Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-18-06 Personnel & FinancePersonnel and Finance Committee Meeting 2006 South Bend Common Council The September 18, 2006 meeting of the Personnel and Finance Committee of the South Bend Common Council was called to order by Chairperson, Council Member Charlotte D. Pfeifer, at 5:02 p.m. in the Council's Informal Meeting Room. Persons in attendance included Council Members Dieter, Pfeifer, Varner, Kuspa, White, Rouse, Kelly, Rouse and Puzzello;, Mayor Stephen Luecke, City Controller M. Catherine Fannello, City Attorney Charles Leone, Pam Meyer, Tom Skarbek, Police Chief Thomas Fautz, Community and Economic Development Executive Director Sharon Kendall, Mrs. Kopola, Elizabeth Leonard, Dennis Andres, City Clerk John Voorde, Mary Ann Myers, Don Inks, Mikki Dobski Shidler and Kathleen Cekanski-Farrand, Council Attorney. Council Member Pfeifer noted that this Committee meeting is intended as a catch-up meeting on the proposed 2007 city budget. Common Council Fund # 1010301: Council President Timothy A. Rouse read into the record a statement dated September 18, 2006 and summarized its attachments which included a June 27, 2006 Action Memo entitled "Reminder Notice of 2007 Proposed Council Budget Requests" and its attachments and the July 7, 2007 memorandum entitled "Proposed 2007 Common Council Budget: Fund 101-0301 (Copies attached) President Rouse concluded his remarks by stating he believes that the proposed Council budget properly includes monies so that the Council can properly balance its fiduciary and fiscal responsibilities with the growing amount of tasks and responsibilities which will be asked of it in light of City Plan. Council Member White voiced concern that the Council Members will get a base salary increase of 1.75°/a while the full-time non-bargaining employees will be getting no base salary in 2007 and will only a $750 supplemental pay. Council Member White further noted that she could not support a new staff position . Council President Rouse stated that the proposed budget does not include new position since the current budget provides for apart-time staff position. He noted that the Council will be playing a lead role in the aggregate in light of the implementation of City Plan. Council Member Kelly stated that he supports the 2D07 Council budget proposed by Council President Rouse, noting that the work ahead will be tremendous. He stated that it is better to be prepared so that the Council can handle the Personnel and Finance Committee September 18, 2006 Page 2 voluminous amount of documents and research which will be asked of the Council. Council Member Puzzello stated that she supports the paralegal concept and the other adjustments since those items have not been properly adjusted for a long time. The Council needs to be prepared and be able to ga to classes and conferences in order to be properly informed. Council Member Dieter stated that the election expense line-item has to be subject to much more detail being provided by the County, noting that he and the Council Attorney have attempted to clarify past election expenditures with limited success. City Controller Fanello noted that she has had the same results but agrees that more detailed information is needed from the Council Auditor before payment would be made from this line-item, Dr. Varner stated that over the years the need for more information has increased resulting in more time that is necessary for such research. He has always seen the need for an independent consultant . Dr. Vamer added that having the funds to use in this regard would be reassuring and a diligent way to use such funds properly. When budgetary concerns are raised, the Council would have a mechanism available, noting that "the Council is running our Council Attorney to death". Council Member Pfeifer stated that she does not support hiring an individual and would prefer a firm. She would consider having dollars available so that professional, unbiased and independent work would be done by having such financial resources. Council Member Puzzello voiced concern that you could not get someone who specialized in municipal law who worked for $15 an hour. Council Member Kirists stated that having cash in reserve for legal advice may be worthwhile, however he voiced concern that the Council Members are getting a base salary increase when the non-bargaining employees are not. He suggested keeping the legal funds if additional professional help is needed. Council Member Kuspa noted that he has similar concerns as Council Member White and Kirsits with regard to the Council receiving base salary increases while the non-bargaining employees will not. He would support additional funding if the Personnel and Finance Committee September 98, 2006 Page 3 Council needed it for additional research, etc., noting that "the Council Attorney is doing a beautiful job". Council Member Dieter stated that he agrees with Council Member Kirsits approach to letting the funds stay in the budget, and re-considering the Council salaries for next year. Council Member Kelly stated that he could "scratch his salary" and let those funds be used as deemed needed by the Council; and would support more staff. City Controller Fanello noted that the total of all Council raises for next year is just about $2,000. City Controller John Vaorde stated that he sees the need far additional money for research, noting that his office has a need in this area also. He suggested that the Council also consider approaching local universities for their assistance for comprehensive studies, noting that IUSB"S Public and Environmental Affairs in the past would provide data on specific topics. The Council Attorney noted that she provided for each of the Council Members a multi-page Council Attorney Annual Report, as she has done each year since 1995 {copy attached); noting that the Council President's Report was also provided to each of the Council Members in preparation for today's review of the Council's proposed budget {copy attached}. She added that the three {3) new Council brochures developed this year should also be attachments to her annual report {copy attached). The Council Attorney thanked the City Administration, the Council Members and the City Clerk's for their support during the challenging times her family has been experiencing the past two (2) months. Miscellaneous Items: City Controller Fannello noted that Tom Skarbek was providing additional information on the parking garages which was requested at the last Personnel and Finance meeting {copy attached). Dr. Varner stated that in reviewing the proposed salary ordinance for the Mayor and the City Clerk that there is quite a discrepancy in the two amounts. He therefore reviewed several other Indiana cities and concluded that there basically is a 3-2 ratio in salaries when comparing these positions. He then provided a multi-page handout dated September 18, 2006 entitled "Proposed Adjustment far the City Clerk Salary for 2007" to the Committee (copy attached}. He suggested that the Clerk's salary could be adjusted over the next several years to meet this Personnel and Finance Committee September 18, 2006 Page 4 ratio and further suggested a $5,DD0 adjustment far the City Clerk for next year. He Hated that we can expect a lot more from the Clerk and his staff and the salary should be representative of those duties. He proposes this for the Council consideration and asked Council Members to contact him if they needed further information. In response to a question from Council Member White, City Controller Fanella stated that if the Council considered this request that it would result in reducing the cash reserves. Council Member Pfeifer asked City Clerk John Voorde to address Dr. Varner's proposal. Mr. Voorde stated that he appreciates the initiative proposed by Dr. Varner, however he prefers that the Council consider what he initially proposed of a 2.5% base salary increase for himself and his entire staff. Rita Kapola of Lakeville, Indiana, voiced concern that she cannot address items when copies are not provided to the public. (Dr. Varner provided a copy of his proposal at that time). Dr. Varner voiced concern that all budgets "get pushed together" when not all budgets need to be acted upon by the Council by the September 3Dtt' deadline. He added that the Department of Local Government Finance now reviews those budgets that affect the tax levy, with other funds not needing action until December 31St. Dr. Varner then passed out amulti-page handout entitled Bill No. 55-D6 Budgets for Enterprise Funds" (copy attached}. He noted that when budget information is received later by the Council a "time crunch" is created. Council Member Puzzello stated that she recalls that when she was previously on the Common Council that the enterprise funds would be acted upon separate from the general fund accounts; and that there was mare time for the Council and the Administration to review all of the budgetary proposals. Dr. Varner then passed out amulti-page handout entitle "Fund # 377 and the CFHF" (copy attached}. He noted that he is currently working an a spread sheet which he will share with the Council when he has it finished. He Hated that this is a fund that does not need action Haw and that the Council could act on it before December 31St, He noted that the Council must "watch all of the dollars because budgets are tight, however this cannot be done in a small time frame". His spread sheet will show that the cost to the city will exceed $1 million to the Personnel and Finance Committee September 18, 2(306 Page 5 College Football Hall of Fame, with the Joint Committee having control and not the Council, as a result of the new administrative agreement. Council Member Pfeifer asked what the benefit would be to separate some of the funds for Council action, noting that she has had a hard time scheduling times far the Council to meet and consider the proposed budget. Dr. Varner stated that the Council has the responsibility to be good fiscal stewards of all monies. The additional time would allow to the Council to carry out their fiduciary duties. He also would like access to an accountant in reviewing some of these proposed budgets. Council Member White inquired why independent audit, to which Dr. Varner marked for additional legal work. current funds were not used for an stated he thought the funds were ear- Council Member Dieter suggested that the funds that need further review that can be acted upon after September 3Qt" be pulled out and that the Council have a "lock-down" session similar to how the Council Retreats were handled Council President Rouse stated that the City cannot function like it did ten (10) years ago; that there are more meeting now; that more research is needed; and that more not less is being asked, especially of the Council. He stressed the due diligence requirements which the Council must carry out when reviewing proposed legislation, and budgets in particular. He stated that if the Council goes forward without the proper attention being paid to an item that "it will come back to haunt you". Council Member Dieter inquired whether there was an agreement with regard to the use of the Hall of Fame's name for the Hall of Fame Game Day project. Mayor Luecke stated that that would be between the NFF and Game Day; however suggested that Rick Walls could answer that question. City Controller M. Catherine Fannello confirmed that the enterprise funds do not have to be passed by the September 30t", however most cities do address these funds and salaries by September 30t". Separation of the funds would be difficult for her office since they will begin working on the capital budget. She stated that she would like to have input in these discussions. She noted that the debt service fund regarding the Hall of Fame must be passed by the September 30t" deadline. Personnel and Finance Committee September 18, 2006 Page 6 Council Member Kelly stated that he believes there is a need for further discussions on the proposed amount requested by Project Future. He noted that the South Bend Tribune editorial in yesterday's paper provides another perspective on why this funding request is needed. Council Member Kelly stated that "we are all in this together regarding economic development, a paint he has stressed far many years". Community and Economic Development Director Sharon Kendall pointed out that Project Future brings contacts with proposed developers which are needed for development in South Bend. She stated that Pat McMahon is committed to reporting to the Council on a periodic basis. She believes that Project Future works well for all of us and are needed in light of Gity Plan. Council Member Dieter stated that he believes that the Project Future request should be reviewed on a yearly basis. information from them has not been received in the pact and their perception of the Council is one of ignoring such requests. He agrees with Council Member Kelly that we must all work together, but more discussion is needed before he could act on their request. Dr. Varner stated that Praject Future's past record is one of success, however he has many concerns with regard to haw it is structured in relation to MetroNet. It appears that now "empire building" is taking place, and the lack of timely information being provided to the Council is an ongoing and growing problem. He stated that he believes the two (2) operations need to be operated independently. He stated that Pat McMahon needed to be involved with one (1) of these operations and not both. Mayor Luecke stated that Mr. McMahon stated that he had checks for $350,000 with regard to MetroNet.. Council Member Kelly stressed the need to work hard to bring new businesses to our community and believes that Project Future is a needed player. Council Member Puzzello noted that she has talked with Pat McMahan and debated him an several topics. She would vote in favor of their request for one (1 }year because they are working well for South Bend. She does have concerns about information not being forthcoming when requested and this must be addressed. Council Member Kuspa stated that in order to get industries and jobs to our community that South Bend must use every means available in today's world. He sees Project Future as going out scratching for the Gity, and believes that Ms. Personnel and Finance Committee September 18, 2006 Page 7 Kendall's Office does not have the time or the money to do that. He stated that everyone who is successful has a team of people working far them behind the scenes. Commitments to provide information to the Council have been a problem. Council Member Kuspa suggested getting opinions from companies who have chosen to locate in South Bend should be contacted to see what role Project Future played in their overall decision to locate here. He would like to know first-hand how Project Future has promoted South Bend, and company representatives could provide that needed information to the Council. He would support their request for next year. Council President Rouse stated that he is very concerned about the perception. In an article that appeared in the South Bend Tribune on Saturday, Mayor Rea and Mayor Steve were quoted and it Hated that Mishawaka cut their contribution to Project Future from $44,000 to $22,000. Their request for five (5) years is being made in light of the additional fund-raising which they would have to do to meet their projected budget demands. A one-year approach would raise questions and perception problems of how much South Bend believes is necessary to keep South Bend moving ahead with regard to development. Council Member Pfeifer questioned the need for afive-year commitment via a resolution. Dr. Varner stated that afive-year statement in the resolution would be non- binding. Council President Rouse asked the Council Attorney to address this issue, to which she stated that the resolution is basically a position statement of the Council. 1n the draft resolution which she has seen there is a section which would make any proposed appropriation subject to the city having the financial capability for such an expenditure. Council Member Kirsits stated that it would "be tough to support an increase for Project Future when its Director makes more than our Mayor and the Mishawaka Mayor's salaries being combined". He voiced concern that Project Future never comes to the Council and requests input on proposed development ideas and that they just come to the Council when they are asking for money. Council Member Kirsits stated that he could support the current amount of $110,000 for a single year, but is very concerned that Mishawaka is only willing to pay $22,000 next year. Personnel and Finance Committee September 18, 20n6 Page 8 Council Member Pfeifer asked City Clerk John Voorde to provide the Council with information on what St. Joseph County will be doing with regard to Project Future. Council Member White stated that she would not support decreasing the amount of support for Project Future. She stated she could support their request for next year and would require them to come back each year and be responsive to the Council. Council Member Pfeifer stated that she could support their current funding for one (1) year, however they must show to the Council that they have clear goals and dialogue with the Council to meet our expectations. She added that she would like their Board to "look like a 21st Century Board". Council Member White and Varner both suggested that goals should be included in any resolution which is proposed for Project Future funding. Council Member Pfeifer than asked for comment from the public. Eric Brown of East Oakside in South Bend stated that he was a member of the Board of Trustees of Project Future far ten (10) years. During that period of time he never saw their budget; never saw any of their audits; and never saw their economic strategies, He agrees with Council Member Pfeifer that their Board needs to be and look like a 21st Century Board. He suggested that the City take a "hard look" at all of their operations. Dr. Varner suggested that they should also be required in the body of the resolution to provided their Form 990 as well as their yearly CPA audit report. Phyllis Steele of Osceola stated that she is a realtor and suggested that the Project Future request should be considered and cut. Council Member Dieter stated that due to the many calls and emails which he has received with regard to the proposed closing of the greenhouses and conservatories by the Administration that the PARC Committee and the Zoning and Annexation Committee will be holding a joint meeting to address this. The Council should have received the letter which he and Council Member Kuspa sent to the Park Board and the Park Superintendent. He also had the Council Attorney request after that letter went out a copy of the Notre Dame Women Engineering Student Report an energy efficiencies and all of the proposed dates when the Park Board will be taking formal action on this. Personnel and Finance Committee September 'i 8, 2006 Page 9 Council Member Kuspa suggested that the Council is also in need of the casts for needed repairs to the bailer etc., to which Council Member Dieter stated he would also request. Mayor Luecke stated that he believed that Phil St. Clair was presenting information to the Park Board to declare the buildings obsolete. Council Member Pfeifer suggested that the Park Board should consider a program similar to how we loan zoo animals, with regard to the plants to places like Fernwood until this matter is resolve. She stated that everything needs to be looked at. Dr. Varner noted that many of the plants could not travel because of their fragile nature. Council Member Kelly stated that he had relatives who visited the Greenhouse and Conservatory recently and were very impressed with it. He stated that the City must do its best to save it and find fundingt. Council Member Kirsits stated that he believes in saving history. However he was there on an incident and stated that parts of the place are "rough" with leaking gas. Council Member Pfeifer suggested that at least an hour be ear-marked for next Monday's Personnel and Finance Committee meeting. There being no further business to come before the Committee, Council Member Pfeifer adjourned the meting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Council Member Charlotte D, P eifer, Chairperson Personnel and Finance Committee Attachments