HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-10-19 Community Investment SOuTxa.�d
ti
U C
W \ "„
PEACE
� .az
s'.% 1865 186i ..._...„7„)
9�,:
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
KAREEMAH FOWLER, CITY CLERK
COMMUNITY INVESTMENT JUNE 10, 2019 4:16 P.M.
Committee Members Present: Gavin Ferlic, Regina Williams-Preston, Dr. Oliver Davis,
Sharon L. McBride
Committee Members Absent: None
Other Council Present: Tim Scott, Jo M. Broden, John Voorde, Jake Teshka, Karen
White
Other Council Absent: None
Others Present: Bianca Tirado, Graham Sparks, Bob Palmer
Presenters: Jo M. Broden
Agenda: Bill No. 19-43- A Resolution of the Common Council of
South Bend, Indiana, Encouraging Continued and Increased
Public Engagement Between the Public and the
Redevelopment Commission
Committee Chair Gavin Ferlic called to order the Community Investment Committee meeting at
4:15 p.m. He introduced members of the Committee and proceeded to give the floor to the
presenters.
Bill No. 19-43- A Resolution of the Common Council of South Bend, Indiana, Encouraging
Continued and Increased Public Engagement Between the Public and the Redevelopment
Commission
Councilmember Jo M. Broden, 201 West North Shore Drive, stated, We did not discuss a
presentation and who is doing what, but I will lead it and the other cosponsors can jump in.
Essentially, this is a follow-up to previous discussions and pulling together and formalizing our
request as Council, to the Redevelopment Commission, to change their meeting time. We have
suggested 5:00 p.m. or after. Also, we want them to adopt procedures for citizens to participate in
some level, similar to what they do at other public Boards and Commissions. Those are the two
(2) requests embedded in this. All of the other statements and the Whereas statements that are a
part of this are basically educational to anyone who is reading it, in terms of the scope of the
Redevelopment Commission, the role of our Committees here at Council and the intersection of
all of us toward promoting the redevelopment of our City. This also makes sure the processes are
as transparent as possible and actually involve the public, both from the participation in and being
INTEGRITYI SERVICEI ACCESSIBILITY
JENNIFER M.COFF MAN BIANCA L.TIRADO JOSEPH R.MOLNAR
CHIEF DEPUTY/DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS DEPUTY/DIRECTOR OF POLICY ORDINANCE VIOLATION CLERK
EXCELLENCE I ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT
455 County-City Building 1227 W.Jefferson Blvd.I South Bend,Indiana 46601 I p 574.235.9221 I f 574.235.9173 I www.southbendin.gov
CITY OF SOUTH BEND OFFICE OF THE CLERK
in attendance but also if they would like to offer input during the process, they have the
opportunities to do that at the Redevelopment Commission meeting itself.
She continued, So,it's pretty simple, I think,in scope. I don't think it is unfamiliar to anyone from
Council in terms of the requests over the years and, again, I think it aligns with both the
Administration's goal to be transparent and also to empower residents and that they have agency
in effecting any business that, frankly, is the City's. Having said that, I'll turn it over to others.
Councilmember Karen White stated, I will say, too, that part of the Council's mission statement
includes that we always be responsive to the needs of our citizens. So, as you begin to look at this
resolution, I see it from an educational perspective. There tends to be a lot of misunderstanding in
regard to the role of the Council and also the role of the Redevelopment Commission.This clarifies
that. Also, it gives some sense that we want to ensure the meetings are held at a time that our
citizens can participate. It also talks about the reports we would like to have as it pertains to the
TIF and other areas. I see this as very informative and in line not only with the Council's mission
statement but also in line with the City's established priorities, as we move forward.
Committee Chair Ferlic then opened the floor to questions from Committee and Council Members.
Councilmember Tim Scott asked, Did anyof the cosponsors speak to Redevelopment in anyway
p p P
regarding this? What are their thoughts?
Committee Chair Ferlic stated, I touched base with Marsha and connected with Dan late last week
as well. Marsha's concern is that we had tried that previously and for the staff members, as well
as the people presenting, a lot of times business hours are better for them. That is something we
can continue to work through.
Councilmember Scott followed up,Has there been any thought to expanding the public portion for
that? Can a packet be out for a longer duration of time to allow for anybody to give feedback?
Committee Chair Ferlic then opened the floor to members of the public wishing to speak in favor
of or in opposition to this legislation.
Dan Buckenmeyer, Director of Business Development for the City of South Bend with offices
located on the 14th floor of the County-City Building, stated, As staff, and as I've said in the
Commission and in my conversations with them, I'm sitting here in attendance to this meeting
because I am direct staff to them. I am very much indirect staff to you all. I have my own opinions
about it but I'm trying to keep this objective. We did just a bit of research on what other
communities are doing. Daytime meetings happen in Elkhart, Fishers, Fort Wayne, Goshen,
Hobart, Huntington, Indianapolis, Muncie,Noblesville, Valparaiso, and Warsaw. We found a few
that do have meetings that edge up to 5:00 p.m. or 5:30 p.m. Of the nineteen(19) communities that
our team researched,ninety percent(90%) of them have meetings that start before 5:30 p.m. Sixty
percent(60%) of them happen during the day. If you look across the many Councils, Committees,
Boards and Commissions across the City, there actually were three (3) that meet in the evening.
Of course, yourselves, the Park Board, and one (1) notable fact are those are both paid positions.
The only other one (1) is HPC and they are not paid.
He continued, I believe it was 2011 and some of 2012 where it was attempted to have the meetings
at 4:00 p.m., and the Commission saw zero (0) uptick in attendance from public, press or others.
EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY INNOVATION I INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT
455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana46601 p 574.235.9221 1574.235.9173 TTD574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov
2
CITY OF SOUTH BEND OFFICE OF THE CLERK
So,it moved back. Another note is that in terms of averaging or generalizing,at one(1)given RDC
meeting, all we might talk about is giving permission to someone using the Gridiron for an event.
At another one (1), there may be three (3) major projects on the docket. So, it's hard to average
out across those attendance and press interest and so on. Usually, when the packet goes out, I start
getting calls from certain members of the press and so on, asking me what it's about. So, they are
involved. As far as transparency goes, we are, as a governmental and City entity, absolutely and
diligently transparent. As we've noted, the packets go out. President Scott, I will address the
comment you made about going out earlier. The packets go out and everything is online.
Everything down to the minutes is absolutely and completely transparent and shared with all
Council Members. There is a huge list. If the press or anyone else wants to be on that list, all they
need to do is ask. They will get the agendas, full packets, minutes and so on all sent to them. I
think I've noted before, even for Council,the staff takes the extra step of listing which district any
given project is happening in, so you can zero (0) in on those if you would like.
He went on, One (1) of the big things on this is just the nature of the business that takes place.
Going back to the three (3) that happened right now, the Council is very directly the City
interfacing with the consumer, the citizen. The Parks Board, City to the resident. HPC is City to
the resident. With other examples like the Board of Public Works,which is where the most money
is spent than any other Board or Commission, that happens during the day because it is business
to business focused. It is contracts being made with contractors and the City. Whether it is
individual professional services or other outside entities, Redevelopment Commission is very
much the same. It is not as consumer-facing as it is business-facing. So,it makes a lot more sense,
to us, to keep that happening during business hours. We are dealing with developers and other
things TIF is used for. The majority of TIF is utilized, and a lot of it is already allocated to bond
payments,but a majority of it goes to infrastructure projects. So,it will be myself and Engineering
up there working in concert on a water project on Michigan Avenue or Western Avenue, what
have you.
He continued, There are public-facing elements of it. We have a lot of public meetings. Using
Western Avenue as an example, we had several public meetings going up to that to formulate the
program. The same is true for Michigan Avenue. We had public meetings with the businesses up
and down Michigan Avenue. So, in those projects that make sense, there are a lot of resident-
facing elements of those TIF projects that take place.We,we would argue both for the Commission
itself and the staff as well as the folks we are interacting directly with, during those meetings, to
have those during the day. In terms of process, I want to press that point. The question about the
packets going out early, beyond just who we are working with, the things we are doing in
Economic Development can't always be public right away. I'll use Amazon as an example. It was
no fault of ours, but it was leaked out that Amazon was moving into a spec building in town and
it ruffled some feathers and raised some issues. It actually could have impacted whether or not
someone came into town and employed a few hundred people. Those are the types of situations
that we have to work really closely on with builders, developers and incoming companies. They
want to control the message and what happens in terms of their entry into a market. A lot of them
demand secrecy. In many instances, we are looking at formulating deals and packages to compete
with Fort Wayne, Toledo or Battle Creek so they can make the final decision of whether or not to
invest in South Bend. So, often times when that packet doesn't come out real early or as early as
EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY INNOVATION INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT
455 County-City Building 227 W.Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f574.235.9173 TTD 574.235.5567 www.southbendin.gov
3
CITY OF SOUTH BEND OFFICE OF THE CLERK
we would like it to, again, we don't strive for anything but transparency. Sometimes our business
customers demand control of when word might come out about something. So, that is one (1)
consideration. I'll stop there but those are some of the more objective reasons of why we think the
way it is going makes sense. As a side note, I don't think there is any objection to reformulating
the meeting in some way so that the public is more involved. I heard no objections to that, but we
think the meeting time works. We understand the perception of the timing and we don't want that,
in any way, to mean a lack of transparency.
Committee Chair Ferlic stated, If you are able, after Committee meetings,please speak together to
pursue any possible amendments.
Councilmember John Voorde stated, I will try to make this brief. It seems to me this is a well-
intentioned resolution to increase transparency, openness and have an informed public. There is,
as Dan mentioned, evidence that a later meeting doesn't necessarily increase attendance by the
public. It seems to me that this could be the beginning of the call to make Board of Public Works,
Century Center Board of Managers, Board of Public Safety all later. Any Board or Commission,
there will always be someone who wants it after hours.We might as well put the City on the second
(2nd) shift if that happens because there are all sorts of costs associated with that, whether it is staff
or whatever. It seems to me,and it is kind of ironic I am the one(1)suggesting this,that technology
can make things a lot more transparent. If we could live stream Board and Commission meetings,
that could make them more accessible. If I knew there was something important coming before a
Board that I was really interested in, I would just record that. I know not everyone has computer
access but certainly they can get that a lot of places for free. But, if we make an initial investment
in whatever technology it takes to do that kind of thing, then we would really be opening up the
process to the public. If anyone was interested, they can look at it either when it's happening or in
its recorded state. I think we could even set it up to participate live. Politically, there are all those
town hall meetings where people call in. I'm not saying these meetings should go on forever, but
again, the technology is there to really open up the process without having to put the City on the
second(2nd) shift. That is all I'm saying.
Committeemember Regina Williams-Preston stated, This is also a call for us as Council Members
and whoever else who has that responsibility to make sure. I had heard the concern about trying to
do it in the evening and no one came. We have to do something to engage people before there is a
problem,right? Because that is where I hear most of the complaints. I do feel they should be in the
evening and we have to do the job to get people to these meetings to keep people engaged and
informed.
Committeemember Dr. Oliver Davis made a motion to send Bill No. 19-43 to the full Council with
a favorable recommendation. Committeemember Williams-Preston seconded this motion which
carried by a voice vote of four(4) ayes.
With no further business, Committee Chair Ferlic adjourned the Community Investment
Committee meeting at 4:34 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Gavin Ferlic, Committee Chair
EXCELLENCE ACCOUNTABILITY I INNOVATION INCLUSION I EMPOWERMENT
455 County-City Building 227W Jefferson Bvld South Bend,Indiana 46601 p 574.235.9221 f574.235.9173 TTD574.235.5567 ea v.southbendin.gov
4