HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 01-16-70SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
January 16, 1970
10:30 A. M.
Presiding Officer:
1. ROLL CALL
Present:
al Counsel:
IRA Staff:
2. ;:-,AFPROVAL OF MI
'County.;Cityi Bldg'.�, „'doom-" 1246
i
Mr. Dean J. Wilhelm, 227 West Jeifiembn Bbul&ard
President South Bend,- Indatria % 46601
Mr. Dean J. Wilhelm, President
Mr. John E. Chenney, Vice President
Rev. Willie V. Williams -,:5ec:retary..
Mr. Fred J.:..H lm.enj: Asst.. Secretary
Mr. Donald A. Wiggins,.Kember,
Mr. F. Jay Nimtz., Viae., Pres.idertts.,.Soard, of; -;Trustees
Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Common ,:C-Quncij.i,,Mernber i,,,.,:,:,
Mr. Edward J. Malo, Architect
Mr. Jim Miller, South Bend Tribune Reporter
Miss Carolyn Woojridge,,;Urbam Logue, Representative,
Mr. Bruce C. Hammerschmidt M � . ,
J .-q!
Mr. Howard Bellinger
Mr. Karl Ebel
Mr. L. Glen0,0;arbe;1:
Rev. B i 1 ly W. Xi rk
Mr. W. Harrison Miller
_J i
.M,t,." . F..-ran k- Al f or4
14rc) i P a ul E B.e,C.her,,
.Mrs ..-�.Dorothy-:L Deane
M.1%-,H.e1en,,.S..,Kin.g.
0 motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by. Rev ;;,.,.�:.:,,-MIiN S -,APPROVED:.;.
Will i ms, the Annual Organizational Minutes and
Regul r,.-
Mi n utes --both of January 2, 197Q;'_were,:_-:",,,
approied-and unanim - omsly carried.
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS
Chenni
total'
motion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr.
V, the claims were approved for.p.ayment--
ing $124,228.89--and unanimously ;carried.
3.
PROJE
OVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd
EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT F
ID R -56
Dorothy N. Howell - Recording Fee
Total
PROJgCT,:,= EXPENDMRE-S, 'ACCOUNT -FUND R-57
Rehibilitat,ibn3-C,I'.ai-MSI.,,;
I
Cora Ellis, #43-22
ThDmas & Janice Parran, #46-12
Purvis & Freddie Kennedy, #20-46
Wi ckes Lumber Company
E. C. Lambert
Ab tract & Title :Comp;any,7
Ab tract Compay �-0f:-St..46seph:'Codnty -
Ch s. W. Cole & Sorv.-�I.rfc.
Cridit Bureau'of South Bend, Inc.
Do thy. N.-14owe'rl 'Rgt6 r dU§ Fee
WODdruiff -
Total
RORC F'. EX PEN DI TU RES:: -ACCOMT FUND *-66'
$ 4.00
$ 4.00
$ 1,090.14
7,360.18
100.00
-7-8.00
210.00
142.50
770.00
60.00
5-.00
954.00
$ 11,010.96
E
Real E
tote Option
Ft
He
He
en!-.O. Seftsihith:,
#23-5
16.00
AM
tract .&Title'torporation
3,430.00
A.
triact -,Comoianyiof
:unty -�
St. Joseph- W
60.00
:.Do
othy,1.�;-,Howe'PV-
Recording Pies • F
62.00
I
-.M.• .Carpdratiok
486.00
U-ited
n
Community Services
25.30
Ur r
an Redevelopment
Capital Fund
50,000.00
Tonal '
4 -, -
97, 30
$ 54 3
RE DE VE -OPMUT'DI STAIG13T., CAP I T-At, -.FUND'
Pr)ject Expenditure Account fuind"R"57 50 000 00
To
Pa
PMENT REVOLVING FUND
eroll: January I to 15, 1970
Howard Bellinger -\666.66
Karl L. Ebel 520:83
L. Glenn Barbe 458.33
Vivian N. Bond 333:33
Dorothy Z. Deane 350.00
Gordon L. Harrell 286.66
Dorothy N. Howell 33a.M
01
3.
It
I
I
Wi
Ja
Si
H
REIMB
FOR M
Tc
am
'ROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd
Patricia L. Joers $ 212.16
C. E. Maxwell 354.16
W. H. Miller 362.50
_.
W. J. Parrish 395.83
_
Billy W. Kirk 375.00
Joanna Wantuch 204.08
G. B. Watkin 308.33
Earl King 350.00
Helen S. King 248.04
_ WYl;itm P. McRae .: ;;; X08.33
Bi 71 '.�]ean WesJ�e - .: r, Z , 08,..
11, cliai A. Madi son,. } - X33.;33 3
Vie,1'14f-Wheeleir
Paul E. Becher,..--
Frank J. Aif,@md , . ;f,.253:_�0 .
John Tidwell -r; 333,1,33 .
Rita M. Kurth ,
$ ,7,818.14
It Camera Shop r..
- 18.36
^othy Z. Deane..- PeiRtx fish ; .
, 58:00
liana Bell Telephene0�»
'28:51
F 22;50
>tant Printing ..Serrv�ce, . -Inp
., : ,
Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc.
12.:04
Iliam P. McRae
36.00
nes R. Meehan & ... v
77.16
..A�eee
Chimer, Inc.. ,�z.; , i...9
:. .la
Behan Service .Ceatt@rv,,J Vic....:
; 111 r,30
iger General Tire, - :100.. e- _; z
ith Bend Park -ing Co:,
290.16
rox Co rporati Qn
68.60
8i$,73.6J
REDEVELOPMENT FUND
th Insurance Ag0ncy,.l.nc,,�jot� Z)., $; 265.:00
using Authority of Cfty :Qf �Qut- ±Bend, 4261, , 90.00
rthern Indiana, Bublic',Sorvtce 4. , °a# Fii : , ; ter:;. 70.00
ith E. Proud, #261._ ,91)1) 30;;00
uth Bend Water Departmet �,= #261 rF f 12.00
t Total ; — 467 00
GRAND T.QTAL A$ 124,228 89
RSEMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT REVOLVING FUND
NTH OF DECEMBER, 1969
Project Expenditures ACCODAW)FO R -66- $ A-1307676
if R -57 15,489.51
AR -66 : < < : 4,728.30
Total ,2 ,, .5
On 3-
4. C04MUNICATIONS
None.
5. OL BUSINESS
,
Mae. ;
61:;x, NE4 BUSINESS
a. Technical Review Committee•' "•The Redevelop TE-00 -CAL REVIEW
ment Cmaission is required to pass, �`Uo -d � all develop -=' `CO MITTEE APPROVED,
ments hat take place anywhere withfin r he Downtow;Ar - 4 WNTML DOWNTOWN URBAN
Projec area. To assist the Redevelopment Commissionli' `le'RUMAL' PROJECT, R -66
a Revi w Board (consisting of the G ,ty�I',ngineer, the -� :-. o •?
Buildi g Department Commissioner, Arei Plan Commissif* •6 {!
Department of Redevelopment, and a member of the Down -!. <- s
town'C uncil) and a Technical Desigih!�trunittee is re=
commen ed to be added. The Technical Design Committee
wi,11�p -ovide the Review Board and Commission with
supple ental skills required to evaluate the taE nical
asIpeIrqt of a given project and insure that decisions-`
will �b predicated on and supported by eompete0tVp0o-
f6 sio al advice.
The Te hni cal Committee will include local' prdfftt onall =S
spedfa ists in the fields of architecture, landscaping,. '
engine' ring and merchandising. They will •be'avaffable v -- f
to •ren er professional judgments, as needed, _01hef-I ds Y i
a`grou or as an individual, depending on•thd eomplexity'_-
of-the .problem in hand. Mr. Bellinger stated possibly Y, -'
four`p ople will be Mi call to provide professional
judgments.
A mini mm retainer of $50.00 a month is recommended,
pl us c pens -ati on for time actually eipended 'his . i'ndi
viduals in the practice cif their9orofes!s•idns .at a rate
of • $20.00 per hour. The retef A: _er, w0l '-b4vt!0mi n0 o6mi =
pensat'on for being available on an "as needed" basis Y`
,and will also cover all meetings and! reports -of'-the
Committee as a wholes !There will also be individual
efforts, either as a „result of a full committee meet -
irig, °.o `.as, otherwise hegaesed, and members will re-
.
ceive 2G. -GO an hour for time actually spent on such
assignnents. s! f.... .....
The Architectural Design firm retained to design the " - - — "�-"
mall) :area will have two baste- ass49nRentS v:,
1,':Develop definitive guidelines and °design
criteria wi th,.;res pect to the general ar-
rangement, function and appearance of the
=4=
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont
Mr. H lmen raised the question on the architectural
desigi firm, for the pedestrian mall design, and the
Techn cal Design Committed, `ais t whether ;th�r will'' r "'
be hired locally? Mr. Ebel alppTi'sed the ''@e'tign' 'fi r► '
hired may be local al so,f and that tha Technical Desi��
Committee is a Committee °dn 'call wW06eeded'by th+e
Review Board and will be comprised of local profes-
.siona s:; whereas the architect for the mall design
mob a- lodal`- 'architect =a at Lad, with `t , �F f6iial
f�tlir it#t proven pedestrfaii mialI design' experience
Mr. W l helm asked if theae is a provision 1 n oar app ;'
prove budget for this purpose, and thle retaining fee
of $5(.00, plus compensa�fon wtien oaf'led.on, how. 1-ong
this ill go on-- whether it 1s for the ` fife -.of the
proje t, and whether the $50.00 monthly retainer will
compe sate for the time? Mr. Barbe apprised provisions
are i cluded in the budget, and that when the Committee
-5-
downtown area with primary emphasis drr the
preparation of preliminary desi gnssarid sche-
matics for the pedestrian mtil area.
2)
Fol l ow€�ng approval 'of the pre imi' nary design , ;,
`
prepare final drawings -`for thi construction
and improvement of the mall area and super-
vise inspection durirg.construction.
.,
The Redevelopment
Commission wi'fljhave the same rla-
M1,
ti ons hi
p with this firm as `atn Jo r tl.tett has with
w Jr'`(
an architect
in the private s'e t6 t"
The Architectural
Design firm 'Wil l be 4esponil ble for
the detail
design and preparation of working ~drawings '
°'
forte
single most important component of the Re
development
Plan. The Urban Design •CoimnT.ttee, on
the ot
her hand, wi 11 not be charge- th .any speci fi`c
proje
t or single element 'bf 'the plih:,: tint ;wifll pro-
vide cesign
continuity and general guidelines for all
physical
improvements taking place anywhere within y
the project
1
area.
�-z . .
F
Mr. Bellinger
a apprised the Revi *w hoard's recomrenda-
PP
d
ti on is
passed on to the COiIM?t - 10 r, ,a n the Techni= y
cal D
s g Commi t t e e woul d 'an' -we'r' que1st1 orfi rai sed
by the
Review Board. The" groups 'v►'i 11 'e working{
`.
together
simultaneously as re t' 'Thee' Redevelop -
ment
ommissi on will analyze 'arr`d 'review -the 'proposed
devel
pments and determine which �►i11 r`tiirf de,. 'tlt±e
R
maxim
benefit. Two 6r' 'tfirde p 6'056sed die�Yelopments ' 4
are +isioned
for some disosTtidn' parcels. ' = r' `'
',
Mr. H lmen raised the question on the architectural
desigi firm, for the pedestrian mall design, and the
Techn cal Design Committed, `ais t whether ;th�r will'' r "'
be hired locally? Mr. Ebel alppTi'sed the ''@e'tign' 'fi r► '
hired may be local al so,f and that tha Technical Desi��
Committee is a Committee °dn 'call wW06eeded'by th+e
Review Board and will be comprised of local profes-
.siona s:; whereas the architect for the mall design
mob a- lodal`- 'architect =a at Lad, with `t , �F f6iial
f�tlir it#t proven pedestrfaii mialI design' experience
Mr. W l helm asked if theae is a provision 1 n oar app ;'
prove budget for this purpose, and thle retaining fee
of $5(.00, plus compensa�fon wtien oaf'led.on, how. 1-ong
this ill go on-- whether it 1s for the ` fife -.of the
proje t, and whether the $50.00 monthly retainer will
compe sate for the time? Mr. Barbe apprised provisions
are i cluded in the budget, and that when the Committee
-5-
6. NEW BUSINESS
'a)
meets as a whole or when they make reports to the
Board or to the Commiss1an it,,.is included; irk the
monthly retainer rate and not coppensated on
�.' i
hourly rate. Mrs. Allen stated iii ft would 'be ;.
forte l i fe of the pro,.ect, it .cauld pp on for
ten y ars and that it
revie
Mr. W lhelm asked if we have people in mind for
the T chnical Design C itt a Mr el e�
appri ed there are peo tv�'h appr,opttl�b �tal4ent
avail ble and willing to serve. This w�,_ a ors
a yea -to -year basis, and the individual coufd
resig at the end of.,tfte ye r., or AP then lgyent ;a
confl ct of interest, ►oyl� rise T:
Mr. W 1 helm asked Mr. James A.- 4,-c }, City Con'.'
troller, what the fil# date of,the �b.udgelt.i�s,
and Mr. Bickel stated for. ttte,`1il "'T bu, et, , probably, ;
May.
Mr. Wiggins inquired on the major functions of the`
Technical Design Committee and if the Commission
would call this Comm i..ttee,,tq emaluat# an overall
desigr on plans and specif ns,�o b,il;,ne►,
buildings? Mr. Bellinger 4pprise�ti, Coarn�, ion
would submit plans to .the Revleew rd,,IWO con- .
sists of City Departments.. entioped, an, y-- .would
use their judgment in the - course o f,.tMt r , _,revi ei as
to what technical assistance,., eaeA �n.o.t'der to
advi s the Commission ss i on,� T.i1e Re,�r!i jew $oars
a report to the Commission enco.4mg iiag ;tj}er,,cgm
menda ion, utilizing the Ti chrii ca; fCo- mi ttee when
needed.., .
. fly a. t
On motion by Mr. Wiggins ; ,eco}dGd ay Rees_ W,1 Ti.Ams4,'
the staff was authorized>to parFkag,e #t
information °tie$ 4
inform tion on a Techr{�cal -11e41 ;ew ,-iomm�.ttee to:H1JD,
t
in Chicago, for their ajpip. N�atl4ai; was :urai-
mously carried.
b. Proposed Reti remehyt -T:,ro gram A `C�or m tikee' L'b-TTER 6 INT "►�T
appoin e y t e ommiss, ;on4rs.,- .consisting of 4,,,V1., AI �.MOR� ED FOUR- -
Williams and Mr. Helme6,' along with staff member, PRUPOSEb`RFTIREMENT
Mr. L. Glenn Barbe, had.b .n sele;o;�ed ,to;,eval -uate
the p posals received '�rp insuranFe firms
retire ent program. Mr. Wilhelm, apprised,.the ..Oqm ,
mittee had been selected.by the,' isslon for aheir
experience in the ins- ur:.ance fie
U
6.
BUSINESS (Cont' d)
':
1) Rev. Witi Aft =Who has had subsia'n'tia:
experience in insurance, and
2) Mr. Helmen,' - ds, past res i aent` ind- 'Tr 'Ust
Officer of the St. Joseph Bank ot I MV.
Co. v j f
The Committee was to: 11 t6ntati velya4dot ea �'Plafi
Mr. Bruce C. Hammerschmidt, Commission Legal,Cotinsell,
can take to proper agencies for. approval And-
'
tablish past service credits -&-thd Commfstl-ob"WITI�' Owl
for each employee. Past—service credits , for each..
employee can be allowed's'crle'l-Y on the basis of much
to the Department of Redevelopment,, include any other
City Department, County. Illy,
Obpartthent r torvi'de -
ion'detetm
1'Com0fts! 1 thean ther p94is requested prior -to:effpl06fi discus ion of'
plan.
Rev.
i Iliams apprised Ue;to' *1 1 t�'_64' rec*,i,��' the.
proposal
of the Natfo'nAT',AssokiafI& 'for,'T jn,V
Development
( represents -64-' the'',PrUd6tiil- 169ura"e"-' -
Company)
l '
be submitted to Commission Legal 'bursel
Mr. H
s!lected
minerschmi dt. Rev. Wi 11 i ams stated Pradential..
because they j aye the'ftlt t6ft p l
was
forma
ion and breakdown.
Mr. Hkmmerschmidt
'
stated a dd tft AW m4tt ' be W ade -on,
the pist
service credit before anything can be started
on th
pension plan.
Mr. Chenney
apprised most fiIr44ft6wJt* tiol ears
back
service credit - -soma mar a:
Mr. Wiggins
stated
tence
for approximately. en 4rs amd base.' on-the
servl:e
in this Departmd "A ;6ii- max` 66 ld -
possi)ly
.'M.!`,^
be fulfilled theiv. Y stated a.'-f- ew 0, t We,
emplq(ees
have more tha n -Years .
Mr. Barbe
stated, accordinlg'-tb tMie, kveitildalflibft
among
the communities, the most commonly-accepted plan
is_ to
a1low credits on, seryice..for city county de -
.
within theId''61 comr�runit
,,
Wigg!
nt stated if w6'�,g' vd- the maki%dh aTl bwa�- e
tredi
t'. to anyone currently ohm" the t taff -I,": W6 Wo ul-d
have `
to draw #e line on what to do in future e mploy-
ments.-
Mr.--Barbe apprised it would only fhVol've �.the'.
empl
ees currently employed in the DPOArtmen''4t.,the
-7-
6. 4W BU_S_INESS (Copt' d
time he plan goes into -effect;. future em
p;lo,es 09,410
not g t back service credits.
Mr. B rbe apprised the ,CoWisston the Jniti.a;l .,costs
would be as follows:
,
1) City of South Bend, Dept.
of Redevelopment service: ,$ 20.,792.4?
2) City of Sou
th d End s
St. Josepp, Caun' �,s rv�ces 13,841..SC
�.� , ,, g.;, , AS
.T i;a 4 b c 2
If any and all past service is -al owP;d beyon they den,
years, the total cost;
prepai premium immedi etel set :up as a X011 3: '
for th employee. J ,
Mr. Wiggins stated this is n �S �kjshe.difundpd plan
and as ed where the money. yj 1 � .:,Yomg _,fngt ? 4 M�^� Che,nrtey
stated whether 2/3's Federail 1 /3.,G�t the popq
originally comes from the'" pc " ers ` yx
a.
f i
Mr. Wi gins said the gjdter` .e 14 tees . `Oee entitled to,
co id ration and he stated a was in favor of local.
servic setup, with a ten -year maximum stipulation;
and th t this would prettysTwell; covgr,evpiryope.,we
have.
On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney,
the Pr dential Company.. is ,seWted to , evelp a re,
ti reme t plan for the employees 6-"- the Ci t± of South .. ..; ;
Bend, Department of Redevelopment'and'to present said
plan to the proper agencies for .their.. approval.,;.;. Also
the Commission is author's zed 0):4706 the letter, 4;6f
Intent (The Letter of ,Intent. fs;. not . binding to .th
Redevelopment Commission or, .tQ. the N��ioral A�soo�a r
ti on for Community Development) , with back_ seryi.oe
credit on local eligibility, with a maximum of ten
(10) years. The mot on was.,- unanimous ly carried by
all Commissioners.
C .
Option
A reements 'Approval and authorization
FIVE;`OP°TIQN OEE-
was requested
forte
President to 04n'five (5) Op=
MENTSIPPROVE
tion Agreements,
in
the Centraa Downtown Urban, to
,PARCEL
NOS, 17 8,.18 -�4, 20 -8,
newal Project,
R -66,
for the fo1,.Towing parcels:::
CENTRAL
OOWN'TOWN URBAN tENEWAL
#17 -8
300
S. CoTumhja Street
PROJECT, R -66._
#18 -4
302
E', . �la�+ne Street
#20 -8
326
" A28 S Michigan Street
#20 -9
330
S. Michigan Street
#28 -4
555
Lincoln Way East
-8-
6. N5W BUSINESS (Cont'd
These
area,
have I
Mr. W
and t
Agree
porte
d
appro
newal
amoun
conde
and c
7. P
a
ment
Monda
Repor
vi ewa
appri
calli
ing s
7:30
be re
Willi
ch urc
Rev.
carri
that
our n
cuss
Downt
Commi
A Pro!
was o
1969,
to 60
pants
prise
VO I 4e
4y- '116catie
parcels are general Ty d in the po-5
with the exception of1*ne.'-'1 'Fhb a ove _p
1Y
een secured by our neg" ti a 'or.,
ggins made the motion`,the t'lion'-s ie'. a-6640"t6'd
0,
dit"hio-iize'd P,
e President be a to�_i!,41n"6e 0`1
.7
ents for the CommisS'Vdn",-_-'Said mdtfdh.
and unanimously A& -"by: -iifl C fiff6hdr§
Grant: Authoriziff%n was rdques'tdd fo t, 60'E" GAANT'APFROVED,
al ozone grant, in F944'O
Project, R-57, for`' reel 46. 16"t e t"A'A L-, Lt PARK A N
J
d n- n
of $1,997.00. On -aktil"p" 'by --1991 UAL` P M% R-57
by Mr. Chenney, VW-1 ove, r was` authorized' ,
rried unanimously. 10
OGRESS REPORTS
it F, J
t
Northeast RehWO afion� r0it r lbt ... AEHA91LI-
:`
:t is under the FOA&
Irogram. The Proifgd, e lte
January fttee [met,
12 1970 �'r ra' tddthe CA 1 tee,
which has been
This is a three-year program. hei re'
W. Ve If f ng'ei)r"
;ed we are in the process of preparing flyers,
ig to the attenti-bh`%Y1 i�61 _ritfdenfi,4 a- _ikL&e-j
:heduled for ThursOiY:,�'O' Y2 1 - ' 0' v!
anuary. 97
I.M., at the SodiffLiiif ef.' -These drs %Kfl
idy for distribution Monday, January 19. Rev.
ims requested flyers. for the bulletin boards in
D-f t1z;,:;:
Y s, i ng',I` '-""
i for this Sunday'!�1_3 de i'ldn "rim s *0.t. I
1Vi 1 � 2 �
1i 11 i ams also asked Y-f till ijmdelfAq .11 V6: !
r I
!d in the news meditin.&AF. Belli!)Ald� 6'ri it- d
1 it wi 11 be, and that Area 01" "M 'i- *` 4" IS.,
fitly working on thisrogram..
-T ri
igo
'eii BUShNESS-;,R_ RELOCATION
�6 0i Relocati(Vh`N6ffVi_tftt- Mr`.' 101e�, I
.-e,d each " Mb n day '0dMi it _;Ja mbdtfigg"i
A_CfI,VITr, CENTRAL
pp
!gotiator and his'Aro Lis' DOWNTOWN; `URBAN
?ach and every par60Vf',t 'e a qofred 'i 'PROJECT: 6;'
t
)wn Area, and provil" sit,
p t
reii e s!T h mee"
-,sioners in the
I-1v
tress Report on gukli sis' Relbciiilon
rit On i 11
itlined by Mr. Har er— 9"1 nt"e N6 ih* tie r
the business relocation staff has ccrn�fi&6& `56
business concerns - -22 of which are business occu-
of Blocks 23, 24 and 25. These three blocks com-
the Post Office site of the Central Core Project.
.. gr-.
7. PROGRESS REPORTS (Cont'd)
The b
condi
reloc
have
to de
since
has o
new f
with 1
.two
Una'
opts
gress
our C
Mr. M
for tl
06je
the ro
Centri
tion I
Rev.
in di
area,
is ve
Rev.
reloc
of 17
ted i
C.
Meetin
was.. I
Bend
in -,the
was fh
of the
shown
Wiggin
be con
buildi
isiness concerns:- t
have.-heen advised of,.g.eneral-
Aons relating to plr')op"gr " 1--
,i yvacqui"sl ion ajnd. tJ
.tion procedures and ;original :suryqy,,.. . forms
,een updated. Special efforts hive' V been 'ma de
ermine if space requi,rements ha, e .changed
the original int4r4.jewi- The r-0-To" ca ''t"
ion s, a,f
J
fered to assist site roccu'4ni's tr1locating .
cilities. Close .,-,c9,n,tac:t has ', been maintaiee,d
early all busi6ess o6c'uoinfi for t he , past
st
d one., half years.. cases., this ,.c Ai
contact] with both grop-pirty own ",,in and
4rs,
s has:bq
a pl us faq.6'i
'agireements. The.-sUff Ji ,making eve:ryr�,
All thi, r
0 k66p d 'p
of our activities in the ac ti on phase of
ntral Core Project.
ller advised the first loan has been approved
e Central Core area by the Small Business Ad- ----
ration,, ;at 5-1/4% int#rest., Same, 12 104ns�
" ' ;lows ' I ede
t. Mr. Miller §tate4'heJs, q4it e „
as d
w
ception the staff ,.-Ifi'a'' @ep recei_*1_n n, the
I Downtown Urban_.R�.ndwal,arb'A, 'tzIn.7”'
as improved since I t
.repor
44
_o bl e
irk stated he dt4,;,po'
?resee
placement involv'i-n'g';'pr'esi-de�-n'ts' in - - 0.e.,downtown.
:,
as facilities ,are and tti.i7coo6r t -q
Y good.
illiams inquired 'at-
Y -a rp-.-.,t rp,-
to in this area? *Re _-K r`,fi ed, ,a. ;,firk 4pp
individuals and -1 '�Ifa0flj s ;,,e t6-bi re
a
f
re a re I o; c aii
�d
this area, an(,L,'
South Bend Civic Planning Associatio'h Ahnualt SO)AH'BtND CIVIC
J:, r I Mrti W
ig%Jps -ap the ..0
prise,d, c"i &s.,Ion PLI
_4JNG ASSOCIATION
t 6 s a''61 .1 alf-I i4o:`i�_Du:th
VI: e-d- tt' peak b "t'
4 Urban Rye L, Mir,, �jNG
-'n-. A6n.ua- 'Mdii 1'
s.'sociatf 'I he� d,
J
ivic-Planning A0
YWCA*. Thursday; ' N' J model ay,,. anuan.- ej-m , :
I A
ire and Mr. ViOgin's. had 4. sl i'de"pr-'esenta"ifqn,
downtown area. A"
deal q rote ; was
)n what we are d6ing and vkat'`we havene. Mr.
stated this is _pne- :of the f4neti.ons we stpm I d .
:erned about and -'si0 "
q,T.d
get j_nto J p t.,
ers -0
ig better public' interqst'.*
7. P90GRESS REPORTS (Cont'd
d Other Projects: Mr. Bellinger apprised that
much f our discussion has been on the Downtown Urban
Renewal Program and he wanted to stress that the other
proje ts-- Industrial Expansion, LaSalle Park, Near
North ast, and now the Near Southeast- -are being worked
on by the staff, as well as in others, Model Cities,
etc. We are now in the process of preparing relocation
reports for the Model Cities application and developing
the relocation section of the open space program for
the West Side.
Mrs. anet Allen apprised that Model Cities puts out a
Weekl Newsletter, and also has an open line to call
for i formation, open to the public.
Mr. B 11inger apprised this Department is going to be
invol ed in the ensuing months in carrying out plans
and p grams in the following areas: LaSalle Park,
Indus rial Park, Central Downtown, Near Southeast,
Near ortheast, and the Model Cities Program.
OTHER PROJECTS
8. N17XT MEETING
The next regular meeting of the Redevelopment Com- NEXT MEETING,
mission will be at 10:30 A.M., Friday, February 6, FEBRUARY 6, 1970
1970, in the Office of the Department of Redevelopment.
9. ADJOURNMENT
0t motion duly made and passed by Mr. Wiggins, the ADJOURNMENT
meeti g adjourned at 11:48 A.M.
(SEAL
3
nger, Lxecuxn ve uireczor
-11-