HomeMy WebLinkAboutRM 06-06-69SOUTH BEND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
June 6, 1969
10:30 A. M. :120 W. LaSalle Ave.
Presiding Officer: Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, President South Bend, Indiana
1.
P
L
2. APP
Mot
William
.1969.
mission
mitted.
3. APP
CALL
ent•
Mr. Donald A. Wiggins, President
Mr. Dean J. Wilhelm, Vice President
Mr. John E. Chenney, Secretary -,
Mr. Fred J. Helmen, Asst. Sec'y.
Rev. Willie V. Williams, Member
rs Present: Mr. Byron W. Sheets, President, Board of Trustees
Mrs. Guy P. Curtis, Secretary, Board of Trustees
Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Common Council Member
Mrs. Jane Maager, WNDU -TV Reporter
Mr. Edgar Seybold, South Bend Civic Planning Assn.
Mrs. Betty Stephens, Director of Relocation,
Community Public Service, Newark, New Jersey
1 Counsel: Mr. Bruce C. Hamnerschmidt
Staff: Mr. Howard Bellinger, Executive Director
Mr. L. Glenn Barbe, Assistant Director
Mrs. Helen S. King, Secretary
r Staff
ers Present: Rev. Billy W. Kirk
Mrs. Dorothy Z. Deane
ROVAL OF MINUTES
ion was made by Mr. Wilhelm, seconded by Rev.
s, for approval of the minutes of May 16,
The "ayes" were unanimous by all the Com-
ers and the minutes were approved as sub-
ROVAL OF CLAIMS
MINUTES: APPROVED
Motion was made by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Rev. CLAIMS APPROVED
Williams, to authorize payment of the claims-- total-
ling $62,321.62. The "ayes" were unanimous by all
Commissioners for the payment of the claims as sub-
mitted.
-1-
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd)
PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -56
Dorothy N. Howell - Recording Fees
Wa ter & Joanna Boryc, #6 -8A
No th Central Appraisal Co., Inc.
Ma y E. Stewart, #4 -4
PROJECT EXPENDITURES ACCOUNT FUND R -57
Real Estate Purchases
Julius & Rose Cako, #41 -9
Ro al W. & Olive Hughes, #37 -11
William & Eddie L. Woodward, #11 -14A
William & Eddie L. Woodward, #11 -14B
Relocation Payments
Fr nk.Budny, #44 -10.
Rehabilitation Payments
Wic es Lumber Co.
McKinley Lumber Co.
Fre die Lee & Barbara Lindsey.
Rob rt, Jr. & Lillie Mae Pryor
Abs ract Co. of St. Joseph County, Inc.
Dor Wrecking Company
Dor thy N. Howell - Recording Fees
Wil iam E. Andreae
Vivian Bond
Business Systems, Inc.
Ern st S. Haynes
Cecil James - Mileage Claim
Har y Jones
Ear King - April and May Mileage
Ear King - Travel to Grand Rapids
Ben ie J. Kirk
Edw rd J. Linnear, Jr.
Wil iam L. P. McRae - Travel to Grand Rapids
Office Engineers, Inc.
W. t. Parrish - Mileage
South Bend Exterminating Co.
Tri County News
EPA!
$ 36.00
52.99
180.00
67.29
Total 3362$
$ 4,130.00
2,260.00
6,405.00
2,740.00
117.00
3,000.00
9,533.50
5,698.26
6,453.33
111.50
11,250.20
28.00
97.00
20.02
116.88
50,00
70.39
85.00
107.60
63.62
62.10
42.00
60.62
72.48
15.30
30.00
21.02
Total $ 52,6
3. APP IOVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd)
REDEVE
DPMENT REVOLVING FUND
Pay�rol 1: May 16 to May 31, 19.69
-3-
Howard Bellinger $
604.16
L. Glenn Barbe
43750
Albert S. Bond
45.00
Vivian N. Bond
194::37 .:
Dorothy:,Z` : Deane
278.33
Gordon L. Harrell
273.00
Dorothy N. Howell
207.50
Patricia L. Joers
194.37
C. E. Maxwell ;;;
333..31
W. H. Miller
343.75
W. J. Parrish
354.16
Billy W. Kirk
354.16
Joanna- Vantuch..:
183.75
G. B. Watkin
291.66
J. E. Pettit
315.41
Earl King
333.33
Londro Munlin
52.50
Hel :en S. King
236.25
John Kr O'Brien
Wt 1 :1 tam E, , Andreae
3l_5.41
William P. McRae
:291.66:
Cecil James
300.00.
Rita M. Kurth
80.00
Billie J. Wesley
183.75
$ ,69536.68
L.,
Tenn- Rarbe - Travel ;t. Gr..and :Rapids
, _
75.14
Bat
; Insurance Agency, Inc.'--
10.00
Viv
an N. Bond
'5.50
Den
en Corporation
20.25
Cen
er for Continuing Education
-
275,00
Citj
Controller of Sotft -h Qend
_ 102.77
Dorc
thy Z. Deane - Pei:ty ,,Catsh i :
35.38
Green
Arrow Parking =
10.00
Indiana
& Mi chi gan.Electrtc Co,
:. 21.77
Jor
an Motor, Inc.
12.00
120
LaSalle West, Inc.
: 434.50 -
N.D.P.
Seminar Series - _Development Research
25.00
Office
Engineers, Inc.
109.72
Pence
Dickens Company.
45.40
Sheehan
Service Center, :Inc,
70.95
South
Bend Water Works
8.. 36
Ideal
Press
57.00
Indiana
Bell Telephonef0o.:
177.80
Schi11ings
Printing;Company -_
22.00
Bruce
C. Hammerschmidt
200.00
John
Gyokeres
'Supply,
95.85
South
Bend Drafting Inc.
25.60
-3-
3. APPROVAL OF CLAIMS (Cont'd)
South
Bend Rubber Stamp Co.
BID; PUBLIC OFFERING
$ 15.25
G.
B. Watkin
wat r
47.60
North
Central Regional NAHRO Conference"
Offering No. 2, for the LaSalle Park Urban
50.00
Renewal
Project, R -57. They bid for a total of 16
Total
$ 8, 8�9.5f
REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT CAPITAL FUND
,stated
that the security deposit is normally -forfeited
North
Central Appraisal.Company, Inc.
_
750.00
. Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc. was collaborat-
Total
; , . $ 750.0U
URBAN
tEDEVELOPMENT FUND
Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc., and the withdrawal'
.is requested
Ho
sing Authority of City.,of South Bend, Ind.
.and find,
90.00
Ke
th E. Proud
-.
15:00
from the
Commission for their decision as to whether
:Total
105.00
the withdrawal and refund of bid deposit - equal'
GRANDJOTAL
$ 62,321.62
4. COMMUNICATIONS
posliti
n of the parcels may be possible without further
a.
HUD Letter Dated Ma`•15 1969: This letter
,:AUDIT
APPROVAL,
approves
the final audit report -on the Chapin Street -,
CHAPIN
STREET URBAN
Urban
Oenewal Project, R- 29,•4nd the only remaining°
_!, RENEWAL PROJECT,
action
involves the approval,of HUD -6202 forms cur-
R -29
rently under their review. -This closes the file on
the Ch pin Street Urban Renewal Project, R -29, final
audit.
b.
Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc. Letter Received
BID; PUBLIC OFFERING
Ma 26
1969: This letter is a request for the
NO 2'LASALLE °PARK
wat r
wa of their bid, awarded on the six parcels,
URBAN RENEWAL`PROJECT,
.in Public
Offering No. 2, for the LaSalle Park Urban
R -57
Renewal
Project, R -57. They bid for a total of 16
=
parcels,
or a total package of $11,889. Mr. Bellinger
,stated
that the security deposit is normally -forfeited
when a
contractor requests their bid be withdrawn after
.-
bid opening.
. Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc. was collaborat-
.,ing wi
h Charles Howell. However, the bid is in the
.name oi
Bell Aluminum Sales, Inc., and the withdrawal'
.is requested
since they have reviewed their position
.and find,
at this time, a lack of resources to meet
.construction
requirements. Authorization was requested`
from the
Commission for their decision as to whether
to accept
the withdrawal and refund of bid deposit - equal'
to 10%
of the cost of the parcels. It was believed dis-
posliti
n of the parcels may be possible without further
expense;
if not, it would be necessary to re- advertise.
-
Mr., Hel
en stated it would be in order to refund the
money if
it did not involve any out -of- pocket expense.
a,a
4. COMMUNICATIONS (Cont'd
Presid nt Wiggins moved for a motion to withdraw the
bid ani defer consideration on the refunding.of the
deposi , and motion was so made:by Mr. Helmen, se-
conded by Mr. Chenney.
c.
Cites. Planning Associates=; Inc.. Dated May,-28,
REMONSTRANCE,
1969:
This eT-tter is from Mr.. T. Brooks Bra emas,
.CENTRAL DOWNTOWN
lsresid
nt of City Planning Associates, Inc., relating
URBAN RENEWAL
his position
in Rev. Lawrence E. Crockett's testi-
PROJECT; R46
monial
in the May 28, 1969 hearing thathe, Rev.
Crockett,
had dictated a remonstrance against the
downtown
project to the secretary of.T. Brooks :Brade -
mas,
n his letter, Mr. T. Brooks Brademas states
he and
his office could not .recall any knowledge of
the al
egation made in Superior. Court, withtthe.Honor-
able N
man Kopec presiding, that his firm, in fact,:.
had helped
draft the remonstrance against the Central-
Downtown
Urban Renewal Project, R -66. President Wiggins
requested
a motion to have the record show this = letter
from City
Planning Associates, Inc., dated May 28,:
1969, has
been received and .is. to be placed on.file,
and motion
was so moved by -Rev. Williams,.s.econded by
Mr Helmen
d. HUD Letter Dated May 14, 1969: This letter
identifies minor points that HUD feels had not been
resoled in the Part II Application., The staff re-
solved all these points immediately upon bei.ng noti-
fied b HUD. These minor findings are not unusual,
but ca not be answered until the-Department is so
advise .
5. NEWI BUSINESS
a..
Change Order No. 3A: :Contract Div. II: This
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3A,
is a co
tract from Rieth -Ri ey Construction Co., Inc..;..:
CONTRACT DIV. II,
for add'tional.work
required. i -n the channeltzation -.
CHAPIN STREET URBAN
of the
4orth half of the Chapin - Western intersection,
RENEWAL PROJECT, R -29
Chapin
treet Urban Renewal Project, R -29, in the
amount
f $705.08 -- inceease•in contract price.
Rev. Wi
liams asked if it has been investigated
that $7
5.08 more is involved:. Mr. Bellinger ap-
prised
hat this has been worked out with.the City:
Engineer,
Lloyd Taylor, and the work A nvol;ved is out-
side of
the framework of the original contract. The
change
rder price is based on =the contract.unit.price.
Preside
it Wiggins stated that, in this particular in-
stance,
it is additional work that is required, but
not at
igher unit cost prices. The Chair entertained
-5-
5. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd
a moti n for the authorization of.Change -Order No. 3A,
Contra t Div. II; said motion was.:made by Rev. Williams,
second d by Mr. Wilhelm. The "ayes were unanimous for
approv 1.
b.
Resolution No. 263: This Resolution-is to
:RESOLUTION NO. 263,
authorize
t e. i ing o an amendatory application for
LASALLE PARK URBAN
the making
of additional relocation claim payments,
RENEWAL PROJECT, R -57
in the
LaSalle Park Urban Renewal Project, R -57. A
family
or individual, may now receive up to $5,000
for replacement
housing cost, if eligible. The relo-
cation
adjustment payment was raised -from $500 to
$1,000
Those entitled to a :replacement hoes1ng .grant
are owner-occupants
of property acquired by Urban Re-
newal.
The difference of the purchase price of the
house 4nd
the replacement house cost may be provided'
up to
5,000. Displaced families eligible for - -,public
housin
units, but find no units available, and,
there f
re, must secure a private rental unit, can
make a
plication for additional relocation payment..
This r
solution would authorize the 'staff to submit
an app
ication so that these funds.can be.made avail-
able.
On motion by Mr. Helmen, seconded by Mr.
Chenne
, Resolution No. 263 was adopted. The "ayes"
were u
animous for approval.
Mr. Ch
nney asked if the office was noti_fyi.ng the
people
in the project area. Mr. Bellinger stated
informational
letters covering these points have-been
sent tc
those who have been displaced or may be dis-
placed,
If the family, or individual, has already
relocated
and is otherwise eligible, they can still
receive
these additional grant benefits.
c.
Resolution No. 264: This Resolution is to
RESOLUTION NO. 264,
authorize
the filing of an amendatory application
INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION
for the
making of.additi:onal.relocation claim pay-
PROJECT,. R -56
ments,
in the Industrial Expansion Project, R -56.
The Ho
sing.Act of 1949 provides -for the making of
additional
Relocation Grant Payments and.Replace-
ment Housing
Payments to or .om :behalf of i ndivi diials
and families
displaced from the project area on or
after August
1, 1968, not to exceed $1,000 per family
in the
case of Additional Relocation:Adjustment Pay-
ments and
not to exceed.$5,000 per family in the case
of the
Housing Replacement Payments.. On motion by
Mr. Hel
en, seconded.by Mr. Chenney, Resolution No.
264 was
adopted. The "ayes "::were unanimous for ap-
proval.
V!
5. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd
The authorization
was requested if.other funds.are .
available
to consider processing these payments and
replacing
the sums from the amendatory application
funds
hen they are received. President Wiggins
stated
our purpose is to serve the community and is
people
and can see no objection to that:
d.J
Resolution No. 266::.-This Resolution authori-
. RESOLUTION NO. 266,
zes the
issuance of project loan notes in connection :
.LASALLE PARK URBAN
with the
LaSalle Park Urban Renewal Project, R -57:
RENEWAL PROJECT, R -57
This R
solution is at the,request.of the: HUD office.
In ord
r to obtain the financial aid, it is necessary
for th
Local Public Agency to authorize.,and, from
time t
time, issue certain obligations,in the form.
of Pro
ect Loan Notes. On motion by Mr. Chenney, se -:
conded
by Mr. Wilhelm, Resolution No. 266 was adopted.
The Pr
Ject Loan Note is executed.by,Mayor L.loyd:M
Allen,
and attested by Kathryn L..Blough, City Clerk
of the
City of South Bend.
e.
Vacant Lots in the LaSalle: Park Urban-Renewal
VACAN1 LOTS,,
Projec
- e proposa .su,mitte y ennie. .
LASALLE.PARK URBAN
Kirk i
to c ean, cut, grade and seed 38 l:o.ts,:at.a
RENEWAL PROJECT, R -57
cost of
$1,950, and would include the labor, equip-
ment:;
.e., tractor dozer, seeds and dumping cost..,
This.c
st compares favorably withipast demolition;
and si
a clearance work. On motion by Rev.: Williams,:
second
ihe
d by Mr. Wilhelm, authori.z.atio:n was given to
award
contract to Bennie J., Kirk:, in:the amount
of $1 ,
50.00. Mr. Chenney said we: should have had
another
bid on it. The motion was :passed.
f.
Grants: Approval was requested for.three (3):
GRANTS APPROVED,
grants
in the LaSalle Park.Urban Renewal Project,
LASALLE'PARK URBAN
R -579
or the following.parce.ls:.
RENEWAL PROJECT, R -57
Nos. 12 -2, 19 -8 and 25 -14.
On motion by Mr. Helmen, seconded by Mr. Chenney,
the above-listed grants were approved. The "ayes"
were unanimous for approval.
g. 0 tion Agreements: Approval and acceptance
of fou 4 Option Agreements, .1n. -the LaSalle Parke
Urban Renewal Project, R -57,. was requested for: the
following parcels on the Amendatory.-Acquisition
list:
Nos. 11 -10, 11 -17b, 22 -17 and 41 -9.
-7
OPTION AGREEMENTS
APPROVED,. LASALLE
PARK URBAN RENEWAL
PROJECT, R -57
5. NE BUSINESS (Cont'd)
On motion by Mr. Wilhelm, seconded by Mr.'Helmen,
the ab ve- listed option agreements were approved..
The "a es" were unanimous for approval.
h.
Contract "H", Landscape Improvements:
CONTRACT " -H",.
Authorization
was requested to advertise i:n he,-
LANDSCAPE-IMPROVEMENTS,
South lend
Tribune and Tri- County News, on June 6
LASALLE PARK URBAN
and 13
to - receive bids on June 30, -1969, for land-
RENEWAL!—-, PROJECT, R -57
scape
mprovements', Contract . "H" in the _ LaSalle
-Park U
ban Renewal Project;: 'R -57. Om motion by
Rev. Williams,
seconded -by -Mr: Chenney, .authori na-
tion was
given to advertise. -June 6 and 13, and-
receivi
bids on June 30, :1969, for Landscap -e
:.
Improvements,
Contract "H. "- The "ayes " - were':
unanimous
for approval.
i.
Annual Meeting of.Indiana :Chapter, American.ANNUAL
MEETING,
Institute
of P a ners: Mr.� Be Tinger requested
JUNE 12 & 13, 1969,
a 'th or
zation to attend this meeting on June 12 and
ANGOLA, IND °IANA
13, 19
9, in Angola, Indiana. On motion by Mr.
Chenne
, seconded by Mr.- Wilhelm, authorization
was gi
en for -the - Executive tDi.rector to attend .the
Annual
Meeting for the dates specified.
j.
IAHRO Annual Meeti.ng.: The Commission was
IAHRO ANNUAL MEETING,
previously
app r s d ofthis meeting by mailings
JUNE 18, 19 & 20, 1969,
which outline
the program. The registration fee
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE
is $40.00,
and extra banquet tickets are $7:.:50 per
DAME
ticket.
Authorization was requested for staff to
attend
and any of the Commission members who would
like to
attend are to get in touch with the staff.
Mr. Hel
en moved for authorization and Mr. Wilhelm
duly s
conded• the motion. President Wiggins'said
the authorization
is granted, along with the stipu-
lation
that one of our trustees, Mrs. Guy P. Curtis,
go as our
guest. The "ayes" were unanimous and Mrs.
Curtis
accepted the invitation.
6. PRO RESS REPORTS
RELOCATION PROGRESS
REPORT
a. Relocation Progress Report:
l) LaSalle Park Urban Renewal Project, R -57:
A total of nine families and three indi
viduals are on our:sttaff's workload cur-
rently. Three families relocated in past
month into sales housing.
2) Industrial Expansion Project R -56: Three
to tvt ua s and six families are to this
project area -- two of these families will
be moving this month.
6. PROGRESS REPORTS (Cont'd
b. Replacement Housing Payment: The replacement
housinc payment will help our staff to some extent in
reloca ing some of these families. Rev. Kirk stated
our si a representative, Mrs. Joan Otto, who had visited
our si a office last week was well pleased with the
progre s our staff was making on rehabilitation and re-
locati n. She was also pleased that all area residents
and th se relocated have received registered letters in-
formin them of the Replacement Housing Payment. Re-
sponse has been received from 14 individuals in LaSalle
Park, -57; and 27 in Industrial Expansion Project, R -56.
Mrs. Janet Allen asked what the relative size is of the
remaining families? Rev. Kirk said they vary from two
to six member families. President Wiggins said that
Rev. K rk has done a commendable job and he deserves to
be com limented.
c.� Questions & Answers:
Mrs. Maager asked the progress report on the
DowntJ ne suit? Mr. Bruce C. Hammerschmidt, Legal
Counse , said the status is the same as the last
time h talked to Mrs. Maager. It is still under
invest gation. We have filed and the suit is in
litiga ion.
Mr. Helmen asked when we are going to move to the
County City building? Mr. Bellinger apprised that
the exact date is not known. Probably not before
the end of the year.
Mrs. Guy P. Curtis introduced Mrs. Betty Stephens,
Director of Relocation, Community Public Service,
Newark New Jersey. Mrs. Stephens is formerly
from South Bend, is working on relocation problems
in Newark and is doing a fine job. Mrs. Curtis
said: "We are very proud of her."
7. NEXT MEETING
Th next regular meeting of the Redevelopment
Commis ion will be at 10:30 A. M., Friday, June
20, 19 9, in the Office of the Department of Re-
develo ent.
8.
The Chair entertained a motion for adjournment,
and motion duly made by Mr. Chenney, seconded by
Mr. Wilhelm, and unanimously approved. Meeting
adjourned at 11:25 A. M.
(SEAL) / -g-
HowardlBellinger, Executiv# Director
REPLACEMENT HOUSING
PAYMENT
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
NEXT MEETING,
JUNE 20, 1969
ADJOURNMENT
Dorsal d A. Wiggins, P
ent