, color, profile. form, texture
and detail of installation.
8. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
9. Alteration of existing or addition of new water feature materials will be
considered if they do not alter the basic concept of the historic landscape
design.
10. When appropriate from an ecological perspective, dredging of waterways
shall be permitted as a means of retaining historic waterways.
11. All wetlands shall be preserved.
12. All shorelines of water courses or bodies shall be protected from erosion in
a manner in keeping with the basic concept of the landscape design.
13. Consideration for removal of existing water features will be given when it
is in conflict with the original design intent of the landscape or when they
are no longer appropriate to their intended purpose.
(List any additional items such as: New storm drains should not be added
until an accurate survey has been taken of the existing condition of the
storm drainage system and the ability of the existing lines to handle
additional water.)
9.7 Furnishings and Objects
(includes Benches, Lights, Signs, Drinking Fountains, Trash Receptacles,
Fences, Tree Grates, Flagpoles, Sculpture, Monuments, Memorials, Planters,
Urns, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.11 B, C and D regarding treatment of materials and
features; and Sections 9.2,9.3, 9.4,9.5, 9.6, 9.8,9.9 and 9.10 for additional
Standards and Criteria that may apply. .
1. All (List the Furnishings and Objects materials, elements, details and
features of the landscape that need to be preserved, such as: benches,
lights, signs, drinking fountains, trash receptacles,fences, tree grates,
flagpoles,sculptures, monuments,planters, urns, etc.) shall be preserved.
2. Original or later contributing furnishings and objects materials, elements,
features and details shall be retained and, if necessary, repaired by
patching, splicing, consolidating. or otherwise reinforcing using recognized
preservation methods. .
3. Deteriorated or missing furnishings and objects materials, elements,
features and details shall be repaced with materials that match the original
in material, size, shape, color. profile. form, texture, configuration and
detail of installation.
4. Alteration of existing or addition of new furnishings and objects will be
considered if the alteration does not alter the basic concept of the historic
landscape design.
•
5. When replacement of furnishings and objects and their materials are
necessary,it should be based on physical or documentary evidence.
6. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
7. Existing memorials, statues, monuments and fountains shall be carefully
preserved and restored where necessary, maintaining the integrity of the
original material band 'design. This work shall be coordinated with the
Boston Art Commission.
8. New furnishings and objects should be designed using vandal resistant
standards.
9. Location of signs shall be guided by a master plan.
10. Signs shall conform to a simple sign system.
11. Existing non-conforming signs should be removed.
(List any additional items such as:All new monuments and fountains shall
be located on the central path.) _
9.8 Structures
(includes Walls, Terraces, Arbors, Gazebos, Follies, Playground Equipment,
Picnic Shelters,Plazas, Greenhouse, Steps, Bridges, Dams, Buildings, etc.)
Refer to Sections 9.11 B, C and D regarding treatment of materials and
features; and Sections 9.2, 9.3,9.4, 9.5, 9.6,9.7, 9.9 and 9.10 for additional
Standards and Criteria that may apply.
1. The general intent is to preserve the original or later contributing
structures that enhance the historic landscape.
2. All (List the structures, elements and materials that need to be
preserved, such as: walls, terraces, arbors, gazebos,follies, playground
equipment, picnic shelters, plazas, greenhouses, steps, bridges, dams,
buildings, etc.) shall be preserved.
3. Original or later contributing structures, materials, elements, details and
ornamentation shall be retained and, if necessary, repaired using
recognized preservation methods.
4. Deteriorated or missing structures, materials, elements, details and
ornamentation shall be replaced with material and elements which match
the original in material, color, texture, size, shape, profile and detail of
installation.
5. When replacement is necessary, it should be based on physical or
documentary evidence.
6. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
7. New additions/alterations to the landscape (such as: parking lots, comfort
stations, buildings, etc.) shall be as unobtrusive as possible and preserve
any original or later contributing landscape features.
8. Removal of non-historic structures from the existing landscape is
encouraged.
9. Structures shall be protected from arson and other acts of vandalism
through proper monitoring procedures and methods such as; permanent
installation of smoke detectors, alarms, or other security systems, or
temporarily boarding up windows and openings.
(List any additional items such as:No buildings of any type shall be erected
on the mall. Refer to the Exteriors - Specific Standards and Criteria for
additional Standards and Criteria that may apply. Individual structures
should be listed with accompanying Standards and Criteria.)
9.9 Archeology
Refer to Sections 9.11 B, C, and D regarding treatment of materials.
Refer to Sections 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7 and 9.8 for additional Standards
and Criteria that may apply.
1. The landscape should be surveyed for potential archeological sites prior to
the beginning of any construction project.
2. Known Archeological site(s) shall be protected during any construction
project.
3. Disturbance of the terrain within the landscape shall be kept to a minimum
so as not to disturb any unknown archeological materials
4. All planning, any necessary site investigation. or data recovery shall be
conducted by a professional archeologist.
(List any additional items such as: New construction in the park area in
front of the building shall not disturb the ground below four feet in order to
protect known archeological sites.)
9.10 Accessibility
Refer to Sections 9.11 B, C, and D regarding treatment of materials.
Refer to Sections 9.3, 9.4, 9.5, 9.6, 9.7 and 9.8 for additional Standards
° and Criteria that may apply.
1. A three-step approach is recommended to identity and implement
accessibility modifications that will protect the integrity and historic
character of the property:
a. Review the historical significance of the property and identify
character-defining features;
b. Assess the property's existing and required level of accessibility;
c. Evaluate accessibility options within a preservation context.
2. Because of the complex nature of accessibility the commission will review
proposals on a case by case bases. The commission recommends
consulting with the following document which is available from the
commission office:
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural
Resources, Preservation Assistance Division; Preservation Brief 32
"Making Historic Properties Accessible" by Thomas C. Jester and
Sharon C. Park, AIA.
9.11 Architectural Materials
A. General
The Boston Landmarks Commission recommends that work proposed to the
materials outlined in sections B. C and D be executed with the guidance of a
professional building materials conservator.
(List any specific comments such as: The removal of the exhaust fans at the
grade level on India Street is encouraged)
B. Masonry (Brick, Stone, Terra Cotta, Concrete, Stucco and Mortar)
1. All (List the masonry materials,features, details and ornamentation of
the building that need to be preserved,such as;granite, brownstone, etc.
brick cornices and door pediments, stone window architrave, terra cotta
brackets, railings, etc. Also include masonry surfaces that need to be
preserved, such as; surface modeling, tooling, bonding patterns, joint
sizes, color, etc.) shall be preserved.
2. Original or later contributing masonry materials, features, details, surfaces
and ornamentation shall be retained and, if necessary, repaired by
patching, piecing-in, or consolidating the masonry using recognized
preservation methods.
e , r
•
3. Deteriorated or missing masonry materials, features, details, surfaces and
ornamentation shall be replaced with material and elements which match
the original in material, color, texture, size, shape, profile and detail of
installation.
4. When replacement of materials or elements is necessary, it should be
based on physical or documentary evidence.
5. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
6. Original mortar shall be retained.
7. Deteriorated mortar shall be carefully removed by hand-raking the joints.
8. Use of mechanical saws and hammers shall not be allowed.
9. Repointing mortar shall duplicate the original mortar in strength,
composition, color, texture. joint size, joint profile and method of
application.
10. Sample panels of raking the joints and repointing shall be reviewed and
approved by the staff of the Boston Landmarks Commission.
11. Cleaning of masonry is discouraged and should he performed only when
necessary to halt deterioration.
12. If the building is to be cleaned, the mildest method possible shall be
used.
13. A test patch of the cleaning method(s) shall be reviewed and approved on
site by staff of the Boston Landmarks Commission. Test patches should
always be carried out well in advance of cleaning (including exposure to
all seasons if possible).
14. Sandblasting (wet or dry), wire brushing, or other similar abrasive
cleaning methods shall not be permitted. Doing so changes the visual
quality of the material and accelerates deterioration.
15. Waterproofing or water repellents are strongly discouraged. These
treatments are generally not effective in preserving masonry and can cause
permanent damage. The Commission does recognize that in extraordinary
circumstances their use may be required to solve a specific problem.
Samples of any proposed treatment shall be reviewed by the Commission
before application. •
16. In general, painting masonry surfaces shall not be allowed. Painting
masonry surfaces will be considered only when there is documentary
evidence that this treatment was used at some point in the history of the
property.
C. Wood
1. All (List the wood surfaces,features, details and ornamentation of the
building that need to be preserved, such as: clapboards, cornices,
brackets, entablatures, shutters, columns, balustrades, shingles, etc.
Also include paint colors and finishes.) shall be preserved.
2. Original or later contributing wood surfaces, features, details and
ornamentation shall be retained and, if necessary, repaired by patching,
piecing-in, consolidating or reinforcing the wood using recognized
preservation methods.
3. Deteriorated or missing wood surfaces, features, details and ornamentation
shall be replaced with material and elements which match the original in
material, color,texture, size, shape,profile and detail of installation.
4. When replacement of materials or elements is necessary, it should be
based on physical or documentary evidence.
5. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
6. Cleaning of wooden elements shall use the mildest method possible.
7. Paint removal should be considered only where there is paint surface
deterioration and as part of an overall maintenance program which
involves repainting or applying other appropriate protective coatings.
Coatings such as paint help protect the wood from moisture and ultraviolet
light and stripping the wood bare will expose the surface to the effects of
weathering.
8. Damaged or deteriorated paint should be removed to the next sound layer
using the mildest method possible.
9. Propane or butane torches, sandblasting, water blasting or other
abrasive cleaning and/or paint removal methods shall not be
permitted. Doing so changes the visual quality of the wood and
accelerates deterioration.
10. Repainting should be based on paint seriation studies. If an adequate
record does not exist repainting shall be done with colors that are
appropriate to the style and period of the building.
D. Architectural Metals (Cast Iron, Steel, Pressed Tin, Copper, Aluminum
and Zinc)
1. All (List the metal materials,features, details and ornamentation of the
building that need to be preserved, such as: cast iron facades, porches
and steps;sheet metal cornices, roofs, roof cresting and storefronts; and
cast or rolled metal doors, window sash, entablatures, and hardware etc.
Also include paint colors and finishes.) shall be preserved.
2. Original or later contributing metal materials, features, details and
ornamentation shall be retained and, if necessary, repaired by patching,
splicing or reinforcing the metal using recognized preservation methods.
3. Deteriorated or missing metal materials, features, details and
ornamentation shall be replaced with material and elements which match
the original in material, color, texture, size, shape, profile and detail of
installation.
4. When replacement of materials or elements is necessary, it should be
based on physical or documentary evidence.
5. If using the same material is not technically or economically feasible, then
compatible substitute materials may be considered.
6. Cleaning of metal elements either to remove corrosion or deteriorated
paint shall use the mildest method possible.
7. Abrasive cleaning methods, such as low pressure dry grit blasting, may be
allowed as long as it does not abrade or damage the surface.
8. A test patch of the cleaning method(s) shall be reviewed and approved on
site by staff of the Boston Landmarks Commission. Test patches should
always be carried out well in advance of cleaning (including exposure to
all seasons if possible).
9. Cleaning to remove corrosion and paint removal should be considered
only where there is deterioration and as part of an overall maintenance
program which involves repainting or applying other appropriate
protective coatings. Paint or other coatings help retard the corrosion rate
of the metal. Leaving the metal bare will expose the surface to accelerated
corrosion.
10. Repainting should be based on paint seriation studies. If an adequate
record does not exist repainting shall be done with colors that are
appropriate to the style and period of the building.
The Landscapes-Specific Standards and Criteria has been financed in part with funds from the National Park Service,
U.S.Department of the Interior,through the Massachusetts Historical Commission.Secretary of State Michael Joseph
Connolly,Chairman.
The U.S.Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race,color.national origin,age,gender,or
handicap in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program,activity
or facility as described above,or if you desire further information,please write to:Office for Equal Opportunity, 1849
C Street NW,Room 1324,U.S.Department of the Interior,Washington,D.C.20240.
AREA PLAN COMMISSION of ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN
RICHARD S. JOHNSON Executive Director ROBERT W. SANTE Assistant Director
1140 COUNTY CITY BUILDING, SOUTH BEND, IN. 46601 (219) 235-9571 FAX(219)235-9813
August'20, 1996
Ms. Loretta Duda, City Clerk
4th Floor, County-City Building
South Bend, Indiana 46601
RE: Leeper Park
Dear Ms. Duda:
The Staff of the Area Plan Commission has reviewed the Historic Preservation Commission's
proposed designation of the above property as an historic landmark with respect to the
relationship of said property to any capital improvements proposed for nearby rights-of-way,
easements or properties. We find no proposed improvements that will conflict with this
designation.
Sincerely,
mes Voll
Planner
Filed in Clerk's Office
AUG 2 1 1996
LORETTA J. DUDA
CITY CLERK,SO.READ,IN.
Sewing: South Bend, Lakeville, New Carlisle, North Liberty, Roseland and St. Joseph County, IN