HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 09-17-71Septem er 17, 1971
10:30 M.
Presiding Officer:
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
Absent:
Others Present:
Le6al Counsel:
LPA Staff:
SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
1200 County -City Building
Mr. Fred J. Helmen, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd.
President South Bend, Indiana 46601
Mr. Fred J. Helmen, President
Rev. Willie V. Williams, Secretary
Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, Member
Mr. John E. Chenney, Vice President
Mr. Bob L. Wade, Asst. Secretary
Mr. F. Jay Nimtz, President, Board of Trustees
Mr. James F. Peacock, Board of Trustees
Mr. Edgar Wertheimer, Board of Trustees
Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Common Council Member
Mr. Henry Howell, South Bend Boxing Club
Mr. James Marchelewicz, WNDU -TV Reporter
Mr. Rick Musser, South Bend Tribune Reporter
Mr. Bruce C. Hammerschmidt
Mr.
B. Ashenfelter
Mr.
Paul E. Becher
Mr.
L. Glenn Barbe
Mrs.
Dorothy Z. Deane
Mr.
Harrison Miller
Rev.
Billy W. Kirk
Mrs.
Helen S. King
Mr.
Bill Slabaugh
Mr.
Edwin Bauer
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, MINUTES APPROVED
the mi utes of the Regular Meeting of September 3, 1971
were approved and unanimously carried.
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins, - CLAIMS.APPROVED
the claims -- totalling $103,498.04 -- were approved for
payment and unanimously carried.
PROJEC EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -57
tract Co. of St. Joseph Co., Inc.
othy N. Howell - Petty Cash
Be
$ 15.00
6.00
Total 21.00
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd)
PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R
Escrow - Loan
Re ha B. Carr (mortgage payoff)
Abstra t & Title Corporation
Abstra t Co. of St. Joseph Co.
B. J. emolition
Bower iomes
Credit Bureau of South Bend, Inc.
Bruce . Hammerschmidt
Doroth N. Howell
LaSall Flying Squad
Daniel A. Snyder
r EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -66
$ 79.10
237.00
1,019.50
1,874.00
62.00
38.50
1,100.00
86.00
2,156.20
75.00
Total 6,727.30
Real Estate Option
First Bank & Trust Co., Guardian Estate of Lutrella
I Teeter, #28 -16
Fi -st Bank & Trust Co., Guardian Estate of Lutrella
I. Teeter, #28 -13
Small Business Displacement Claims
City Bar B Cue, #9 -12
Coney Island, #1 -5
Relocation Claims
C1 ud Bros., Inc., #13 -5 - Paid to Indiana Bell Tele. Co.
C1 ud Bros., Inc., #13 -5 - Paid to Rands Delivery System
Main Liquor Store, #9 -2 - Paid to L. B. Wiltfong Movers
Main Liquor Store, #9 -2 - Paid to Indiana Bell Tele. Co.
Main Liquor Store, #9 -2 - Paid to Humes Electric Co.
Ra cho Restaurant, #3 -15 - Paid to E. J. White, Inc.
Ra cho Restaurant, #3 -15 - Paid to Keith E. Proud
Ra cho Restaurant, #3 -15 - Paid to Barnes Electric Co.
Ra cho Restaurant, #3 -15 - Paid to A -1 Service
Fi estone Stores, #26 -1 - Paid to U.S.A. Van & Storage
Additi nal Relocation Claim
Geneva L. Smallwood
The Abstract & Title Corp.
Abstract Co. of St. Joseph Co., Inc.
American District Telegraph Co., Inc.
Al ,bert S. Bond
Clean Towel Service
-2-
10.00
10.00
2,500.00
2,500.00
156.00
5,120.00
810.00
18.00
307.00
1,442.00
330.00
2,522.00
365.95
499.00
-11 KI
40.00
416.00
192.75
100.00
3.06
3. APPROVAL O
OF CLAIMS Cont'd)
Community D
Development Associates, Inc. $
$ 700.00
Loretta D
Daly 1
19000.00
S. M. Mix &
&- Associates 1
1,549.91
W. Joseph D
Doran - County Clerk 1
1,500.00
Paul F n
nfer 4
400.00
Ronald E
E, Gettel 4
4,500.00
Bruce C
C. Hammerschmidt 3
3,950.00
Dorothy N
N. Howell - Petty Cash 2
277.00
Howell E
Electric Co. 1
15.00
Indiana &
& Michigan Electric Co. 1
141.87
Indust i
ial Belting .
56.50
Ralph .
.& S
1,200.00
Midwest A
Auction Co. 7
75.00
Northern I
Indiana Public Service 1
11.19
Otis Elevator C
Co. 1
18.10
The RU o
ormer 9
91.50
Ed Sei e
ert & Sons -
- 35,200.00
Justin S
Smith -
- - 40.00
South 3
3end Tribune 6
66.30
Val -ley E
Equipment Co., Inc. 1
10.00
E. J. 4
4hite Plumbing Co. 1
120.00
Project E
Expenditures Account, Ind. R -56 4
457.01
Total 69,223.14
P.E.A.- C
CODE ENFORCEMENT E -3 _
Arrow E
Electric Co., Inc. ` $
•
Anthon P
;J
175.00
Off i
cg
REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND' -
roll: September 1 through 15, 1971
Ault Camera Shop, Inc, i4
L. G1e n Barbe 45.00
Bath I surance Agency, Inc. 1.5.00
Busine s Systems, Inc. - 2:96
City o South Bend - Postage-,. 84.86
Keith 1. Crighton r. _ 11.90
Ehring r Florist ..'10.20
Employ r Overload Co. 67.00
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co -. 49,70
Manpow r 75.56
James .Meehan &Associates 3,5.09
W. Har ison Miller 148.00
Office Engineers, Inc. 9$•19
Royal Fypewriter Co. of South Bend 2,. 4.7
Richarl E. Pfeifer 78.90
South 3end Parking Co., Inc. - - :75.00
South end Water Works
6.67
Waggon is Fuel Co. 11•.05
Joseph A. Buczkowski - OSA -33 300.00
-3-
-3-
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd
Fred _J nowiak - SBCSC
Helen Turney - SBCSC
Total
GRAND TOTAL
URBAN- REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CAPITAL FUND
$ 5,000.00
5,000.00
27,066.68
$ 103,498,04
Project
Michiana Arts And Sciences Council, Inc.
Expenditures
Account,
Ind.
R -57
$ 1,83.0.00
-
Preside
it of the South Bend Redevelopment Commission,
_
advised
Total 1,830.00
REIMBURSEMENT
TO REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND
of-the stan,dpi,pe base would enhance the
Cultura
Project
Expenditures
Account,
Ind.
E -3
$ 3,033.65
Project
The sta
Expenditures
Account,
Ind.
R -56
7,13.34
Project
north of Jefferson Boulevard.
Expenditures
Account,
Ind.
R -57
4,854.12
Project
Expenditrues
Account,
Ind.
R -66
10,910.01
_
b.
Cholis and Cholis Letter Dated Se tember 15!,,s.
PARCEL NO 10 -3,
1971:
This law firm represents Mrs. Monica M. Peak,
Total _ 19,511.:12
4. "COM UNICATIONS
a.
Michiana Arts And Sciences Council, Inc.
PRESERVATION OF
Letter
ated September 7, 1971: The letter, written-by
STANDPIPE BASE, R -66
Mrs. E.
Blair Warner, President, to Mr. Fred J. Helmen,
Preside
it of the South Bend Redevelopment Commission,
_
advised
it is the feeling of many that the historical,
charace
of-the stan,dpi,pe base would enhance the
Cultura
Center Site, and requested, if possible, to
presery
the base as a reminder of our community's:;
heri tag
_ .__ _ _
The sta
dpipe supplied water to the community for many
years.
The base is located on the east side of Lincoln
Way East,
north of Jefferson Boulevard.
Preside
it Helmen said if it meets with the plans and
specifi
ations and is not in the way of the Cultural
Center,
we will try to preserve it. The Commission
concurr
d.
_
b.
Cholis and Cholis Letter Dated Se tember 15!,,s.
PARCEL NO 10 -3,
1971:
This law firm represents Mrs. Monica M. Peak,
220 W. WASHINGTON ST.,
former
owner of Parcel No. 10 -3, known as 220 West =
R46
Washington
Street, R -66 Project.
The letter
'the
requested that the Department be made. .aware
if
use of said premises be made contrary to the
use for
which it was condemned, Mrs. Peak is demanding .
that th
real estate be re- conveyed to her on a sale
basis,
he terms of which are to be ultimately negoti-
ated wi
h the Department of Redevelopment.
-4-
4.
:OMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd
The atest status of this parcel is.,that the County
Council will appropriate the money for the purchase of
this parcel by the County, and this amount has been
allocated in the County budget.
City of Lincoln Park•Letier Dated September 13, CITY,OF LINCOLN PARK,
1971: The Director, Mr..Emanuel,Gorland, listed; :a .: MICHI;GAN, -.LAND DISPOSI-
few suggestions on the disposition of urban renewal- land TION
whici has been very successful for them.
Mr. �arbe, who was Di- rector there for two years; advised.
thei project is much,smalIer - taking in;about three
bloc s. downtown, along with- a- residentfail_ section -in back,
of ft. This involved extensive;cl;earance with some reha
bil i ation, providing municipally - .owned free parki "ng for :
busi esses. Canopies were placed.full. length- of : >the stores..
in tie rear. The street ; was -an eight- l;ane-state�hi .-ghway-
the ity only repaired the sidewalks: The.project is now
complete.
5. bLD BUSINESS
a. Arthur Rubloff & Co., Real Estate Developers, ARTHUR RUBLOFF & CO.,
Chicago, Illinois A .meetin;g.- was held with. this firm , REAL ,ESTATE DEVELOPERS
yesterday September 16th, in South Bend, with fqur
of tie local realtors resulting in a- -very good session
Messrs. Beak and Brown of Arthur Rubloff & Co. drove about
town, the Scottsdale Shopping Center on the south side
and in our downtown project. They wial: submit a letter
indi ating their feelings on; how they might or "might not
be i volved.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. Additive Alternate 1 to Contract-1 for Phase II -A: ADDITIVE- ALTERNATE 1 TO
Commission approva 1 was requeste to delete Additive CONTRACT 1 FOR PHASE II -A
Alternate 1 from this Contract, which is i.n-the amount of DELETED, R -66
$6,144.00 -- the cost for the artistic treatment.on the
retaining wall. This .changes thegrand.total-of $682!20430
tote bid amount of $676,060,;30, and the type;of artistic.
treatment for an appearance ,complemen.tary tp -the Cultural
Center to be decided by the Commission at a later date.
Commission awarded: - above Contract ao.Howell_..Construetion
Company in meeting of August 9; Contract was;a:ppro.ved _
September 3, 1971, subject to Commission Legal Counsel
appr val and the,P.resident and Secretary :au:thorized; to:
sign. The Pre- Construction;C,onference was held on: Sept-em-
ber ber 5, at which time the Additive Alternate 1 was re
ques ed to be deleted. The Cultural Center is to be con-
511
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd)
tact d and numerous sketches and samples for the
artistic treatment are to be submitted ; for -Com-
mission approval
On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams;
,Additive Alternate 1�.Was authorized to be deleted
from the Contract,- _i:n- _the.,amount of $6.;1:44....00, and.-
the rtistic treatment- "for the "retaining- wall-to be
decided by the - Commission" "at a -1 ater -date Motion
unanimously carried.
D. Parcel - No.",28 -11 to be' included- for 'Demol - PARCEL NO. 28 -11,
tion Contract No. Authorization Was requested ADDED TO DEMOLITION
toad Par ce No. 28- 1'1'"to `Demolition Contract No. CONTRACT NO. 18,
18. This is a.house'located at`631 -fast Monroe and'' R -66•
is u tenable. 'Commission approval for advertisement
was authorized on September 13,..and as the ad has=not
been submitted for advert- sing "as�yet, this'parceT -is
requested to be "added to� -the Contract:
On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams,
Parcel No. 28 -11 was authorized to be added to Demoli-
tion Contract No. 18 for advertising. Motion unani-
mously carried.
Certificate of 'Completion: Authorization for CERTLFICATE OF COM-
Certificate of Completion`of Redevelopment for D`isposi- PLETION AUTHORIZED,
tion Parcel Nos. 6 -13 and 6 -14, in the LaSal1e Park - DISPOSITION PARCELS
Urban Renewal Project, R -57, to -James and Ocie Scott, _ 6 -13 & 6 -14, R -57
was requested.
On m tion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev..Wil- li,ams,ry
the ertificate of- Completion of Redevelopment for the
abov parcels was authorized and motion unanimously
carried.
George Cimermancic Associates: President LASALLE PARK HOUSING,
Helm en asked how this Detroit developer is_ coming along R -57
with the homes he proposed bu i3 di ng?
Mr. imermancic was proposing to build ten houses on `a
spec lative basis; upon selling these they would start
on a other group. He had requested pruchase approval of
bids on 20 to 27 :1:ots6 in the 'LaSalle Park Urban Renewal
Proj ct, R -57 They submiteedproposals to build 25
single-family units, consisting of 15.- three - bedroom-
ranc es to sell for $18,200 each, and 10 four - bedroom
colo ials for $21.0 2001each -iwith full basements' brick:
exterior and completely caepeted ":
Mr. arbe advised `these 'Tots had al T been- 'soil tested,
and hat this''firm would-be on a release`clause'vith
24 m nths to build. —
sm
6.
VEW BUSINESS (Cont'd
The iomes are in varying stages of completion - -80% to
85% omplete. All are enclosed. The feel.i,ng.in the
neig borhood is that aluminum siding was offered them:
and the siding material being used is brick. The
housles are not selling.
Mr. Hammerschmidt advised these are speculative houses
and are not under contract.. Our contract with the firm
says if the developer does-not complete the homes, they
are in default. We would have the authority to complete
and sell the homes. The firm is also confronted with
:vandalism in the area.
President Helmen requested Mr. Hammerschmidt be given
the name and address of the firm, along with site
addresses of homes.
e. Resolution No'. 376: This Resolution authorizes
the execution of the Redevelopment Agreement for the
Disposition of Land'and the Execution of Warranty. Deeds
for the transfer of title thereto for Parcel'Nos. 20 -1
and 1/2 of 20 -2, in the LaSalle.Park Urban Renewal Project,
R-57.
On oti on by Rev. . Williams , seconded by Mr.:_ _Wi_ggi ns , Resol u
ti o No. 376 was adopted. Motion unanimously carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 376
APPROVED, R -57
f. Contract 15 -A, 15 -B and 15 -C: Commission approval CONTRACT 15 -A, 15 -B &
was requested of these contracts, subject to..Commission 15 -C APPROVED, R -66
Legal Counsel approval, and the President and Secretary
authorized to sign. The contracts were awarded in Com-
mis ion meeting of August 9th.
Abo a motion was made by Mr. Wiggins,.seconded by Rev.
Williams, and unanimously carried.
g. Commercial Lease: Approval was requested of COMMERCIAL LEASE
a Commercial Lease with Odeva Haynes, for the use of APPROVED, E -5
premises at 128 North Birdsell Street fora site office
for the Model Cities Project, E -5, from November 1, 1971
through November 1, 1972, for the sum of $125.00 per
month.
On motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. -Wiggins, the
Commercial Lease was authorized. Motion unanimously
car ied.
qu
Pa
h. Rehabilitation Grants: Authorization was re- TWO (2) REHABILITATION
ted for two 2 Rehabilitation Grants, in the LaSalle GRANTS APPROVED, PARCEL
Urban Renewal Project, R -57, for the following: NOS. 21 -10 & 21 -349
R -57
-7-
NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd
Par
el No. Address Grant Amount
21-'0
234 North Illinois $ 1,900.00
21-34
113 North Wellington 3,500.00 **
**
ombination loan and grant, with Section 312 loan
pproved by HUD.
On
otion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins,.the
above-stated
grants were approved and unanimously carried.
i. Rehabilitation Grant, E -3:. Authorization was
:ONE (1) REHABILITATION
req
este or one Rehabilitation Grant, for the
GRANT APPROVED, PARCEL
Northeast
Code Enforcement Project, E -3, for Parcel No.
NO. 30 -29, E -3
30-29,
at 607 North'Eddy Street.—An the - amount of
$294116.00.
On motion
by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins,
the
above grant was approved and unanimously.carried.
j. Nine (9) Change Orders: Commission approval
NINE (9) CHANGE ORDERS
was
requested for the following Change Orders in ac-
APPROVED, R -66
cor
ance with the Labor Department.Policy in which a
new
wage determination schedule has been issued:
Change
Order No. Contract No., R -66
4 Contract 1 to Phase I -A
1 Contract 1 to Phase II -A
1 Contract 14
1 Contract 15 -A
1 Contract 15 -B
1 Contract 15 -C
1 Contract 17 -A
1 Contract 17 -B
1 Contract 174
The
above change orders are necessary to incorporate
the
new minimum Federal wage scales dated August.13th.
In
most cases contractors are paying more than.the .
wage
schedule, and as .a result there is no change in
contract
price, nor change.in time.
Mr.
Slabaugh advised the reason for the above was Presi-
den
Nixon's suspension of.the Davis Bacon Act and its
fin
1 reinstatement.
On otion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams,
the above change orders were approved and the Presi-
den .and Secretary authorized to sign.
k. Change Order No. 3 to Contract 1 for Phase I -A: CHANGE ORDER NO. 3
Approval was requested for this Change Order with Rieth- TO CONTRACT 1 FOR
Riley Construction Co., Inc., for an increase in- contract PHASE I -A APPROVED,
price of $2,241.67, with no change in time.
6.
The
1)
2)
3)
4)
On
Ord
an
NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd)
changes incurred -are for the following
The existing sidewalk on the southside of Monroe
Street between Michigan Street and first alley to,
the west is to remain, instead of being removed.
This portion is suitable for retention
Additional retention of part of basement under side-
walk on north side of Monroe Street, west of Michi.gan....
Also additional concrete for abandoning basements
under sidewalk on south side of Monroe Street.
Additional clearing and tree removal in- !block -north
of Monroe Street between- Lincolnway East and Fellows
and removal of trees for:construction- of ..san_ tart'
sewer in Monroe Street east of Lincolnway.
Construct temporary- service drives,for gccess to
Inwood's parking lot iii accordance_with,,South Bend
Traffic Dept. drawing dated,July 28, 1971,
notion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, Change. _ ,_
�r No. 3 to Contract 1 for Phase I -A was approved for
increase in contract - price of $2,241,67. Motion unani-
0 y carried.
1. The South Bend Boxing Club: Mr. Henry Howell,
representing the C ub, requested the use of the second
floor area in the Old Odd Fellows flall, at 205 East
Jefferson Boulevard for a dance, to be held -in about
two weeks to raise money for out.o,f town trips for their
Club. The first .floor of .the bui ldi n,g . i s ;used as _a gym
area and the second floor is; requested for the dance,
an icipating approximately 150 people.
Ad
cur
den
agr
How
you
3:0
to
On
app
for
the
int
Dep
mus
iscussion followed on reports received on extra--
ricular activities at their present quarters. Presi-
t Helmen advised there is to be no breach of the
cement for the use of the boxing quarters,. Mr.
all is presently training - approximately 30 to 4Q..,,
ng men to box. They work- out-every afternoon from
to 6:00 P.M. The same stipulations would.have
be followed for the use of the second floor.
notion by Mr. Wiggins, secondedby Rev. Williams,
roval for the use of the second floor for a dance
one evening was given, with the stipulation that
Building Department, Fire Department and all.other
Brested bodies give their approval, and that this
artment be protected by insurance. Also iie lance -
t be properly supervised. Motion carried:-
U
THE SOUTH BEND BOXING
CLUB, DANCE REQUEST,
R -66
6.
NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd)
m. Rent Write -Offs: Mr. Bruce C. Hammerschmidt,
RENT WRITE -OFFS
Commission
Legal Counsel, requested rent-write offs for
AUTHORIZED
the
following:
David Emmons . $ - 35:.00
Clarence McKee = 130`.00 -
Patrick Glossinger 5-.00
Waive Burnett 56.00
Betty. Carter - 30:00:._ .
Alberta Binion 30.00
Betty Franklin 25 .Oa
Jeannie Fluelin 40:00
Walter McKee 420.00
Rent Tenure "Error: 500.00
Total Write =Off 4 $ 1 9271,.00
Two
moved without any forwarding address, others are
har
ship cases and /or ADC mothers now 'receiving rent'
sup
lement. Those are low income people who-were
not
able to pay. The rents are cumulative, and all
wer
on temporary relocations. The rents are not,
col
ectible.
On
iiotion byiMr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev.�Williams,
rent
write -off, in the amount of $1,271.00, was authorized,
and
motion unanimously carried.
7.
SUGGESTION FOR 'DOWNTOWN PROJECT,'R -66:
TREE REPLACEMENTS,
_.
R -66
Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Common Cou'nci'l- Member, asked
if
a are making plans to replace the trees we'are re_-
moving.
Let's not end up as Williams Street with no
tre
s.
Mr. Barbe advised landscaping i s an , item .i n our
budget.
Mr. Wiggins said that this -is part of the Downtown
Pro'ect which encompasses items for a great dea'T of
plantings--a green belt idea. We will have a lot.of
trees before the project is ' completed.
President Helmen said Mrs. Allen's suggestion was
a very good one.
8. PROGRESS REPORTS
a. Business- Relocation, R -66 :. Mr. Paul E. Becher, BUSINESS RELOCATION,
Commercial Relocation Director, advised before the Com- R -66
mission this morning were claims from six business con-
cerns. Four claims are for moving expenses totalling
-10-
FM
$11
Pay
Cur
but
app
for
At
in
is
the
cla
mor
cla
the
Ind
Mr.
of
fee
in
doH
tha
bei
PROGRESS REPORTS (Cont'd)
,569.95, and two are for Small Business Displacement
cents totalling $5,000.00.: Grant total is $16,569.95.
gently there are thirteen businesses which.have moved
have not yet filed a relocation claim. He estimated.-
,oximately 20 additional businesses will relocate be
November lst.
:he present time there is one claim over $10,000
;he Chicago Regional Office for concurrence. This:
-.he South Bend Supply Company claim and the last one
Chicago office will handle. Three over.$10,000
ims are now being processed in this office, with four
: being initi.ated before October 1. One additional
im for $10,000 will be made before November 1, and
;e will be sent to the new Area Office.of HUD in
ianapolis.
Wiggins asked what seems to be the general feeling
Firms as to remaining in the.Mall area? Mr.. Becher's
lings were that they expressed interest and everyone
the downtown area quite naturally wants to- remain
itown. They do realize problems are involved and
t construction and rental rates will be higher than
ire and that the business volume must be larger to
Densate for the extra costs.
b. Downtown Rehabilitation Report, R -66: Mr.
Ed in Bauer, Downtown Rehabilitation Supervisor, advised
as of this date, ten buildings have been inspected and
si buildings surveyed that are tentatively to be demol-
is ed. Four of the latter buildings are presently occu-
pied by two tenants. All of the sixteen buildings
arE directly located on the proposed downtown mall. There
is a capacity for 23 tenant spaces, of which five 'spaces .
arE presently without tenants. Photographs have been taken
to document the existing conditions.
Initial contact with owners will begin next week for pre-
sentation of survey findings and to arrange for on -site:
appointments to review rehabilitation standards. Environ-
mental requirements will be stressed that best represents
th broad public interest, along with code enforcements.
Th projects are proceeding as scheduled on three.down-
to n renewal locations.
Pr sident Helmen inquired what type of reception Mr..
Ba er gets? Mr. Bauer advised that everyone shows
in erect, is concerned, and wants to know what is
go ng on. He said he will start meeting.with the
pe ple on:an individual basis and will get a definite
re ction on how far they can go and how they will
pa ticipate.
-11-
DOWNTOWN REHABILITATION
REPORT, R -66
PROGRESS REPORTS (Cont'd)
c. Indianapolis Association of Housing Redevelop -
meit Officials Meeting.: Mr. Barbe.gave a report of this
me ting he September 14 and 15, 1971, in which the
Ex cutive Committee and Legislative Committee met in
Jo nt session and it was decided to attempt to get a
bill before the 1972.General Assembly to correct and /or .
cl rify several points in the present Cities and Towns
Re evelopment Act and the new State Relocation Act, in-
cl ding the printer's error in the Relocation Act which
co ld render it null and void.
The primary discussion of the Executive Committee centered
on the Indianapolis school segregation suit i:n U.S. Dis-
trict Court of Judge Dillon. The suit originated from
fie parents suing the District. Judge Dillon has expanded
the suit to include Public Housing Authority, the Plan
Commission and Redevelopment Commission. It is believed
this court case will become a national landmark case and
wi 1 have definite effects on planning, public housing
an(.[ redevelopment throughout the nation.
1)
2)
3)
4)
Re%
he
d. Relocation Report:
Central Downtown, R -66:
Majority of families remaining in the area are
large and have low incomes; consequently, adequate
housing is difficult. to find. Only source of
housing for these hard core families is the Housing
Authority, andat present there are no available
units.
IAHRO MEETING REPO(
SEPT. 14 & 15, 1971
RELOCATION PROGRESS
REPORT:
1) R -66
LaSalle Park, Ind.�R -57:
Currently working with two families, who are in 2) R -57
process of purchasing homes.
Kennedy School Area:
Two families in this area, have closing this month
and will move in October; one family will close in
October and move in November; three families waiting
for loan�approval;'one -family has closed and waiting
for home to become vacant; and one family has moved
to Florida.
Open Space Program:
Four families from area have been relocated; one
family waiting for loan approval; and one individual
waiting for Public Housing unit.
Billy W. Kirk gave the above report. He also advised
attended a meeting Tuesday evening at Stephan Center to
-12-
3) Kennedy School Area
4) Open Space Program
8.1 PROGRESS REPORTS (Cont'd)
gel; volunteers. Twenty -four students of Notre Dame
signed up as volunteers for this coming season.
The Housing Clinic for young people in the project area,
at 410 Lincoln Way East, has all volunteers and they
wo k with young people, tutoring, games, etc. They are
do ng a wonderful job on what funds are available.
9.1 NEXT MEETING
The next Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Com-
mi sion will be at 10:30 A.M., Friday, October 1, 1971,
in the Office of the Department of Redevelopment.
101 ADJOURNMENT
On motion duly made and passed by Rev. Williams,
meeting adjourned at 12:07 P.M.
(SAL)
NEXT MEETING, FRIDAY,
OCTOBER 1, 1971
ADJOURNMENT
nfel er, Executive Director Fred eJ. men, President
-13-